DOCSLIB.ORG

REGULAR MEETING of the BOARD of PORT COMMISSIONERS of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REGULAR MEETING of the BOARD of PORT COMMISSIONERS of The REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS of the PORT OF OAKLAND Held on Monday, Tanuary 4, 1932, at the hour of 3:30 oclock p.m., due notice of such meeting having been given members of the Board, in the office. of the Board, Room 75, Grove Street Pier. Commissioners present: Goodrich, Leet, Pendleton and President Fisher -4- Commissioner absent: Dr. Pardee -1- The Assistant Port Manager and the Port Attorney were also present. The minutes of the regular meeting of December 28, 1931, were approved and adopted. Communication from the Oakland Chamber of Commerce enclosing letter from the Sacramento Region Citizens Council requesting representation at a meet- ing to be held at Sacramento on January 9, 1932, et which meeting shipside refrig- eration sites are to be discussed, was read and the Port Manager directed to request the Oakland Chamber of Commerce to have its representative convey to the Sacramento Region Citizens Council its desire to cooperate in the matter of a shipside refrigeration terminal site, and to advise that in the event that the State of California should desire to avail itself of the site, which was inves- tigated by Judge Van Bernards Committee at the Outer Harbor Terminal, arrange- ments could be made to re-convey to the State this site, which originally was conveyed by the State as tidelands to the City of Oakland. Communication from Mayor Morcorn, enclosing letter from Rear Admiral W. C. Cole, Commandant, 12th Naval District, calling attention to the probable visit of the U.S.S. CONSTITUTION to Oakland Harbor during 1933, was read and the Port Manager directed to advise Rear Admiral Cole that a berth would be provided at one of the Municipal Terminals for the U.S.S. CONSTITUTION at the time of its visit to Oakland. Communication from Grinnell Company advising that in the future all Grinnell Automatic Sprinkler Systems in the East Bay region would be manufactured and installed by the Grinnell Company from its Oakland plant, was filed. Communication from the Southern Pacific Company advising that the Cal- ifornia Railroad Commission, under date of December 21, 1931, issued order No. 24336 authorizing the South Pacific Coast Railroad Company and the Southern Pacific Company to enter into agreement with the city relative to the settlement of right- of-way matters across the Oakland Airport, was filed. Communication from the Port Manager transmitting copies of weekly reports submitted by Traffic Representatives for the week ending January 1, 1932, was filed. Communication from the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Pub- lic Roads, relative to track connection on Dennison Street to serve Government Island, was filed. Communication from the Port Manager to the U. S. Department of Agricul- ture, requesting the taking out of permit for repairs to Government Island bridge at the foot of Dennison Street, was approved. Communication from Pacific Air Transport requesting permission to install five underground storage tanks for the storage of 12,000 gallons of gasoline, together with a pipe line leading thereto from a proposed spur track to be con- structed by the Southern Pacific opposite the Airport wharf, was read and the Port Attorney directed to prepare the necessary agreement granting Pacific Air Trans- port permission to install the facilities requested. Communication in the form of a public notice, dated December 28, 1931, from Colonel Thomas M. Robins, United States Engineer, advising that his report had been submitted to the Chief of Engineers as unfavorable to further improve- meat of Government Island at this time, end stating that further dredging in the Brooklyn Basin area would be held in abeyance until a plan for ultimate devel- opment of Brooklyn Basin area has been agreed upon by local interests and approved by the War Department, was filed. Communication from Colonel Clarence M. Young, Assistant Secretary of Commerce, expressing appreciation for the additional space in the Administration Building at the Airport for the use of the Department of Commerce inspectors, was filed. Communication from the Interstate Company, dated January 2, 1932, agree- ing to the leasing of the Oakland Airport Inn for a period of two years beginning July 15, 1932, at a monthly rental of $250.00 par month, was read and the Port Attorney directed to prepare a lease covering such agreement. Communication from the Associated Air Services, Ltd., relative to the establishment of an approved repair depot for airplanes et the Oakland Municipal Airport, was read and referred to the Airport Committee. Communication from the American Trust Company requesting authorization for the payment in Libby, McNeill Libby of the proceeds of coupons due January 1, 1932, on $60,000 worth of Swift Companys Sinking Fund Gold Bonds, which bonds are being held as security for faithful performance of lease on Warehouse "B", was read and re q uest granted. The Port Attorney was directed to advise the Ameri- can Trust Company accordingly. Certified copy of Resolution No. 608 C.M.S. of the City Council request- ing the Board to relinquish to the City Council control and jurisdiction of a por- tion of the Fort area, being a strip of land averaging twenty feet wide and ex- tending along the westerly side of Third Avenue from East Seventh Street to East Eighth Street, said area being required for the widening of Third Avenue, was read and filed. The Port Attorney was instructed to advise the City Council that the Board is agreeable to relinquishing that portion of the port area required for the widening of Third Avenue between East Seventh and East Eighth Streets at such time as the area is required for the actual improvement of Third Avenue. Application of California State Chamber of Commerce for advertisement in its journal, which had been referred to President Fisher, was filed. Upon recom- mendation of President Fisher, the Board authorized the insertion of an advertise- ment of a nature and size to be approved by President Fisher. The Port Manager reported on the status of certain funds as of December 31, 1931. Harbor Maintenance Fund: Unencumbered Cash Balance......... .......... $177,408.59 Set up in Special Funds 220 and 222 175,000.00 Total Estimated Unencumbered Resources ....... 489,881.53 (Last week 493,047.32) 1925 Oakland Harbor Improvement Fund: Unencumbered Cash Balance $ 73,455.11 The comparative statistical report of the Port Manager for the month of November, 1931, for the Port of Oakland, Howard Terminal, and Parr Terminal, was filed. Report of the Port Manager on vessels scheduled to receive cargo at the Outer Harbor Terminal during January, was filed. Report of the Airport Committee on meeting held with Associated Air Services, Ltd., relative to establishment of airplane repair depot, was filed. Report of the Port Manager on revenues received from leases of Boeing Company and from the sale of gasoline and oils at Oakland Municipal Airport, was filed. The Assistant Port Manager reported that written request was made of Southern Pacific Company, under date of December 30, 1931, for the construction of a spur track on the Southern Pacific right-of-way in the rear of the wharf at Oakland Municipal Airport, same to be-used for the receiving of tank car deliver- ies of gasoline and other freight destined for the Airport. The report of the Port Manager for the month of December was filed. The Port Attorney reported progress on the preparation of the proposed lease with Coos Bay Lumber Company for use of certain facilities at Ninth Avenue Pier. The Port Attorney reported that the revised printed draft of Council ordinance providing adjustment of titles relative to the garbage wharf site had been sent to the Southern Pacific Company and Western Pacific Railroad Company for final approval. The Port Attorney reported that revised copies of suggested agreement covering the formation of a pilots association for the Port of Oakland had been forwarded for their consideration. The report of the Auditing Committee on claims and demands was adopted. The following resolution was introduced and passed by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Goodrich, Leet, Pendleton and President Fisher -4- NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Dr. Pardee -1- "RESOLUTION NO. 2309 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS. RESOLVED: That the following claims and demands, having been approved by the Auditing Committee, be and the seine are hereby approved and allowed by the Board of Port Commissioners and the Auditor is authorized to draw his warrant for the same out of the proper Fund: HARBOR MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT FUND: Begley-Nunes Co. 74.99 Chester A. Bray 29.75 California Steel Company 1.05 Cochran Celli 1.40 Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Company 4.41 Commercial News Publishing Company 225.00 East Bay Municipal Utility District 251.85 The Electric Corporation 3.72 The Fox Press 55.00 General Electric Supply Corporation 70.27 Greenwood Printers Ltd. 26.50 Grinnell Company of the Pacific 8.18 Charles R. Hadley Company 8.77 C. J. Hendry Company 7.96 The Harbor Tug and Barge Company 12.00 Abbot A. Hanks, Inc. 2.50 Libby, McNeill Libby 2.31 Melrose Lumber Supply Co. 2.51 M. D. McCarl 6.31 A. S. Titus 3.10 Geo. H. Nash 125.10 Thos H. Moore 95.60 Wm. Nat Friend, Postmaster 78.00 Pacific Coast Engineering Co. 3,612.25 A. Newman 11.50 Oakland Plumbing Supply Co. 2.24 Oakland Title Insurance end Guaranty Company 80.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 64.52 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 1,315.71 Pacific Electric Motor Co. 11.10 Pacific Tool and Supply Company 1.18 Ritchie Engraving Company 84.94 Clyde Sunderland Studios 8.00 Smith Brothers 6.32 Tyre Bros.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Extensions of Remarks 23579 Extensions of Remarks
    August 27, 1980 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 23579 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS CHRYSLER AND AUTO Planners had little idea one design would like a laser beam through Detroit's darkest TECHNOLOGY be so crucial when they first set pen to hour. This is another of those genuinely paper four years ago. The Omni/Horizon small cars packed with an astonishingly line was almost ready for introduction at roomy interior. SAE measurements <used by HON. DOUG WALGREN that time. Americans had just resumed the EPA to categorize cars> spot the K-car OF PENNSYLVANIA their big-car buying habits after Energy just slightly smaller than an X-car in front, IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Crisis I, encouraged by plentiful-albeit but a bit larger in both back-seat and truck more expensive-fuel supplies. The K would roominess. Outside, the K rides on a five­ Wednesday, August 27, 1980 replace the Aspen/Volare, and, for the first inch-shorter wheelbase than the X-car, is six e Mr. WALGREN. Mr. Speaker, time ever, Chrysler planners knew exactly inches shorter overall, and is just a touch American auto technology is in a cru­ what they wanted. The "blueprint" letter wider. Inside, Chrysler supplies seatbelts for cial state of transition. For a number that set development in motion was seven five or six people <depending on whether of inescapable reasons we must change pages long, whereas single-sheet descrip­ the front seats are buckets or a bench), and tions had typically launched new Chrysler the EPA has anointed this a "midsize" car the size and design of new automobiles products in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Ss Exchw~Uer
    Reproduced from tfti'UnCfassifled l DeclasSiffed Hofdlngs of the National Archives . - Serial UStl #150 THIBD l'JAV~t\L DISTRICT FGR: 1~1.AP :.CCC OFFICl! OF PORT DIRECTOR 30 November 1944 17 Battery Place ?Iew York 4; lI.Y. • SECRET CU49 From.: Port Director, THmD Naval District To: Nmv YORK SECTION . Commanding Officer; USS LEJEUNE , Commanding Officer, ID!S PATRCLLER J;fa ste·r, SS ..1R.A\V' 1l iiaster, liV BA?fr.AM Ma st er, lW BRIT.i\ltt~IC }~asterf SS CAPE NOllf.E , li&itQiPj g'iH( S&!\MPIQMS iEIII, Master; STK CH1Thll>OEG ),faster, STIC CHi\NTITJ.y !.(aster, STK CRO\VN POINT l~aster, STK ElllPmE MILNER Master, STK ESSO IL~RTFORD Master; STK :ESSO l"!Ill~Il1GTOI~ )~aster I SS EL~lrrHI_4 }~aster, SS ECCEIJ.F:R Master, USi~T EXCELSIOR Master; SS EXCHW~UER Ma·ater; SS EXHIBITOR ).ia at er ; SS EX?\1IINS'11ER Master; STK FORT STEVENS Master; SS GOLDEN FI~ECE Master; STK GR _,~ ND RIVF.Jt Master; SS GREAT REPUBLIC Ma st er; STK I\J)RSTEti \\T1\l~G }!aster, STIC ICERl{STO\VN Master; STK r.{:\RK.'lY l1aster, SS l[ID!JIGHT Master, STK PAOLI Master; STK l'ERRYVILLE . ' !~aster, SS R1\PH .. \EL sm.n.ms . BOSTOl~ SECTION Mast er , SS l;L\RilIB WOLF Master, ss ·s .. 'ilrrA P.:\UL,\ blaster, SS Si\ ~lT ~ i ROSA : - -. _~ ' .. ... " ·:•. •" . ' . , co1JV·O"¥ cu-4·9 . · · · ---.. -.- __ .... _- -- -"r----------- --------- ---------------- .... ------ ------ cor.'1Tvt4.NDI1JG OFFICER VESSEL FLAG MAsTER , \. SS AR1'l\"lA BRIT. T. v. ROBERTS r~w BAI\TTA~~~ lJETfI.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe” by C.S
    1. STAFF REPORTS / ITEMS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION Broken Arrow Comprehensive Plan Update The last major update of the Broken Arrow Comprehensive Plan was in 1997. A partial amendment was completed in June 2003. The Comprehensive Plan policies suggest updating the plan every 10 to 15 years. The following principle steps are being proposed to launch a process to update the Comprehensive Plan, Although the Comprehensive Plan update will be coordinated by retaining a consulting firm, the following steps are proposed, before a consulting firm can be retained. Timeline 1. Discuss scope of work with the Planning Commission and City Council. (December 2016) 2. City Manager, Staff and Departments to review the needs for RFP, RFQ or RFI process. (January 2017) 3. Advertise (1 month) for retaining a consulting firm. (February-March 2017) 4. Interview consultants and retain one team (1 month). (March-April 2017) 5. Comprehensive Plan process to be completed in approximately 18 months Revisions to the Current Comprehensive Plan Chapter 1 – Introduction • This chapter will need to be completely updated to document the process used in the Comprehensive Plan update, as well as modifications that have occurred to other documents (i.e. Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Regulations, Engineering Design Manual). • Evaluate Section 1.6, what worked, what did not work. Chapter 2 – Development Opportunities and Constraints • Update city limit boundaries, zoning districts and base maps to reflect current data. (1997 plan has data from 1995). • Revised building condition survey in the center of the city. • Are there sections in this chapter that should be deleted (i.e. soils), or sections that need to be added or strengthen? Yes-allow section to remain with updates.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Recording Historic Ships
    GUIDELINES FOR RECORDING HISTORIC SHIPS Third Edition: 2004 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY FOR HABS/HAER/HALS AND THE USE OF OTHER GUIDELINES The legislative authority of HABS/HAER/HALS is the 1935 Historic Sites Act (Public Law 74-292) and the 1966 National Historic Preservation Act (Public Law 89-665), as amended in 1980 (Public Law 96-515). The guidelines should be used in conjunction with: Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering Documentation as published in the Federal Register, Vol. 48, No. 190, Notices, pp. 44730-44734, generally known as HABS/HAER Standards. Recording Historic Structures. John A. Burns, editor. Washington, D.C.: The AIA Press, 1989 HABS/HAER Guidelines: - HABS Historical Reports - HABS/HAER Guidelines: Recording Structures with HABS Measured Drawings (1995) - Historic American Engineering Record Field Instructions (1995) Transmitting HABS/HAER Documentation Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record/Historic American Landscapes Survey, National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW - 2270 Washington, DC 20240 (202) 354-2167 First edition, September 1988. Second edition, September 1994. Third edition, January 2004. Cover: Inboard Profile Ship BALCLUTHA, San Francisco, California HAER No. CA-54 Reduced from portion of original 3/8" scale drawing delineated by Robbyn L. Jackson and Deborah J. Cooper, 1987. National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior GUIDELINES FOR RECORDING HISTORIC SHIPS RICHARD K. ANDERSON, JR. THIRD EDITION 2004 EDITED BY TODD A. CROTEAU HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Moore Dry Dock Company Ships Plans, 1768-1962
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt6d5nf1zx No online items Finding Aid to the Moore Dry Dock Company Ships Plans, 1768-1962, This description was produced by the Historic Documents Department of San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park. Historic Documents Department San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park National Park Service Third Floor, Building E, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Phone: 415-561-7030 Fax: 415-556-3540 Contact Information at: www.nps.gov/safr/historyculture/researchcontact.htm All written inquiries should include your name, mailing address, and telephone numbers. 2007 Finding Aid to the Moore Dry HDC 1065 1 Dock Company Ships Plans, 1768-1962, Finding Aid to the Moore Dry Dock Company ships plans, 1768-1962, Collection Number: HDC 1065 San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park Historic Documents Department San Francisco, California Contact Information: San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park Third Floor, Building E, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Phone: 415-561-7030 Fax: 415-556-3540 All written inquiries should include your name, mailing address, and telephone numbers. Processed by: Mary Gentry Date Completed: 4/4/2008 Encoded by: San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, Historic Documents Department Summary Title: Moore Dry Dock Company ships plans, Date: 1768-1962, Date (bulk): bulk 1916-1954 Collection No: HDC 1065 Creator: Moore Dry Dock Company Moore Shipbuilding Company Moore & Scott Iron Works Extent: 21266 items. Repository: San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park (Calif.) Historic Documents Department Building E, Fort Mason San Francisco, California 94123 Abstract: The Moore Dry Dock Company Ships Plans collection (HDC 1065) consists of naval architecture and marine engineering drawings from the Moore Dry Dock Company of Oakland, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • Introductions to Heritage Assets: Ships and Boats: 1840 to 1950
    Ships and Boats: 1840-1950 Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary Historic England’s Introductions to Heritage Assets (IHAs) are accessible, authoritative, illustrated summaries of what we know about specific types of archaeological site, building, landscape or marine asset. Typically they deal with subjects which lack such a summary. This can either be where the literature is dauntingly voluminous, or alternatively where little has been written. Most often it is the latter, and many IHAs bring understanding of site or building types which are neglected or little understood. Many of these are what might be thought of as ‘new heritage’, that is they date from after the Second World War. This overview looks at ships and boats built after 1840. Principally drawing on archaeological, technological and historical sources, it describes vessels used on English inland and coastal waters and in the open sea. The evidence of wrecks and abandoned vessels is drawn on, as well as extant vessels. Also included is the early development of submarines. This guidance note has been written by Mark Dunkley and edited by Paul Stamper. It is one is of several guidance documents that can be accessed at HistoricEngland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/listing-selection/ihas-buildings/ First published by English Heritage September 2012. This edition published by Historic England July 2016. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated. HistoricEngland.org.uk/advice/ Front cover I K Brunel’s SS Great Britain. © David Noton, used with permission of the
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Adoption and Adaptation in Canada's West Coast Shipyards
    Technology Adoption and Adaptation in Canada’s West Coast Shipyards 1918-1950 Chris Madsen La construction navale a émergé comme une industrie importante dans la province de la Colombie-Britannique au cours de la première moitié du XXème siècle. Les demandes des guerres mondiales, des marchés commerciaux autant étrangers que côtières avec le développement des ports qui y est associé, des relances gouvernementales de l'industrie et des fabriques, ainsi qu'une économie régionale basée sur les commodités, ont influencé les décisions derrière la construction de navires. Les entreprises privées et les responsables des achats du gouvernement ont comparé les progrès réalisés dans la construction navale avec les développements dans d'autres pays maritimes de premier plan, plus particulièrement le Royaume-Uni et les États-Unis. La construction navale en Colombie-Britannique reflète un amalgame de tradition artisanale britannique, la pratique de production nord- américaine, et la psychologie de propriétaires individuels et leur personnel. En conséquence, l'adoption de nouvelles technologies dans cette industrie « moderne » s'est basée sur la perception d'adaptabilité et l'acceptation. Les questions significatives concernaient le choix entre la construction en bois ou en acier, les investissements d'infrastructure à long terme en vertu de la législation sur les subventions pour les cales sèches, la persistance de rivetage par rapport à la soudure pour l'assemblage des coques, la fourniture locale des moteurs de marine et de la machinerie complexe, et la finition appliquée à la construction neuve et aux conversions. Les chantiers navals de taille moyenne de la cote ouest du Canada éprouvaient toujours du mal à se tenir au courant des dernières technologies afin de maintenir une compétitivité et à compenser d'autres limitations qui pèsent sur la construction générale navale en tant qu'une industrie lourde viable.
    [Show full text]
  • Bethlehem Steel Corporation Records 1699
    Bethlehem Steel Corporation records 1699 This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on September 14, 2021. Description is written in: English. Describing Archives: A Content Standard Manuscripts and Archives PO Box 3630 Wilmington, Delaware 19807 [email protected] URL: http://www.hagley.org/library Bethlehem Steel Corporation records 1699 Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Historical Note ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 5 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 6 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Bethlehem Steel Corporation records ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • War Stimulus: the Japanese Threat and Rebirth of the North America Pacific Coast Shipbuilding Industry 1937-46
    War Stimulus: The Japanese Threat and Rebirth of the North America Pacific Coast Shipbuilding Industry 1937-46 Chris Madsen Professor Canadian Forces College and Royal Military College of Canada Sea power and its effective exercise by nations rested upon solid economic, financial, and industrial foundations. In general, national capacity and resources dictated the ability to build and operate fleets of ocean-going ships for military and trade purposes. Machine-age navies, in particular, were by nature technically complex and demanding. Warship construction constantly incorporated changes in technology, design, and production technique, in order to promote efficiency and quality advantage over rivals.1 Interplay between finances, policy, anticipated threat levels, strategy, operational requirements, and tactical employment factored into naval plans and in turn the available number and types of ships. In the first half of the twentieth century, the long lead times and significant budgetary constraints characteristic of naval procurement during peace gave way to the hurried provision of ships, munitions, and ordnance in quantity when money flowed more freely in times of impending crisis and world war. Shipbuilding, a highly cyclical industry, became a major benefactor of enlarged government business geared toward victory. Timely construction of ships for war purposes required sufficient shipbuilding capacity - public and private sector - at the call of procuring authorities.2 New sources of supply in support of this effort grew in geographical areas, either under- utilized or until then deemed non-economical for competitive commercial reasons, for the 1 William M. McBride, Technological Change and the United States Navy, 1865-1945 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Roger D. Lapham Photograph Collection, 1892-1956
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8jm2c1f No online items A guide to the Roger D. Lapham photograph collection, 1892-1956 Processed by: Amy Croft, Spring 2013. San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park Building E, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Phone: 415-561-7030 Fax: 415-556-3540 [email protected] URL: http://www.nps.gov/safr 2013 A guide to the Roger D. Lapham P79-092a (SAFR 23379) 1 photograph collection, 1892-1956 A Guide to the Roger D. Lapham photograph collection P79-092a San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, National Park Service 2013, National Park Service Title: Roger D. Lapham photograph collection Date: 1892-1956 Date (bulk): 1915-1945 Identifier/Call Number: P79-092a (SAFR 23379) Creator: Lapham, Roger D. (Roger Dearborn), 1883-1966 Physical Description: 1328 items. Repository: San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, Historic Documents Department Building E, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Abstract: The Roger D. Lapham photograph collection, 1892-1956, bulk 1915-1945, (SAFR 23379, P79-092a) is comprised mainly of photographs of American-Hawaiian Steamship Company vessels. The collection has been processed to the Item level and is open for use. Physical Location: San Francisco Maritime NHP, Historic Documents Department Language(s): In English. Access This collection is open for use unless otherwise noted. Nitrate negatives are restricted from use. Use-copies can be provided. Glass plate negatives may require special handling by the reference staff. Publication and Use Rights Some material may be copyrighted or restricted. It is the researcher's obligation to determine and satisfy copyright or other case restrictions when publishing or otherwise distributing materials found in the collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Don Denevi Research and Manuscript Collection, 1885-1980
    Don DeNevi Research and Manuscript Collection, 1885-1980 GOGA 17975 Golden Gate National Recreation Area Park Archives and Records Center ATTN: Park Archives and Records Center Presidio of San Francisco Building 201, Fort Mason Building 667 McDowell Ave. San Francisco, CA 94123 San Francisco, CA 94129 [Mailing Address] [Physical Address] www.nps.gov/goga/learn/historyculture Phone: 415-561-2807 Fax: 415-441-1618 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3-5 Golden Gate National Recreation Area .................................................................................... 3 Park Archives and Records Center ....................................................................................... 3-5 Don DeNevi Research and Manuscript Collection ...................................................... 6-21 Scope and Content ...................................................................................................................... 6 Title......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Dates ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Collection Number ................................................................................................................................. 6 Creator ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]