DOCSLIB.ORG

Rommel PRESS.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rommel PRESS.Indd ROMMEL PRESS 2 November 2012 German film looks at ties between Rommel and Hitler A new film about Erwin Rommel has been shown on German television, depicting the general as a weak man undone by his links to Adolf Hitler. Dubbed the "Desert Fox" when he fought the Allies in North Africa during World War II, he was admired by enemies for his skills on the battlefield. He finally killed himself, under pressure from the Nazi leader, who suspected him of taking part in a plot. But the TV film questions depictions of Rommel as a tragic anti-Nazi hero. It was broadcast on German public television channel ARD on Thursday, as the 70th anniversary of the battle of El Alamein was commemorated. The battle saw the defeat of Rommel and his German army, the Afrikakorps. On Friday morning, Rommel was the top trending topic among users of Twitter in Germany and the film has generated articles and comment in the media. Historians say the field marshal came to be regarded as a military hero in post-war Germany, where even a warship was named after him. In the English-speaking world, he was positively portrayed by the actor James Mason in The Desert Fox (1951), which highlighted his disputed role in the July Plot to assassinate Hitler in 1944. Nico Hofmann, who produced the new German film, told Reuters news agency: "The idea is to demystify Rommel. "There is a lot of speculation surrounding the myth of Rommel. To some he is a brave, proud soldier, the Desert Fox. "Some people don't know he committed suicide under pressure from Hitler and think he perished in the war and there are many questions about how close he was to the resistance." The film leaves open to question whether Rommel was part of the 20 July Plot to assassinate Hitler with a bomb. The general's own wife Lucie denied he had played a role. But his son Manfred, who was 15 when the general died and is now 83, wrote to the film's producers last year, protesting that the film underplayed Rommel's role in the resistance to Hitler, said Mr Hofman. Some historians argue that Rommel was a loyal follower of Hitler to the end, who owed the Nazi leader his ascent through the German military, while not sharing his Nazi politics. "I don't accept that Rommel was a Nazi but I do believe that Rommel was a man who used the Nazi apparatus to secure a military rank which he would not otherwise have got," British military historian Robert Lyman told BBC Radio 4's World Tonight programme. "He was a brilliant field tactician but he was always on the outside of the main aristocracy of the German army. Nazism gave him an opportunity because Hitler fundamentally liked winners." Mr Lyman believes the suggestion that Rommel plotted to assassinate Hitler is "absurd", arguing that he was a "very loyal soldier" who rejected the approaches of the plotters. "That actually indicates that Rommel was a fundamentally weak man, a moral coward who recognised what Nazism and Hitler could give him personally but was not willing to live by his principles," he told the BBC. "When Hitler insisted that he committed suicide, he obeyed his Fuehrer." The traditional view of Rommel's death is that he agreed to swallow poison to avoid a public trial and retaliation against his family. Critics of the film say it brushes over the issue of whether Rommel knew about the Holocaust, with many historians arguing that an officer of his rank must have known about the Nazis' genocidal policies. German history professor Soenke Neitzel, who has written about Rommel and advised the film-makers, told Reuters: "On the one hand he didn't commit war crimes that we know of and ordered a retreat at El Alamein despite Hitler's order [to stand and fight]. "But he took huge German casualties elsewhere and he was a servant of the regime. He was not exactly a shining liberal or Social Democrat. Mostly, he was interested in his career." ROMMEL PRESS Row over film that portrays Rommel as more rat than fox Tony Paterson Sunday, 28 October 2012 Was Germany's Second World War general, Erwin Rommel, really the chivalrous "Desert Fox" commander of legend who is reputed to have plotted against Hitler? Or was he a deeply convinced Nazi and anti-Semite driven by an egotistical desire for fame? German viewers will get an opportunity to make up their own minds on Thursday evening when Rommel, a controversial television drama about the celebrated wartime general, will be broadcast. The production has infuriated the surviving relatives of the general who committed suicide in 1944. Its authors stand accused of relying on the works of the discredited Holocaust- denying British historian David Irving. A German historian involved walked out in disgust. Manfred Rommel, the late general and subsequent field marshal's 83-year-old son has protested that the film's portrayal of his father as a favourite of Hitler and a war criminal is untrue. "These are lies," the Rommel family wrote to the film-makers. Churchill once described Rommel as a "great general" and in reunified post-war Germany, the field marshal is still largely remembered as one of the few "decent" military commanders to have served the Nazi regime. Because of his initial spectacular successes in the desert campaign against the British, Rommel became a favourite of Hitler. Nico Hofmann, the film's producer, told Der Spiegel magazine: "We have carried out the demystification of Rommel... We have deliberately distanced ourselves from all the clichés. In our film he is not the victorious and noble 'Desert Fox' who was even respected by the British." His film concentrates on the last seven months of Rommel's life in 1944 when he was the commanding field marshal on the German western front and faced the task of reinforcing Hitler's "Atlantic wall" defences before the Allied D-Day landings. The producers shot key sequences of the film in the chateau in La Roche-Guyon north-west of Paris that was used by Rommel as his headquarters at the time. The film portrays Rommel as a Hamlet-like figure who is conscious of the prospect of Germany's imminent defeat, but too vacillating and weak to throw his weight behind the plot to assassinate Hitler. Instead, he bases his hopes on the Germans surrendering to the Allies. His predicament is captured over dinner when Rommel tells his fellow commanders that the Allies will break through the Western Front within three weeks and head straight for Germany. "We can only hope that they will be quicker than the Russians," he adds. Two of Rommel's officers who are already committed to overthrowing Hitler tell him that he is the man to end the war. Hans Speidel, his chief of staff, adds that if there is no other solution, Hitler will have to be shot. Rommel swallows hard and then exclaims: "Speidel you are a tough warrior !" Hofmann describes Rommel as an ambivalent figure who ends his life as a "broken hero". The film also implies that he was fully aware of the Nazi Holocaust and that he may himself have been anti-Semitic. Ulrich Tukur, the celebrated German actor who plays Rommel, said he spent months researching his character: "Rommel was deeply insecure. He was a tragic figure who was defeated by history," he insisted. However, Rommel's grand-daughter, Catherine, maintains the film is unfair. "It is not a question of who is right or wrong. We simply have the impression that this portrayal does not do justice to Erwin Rommel," she said. Her views have been echoed by the Stuttgart historian Cornelia Hecht who was employed as an adviser to the production team until she walked out last year. She said the film had "left out" several important details about Rommel's involvement in German resistance against Hitler and claimed dialogue in the film had been lifted from an biography of Rommel by the "revisionist" historian David Irving. The producers responded by recruiting their own team of respected German historians and military experts who praised the film-makers for the "care" taken in the production and decreed that it was accurate. Hofmann has since held a meeting with members of the Rommel family which he described as "confrontational and emotional". The row over the film seems certain to continue long after it is broadcast. To what extent Rommel was prepared to oppose Hitler may never be known. His aim to broker a peace deal with the Allies was never realised. The former Afrika Korps commander was badly wounded in Normandy during an Allied air attack in 1944 and taken back to Germany for treatment. After the abortive 20 July 1944 attempt to assassinate Hitler, his name was mentioned in connections with the plotters, but the true extent of his involvement is still unclear. Hitler was, however, aware that the execution of a German war hero would be a propaganda disaster. Rommel was visited by two senior generals at his home in October 1944. They handed him a cyanide capsule and told him that suicide would ensure a generous pension for his family and a state funeral. Rommel honoured the offer and swallowed the capsule in the generals' parked staff car. ROMMEL PRESS Th e Devil's General? German fi lm seeks to debunk Rommel myth Th u, Nov 1 2012 By Madeline Chambers BERLIN (Reuters) - Erwin Rommel, the World War Two German fi eld marshal celebrated as the brilliant and humane "Desert Fox", is portrayed in a new fi lm as a weak man torn by his loyalty to Adolf Hitler and the dawning realization that he was serving a devil.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Operation Valkyrie
    Operation Valkyrie Rastenburg, 20th July 1944 Claus Philipp Maria Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg (Jettingen- Scheppach, 15th November 1907 – Berlin, 21st July 1944) was a German army officer known as one of the leading officers who planned the 20th July 1944 bombing of Hitler’s military headquarters and the resultant attempted coup. As Bryan Singer’s film “Valkyrie”, starring Tom Cruise as the German officer von Stauffenberg, will be released by the end of December, SCALA is glad to present you the story of the 20 July plot through the historical photographs of its German collections. IClaus Graf Schenk von Stauffenberg 1934. Cod. B007668 2 Left: Carl and Nina Stauffenbergs’s wedding, 26th September 1933. Cod.B007660. Right: Claus Graf Schenk von Stauffenberg. 1934. Cod. B007663 3 Although he never joined the Nazi party, Claus von Stauffenberg fought in Africa during the Second World War as First Officer. After the explosion of a mine on 7th March 1943, von Stauffenberg lost his right hand, the left eye and two fingers of the left hand. Notwithstanding his disablement, he kept working for the army even if his anti-Nazi believes were getting firmer day by day. In fact he had realized that the 3rd Reich was leading Germany into an abyss from which it would have hardly risen. There was no time to lose, they needed to do something immediately or their country would have been devastated. Claus Graf Schenk von Stauffenberg (left) with Albrecht Ritter Mertz von Quirnheim in the courtyard of the OKH-Gebäudes in 4 Bendlerstrasse. Cod. B007664 The conspiracy of the German officers against the Führer led to the 20th July attack to the core of Hitler’s military headquarters in Rastenburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure As Process: the Regularized Intergovernmentalism of Franco-German Bilateralism
    Krotz: Regularized Intergovernmentalism Program for the Study of Germany and Europe Working Paper 02.3 Structure as Process: The Regularized Intergovernmentalism of Franco-German Bilateralism by Ulrich Krotz Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies Harvard University 27 Kirkland Street at Cabot Way Cambridge, MA 02138 phone: 617-495-4303 x291 e-mail: [email protected] For comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this text I thank Rawi Abdelal, Peter Hall, Peter Katzenstein, Jonas Pontusson, and Henry Shue. Abstract This article systematically scrutinizes the intergovernmental and administrative aspects of Franco- German relations with the 1963 Elysée Treaty at their core. This treaty, together with its various ad- ditions and extensions, has defined the basic processes of bilateral interaction between the French and German states. Recurrent tension in Franco-German relations notwithstanding, many observers and participants have viewed France and Germany to be connected particularly closely since the 1960s. This article explores key elements of what it is that links France and Germany. Thereby it clarifies the concept of regularized intergovernmentalism, suggests viewing this specific set of inter- national practices from a social-structural perspective, and evaluates the effects and limits of such regularized procedures. Its findings suggest that bilateral structures have complemented and under- girded a broadly multilateral post-World War II world and are likely to continue to do so. Krotz: Regularized Intergovernmentalism 1 Table of Contents I. Structure as Process: Elysée Treaty as Main Frame _______________________________ 3 Contents of the Treaty 3 Extensions, Additions, Intensifications 6 Semiannual Summit Meetings 8 Beyond and Below 10 II. Regularized Intergovernmentalism across Policy Areas __________________________ 13 Security, Defense, Armament 14 Economics and Finance 18 Culture, Environment, and Other Policy Areas 20 III.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO's WHO in the WAR in EUROPE the War in Europe 7 CHARLES DE GAULLE
    who’s Who in the War in Europe (National Archives and Records Administration, 342-FH-3A-20068.) POLITICAL LEADERS Allies FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT When World War II began, many Americans strongly opposed involvement in foreign conflicts. President Roosevelt maintained official USneutrality but supported measures like the Lend-Lease Act, which provided invaluable aid to countries battling Axis aggression. After Pearl Harbor and Germany’s declaration of war on the United States, Roosevelt rallied the country to fight the Axis powers as part of the Grand Alliance with Great Britain and the Soviet Union. (Image: Library of Congress, LC-USZ62-128765.) WINSTON CHURCHILL In the 1930s, Churchill fiercely opposed Westernappeasement of Nazi Germany. He became prime minister in May 1940 following a German blitzkrieg (lightning war) against Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, and France. He then played a pivotal role in building a global alliance to stop the German juggernaut. One of the greatest orators of the century, Churchill raised the spirits of his countrymen through the war’s darkest days as Germany threatened to invade Great Britain and unleashed a devastating nighttime bombing program on London and other major cities. (Image: Library of Congress, LC-USW33-019093-C.) JOSEPH STALIN Stalin rose through the ranks of the Communist Party to emerge as the absolute ruler of the Soviet Union. In the 1930s, he conducted a reign of terror against his political opponents, including much of the country’s top military leadership. His purge of Red Army generals suspected of being disloyal to him left his country desperately unprepared when Germany invaded in June 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Paper 5
    PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH CENTER May 2002 OCCASIONAL PAPER 5 Issues for City Government in the New Millennium On the Occasion of orty Years of Partnership with Stuttgart, Germany By: Dr. Wolfgang Schuster, Introduction Mayor, Stuttgart, Germany To celebrate 40 years of sister cities cooperation between St. Louis and Stuttgart, Ger- many, the Department of Sociology and the Public Policy Research Center of the Introduction by Teresa Guess, Assistant Professor University of Missouri-St. Louis invited the Mayor of Stuttgart, Germany to address an Department of Sociology, audience of civic and academic leaders on the subject of the future of cities. University of Missouri - St. Louis Dr. Wolfgang Schuster, highly qualified to speak on this subject, is a graduate of Ecole Nationale dAdministration in Paris having completed his law studies at Tubingen, Geneva, .reiburg. He served a term as Representative in the Baden Wuerttemberg State Parliament before joining Dr. Manfred Rommel, then Mayor of Stuttgart, as chief of How do we staff of the administration of City of Stuttgart in 1980. After six years, he left to become Mayor of Schwabisch Gmund. During his tenure there, Dr. Schuster was instrumental reconnect personal in rebuilding its inner city and starting a variety of cultural and economic revitalization freedom, social projects. responsibility, Returning to Stuttgart as Mayor for Cultural Relations in 1993, Dr. Schuster ran for and solidarity in Lord Mayor in 1996-97 after the retirement of Dr. Manfred Rommel. Dr. Mayor Wolfgang Schuster has visited St. Louis at numerous occasions since the administrations developing St. of Majors James Conway and Vince Schoemehl.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 Points Total) PLEASE DO NO
    Mr. Huesken 10th Grade United States History II Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 points total) PLEASE DO NO WRITE ON THIS TEST DIRECTIONS – Please answer the following multiple-choice questions with the best possible answer. No answer will be used more than once. (45 questions @ 1 point each = 45 points) 1) All of the following were leaders of totalitarian governments in the 1930’s and 1940’s except: a. Joseph Stalin b. Francisco Franco. c. Benito Mussolini d. Neville Chamberlain. 2) In what country was the Fascist party and government formed? a. Italy b. Japan c. Spain d. Germany 3) The Battle of Britain forced Germany to do what to their war plans in Europe in 1942? a. Join the Axis powers. b. Fight a three-front war. c. Put off the invasion of Britain. d. Enter into a nonaggression pact with Britain. 4) The Nazis practiced genocide toward Jews, Gypsies, and other “undesirable” peoples in Europe. What does the term “genocide” mean? a. Acting out of anti-Semitic beliefs. b. Deliberate extermination of a specific group of people. c. Terrorizing of the citizens of a nation by a government. d. Killing of people for the express purpose of creating terror. 5) The term “blitzkrieg” was a military strategy that depended on what? a. A system of fortifications. b. Out-waiting the opponent. c. Surprise and quick, overwhelming force. d. The ability to make a long, steady advance. 6) In an effort to avoid a second “world war”, when did the Britain and France adopt a policy of appeasement toward Germany? a.
    [Show full text]
  • Erwin Rommel Account of Blitzkrieg
    Blitzkrieg, 1940 Directions: Read and annotate the secondary source description of German Blitzkrieg and the primary source account by German General Rommel. Then, write a fake primary source from the perspective of a person living in France, either a soldier or a civilian, describing the experience from their perspective. The period between Germany's defeat of Poland in October 1939 and her invasion of Norway in April 1940 is often referred to as the "Phony War." Not much happened. The French stiffened their defenses while the British moved troops to the continent. The British wanted to send their air force to bomb targets inside Germany but were persuaded not to by the French who feared German reprisal. The major activity consisted of dueling propaganda messages blared from loud speakers across the German and French lines. The French, feeling secure behind their Maginot Line, were ready to fight World War I all over again - a war of defense. Hitler had other ideas. In order to isolate the iron ore resources of Sweden, and secure his northern flank, Hitler invaded Norway and Denmark on April 9. The next blow came a month later. In the early morning darkness of May 10, the Germans unleashed their Blitzkrieg against the Netherlands and Belgium. The attack sent the defending troops reeling. The roads overflowed with refugees fleeing the front. French and British troops rushing to the rescue were caught in the headlong retreat and pushed back. German dive-bombers - the Stukas - filled the sky, strafing the retreating mix of civilians and soldiers with machine gun and bomb.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Traditionswürdigkeit Erwin Rommels Für Die Bundeswehr
    Wissenschaftliche Dienste Sachstand Die Traditionswürdigkeit Erwin Rommels für die Bundeswehr © 2019 Deutscher Bundestag WD 2 – 3000 – 005/19 Wissenschaftliche Dienste Sachstand Seite 2 WD 2 - 3000 - 005/19 Die Traditionswürdigkeit Erwin Rommels für die Bundeswehr Aktenzeichen: WD 2 - 3000 - 005/19 Abschluss der Arbeit: 22. Februar 2019 Fachbereich: WD 2: Auswärtiges, Völkerrecht, wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, Verteidigung, Menschenrechte und humanitäre Hilfe Die Wissenschaftlichen Dienste des Deutschen Bundestages unterstützen die Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestages bei ihrer mandatsbezogenen Tätigkeit. Ihre Arbeiten geben nicht die Auffassung des Deutschen Bundestages, eines sei- ner Organe oder der Bundestagsverwaltung wieder. Vielmehr liegen sie in der fachlichen Verantwortung der Verfasse- rinnen und Verfasser sowie der Fachbereichsleitung. Arbeiten der Wissenschaftlichen Dienste geben nur den zum Zeit- punkt der Erstellung des Textes aktuellen Stand wieder und stellen eine individuelle Auftragsarbeit für einen Abge- ordneten des Bundestages dar. Die Arbeiten können der Geheimschutzordnung des Bundestages unterliegende, ge- schützte oder andere nicht zur Veröffentlichung geeignete Informationen enthalten. Eine beabsichtigte Weitergabe oder Veröffentlichung ist vorab dem jeweiligen Fachbereich anzuzeigen und nur mit Angabe der Quelle zulässig. Der Fach- bereich berät über die dabei zu berücksichtigenden Fragen. Wissenschaftliche Dienste Sachstand Seite 3 WD 2 - 3000 - 005/19 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 4 2. Die bisherige Umbenennungspraxis bei Namensgebern mit Wehrmachtbezug 6 3. Erwin Rommel und der Traditionserlass der Bundeswehr 10 4. Fazit 18 Wissenschaftliche Dienste Sachstand Seite 4 WD 2 - 3000 - 005/19 1. Einleitung Am 28. März 2018 hat die Bundesministerin der Verteidigung, Ursula von der Leyen, in Hanno- ver im Rahmen eines Festakts zur Umbenennung der Liegenschaft der „Schule für Feldjäger und Stabsdienst der Bundeswehr“1 den neuen Traditionserlass der Bundeswehr 2 in Kraft gesetzt.
    [Show full text]
  • Heeresgruppe B (Army Group B)
    RECORDS OF GERMAN FIELD COMMANDS, ARMY GROUPS (PART II) Heeresgruppe B (Army Group B) Army Group B was formed from the prior Army Group North on October 5, 1939, and was placed in the West until September 1940 when it was moved, after a short stay in Germany, to the German-Soviet border area in occupied Poland. On April 1, 194-1, it was renamed Army Group Center. Army Group South was designated Army Group B in July 194-2 and controlled the armies advancing in the region between Stalingrad and Kursk. Disbanded in February 194-3 it was re-formed in May 194-3 as OKW-Auffrischungs- stab Rommel. In July 194-3 it was reorganized as Army Group B and was located in south Germany, the Balkans, north Italy, and France. The Army Group was charged with control of anti-invasion forces along the Channel coast and was commanded by Gen, Erwin Rommel until July 1944-• Field Marshal Guenter von Kluge took it over for a short time and from August 18, 1944, until the capitulation it was under Field Marshal Walter Model. Army Group B took part in operations in France and controlled the Ardennes counteroffensive,* Item Item No. Roll 1st Frame Ic, Anlage zum T'atigkeitsbericht. Reports relating to the political and military situation in Italy, Italy's capitulation, and disarmament of Italian units; also includes German military communiques. Jul 30 - Nov 14-, 194-3• 49354 276 Ic, Meldungen. Daily activity reports covering Allied progress in France. Jul 1 - Dec 31, 1944. 65881/1-2 276 195 Ic, Meldungen.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitler's Judges: Ideological Commitment and the Death Penalty in Nazi Germany*
    DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS ISSN 1441-5429 DISCUSSION PAPER 10/16 Hitler's Judges: Ideological Commitment and the Death Penalty in Nazi Germany* Wayne Geerling§, Gary Magee+, Vinod Mishra+ and Russell Smyth+ Abstract: To what extent do judges in courts in authoritarian regimes merely implement the will of the state? What determines judges’ behaviour in such contexts? We address these questions by examining the role of judicial policy preferences in influencing whether judges in Nazi Germany sentenced defendants charged with serious political offences - treason and high treason - to death. Our findings lend support to the attitudinal model of judicial decision- making. Specifically, we find that judicial policy preferences, measured by the depth of the ideological commitment of the judge to the Nazi Party worldview, were an important determinant of whether judges imposed the death sentence. We also find that judges who were more ideologically committed to the Nazi Party were more likely to impose the death sentence on those who belonged to the most organised political opposition groups to the Nazi state, those whose acts of treason or high treason involved violent resistance against the state, and those with characteristics to which Nazism was intolerant. We thank Rob Brooks, Nuno Garoupa, Vai-Lam Mui, Paul Raschky and Hans-Joachim Voth for helpful comments on, and/or discussions about, earlier versions of this paper. We, alone, are responsible for the views expressed therein and any remaining errors. Son Nguyen and Friederike Bauer provided excellent research assistance. This research was supported in part by successive grants from the Department of Economics, Monash University.
    [Show full text]
  • Manfred Rommel. Die Biografie
    Manfred Rommel. Die Biografie Bearbeitet von Josef Schunder, Christian Ude 1. Auflage 2012. Buch. 300 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 8062 2588 4 Format (B x L): 13,5 x 21 cm Weitere Fachgebiete > Geschichte > Geschichtswissenschaft Allgemein > Biographien & Autobiographien: Historisch, Politisch, Militärisch schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. NEUE LEBENSAUFGABE ALS OBERBÜRGERMEISTER UNERWARTET KANDIDAT Der 14. August 1974 leitete in Manfred Rommels Leben, ohne dass er es gleich geahnt hätte, eine Wende ein. An diesem Tag starb wäh- rend eines Kuraufenthalts auf der Bühlerhöhe im Schwarzwald völ- lig unerwartet der amtierende Stuttgarter Oberbürgermeister Arnulf Klett. Die Landeshauptstadt stand kurz unter Schock. Umgehend setzten aber bei den Parteien die Überlegungen ein, wen sie auf den Schild heben könnten, um nach dem parteilosen Klett einen Mann ihrer Couleur auf den OB-Sessel hieven zu können. Bei den CDU-Granden in der Stadt kam recht schnell der Name Rommel ins Spiel, was im Nachhinein recht schlüssig wirkt, hatte er sich doch beträchtliche Erfahrung in der Landesverwaltung er- worben, als Geburtsort Stuttgart im Ausweis stehen und überdies auch noch einen bekannten Namen vorzuweisen. Es war sogar noch naheliegender. 1965 hatten Parteivertreter schon einmal bei Manfred Rommel vorgefühlt, ob er sich eine Kan- didatur gegen den damals um eine weitere Amtszeit bemühten OB Klett vorstellen könnte.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Schrecklichen Kinder: German Artists Confronting the Legacy of Nazism
    Die Schrecklichen Kinder: German Artists Confronting the Legacy of Nazism A Division III by A. Elizabeth Berg May 2013 Chair: Sura Levine Members: Jim Wald and Karen Koehler 2 Table of Contents Introduction . 3 Heroic Symbols: Anselm Kiefer and the Nazi Salute . 13 And You Were Victorious After All: Hans Haacke and the Remnants of Nazism . 31 “The Right Thing to the Wrong People”: The Red Army Faction and Gerhard Richter’s 18. Oktober 1977 . 49 Conclusion . 79 Bibliography . 85 3 Introduction After the end of World War II, they were known as the Fatherless Generation. The children of postwar Germany—the children of Nazis—had lost their fathers in the war, though not always as a result of their death. For many members of this generation, even if their fathers did survive the war and perhaps even years in POW camps, they often returned irreparably physically and psychologically damaged. Once these children reached adolescence, many began to question their parents’ involvement with Nazism and their role during the war. Those who had participated in the atrocities of the war and those whose silence betrayed their guilt were problematic role models for their children, unable to fulfill their roles as parents with any moral authority.1 When these children came of age in the 1960s and entered universities, there was a major shift in the conversation about the war and the process of coming to terms with the past. The members of the postwar generation made themselves heard through large-scale protest and, eventually, violence. In this series of essays, I will look at the ways in which artists of this generation created work in response to their troubled history and the generational politics of the 1960s and 70s.
    [Show full text]
  • Rulers and Generals
    Rulers and Generals Jeremy Kedziora Randall W. Stone October 22, 2009 Abstract Democratic states win more of the wars they fight, win them more quickly, and pay lower costs than do autocratic states. We offer a novel explanation for this observation: democratic states are more successful in war because autocrats are more likely to suffer from a commitment problem that prevents their generals from using their expertise on the battlefield. We derive this argument from a two-period model with incomplete information in which battles allow rulers make inferences regarding the competence of generals. We illustrate our argument with examples from World War II. To keep you is no benefit. To destroy you is no loss. ∼ the Khmer Rouge ...in this country, it is wise to kill an admiral from time to time to encourage the others... ∼ Voltaire’s Candide 1 Introduction Democratic states win more of the wars they fight, win them more quickly, and pay lower costs than do autocratic states (Lake 1992; Siverson 1995; Bennett and Stam 1996; Reiter and Stam 1998a). Explanations for this democratic wartime advantage either suggest that democracies are better at prosecuting war than autocracies (e.g. Reiter and Stam 1998b, Lake 1992, Bueno de Mesquita et al. 1999) or suggest that democratic states are more careful about selecting which wars to fight (e.g. Reiter and Stam 1998a). We argue that each of these arguments is either in- complete or unsupported by subsequent empirical research, and so none of them has presented a convincing mechanism to account for the democratic advantage. We suggest that the mecha- nism is delegation: democracies are better able to take advantage of the skills and expertise of battlefield commanders because they are better able to make credible commitments.
    [Show full text]