DOCSLIB.ORG

Item No: 2 Reference: B/16/00397/OUT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Item No: 2 Reference: B/16/00397/OUT Item No: 2 Reference: B/16/00397/OUT Parish: COPDOCK & WASHBROOK Ward Members: Cllrs Barry Gasper and Nick Ridley Location: Land east of Lane Farm, Folly Lane, Copdock and Washbrook, IP8 3JQ Proposal: Outline - Erection of 16 No. dwellings Applicant: Mr Geelmuyden Case Officer: Gemma Pannell Date for Determination: 23 June 2016 RECOMMENDATION: Refuse Planning Permission This application is referred to Planning Committee as the proposal is of a scale that requires consideration by Members. THE SITE 1. The site comprises former agricultural land, previously used in association with a neighbouring fruit farm and extends to 1.1ha. The site abuts the built up area boundary on its eastern edge. The site is opposite to a working farm, Lane Farm. To the north-east the site is bordered by an area of woodland, to the northwest and south-east by the gardens of neighbouring residential properties. THE PROPOSAL 2. The application is outline, with all matters reserved, for 16 dwellings. The applicant has provided an indicative layout to demonstrate that the site could accommodate this scale of development, which represents 14.5 dwellings per hectare. The applicant has also confirmed that the site would include 5 affordable dwellings. 3. The application documents can be viewed on line via the planning pages on the District Council’s website. RELEVANT HISTORY 4. Land east of Lane Farm, Folly Lane, Copdock And Washbrook B/89/01106/OUT Outline - residential development (maximum 5 dwellings) Refused B/80/00029/ O/A Residential development Refused W/3866/ Erection of Bungalow (Wandelaar) Granted NATIONAL PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK 5. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) contains the Government’s planning policies for England and sets out how these are expected to be applied. Planning law, and the NPPF, continues to require that applications for planning permission are determined in accordance with the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The policies contained within the NPPF are a material consideration and should be taken into account for decision-making purposes. Planning Committee 7 September 2016 40 6. The NPPF is supported by the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG), which assists applicants and decision makers to interpret the NPPF. Both the NPPF and PPG are referred to within this report where relevant to the assessment. PLANNING POLICIES 7. The Development Plan comprises the Babergh Core Strategy 2014 and saved policies in the Babergh Local Plan (Alteration No.2) adopted 2006. The following policies are applicable to the proposal: Babergh Core Strategy 2014 CS1 Applying the Presumption in favour of sustainable development in Babergh CS2 Settlement Pattern Policy CS3 Strategy for Growth and Development CS11 Strategy for Development for Core and Hinterland Villages CS15 Implementing Sustainable Development in Babergh CS18 Mix and Types of Dwellings CS16 Affordable Homes CS21 Infrastructure Provision Babergh Local Plan (Alteration No.2) 2006 HS32 Public Open Space (New Dwellings and Sites up to 1.5ha) CN01 Design Standards CR07 Landscaping Schemes TP15 Parking Standards – New Development 8. The relevant policies can be viewed on line. Please see the notes attached to the schedule. CONSULTATIONS 9. Copdock and Washbrook Parish Council – No objection in principle to residential development of this site, however the following comments are made: Present proposals are an overdevelopment; The layout is not in keeping with adjacent properties; Folly Lane is considered too narrow to accommodate this level of traffic; Houses were out of keeping with the existing residential properties and that either bungalows or chalet bungalows would be more in keeping; The site access is sited in an unsuitable position; Insufficient parking spaces for the type and number of dwellings proposed; No amenity space provided in the scheme. 10. County Highway Authority - The Highway Authority has no objection to the principle of residential development on this site. However, the access route to the site, Folly Lane leading to London Road, is not adequate in its current form to adequately or safely serve residential development traffic, both pedestrians and vehicles. 11. The Applicant, via the Agent, has acknowledged the deficiencies of the access route and have accepted the need for highway improvements. The submitted Design and Access Statement and accompanying Site Layout drawing both indicate acceptance to provision of road and footway improvements along Folly Lane. 12. The required highway improvements can all be accommodated within the existing highway land (as researched by the Agents) and do not require third party land. The Planning Committee 7 September 2016 41 improvements are listed as follows: Widening and adjustment of the existing Folly Lane junction with London Road. The width of Folly Lane is only approx. 4.4 metres wide between the existing kerbs at the junction and this provides difficulty for 2 cars trying to pass each other. This means that any vehicle waiting to turn into Folly Lane is having to wait on London Road if a vehicle is leaving Folly Lane at the same time. Provision of a footway along Folly Lane to link the application site with the existing footway and bus stops on London Road. As there is currently only a footway on the north bound (or Ipswich bound) side of London Road, there is a need for a short section of footway to be provided across the central reservation on London Road. This will allow residents to access the existing bus stop and shelter on the south bound (or Capel St Mary bound) side. Folly Lane is not wide enough to allow two vehicles to pass each other so there will be a need to widen Folly Lane between London Road and the application site access. Widening of Folly Lane on the site frontage will require the repositioning of the existing drainage ditch. 13. All of the above improvements will be subject to appropriate design and can be accommodated either within the existing highway or the application site. 14. Environment Agency - The submitted application form does not include any information on how foul water from the development will be dealt with. Section 7.3 of the Design and Access Statement states that ‘This is an Outline Application, and any upgrades or provision for foul and surface water drainage will be included as part of the details of the proposal and will be agreed as Reserved Matters.’ However, without this information, we are unable to provide advice on any water quality concerns we may have. Even when establishing the principle of the development at the outline stage, the applicant must supply adequate information to demonstrate that the risks of pollution posed to water quality can be safely managed. 15. The first presumption should be to provide a system of foul drainage discharging into a public sewer to be treated at a public sewage treatment works. A private means of foul effluent disposal is only acceptable when foul mains drainage is unavailable. Information we hold shows that the site is served by public sewers and it is therefore assumed that the development will be connected to the main foul sewer, although you should ensure this is confirmed before you make your decision. Anglian Water Services should be consulted regarding the available capacity in the foul water infrastructure. If there is not sufficient capacity in the infrastructure then we must be consulted again with alternative methods of disposal. 16. County Archaeologist – No objection, subject to condition 17. Anglian Water – No objection: The foul drainage from this development is in the catchment of Chantry Water Recycline Centre that will have available capacity for these fulls. The sewerage system at present has available capacity for these flows. The proposed method of surface water management does not relate to Anglian Water assets and therefore advice should be sought from the Lead Local Flood Authority. 18. Natural England – No comment 19. Suffolk Wildlife Trust – Based on the available information, we are satisfied with the findings of the consultant and request that the recommendations made within the report are implemented in full, via a condition of planning consent, should permission be granted. 20. Suffolk County Council Planning Obligations Manager - I refer to the planning application consultation for the scheme in Babergh. Planning Committee 7 September 2016 42 Proposed number of dwellings from outline proposal: 16 Approximate persons generated from proposal 38 21. The local catchment schools are Copdock Primary School, East Bergholt High and Suffolk One. We currently forecast to have no surplus places at the primary and secondary school, but do have surplus places at Suffolk One. Therefore we require CIL contributions for the pupils generated from the development. School level Minimum pupil yield: Required: Cost per place £ (2016/17): Primary school age range, 5-11: 3 3 12,181 High school age range, 11-16: 2 2 18,355 Sixth school age range, 16+: 1 0 19,907 Total education contributions: £73,253.00 22. From this development proposal we would anticipate up to 2 pre-school pupils at a cost of £6,091 per place. There is 1 provider in this area with no surplus spaces available. Minimum number of eligible children: Required: Cost per place £ (2016/17): Pre-School age range, 2-4: 2 2 6,091 Required pre-school contributions: £12,182.00 23. Using established methodology, the capital contribution towards libraries arising sought from this scheme is stated below and would be spent at the local catchment library and allows for improvements and enhancements to be made to library services and facilities. Libraries contribution: £21,600.00 Summary Table: Service Requirement Contribution per Capital Contribution dwelling Education - Primary £2,283.94 £36,543.00 Education – Secondary £2,294.38 £36,710.00 Education – Sixth Form £0.00 £ 0.00 Pre-School Provision £761.38 £12,182.00 Transport £0.0 £0.00 Libraries £1,350.00 £21,600.00 Waste £0.00 £0.00 Total £6,689.70 £107,035.00 24.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SUFFOLK Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society
    Entries in red - require a SUFFOLK Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road Parish Location Position SU_BGIW00 TM 3372 8917 A144 BUNGAY Bungay Centre by the road SU_BGIW00A TM 351 881 A144 BUNGAY SE of Bungay on the verge SU_BGIW01 TM 3493 8814 A144 ST MARY SOUTH ELMHAM OTHERWISE HOMERSFIELD St Mary's Parish by the road SU_BGIW02 TM 3614 8724 A144 ST JOHN ILKETSHALL St John's by the road SU_BGIW04 TM 3739 8377 A144 ST LAWRENCE ILKETSHALL Ilketshall St Lawrence by the road SU_BGIW05 TM 3812 8269 A144 SPEXHALL Spexhall Hall by the road SU_BGIW06 TM 3850 8126 A144 SPEXHALL Spexhall by the road SU_BGIW07 TM 390 796 A144 HALESWORTH Bramfield Road by the road SU_BGIW08 TM 38964 78093 was A144 HALESWORTH Bungay Road, just before new bypass by lamp post SU_BGIW09 TM 3842 7682 A144 HALESWORTH Halesworth by the road SU_BGIW10 TM 397 756 A144 WENHASTON WITH MELLS HAMLET Mells by the road SU_BGIW11 TM 3982 7421 A144 BRAMFIELD Bramfield by the road SU_BGIW12 TM 4008 7268 A144 BRAMFIELD Bramfieldhall Wood by the road SU_BUCA10 TM 0054 5903 road ONEHOUSE Lower Road, 5m NW of Lodge Cottage by the road SU_BUSC03 TL 89291 67110 A143 GREAT BARTON E of The Forge, The Street on verge, back to high cut hedge SU_BUSC05 TL 91912 68913 A143 PAKENHAM E of Queach Farm by the road SU_BUSC07 TL 94258 71190 A143 IXWORTH THORPE N of roundabout with A1088 on open verge SU_BUSC08 TL 95393 72317 A143 STANTON Bury Road, Alecock's Grave on verge just W of crossroads SU_BUSC11 TL 9930 7420 A143 HEPWORTH Hepworth South Common by
    [Show full text]
  • Babergh District Council
    Draft recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Babergh District Council Consultation response from Babergh District Council Babergh District Council (BDC) considered the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s draft proposals for the warding arrangements in the Babergh District at its meeting on 21 November 2017, and made the following comments and observations: South Eastern Parishes Brantham & Holbrook – It was suggested that Stutton & Holbrook should be joined to form a single member ward and that Brantham & Tattingstone form a second single member ward. This would result in electorates of 2104 and 2661 respectively. It is acknowledged the Brantham & Tattingstone pairing is slightly over the 10% variation threshold from the average electorate however this proposal represents better community linkages. Capel St Mary and East Bergholt – There was general support for single member wards for these areas. Chelmondiston – The Council was keen to ensure that the Boundary Commission uses the correct spelling of Chelmondiston (not Chelmondistan) in its future publications. There were comments from some Councillors that Bentley did not share common links with the other areas included in the proposed Chelmondiston Ward, however there did not appear to be an obvious alternative grouping for Bentley without significant alteration to the scheme for the whole of the South Eastern parishes. Copdock & Washbrook - It would be more appropriate for Great and Little Wenham to either be in a ward with Capel St Mary with which the villages share a vicar and the people go to for shops and doctors etc. Or alternatively with Raydon, Holton St Mary and the other villages in that ward as they border Raydon airfield and share issues concerning Notley Enterprise Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Impact Assessment for Local Plan Site Allocations Stage 1: Strategic Appraisal
    Babergh & Mid Suffolk District Councils Heritage Impact Assessment for Local Plan Site Allocationsx Stage 1: strategic appraisal Final report Prepared by LUC October 2020 Babergh & Mid Suffolk District Councils Heritage Impact Assessment for Local Plan Site Allocations Stage 1: strategic appraisal Project Number 11013 Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Draft for review R. Brady R. Brady S. Orr 05.05.2020 M. Statton R. Howarth F. Smith Nicholls 2. Final for issue R. Brady S. Orr S. Orr 06.05.2020 3. Updated version with additional sites F. Smith Nicholls R. Brady S. Orr 12.05.2020 4. Updated version - format and typographical K. Kaczor R. Brady S. Orr 13.10.2020 corrections Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning London Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning Manchester 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment London SE1 8RD Landscape Planning & Assessment landuse.co.uk Landscape Management 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents HIA Strategic Appraisal October 2020 Contents Cockfield 18 Wherstead 43 Eye 60 Chapter 1 Copdock 19 Woolverstone 45 Finningham 62 Introduction 1 Copdock and Washbrook 19 HAR / Opportunities 46 Great Bicett 62 Background 1 East Bergholt 22 Great Blakenham 63 Exclusions and Limitations 2 Elmsett 23 Great Finborough 64 Chapter 4 Sources 2 Glemsford 25 Assessment Tables: Mid Haughley 64 Document Structure 2 Great Cornard
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, JANUARY 19, 1-864. No. 22809. C
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, JANUARY 19, 1-864. 277 each. And that, with the exceptions aforesaid, the within the hundred of Stow, as are not included several parishes and places included in the hun- in any highway district formed in the Western dreds of Mutford and Lothingtand, that Is to say, Division of the said county, that is to say, the the several parishes of Ashby, Barnby, .Helton several parishes of Akenham, Ashfield-with- and Brownston, Blundeston with Flixton, Brad- Thorpe, Ashbocking, Badley, Barham, Barking, well, Burgh Castle, Carlton Colville, Gorton, and Darmsden, Battisford, Baylham, Blakenham Fritton, Gisleham, Gunton, Herringfleet, Hopton, Great, Blakenham Little, Bramford, Bricet Kessingland, Lound, Mutford, Oulton, Pakefield Great, Claydon, Coddenham, Greeting All Saints', with such part of Kirkley as is not included Greeting Saint Mary, Creeting Saint Olave, under the Lowestoft Improvement Act, Rushmere, Crowfield, Debenham, Flowton, Framsden, and Somerleyton, shall constitute a Highway Gosbeck, Helmingham, Hemingstone, Henley, District, to be known as "The Mutford and Mickfield, Needham Market, Nettlestead, Offton- Lothingland District." And we do hereby order, with-Little Bricet, Pettaugh, Old Newton-with- that all the several parishes comprised in the said Dagworth, Onehouse, Shetland, Stowmarket and district shall have one Waywarden each. And ChUton, Stowupland, Ringshall, Somersham, that, with the exceptions aforesaid, the several Stonham Aspall, Stonham Earl, Stonham Parva, parishes and places included in the Plomesgate
    [Show full text]
  • Records Relating to the 1939 – 1945 War
    Records Relating to the 1939 – 1945 War This is a list of resources in the three branches of the Record Office which relate exclusively to the 1939-1945 War and which were created because of the War. However, virtually every type of organisation was affected in some way by the War so it could also be worthwhile looking at the minute books and correspondence files of local councils, churches, societies and organisations, and also school logbooks. The list is in three sections: Pages 1-10: references in all the archive collections except for the Suffolk Regiment archive. They are arranged by theme, moving broadly from the beginning of the War to its end. Pages 10-12: printed books in the Local Studies collections. Pages 12-21: references in the Suffolk Regiment archive (held in the Bury St Edmunds branch). These are mainly arranged by Battalion. (B) = Bury Record Office; (I) = Ipswich Record Office; (L) = Lowestoft Record Office 1. Air Raid Precautions and air raids ADB506/3 Letter re air-raid procedure, 1940 (B) D12/4/1-2 Bury Borough ARP Control Centre, in and out messages, 1940-1945 (B) ED500/E1/14 Hadleigh Police Station ARP file, 1943-1944 (B) EE500/1/125 Bury Borough ARP Committee minutes, 1935-1939 (B) EE500/33/17/1-7 Bury Town Clerk’s files, 1937-1950 (B) EE500/33/18/1-6 Bury Town Clerk’s files re Fire Guard, 1938-1947 (B) EE500/44/155-6 Bury Borough: cash books re Government Shelter scheme (B) EE501/6/142-147 Sudbury Borough ARP registers, report books and papers, 1938-1945 (B) EE501/8/27(323, Plans of air-raid shelters, Sudbury,
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Poll Babergh
    Suffolk County Council ELECTION OF COUNTY COUNCILLOR FOR THE BELSTEAD BROOK DIVISION NOTICE OF POLL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT :- 1. A Poll for the Election of a COUNTY COUNCILLOR for the above named County Division will be held on Thursday 6 May 2021, between the hours of 7:00am and 10:00pm. 2. The number of COUNTY COUNCILLORS to be elected for the County Division is 1. 3. The names, in alphabetical order and other particulars of the candidates remaining validly nominated and the names of the persons signing the nomination papers are as follows:- SURNAME OTHER NAMES IN HOME ADDRESS DESCRIPTION PERSONS WHO SIGNED THE FULL NOMINATION PAPERS 16 Two Acres Capel St. Mary Frances Blanchette, Lee BUSBY DAVID MICHAEL Liberal Democrats Ipswich IP9 2XP Gifkins CHRISTOPHER Address in the East Suffolk The Conservative Zachary John Norman, Nathan HUDSON GERARD District Party Candidate Callum Wilson 1-2 Bourne Cottages Bourne Hill WADE KEITH RAYMOND Labour Party Tom Loader, Fiona Loader Wherstead Ipswich IP2 8NH 4. The situation of Polling Stations and the descriptions of the persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows:- POLLING POLLING STATION DESCRIPTIONS OF PERSONS DISTRICT ENTITLED TO VOTE THEREAT BBEL Belstead Village Hall Grove Hill Belstead IP8 3LU 1.000-184.000 BBST Burstall Village Hall The Street Burstall IP8 3DY 1.000-187.000 BCHA Hintlesham Community Hall Timperleys Hintlesham IP8 3PS 1.000-152.000 BCOP Copdock & Washbrook Village Hall London Road Copdock & Washbrook Ipswich IP8 3JN 1.000-915.500 BHIN Hintlesham Community Hall Timperleys Hintlesham IP8 3PS 1.000-531.000 BPNN Holiday Inn Ipswich London Road Ipswich IP2 0UA 1.000-2351.000 BPNS Pinewood - Belstead Brook Muthu Hotel Belstead Road Ipswich IP2 9HB 1.000-923.000 BSPR Sproughton - Tithe Barn Lower Street Sproughton IP8 3AA 1.000-1160.000 BWHE Wherstead Village Hall Off The Street Wherstead IP9 2AH 1.000-244.000 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance August 2015
    Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance August 2015 Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance 2015 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The landscape of Babergh and Mid Suffolk (South and North Suffolk) is acknowledged as being attractive and an important part of why people choose to live and work here. However current pressures for development in the countryside, and the changing agricultural and recreational practices and pressures, are resulting in changes that in some instances have been damaging to the local character and distinctiveness of the landscape. 1.1.1 Some development is necessary within the countryside, in order to promote a sustainable prosperous and vibrant rural economy. However, such development would be counterproductive if it were to harm the quality of the countryside/landscape it is set within and therefore the quality of life benefits, in terms of health and wellbeing that come from a rural landscape in good condition.1 1.1.2 The Council takes the view that there is a need to safeguard the character of both districts countryside by ensuring new development integrates positively with the existing character. Therefore, a Landscape Guidance has been produced to outline the main elements of the existing character and to outline broad principles that all development in the countryside will be required to follow. 1.1.3 Well designed and appropriately located development in the countryside can capture the benefits of sustainable economic development whilst still retaining and enhancing valuable landscape characteristics, which are so important to Babergh and Mid Suffolk. 1.1.4 The protection and enhancement of both districts landscape is essential not only for the intrinsic aesthetic and historic value that supports tourism and the economy for the area but also to maintain the quality of life for the communities that live in the countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • A4 Simple Report 1-Col No Divider Nov 2019
    Issue number: BT-JAC-020631 550-0003-EIA Bramford to Twinstead Scoping Report: Volume 2: Appendices May 2021 Page left intentionally blank National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead i Contents Contents ii Appendix 1.1 Transboundary Supporting Information 2 Appendix 2.1 Relevant Environmental Legislation, Policy and Guidance 6 Appendix 2.2 Local Planning Policy 23 Appendix 4.1 Outline Code of Construction Practice 31 Appendix 6.1 Key Characteristics of Landscape Character Assessment 44 Appendix 6.2 Landscape Assessment Methodology 51 Appendix 6.3 Visual Assessment Methodology 72 Appendix 6.4 Wireline and Photomontage Methodology 81 Appendix 6.5 Arboricultural Survey Methodology 87 Appendix 7.1 Biodiversity Supporting Information 91 Appendix 7.2 Ecology Survey Methodology 103 Appendix 7.3 Draft Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report 128 Appendix 17.1 Major Accidents and Disasters Scoping Table 144 Appendix 18.1 Cumulative Effects Assessment Long List Table 153 National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead ii Appendix 1.1 Transboundary Supporting Information National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead iii Page left intentionally blank National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead 1 Appendix 1.1 Transboundary Supporting Information Criteria and Relevant Considerations Result of the Screening Considerations Characteristics of the development: The Bramford to Twinstead project is a proposal to Size of the development consent and build a new c.27km 400kV electricity reinforcement and associated infrastructure between Use of natural resources Bramford in Suffolk and Twinstead in Essex. It includes Production of waste the removal of the existing 132kV overhead line Pollution and nuisances between Burstall Bridge and Twinstead Tee, and a new Risk of accidents substation at Butler’s Wood.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Michael's, ~Amsey
    ST. MICHAEL'S, ~AMSEY. THE ENGLISH ANCESTRY OF Ueinulb anb fflatt~ilV fflarvin OF HARTFORD, CT., 1638 THEIR HOMES AND PARISH CHURCHES BY WILLIAM T. R. MARVIN A. M., WlLUAMS, :\-U!MBRR s. K. HISTORIC GXN&ALOGICAL SOCIETY, HON'V MRMB!!.R OP' THX "'-MRRlCAN NUMCS. AND ARCH..-4-:0LOGICAL SOCI'8TV, COR. MRM!IRR NUM.15. AND ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY, P!ULADHLPH[A, ASSOCI& &TRANGER SOCIKTK ROYALS OK NUMIS. OR BB:LGIQUE, RTC. PRIVATELY PRINTED BOSTON 19P() .. COPYR[GHT I9{l0 W. r. R. MARVIN BOSTON lto tbe Llr.lemor"Q of MY FATHER THEOPHILUS R. :\-IARVIN THE FIRST TO TRACE OUR FAMILY HISTORY IN A:.1 ERICA AND OF MY ELDEST SON WHO BORE HIS NAME. FOREWORD ~ IEVERAL years ago Mr. Wiliiam S. Appleton, of Boston, ~ while in London, found in the Will of John Lucas a ~ j'f ref~rence to REY.NOLD w~.-1.RVINE, of Ramsey, Essex, ~--~~ which attracted his attent10n, for he was aware of my descent from the early settler at Hartford and Lyme, Conn., who bore that name, and of my interest in the family history. On his return, he very kindly informed me of his discovery, and a brief reference was made to it in an account of the Marvin Family,. which was prepared from material gathered by my father and myself, and printed in the sumptuous "Family Histories and Gen­ ealogies," published by Mr. and Mrs. Edward E. Salisbury, of New Haven, Conn. It was impossible to delay the publication of that work- ,hen far advanced - to follow out an uncertain clue.
    [Show full text]
  • "[Click Here and Type the Town Or Village]" – WAR MEMORIAL
    Burstall, Suffolk – WAR MEMORIAL Memorial window in the Church; Roll of Honour in the Village Hall There is a memorial book, compiled in 2003 by Jennifer Jones, in the Parish Church, containing photographs of the graves or memorials of most of the men of the North Samford Benefice (Belstead, Bentley, Burstall, Copdock & Washbrook, Sproughton and Tattingstone) who died in the First World War. This document was researched by Jean Austin 2006. To the Glory of God And in grateful memory Of the men of Burstall Who gave their lives for Our Country in the War 1914-1918 1914-1918 Cooper John Henry Private 43723 2nd Battalion Suffolk Regiment, formerly 1190 Suffolk Regiment. Killed in action 13 November 1916 France/Flanders. Born 1880 Stowmarket, son of Ebenezer and Maria Cooper. Enlisted Stowmarket. Buried in the Luke Copse Military Cemetery and commemorated on the Burstall war memorial. Lloyd Frank Guardsman 19720, Coldstream Guards. Died 30 November 1918. Born 1898 Burstall, son of Edgar and Eliza Lloyd, brother of Joseph (see below). Buried in Burstall churchyard and commemorated on the Burstall war memorial. Lloyd Joseph Gunner 59672 112th Siege Battalion Royal Garrison Artillery. Died 22 October 1916. Born 1893 Burstall, son of Edgar and Eliza Lloyd, brother of Frank (see above). Buried (next to his brother) in Burstall churchyard and commemorated on the Burstall war memorial. Lloyd Walter Private 43887 11th Battalion Suffolk Regt. Died 26 February 1919. Born 1897 Burstall, son of Harry and Georgina Lloyd. Buried in Burstall Churchyard and commemorated on the Burstall war memorial. Pryke Ernest William Private 203726 1st Battalion Norfolk Regiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of the Copdock & Washbrook Neighbourhood Plan
    Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of the Copdock & Washbrook Neighbourhood Plan Environmental Report Copdock & Washbrook Parish Council December 2020 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of the Copdock & Washbrook Neighbourhood Plan Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Rosie Cox Cheryl Beattie Nick Chisholm-Batten Nick Chisholm-Batten Environmental Planner Senior Environmental Associate Director Associate Director Planner Revision History Revision Revision date Details Name Position V1 12/11/20 Draft for internal Rosie Cox Environmental Planner review V2 18/11/20 Draft for group Laura Butters Copdock and comment Washbrook Parish Council V3 21/12/20 Final Rosie Cox Environmental Planner Prepared for: Copdock & Washbrook Parish Council Prepared by: AECOM Limited 3rd Floor, Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol BS1 6NA United Kingdom T: +44 117 901 7000 aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for use of Locality (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Copdock & Washbrook Parish Council AECOM Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of the Copdock & Washbrook Neighbourhood Plan Table of Contents Non-Technical Summary .................................................................................... i 1. Introduction .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Babergh and Mid Suffolk Pre-Submission Joint Local Plan
    PART 3 156 Joint Local Plan – Pre-Submission (Reg 19) – November 2020 PLACE AND ALLOCATIONS POLICIES The maps presented in this section form the main Policies Maps for the Plan. Joint Local Plan – Pre-Submission (Reg 19) – November 2020 157 Appendix 04 - Town Centre Maps Hadleigh CALAIS STREET MEADOWS WAY MEADOWS PYKENHAM WAY POUND LANE ANGEL STREET QUEEN STREET Path (um) INKERMAN TERRACE HIGH STREET HIGH ERS CLOSE CHURCH STREET GEORGE STREET Guildhall MARKET PLACE MAGDALEN ROAD MAGDALEN DUKE STREET GUTHRUM ROAD GUTHRUM 158 BABERGH AND MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCILS Joint Local Plan – Pre-Submission (Reg 19) – November 2020 TOPPESFIELD CLOSE Hadleigh Town Centre © Crown copyright andSCALE database right 1:3000 2020 Ordnance Survey Licence number 100023274 Sudbury UPPER EAST STREET SUFFOLK ROAD NEWMAN'S ROAD NEW STREET INKERMAN ROW CAVENDISH WAY NORTH STREET GAOL LANE EAST STREET WEAVERS LANE BELLE VUE ROAD KING STREET MARKET HILL GAINSBOROUGH STREET HAMILTON ROAD FRANCIS ROAD CHRISTOPHER LANE GREAT EASTERN ROAD STATION ROAD BABERGH AND MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCILS SCALE 1:3500 Sudbury Town Centre © Crown copyright and database right 2020 Ordnance Survey Licence number 100023274 Joint Local Plan – Pre-Submission (Reg 19) – November 2020 159 Stowmarket LAKESIDE CHILDER ROAD VIOLET HILL ROAD HILL VIOLET BABERGH AND MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCILS TAVERN STREET TAVERN Stowmarket Town Centre CROWE STREET ABBOT'S HALL ROAD GIPPING WAY GIPPING TEMPLE ROAD TEMPLE STATION ROAD WEST IPSWICH STREET IPSWICH STOWUPLAND STREET STRICKLANDS ROAD UNITY ROAD UNITY MILTON ROAD SOUTH Ordnance Survey Licence number 100017810 © Crown copyright and database right 2020 HOLLINGSWORTH ROAD NAVIGATION APPROACH GIPPING WAY GIPPING SCALE 1:4000 160 Joint Local Plan – Pre-Submission (Reg 19) – November 2020 Policy LS01 – Hinterland and hamlet sites The following sites are allocated under LS01 as identified on the relevant Policy Maps.
    [Show full text]