DOCSLIB.ORG

TERRA NOSTRA Schriften Der Geounion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung – 2010/2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TERRA NOSTRA Schriften Der Geounion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung – 2010/2 TERRA NOSTRA Schriften der GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung – 2010/2 15th Conference of the International Work Group for Palaeoethnobotany Wilhelmshaven, Germany May 31 - June 5, 2010 Local organising committee Felix Bittmann, Friederike Bungenstock, Dirk Enters, Johannes Ey, Hauke Jöns, Erwin Strahl, Steffen Wolters Advisory group Wiebke Kirleis, Angela Kreuz, Walter Dörfler, Manfred Rösch IWGP committee Monika Badura, Corrie Bakels, Ramon Buxó, Felix Bittmann, Stefanie Jacomet Glynis Jones, Mordechai Kislev, Helmut Kroll, Naomi Miller, Klaus Oeggl, Anaya Sarpaki Sponsored by: Werner-Brune-Stiftung Wilhelmshaven/Bad Lauterberg Marschenrat zur Förderung der Forschung im Küstengebiet e. V. Gerd-Möller-Stiftung, Wilhelmshaven PROGRAMME and ABSTRACTS Niedersächsisches Institut für historische Küstenforschung IMPRINT TERRA NOSTRA – Schriften der GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung Publisher Verlag GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung Arno-Holz-Str. 14, 12165 Berlin, Germany Tel.: +49 (0)30 7900660, Fax: +49 (0)30 79006612 Email: [email protected] Editorial office Christof Ellger Schriftleitung GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung Arno-Holz-Str. 14, 12165 Berlin, Germany Tel.: +49 (0)30 79006622, Fax: +49 (0)30 79006612 Email: [email protected] Vol. 2010/2 15th International Conference of the International Work Group Heft 2010/2 for Palaeoethnobotany Editor Felix Bittmann Herausgeber Lower Saxony Institute for Historical Coastal Research Viktoriastr. 26-28, 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany Tel.: +49 (0)4421 915 0, Fax: +49 (0)4421-915110 Email: [email protected] Editorial staff Felix Bittmann, Friederike Bungenstock, Dirk Enters, Johannes Ey, Redaktion James Greig, Hauke Jöns, Rolf Kiepe, Erwin Strahl, Steffen Wolters Printed by Brune-Mettcker Druck- und Verlags-GmbH Druck Copyright and responsibility for the scientific content of the contributions lie with the authors. Copyright und Verantwortung für den wissenschaftlichen Inhalt der Beiträge liegen bei den Autoren. ISSN 0946-8978 GeoUnion Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung, Berlin, May 2010 CONTENT 1 Schedule 2 Abstracts Lectures 12 Abstracts Posters 101 Names and Addresses of Participants 197 2 SCHEDULE SUNDAY, 30th May 16.00 – 20.00 Registration (Gorch-Fock-Haus, Viktoriastr. 15) MONDAY, 31st May 8.00 – 9.00 Registration 9.00 – 9.30 Introductory Session and Addresses: Welcome by Dr. Felix Bittmann Eberhard Menzel, Mayor of Wilhelmshaven Prof. Dr. Hauke Jöns, chairman of the “Marschenrat” Announcements Gathering, Cultivation and Domestication Chair: K.-E. Behre 9.30 – 9.45 Kreuz, A./Schäfer, E. Weed finds as indicators for the cultivation regime of the Early Neolithic Bandkeramik culture? 9.45 – 10.00 Marinova, E./Popova, T. Free threshing wheat from the Bulgarian prehistory 10.00 – 10.15 Kirleis, W./Kroll, H. The orchard in the Neolithic: Malus in central Europe 10.15 – 10.30 Klooß, S. Wood use and management of the Final Mesolithic fishermen-hunter-gatherers on the southern Baltic Sea coast 10.30 – 11.00 Coffee break Chair: C.C. Bakels 11.00 – 11.15 Viklund, K. The introduction of sustainable cereal cultivation into northernmost Europe – a survey and discussion of the archaeobotanical record from Sweden 11.15 – 11.30 Klooß, S./Kirleis, W./ Neolithic farming and environmental change during the Feeser, I./Dörfler, W. Funnel Beaker culture in northern central Europe 11.30 – 11.45 McClatchie, M./Whitehouse, N./ Cultivating societies: New evidence for arable agriculture McLaughlin, R./Schulting, R./ from Neolithic Ireland Colledge, S./Barratt, P./ Bogaard, A. 11.45 – 12.00 Hovsepyan, R. Preliminary data on the prehistoric agriculture of the southern Caucasus (the main phases of development) 12.00 – 12.15 Kihno, K./Jääts, L. Observations of landraces of winter rye in slash-and-burn experiments in Estonia 12.15 – 12.30 Hovsepyan, R./Smith, A./ Preliminary data on the archaeobotany of Areni-1 cave Bagoyan, T. (Armenia) 12.30 – 14.00 Lunch Chair: R. Cappers 14.00 – 14.15 Melamed, Y. Food-plant remains from the Mousterian Nahal Mahanayeem outlet, Israel 14.15 – 14.30 Morales, J./Barker, G./Hunt, C./ Mesolithic plant gathering and early agriculture in Reynolds, T. northeast Libya: The plant remains from Haua Fteah and Hagfet al-Gama 14.30 – 14.45 Oliveira, H./Lister, D./Jones, M. Phylogeography of Triticum turgidum landraces in Iberia and North Africa: Genetic structure and cultivation history 14.45 – 15.00 Vrydaghs, L./Chevalier, A./ Multi-proxy palaeoecological investigations (pollen, Horrocks, M./van der Kaars, S./ starch, microcharcoal, phytolith and macrobotanical) of Denham, T. human occupation and plant exploitation in the highlands of Papua New Guinea SCHEDULE 3 15.00 – 15.30 Coffee break Ethnobotanical approaches Chair: M. Kohler-Schneider 15.30 – 15.45 Petö, Á./Pópity, D. Complex microarchaeobotanical analysis of food remains from a Neolithic settlement; a case study from Tiszasziget archaeological site, Hungary 15.45 – 16.00 Festi, D./Oeggl, K. Archaeobotanical investigation on the Copper Age settlement of Latsch (eastern Italian Alps) 16.00 – 16.15 Schwarz, A.S./Schmidl, A./ Subsistence strategies at Bronze Age smelting sites in Goldenberg, G./Oeggl, K. the eastern Alps 16.15 – 16.30 Kvavadze, E./Bitadze, L./ The Bronze Age first-aid kit, according to palaeobotanical Narimanishvili, G./Kakhiani, K./ data from archaeological sites in Georgia Jalabadze, M./Koridze, I./ Rukhadze, L./Chichinadze, M./ Martkoplishvili, I./Pataridze, N./ Laliashvili, S. 16.30 – 16.45 Petö, Á./Herendi, O. Phytolith studies at a late Avar Period settlement near Hódmezövásárhely (southeast Hungary) 16.45 – 17.00 Break 17.00 – 18.00 Public lecture: The Neolithic glacier mummy “Ötzi”: His life Dickson, J./Oeggl, K. circumstances and environment 18.00 – 18.30 “Transfer” 18.30 – 21.00 Welcome Reception Neues Küstenmuseum, Weserstr. 58 TUESDAY, 1st June 8.30 – 9.00 Late Registration Methods and Analytical Archaeobotany Chair: R. Buxó 9.00 – 9.15 Fraser, R./Styring, A./ Archaeobotanical remains for carbon and nitrogen stable Bogaard, A./Ditchfield, P. isotope analysis: Pre-treatment, pitfalls and potentials 9.15 – 9.30 Bogaard, A./Fraser, R./ Stable nitrogen isotope analysis of archaeobotanical Charles, M./Heaton, T./ remains: Implications for the reconstruction of crop Jones, G. husbandry and palaeodietary practices 9.30 – 9.45 Fiorentino, G./Caracuta,V. Isotopic and biometrical analyses of charred caryopses from a Middle Bronze Age storage pit at Ebla (northwest Syria): A tool for identifying ancient crop provenance? 9.45 – 10.00 Burger, P./Ruas, M.-P./ Assessing agrobiodiversity of Prunus avium L. and P. Terral, J.-F. cerasus L. (cherries) during Antiquity and the Middle Ages: A morphometric approach 10.00 – 10.15 Wollstonecroft, M./Hroudova, Z./ Bolboschoenus glaucus: A new species in the flora of the Hillman, G./Fuller, D. ancient Near East 10.15 – 11.00 Coffee break Chair: S. Jacomet 11.00 – 11.15 Schlumbaum, A./ Considering the origin of Roman Lagenaria siceraria Vandorpe, P. (bottle gourd) north of the Alps: A morphological and archaeogenetic approach 11.15 – 11.30 Brinkkemper, O./ Seeds of Myosotis (forget-me-not) no longer forgotten van der Maaten, L./Boon, P. 11.30 – 11.45 Van der Veen, M./Morales, J./ Identifying foodways – new methodological approaches Cox, A. 11.45 – 12.00 Berzsényi, B./Stika, H.P./ Agriculture, crop processing and social relations in Jones, M.K. Middle Bronze Age Hungary 4 SCHEDULE 12.00 – 12.15 Maier, U. Detecting intra-site patterns with systematic sampling strategies – archaeobotanical grid sampling in lakeshore settlements 12.15 – 12.30 Schepers, M. The identification of past plant communities using modern relevées: A case study from Swifterbant 12.30 – 14.00 Lunch Chair: F. Bittmann 14.00 – 14.15 Hartmann-Shenkman, A./ The “pantry” of Tel ‘Eton, Israel – vessels and their Auman-Hazan, C./Faust, A./ content Weiss, E. 14.15 – 14.30 Karg, S./Henriksen, S.P./ Cross-disciplinary studies on the evolution and cultural Henriksen, M.B./Mannering, U./ history of flax and linen in southern Scandinavia Allaby, R. 14.30 – 14.45 Kreuz, A./Schäfer, E./Thiébault, The archaeobotanical database programme ArboDat©, a S./Ruas, M.-P./Dreslerová, D./ time economizing tool for data archiving and evaluation Pokorná, A./Křivánková, D. (German, French and English version) 14.45 – 15.00 Rovner, I./Gyulai, F. Beyond typology: A new quantitative method for differentiating wild versus domesticated seed populations 15.00 – 18.00 Break and Laboratory/Poster session WEDNESDAY, 2nd June 8.30 – 9.00 Late Registration Regional and Historical Archaeobotany Chair: A. Kreuz 9.00 – 9.15 Boenke, N. Do cannibals act differently? Archaeobotanical results from the Neolithic site of Herxheim, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany 9.15 – 9.30 Borojevic, K. Plant remains from a Late Neolithic building at the Vinča site 9.30 – 9.45 Antolín Tutusaus, F./ Durum wheat in the Early Neolithic of the Iberian Buxó, R./ Peninsula: Evaluating the evidences from La Draga (Banyoles, Girona Province, Spain) 9.45 – 10.00 Kubiak-Martens, L. Late Neolithic settlement in a tidal environment of Noord- Holland, the Netherlands 10.00 – 10.15 Peña-Chocarro, L./Morales, The first farmers in southern Iberia J./Pérez-Jordà, G. 10.15 – 10.30 Rösch, M./Kleinmann, A./ A Bell Beaker site with wet preservation from Hegau/ Lechterbeck, J./Sillmann, M./ south-west Germany: Macrofossil and pollen evidence for Wick, L. land use 10.30 – 11.00 Coffee break Chair: S. Karg 11.00 – 11.15 Rottoli, M. Middle Neolithic agriculture in northern Italy: Archaeobotanical results from sites of Square-mouthed Pottery culture 11.15 – 11.30 Salavert, A. Plant economy of the first farmers in central Belgium (Linearbandkeramik, 5200-5000 BC) 11.30 – 11.45 Fahmy, A. G. Food ingredients and cooking procedures in Predynastic Egypt: Archaeobotanical evidence from Hierakonpolis 11.45 – 12.00 Figueiral, I./Séjalon, P. Deep down the wells in southern France: Plant remains (Neolithic – Roman) from Mas de Vignoles IX and their implication for the study of settlement, environment and economy SCHEDULE 5 12.00 – 12.15 Lityńska-Zając, M./ Macroremains and pollen pattern of Pinus sylvestris – Nalepka, D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The German North Sea Ports' Absorption Into Imperial Germany, 1866–1914
    From Unification to Integration: The German North Sea Ports' absorption into Imperial Germany, 1866–1914 Henning Kuhlmann Submitted for the award of Master of Philosophy in History Cardiff University 2016 Summary This thesis concentrates on the economic integration of three principal German North Sea ports – Emden, Bremen and Hamburg – into the Bismarckian nation- state. Prior to the outbreak of the First World War, Emden, Hamburg and Bremen handled a major share of the German Empire’s total overseas trade. However, at the time of the foundation of the Kaiserreich, the cities’ roles within the Empire and the new German nation-state were not yet fully defined. Initially, Hamburg and Bremen insisted upon their traditional role as independent city-states and remained outside the Empire’s customs union. Emden, meanwhile, had welcomed outright annexation by Prussia in 1866. After centuries of economic stagnation, the city had great difficulties competing with Hamburg and Bremen and was hoping for Prussian support. This thesis examines how it was possible to integrate these port cities on an economic and on an underlying level of civic mentalities and local identities. Existing studies have often overlooked the importance that Bismarck attributed to the cultural or indeed the ideological re-alignment of Hamburg and Bremen. Therefore, this study will look at the way the people of Hamburg and Bremen traditionally defined their (liberal) identity and the way this changed during the 1870s and 1880s. It will also investigate the role of the acquisition of colonies during the process of Hamburg and Bremen’s accession. In Hamburg in particular, the agreement to join the customs union had a significant impact on the merchants’ stance on colonialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Research Article
    1 Original Research Article 2 3 THE MALOIDEAE (ROSACEAE) STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL FEATURES 4 DETERMINING PASSIVE IMMUNITY TO MYCOSIS 5 6 7 With the help of microscopic methods the leaves and fruits surface tissues of plants of four 8 genera of the Maloideae subfamily were screened: Malus Mill., Pyrus L., Cydonia Mill., 9 Mespilus L., as model objects, and attempts were made to explain the dependence of mycosis 10 damage on microstructural features. The species composition of fungi that cause damage to the 11 Maloideae leaves and fruits in the Russia southern regions is analyzed. It is established that 12 among pathogens with different types of parasitism there are common excitants, as well as 13 highly specialized, more represented on Mespilus germanica. Higher resistance to the complex 14 of fungal diseases, in comparison with apple and pear, was found in quince and medlar. This 15 stability at the initial stage of the pathological process is associated with structural features such 16 as micromorphology of the fruits and stomata cuticle in the abaxial leaves epidermis. The leaves 17 stomatal cracks of the medlar are narrow with raised outgrowths, on the surface of the fruit – the 18 layered structure of the cuticular layer. Quince has a powerful continuous cuticular cover. 19 Compared with Malus and Pyrus, Cydonia and Mespilus also have a large (30 % or more) 20 polyphenol content in the pericarp outer layer cells. In addition to the gender-specific differences 21 in the microstructure of the integumentary tissues and the content of polyphenols affecting the 22 resistance to pathogens at the stage of their penetration, general patterns of leaf surface 23 formation, such as hypostomacy, anomocytic stomata, folded microrelief of the cuticular surface, 24 and the presence of single and multicellular trichomes are noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription
    Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2018, Article ID 7627191, 10 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7627191 Research Article Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription Jiahui Sun ,1,2 Shuo Shi ,1,2,3 Jinlu Li,1,4 Jing Yu,1 Ling Wang,4 Xueying Yang,5 Ling Guo ,6 and Shiliang Zhou 1,2 1 State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China 2University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100043, China 3College of Life Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China 4Te Department of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China 5Key Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing 100038, China 6Beijing Botanical Garden, Beijing 100093, China Correspondence should be addressed to Ling Guo; [email protected] and Shiliang Zhou; [email protected] Received 21 September 2017; Revised 11 December 2017; Accepted 2 January 2018; Published 19 March 2018 Academic Editor: Fengjie Sun Copyright © 2018 Jiahui Sun et al. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Maleae consists of economically and ecologically important plants. However, there are considerable disputes on generic circumscription due to the lack of a reliable phylogeny at generic level. In this study, molecular phylogeny of 35 generally accepted genera in Maleae is established using 15 chloroplast regions. Gillenia isthemostbasalcladeofMaleae,followedbyKageneckia + Lindleya, Vauquelinia, and a typical radiation clade, the core Maleae, suggesting that the proposal of four subtribes is reasonable.
    [Show full text]
  • A Selection of Stochastic Processes Emanating from Natural Sciences
    A selection of stochastic processes emanating from natural sciences vorgelegt von Diplom-Mathematikerin Maite Isabel Wilke Berenguer Berlin Von der Fakult¨atII - Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften der Technischen Universit¨atBerlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften Dr. rer. nat. genehmigte Dissertation. Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. math. J¨orgLiesen Berichter/Gutachter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Michael Scheutzow Berichter/Gutachter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Frank Aurzada Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 07. Oktober 2016 Berlin 2016 Jack of all trades, master of none,... ... though oftentimes better than master of one. " 4 Contents I Percolation 13 1 Lipschitz Percolation 15 1.1 (Classic) Lipschitz Percolation . 16 1.1.1 Applications and related fields . 19 1.2 Lipschitz Percolation above tilted planes . 19 1.3 Asymptotic bounds on the critical probability . 23 1.3.1 A dual notion: λ-paths . 25 1.3.2 Proofs of lower bounds . 27 1.3.3 Proofs of upper bounds . 40 II Population Genetics 49 2 A novel seed-bank model 51 2.1 A famous model by Fisher and Wright and Kingman's dual . 54 2.2 Modelling a seed-bank . 64 2.3 The Wright-Fisher model with geometric seed-bank . 68 2.3.1 A forward scaling limit . 72 2.3.2 The dual of the seed-bank frequency process . 77 2.3.3 Long-term behavior and fixation probabilities . 78 2.4 The seed-bank coalescent . 81 2.4.1 Related coalescent models . 87 2.5 Properties of the seed-bank coalescent . 88 2.5.1 Coming down from infinity . 88 2.5.2 Bounds on the time to the most recent common ancestor 95 2.5.3 Recursions for important values .
    [Show full text]
  • (Rosaceae), I. Differentiation of Mespilus and Crataegus
    Phytotaxa 257 (3): 201–229 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.3.1 STUDIES IN MESPILUS, CRATAEGUS, AND ×CRATAEMESPILUS (ROSACEAE), I. DIFFERENTIATION OF MESPILUS AND CRATAEGUS, EXPANSION OF ×CRATAEMESPILUS, WITH SUPPLEMENTARY OBSERVATIONS ON DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE CRATAEGUS AND AMELANCHIER CLADES JAMES B. PHIPPS Department of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada; email: [email protected] Abstract The paper argues the position for retaining a monotypic Mespilus, i.e., in the sense of M. germanica, the medlar. Recent cladistic papers lend support for Mespilus being sister to Crataegus, and there is a clear morphological distinction from Cra- taegus, emphasized by adaptation to carnivore frugivory. Mespilus secured, the paper then treats each of the known hybrids between Mespilus and Crataegus, making the new combination Crataemespilus ×canescens (J.B. Phipps) J.B. Phipps. Keywords: Crataemespilus ×canescens (J.B. Phipps) J.B. Phipps comb. nov.; inflorescence position; medlar; Mespilus a folk-genus; Mespilus distinct from Crataegus; Rosaceae; taxonomic history of Mespilus Introduction The author has a long-standing interest in generic delimitation in the Maloid genera of the Rosaceae (Maleae Small, formerly Maloideae C. Weber, Pyrinae Dumort.), as shown particularly in a series of papers with K. Robertson, J. Rohrer, and P.G. Smith (Phipps et al. 1990, 1991; Robertson at al. 1991, 1992; Rohrer at al. 1991, 1994) which treated all 28 genera of Maleae as recognised by us. There is also a revisionary treatment of New World Heteromeles M.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping up with the Dutch Internal Colonization and Rural Reform in Germany, 1800–1914
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR HISTORY, CULTURE AND MODERNITY www.history-culture-modernity.org Published by: Uopen Journals Copyright: © The Author(s). Content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence eISSN: 2213-0624 Keeping Up with the Dutch Internal Colonization and Rural Reform in Germany, 1800–1914 Elizabeth B. Jones HCM 3 (2): 173–194 http://doi.org/10.18352/hcm.482 Abstract Recent research on internal colonization in Imperial Germany empha- sizes how racial and environmental chauvinism drove plans for agri- cultural settlement in the ‘polonized’ German East. Yet policymakers’ dismay over earlier endeavours on the peat bogs of northwest Germany and their admiration for Dutch achievements was a constant refrain. This article traces the heterogeneous Dutch influences on German internal colonization between 1790 and 1914 and the mixed results of Germans efforts to adapt Dutch models of wasteland colonization. Indeed, despite rising German influence in transnational debates over European internal colonization, derogatory comparisons between medi- ocre German ventures and the unrelenting progress of the Dutch per- sisted. Thus, the example of northwest Germany highlights how mount- ing anxieties about ‘backwardness’ continued to mold the enterprise in the modern era and challenges the notion that the profound German influences on the Netherlands had no analog in the other direction. Keywords: agriculture, Germany, internal colonization, improvement, Netherlands Introduction Radical German nationalist Alfred Hugenberg launched his political career in the 1890s as an official with the Royal Prussian Colonization Commission.1 Created by Bismarck in 1886, the Commission’s charge HCM 2015, VOL. 3, no. 2 173 © ELIZABETH B.
    [Show full text]
  • Estudios Interdisciplinares De Arqueología
    ANEJOS DE Estudios Interdisciplinares de Arqueología Octubre 2018 Asociación de OVIEDO Profesionales Anejos de NAILOS Independientes de la Número 4 Arqueología de Oviedo, 2018 4Anejos de NAILOSISSN 2341-3573. ISSN 2341-3573. Nº. 4, 2018 Asturias 1 Anejos de Nailos Estudios Interdisciplinares de Arqueología Jornadas de Arqueología Española en el Exterior Juan R. Muñiz Álvarez (coordinador) Oviedo, 2018 En recuerdo de Juan Antonio Fernández- Tresguerres Velasco (1941-2011) ANEJOS DE Estudios Interdisciplinares de Arqueología Consejo Asesor Consejo Editorial Alejandro García Álvarez-Busto Universidad de Oviedo José Bettencourt Juan José Ibáñez Estévez César García de Castro Valdés Universidade Nova de Lisboa Institución Milá i Fontanals, Museo Arqueológico de Asturias CSIC David González Álvarez Rebeca Blanco-Rotea Instituto de Ciencias del Patrimonio, Universidade de Minho / Juan José Larrea Conde CSIC / Durham University Universidad de Santiago de Universidad del País Vasco María González-Pumariega Solís Compostela Gobierno del Principado de Asturias José María Martín Civantos Carlos Marín Suárez Miriam Cubas Morera Universidad de Granada Universidad de la República, Uruguay Universidad de York Andrés Menéndez Blanco Universidad de Oviedo Aitor Ruiz Redondo Camila Gianotti Université de Bordeaux Sergio Ríos González Universidad de la República Arqueólogo (Udelar) Patricia Suárez Manjón Ignacio Rodríguez Temiño Arqueóloga Junta de Andalucía Adolfo Fernández José Antonio Fernández Fernández José Carlos Sánchez Pardo de Córdoba Pérez Universidad de Vigo Universidad de Santiago de Secretario Compostela Arqueólogo Manuel Fernández-Götz Fructuoso Díaz García University of Edinburgh David Santamaría Álvarez Director Arqueólogo Fundación Municipal de Cultura de Siero Nailos nº 4. Octubre de 2018 © Los autores CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 ES Edita: Asociación de Profesionales Se permite la reproducción de los artícu- Estudios Independientes de la Arqueología los, la cita y la utilización de sus conteni- Interdisciplinares de Asturias (APIAA).
    [Show full text]
  • The Grand Duchy of Warsaw
    Y~r a n c v s> Tne Grand Duch} Of Warsaw THE GRAND DUCHY OF WARSAW BY HELEN ELIZABETH FKANCIS THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS IN HISTORY COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 1916 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS Oo CM Z? 191 6 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY 1 ENTITLED IS APPROVED BY ME AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Jiistru^ySr in Charge APPROVED: ^f^r^O /<a%*££*^+. 343G60 CONTENTS I. Short Sketch of Polish History before the Grand Duchy of Warsaw 1 II. The Establishment of the Grand Duchy of Warsaw 20 III. The Grand Duchy of Warsaw from 1807—1812 37 IV. The Breach of 1812 53 V. The Fate of the Grand Duchy of Warsaw as Decided at 74 the Congress of Vienna, 1815 VI. The Poles Since 1815 84 VII. Bibliography A. Primary Material 88 B. Secondary Material 91 C. Bibliographical Notes 95 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/grandduchyofwarsOOfran 1. I. A Short Sketch of Polish History before THE br&AftU UUUHi UP WAHSAW Among the many problems which demand the attention of the world today is that of Poland, and the outbreak of the ^reat War now going on in Europe has made this problem prominent. Ever since the final partition in 1795, the patriotic poles have held closely in their hearts the idea of a reunited independent country. Uprisings in Russian Poland in 1831, 1 in ualicia in 2 3 1855, and in Russia in 1863 showed that these ideas were alive.
    [Show full text]
  • When Did Agriculture Begin? the Edible Fig Is a Genetic Mutant of the Inedible Wild Fig
    6494_Microco_6ro96M Downloaded from When Did Agriculture Begin? the edible fig is a genetic mutant of the inedible wild fig. What appeared to have happened as long as 11,400 years ago is that 1 Stephen W. Carmichael “farmers” discovered this edible fruit would not propagate on its Mayo Clinic own and learned that it could only be raised if they took an active [email protected] role. Other fruit trees, such as the grape, olive, and date, can be https://www.cambridge.org/core It has generally been considered that cereals (such as wheat, similarly propagated, but other studies have suggested that this rice, and maize) were the first crops to be cultivated by human be- occurred about 5 millennia after these fig specimens. ings. But a new study that included scanning electron microscopy, Co-incidentally, a “Perspectives” article in the same issue of Sci- by Mordechai Kislev, Anat Hartmann, and Ofer Bar-Yosef (micro- ence described how ancient farmers turned weeds into cereal crops.3 graphs by Yakov Langsam) provides strong evidence that figs were John Doebley pointed out that a central feature for domestication 2 the first agricultural crop in human history. of cereals is that the grains must remain on the plant for harvesting Kislev et al. recovered nine fig fruits (plus many nutlets called by humans, rather than falling (in this context, referred to as “shat- . IP address: drupelets) from the ruins of a burned building near Jericho. The fire tering”) from the plant, as required for a wild species to propagate. had carbonized the fruit which helped preserve the morphology of Quantitative locus mapping has convincingly shown that the loss the specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Stuttgarter Antiquariatsmesse
    KATALOG CCXXX 2021 NEUZUGÄNGE ZUR (VIRTUELLEN) STUTTGARTER ANTIQUARIATSMESSE ANTIQUARIAT CLEMENS PAULUSCH GmbH ANTIQUARIAT NIKOLAUS STRUCK VORWORT INHALT Liebe Kunden, Kollegen und Freunde, Aus dem Messekatalog 1 - 12 Stadtansichten 13 - 303 das Jahr 2021 beginnt wie kaum ein anderes in der jüngeren Geschichte. Landkarten 304 - 528 Wir hätten uns vor 12 Monaten nicht vorstellen können, dass die Dekorative Grafik 529 - 600 Stuttgarter Antiquariatsmesse – wie viele andere Messen auch – ausfällt und nur mit einem gedruckten Katalog und virtuell stattfindet. Wir hätten uns aber vor einem Jahr so vieles nicht vorstellen, was in den vergangenen Monaten traurige Realität wurde. Wir werden Ihnen demnach in diesem Jahr keine Auswahl an Stadtan- sichten und Landkarten im Württembergischen Kunstverein präsentieren Allgemeine Geschäfts- und können, möchten aber wie auch in den vergangenen Jahren mit einem Lieferbedingungen sowie die Katalog die letzten Neuzugänge vorstellen. Im Gegensatz zu den vergan- Widerrufsbelehrung finden Sie genen Jahren sind ausnahmslos alle Titel des Kataloges sofort bestell- auf der letzten Seite. bar, auch die ersten zwölf, die Bestandteil des gedruckten Katalogs sind. Den Messekatalog können Sie auf der Homepage der Messe herunter- laden (https://www.antiquariatsmesse-stuttgart.de/de/katalog/katalog- Lieferbare Kataloge als-pdf) und können ihn auch über den Verband Deutscher Antiquare beziehen. Katalog 222 665 Karten und ein Atlas (666 Nummern) Da wohl bis auf weiteres der persönliche Kontakt mit Ihnen unterbleiben muss, wünschen wir Ihnen auf diesem Wege das Beste für 2021. Katalog 226 Unser Ladengeschäft ist derzeit geschlossen, Besuche sind aber nach Deutschland Teil 7: Nachträge persönlicher Vereinbarung in Ausnahmefällen möglich. Wir sind per Mail (1000 Nummern) und während der üblichen Öffnungszeiten (außer Samstags) auch telefonisch erreichbar.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteromeles Arbutifolia (Lindl.) M. Roemer NRCS CODE: Subfamily: Maloideae Family: Rosaceae (HEAR5) Photos: A
    I. SPECIES Heteromeles arbutifolia (Lindl.) M. Roemer NRCS CODE: Subfamily: Maloideae Family: Rosaceae (HEAR5) photos: A. Montalvo Order: Rosales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida Fruits (pomes) in late fall and winter. A. Subspecific taxa None recognized by Phipps (2012, 2016) in Jepson Manual or Jepson e-Flora. B. Synonyms Photinia arbutifolia (Ait.) Lindl.; Crataegus arbutifolia Ait. (McMinn 1939) Heteromeles (Lindl.) M. Roemer arbutifolia var. arbutifolia ; H. a. var. cerina (Jeps.) E. Murray; H. a. var. macrocarpa (Munz) Munz; H. salicifolia (C. Presl) Abrams (Phipps 2016) (but see I. F. Taxonomic issues). C. Common name toyon, California Christmas berry, California-holly (Painter 2016); Christmas berry (CalFlora 2016). D. Taxonomic relationships Phylogenetic analyses based on molecular and morphological data confirm thatPhotinia is the most closely related genus (Guo et al. 2011). Photinia differs in having 20 stamens, fused carpels, and stone cells in the testa as well as occurring in summer-wet environments (Phipps 1992). E. Related taxa in region None. There is only one species of Heteromeles. The closely related Photinia is primarily tropical (Meyer 2008) and not in California. Toyon's taxonomic stability may be in part related to its reproductive mode (Wells 1969). F. Taxonomic issues The three varieties of H. arbutifolia listed above in cell I. B. are currently recognized in the USDA PLANTS (2016) database. G. Other One of the most widely distributed California shrubs. Also widely planted and well-known for its bright red fruits in winter. McMinn (1939) noted it had been planted widely in parks and gardens since about 1914. From the Greek words 'heter' for different and 'malus' for apple (Munz 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into the Placement of Disarticulated Human Remains Into Shell Middens During Prehistory
    An investigation into the placement of disarticulated human remains into shell middens during prehistory Emily Rebecca Hellewell PhD University of York Archaeology October 2015 Abstract The aim of this thesis was to critically evaluate the evidence for disarticulated human remains in shell middens, using sites in northwest Europe dating to the Late Mesolithic/Early Neolithic as case studies. Traditionally, disarticulated remains placed in shell middens have been overlooked and assumed to be the result of burial disturbance with little in-depth analysis to the plausibility of this as an interpretation. The research considers whether it is possible to determine that the remains occurred through disturbance to inhumations, and to assess to what extent it is possible to reconstruct the processes of deposition of disarticulated remains. A new methodology has been developed with specific emphasis on identifying what taphonomic processes may have led to commingled human remains to be found at shell midden sites. Six hypothetical bone profile diagrams are presented, based on differing taphonomic processes known to affect burial remains. These hypothetical diagrams then provide comparative models to assess the evidence presented in the case studies. Three case studies located on the coast of western Scotland; Cnoc Coig, An Corran and Carding Mill Bay, demonstrate that it is likely that the placement of human remains into ancient shell middens emerged as part of secondary burial practices employed around the time of the Mesolithic/ Neolithic transition, while a Danish case study, Havnø, highlights a potential change in practices occurring from the Mesolithic into the Neolithic. Critically, the close assessment of the disarticulated remains provides strong evidence that disarticulated remains in shell middens are likely to be the result of more complex burial processes than previously thought.
    [Show full text]