7.6.2017 A8-0202/3 Amendment 3 Krzysztof Hetman, Lambert Van

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

7.6.2017 A8-0202/3 Amendment 3 Krzysztof Hetman, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Janusz Lewandowski, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Matthijs van Miltenburg, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Andrzej Grzyb, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Michał Boni, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Agnieszka Kozłowska- Rajewicz, Barbara Kudrycka, Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Andrey Novakov, Maria Spyraki, Daniel Buda, Claudia Schmidt, Paul Rübig, Herbert Dorfmann, Vladimir Urutchev, Seán Kelly, Reimer Böge, José Manuel Fernandes, Monika Hohlmeier, Peter Jahr, Iuliu Winkler, Siegfried Mureşan, Franc Bogovič, Marc Joulaud, Ivana Maletić, Jan Olbrycht, Lefteris Christoforou, Sabine Verheyen, Tamás Deutsch, Andor Deli, Maurice Ponga, Jérôme Lavrilleux, Françoise Grossetête, Wim van de Camp, Albert Deß, Stanislav Polčák, Pavel Svoboda, Jaromír Štětina, Ivan Štefanec, Julia Pitera, Jarosław Wałęsa, Alain Lamassoure, Arnaud Danjean, Anne Sander, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Fernando Ruas, Adam Szejnfeld, Csaba Sógor, Milan Zver, László Tőkés, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Brian Hayes, Mairead McGuinness, Markus Pieper, Andrey Kovatchev, Petri Sarvamaa, Tunne Kelam, Adina-Ioana Vălean, Renate Sommer, Artis Pabriks, József Szájer, Cristian-Silviu Buşoi, Jarosław Kalinowski, Inese Vaidere, Kerstin Westphal, Ulrike Rodust, Tiemo Wölken, Constanze Krehl, Jens Geier, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Joachim Schuster, Petra Kammerevert, Evelyne Gebhardt, Arndt Kohn, Maria Noichl, Ismail Ertug, Jo Leinen, Norbert Neuser, Gabriele Preuß, Birgit Sippel, Susanne Melior, Knut Fleckenstein, Martina Werner, Karin Kadenbach, Dietmar Köster, Georgi Pirinski, Monika Smolková, Liliana Rodrigues, Derek Vaughan, Tonino Picula, Iratxe García Pérez, Iskra Mihaylova, Hannu Takkula, Norica Nicolai, Urmas Paet Report A8-0202/2017 Kerstin Westphal Building blocks for a post-2020 EU cohesion policy 2016/2326(INI) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Motion for a resolution Amendment 14. Believes, given that cohesion policy 14. Believes, given that cohesion policy funding is intended to boost investment, funding is intended to boost investment, growth and employment throughout the growth and employment throughout the EU, that national contributions to the EU, that the Commission should explore, cofunding of projects under that policy in in the 7th Cohesion Report and in close the post-2020 period should not be taken cooperation with the Member State into account in deficit calculations under governments, how to address the impact the Stability and Growth Pact rules; of these investments on the budget deficits of these governments; Or. en AM\1127658EN.docx PE605.513v01-00 EN United in diversity EN .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Europaparlamentet 2019–2024
Europaparlamentet 2019–2024 Utskottet för miljö, folkhälsa och livsmedelssäkerhet ENVI_PV(2020)0305_1 PROTOKOLL från sammanträdet den 5 mars 2020 kl. 9.30–12.30 BRYSSEL Sammanträdet öppnades torsdagen den 5 mars 2020 kl. 9.40 med utskottets ordförande, Pascal Canfin, som ordförande. 1. Godkännande av föredragningslistan ENVI_OJ(2020)0305_1 Föredragningslistan godkändes i den form som framgår av detta protokoll. 2. Meddelanden från ordföranden Ordföranden meddelade följande: Tolkning: Tolkningen motsvarade utskottets normala språkprofil: 21 språk tolkades med undantag för estniska, maltesiska och iriska. Elektroniska sammanträdeshandlingar/webbsändning: Ordföranden informerade om att sammanträdeshandlingar som vanligt fanns tillgängliga i elektroniskt format via programmet för e-sammanträden och att sammanträdet skulle sändas på nätet. Rapport från ad hoc-delegationen till 25:e partskonferensen för FN:s ramkonvention om klimatförändringar i Madrid, Spanien, den 10– 14 december 2019: Ordföranden informerade om att sammanträdeshandlingarna innehöll rapporten från ad hoc-delegationen till 25:e partskonferensen för FN:s ramkonvention om klimatförändringar i Madrid, Spanien, den 10– 14 december 2019. PV\1204450SV.docx PE650.672v01-00 SV Förenade i mångfaldenSV 3. Meddelanden från ordföranden om samordnarnas rekommendationer av den 18 februari 2020 Ordföranden meddelade att samordnarnas rekommendationer av den 18 februari 2020 hade skickats ut elektroniskt, och att de, eftersom inga invändningar lagts fram, ansågs vara godkända (se bilaga
[Show full text]
Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue De La Loi 170 1000 Brussels
Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue de la Loi 170 1000 Brussels Brussels, 16th April 2021 Dear Mr. High Representative; Mr Vice-President of the Commission: A delegation from the illegitimate National Assembly of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which emerged from the electoral farce organised on 6th December 2020 by the regime of Nicolás Maduro, recently paid a visit to Brussels and was officially received by the institution you lead. According to a statement you made on behalf of the European Union on 6th December, this spurious process took place in the absence of electoral conditions that could have guaranteed its credibility, without any respect for political pluralism, and in an atmosphere of persecution and disqualification of democratic leaders whose legitimate rights were curtailed. Your statement concludes that such circumstances could not consider this process credible, inclusive, and transparent and therefore the results did not represent the will of the Venezuelan people. That initial statement was confirmed on 6 January of this year by a new declaration, in similar terms to those expressed on 6 December, and by the conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council of 25 January. These reiterated the lack of recognition of the electoral process and regretted the behaviour of the authorities of the Maduro regime, whose actions are preventing a solution to the serious crisis in Venezuela. We were surprised and gravely concerned to learn that on 14th April, at your request, senior officials of the European External Action Service received the aforementioned delegation, comprising Iris Varela, Pedro Carreño and Desirée Santos Amaral, at the EEAS headquarters.
[Show full text]
En En Motion for a Resolution
European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0087/2021 19.1.2021 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law pursuant to Rule 144 of the Rules of Procedure on the crackdown on the democratic opposition in Hong Kong (2021/2505(RSP)) Michael Gahler, Miriam Lexmann, Željana Zovko, David McAllister, Paulo Rangel, Andrius Kubilius, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Tomáš Zdechovský, Vladimír Bilčík, Inese Vaidere, David Lega, Christian Sagartz, Tomas Tobé, Loránt Vincze, Krzysztof Hetman, Magdalena Adamowicz, Ivan Štefanec, Janina Ochojska, Eva Maydell, Luděk Niedermayer, Jiří Pospíšil, Stanislav Polčák, Stelios Kympouropoulos, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Benoît Lutgen, Maria Walsh on behalf of the PPE Group RE\P9_B(2021)0087_EN.docx PE662.871v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0087/2021 European Parliament resolution on the crackdown on the democratic opposition in Hong Kong (2021/2505(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to its resolution of 16 June 2020 on the PRC national security law for Hong Kong and the need for the EU to defend Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy, of 18 July 2019 on the situation in Hong Kong, to its resolutions of 24 November 2016 on the case of Gui Minhai, jailed publisher in China, of 4 February 2016 on the case of the missing book publishers in Hong Kong, and to its previous recommendations relating to Hong Kong, in particular the recommendation of 13 December 2017 on Hong Kong, 20 years after handover, – having
[Show full text]
European Parliament Report on The
European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting A8-0389/2017 1.12.2017 REPORT on the implementation of EU macro-regional strategies (2017/2040(INI)) Committee on Regional Development Rapporteur: Andrea Cozzolino RR\1141013EN.docx PE604.868v02-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_INI_ImplReport CONTENTS Page EXPLANATORY STATEMENT - SUMMARY OF FACTS AND FINDINGS ..................... 3 MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ............................................ 5 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY ....................................................................................................................... 13 INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ................................ 22 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE .................................... 23 PE604.868v02-00 2/23 RR\1141013EN.docx EN EXPLANATORY STATEMENT - SUMMARY OF FACTS AND FINDINGS Background Macro-regional strategies (MRS) have gained importance in recent years as a platform for transnational cooperation between Member States but also with third countries. They provide an integrated framework to address mutual challenges and exploit common potential. In the 2014-2020 programming period, MRS have been incorporated in the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) programmes. Currently, four existing MRS (Baltic, Danube, Adriatic-Ionian and Alpine) are bringing together 19 Member States and 8 non-EU countries. Some Member States participate in more than one MRS. MRS are set within the
[Show full text]
Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament
ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
[Show full text]
034499/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt Am 09/10/20
034499/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt am 09/10/20 Council of the European Union Brussels, 9 October 2020 (OR. en) 11625/20 PE-QE 184 'I' ITEM NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Permanent Representatives Committee Subject: Replies to questions for written answer submitted to the Council by Members of the European Parliament – Examination by Coreper The Permanent Representatives Committee is invited to examine the draft replies to the questions for written answer set out in the documents listed in the Annex to this note. Pursuant to Article 12(2)(a) of the Council's Rules of Procedure, the Presidency intends to propose the use of the 'silence procedure' to adopt the texts of the replies to the abovementioned questions for written answer. 11625/20 PZ/vp 1 GIP.2 EN www.parlament.gv.at ANNEX Replies to questions for written answer submitted to the Council by Members of the European Parliament a) E-003883/2020 - Radka Maxová (Renew), Chrysoula Zacharopoulou (Renew), Dragoș Pîslaru (Renew), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Jarosław Duda (PPE), Łukasz Kohut (S&D), Kateřina Konečná (GUE/NGL), Leszek Miller (S&D), Ville Niinistö (Verts/ALE), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI), Salvatore De Meo (PPE), Miriam Lexmann (PPE), Elżbieta Kruk (ECR), Demetris Papadakis (S&D), Milan Brglez (S&D), Alex Agius Saliba (S&D), Manuel Pizarro (S&D), Karin Karlsbro (Renew), Robert Biedroń (S&D), Pascal Arimont (PPE), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Marisa Matias (GUE/NGL), Viktor Uspaskich (Renew), Hilde Vautmans (Renew), Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
[Show full text]
Ms Mairead Mcguinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr
TO: Ms Mairead McGuinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr Valdis Dombrovskis European Commission Executive Vice-President for An Economy that Works for People CC: Mr Frans Timmermans European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal Ms Kadri Simson European Commissioner for Energy Brussels, 13 April 2021 Dear Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis, Dear Commissioner McGuinness, We are convinced that the Taxonomy Regulation is crucial for the European Union to achieve both the new greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050. Additionally, the Regulation should help strengthening the European Union’s strategic resilience and global economic competitiveness, maintaining its energy security and affordability, boosting growth and job creation and supporting a just and inclusive energy transition that leaves nobody behind. However, to what extent the Taxonomy Regulation will ultimately meet these expectations depends primarily on the technical screening criteria (TSC) defined in the Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation. We understand the European Commission will publish it later this month, whereupon the European Parliament may make full use of its scrutinizing prerogatives under Article 290 TFEU. In advance of its publication, we would like to share with you some of our major concerns regarding the revised draft version of this delegated act. Firstly, it is indispensable that the Taxonomy Regulation takes into account transition at the energy system level and supports the most cost-efficient decarbonisation pathway for each Member State in line with the principle of technology neutrality. In this context, it is key to acknowledge the role of gaseous fuels.
[Show full text]
30.6.2021 A9-0213/1 Amendment 1 Loránt Vincze, Frances Fitzgerald
30.6.2021 A9-0213/1 Amendment 1 Loránt Vincze, Frances Fitzgerald, Ivan Štefanec, Paulo Rangel, Maria Walsh, Tomáš Zdechovský, Brice Hortefeux, Sven Simon, Michael Gahler, Esther de Lange, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Jeroen Lenaers, Esteban González Pons, Peter Jahr, Vladimír Bilčík, Maria Spyraki, Jarosław Duda, Axel Voss, Gheorghe Falcă, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Geoffroy Didier, Eugen Tomac, Rainer Wieland, Stefan Berger, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Michaela Šojdrová, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Christophe Hansen, Andrius Kubilius, Daniel Buda, Rasa Juknevičienė, Lena Düpont, Angelika Niebler, Helmut Geuking, Milan Zver, Inese Vaidere, François-Xavier Bellamy, Agnès Evren, Tomas Tobé, Jessica Polfjärd, Jörgen Warborn, Pernille Weiss, Iuliu Winkler, Henna Virkkunen, Danuta Maria Hübner, Miriam Lexmann, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Nathalie Colin-Oesterlé, Franc Bogovič, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar, Anne Sander, Fulvio Martusciello, Pablo Arias Echeverría, Lídia Pereira, Christine Schneider, Sabine Verheyen, Romana Tomc, Tom Berendsen, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Colm Markey, Lukas Mandl, Álvaro Amaro, David Casa, Peter Pollák, Janusz Lewandowski, Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou, Marion Walsmann, Gabriel Mato, Ralf Seekatz, Javier Zarzalejos, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Christian Sagartz, Jan Olbrycht, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Sven Schulze, Traian Băsescu, Siegfried Mureşan, David McAllister, Seán Kelly, Markus Pieper, Christian Ehler, Deirdre Clune Report A9-0213/2021 Helmut Scholz Citizens’ dialogues and
[Show full text]
EU Firearms Proposal Committee Members
Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/imco/home.html NB - You can “Click” on the MEP’s name to be taken to their profile page on the EU Website which contains more information such as Facebook pages and Twitter feeds. PLEASE - ONLY USE THIS LIST TO EMAIL POLITE AND SENSIBLE COMMENTS TO THESE MEP’S DO NOT USE IT TO SEND SPAM OR DEROGATORY OR RUDE EMAILS - WE WANT TO KEEP OUR FIREARMS, NOT ANNOY THE PEOPLE WITH THE POWER TO HELP US. Photo Name/Position/Country Email Address Vicky FORD [email protected] Chair European Conservatives and Reformists Group United Kingdom Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT [email protected] Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Sweden Robert ROCHEFORT [email protected] Vice-Chair Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe France Catherine STIHLER [email protected] Vice-Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament United Kingdom Nicola DANTI [email protected] Vice-Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Italy Dita CHARANZOVÁ [email protected] Member Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Czech Republic Carlos COELHO [email protected] Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Portugal Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI [email protected] Member Group
[Show full text]
European Elections Why Vote? English
Europea2n E0lecti1ons9 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT THE EUROPEAN ELECTIONS WHY VOTE? ENGLISH Latvia Results of the 25 May 2019 European elections Show 10 entries Search: Trend European Number of Percentage of Number of Political Parties compared affiliation votes votes seats with 2014 New Unity EPP 124 193 26.24 % 2 ↓ Social Democratic Party S&D 82 604 17.45 % 2 ↑ "Harmony" National Alliance "All for Latvia!" - ECR 77 591 16.40 % 2 ↑ For Fatherland and Freedom Development/For! 58 763 12.42 % 1 New Latvian Russian Union Greens/EFA 29 546 6.24 % 1 = Showing 1 to 5 of 5 entries Previous Next List of MEPs Inese Vaidere New Alliance EPP Sandra Kalniete New Alliance EPP Nils Ouchakov Social-democrat Party S&D Andris Ameriks Social-democrat Party S&D Tatjana Ždanoka Russian Union of Latvia Greens/EFA Roberts Zile National Alliance ECR Dace Melbärde National Alliance ECR Ivars Ijabs Development Renew Europe Lists for the elections on 25 May 2019 European Leading Name of party Translation Website Programme affiliation candidate Jauna Vienotība New Unity EPP Valdis vienotiba.lv Programme Dombrovskis Sociāldemokrātiskā Partija Social Democratic Party S&D Nils Ušakovs saskana.eu Programme "Saskaņa" (SDPS) "Harmony" Progresīvie The Progressives S&D Gunta Anča progresivie.lv Programme Nacionālā apvienība "Visu National Alliance "All for ECR Roberts Zile nacionalaapvieniba.lv Programme Latvijai!"-"Tēvzemei un Latvia!" - For Fatherland Brīvībai/LNNK" and Freedom Zaļo un Zemnieku Union of Greens and ALDE Dana zzs.lv Programme savienība (ZZS) Farmers
[Show full text]
Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Result of Roll-call votes of 01.09.2021 Table of contents 1. Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022 - General Introduction - Total expenditure - General statement of revenue - Statement of revenue and expenditure by section, 2021/0227(BUD), Luděk Niedermayer ............................................... 2 1.1. Vote on the amendments on the draft opinion (roll-call) ................................................ 2 1.2. Vote on the amendments on the budgetary amendments (roll-call) ............................. 15 Key to symbols: + : in favour - : against 0 : abstention Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs 1. Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022 - General Introduction - Total expenditure - General statement of revenue - Statement of revenue and expenditure by section, 2021/0227(BUD), Luděk Niedermayer 1.1. Vote on the amendments on the draft opinion (roll-call) Roll-call: CA A 45 + PPE Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Stefan Berger, Markus Ferber, Frances Fitzgerald, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Othmar Karas, Georgios Kyrtsos, Janusz Lewandowski, Aušra Maldeikienė, Siegfried Mureşan, Luděk Niedermayer, Lídia Pereira, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Ralf Seekatz, Inese Vaidere Renew Gilles Boyer, Engin Eroglu, Luis Garicano, Billy Kelleher, Caroline Nagtegaal, Dragoş Pîslaru, Stéphanie Yon-Courtin S&D Marek Belka, Jonás Fernández, Niels Fuglsang, Eero Heinäluoma, Aurore Lalucq, Pedro Marques,
[Show full text]
European Parliament 2014-2019
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Budgets 2017/0351(COD) 20.6.2018 OPINION of the Committee on Budgets for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a framework for interoperability between EU information systems (borders and visa) and amending Council Decision 2004/512/EC, Regulation (EC) No 767/2008, Council Decision 2008/633/JHA, Regulation (EU) 2016/399 and Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 (COM(2017)0793 – C8-0002/2018 – 2017/0351(COD)) Rapporteur for opinion: Bernd Kölmel AD\1156513EN.docx PE616.791v02-00 EN United in diversity EN PA_Legam PE616.791v02-00 2/9 AD\1156513EN.docx EN SHORT JUSTIFICATION The rapporteur welcomes the two Commission proposals for a regulation for establishing a framework for interoperability between EU information systems adopted on 12 December 2017. Both proposals aim at overcoming structural shortcomings in the present EU information management architecture by making information systems interoperable, i.e. able to exchange data and share information. The rapporteur fully subscribes to their purpose, which is to ensure fast access to information, including by law enforcement authorities, to detect multiple identities and combat identity fraud, to facilitate identity checks of third- country nationals and to facilitate the prevention, investigation or prosecution of serious crime and terrorism. The present opinion concerns the proposal on borders and visa, which aims to regulate access to the Visa Information System, the Schengen Information System as currently regulated by Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006, the Entry-Exit System (EES) and the European Travel information and Authorisation System (ETIAS).
[Show full text]