Jewish Contributions to Interfaith Dialogue and Peaceful Co-Existence Jonathan Magonet (Tokyo 31.5.2015)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jewish Contributions to Interfaith Dialogue and Peaceful Co-Existence Jonathan Magonet (Tokyo 31.5.2015) Jewish contributions to interfaith dialogue and peaceful co-existence Jonathan Magonet (Tokyo 31.5.2015) On Jews and Judaism When speaking about Judaism and the Jewish people in Japan I am faced with a particular dilemma. According to the only statistics that I could find, the total Jewish population in Japan amounts to about two thousand people (0.0016% of the population). I presume this figure is based on the two small Jewish communities to be found here, in Tokyo and Kobe. Even if this figure is an underestimate, it does mean that most Japanese people are never likely in their lives to meet a Jewish person. In Europe or America there is a small but significant Jewish presence and a long and complex history, so that some aspects of Jewish beliefs and culture are well known. The situation here is very different. This means that when addressing a Japanese audience I am always faced with the question of how much background information I need to give when speaking on any particular topic relating to Jews and Judaism. This is particularly the case when it comes to the question of interfaith dialogue between the three monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Even the relative size of the three raises interesting questions. Though these figures are only approximate, there are about 2.2 billion adherents to Christianity worldwide, just over 30 percent of the world population; Islam has about 1.6 billion adherents, just under 25 percent of the world population; in sharp contrast the total number of Jewish people in the world amounts to about 14 million, 0.2 percent of the world population. So if size alone is to be taken into consideration Judaism hardly belongs in the same league as the other two major religions. And yet, all three belong together as the three so-called ‘monotheistic faiths’, and are also identified together as the ‘Abrahamic’ religions. Before addressing the topic of interfaith dialogue itself I would like to explain more about the nature of Jewish society today. The origins of the Jewish people are to be found in the pages of the Hebrew Bible, a library of books that record the selected memories of a particular people and the civilisation they created between two and three thousand years ago. It reflects their struggles over the period of a millennium in trying to comprehend, and find a way of living with, their revolutionary understanding of the nature and demands of God. This God was understood to be the single Creator of, and power within, the universe, was invisible and in no way to be represented by physical symbols. Yet this God had entered into a special relationship with their ancestor Abraham and ultimately with his descendants, the people known as Israel, a name which means either one who struggles with God or one who struggles for, on behalf of, God. The basis of that relationship according to one important Biblical formulation was that Abraham would educate his offspring to champion the values of ‘righteousness and justice’ in the world (Gen 18:19). This would be exemplified by the society they would build in a land promised to them by God. Moreover, through them all the families of the world would find ‘blessing’, a Biblical term embracing fruitfulness, material prosperity and security. God’s promise was borne out by the rescue of Abraham’s descendants from slavery in Egypt, thus enshrining the concept of freedom from slavery within the Biblical religious system. The relationship with God was formalised in a covenant of mutual responsibility between God and the people of Israel, at Mount Sinai. It was sealed and confirmed by the entry into and settlement in the land of Canaan. 1 The subsequent Biblical materials describe the ups and downs of that experiment in creating a new society, the challenges it faced through internal human successes, failures and follies, and the difficult interaction with both local neighbouring nations and the contemporary super-powers, Egypt to the south and Assyria and Babylon, and their successors, to the north. Key elements in this story include the creation of a successful state and briefly a minor empire of their own, the subsequent division into two separate kingdoms, both of which became subject to conquest and the deportation of their leadership and large parts of their population. Only the southern kingdom, Judah, from which will come the name ‘Jew’, with its capital in Jerusalem, was restored after a period of exile in Babylon. The second exile, under the Romans some five hundred years later, continued the process of creating what we now know as the Jewish Diaspora, communities of Jews scattered throughout the known world. The people had lost all the previous landmarks of their national religious identity: the Temple in Jerusalem, its priesthood, the land itself and a a royal family. The Judaism that emerged, created by a scholarly elite of rabbis, became a faith community, struggling to maintain its unique identity in widely differing circumstances. Jews lived subsequently under both Christianity and Islam, both of which religions, in different ways, saw themselves as inheritors and successors of Judaism. So Jews had to find ways of responding to the very different spiritual challenges raised by this experience of exile and dependency, whether living as isolated and often oppressed minority communities, or in some kind of intellectual and spiritual symbiotic relationship with the majority society and culture whenever this was possible. The basic Jewish legal principle, ‘dina d’malkhuta dina’, ‘the law of the land is the law’, enabled Jewish communities to conform and indeed contribute to the surrounding societies, as long as the law of the host society did not undermine some ultimate Jewish values. Among the consequences of this history were the removal of any missionary activity from Judaism and a marked caution about welcoming newcomers. But as a corollary Judaism taught that there was no need to become Jewish in order to find God, but that any individual or society would be acceptable to God if they kept seven basic social laws, the ‘laws of the sons of Noah’, mostly derived from the Ten Commandments. Alongside six prohibitions, including murder, idolatry and adultery, there was a seventh positive demand, to ensure that the society created the necessary institutions for promoting justice and the rule of law – the legacy of God’s initial choice of Abraham. This successful model of Jewish existence was to change radically following the European Enlightenment and Emancipation. Jews found themselves for the first time as independent citizens of their respective emerging national states. Their previous collective existence was as a closed self-contained community. This situation was enforced externally by the society in which they lived, and supported internally by a shared commitment to Jewish law, controlled by rabbinic authorities and lay leaders. This closed world came to an end and was gradually replaced by that of individual Jewish citizens of the nation state whose personal relationship with Judaism and the Jewish community became a matter of personal choice. A number of movements and trends emerged that still offered the possibility of belonging formally to the Jewish people but through the personal decision of the individual to belong. The religious groupings, based on their interpretation of Jewish tradition and their relationship to it, ranged from Liberal or Reform through Conservative to a variety of degrees of Orthodox Judaism. But other Jews, aware of the precarious nature of Jewish life in the Diaspora, and influenced by contemporary nationalistic 2 aspirations in the nineteenth century, looked to ending the two thousand years’ experience of exile by returning to their Biblical homeland. Zionism, in its many different forms, religious and secular, socialist and practical, aimed at a permanent solution to the vulnerability of Jewish existence. The movement was ultimately successful in the creation of the State of Israel, but only because of the world’s horror at the Nazi attempt to wipe out all traces of the Jewish people. Yet these trends, religious or ideological, only account for part of the Jewish response to Emancipation and modern society. It can be argued that the major Jewish post-emancipation movement was assimilation to the host society whenever and to the extent that this was possible. This desire to ‘normalise’ the Jewish situation, though experienced as a private matter and as a personal break with the past, was shared by many, but was nevertheless influenced by traditional Jewish religious elements. For example, Jews as individuals identified themselves, often in large numbers, with certain emerging intellectual and ideological trends in Europe, sometimes playing a leading role. While they understood this activity as a conscious rebellion against what they saw as the backwardness and constraints of the Judaism of their parents’ generation, certain aspects of this trend can be seen as ‘secular’ versions of the earlier religious value system. Thus the demand for social justice to be found in Biblical teachings of the prophets and in rabbinic law found their expression in socialist and communist movements, particularly in the history leading up to the Russian revolution and the creation of the Soviet Union.1 The Jewish commitment to study of traditional texts as a central religious value of rabbinic Judaism became translated into intellectual attainments in the arts, sciences, academia and the professions. In the Middle Ages Christian societies had forced Jews to be engaged in areas of commerce and international trade. They were helped in this activity by their network of family and other connections in different countries and the fact that those they worked with shared the same Jewish legal system to regulate their activities.
Recommended publications
  • 10 WINTER 1986 Ffl Jiiirfuijtjjrii-- the Stemberg Centre for Judaism, the Manor House , 80 East End Road, Contents London N3 2SY Telephone: 01-346 2288
    NA NUMBEFt 10 WINTER 1986 ffl jiiirfuijTJJriI-- The Stemberg Centre for Judaism, The Manor House , 80 East End Road, Contents London N3 2SY Telephone: 01-346 2288 2 Jaclynchernett We NowNeeda separate MANNA is the Journal of the Sternberg Conservative Movement Centre for Judaism at the Manor House and of the Manor House Society. 3 MichaelLeigh Andwhywe Mus.tTake upthe challenge MANI`IA is published quarterly. 4 Charlesselengut WhyYoung Jews Defectto cults Editor: Rabbi Tony Bayfield Deputy Editor: Rabbi william Wolff Art Editor: Charles Front 8 LionelBlue lnklings Editorial Assistant: Elizabeth Sarah Curtis cassell Help! Editorial Board: Rabbi Colin Eimer, 10 ^ Deirdreweizmann The outsider Getting Inside Rabbi Dr. Albert Friedlander, Rabbi the Jewish Skin David Goldberg, Dr. Wendy Green- gross, Reverend Dr. Isaac Levy, Rabbi Dr. Jonathan Magonet, Rabbi Dow Mamur, Rabbi Dr. J.ohm Rayner, Pro- 12 LarryTabick MyGrandfather Knew Isaac Bashevis singer fessor J.B . Segal, Isca Wittenberg. 14 Wendy Greengross Let's pretend Views expressed in articles in M¢7!#cz do not necessarily reflect the view of the Editorial Board. 15 JakobJ. Petuchowski The New Machzor. Torah on One Foot Subscription rate: £5 p.a. (four issues) including postage anywhere in the U.K. 17 Books. Lionel Blue: From pantryto pulpit Abroad: Europe - £8; Israel, Asia; Evelyn Rose: Blue's Blender Americas, Australasia -£12. 18 Reuven silverman Theycould Ban Baruch But Not His Truth A 20 Letters 21 DavjdGoldberg Lastword The cover shows Zlfee Jew by Jacob Kramer, an ink on yellow wash, circa 1916, one of many distinguished pic- tures currently on exhibition at the Stemberg Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Andre Ungar Z’L (21 July 1929–5 May 2020)
    Rabbi Andre Ungar z’l (21 July 1929–5 May 2020) Jonathan Magonet abbi Ungar was born in Budapest to Bela and Frederika Ungar. The Rfamily lived in hiding with false identity papers from 1944 under the German occupation.1 After the war, a scholarship brought him to the UK where he studied at Jews’ College, then part of University College, and subsequently studied philosophy. Feeling uncomfortable within Orthodoxy, he met with Rabbi Harold Reinhart and Rabbi Leo Baeck and eventually became an assistant rabbi at West London Synagogue. In 1954 he obtained his doctorate in philosophy and was ordained as a rabbi through a programme that preceded the formal creation of Leo Baeck College in 1956. In 1955 he was appointed as rabbi at the pro- gressive congregation in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. Very soon his fiery anti-Apartheid sermons were condemned in the Afrikaans newspapers and received mixed reactions from the Jewish community. In December 1956 he was served with a deportation order and was forced to leave the country. He wrote with passion about his South African experience some ten years later in the book Resistance against Tyranny2 A symposium edited by his friend and fellow Hungarian Eugene Heimler whose important account of his Holocaust experience Night of the Mist Ungar had translated into English. I found that our own genteel white leisure and wealth was a thin veneer over a vast mass of coloured suffering; and that the distinction was arti- ficially created, maintained and, since the Nationalist victory of 1948, deliberately worsened day after day.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing the Witch in Contemporary American Popular Culture
    "SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES": CONSTRUCTING THE WITCH IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN POPULAR CULTURE Catherine Armetta Shufelt A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2007 Committee: Dr. Angela Nelson, Advisor Dr. Andrew M. Schocket Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Donald McQuarie Dr. Esther Clinton © 2007 Catherine A. Shufelt All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Angela Nelson, Advisor What is a Witch? Traditional mainstream media images of Witches tell us they are evil “devil worshipping baby killers,” green-skinned hags who fly on brooms, or flaky tree huggers who dance naked in the woods. A variety of mainstream media has worked to support these notions as well as develop new ones. Contemporary American popular culture shows us images of Witches on television shows and in films vanquishing demons, traveling back and forth in time and from one reality to another, speaking with dead relatives, and attending private schools, among other things. None of these mainstream images acknowledge the very real beliefs and traditions of modern Witches and Pagans, or speak to the depth and variety of social, cultural, political, and environmental work being undertaken by Pagan and Wiccan groups and individuals around the world. Utilizing social construction theory, this study examines the “historical process” of the construction of stereotypes surrounding Witches in mainstream American society as well as how groups and individuals who call themselves Pagan and/or Wiccan have utilized the only media technology available to them, the internet, to resist and re- construct these images in order to present more positive images of themselves as well as build community between and among Pagans and nonPagans.
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer and Liturgy
    Reform Judaism: In 2000 Words Prayer and Liturgy Context The liturgy that we hold in our hands as we pray articulates our values, expresses our concerns, provides language and structure for our communal worship. As Reform Jews we believe that it must therefore evolve to reflect who we are, to speak as we speak. Indeed, liturgy has never been static; it has always grown and changed, influenced by where Jews lived, their experiences and their relationships with those around them. This week, not one essay but two, reflecting the importance of liturgical development in Reform Judaism. In these articles, Rabbi Professor Jonathan Magonet, former Principal of the Leo Baeck College and Rabbi Paul Freedman of Radlett Reform Synagogue, both of whom have edited Reform liturgies, explore some of the major changes in the liturgical life of our community over the last century. Content – Rabbi Professor Jonathan Magonet The liturgy, prayers and forms of service of the UK Reform Movement, like those of the many versions of non- Orthodox Judaism worldwide, are dynamic and ever changing. This often leads to the charge of being ‘fashionable’ and therefore somehow superficial. However, a look at the difference between the siddur in use from 1931 until the major revision in 1977 is a stark reminder that between those two dates the Jewish people experienced two major world-shaking events, the Shoah (Holocaust) and the creation of the State of Israel. Not to have changed, not to have taken these into account, would have been absurd, irrespective of any ‘progressive’ ideological concerns. Perhaps less dramatic but equally significant in terms of the wider society in which we live, the recognition of gender inequality and the wish to address it clearly within the movement, had to be reflected in the ‘new’ siddur published in 2008 – not for the sake of being ‘trendy’ but because a religious tradition that is out of touch with the forces affecting its members becomes at best a mere cult and at worst asks its members to hold very different ideals in their ritual and daily lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Disagreeing in the Service of God: Jews and Christians Need One Another, Argues an Esteemed Orthodox
    Disagreeing in the Service of God Jews and Christians need one another, argues an esteemed Orthodox rabbi in his latest book. An interview with Rabbi Irving Greenberg After the publication of "For the Sake of Heaven and Earth," Rabbi Irving "Yitz" Greenberg spoke to Beliefnet senior editor Alice Chasan about the book, which traces the development of his thinking about Jewish-Christian relations and argues for a pluralist theology that commands followers of each religion to embrace the unique contributions of the other. You've spent many years dedicating yourself to Jewish-Christian dialogue. What is your goal? Who said I have a goal? What I mean by that is that, as I indicated in the book's opening essay, some of this grew out of the experience. I didn't necessarily know what I was doing when I started. Therefore, my comment is, this is all retrospection. I think the big issue that I stumbled into unintentionally, perhaps, is one of the big issues of religion of our time—the encounter of powerful and meaningful religions with each other, in what I think is unprecedented in human history. It is a direct and unmediated encounter—and in what is in many ways a highly open and sympathetic environment between religions, identities, and cultures. This is the underlying issue of pluralism and of freedom. I confess I didn’t start with those ideas. In the modern era, people for the first time in history were brought together geographically in the cities, culturally open to one another. For the first time, the "Other" is no longer other.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Philosophy and Western Culture Jewish Prelims I-Xvi NEW.Qxp 25/10/07 14:06 Page Ii
    Jewish_Prelims_i-xvi NEW.qxp 25/10/07 14:06 Page i Jewish Philosophy and Western Culture Jewish_Prelims_i-xvi NEW.qxp 25/10/07 14:06 Page ii ‘More than just an introduction to contemporary Jewish philosophy, this important book offers a critique of the embedded assumptions of contemporary post-Christian Western culture. By focusing on the suppressed or denied heritage of Jewish and Islamic philosophy that helped shape Western society, it offers possibilities for recovering broader dimensions beyond a narrow rationalism and materialism. For those impatient with recent one-dimensional dismissals of religion, and surprised by their popularity, it offers a timely reminder of the sources of these views in the Enlightenment, but also the wider humane dimensions of the religious quest that still need to be considered. By recognising the contribution of gender and post-colonial studies it reminds us that philosophy, “the love of wisdom”, is still concerned with the whole human being and the complexity of personal and social relationships.’ Jonathan Magonet, formerly Principal of Leo Baeck College, London, and Vice-President of the Movement for Reform Judaism ‘Jewish Philosophy and Western Culture makes a spirited and highly readable plea for “Jerusalem” over “Athens” – that is, for recovering the moral and spiritual virtues of ancient Judaism within a European and Western intellectual culture that still has a preference for Enlightenment rationalism. Victor Seidler revisits the major Jewish philosophers of the last century as invaluable sources of wisdom for Western philosophers and social theorists in the new century. He calls upon the latter to reclaim body and heart as being inseparable from “mind.”’ Peter Ochs, Edgar Bronfman Professor of Modern Judaic Studies, University of Virginia Jewish_Prelims_i-xvi NEW.qxp 25/10/07 14:06 Page iii JEWISH PHILOSOPHY AND WESTERN CULTURE A Modern Introduction VICTOR J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shalom/Salaam Group: Muslim-Jewish Dialogue in Vancouver, British Columbia
    THE SHALOM/SALAAM GROUP: MUSLIM-JEWISH DIALOGUE IN VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA by ALISON TIFFANY GALLAHER B.A., The University of British Columbia, 1991 B.A., The University of British Columbia, 2002 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Anthropology) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September 2005 © Alison Tiffany Gallaher, 2005 Abstract While the expanding phenomenon of Muslim-Jewish interfaith dialogue in North America and Western Europe is often credited with the potential to positively influence relations in these regions as well as in the Middle East, analysis of such initiatives is under-represented in the anthropological literature. In an ethnographic examination of a small dialogue group in Vancouver, British Columbia, I interviewed eleven Muslim participants of differing ages, genders, and ethnic backgrounds to discover how they viewed the project's purpose, dynamics, and their participation in it. I found that despite mutual goodwill and an effort on both sides to blur religious boundaries and create a unified psychological space or sense of communitas, the interfaith initiative encountered difficulties due to disagreements over whether dialogue should include discussion of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, tension over the expression of religious stereotypes in one small group context, differences between the individualistic, esoteric beliefs of liberal (and sometimes secular) Jews and the more traditional Muslims' respect for religious authority and tradition, and the challenge for many of the Muslims of balancing inter-religious activities with the requirements of religious practice and the demands of work, school, and family responsibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Healers of Our Time: Women, Faith, and Justice a Mapping Report
    HEALERS OF OUR TIME: WOMEN, FAITH, AND JUSTICE A MAPPING REPORT Conducted by The Institute for Women’s Policy Research Supplemented by Women in Theology and Ministry Candler School of Theology, Emory University October 2008 The Sister Fund Copyright 2008 tsf-cover-spine-spread.indd 2 11/18/08 8:54:22 AM The Sister Fund ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many individuals contributed to the produc- Professor and Director of Women in Theology tion of this study. At The Sister Fund, Dr. Helen and Ministry, and Hellena Moon, doctoral student LaKelly Hunt, President, and Kanyere Eaton, in the Graduate Division of Religion, the research Executive Director, conceived of the project and team extended the original pool of women’s planned its original content and design. Lilyane organizations and expanded the academic Glamben, former Deputy Director, served as research review. They also revised and edited the project director. Julia A. Cato, Program Officer, original report. Team members included Michelle and Linda Kay Klein, Director of Research and Hall, Ayanna Abi-Kyles, Josey Bridges, and Anne Communications, were invaluable members of Hardison-Moody. the project team. Lake Research Partners and Auburn Media The original study was conducted by the provided helpful review of the content and the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR). project as a whole. Elizabeth Perrachione served Dr. Amy Caiazza, former Director of Democracy as editor, with assistance from Leslie Srajek. The and Society Programs, served as primary Sister Fund hosted two separate sessions, May researcher and author. Anna Danziger, Mariam 10, 2007, and February 27, 2008, at which a K.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Shared Values in a Diverse Society: Lessons from the Intelligent Design Controversy
    FINDING SHARED VALUES IN A DIVERSE SOCIETY: LESSONS FROM THE INTELLIGENT DESIGN CONTROVERSY Alan E. Garfield∗† If we are to be as a shining city upon a hill, it will be because of our ceaseless pursuit of the constitutional ideal of human dignity.1 INTRODUCTION American society is destined to become dramatically more diverse over the course of this century. The Census Bureau estimates that non- Hispanic Whites will constitute less than half the population by mid- century2 and that foreign-born residents already outnumber the entire population of Canada.3 Although the Census Bureau does not track people’s religious affiliation,4 other surveys indicate that America is also ∗. Professor of Law, Widener University School of Law. This Article is a product of my work as the 2005–2007 H. Albert Young Fellow in Constitutional Law and was originally presented as the 2007 H. Albert Young Lecture at Widener University School of Law on April 25, 2007. †. I am grateful to the Young Foundation for its generous support of my scholarship, and to Erin Daly, Michael Goldberg, Stephen Henderson, Patrick Kelly, Laura Ray, and John Wladis for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this work. 1. Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., Address at the Georgetown University Text and Teaching Symposium (Oct. 12, 1985), in THE GREAT DEBATE: INTERPRETING OUR WRITTEN CONSTITUTION 11, 25 (2005 ed.), available at http://www.fed-soc.org/resources/id.50/default.asp. 2. Press Release, U.S. Census Bureau, An Older and More Diverse Nation by Midcentury (Aug. 14, 2008), available at http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/012496.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Einführung Jonathan Magonet
    “That night, sleep deserted the king.” (Esth. 6:1) th 45 International Jewish-Christian Bible Week The Book of Esther th th 28 July to 4 August 2013 ESTHER INTRODUCTION Jonathan Magonet The Book of Esther hardly needs an introduction. However, at first glance it is easy to dismiss it as belonging to the kind of extravagant storytelling we associate with the oriental world, something out of the ‘Thousand and One Nights’. Nevertheless, we must be careful not to project our west- ern prejudices onto this kind of literature, which, in its own way, seeks to instruct as well as enter- tain. Within the Hebrew Bible the Book of Esther might be classified as wisdom literature, illustrat- ing how a wise man turns the tables on his deadly enemy in the struggle for power in a world of palace intrigues. Moreover it is especially significant as the only book to be set in the Diaspora, exploring the implications of this new reality of exile with its opportunities and dangers. For modern sensitivities it has offered a fascinating, if problematic, reflection on feminist issues. Earlier commentators saw Queen Vashti as the real heroine of the Book, refusing to obey her hus- band’s summons to be displayed before his men friends. In contrast, Esther appears to be totally submissive, first to the will of Mordecai and then to the king. It is only at the end that she be- comes the prime mover of events. But Vashti’s rebellion ends in a heroic failure, whereas Esther’s apparent submissiveness ends in victory.
    [Show full text]
  • Kol Nidrei כל־נדרי and Evening וערבית Service ליום of Yom Kippur כיפור
    KOL NIDREI כל־נדרי AND EVENING וערבית SERVICE ליום OF YOM KIPPUR כיפור Preparatory Prayers 202 הקדמה לתפילה Kol Nidrei 205 כל נדרי EvEning SErvicE The Sh’ma and Its Blessings 207 שמע וברכותיה The Silent Amidah 213 תפילת העמידה בלחש S’lih.ot: Pleas for Forgiveness 223 סליחות Viddui: Prayers of Confession 234 וידוי Concluding Prayers 246 סיום התפילה 201 yom kippur · evening service Copyright © 2010 by The Rabbinical Assembly, Inc. All rights reserved. הקדמה לתפילה PREPARATORY PRAYERS Isaiah . ָׁשֹלום The Meaning Shalom: shalom to those who are far off, shalom to those who shalom This verse from the .57:19 ָׁשָלֹום ׁשלֹום ָ לָרחְֹוקוַלָּקָרֹוב אַמר יהוה. .of the Day are near, says ADONAI Haftarah for Yom Kippur One day a year we morning is used here to welcome everyone to the make a journey in the Meditation for Putting on the Kittel synagogue. The welcome will be developed further company of the whole when the liturgy declares that we are permitted community of Israel— Just as I clothe myself in this white garment, so may You purify tonight “to pray with those who have transgressed.” all of us together, each of us alone. That day is my soul and my body, as the prophet Isaiah said, Originally a . ִקֶיטל The Day,” the Day of “Even if your sins are like crimson, Kittel“ Yiddish term, the word kittel ְלִבַיׁשִת קֶיטל ”.Atonement, the day that they will turn snow-white refers to a white garment ְּכֵׁשֶם ׁשֲאִנִי מְתַלֵּבִׁש/מְתַלֶּֽבֶׁשְת ּבֶֽבֶגָד לָבֵן, ּכַן ּתְלִּבין is deathlike. It is the day we wear the kittel, the K’shem she-ani mitlabbeish/mitlabbeshet b’veged lavan, kein talbin traditionally worn on Yom Kippur as well as at sacred ֶאִת־נְׁשָמִתְי וגּו ָפִתַי, ּכָּכִתּוב: אִם־יְהֲיּו חָטֵאיֶכם white gown that will one et nishmati v’gufati, ka-katuv: im yihyu h.
    [Show full text]
  • Talking to the Other: Jewish Interfaith Dialogue with Christians and Muslims
    Talking to the Other Jacob said to Esau: I have seen your face as if seeing the face of God and you have received me favourably. (Genesis 33:10) Talking to the Other Jewish Interfaith Dialogue with Christians and Muslims Jonathan Magonet The publication of this book was made possible through a subsidy from the Stone Ashdown Trust Published in 2003 by I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd 6 Salem Road, London W2 4BU 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 www.ibtauris.com In the United States and Canada distributed by Palgrave Macmillan a division of St. Martin’s Press 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 Copyright © Jonathan Magonet, 2003 The right of Jonathan Magonet to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. ISBN 1 86064 905 X A full CIP record for this book is available from the British Library Typeset in Caslon by Dexter Haven Associates, London Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books, Bodmin Contents Foreword, by Prince Hassan bin Tallal vii Preface xiii 1 Interfaith Dialogue – A Personal Introduction 1 From Theory to Practice 2 The Challenge to Judaism of Interfaith Dialogue 11 3 Chances and Limits of Multicultural Society 23 4 Reflections
    [Show full text]