The Problem of the Origin of the Armenian Ethnicity Has Been High- Lighted in Numerous Scholarly Publications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Problem of the Origin of the Armenian Ethnicity Has Been High- Lighted in Numerous Scholarly Publications ON THE ORIGIN OF THE ARMENIANS (IN THE LIGHT OF NON-METRIC CRANIAL TRAITS DATA) ALLA MOVSESIAN Lomonosov State University, Moscow NVARD KOCHAR Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Armenian Academy of Sciences, Yerevan The problem of the origin of the Armenian ethnicity has been high- lighted in numerous scholarly publications. Many archaeological data corroborate the cultural continuity between the current and ancient populations of Armenia extending at least down to the period of early Iron Age.1 In effect, the formation of the physical type of Armenians had been deeply rooted in a grey antiquity and is closely associated with the formation of the Armenoid anthropological type embracing many populations of the Near East and the Caucasus, as well as the majority of the Armenian nation. The Armenoid type is characterised by a slightly wavy hair, a developed tertiary integument, with abundant fa- cial hair, dark complexion, dark eyes and hair, a peculiarly shaped nose with a dropped tip, wide and elevated nose wings, moderately thick lips, narrowly cut eyes, medium-size rather elevated face, brachycranial, very elevated skull, often with a very inclined forehead and a flat back of the head. The origin of the Armenoid type is very interesting with regard to complicated ethno-genetic processes within the Near East and the Caucasus, as well as to the historical antiquity of the peoples of these regions and their proximity to the centres of the world civilisation. Ac- cording to Debec: “... there can be no serious ethno-genetic study of the European and Near Eastern peoples that would skip references to the peoples of the Caucasus”.2 1B.B. Piotrovskij, Arxeologiya Zakavkaz’ya, Leningrad, 1949. 2G.F. Debec, “Paleoantropologiya SSSR”, Trudy Instituta Etnografii, n.s.t. IV, Moscow-Lenin- grad, 1948. Brill, Leiden, 2004 Iran and the Caucasus, 8.2 184 ALLA MOVSESIAN, NVARD KOCHAR Bunak who had made an inestimable contribution into the anthro- pology of Armenians indicated the very early origin and extensive dis- tribution of the Armenoid type as far back as 1927. Examining the iconographic material and comparing it with the craniological data, he wrote that “the formation of this type had been completed prior to the emergence in the Near Eastern region of the European and Asiatic tribes (Phrygians, Greeks, Iranians, Turks, etc.), which had been dis- solved in the already crystallised Armenoid race rather than apprecia- bly affected the anthropological type of the population”.3 The morphological characteristics of the contemporary Armenian groups have been studied in detail by Abdushelishvili.4 Examining the dental material, he concluded on the undoubted resemblance and in- ternal unity of the Armenian sub-ethnic groups. This type of unity has also been detected while studying the population genetics of the der- matological indications showing, as in case of the dental and crani- ological analyses, a distinct Europeoidal Near-Eastern (Armenoid) ra- cial diagnostic complex.5 The dermatoglyphics and family structure studies have also yielded the differentiation time of the Armenian sub- populations from the initial proto-population amounting to 8-9 thou- sand years. This enables an assumption to be made that it was already in the Neolithic time that the initial type was formed giving rise to the Armenian gene pool. However, neither archaeological, nor linguistic, nor population-ge- netic reconstructions of the ethno-genetic processes can be regarded as completed without the paleoanthropological data being considered as historical sources. Unfortunately, it is exactly the lack of paleoanthro- poligical materials that explains the annoying blanks in the study of the ancient population of Armenia. Substantial contributions to the paleoanthropology of Armenia were the works by Abdushelishvili6 and Alexeev.7 A basic research 3V.V. Bunak, “Crania Armenica”, Trudy NII antropologii pri MGU, vol. II, Moscow, 1927. 4M.G. Abdu•eli•vili, “Ob antropologi¢eskom sostave sovremennogo naseleniya Armenii”, Antropologi¢eskij sbornik IV, Trudy Instituta etnografii AN SSSR, vol. 82, Moscow, 1963. 5N.R. Ko¢ar, Antropologiya armyan. Dermatoglifika i populyacionnaya struktura, Erevan, 1989; N.R. Ko¢ar, V.A. ¶eremet’eva, Yu.G. Ry¢kov, “Dermatoglifika v izu¢enii geneti¢eskix processov po- pulyacii ¢eloveka (na primere naseleniya Armenii)”, Genetika, vol. XVII, N 8, 1981. 6M.G. Abdu•eli•vili, op. cit.; idem, “Materialy k kraniologii Kavkaza”, Trudy Instituta eksperi- mental’noj morfologii AN GSSR, vol. V, Tbilisi, 1955; idem, “Ob antropologi¢eskom sostave sovre- mennogo naseleniya Armenii”, Antropologi¢eskij sbornik IV, Trudy Instituta etnografii AN SSSR, vol. 82, Moscow, 1963; idem, K kraniologii sovremennogo i drevnego naseleniya Kavkaza, Tbilisi, 1966. 7V.P. Alexeev, Proisxo¿denie narodov Kavkaza, Moscow, 1974; V.P. Alexeev, I.I. Goxman, An- tropologiya aziatskoj ¢asti SSSR, Moscow, 1984..
Recommended publications
  • The Gūrān Author(S): V. Minorsky Source: Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Vol. 11, No
    The Gūrān Author(s): V. Minorsky Source: Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Vol. 11, No. 1 (1943), pp. 75-103 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of School of Oriental and African Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/609206 . Accessed: 22/03/2013 18:41 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge University Press and School of Oriental and African Studies are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 71.172.230.205 on Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:41:23 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions The Guran By V. MINORSKY THE vague and indiscriminate use of the term Kurd goes back to early times. According to Hamza Isfahani (circa 350/961), ed. Berlin, 151, "The Persians used to call Daylamites 'the Kurds of Tabaristn ', as they used to call Arabs 'the Kurds of Sfuristan', i.e. of 'Iraq." Other Arab and Persian authors of the tenth century A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Y-Chromosome Phylogeographic Analysis Of
    Y-chromosome phylogeographic analysis of the Greek-Cypriot population reveals elements consistent with Neolithic and Bronze Age settlements Konstantinos Voskarides, Stéphane Mazières, Despina Hadjipanagi, Julie Di Cristofaro, Anastasia Ignatiou, Charalambos Stefanou, Roy King, Peter Underhill, Jacques Chiaroni, Constantinos Deltas To cite this version: Konstantinos Voskarides, Stéphane Mazières, Despina Hadjipanagi, Julie Di Cristofaro, Anastasia Ignatiou, et al.. Y-chromosome phylogeographic analysis of the Greek-Cypriot population reveals ele- ments consistent with Neolithic and Bronze Age settlements. Investigative Genetics, BioMed Central, 2016, 7 (1), 10.1186/s13323-016-0032-8. hal-01273302 HAL Id: hal-01273302 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01273302 Submitted on 12 Feb 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Voskarides et al. Investigative Genetics (2016) 7:1 DOI 10.1186/s13323-016-0032-8 RESEARCH Open Access Y-chromosome phylogeographic analysis of the Greek-Cypriot population reveals elements consistent with Neolithic and Bronze Age settlements Konstantinos Voskarides1†, Stéphane Mazières2†, Despina Hadjipanagi1, Julie Di Cristofaro2, Anastasia Ignatiou1, Charalambos Stefanou1, Roy J. King3, Peter A. Underhill4, Jacques Chiaroni2* and Constantinos Deltas1* Abstract Background: The archeological record indicates that the permanent settlement of Cyprus began with pioneering agriculturalists circa 11,000 years before present, (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armenians the Peoples of Europe
    The Armenians The Peoples of Europe General Editors James Campbell and Barry Cunliffe This series is about the European tribes and peoples from their origins in prehistory to the present day. Drawing upon a wide range of archaeolo­ gical and historical evidence, each volume presents a fresh and absorbing account of a group’s culture, society and usually turbulent history. Already published The Etruscans The Franks Graeme Barker and Thomas Edward James Rasmussen The Russians The Lombards Robin Milner-Gulland Neil Christie The Mongols The Basques David Morgan Roger Collins The Armenians The English A.E. Redgate Geoffrey Elton The Huns The Gypsies E. A. Thompson Angus Fraser The Early Germans The Bretons Malcolm Todd Patrick Galliou and Michael Jones The Illyrians The Goths John Wilkes Peter Heather In preparation The Sicilians The Spanish David Abulafia Roger Collins The Irish The Romans Francis John Byrne and Michael Timothy Cornell Herity The Celts The Byzantines David Dumville Averil Cameron The Scots The First English Colin Kidd Sonia Chadwick Hawkes The Ancient Greeks The Normans Brian Sparkes Marjorie Chibnall The Piets The Serbs Charles Thomas Sima Cirkovic The Armenians A. E. Redgate Copyright © Anne Elizabeth Redgate 1998,2000 The right of Anne Elizabeth Redgate to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 1998 First published in paperback 2000 2468 10975 3 1 Blackwell Publishers Ltd 108 Cowley Road Oxford OX4 1JF Blackwell Publishers Inc. 350 Main Street Malden, Massachusetts 02148 USA All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitical Implications of Armenian Origins
    Keghart Geopolitical Implications of Armenian Origins Non-partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights https://keghart.org/geopolitical-implications-of-armenian-origins/ and Democracy GEOPOLITICAL IMPLICATIONS OF ARMENIAN ORIGINS Posted on March 3, 2016 by Keghart Category: Opinions Page: 1 Keghart Geopolitical Implications of Armenian Origins Non-partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights https://keghart.org/geopolitical-implications-of-armenian-origins/ and Democracy Z. S. Andrew Demirdjian, Ph.D., Los Angeles, 3 March 2016 After reading Israel Finkelstein’s and Neil Asher Silberman's The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Text (2001), a question hovered in the back of my mind about Armenians. According to the Bible, Israelites descend from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Abraham was born in the Sumerian city of Ur, and he migrated with his family to Canaan (the Promised Land). Central to the theory of the authors is the contention that the story of Abraham's journey, the patriarchs, the Exodus from Egypt, the 40-year sojourn in the Sinai, the conquest of Canaan, the covenant of the Promised Land, and so on were based on legends for archeology has failed to substantiate any of these claims. The conclusion: The consolidation of the Israelites into a nation was not the result of nomadic wanderings in the desert and divine revelation, but came from the need to defend themselves against the Philistines who had settled on the Canaanite coastal plain more or less at the same time the Israelites had settled in the hills as farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • When Genetics and History Clash: the Origins of Hamshen Armenians
    CHECKING THE HYPOTHESIS OF A BALKAN Institute of Molecular Biology ORIGIN OF THE ARMENIANS NAS, Armenia Levon Yepiskoposyan,1 Peter Hrechdakian,2 Hovann Simonian3 1Institute of Molecular Biology, National Academy of Sciences, Yerevan, Armenia; 2Armenian DNA Project at Family Tree DNA; 3University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles Background The origin of Armenians is a controversial subject for anthropologists, archaeologists, historians and linguists. Among several hypotheses on this point, one prevails. The ancient Greek historian Herodotus described the Armenians as Phrygian colonists because of their speech and the garments they wore: “The Armenians, who are Phrygian colonists, were armed in the Phrygian fashion. Both nations were under the command of Artochmes, who was married to one of the daughters of Darius” [Herodotus: History, VII, 73]. In the same time there are no convincing linguistic, archaeological and ethnographical evidences supporting this opinion. The recent advances in molecular genetics technique allow thoroughly assessing different aspects of human evolutionary history. Here, we tested the traditional Balkan version of the origin of Armenians based on the Y-chromosomal markers. Material and methods M78 E1b1b1a1 We used the results of high-resolution typing in 1226 DNA samples representing 11 Armenian V13 M35 E1b1b1a1b geographic groups covering the whole area of the Armenian plateau and the database of the V22 Armenian DNA project at Family Tree DNA comprising a general Armenian population (Table). E1b1b1a1c As possible signals of Balkan influence the presence of the E1b1b1a1-M78 haplogroup with its major sub-branches (E1b1b1a1b-V13, E1b1b1a1a-V12 and E1b1b1a1c-V22) were considered (Fig. 1) in M34 Greek [King et al., 2008] and Bulgarian [Karachanak et al., 2013] samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Evidence for an Origin of the Armenians from Bronze Age Mixing of Multiple Populations
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/015396; this version posted February 18, 2015. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Genetic evidence for an origin of the Armenians from Bronze Age mixing of multiple populations Marc Haber1, Massimo Mezzavilla1,2, Yali Xue1, David Comas3, Paolo Gasparini2, Pierre Zalloua4, Chris Tyler-Smith1,* 1The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambs. CB10 1SA, United Kingdom. 2Institute for Maternal and Child Health -IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” - Trieste, University of Trieste, Italy. 3Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC–UPF), Departament de Ciències de la Salut i de la Vida, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain 4The Lebanese American University, Chouran, Beirut, Lebanon *Corresponding author: Chris Tyler-Smith, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, United Kingdom. Phone: +44(1223)-834244. Fax: +44(1223)-494919. E-mail: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/015396; this version posted February 18, 2015. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract The Armenians are a culturally isolated population who historically inhabited a region in the Near East bounded by the Mediterranean and Black seas and the Caucasus, but remain underrepresented in genetic studies and have a complex history including a major geographic displacement during World War One.
    [Show full text]
  • Proto-Indo-Europeans: the Prologue
    Proto-Indo-Europeans: The Prologue Alexander Kozintsev Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography, Saint-Petersburg and Saint-Petersburg State University, Russia This study collates linguistic, genetic, and archaeological data relevant to the problem of the IE homeland and proto-IE (PIE) migrations. The idea of a proto-Anatolian (PA) migration from the steppe to Anatolia via the Balkans is refuted by linguistic, archaeological, and genetic facts, whereas the alternative scenario, postulating the Indo-Uralic homeland in the area east of the Caspian Sea, is the most plausible. The divergence between proto-Uralians and PIEs is mirrored by the cultural dichotomy between Kelteminar and the early farming societies in southern Turkmenia and northern Iran. From their first homeland the early PIEs moved to their second homeland in the Near East, where early PIE split into PA and late PIE. Three migration routes from the Near East to the steppe across the Caucasus can be tentatively reconstructed — two early (Khvalynsk and Darkveti-Meshoko), and one later (Maykop). The early eastern route (Khvalynsk), supported mostly by genetic data, may have been taken by Indo-Hittites. The western and the central routes (Darkveti-Meshoko and Maykop), while agreeing with archaeological and linguistic evidence, suggest that late PIE could have been adopted by the steppe people without biological admixture. After that, the steppe became the third and last PIE homeland, from whence all filial IE dialects except Anatolian spread in various directions, one of them being to the Balkans and eventually to Anatolia and the southern Caucasus, thus closing the circle of counterclockwise IE migrations around the Black Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anthropological Features of Armenian and Assyrian (Aissori) Women
    Anatomy. The anthropological features of Armenian and Assyrian (Aissori) women. By C. U. ARIËNS KAPPERS. (Communicated at the meeting of March 25. 1933). Exact measurements concerning the women in the Near~East are rare. The anthropological statements usually concern men. a fact to be explained by the difficulty anthropologists meet in approaching the females. This holds good especially for the Moslim population. But also for the Christian population of these regions anthropological data of females are few. From this rule an exception is made by the work of Prof. and Mrs. KRISCHNER 1). who contributed so much to our knowledge of the Near~ East. including the females. Among the papers left by the late Prof. H. KRISCHNER is a dossier con~ taining the various soma tic measurements of more than two hundred Arme~ nian women. The data registered for each are: age. height. sitting height. the breadth. length and heigth of the head. height and breadth of the nose. breadth and length of the ear. breadth and length of the face and the internal and exter~ nal eye distances. all together the largest series of data ever measured on women of this race. In addition Prof. KRISCHNER registered the same data for 37 Armenian males and, - which is important -. for fifteen female Assyrians (Aissori or Suriani) . - As Mrs. M. KRISCHNER put these data to my disposal I am giving the result of this work in the following pages. Hitherto data concerning Armenian females are only given by CHANTRE 2). who examined forty four Armenian women. KAPPERS gave us the average headmeasurements of 39 females.
    [Show full text]
  • 056 Topchyan Aram ***** 675
    ARAM TOPCHYAN (Erevan ) THE EPONYM “M ÚAK” OF MAZACA IN MOVS ãS XORENAC‘I’S HISTORY OF ARMENIA Abstract. In Chapters I, 13 and 14 of his History of Armenia , Movs e¯s Xorenac‘i (fifth century AD), the “father of Armenian historiography,” narrates about a le- gendary Armenian hero, M sˇak, who built the city of Mazaca (later Caesarea) in Cappadocia. Scholars have paid no due attention to this very interesting passage ad - ditionally testifying that: 1) The Phrygians (called Mu sˇki in the Assyrian records), as witnessed by Greek sources (Herodotus, Josephus Flavius, Eudoxus and Stephen of Byzantium), were among the ancestors of the Armenians and Cappadocians. 2) They were newcomers in the territory of the future Cappadocia and conquered the people living there (this, according to the Assyrian records, happened in the 12th c. BC). 3) The Mu sˇki were the founders of Mazaca. 4) The Armenians and the Cap - padocians were so closely associated with one another that the country of which Mazaca was the capital was still called “Prot e¯ Armenia” by the Greeks. The History of Armenia by Movs e¯s Xorenac‘i is perhaps the most di - sputed work in medieval Armenian literature. Since the latter half of the nineteenth century, its traditional date (Movs e¯s claims to have lived in the fifth century AD), sources and reliability have been seriously doubted, be - coming a subject of spirited, sometimes furious, debates, which at times continue in our days. Alfred von Gutschmid (1831-1887) was the first to reduce the value of Movs e¯s’ work as historical source almost to zero.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Evidence for an Origin of the Armenians from Bronze Age Mixing of Multiple Populations
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2016) 24, 931–936 & 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1018-4813/16 www.nature.com/ejhg ARTICLE Genetic evidence for an origin of the Armenians from Bronze Age mixing of multiple populations Marc Haber1, Massimo Mezzavilla1,2, Yali Xue1, David Comas3, Paolo Gasparini2, Pierre Zalloua4 and Chris Tyler-Smith*,1 The Armenians are a culturally isolated population who historically inhabited a region in the Near East bounded by the Mediterranean and Black seas and the Caucasus, but remain under-represented in genetic studies and have a complex history including a major geographic displacement during World War I. Here, we analyse genome-wide variation in 173 Armenians and compare them with 78 other worldwide populations. We find that Armenians form a distinctive cluster linking the Near East, Europe, and the Caucasus. We show that Armenian diversity can be explained by several mixtures of Eurasian populations that occurred between ~ 3000 and ~ 2000 BCE, a period characterized by major population migrations after the domestication of the horse, appearance of chariots, and the rise of advanced civilizations in the Near East. However, genetic signals of population mixture cease after ~ 1200 BCE when Bronze Age civilizations in the Eastern Mediterranean world suddenly and violently collapsed. Armenians have since remained isolated and genetic structure within the population developed ~ 500 years ago when Armenia was divided between the Ottomans and the Safavid Empire in Iran. Finally, we show that Armenians have higher genetic affinity to Neolithic Europeans than other present-day Near Easterners, and that 29% of Armenian ancestry may originate from an ancestral population that is best represented by Neolithic Europeans.
    [Show full text]
  • An Admixture Signal in Armenians Around the End of the Bronze Age Reveals Widespread Population Movement Across the Middle East
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.24.168781; this version posted June 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. AN ADMIXTURE SIGNAL IN ARMENIANS AROUND THE END OF THE BRONZE AGE REVEALS WIDESPREAD POPULATION MOVEMENT ACROSS THE MIDDLE EAST Anahit Hovhannisyan1,2, Eppie Jones2,3, Pierpaolo Maisano Delser2,3, Joshua Schraiber4,5, Anna Hakobyan1, Ashot Margaryan1,6, Peter Hrechdakian7, Hovhannes Sahakyan1,8, Lehti Saag8, Zaruhi Khachatryan1, Levon Yepiskoposyan9, Andrea Manica2 1Institute of Molecular Biology, National Academy of Sciences, 7 Hasratyan Street, 0014 Yerevan, Armenia 2Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB23EJ, UK 3Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland 4Department of Biology, and Institute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, 19122 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 5Ancestry DNA, 84043, Lehi, UT, USA 6Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark 7Armenian DNA Project at Family Tree DNA, 77008 Houston, Texas, USA 8Estonian Biocentre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Riia 23b, 51010 Tartu, Estonia 9 Russian-Armenian University, 123 Hovsep Emin Street, 0051, Yerevan, Armenia Abstract The Armenians, a population inhabiting the region in West Asia known as the Armenian Highland, has been argued to show a remarkable degree of population continuity since the Early Neolithic. Here we test the degree of continuity of this population as well as its plausible origin, by collating modern and ancient genomic data, and adding a number of novel contemporary genomes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Indo-European Studies MONOGRAPH SERIES
    The Journal of Indo-European Studies MONOGRAPH SERIES Visit our web site http://www.jies.org for a complete index of Journal articles published since 1973 Proto Indo European: The Archaeology of a Linguistic Problem Studies in Honor of Marija Gimbutas Monograph No. 001: Edited by Susan Nacev Skomal and Edgar C. Polomé A. Richard Diebold, Jr.: Linguistic Ways to Prehistory; Winfred P. Lehmann: Linguistic and Archaeological Data for Handbooks of Proto-Languages; János Nemeskéri and László Szathmáry: An Anthropological Evaluation of the IE Problem; Nikolai Ja. Merpert: Ethnocultural Change in the Balkans in the Eneolithic; Sándor Bökönyi: Horses and Sheep in the Copper and Bronze Ages; Homer L. Thomas: The Indo-Europeans—Some Historical and Theoretical Considerations; János Makkay: The Linear Pottery and the Early Indo- Europeans; Eric P. Hamp: The Pig in Ancient Northern Europe; Ralph M. Rowlett: Grave Wealth in the Horodenka Group; Christopher Hawkes: Archaeologists and Indo- Europeanists—Can They Mate?; Edgar C. Polomé: Who are the Germanic People?; Gregory Nagy: The IE Heritage of Tribal Organization—Evidence from the Greek polis; Bruce Lincoln: On the Scythian Royal Burials; Calvert Watkins: Linguistic and Archaeological Light on Some Homeric Formulas; T.L. Markey: Morning, Evening, and the Twilight Between; Wolfgang P. Schmidt: ‘Indo-European’—’Old European’; Colin Renfrew: Old Europe or Ancient Near East? Clay Cylinders of Sitagroi; Edgar C. Polomé: Marija Gimbutas, A Biographical Sketch. ISBN 0-941694-29-1 1987 (1994), Pages 400, Paperback with illustrations: $98.00 Indo-European Origins: The Anthropological Evidence Monograph No. 002: By John V. Day A comprehensive survey of the evidence from biological anthropology for Indo-European origins, based on the author’s Ph.D.
    [Show full text]