View of Landing Charges at Heathrow
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Spice Briefing
MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian -
Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL) Materials
BRIGHTON AND HOVE Moving On 2 A resource to support Year 6 and Year 7 students in developing social and emotional skills for transfer. Healthy Schools Team Hove Park Mansions Hove Park Villas Hove BN3 6HW Tel: 01273 293530 Fax: 01273 295392 E-mail: [email protected] The Healthy Schools Team will provide updates to this resource online Published May 2009 Preface The transfer from primary school to secondary school is a significant event involving many complex emotions. The move ought to be successful for all pupils and we should try to ensure that the process is as smooth as possible. In Brighton & Hove schools there is already much good practice supporting pupils in managing this significant change. The CYPT welcomes wholeheartedly this new resource, Moving On 2. It will provide schools with additional materials for use within the curriculum, ensuring that pupils feel that their primary level achievements are valued and acknowledged, and enabling them to build on those achievements at secondary level. Preface ThisThe transfer resource, from primary school which to secondar yhas school isbeen a significant developed event by Brighton & Hove teachers working with consultants from involving many complex emotions. The move ought to be successf u l for all pupils and we should try to ensure that the process is as smooth as possible. theIn Brighton Advisory & Hove schools Service,there is already much replaces good practice supportingthe Moving On booklet and instead provides a Year 6 unit of work that pupils in managing this significant change. links effective literacy planning to the Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL) materials. -
Secondary School School Admissions in Brighton & Hove 2016-2017
Secondary School School Admissions in Brighton & Hove 2016-2017 Closing date for applications 31 October 2015 A guide for parents and carers • Transferring to Secondary School • Moving into the area Mandarin If you would like a translation of the information contained in this booklet, please tick the appropriate box and write your name and address below. This formLatvian should then be sent to the School Admissions Team at the address below: 如果您想要一份这本小册子中所包含的信息的翻译版本,请勾选适当的方格,并在下方写上您 The aim of this booklet is to help parents obtain aIf place you would in schoollike a translation of the information contained in this booklet, please tick the appropriate Polish for的姓名 their和 地址child.,然后将本表格寄到以下地址的入学申请小组 It explains the procedure to follow,(Schoolbox the and Admissionstimescales write your Teamname )。and address below. This form should then be sent to the School and what to do if there are any problems or difficulties.Admissions Team at the address below: If a translation is needed, please fill in the form at the Ja jūs vēlaties saņemt bukleta tulkojumu, lūdzu atzīmējiet to attiecīgajā lauciņā un zemāk norādiet backThe aimof the of this booklet booklet and is to posthelp parentsit. obtain a place in school savufor their vārdu child. un adresi. It explains Šo veidlapu the pēc tam nosūtiet Skolas Uzņemšanas nodaļai uz zemāk norādīto If you would like a translation of the information contained in this booklet,adresi: please tick the appropriate procedurebox and write to follow your name and the and timescales address below. and what This to form do if should there are then any be problems sent to the or School difficulties. -
Secondaryschoolspendinganaly
www.tutor2u.net Analysis of Resources Spend by School Total Spending Per Pupil Learning Learning ICT Learning Resources (not ICT Learning Resources (not School Resources ICT) Total Resources ICT) Total Pupils (FTE) £000 £000 £000 £/pupil £/pupil £/pupil 000 Swanlea School 651 482 1,133 £599.2 £443.9 £1,043.1 1,086 Staunton Community Sports College 234 192 426 £478.3 £393.6 £871.9 489 The Skinners' Company's School for Girls 143 324 468 £465.0 £1,053.5 £1,518.6 308 The Charter School 482 462 944 £444.6 £425.6 £870.2 1,085 PEMBEC High School 135 341 476 £441.8 £1,117.6 £1,559.4 305 Cumberland School 578 611 1,189 £430.9 £455.1 £885.9 1,342 St John Bosco Arts College 434 230 664 £420.0 £222.2 £642.2 1,034 Deansfield Community School, Specialists In Media Arts 258 430 688 £395.9 £660.4 £1,056.4 651 South Shields Community School 285 253 538 £361.9 £321.7 £683.6 787 Babington Community Technology College 268 290 558 £350.2 £378.9 £729.1 765 Queensbridge School 225 225 450 £344.3 £343.9 £688.2 654 Pent Valley Technology College 452 285 737 £339.2 £214.1 £553.3 1,332 Kemnal Technology College 366 110 477 £330.4 £99.6 £430.0 1,109 The Maplesden Noakes School 337 173 510 £326.5 £167.8 £494.3 1,032 The Folkestone School for Girls 325 309 635 £310.9 £295.4 £606.3 1,047 Abbot Beyne School 260 134 394 £305.9 £157.6 £463.6 851 South Bromsgrove Community High School 403 245 649 £303.8 £184.9 £488.8 1,327 George Green's School 338 757 1,096 £299.7 £670.7 £970.4 1,129 King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys 211 309 520 £297.0 £435.7 £732.7 709 Joseph -
VOS News the Arnish Black Hole Page 10 a Lewis Wind Atlas Part I Page 12 the Views of Scotland Newsletter Vol 2 No 2 October 2004 All Puff and Protons Page 16
The Lewis Dossier Lewis environment in crisis page 3 A feeling of wilderness page 4 VOS News The Arnish black hole page 10 A Lewis wind atlas part I page 12 The Views of Scotland Newsletter Vol 2 No 2 October 2004 All puff and protons page 16 ‘challenges’ for the Danish energy system. Two of these Danish wind boss admits: translate as follows: z The forced development of wind turbines in Denmark Wind-power raises the demand for subsidy in øre/kWh; z The increased development of wind turbines does not reduce Danish CO2 emissions. hasn’t cut The argument is simple. Denmark, unable to absorb most of its wind output, exports over 80 per cent of it. By Denmark’s CO definition, this does not cut Danish emissions. 2 Much of it goes to Scandinavian suppliers (with six per cent losses en route) to replace genuinely clean hydro power emissions or Swedish nuclear. So it doesn’t cut emissions there either. Wind-power does almost nothing to cut emissions of Whilst Danish wind-power generators are heavily subsidised, buyers from other countries pay the going rate CO2 because its output is so unpredictable. This makes its fossil-fuel backup highly inefficient and and sometimes even charge for taking it. tends to offset the savings as it makes. Buying electricity at giveaway prices allows generators to New Labour’s ‘Renewables Obligations’ subsidy schemes turn their hydro off, save water – and wait for the wind to do not oblige electricity suppliers to measure cuts in CO2 drop so that they can sell the hydro at better prices. -
Members 1979-2010
Members 1979-2010 RESEARCH PAPER 10/33 28 April 2010 This Research Paper provides a complete list of all Members who have served in the House of Commons since the general election of 1979 to the dissolution of Parliament on 12 April 2010. The Paper also provides basic biographical and parliamentary data. The Library and House of Commons Information Office are frequently asked for such information and this Paper is based on the data we collate from published sources to assist us in responding. This Paper replaces an earlier version, Research Paper 09/31. Oonagh Gay Richard Cracknell Jeremy Hardacre Jean Fessey Recent Research Papers 10/22 Crime and Security Bill: Committee Stage Report 03.03.10 10/23 Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Bill [HL] [Bill 79 of 2009-10] 08.03.10 10/24 Local Authorities (Overview and Scrutiny) Bill: Committee Stage Report 08.03.10 10/25 Northern Ireland Assembly Members Bill [HL] [Bill 75 of 2009-10] 09.03.10 10/26 Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill: Committee Stage Report 11.03.10 10/27 Unemployment by Constituency, February 2010 17.03.10 10/28 Transport Policy in 2010: a rough guide 19.03.10 10/29 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2010/11 26.03.10 10/30 Digital Economy Bill [HL] [Bill 89 of 2009-10] 29.03.10 10/31 Economic Indicators, April 2010 06.04.10 10/32 Claimant Count Unemployment in the new (2010) Parliamentary 12.04.10 Constituencies Research Paper 10/33 Contributing Authors: Oonagh Gay, Parliament and Constitution Centre Richard Cracknell, Social and General Statistics Section Jeremy Hardacre, Statistics Resources Unit Jean Fessey, House of Commons Information Office This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. -
Admissions in Brighton & Hove 2015-16
Secondary School Admissions in Brighton & Hove 2015-16 Important If you do not read the booklet you will not have full information about the school admission process, and may be disadvantaged in getting a place for your child at your preferred school. You can now apply for school places online. Visit the Brighton & Hove City Council website at www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/schooladmissions or see inside for more details. Closing date for applications 31 October 2014 Mandarin If you would like a translation of the information contained in this booklet, please tick the appropriate box and write your name and address below. This form should then be sent to the Contact information School Admissions Team at the address below: 如果您想要一份这本小册子中所包含的信息的翻译版本,请勾选适当的方格,并在下方写上您Polish 的姓名The aim和地址 of ,this然后将本表格寄到以下地址的入学申请小组 booklet is to help parents obtain a( placeSchool in Admissions school for Team their)。 If you want more information about the school admissions process, or if you want to child. It explains the procedure to follow and the timescales and what to do comment about this booklet or the admission arrangements, please write to: Ifif youthere would are like any a translationproblems of orthe difficulties. information contained For a full in this translation, booklet, please please tick thefill appropriatein the School Admissions Team Theboxform aimand at ofwrite the this your backbooklet name of is thetoand help bookletaddress parents below. and obtain post This a place formit to in should the school address then for theirbe sentindicated. child. to the It explainsSchool the procedureAdmissions to Team follow at and the theaddress timescales below: and what to do if there are any problems or Brighton & Hove City Council difficulties. -
I WAS a TEENAGE GOVERNOR, Project
I WAS A TEENAGE GOVERNOR: GETTING READY FOR PUPIL GOVERNORSHIP PROJECT REPORT PHASE 2 – PUPIL GOVERNORSHIP: INITIAL PREPARATION AND EXPERIENCE IN THE PROJECT SCHOOLS DERRY HANNAM CONTENTS Acknowledgements 1. Introduction – The evolving context 5 2. The baseline in the schools 9 3. The May 2004 information exchange at ippr 14 4. Development during Phase 2 – hypotheses, pitfalls and progress, the voices of the participants 18 5. Conclusion – emerging issues for Phase 3 – and the question of voting 26 References Appendix 1 – the interview schedules – an example Appendix 2 – a proposal for the evaluation of Phase 3 and 4 Acknowledgements The author would like to express his heartfelt thanks to the following without whom the IWATG project could not have successfully completed its second ph ase and this report could not have been written. The Carnegie United Kingdom Trust for its financial support . T H E C A R N E G I E U N I T E D K I N G D O M T R U S T Incorporated by Royal Charter 1917 The head teachers, project link teachers and governo rs, and student associate governors (both actual and prospective) of : - Chafford Hundred Campus, Thurrock Colne School, Brightlingsea, Essex The Cornelius Vermuyden School, Canvey Island, Essex Davison CE High School for Girls, Worthing, West Sussex Falme r High School, Brighton and Hove Gable Hall School, Thurrock Langdon School, Newham Milton Cross School, Portsmouth Passmores Comprehensive School, Harlow, Essex Peacehaven Community School, East Sussex Springfield School, Portsmouth St.. Benedict’s Colleg e, Colchester, Essex Varndean School, Brighton and Hove LEA Governor Services and Advisory Officers: - Peter Bates from Thurrock LEA Andy Heaword and David Hart from Portsmouth City LEA Ruth Hilton from Brighton and Hove LEA Judith Ogan from Essex LEA Sue Tregear from West Sussex LEA PROJECT REPORT PHASE 2 3 And from the project partner organisations : - Tony Breslin of the Citizenship Foundation for invaluable advice and support . -
Towards a More Complex Language Identity? an Investigation of Opinions on Scots in a Sample of Policy Makers and Others∗
Atina L.K. Nihtinen Towards a more complex language identity? An investigation of opinions on Scots in a sample of policy makers and others∗ Background to this survey In a recent study on language policy in Britain and Ireland in a book called “Multilingual Europe” (Battarbee 2005, 131–146), it is argued that the definition and status of Scots are still considered to be controversial in spite of recognition by the European Bureau for Lesser-Used Languages (EBLUL)1, the Scottish parliament and at a UK government level. Battarbee (2005, 140) points out that virtually nothing has been done to enhance the status of Scots apart from some cosmetic2 use in the Scottish Parliament. It has been stated several times that whether Scots is seen as a language or a dialect (or dialects for that matter) is dependent on a political point of view. Defining present-day Scots as a language has been difficult for both linguistic and historical reasons (See e.g. Leith 1983, 164 and McArthur 1998). In any case, it was only after the Union of the Crowns (and, even more markedly, after the Union of Parliaments) that Scots gradually came to be regarded as a corrupt form of English and the language lost its status as a result of political events. Had the political situation been different, it can be argued that Scots would have been a national language through the centuries in a similar fashion to many national languages in Europe. On the other hand, contemporary Scots is “certainly distinct enough to be dealt with separately” (Dossena 2005a, 9) and a terminological distinction between Scots and Scottish Standard English “has to be drawn very clearly and explicitly to avoid confusion” (Dossena 2005a, 13). -
Spice Briefing
LIST OF ALL MSPS A-Z: SESSION 2 Scottish Parliament The Fact sheet provides an alphabetical list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the second Fact sheet parliamentary session, 7 May 2003 – 2 April 2007. It also lists the party for which each MSP was elected as well as the constituency or region that they represented. MSPs: Historical The abbreviation (C) has been used to indicate a constituency seat Series and (R) to indicate a regional seat. 12 March 2009 1 MSP Party Constituency or Region Brian Adam Scottish National Party Aberdeen North (C) Bill Aitken Conservative Glasgow (R) Wendy Alexander Labour Paisley North (C) Andrew Arbuckle1 Liberal Democrat Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Jackie Baillie Labour Dumbarton (C) Shiona Baird Green North East Scotland (R) Richard Baker Labour North East Scotland (R) Chris Ballance Green South of Scotland (R) Mark Ballard Green Lothians (R) Scott Barrie Labour Dunfermline West (C) Sarah Boyack Labour Edinburgh Central (C) Rhona Brankin Labour Midlothian (C) Ted Brocklebank Conservative Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Robert Brown Liberal Democrat Glasgow (R) Derek Brownlee2 Conservative South of Scotland (R) Bill Butler Labour Glasgow Anniesland (C) Rosemary Byrne3 Scottish Socialist Party South of Scotland (R) Dennis Canavan Independent Falkirk West (C) Malcolm Chisholm Labour Edinburgh North and Leith (C) Cathie Craigie Labour Cumbernauld and Kilsyth (C) Bruce Crawford Scottish National Party Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Roseanna Cunningham Scottish National Party Perth (C) Frances Curran Scottish Socialist Party West of Scotland (R) Margaret Curran Labour Glasgow Baillieston (C) David Davidson Conservative North East Scotland (R) Susan Deacon Labour Edinburgh East and Mussleburgh (C) James Douglas-Hamilton Conservative Lothians (R) Helen Eadie Labour Dunfermline East (C) Fergus Ewing Scottish National Party Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber (C) 1 Andrew Arbuckle became the regional member for Mid Scotland and Fife on 10 January 2005. -
Meeting of the Parliament
MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Wednesday 14 September 2005 Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2005. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by Astron. CONTENTS Wednesday 14 September 2005 Debates Col. TIME FOR REFLECTION .................................................................................................................................. 19015 FERRY SERVICES (CLYDE AND HEBRIDES) ..................................................................................................... 19017 Motion moved—[Tavish Scott]. Amendment moved—[Fergus Ewing]. Amendment moved—[Mr David Davidson]. Amendment moved—[Tommy Sheridan]. The Minister for Transport and Telecommunications (Tavish Scott) ....................................................... 19017 Fergus Ewing (Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber) (SNP) ................................................................... 19023 Mr David Davidson (North East Scotland) (Con) ..................................................................................... 19027 Tommy Sheridan (Glasgow) (SSP) ......................................................................................................... 19030 Michael McMahon (Hamilton -
The Scottish Conservatives, 1997–2001 the Scottish Conservatives, 1997–2001: from Disaster to Devolution and Beyond
9 Peter Lynch The Scottish Conservatives, 1997–2001 The Scottish Conservatives, 1997–2001: from disaster to devolution and beyond Peter Lynch William Hague’s four years of leadership of the Conservative Party coincided with a revolution in the political opportunity structure of Scottish Conser- vatism. First, the Scotish Tories were wiped out at the 1997 general election, their worst electoral performance of all time and their lowest share of the vote since 1865. Second, the party’s constitutional position was heavily de- feated at the devolution referendum of September 1997, so that Conservative opposition to a Scottish Parliament became an anachronism and devolution was set to become a reality. The party’s prospects took an upward turn when it gained seats in the new Scottish Parliament in the May election of 1999 and from then on, it has faced a radically different political environment to that which existed previously. After 1999, bereft of Westminster representation, the devolved parliament was the only show in town for the Tories north of the Border, with an untested leader, a weakened party organisation, declining levels of political support and a reduced status in that Parliament as the Scottish National Party (SNP) were the main opposition party. Adjusting to this new environment was a major task for the Scottish party. The combined impact of the 1997 general election wipeout and the onset of devolution brought three fundamental challenges for the Scottish Tories. First, the party had to adjust to devolution within Scotland in terms of party organisation, policy, autonomy and campaigning. It was required to act as an autonomous entity in the Scottish Parliament and gain credibility as a Scottish party – and reverse its image as an anti-Scottish party.1 Organisa- tional change and a reinvention of the Tories as a Scottish party were high priorities after 1997.