DOCSLIB.ORG

GRANT PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GRANT PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN I GRANT PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN i GRANT PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN ii ***This Page Left Intentionally Blank*** GRANT PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN iii GRANT PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Prepared for: Grant Parish Prepared by: Stephenson Disaster Management Institute Ms. Lauren Stevens Mr. Chris Rippetoe Mr. Joseph Harris Mr. Brant Mitchell Dr. Carol J. Friedland, P.E., Ph.D., C.F.M. Mr. Stuart Nolan Louisiana State University – LA Emerging Technology Center Baton Rouge, LA 70803 March 16, 2017 GRANT PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN iv ***This Page Left Intentionally Blank*** GRANT PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This 2016 Grant Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update was coordinated by the Grant Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Steering Committee, in collaboration with the participating jurisdictions as well as community stakeholders and the general public. The participating jurisdictions are made up of the following communities: Unincorporated Grant Parish Town of Colfax Village of Creola Village of Dry Prong Village of Georgetown Town of Montgomery Town of Pollock Special thanks is directed to all of those who assisted in contributing feedback and expertise on this document, especially the Grant Parish Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. These combined efforts have made this project possible. The Grant Parish Steering Committee consists of the following individuals, who are credited in the creation of this document: Cade Fletcher Director Grant Parish OEP Steven McCain Sheriff Grant Parish Sheriff's Office Ossie Clark Mayor of Colfax Town of Colfax Danny Moore Mayor of Creola Village of Creola John L. Landry Mayor of Dry Prong Village of Dry Prong Danny Olden Mayor of Georgetown Village of Georgetown Vera Waters Mayor of Montgomery Town of Montgomery Jerome Scott Mayor of Pollack Town of Pollack The 2016 Grant Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update was written by the Stephenson Disaster Management Institute, Louisiana State University. Further comments should be directed to the Grant Parish Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness: 503 Main St., Colfax, LA, 71417. GRANT PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN vi Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 Location, Demography, and Economy........................................................................................................ 1-2 Location .................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 Economy ................................................................................................................................................. 1-4 Hazard Mitigation ....................................................................................................................................... 1-4 General Strategy ......................................................................................................................................... 1-6 2016 Plan Update ....................................................................................................................................... 1-7 2. Hazard Identification and Parish-Wide Risk Assessment ....................................................................... 2-1 Prevalent Hazards to the Community ........................................................................................................ 2-1 Previous Occurrences ................................................................................................................................. 2-3 Probability of Future Hazard Events ........................................................................................................... 2-3 Inventory of Assets for the Entire Parish .................................................................................................... 2-4 Essential Facilities of the Parish.................................................................................................................. 2-6 Future Development Trends .................................................................................................................... 2-11 Future Hazard Impacts ............................................................................................................................. 2-12 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................... 2-13 Hazard Identification ................................................................................................................................ 2-15 Drought ................................................................................................................................................. 2-15 Flooding ................................................................................................................................................ 2-18 Thunderstorms ..................................................................................................................................... 2-39 Tornadoes ............................................................................................................................................. 2-51 Tropical Cyclones .................................................................................................................................. 2-57 Wildfires ............................................................................................................................................... 2-72 Winter Storms ...................................................................................................................................... 2-87 3. Capability Assessment ............................................................................................................................ 3-1 Policies, Plans, and Programs ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 Building Codes, Permitting, Land Use Planning and Ordinances ........................................................... 3-2 Administration, Technical, and Financial.................................................................................................... 3-3 Education and Outreach ............................................................................................................................. 3-4 Flood Insurance and Community Rating System ........................................................................................ 3-5 NFIP Worksheets ........................................................................................................................................ 3-8 4. Mitigation Strategy ................................................................................................................................. 4-1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4-1 Goals ........................................................................................................................................................... 4-1 2016 Mitigation Actions and Update on Previous Plan Actions ................................................................. 4-2 GRANT PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN vii Grant 2011 Hazard Mitigation Action Update ........................................................................................ 4-3 Unincorporated Grant New Mitigation Actions ................................................................................... 4-12 Town of Colfax - New Mitigation Actions ............................................................................................. 4-14 Village of Creola - New Mitigation Actions ........................................................................................... 4-16 Village of Dry Prong - New Mitigation Actions ..................................................................................... 4-18 Village of Georgetown - New Mitigation Actions ................................................................................. 4-20 Town of Montgomery - New Mitigation Actions .................................................................................. 4-22 Town of Pollock - New Mitigation Actions ........................................................................................... 4-24 Action Prioritization .................................................................................................................................. 4-26 Appendix A: Planning Process ........................................................................................................................ A-1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................................... A-1 The Grant Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update ...................................................................................... A-1 Planning ...................................................................................................................................................... A-3 Coordination ..............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 114/Thursday, June 13, 2002/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2002 / Notices 40735 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Dated: June 7, 2002. pages of comments from numerous Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: Art Payne, commenters, including the parties 202–564–3261; facsimile: 202–565– Acting Director, National Center for requesting more time. EPA believes that 0050; e-mail: [email protected]. Environmental Assessment. it has appropriately responded to the [FR Doc. 02–14993 Filed 6–12–02; 8:45 am] comments received. Furthermore, EPA SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BILLING CODE 6560–50–P is establishing these TMDLs pursuant to Foundation for Global Action on deadlines established in a consent Persistent Organic Pollutants: A United decree in the case styled Sierra Club, et States Perspective, developed by ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION al. v. Clifford et al., No. 96–0527, (E.D. scientists from EPA, other federal and AGENCY La.) which does not at this late date state agencies, and the academic permit EPA to grant additional time for [FRL–7227–3] community, is a technical support public comment, absent relief from the document aimed at informing decision Clean Water Act Section 303(d): Final court, which the Agency does not makers, general academia, and the Agency Action on 98 Total Maximum believe is necessary to seek here. public on the scientific foundation and Daily Loads (TMDLs) and Final Agency However, EPA will continue to accept relevance to the United States of the Action on 20 Determinations That information submitted regarding Stockholm Convention on Persistent TMDLs Are Not Needed potential errors in the TMDL, and/or to Organic Pollutants (POPs).
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas
    Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1970-A Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas State Highway Commission Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas By R. C. GILSTRAP FLOODS OF 1968 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1970-A Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas State Highway Commission u. s. s. s. WATER RESOURCES DIVISION ROLL A, MO. RECEIVED APR 101972 AM PM 7|8|9|10|ll|12[li2i3i4i5|6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 76-185107 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1214 CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................................................................................................... Al Introduction.................................................................. ....................................................... 1 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................ 3 Definitions of terms and abbreviations...... .......... ........................................................... 3 Precipitation.................. .................................................................................................... 4 Floods..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana Natural and Scenic Rivers' Descriptions
    Louisiana Natural and Scenic Rivers' Descriptions (1) Pushepatapa Creek - Washington - From where East Fork and West Fork join near state line to where it breaks up prior to its entrance into the Pearl River. (2) Bogue Chitto River - Washington, St. Tammany - From the Louisiana-Mississippi state line to its entrance into the Pearl River Navigation Canal. (3) Tchefuncte River and its tributaries - Washington, Tangipahoa, St. Tammany - From its origin in Tangipahoa Parish to its juncture with the Bogue Falaya River. (4) Tangipahoa River - Tangipahoa - From the Louisiana-Mississippi state line to the I-12 crossing. (5) (Blank) (6) Tickfaw River - St. Helena - From the Louisiana-Mississippi state line to La. Hwy. 42. (7) Amite River-East Feliciana-From the Louisiana-Mississippi state line to the permanent pool level of the Darlington Reservoir; and from the Darlington Reservoir Dam to La. Hwy. 37; provided that the portion of the Amite River from the Louisiana-Mississippi state line to La. Hwy. 37 shall remain within the Natural and Scenic Rivers System until the issuance of a permit by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 1344 and 33 C.F.R. 232; provided, that if the Darlington Reservoir and dam are not approved and funded no later than September 1, 1997, the portion of the Amite River within the Natural and Scenic Rivers System shall be as follows: From the Louisiana-Mississippi state line to La. Hwy. 37. (8) Comite River - East Feliciana, East Baton Rouge - From the Wilson-Clinton Hwy. in East Feliciana Parish to the entrance of White Bayou in East Baton Rouge Parish.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of the Little River Basin, Louisiana
    Water Resources of the Little River Basin, Louisiana By M. W. GAYDOS, J. E. ROGERS, and R. P. SMITH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1989 Prepared in cooperation with the Louisiana Department of Public Works and the Louisiana Geological Survey Department of Conservation, Baton Rouge, Louisiana UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-600030 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price J3.15 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-02416 CONTENTS Page Abstract ______________ _ ____________ 1 Acknowledgments _ - - ______-_-- - 2 Introduction __ 2 The hydrologic setting __ _____ ______ 4 Summary of geology _ .. 4 Topography and drainage _ ________________ 6 Water use _______ _ ___________ 7 Hydrologic zones _________ ________ 8 Zone A ______ _ 9 Streams 9 Aquifers 11 Suitability of water _ _ _ 16 Zone B _____________________________ _ ____ 19 Streams _-_-_ _ _____________ _ _ 19 Aquifers __________ ___________ _ _ 20 Suitability of water ________________________ 22 Zone C ____________________________________ 23 Streams 23 Aquifers ______________________________- 24 Suitability of water ________________________ 29 Water conditions at population centers __ _ 30 Ruston _______ ____________ 31 Jonesboro-Hodge _ _ _ _ _____________ 34 Winnfield __________________________________ 35 Tullos-Urania-Olla _____________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Catahoula Parish, Louisiana
    Prepared in cooperation with the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Water Resources of Catahoula Parish, Louisiana Introduction In 2010, 30.01 million gallons per day (Mgal/d) of water were withdrawn in Catahoula Parish, Louisiana, including about Information concerning the availability, use, and 22.63 Mgal/d from groundwater sources and 7.38 Mgal/d from quality of water in Catahoula Parish, Louisiana (fig. 1), surface-water sources1 (table 1). Withdrawals for agricultural is critical for proper water-supply management. The use, composed of aquaculture, general irrigation, livestock, and purpose of this fact sheet is to present information that can rice irrigation, accounted for about 93 percent (28.05 Mgal/d) be used by water managers, parish residents, and others of the total water withdrawn (table 2). Other categories of use for stewardship of this vital resource. Information on the included public supply and rural domestic. Water-use data availability, past and current use, use trends, and water collected at 5-year intervals from 1960 to 2010 indicated that quality from groundwater and surface-water sources in water withdrawals peaked in 2000 at 30.99 Mgal/d (fig. 2). the parish is presented. Previously published reports (see References Cited section) and data stored in the U.S. 1Water-withdrawal data are based on estimated or reported site-specific data Geological Survey’s National Water Information System and aggregated data, which are distributed to sources. For a full description of water-use estimate methodology, see “Data Collection” in Sargent (2011). (U.S. Geological Survey, 2016) are the primary sources of Tabulation of numbers across text and tables may result in different totals the information presented here.
    [Show full text]
  • Interior and Army Sign Cooperative Agreement To
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR k********************newsrelease FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Most - 343-5634 U. S. ARMYCORPS OF ENGINEERS Huppuch - OX 7-1276 For Release MARCH5, 1964 INTERIORAND ARMYSIGN COOPERATIVEACREEMENT FOR WATER PRDJECT IN LOUISIANA; WATERFOWLTO BENEFIT A major waterfowl wintering area in Louisiana today was assured a long life by joint action of the Department of the Interior and the Corps of Army Engineers. A cooperative agreement between the two Federal agencies will protect the fish and wildlife values of Catahoula Lake from construction of Lock and Dam No. 2, a part of the Ouachita Black River Navigation Project near Jonesville, La. Under the agreement, the Corps will use funds appropriated for the project to construct a diversion channel from Catahoula Lake to Black River downstream from the dam site with an outlet-control structure at the lakeward end of the channel; construct a low dam in Little River at elevation 34 feet above mean sea level to prevent flow into Catahoula Lake from the navigation pool; and maintain these structures as part of the project. The Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife of the Department of the Interior will assume responsibility for day-to-day operation of the control strnctures to regulate water levels in the lake under a plan to be developed cooperatively with the Corps and the State of Louisiana. Great numbers of ducks winter on the lake and the adjoining Catahoula National Wildlife Refuge. This high use by waterfowl depends upon normal water- level fluctuation over the open lakebed. The zone between elevations 27 and 30 feet includes about 18,CCO acres of land which produces waterfowl food plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancillary Benefits of the Ouachita River Navigation System
    Ancillary Benefits of the Ouachita River Navigation System Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. Selin Celikkol, MSIE Department of Industrial Engineering University of Arkansas Submitted to the Mack Blackwell Rural Transportation Center University of Arkansas May 2007 Abstract The Ouachita River, one of five designated commercially navigable waterways in the state, is economically and socially beneficial to the region’s communities and industries. The river provides barge service via two public ports in addition to privately owned terminals and riverfront industrial sites. The Ouachita has been classified as a “low- use river” and is at high risk of losing its federal funding for maintenance and operation. This study investigates the ancillary benefits of the Ouachita River to the State of Arkansas including recreation, tourism, commercial shipping, water supply and electrical generation. The goal of this report is to provide information that may be useful in seeking ongoing funding of the river. 1.0 Project Description The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Office of Management and Budget have classified the Ouachita River1 as a "low-use river" because of what they regard as insufficient tonnage being shipped on the waterway. However, users of the river contend that when all of the uses of the waterway are considered, the federal interest is well-served in terms of economic, social and environmental benefits. The Ouachita River, one of five designated commercially navigable waterways in Arkansas, has public ports at Crossett and Camden in south Arkansas. Barge service is also available through privately owned terminals and riverfront industrial sites along the river.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Louisiana Court of Appeal, Third Circuit Ca 07
    STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA 07-821 HENRY SANDERS VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ********** APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LASALLE, NO. 33,917 HONORABLE JOHN PHILIP MAUFFRAY, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE ********** BILLY HOWARD EZELL JUDGE ********** Court composed of Michael G. Sullivan, Glenn B. Gremillion, and Billy Howard Ezell, Judges. REVERSED. Albin Alexandre Provosty Provosty, Sadler, deLaunay P. O. Drawer 1791 Alexandria, LA 71309-1791 (318) 445-3631 Counsel for Defendant/Appellant: State of Louisiana, Department of Natural Resources William Henry Sanders J. Christopher Peters Attorney at Law P. O. Box 1363 Jena, LA 71342-1363 (318) 992-8251 Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee: Henry Sanders Ezell, Judge. Henry Sanders filed a suit against the State of Louisiana involving land located on Catahoula Lake. Mr. Sanders sought to be recognized as possessor of a certain area of land and also asked that a boundary be established between his land and the land owned by the State, as owner of the bed of Catahoula Lake and/or Little River. Additionally, Mr. Sanders sought an injunction prohibiting the State from “artificially flooding and holding of water or by artificially inducing a rapid rate of regression of back water and overflow water.” Finally, Mr. Sanders sought an award of damages against the State, alleging that the State was in bad faith. The trial court denied Mr. Sanders’ last two claims. However, the trial court found that the proper ordinary high water mark of Catahoula Lake in 1812 was 30.1- foot elevation above mean sea level (MSL), as opposed to the 36-foot elevation that the State claimed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lasalle Parish !! !! 4 3 Catahoula
    ¢Á01 !! INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM To U.S. 165 To Grayson To Sikes 55 To U.S. 165 To ¤¤¤£ U.S. HIGHWAY SYSTEM CALDWELL &''2 CALDWELL STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM PARISH T PARISH R 2 E R 3 E R 4 E WINN To Grayson 11 DIVIDED HIGHWAY WITH CONTROL OF ACCESS PARISH N T DIVIDED HIGHWAY WITH FRONTAGE ROADS 11 5 5 MULTI-LANE UNDIVIDED HIGHWAY N &'843 CATAHOULA Flat Creek &'127 24 19 21 22 23 MULTI-LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY 21 22 23 20 21 PARISH To Winnfield 19 20 22 24 19 23 20 &'506 Sandy Creek ! æ 31°55'N ! Bear Branch 24 !! PUBLIC ROAD Standard 165 -92°00'W 31°55'N 31°55'N Ý ¤£ Rabbit Branch -92°20'W -92°25'W BITUMINOUS ROAD 125 &'124 26 &' &'124 25 ÛÒ ÛÒ ÛÒ 28 &'126 GRAVEL ROAD 27 Ý &'124 27 25 28 30 29 28 27 30 29 !! 30 29 OLLA PAVED ROAD POP. 1385 !! æ 26 26 OLLA 25 æ PROPOSED HIGHWAY Castor Creek AIRPORT æ &'124 Ý Ý &'124 p âÐ HIGHWAY BRIDGE (MORE THAN 20' SPAN) 35 33 31 32 ! 3 34 36 ! Ð æ 31 32 33 34 Chickasaw Creek 35 â HIGHWAY BRIDGES CLOSELY SPACED 31 32 36 Cypress Creek æ (W 36 To Harrisonburg 34 33 Ð 35 ë HIGHWAY DRAWBRIDGE 36 Ý &'125 ©« HIGHWAY TUNNEL 6 6 5 3 3 3 2 qq OVERHEAD STRUCTURE AD 165 2 1 ¤ O £ 4 Delaney R ¤ IL 2 Branch FF A 5 1 1 1 1 R 4 1 6 5 4 FT PUBLIC FERRY (FF - FREE, TF - TOLL) IC IF C Waterhole A Branch &'127 P STATE BOUNDARY N IO N U 9 10 10 PARISH BOUNDARY 7 8 !! 12 Franklin Branch 12 12 9 10 7 8 9 !! 7 INCORPORATED AREA BOUNDARY 12 URANIA 11 8 11 POP.
    [Show full text]
  • Ouachita River Basin TMDL for TSS, Turbity and Siltation
    TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) For TSS, Turbidity, and Siltation For 13 Subsegments in the Ouachita River Basin 303(d) listed subsegments Bayou Chauvin 080102 Bayou Louis 080202 Bayou Bartholomew (Scenic) 080401 Boeuf River 080901 Big Creek 080903 Bayou Lafourche 080904 Clear Lake 080910 Bayou Macon 081001 Joe’s Bayou 081002 Tensas River 081201 Lake St. Joseph 081202 Little River- Castor Creek (Scenic) 081601 Little River- Bear Creek (Scenic) 081602 US EPA Region 6 Final May 31, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary....................................................................................................................... iv 1. Introduction................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Study Area Description.............................................................................................................. 1 2.1 General Information.............................................................................................................. 1 2.2 Problem Statement............................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Turbidity and TSS......................................................................................................... 4 2.2.2 Siltation ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Water Quality Standards.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 61/Friday, March 29
    15196 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 61 / Friday, March 29, 2002 / Notices This action is taken under the order in the lawsuit Sierra Club, et al. that TMDLs are not needed are available authority of 42 U.S.C. section 122(i). v. Clifford et al., No. 96–0527, (E.D. La.). for public inspection at this address as well. Documents from the Wendy L. Carney, This notice also announces the administrative record file may be Acting Director, Superfund Division. availability for comment of EPA determinations that TMDLs are not viewed at www.epa.gov/region6/water/ [FR Doc. 02–7770 Filed 3–28–02; 8:45 am] needed for 20 waterbody/pollutant tmdl.htm, or obtained by calling or BILLING CODE 6560–50–M combinations in the Calcasieu and writing Ms. Caldwell at the above Ouachita river basins because new data address. Please contact Ms. Caldwell to schedule an inspection. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and information show that water quality AGENCY standards are being met. This proposed FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: action would result in the removal of 20 Ellen Caldwell at (214) 665–7513. [FRL–7165–6 ] waterbody/pollutant combinations from the Louisiana 303(d) list. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1996, Clean Water Act Section 303(d): two Louisiana environmental groups, Availability of Total Maximum Daily DATES: Comments must be submitted in the Sierra Club and Louisiana Loads (TMDLs) and Determinations writing to EPA on or before April 29, Environmental Action Network That TMDLs Are Not Needed 2002. (plaintiffs), filed a lawsuit in Federal AGENCY: Environmental Protection ADDRESSES: Comments on the 98 Court against the United States Agency (EPA).
    [Show full text]
  • CONG BOOK MARCH 2017 Final
    Projects Supported by Ouachita River Valley Association MARCH 2017 1 FOREWORD The Ouachita River Valley Association is pleased to have the opportunity to submit information outlining some of the most urgent water resources development needs in the Ouachita River Basin in Arkansas and Louisiana. We are grateful for the role the federal government, through the Congress and the Administration, represented by the Corps of Engineers, has played in developing and caring for the bountiful natural resources in this basin for more than a century. Much of the economic, recreational, and natural resources preservation of the basin has been made possible through these investments. The Ouachita River is a unique resource that serves not only the residents of the region but the nation at-large. With this opportunity comes the responsibility to conserve and protect what has been inherited from nature and those preceding us. In as much as these assets are held in national trust, it is appropriate that they are operated and maintained by the national government in partnership with state and local governments. The Ouachita River Valley Association is proud to have been a stakeholder in these efforts for more than a century. Information presented in this booklet outlines those projects of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that the Ouachita River Valley Association strongly supports and encourages completion of at the earliest possible date. Funding levels for Fiscal Year (FY) 2016/2017 are presented for each project listed. Also included is suggested language to be used in an appropriate document that would authorize bank stabilization measures on the Ouachita-Black Rivers from mile 0 to mile 460 at Remmel Dam near Hot Springs, AR, and add navigation from Mile 41.5 on the Black River, LA, at the mouth of Little River, up Little River 14,000 feet, as a project feature of the Ouachita-Black Rivers Navigation Project.
    [Show full text]