DOCSLIB.ORG

Recommendations for the Enhancement of the Existing Legal Frameworks for Genomics, Human Enhancement, and AI and Robotics [WP5 – the Consortium’S Proposals]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recommendations for the Enhancement of the Existing Legal Frameworks for Genomics, Human Enhancement, and AI and Robotics [WP5 – the Consortium’S Proposals] D5.6: Recommendations for the enhancement of the existing legal frameworks for genomics, human enhancement, and AI and robotics [WP5 – The consortium’s proposals] Lead contributors Konrad Siemaszko, Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights [email protected] Rowena Rodrigues, Trilateral Research (AI and robotics section; inputs to methodology; review); Santa Slokenberga, Uppsala University (human genetics and genomics section; review) Other contributors Nicole Santiago, Anaïs Rességuier, Trilateral Research (AI and robotics section; inputs to methodology; review) Feedback: Amal Matar, Mats G. Hansson, Uppsala University (feedback on human genetics and genomics section and alignment with Task 5.2); Zuzanna Warso, Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (feedback on draft human enhancement section) Acknowledgments We acknowledge the inputs from the SIENNA webinars participants including David W. Wood, London Futurists and additionally, Getter Paberits, F-Secure Corporation (AI and robotics). Reviewers: Roger Brownsword, TELOS, King's College London and Bournemouth University; Philip Brey, University of Twente; Maria Bottis, Ionian University; Katharina Ó Cathaoir, University of Copenhagen (human genetics and genomics section) Due date 31 July 2020 Delivery date 30 July 2020 Type Report Dissemination level PU = Public Keywords artificial intelligence, legal frameworks, genomics, human enhancement, human genetics, recommendations, regulation, robotics The SIENNA project - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact - has received funding under the European Union’s H2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 741716. © SIENNA, 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 741716 – SIENNA – D5.6 Deliverable report Abstract This report identifies potential changes needed in the existing legal and human rights frameworks (international, EU and national) that might be necessary or desirable to create an environment in which the SIENNA proposals for ethical human genetics and genomics, human enhancement technologies and AI and robotics could be implemented most effectively. It also includes recommendations to improve enforcement and promote the uptake and effectiveness of the existing legislation in these fields. The desired or necessary changes advanced are specified in the report along with related actions, actors responsible for implementing them, their priority levels, implementation challenges and how these could be addressed. The report also discusses the interrelations between ethics and law from the perspective of policymakers. Document history Version Date Description Reason for change Distribution V1.0 6.07.2020 First draft D 5.6 contributors and reviewers V2.0 30.07.2020 Final version Address feedback SIENNA partners, and comments European from partners and Commission reviewers. Information in this report that may influence other SIENNA tasks Linked task Points of relevance Task 6.2: Adapt and exploit methods Task 6.2 draws on the results included here (to analyse the possibilities for the general application of our approach for legal and human rights analysis, with reference to other types of future and emerging technologies). Task 6.4: Obtain buy-in for SIENNA Task 6.4 will disseminate and/or exploit the recommendations proposals from EU and international advanced here through liaising with organisations at the institutions international, EU or national levels to obtain buy-in for them. 2 741716 – SIENNA – D5.6 Deliverable report Table of contents Table of contents ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 5 List of tables............................................................................................................................................. 8 List of acronyms/abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 8 Glossary of terms .................................................................................................................................. 10 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 12 1.1 Background and objectives ......................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Approach and methods ............................................................................................................... 12 1.3 Structure of the report ................................................................................................................. 14 1.4 Scope and limitations .................................................................................................................. 14 2. Ethics, law and enhancing the legal frameworks – introductory clarifications .................................. 15 3. Enhancing the legal frameworks for human genetics and genomics ................................................ 20 3.1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 20 3.1.1 Background and purpose ...................................................................................................... 20 3.1.2 Approach and delimitations ................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Principles that steer potential changes ....................................................................................... 21 3.3 International level changes ......................................................................................................... 23 3.4 EU level changes ........................................................................................................................ 27 3.5 National level changes ................................................................................................................ 31 3.6 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 33 4. Enhancing the legal frameworks for human enhancement technologies .......................................... 34 4.1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 34 4.1.1 Scope and limitations ............................................................................................................ 35 4.1.2 Challenges in improving the legal frameworks for HET ........................................................ 36 4.2. Potential changes and recommendations .................................................................................. 37 4.2.1 Health and safety .................................................................................................................. 38 4.2.2 Privacy and data protection ................................................................................................... 43 4.2.3 Autonomy .............................................................................................................................. 46 4.2.4 Equality .................................................................................................................................. 47 4.2.5 Technology assessment ....................................................................................................... 48 4.2.6 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 49 5. Enhancing the legal frameworks for AI and robotics ......................................................................... 57 5.1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 57 3 741716 – SIENNA – D5.6 Deliverable report 5.2. International level changes ........................................................................................................ 58 5.3. EU-level changes ....................................................................................................................... 63 5.4. National level changes ............................................................................................................... 71 5.5 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 75 6. Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................... 77 References ............................................................................................................................................ 81 Books, articles and other references................................................................................................. 81 Legislative texts and documents ....................................................................................................... 88 European Union ............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VINCENNES-SAINT-DENIS UFR Arts, Philosophie, Esthétique
    UNIVERSITE PARIS 8 – VINCENNES-SAINT-DENIS U.F.R Arts, philosophie, esthétique Ecole doctorale : Esthétique, Sciences et Technologies des Arts THESE pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L'UNIVERSITE PARIS 8 Discipline : Esthétique, Sciences et Technologies des Arts spécialité Images Numériques présentée et soutenue publiquement par CHANHTHABOUTDY Somphout le 18 novembre 2015 Vanité interactive : recherche et expérimentation artistique _______ Directrice de thèse : Marie-Hélène TRAMUS _______ JURY M. Gilles METHEL, Professeur Université Toulouse 2 Mme Chu-Yin CHEN, Professeure Université Paris 8 Mme Marie-Hélène TRAMUS, Professeure émérite Université Paris 8 Pascal Ruiz, Artiste multimédia 1 2 Résumé Vanité interactive : recherche et expérimentation artistique Ce travail se positionne dans le domaine de l'interactivité sensorielle, de la 3D temps réel et des arts visuels. Cette étude artistique et technique s’inscrit directement dans une recherche entamée depuis des années, sur la question de la représentation sublimée de la mort, qui se retrouve pleinement transfiguré dans l’emblème de la Vanité et sur la recherche de nouvelles façons d’entretenir un dialogue en rétroaction avec l’œuvre. Sur le point artistique, la recherche analyse le processus de création, qui a mené de la représentation sublimée de la mort en vidéo, à la réalisation et l’expérimentation de Vanité au sein de tableaux virtuels interactifs et immersifs. Cette analyse apporte des réponses aux questionnements envers la signification des intentions liées à la création et l’utilisation de Vanité en 3D dans des installations conversationnelles. Elle met en lumière les enjeux de ce procédé innovant par rapport à l’histoire de la Vanité depuis son apparition.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Walser, Paul Scheerbart, and Joseph Roth Vi
    Telling Technology Contesting Narratives of Progress in Modernist Literature: Robert Walser, Paul Scheerbart, and Joseph Roth Vincent Hessling Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Vincent Hessling All rights reserved ABSTRACT Telling Technology Contesting Narratives of Progress in Modernist Literature: Robert Walser, Paul Scheerbart, and Joseph Roth Vincent Hessling Telling technology explores how modernist literature makes sense of technological change by means of narration. The dissertation consists of three case studies focusing on narrative texts by Robert Walser, Paul Scheerbart, and Joseph Roth. These authors write at a time when a crisis of ‘progress,’ understood as a basic concept of history, coincides with a crisis of narra- tion in the form of anthropocentric, action-based storytelling. Through close readings of their technographic writing, the case studies investigate how the three authors develop alter- native forms of narration so as to tackle the questions posed by the sweeping technological change in their day. Along with a deeper understanding of the individual literary texts, the dissertation establishes a theoretical framework to discuss questions of modern technology and agency through the lens of narrative theory. Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii INTRODUCTION: Toward a Narratology of Technological Change 1 CHAPTER I: Robert Walser’s Der Gehülfe: A Zero-Grade Narrative of Progress 26 1. The Employee as a Modern Topos 26 2. The Master and the Servant: A Farce on Progress 41 3. Irony of ‘Kaleidoscopic Focalization’ 50 4. The Inventions and their Distribution 55 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Graduate Studies Program
    GRADUATE STUDIES PROGRAM Welcome It is our pleasure to welcome you to Singularity University. Our mission is to assemble, educate and inspire leaders who strive to understand and facilitate the development of exponentially advancing technologies in order to address humanity’s grand challenges. Singularity University’s Graduate Studies Program brings together a diverse group–the most accomplished experts in academics, business, and government together with the brightest students from across the globe–for an intense ten-week summer program. The program immerses participants in an unparalleled convergence learning environment. We also challenge our students with our 109+ Team Projects, asking them how they can positively affect the lives of a billion people within 10 years. The next few decades will see the transformation of the science and technology tools available to the world in a fashion more profound than any other time in our history. The current technology revolution moves at an exponential pace, and exponential technologies imply a future with capabilities previously unimagined. Singularity University was founded using the standpoint that with more capability comes more responsibility. Our commitment is to not only to teach, but also to act: to view the world’s Grand Challenges as opportunities to use advancing technology for the benefit of all. If you are interested in the world’s grand challenges, if you are an entrepreneur passionate about making your dreams materialize, and if you are at the top of your class then we hope you will consider applying to the Graduate Studies Program. If you are invited to participate in this highly selective program, you will experience a life-changing 10-week program and join an incredible community of thinkers and doers.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2020
    Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2020 Published: 21 October 2019 ID: G00432920 Analyst(s): David Cearley, Nick Jones, David Smith, Brian Burke, Arun Chandrasekaran, CK Lu Strategic technology trends have the potential both to create opportunity and to drive significant disruption. Enterprise architecture and technology innovation leaders must evaluate these top trends to determine how combinations of trends can power their innovation strategies. Key Findings ■ Strategic technology trends have significant potential to create and respond to disruption and to power both transformation and optimization initiatives. ■ Artificial intelligence (AI) is a foundational catalyst for advanced process automation and human augmentation and engagement. ■ Physical environments including factories, offices and cities will become “smart spaces” within which people will interact through multiple touchpoints and sensory channels for an increasingly ambient experience. ■ Dealing with privacy, digital ethics and security challenges generated by AI, the Internet of Things (IoT)/edge, and other evolving technologies will become critical to maintain trust and avoid legal entanglements. Recommendations Enterprise architecture and technology innovation leaders must: ■ Center their innovation efforts on people and use tools such as personas, journey maps, technology radars, and roadmaps to evaluate opportunities, challenges and time frames for adoption. ■ Build an overarching view across functional and process silos and exploit a complementary set of tools including RPA, iBPMS, DTO, application development, and AI domains that guide how the tools are used and the systems they create are integrated. ■ Embrace multiexperience and implement development platforms and design principles to support conversational, immersive and increasingly ambient experiences. ■ Establish governance principles, policies, best practices and technology architectures to increase transparency and trust regarding data and the use of AI.
    [Show full text]
  • Nord Brain Stimulation in Psychiatry
    Cambridge Textbook of Neuroscience for Psychiatrists Chapter title: Brain stimulation in psychiatry Name: Dr Camilla L Nord Affiliation: MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge Email: [email protected] Phone: 01223767481 Address: MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF 1 Brain stimulation in psychiatry One of the best examples of translation from neuroscience to psychiatric treatment is brain stimulation, an array of techniques aimed at modulating the activity and/or plasticity of particular brain structures. Brain stimulation is not new: as far back as ancient Rome, the physician Scribonius Largus wrote of electrical stimulation to relieve migraine (although he employed a torpedo fish, a species of electric ray). Today, a number of invasive and non- invasive brain stimulation techniques show efficacy in treating psychiatric disorders. What these distinct approaches have in common is their ability to target specific neural regions more directly than traditional pharmacological or psychological approaches (see Figure 1). This capacity to influence the very circuits implicated in neuroscience studies has contributed to some transformative discoveries, but has faced key translational challenges, including response variability and inadequate placebos. 1. Non-invasive brain stimulation There are two chief forms of non-invasive brain stimulation: transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). TMS uses brief, high-current pulses to induce a magnetic field, indirectly activating neurons, and causing an increase or decrease in brain activity in a localised target region1. There is substantial evidence that repetitive high-frequency TMS pulses over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) are effective for major depressive disorder2, purportedly by restoring activity in the L-DLPFC, a commonly-described source of aberrant activation in neuroimaging studies in depression (often, but not always, showing hypoactivation)3.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    M889 - FULLER TEXT.qxd 4/4/07 11:21 am Page 1 Phil's G4 Phil's G4:Users:phil:Public: PHIL'S JO Introduction Science and Technology Studies (STS) is an interdisciplinary field usually defined as the confluence of three fields with distinct intellec- tual lineages and orientations: history of science, philosophy of science, and sociology of science. All three have been marginal to their named disciplines, because surprisingly few of the original practitioners of history, philosophy, or sociology of science were primarily trained in history, philosophy, or sociology. Rather, they were natural or exact scientists who came to be disenchanted with the social entanglements of their chosen fields of study. In effect, they fell victim to an intellec- tual bait-and-switch, whereby the reasons they entered science failed to explain science’s continued support in the wider society. This point often makes STS appear more critical than many of its practitioners intend it to be. STS researchers are virtually in agreement that people tend to like science for the wrong reasons (i.e. they are too easily taken in by its hype), but relatively few STS researchers would thereby con- clude that there are no good reasons to like science. There have been three generations of STS research, and each tells a different story of disenchantment with science. First, the logical pos- itivists, including Karl Popper, were keen to protect the theoretical base of science from the technological devastation that was wrought in its name during World War I. Next, Thomas Kuhn and his con- temporaries on both sides of the Atlantic – including Paul Feyerabend, Imre Lakatos, Stephen Toulmin, Derek de Solla Price – tried to do the same vis-à-vis World War II, though, more than the previous genera- tion, they relied on science’s past for normative guidance, largely out of a realization of technology’s contemporary role in scaling up the sci- entific enterprise and giving it forward momentum.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays on the Ethics of Emerging Technologies
    CRUCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: ESSAYS ON THE ETHICS OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES KARIM A. JEBARI Licentiate Thesis Stockholm, Sweden 2012 Abstract. Jebari, Karim A. 2012. Crucial Considerations: Essays on the Ethics of Emerging Technologies Theses in Philosophy from the Royal Institute of Technology 42. 79 + vi pp. Stockholm. ISBN 978-91-637- 2006-2 Essay I explores brain machine interface (BMI) technologies. These make direct communication between the brain and a machine possible by means of electrical stimuli. This essay reviews the existing and emerging technologies in this field and offers a systematic inquiry into the relevant ethical problem ii This licentiate thesis consists of an introduction and the following essays: I. Jebari, Karim A., “Brain Machine Interface and Human Enhancement. An Ethical Review” Forthcoming in Neuroethics II. Jebari, Karim A. and Hansson, Sven Oven., “European Public Deliberation on Brain Machine Interface Technology” Submitted manuscript III. Jebari, Karim A., “Three Kinds of Moral Enhancement” Submitted manuscript © 2012 by Karim A. Jebari ISSN 1650-8831 ISBN 978-91-637-2006-2 Printed in Stockholm, Sweden by E-print AB 2012 iii CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vi INTRODUCTION 1 I. Previous research on human enhancement 1 II. Human enhancement and public discourse 3 III. Human dignity 4 IV. Summary of the essays 7 V. Sammanfattning på svenska 9 ESSAYS I. BRAIN MACHINE INTERFACE AND HUMAN ENHANCEMENT. AN ETHICAL REVIEW 17 1. Introduction 17 2. Existing Brain Machine Interfaces 19 3. Experimental technologies 23 4. Ethical considerations 27 5. Concluding remarks 33 II. EUROPEAN PUBLIC DELIBERATION ON BRAIN MACHINE INTERFACE TECHNOLOGY 34 1. Introduction 34 2. Theoretical background 36 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Transhumanism, Progress and the Future
    A peer-reviewed electronic journal published by the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies ISSN 1541-0099 20(2) – December 2009 Transhumanism, Progress and the Future Philippe Verdoux [email protected] Journal of Evolution and Technology - Vol. 20 Issue 2 –December 2009 - pgs 49-69 http://jetpress.org/v20/verdoux.htm Abstract This paper argues that one can advocate a moral imperative to pursue enhancement technologies while at the same time rejecting the historical reality of progress and holding a pessimistic view of the future. The first half of the paper puts forth several arguments for why progress is illusory and why one has good reason to be pessimistic about the future of humanity (and posthumanity). The second half then argues that this is entirely consistent with also championing the futurological vision of transhumanism. The claim is that, relative to the alternatives proposed, this vision actually offers the safest route into the future, even if it also entails an increase in the probability of self-annihilation. 1. Transhumanism and progress Transhumanism is a recent philosophical and cultural movement that has both descriptive and normative components: (1) the descriptive claim is that current and anticipated future technologies will make it possible to radically alter both our world and persons, not just by “enhancing” the capacities that we already have but also by adding entirely new capacities not previously had.1 (2) The normative claim is that we ought to do what we can to foment and accelerate the creation of such “enhancement” technologies, thereby converting the possibility of a “posthuman” future into an actuality.
    [Show full text]
  • Transhumanism and Its Critics on the Ethics of Enhancement Via Brain-Computer Interfacing
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 4-17-2014 12:00 AM Cultivating Better Brains: Transhumanism and its Critics on the Ethics of Enhancement Via Brain-computer Interfacing Matthew Devlin The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Tim Blackmore The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Media Studies A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Matthew Devlin 2014 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Film and Media Studies Commons Recommended Citation Devlin, Matthew, "Cultivating Better Brains: Transhumanism and its Critics on the Ethics of Enhancement Via Brain-computer Interfacing" (2014). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1946. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1946 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CULTIVATING BETTER BRAINS: TRANSHUMANISM AND ITS CRITICS ON THE ETHICS OF COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT VIA BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACING (Thesis format: Monograph) by Matthew Devlin Graduate Program in Media Studies A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Matthew Devlin 2014 Abstract Transhumanists contend that enhancing the human brain—a subfield of human enhancement called cognitive enhancement—is both a crucial and desirable pursuit, supporting the cultivation of a better world.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispositions of Emotional Intelligence in School Principals
    National Louis University Digital Commons@NLU Dissertations 12-2020 Dispositions of Emotional Intelligence in School Principals Efrain Martinez Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/diss Part of the Educational Leadership Commons Recommended Citation Martinez, Efrain, "Dispositions of Emotional Intelligence in School Principals" (2020). Dissertations. 557. https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/diss/557 This Dissertation - Public Access is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@NLU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@NLU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running head: DISPOSITIONS OF EI IN PRINCIPALS 1 Dispositions of Emotional Intelligence in School Principals Efraín Martínez, MA, MEd Educational Leadership Doctoral Program Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership National College of Education National Louis University December, 2020 DISPOSITIONS OF EI IN PRINCIPALS 2 DISPOSITIONS OF EI IN PRINCIPALS 3 Copyright by Efraín Martínez, 2020 All Rights Reserved DISPOSITIONS OF EI IN PRINCIPALS 4 Abstract School principals address problems that extend way beyond the classroom. This qualitative study is about dispositions of emotional intelligence in school principals. The participants interviewed were novice school principals or principal coaches. The results showed that principals tend to address the needs of others more than their own. Strategies are shared on how to improve emotional intelligence. Additionally, the study provides recommendations that school districts can implement to ensure the success of school principals. Keywords: emotional intelligence, school principals, self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, social skill, Daniel Goleman, Dale Carnegie, anticipatory mindset DISPOSITIONS OF EI IN PRINCIPALS 5 Preface The feeling of pride when becoming a principal is not easy to describe.
    [Show full text]
  • Nat ’17 Cponference Rogramme
    The First Biannual Neuroadaptive Technology Conference NAT ’17 CPONFERENCE ROGRAMME July 19 – July 21, 2017, Berlin, Germany The First Biannual Neuroadaptive Technology Conference Conference Programme © 2017 Society for Neuroadaptive Technology This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. The First Biannual Neuroadaptive Technology Conference is sponsored by Brain Products GmbH www.brainproducts.com zander laboratories Zander Laboratories BV Liverpool John Moores University Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Technische Universität Berlin Team PhyPA General Chairs Dr Thorsten O. Zander Technische Universität Berlin, Germany Prof. Stephen Fairclough Liverpool John Moores University, UK Organizational Support Lena Andreessen Technische Universität Berlin, Germany - Review Process, Website, Communication, Keynotes, Conference Venue, Conference Programme, Conference Bags Laurens R. Krol Technische Universität Berlin, Germany - Website, Badges, Conference Programme, Conference Bags Kellyann Stamp Liverpool John Moores University, UK - Conference Programme Programme Committee Hasan Ayaz (Drexel University, USA ) Carryl Baldwin (George Mason University, USA ) Benjamin Blankertz (TU Berlin, Germany ) Anne-Marie Brouwer (TNO, The Netherlands ) Marc Cavazza (University of Kent, UK ) Guillaume Chanel (University of
    [Show full text]
  • Why Principles Should Play a Limited Role in Policy Making
    Knowledge kills action – Why principles should play a limited role in policy making J. Britt Holbrook, Georgia Institute of Technology Adam Briggle, University of North Texas This essay argues that principles should play a limited role in policy making. It first illustrates the dilemma of timely action in the face of uncertain unintended consequences. It then introduces the precautionary and proactionary principles as different alignments of knowledge and action within the policymaking process. The essay next considers a cynical and a hopeful reading of the role of these principles in public policy debates. We argue that the two principles, despite initial appearances, are not all that different when it comes to formulating public policy. We also suggest that allowing principles to determine our actions undermines the sense of autonomy necessary for true action. Keywords: Precautionary Principle; Proactionary Principle; Policy; Decision Procedure; Risk; Uncertainty; Autonomy Knowledge kills action. (Nietzsche)1 1. Knowing and acting How are knowledge and action related? This question is asked less often than another: When do we know enough to justify taking action? In the context of making science and technology policy, the question assumes yet a different form: When do we have sufficient scientific risk assessment about a new technological activity to warrant promoting that activity and embedding it in society? In this paper, we explore how the relation between knowledge and action should be structured in policymaking, which itself is both a kind of knowing and acting. Decision makers often confront a dilemma: Act too soon, and we create avoidable harms; but act too late, and we forfeit possible benefits.
    [Show full text]