WASH Cluster Working Group Meeting Minutes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WASH Cluster Working Group Meeting Minutes WASH Cluster Working Group Meeting Minutes Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 Time: 3 pm to 4.30 pm (90 minutes) Location: Donetsk United Nations Offices (Polotskaya st., 1a) Agenda: 1. Introduction of participants; 2. Follow up on actions agreed last meeting; 3. Partner updates 4. WASH Cluster Updates a. WASH at EECP. Overview b. Preparation to the winter c. Timeline for HNO-HRP process d. Contingency Plan 5. WASH needs Data Base for VD for 2018 6. AOB. 1. Follow up on actions agreed last meeting: Action points from previous meeting: # Action Points WHO Description 1 WHO to provide their report on WHO Draft of the report is done and will be laboratories workshops. shared among partners as soon as will be finalized 2 Clarify and provide a list of needs UNHCR The needs partially covered, UNHCR will for buckets. determine whether there are still uncovered needs 3 List of requested places for DDC DDC will provide the list of such places to installing water tanks. the next meeting 4 List of schools with problem toilets UNICEF UNICEF will provide the list of schools to the next meeting 2. Partner updates: UNHCR: During the reporting period 40 HH were assisted with NFIs (including buckets and jerry cans)in Yasynuvata, Donetsk, Yelenovka, Sihnalne, Luhanske, Leninske (Novoazovsk rajon). WASH Cluster Working Group Meeting As for CBPs, 3 projects are ongoing and 4 were completed. Repair of shower room at sports school, Donetsk, Kirovskyi district (through DDC, ongoing). Repair of heating system at school 62, Donetsk, Kyibyshevskyi district (through DDC, ongoing). 1 laundry of the kindergarten is being repaired in Horlivka (kindergarten #94, ongoing). Boiler for heating system was installed in Samoilove kindergarten (Novoazovskyi rajon, completed). Water pipes and materials for repair a bathroom at CC in Yasynuvata (completed). Repair of toilets and installation of pipes at school # 6 in Yasynuvata (ongoing). Repair of laundry at Novoazovsk district hospital (ongoing). PIN: has their activities only in LPR. In DPR PIN has solved problems with ‘frozen’ stock of materials for VD. The application for the registration/accreditation in DPR has been submitted. Save the Children: currently, SC doesn’t have any activities in WASH direction. IOM: is in the process of assessment of the social institutions (including but not limited to the medical facilities, IDP centers; territorial and rehabilitation centers) for WASH rehabilitation. All in all, 20 objects in Donetsk, Horlivka, Makeevka, Torez, Khartsyzsk, Shakhtersk, Novoazovsk, Snezhnoe, Debaltsevo and other locations are now being considered and assessed. OHCHR: continue their monitoring of the situation. In the middle September OHCHR produced their report #19, where WASH theme will be mentioned. ICRC: continue their support to VD. ICRC consider issues at small vodocanals. ICRC also was presented as monitoring mission during the process of repairing pipe between Horlivka and Toretsk in a ‘Grey Zone’. DDC: has their project with Save the Children; with MSF distribute hygiene kits for social institutions. DDC also has projects with UNICEF and MOST. Continue working with UNHCR in repairing project of water system and with IOM in assessment of the projects. WHO: monitoring the situation with quality of the water. Cases of Cholera Disease have not been confirmed. Coxsackievirus virus was registered in single cases, which do not exceed the epidemic threshold. WHO continue to monitor process of laboratories assessment of the water quality. WHO is in position of waiting for confirmation budgeting and its amount. WHO will continue their assessment (depend of Budget). OCHA: will share the Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP) Mid-Year Review (MYR) report. UNICEF: is working on a Water Risk Assessment (WRA) in Luhanska oblast. Equipment for water treatment was installed in 2008 – 2011. Some of them, in the amount of 15 units are needed to be repaired/replaced – after 15 September, representative of the company, who was owner of these filter stations will share the list of needs/spare parts with UNICEF. 3. WASH Cluster Updates a. WASH at EECP. Overview WASH Cluster took part in the joint observation mission to Exit/Entrance Checkpoints in Donetska GCA oblast, namely EECP Hnutove, EECP Novotroitske, EECP Mariinka and EECP Maiorske. Representatives from WASH Cluster: • Stas Dymkovskyy, WASH Cluster IMO; • Mathieu VERNUSSE, head of PUI mission in Ukraine; • Andrii Solonenko, WASH Monitor, UNICEF; • Other representatives of INGOs and Oblast administration. Dates for the visits: 22-23 August 2017. WASH Cluster will share with partners report soon. (till 22 September). b. Preparation to the winter FSL and Shelter Clusters are planning a special donor meeting on winterization issue, with participation by WASH. WASH Cluster is planning to raise the centralized heating issue and connected potential risks. Among hot spots, WASH Cluster is planning to highlights next settlements: Toretsk, Avdiivka, Pokrovsk (and settlements on the same water pipeline as Pokrovsk), Volnovakha, Lysychansk, Mariupol. Also several WASH Cluster Working Group Meeting settlements which are connected to the Karbonit system from Luhansk NGCA side (Kirovsk, Pervomaisk and Stakhanov). WASH Cluster prepared a new Bulletin, where partners can find detailed info about identified risky locations. We encourage all partners visit WASH Cluster web site, where they can find the last issue of Bulletin and many other useful information: https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ukraine/water-sanitation- and-hygiene c. Timeline for HNO-HRP process The Inter Cluster Coordination Group (ICCG) is in the process of discussion of a 1 or 2-years Humanitarian response Plan (HRP) for the next humanitarian cycle. The next meeting ICCG will be focused on this issue also. In case, of 2-years HRP, there will be a recovery/development component and the modality of coordinate would need to be addressed. WASH Cluster would also follow up with UNDP regarding the interface between development projects and transitional-style programming, for example. d. Contingency Plan WASH Cluster has prepared Version 9 of Contingency plans, which provide the general overview of flare-ups follow by different scenarios. An international mission of experts are coming to Ukraine to help updating the 2015 interagency Contingency Plan: experts from UNICEF, WHO, FAO and OCHA.The mission will be in Ukraine for 17-21th Sept. 2017. On 19th Sept is planned an extended workshop for Contingency planning…this is not expected to be extremely large (so limited participation) to help the productivity of discussions 4. WASH needs Data Base for VD for 2018 WASH Cluster is going to create similar to the last year Needs database for 2018, where you can find the main needed projects and materials for ensuring stable operation of water bulk supply system in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. 5. AOB. Action points for the next meeting: # Action Points WHO Deadline 1 WHO to provide their report on WHO ASAP laboratories workshops. 2 Clarify and provide a list of needs for buckets (for store drinking UNHCR ASAP water). 3 WASH Cluster will share EECP WASH 22/09/17 Report Cluster 4 List of requested places for DDC ASAP installing water tanks. 5 List of schools with problem toilets UNICEF ASAP 6 To clarify the possibility of arranging visits to CPs (NGCA) to observe a OCHA ASAP humanitarian situation WASH Cluster Working Group Meeting .
Recommended publications
  • Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
    Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 10 Protection Cluster Fact
    UKRAINE OCTOBER 2017 THE PROTECTION CLUSTER INCLUDES SUB-CLUSTERS ON CHILD PROTECTION, GENDER BASED VIOLENCE AND MINE ACTION © R2P / EECP 'Novotroytske' PROTECTION CONCERNS . Security situation: In October 2017, OHCHR recorded 24 conflict-related civilian casualties: 5 killed and 19 injured. In October, mine-related incidents accounted for almost 67% of civilian PROTECTION CLUSTER CONTACTS casualties. Anna Rich, Protection Cluster Coordinator, . Mine Action: On October 16, a man was injured by a tripwire mine explosion in NGCA near [email protected] Mayorsk checkpoint, while trying to cross the contact line outside of the designated area. On Sadaqat Shah Roghani, Child Protection Sub October 16, another civilian was injured by the detonation of a tripwire mine near Zaytseve Cluster Coordinator [email protected] (Donetsk region, GCA). In October, one civilian was injured when his farming tractor hit an Olena Kochemyrovska, GBV Sub Cluster unknown explosive object in Slovianoserbsk (Luhansk region, NGCA). Coordinator, [email protected] . Freedom of movement: People were not able to obtain or extended electronic permits for Martin Oubrecht, Mine Action Sub Cluster crossing of the contact line for several weeks in October, as the electronic database of the Coordinator, [email protected] Security Service of Ukraine was under maintenance. Mykhailo Verych, Age and Disability TWG . Child protection: Children in a number of settlements along the contact line continue having Coordinator, [email protected] limited access to education. 350 children have not been able to attend school in October in Olena Lukaniuk, House, Land and Property Ocheretyne village (Donetsk region, GCA), as repairs of the school have not been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Places of Illegal Detention
    EASTERN-UKRAINIAN CENTER FOR CIVIC INITIATIVES PLACES OF ILLEGAL DETENTION IN EASTERN UKRAINE DURING THE MILITARY CONFLICT HDIM WARSAW 2016 AUTHORS Volodymyr Shcherbachenko Ganna Ianova Olexandr Pavlichenko "JUSTICE FOR PEACE IN DONBAS" COALITION The Coalition was established in December 2014 and includes 17 NGOs, mainly from the Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Luhansk. The Coalition members are: Alchevsk Human Rights Analytical Centre, Centre for Civil Liberties / Euromaidan SOS, Civic Organization “Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group,” Donbas SOS, Donetsk "Memorial," Eastern-Ukrainian Centre for Civic Initiatives, Ecological and Cultural Centre “Bakhmat,” Human Rights Centre “Postup” / Vostok SOS, Luhansk Regional Human Rights Centre “Alternative,” Luhansk Rights Defence Group, Public Committee for Protection of Constitutional Rights and Freedoms of Citizens, Public Movement “Ochyshchennya,” Public Organization “Mirny bereg,” “Social Action” Centre NGO, Starobilsk District Public Human Rights Women’s Organization “Victoria,” Starobilsk Public Organization CONTEXT he armed conflict in Eastern Ukraine led to numerous gross and systemic violations of human rights on the territory of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, in particular the establishment of a network of illegal T detention places by Ukrainian army and Russia-backed separatists. International human rights law and international humanitarian law prohibit arbitrary detention.1 Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, applicable in both international and non-international armed
    [Show full text]
  • Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key Figures
    Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key figures In need In need coverage (total) (priority) (existing programmes) HHs in private Donetsk obl. 3,150 committed houses and + 37,126 HHs 5,500 apartments Luhansk obl. 2,350 gap GCA Indiv. in CCs committed and Social All Ukraine 7,700 Ind 7,700 Institutions 7,700 gap 5,531* gap 6,000 committed Donetsk obl. 33,500 HHs 14,603 HHs in private 8,603 gap houses and 2,500 committed apartments Luhansk obl. 20,700 HHs 9,000 NGCA 6,500 gap 11,347 committed Indiv. in non- Donetsk obl. 30,900 ind NA specialized CCs 19,553 gap and Social NA committed Luhansk obl. 19,100 ind NA Institutions NA gap 23,182* gap * Note: # of individuals in CCs and social institutions were divided by Cluster coefficient of 2.42 in order to get the final number in HHs Contents 1. Winterization context and objectives .............................................................................................. 2 2. Key recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 2 3. Winterization beneficiary prioritization ........................................................................................... 4 4. Heating ............................................................................................................................................. 6 (a) GCA ........................................................................................................................................... 6 (b) NGCA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH Only
    FSC.DEL/32/15 18 February 2015 ENGLISH only Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the 780-th FSC Plenary Meeting (18 February 2015 at 10.00, Hofburg) Mr. Chairman, The agreements reached in Minsk in September 2014 and February 2015 must be fully implemented, and no action should be taken that would run contrary to the letter and spirit of these agreements. For its part, Ukraine strictly adheres to the implementation of these agreements as this is the only possible way towards the peaceful resolution in Donbas. In strict compliance with the agreement, reached in Minsk on 12 February 2015, the Ukrainian forces ceased fire along the entire line of contact since 00.00 hrs of 15 February. We proceed from understanding that achieving sustainable and comprehensive ceasefire would be a crucial step towards full implementation of the Minsk agreements of 5 and 19 September 2014 as well as the “Package of Measures” of 12 February 2015. Regrettably, despite the certain decrease of hostilities, the situation in Donbas remains very tense and numerous violations of the ceasefire on the side of the pro-Russian militants have been registered. The total number of violations of the ceasefire by the illegal armed groups over 15 February reached 164. Just on the first day of the ceasefire, Ukrainian positions around Debaltseve were shelled with mortars, artillery and MRLS 88 times. The militants also used tanks to attack the Ukrainian forces. The militants claimed in public that the Minsk agreements, in their opinion, did not relate to the situation around Debaltseve and declared that they would continue attacking the city for they have a “right to shell at Debaltseve as it is their own territory”.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation in Ukraine
    COMMUNICATION SUBMITTED UNDER ARTICLE 15 OF THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT SITUATION IN UKRAINE: WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY COMMITTED IN PRISONS SEIZED AND CONTROLLED BY ANTI-GOVERNMENT FORCES September 2020 TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS ATO Anti-Terrorist Operation CF Correctional Facility DPR Donetsk Peoples’ Republic ECHR European Convention on Human Rights ECtHR European Court of Human Rights FIDH International Federation for Human Rights IAC International Armed Conflict ICC International Criminal Court ICTY International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia KHPG Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group LPR Luhansk Peoples’ Republic NIAC Non-International Armed Conflict PTDC Pre Trial Detention Centre SBU Ukrainian State Security UAF Ukrainian Armed Forces The preparation and elaboration of this FIDH-KHPG Communication were made possible thanks to the support of the United Nations Development Programme in Ukraine, International Renaissance Foundation, the European Commission, Open Society Foundations, National Endowment for Democracy (United States), the Democracy Commission of the United States Embassy in Ukraine, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of FIDH and KHPG and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the aforementioned supporting institutions. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of abbreviations 2 I. Introduction 4 II. Executive Summary 6 III. Filing Parties 9 IV. Methodology 12 V. Factual Background 17 A. Outbreak of Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine 17 B. Ukrainian Prisons in Donetsk and Luhansk Provinces Prior 24 to the Outbreak of Armed Conflict C. Impact of the Outbreak of Armed Conflict on Prisoners in 24 Eastern Ukraine D.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel Liberman Research Director Brookline, MA Katrina A. Krzysztofiak Laura Raybin Miller Program Manager Pembroke Pines, FL Patricia Hoglund Vincent Obsitnik Administrative Officer McLean, VA 888 17th Street, N.W., Suite 1160 Washington, DC 20006 Ph: ( 202) 254-3824 Fax: ( 202) 254-3934 E-mail: [email protected] May 30, 2005 Message from the Chairman One of the principal missions that United States law assigns the Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad is to identify and report on cemeteries, monuments, and historic buildings in Central and Eastern Europe associated with the cultural heritage of U.S. citizens, especially endangered sites. The Congress and the President were prompted to establish the Commission because of the special problem faced by Jewish sites in the region: The communities that had once cared for the properties were annihilated during the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Country Office
    Ukraine Country Office Humanitarian Situation Report No. 2/2021 UNICEF/2021/Filippov Situation in Numbers Reporting Period: 1 January – 30 June 2021 Highlights 510,000 children in need of Following a relative calm second half of 2020, ceasefire violations notably intensified in the first half of 2021, with significant deterioration of the overall security situation. Until May 1, the humanitarian assistance UN recorded 39 civilian casualties which was 22 per cent higher than the previous four months (32 casualties). Active armed clashes along the Line of Contact (LoC) also resulted in damages to schools and health facility. As a result, the humanitarian community, including UNICEF, 3,400,000 people launched a contingency plan to prepare for any possible escalation. in need (HRP, Jan 2021) The COVID-19 pandemic continued to generate an additional burden on the economy and healthcare services. From March to June, Ukraine experienced a third wave of the pandemic outbreak, resulting in strict lockdowns across the country and in some parts of eastern Ukraine. 189,000 Ukraine’s national vaccination campaign remained slow, with less than two million of its adult Internally displaced people in population being fully vaccinated as of 29 July. The access to the non-government-controlled need (IDPs, HRP, Jan 2021) areas (NGCA) remained a major challenge for the humanitarian community from the start of the pandemic. In the first half of 2021, UNICEF received USD 9 million, out of a USD 14.7 million appeal. The health, education and HIV/AIDS programmes remain largely under-funded. UNICEF Appeal 2021 US$ 14.7 million UNICEF’s Response and Funding Status Funding status 68% Funding status 100% Funding status 100% Funding status 69% Funding status 31% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs The ongoing hostilities continued to affect schools and hospitals along the Line of Conflict (LoC) in eastern Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • THEMATIC REPORT SMM Facilitation and Monitoring of Infrastructure
    - 1 - THEMATIC REPORT SMM facilitation and monitoring of infrastructure repair in eastern Ukraine January 2017 – August 2018 December 2018 15362/18mf Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2018 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm Table of Contents Summary: Infrastructure in context ...................................................................................................... - 1 - Political framework for facilitation of infrastructure repair ............................................................... - 2 - Working Group on Security Issues (WGSI) .................................................................................... - 2 - Joint Centre for Control and Co-ordination (JCCC) ..................................................................... - 3 - SMM support for infrastructure maintenance and repair in eastern Ukraine ..................................... - 3 - Overall SMM operational contributions ........................................................................................ - 3 - Water supply in Donetsk region ..................................................................................................... - 5 - Electricity supply
    [Show full text]
  • Putin's Next Objectives in the Ukraine Crisis
    HUGO SPAULDING BACKGROUNDER FEBRUARY 3, 2015 PUTIN’S NEXT OBJECTIVES IN THE UKRAINE CRISIS Russia’s campaign in eastern Ukraine has reached an inflection point. Five months after signing a ceasefire agreement, Russian and separatist forces have moved from a preparation phase to a maneuver offensive launched by the separatist victory at the Donetsk airport on January 21, 2015. This new phase of the conflict presents a fresh set of operational decision points for the governments in Moscow and Kyiv. Will Russian- backed forces stop at the boundaries of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts [Provinces] and consolidate their gains? Will they seize Mariupol and then drive west to build a land-corridor to Crimea? Or will they prepare for much larger battles to take the pivotal cities of Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk, and Zaporizhia, whose capture would put the survival of the Ukrainian state in grave doubt? Will the Kyiv government commit reserves to defend against any of these contingencies? These decisions, much like the decision to seize the airport, will shed light on Moscow’s strategic objectives in Ukraine and Kyiv’s capacity to withstand them. They will also shape the evolution and quite possibly the outcome of this war. RUSSIAN OBJECTIVES IN KYIV Russia’s strategic interest in controlling Ukrainian political may well be reluctant to undertake it. Unless he can either affairs reflects Russian President Vladimir Putin’s belief in achieve his goals by means short of conquest or be persuaded the need to maintain a buffer between NATO, the European to accept lesser objectives, he is likely to be planning for and Union, and Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Ukraine
    UKRAINE - Eastern Ukraine Flow Diagram of Cross Contact Line Movement (NGCA to GCA) For Humanitarian Use Only (among permanent residents of NGCA) Production date: April 04, 2020 Other oblasts Donetsk oblast Luhansk oblast Note: Bilovodsk Data, designations and boundaries Sieverodonetsk contained on this map are not warranted to be error-free Stanytsia Luhanska and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, associates, and donors mentioned on this product. Sloviansk Stanytsia Luhanska Bakhmut Kramatorsk Kharkiv Luhansk Luhansk Data was collected at EECPs from Kyiv Zaitseve City January 9th till February 24, 2020 Kostiantynivka Luhansk Center Luhansk in time period from 8am till 3pm West by stratified random sampling with 95% confidence level and Kadiivka Kadiivka Sorokyne Dnipro oblast 5% margin of error. Mayorsk Brianka Debaltseve Area of origin/destination settlement Alchevsk citation frequency was weighted Lutuhyne using total number of EECP Yenakiieve crossings as reported by UNHCR Rovenky (as of January and February 2020). Pokrovsk Donetsk Antratsyt Myrnohrad North The diagram displays only Horlivka Khrustalnyi Selydove NGCA to GCA routes, as reported Luhansk by respondents permanently Dnipro South residing in NGCA. Makiivka Interviews were conducted on official EECPs. Marinka Kurakhove Donetsk Donetsk Khartsyzk Current flow diagram can be used City East Marinka Chystiakove only for qualitative analysis. Vuhledar Snizhne Amvrosiivka Donetsk Proportion of respondents Zaporizhzhia oblast Novotroitske reporting a settlement Funded by: Implemented with: Novotroitske as their area of origin/destination: Volnovakha 5% Docuchaievsk 10% 15% 20% Respondents interviewed at (EECP): Stanytsia Luhanska Donetsk Russian Federation Mayorsk South Marinka Data sources Cross contact line movement data: Novotroitske Right to Protection, UNHCR Hnutove Contact: Hnutove Direction of the depicted [email protected] cross-contact line movement Mariupol Novoazovsk GCA NGCA Contact line Sea of Azov.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the 822Nd FSC Plenary Meeting Mr. Chairman, in the Past Month the Combined Russian-Sep
    FSC.DEL/112/16 8 June 2016 ENGLISH only Permanent Mission of Ukraine to the International Organizations in Vienna Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the 822nd FSC Plenary Meeting (8 June 2016 at 10.00, Hofburg) (Agenda item 2) Mr. Chairman, In the past month the combined Russian-separatist forces in Donbas provoked hostilities at the level not seen this year. The disregard by Russia and its proxies for undertaken international commitments bears deadly and bloody consequences. Last month registered the highest toll of casualties among Ukrainian servicemen since August 2015. 28 soldiers were killed and 98 wounded. Apart from shellings and provocations, the illegal armed formations intensified their subversive activities, attacking Ukrainian units or mining the roads in the government controlled areas. Ukraine condemns the use by the militants of cynical practice of shellings from the residential areas, which was witnessed many times in the past and is recently again reported by the SMM. On 30 May the SMM informed about number of the residents of Kuibyshevskyi district of the Donetsk city where militants fired from nearby areas before withdrawing their weapons soon after. Image of a battle tank placed between residential houses, made by the SMM UAV over the militant-controlled areas near Zaitseve, is a conspicuous evidence of disregard for the Minsk agreements and for the security of the local population. In the report of 3 June the SMM registered accounts of residents in the town of Debaltseve pointing out that the Russia- backed militants shell from residential areas to provoke response of the Ukrainian forces.
    [Show full text]