DOCSLIB.ORG

KRAMATORSK FOOD SECURITY CLUSTER Meeting – 17Th March 2016 UN Common Premises Contact: [email protected] AGENDA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KRAMATORSK FOOD SECURITY CLUSTER Meeting – 17Th March 2016 UN Common Premises Contact: Info.Ukraine@Fscluster.Org AGENDA KRAMATORSK FOOD SECURITY CLUSTER Meeting – 17th March 2016 UN common premises Contact: [email protected] AGENDA - Follow up on previous meeting minutes; - Cluster structure; - Reporting tools briefing; - Achievements February 2016; - AOB PREVIOUS MINUTES(1/3) • meetings to take place every 2 weeks in Kramatorsk: wednesdays • Lead agencies: WFP and FAO • Organizations to share plans • DRC: March 2016 • ACF: March 2016 • WFP: March 2016 • PU-AMI: April 2016 • SCI: March 2016 • Red Cross and Save Ukraine plans up to Feb 2016 • Organizations to share Actuals before the 10th of the following month • WFP Organizations need to report • ACF that they did nothing: • PIN • FAO ENGAGEMENT PREVIOUS MINUTES(2/3) • Focal persons Organization Name Name Surname Premiere-Urgence/ Aide Medicale Internationale Sandrine Chapeleau Action contre le famme Viktor Avtonomov Save the Children International Marvin JURAO Ukraine Red Cross Society Nikolay Nagornyy Rinat Akhmetov Foundation (FDU-RAF) Rzayeva Evgeniya Save Ukraine Natalya Belyaeva Help Age Sinead McGrath Mercy Corps Stuart Willcuts Mercy Corps Oksana Mikitenko IASC GenCAP April Phalm French Red Cross Susanna Mnatsakanova Polish Humanitarian Action (PAU) Stanislav Pidperygora Turbote Galyna Poliakova ADRA Ukraine Larisa Kobzarenko People In Need (PIN) Paul Thibault NGO Forum Nino Zhvania Hungarian Interchurch Aid Vita Nesterenko DRC Isla Fraser IFRC Bilal Hussain Shah All-Ukrainian Charity “Child Well-Being Fund Ukraine” Tetiana Khomutinina Action contre le famme Olena Budagovska PREVIOUS MINUTES(3/3) • Working Groups: Assessments, Agriculture. Cash Task Force • ToR: – “Be proactive in exchanging information and reporting, highlight needs, gaps, and duplication, mobilize resources (financial, human, material), engage with affected communities and build local capacity.” – “Share responsibility for FS Cluster activities, including assessing needs, developing plans, and developing policies and guidelines through working groups.” – “Work as a team.” Next Steps • How to report to cluster? • Assessments • Develop policies • What do YOU expect from the Cluster? CLUSTER STRUCTURE • Meetings in Slaviansk or Kramatorsk? • Partners working in Mariupol • Sub national focal point • ToR • 2016 Strategy: – HRP + non HRP + Private – Objectives: 1.- Ensure immediate access to food 553,000 individuals 2.- Livelihood assistance and food production 43,000 households REPORTING TOOLS Starting point • Organizations plans and reporting: DRC,WFP, ACF, PIN, FAO, PU-AMI,SCI, URCS, Save Ukraine. • Trained organizations: – ADRA, Child Well Being Fund, FAO, ICRC, IRD, PIN, PU-AMI, TPL, SCI, URCS, UNDP. • Reporting tool: 3 Ws Proposal • Move online • Train partners FEBRUARY INTERVENTIONS Summary of interventions February 2016 Access to food Livelihoods (individuals) (households) Donetsk 96,095 2,003 Luhansk 38,219 0 TOTAL 134,314 2,003 Cluster Members Responses for February 2016 - Donetsk Donetsk Improved Access to Livelihood Investment Rayon food (individuals) (households) Amvrosiivskyi 9 036 1 050 Avdiivka 1 123 Bakhmut (Artemivsk) 2 289 Dobropillia 964 Dokuchaievsk 1 249 Donetsk 3 234 Druzhkivka 1 241 Dymytrov 1 230 Dzerzhynska 312 465 Horlivka 1 536 Khartsyzk 5 904 Kirovske 3 000 Kostiantynivka 1 593 Kostiantynivskyi 517 Kramatorsk 2 135 Krasnoarmiisk 2 475 Krasnoarmiiska 995 Improved Access to Food: GFD, unconditional cash, Food Donetsk Improved Access to Livelihood Investment Rayon food (individuals) (households) Krasnolymanska 117 Krasnolymanskyi 26 Lyman (Krasnyi Lyman) 2 176 Makiivka 7 928 Mariupol 5 745 Novoazovskyi 1 293 Pershotravnevyi 2 481 Shakhtarsk 2 074 Shakhtarskyi 2 687 Slovianska 1 047 Slovyansk 2 984 Snizhne 3 750 Starobeshivskyi 5 800 Telmanivskyi 3 106 Toretsk (Dzerzhynsk) 3 597 Torez 2 879 Volnovaskyi 1 280 684 Yasynuvata 750 Yasynuvatskyi 531 Yenakiieve 3 719 Zhdanivka 3 292 Cluster Members Responses for February 2016 - Luhansk Luhansk Improved Access Rayon to food Alchevsk 894 Bilokurakynskyi 398 Bilovodskyi 201 Brianka 73 Krasnodon 34 Krasnyi Luch 27 Kreminskyi 411 Luhansk 529 Lutuhynskyi 143 Lysychansk 2 952 Markivskyi 570 Milovskyi 70 Novoaidarskyi 1 788 Novopskovskyi 528 Perevalskyi 715 Cluster Members Responses for February 2016 - Luhansk Luhansk Improved Access Rayon Pervomaisk 1 586to food Popasnianskyi 14 829 Rovenky 400 Rubizhne 231 Sievierodonetsk 3 808 Sievierodonetska 2 000 Slovyanoserbskyi 133 Stakhanov 31 Stanychno-Luhanskyi 2 402 Starobilskyi 354 Svativskyi 2 119 Sverdlovsk 829 Troitskyi 164 MAP AOB • ….
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine
    ENTERING THE GREY-ZONE: Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine civiliansinconflict.org i RECOGNIZE. PREVENT. PROTECT. AMEND. PROTECT. PREVENT. RECOGNIZE. Cover: June 4, 2013, Spartak, Ukraine: June 2021 Unexploded ordnances in Eastern Ukraine continue to cause harm to civilians. T +1 202 558 6958 E [email protected] civiliansinconflict.org ORGANIZATIONAL MISSION AND VISION Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) is an international organization dedicated to promoting the protection of civilians in conflict. CIVIC envisions a world in which no civilian is harmed in conflict. Our mission is to support communities affected by conflict in their quest for protection and strengthen the resolve and capacity of armed actors to prevent and respond to civilian harm. CIVIC was established in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a young humanitarian who advocated on behalf of civilians affected by the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Honoring Marla’s legacy, CIVIC has kept an unflinching focus on the protection of civilians in conflict. Today, CIVIC has a presence in conflict zones and key capitals throughout the world where it collaborates with civilians to bring their protection concerns directly to those in power, engages with armed actors to reduce the harm they cause to civilian populations, and advises governments and multinational bodies on how to make life-saving and lasting policy changes. CIVIC’s strength is its proven approach and record of improving protection outcomes for civilians by working directly with conflict-affected communities and armed actors. At CIVIC, we believe civilians are not “collateral damage” and civilian harm is not an unavoidable consequence of conflict—civilian harm can and must be prevented.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid WASH and Infrastructure Assessment in Non-Government Controlled Areas of Eastern Ukraine
    ` A Rapid WASH and Infrastructure Assessment in Non-Government Controlled Areas of Eastern Ukraine August, 2015 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This assessment was commissioned by UNICEF, with data collected remotely by REACH in July 2015 from key informants at water, health, and education facilities as well as from affected communities. Thanks go to all those individuals and organisations who contributed towards this assessment, including the Global WASH Cluster who contributed to the final analysis and drafting. REACH is a joint initiative of IMPACT, its sister organisation ACTED, and the United Nations Operational Satellite Applications Programme (UNOSAT). REACH facilitates the development of information tools and products that enhance the capacity of aid actors to make evidence-based decisions. For more information, write to [email protected], visit www.reach-intiative.org and follow us @REACH_info. Cover photo: Delivery of drinking water to Debaltseve, Donetsk Oblast, March 2015, ©UNICEF i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Conflict has been ongoing in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts since May 2014, with spikes of violence in June 2014 and again in January-February and in July 2015. Attempts to negotiate a political solution to the conflict led to the ‘Minsk’ ceasefire signed between the Governments of Ukraine, Russian Federation and the non-state actors in September 2014. However, the truce collapsed within days, similar to a new ceasefire agreement signed in February 2015. Relative calm around the Contact Line (CL) has ensued since September 2015, however, the situation remains fragile given lack of trust between the parties to the conflict. From the end of 2014, Ukrainian legislation has restricted freedom of moment of both people and goods, in addition to the cessation of salary and pension payments in the non-governmental controlled areas (NGCAs), increasing hardship for local populations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 10 Protection Cluster Fact
    UKRAINE OCTOBER 2017 THE PROTECTION CLUSTER INCLUDES SUB-CLUSTERS ON CHILD PROTECTION, GENDER BASED VIOLENCE AND MINE ACTION © R2P / EECP 'Novotroytske' PROTECTION CONCERNS . Security situation: In October 2017, OHCHR recorded 24 conflict-related civilian casualties: 5 killed and 19 injured. In October, mine-related incidents accounted for almost 67% of civilian PROTECTION CLUSTER CONTACTS casualties. Anna Rich, Protection Cluster Coordinator, . Mine Action: On October 16, a man was injured by a tripwire mine explosion in NGCA near [email protected] Mayorsk checkpoint, while trying to cross the contact line outside of the designated area. On Sadaqat Shah Roghani, Child Protection Sub October 16, another civilian was injured by the detonation of a tripwire mine near Zaytseve Cluster Coordinator [email protected] (Donetsk region, GCA). In October, one civilian was injured when his farming tractor hit an Olena Kochemyrovska, GBV Sub Cluster unknown explosive object in Slovianoserbsk (Luhansk region, NGCA). Coordinator, [email protected] . Freedom of movement: People were not able to obtain or extended electronic permits for Martin Oubrecht, Mine Action Sub Cluster crossing of the contact line for several weeks in October, as the electronic database of the Coordinator, [email protected] Security Service of Ukraine was under maintenance. Mykhailo Verych, Age and Disability TWG . Child protection: Children in a number of settlements along the contact line continue having Coordinator, [email protected] limited access to education. 350 children have not been able to attend school in October in Olena Lukaniuk, House, Land and Property Ocheretyne village (Donetsk region, GCA), as repairs of the school have not been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Places of Illegal Detention
    EASTERN-UKRAINIAN CENTER FOR CIVIC INITIATIVES PLACES OF ILLEGAL DETENTION IN EASTERN UKRAINE DURING THE MILITARY CONFLICT HDIM WARSAW 2016 AUTHORS Volodymyr Shcherbachenko Ganna Ianova Olexandr Pavlichenko "JUSTICE FOR PEACE IN DONBAS" COALITION The Coalition was established in December 2014 and includes 17 NGOs, mainly from the Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Luhansk. The Coalition members are: Alchevsk Human Rights Analytical Centre, Centre for Civil Liberties / Euromaidan SOS, Civic Organization “Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group,” Donbas SOS, Donetsk "Memorial," Eastern-Ukrainian Centre for Civic Initiatives, Ecological and Cultural Centre “Bakhmat,” Human Rights Centre “Postup” / Vostok SOS, Luhansk Regional Human Rights Centre “Alternative,” Luhansk Rights Defence Group, Public Committee for Protection of Constitutional Rights and Freedoms of Citizens, Public Movement “Ochyshchennya,” Public Organization “Mirny bereg,” “Social Action” Centre NGO, Starobilsk District Public Human Rights Women’s Organization “Victoria,” Starobilsk Public Organization CONTEXT he armed conflict in Eastern Ukraine led to numerous gross and systemic violations of human rights on the territory of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, in particular the establishment of a network of illegal T detention places by Ukrainian army and Russia-backed separatists. International human rights law and international humanitarian law prohibit arbitrary detention.1 Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, applicable in both international and non-international armed
    [Show full text]
  • Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key Figures
    Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key figures In need In need coverage (total) (priority) (existing programmes) HHs in private Donetsk obl. 3,150 committed houses and + 37,126 HHs 5,500 apartments Luhansk obl. 2,350 gap GCA Indiv. in CCs committed and Social All Ukraine 7,700 Ind 7,700 Institutions 7,700 gap 5,531* gap 6,000 committed Donetsk obl. 33,500 HHs 14,603 HHs in private 8,603 gap houses and 2,500 committed apartments Luhansk obl. 20,700 HHs 9,000 NGCA 6,500 gap 11,347 committed Indiv. in non- Donetsk obl. 30,900 ind NA specialized CCs 19,553 gap and Social NA committed Luhansk obl. 19,100 ind NA Institutions NA gap 23,182* gap * Note: # of individuals in CCs and social institutions were divided by Cluster coefficient of 2.42 in order to get the final number in HHs Contents 1. Winterization context and objectives .............................................................................................. 2 2. Key recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 2 3. Winterization beneficiary prioritization ........................................................................................... 4 4. Heating ............................................................................................................................................. 6 (a) GCA ........................................................................................................................................... 6 (b) NGCA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Situation in Ukraine
    COMMUNICATION SUBMITTED UNDER ARTICLE 15 OF THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT SITUATION IN UKRAINE: WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY COMMITTED IN PRISONS SEIZED AND CONTROLLED BY ANTI-GOVERNMENT FORCES September 2020 TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS ATO Anti-Terrorist Operation CF Correctional Facility DPR Donetsk Peoples’ Republic ECHR European Convention on Human Rights ECtHR European Court of Human Rights FIDH International Federation for Human Rights IAC International Armed Conflict ICC International Criminal Court ICTY International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia KHPG Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group LPR Luhansk Peoples’ Republic NIAC Non-International Armed Conflict PTDC Pre Trial Detention Centre SBU Ukrainian State Security UAF Ukrainian Armed Forces The preparation and elaboration of this FIDH-KHPG Communication were made possible thanks to the support of the United Nations Development Programme in Ukraine, International Renaissance Foundation, the European Commission, Open Society Foundations, National Endowment for Democracy (United States), the Democracy Commission of the United States Embassy in Ukraine, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of FIDH and KHPG and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the aforementioned supporting institutions. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of abbreviations 2 I. Introduction 4 II. Executive Summary 6 III. Filing Parties 9 IV. Methodology 12 V. Factual Background 17 A. Outbreak of Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine 17 B. Ukrainian Prisons in Donetsk and Luhansk Provinces Prior 24 to the Outbreak of Armed Conflict C. Impact of the Outbreak of Armed Conflict on Prisoners in 24 Eastern Ukraine D.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel Liberman Research Director Brookline, MA Katrina A. Krzysztofiak Laura Raybin Miller Program Manager Pembroke Pines, FL Patricia Hoglund Vincent Obsitnik Administrative Officer McLean, VA 888 17th Street, N.W., Suite 1160 Washington, DC 20006 Ph: ( 202) 254-3824 Fax: ( 202) 254-3934 E-mail: [email protected] May 30, 2005 Message from the Chairman One of the principal missions that United States law assigns the Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad is to identify and report on cemeteries, monuments, and historic buildings in Central and Eastern Europe associated with the cultural heritage of U.S. citizens, especially endangered sites. The Congress and the President were prompted to establish the Commission because of the special problem faced by Jewish sites in the region: The communities that had once cared for the properties were annihilated during the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • THEMATIC REPORT SMM Facilitation and Monitoring of Infrastructure
    - 1 - THEMATIC REPORT SMM facilitation and monitoring of infrastructure repair in eastern Ukraine January 2017 – August 2018 December 2018 15362/18mf Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2018 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm Table of Contents Summary: Infrastructure in context ...................................................................................................... - 1 - Political framework for facilitation of infrastructure repair ............................................................... - 2 - Working Group on Security Issues (WGSI) .................................................................................... - 2 - Joint Centre for Control and Co-ordination (JCCC) ..................................................................... - 3 - SMM support for infrastructure maintenance and repair in eastern Ukraine ..................................... - 3 - Overall SMM operational contributions ........................................................................................ - 3 - Water supply in Donetsk region ..................................................................................................... - 5 - Electricity supply
    [Show full text]
  • Putin's Next Objectives in the Ukraine Crisis
    HUGO SPAULDING BACKGROUNDER FEBRUARY 3, 2015 PUTIN’S NEXT OBJECTIVES IN THE UKRAINE CRISIS Russia’s campaign in eastern Ukraine has reached an inflection point. Five months after signing a ceasefire agreement, Russian and separatist forces have moved from a preparation phase to a maneuver offensive launched by the separatist victory at the Donetsk airport on January 21, 2015. This new phase of the conflict presents a fresh set of operational decision points for the governments in Moscow and Kyiv. Will Russian- backed forces stop at the boundaries of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts [Provinces] and consolidate their gains? Will they seize Mariupol and then drive west to build a land-corridor to Crimea? Or will they prepare for much larger battles to take the pivotal cities of Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk, and Zaporizhia, whose capture would put the survival of the Ukrainian state in grave doubt? Will the Kyiv government commit reserves to defend against any of these contingencies? These decisions, much like the decision to seize the airport, will shed light on Moscow’s strategic objectives in Ukraine and Kyiv’s capacity to withstand them. They will also shape the evolution and quite possibly the outcome of this war. RUSSIAN OBJECTIVES IN KYIV Russia’s strategic interest in controlling Ukrainian political may well be reluctant to undertake it. Unless he can either affairs reflects Russian President Vladimir Putin’s belief in achieve his goals by means short of conquest or be persuaded the need to maintain a buffer between NATO, the European to accept lesser objectives, he is likely to be planning for and Union, and Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the 822Nd FSC Plenary Meeting Mr. Chairman, in the Past Month the Combined Russian-Sep
    FSC.DEL/112/16 8 June 2016 ENGLISH only Permanent Mission of Ukraine to the International Organizations in Vienna Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the 822nd FSC Plenary Meeting (8 June 2016 at 10.00, Hofburg) (Agenda item 2) Mr. Chairman, In the past month the combined Russian-separatist forces in Donbas provoked hostilities at the level not seen this year. The disregard by Russia and its proxies for undertaken international commitments bears deadly and bloody consequences. Last month registered the highest toll of casualties among Ukrainian servicemen since August 2015. 28 soldiers were killed and 98 wounded. Apart from shellings and provocations, the illegal armed formations intensified their subversive activities, attacking Ukrainian units or mining the roads in the government controlled areas. Ukraine condemns the use by the militants of cynical practice of shellings from the residential areas, which was witnessed many times in the past and is recently again reported by the SMM. On 30 May the SMM informed about number of the residents of Kuibyshevskyi district of the Donetsk city where militants fired from nearby areas before withdrawing their weapons soon after. Image of a battle tank placed between residential houses, made by the SMM UAV over the militant-controlled areas near Zaitseve, is a conspicuous evidence of disregard for the Minsk agreements and for the security of the local population. In the report of 3 June the SMM registered accounts of residents in the town of Debaltseve pointing out that the Russia- backed militants shell from residential areas to provoke response of the Ukrainian forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporters Without Borders On-Media-12-05-2014,46265.Html
    Reporters Without Borders http://www.rsf.org/ukraine-summary-of-attacks- on-media-12-05-2014,46265.html Europe/Ex-USSR - Ukraine News feed Summary of attacks on media 10 June 2014 Besides its regular press releases, Reporters Without Borders is starting a Ukraine news feed in order to summarize the violations of freedom of information constantly taking place in Ukraine. 09.06.2014 - Two Russian journalists arrested in Donetsk region Two Russian journalists with “People’s Republic of Donetsk” accreditation – Zvezda cameraman Andrei Sushenkov and soundman Anton Malyshev – were arrested at a Ukrainian National Guard checkpoint near the city of Sloviansk on the evening of 6 June. Zvezda is a Russian defence ministry offshoot. They were hand over to the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) for questioning on suspicion of “collecting information on Ukrainian checkpoints.” Released on the night of 8 June and put on a flight to Moscow, they said they were held for two days in a cramped and overheated cell. 09.06.2014 - Constant harassment of local media Vasyl Serdyukov, a reporter for the local newspaper Serditaya Gazeta, and his photographer son Yevhen Serdyukov were kidnapped and beaten by militiamen in Rubizhne, a city in the Luhansk region, on 8 June. After being taken to the regional government headquarters in Luhansk, they were freed the next day at dawn. The militia accused them of covering local news in a way that was one-sided and hostile to the separatists. The newspaper’s editor denied this categorically. Yevhen Serdyukov had to be hospitalized with concussion and bruising all over his body.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 November 2017 to 15
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 November 2017 to 15 February 2018 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Executive summary ............................................................................................ 1–16 1 II. Rights to life, liberty, security and physical integrity ........................................... 17–41 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................... 17–24 3 B. Deprivation of liberty, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment, and conflict-related sexual violence ........................................................... 25–41 6 1. Access to places of detention ........................................................... 25–27 6 2. Deprivation of liberty, enforced dis-appearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment, and conflict related sexual violence ......................... 28–35 6 3. Situation of pre-conflict prisoners ................................................... 36–41 7 III. Accountability and administration of justice ........................................................ 42–55 9 A. Accountability for human rights violations and abuses committed in the east 42 9 B. Fair trial rights ............................................................................................ 43–48 9 C. High-profile cases of violence related to riots and public disturbances ......... 49–55 10 1. Accountability for the killings of protesters at Maidan ....................
    [Show full text]