DOCSLIB.ORG

MAR650: Lecture 2: Layer Oceans and Mixed Layer Dynamics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MAR650: Lecture 2: Layer Oceans and Mixed Layer Dynamics MAR650: Lecture 2: Layer Oceans and Mixed Layer Dynamics z y Wind stress o x Mixed Layer and Wind-induced Ekman layer Interior geostrophic layer Bottom Ekman layer Bottom log-boundary layer 1 1) Wind-induced surface Ekman layer ∂2u − fv = K E m 2 ∂z Coriolis force = Vertical diffusion ∂2v fu = K E m ∂z2 a) Current profile: τ v € The Ekman velocity decreases and rotates clockwise o E with depth Ekman spiral. 45 b) The Ekman layer thickness (depth): € € 2K Directly proportional to turbulent h = m E f viscosity coefficient and inversely hE UE (Ekman volume transport) proportional to the Coriolis parameter. c) The direction of the surface Ekman current: € v The angle between the wind stress and E o o tanα = = 1 , α = 45 surface Ekman current is 45 . On the uE τ v τ northern hemisphere, the surface E o Ekman current is 45 on the right of o o the wind stress. 45 90 d) The total volume transport: € € € U The volume transport is always 90o to the direction of the E wind stress. On the northern hemisphere, it is on the right of 2 the wind stress. Ekman Pumping: 0 ∂u ∂v ∂w ∂U ∂V 1 ∂τ y ( + + )dz = 0 ⇒ w = + = ∫ ∂x ∂y ∂z z=−hE ∂x ∂y ρf ∂x −hE If we extend it to a general case with x and y components of the wind, we get ∂U ∂V 1 ∂τ y ∂τ 1 w = + = ( − x ) = k ⋅ curlτ z= − hE ∂x ∂y ρf ∂x ∂y ρo f €The vertical velocity at the bottom of the surface Ekman layer is proportional to the vorticity of the surface wind stress and it is independent of the detailed structure of the Ekman flow. the vertical velocity is positive for the positive vorticity of the wind stress, and negative for the negative vorticity of the wind stress. curlτ > 0 € hE Ekman pumping 2) Interior geostrophic layer Turbulent mixing is weak, the motion is approximately geostrophic 1 ∂P 1 ∂P u = , v = − Coriolis force = Pressure gradient force g ρf ∂y g ρf ∂x FP FP (The pressure gradient force) t Geostrophic 0 t Vg 1 adjustment t P0 2 € € € Vg P1 Fc Fc P 2 F € € c Fc (The Coriolis force) € Where does the energy come here? Vorticity of the wind€ stress (Ekman pumping) € 3) The Bottom Ekman boundary layer 1 ∂P ∂ 2u fv K − = − + m 2 ρ ∂x ∂z 2 Coriolis force=Pressure gradient force+Vertical diffusion 1 ∂P ∂ v fu = − + K m 2 ρ ∂y ∂z Surface wind stress drives the surface Ekman layer and also transport the energy the interior layer. The energy driving the bottom boundary layer could be come from the interior geostrophic motion. a) Total velocity and Ekman velocity: Total velocity (a sum of geostrophic and Ekman velocities) rotates counterclockwise with depth. It reaches the geostrophic current at the top of the Ekman layer and vanishes at the bottom. Ekman velocity decreases and rotates clockwise with the height (from the bottom. It is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the geostrophic velocity at the bottom and vanish at the top of the bottom Ekman layer. v Total velocity Ekman velocity with depth with height 0 u -u 0 uE ug g (top) (bottom) d) Total volume transport: The volume transport is always 90o on the right of the bottom frictional force (on the northern hemisphere). Unlike the volume transport in the surface Ekman layer, the transport in the bottom boundary is related to the Ekman layer thickness and magnitude of the geostrophic current in the interior. 2 τ by K m hE 1 U E = − = − u g = − u g = − u g hE f fhE 2hE 2 Note: τby is the bottom stress exerting from the fluid on the bottom. The bottom frictional force is equal in magnitude and opposite to the bottom stress. τby (transport) UE -τby (bottom frictional force) 4) The bottom log boundary layer In a very thin layer close to the bottom, the turbulent viscosity-induced stress is much larger than the Coriolis and pressure gradient forces. In this layer, the stress does not change with depth: ∂τ This is also called the constant = 0 ∂z stress boundary layer According to the definition of the stress, we have € 2 ∂u ∂u 1 τ u* τ = ρK m ⇒ = ( ) = u* : the frictional velocity ∂z ∂z K m ρ K m Assume that mixing length l = κ z , where κ is von Karman constant , then we have ∂u u u u = * = * ⇒ u = * (ln z + C) ∂z l κz κ Define zo is the roughness height, at which turbulence-induced stress equals to zero, then u* z u = ln zo : 0.01 mm ~ 60 mm κ zo Surface Mixed Layer General features of vertical structure of the water temperature: T ∂T = 0 Mixed layer ∂z Solar radiation, wind mixing/cooling ∂T Thermoclines large Sharp vertical gradient of the water temperature Depth ∂z Deep weak ∂T stratified layer small Weak vertical gradient of the water temperature ∂z Question 1: Why do the thermoclines exist in the ocean? 8 An example: Assume that solar radiation leads to a vertically linear distribution of the water temperate: T = To + γz Wind mixing and cooling cause a vertical mixing, resulting in a mixed layer of h and a temperature as 1 0 h T (T z)dz T = ∫ o + γ = o − γ An averaged temperature from 0 to -h h −h 2 h h T = To − γ Mixed layer 2 Thermoclines A transition zone between the mixed T = To + γz layer to the deep ocean For density: pycnoclines; for salinity: thermohalines 9 Question 2: Is the oceanic current is a turbulent motion? Reynold number: VL V: velocity of the motion R = e γ L: typical scale of the motion γ: fluid’s viscosity Laboratory experiment: Re > 2000 or 4000 (depending on the property of the fluid), the motion become turbulent! In the ocean, 11 -6 2 Re > 10 (for example, in the Gulf Stream, V~ 1 m/s, L ~100 km, and γ ~10 m /s) The oceanic current is a turbulent motion! 10 Question 3: What causes turbulence and how is it dissipated? Assume that Shear Instability u2: the typical scale of the kinetic energy of the large-scale eddies; l: the typical size scale of the large-scale eddies; Large-scale eddies The time scale required for the energy transfer of large-scale eddies to small-scale eddies is l u Small-scale eddies The energy transfer rate from large-scale eddies to small-scale€ eddies equals: turbulent kinetic energy u 2 u 3 ~ = Dissipation time scale l / u l If these small-scale eddy’s energy is dissipated at a €rate of ε, then u 3 Turbulent dissipation rate ε ~ l 11 € Question 4: How does shear instability cause turbulence? Moving a blob of water in a stable density gradient leads to vertical ρ1 oscillations. ^ The buoyancy force defined as its “weight” equals to: ρ2 ^ Fg = −g(ρb − ρ s ) ρ3 ^ ρb is the density of the blob; ρs is the density of the surrounding water ρ4 The frequency of the blob’s oscillation is related to how fast it changes direction, It is controlled by the buoyancy force. In fact, the frequency of the oscillation is equal to g ∂ρ N = − Brunt-Väisälä frequency ρo ∂z Internal wave frequency: f ≤ ω ≤ N How could turbulence mixing occur in a stable stratified fluid? 12 One of the most important forces to cause vertical mixing is the vertical shear of the horizontal velocity, i.e,: Why do the shear of ∂u ∂v , the velocity is so ∂z ∂z important for mixing? Example: w > 0 w = 0 no wind w = 0 Smoke plume cigarette Does any shear of the velocity generate Light In the ocean: turbulence? Heavy 13 Richardson number The occurrence of the turbulence mixing is dampened by strong density gradient, but strengthened by strong shear of the velocity. Whether or not turbulence mixing could occur depends on a ratio of vertical stratification to the vertical shear of the velocity. Richardson number is defined as a ratio of the square of the buoyancy frequency to the square of the vertical shear of the horizontal velocity: 2 2 ∂u Ri = N / ∂z In general, turbulence develops as Ri < 0.25, but recent microstructure measurement shows that critical Richardson number is bigger for the interior ocean mixing or over the slope. Question 5: How is a mixed layer developed? What are the key balance of turbulence energy during the development of a mixed layer? 14 A mixed layer is developed with 4 stages: t (time) t h1 t1/3 h h2 t2 t1/3 h3 Monin-Obukov Depth h4 Stage 1: t << 1/f (time scale << the inertial period), wind stress is limited in a thin layer close to the surface, h ~ t Stage 2: the mixed layer continues to deepen, but cooler water below the mixed layer is entrained, the deepening speed of the mixed layer decreases: h ~ t1/3 Stage 3: a strong vertical shear of the velocity is established, shear instability speed up mixing. In this stage, h ~ t2 Stage 4: Energy generated by the vertical shear of the velocity is balanced by the heat-induced buoyancy force, the mixed layer stops deepening. This is a slowly process during which h ~ t1/3. u* = τ ο / f : frictional velocity; ρ : reference density ~ 2 m u 3 o ρo o * : surface wind stress, Q: the surface heat flux, Monin-Obukov Depth: h = τ ο 15 gαQ mo: turbulent dissipation coefficient € € The most important properties of a mixed layer is ∂V ∂T ∂ S ∂ρ = 0; = 0, = 0, = 0 ∂ z ∂ z ∂ z ∂ z Question 6: For a given same wind stress, the wind could drive an Ekman flow, but also wind mixing leads €to a mixed layer.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ekman Layer at the Sea Surface • Ekman Mass Transport • Application of Ekman Theory • Langmuir Circulation • Important Concepts
    Principle of Oceanography Gholamreza Mashayekhinia 2013_2014 Response of the Upper Ocean to Winds Contents • Inertial Motion • Ekman Layer at the Sea Surface • Ekman Mass Transport • Application of Ekman Theory • Langmuir Circulation • Important Concepts Inertial Motion The response of the ocean to an impulse that sets the water in motion. For example, the impulse can be a strong wind blowing for a few hours. The water then moves under the influence of coriolis force and gravity. No other forces act on the water. In physics, the Coriolis effect is a deflection of moving objects when they are viewed in a rotating reference frame. This low pressure system over Iceland spins counter-clockwise due to balance between the Coriolis force and the pressure gradient force. Such motion is said to be inertial. The mass of water continues to move due to its inertia. If the water were in space, it would move in a straight line according to Newton's second law. But on a rotating Earth, the motion is much different. The equations of motion for a frictionless ocean are: 푑푢 1 휕푝 = − + 2Ω푣 푠푖푛휑 (1a) 푑푡 휌 휕푥 푑푣 1 휕푝 = − − 2Ω푢 푠푖푛휑 (1b) 푑푡 휌 휕푦 푑휔 1 휕푝 = − + 2Ω푢 푐표푠휑 − 푔 (1c) 푑푡 휌 휕푥 Where p is pressure, Ω = 2 π/(sidereal day) = 7.292 × 10-5 rad/s is the rotation of the Earth in fixed coordinates, and φ is latitude. We have also used Fi = 0 because the fluid is frictionless. Let's now look for simple solutions to these equations. To do this we must simplify the momentum equations.
    [Show full text]
  • World Ocean Thermocline Weakening and Isothermal Layer Warming
    applied sciences Article World Ocean Thermocline Weakening and Isothermal Layer Warming Peter C. Chu * and Chenwu Fan Naval Ocean Analysis and Prediction Laboratory, Department of Oceanography, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-831-656-3688 Received: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 13 November 2020; Published: 19 November 2020 Abstract: This paper identifies world thermocline weakening and provides an improved estimate of upper ocean warming through replacement of the upper layer with the fixed depth range by the isothermal layer, because the upper ocean isothermal layer (as a whole) exchanges heat with the atmosphere and the deep layer. Thermocline gradient, heat flux across the air–ocean interface, and horizontal heat advection determine the heat stored in the isothermal layer. Among the three processes, the effect of the thermocline gradient clearly shows up when we use the isothermal layer heat content, but it is otherwise when we use the heat content with the fixed depth ranges such as 0–300 m, 0–400 m, 0–700 m, 0–750 m, and 0–2000 m. A strong thermocline gradient exhibits the downward heat transfer from the isothermal layer (non-polar regions), makes the isothermal layer thin, and causes less heat to be stored in it. On the other hand, a weak thermocline gradient makes the isothermal layer thick, and causes more heat to be stored in it. In addition, the uncertainty in estimating upper ocean heat content and warming trends using uncertain fixed depth ranges (0–300 m, 0–400 m, 0–700 m, 0–750 m, or 0–2000 m) will be eliminated by using the isothermal layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from the Coriolis Global Data Center in France (Ftp://Ftp.Ifremer.Fr)
    remote sensing Article Impact of Enhanced Wave-Induced Mixing on the Ocean Upper Mixed Layer during Typhoon Nepartak in a Regional Model of the Northwest Pacific Ocean Chengcheng Yu 1 , Yongzeng Yang 2,3,4, Xunqiang Yin 2,3,4,*, Meng Sun 2,3,4 and Yongfang Shi 2,3,4 1 Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316000, China; [email protected] 2 First Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266061, China; yangyz@fio.org.cn (Y.Y.); sunm@fio.org.cn (M.S.); shiyf@fio.org.cn (Y.S.) 3 Laboratory for Regional Oceanography and Numerical Modeling, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266071, China 4 Key Laboratory of Marine Science and Numerical Modeling (MASNUM), Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266061, China * Correspondence: yinxq@fio.org.cn Received: 30 July 2020; Accepted: 27 August 2020; Published: 30 August 2020 Abstract: To investigate the effect of wave-induced mixing on the upper ocean structure, especially under typhoon conditions, an ocean-wave coupled model is used in this study. Two physical processes, wave-induced turbulence mixing and wave transport flux residue, are introduced. We select tropical cyclone (TC) Nepartak in the Northwest Pacific ocean as a TC example. The results show that during the TC period, the wave-induced turbulence mixing effectively increases the cooling area and cooling amplitude of the sea surface temperature (SST). The wave transport flux residue plays a positive role in reproducing the distribution of the SST cooling area. From the intercomparisons among experiments, it is also found that the wave-induced turbulence mixing has an important effect on the formation of mixed layer depth (MLD).
    [Show full text]
  • Influences of the Ocean Surface Mixed Layer and Thermohaline Stratification on Arctic Sea Ice in the Central Canada Basin J
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115, C10018, doi:10.1029/2009JC005660, 2010 Influences of the ocean surface mixed layer and thermohaline stratification on Arctic Sea ice in the central Canada Basin J. M. Toole,1 M.‐L. Timmermans,2 D. K. Perovich,3 R. A. Krishfield,1 A. Proshutinsky,1 and J. A. Richter‐Menge3 Received 22 July 2009; revised 19 April 2010; accepted 1 June 2010; published 8 October 2010. [1] Variations in the Arctic central Canada Basin mixed layer properties are documented based on a subset of nearly 6500 temperature and salinity profiles acquired by Ice‐ Tethered Profilers during the period summer 2004 to summer 2009 and analyzed in conjunction with sea ice observations from ice mass balance buoys and atmosphere‐ocean heat flux estimates. The July–August mean mixed layer depth based on the Ice‐Tethered Profiler data averaged 16 m (an overestimate due to the Ice‐Tethered Profiler sampling characteristics and present analysis procedures), while the average winter mixed layer depth was only 24 m, with individual observations rarely exceeding 40 m. Guidance interpreting the observations is provided by a 1‐D ocean mixed layer model. The analysis focuses attention on the very strong density stratification at the base of the mixed layer in the Canada Basin that greatly impedes surface layer deepening and thus limits the flux of deep ocean heat to the surface that could influence sea ice growth/ decay. The observations additionally suggest that efficient lateral mixed layer restratification processes are active in the Arctic, also impeding mixed layer deepening. Citation: Toole, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Frictional Boundary Layers
    Chapter 5 Frictional boundary layers 5.1 The Ekman layer problem over a solid surface In this chapter we will take up the important question of the role of friction, especially in the case when the friction is relatively small (and we will have to find an objective measure of what we mean by small). As we noted in the last chapter, the no-slip boundary condition has to be satisfied no matter how small friction is but ignoring friction lowers the spatial order of the Navier Stokes equations and makes the satisfaction of the boundary condition impossible. What is the resolution of this fundamental perplexity? At the same time, the examination of this basic fluid mechanical question allows us to investigate a physical phenomenon of great importance to both meteorology and oceanography, the frictional boundary layer in a rotating fluid, called the Ekman Layer. The historical background of this development is very interesting, partly because of the fascinating people involved. Ekman (1874-1954) was a student of the great Norwegian meteorologist, Vilhelm Bjerknes, (himself the father of Jacques Bjerknes who did so much to understand the nature of the Southern Oscillation). Vilhelm Bjerknes, who was the first to seriously attempt to formulate meteorology as a problem in fluid mechanics, was a student of his own father Christian Bjerknes, the physicist who in turn worked with Hertz who was the first to demonstrate the correctness of Maxwell’s formulation of electrodynamics. So, we are part of a joined sequence of scientists going back to the great days of classical physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Upwelling Revisited: Ekman, Bakun, and Improved 10.1029/2018JC014187 Upwelling Indices for the U.S
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans RESEARCH ARTICLE Coastal Upwelling Revisited: Ekman, Bakun, and Improved 10.1029/2018JC014187 Upwelling Indices for the U.S. West Coast Key Points: Michael G. Jacox1,2 , Christopher A. Edwards3 , Elliott L. Hazen1 , and Steven J. Bograd1 • New upwelling indices are presented – for the U.S. West Coast (31 47°N) to 1NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Monterey, CA, USA, 2NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, address shortcomings in historical 3 indices USA, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA • The Coastal Upwelling Transport Index (CUTI) estimates vertical volume transport (i.e., Abstract Coastal upwelling is responsible for thriving marine ecosystems and fisheries that are upwelling/downwelling) disproportionately productive relative to their surface area, particularly in the world’s major eastern • The Biologically Effective Upwelling ’ Transport Index (BEUTI) estimates boundary upwelling systems. Along oceanic eastern boundaries, equatorward wind stress and the Earth s vertical nitrate flux rotation combine to drive a near-surface layer of water offshore, a process called Ekman transport. Similarly, positive wind stress curl drives divergence in the surface Ekman layer and consequently upwelling from Supporting Information: below, a process known as Ekman suction. In both cases, displaced water is replaced by upwelling of relatively • Supporting Information S1 nutrient-rich water from below, which stimulates the growth of microscopic phytoplankton that form the base of the marine food web. Ekman theory is foundational and underlies the calculation of upwelling indices Correspondence to: such as the “Bakun Index” that are ubiquitous in eastern boundary upwelling system studies. While generally M. G. Jacox, fi [email protected] valuable rst-order descriptions, these indices and their underlying theory provide an incomplete picture of coastal upwelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean 423 Vertical Circulation 1 When We Are Thinking About How The
    Ocean 423 Vertical circulation 1 When we are thinking about how the density, temperature and salinity structure is set in the ocean, there are different processes at work depending on where in the water column we are looking. If we are considering the thermocline, then we notice first that north-south distribution of the surface density/temperature/ salinity across the subtropical gyre can be mapped into their structure in the vertical. This suggests that vertical structure originates at the surface. To figure this out, we can look any one particular isopycnal layer, and see that at some point north and south it intersects the sea surface. Poleward of that point, the layer below the mixed layer is a slightly denser layer. Following stratigraphy, we call the point where an isopycnal layer intersects the sea-surface its outcrop. isopycnal outcrop w < 0 (downwelling), v < 0 z w(0)=we z=0 y z=-H(y) vG mixed layer, winter L.I. V. P. permanent thermocline = const Let’s imagine a water parcel starting somewhere at the surface in the northern half of the subtropical gyre. We ignore the Ekman layer, except for the Ekman pumping it produces, which we specify as a boundary condition on vertical velocity at the ocean surface. The geostrophic velocity is southward everywhere (including the mixed layer) in this part of the ocean because of the downward Ekman pumping. Imagine water parcels flowing southward in the mixed layer Ocean 423 Vertical circulation 2 (and no heating or cooling). A water parcel, when it encounters lighter water to the south will tend to follow its own isopycnal down out of the mixed layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of an Ocean Mixed Layer Model in IFS
    622 Implementation of an ocean mixed layer model in IFS Y. Takaya12, F. Vitart1, G. Balsamo1, M. Balmaseda1, M. Leutbecher1, F. Molteni1 Research Department 1European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK 2Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, Japan March 2010 Series: ECMWF Technical Memoranda A full list of ECMWF Publications can be found on our web site under: http://www.ecmwf.int/publications/ Contact: [email protected] c Copyright 2010 European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Shinfield Park, Reading, RG2 9AX, England Literary and scientific copyrights belong to ECMWF and are reserved in all countries. This publication is not to be reprinted or translated in whole or in part without the written permission of the Director. Appropriate non-commercial use will normally be granted under the condition that reference is made to ECMWF. The information within this publication is given in good faith and considered to be true, but ECMWF accepts no liability for error, omission and for loss or damage arising from its use. Implementation of an ocean mixed layer model Abstract An ocean mixed layer model has been implemented in the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) in order to have a better representation of the atmosphere-upper ocean coupled processes in the ECMWF medium-range forecasts. The ocean mixed layer model uses a non-local K profile parameterization (KPP; Large et al. 1994). This model is a one-dimensional column model with high vertical resolution near the surface to simulate the diurnal thermal variations in the upper ocean. Its simplified dynamics makes it cheaper than a full ocean general circulation model and its implementation in IFS allows the atmosphere- ocean coupled model to run much more efficiently than using a coupler.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Transport Between the Surface Mixed Layer and the Ocean Interior with a Forward and Adjoint Global Ocean Transport Model
    APRIL 2005 P R I M E A U 545 Characterizing Transport between the Surface Mixed Layer and the Ocean Interior with a Forward and Adjoint Global Ocean Transport Model FRANÇOIS PRIMEAU Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California (Manuscript received 1 July 2003, in final form 7 September 2004) ABSTRACT The theory of first-passage time distribution functions and its extension to last-passage time distribution functions are applied to the problem of tracking the movement of water masses to and from the surface mixed layer in a global ocean general circulation model. The first-passage time distribution function is used to determine in a probabilistic sense when and where a fluid element will make its first contact with the surface as a function of its position in the ocean interior. The last-passage time distribution is used to determine when and where a fluid element made its last contact with the surface. A computationally efficient method is presented for recursively computing the first few moments of the first- and last-passage time distributions by directly inverting the forward and adjoint transport operator. This approach allows integrated transport information to be obtained directly from the differential form of the transport operator without the need to perform lengthy multitracer time integration of the transport equations. The method, which relies on the stationarity of the transport operator, is applied to the time-averaged transport operator obtained from a three-dimensional global ocean simulation performed with an OGCM. With this approach, the author (i) computes surface maps showing the fraction of the total ocean volume per unit area that ventilates at each point on the surface of the ocean, (ii) partitions interior water masses based on their formation region at the surface, and (iii) computes the three-dimensional spatial distribution of the mean and standard deviation of the age distribution of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Scale Processes in the Coastal Ocean
    or collective redistirbution of any portion of this article by photocopy machine, reposting, or other means is permitted only with the approval of The Oceanography Society. Send all correspondence to: [email protected] ofor Th e The to: [email protected] Oceanography approval Oceanography correspondence PO all portionthe Send Society. ofwith any permitted articleonly photocopy by Society, is of machine, reposting, this means or collective or other redistirbution article has This been published in SPECIAL ISSUE ON CoasTal Ocean PRocesses TuRBulence, TRansFER, anD EXCHanGE Oceanography BY JAMes N. MouM, JonaTHan D. NasH, , Volume 21, Number 4, a quarterly journal of The Oceanography Society. Copyright 2008 by The Oceanography Society. All rights reserved. Permission is granted to copy this article for use in teaching and research. research. for this and teaching article copy to use in reserved.by The 2008 rights is granted journal ofCopyright OceanographyAll The Permission 21, NumberOceanography 4, a quarterly Society. Society. , Volume anD JODY M. KLYMak Small-Scale Processes in the Coastal Ocean 20 depth (m) 40 B ox 1931, ox R ockville, R epublication, systemmatic reproduction, reproduction, systemmatic epublication, MD 20849-1931, USA. -200 -100 0 100 distance along ship track (m) 22 Oceanography Vol.21, No.4 ABSTRACT. Varied observations over Oregon’s continental shelf illustrate the beauty and complexity of geophysical flows in coastal waters. Rapid, creative, and sometimes fortuitous sampling from ships and moorings has allowed detailed looks at boundary layer processes, internal waves (some extremely nonlinear), and coastal currents, including how they interact. These processes drive turbulence and mixing in shallow coastal waters and encourage rapid biological responses, yet are poorly understood and parameterized.
    [Show full text]
  • A Laboratory Model of Thermocline Depth and Exchange Fluxes Across Circumpolar Fronts*
    656 JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 34 A Laboratory Model of Thermocline Depth and Exchange Fluxes across Circumpolar Fronts* CLAUDIA CENEDESE Physical Oceanography Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts JOHN MARSHALL Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts J. A. WHITEHEAD Physical Oceanography Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts (Manuscript received 6 January 2003, in ®nal form 7 July 2003) ABSTRACT A laboratory experiment has been constructed to investigate the possibility that the equilibrium depth of a circumpolar front is set by a balance between the rate at which potential energy is created by mechanical and buoyancy forcing and the rate at which it is released by eddies. In a rotating cylindrical tank, the combined action of mechanical and buoyancy forcing builds a strati®cation, creating a large-scale front. At equilibrium, the depth of penetration and strength of the current are then determined by the balance between eddy transport and sources and sinks associated with imposed patterns of Ekman pumping and buoyancy ¯uxes. It is found 2 that the depth of penetration and transport of the front scale like Ï[( fwe)/g9]L and weL , respectively, where we is the Ekman pumping, g9 is the reduced gravity across the front, f is the Coriolis parameter, and L is the width scale of the front. Last, the implications of this study for understanding those processes that set the strati®cation and transport of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) are discussed. If the laboratory results scale up to the ACC, they suggest a maximum thermocline depth of approximately h 5 2 km, a zonal current velocity of 4.6 cm s21, and a transport T 5 150 Sv (1 Sv [ 106 m3 s 21), not dissimilar to what is observed.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Patterns of Wind-Power Input to the Ocean Circulation
    2328 JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 41 On the Patterns of Wind-Power Input to the Ocean Circulation FABIEN ROQUET AND CARL WUNSCH Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts GURVAN MADEC Laboratoire d’Oce´anographie Dynamique et de Climatologie, Paris, France (Manuscript received 1 February 2011, in final form 12 July 2011) ABSTRACT Pathways of wind-power input into the ocean general circulation are analyzed using Ekman theory. Direct rates of wind work can be calculated through the wind stress acting on the surface geostrophic flow. However, because that energy is transported laterally in the Ekman layer, the injection into the geostrophic interior is actually controlled by Ekman pumping, with a pattern determined by the wind curl rather than the wind itself. Regions of power injection into the geostrophic interior are thus generally shifted poleward compared to regions of direct wind-power input, most notably in the Southern Ocean, where on average energy enters the interior 108 south of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current core. An interpretation of the wind-power input to the interior is proposed, expressed as a downward flux of pressure work. This energy flux is a measure of the work done by the Ekman pumping against the surface elevation pressure, helping to maintain the observed anomaly of sea surface height relative to the global-mean sea level. 1. Introduction or the input to surface gravity waves (601 TW; Wang and Huang 2004b), but they are not directly related to The wind stress, along with the secondary input from the interior flow.
    [Show full text]