Who Is Thomas Jefferson?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Who is Thomas Jefferson? 1. When was Thomas Jefferson born? a. January 12, 1844 b. April 13, 1743 c. September 12, 1810 d. February 12, 1809 2. Where was he born? a. Washington D.C. b. Paris c. Virginia d. New York 3. What type of house did Jefferson live in as a boy? a. Log cabin b. Hospital c. Apartment d. A mansion 4. What class of society did Jefferson grow up in? a. Privileged b. Poor c. Middle Class d. History 5. How old was Jefferson when he went to William and Mary? a. 20 b. 16 c. 18 d. 10 6. As a boy, what language did Jefferson learn? a. Spanish b. German c. Dutch d. Greek 7. What year did Jefferson finish his studies at the College of William and Mary? a. 1760 b. 1762 c. 1765 d. 1776 8. Who did Jefferson study under to become a lawyer? a. George Wythe b. John Locke c. Abraham Lincoln d. John Adams 9. What year did Jefferson become a lawyer? a. 1767 b. 1752 c. 1749 d. 1736 10. What was the name of Jefferson’s home? a. Mount Vernon b. Monticello c. Mount Rushmore d. Molly Brown 11. Jefferson married who on January 1, 1772? a. Betsy Ross b. Susan B. Anthony c. Mary Poppins d. Martha Wayles Skelton 12. The First Continental Congress meet in what city? a. Boston b. New York c. Philadelphia d. Charlestown 13. Who wrote the Declaration of Independence? a. Thomas Jefferson b. Robert Livingston c. John Adams d. George Washington 14. Congress approved and signed the Declaration of Independence on what day? a. July 4, 1775 b. July 4, 1776 c. July 4, 1781 d. July 4, 1779 15.What country was Jefferson minister to? a. Germany b. England c. France d. Russia 16. Who asked Jefferson to be Secretary of State? a. George Washington b. John Adams c. Ben Franklin d. John Handcock 17. What political party did Jefferson belong to? a. Republican b. Federalists c. Democrats d. Democratic-Republicans 18. Who were the two main candidates of the Election of 1800? a. Ben Franklin and George Washington b. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson c. Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln d. John Adams and Patrick Henry 19. The House of Representatives needed to vote how many times to determine the winner? a. 5 b. 69 c. 105 d. 36 20. Jefferson became the which President of the United States? a. 2nd b. 3rd c. 4th d. 1st 21. What was Jefferson’s greatest achievement as President? a. Lewis and Clark Expedition b. Alien and Sedition Acts c. Louisiana Purchase d. Reelection in 1804 22. Who did Jefferson renew his friendship with after returning to Monticello? a. Alexander Hamilton b. Arron Burr c. John Adams d. George Washington 23. What University did Jefferson help establish? a. University of South Carolina b. Harvard University c. University of Virginia d. Duke University 24. Jefferson sold his library which became the heart of what? a. Library of Congress b. Smithsonian c. Library of Virginia d. Library of New York 25. How old was Thomas Jefferson when he died on July 4, 1826? a. 80 b. 83 c. 90 d. 85 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Richatd Henry Lee 0Az-1Ts4l Although He Is Not Considered the Father of Our Country, Richard Henry Lee in Many Respects Was a Chief Architect of It
rl Name Class Date , BTocRAPHY Acrtvrry 2 Richatd Henry Lee 0az-1ts4l Although he is not considered the father of our country, Richard Henry Lee in many respects was a chief architect of it. As a member of the Continental Congress, Lee introduced a resolution stating that "These United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States." Lee's resolution led the Congress to commission the Declaration of Independence and forever shaped U.S. history. Lee was born to a wealthy family in Virginia and educated at one of the finest schools in England. Following his return to America, Lee served as a justice of the peace for Westmoreland County, Virginia, in 1757. The following year, he entered Virginia's House of Burgesses. Richard Henry Lee For much of that time, however, Lee was a quiet and almost indifferent member of political connections with Britain be Virginia's state legislature. That changed "totaIIy dissolved." The second called in 1765, when Lee joined Patrick Henry for creating ties with foreign countries. in a spirited debate opposing the Stamp The third resolution called for forming a c Act. Lee also spoke out against the confederation of American colonies. John .o c Townshend Acts and worked establish o to Adams, a deiegate from Massachusetts, o- E committees of correspondence that seconded Lee's resolution. A Declaration o U supported cooperation between American of Independence was quickly drafted. =3 colonies. 6 Loyalty to Uirginia An Active Patriot Despite his support for the o colonies' F When tensions with Britain increased, separation from Britain, Lee cautioned ! o the colonies organized the Continental against a strong national government.
[Show full text]
Signers of the United States Declaration of Independence Table of Contents
SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 56 Men Who Risked It All Life, Family, Fortune, Health, Future Compiled by Bob Hampton First Edition - 2014 1 SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTON Page Table of Contents………………………………………………………………...………………2 Overview………………………………………………………………………………...………..5 Painting by John Trumbull……………………………………………………………………...7 Summary of Aftermath……………………………………………….………………...……….8 Independence Day Quiz…………………………………………………….……...………...…11 NEW HAMPSHIRE Josiah Bartlett………………………………………………………………………………..…12 William Whipple..........................................................................................................................15 Matthew Thornton……………………………………………………………………...…........18 MASSACHUSETTS Samuel Adams………………………………………………………………………………..…21 John Adams………………………………………………………………………………..……25 John Hancock………………………………………………………………………………..….29 Robert Treat Paine………………………………………………………………………….….32 Elbridge Gerry……………………………………………………………………....…….……35 RHODE ISLAND Stephen Hopkins………………………………………………………………………….…….38 William Ellery……………………………………………………………………………….….41 CONNECTICUT Roger Sherman…………………………………………………………………………..……...45 Samuel Huntington…………………………………………………………………….……….48 William Williams……………………………………………………………………………….51 Oliver Wolcott…………………………………………………………………………….…….54 NEW YORK William Floyd………………………………………………………………………….………..57 Philip Livingston…………………………………………………………………………….….60 Francis Lewis…………………………………………………………………………....…..…..64 Lewis Morris………………………………………………………………………………….…67
[Show full text]
20 Thomas Jefferson.Pdf
d WHAT WE THINK ABOUT WHEN WE THINK ABOUT THOMAS JEFFERSON Todd Estes Thomas Jefferson is America’s most protean historical figure. His meaning is ever-changing and ever-changeable. And in the years since his death in 1826, his symbolic legacy has varied greatly. Because he was literally present at the creation of the Declaration of Independence that is forever linked with him, so many elements of subsequent American life—good and bad—have always attached to Jefferson as well. For a quarter of a century—as an undergraduate, then a graduate student, and now as a professor of early American his- tory—I have grappled with understanding Jefferson. If I have a pretty good handle on the other prominent founders and can grasp the essence of Washington, Madison, Hamilton, Adams and others (even the famously opaque Franklin), I have never been able to say the same of Jefferson. But at least I am in good company. Jefferson biographer Merrill Peterson, who spent a scholarly lifetime devoted to studying him, noted that of his contemporaries Jefferson was “the hardest to sound to the depths of being,” and conceded, famously, “It is a mortifying confession but he remains for me, finally, an impenetrable man.” This in the preface to a thousand page biography! Pe- terson’s successor as Thomas Jefferson Foundation Professor at Mr. Jefferson’s University of Virginia, Peter S. Onuf, has noted the difficulty of knowing how to think about Jefferson 21 once we sift through the reams of evidence and confesses “as I always do when pressed, that I am ‘deeply conflicted.’”1 The more I read, learn, write, and teach about Jefferson, the more puzzled and conflicted I remain, too.
[Show full text]
Thomas Jefferson and the Ideology of Democratic Schooling
Thomas Jefferson and the Ideology of Democratic Schooling James Carpenter (Binghamton University) Abstract I challenge the traditional argument that Jefferson’s educational plans for Virginia were built on mod- ern democratic understandings. While containing some democratic features, especially for the founding decades, Jefferson’s concern was narrowly political, designed to ensure the survival of the new republic. The significance of this piece is to add to the more accurate portrayal of Jefferson’s impact on American institutions. Submit your own response to this article Submit online at democracyeducationjournal.org/home Read responses to this article online http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol21/iss2/5 ew historical figures have undergone as much advocate of public education in the early United States” (p. 280). scrutiny in the last two decades as has Thomas Heslep (1969) has suggested that Jefferson provided “a general Jefferson. His relationship with Sally Hemings, his statement on education in republican, or democratic society” views on Native Americans, his expansionist ideology and his (p. 113), without distinguishing between the two. Others have opted suppressionF of individual liberties are just some of the areas of specifically to connect his ideas to being democratic. Williams Jefferson’s life and thinking that historians and others have reexam- (1967) argued that Jefferson’s impact on our schools is pronounced ined (Finkelman, 1995; Gordon- Reed, 1997; Kaplan, 1998). because “democracy and education are interdependent” and But his views on education have been unchallenged. While his therefore with “education being necessary to its [democracy’s] reputation as a founding father of the American republic has been success, a successful democracy must provide it” (p.
[Show full text]
Patrick Henry
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY PATRICK HENRY: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HARMONIZED RELIGIOUS TENSIONS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE HISTORY DEPARTMENT IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY BY KATIE MARGUERITE KITCHENS LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA APRIL 1, 2010 Patrick Henry: The Significance of Harmonized Religious Tensions By Katie Marguerite Kitchens, MA Liberty University, 2010 SUPERVISOR: Samuel Smith This study explores the complex religious influences shaping Patrick Henry’s belief system. It is common knowledge that he was an Anglican, yet friendly and cooperative with Virginia Presbyterians. However, historians have yet to go beyond those general categories to the specific strains of Presbyterianism and Anglicanism which Henry uniquely harmonized into a unified belief system. Henry displayed a moderate, Latitudinarian, type of Anglicanism. Unlike many other Founders, his experiences with a specific strain of Presbyterianism confirmed and cooperated with these Anglican commitments. His Presbyterian influences could also be described as moderate, and latitudinarian in a more general sense. These religious strains worked to build a distinct religious outlook characterized by a respect for legitimate authority, whether civil, social, or religious. This study goes further to show the relevance of this distinct religious outlook for understanding Henry’s political stances. Henry’s sometimes seemingly erratic political principles cannot be understood in isolation from the wider context of his religious background. Uniquely harmonized
[Show full text]
The Causes of the American Revolution
Page 50 Chapter 12 By What Right Thomas Hobbes John Locke n their struggle for freedom, the colonists raised some age-old questions: By what right does government rule? When may men break the law? I "Obedience to government," a Tory minister told his congregation, "is every man's duty." But the Reverend Jonathan Boucher was forced to preach his sermon with loaded pistols lying across his pulpit, and he fled to England in September 1775. Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence that when people are governed "under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such a Government." Both Boucher and Jefferson spoke to the question of whether citizens owe obedience to government. In an age when kings held near absolute power, people were told that their kings ruled by divine right. Disobedience to the king was therefore disobedience to God. During the seventeenth century, however, the English beheaded one King (King Charles I in 1649) and drove another (King James II in 1688) out of England. Philosophers quickly developed theories of government other than the divine right of kings to justify these actions. In order to understand the sources of society's authority, philosophers tried to imagine what people were like before they were restrained by government, rules, or law. This theoretical condition was called the state of nature. In his portrait of the natural state, Jonathan Boucher adopted the opinions of a well- known English philosopher, Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes believed that humankind was basically evil and that the state of nature was therefore one of perpetual war and conflict.
[Show full text]
Patrick Henry's Integrity Patrick Henry Was Born in Virginia in 1736 When Virginia Was Still a British Colony
Patrick Henry's Integrity Patrick Henry was born in Virginia in 1736 when Virginia was still a British colony. He became a lawyer when he was 24 years old and quickly became well known for his eloquent work in the legal case known as the Parsons' Cause. This case was significant because it argued whether the colonial government or the British crown should make financial decisions for the colonies. About five years before, the Two Penny Act restricted the pay of ministers of the Anglican church (parsons) during a drought year in which the price of tobacco jumped higher (high demand, low supply). Parsons were paid in those days with tobacco, which had a value of about 2 cents a pound. The Two Penny Act of Virginia, enacted by the colonial government [that is, Virginia's government, not England's], maintained that parsons continue to earn 2 cents despite the higher price of tobacco. The parsons protested this because they believed they should benefit from the increased value of tobacco. The parsons appealed to authorities in England, who overruled [set aside, didn't enforce] the Two Penny Act. This judgment by England angered colonialists who believed England had no right to interfere in the colony's financial decision making. Although the Two Penny Act lasted only a year, some parsons sued for back wages. Patrick Henry argued in the case against one parson for the state's right to make its own laws. Although the parson won the case, he was awarded only a penny in back pay. Henry’s success launched a new recognition of his skills.
[Show full text]
Life, Liberty, and . . .: Jefferson on Property Rights
Journal of Libertarian Studies Volume 18, no. 1 (Winter 2004), pp. 31–87 2004 Ludwig von Mises Institute www.mises.org LIFE, LIBERTY, AND . : JEFFERSON ON PROPERTY RIGHTS Luigi Marco Bassani* Property does not exist because there are laws, but laws exist because there is property.1 Surveys of libertarian-leaning individuals in America show that the intellectual champions they venerate the most are Thomas Jeffer- son and Ayn Rand.2 The author of the Declaration of Independence is an inspiring source for individuals longing for liberty all around the world, since he was a devotee of individual rights, freedom of choice, limited government, and, above all, the natural origin, and thus the inalienable character, of a personal right to property. However, such libertarian-leaning individuals might be surprised to learn that, in academic circles, Jefferson is depicted as a proto-soc- ialist, the advocate of simple majority rule, and a powerful enemy of the wicked “possessive individualism” that permeated the revolution- ary period and the early republic. *Department Giuridico-Politico, Università di Milano, Italy. This article was completed in the summer of 2003 during a fellowship at the International Center for Jefferson Studies, Monticello, Va. I gladly acknowl- edge financial support and help from such a fine institution. luigi.bassani@ unimi.it. 1Frédéric Bastiat, “Property and Law,” in Selected Essays on Political Econ- omy, trans. Seymour Cain, ed. George B. de Huszar (Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y.: Foundation for Economic Education, 1964), p. 97. 2E.g., “The Liberty Poll,” Liberty 13, no. 2 (February 1999), p. 26: “The thinker who most influenced our respondents’ intellectual development was Ayn Rand.
[Show full text]
The Declaration of Independence
The Declaration of Independence IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776. THE UNANIMOUS DECLARATION of the thirteen united STATES OF AMERICA, WHEN in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.ÐWe hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.ÐThat to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,ÐThat whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.Ð Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.
[Show full text]
Minutes of April 13, 2021 Board Meeting
1 April 13, 2021 The Wythe County Board of Supervisors held its regularly scheduled meeting at 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, April 13, 2021. The location of the meeting was in the Boardroom of the County Administration Building, 340 South Sixth Street, Wytheville, Virginia. MEMBERS PRESENT: Brian W. Vaught, Chair Coy L. McRoberts Ryan M. Lawson, Vice Chair James D. “Jamie” Smith Rolland R. Cook Stacy A. Terry B. G. “Gene” Horney, Jr. STAFF PRESENT: Stephen D. Bear, County Administrator Matthew C. Hankins, Assistant County Administrator Don Martin, Assistant County Attorney Jimmy McCabe, Emergency Services Coordinator Martha Collins, Administrative Assistant/Clerk OTHERS PRESENT: Kim Aker Lorna King Barry Ayers Ami Kirk Deanna Bradberry Linda Lacey Steve Canup Zach Lester Emily Cline Linda Meyer Mitchell Cook Cade Minton Tracey Crigger Dicky Morgan Noah Davis Megan Patrick James Fedderman Jonathan Powers Justin Felts Jo Repass Charlie Foster Lynn Rosenbaum Steve Goliher Chris Sizemore Amber Gravley Lachen Streeby Lori Guynn Donn Sunshine Dylan Jones and family Frances Watson Andy Kegley Joseph Wilkins Gus Kincer approximately five others 2 April 13, 2021 CALL TO ORDER Chair Vaught determined that a quorum was present and called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The Chair also requested that everyone keep County Attorney Scot Farthing and his family in their prayers due to the recent loss of his father. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Pastor Steve Canup, Fort Chiswell Church of Christ, provided the invocation and Supervisor Cook led the Pledge
[Show full text]
Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death!”
“Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death!” These words first rang out in Richmond’s St. John’s Church on March 23, 1775. Approximately 120 delegates were meeting to discuss Virginia’s position regarding King George III. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were both attending this Second Virginia Convention. The United States was not yet an independent nation. The coLonies were under British rule, which meant King George III governed them. What exactLy was happening in the coLonies at this time? There was a great deal of unrest and there was talk of revolution. The British government thought they had the right to tax the colonies and control their trade. OnLy six months earLier deLegates from 12 of the 13 colonies (Georgia could not attend) met in PhiLadeLphia for the First ContinentaL Congress. They were meeting to decide what to do. Some wanted to stop trade with the British and some were talking of fighting the British. On March 23, 1775 Patrick Henry made his speech to a group of Virginia legislators to convince them that Virginia shouLd support the Revolutionary War effort. BeLow is the closing paragraph of Patrick Henry’s famous speech. The Last 7 words are renown. “It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” Henry’s speech is credited for inspiring the Virginia deLegates to take up arms.
[Show full text]
Saint Louis Mercantile Library Special Collections - Letters M-002 – Harrison, Benjamin
Saint Louis Mercantile Library Special Collections - Letters M-002 – Harrison, Benjamin Extended History of Collection M-042 – Harrison, Benjamin Benjamin Harrison (V) (1726-1801) was born on April 5, 1726 at Berkeley Plantation, the eldest son of Benjamin Harrison IV. Berkeley Plantation is still situated on the James River. Benjamin's mother, Ann Carter, was the daughter of Robert “King” Carter whose family like the Harrison’s was a force in Virginia and American politics. In 1748, at the age of 22, Benjamin married his second cousin Elizabeth Bassett, the daughter of William Bassett, from neighboring New Kent County, and a niece of George Washington’s wife Martha. Benjamin attended William and Mary College where he met Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson. His classical studies education was cut short after a lightning strike killed his father and two of his sisters at Berkeley on July 12, 1745. At age 19 he returned home and took over managing Berkeley’s 1,000 acre operations including ship building and horse breeding. Eight of the Harrison’s children survived to adulthood. Their most famous son was William Henry Harrison, the American general in the victory over the Indians at Tippecanoe, and who was elected President of the United States in 1840. Their great- grandson, Benjamin Harrison, a Civil War general, was also elected President, in 1888. Harrison’s public service began in the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1749 and continued there for 25 years, sometimes as Speaker. He vehemently opposed the Stamp Act and helped pen the Colony’s protest. By 1772 he was urging that the importation of slaves be curbed and heavily taxed.
[Show full text]