Characterization of the Luminescent, Homoleptic, Three-Coordinate, Water Soluble Au(I) Complex ofTrisulfonated (TPPTS) as the Cesium Salt, CS8[Au(TPPTS)3]·5.25 H20

john P Fackler, fr"and Tiffany A. Grant Laboratory for Molecular Structure andBonding, Department ofChemistry, TexasA&MUniversity, College Station, TX 77843-3255, USA

Brian E Hanson Department ofChemistry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0212, USA

Richardj Staples Department ofChemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Received: 9 February 1999

The homoleptic metal-TPPTS complex Css[Au(TPPTShl·5.25 H 20 has been characterized structurally. The x-ray data for the triclinic crystal, P-l, with cell constants a = 13.7003(4), b = 18.0001(6), c = 18.2817(2), a = 100.249(2), [3 = 99.593(2), 'Y = 109.818(2) shows trigonal planar Au(I) centers coordinated by three TPPTS having Au-P distances equal to 2.374(6), 2.394(5), and 2.417(5)A. The structure shows a complex network of bonding involving the Cs" ions, the sulfate groups of the , and H 20 solvent molecules. The [Au(TPPTShls- luminesces in the solid state and in aqueous solution with a broad emission at ca 520 nm which is quenched by 02' and other small molecules. The forbidden singlet to triplet absorption at ca 552 nm with 8 - 0.8Lmol-1cm-1 is also observed.

Phosphine complexes of transition metals are simple means of separating the catalyst from the important in homogeneous catalysis (1, 2). During the product soluble in the non-aqueous layer. The past few years 'green-chemistry' has dictated that new trisulfonated triphenylphosphine, TPPTS, trisfm­ solvents and catalysts be found that minimize the use sulfophenyl), is one of the more commonly of toxic chemicals. Processes that function under less employed in biphasic catalyst systems (6). hazardous reaction conditions (3) and with benign Luminescence studies of Au(I) compounds have solvents have been sought. The use of water soluble produced some interesting results recently (7, 8). phosphine catalysts is part of this green chemistry Photoluminescence (9) is observed in several classes of trend. A 1994 NATO workshop brought focus to this Au(I) compounds, including three-coordinate effort (4). The successful use of water-soluble complexes (10, 11). Trigonal coordination about the sulfonated phosphine catalysts in , gold center leads to an excited state which produces a hydrogenation, and coupling reactions (5) has been long-lived (us) metal-centered phosphorescence (12). especially important. These systems have provided a With the use of water soluble phosphines such as

20 <:00' Cold Bulletin 1999,32(1) [Au(TPPTS) 3] g. units, Figure 1, that are interconnected through a complex network of bonds between the sulfonate groups and the cesium cations, Figure 2. The coordination about Au(1) approximates D 3h symmetry, excluding the phenyl rings. The Au-P bond lengths are 2.374(6), 2.394(5), and 2.417(5)A and are similar to those found in other gold-phosphine complexes. This same general ligand geometry (presumably ligand dictated) has been suggested (18) for the important hydroformylation catalyst [RhH(CO)TPPTS] used by Ruhrchemie AG. The sum of the P-Au-P angles is equal to 360°. The diameter of a molecule is on the order of 15A with 8 Cs+ ions Figure 1 Molecular structure ofthe anion fAu(TPPTS}3;S-. associated with the nine sulfate groups. The carbon The Cs+ ions and water molecules are omittedfor and oxygen atoms were refined isotropically with some clarity disorder the oxygen atoms of the sulfate groups and water molecules. The cesium salt of TPPTS was used (19) to obtain single crystals of 1. The large size of Cs" and its polarizability compared to the more common sodium salt of the ligand appear to be important factors in the crystallization in which CsCl is eliminated (Equation 1). Crystallization using the sodium salt of TPPTS was unsuccessful.

Csg[Au(TPPTSh]Cl---'" Css[Au(TPPTSh] + CsCl (1)

Although gold(I) is commonly two-coordinate Figure 2 Molecular structure ofCsgfAu(TPPTS)i .525HzO there are a few structural reports of three-coordinate Au (I) complex (20), few of these compounds have been investigated for photoluminescence. Two crystal 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane (TPA) and TPPTS structures of water soluble, 3-coordinate Au(1) (13) aqueous solution phosphorescence is observed and complexes of alkylated (at N) 1,3,5 triaza-7­ has been suggested to be associated with a 3­ phosphaadamantane (21, 22) have been described but coordinate, tris-phosphine species. However, prior to these materials contain iodide weakly interacting with this work no strictly 3-coordinate, luminescent, water the Au(1) centers at ~ 2.9 A. Another water soluble, soluble tris-phosphine complex of Au (I) had been nearly planar AuP 3 complex, uses the ligand structurally characterized. Furthermore, no homoleptic diphenylhydroxymethylphosphane (23). metal complexes of the important TPPTS ligand have Compound 1 is the first metal complex been characterized structually and there are few structurally characterized which has a homoleptic examples of structurally characterized metal complexes arrangement of the commercially important TPPTS containing this ligand (14 - 16). ligands. TPPTS complexes and others (24) with The compound Css[Au(TPPTS)3]·5.25H20 (1) sulfonated phosphine ligands tend to crystallize in which exhibits luminescence in the solid state and in layers consisting of hydrophilic planes of sulfonate aqueous solution, was synthesized by the addition of groups, cations, and solvent with hydrophobic planes three equivalents of the cesium salt of TPPTS to one containing the metal complex and the ligands. A equivalent of Au(THT)Cl in a H 20/CH2Cl2 (1:1) similar arrangement is found here with the trigonally solution. Crystals of 1 were obtained from a water planar Au(1) TPPTS complex. It is isoelectronic and solution of the complex (17). The complex crystallizes presumably structurally like the Pd(0) catalysts that in the triclinic space group P-1 with two formula units have been used for carbonylation of aryl halides (25), in the unit cell. The lattice contains discrete as well as the Rh(1) catalysts mentioned above (2). The

(fji;} ColdBulletin 1999,32(1) 21 3Ip{IH} NMR spectrum of [Au(TPPTS) 3]8- shows a dynamic behavior similar to the behavior reported for 0.286 the Pd(O) system. With [Au(TPPTS)3]8-, a broad signal F at 43.5 ppm is observed at room temperature which is I the weighted average signal for [Au(TPPTS) 3]8-, u 0.2 [Au(TPPTS)z]5- and free TPPTS (at - 5ppm), seen as o sharp peaks at low temperature (in CD30D ), with the e [Au(TPPTSh]8- dominating. As further equivalents of the TPPTS ligand are added to a solution of the c 0.1 e complex, this latter signal shifts upfield, as observed in n the Pd(O) system, indicating chemical exchange. c The luminescence (26) exhibited by 1 in the solid e state and in aqueous solution is illustrated in Figure 3. 0-F.....--.---r-r--.--...... --.---,-r--T'i 400 500 600 650 The solid state complex emits at 494 nm and is blue­ Emission (nm] shifted from the emission observed in aqueous solution at 513 nm. This 750 cm- l difference in the Figure 3 The emission spectraofNag!Au(TPPTShl (a) as a peak maximum presumably is related to small solid atroom temperature and (b) in aqueous differences in the strength of the Au-P bonds in the solution, excited at 335nm. The ionic strength is two phases. The overall similarity of the spectra heldconstant in solution with 0.5M NaCl confirms that the same 3-coordinate species is the luminescent species in both phases. 0.2349 (a) The forbidden electronic absorption between the singlet ground-state and the triplet excited state in F [Au(TPPTS)3]8- can be observed in aqueous solution I 0.2 u at room temperature. The absorption has a maximum o ~ l f~ 5) at 552 nm ( 8 max 0.8 ML-1cm- , 1.5 x 10- and a width at half-height of about 4015 cm- l . The oscillator e strength is in a range expected (27) for spin forbidden s 0.1 ~1800 c transitions. The shift of cm! to higher energy e for the emission maximum from the triplet excited n state, compared with the absorption from the singlet c e ground state presumably reflects the presence of o~~==-r-'-"""'~I"'"""""T---r"""T""""';=:;:; stronger Au-P bonds in the excited state. As reported 400 500 600 650 previously (13) the HOMO for 3-coordinate AuP 3 Emission (nm) complexes in D 3h symmetry is largely an antibonding Figure 4 The reversible emission quenching of e' (dxy,dx2-y2) orbital while the LUMO is a non­ bonding a" (pJ orbital. The us lifetime of the excited Nag!Au(TPPTS)i by 02{g) in aqueous solution: state allows for a relaxation and strengthening of the (a) 100 %N2{g)purge; (b) 100%02{g) purge; Au-P bonds to accommodate the removal of electron (c) 100% N 2{g)purge after oxygenation. Spectra density from the antibonding HOMO (28). wereexcited at 335nm Energy transfer and electron transfer quenching has been demonstrated for some photoluminescent metal 15 minutes. This reversibility may be important for complexes of Au(I) (29, 30). Excited state quenching potential application of these systems as reactions also occur with photoluminescent photoluminescent sensors. Small molecules such as nitric [Au(TPPTSh]8- in aqueous solution. Dioxygen reversibly oxide, sulfur dioxide, and alkyl halides, and some metal 2 quenches luminescent Au(I) complexes in the solid state ions such as Cu + also quench the emission in aqueous in thin films of gold containing polymers (31, 32). A solution. These results will be reported in detail elsewhere. reversible quenching process also occurs in aqueous solutions of [Au(TPPTSh]8-. Figure 4 shows the emission ACKNOWLEDGMENT spectrum of [Au(TPPTSh]8- in a de-oxygenated aqueous solution and in an aqueous solution saturated with O 2; The support of the Robert A Welch Foundation is before and after bubbling N 2 (g) through the solution for gratefully acknowledged.

22 <:00' Cold Bulletin 1999,32(1) ABOUT THE AUTHORS 12 JM. Forward, J,P., Fackier, Jr and Z. Assefa, in 'Optoeiectronic Properties of Inorganic Compounds', ed. D.M.Roundhill andJ,P. Fackier, Jr,PienumPress, 1999,pp.195-229 John P Fackler, jr is Distinguished Professor of 13 JM Forward, Z. Assefa and J,P. Fackier, Jr,} Am. Chem. Soc., 1995,117,9103 Chemistry at Texas A&M University and amongst his 14 D,J.Darensbourg, C,J.Btscholtandj.H. Reibenspies, [nag. Chem., 1991,30,1144 more than 280 publications there are over 100 papers 15 T Bartik, E. Bartik, E.E. Hanson, KH. Whitmire and I. Guo, Inorg. Chem., 1993, relating to gold chemistry. Tiffany A Grant studied for 32,5833 her PhD with Fackler on the luminescent properties of 16 D,J. Darensbourg, T J, Decuir and JH. Reibenspies, Aqueou, Organometaillc gold (I) complexes and developed the crystallization of Chemistry and Catalysts', ed. IT. Horrath and F. joo, NATO ASI Series, Kiuwer the water soluble phosphine complex reported here. Academic Publishers, 1995,p. 61 Brian E Hanson is Professor of Chemistry at Virginia 17 The crystal structure of 1 was soived and refined in the triclinic P-1 space group. Paie Polytechnic Institute and State University and is an yeilow crystals were obtained from a water soiution. Crystallogrephic data are given as expert in the use of biphasic systems for a,b,c (A); (X,~,I' (deg): voiume (Al), Z, Rl [!>2sigma(I)], and GOP a = 137003(4), hydroformylation which involve sulfonated phosphine 180001(6),18.2817(2); 100249(2), 99593(2),109818(2); 40463(2),2,0.0659, 0.946 complexes of metal ions. Richard J Staples is staff 18 E. Cornils andE.G.Kuntz, in reference 2,p. 276 crystallographer for the Chemistry Department at 19 J, Kang, Masters Thesis, Virginia Poiytechnic Institute andStateUniversity, Biacksburg, Harvard University and has structurally characterized VA, 1997 over 50 gold compounds. 20 M.e. Gimeno andA.Laguna, Chem. Pev., 1997,97,511 21 JM. Forward, J,P. Fackier, Jr andRJ, Stapies, Grganometa1lics, 1995,14,4194 REFERENCES 22 J,M.Forward, R,J.Stapies, C.w. !.iuand J,P. Fackier, Jr,ActaCryst. Sect. C, 1997,195 23 D.E.Berning, KV Katti, e.L. Barnes andWA Voikert, Chem. Ber:/Recueil, 1997,130, 'Homogeneous Catalysis withMetalPhosphine Complexes', ed.L.H Pignoiet, Plenum 907 Press, 1983 24 AL Casaiunuovo andjc Caiabrese, J Am. Chem. Soc., 1990,112,4324 Aqueous-Phase Organometaillc Catalysis'. ed. E. Corniis and WA Hermann, 25 F. Monteiland P,J. Kaick, Grganomet. Chem., 1994,482,45-51 Wiley-VCH, 1998 26 Photoiuminesce data were obtained using a SLM AMINCO, Modei 8100

3 e. Washam, 'Reaction Times', American Chemical Society: Washington, D.C. April spectrofluorometer with a xenoniamp. Radiation wasfiltered througha 0.10M KN0 2 1998 soiution. Soiution measurements, uniess stated otherwise, were done in 0.50 M NaCi

IT. Horvathand F. J06, i\queous Organometaillc Chemistry and Catalysis', Kiuwer formed withdoubiy distilled water, deoxygenated bya 15 min N2 (g) purge. Acad., Dordrecht, 1995 27 TM. Dunn, in 'Modern Coordination Chemistry', ed. J, Lewis and RG. Wiikins, e. Amatore, E. Biart, J,P. Genet, A. [utand, S. Lemaire-Audoire and M. Savignac, Interscience, 1969,p. 280 J Grg. Chem., 1995,60, 6829 28 The shiftobserved suggests a strengthening of the Au-Pbondsin the excited stateby F. Monteil, L.Miquei, R Queauand P. Kaick, in reference 3, pp.131-147 about5 kcal. J,e. Vickery, M.M. Oimstead, E.Y. Fungand AL Baich, Angew Chem. Int.Ed Eng!, 29 e.-M. Che,H-L. Kwong, e.-K. Poonand V. W-W Yam,} Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1997,36, 1179 1990,3215 8 MA Mansour, WE. Connick, RJ, Lachicotte, HJ, Gysiing and R Eisenberg, J Am. 30 D. !.i, e.-M. Chc,H-L. Kwong andVH.-H Yam,. J Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1992, Chem. s-,1998,120, 1329 3325 9 MN.I. Khan, R,J.Stapies, e. King, J,P. Fackier; Jr and RE.P.Winpenny, lnoig. Chem., 31 A. Mills, A. Lepre, BRe. Theobaid, E. Siade and E. Murrer, Ana! Chem., 1997, 1993,32, 5800 69,2842. 10 e. King, MN.I. Khan, R,J.Stapies andJ,P. Fackier, Jr,Inorg. Chem., 1992,31,3236 32 A. Mills, A. Lepre, BRe. Theobaid, E. Siade and BA Murrer, Cold BuD., 1998, 11 TM. McCieskey and HE. Gray, lnoig. Chem., 1992,31, 1734 31, 68

Continued from page 11 39 T Miyadera, Appl. Cata! B,1993,2, 199 32 A.Ueda, T Nakao, M. Azuma andT Kobayashi, Gata! Today, 1998,45, 135 40 IN Armor, Cata! Today, 1995,26, 147 33 M. Haruta, S. Tsubota, T Kobayashi, H. Kageyama, M,J. Genet and B. Deimon, 41 A. Obuchi, A. Ohi, M. Nakamura, A. Ogata, K. Mizuno and H Ohucht,Appl. Catal. J Cata!, 1993,144, 175 B,1993,2, 71 34 A.Ueda, T OhshlmaandM. Haruta,Appl. Cata! B,1997,12,81 42 H Hamada, CatalysisSurveysfromjapan, 1997,1,53 35 G. Zhang, etsl.,Appl. Gata! B,1992,1,1.15 43 E. Kikuchi andK.Yogo, Catal. Today, 1994,22, 73 36 H. Hirabayashi, H Yahtro, N. Mizuno andM. Iwamoto, Chem. Lett., 1992,2235 44 R Burchand P,J. Millington, Appl. Cata! B,1993,2, 101 37 M. Haruta,T Takase, T Kobayashi andS.Tsubota, in 'Cataiytic Science andTechnoiogy', 45 R Burch, P. J, Millington andA.P. Waiker, Appl. Gata! B,1994,4, 65 ed. S. Yoshida, N. Takezawa and T Ono, Kodansha, Tokyo, 1991, 1, 331; DAH. 46 M. Ogura, Y Sugiura, M. Hayashi and E. Kikuchi, Cata! Lett., 1996,42, 185 Cunningham, T Kobayashi, N. Kamijo andM.Haruta,Gata! Lett,1994,25, 257 47 A.Ueda, T Kobayashi and M. Haruta,Shokubai (Catalysis & Catalysts), 1997,39,122 38 Y!.i andIN Armor,} Catal., 1994,145, 1 47 M. Misono, Cattech, 1998,3, 53

(fji;} ColdBulletin 1999,32(1) 23