Sacrifice in Suburbia: American Novels As Troubled Tragedies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Sacrifice in Suburbia: American Novels as Troubled Tragedies Carly Janette Norman Osborn Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English The University of Adelaide September 2015 Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................iii Declaration .................................................................................................................................................v Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. vi Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................1 1. Critical Contexts ................................................................................................................................9 1.1. Existing Scholarship .................................................................................................... 9 1.2. Girardian Theory ....................................................................................................... 40 2. The American Dream .................................................................................................................... 73 2.1. A Mythical History..................................................................................................... 73 2.2. Death of a Salesman: Troubling Tragedy ............................................................... 94 3. The Virgin Suicides: Unravelling Fantasies .............................................................................. 109 4. The Ice Storm: Excess and Irony .............................................................................................. 137 5. Revolutionary Road: Plays and Failures .................................................................................... 182 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 232 Works Cited ........................................................................................................................................... 242 ii Abstract In this thesis I enlist the mimetic theory of René Girard to argue that three twentieth-century American novels — Jeffrey Eugenides’ The Virgin Suicides, Rick Moody’s The Ice Storm, and Richard Yates’s Revolutionary Road — are tragic texts. I demonstrate that these novels are participating in a tradition begun in sacrificial ritual and myth, in which a victim is blamed for a crisis and sacrificed for the benefit of a troubled community. I then argue that the tragic sacrifice is subverted and complicated by various textual means, subcategorising the novels as ‘anti-tragedies’ that present the characteristic features of tragedy but problematise its cathartic effects. To ground my analysis, I establish an understanding of the American Dream as tragic, by examining three non-fiction texts on the Dream. I then briefly consider Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman as a play that deploys tragedy as discourse about the American Dream, before moving to a critical evaluation of the three novels. I make a case for the legitimacy of considering the novel as part of the tradition of tragedy. I find that each novel contains a plethora of tragic tropes—those thematic features of ritual and myth identified by Girard, the treatment of which is significant in terms of cathartic effect. I argue that the novel has a unique capacity to problematise its own narrative and thus function as a ‘self conscious’ tragedy, and that this self-consciousness makes sacrifice the subject of the text rather than a structural element within it. Girard’s mimetic theory has been criticised for its lack of attention to gender and to the experiences of women. My analysis of the significance of the female bodies in Eugenides’, Moody’s, and Yates’s novels extends Girardian scholarship in its consideration of women as scapegoats, and pays particular attention to gender in ways that Girard himself has not. I iii present evidence that the narrative attitude towards select female bodies in the three novels is directly relevant to their eligibility as Girardian scapegoats. Whereas previous Girardian scholarship has analysed novels for their treatment of one or more aspects of mimetic theory, such as mimetic desire or scapegoating, my thesis is the first work to analyse modern novels as tragedies: that is, as narratives in dialogue with the entire story-arc of ritual and myth. In doing so, my thesis strengthens the Girardian claim that tragedies are sacrificial scapegoat-rituals in narrative form. I then take Girard’s minor remarks about the ‘anti-mythical’ nature of modern tragedies, and extend this speculation into a detailed analysis of how such modern tragedies enact their anti-tragic subversions. iv Declaration I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission in my name for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint award of this degree. I give consent to this copy of my thesis when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The author acknowledges that copyright of published works contained within this thesis resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University’s digital research repository, the Library Search and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time. ________________________ Carly Osborn September 2015 v Acknowledgements I am very grateful for the help and support of my supervisors, Dr Lucy Potter and Dr Mandy Treagus, and my interim supervisor Dr Heather Kerr. Your expertise and intelligence helped so much to refine my ideas and to clarify their articulation. Thank you. Thanks to the members of the Australian Girard Seminar and the Colloquium on Violence and Religion, for many outstanding conferences that greatly enriched my thinking, and for the warm and supportive scholarly community. Thanks to my wonderful husband Adam, and my family and friends, for all their love and encouragement, and for listening to me rant about sacrificial ritual at dinner tables. Finally, my gratitude to the luminous René Girard (1923-2015), who passed away peacefully the same day this volume was prepared, and to whose legacy it offers a humble contribution. Vale. vi This thesis is dedicated to the memory of my beloved grandparents Jean Margaret Norman (1920 – 2012) & Frederic George Norman (1923 – 2013) Introduction George Steiner pronounced the death of tragedy in 1961. In a modern world without gods and heroes, he declared, tragedy cannot survive (The Death of Tragedy 10). He defended this view in 2004, maintaining that modernity is hostile to every element that is necessary to tragedy.1 But despite such notices of its demise, tragedy refuses to depart the stage. In fact, in 2014 the Publications of the Modern Language Association of America dedicated a special issue to tragedy, with an editorial titled ‘The Urgency of Tragedy Now’. In it, Helene Foley and Jean Howard suggest that Steiner’s ‘nostalgia’ for pre-modernity ‘blinded him to the possibilities of the present’: that tragedy is not only alive but vibrantly present as ‘a resource with which to think, feel, and perform the urgencies of the times’ (618, 617). This special issue presents a feast of scholarly perspectives on tragedy, as well as interviews with directors and playwrights, and recounts of modern productions that make plain the energy and relevance of tragedy today. From tales of performances of a re-fashioned Sophocles’ Antigone in post-dictatorship Uruguay, to a comparison of Tony Kushner’s Angels in America with Sophocles’s Oedipus at Colonus, to analyses of new works such as those by Carol Churchill, the issue shows that tragedy is a living and evolving genre. Yet nowhere in this special edition is tragedy considered, or even mentioned, in the novel form. The editors mention ‘tragedy as a written discourse’ but only to differentiate dramatic scripts from stage performances. If tragedy is a vital, energetic genre in dialogue with the urgencies of modern times, why do we not look for it in that essentially modern genre, the novel? The PMLA editors note that their edition was necessarily selective, though in expressing their 1 In the 2004 article Steiner grudgingly allows for some modern texts to be categorised as ‘tragedies’ (his inverted commas), if they pass his definitive litmus test: ‘ontological homelessness… is what tragedy is about’ (“‘Tragedy,’ Reconsidered” 2). He still, however, defends his original thesis, and reserves the classification of true or ‘absolute tragedy’