DOCSLIB.ORG

TMS.Edu the MASTER’S SEMINARY JOURNAL Published by the MASTER’S SEMINARY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TMS.Edu the MASTER’S SEMINARY JOURNAL Published by the MASTER’S SEMINARY Volume 31, Number 2 Fall 2020 The Master’s Seminary Journal Seminary Master’s The The Master’s Seminary Master’s The The Master’s Seminary Journal Seminary Master’s The Sun Valley, CA91352-3798 Sun Valley, 13248 Roscoe Blvd. V olume 31, Number An Analysis of Geerhardus Vos’ Nature and Method of Biblical Theology RICHARD C. BARCELLOS 2 A Methodology for Janus Parallelism NATHAN LEMASTER The Eternal God of a Vanishing Creation: Recovering the Doctrine of Divine Timelessness PETER SAMMONS Toward the Worship of God as Actus Purus ALAN QUIÑONES Martyn Lloyd-Jones on “Unity” KEVIN D. ZUBER Recent Scholarship and the Quest to Understand Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 PETER J. GOEMAN The Hermeneutics of the American Revolution Fall GREGG L. FRAZER 2020 Postmodernism and the Gospels: Dancing on the Edge of Disaster Permit. No. 99 Van Nuys, CA Van U.S. Postage Organization Non-Profit F. DAVID FARNELL PAID TMS.edu THE MASTER’S SEMINARY JOURNAL published by THE MASTER’S SEMINARY Sam Horn, President Nathan A. Busenitz, Dean of Faculty Edited for the Faculty: Lucas Alemán Michael A. Grisanti Roberto Sánchez Brian Biedebach Carl Hargrove Paul Twiss Nathan A. Busenitz Brad Klassen Michael J. Vlach Austin Duncan Steven J. Lawson Iosif J. Zhakevich F. David Farnell John MacArthur Mark Zhakevich Josiah Grauman James Mook Kevin D. Zuber Bryan J. Murphy by Sam Horn Editor Nathan Busenitz Co-Editor Peter Sammons Managing Editor Kevin D. Zuber Production Supervisor Michael J. Vlach Copy Editor John Stone Book Review Coordinator Jack Smith Editorial Consultant Anastasia Prinzing Style Guide Consultant The views represented herein are not necessarily endorsed by The Master’s Seminary, its administration, or its faculty. The Master’s Seminary Journal (TMSJ) is published semiannually and distributed electronically. For information about articles, policy, or journal access, contact [email protected]. TMSJ is indexed in Elenchus Bibliographicus Biblicus of Biblica; Christian Periodical Index; and Guide to Social Science & Religion in Periodical Literature. Articles are abstracted in New Testament Abstracts; Old Testament Abstracts; and Religious and Theological Abstracts. This periodical is indexed in the ATLA Religion Database®, (ATLAS®) collection. Both are products of the American Theological Library Association. Copyright is waived if articles are used in a classroom or congregation and if the number of copies (to be distributed free of charge and marked, “Copyright (year). Reprinted from The Master’s Seminary Journal.”) does not exceed one hundred. For any other use, advance permission is required. ISSN #1066-3959 Volume 31 Fall 2020 Number 2 THE MASTER’S SEMINARY JOURNAL CONTENTS Editorial ...........................................................................................................149 Sam Horn An Analysis of Geerhardus Vos’ Nature and Method of Biblical Theology ...........................................................151 Richard C. Barcellos A Methodology for Janus Parallelism ................................................................173 Nathan LeMaster The Eternal God of a Vanishing Creation: Recovering the Doctrine of Divine Timelessness ...............................................189 Peter Sammons Toward the Worship of God as Actus Purus ......................................................213 Alan Quiñones Martyn Lloyd-Jones on “Unity” ........................................................................231 Kevin D. Zuber Recent Scholarship and the Quest to Understand Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 .................................................................................243 Peter J. Goeman The Hermeneutics of the American Revolution .................................................275 Gregg L. Frazer Postmodernism and the Gospels: Dancing on the Edge of Disaster .......................................................................301 F. David Farnell Reviews............................................................................................................321 An Introduction to Biblical Greek: A Grammar with Exercises by John D. Schwandt ........................................................................................321 Reviewed by Paul Twiss The Suffering Servant of the Lord: A Prophecy of Jesus Christ by David J. MacLeod ........................................................................................323 Reviewed by Kevin D. Zuber TMSJ 31/2 (Fall 2020) 149–150 EDITORIAL Dr. Sam Horn President of The Master’s University and Seminary * * * * * Whenever there is a transition in institutional leadership—especially within the office of the president of a conservative evangelical seminary—a question naturally arises regarding transitions in fidelity. The history of academic institutions, and of seminaries in particular, has proven this to be a reasonable concern. Thus, with this passing of the baton, I am committed to the reaffirmation of our doctrinal convictions in order to maintain doctrinal fidelity and to guard the theological integrity of The Master’s Seminary. One of the goals of The Master’s Seminary Journal (hereafter TMSJ) is to demonstrate our ongoing commitment to the same doctrinal truths that have marked this institution since its inception. You can expect from TMSJ what you have always expected: faithful scholarship for the edification of the church. Historically, TMSJ has been written for laymen. In essence, TMSJ acted as a precursor for what is today The Master’s Seminary Blog, and yet as blogs have inundated the internet, pastors and laymen have more blog articles than they can read. This popular-level trend in Christian literature has created a vacancy in the intellectual sphere. Pastors and church members need faithful academic resources. The church waits for the scholarship of men and women who fear and tremble before the Word of God, and then speak truth into issues thus far saturated with liberal scholarship. This is the new direction for TMSJ as we strive to serve pastor- theologians charged to lead, feed, and guard their local churches, as well as the godly laymen who are called to support and serve alongside them in the work of the ministry. Without question, the mind of the pastor must be multi-disciplined. He must be versed in New Testament, Old Testament, linguistics, biblical languages, systematic theology, historical theology, and biblical theology, to name several. His calling requires him to weave these disciplines together each week in his study. The Master’s Seminary exists to serve and benefit the church, and to do that well, we must serve in ways that equip the pastor to better exposit the Word and to guard the truth entrusted to him. This will be the goal of every issue of TMSJ. This issue addresses a variety of theological disciplines with articles we believe will serve our readers in a number of important ways. 149 150 | Editorial In the field of biblical theology, Richard C. Barcellos (Ph.D.) writes on the scholar Geerhardus Vos—the Reformed theologian who entered the field of biblical theology after it had been dominated by “the literal/critical biblical-theological enterprise” for a century. Despite cultural trends, Vos assumed the chair of biblical theology at Princeton. Through a hermeneutic grounded not only in how Scripture is formed, but in what it says and how it says it, Vos would one day be considered “an all-time master in the field of Biblical Theology.” We have much to learn not only from his research, but from his desire to let the Word speak where the world has dominated. In the field of linguistics, Nathan LeMaster (Ph.D. candidate) seeks to establish a methodology for identifying Janus Parallelism, the masterful Hebrew literary device used to intentionally exploit a single word with two meanings. While much has been written on this subject, little work has been done to demonstrate a consistent method for identifying this ancient linguistic tool. The purpose is to better understand the mind of the Hebrew writers of the Old Testament, so as to better understand the authorial intention of Scripture. In the field of theology, Peter Sammons (Ph.D.), Alan Quiñones (Ph.D. candidate), and Kevin Zuber (Ph.D.) write on a variety of issues. Sammons enters the current debate over the foundational doctrine of classical theism: Divine timelessness. Quiñones explores the claim, first articulated by Aristotle, that God is Actus Purus—eternally all that He can be. And Zuber seeks to understand the perspective of Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones on the critical issue of unity and ecumenism within the church. In the field of biblical languages, Peter J. Goeman (Ph.D.) analyzes Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 to address one of the most debated issues in Old Testament scholarship—the phrase “as one lies with a female.” Pushed by cultural shifts, biblical scholarship rages over this issue, and Goeman intervenes with biblical precision and fidelity. In the field of hermeneutics, Gregg L. Frazer (Ph.D.) explores the hermeneutics of the American Revolution. He examines how the political climate of the time resulted in various interpretations of Scripture by analyzing the sermons of two preachers: a loyalist and a patriot. In the field of New Testament historiography, F. David Farnell (Ph.D.) explores postmodern influence on the interpretation of the Gospels, reminding readers of the power and simplicity of the natural meaning of Scripture. I am humbled by the institutional legacy that has been entrusted to me. At The Master’s Seminary, I am surrounded by some of the most thoughtful
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PRESBYTERIANISM in AMERICA the 20 Century
    WRS Journal 13:2 (August 2006) 26-43 PRESBYTERIANISM IN AMERICA The 20th Century John A. Battle The final third century of Presbyterianism in America has witnessed the collapse of the mainline Presbyterian churches into liberalism and decline, the emergence of a number of smaller, conservative denominations and agencies, and a renewed interest in Reformed theology throughout the evangelical world. The history of Presbyterianism in the twentieth century is very complex, with certain themes running through the entire century along with new and radical developments. Looking back over the last hundred years from a biblical perspective, one can see three major periods, characterized by different stages of development or decline. The entire period begins with the Presbyterian Church being overwhelmingly conservative, and united theologically, and ends with the same church being largely liberal and fragmented, with several conservative defections. I have chosen two dates during the century as marking these watershed changes in the Presbyterian Church: (1) the issuing of the 1934 mandate requiring J. Gresham Machen and others to support the church’s official Board of Foreign Missions, and (2) the adoption of the Confession of 1967. The Presbyterian Church moves to a new gospel (1900-1934) At the beginning of the century When the twentieth century opened, the Presbyterians in America were largely contained in the Presbyterian Church U.S.A. (PCUSA, the Northern church) and the Presbyterian Church in the U.S. (PCUS, the Southern church). There were a few smaller Presbyterian denominations, such as the pro-Arminian Cumberland Presbyterian Church and several Scottish Presbyterian bodies, including the United Presbyterian Church of North America and various other branches of the older Associate and Reformed Presbyteries and Synods.
    [Show full text]
  • Resurrection in Daniel 12 and Its Contribution to the Theology of the Book of Daniel
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 1996 Resurrection in Daniel 12 and its Contribution to the Theology of the Book of Daniel Artur A. Stele Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Stele, Artur A., "Resurrection in Daniel 12 and its Contribution to the Theology of the Book of Daniel" (1996). Dissertations. 148. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/148 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters to 7 Churches Laodicea Part 2.Pdf
    11. Letters to the 7 Churches Rev. ch 3:7-13 Laodicea Part 2 Student copy Start audio file 11 Part 2 To review where we left off last week 1. Why are you not listening 2. Why will you not honour Me? 3. Why will you not recognise Me? This church is actually saying “I’m rich” look at us, we’re rich, we’ve become wealthy, we don’t need anything. This is their self-assessment.!!! Jesus’ response to this was …..You do not know that you are wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked Song we used to sing – I am covered over in the robe of righteousness which Jesus gives to me……….. that’s what we need, the covering that Jesus gives. The robes should be white. These people thought they were clothed right but they weren’t Nothing in my hands I bring, simply to Thy cross I cling, naked come to Thee for dress, helpless look to Thee for grace…. So what has happened today? When did the churches start to go wrong? Up until the 20th century the true church preached the gospel, preached repentance and preached Holiness of living. Even churchgoers who may not have had a real relationship with Jesus were mostly moral good living people. They were influenced by the fact that we were largely a Christian country and our laws were based on the Bible. And most still attended church which would have had an influence on the way they lived. 1 11. Letters to the 7 Churches Rev. ch 3:7-13 Laodicea Part 2 Student copy Back in the 60’s there were very few divorces.
    [Show full text]
  • Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
    MIDWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY UNCHANGING BEAUTY: FAITH AS THE APPREHENSION OF THE IMMUTABLE GOD’S GLORY REVEALED IN THE SON A PAPER SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COURSE DR 01-37395 ADVANCED SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY BY SAMUEL G. PARKISON KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI AUGUST, 19 2018 Introduction Two topics that have generated considerable attention in the field of systematic theology as of late are aesthetics1 and classical theism.2 Though neither topic is new to the Church’s life, each have experienced relative neglect and resurgence. However, notwithstanding how much attention both these theological loci have received, they are not often discussed in relation to one another. This paper seeks to explore their convergence in Christology. To be specific, we seek to answer: is the doctrine of divine immutability compatible with an aesthetic-soteriology, in which Christological glory elicits faith? This paper will contend for the affirmative: indeed, not only is divine immutability compatible with such an aesthetic-soteriology, it is necessary for it to work. Christology will thus serve as the gravitational center for this study, pulling these two areas of interest together. The aesthetic interest of saving faith is Christ, the Word made flesh. Likewise, the central challenge to divine immutability is Christ, the Word made flesh. Structurally, this paper will move from an examination of the aesthetic dimension of saving faith, to Christ’s revelatory role of the immutable God in the incarnation, and will conclude with a brief consideration and response to divine immutability’s challenge in light of the incarnation. Thus, we will show that saving faith in Jesus—as a response to his irresistible beauty—results in mediated access to the unchanging, beautiful Triune God.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2019 RADICAL ORTHODOXYT Theology, Philosophy, Politics R P OP Radical Orthodoxy: Theology, Philosophy, Politics
    Volume 5, no. 1 | March 2019 RADICAL ORTHODOXYT Theology, Philosophy, Politics R P OP Radical Orthodoxy: Theology, Philosophy, Politics Editorial Board Oliva Blanchette Michael Symmons Roberts Conor Cunningham Phillip Blond Charles Taylor Andrew Davison Evandro Botto Rudi A. te Velde Alessandra Gerolin David B. Burrell, C.S.C. Graham Ward Michael Hanby David Fergusson Thomas Weinandy, OFM Cap. Samuel Kimbriel Lord Maurice Glasman Slavoj Žižek John Milbank Boris Gunjević Simon Oliver David Bentley Hart Editorial Team Adrian Pabst Stanley Hauerwas Editor: Catherine Pickstock Johannes Hoff Dritëro Demjaha Aaron Riches Austen Ivereigh Tracey Rowland Fergus Kerr, OP Managing Editor & Layout: Neil Turnbull Peter J. Leithart Eric Austin Lee Joost van Loon Advisory Board James Macmillan Reviews Editor: Talal Asad Mgsr. Javier Martínez Brendan Sammon William Bain Alison Milbank John Behr Michael S Northcott John R. Betz Nicholas Rengger Radical Orthodoxy: A Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Politics (ISSN: 2050-392X) is an internationally peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the exploration of academic and policy debates that interface between theology, philosophy and the social sciences. The editorial policy of the journal is radically non-partisan and the journal welcomes submissions from scholars and intellectuals with interesting and relevant things to say about both the nature and trajectory of the times in which we live. The journal intends to publish papers on all branches of philosophy, theology aesthetics (including literary, art and music criticism) as well as pieces on ethical, political, social, economic and cultural theory. The journal will be published four times a year; each volume comprising of standard, special, review and current affairs issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Immaculate Conception in Ecumenical Perspective
    32 THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION IN ECUMENICAL PERSPECTIVE By DONALD G. DAWE HE POPULAR presupposition of ecumenical dialogue is that ~ we should start with the easy matters first and proceed ]1 slowly, if at all, to the more difficult questions. This IL approach has served the ecumenical dialogue on marian questions well up to this point. Common exploration of~scripture has swept away much misunderstanding. Historical studies of the protestant reformers, their piety and theology, have shown a deep and widespread concern for Mary that had been lost by their later followers. While rejoicing in these discoveries, one is always left with the stubborn realization that we do not live in the first century, or the sixteenth century, but the twentieth century. Our theological questions, our ecumenical concerns and our piety are shaped by the traditions of the Church as it exists today. Therefore we need to look at the traditions that have shaped the Churches of today as they search for the meaning of Mary. When we leave historical and biblical studies to look at contem- porary marian devotion and theology, we are painfully aware of the depth and seriousness of conflict. Nowhere is this more evident than in considering the two great marian definitions that have been crucial to modern Roman Catholicism -- the promulgation of the dogma of the Immaculate Conception in 1854 and the dogma of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary in 1950. Suddenly we find ourselves transported from the realm of the familiar, where agree- ment lies close to the surface, into those most difficult and painful questions, where deep and threatening differences become evident.
    [Show full text]
  • Actus and Potentia: from Philosophy of Nature to Metaphysics
    Actus and Potentia: From Philosophy of Nature to Metaphysics (Dedicated to Lawrence Dewan, OP and Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, OP) Alfred J. Freddoso University of Notre Dame Thomistic Philosophy Workshop Mt. St. Mary College, Newburgh June, 2015 1. Introduction cum exhortation In this presentation I want to lay out the general parameters of the distinction between actus and potentia, and to indicate how the order of learning here takes us fairly directly from philosophy of nature to the heights of metaphysics — more particularly, to St. Thomas’s teaching on creation ex nihilo, both (a) in its positing of the distinction between esse and essentia in the creature that receives, as it were, the act of creating and (b) in its characterization of the agent of creation. This is just one example of the power of St. Thomas’s Aristotelian philosophy of nature. I hope that what I say here will help you to recognize indications within contemporary mainstream philosophy of the enduring importance of the distinction between actus and potentia, acknowledged or unacknowledged, not just for philosophy of nature and philosophy of science, but for philosophical anthropology (aka philosophy of mind), natural theology, and moral theory as well. Now our best approach to the distinction between potentia and actus is precisely to begin from the principles of change as Aristotle lays them out in Physics 1 and to link the various specifications of the distinction to distinctive exercises of efficient causality. Before I get to that, however, I want to insert a word of encouragement and exhortation to the budding Thomists out there.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © 2015 Robert Charles Brandhagen All Rights Reserved
    Copyright © 2015 Robert Charles Brandhagen All rights reserved. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation or instruction. PREACHING A BIBLICAL DOCTRINE OF MARRIAGE, DIVORCE, AND REMARRIAGE AT FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF REEDSBURG, AND BIG SPRING CHURCH OF WISCONSIN DELLS, WISCONSIN __________________ A Project Presented to the Faculty of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary __________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Ministry __________________ by Robert Charles Brandhagen May 2015 APPROVAL SHEET PREACHING A BIBLICAL DOCTRINE OF MARRIAGE, DIVORCE, AND REMARRIAGE AT FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF REEDSBURG, AND BIG SPRING CHURCH OF WISCONSIN DELLS, WISCONSIN Robert Charles Brandhagen Read and Approved by: __________________________________________ Robert L. Plummer (Faculty Supervisor) __________________________________________ Joseph C. Harrod Date ______________________________ To Lisa Ann, "You have captivated my heart, my sister, my bride" (Song of Sol 4:9). TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES . viii PREFACE . x Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION . 1 Purpose . 1 Goals . 1 Ministry Context . 2 Rationale . 4 Definitions . 5 Limitations and Delimitations . 6 2. BIBLICAL AND THEOLOGICAL SUPPORT FOR PREACHING A BIBLICAL DOCTRINE OF MARRIAGE, DIVORCE, AND REMARRIAGE . 8 Introduction . 8 Creation Ordinance Perspective on Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage (Gen 2:18-25) . 8 Legal Perspective on Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage (Deut 24:1-5) . 11 Malachi’s Perspective on Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage (Mal 2:10-16) . 17 Jesus’ Perspective on Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage (Matt 19:3-12) . 22 Paul’s Perspective on Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage (1 Cor 7:1-40) .
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Augustus Briggs Papers, 1841 – 1913
    The Burke Library Archives, Columbia University Libraries, Union Theological Seminary, New York Union Theological Seminary Archives 1 Finding Aid for Charles Augustus Briggs Papers, 1841 – 1913 Credit to: UTS Records Series 18 Faculty Photographs, The Burke Library at Union Theological Seminary, Columbia University in the City of New York. Finding Aid prepared by: Margaret M. McGuinness, 1981; additions by Ruth Mary Pollack, 1985 Revised by Audrey Walton, Simon Taylor, Todd Willison 2013 Revised with additions by Ruth Tonkiss Cameron, 2014 Reviewed and updated by Brigette C. Kamsler, February 2015 with financial support from the Henry Luce Foundation Summary Information Creator: Charles Augustus Briggs, 1841-1913 and Emilie Grace Briggs Title: Charles Augustus Briggs Papers Inclusive dates: 1841-1913 Bulk dates: 1869-1913 Abstract: Presbyterian pastor, Union Theological Seminary professor of Hebrew and Cognate Languages, of Biblical Theology, of Theological Encyclopedia and Symbolics, Episcopal priest. Interests in Old Testament, Hebrew and cognate languages, biblical criticism. Trained in Germany, helped to introduce historical criticism to America and was brought to heresy trial by Presbyterian Church. Materials include correspondence, writings, personal documents, heresy trials coverage. Size: 62 boxes, 45 horizontal boxes, 1 Oversize box, 85.25 linear feet Storage: Onsite storage Repository: The Burke Library Union Theological Seminary 3041 Broadway New York, NY 10027 Email: [email protected] UTS1: Charles Augustus Briggs Papers, 1841 – 1913 2 Administrative Information Provenance: Emilie Grace Briggs, eldest daughter of Charles Augustus, donated the majority of her father’s papers to the library at Union Theological Seminary, now The Burke library, on a series of occasions before her death in 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Theology and the Christian Contribution to Metaphysics: on Thomas Joseph White’S Wisdom in the Face of Modernity
    Nova et Vetera, English Edition, Vol. 10, No. 2 (2012): 539 –62 539 Natural Theology and the Christian Contribution to Metaphysics: On Thomas Joseph White’s Wisdom in the Face of Modernity NICHOLAS J. H EALY , J R. John Paul II Institute Washington, DC From the very heart of Christian faith and, at the same time, the heart of Greek thought now joined to faith, Manuel II was able to say: Not to act “with logos” is contrary to God’s nature. [T]he faith of the Church has always insisted that between God and us, between his eternal Creator Spirit and our created reason there exists a real analogy, in which unlike - ness remains infinitely greater than likeness, yet not to the point of abol - ishing analogy and its language (cf. Lateran IV). God does not become more divine when we push him away from us in a sheer, impenetrable voluntarism; rather, the truly divine God is the God who has revealed himself as logos and, as logos, has acted and continues to act lovingly on our behalf. This inner rapprochement between biblical faith and Greek philosophical inquiry was an event of decisive importance not only from the standpoint of the history of religions, but also from that of world history—it is an event which concerns us even today. 1 It is my view that the neoscholastic rationalism that was trying to reconstruct the praeambula fidei, the approach to faith, with pure rational certainty, by means of rational argument that was strictly inde - pendent of any faith, has failed; and it cannot be otherwise for any such attempts to do that kind of thing.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Will Learn How to Analyze Historical Narratives
    History 308/708, RN314/614, TX849 Religious Thought in America Fall Term, 2018 MWF: 1:25-2:15 Jon H. Roberts Office Hours: Mon. 3-5, Tues. 9-10, Office: 226 Bay State Road, Room 406 and by appointment 617-353-2557 (O); 781-209-0982 (H) [email protected] Course Description: Few concepts have proved more difficult to define than religion, but most students of the subject would agree that religious traditions commonly include rituals and other practices, aesthetic and emotional experiences, and a body of ideas typically expressed as beliefs. This course focuses on those beliefs during the course of American history from the first English colonial settlement to the present and on their interaction with the broader currents of American culture. Theology is the term often used to describe the systematic expression of religious doctrine. It is clearly possible, however, to discuss religious beliefs outside the context of formal theology, and it is at least arguable that some of the most influential beliefs in American history have received their most vivid and forceful expressions beyond the purview of theological discourse. Accordingly, while much of our attention in this course will focus on the works of theologians and clergy--the religious “professionals”--we shall also deal with religious strategies that a widely disparate group of other thinkers (e.g., scientists, artists, and other influential lay people) have deployed in attempting to account for the nature of the cosmos, the structure of the social order, and the dynamics of human experience. Most of the people whom we’ll be studying were committed proponents of Christianity or Judaism, but the course lectures and readings will also occasionally move outside of those traditions to include others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revival of Political Hesychasm in Greek Orthodox Thought: a Study of the Hesychast Basis of the Thought of John S
    ABSTRACT The Revival of Political Hesychasm in Greek Orthodox Thought: A Study of the Hesychast Basis of the Thought of John S. Romanides and Christos Yannaras Daniel Paul Payne, B.A., M.Div. Mentor: Derek H. Davis, Ph.D. In the 1940s Russian émigré theologians rediscovered the ascetic-theology of St. Gregory Palamas. Palamas’s theology became the basis for an articulation of an Orthodox theological identity apart from Roman Catholic and Protestant influences. In particular the “Neo-Patristic Synthesis” of Fr. Georges Florovsky and the appropriation of Palamas’s theology by Vladimir Lossky set the course for future Orthodox theology in the twentieth century. Their thought had a direct influence upon the thought of Greek theologians John S. Romanides and Christos Yannaras in the late twentieth century. Each of these theologians formulated a political theology using the ascetic-theology of Palamas combined with the Roman identity of the Greek Orthodox people. Both of these thinkers called for a return to the ecclesial-communal life of the late Byzantine period as an alternative to the secular vision of the modern West. The resulting paradigm developed by their thought has led to the formation of what has been called the “Neo- Orthodox Movement.” Essentially, what the intellectual and populist thinkers of the movement have expressed in their writings is “political hesychasm.” Romanides and Yannaras desire to establish an Orthodox identity that separates the Roman aspect from the Hellenic element of Greek identity. The Roman identity of the Greek people is the Orthodox Christian element removed from the pagan Hellenism, which, as they argue, the Western powers imposed on the Greek people in the establishment of the modern nation-state of Greece in 1821.
    [Show full text]