The Pulsar Menagerie

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Pulsar Menagerie P ULSARS NEWS the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astro- physics in Cambridge, Massachusetts. ECTION S The Pulsar Menagerie Einstein’s test bed Another graduate student was central to the The lighthouses of the universe take on countless guises, as astronomers next pulsar triumph. This time, the Nobel have learned to their ongoing delight during the last 4 decades committee rewarded both the student and PECIAL his adviser with the physics prize, in 1993. S When pulsars spun their way into astro- and observers alike. “Pulsars have blessed us The setting was a search for new pulsars nomical lore in 1967, their debut was with stunning and unexpected discoveries in 1974 at Arecibo Observatory. Russell hardly glamorous. The radio telescope that every few years,” says astrophysicist David Hulse, working under astronomer Joseph found them was not a photogenic dish, but Nice of Princeton University in New Jersey. Taylor of the University of Massachusetts, a 4.5-acre British field wired with 2048 Amherst, devised a computer algorithm that gangly aerials. The first signal, spotted in The iconic Crab picked out pulsars 10 times more sensitively August, was an odd “piece of scruff ” em- Among the 1500 pulsars now known, just than did previous efforts. One object, called bedded within kilometers of chart record- one has an ironclad link to a fiery birth dis- PSR B1913+16 for its sky coordinates, spun ings. Puzzled for months by that flickering play witnessed by scientists: the famous pul- 17 times per second—but its timing pattern light, the University of Cambridge re- sar inside the Crab Nebula. Chinese kept changing. “My reaction was not search team called it LGM-1, in case it astronomers first recorded the Crab super- ‘Eureka, it’s a discovery,’ but ‘Nuts, what’s came from little green men. nova as a “guest star” on 4 July 1054. Today, wrong now?’ ” recalls Hulse, now a fusion By December, it was clear that the the pulsar’s fierce output of energy lights up scientist at the Princeton Plasma Physics pulses—precisely one every 1.33731109 the blast’s expanding tangle of debris. Laboratory. “I was frustrated and annoyed.” seconds—streamed from an exotic, com- Giant radio dishes in Green Bank, West Vexation turned to elation when Hulse pact body. The team’s first report, led by Virginia, and near Arecibo, Puerto Rico, divined the truth: The pulsar darted in an 8- radio astronomer Antony Hewish, pro- spotted the Crab pulsar in 1968. As- hour orbit around another body. Taylor posed “stable oscillations of white dwarf tronomers were startled by its rapid-fire rushed to Arecibo, and the pair confirmed or neutron stars.” But a blaze of research blips, 30 each second. Even more thrilling the system that became known as the Hulse- in 1968 left no doubt that the group had was a perceptible change in its spin rate: Taylor binary. The pulsar’s orbit revealed The Crab’s clock was that its partner was a nonpulsing neutron losing 36.5 billionths of star. Taylor worked with astrophysicist Joel a second per day. Weisberg, now at Carleton College in The results vindicat- Northfield, Minnesota, and others to show ed a bold model put that Einstein’s general theory of relativity forward by theorist was needed to describe the strong gravita- Thomas Gold of Cor- tional embrace of the two objects—the first nell University in Itha- such test outside our solar system. ca, New York. In Gold’s Most critically, the team showed that the view, pulsars were spin- two bodies inexorably spiral together, at ex- ning neutron stars that actly the rate predicted by Einstein 60 years gradually wound down earlier. Gravitational waves carry away the under the influence of lost orbital energy. “It’s indirect, like show- intense magnetic fields. ing that radio waves exist because you know Energy lost by a pulsar’s the radio transmitter uses power,” Hulse deceleration, he rea- says. “But it was the first evidence for the soned, would illuminate existence of gravitational waves.” the nebula. Part of the energy would stream Outrageous spin High-energy fire hose. The Vela pulsar (bottom left of each image) into space within two By the late 1970s, research on pulsars had expels a rapidly fluctuating jet of particles half a light-year long, cylinders of light, dwindled, says astronomer Donald Backer revealed by the Chandra X-ray Observatory. sweeping through the of the University of California (UC), Berke- cosmos like lighthouse ley. It was a perfect time for a whopper, and unveiled an object prophesied in the 1930s beams as the pulsar spun. The broad details Backer’s team found it at Arecibo in 1982: by astrophysicists Walter Baade, Fritz of Gold’s model still reign today. PSR B1937+21, rotating a jaw-dropping Zwicky, and Lev Landau: an ultradense The Crab quickly rose to iconic status. 642 times per second. Yet another graduate neutron star, perhaps 20 kilometers across, But as it turns out, the pulsar is far from typ- student, Shrinivas Kulkarni (now at the left by a massive star’s death in a superno- ical. It’s unusually bright, spewing a huge California Institute of Technology in va explosion long ago. portion of its energy into radio waves and Pasadena), made the key initial find at the ET AL. Hewish went on to share the 1974 Nobel x-rays. Moreover, it raised hopes that hordes telescope. Prize in physics—an honor that also should of pulsars would turn up in other supernova This “millisecond pulsar” sparked a theo- have recognized his graduate student Jocelyn remnants, but most searches have struck ry frenzy. It was nowhere near a supernova Bell Burnell for her central role in the discov- out. “There is another branch of compact remnant, but its rotational speed—exceeding ery, many astronomers feel. Since then, a objects created, and they’re definitely differ- 1/10th the speed of light at its equator— stream of findings has made pulsars the dar- ent from the canonical pulsars everyone ex- looked like that of a freshly minted neutron lings of high-energy astrophysics for theorists pected,” says astrophysicist Patrick Slane of star. Astrophysicists Malvin Ruderman, the CREDIT: NASA/CXC/PSU/G. PAVLOV 532 23 APRIL 2004 VOL 304 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org P ULSARS S PECIAL late Jacob Shaham, and colleagues at Colum- dio astronomer Dale Frail of the National Ra- tivity than the Hulse-Taylor binary bia University in New York City suggested dio Astronomy Observatory in Socorro, New (Science, 9 January, p. 153). that the pulsar was old but got a new lease on Mexico, saw minuscule fluctuations in the ar- Already, astrophysicists are mystified life by yanking material from a companion rival times of pulses from PSR B1257+12. by the energetic interplay between the neu- S star. Gas plunging onto the greedy neutron Their model suggested that two planets, a few tron stars. Intense winds from the faster ro- ECTION star spun it up to outrageous rates, like a mer- times larger than Earth, tugged the pulsar to tating pulsar create a tear-shaped shock and fro ever so slightly as they orbited. wave around the slower pulsar. Teams are The claim was controversial, but probing this process as one pulsar dips be- Wolszczan thinks the impact was worth hind the other, every 2.4 hours. the early catcalls. “After a relatively In one interpretation of the data, the fast short period of disbelief, the average pulsar is churning out 100,000 to 1 million reaction was that the existence of plan- times more charged gas than expected ets around a neutron star must mean from the seething region above its surface, that the planet-production process in says theorist Jonathan Arons of UC Berke- general was a robust one,” he says. In- ley. “The physics is not quite incredible, deed, more than 100 other planets are but it’s close,” he says. now known, although PSR B1257+12 As searches for new pulsars continue, is still the only burned-out corpse of a astronomers await the next varieties on Pulsars Surf the Cosmic Waves Imagine floating in the middle of a large lake, where you can’t quite see the shore. If peo- ple throw big rocks into the water, you’ll feel a riot of ripples. With the right tools, you might be able to tell how many rocks splashed in—and how big they were. In space, the “rocks” are binary pairs of giant black holes at the cores of galaxies, and the Tilt-a-whirl. Misalignment between a pulsar’s “ripples” are gravitational waves. Long before they crash, the spiraling black holes churn the spin axis and magnetic axis sends an inclined waters of spacetime. The waves, spanning light-years, traverse the entire universe. As each one radio beam whirling into space. passes by, it distorts the apparent distances between objects in a subtle but distinct pattern. Millisecond pulsars surf those waves. As they bob to and fro, their signals arrive in ry-go-round getting constant shoves. telescopes on Earth at slightly different times. By timing an array of such pulsars for Since then, astronomers have found near- years, astronomers think they might spot the imprints of gravitational waves in this ly 100 such “recycled” pulsars. Some are iso- decade—perhaps beating out several major physics experiments on the ground. lated, but others have a partner in the process Astronomer Donald Backer of the Univer- of being eaten or literally blown away by the sity of California, Berkeley, thinks his team is pulsar’s radiation. For instance, the “black “within a factor of 5” of the necessary preci- widow” pulsar, found in 1988 by astronomer sion to detect the waves, using about a dozen Andrew Fruchter of the Space Telescope Sci- pulsars in the Northern Hemisphere.
Recommended publications
  • Species Which Remained Immutable and Unchanged Thereafter
    THE ORIGIN OF THE ELEMENTS BY WILLIAM A. FOWLER CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PASADENA They [atoms] move in the void and catching each other up jostle together, and some recoil in any direction that may chance, and others become entangled with one another in various degrees according to the symmetry of their shapes and sizes and positions and order, and they remain together and thus the coming into being of composite things is effected. -SIMPLICIUS (6th Century A.D.) It is my privilege to begin our consideration of the history of the universe during this first scientific session of the Academy Centennial with a discussion of the origin of the elements of which the matter of the universe is constituted. The question of the origin of the elements and their numerous isotopes is the modern expression of one of the most ancient problems in science. The early Greeks thought that all matter consisted of the four simple substances-air, earth, fire, and water-and they, too, sought to know the ultimate origin of what for them were the elementary forms of matter. They also speculated that matter consists of very small, indivisible, indestructible, and uncreatable atoms. They were wrong in detail but their concepts of atoms and elements and their quest for origins persist in our science today. When our Academy was founded one century ago, the chemist had shown that the elements were immutable under all chemical and physical transformations known at the time. The alchemist was self-deluded or was an out-and-out charla- tan. Matter was atomic, and absolute immutability characterized each atomic species.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Stars: Introduction
    Neutron Stars: Introduction Stephen Eikenberry 16 Jan 2018 Original Ideas - I • May 1932: James Chadwick discovers the neutron • People knew that n u clei w ere not protons only (nuclear mass >> mass of protons) • Rutherford coined the name “neutron” to describe them (thought to be p+ e- pairs) • Chadwick identifies discrete particle and shows mass is greater than p+ (by 0.1%) • Heisenberg shows that neutrons are not p+ e- pairs Original Ideas - II • Lev Landau supposedly suggested the existence of neutron stars the night he heard of neutrons • Yakovlev et al (2012) show that he in fact discussed dense stars siiltimilar to a gi ant nucl eus BEFORE neutron discovery; this was immediately adapted to “t“neutron s t”tars” Original Ideas - III • 1934: Walter Baade and Fritz Zwicky suggest that supernova eventtttts may create neutron stars • Why? • Suppg(ernovae have huge (but measured) energies • If NS form from normal stars, then the gravitational binding energy gets released • ESN ~ star … Original Ideas - IV • Late 1930s: Oppenheimer & Volkoff develop first theoretical models and calculations of neutron star structure • WldhWould have con tidbttinued, but WWII intervened (and Oppenheimer was busy with other things ) • And that is how things stood for about 30 years … Little Green Men - I • Cambridge experiment with dipole antennae to map cosmic radio sources • PI: Anthony Hewish; grad students included Jocelyn Bell Little Green Men - II • August 1967: CP 1919 discovered in the radio survey • Nov ember 1967: Bell notices pulsations at P =1.337s
    [Show full text]
  • Beeps, Flashes, Bangs and Bursts
    Beeps, Flashes, Big stars work much faster: Bangs and Bursts. 1,000,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 and Chirps. Forever Peter Watson 3 hours! Live fast, Die Young! Peter Watson, Dept. of Physics Change colour, size, brightness •Vast majority of stars are boring: “main- sequence” (aka middle- class) changing very slowly. •Some oscillate: e.g Cepheids •Large bright stars change by factor 3 in brightness Peter Watson Peter Watson If Stars are large.... • we get supernovae • 6 visible in Milky Way over last 1000 years •well understood: work by blocking mechanism • SN 1006: Brightest •very important since period is proportional to Supernova. intrinsic brightness: • Can see remnants of the expanding •i.e. measure the apparent brightness, the period tells shockwave you the actual brightness, so you know how far away Frank Winkler (Middlebury College) et it is al., AURA, NOAO, NSF Peter Watson Peter Watson Remnant of a very Tycho’s old SN Supernova • Part of the veil nebula in X-rays in Cygnus (1572) Sara Wager NASA / CXC / F.J. Lu (Chinese Academy of Sciences) et al. Peter Watson Peter Watson The Crab (M1) •Recorded by Chinese astronomers "I humbly observe that a guest star has appeared; above the star there is a feeble yellow glimmer. If one examines the divination regarding the Emperor, the interpretation [of the presence of this guest star] is the following: The fact that the star has not overrun Bi and that its brightness must represent a person of great value. I demand that the Office of Historiography is informed of this." PW Peter Watson 1054: Crab •Recorded by Chinese astronomers as “guest star” •May have been recorded by Chaco Indians in New • X-rays (in blue) Mexico • + Optical 4 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Korean 1592--1593 Record of a Guest Star: Animpostor'of The
    Journal of the Korean Astronomical Society 49: 00 ∼ 00, 2016 December c 2016. The Korean Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. http://jkas.kas.org THE KOREAN 1592–1593 RECORD OF A GUEST STAR: AN ‘IMPOSTOR’ OF THE CASSIOPEIA ASUPERNOVA? Changbom Park1, Sung-Chul Yoon2, and Bon-Chul Koo2,3 1Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 85 Hoegi-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02455, Korea; [email protected] 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea [email protected], [email protected] 3Visiting Professor, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02455, Korea Received |; accepted | Abstract: The missing historical record of the Cassiopeia A (Cas A) supernova (SN) event implies a large extinction to the SN, possibly greater than the interstellar extinction to the current SN remnant. Here we investigate the possibility that the guest star that appeared near Cas A in 1592{1593 in Korean history books could have been an `impostor' of the Cas A SN, i.e., a luminous transient that appeared to be a SN but did not destroy the progenitor star, with strong mass loss to have provided extra circumstellar extinction. We first review the Korean records and show that a spatial coincidence between the guest star and Cas A cannot be ruled out, as opposed to previous studies. Based on modern astrophysical findings on core-collapse SN, we argue that Cas A could have had an impostor and derive its anticipated properties. It turned out that the Cas A SN impostor must have been bright (MV = −14:7 ± 2:2 mag) and an amount of dust with visual extinction of ≥ 2:8 ± 2:2 mag should have formed in the ejected envelope and/or in a strong wind afterwards.
    [Show full text]
  • G7. 7-3.7: a Young Supernova Remnant Probably Associated with the Guest
    Draft version September 12, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 G7.7-3.7: a young supernova remnant probably associated with the guest star in 386 CE (SN 386) Ping Zhou (hs),1, 2 Jacco Vink,1, 3, 4 Geng Li (Î耕),5, 6 and Vladim´ır Domcekˇ 1, 3 1Anton Pannekoek Institute for Astronomy, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2School of Astronomy and Space Science, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Nanjing, 210023, China 3GRAPPA, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4SRON, Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands 5National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China 6School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.19A Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China Submitted to ApJL ABSTRACT Although the Galactic supernova rate is about 2 per century, only few supernova remnants are associated with historical records. There are a few ancient Chinese records of \guest stars" that are probably sightings of supernovae for which the associated supernova remnant is not established. Here we present an X-ray study of the supernova remnant G7.7−3:7, as observed by XMM-Newton, and discuss its probable association with the guest star of 386 CE. This guest star occurred in the ancient Chinese asterism Nan-Dou, which is part of Sagittarius. The X-ray morphology of G7.7−3:7 shows an arc-like feature in the SNR south, which is characterized by an under-ionized plasma with sub-solar abundances, a temperature of 0:4{0.8 keV, and a density of ∼ 0:5(d=4 kpc)−0:5 cm−3.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is CHEOPS?
    Swiss and ESA satellite CHEOPS launching soon! CHEOPS will be launching into space on the 17th of December! You may be wondering: what is CHEOPS? CHEOPS stands for CHaracterising ExOPlanet Satellite. Its goal is to study ​ ​ transits of already-known exoplanets to gain more knowledge about them. What type of information are we looking for? Scientists want to know detailed information about planets outside our Solar System, such as the mass, planet size, and density, which will in turn help to figure out the composition of these exoplanets. Studying exoplanet composition and their atmospheres is important especially for astrobiology. A planet’s chemical composition can affect its habitability for life as we know it. Scientists usually look for biosignatures such as the presence of methane or oxygen in the planet’s atmosphere, which could indicate presence of past or present life. Artist’s impression of CHEOPS. Credits: ESA / ATG medialab. The major contributors CHEOPS is a collaboration between ESA and the Swiss Space Office. The mission was proposed and is now headed by Prof. Willy Benz, from the University of Bern, which houses the mission’s consortium. The science operations consortium is at the University of Geneva, where they have many collaborators, such as the Swiss Space Center at EPFL. As it is an ESA endeavour, many other European institutions are also contributing to the mission. For example, the mission operations consortium is located in Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain. The launch The satellite has already been shipped to Kourou, French Guiana, where it will be launched by the ESA spaceport.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet Tool Kit
    Exoplanet Tool Kit New Mexico Super Computing Challenge Final Report April 5, 2011 Team 35 Desert Academy Team Members Chris Brown Isaac Fischer Teacher Jocelyn Comstock Mentors Henry Brown Prakash Bhakta Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 2 Background ............................................................................................................ 3 Astrophysics .............................................................................................. 3 Definition and Origin of Extroplanets ....................................................... 4 Methods of Detection ............................................................................... 4 Project .................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology............................................................................................. 6 Data Results .............................................................................................. 7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 10 Future Study ......................................................................................................... 11 Acknowledgements.............................................................................................. 12 References ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NL#135 May/June
    May/June 2007 Issue 135 A Publication for the members of the American Astronomical Society 3 IOP to Publish President’s Column AAS Journals J. Craig Wheeler, [email protected] Whew! A lot has happened! 5 Member Deaths First, my congratulations to John Huchra who was elected to be the next President of the Society. John will formally become President-Elect at the meeting in Hawaii. He will then take over as President at the meeting in St. Louis in June of 2008 and I will serve as Past-President until the 6 Pasadena meeting in June of 2009. We have hired a consultant to lead a one-day Council retreat before the Hawaii meeting to guide the Council toward a more strategic outlook for the Society. Seattle Meeting John has generously agreed to join that effort. I know he will put his energy, intellect, and experience Highlights behind the health and future of the Society. We had a short, intense, and very professional process to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to 10 publish the Astrophysical Journal and the Astronomical Journal, to evaluate the proposals, and Award Winners to select a vendor. We are very pleased that the IOP Publishing will be the new publisher of our cherished and prestigious journals and are very optimistic that our new partnership will lead to in Seattle a necessary and valuable evolution of what it means to publish science journals in the globally- connected electronic age. 11 The complex RFP defining our journals and our aspirations for them was put together by a team International consisting of AAS representatives and outside independent consultants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Planets Around Other Stars by Andrew Fraknoi, Astronomical Society of the Pacific
    www.astrosociety.org/uitc No. 19 - Winter 1991-92 © 1992, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 390 Ashton Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94112 The Search for Planets Around Other Stars by Andrew Fraknoi, Astronomical Society of the Pacific The question of whether there are planets outside our Solar System has intrigued scientists, science fiction writers and poets for years. But how can we know if any really exist? We devote this issue of The Universe in the Classroom to the search for planets around other stars. What is the difference between a planet and a star? Why do we think there might be planets around other stars? Why is it so hard to see planets around other stars? If we can't see them, how can we find out if there are planets around other stars? Have any planets been detected from stellar wobbles? The Case of Barnard's Star Are there other ways to detect planets? Can we see the large disks of gas and dust around other stars out of which planets form? What about reports of planets around pulsars? Activity: Center of Mass Demonstration What is the difference between a planet and a star? Stars are huge luminous balls of gas powered by nuclear reactions at their centers. The enormously high temperatures and pressures in the core of a star force atoms of hydrogen to fuse together and become helium atoms, releasing tremendous amounts of energy in the process. Planets are much smaller with core temperatures and pressures too low for nuclear fusion to occur. Thus they emit no light of their own.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Stars and Their Envelopes A.Y.Potekhin1,2 in Collaboration with G.Chabrier,2 A.D.Kaminker,1 D.G.Yakovlev,1
    Dense matter in neutron stars and their envelopes A.Y.Potekhin1,2 in collaboration with G.Chabrier,2 A.D.Kaminker,1 D.G.Yakovlev,1 ... 1Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute, St.Petersburg 2CRAL, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon Introduction: Neutron stars and their importance for fundamental physics Neutron-star envelopes – link between the superdense core and observations Conductivities and thermal structure of neutron star envelopes Atmospheres and thermal radiation spectra of neutron stars with magnetic fields Neutron stars – the densest stars in the Universe Mass and radius: Gravitational energy: average density: Neutron stars on the density – temperature diagram Phase diagram of dense matter. Courtesy of David Blaschke GR effects Gravitational radius Redshift zg: “compactness parameter” u=rg/R ~ 0.3–0.4 “Observed” temperature = Teff /(1+zg) gravity Light rays are bending near the stellar surface, thus allowing one to “look behind the horizon”. “Apparent” radius Neutron stars – the stars with the strongest magnetic field Radio waves P ≈ 1.4 ms – 12 s Ω ≈ 0.5 – 4500 s−1 B In the strong magnetic field of a rapidly rotating neutron star, charged particles are accelerated to relativistic energies, creating coherent radio emission. Therefore many neutron stars are observed as pulsars. Ω2 B2 Ω1 ω B1 Gravitational waves Radio waves Binary neutron stars emit gravitational waves (losing the angular momentum) and undergo relativistic precession. Prediction L.D.Landau (1931) – anticipation [L.D.Landau, “On the theory of stars,” Physikalische Zs. Sowjetunion 1 (1932) 285]: for stars with M>1.5M☼ “density of matter becomes so great that atomic nuclei come in close contact, foming one gigantic nucleus’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Star
    Variable star A variable star is a star whose brightness as seen from Earth (its apparent magnitude) fluctuates. This variation may be caused by a change in emitted light or by something partly blocking the light, so variable stars are classified as either: Intrinsic variables, whose luminosity actually changes; for example, because the star periodically swells and shrinks. Extrinsic variables, whose apparent changes in brightness are due to changes in the amount of their light that can reach Earth; for example, because the star has an orbiting companion that sometimes Trifid Nebula contains Cepheid variable stars eclipses it. Many, possibly most, stars have at least some variation in luminosity: the energy output of our Sun, for example, varies by about 0.1% over an 11-year solar cycle.[1] Contents Discovery Detecting variability Variable star observations Interpretation of observations Nomenclature Classification Intrinsic variable stars Pulsating variable stars Eruptive variable stars Cataclysmic or explosive variable stars Extrinsic variable stars Rotating variable stars Eclipsing binaries Planetary transits See also References External links Discovery An ancient Egyptian calendar of lucky and unlucky days composed some 3,200 years ago may be the oldest preserved historical document of the discovery of a variable star, the eclipsing binary Algol.[2][3][4] Of the modern astronomers, the first variable star was identified in 1638 when Johannes Holwarda noticed that Omicron Ceti (later named Mira) pulsated in a cycle taking 11 months; the star had previously been described as a nova by David Fabricius in 1596. This discovery, combined with supernovae observed in 1572 and 1604, proved that the starry sky was not eternally invariable as Aristotle and other ancient philosophers had taught.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 – the Deaths of Stars
    Chapter 13 – The Deaths of Stars On July 4, 1054, Chinese astronomers noted a new bright star in the constellation of Taurus. The “guest star” was so bright it could be seen in daylight for almost a month! This event was recorded by several independent chinese astronomers and could be observed for almost 2 years. This dramatic event heralded the death throes of a massive star only 6500 light years away. When we turn modern day telescopes towards Taurus we observe the fallout from this immense explosion. This region is known as the Crab Nebula (M1). Located inside the nebula is a pulsar – a fast rotating neutron star, the final dense remains of the star that went supernova only a millenium ago... As with many properties of stars that we have seen, how a star ends its life depends on its mass. The common feature across the mass range is that stars “die” when they run out of fuel, because now there is no way to resist the compression force of gravity. The Death of Low Mass Stars The core of a star heats up in response to gravitational contraction. Therefore, low mass stars never get very hot. In fact, stars below 0.4 solar masses only get hot enough to fuse hydrogen (and only in p-p chain reactions). This low temperature means that the hydrogen fuel is consumed relatively slowly. In addition, as we saw in a previous lecture, very low mass stars are completely convective. The large scale convection continually brings fresh hydrogen fuel to the centre of the star.
    [Show full text]