DOCSLIB.ORG

RAMPART RANGE ROAD Maintained by Other Platted, Prescriptive Or Other Grant App No: Incorporated City Deed Vicinity Map Location Easement Date: 5/20/2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RAMPART RANGE ROAD Maintained by Other Platted, Prescriptive Or Other Grant App No: Incorporated City Deed Vicinity Map Location Easement Date: 5/20/2019 I - 2 ) `5 3 34 9 3 SITE S F USAF ACADEMY ( d R T e E g L n L a E R R PIKE NATNL. FOREST C rt O a U p N m T a Y R 30 Rd 9 Iu FS H W Y L o y ) 2 0 4 0 C 3 r e S e F k ( R d d R e g n a R t r Project Start a p S m c a h R u b F Woodland Rd a T r r o t a r h r n Tr r D L y t n a l l r R ie an ad ge n R re G d Project End 0 500 1,000 Feet ¯ 1 inch = 1,000 feet Legend Rampart Range Rd ROW County Maintained Unknown RAMPART RANGE ROAD Maintained by Other Platted, Prescriptive or Other Grant App No: Incorporated City Deed Vicinity Map Location Easement Date: 5/20/2019 19 May 2019 Dear El Paso County Public Works, We are writing this letter in support the Federal Lands Access Program Grant concerning Rampart Range Road. We live immediately on Rampart Range Road in El Paso County, and have seen the traffic increase greatly over the years. Rampart Range Road is the main county road leading Rampart Reservoir's National Forest campgrounds and many trails. This forest access is one of the closest to Colorado Springs and surrounding communities and the traffic increase over just the last 5 years has been considerable. Living next to this road, we are keenly aware of the dust, potholes, and problems of this dirt road. Now, we have a large number of bicyclists and runners trying to enjoy the national forest, but are forced to deal with the fugitive dust issues as well. Upper Rampart Range Road was built in the 1930's by the CCC when the population of Colorado Springs was around 33,000, and has not really been improved upon since. Yet, it has now become a main forest access for recreation to the second largest city in the state of Colorado, with the metro area now reaching nearly 675,000 people. Colorado Springs is projected to surpass Denver in the near future, so it makes good sense for FLAP to invest in this area now. I am please that the county is applying for the FLAP for Rampart Range Road, and I support the improvement. Fixing this road is long overdue. If you have any questions or would like to speak to me, please call us at 719-687-2215 or email us at: [email protected]. Sincerely, James C. Higgins Mary M. Higgins 12005 Front Range Rd Woodland Park, CO 80863 May 19th, 2019 Dear El Paso County Public Works, This letter is written in regard to support of obtaining the Federal Lands Access Program Grant in order to improve the condition of Rampart Range Road. My family and I have lived on Rampart Range Road since 1998. Over the past twenty-one years the traffic has exponentially increased. This is a result of an increase in traffic going to commerial and recreational areas such as Eagle lake camp and Rampart Reservoir Recreation Area. The local population of both Teller County and El Paso County have increased substantially within the last ten years. However, as the population and traffic has increased over the years, there has not been any substantial improvements to Rampart Range Road. Upper Rampart Range Road is a dirt road that provides the only access to a significant portion of Pike National Forest, and the previously mentioned commercial and recreational facilities. Washboards, potholes and road dust have become a year round problem. A myriad of peer reviewed studies have discovered an association between road dust exposure and poor health outcomes especially within the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. I am concerned that the fugitive dust caused by the traffic is becoming a health hazard for my family and neighbors alike. Quality of life has decreased for me and my family due to the immense amount of traffic and associated factors. I am thrilled to hear that El Paso County is applying for the FLAP grant in order to address the previously mentioned issues with Rampart Range Road. I strongly support the improvement of Rampart Range Road. Improving the condition of this road has been overlooked for many years. This road is in desperate of repairs. I can be reached at 719-338-1662 and I would be happy to answer any questions or provide additional information. Sincerely, Scott Kerschner and the Kerschner Family Dear El Paso County Public Works, We are writing this letter in support the Federal Lands Access Program Grant for Rampart Range Road. We live on Rampart Range Road in El Paso County, and have seen the traffic increase greatly over the past 17 years. As the only county road accessing Rampart Reservoir, the reservoir’s campground and the surrounding Pike National Forest campgrounds and trails, traffic from Colorado Springs and surrounding communities passes by our home. Living next to this road, we are keenly aware of the dust, potholes, and washboarding of this gravel road. Additionally, we have bicyclists and runners dealing with the fugitive dust issues as well. Upper Rampart Range Road was built in the 1930's by the CCC when the population of Colorado Springs was around 33,000 and has not been improved upon since. It has now become a main forest access for recreation to the second largest city in the state of Colorado, with a population of nearly 675,000 people. I am pleased that the county is applying for the FLAP for Rampart Range Road, and I support the improvement. Bringing this road up to standards and in compliance with EPA dust mitigation is overdue and in the long run may save the county money otherwise spent on grading and mag chloride treatment. If you have any questions or would like to speak to us, please call 719-687- 3896. Sincerely, Jeff and Anne Bodin 11690 Rampart Range Rd Woodland Park, CO 80863 (El Paso County) From: Philomena [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 6:33 AM To: Jana Nemeckova <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Federal Lands Access Program Grant Rampart Range Road CAUTION: This email originated from outside the El Paso County technology network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please call IT Customer Support at 520-6355 if you are unsure of the integrity of this message. Dear El Paso County Public Works, We are writing this letter in support the Federal Lands Access Program Grant concerning Rampart Range Road. We live off of Rampart Range Road in El Paso County, and have seen the traffic increase greatly over the years. As one of the main county roads leading Rampart Reservoir's National Forest campgrounds and many trails, Colorado Springs and surrounding communities the increasing traffic is considerable. Living near this road, we are keenly aware of the dust, potholes, and problems of this dirt road. Now, we have a large number of bicyclists and runners dealing with the fugitive dust issues as well. Upper Rampart Range Road was built in the 1930's by the CCC when the population of Colorado Springs was around 33,000, and has not really been improved upon since. Yet, it has now become a main forest access for recreation to the second largest city in the state of Colorado, of nearly 675,000 people. I am please that the county is applying for the FLAP for Rampart Range Road, and I support the improvement. Fixing this road is long overdue. If you have any questions or would like to speak to me, please call 719-687-4102. Sincerely, Robert and Philomena Chillino From: Lorie Schleicher [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 12:11 PM To: Jana Nemeckova <[email protected]> Cc: 'Mary' <[email protected]>; Robert Schleicher <[email protected]> Subject: FLAP Grant for Rampart Range Road CAUTION: This email originated from outside the El Paso County technology network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please call IT Customer Support at 520-6355 if you are unsure of the integrity of this message. To Whom It May Concern, We live on Rampart Range Road, we are the first big black wrought iron gate that you see on your right once you turn right off of Loy Creek Road onto Rampart Range Road. My husband and I are in support of the County applying for the Federal Land Access Grant for Rampart Range Road, or as we call it “The Super Highway”. We are very blessed to live in such a beautiful part of the State, but living on a road that leads you to such sought after recreational activities has become an extreme nuisance, i.e., dust, heavy traffic, speeding, drivers that do not know how to stay on their side of the road, or just people in general that do not know how to drive in the mountains, and those that have no common sense in this dry arid climate as you will see cigarette butts on the road, bicyclist and even the US Olympic Runners park at the top of our driveway so they can train up here! We truly appreciate your consideration of this grant which will help all of us tremendously with the dust issue, but it has become an extreme safety issue up here as well.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RURAL ADDRESS SIGNS Revised: DEC 2006 Page 1 of 3 PART HIGHWAY SIGNS RECOMMENDED SECTION GUIDE and INFORMATION SIGNS PRACTICES SUB-SECTION
    Issued: DEC 2003 RURAL ADDRESS SIGNS Revised: DEC 2006 Page 1 of 3 PART HIGHWAY SIGNS RECOMMENDED SECTION GUIDE AND INFORMATION SIGNS PRACTICES SUB-SECTION General road is numbered accordingly. In 1979, Strathcona County developed a New township road numbers are assigned by rural address system to assist emergency adding a zero to the township number. The services in quickly locating residences and intermediate Township Roads (road developments in rural areas. The rural allowances) are numbered sequentially at address system also provided a convenient two-mile intervals. method for motorists to locate residences and rural businesses without the clutter of Ranges are numbered sequentially from east directional signage at major highway to west, starting from the longitudinal intersections. meridian lines (4th, 5th or 6th meridian). New Range Road numbers are assigned by The Strathcona County address system adding a zero to the range number. The provided the basis for the rural address intermediate range roads (road allowances) system, which is presently used across the are numbered sequentially at one-mile province and is described in the following intervals. guidelines. In urban areas, different addressing systems may be used, as Forced Road Allowances determined by the municipality. While many rural roads in Alberta form part Other rural address systems may exist in of the survey grid road system, other roads Alberta, such as M.D. of Foothills’ rural street are irregular and simply follow rivers, numbering system, which is an extension of streams or the topography of the land. the City of Calgary’s urban system. The type These roads are usually assigned an of addressing system to be used should be auxiliary township road number or range discussed with the rural municipality prior to road number based on the alignment of the installation.
    [Show full text]
  • Acorn Lane 1600 Oak Ridge Rd Cul-De-Sac 4.35 Aspen Crest 700 Mere Wind Dr
    Street Distance Beginning Point End Point 1998 PCR Acorn Lane 1600 Oak Ridge Rd Cul-de-Sac 4.35 Aspen Crest 700 Mere Wind Dr. Cul-de-Sac 0.00 Balsam Drive 1460 Hemlock -East Hemlock - West 4.59 Bea Lane 915 Grove St. Main St 4.24 Birch Lane A 465 Concord Circle Pavement Change 3.94 Birch Lane B 990 Pavement Change Ocean Terr 3.09 Blackstrap Road 6356 Falmouth TL Route 100 Blanchard Rd Ext A 983 Skillin Rd Pavement Change 3.26 Blanchard Rd Ext B 309 Pavement Change Pavement Change 3.26 Blanchard Rd Ext C 700 Pavement Change Skillin 3.26 Blanchard Road A 5874 Blanchard Rd Ext Pavement Change Blanchard Road B 8941 Pavement Change Main St Blue Heron 315 Ledge Ln Dead End 4.60 Broadmoor Drive 815 Willow Lane Tuttle Rd 4.25 Brookside Dr 895 Greely Rd Dead End 4.80 Bruce Hill Road 1 5100 Blanchard Rd Pleasant Valley Rd 3.00 Bruce Hill Road 2 5880 Blanchard Rd Range Rd 2.89 Bruce Hill Road 3 1900 Range Rd Dead End 3.97 Candlewick Lane 645 Country Charm Dead End 2.53 Carol Street 390 Woodside Hillcrest St 3.89 Carriage Rd 2500 Route 88 Dead End 4.05 Chet's Way 2975 Tuttle Rd. Dead End 0.00 Concord Circle 305 Wildwood Birch Lane 4.60 Conifer Ridge Road 1090 Route 88 Cul-de-Sac 3.94 Cottage Farms Road 955 Main St Dead End 4.80 Country Charm Road 1455 Val Halla Hedgrow Dr 3.65 Crestwood Road 1585 East Pinewood West Pinewood 2.39 Cross Road 1865 Winn Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • 02/19/2021 Campbell County Maintained Roads 1 NAME RD # from to LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE ADOPTED Alexandria Pike East CR 1304 Low Ga
    02/19/2021 Campbell County Maintained Roads 1 NAME RD # FROM TO LENGTH WIDTH SURFACE ADOPTED Alexandria Pike East CR 1304 Low Gap East KY 709 5,650 25 Blacktop Jan-93 Alexandria Pike West CR 1557 Dead End Dead End 14,225 25 Blacktop Jul-19 Aulick Road CR 1214 Hissem Road Fairlane Road 6,630 13 Blacktop Aug-87 Autumn Lane CR 1307 US 27 Dead End 1,150 15 Blacktop Aug-87 Avery Road CR 1111 KY 9 KY 2828 1,208 15 Blacktop Aug-87 Awesome Place CR 1512 Wolf Road Dead End 1,200 25 Blacktop Apr-02 Backus Drive CR 1305 US 27 Dead End 1,936 20 Blacktop Aug-87 Bakerfield Road CR 1221 Boone Smith Road Dead End 5,162 16 Blacktop Aug-87 Barrs Branch CR 1100 KY 10 KY 1121 7,437 16 Blacktop Aug-87 Baynum Hill CR 1114 KY 10 Dead End 3,656 15 Blacktop Aug-87 Belle Point Drive CR 1546 Pleasant Ridge Road Cul-de-sac 1,200 25 Blacktop May-06 Bezold Road CR 1120 Burns Road California Crossroads 6,480 16 Blacktop Aug-87 Birch Creek Road CR 1566 Darlington Creek Drive Dead End 240 25 Asphalt Feb-21 Black Road CR 1521 Eight Mile Road Dead End 2,300 11 Blacktop Aug-87 Blangey Road CR 1325 KY 8 Dead End 3,450 15 Blacktop Aug-87 Blossom Drive CR 1311 US 27 Dead End 1,100 20 Blacktop Aug-87 Blossom Lane CR 1360 US 27 Southgate City Limits 3,450 22 Blacktop Aug-87 Blue Sky Lane CR 1526 Poplar Thicket Dead End 980 10 Blacktop Aug-89 Bob Huber Drive CR 1246 Bud Pogue Way End of County Maintenance 800 24 Concrete Dec-89 Bob White Lane CR 1132 KY 10 Dead End 3,405 13 Blacktop Aug-87 Boone Smith Road CR 1222 Pleasant Ridge Road KY 1936 8,843 17 Blacktop Aug-87 Boyd Road
    [Show full text]
  • ROCKY MOUNTAIN National Park CO LO 1^^.00
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN National Park CO LO 1^^.00 UNITED STATES RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL PARK. SERIES Copyright by WiswaU The Village of Estes Park nestles in a quiet little valley, surrounded by mountains Page two An Appreciation of Rocky Mountain National Park By ENOS A. MILLS, Author of "Wild Life on the Rockies," "The Rocky Mountain Wonderland," etc. Written Especially fer the United States Railroad Administration j]HE Rocky Mountain National Park is a marvelous grouping of gentle­ ness and grandeur; an eloquent, wordless hymn, sung in silent, poetic pictures; a wilderness mountain world of groves and grass plots, crags and canyons, rounded lakes with shadow-matted shores that rest in peace within the purple forest. There are wild flowers of every color, and many a silken meadow edged with ferns. Brokenness and beauty, terrace upon terrace, a magnificent hanging wild garden. Over these terraces waters rush and pour. From ice-sculptured, snow-piled peaks, young and eager streams leap in white cascades between crowding cliffs and pines. Through this wildness winds the trail, with its secrets of the centuries, where adventures come and go and where the magic camp fire blossoms in the night. In these primeval scenes the grizzly bear gives to the wilderness its master spell; the mountain ram poses on the cliff; the laughing, varied voice of the coyote echoes when the afterglow falls; the home-loving beaver builds his willow-fringed hut; the birds sing; the cheerful chipmunk frolics and never grows up; and here the world stays young. The Rocky Mountain National Park holds adventure for every visitor.
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT Access Management Guidebook
    ReducingTrafficCongestion andImprovingTrafficSafety inMichiganCommunities: THE ACCESSMANAGEMENT GUIDEBOOK COMMUNITYA COMMUNITYB Cover graphics and ROW graphic by John Warbach, Planning & Zoning Center, Inc. Photos by Tom Doyle, Michigan Department of Transportation. Speed Differential graphic by Michigan Department of Transportation. Road Hierarchy graphic by Rossman Martin & Associates, Inc. Reducing Traffic Congestion and Improving Traffic Safety in Michigan Communities: THE ACCESS MANAGEMENT GUIDEBOOK October, 2001 Prepared by the Planning & Zoning Center, Inc. 715 N. Cedar Street Lansing, MI 48906-5206 517/886-0555 (tele), www.pzcenter.com Under contract to the Michigan Department of Transportation With the assistance of three Advisory Committees listed on the next page The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Michigan State Transportation Commission or the Michigan Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. Dedication This Guidebook is dedicated to the countless local elected officials, planning and zoning commissioners, zoning administrators, building inspectors, professional planners, and local, county and state road authority personnel who: • work tirelessly every day to make taxpayers investment in Michigan roads stretch as far as it can with the best possible result; and • who try to make land use decisions that build better communities without undermining the integrity of Michigan's road system. D:\word\access\title
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Monument Creek Watershed Landscape Assessment
    MonumentMonument CreekCreek WatershedWatershed LandscapeLandscape AssessmentAssessment a Legacy Resource Management Program Project Monument Creek Watershed Landscape Assessment prepared for: United States Air Force Academy 8120 Edgerton Dr Ste 40 Air Force Academy CO 80840-2400 prepared by: John Armstrong and Joe Stevens Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University, College of Natural Resources Fort Collins CO 80523 31 January 2002 Copyright 2002 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Cover photo: Panorama of Pikes Peak and the Rampart Range (the western boundary of the Monument Creek Watershed) from Palmer Park. Photograph by J. Armstrong. Funding provided by the Legacy Resource Management Program, administered by the US Army Corps of Engineers. table of contents list of figures ................................................................................................3 list of tables ..................................................................................................3 list of maps ..................................................................................................3 list of photographs .....................................................................................4 acknowledgements...........................................................................................5 introduction .......................................................................................................7 project history .............................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Involvement Summary With
    Prepared for Volume 2: Developing Vision 2040 Prepared by Phase 3 Stakeholder Involvement Summary with November 2016 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Community Outreach .................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Targeted Outreach and Community Events ............................................................ 3 2.2 Social Media, News Media, and Paid Advertising ..................................................... 5 2.3 Print and Digital Survey Outreach ........................................................................ 7 2.4 Vision 2040 Open Houses ................................................................................... 7 3.0 Survey Summary ...................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Survey Questions and Responses ........................................................................ 11 3.2 General Comments ........................................................................................... 21 3.3 Respondent Characteristics ................................................................................ 22 4.0 Project Prioritization Workshops .............................................................................. 27 4.1 VTAC Workshop
    [Show full text]
  • Report for Range Roads 231 and 232
    Report for Range Roads 231 and 232 Response Counts Completion Rate: 96% Complete 24 Partial 1 Totals: 25 1. Which road do you primarily use? 42% Range Road 232 58% Range Road 231 Value Percent Responses Range Road 231 58.3% 14 Range Road 232 41.7% 10 Totals: 24 2. Are there features that you like about the roadways, and what are they? ResponseID Response 5 Low traffic, free flowing 6 I like that they are single lane. 7 increase number of lanes on range road 232 most important is street light on range road 232 if county provide services like water and sewerage residents will put there in puts as per county advice. that is very important because it help big time on people health by getting city water 8 Between Sherwood Park and hwy 14 it's nice and wide ResponseID Response 9 Traffic flows well 10 None 12 Faster access to Whitemud Freeway and Henday 13 It is a local collector and should remain this way. 14 It's paved 15 Quick access to highway 628 16 Has been good access for our commutes to date but don't like the heavier activity as a bypass road to the Whitemud freeway. 17 No 18 The turning lane in to Meadow Hawk. 19 I like there are no street lights on RR231. 20 Easy access 22 That they are paved. 25 Easy right hand turn onto 522 keeps traffic flow moving. 26 Easy right hand turn from 231 to 522 west bound 27 speed limit at 60/80km is good, but confusing near school zone at north end of RR 231.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Intersection This Fact Sheet Provides Guidance and Information Regarding Priority Intersections (Those Controlled by a Give Way Or Stop Sign)
    FACT SHEET FACT 7 Intersection Form – Priority Intersection This fact sheet provides guidance and information regarding priority intersections (those controlled by a give way or stop sign). Pros Cons • Low cost • Can be poor for cyclist and pedestrian safety • Low space requirements • On busy roads, pedestrian delays for crossing the road • No delays for major road through traffic may be excessive • When volumes on main road are high, can result in excessive delays and poorer safety outcomes for side road traffic Best Practice Considerations: • Crossing distances for pedestrians should be minimised • If cycle lanes are provided between blocks, these should be marked across the intersections • Where cycle lanes are provided on the major leg, the minor leg should be controlled by a give way or stop • Sight distances can dictate whether the intersection is uncontrolled, a give way or a stop • Some traffic turning movements can be banned to improve safety Basic A basic priority intersection treatment is where no right turning facilities are provided on the main road. In these layouts, turning traffic on the main road briefly blocks through traffic. These intersections are low cost due to the limited space required but can create safety issues if the traffic flows are heavy. Appropriate Locations • Intersections where the traffic volumes on the side road(s) are low • Low volume of right turning vehicles on the main road Limitations • Right turning vehicles on the main road impede through traffic • Vehicles turning out of the side street must find gaps in both directions of traffic. No turning bay Local examples: Roberts Street / Titiraupenga Street Flush Median A flush median is a painted area between traffic lanes which motorists can take refuge in while waiting to turn in/out of side roads or local accessways and where pedestrians can wait to cross the road.
    [Show full text]
  • Roads to Yukon Resources Feds, Territory Commit C$360 Million to Modernize Yukon Mining Roads
    Providing coverage of Alaska and Northwest Canada's mineral industry September 2017 Vol. 22, No. 37 Week of September 10, 2017 Mining News: Roads to Yukon resources Feds, territory commit C$360 million to modernize Yukon mining roads Shane Lasley Mining News Roads to some of Yukon’s richest mining districts are getting more than C$360 million in upgrades. Canada Prime Minister Justin Trudeau rolled out the plans to invest in modern transportation infrastructure during a visit to the territory on Sep. 2. “Modern infrastructure is key to developing and properly managing the incredible natural resources we have at our fingertips,” Trudeau said. The prime minister pledged C$247.8 million to the Yukon Resource Gateway project, a program that will upgrade more than 650 kilometers of roads in the territory, and build or replace numerous bridges, culverts, and stream crossings in two minerals-rich regions of the Yukon. “The Resource Gateway is one of the most significant projects ever undertaken in this territory and will have an incredibly positive impact on the Yukon economy,” said Yukon Premier Sandy Silver. Following the development of project agreements with First Nations in regions of the proposed road upgrades, as well as the precursor environmental and socio-economic reviews, the Yukon will contribute up to C$112.8 million to the road project. “First Nation agreement is essential to the continuation of the project and we look forward to working in partnership with them on this milestone development,” Silver added. This unprecedented road improvement project will boost the mine projects nearing development and add extra fuel to the excitement for mineral exploration in Canada’s westernmost territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinellas County Transportation Design Manual, January 2021
    Transportation Design Manual January 2021 Transportation Design Manual CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 5 CHAPTER 2 - REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER 3 – TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES ...................................................................................... 7 3.1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ............................................................................................................. 7 3.3 SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 7 3.4 INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) ......................................................................... 8 3.5 GAP STUDY ................................................................................................................................... 8 3.6 INTERSECTION DELAY STUDY ................................................................................................... 8 3.7 TRAVEL TIME AND DELAY STUDY .............................................................................................. 8 3.8 NO-PASSING ZONE STUDY ......................................................................................................... 8 3.9 ADVISORY
    [Show full text]