Term Paper Topics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Research Assignment Overview for Profs Term Paper Topics 1. What does archaeological evidence from the Gezer high place contribute to the understanding of the carving of a Decalogue on two stone tablets (Exod 20; Deut 5)? (Davi d Ussishkin, “On the hi story of the hi gh place at Gezer.” Timelines 2 (2006): 411-416. Leuven: Peeters.) 2. What does the Nash Papyrus contribute to the understanding of the importance of the Decalogue in Jewish spiritu ality in Egypt before the Common Era? (F. C. Burkitt, “The Hebrew Papyrus of the Ten Commandments.” Jewish Quarterly Review 15 (1903) 392-408. (http://faculty.gordon.e du/hu/bi /Te d_Hilde brandt/OTeSources/02- Exodus/Text/Articles/Burkitt-10Commands-JQR.pdf) 3. Ramesses II (1290-1224 B.C.E.) took great pride in his victory at the Battle of Kadesh (1286 B.C.E.). Explain the tactical mistake he made during the battle, and how the stories of his Battle at the Red Sea (Exod 14:21-31) may be a satire ridiculing Ramesses as a warrior. (Frank Moore Cross, “The Song of the Sea and Canaanite Myth.” In Canaanite Myth and He brew Epi c: essays in the history of the religion of Israel: 112-144, Cam bri dge : Harvard University 1973) 4. Merneptah (1224-1214 BCE) celebrated his victory over the “people of Israel” on a stela at Thebes. How may this inscription be related to the 300 villages which appeared in the hills north of Jerusalem around 1250 B.C.E. and the traditions in the Books of Joshua-Judges? (La wrence E. Stager, “Forging an Identity; the emergence of ancient Israel.” In The Oxford History of the Biblical World: 123-175. Edited by M.D. Coogan. New York: Oxford University.) 1. Pharaohs as early as Narmer (3000 B.C.E.) are portrayed with their right arms raised and holding a mace about to kill the enemies of Egypt. How does this Egyptian motif contribute to the understanding of the biblical description of Yahweh with “…a mighty hand and an outstretched arm”? (Exod 6:1-11; Deut 4:29-38; 1 Kgs 8:37-47; Ps 136:7- 17; Ezek 20:29-39). (T h omas E.Le vy; Edwin C M van den Brink; Yuva l Goren ; Da vi d Alon, “New Light on King Narmer and the Protodynastic Egyptian Presence in Canaan.” Biblical Archaeologist 58, (Mar 1995): 26-35.) 2. Two important theories of archaeology that developed during the first half of the 20th century are Cultural History and Annales Archaeology. Explain a significant difference in the approaches that Cultural Historians and Annales Archaeologists take to their work. (Ian Hodder and Scott Hutson, “Archaeology and History.” In Reading the Past: current approaches to intre pretati on in archaeology: 125-155. Ne w York : Cam bri dge University.) 3. Two important theories of archaeology that developed during the second half of the 20th century are Processual Archaeology and Post- Processual Archaeology. Explain a significant difference in the approaches that Processual Archaeologists and Post-Processual Archaeologists take to their work. (Ian Hodder and Scott Hutson, “Post- Processual Archaeology.” In Reading the Past: current approaches to intrepretation in archaeology: 206-235. New York : Cam bri dge University.) 4. Compare and contrast how Rainey and Edelmen use the Annals of Merneptah to identify the location of early Israelite villages. (G.W. Ahlstrom and Diana Edelman, “Merneptah’s Israel.” JN ES (1985): 44:59-61. Anson F. Rainey, “Israe l in Merenptah’s Inscription and Reliefs.” I EP 51 (2001): 57-75) 5. What do the reliefs in Sennacherib’s trophy room at Nineveh depicting his conquest of Lachish contribute to understanding the irony of the Nineveh motif in the book of Jonah? (Christoph Uehlinger, “Cli o in a world of pi ctures -- another look at the Lachi sh re liefs from Sennacheri b's southwest palace at Nineveh.” In “Like a bird in a cage”: 221-305. Edi te d by Lester L. Grabbe . Ne w York : Sheffield Academic, 2003) 6. The Bible indicts Ahab and Jezebel as heretics. What contrasting qualities do the Annals of Mesha contribute to the understanding of these monarchs of ancient Israel? (J. Andre w Dearman and Ge rald L. Mattingly, “Mesha Stela.” Anchor Bible Dictionary 4 (1992): 708-709. Edited by D. N. Freedman. New York : Double day.) 7. What do the Annals of Sennacherib on the Taylor Prism contribute to the understanding of why the Assyrians lifted their siege of Jerusalem without conquering the city (2 Kgs 18:17—19:36)? (Davi d Ussishkin, “Sennacherib's campaign to Philistia and Judah: Ekron, Lachish, and Jerusalem.” In Essays on Ancient Israel in its Near Eastern Conte xt: 339-357. Edi te d by Yai rah Amit, Ehud Ben Zvi; Israel Finkelstein and Oded Lipschits. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2006) 8. Explain and critique two pieces of archaeological evidence which Kenneth A. Kitchen offers to support his conclusion that the stories in the books of Joshua and Judges are historically reliable? (K.A. Ki tchen, “Hum ble Be ginnings – around and in Canaan,” In On the Reliabi li ty of the Old Testament: 159-239. Grand Raids: William B. Eerdmans.) 9. Explain why archaeologists consider the House of David Inscription recovered by Avraham Biran at Tel Dan and the Yehoash Inscription to be authentic, but the Ivory Pomegranate Inscription to be a forgery. (Shimon Ilani, Amnon Rosenfeld, Howard R. Feldman, Wolfgang E. Krumbein a n d Joel Kronfeld, “Archaeometric Analysis of the ‘Jehoash Inscription’ Tablet.” Journal of Archaeological Science 35 (2008): 2966-2972) 10. What does the Egyptian royal ritual of brother-sister marriage contribute to understanding Abraham’s reference to Sarah as his sister in the book of Ge ne sis (Ge n 12:9--13:1)? (Russell Mi ddle ton, “Brother-Sister and Father-Daughter Marriage in Ancient Egypt.” American Soci ologi cal Review 27, 5 (1962): 603-611). A Short Guide to Writing Research Papers in an introductory course on the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible The following notes and references are meant to help you to organize and compose a conventional term paper on archaeology and the Bible. You may find the basic sequence and resources helpful in other disciplines, too. 1. Choosing a Topic Your topic may be chosen for you, but, if not, aim for one that is (1) interes ting to you, (2) manageable with readily available sources, (3) malleable so you can narrow in on an especially interesting or important aspect and (4) argu able. The following resources explain the dynamics of choosing a good topic for any research. Booth, Wayne, Gregory C. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams 1995 The Craft of Re search. Chicago: University of Chicago. Ke nne dy, J. 1984 Library Research Guide to Religion and Theology: Illustrated Search Strategy and Sources. 2d ed. Ann Arbor: Pieran. Lue y, Beth 1995 Handbook for Academic Authors. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Preece, Roy 1994 Starting Research: An Introduction to Academic Research and Dissertation Writing. New York: St. Martin’s. Choose topics suggested by assigned readings, by questions posed in the Study Guide or by the additional sources in the bibliographies. 2. Researching Your Topic Material about your topic will be found in a variety of sources. In most cases, you can build your research by moving from general to specific treatments of your topic. In your research, it is vital that you not allow your expanding knowledge of what others think about your topic to drown your own curiosities, sensibilities, and insights. Instead, as your initial questions expand and then diminish with increased knowledge from your research, your own deeper concerns, insights, and point of view should emerge and grow. You might even try to reach new conclusions or arrive at a new pe rspe ctive about your topic. A. Consult Standard Sources and Build Bibliography Encyclopedia articles, dictionaries, and other standard re fere nce tools contain a wealth of material—and helpful bibliographies — to orient you in your topic. Look for the best, most authoritative, and up-to-date treatments. Checking cross-references will deepen your knowledge. General References: Freedman, David Noel et al. 1992 The Anchor Bible Dictionary. 6 vols. New York: Doubleday Me yers, Eric M., ed. 1997 The Oxford Encyclopedia of Archaeology in the Near East. New York: Oxford University. One volume commentaries Brown, Raymond E., Joseph A. Fitzmyer, and Roland E. Murphy, eds. 1990 The New Jerome Biblical Commentary. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice- Hall. Mays, James L., ed. 2000 The HarperCollins Bible Commentary. Re v. e d. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco. Newsom, Carol A., and Sharon H. Ringe, eds. 1998 Women’s Bible Commentary. Expanded edition. Louisville: Westminster John Knox. General books on Egypt, Mesopotamia and ancient Israel: Baines, John and Jaromir Malek 1980 Atlas of Ancient Egypt. New York: Facts on File. Coogan, Michael D., e d. 1998 The Oxford History of the Biblical World. New York: Oxford. De Vaux, Roland, Ancient Israel. 2 vols. New York: McGraw Hill, 1965. King, Philip J. and Lawrence E. Stager 2001 Life in Biblical Israel. Louisville: WestminsterJohnKnox. Rainey, Anson and R. Steven Notley 2006 The Sacred Bridge: Carta’s atlas of the biblical world. Jerusalem: Carta. Roaf, Michael 1990 Cultural Atlas of Mesopotamia and the Ancient Near East. New York: Facts on File. Start listing the sources you consult right away in standard bibliographical format (see section 5, below, for examples of usual formats). Assigning a number to each one facilitates easy reference later in your work. Investing in a bibliography program like Nota Bene (http://www.notabene.com/), EndNote (http://www.endnote.com/), Biblio (http://www.scholarsoft.com/biblio2.htm) or Biblioscape (http://www.bi bli oscape .com/) will keep your sources and your notes in easy- to-use order.