Final 2019 FTIP

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Table of Contents

Introduction ...... 3

Federal Transportation Improvement Program Development

Process and Requirements ...... 4

Regionally Significant Projects

Project List ...... 11

Financial Plan

Revenue and Expenditure Plan ...... 19

Project Listing by Funding Category

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ)……………………...…2 of 23 Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 ...... 10 of 23 Federal Transit Administration Section 5311 ...... 14 of 23 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) ...... 15 of 23 Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP)…………………………………17 of 23 Safety Program………………………………………………………………………...18 of 23 State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) ...... 19 of 23 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) ...... 21 of 23

Page | 1

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Appendices

Appendix A ...... Formal Amendments to the 2017 FTIP Appendix B ...... Lump Sum Listings Appendix C ...... Annual Listing of Obligated Projects for FFY 2016-17 Appendix D ...... Transportation Control Measure Project List Appendix E ...... Expedited Project Selection Procedures Appendix F ...... Administrative and Formal Amendment Process Appendix G ...... Public Involvement Process Appendix H ...... Public Notices/Proof of Publication Appendix I ...... SJCOG Adoption Resolution Appendix J ...... Air Quality Codes Appendix K ...... 2018 RTP Policies and Performance Measures Appendix L ...... CMAQ Scoring Criteria Appendix M……………………………………………....Project Cost Estimation Template Appendix N…………………………………………………Environmental Justice Analysis Appendix O……………………………………………………………………..FTIP Checklist Appendix P…………………………………………………………..Response to Comments

Page | 2

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

FFY 2018/19 through FFY 2021/22

Introduction

San Joaquin County is located in the Central San Joaquin Valley. (Figure 1). It is the northernmost of the eight counties that comprise California's San Joaquin Valley. Local governments consist of the County of San Joaquin and the cities of Stockton, Lodi, Manteca, Tracy, Lathrop, Ripon, and Escalon (Figure 2). The San Joaquin Valley The San Joaquin Valley consists of the counties of San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, Madera, Fresno, Tulare, Kings, and Kern (Figure 3). These eight counties share an air basin that currently does not meet Federal and State air quality standards.

In response, the eight valley transportation planning agencies and the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to ensure a coordinated approach to transportation and air quality planning. The MOU defines a cooperative process designed to achieve compliance with Federal air quality conformity requirements. A second MOU has been executed between the eight transportation planning agencies to ensure a coordinated, cooperative transportation planning process on issues of mutual concern. One of the planning/programming efforts addressed as part of this cooperative effort is the preparation and presentation of the federally-required Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP).

Figure 1: Counties within California FTIP Presentation In response to the Memorandum of Understanding between the eight Valley transportation planning agencies, a committee was formed to coordinate FTIP development, content, and format. As a result, the FTIPs being produced reflect this common format. This should provide for a quicker, more efficient review process for all San Joaquin Valley FTIPs.

Page | 3

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Federal Transportation Improvement Program Development

This section includes information on the process and requirements for developing a Federal Transportation Improvement Program.

Figure 2: San Joaquin County Figure 3: San Joaquin Valley

Overview The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), approved in 2015, requires that each Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) prepare a transportation improvement program (TIP).

The TIP is a financially constrained transportation programming document developed by San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) through its member agencies and in cooperation with State and Federal agencies and the eight San Joaquin Valley counties. The basic premise behind the TIP is that it is the incremental implementation (four years) of the long-range Regional Transportation Plan (24-years). The TIP serves to present federal funding agencies manageable components of funding the long-range plan.

The FTIP compiles individual projects and project lists from various sources. Any surface transportation project requiring Federal funding or a Federal action to proceed must be included in the FTIP; aviation projects are not required to be listed. In addition, MPO federal planning regulations require regionally

Page | 4

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

significant non-federal projects to be listed for "informational purposes and air quality analysis ..." (CFR 450.321 (f)(5)). Major sources of FTIP projects include:

• The adopted State Transportation Improvement Program and State Highway Operation and Protection Program approved by the California Transportation Commission;

• The Regional Surface Transportation Program (STP) and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) projects approved by the MPO;

• Federal transit projects and programs listed in current, pending, or near-future grants;

• Other maintenance and safety programs, including Federal bridge, seismic retrofit, and other safety projects;

• Local sales tax measure and developer-funded projects on State highways; and,

• As an element of the air quality conformity analysis, regionally significant, non-federally funded projects that have other funding sources either "committed" for the first year of the FTIP's quadrennial element, or "reasonably expected to be available" for second and subsequent years.

The FTIP must be composed of two parts. The first part is a priority list of projects to be carried out over a four-year period. The second part is a financial plan that demonstrates how the FTIP can be implemented. The financial plan is also required to list all public and private resources and financing techniques that are expected to be used to carry out the program. The FTIP is developed with the involvement of affected public agencies and the general public.

Federal Transportation Improvement Program Process and Development

The San Joaquin Council of Governments prepares the 4-year FTIP and 24-year RTP plan in close cooperation with its member agencies, the San Joaquin Regional Transit District, the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission, state and federal agencies, and the general public. As federal funding programs under the MPO’s control are developed, notifications are sent out to eligible agencies and the public, informing them of the appropriate manner in which projects may be submitted for consideration. The process involves the efforts of the SJCOG’s Technical Advisory Committee, SJCOG's Citizen's Advisory Committee, SJCOG’s Interagency Transit Committee, the SJCOG Board of Directors, and the general public, both through informal comments as well as a formal public hearing.

Public participation is key in the development of the FTIP and the RTP. Public input into the planning and programming activities is essential in determining the transportation priorities of the citizens of San Joaquin County. The public outreach effort for the renewal of the county’s ½ cent sales tax, Measure K, was extensive and helped establish project priorities. Measure K renewal funds contribute to many of the

Page | 5

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

county’s transportation projects and serve as a local match to the state and federal transportation programs. Numerous projects in the RTP and FTIP are partially funded with Measure K renewal funds.

SJCOG’s Public Participation Plan formalizes strategies used to involve the citizens of San Joaquin County in transportation planning activities, as well as other interagency partners. Interagency Consultation took place to develop this FTIP and related RTP with the local agencies in the county, the San Joaquin Valley MPOs, and the state and federal agencies.

The outreach process outlined allows for proper consultation of all affected agencies and for appropriate public input and hence meets the federal requirements for a coordinated and open planning.

The Federal Transportation Improvement Program Process and Plan

In order for the FTIP process to be completed, there is a need to demonstrate regional air quality conformity under the requirements of the current regulations set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency. SJCOG has prepared the corresponding FTIP Air Quality Conformity Determination as required by federal law. In addition, the Quadrennial Element of the FTIP moves forward two years, carrying through federal fiscal year 2021/222, and revenues and costs have been updated with an emphasis on the quadrennial element.

Consistency with Other Documents

This FTIP is consistent with the following documents:

• Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)

• Air Quality Conformity Analysis

• State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)

• State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP)

• State Implementation Plan for Air Quality (SIP)

• San Joaquin Valley Transportation Control Measures (TCM)

• Congestion Management Program (CMP)

• Measure K Renewal Strategic Plan

• Strategic Highway Safety Plan

The chart on the next page reflects the relationship between the planning and programming process at the Federal level, State level and local Metropolitan Planning Organization level.

Page | 6

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Page | 7

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

The Federal Transportation Improvement Program as a Management Tool

The FTIP is used as a management and monitoring tool to maintain and update the transportation system. Preservation of the road systems is one of the top priorities to both local jurisdictions and the state. San Joaquin County also has a ½ cent sales tax (Measure K Renewal) which includes provisions for local street repair and maintenance as well as preservation of other modes (transit, TCM’s, bicycle and pedestrian).

There are also other methods to ensure preservation of the existing system. Caltrans has several programs under the State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP). This program covers several programs: Bridge Preservation, Operations, Safety, and Roadways. Use of the Highway Pavement Management System (HPMS) is also used to evaluate and monitor the system.

Operations and Maintenance

The existing transportation system in San Joaquin County PCI Categories includes an extensive network of local streets and roads, 100 bridges, state highways, and both passenger rail and bus Good - Excellent transit. The region’s local streets and roads are vital in the 70

strength of the entire transportation system. Local streets 50 At Risk and roads connect our communities and carry traffic 25 Poor throughout our region whether by automobile, heavy truck, 0 Failed bus, or bicycle.

Source: 2016 California Statewide Local Streets Pavement management of local streets and roads is the and Roads Needs Assessment Report.

responsibility of each local government in San Joaquin County. As such, the operations and maintenance are a priority in making transportation investment decisions. These transportation investments account to the following activities but not limited to preserving and improving local roadway conditions involving traffic operation management as well as routine maintenance, preventative maintenance, rehabilitation and reconstruction of pavement and bridges.

In 2016, a comprehensive statewide needs assessment of local streets and roads system was commissioned by a collective body of city and county Public Works Agencies including Regional Transportation Planning Agencies. Collected every two years, the 2016 survey was an update to the third statewide survey conducted just two years earlier. The 2016 study again looks at this vital component of the state’s transportation system to provide critical analysis and information on the local transportation

Page | 8

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

network’s condition and funding needs on a statewide level. The final result of that study shows that on a scale of zero (failed) to 100 (excellent), San Joaquin County’s local streets and roads have an average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 70, down from 73 reported in 2014. This is an assessment of which the average pavement condition is on the edge between “Good” and “At- risk” categories. The statewide average pavement condition has declined to a PCI of 65 since 2014, which is identified as an “At-risk” category. The statewide needs assessment is currently being updated.

Within the 4-year Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) period, the estimated funding level in San Joaquin County to maintain the pavement condition of PCI 70 or better is approximately $52 million with an additional $23.9 million for bridge needs. Funding for local roadway operations and maintenance in San Joaquin County is provided through six major programs: state gas tax, state Senate Bill 1 Local Streets and Roads funds, state Local Transportation Fund (LTF), federal Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP), federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP), and Measure K, the local transportation sales tax. No shortfalls in available revenues versus identified costs for maintaining and operating the local roadway system, including all Federal-aid facilities, are anticipated.

Operations and maintenance of California’s 50,000 lane-mile state highway system is the responsibility of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Caltrans manages this effort through the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP). The SHOPP is currently divided into eight major project categories including: major damage restoration, collision reduction, mandates, bridge preservation, roadway preservation, mobility, roadside preservation, and facilities. Caltrans monitors the condition and operational effectiveness of the state highway system, including all state-owned highways and bridges, through periodic inspection, traffic studies, and system analysis. Caltrans prepares a 10-year plan for SHOPP projects based upon the needs identified by each Caltrans District across the state through this monitoring. Caltrans subsequently prepares a 4-year program of SHOPP projects every two years based upon funding approved by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and the statewide funding priorities at that time. The CTC is required to adopt the 4-year SHOPP and ensures consistency with available state funding. Based upon programming from the 2018 SHOPP, the 2019 FTIP identifies a total of $319.5 million in SHOPP revenues to support state highway operations and maintenance.

Transit operations and maintenance of the existing transit system in San Joaquin County includes operating assistance to transit operators, vehicle maintenance, vehicle replacement, and safety/security investments for both passenger rail and bus transit. Transit operations and maintenance is the responsibility of the individual transit operators including the San Joaquin Regional Transit District, the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission, and the cities of Lodi, Tracy, Manteca, Escalon, and Ripon. Funding for transit operations and maintenance is primarily provided through six programs: Federal

Page | 9

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Transit Administration 5307, Federal Transit Administration 5311, state Transportation Development Act, state transit bond, the county transportation sales tax (Measure K), and transit fares. The 2019 FTIP identifies a total of $63.9 million in these revenues to support transit operations and maintenance.

Other Street and Road Projects Considered "Regionally Significant"

Regionally significant local projects are included for informational purposes and air quality analysis. There are several projects that are funded through local means which do not appear in the FTIP project listing.

The definition of a regionally significant project is a:

"transportation project (other than an exempt project) that is on a facility which serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and from the area outside of the region, major activity centers in the region, major planned developments such as new retail malls, sports complexes, etc, or transportation terminals as well as most terminals themselves) and would normally be included in the modeling of a metropolitan area's transportation network, including at a minimum all principal arterial highways and all Fixed Guideway transit facilities that offer an alternative to regional highway travel."

The following table illustrates key regionally significant projects in San Joaquin County as identified in SJCOG’s 2018 RTP.

Note: Some projects are included in the FTIP project listing, and are indicated with a CTIPS Identification number, other projects are identified for possible environmental action only.

Page | 10

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Regionally Significant Project List

Page | 11

Table 6-1: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Mainline Highway Improvements Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO ID CTIPS ID # PPNO Project InformationJurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Cost to Deliver Total Milestone YearsFTIP ProgrammingNEPA ApprovalOpen to TrafficMK RenewalRTIF Project Construct a second lane on the SR 99 NB Off-ramp/SR-120 WB On- Ramp and on the SR-120 EB off- ramp/SR-99 SB On-Ramp. Reconstruct Austin Road Overcrossing. Widen SR-120 from 4 lanes to 6 between Main Street and SR 99/120 SR-99. Construct auxiliary lanes on On SR-120 from Main Street (P.M. 5.13) to SR- Operational SR-99 between SR-120 and Olive 99 and on SR-99 from SR-120 to Olive Avenue SJ14-1004 212-0000-0665 Caltrans Improvements Avenue. (P.M. 6.22) $76,711,000 2015 2018 2023 X Widen from 6 to 8 lanes SJ07-1003 Caltrans I-205 HOV (inside/outside) Alameda County Line to Eleventh Street $95,874,000 2020 2026 X Widen from 6 to 8 lanes SJ14-1001 Caltrans I-205 HOV (inside/outside) Eleventh Street to MacArthur Drive $102,000,000 2020 2026 X X Widen from 6 to 8 lanes SJ14-1002 Caltrans I-205 HOV (inside/outside) MacArthur Drive to I-5 $100,000,000 2020 2026 X Widen to add HOV lanes with HOV Connector Ramps to I-205 and SR- SJ07-1008 Caltrans I-5 HOV Mossdale 120 I-205 to Louise Avenue (P.M. 12.5/R 16.5) $207,970,000 2022 2028 X X SJ07-1014 Caltrans SR-120 Widen 4 to 6 lanes (inside) I-5 to Main Street (P.M. 5.13) $95,191,000 2024 2030 X

Widen 6 to 8 lanes (inside/outside), including reconstruction of SR- 99/Main Street and SR-99/Wilma Avenue interchanges and pedestrian SJ18-1001 Caltrans SR-99 HOV overcrossing SR-120 to Stanislaus County Line $200,000,000 2026 2032 Widen from 6 to 8 lanes (inside SJ11-1001 Caltrans I-5 HOV median) including auxiliary lanes Hammer Lane to North of Eight Mile Road $124,620,000 2009 2036 X SJ07-1005 Caltrans I-5 HOV Widen 6 to 8 lanes (inside) French Camp Road to Charter Way $97,880,000 2030 2038 X SJ07-1006 Caltrans I-5 HOV Widen 6 to 8 lanes (inside) Louise Avenue to French Camp Road $193,880,000 2032 2040 X Widen 4 to 6 lanes (inside) - SJ14-1003 Caltrans SR-99 Widening ENVIRONMENTAL ONLY Harney Lane to Turner Road $3,000,000 $1,297,126,000 Table 6-2: 2018 Regional Transportation Project List - Interchange Improvements Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO ID CTIPS ID # PPNO Project InformationJurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Cost to Deliver Total MilestoneFTIP Years ProgrammingNEPA ApprovalOpen to TrafficMK RenewalRTIF Project Reconstruct interchange (PM 16.4- SJ07-2005 Lathrop I-5 at Louise Avenue 16.8) I-5 at Louise Avenue $28,754,000 2024 2030 X Reconstruct interchange (P.M. SJ07-2004 Lathrop I-5 at Lathrop Road 17.3/17.8) I-5 at Lathrop Road $39,146,000 2029 2033 X Relocation of intersection at Roth/Harlan Road inclusive of signalization; relocation of intersection at Roth/Manthey Road inclusive of signalization. Widen from 2 to 5 lanes from Roth/Harlan road intersection to Roth/Manthey SJ11-3066 Lathrop I-5 at Roth Road Road Intersection I-5 at Roth Road $16,800,000 2020 SR 120 at Yosemite Reconstruct interchange - SR 120 at Yosemite Ave/Guthmiller SJ14-2004 Lathrop Ave/Guthmiller Road ENVIRONMENTAL ONLY Road $3,000,000 SR-99 at SR-12 West Reconstruct interchange and widen SR-99 at SR-12 West (Kettleman SJ11-2015 Lodi (Kettleman Lane) to free flowing interchange Lane) $50,000,000 2030 2036 X Reconstruct interchange to provide 6 through lanes on SR 99, 4 lanes on Harney between Reynolds Ranch Pkwy and SR 99 and modify on- SJ07-2006 Lodi SR-99 at Harney Lane ramps and off-ramps SR-99 at Harney Lane $35,362,000 2009 2028 2033 X Reconstruct interchange to provide operational and safety improvements on SR 99 at Turner SJ07-1020 112-0000-0347 Lodi SR-99 at Turner Road Road (PM 31.3/31.6) SR-99 at Turner Road $6,142,986 2019 2036 2041 X Reconstruct interchange (P.M. SJ07-2012 Manteca SR-120 at Union Road 4.1/4.1) SR-120 at Union Road $22,000,000 2021 X SJ07-2009 212-0000-0231 Manteca SR-120 at McKinley Ave Construct new interchange SR-120 at McKinley Avenue $37,850,000 2009 2014 2022 X X SJ18-2001 Manteca SR-120 at Airport Way Reconstruct interchange SR-120 at Airport Way $36,828,000 2029 2031 X SJ18-2002 Manteca SR-120 at Main Street Reconstruct interchange SR-120 at Main Street $36,828,000 2031 2033 X SR-99 at Raymus Construction of new interchange - SJ14-2001 Manteca Expressway ENVIRONMENTAL ONLY SR-99 at Raymus Expressway $3,000,000 X X Interchange Modification and SJ11-2004 212-0000-0309 Stockton I-5 at Hammer Lane auxiliary lanes (PM 32.6) I-5 at Hammer Lane $47,164,647 2007 2009 2036 Construction of a new interchange SJ11-2006 212-0000-0309 Stockton I-5 at Otto Drive and auxiliary lanes (PM 33.3/34.2) I-5 at Otto Drive $103,371,218 2007 2009 2036 Modification of interchange (P.M. SJ07-2020 212-0000-0309 Stockton I-5 at Eight Mile Road 34.7/35.9) I-5 at Eight Mile Road $57,255,179 2007 2009 2036 Reconstruct Interchange (PM 35.1- SJ11-2002 212-0000-0562 Stockton SR-99 at Eight Mile Road 35.5) SR-99 at Eight Mile Road $93,070,215 2030 2036 X Reconstruct interchange (PM 23.5- SJ11-2001 212-0000-0561 Stockton SR-99 at Morada 24.5) SR-99 at Morada $96,474,024 2030 2036 Construct Interchange I-205 at Construct Interchange I-205 at Eleventh street realign and widen Eleventh street realign and widen Eleventh Street to 6-lanes north of Eleventh Street to 6-lanes north of Grant Line to Byron Road. Grant Line to Byron Road. Construct Construct Aux lane Hansen to Aux lane Hansen to Eleventh; in WB I- I-205/Lammers Eleventh; in WB I-205 Eleventh 205 Eleventh Street to Grant Line SJ11-2010 212-0000-0227 Tracy Rd/Eleventh St Street to Grant Line Road Road $51,500,000 2007 2012 2022 X I-580 at International Pkwy/Patterson Pass SJ14-2002 Tracy Road Reconstruct interchange I-580 at Mountain House Parkway $9,000,000 2015 2018 2021 X I-205 at Mountain SJ14-2003 Tracy House/International Pkwy Reconstruct interchange I-205 at Mountain House Parkway $4,000,000 2015 2018 2021 X X

SJ11-2011 Tracy I-205 at Grant Line Road Modification of existing interchange I-205 at Grant Line Road $32,574,820 2018 2024 Phase 1: Construct new interchange SJ11-2012 212-0000-0228 Tracy I-205 at Chrisman Rd east-west ramps I-205 at Chrisman Rd $36,056,267 2009 2020 2026

I-205 / MacArthur Modification of existing interchange - SJ18-2003 Tracy Interchange modification ENVIRONMENTAL ONLY At MacArthur (PM 7.8 -PM 8.5) $9,670,000

I-580 at Corral Hollow Modification of existing interchange - SJ11-2031 Tracy Road ENVIRONMENTAL ONLY I-580 at Coral Hollow Road $5,500,000 2018 Construction of new interchange - SJ11-2032 Tracy I-580 at Lammers Road ENVIRONMENTAL ONLY I-580 at Lammers Road $5,500,000 2018 $866,847,355 Table 6-3: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Regional Roadway Improvements Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO ID CTIPS ID # PPNO Project InformationJurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Cost to Deliver Total Milestone YearsFTIP ProgrammingNEPA ApprovalOpen to Traffic MK RenewalRTIF Project Widen and reconstruct to include center turn lane, bike lane, and graded SJ07-3010 212-0000-0716 Escalon McHenry Avenue shoulders. Narcissus to Jones Road $400,000 2017 2018 2020 Reconstruct intersection, including addition of turn pockets, improvement of traffic signal and installation of train Intersection of Ullrey Avenue and Ullrey Avenue/McHenry pre-emption system for UPRR railroad McHenry Avenue including UPRR SJ07-3013 Escalon Avenue Intersection crossing. railroad crossing. $1,000,000 2022 2024 X SR 120/Brennan Ave SJ07-3011 212-0000-0228 Escalon Intersection Intersection improvements SR-120 at Brennan Avenue $446,066 2020 2026 Construct new roadway parallel to I-5, 2 lanes from Brookhurst Blvd to Stewart Along Northwest side of I-5 from SJ07-3014 Lathrop Golden Valley Parkway Road Brookhurst Blvd to Stewart Road $7,500,000 2018 2023 Construct new roadway parallel to I-5, 4 lanes from Stewart Road to Paradise Along Northwest side of I-5 from Stewart SJ14-3001 Lathrop Golden Valley Parkway Road Road to Paradise Road $45,000,000 2018 2026 Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, from Along Northwest side of I-5 from SJ07-3014 Lathrop Golden Valley Parkway Brookhurst Blvd to Stewart Road Brookhurst Blvd to Stewart Road $7,500,000 2018 2027 Widen from 2/3 lane collector to 4 lane Hutchins Street to Lower Sacramento SJ07-3018 Lodi Harney Lane divided arterial Road $18,390,688 2009 2016 2026 X Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. Add center dual left turn lane, turn pockets at intersections and median seperation Between SR 99 to Central California SJ07-3022 Lodi Victor Road (SR-12) with landscape Traction railroad tracks. $9,013,203 2030 2034 X SJ07-3017 Lodi Ham Lane Widen 2/3 lanes to 4 lanes From Lodi Avenue to Elm Street $2,784,072 2037 X Construct new 4 lane roadway (gap SJ11-3010 Manteca Atherton Drive closure) East of Airport Way to Union Road $2,481,200 2010 SJ07-3023 Manteca Airport Way Widen from 2 to 4 lanes SR-120 to Yosemite Ave. $9,039,644 2010 2022 SJ11-3008 Manteca Airport Way Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Lathrop Road to Roth Road $6,563,978 2012 2022 X SJ07-3027 Manteca Louise Avenue Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Main Street to SR-99 $1,522,000 2022 2023 X SJ11-3011 Manteca Atherton Drive Construct new 4 lane roadway McKinley Ave to West of Airport Way $1,095,144 2012 2023 SJ07-3024 Manteca Lathrop Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes From East of UPRR to SR-99 $3,079,636 2016 2024 SJ11-3014 Manteca Raymus Expressway Construct new 4-lane expressway Main Street to SR-99 $9,343,608 2017 2026 X SJ14-3003 Manteca Airport Way Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Yosemite Ave. to Lathrop Road $6,327,751 2010 2027 SJ11-3013 Manteca Raymus Expressway Construct new 2 lane expressway SR-120 to Woodward Ave $2,801,188 2017 2028 X SJ11-3012 Manteca Atherton Drive Construct new 4 lane roadway Woodward Ave to McKinley Ave $4,321,170 2019 2029 SJ11-3015 Manteca Raymus Expressway Construct new 2 lane expressway Woodward Ave to Main Street $11,115,162 2019 2031 X SJ14-3004 Manteca Airport Way Widen from 4 to 6 lanes SR 120 to Lathrop Road $12,351,768 2010 2036 SJ18-3003 Port of Stockton Washington Street Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Navy Drive to Port Rd 21 $6,000,000 2017 2021 SJ11-3020 Ripon River Road, Phase 2 Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Fulton Avenue to Jack Tone Road $2,500,000 2017 2019 SJ11-3017 Ripon Jack Tone Road, Phase 1 Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Santos Road to South Clinton Avenue $9,500,000 2013 2020 Construct 2-lane extension of Garrison Maple Avenue to 500 ft east of Acacia SJ11-3019 Ripon Garrison Road Gap Closure Road. Avenue $3,000,000 2014 2021 Rehabilitate and widen roadway from 2 SJ11-3016 112-0000-0323 Ripon Stockton Avenue to 4 lanes Second Street to Doak Boulevard $3,300,000 2017 2021 X SJ07-3137 Ripon W. Ripon Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Jack Tone Road to Olive Expressway $10,000,000 2020 2024 Construct 4-lane extension of Canal SJ14-3006 Ripon Canal Boulevard Extension Boulevard Jack Tone Road to Olive Expressway $4,600,000 2013 2026 X Construct 6-lane Olive Expressway - SJ07-3137 Ripon Olive Expressway ENVIRONMENTAL ONLY Canal Boulevard to Raymus Expressway $3,000,000 X San Joaquin Widen from 2 to 3 lanes, add drainage, SJ11-3023 County Pershing Avenue curb, gutter, sidewalk Meadow Avenue to Thorton Road $3,754,775 2009 2019 X San Joaquin Widen from 2 to 3 lanes, add paved SJ11-3028 County Cherokee Road shoulders SR-99 to Ashley Road $3,816,000 2016 2020 San Joaquin SJ11-3029 County Howard Road Passing lanes and channelization Tracy Blvd to Matthews Road $15,000,000 2021 2023 Realign roadway and widen from 2 to 4 San Joaquin Grant Line Road Corridor lanes with operational and safety SJ14-3005 County Improvements improvements Tracy City Limits to 11th Street $27,459,000 2023 X San Joaquin SJ11-3031 County Tracy Boulevard Passing lanes and channelization I-205 to Howard Road $5,000,000 2023 2025 San Joaquin Operational and safety improvements SJ11-3027 County Eleventh Street along corridor and at intersections Tracy City Limits to I-5 $15,439,000 2023 2028 X X San Joaquin SJ07-3154 County Roth Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes with shoulders) UPRR to Airport Way $4,678,947 2028 San Joaquin SJ11-3008 County Airport Way Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Roth Road to French Camp Road $11,446,302 2036 X Table 6-3: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Regional Roadway Improvements Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO ID CTIPS ID # PPNO Project InformationJurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Cost to Deliver Total Milestone YearsFTIP ProgrammingNEPA ApprovalOpen to Traffic MK RenewalRTIF Project San Joaquin SJ11-3007 County Escalon Bellota Road Widen 2 to 4 lanes with shoulders Escalon City limits to Mariposa Road $18,106,406 2036 X Widen roadway from 2 to 3 lanes and San Joaquin widen BNSF railroad grade separation SJ11-3030 County Mariposa Road from 2 to 4 lanes Austin Road to Jack Tone Road $27,177,409 2032 2037 X SJ11-3032 Stockton Holman Rd Construction of new 6 lane road Gary Galli Dr to Eight Mile Rd $13,600,000 2020 SJ07-3076 Stockton Trinity Parkway Extension Construction of new 4 lane road Bear Creek to Otto Dr $1,500,000 2020 SJ11-3057 Stockton Arch-Airport Rd Widen from 3 to 6 lanes SR-99 to Pock Lane $4,000,000 2020 X SJ11-3060 Stockton Arch-Airport Rd Widen from 3 to 6 lanes Alitalia Ave to Airport Way $1,800,000 2020 SJ11-3034 Stockton Davis Rd Widen from 3 to 4 lanes Eight Mile to Bear Creek $2,400,000 2020 SJ11-3054 Stockton French Camp Road Widen from 4 to 8 lanes Manthey Rd to I-5 $1,700,000 2020 SJ11-3037 Stockton Hammer Ln Extension New Street Mariners Dr to Trinity Parkway $3,600,000 2021 SJ11-3033 Stockton Lower Sacramento Rd Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Grider Way to Armor Dr $7,000,000 2021 X SJ07-3087 Stockton Trinity Parkway Extension Construct 4 lane extension Otto Drive to Hammer Lane $8,000,000 2021 SJ07-3084 Stockton Morada Lane Widen from 3 to 6 lanes West Ln to UPRR $8,503,073 2026 Widen from 2 to 4 lanes with a middle turn lane. Construct curb, gutter, SJ07-3093 Stockton Alpine Avenue sidewalks and driveways. UPRR (SPRR) to Wilson Way $17,987,271 2026 SJ11-3044 Stockton Arch Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Fite Court to Frontier Way $1,526,193 2026 SJ11-3045 Stockton Arch Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Frontier Way to SR-99 $4,796,606 2026 SJ07-3078 Stockton Maranatha Dr Construction of new 4 lane road March Ln to Hammer Ln $6,431,812 2026 SJ11-3062 Stockton Maranatha Dr Construction of new 4 lane road Wilson Way to March Ln $11,337,431 2026 SJ11-3056 Stockton Lower Sacramento Rd Widen from 4 to 6 lanes Armor Dr to Morada Ln $4,469,564 2026 X SJ11-3039 Stockton Lower Sacramento Rd Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Marlette Rd to Pixley Slough $25,291,193 2026 X SJ11-3055 Stockton Lower Sacramento Rd Widen from 4 to 6 lanes Morada Ln to Hammer Ln $17,364,769 2031 Intersection and operational SJ07-3088 Stockton Airport Way improvement Harding Way to Industrial Rd $7,693,929 2031 X SJ11-3047 Stockton Eight Mile Rd Widen from 2 to 4 lanes New Road D to New Road F $2,616,330 2026 SJ11-3048 Stockton Eight Mile Rd Widen from 2 to 4 lanes New Road F to New Road E $5,014,633 2026 SJ11-3050 Stockton Eight Mile Rd Widen from 5 to 6 lanes I-5 to Thornton Rd $10,722,581 2036 X SJ07-3094 Stockton Eight Mile Rd Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Thornton Road to Lower Sacramento Rd $30,299,304 2036 X SJ11-3061 Stockton Eigth Mile Rd Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Lower Sacramento Rd to West Lane $9,001,673 2036 X SJ07-3095 Stockton Eight Mile Rd Widen from 2 to 6 lanes West Ln to Holman Rd $14,429,152 2036 X SJ11-3051 Stockton Eight Mile Rd Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Holman Rd to SR 99 $19,459,498 2036 X SJ07-3089 Stockton Arch Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Newcastle Rd to Fite Court $8,927,474 2036 SJ11-3053 Stockton French Camp Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Wolfe Rd to Manthey Rd $11,226,974 2036 SJ11-3063 Stockton March Ln Extension Construction of new 8 lane road Holman Rd to SR 99 $30,299,304 2036 SJ18-3001 Stockton Mariposa Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Stagecoach Road to Austin Road $46,260,545 2036 X Widen 2 to 4 lanes (Valpico Road to MacArthur Drive from Valpico Road to SJ07-3108 112-0000-0325 Tracy MacArthur Drive Schulte Road) Schulte Road; $10,973,987 2020 X Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, including reconstruction of Delta-Mendota Canal SJ18-3002 Tracy International Parkway and California Aqueduct bridges I-205 to I-580 $35,000,000 2022 SJ07-3110 Tracy Corral Hollow Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Parkside Drive to Linne Road $22,906,820 2022 X Faith Lane (San Marco Subdivision limits) SJ07-3109 Tracy Schulte Road Extend 4 lane roadway to Lammers Road $16,937,000 2024 X SJ07-3107 Tracy Grant Line Road Widen from 5 to 6 lanes Naglee Road to Lammers Road $6,392,443 2026 X Widen 2 to 4 lanes including ROW and SJ07-3181 Tracy Corral Hollow Road Widening construction of two bridges Linne Road to I-580 $38,312,346 2026 Extend 4 lane roadway on new alignment and construct railroad grade SJ11-3067 Tracy MacArthur Drive separation Mt. Diablo Road to Eleventh Street $22,602,553 2034 X Widen from 4 lane minor arterial to 4 SJ07-3183 Tracy Tracy Blvd. lane major arterial I-205 to Eleventh Street $17,401,433 2030 $843,640,008 Table 6-4: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements Category

On West Lane between Alpine SJ07-4027 Stockton West Lane at UPRR Construct a 6 lane grade separation Avenue & El Pinal Drive/Klinger Road $42,230,000 2038 X Port of SJ18-4001 Stockton Fyffe Avenue at CCTC Construct a 2 lane grade separation Fyffe Avenue at CCTC $10,000,000 2021 $226,911,000 Table 6-5: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Bus Transit Improvements Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO ID CTIPS ID # PPNO Project InformationJurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Cost to Deliver Total Milestone FTIPYears ProgrammingNEPA ApprovalCompletion Costs associated with eTrans demand SJ11-5002 Escalon eTrans Transit Operations responsive & fixed route transit system Cities of Escalon and Modesto $6,500,000

Bus Replacements, passenger amenities, SJ14-5001 Escalon eTrans Capital Improvements and miscellanious equipment City of Escalon $1,000,000 SJ07-5002 212-0000-0155 Lodi Grapeline Capital Bus stop shelters/improvements City of Lodi $8,400,000 SJ07-5004 212-0000-0299 Lodi Grapeline Capital Transit facility upgrades City of Lodi $3,600,000 SJ07-5005 Lodi Grapeline Capital Transit Station Expansion City of Lodi $2,500,000

Costs associated with Grapeline fixed SJ07-5006 212-0000-0154 Lodi Grapeline Operating route and Paratransit/Dial-A-Ride services City of Lodi $125,000,000 Transit Facilities Safety & Security Safety and security for Lodi Grapeline SJ18-5002 Lodi System service City of Lodi $900,000 Construct transit transfer station in SJ18-5003 Lodi Southwest Transit Transfer Station southwest Lodi City of Lodi $750,000 SJ18-5004 Lodi Bus Replacements Purchase replacement buses City of Lodi $30,000,000 SJ18-5024 Lodi Grapeline Capital Bicycle Support Program City of Lodi $200,000 SJ18-5025 Lodi Grapeline Capital Radio/Communication Upgrade City of Lodi $300,000 Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) SJ18-5026 Lodi Grapeline Capital upgrades City of Lodi $1,800,000 SJ18-5027 Lodi Grapeline Capital CNG Fuel upgrades City of Lodi $600,000 SJ18-5028 Lodi Grapeline Capital Bus Wash upgrades City of Lodi $400,000 Bus shelters/pedestrian facilities, bike facilities, lighting and multifunctional SJ07-5015 212-0000-0681 Manteca Passenger Amenities landscaped area. City of Manteca $10,000,000

SJ07-5016 212-0000-0300 Manteca Safety and Security Costs associated with Safety/Security/ITS City of Manteca $3,000,000

SJ07-5017 212-0000-0235 Manteca Manteca Transit Rolling Stock Purchase of replacement and new buses City of Manteca $14,000,000 Costs associated with the Operations and administration of Dial-A-Ride and fixed SJ07-5018 212-0000-0213 Manteca Manteca Transit System Operations route service in Manteca City of Manteca $85,000,000 Construct a bus maintenance and storage SJ14-5031 212-0000-0694 Manteca Bus Maintenance & Storage Facility facility City of Manteca $4,800,000 Costs to support transit planning efforts to update the City of Manteca Short-Range SJ18-5006 Manteca Manteca Transit Planing Transit Plan every four years City of Manteca $760,000

SJ18-5007 Manteca Bus Enhancements Enhancements for Manteca Transit buses City of Manteca $3,875,000 Training to assist customers in using SJ18-5008 Manteca Travel Training transit services City of Manteca $1,193,177 Construct improvements at Manteca SJ18-5009 Manteca Transit Center Improvements Transit Center City of Manteca $5,011,345 Costs associated with the delivery of a SJ07-5019 Ripon Ripon Blossom Express Operations fixed route transit system Cities of Ripon and Modesto $2,000,000 Costs associated with the delivery of a SJ18-5010 Ripon Ripon Dial-A-Ride Operations Dial-A-Ride service in Ripon City of Ripon $2,000,000 Purchase of replacement and expansion SJ18-5011 Ripon Ripon Bus Purchases buses City of Ripon $4,200,000 Construct benches, shelters, and transit SJ18-5012 Ripon Transit Capital Improvements maintenance facility City of Ripon $3,810,000 SJ18-5013 Ripon Ripon Multimodal Station Construct Multimodal Station City of Ripon $5,800,000 Bus Rapid Transit and SMA Costs associated with BRT and SMA $938,917,500 SJ07-5026 RTD Operations Operations Stockton Metropolitan Area SJ07-5032 RTD Countywide DAR-Operations Countywide Dial-A-Ride Operations San Joaquin County $83,291,817 SJ07-5037 RTD Intercity/County Hopper Operations Intercity/County Hopper Operations San Joaquin County $166,583,633 Non-Revenue Fleet-Replacement Costs associated with the purchase of SJ07-5039 RTD Vehicles hybrid or electric replacement vehicles San Joaquin County $3,327,606 Costs of preventative maintenance of SJ07-5039 212-0000-0161 RTD Preventative Maintenance vehicle fleet San Joaquin County $75,948,485

Costs associated with the implementation of the BRT service along the corridor including traffic signal upgrades, bus stop SJ14-5016 RTD BRT Project: March Lane Corridor amenities and access enhancments Stockton Metropolitan Area $14,500,000 2025 Table 6-5: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Bus Transit Improvements Category

Costs associated with the implementation of the BRT service along the corridor BRT Project: Arch Road/Sperry including traffic signal upgrades, bus stop SJ14-5018 RTD Corridor amenities and access enhancments Stockton Metropolitan Area $15,000,000 2035

Costs associated with the implementation of the BRT service along the corridor including traffic signal upgrades, bus stop SJ14-5019 RTD BRT Project: Eight Mile Road Corridor amenities and access enhancments Stockton Metropolitan Area $15,000,000 2040 Expansion of BRT and/or intercity SJ14-5020 RTD New Transfer Station Facilities connection facilities San Joaquin County $25,000,000 SJ14-5021 RTD Hammer Triangle Transfer Station Hammer Triangle Transfer Station Stockton Metropolitan Area $25,000,000 2040 Purchase and install safety and security SJ14-5028 212-0000-0474 RTD Safety and Security devices related to buses and facilities San Joaquin County $7,179,790 Costs related to grant acitivites and SJ14-5029 212-0000-0475 RTD Project and Grant Administration administration San Joaquin County $13,320,976 SJ14-5030 212-0000-0610 RTD Capital Tire Lease Multi-year tear funding lease contract San Joaquin County $9,075,561 Construct solar power charging facilities SJ14-5033 RTD RTD Solar Power Project (Phase I) for electric buses Stockton Metropolitan Area $10,000,000 SJ18-5014 RTD Capitalized Spare Parts Bus component rebuild and parts San Joaquin County $5,375,000 Purchase of replacement buses for all SJ18-5015 RTD Bus Replacements RTD services San Joaquin County $252,601,279 Purchase of Automatic Vehicle Location and Communications Equipment for SJ18-5016 RTD Bus Operations Technology Buses San Joaquin County $4,991,884 Agency-wide servcers, back-ups, and SJ18-5017 RTD Information Technology work station replacements San Joaquin County $41,658,813 Purchase of cleaning equiipment, tools, particulate cleaner, testing equipment, SJ18-5018 RTD Facility and Maintenance Equipment component overhaul equipment San Joaquin County $6,478,840 Purchase and install new and replacement benches, shelters, and other SJ18-5019 RTD Passenger Amenities amenities San Joaquin County $4,050,000 Costs associated with the delivery of SJ18-5020 RTD Metro Hopper Operations deviated fixed route operations Stockton Metropolitan Area $83,291,817 Costs associated with the delivery of San Joaquin County to Bay Area and SJ18-5021 RTD Interregional Commuter Operations interregional commuter operations Sacramento $83,291,817 SJ07-5049 Tracy TRACER Capital Purchase replacement buses Purchase 3 buses every 5 year period $6,000,000 Costs associated with the delivery of fixed route and paratransit services including salaries, contracting of service, SJ07-5055 212-0000-0149 Tracy TRACER Operations equipments, etc. City of Tracy $100,000,000 2007 Costs to support transit planning efforts to update the City of Tracy Short-Range Transit Analysis and Action Plan every SJ07-5056 Tracy Tracy Transit Planning five years City of Tracy $750,000 TRACER Grant Management and Costs to support transit service $31,775,000 SJ18-5022 Tracy Administration administration and Grant Management City of Tracy Construction of bus stop improvements $7,500,000 SJ18-5023 Tracy TRACER Capital every five years Various locations in City of Tracy $2,357,309,340 Table 6-6: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Rail Corridor Improvements Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO ID CTIPS ID # PPNO Project InformationJurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Cost to Deliver Total Milestone FTIPYears ProgrammingNEPA ApprovalCompletion Date Construct double main track, panelized turnouts, San Joaquin County between Caltrans Caltrans Intercity Rail relocate/renew siding turnout, and realign existing Escalon and Stockton SJ07-6001 112-0000-0139 trackage. $34,012,294 Caltrans Intercity Rail Passenger In Stockton, Construct track connections and a Intersection of the BNSF and UP Caltrans SJ11-6001 112-0000-0277 Facility new intercity passenger rail facility railroads. $19,622,477 212-0000-0281/ SJRRC ACE Capital Purchase rail cars for ACE service expansion ACE Capital SJ07-6003 212-0000-0645 $9,593,211 SJRRC shared costs for the overall maintenance SJRRC ACE Capital ACE Capital SJ07-6004 212-0000-0190 of vehicles $8,245,801 2030 SJ07-6009 SJRRC ACE Capital Realignment of tracking Near Altamont Pass $9,811,239 Restoration of abandoned Western Pacific Depot Downtown Stockton, between Weber SJRRC ACE Capital SJ07-6013 112-0000-0140 building Ave and Miner Ave $7,630,963 2007 Allow SJRCC to operate on separate tracks from Between the Stockton ACE Station Stockton Track Extension Phases SJRRC Union Pacific Railroad between maintenance yard and the ACE Equipment II & III (ACE Gap Closure Project) SJ07-6015 212-0000-0306 and the station siding. Maintenance Facility $20,712,615 Enhance/extend rail to benefit residents; integrate San Joaquin County and San SJRRC ACE Service Extensions ACE with the State intercity rail service; extend Joaquin Valley; Sacramento, SJ07-6016 ACE service Modesto, and San Francisco $9,334,848 2030 Acquisition of ACE Corridor between Stockton Between Stockton and Niles SJRRC ACE Forward SJ07-6017 and Niles Junction Junction $49,056,193 Phase II Implementation Plan for SJRRC Commuter rail service Central Valley to Sacramento SJ07-6018 the Central Valley Rail Service $1,090,138 SJRRC Operations Shuttle Services in San Joaquin County stations San Joaquin County SJ07-6019 $1,224,225 2030 Maintenance Facility Expansion from 9 train sets SJRRC Capital City of Stockton SJ07-6020 to 17 train sets Phase 2 $17,000,000 2020 ACE operations and Capital Access Fee (5 trains from 2012 to 2016, 6 trains from 2017 to 2021, 7 SJRRC/Santa Clara/Alameda SJRRC ACE Operations trains from 2022 to 2029 and 8 trains from 2030 to contributions shown SJ07-6021 2041) $556,612,929 2030 Rail Information Systems (Ticket vending machines, on-train internet, changeable message ACE Operational Corridor and SJRRC Rail Information Systems signs at stations, trip planner via internet, real Station Planning Areas time system for train status for ACE and other SJ07-6023 connecting services) $14,607,844 Central Valley Rail Service Operations and SJRRC Central Valley Rail Service Maintenance, Capital Access Fees, ROW Central Valley to Sacramento SJ07-6025 purchase) $92,661,697 Rolling Stock/Track Improvements/ Station ACE Operational Corridor and SJRRC ACE Capital SJ07-6028 Improvements Station Planning Areas $34,884,404 2030 Central Valley to Sacramento Commuter Rail SJRRC ACE Capital Central Valley to Sacramento SJ07-6029 Project - Extension of services $58,867,431 Altamont Corridor Speed and Safety upgrades (including signal upgrade to automatic train stop ACE Operational Corridor and SJRRC ACE Capital increase train speed from 79 to 90 MPH and Station Planning Areas SJ07-6035 several track realighment projects) $32,704,128 Facilities and information technology maintenance ACE Operational Corridor and SJRRC Minor Capital and enhancements, fleet vehicle replacements Station Planning Areas SJ14-6005 and expansion $9,669,521 2030 Lathrop/Manteca: MP 82.7 to MP SJRRC ACEforward: Capital Phase 1 Extension of Wyche Siding SJ14-6001 80.4, 8,500' clear of McKinley Ave $9,000,000 2022 Connection from UPRR Fresno Sub to UPRR Lathrop, Ca: Oakland Sub MP 84.25 SJRRC ACEforward: Capital Phase 1 SJ14-6002 Oakland Sub to Fresno Sub MP 94.1 $7,848,492 2018 High priority locations between SJRRC ACEforward: Capital Phase 2 Grade crossing improvements/grade seperations Stockton and San Jose. Chrisman Rd MP 72.8, McKinley Ave MP 82.1 SJ14-6003 $15,000,000 2022 Construct park and ride lot and related on-street In Stockton, between the UPRR, SJRRC Robert J. Cabral Station Expansion parking, sidewalks, lighting, security, and other Weber Avenue, Union Street, and SJ14-6006 passenger amenity improvements Main Street $1,311,000 2020 Lathrop Transfer Station- Between ACE and SJRRC Lathrop Transfer Station City of Lathrop SJ07-6022 Central Valley Service $26,753,555 2022 Table 6-6: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Rail Corridor Improvements Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO ID CTIPS ID # PPNO Project InformationJurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Cost to Deliver Total Milestone FTIPYears ProgrammingNEPA ApprovalCompletion Date Lathrop/Manteca Station Platform Lengthen platform at current Lathrop/Manteca SJRRC Lathrop/Manteca SJ18-6001 Extension project Station to allow for eight car train capacity $1,791,000 2022 Tracy Station Platform Extension Lengthen platform at current Tracy Station to SJRRC City of Tracy SJ18-6002 project allow for eight car train capacity $1,791,000 2022 SJRRC Manteca Station Project - Platform City of Manteca SJ18-6003 $6,734,647 2022 SJRRC Manteca Station Project - Parking City of Manteca SJ18-6004 $2,577,533 2022 SJ18-6005 SJRRC Ripon Station Project - Platform City of Ripon $6,778,813 2022 SJ18-6006 SJRRC Ripon Station Project - Parking City of Ripon $5,921,877 2022 SJ18-6006 SJRRC 2nd Main Ripon to Modesto Ripon to Modesto $5,753,593 2022 SJ18-6007 SJRRC Rolling stock associated with SB 132 Ripon to Lathrop $71,442,000 2026 Tri-Valley / Between BART and ACE in Tri- Altamont Pass Corridor Feasibility Report analyzing transit connectivity SJ18-6008 SJV Valley $1,600,000 2019 Tri-Valley / Between BART and ACE in Tri- Altamont Pass Corridor Environmental document for transit connectivity SJ19-6009 SJV Valley $7,000,000 2021 $1,158,645,467 Table 6-7: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Public Airport-Aviation Projects Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPOProject ID InformationJurisdictionFacility Name/Route Project Description Cost to Deliver Total MilestoneNEPA Years ApprovalCompletion San Joaquin Extend Taxiway B to Runway 29R SJ18-7001 County Stockton Metro Airport end $6,043,100 2018 San Joaquin SJ18-7002 County Stockton Metro Airport Terminal Apron Extension $4,599,600 2018 San Joaquin Widen Cargo Apron (includes SJ18-7003 County Stockton Metro Airport Environmental Assessment) $9,637,302 2019 San Joaquin Airport Security System SJ18-7004 County Stockton Metro Airport Replacement $1,166,300 2019 San Joaquin Taxiway B & Taxiway F SJ18-7005 County Stockton Metro Airport Realignment $10,284,300 2020 San Joaquin Terminal Modernization and SJ18-7006 County Stockton Metro Airport Expansion - Phase 1 $10,000,000 2021 Runway 11L-29R & Runway 11R- San Joaquin 29L Rehabilitation (Crack & Slurry SJ18-7007 County Stockton Metro Airport Seal) $956,100 2021 Pavement Reconstruction / San Joaquin Rehabilitation - Various Taxiways - SJ18-7008 County Stockton Metro Airport Phase 1 $105,933 2021 Pavement Reconstruction / San Joaquin Rehabilitation - Various Aprons - SJ18-7009 County Stockton Metro Airport Phase 1 $6,548,667 2021 San Joaquin Terminal Modernization and SJ18-7010 County Stockton Metro Airport Expansion - Phase 2 $10,000,000 2022 Pavement Reconstruction / San Joaquin Rehabilitation - Various Taxiways - SJ18-7011 County Stockton Metro Airport Phase 2 $105,933 2022 Pavement Reconstruction / San Joaquin Rehabilitation - Various Aprons - SJ18-7012 County Stockton Metro Airport Phase 2 $6,548,667 2022

San Joaquin Taxiway M & L Decommissioning & SJ18-7013 County Stockton Metro Airport Taxiway Nomenclature $138,700 2022 Pavement Reconstruction / San Joaquin Rehabilitation - Various Taxiways - SJ18-7014 County Stockton Metro Airport Phase 3 $105,933 2023 Pavement Reconstruction / San Joaquin Rehabilitation - Various Aprons - SJ18-7015 County Stockton Metro Airport Phase 3 $6,548,667 2023 San Joaquin Taxiway B East (partial) & West SJ18-7016 County Stockton Metro Airport Reconstruction $16,823,000 2025 San Joaquin Runway 11R-29L Rehabilitation SJ18-7017 County Stockton Metro Airport (Crack & Slurry Seal) $241,400 2026 Table 6-7: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Public Airport-Aviation Projects Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPOProject ID InformationJurisdictionFacility Name/Route Project Description Cost to Deliver Total MilestoneNEPA Years ApprovalCompletion San Joaquin Taxiway D Extension - Phase 1 SJ18-7018 County Stockton Metro Airport Environmental & Design $643,400 2027 San Joaquin Taxiway D Extension - Phase 2 SJ18-7019 County Stockton Metro Airport Construction $6,726,900 2028 SJ14-7019 Tracy Tracy Municipal Airport Install Helicopter Pad $126,000 2018 SJ14-7020 Tracy Tracy Municipal Airport Aircraft Wash Facility $98,000 2019 SJ14-7021 Tracy Tracy Municipal Airport Perimeter Fencing (1,100LF) $44,000 2019

SJ14-7022 Tracy Tracy Municipal Airport Build Permanent Public Restrooms $220,500 2020

SJ14-7023 Tracy Tracy Municipal Airport FBO Office - Repair FBO Building $1,016,946 2020 Land Acquisition Identified in SJ14-7024 Tracy Tracy Municipal Airport Airport Master Plan, Canal Ar $21,848,504 2020 $120,577,852 Table 6-8: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Active Transportation and Community Enhancement Projects Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO ID CTIPS ID # Project InformationJurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Cost to Deliver Total MilestoneFTIP Years ProgrammingNEPA ApprovalCompletionMilestone Years Install video detection of bicyclists Citywide Bicycle Facilities Detection and green painted bicycle lanes at 13 various signalized intersections SJ14-8018 Lodi Improvement Project signalized intersections throughout Lodi $565,000 2017 2017 2020

Install crosswalks, LED in-pavement Fulton Ave. between W. Shasta Ave. crosswalk lights, speed feedback and Cindy Dr.; Cindy Dr./ Calhoun Parkview Elementary Safe Routes to signs, signs and striping; construct Ave.; W. Shasta Ave. between N. SJ07-3200 212-0000-0446 Ripon School bulb-outs Ripon Rd. and Fulton Ave. $493,000 2013 2018 2019 Install 3-position bike racks on 40' and smaller buses, luggage bay bike racks for 45' commuter buses, interior bike locks on articulated RTD's Bike and Bus Transportation buses, and bike storage racks with In Stockton at the Downtown Transit SJ14-8019 SJRTD Project lids at Downtown Transit Center. Center and on SJRTD's bus fleet $272,000 2017 2017 2019 On Ardelle Avenue between the East San Joaquin Elmwood School Access Side Community Park and Bird SJ14-8021 County Improvements Construct sidewalk, curb, and gutter Avenue $1,772,000 2017 2018 Install complete street improvements On Miner Avenue between Center SJ14-8001 212-0000-0664 Stockton Miner Avenue Complete Street on Miner Avenue Street and the UPRR $15,746,000 2015 2017 2020 Install pedestrian crossings (with enhanced safety features) including high visibility crosswalks and flashing 9 intersections in the Weston Ranch SJ07-3116 212-0000-0403 Stockton Weston Ranch Pedestrian Crossings beacons subdivision in southwest Stockton $1,034,700 2017 2018 2020 Reduce travel lanes from four to three to accommodate center two- way left turn lane and install Class II N. El Dorado Street between Morada SJ07-3116 212-0000-0403 Stockton North El Dorado Street Road Diet bicycle lanes Lane and W. Hammer Lane $530,550 2017 2018 2020

Install a raised median with pedestrian median fencing to prevent jaywalksing and install new sidewalks N. El Dorado Street between Essex SJ07-3116 212-0000-0403 Stockton El Dorado Street Enhancements and ADA compliant curb ramps Street and the Calaveras River Trail $664,830 2017 2018 2020 Tam O'Shanter Drive and Knickerbocker Drive Roundabout and On Tam O'Shanter Drive between SJ14-9008 212-0000-0710 Stockton Bicycle Lane Install Class II Bicycle Lanes Hammer Lane and Knickbocker Drive $39,890 2017 2018 2020

Montauban Ave and Hammertown On Montauban Avenue between SJ14-9009 212-0000-0711 Stockton Drive Roundabout and Bicycle Lane Install Class II Bicycle Lanes Hammertown Drive and Swain Rd $72,260 2017 2018 2020 Lincoln Street and Eighth Street On Eighth Street between Lincoln SJ14-9010 212-0000-0712 Stockton Roundabout and Bicycle Lane Install Class II Bicycle Lanes Street and S. El Dorado Street $93,320 2017 2018 2020

On Bear Creek Bike Path between Thornton Road and Lower Sacramento Road, Pixley Slough Bike Path between Bear Creek Bike Path and Eight Mile Road, on Thornton Road between Bear Creek and Eight Mile Road, on Eight Mile Road between Thornton Road and Lower Install new bicycle facilities and Sacramento Road, and on Lower Bear Creek and Pixley Slough upgrade various existing bicycle Sacramento Road between Eight Mile SJ14-8017 212-0000-0715 Stockton Bicycle and Pedestrian Path facilities. Road and Bear Creek $1,727,110 2017 2019 2020 Table 6-8: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Active Transportation and Community Enhancement Projects Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO ID CTIPS ID # Project InformationJurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Cost to Deliver Total MilestoneFTIP Years ProgrammingNEPA ApprovalCompletionMilestone Years Reconstruct, widen, and improve existing pathway to Class I Bicycle and Pedestrian Path standards. Parallel to March Lane in the EBMUD Install intersection and midblock corridor between Brookside Road and improvements, high visibility Hillsboro Way, on March Lane March Lane/EBMUD Bicycle and crosswalks, striping, gap closures, between Hillsboro Way and West Pedestrian Path Connectivity upgrade of ADA ramps, flashing Lane, and on West Lane between SJ14-8015 212-0000-0713 Stockton Improvements beacons, and wayfinding signage March Lane and the EBMUD corridor $3,868,738 2017 2019 2021

Construct curb, gutter, and sidewalk to close sidewalk gaps along routes to schools. Install or upgrade curb ramps for ADA compliance. Upgrade draingage, crosswalks, and school Various locations near schools SJ14-8016 212-0000-0714 Stockton Closing Gaps to Schools approach signage as needed throughout Stockton $2,620,929 2017 2019 2021

Lowell Avenue Sidewalk Construction Construct 1,200 feet of sidewalk and On the south side of Lowell Avenue SJ14-8020 Tracy Project one ADA curb ramp between Chester Dr and Tracy Blvd $328,000 2017 2017 2019 Mt. Diablo/ Mt. Oso/ C St. Mt. Diablo/ Mt. Oso/ C St. City of Tracy SJ14-8013 212-0000-0661 Tracy Improvements Improvements $1,472,000 2017 2017 2020 Specific projects are listed in the 2012 Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, Safe Routes to School Master Plan Miscellaneous regional bicycle, and local agency bike plans subject pedestrian, and safe routes to school to updates and competitive project Various locations throughout San SJ07-8021 Various facilities and programs selection. Joaquin County $178,057,879

Specific streetscape and community Miscellaneous regional community enhancement projects are subject to Various locations throughout San SJ14-8001 Various enhancement projects competitive project selection. Joaquin County $96,051,723 TOTAL $305,409,929 Table 6-9: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Transportation Control Measure Category

Project Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO IDInformationJurisdiction Project Name Project Description Cost to Deliver Total Milestone YearsCompletionMilestone Years Golden Valley Parkway & Lathrop Road Intersection See Operations and SJ14-9001 Lathrop Improvements Install traffic signal and interconnect four signals Maintenance Project List See Active Transportation Citywide Bicycle Facilities Install video detection of bicyclists at and green painted bicycle and Community SJ14-8018 Lodi Detection Improvement Project lanes at signalized intersections Enhancement Project List Colony/Hoff Traffic Signal See Operations and SJ14-9002 Ripon Project Install traffic signal Maintenance Project List San Joaquin SR 26 and Jack Tone Road See Operations and SJ14-9003 County Roundabout Install roundabout Maintenance Project List San Joaquin SR 4 and Jack Tone Road See Operations and SJ14-9004 County Roundabout Install roundabout Maintenance Project List Robert J. Cabral Station See Rail Corridor SJ14-6006 SJRRC Expansion Construct park and ride lot Improvements Project List RTD Solar Power Project See Bus Transit SJ14-5033 SJRTD (Phase I) Construct solar power facilities to charge battery electric buses Improvements Project List See Bus Transit SJ14-5034 SJRTD Hopper Bus Purchase Purchase 4 ultra-low emission gasoline buses (Replacement) Improvements Project List See Bus Transit SJ14-5035 SJRTD Electirc Bus Purchase Purchase 7 battery-electric 40' buses (Replacement) Improvements Project List

Install 3-position bike racks on 40' and smaller buses, luggage bay See Active Transportation RTD's Bike and Bus bike racks for 45' commuter buses, interior bike locks on articulated and Community SJ14-8019 SJRTD Transportation Project buses, and bike storage racks with lids at Downtown Transit Center. Enhancement Project List See Active Transportation and Community SJ14-8001 Stockton Miner Avenue Complete Street Install complete street improvements on Miner Avenue Enhancement Project List

Reconstruct, widen, and improve existing pathway to Class I Bicycle March Lane/EBMUD Bicycle and Pedestrian Path standards. Install intersection and midblock See Active Transportation and Pedestrian Path improvements, high visibility crosswalks, striping, gap closures, and Community SJ14-8015 Stockton Connectivity Improvements upgrade of ADA ramps, flashing beacons, and wayfinding signage Enhancement Project List Construct curb, gutter, and sidewalk to close sidewalk gaps along routes to schools. Install or upgrade curb ramps for ADA See Active Transportation compliance. Upgrade draingage, crosswalks, and school approach and Community SJ14-8016 Stockton Closing Gaps to Schools signage as needed Enhancement Project List See Active Transportation Bear Creek and Pixley Slough Install new bicycle facilities and upgrade various existing bicycle and Community SJ14-8017 Stockton Bicycle and Pedestrian Path facilities. Enhancement Project List Real-time Traffic Flow Implement real-time traffic flow monotiring using Bluetooth/Wifi See Operations and SJ14-9005 Stockton Monitoring vehicle probe technology Maintenance Project List

Pacific Avenue and March See Operations and SJ14-9006 Stockton Lane Intersection Modification Install southbound right turn lane and retime traffic signal Maintenance Project List Left-Turn Lanes Additions at See Operations and SJ14-9007 Stockton Various Intersections Install left turn lanes Maintenance Project List

Tam O'Shanter Drive and Knickerbocker Drive See Operations and SJ14-9008 Stockton Roundabout and Bicycle Lane Install roundabout and Class II Bicycle Lanes Maintenance Project List Table 6-9: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Transportation Control Measure Category

Project Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO IDInformationJurisdiction Project Name Project Description Cost to Deliver Total Milestone YearsCompletionMilestone Years

Montauban Ave and Hammertown Drive See Operations and SJ14-9009 Stockton Roundabout and Bicycle Lane Install roundabout and Class II Bicycle Lanes Maintenance Project List Lincoln Street and Eighth Street Roundabout and Bicycle See Operations and SJ14-9010 Stockton Lane Install roundabout and Class II Bicycle Lanes Maintenance Project List See Active Transportation Lowell Avenue Sidewalk and Community SJ14-8020 Tracy Construction Project Construct 1,200 feet of sidewalk and one ADA curb ramp Enhancement Project List Corral Hollow Road and See Operations and SJ11-CM26 Tracy Valpico Road Traffic Signal Install traffic fignal Maintenance Project List Corral Hollow Road Adaptive See Operations and SJ11-CM18 Tracy Traffic Control Install adaptive traffic control system Maintenance Project List Ridesharing and Vanpool Trip Reduction Coordination, Guaranteed Ride Home, Vanpool See Operations and SJ07-9001 Various Programs Enhancement, Match lists, TDM marketing, etc. Maintenance Project List See Operations and SJ07-9002 Various Park and Ride Lots Various Locations Maintenance Project List Signal System Improvements, Operational and Intersection Traffic Flow Improvements and Improvements to Smooth Traffic Flow, Closed Circuit TV, Freeway See Operations and SJ07-9003 Various Systems Managements Service Patrols Maintenance Project List $0 Table 6-10: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Operations and Maintenance Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO ID CTIPS ID # PPNO Project InformationJurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Cost to Deliver Total Milestone YearsFTIP ProgrammingNEPA ApprovalOpen toMilestone Traffic Years SHOPP - Collision Reduction Grouped SJ07-1019 212-0000-0313 Caltrans Various locations Projects Various $282,542,602 various various 2042 SJ07-1020 212-0000-0314 Caltrans Various locations SHOPP - Mobility Grouped Projects Various $92,928,777 various various 2042 SHOPP Roadway Preservation SJ07-1021 212-0000-0315 Caltrans Various locations Grouped Projects Various $194,525,465 various various 2042

SHOPP-Other (Emergency Response, Mandates, Bridge Preservation, SJ07-1022 212-0000-0392 Caltrans Various locations Roadside Preservation Etc.) Various $136,747,973 various various 2042 Caltrans Highway Bridge Program SJ07-3002 212-0000-0272 Caltrans Various locations Lump Sum projects (Safety) Various $116,490,513 various various 2042 Caltrans Highway Bridge Program Line SJ07-3003 various Caltrans Various locations Item projects (Safety) Various $197,179,445 various various 2042 Lump sum for Emergency Repair SJ07-3004 212-0000-0307 Caltrans Various locations Program (Safety) Various $3,750,000 various various 2042 212-0000- 0353/212-0000- SJ07-3005 0567 Caltrans Various locations Caltrans Minor Program (Safety) Various $12,115,575 various various 2042 Upgrade existing communication SR-120 TMS infrastructure between field elements On Route 5, 120, and 99 at various SJ18-3001 Caltrans Upgrade/Repairs and District 10 TMC locations in San Joaquin County $6,970,000 2022 Contingency Project: Install Ramp In San Joaquin County on State Route SJ18-3002 Caltrans SR 120 Meters 120 $22,740,000 2023 Repair, update, and install ITS elements, including installation of In San Joaquin County on Various SJ18-3003 Caltrans Various routes Phase 1 MVPs, and filling in the gaps Routes $5,500,000 2024 Repair, update, and install ITS elements, including installation of In San Joaquin County on Various SJ18-3004 Caltrans Various routes Phase 2 MVPs, and filling in the gaps Routes $4,250,000 2025

SJ18-3005 Caltrans SR 4 various locations Installing ramp meters SR-4 Ramp metering system Installation $56,503,000 2024 I- 5 various locations I 205 to In San Joaquin County on I-5 from I-205 SJ18-3006 Caltrans Mathews Rd Install ramp meters and ITS elements to Mathew Road $32,175,000 2026 I-5 various locations from In San Joaquin County on I-5 from Mathews to Dr. Martin Luther Mathew Road to Dr. Martin Luther King SJ18-3007 Caltrans King Jr. Blvd Install ramp meters and ITS elements Jr. Blvd $29,250,000 2027 SR 99 various locations from Hammer Lane to Armstong In San Joaquin County on SR-99 from SJ18-3008 Caltrans Rd Install ramp meters and ITS elements Hammer Lane to Armstrong Road $21,450,000 2029 I-5 various locations from Dr. In San Joaquin County on I-5 from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd to Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. to Calaveras SJ18-3009 Caltrans Calaveras River Install ramp meters and ITS elements River $23,400,000 2030 I-5 various locations from Calaveras River to Eight Mile In San Joaquin County on I-5 from SJ18-3010 Caltrans Rd. Install ramp meters and ITS elements Calaveras River to Eight Mile Road $37,050,000 2030 In San Joaquin County on SR-99 from SR 99 various locations from Armstrong Road to Mokelumne River SJ18-3011 Caltrans Armstong to Turner Install ramp meters and ITS elements North of Turner Road $33,150,000 2030 In San Joaquin County on SR-99 from SR 99 various locations from Mokelumne River North of Turner Road SJ18-3012 Caltrans Turner to Acampo Install ramp meters and ITS elements to North of Acampo Road $23,400,000 2031 Rehabilitation of various streets and SJ11-3046 212-0000-0001 Escalon Various Street Rehabilitation roads City streets, various locations $20,736,003 various 2042 Rehabilitation of various streets and SJ11-3047 212-0000-0001 Lathrop Various Street Rehabilitation roads City streets, various locations $48,882,059 various 2042 Costs associated with the improvement Louise Avenue and McKinley of the Louise Avenue and McKinley Avenue Intersection Avenue intersection including City of Lathrop Improvements installation of left turn lanes and SJ14-CM17 212-0000-0644 Lathrop modified traffic signal equipment. $450,000 2017 2020 Table 6-10: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Operations and Maintenance Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO ID CTIPS ID # PPNO Project InformationJurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Cost to Deliver Total Milestone YearsFTIP ProgrammingNEPA ApprovalOpen toMilestone Traffic Years Replace all-way stop intersection at Golden Valley Parkway with new traffic signal with detection system, slurry seal, install signage and striping, and Golden Valley Parkway & interconnect four signals on Lathrop Lathrop Road Intersection City of Lathrop Road between Golden Valley Parkway Improvements and Harlan Road. Install approximately 750 feet of sidewalk on south side of Spartan Way west of Golden Valley Parkway intersection SJ14-9001 212-0000-0699 Lathrop $450,000 2017 2020 Rehabilitation of various streets and SJ11-3048 212-0000-0001 Lodi Various Street Rehabilitation roads City streets, various locations $179,583,369 various 2042 From the UPRR to Cherokee Lane. Construct two left lane, parking on both sides, Class II bikes lanes, install storm drain system, curb gutter and sidewalks, landscaping and street lights. Upgrade existing lighted Lockeford Street crosswalk. Install new signal at City of Lodi Improvements Lockeford St. and Stockton St. including installation of EVP, ADA ramps, signage and striping. Modify traffic signal and striping at Cherokee Lane and Lockeford St. to accommodate SJ11-3190 212-0000-0552 Lodi travel lanes.) $5,420,000 2017 2020 Rehabilitation of various streets and SJ11-3049 212-0000-0001 Manteca Various Street Rehabilitation roads City streets, various locations $147,861,870 various 2042

Rough & Ready Island Rail Construct new rail bridge (double-track) SJ18-3013 Port of Stockton Bridge to replace existing deficient structure City of Stockton $18,000,000 2040 At intersection of Colony Rd/Hoff SJ14-9001 212-0000-0700 Ripon Colony/Hoff Traffic Signal Install traffic singal Drive/SR 99 Ramps $660,000 2017 2018 2019 In Ripon, install traffic signal and River Road Sidewalk and crosswalks at River Road/Fulton City of Ripon Intersection Improvements Avenue intersection and install SJ14-8004 212-0000-0658 Ripon sidewalk. $550,000 2017 2018 2019 Widen River Road from 2 to 6 lanes River Road Phase I between Fulton Avenue intersection City of Ripon SJ11-3020 212-0000-0695 Ripon and North Ripon Road $932,000 2017 2018 2019 Rehabilitation of various streets and SJ11-3050 212-0000-0001 Ripon Various Street Rehabilitation roads City streets, various locations $42,047,006 various 2042 Rehabilitation to include: driveways, wheelchair ramps, median islands, San Joaquin Various Roadway pedestrian improvements, and class II Rehabilitate roadway and surrounding SJ11-3051 212-0000-0001 County Rehabilitation bicycle lanes. streets $1,303,907,722 various 2042 San Joaquin SR 26 and Jack Tone Road At intersection of Jack Tone Road and SJ14-9003 212-0000-0701 County Roundabout Install roundabout SR 26 $1,525,000 2017 2018 2020 San Joaquin SR 4 and Jack Tone Road At intersection of Jack Tone Road and SJ14-9004 212-0000-0702 County Roundabout Install roundabout SR 4 $1,659,000 2017 2018 2020 San Joaquin Byron Road and Grant Line At intersection of Byron Road and Grant SJ07-3116 212-0000-0403 County Road Roundabout Install roundabout Line Road near Tracy $1,367,300 2017 2018 2020 San Joaquin Duncan Road and Comstock At intersection of Duncan Road and SJ07-3116 212-0000-0403 County Road Roundabout Install roundabout Comstock Road near Linden $1,213,900 2017 2018 2020 At intersection of Liberty Road and San Joaquin Liberty Road and Dustin Dustin Road in northern San Joaquin SJ07-3116 212-0000-0403 County Road Roundabout Install roundabout County $1,279,500 2017 2018 2020 Regional Surface Transportation Program Various state highway and transit SJ11-3042 212-0000-0001 SJCOG (STP) Lump Sum Projects capital projects San Joaquin County $3,038,998 various 2042

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd between Convert signals from pedestal-mounted N. Eldorado Street and S. Aurora Street Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd to mast arms and provide protected left- at intersections of S. San Joaquin Street, SJ07-3116 212-0000-0403 Stockton Signal Modifications turns California Street, and S. Grant Street $1,163,500 2017 2018 2020 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd between SJ07-3116 212-0000-0403 Stockton Median Install raised median Bieghle Alley and Mariposa Road $370,710 2017 2018 2020 Table 6-10: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Operations and Maintenance Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO ID CTIPS ID # PPNO Project InformationJurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Cost to Deliver Total Milestone YearsFTIP ProgrammingNEPA ApprovalOpen toMilestone Traffic Years Upgrade existing guardrails with new guardrails, transition rails, and end SJ07-3116 212-0000-0403 Stockton Guardrail Upgrades treatments 16 locations throughout Stockton $1,180,900 2017 2018 2020 Install raised median curb between the existing median limits at various Pacific Avenue between the Calaveras SJ07-3116 212-0000-0403 Stockton Pacific Avenue Median locations River Trail and W. Hammer Lane $969,750 2017 2018 2020 Implement real-time traffic flow Real-time Traffic Flow monotiring using Bluetooth/Wifi vehicle Various intersections along arterials SJ14-9005 212-0000-0707 Stockton Monitoring probe technology throughout Stockton $595,000 2017 2018 2019

Pacific Avenue and March Install southbound right turn lane and At intersection of Pacific Avenue and SJ14-9006 212-0000-0708 Stockton Lane Intersection Modification retime traffic signal March Lane $649,000 2017 2018 2019 At intersections of March Lane and Feather River Drive, West Lane and Left-Turn Lanes Additions at Bianchi Road, and Airport Way and Arch- SJ14-9007 212-0000-0709 Stockton Various Intersections Install left turn lanes Airport Road. $2,125,000 2017 2018 2019

At intersection of Tam O'Shanter Drive Tam O'Shanter Drive and and Knickerbocker Drive, and on Tam Knickerbocker Drive Install roundabout and Class II Bicycle O'Shanter Drive between Knickerbocker SJ14-9008 212-0000-0710 Stockton Roundabout and Bicycle Lane Lanes Drive and Hammer Lane $966,112 2017 2018 2019 At intersection of Montauban Avenue Montauban Ave and and Hammertown Drive and on Hammertown Drive Install roundabout and Class II Bicycle Montauban Avenue between SJ14-9009 212-0000-0711 Stockton Roundabout and Bicycle Lane Lanes Hammertown Drive and Swain Road $1,078,227 2017 2018 2019 At intersection of Lincoln Street and Lincoln Street and Eighth Eighth Street, and on Eighth Stret Street Roundabout and Install roundabout and Class II Bicycle between Lincoln Street and El Dorado SJ14-9010 212-0000-0712 Stockton Bicycle Lane Lanes Streeet $1,183,302 2017 2018 2019 Rehabilitation to include: driveways, Regional Surface wheelchair ramps, median islands, Transportation Program pedestrian improvements, and class II SJ11-3043 212-0000-0001 Stockton (STP) Lump Sum Projects bicycle lanes. City streets, various locations $5,931,260 various 2042 Regional Surface Transportation Program SJ11-3044 212-0000-0001 Stockton (STP) Lump Sum Projects Operations and Maintence City streets, various locations $1,930,715 various 2042 Rehabilitation of various streets and SJ11-3052 212-0000-0001 Stockton Various Street Rehabilitation roads City streets, various locations $822,879,679 various 2042 Install adaptive traffic control system March Lane Adaptive Traffic along March Lane between Feather City of Stockton Control River drive and Montauban Ave to SJ11-CM16 212-0000-0589 Stockton improve safety and traffic operations $1,322,000 2018 2022 Install new traffic signal at the Miner Miner Ave and Filbert St. Ave and Filbert St. intersection City of Stockton Signal including EVP, ADA ramps, signs and SJ11-CM21 212-0000-0601 Stockton striping $686,000 2018 2022 Construct roundabout at Swain Road Swain Rd. and Montauban and Montauban Ave. including PTZ City of Stockton Roundabout Installation cameras, ADA ramp, signs, striping, SJ11-CM24 212-0000-0604 Stockton and street lights $837,000 2018 2022 Add SBL on Thorton(at Hammer), add Thorton Rd at Hammer Ln. WBL on Lower Sac(Thorton/Pacific). and Lower Sac Left Turn Retime both signals, as well as adjacent City of Stockton Lanes signal (Hammer/Lower Sac). EVP at Pacific/Lower Sac to be upgrade. SJ14-CM05 212-0000-0632 Stockton $918,000 2018 2022 Tam O'Shanter Drive and Install roundabout at intersection of Castle Oaks Drive Tam OShanter Drive and Castle Oaks City of Stockton SJ14-CM08 212-0000-0635 Stockton Roundabout Drive $603,000 2018 2022 Costs associated with installation of signal prioritization equipment for BRT Phase BRT Phase V Stockton Metropolitan Area 5 operations on Weber Ave, Miner Ave, Wison Way, Fremont St., Filbert St and Main St. SJ14-CM10 212-0000-0641 Stockton $2,099,000 2018 2022 Table 6-10: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Operations and Maintenance Category

Identifiers 2018 RTP MPO ID CTIPS ID # PPNO Project InformationJurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Cost to Deliver Total Milestone YearsFTIP ProgrammingNEPA ApprovalOpen toMilestone Traffic Years West Lane Traffic Install new traffic responsiveness signal Responsiveness Signal control system on West Lane between City of Stockton Control System Harding Way and Enterprise Street. SJ14-CM15 212-0000-0642 Stockton $754,000 2018 2022 Costs associated with installation of signal prioritization equipment for BRT operations on Pacific Avenue and BRT Phase 1-B Stockton Metropolitan Area Madison Street. Replace signalized intersection at Miner Avenue and San Joaquin Street with a roundabout SJ14-CM16 212-0000-0643 Stockton $1,599,000 2018 2022 Corral Hollow Road and SJ11-CM26 212-0000-0606 Tracy Valpico Road Traffic Signal Intersection Signalization Corral Hollow Road and Valpico Road $751,000 2011 2022 Rehabilitation of various streets and SJ11-3053 212-0000-0001 Tracy Various Street Rehabilitation roads City streets, various locations $228,998,217 various 2042 Corral Hollow Road Adaptive SJ11-CM18 212-0000-0616 Tracy Trafic Signal Traffic Signal Coordination West Valley Mall to Schulte Road $1,121,625 2011 2020 Install adaptive traffic signal system on 11th Street Adaptive Traffic 11th St. between Corral Hollow Road to City of Tracy Signal SJ11-CM17 212-0000-0597 Tracy Mac Arthur Dr. $909,000 2017 2020 Construct westbound left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane and related Eleventh St and MacArthur Dr signal modifications and UPRR railroad City of Tracy Geometric Improvements grade crossing modifications at the intersection of Eleventh Street and SJ11-CM12 212-0000-0542 Tracy MacArthur Drive $1,875,000 2017 2020 Trip Reduction Coordination, Guaranteed Ride Home, Vanpool Ridesharing and Vanpool Enhancement, Match lists, TDM SJ07-9001 112-0000-0025 Various Programs marketing, etc. San Joaquin County $18,000,000 various 2042 SJ07-9002 Various Park and Ride Lots Various Locations San Joaquin County $2,000,000 various 2042 Signal System Improvements, Operational and Intersection Improvements to Smooth Traffic Flow, Traffic Flow Improvements Closed Circuit TV, Freeway Service SJ07-9003 Various and Systems Managements Patrols San Joaquin County $5,000,000 various 2042 $4,220,178,073 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Air Quality Conformity Assessment

The San Joaquin Valley Air Basin is classified as a non-attainment area for ozone, PM2.5, and PM10, and has a maintenance plan for carbon monoxide (CO) for the urbanized/metropolitan areas of Kern, Fresno, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. SJCOG is responsible for satisfying the federal requirements to demonstrate conformity with the applicable State Implementation Plans (SIP) as they apply to San Joaquin County, the northernmost of eight counties which comprise the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin.

In non-attainment and maintenance areas, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) provide the federal approval of the FTIP, including a determination that the FTIP conforms to the applicable SIPs. Per the federal conformity regulations, the projects identified in the FTIP cannot further deteriorate the existing air quality problems. In addition, the FTIP must document the timely implementation of transportation control measures identified in the applicable SIPs.

The San Joaquin Council of Governments prepared the conformity assessment as a separate document included with the 2019 FTIP. The findings are that the local air quality planning issues and programs are sufficient to demonstrate that transportation control measures were identified through a legitimate planning process; that these measures have received the necessary federal, state and local commitment to ensure implementation; and that these commitments are being maintained through identification in the San Joaquin County 2018 RTP and programming of the necessary funds in the 2019 FTIP.

This determination demonstrates that all of SJCOG’s planned transportation projects contained in the 2018 RTP and 2019 FTIP conform to the requirements in the applicable State Implementation Plans for San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, as well as to the federal conformity regulations.

Transportation Control Measures

Transportation control measures (TCMs) to reduce emissions adequate to demonstrate conformity with the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Air Quality are identified in the Air Quality Conformity Analysis. A specific project listing is located in Appendix D. These TCMs are consistent with the 2018 RTP, and the Air Quality Conformity Analysis.

Page | 12

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Financial Plan

By Federal law, the FTIP must be a financially constrained document. It must specifically include a financial plan that demonstrates how the projects can be funded while the existing transportation system is being adequately operated and maintained. For the first year, only projects for which funds are available or committed can be shown. For the second, third and fourth years, only projects for which construction and operating funds can reasonably be expected to be available may be included.

The detailed Revenue Forecast is discussed in Appendix G of the 2018 RTP. Appendix I of the 2018 RTP provides a Project Cost Estimation Template and is incorporated into the 2019 FTIP as Appendix M.

The funding charts on the following pages are intended to show currently available revenues to finance the projects contained within the 2019 FTIP. The federal and state revenue projections are based on the best available data as currently provided through the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). These state and federal programs include:

• State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) • Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) • Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) • State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) • Highway Bridge Program (HBP) • Sec. 130 Railroad Grade Crossing • Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) • Hazard Elimination Safety (HES) • High Risk Rural Roads (HR3)

San Joaquin Council of Governments has utilized those estimates throughout its project selection process with the aim of fully allocating all available revenue against eligible projects.

The local funds indicated are available and provided by a variety of sources including the local Measure K ½ cent sales tax, transportation sales tax in San Joaquin County, Transportation Development Act funds, gas tax revenues, development impact fees, direct developer contributions and other private funds, special taxing districts, and local general funds. The Measure K funds reflected in the FTIP are drawn from the Measure K Renewal (passed in 2006) Strategic Plan which identify the schedule of Measure K funding disbursements to specific projects by year as adopted by the San Joaquin Council of Governments. Other local funding commitments are reflected in each entity’s local capital improvement program which is adopted annually by local resolution.

Page | 13

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

For the transit operators, a financial transactions report is required to assure continued ability to operate. Because their grants are on an annualized grant cycle, projects are sometimes “projections.” As the amounts become known for each year from the granting agencies, these years are formally amended into the FTIP consistent with the actual grants. Following the Revenue charts, Expenditure charts appear. These summarize all of the FTIP project costs by mode and by program. Specifically related to the FTA 5307 Program, it should be noted that the public review and comment period, and the public involvement activities established for this FTIP satisfy the program of projects (POP) requirements of the FTA 5307 Program.

Project Priority

In accordance with federal transportation legislation, the San Joaquin Council of Governments establishes priorities to guide the programming of transportation funding in San Joaquin County. The 2019 FTIP represents the 2018-2022 programming period of SJCOG’s 2018 RTP, which can be considered the San Joaquin region’s 24-year “statement of priorities” for the future transportation system. The goals, policies, objectives, and performance indicators for the 2018 RTP are all designed to articulate:

• What the region wants the future transportation system to look like;

• What types of decisions will help the region attain its vision; and

• Measures, or indicators by which the region can assess its progress. The RTP policies and supportive strategies include Enhance the Environment for Existing and Future Generations and Conserve Energy, Maximize Mobility and Accessibility, Increase Safety and Security, Preserve the Efficiency of the Existing Transportation System, Support Economic Vitality, Promote Interagency Coordination and Public Participation for Transportation Decision-Making and Planning Efforts, Maximize Cost-Effectiveness, and Improve Quality of Life for Residents.

The RTP policies and performance measures provide an objective criterion to evaluate how well the 2019 FTIP projects (as part of the planned investments in the RTP) will achieve desired outcomes. These performance measurements have been developed through extensive discussion and consensus building during the development of the 2018 RTP. Meetings took place throughout the county gathering input from a myriad of participants ranging from concerned citizens, government officials, and local business leaders. Appendix K identifies 2018 RTP-specific policies and performance measurements.

The 2019 FTIP achieves SJCOG’s 2018 RTP’s overall system goals of designing a transportation system that will enhance the quality of life in San Joaquin County.

Page | 14

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

The 2019 FTIP identifies the 2018 to 2022 project priorities incorporated in SJCOG’s 2018 RTP and can be further prioritized as:

• All projects (as a group) shown in the first year of the Quadrennial Element (FY 18/19) shall have first priority; • All projects (as a group) shown in the second year of the Quadrennial Element (FY 19/20) shall have second priority; • All projects (as a group) shown in the third year of the Quadrennial Element (FY 20/21) shall have third priority; • All projects (as a group) shown in the fourth year of the Quadrennial Element (FY 21/22) shall have fourth priority.

As a federally-designated air quality nonattainment area, SJCOG programs TCM highway or transportation projects for each year consistent with the approved SIP, and documents timely implementation of the TCMs in the Air Quality document.

Performance Based Planning

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) is the Federal transportation funding bill signed into law in 2012. A key feature of MAP-21 is the establishment of a performance- and outcome- based program, known as “Performance Based Planning,” with the objective to invest in projects that will make progress toward the achievement of the national goals for the transportation. The most recent Federal transportation bill, Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act of 2016 (FAST Act), carries forward the same performance management framework. FHWA worked with state and regional agencies to identify performance measures that meet the requirements. Beginning in 2018, state Departments of Transportation and Metropolitan Transportation Organizations will be required to implement the Federal performance measures.

Under the final performance rules, Caltrans is directly responsible to submit performance targets and periodic reports on progress to those targets to Federal agencies on an annual basis. MPOs, such as SJCOG, are required to establish targets for the same performance measures on all public roads in the MPO planning area within 180 days after the state establishes each target. The MPO may elect to support the statewide targets, establish numerical targets specific to their region, or use a combination of both approaches. Furthermore, MPOs must incorporate these short-range targets into their planning process – most notably, the FTIP and the RTP.

Page | 15

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

The Federal performance measures are thematically split into three groupings under the rubric of “Performance Management” (PM):

• PM 1: Safety

• PM2: Transportation Asset Management

• PM 3: System Reliability, Freight, Congestion, and Air Quality

PM 1 Safety targets were set by Caltrans on August 31, 2017, allowing until February 27, 2018 for MPOs to submit targets in this area. SJCOG’s approach in this area will be described in detail below and incorporated directly into the RTP and FTIP. PM 2 and PM 3 targets are expected to be adopted by Caltrans in May 2018 and by MPOs in November 2018. Given the timing, SJCOG has not included these rules in the 2019 FTIP. Once the targets are established they will be incorporated into subsequent RTP and FTIP cycles.

PM 1: Safety

Caltrans Target-Setting and Methodological Considerations

FHWA issued the Safety Performance Management Final Rule (Safety PM) as an implementation of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), effective April 15, 2016. The Safety PM identified the core Federal safety goal “to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads.” The Safety PM establishes five performance measures to carry out the HSIP, defined as the five- year rolling averages for: (1) Number of Fatalities, (2) Rate of Fatalities per 100 million VMT, (3) Number of Serious Injuries, (4) Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 million VMT, and (5) Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Non-motorized Serious Injuries. These safety performance measures are applicable to all public roads regardless of ownership or functional classification.

The Caltrans target-setting process was guided by the Safety PM as well as the Caltrans Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and Strategic Management Plan (SMP). In cooperation with the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS), Caltrans adopted the following five Safety Performance Management Targets:

TABLE 1. Caltrans Adopted Safety Performance Targets 2018 Target (5-Yr. Percent Reduction Performance Target Rolling Average) From 2017 Number of Fatalities 3,590.8 -7.69% Rate of Fatalities (per 100M VMT) 1.0 -7.69% Number of Serious Injuries 12,823.4 -1.5% Rate of Serious Injuries (per 100M VMT) 3.8 -1.5% Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and 4,271.1 -10% Non-Motorized Serious Injuries

Page | 16

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

SJCOG has elected to support the state target rather than establishing a region-specific numerical target. SJCOG will highlight projects and programs in the RTP and FTIP that help the state achieve the statewide targets, and will track regional safety performance over time using the state’s methodology.

Safety is integral to the SJCOG planning and programming process. Specifically, SJCOG begins most transportation planning efforts with a preliminary analysis of the challenges facing the transportation system within the project area. In almost all cases, this ongoing effort continually identifies new issues and feeds them into the planning process. For example, SJCOG initiates corridor studies (or Project Study Reports-PSRs) that provide details on the types of challenges and system deficiencies found in a portion of the region. Within these reports, SJCOG sets out a goal to improve overall transportation safety along the corridor. Data analyses focus on identifying intersections, accident information, or existing design features that can benefit from the safety enhancements. This is then followed by more detailed investigation of the types of strategies that can be used to reduce the number and severity of accidents. SJCOG’s Unmet Transit Needs (UTN) Report provides the general public opportunities to raise any safety and security issues on public transit. Cumulatively, SJCOG’s planning studies suggest strategies and recommend capital projects for the long-range RTP and the FTIP. Safety and security improvements to major state highway corridors in the region, including but not limited to I-5, SR-99, I-205, and SR-12, were outcomes of this regional planning process.

SJCOG strives to improve communication and coordination between public agencies and the public by identifying and engaging key transportation planning stakeholders. Through these stakeholder groups, SJCOG often identifies safety issues critical to their interests. For example, SJCOG works closely with member agencies (cities and county) and Caltrans in nominating projects for the State Highway Operation and Protection Program and the Highway Safety Improvement Program.

SJCOG planning staff regularly engages with public health agencies, SJCOG Citizen Advisory Committee, Goods Movement Task Force, and with bicycle coalitions interested in transportation safety issues specific to their missions. SJCOG also work closely with public transit operators, the SJCOG Interagency Transit Committee, and the Social Services Transportation Advisory Committee to identify transit safety and security improvements and have financed those projects through the Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement and Service Enhancement Program.

SJCOG also operates a transportation demand management program called dibs, that covers a three- county area comprised of San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Merced. As part of the program, SJCOG receives input on safety concerns or suggestions for improvement on roadway and transit systems from the general public. Through this feedback, SJCOG is able to implement safety performance improvements that address major public safety issues, as well as the specific concerns of raised by the interest groups.

Page | 17

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Although safety is holistically integrated into SJCOG’s regional transportation planning and programming process, as described above, the following highlighted projects in the RTP/SCS specifically address documented safety issues:

• SR 99/SR 120 Operational Improvements – This project will improve the capacity and recurring traffic congestion of the eastbound to southbound and northbound to westbound connector ramps and eliminate weaving and merging between SR-99/120 and SR-99/Austin Road interchanges. The SR 99/120 freeway interchange is currently subject to significant congestion, delays, and high accident rates.

• SR 99 at Turner Road - Reconstruct interchange to provide operational and safety improvements.

• Grant Line Road Corridor Improvements - Realign roadway and widen from 2 to 4 lanes with operational and safety improvements.

• SR 120/Brennan Avenue Intersection – Signalization and intersection improvements. Currently stop-controlled with a high accident rate.

• Roth Road Grade Separation – 4-lane grade separation between Roth Road and UPRR tracks.

• Transit Facility Safety & Security Projects – RTD, Lodi and Manteca systems.

• Altamont Corridor Express Speed and Safety Upgrades - Including signal upgrade to automatic train stop increase train speed from 79 to 90 MPH and several track realignment projects.

• Active Transportation Projects – Most projects in this category would increase the safety of pedestrians and/or bicyclists.

Page | 18

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Financial Plan

Page | 19

TABLE 1: REVENUE

San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Adoption ($'s in 1,000) N O 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) T Funding Source/Program E 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL S Sales Tax City County Gas Tax Gas Tax (Subventions to Cities) Gas Tax (Subventions to Counties) Other Local Funds $2,931 $1,988 $38,867 $512 $44,298 County General Funds $9 $292 $301

LOCAL City General Funds $2,922 $1,696 $20,867 $512 $25,997 Street Taxes and Developer Fees $18,000 $18,000 RSTP Exchange funds Transit Transit Fares Other (See Appendix 1) $8,228 $19,855 $7,330 $13,165 $48,578 Local Total $11,159 $21,843 $46,197 $13,677 $92,876 Tolls Bridge Corridor Regional Sales Tax $2,022 $400 $3,000 $400 $5,822

REGIONAL Other (See Appendix 2) Regional Total $2,022 $400 $3,000 $400 $5,822 State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) 1 $90,195 $117,897 $46,239 $65,212 $319,543 SHOPP $90,195 $117,897 $46,239 $65,212 $319,543 SHOPP Prior State Minor Program State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) 1 $6,802 $12,300 $22,843 $342 $42,287 STIP $6,802 $12,300 $22,843 $342 $42,287 STIP Prior State Bond Proposition 1A (High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program) Proposition 1B (Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006) STATE Active Transportation Program (ATP) 1 $6,810 $1,051 $7,861 Highway Maintenance (HM) Program 1 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) 1 $1,422 $20,917 $2,277 $480 $25,096 Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) State Transit Assistance (STA)(e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42) $13 $13 $14 $14 $54 Other (See Appendix 3) $3,408 $3,408 State Total $108,650 $152,178 $71,373 $66,048 $398,249 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Grants $11,284 $10,975 $11,149 $11,325 $44,733 5309 - Fixed Guideway Capital Investment Grants 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants 5310 - Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities $844 $844 $844 $844 $3,376 5311 - Formula Grants for Rural Areas $360 $360 $360 $360 $1,440 5311f - Intercity Bus 5337 - State of Good Repair Grants

FEDERAL TRANSIT 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grants $1,207 $657 $657 $657 $3,178 FTA Transfer from Prior FTIP $4,581 $7,774 $12,355 Other (See Appendix 4) Federal Transit Total $18,276 $20,610 $13,010 $13,186 $65,082 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program $9,593 $9,785 $9,782 $9,778 $38,939 Construction of Ferry Boats and Ferry Terminal Facilities (Ferry Boat Program) Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program Federal Lands Access Program Federal Lands Transportation Program GARVEE Bonds Debt Service Payments High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) $9,776 $1,819 $6,529 $18,124 National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (FASTLANE/INFRA Grants)

FEDERAL HIGHWAY Railway-Highway Crossings Program Recreational Trails Program SAFETEA-LU Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP/RSTP) $9,369 $9,723 $9,719 $9,715 $38,526 Other (see Appendix 5) Federal Highway Total $18,962 $29,284 $21,320 $26,023 $95,589 Other Federal Railroad Administration (see Appendix 6) RAIL

FEDERAL Federal Railroad Administration Total

Federal Total $37,238 $49,894 $34,330 $39,209 $160,671

TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) Other (See Appendix 7) FINANCE INNOVATIVE Innovative Financing Total REVENUE TOTAL $159,069 $224,315 $154,900 $119,334 $657,618

Financial Summary Notes: 1 State Programs that include both state and federal funds.

Caltrans, Division of Transportation Programming Office of Federal Transportation Management Program LG: 01/19/2018 TABLE 1: REVENUE - APPENDICES

San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Adoption ($'s in 1,000)

Appendix 1 - Local Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) CURRENT Local Other 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL Local Transportation Fund $2,349 $13,895 $327 $7,043 $23,614 Private Funds $963 $963 TDA Funds $5,879 $5,960 $6,040 $6,122 $24,001

Local Other Total $8,228 $19,855 $7,330 $13,165 $48,578

Appendix 2 - Regional Other Regional Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) CURRENT 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL

Regional Other Total

Appendix 3 - State Other State Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) CURRENT 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 $3,408 $3,408

State Other Total $3,408 $3,408

Appendix 4 - Federal Transit Other Federal Transit Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) CURRENT 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL

Federal Transit Other Total

Appendix 5 - Federal Highway Other Federal Highway Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) CURRENT 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL

Federal Highway Other Total

Appendix 6 - Federal Railroad Administration Other Federal Railroad Administration Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) CURRENT 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL

Federal Railroad Administration Other Total

Appendix 7 - Innovative Other Innovative Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) CURRENT 2018/19 2019/20 2018/19 2019/20 TOTAL

Innovative Other Total

Page 3 of 7 TABLE 2: PROGRAMMED

San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Adoption ($'s in 1,000)

N O 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) T Funding Source/Program E 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL S

Local Total $11,159 $21,843 $46,197 $13,677 $92,876 LOCAL

Tolls Bridge Corridor Regional Sales Tax $2,022 $400 $3,000 $400 $5,822

REGIONAL Other (See Appendix A) Regional Total $2,022 $400 $3,000 $400 $5,822 State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) 1 $90,195 $117,897 $46,239 $65,212 $319,543 SHOPP $90,195 $117,897 $46,239 $65,212 $319,543 SHOPP Prior State Minor Program State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) 1 $6,802 $12,300 $22,843 $342 $42,287 STIP $6,802 $12,300 $22,843 $342 $42,287 STIP Prior State Bond Proposition 1A (High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program) Proposition 1B (Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006) STATE Active Transportation Program (ATP) 1 $6,810 $1,051 $7,861 Highway Maintenance (HM) Program 1 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) 1 $1,422 $20,917 $2,277 $480 $25,096 Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) State Transit Assistance (STA)(e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42) $13 $13 $14 $14 $54 Other (See Appendix B) $3,408 $3,408 State Total $108,650 $152,178 $71,373 $66,048 $398,249 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Grants $11,284 $10,975 $11,149 $11,325 $44,733 5309 - Fixed Guideway Capital Investment Grants 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants 5310 - Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities $844 $844 $844 $844 $3,376 5311 - Formula Grants for Rural Areas $360 $360 $360 $360 $1,440 5311f - Intercity Bus 5337 - State of Good Repair Grants

FEDERAL TRANSIT 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grants $1,207 $657 $657 $657 $3,178 FTA Transfer from Prior FTIP $4,581 $7,774 $12,355 Other (See Appendix C) Federal Transit Total $18,276 $20,610 $13,010 $13,186 $65,082 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program $9,400 $9,437 $4,132 $22,968 Construction of Ferry Boats and Ferry Terminal Facilities (Ferry Boat Program) Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program Federal Lands Access Program Federal Lands Transportation Program GARVEE Bonds Debt Service Payments High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) $9,776 $1,819 $6,529 $18,124 National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (FASTLANE/INFRA Grants) Railway-Highway Crossings Program FEDERAL HIGHWAY Recreational Trails Program SAFETEA-LU Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP/RSTP) $8,509 $9,687 $9,402 $8,005 $35,603 Other (see Appendix D) Federal Highway Total $17,909 $28,900 $15,352 $14,534 $76,695 Other Federal Railroad Administration (see Appendix E)

Federal Railroad Administration Total FEDERAL RAIL Federal Total $36,185 $49,510 $28,362 $27,720 $141,777 TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) Other (See Appendix F) FINANCE INNOVATIVE Innovative Financing Total

PROGRAMMED TOTAL $158,016 $223,931 $148,932 $107,845 $638,724

Financial Summary Notes: 1 State Programs that include both state and federal funds.

Caltrans, Division of Transportation Programming Office of Federal Transportation Management Program LG: 01/19/2018 TABLE 2: PROGRAMMED - APPENDICES

San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Adoption ($'s in 1,000)

Appendix A - Regional Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) CURRENT Regional Other 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL

Regional Other Total

Appendix B - State Other State Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) CURRENT 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 $3,408 $3,408

State Other Total $3,408 $3,408

Appendix C - Federal Transit Other Federal Transit Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) CURRENT 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL

Federal Transit Other Total

Appendix D - Federal Highway Other Federal Highway Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) CURRENT 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL

Federal Highway Other Total

Appendix E - Federal Railroad Administration Other Federal Railroad Administration Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) CURRENT 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL

Federal Railroad Administration Other Total

Appendix F - Innovative Finance Other Innovative Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle) CURRENT 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL

Innovative Other Total

Page 6 of 7 TABLE 3: REVENUE-PROGRAMMED

San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Adoption ($'s in 1,000)

4 YEAR (FTIP Cycle)

Funding Source/Program 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 TOTAL

Local Total LOCAL

Tolls Bridge Corridor Regional Sales Tax

REGIONAL Other Regional Total State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) 1 SHOPP SHOPP Prior State Minor Program State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) 1 STIP STIP Prior State Bond Proposition 1A (High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program)

STATE Proposition 1B (Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006) Active Transportation Program (ATP) 1 Highway Maintenance (HM) Program 1 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) 1 Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) State Transit Assistance (STA)(e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42) Other State Total 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Grants 5309 - Fixed Guideway Capital Investment Grants 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants 5310 - Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities 5311 - Formula Grants for Rural Areas 5311f - Intercity Bus 5337 - State of Good Repair Grants

FEDERAL TRANSIT 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grants FTA Transfer from Prior FTIP Other Federal Transit Total Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program $193 $349 $5,650 $9,778 $15,970 Construction of Ferry Boats and Ferry Terminal Facilities (Ferry Boat Program) Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program Federal Lands Access Program Federal Lands Transportation Program GARVEE Bonds Debt Service Payments High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (FASTLANE/INFRA Grants)

FEDERAL HIGHWAY Railway-Highway Crossings Program Recreational Trails Program SAFETEA-LU Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP/RSTP) $860 $36 $317 $1,711 $2,923 Other Federal Highway Total $1,053 $384 $5,967 $11,489 $18,894 Other Federal Railroad Administration RAIL

FEDERAL FEDERAL Federal Railroad Administration Total Federal Total $1,053 $384 $5,967 $11,489 $18,894 TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) Other FINANCE INNOVATIVE Innovative Financing Total REVENUE - PROGRAMMED TOTAL $1,053 $384 $5,967 $11,489 $18,894

Caltrans, Division of Transportation Programming Office of Federal Transportation Management Program LG: 01/19/2018 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Project Listing by Funding Category

Page | 20

San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version)

Route Description Change Description Postmile Program Schedule PIN (Construction costs escalated per Caltrans percentage) Project Comments Dist-EA Fund Total Escalated Cost Funding Summary (Current & Prior Years) AQ Prior Years Four Year Element Lead Status Phase 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Local State Federal

In Stockton, construct complete street improvements on PE 670,000 Carry Over Miner Avenue between Sutter Street and Aurora Street RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-8001 (USING TOLL CREDITS) Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 3,816,000 ******** Version 2 - 10/24/2017 ******** ATP State-Only Funds apply for PE and CON Phase. 3.02 $ 4,486,000 Prior 670,000 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000719 Total 670,000 3,816,000 Current 3,816,000

In Lodi, at various signalized intersections. Install video PE 60,000 Carry Over detection of bicyclists and green painted bicycle lanes. RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-8018 (USING STATE-ONLY ATP FUNDS) Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 505,000 ******** Version 1 - 06/14/2017 ******** ATP/CITY (USING STATE-ONLY ATP FUNDS) 3.02 $ 565,000 Prior Lodi, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000720 Total 60,000 505,000 Current 118,000 447,000

Install 3-position bike racks on 40 and smaller buses, PE Carry Over luggage bay bike racks for 45 commuter buses, interior RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-8019 bike locks on articulated buses, and bike storage racks Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. with lids at Downtown Transit Center in Stockton. Const 272,000 ******** Version 2 - 01/29/2018 ******** ATP/XSJ Funding advanced using SB 1 ATP funds from ATP 3.02 $ 272,000 Prior SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000722 Total 272,000 Joaquin Regional Current 74,000 198,000

In Tracy, on Lowell Ave between Chester Drive and PE 33,000 Carry Over west of Tracy Blvd. Construct 1, 200 linear feet of RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-8020 sidewalk and one ADA curb ramp. (USING Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. STATE-ONLY SB 1 ATP FUNDS) Const 295,000 ******** Version 2 - 01/29/2018 ******** ATP/CITY Project is utilizing State-Only SB 1 ATP Funds from 3.02 $ 328,000 Prior 33,000 Tracy, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000721 Total 33,000 295,000 Current 63,000 232,000

Page 1 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (Non-transit)

Install new traffic responsiveness signal control system PE 135,000 Carry Over on West Lane between Harding Way and Enterprise RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-CM15 Street. Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 620,000 ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** CMAQ/CITY Project data transfered from 2014 FTIP. 5.07 $ 755,000 Prior 135,000 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000642 Total 135,000 620,000 Current 86,599 533,401

In Stockton, at various intersections along Thornton PE 102,000 Carry Over Road, Pacific Avenue, Pershing Avenue, West Lane, RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-9005 Airport Way, El Dorado Street, Hammer Lane, March Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Lane, Charter Way, and Dr Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Const 493,000 ******** Version 1 - 03/09/2017 ******** CMAQ/CITY 1.07 $ 595,000 Prior 11,699 90,301 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000707 Total 102,000 493,000 Current 56,547 436,453

In Stockton, at intersection of Pacific Avenue and March PE 95,000 Carry Over Lane. Install southbound right turn lane. Includes signal RW 117,000 ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ14-9006 systems modification and signal re-timing, pole Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. relocation, sidewalk relocation, corner ramp ADA Const 437,000 ******** Version 2 - 03/07/2018 ******** CMAQ/CITY ******** Version 1 - 03/09/2017 ******** 5.01 $ 649,000 Prior 10,896 84,104 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000708 Total 95,000 117,000 437,000 Current 63,544 490,456

In Stockton, install left turn lanes at the following PE 318,750 Carry Over locations: at intersection of West Lane/Bianchi Road RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-9007 install one additional left turn lane on all approaches; at Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. intersection of March Lane/Feather River Drive install Const 1,806,250 ******** Version 1 - 03/09/2017 ******** CITY/CMAQ 5.01 $ 2,125,000 Prior 36,561 282,189 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000709 Total 318,750 1,806,250 Current 207,177 1,599,073

In Stockton, at intersection of Tam OShanter Drive and PE 152,000 Carry Over Knickerbocker Drive. Replace all-way stop intersection RW 116,000 ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ14-9008 with roundabout. Install Class II Bicycle Lanes between Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Knickerbocker Drive and Hammer Lane. Upgrade Const 698,112 ******** Version 2 - 03/07/2018 ******** CMAQ/CITY ******** Version 1 - 03/09/2017 ******** 5.01 $ 966,112 Prior 17,480 134,520 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000710 Total 152,000 116,000 698,112 Current 93,624 720,488

In Stockton, at intersection of Montauban Avenue and PE 192,935 Carry Over Hammertown Drive. Replace all-way stop with RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-9009 roundabout. Install Class II bicycle lane on Montauban Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. between Hammertown and Swain Road. Install corner Const 885,292 ******** Version 1 - 03/09/2017 ******** CMAQ/CITY 5.01 $ 1,078,227 Prior 22,130 170,805 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000711 Total 192,935 885,292 Current 101,543 783,749

Page 2 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (Non-transit)

In Stockton, at intersection of Lincoln Street and Eighth PE 185,968 Carry Over Street. Convert all-way stop intersection to roundabout RW 135,954 ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ14-9010 and install bicycle lanes on Eighth Street between Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Lincoln Street and El Dorado Street. Upgrade sidewalk Const 861,380 ******** Version 2 - 03/07/2018 ******** CMAQ/CITY ******** Version 1 - 03/09/2017 ******** 5.01 $ 1,183,302 Prior 21,327 164,641 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000712 Total 185,968 135,954 861,380 Current 114,395 882,939

In Stockton, parallel to March Lane in the East Bay PE 360,000 Carry Over MUD corridor between Brookside Road and Hillsboro RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ14-8015 Way. Reconstruct , widen and improve existing pathway Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. to Class I Bicycle and Pedestrian Path standards. Const 3,508,738 ******** Version 3 - 03/08/2018 ******** ATP/CMAQ/CITY ******** Version 2 - 09/07/2017 ******** 3.02 $ 3,868,738 Prior 43,000 317,000 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000713 Total 360,000 3,508,738 Current 402,453 3,106,285

In Stockton, at various locations. Construct , curb, PE 450,000 Carry Over gutter, and sidewalk to close sidewalk gaps along RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ14-8016 routes to schools. Install or upgrade curb ramps for Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. ADA compliance. Upgrade drainage, crosswalks, and Const 2,170,929 ******** Version 3 - 03/08/2018 ******** ATP/CMAQ/CITY ******** Version 2 - 09/07/2017 ******** 3.02 $ 2,620,929 Prior 52,000 398,000 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000714 Total 450,000 2,170,929 Current 250,229 1,920,700

In Stockton, install and upgrade various bicycle PE 308,413 Carry Over facilities along Bear Creek between Thornton Road and RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-8017 Lower Sacramento Road, along Pixley Slough between Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Bear Creek and Eight Mile Road, on Thornton Road Const 1,418,697 ******** Version 1 - 03/09/2017 ******** CMAQ/CITY 3.02 $ 1,727,110 Prior 35,375 273,038 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000715 Total 308,413 1,418,697 Current 162,725 1,255,972

Costs associated with the improvement of the Louise PE Carry Over Avenue and McKinley Avenue intersection including RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ14-CM17 installation of left turn lanes and modified traffic signal Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. equipment. Const 450,000 ******** Version 4 - 03/07/2018 ******** CMAQ/CITY ******** Version 3 - 06/15/2017 ******** 5.01 $ 450,000 Prior Lathrop,City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000644 Total 450,000 Current 50,000 400,000

In Lathrop, at interesection of Golden Valley Parkway & PE 50,000 Carry Over Lathrop Road, and on Lathrop Road between Golden RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ14-9001 Valley Parkway and Harlan Road. Replace all-way stop Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. intersection at Golden Valley Parkway with new traffic Const 400,000 ******** Version 3 - 03/07/2018 ******** CMAQ/CITY ******** Version 2 - 06/15/2017 ******** 5.02 $ 450,000 Prior 50,000 Lathrop,City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000699 Total 50,000 400,000 Current 400,000

Page 3 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (Non-transit)

Purchase of replacement CNG street sweeper PE Carry Over RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-CM11 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 410,000 ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** CMAQ/CITY Project data transfered from 2014 FTIP. 4.01 $ 410,000 Prior Lodi, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000638 Total 410,000 Current 205,000 205,000

In Ripon, at intersection of Colony Road/Hoff Drive/SR PE 40,000 Carry Over 99 Ramps. Replace all-way stop intersection with RW 20,000 ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-9002 signalized intersection, install sidewalk ADA Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. improvements, signage, and striping. Const 600,000 ******** Version 1 - 03/08/2017 ******** CMAQ/CITY 5.02 $ 660,000 Prior 60,000 Ripon, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000700 Total 60,000 600,000 Current 200,000 400,000

In San Joaquin County, at intersection of State Route PE 272,000 Carry Over 26 and Jack Tone Road. Replace all-way stop RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ14-9003 intersection with roundabout. Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 1,253,000 ******** Version 2 - 03/07/2018 ******** CO/CMAQ ******** Version 1 - 03/08/2017 ******** 5.01 $ 1,525,000 Prior 31,199 240,801 San Joaquin Co DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000701 Total 272,000 1,253,000 Current 143,719 1,109,281

In San Joaquin County, at intersection of State Route 4 PE 282,000 Carry Over and Jack Tone Road. Replace all-way stop intersection RW 80,000 ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ14-9004 with roundabout. Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 1,297,000 ******** Version 2 - 03/07/2018 ******** CMAQ/CO ******** Version 1 - 03/08/2017 ******** 5.01 $ 1,659,000 Prior 32,346 249,654 San Joaquin Co DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000702 Total 282,000 80,000 1,297,000 Current 157,942 1,219,058

Throughout San Joaquin and Merced Counties, PE Carry Over implement travel demand management program. RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ11-9009 Toll Credits apply for CMAQ funds in FFY 19/20 and Const 2,850,000 20/21. CMAQ 4.01 $ 2,850,000 Prior San Joaquin DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000608 Total 2,850,000 Council of Current 2,850,000

Install Adaptive Traffic Signal System on 11th Street PE 145,625 Carry Over between Corral Hollow Road to Mac Arthur Drive RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ11-CM17 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 765,000 ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** CITY/CMAQ Project data transfered from 2014 FTIP. 5.07 $ 910,625 Prior 145,625 Tracy, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000597 Total 145,625 765,000 Current 63,750 701,250

Page 4 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (Non-transit)

Install Corrall Hollow Adaptive Traffic Signal System PE 164,625 Carry Over between Schulte Road to the Mall Entry RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ11-CM18 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 957,000 ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** CMAQ/CITY Project data transfered from 2014 FTIP. 5.07 $ 1,121,625 Prior 164,625 Tracy, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000598 Total 164,625 957,000 Current 79,750 877,250

Install Traffic Signal at Corral Hollow and Valpico PE 80,000 Carry Over Road and construct related intersection improvements. RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ11-CM26 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 584,000 ******** Version 7 - 01/18/2017 ******** CMAQ Toll credits apply for PE and CON phases. 5.02 $ 664,000 Prior 80,000 Tracy, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000606 Total 80,000 584,000 Current 584,000

Page 5 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (Transit Projects)

Costs associated with installation of signal PE 375,000 Carry Over prioritization equipment for BRT Phase 5 operations on RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-CM10 Weber Ave, Miner Ave, Wison Way, Fremont St., Filbert Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. St and Main St. Const 1,725,000 ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** CMAQ/CITY Project data transfered from 2014 FTIP. 2.06 $ 2,100,000 Prior 375,000 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000641 Total 375,000 1,725,000 Current 240,870 1,484,130

Costs associated with installation of signal PE 285,000 Carry Over prioritization equipment for BRT operations on Pacific RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ14-CM16 Avenue and Madison Street. Replace signalized Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. intersection at Miner Avenue and San Joaquin Street Const 1,315,000 ******** Version 7 - 03/07/2018 ******** CMAQ/CITY ******** Version 6 - 03/08/2017 ******** 2.06 $ 1,600,000 Prior 285,000 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000643 Total 285,000 1,315,000 Current 183,520 1,131,480

Purchase of one passenger rail car for service PE Carry Over expansion. RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-6003 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 3,500,000 ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** 5307-TR Project data transfered from 2014 FTIP. 2.10 $ 3,500,000 Prior SJRRC - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000645 Total 3,500,000 Joaquin Regional Current 3,500,000

Stockton Track Extension, Phase 2 . On UPRR Fresno PE Carry Over Subdivision mainline near El Pinal, from ACE Rail RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-6026 Maintenance Facility to Cabral Station: construct Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. dedicated passenger track. Includes track work, bridge Const 22,651,640 ******** Version 3 - 11/15/2017 ******** 5307_TR/PROP1A/EARREPU/MEA ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** 2.11 $ 22,651,640 Prior 2,380,000 10,579,000 9,692,640 SJRRC - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000683 Total 22,651,640 Joaquin Regional Current

In Stockton, near the Robert J. Cabral Station between PE 316,000 Carry Over the UPRR, Weber Avenue, Union Street, and Main RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-6006 Street. Construct park and ride lot and related on-street Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. parking, sidewalks, lighting, security, and other Const 995,000 ******** Version 1 - 03/08/2017 ******** CMAQ Toll Credits apply for PE and CON phases. 1.15 $ 1,311,000 Prior 1,311,000 SJRRC - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000703 Total 1,311,000 Joaquin Regional Current

Replacement of age eligible vehicles for SMA, Intercity PE and Interregional service RW ******** Version 1 - 03/23/2018 ******** SJ07-5027 Listing added back into 2017 FTIP for amendments to Const 38,373,579 PVT/5307-TR/XSJ 2.10 $ 38,373,579 Prior 33,373,579 5,000,000 SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000728 Total 38,373,579 Joaquin Regional Current

Page 6 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (Transit Projects)

Purchase of 6 BRT replacement buses that will operate PE 666,133 on BRT Corridors. Corridor ( BRT III Along Hammer RW ******** Version 3 - 03/13/2018 ******** SJ11-CM03 between 99 & I- 5 ) Improvements and Transit Project was included as part of FTA Grant Enhancements to support BRT service along the Const 11,258,954 CA-95-X143, including programming in the 2011 CMAQ/5309c/5307-TR/PVT FTIP. The grant currently has a balance of 2.10 $ 11,925,087 Prior 2,485,018 9,440,069 SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000729 Total 11,925,087 Joaquin Regional Current

Six-mile BRT route, running along Fremont Street and PE Miner Avenue, from east of SR 99 to east of I-5. RW ******** Version 5 - 03/13/2018 ******** SJ14-5017 Construction costs for road/sidewalk enhancements, ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** fare vending machines, shelters, lighting, and signal Const 2,749,204 Project data transfered from 2014 FTIP. XSJ/STA/5307-TR/TIRCP ******** Version 3 - 04/08/2016 ******** 2.06 $ 2,749,204 Prior 171,708 977,496 1,600,000 SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000730 Total 2,749,204 Joaquin Regional Current

Purchase of six electric buses for fleet replacement. PE RW ******** Version 1 - 03/26/2018 ******** SJ07-5044 Const 5,460,121 5307-TR/STA/TIRCP/XSJ/HVIP 2.10 $ 5,460,121 Prior 1,102,057 712,064 3,646,000 SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000731 Total 5,460,121 Joaquin Regional Current

6-mile BRT route running along MLK Blvd, from west PE of SR 99 to west of I-5. Construction costs for RW ******** Version 1 - 03/26/2018 ******** SJ14-5014 road/sidewalk enhancements, fare vending machines, shelters, lighting, signal upgrades. Const 7,988,643 XSJ/TIRCP/5307-TR/STA 4.12 $ 7,988,643 Prior 493,632 4,895,011 2,600,000 SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000732 Total 7,988,643 Joaquin Regional Current

In Stockton, at Regional Transportation Center PE maintenance facility and Downtown Transit Center. RW ******** Version 1 - 03/26/2018 ******** SJ14-5033 Install solar power infrastructure for battery-electric Toll Credits apply for CON phase. bus charging facilities. Toll credits apply for CON Const 3,375,000 CMAQ 2.10 $ 3,375,000 Prior 3,375,000 SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000734 Total 3,375,000 Joaquin Regional Current

Replace seven 40 diesel- electric hybrid buses with new PE 40 battery-electric buses. Toll credits apply for CON RW ******** Version 1 - 03/26/2018 ******** SJ14-5035 phase. Toll credits apply for CON phase. Const 7,774,410 5307-TR 2.10 $ 7,774,410 Prior SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000735 Total 7,774,410 Joaquin Regional Current 7,774,410

Page 7 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (Transit Projects)

Purchase 5 diesel/ electric hybrid buses for fleet PE Carry Over expansion RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ11-CM14 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 2,326,822 ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** LTF/CMAQ/5307/PTMISEA/CITY Project data transfered from 2014 FTIP. 2.10 $ 2,326,822 Prior Tracy, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000543 Total 2,326,822 Current 765,294 1,561,528

Replace 9 old diesel school buses with new CNG PE Carry Over school buses RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-CM03 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 1,444,500 ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** CMAQ/PVT Project data transfered from 2014 FTIP. 2.10 $ 1,444,500 Prior Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000630 Total 1,444,500 Current 963,000 481,500

Page 8 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Federal Demonstration Project

Construct new interchange I-205 at Lammers PE 7,220,882 Carry Over Road/Eleventh Street. Realign and widen Eleventh RW 5,000,000 ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-2032 Street to 6- lanes north of Grant Line Road to Byron Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Road. Construct Aux lane Hansen to Eleventh; in WB Const 40,672,118 ******** Version 9 - 03/09/2017 ******** DEMO-ST/CITY/TI/IM/DEV Project added into 2017 FTIP for ROW acquisition 0.00 $ 52,893,000 Prior 5,427,882 6,793,000 Tracy, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000227 Total 12,220,882 40,672,118 Current 40,672,118

Page 9 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 Program

In the City of Lodi , costs associated with transit PE Carry Over operations in the Lodi urbanized area. RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-5006 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 18,215,770 3,850,000 3,850,000 3,850,000 3,850,000 ******** Version 23 - 06/22/2017 ******** 5307/XSJ/TDA/CITY ******** Version 22 - 03/28/2017 ******** 2.01 $ 33,615,770 Prior 2,546,140 7,986,222 7,683,408 Lodi, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000154 Total 18,215,770 3,850,000 3,850,000 3,850,000 3,850,000 Current 3,400,000 6,400,000 5,600,000

Costs to construct and maintain passenger amenities PE Carry Over and improve transportation service facilities and RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-5004 maintenance facilities, including purchase of small Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. tools and parts. Const 1,066,410 780,000 780,000 780,000 780,000 ******** Version 9 - 11/14/2017 ******** 5307/TDA/5339 ******** Version 8 - 06/22/2017 ******** 2.04 $ 4,186,410 Prior 195,209 871,201 Lodi, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000299 Total 1,066,410 780,000 780,000 780,000 780,000 Current 1,200,000 1,920,000

Cost associated with the operation of Manteca Transit PE Carry Over system. RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-5018 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 10,674,180 1,260,000 1,360,000 1,460,000 1,560,000 ******** Version 18 - 01/29/2018 ******** 5307/TDA ******** Version 17 - 03/28/2017 ******** 2.01 $ 16,314,180 Prior 5,022,036 5,652,144 Manteca, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000213 Total 10,674,180 1,260,000 1,360,000 1,460,000 1,560,000 Current 2,820,000 2,820,000

Capital assistance for operations of Manteca Transit. PE Carry Over Includes preventative maintenance of Manteca Transit RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-5031 vehicles, securtiy, employee training, lease and rental Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. agreements, ADA, and project administration. Const 600,000 625,000 650,000 675,000 ******** Version 3 - 03/28/2017 ******** 5307/TDA Amendment adds FTA 5307 and TDA Funds for 2.03 $ 2,550,000 Prior Manteca, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000694 Total 600,000 625,000 650,000 675,000 Current 510,000 2,040,000

Costs of preventive maintenance of RTDs revenue and PE Carry Over non-revenue fleet. Includes routine upkeep, & RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ07-5045 inspections, major repairs, labor , and administration Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. costs. Costs are tracked through work orders. Const 78,935,682 3,750,000 3,750,000 3,750,000 3,750,000 ******** Version 27 - 03/07/2018 ******** 5307/TDA/AR-5307/PVT/5307-TR ******** Version 26 - 07/21/2017 ******** 2.01 $ 93,935,682 Prior 5,843,865 13,633,422 59,458,395 SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000161 Total 78,935,682 3,750,000 3,750,000 3,750,000 3,750,000 Joaquin Regional Current 3,000,000 12,000,000

Equipment Purchase and installation of safety and PE Carry Over security devices related to bus and bus facilities that RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ14-5028 include ITS applications Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 798,026 66,163 67,439 68,739 70,064 ******** Version 15 - 03/07/2018 ******** STA/5307/PVT/AR-5307/LTF ******** Version 14 - 07/27/2017 ******** 2.05 $ 1,070,431 Prior 91,313 109,941 596,772 SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000474 Total 798,026 66,163 67,439 68,739 70,064 Joaquin Regional Current 54,482 217,923

Page 10 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 Program

Cost associated with maintaining a multi-year tire PE Carry Over funding lease contract RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ14-5030 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 1,136,579 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 ******** Version 9 - 03/07/2018 ******** 5307/TDA ******** Version 8 - 07/27/2017 ******** 2.05 $ 2,636,579 Prior 227,316 909,263 SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000610 Total 1,136,579 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 Joaquin Regional Current 300,000 1,200,000

Capital Cost of Contracting PE RW ******** Version 1 - 03/26/2018 ******** SJ14-5027 Const 2,050,115 2,176,403 2,305,128 2,436,335 5307/TDA 2.01 $ 8,967,981 Prior SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000733 Total 2,050,115 2,176,403 2,305,128 2,436,335 Joaquin Regional Current 1,793,597 7,174,384

Rebuild and replace engines, transmissions , and other PE major components over $500. RW ******** Version 1 - 03/26/2018 ******** SJ18-5014 Const 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 5307/TDA 2.03 $ 1,500,000 Prior SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000736 Total 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 Joaquin Regional Current 300,000 1,200,000

Rehabilitation of bus fleet, including complete overhaul PE and component rebuild RW ******** Version 1 - 03/26/2018 ******** SJ07-5039 Const 596,235 596,235 596,235 596,235 5339/TDA 2.03 $ 2,384,940 Prior SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000737 Total 596,235 596,235 596,235 596,235 Joaquin Regional Current 476,988 1,907,952

Costs associated with the delivery of Tracer fixed route PE Carry Over and comparable paratransit services. This includes RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-5055 salaries, contracting of service, equipment, etc. Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 24,256,603 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 ******** Version 21 - 07/27/2017 ******** TDA/5307 ******** Version 20 - 03/28/2017 ******** 2.01 $ 36,256,603 Prior 11,954,013 12,302,590 Tracy, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000149 Total 24,256,603 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 Current 6,000,000 6,000,000

Capital Cost of Contracting PE Carry Over RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-5055 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 3,276,207 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 ******** Version 4 - 03/28/2017 ******** 5307/TDA Amendment adds FTA 5307 and TDA Funds for 2.01 $ 9,276,207 Prior 655,242 2,620,965 Tracy, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000673 Total 3,276,207 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Current 1,200,000 4,800,000

Page 11 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Federal Transit Administration Section 5310

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 PE Carry Over Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Operating RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-5056 assistance to transit agencies Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 360,894 360,894 360,894 360,894 ******** Version 1 - 06/14/2017 ******** 5310 2.01 $ 1,443,576 Prior Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000717 Total 360,894 360,894 360,894 360,894 Current 1,443,576

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 PE Carry Over Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Purchase of RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-5056 new buses to replace existing vehicles or for minor Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. expansions of the fleet Const 483,000 483,000 483,000 483,000 ******** Version 1 - 06/14/2017 ******** 5310 2.10 $ 1,932,000 Prior Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000718 Total 483,000 483,000 483,000 483,000 Current 1,932,000

Page 12 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Federal Transit Administration Section 5311 Program

FTA 5311 funding for SJRTD to provide services to PE Carry Over rural areas of San Joaquin County RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ07-5030 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 8,901,769 650,249 650,249 650,249 650,249 ******** Version 22 - 03/07/2018 ******** 5311/LTF/PTMISEA ******** Version 21 - 01/04/2018 ******** 2.01 $ 11,502,765 Prior 4,879,724 38,000 3,984,045 SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000266 Total 8,901,769 650,249 650,249 650,249 650,249 Joaquin Regional Current 1,161,864 1,439,132

Page 13 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program

HBRR Bacon Island Road over Middle River, PE 3,363,415 20,917,000 Carry Over Woodward Island Ferry replacement with 2 lane bridge. RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-3068 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 20,917,000 ******** Version 12 - 11/14/2017 ******** HBRR-S/LTF/LF-AC ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** 0.00 $ 45,197,415 Prior 21,589,683 2,690,732 San Joaquin Co DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000425 Total 24,280,415 20,917,000 Current 20,917,000

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR part 93.126 PE Carry Over Exempt table 2 categories - Widening narrow RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-3002 pavements or reconstructing bridges ( no additional Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. lanes). Const 1,606,700 2,572,160 542,000 133,293,345 ******** Version 27 - 11/14/2017 ******** BR-LOCS/HBRR-L/CITY/LF-AC ******** Version 26 - 06/15/2017 ******** 1.19 $ 138,014,205 Prior Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000272 Total 1,606,700 2,572,160 542,000 133,293,345 Current 12,839,066 125,175,139

Page 14 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Local Program

Interchange Improvements In Stockton, at SR 99 and PE 60,000 600,000 Carry Over Morada Lane interchange: Project programmed in the RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ11-2001 FTIP for environmental approval. Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 09/13/2016******** PVT ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 03/04/2014 ******** 0.00 $ 660,000 Prior 60,000 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000561 Total 60,000 600,000 Current 600,000

Interchange Improvements In Stockton, at SR 99 and PE 45,000 600,000 Carry Over Eight Mile Rd Interchange: Project Programmed in RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ11-2002 FTIP for environmental only Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 09/13/2016******** PVT ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 03/04/2014 ******** 0.00 $ 645,000 Prior 45,000 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000562 Total 45,000 600,000 Current 600,000

Page 15 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Regional Surface Transportation Program

In Escalon, on McHenry Avenue between Narcissus PE Carry Over Way to Jones Road. Widen and reconstruct roadway to RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ07-3010 add two-way left turn lane. Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 400,000 ******** Version 3 - 03/07/2018 ******** CITY/STPL ******** Version 2 - 06/19/2017 ******** 5.01 $ 400,000 Prior Escalon, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000716 Total 400,000 Current 200,000 200,000

In Lodi, on Lockeford St. from the UPRR to Cherokee PE Carry Over Lane. Construct two way left turn lane, parking on both RW ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 03/27/2018******** SJ11-3190 sides, Class II bike lanes, install storm drain system, ******** Version 8 - 12/21/2016 ******** curb gutter and sidewalks, landscaping and street Const 5,420,018 ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** STPL/CITY/CMAQ Project data transfered from 2014 FTIP. 5.01 $ 5,420,018 Prior 3,618,000 1,802,018 Lodi, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000552 Total 5,420,018 Current

In Ripon, on Stockton Avenue, from Second Street to PE 465,000 Carry Over Doak Boulevard. Reconstruct street and add two-way RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ11-3016 left turn lane and sidewalks. Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 3,535,000 ******** Version 7 - 01/03/2018 ******** LTF/STPL/XSJ ******** Version 6 - 06/15/2017 ******** 1.10 $ 4,000,000 Prior 465,000 Ripon, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 11200000323 Total 465,000 3,535,000 Current 1,758,000 1,777,000

Pavement resurfacing and rehabilitation projects in San PE Carry Over Joaquin County. Projects are consistent with CFR part RW ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 03/27/2018******** SJ07-3071 93, 126, exempt tables 2 & 3. Toll Credits apply for all projects and phases in FFY Const 6,531,903 5,811,804 9,401,854 8,004,791 18/19, 19/20, 20/21, and 21/22. STPL 1.10 $ 29,750,352 Prior Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000001 Total 6,531,903 5,811,804 9,401,854 8,004,791 Current 29,750,352

Page 16 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Safety

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 PE Carry Over Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-3116 Railroad/highway crossing, Safer non-Federal-aid Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control Const 10,057,400 1,855,890 6,942,800 ******** Version 25 - 11/14/2017 ******** HSIP/LTF/STPL ******** Version 24 - 01/17/2017 ******** 1.06 $ 18,856,090 Prior Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000403 Total 10,057,400 1,855,890 6,942,800 Current 732,440 18,123,650

Page 17 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) State Highway Operations and Protection Program

Projects are consisent with 40 CFR part 93.126. PE Carry Over Exempt tables 2 & 3 Categories - Roadway/Highway RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ07-1019 Crossing, Safer non-federal-aid system roads, Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and Const 28,672,000 19,442,000 2,712,000 ******** Version 36 - 03/08/2018 ******** SHOPPAC ******** Version 35 - 09/19/2017 ******** 1.06 $ 50,826,000 Prior Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000313 Total 28,672,000 19,442,000 2,712,000 Current 50,826,000

Grouped Projects for Pavement Resurfacing and or PE Carry Over Rehab. Projects are consistent with 40 CFR part RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ07-1021 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 - Pavement resurfacing and/or Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Rehab, Emergency Relief 23(U.S.C 125) widening Const 7,431,000 40,789,000 4,035,000 6,458,000 ******** Version 28 - 03/08/2018 ******** SHOPPAC ******** Version 27 - 11/07/2017 ******** 1.06 $ 58,713,000 Prior Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000315 Total 7,431,000 40,789,000 4,035,000 6,458,000 Current 58,713,000

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR part 93.126, PE Carry Over Exempt Tables 2 - Widening narrow pavements or RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ07-3002 reconstructing bridges( no additional travel lanes) Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 12,552,000 39,815,000 15,425,000 ******** Version 22 - 03/08/2018 ******** SHOPPAC ******** Version 21 - 11/14/2017 ******** 1.06 $ 67,792,000 Prior Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000432 Total 12,552,000 39,815,000 15,425,000 Current 67,792,000

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 PE Carry Over Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ07-1020 Railroad/highway crossing, Safer non-Federal-aid Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control Const 36,987,000 17,851,000 24,067,000 57,344,000 ******** Version 11 - 03/08/2018 ******** SHOPPAC ******** Version 10 - 11/14/2017 ******** 1.06 $ 136,249,000 Prior Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000667 Total 36,987,000 17,851,000 24,067,000 57,344,000 Current 136,249,000

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 PE Carry Over Exempt Tables 2 categories - Repair damage caused RW ******** Version 1 - 03/22/18 ******** SJ07-1022 by natural disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist acts. This Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. applies to damages that do not qualify for Federal Const ******** Version 9 - 03/08/2018 ******** SHOPPAC ******** Version 8 - 08/10/2017 ******** 1.06 $ - Prior Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000668 Total Current

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 PE Carry Over Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-1022 Railroad/highway crossing, Safer non-Federal-aid Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control Const 4,553,000 1,410,000 ******** Version 6 - 07/21/2017 ******** SHOPPAC ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** 1.06 $ 5,963,000 Prior Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000669 Total 4,553,000 1,410,000 Current 5,963,000

Page 18 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) State Highway Operations and Protection Program

Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements, Shoulder PE Carry Over Improvements, Pavement resurfacing and/or RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-3005 rehabilitation - Minor Program. Projects are consistent Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. with 40 CFR Part 93.125 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 Const ******** Version 4 - 08/10/2017 ******** SHOPPAC ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** 1.06 $ - Prior Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000684 Total Current

Grouped Projects for Pavement resurfacing and/or PE Carry Over rehabilitiation on the State Highway Ststem - Highway RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-1023 Maintenance. Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Const ******** Version 5 - 08/10/2017 ******** NH/STP ******** Version 4 - 08/01/2017 ******** 1.10 $ - Prior Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000685 Total Current

Page 19 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) STIP / Regional Choice

205 Near Tracy, from the Alameda County line to Interstate PE 12,359,000 Carry Over L0.0/R13.4 5. Widen from 6 to 8 lanes with high occupancy vehicle RW ******** Version 1 - 06/04/18 ******** SJ07-1003 lanes, relocate section of existing and construct new Project data transfered from 2018 STIP. 10-1H170 soundwalls. Close decks of 22 existing bridges to Const ******** VERSION 1 - 04/05/2018 ******** STIP-AC ^^^^^^^^ Version 1 - 02/08/2018 ^^^^^^^^ 0.00 $ 12,359,000 Prior Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 11200000422 Total 12,359,000 Current 12,359,000

205 Near Tracy, from the Alameda County line to Eleventh PE 7,915,000 Carry Over L0.0/R3.0 Street. Widen from 6 to 8 lanes with high occupancy RW ******** Version 1 - 06/04/18 ******** SJ07-1001 vehicle lanes, including widening of Delta-Mendota Project data transfered from 2018 STIP. 10-1H170 Canal Bridge No. 29-0037 and relocate section of Const ******** VERSION 1 - 04/05/2018 ******** STIP-AC ^^^^^^^^ Version 1 - 03/12/2018 ^^^^^^^^ 0.00 $ 7,915,000 Prior Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 11200000424 Total 7,915,000 Current 7,915,000

99 Add new auxiliary lanes, upgrade existing bridges, PE 6,311,234 Carry Over 3.1/6.2 relocate an at-grade railroad crossing, intersections, RW 6,816,000 ******** Version 1 - 06/04/18 ******** SJ14-1004 construct additional connector lanes, ramp upgrades, Project data transfered from 2018 STIP. 10-1E740 and new signals/lighting. Due to funding constraints, Const 10,142,000 ******** VERSION 1 - 04/05/2018 ******** STIP-AC/STPL/XSJ/SB1 ^^^^^^^^ Version 1 - 02/07/2018 ^^^^^^^^ 0.00 $ 23,269,234 Prior 4,511,234 1,800,000 Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 11200000421 Total 6,311,234 6,816,000 10,142,000 Current 3,408,000 13,550,000

120 In Manteca, at McKinley Avenue. Construct new PE 4,005,000 Carry Over R2.0/R2.6 interchange. RW 16,386,000 ******** Version 1 - 06/04/18 ******** SJ07-2009 Project data transfered from 2018 STIP. Const 25,623,000 ******** VERSION 3 - 04/05/2018 ******** DEMOS21/LTF/NH ******** RTIP VERSION 2 - 02/06/2018 ******** 0.00 $ 46,014,000 Prior 17,511,000 2,880,000 Manteca, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 11200000348 Total 20,391,000 25,623,000 Current 13,323,000 12,300,000

Planning, Programming and Monitoring. PE Carry Over RW ******** Version 1 - 06/04/18 ******** SJ030 Project data transfered from 2018 STIP. Const 3,162,000 200,000 342,000 342,000 343,000 ******** VERSION 33 - 04/05/2018 ******** STIP-AC/LTF ******** RTIP VERSION 32 - 02/08/2018 ******** 0.00 $ 4,389,000 Prior 110,000 3,052,000 San Joaquin DFTIP Amend 0.00 11200000026 Total 3,162,000 200,000 342,000 342,000 343,000 Council of Current 1,227,000

In Tracy, on MacArthur Drive, from Schulte Road to PE 677,000 Carry Over Valpico Road. Widen from two to four lanes. RW 450,000 ******** Version 1 - 06/04/18 ******** SJ07-3108 Project data transfered from 2018 STIP. Const 3,194,000 4,740,000 ******** VERSION 4 - 04/05/2018 ******** LTF/STIP-AC ******** RTIP VERSION 3 - 02/06/2018 ******** 0.00 $ 9,061,000 Prior 1,127,000 3,194,000 Tracy, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 11200000325 Total 4,321,000 4,740,000 Current 1,546,000 3,194,000

Page 20 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Transit Program (Non-CMAQ)

Purchase of buses and transit passenger amenities, PE 85,000 Carry Over includeing bus shelters, benches , trash receptacles, RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-5015 map cases and solar lighting fixtures. Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 808,474 687,500 ******** Version 1 - 07/12/16 ******** 5339/STA/PTMISEA/LTF Project data transfered from 2014 FTIP. 2.07 $ 1,580,974 Prior 1,270 245,425 646,779 Manteca, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000681 Total 893,474 687,500 Current 137,500 550,000

Purchase ten new, more efficient 45 foot hybrid PE Carry Over diesel-electric buses to replace outdated diesel fueled RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ07-5036 buses that have exceeded their useful life. Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 10,384,000 ******** Version 1 - 06/14/2017 ******** 5339/XSJ 2.10 $ 10,384,000 Prior 2,100,000 8,284,000 SJRTD - San DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000723 Total 10,384,000 Joaquin Regional Current

Page 21 of 22 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program San Joaquin Format (Highest Version) Various

In Stockton, complete street improvements to Miner PE 334,000 Carry Over Avenue between Center Street and Sutter Street. RW ******** Version 1 - 03/20/18 ******** SJ14-8012 (Regional ATP Cycle 2) (USING TOLL CREDITS) Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. Const 2,605,000

ATP/CITY 12 month Time Extension for CON Phase granted by 3.02 $ 2,939,000 Prior 334,000 City of Stockton DFTIP Amend 0.00 21200000696 Total 334,000 2,605,000 Current 41,000 2,564,000

Page 22 of 22 Appendix A

Formal Amendments to the 2017 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Formal Amendments from the 2017 Federal Transportation Improvement Program

Amendment MPO Action Date Caltrans Action Date Federal Action Date Number

1 02/15/16 01/10/17 01/18/17

5 01/26/17 02/13/17 03/15/17

7 03/23/17 04/28/17 05/15/17

9 04/27/17 05/12/17 06/14/17

11 06/22/17 07/24/17 08/23/17

15 08/24/17 10/24/17 11/03/17

18 11/16/17 12/18/17 02/08/18

23 03/22/18 05/01/18 05/17/18

26 04/26/18 05/21/18 05/24/18

Appendix B

Lump Sum Listings

Programming Grouped Project Listings in Air Quality Non-Attainment or Maintenance Areas

Background:

Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 450.216 (j) allows projects that are not considered to be of appropriate scale for individual identification in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) to be grouped by function, work type or geographic region using appropriate classifications using the applicable classifications under 23 CFR 771.117(c) and (d) and/or 40 CFR part 93.

MPOs may find grouping projects to offer some advantages and flexibility when amending projects in the FTIP/FSTIP. New projects can be added to an existing grouped project listing through administrative modifications in accordance with the Amendment and Administrative Modification Guidelines. For non- Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funded projects, the detailed project lists may be revised without the need for amendments or administrative modifications if the revisions do not result in changes to the total grouped project costs. However, MPOs must update the detailed project lists to reflect the revision, and furnish them to the respective FTIP/FSTIP Coordinators at Caltrans, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and FTA along with a cover letter.

These guidelines are for programming grouped project listings for Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the rural-nonMPO areas that are classified as either air quality non-attainment or maintenance. The grouped project listings must be consistent with the “Exempt Project” classification contained in the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Transportation Conformity Regulation (40CFR part 93). It is the MPO’s responsibility to determine the eligibility of projects to be included in grouped project listings. If verification/confirmation is needed, an MPO shall consult with their planning coordinators from FHWA and Caltrans Federal Programming Office to confirm their findings.

Programming Guidelines:

1. Use the flow chart below to determine if a project is eligible for grouping. Projects ineligible for grouping must be programmed individually in the FTIP/FSTIP.

Grouping for Non- Attainment or Maintenance areas

Project exempt from Air Quality Conf? (40CFR93.126 & .127 Tables 2 & 3) N Y Project is not eligible for N Does scale of project make it appropriate for grouping grouping? (MPO to decide based on $, public sensitivity, and community interest in project)

Project eligible for grouping

AJB_021710

2. The description of the grouped project listings shall include appropriate “Exempt Project” classification per 40 CFR Part 93.126 and 93.127. See “Attachment A” for the “Pre-approved List of Grouped Project Listings”. If the proposed grouped project listing is different from the ones listed in Attachment A, the MPO shall contact their planning coordinators from Caltrans Federal Programming Office, FHWA or FTA prior to programming the new grouped project listing in its FTIP. 3. Projects may be further grouped by grantee/agency or by geographic area provided the grouped listing is consistent with the project listings per Attachment A. Note that projects can not be grouped by a particular fund type or funding program in the FTIP. 4. Detailed project listing (back-up listing) for a grouped project that is programmed or amended in an FTIP, must be included with the transmittal package to Caltrans. The detailed listings shall contain individual project information with sufficient description to accurately identify scope, implementing agency, location, limits of the project (if any), program year and the total cost. See “Attachment B” for the format of the detailed project listing. Total cost of the projects (including funding for all project phases) from the detailed project listing shall be programmed under the “Construction” phase in the FTIP. 5. Projects funded from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) can be grouped as long as the detailed project list is readily available to the Federal Transit Administration and the public. The detaled project list must be included by MPO in FTIP/ FTIP Amendment when it is circulated for public review.

6. Projects with multiple FTA UZAs and with multiple FTA fund types can be grouped as long as the grouped projects meet the requirements of No. 5 above.

7. For MPO areas classified as air quality attainment (areas that are not classified as “maintenance”), projects that can be classified as “Categorical Exclusion (CE)” per 23 CFR 771.117 (c) and (d) can be grouped together by CE classifications.

Attachments: Attachment A: Pre-approved list of grouped project listings Attachment B: Detailed project listings format

2 AJB_021710 Attachment A Pre-approved Grouped Project Listings

Sl. No. Grouped Projects Listing Name Project Description Grouped Projects for Bridge Rehabilitation and Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 categories - Widening narrow pavements or 1 Reconstruction - SHOPP Program reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes). Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Railroad/highway crossing, Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - Safer non-Federal-aid system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than 2 SHOPP Collision Reduction Program signalization projects, Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, Pavement marking demonstration, Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, Lighting improvements, Emergency truck pullovers Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Railroad/highway crossing, Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - Safer non-Federal-aid system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than 3 SHOPP Mandates Program signalization projects, Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, Pavement marking demonstration, Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, Lighting improvements, Emergency truck pullovers Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 categories - Repair damage caused by natural Grouped Projects for Emergency Repair - SHOPP 4 disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist acts. This applies to damages that do not qualify for Federal Emergency Relief funds or to Emergency Response Program damages that qualify for federal Emergency Relief funds but extend beyond the Federally declared disaster period Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Railroad/highway crossing, Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - Safer non-Federal-aid system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than 5 SHOPP Mobility Program signalization projects, Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, Pavement marking demonstration, Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, Lighting improvements, Emergency truck pullovers Grouped Projects for Shoulder Improvements - 6 Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 categories - Fencing,Safety roadside rest areas SHOPP Roadside Preservation Program Grouped Projects for Pavement resurfacing and/or Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 categories - Pavement resurfacing and/or 7 rehabilitation - SHOPP Roadway Preservation rehabilitation, Emergency relief (23 U.S.C. 125), Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel Program lanes) Grouped Projects for Bridge Rehabilitation and Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 categories - Widening narrow pavements or 8 Reconstruction - HBP Program reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes). Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Railroad/highway crossing, Safer non-Federal-aid system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than 9 Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements signalization projects, Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, Pavement marking demonstration, Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, Lighting improvements, Emergency truck pullovers Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Railroad/highway crossing, Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - Safe Safer non-Federal-aid system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than a Routes to School Program (SRTS) signalization projects, Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, Pavement marking demonstration, Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, Lighting improvements, Emergency truck pullovers Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Railroad/highway crossing, Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - Safe Safer non-Federal-aid system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than b Routes to School Program (SR2S State Program) signalization projects, Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, Pavement marking demonstration, Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, Lighting improvements, Emergency truck pullovers Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Railroad/highway crossing, Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - HSIP Safer non-Federal-aid system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than 10 Program signalization projects, Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, Pavement marking demonstration, Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, Lighting improvements, Emergency truck pullovers 11 Grouped Projects for Railroad/highway crossing Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 categories - Railroad/highway crossing Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements on High Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Safer non-Federal-aid 12 Risk Rural Roads - HRRR program system roads 13 Grouped Projects for Hazard Elimination Program Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 categories - Hazard Elimination Program Grouped Projects for Safer non-Federal-aid system Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Safer non-Federal-aid 14 roads system roads 15 Grouped Projects for Shoulder Improvements Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Shoulder improvements Attachment A Pre-approved Grouped Project Listings Sl. No. Grouped Projects Listing Name Project Description Grouped Projects for Shoulder Improvements on the a Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Shoulder improvements State Highway System Grouped Projects for Shoulder Improvementsn on b Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Shoulder improvements the Local Roads System Grouped Projects for Shoulder Improvements in xxx c Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Shoulder improvements County/City 16 Grouped Projects for Increasing Sight Distance Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Increasing Sight Distance Grouped Projects for Increasing Sight Distance on a Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Increasing Sight Distance the State Highway System Grouped Projects for Increasing Sight Distance on b Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Increasing Sight Distance the Local Roads System Grouped Projects for Increasing Sight Distance in c Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Increasing Sight Distance xxx County/City Grouped Projects for Pavement resurfacing and/or Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Pavement resurfacing 17 rehabilitation and/or rehabilitation Grouped Projects for Pavement resurfacing and/or Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Pavement resurfacing a rehabilitation on the State Highway System and/or rehabilitation Grouped Projects for Pavement resurfacing and/or Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Pavement resurfacing b rehabilitation on the State Highway System - and/or rehabilitation Highway Maintenance Grouped Projects for Pavement resurfacing and/or Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Pavement resurfacing c rehabilitation on the Local Roads System and/or rehabilitation Grouped Projects for Pavement resurfacing and/or Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Pavement resurfacing d rehabilitation in xxx County/City and/or rehabilitation Grouped Projects for Pavement resurfacing and/or Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Pavement resurfacing e rehabilitation - ARRA or XXXX funded and/or rehabilitation Grouped Projects forPavement resurfacing and/or Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Pavement resurfacing f rehabilitation - AC overlays and/or rehabilitation Grouped Projects for Pavement marking Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Pavement marking 18 demonstration demonstration. 19 Grouped Projects for Emergency truck pullovers Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Emergency truck pullovers.

Grouped Projects for Widening narrow pavements Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Non Capacity widening 20 or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes) narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes). Grouped Projects for Non Capacity widening (no Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Non Capacity widening a additional travel lanes) narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes). Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Truck climbing lanes 21 Grouped Projects for Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area 22 Grouped Projects for Skid treatments Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Skid treatments 23 Grouped Projects for Safety roadside rest areas Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Safety roadside rest areas Grouped Projects for Railroad/highway crossing Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Railroad/highway crossing 24 warning devices warning devices Grouped Projects for Traffic control devices and Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Traffic control devices and 25 operating assistance other than signalization operating assistance other than signalization project Grouped Projects for Traffic control devices and Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Traffic control devices and a operating assistance operating assistance other than signalization project Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Traffic control devices and b Grouped Projects for Traffic control devices operating assistance other than signalization project 26 Grouped Projects for Increasing Sight Distance Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Increasing Sight Distance Attachment A Pre-approved Grouped Project Listings Sl. No. Grouped Projects Listing Name Project Description 27 Grouped Projects for Fencing Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Fencing 28 Grouped Projects for Lighting improvements Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Lighting improvements Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Continuation of ride-sharing 29 Grouped Projects for Ride-sharing and van-pooling and van-pooling promotion activities at current levels Grouped Projects for Bicycle and pedestrian Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Bicycle and pedestrian 30 facilities facilities (both motorized and Non-motorized) Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Bicycle and pedestrian a Grouped Projects for Bicycle facilities facilities (both motorized and Non-motorized) Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Bicycle and pedestrian b Grouped Projects for Pedestrian facilities facilities (both motorized and Non-motorized) Grouped Projects for Bicycle and pedestrian Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Bicycle and pedestrian c facilities funded with xxxx facilities (both motorized and Non-motorized) Grouped Projects for Bicycle and pedestrian Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Bicycle and pedestrian d facilities in xxxx County/City facilities (both motorized and Non-motorized) Grouped Projects for Bicycle and pedestrian Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Bicycle and pedestrian e facilities - Motorized facilities (both motorized and Non-motorized) Grouped Projects for Bicycle and pedestrian Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Bicycle and pedestrian f facilities - Non - Motorized facilities (both motorized and Non-motorized) 31 Grouped Projects for Noise attenuation Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Noise attenuation. Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Projects that correct, 33 Projects that correct, improve, or eliminate a improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature. hazardous location or feature. Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - Safer Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Safer non-Federal-aid 34 non-Federal-aid system roads system roads Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Railroad/highway crossing, Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - Safer Safer non-Federal-aid system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than 35 roads - Inclusive of federal aid and non-federal aid signalization projects, Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, Pavement marking demonstration, Truck roads climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, Lighting improvements, Emergency truck pullovers Grouped Projects for Directional and informational Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Directional and 37 signs informational signs. Grouped Projects for Directional and informational Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Directional and a signs funded with xxxx informational signs. Grouped Projects for Directional and informational Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Directional and b signs in xxxx County/City informational signs. Grouped Projects for Directional and informational Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Directional and c signs on the federal aid system informational signs. Grouped Projects for Directional and informational Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Directional and d signs on the non-federal aid system informational signs. 38 Grouped Projects for Sign removal Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Sign removal 39 Grouped Projects for Plantings, landscaping, etc. Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Plantings, landscaping, etc. Grouped Projects for Acquisition of scenic Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Acquisition of scenic 40 easements easements Grouped Projects for Emergency or hardship Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Emergency or hardship 41 advance land acquisitions advance land acquisitions (23 CFR 710.503). Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Engineering to assess 42 Grouped Projects for Engineering social, economic, and environmental effects of the proposed action or alternatives to that action; non-capacity increasing Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Planning activities 43 Grouped Projects for Planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C. Grouped Projects for Grants for training and Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Grants for training and 44 research programs research programs Attachment A Pre-approved Grouped Project Listings

Sl. No. Grouped Projects Listing Name Project Description Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Planning and technical 45 Grouped Projects for Planning and technical studies studies Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Specific activities which do Grouped Projects for Activities that do not lead to not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: Planning and technical studies, Grants for training and research programs, 46 construction Planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C, Federal-aid systems revisions, Engineering to assess social, economic, and environmental effects of the proposed action or alternatives to that action. Grouped Projects for Transportation enhancement Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Transportation 47 activities enhancement activities (except rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities) Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Repair of damage caused 48 Grouped Projects for Emergency Repair by natural disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist acts, except projects involving substantial functional, locational or capacity changes. Grouped Projects for Rehabilitation or Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Rehabilitation or 49 reconstruction of track structures, track, and reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in existing rights-of-way.( non-capacity Increasing) trackbed in existing rights-of-way Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Reconstruction or Grouped Projects for Reconstruction or renovation 50 renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail or bus buildings, storage and maintenance facilities, stations, terminals, of transit buildings and structures and ancillary structures).( non-capacity Increasing) Grouped Projects for Construction of small Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Construction of small 51 passenger shelters and information kiosks passenger shelters and information kiosks Grouped Projects for Construction or renovation of Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Construction or renovation 52 power, signal, and communications systems of power, signal, and communications systems Grouped Projects for Purchase of operating Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Purchase of operating 53 equipment for vehicles equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, etc.) Grouped Projects for Purchase of office, shop, and Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Purchase of office, shop, 54 operating equipment for existing facilities and operating equipment for existing facilities Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.12693.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Rehabilitation of transit GroupedG d Projects P j for f Rehabilitation R h bili i of f transit i 55 vehicles (In PM10and PM2.5nonattainment or maintenance areas, such projects are exempt only if they are in compliance with vehicles control measures in the applicable implementation plan) Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Purchase of support 56 Grouped Projects for Purchase of support vehicles vehicles Grouped Projects for Operating assistance to transit Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Operating assistance to 57 agencies transit agencies Grouped Projects for Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet. (Minor changes include changing the number of transit vehicles purchased Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Purchase of new buses 58 by 25% or less, and changes to the fuel type of and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet transit vehicles. MPO needs to take the change through an interagency consultation to confirm that the change in scope is minor) Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Railroad/highway crossing, Safer non-Federal-aid system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements, signalization projects, Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, Pavement marking demonstration, Truck 59 Shoulder Improvements, Pavement resurfacing climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, Lighting improvements, Emergency truck pullovers, Pavement resurfacing and/or and/or rehabilitation - Minor Program rehabilitation, Emergency relief (23 U.S.C. 125), Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes) Attachment A Pre-approved Grouped Project Listings Sl. No. Grouped Projects Listing Name Project Description The projects included under following grouped project listings may be exempt from regional emissions analysis. Note that the local effects of the project on CO and PM concentrations must be considered to determine if a hot-spot analysis may be required prior to making a project level conformity determination.

60 Grouped Projects for Intersection Channelization Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 3 categories - Intersection Channelization Projects.

61 Grouped Projects for Intersection Signalization Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 3 categories - Intersection Signalization Projects

62 Grouped Projects for Interchange Reconfiguration Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 3 categories - Interchange Reconfiguration Projects

Grouped Projects for Changes in Vertical and Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 3 categories - Changes in Vertical and Horizontal 63 Horizontal Alignment Alignment Projects Grouped Projects for Truck Size and Weight Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 3 categories - Truck Size and Weight Inspection 64 Inspection Stations Stations Grouped Projects for Bus Terminals and Transfer 65 Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 3 categories - Bus Terminals and Transfer Points Points Note: All Grouped listings must be accompanied by detailed back-up listings ATTACMENT B Detailed Project Listings Format "Title of the Grouped Project Listing"

Program Total District-EA (if Year Federal State/Local Project Agency County applicable) Project Title Project Description (FFY) Funds Funds Cost 2019 FTIP - Pavement and Resurfacing Grouped Backup List CTIPS ID: 212-0000-0001 Date Last Updated: 06/04/2018 Amendment: Final 2019 FTIP

FY 2018/19 Total Project Project Sponsor Project Project Description and Limits Phase RSTP Funds Local Funds Phase Cost Lathrop Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $874,000 $0 $874,000 Manteca Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $603,605 $0 $603,605 San Joaquin County Walnut Grove Road Resurfacing Roadway Resufacing: Blossom Road to Thornton Road CON $547,000 $0 $547,000 San Joaquin County El Dorado Street Resurfacing Roadway Resurfacing: I-5 to Stockton City Limits CON $1,326,000 $0 $1,326,000 San Joaquin County West Ripon Road Resurfacing Austin Road to Ripon City Limits CON $883,000 $0 $883,000 San Joaquin County French Camp Road Resurfacing Roadway Resurfacing : 1,190 feet west of El Dorado Street to Airport Way CON $1,048,000 $0 $1,048,000 San Joaquin County West Lane Resurfacing (East Roadway Resurfacing: Eight Mile Road to Armstrong Road side only) CON $602,216 $0 $602,216 Tracy Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $648,082 $0 $648,082 FY 2018/19 Total $6,531,903 $0 $6,531,903

FY 2019/20 Total Project Project Sponsor Project Project Description and Limits Phase RSTP Funds Local Funds Phase Cost Escalon Roadway Resufacing Location TBD CON $200,000 $0 $200,000 San Joaquin County Roadway Resufacing Location TBD CON $3,010,841 $0 $3,010,841 Stockton Roadway Resufacing Location TBD CON $2,600,963 $0 $2,600,963 FY 2019/20 Total $5,811,804 $0 $5,811,804

FY 2020/21 Total Project Project Sponsor Project Project Description and Limits Phase RSTP Funds Local Funds Phase Cost Escalon Roadway Resufacing Location TBD CON $200,000 $0 $200,000 Lathrop Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $200,000 $0 $200,000 Lodi Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $1,104,373 $0 $1,104,373 Manteca Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $603,383 $0 $603,383 Ripon Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $400,000 $0 $400,000 San Joaquin County Roadway Resufacing Location TBD CON $3,009,832 $0 $3,009,832 Stockton Roadway Resufacing Location TBD CON $2,600,103 $0 $2,600,103 Tracy Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $642,208 $0 $642,208 Tracy Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $641,955 $0 $641,955 FY 2020/21 Total $9,401,854 $0 $9,401,854

FY 2021/22 Total Project Project Sponsor Project Project Description and Limits Phase RSTP Funds Local Funds Phase Cost Escalon Roadway Resufacing Location TBD CON $200,000 $0 $200,000 Lathrop Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $200,000 $0 $200,000 Lodi Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $551,908 $0 $551,908 Manteca Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $603,156 $0 $603,156 Ripon Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $200,000 $0 $200,000 San Joaquin County Roadway Resufacing Location TBD CON $3,008,802 $0 $3,008,802 Stockton Roadway Resufacing Location TBD CON $2,599,227 $0 $2,599,227 Tracy Roadway Resurfacing Location TBD CON $641,698 $0 $641,698 FY 2021/22 Total $8,004,791 $0 $8,004,791 Caltrans Division of Local Assistance Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) 2015 FTIP Back-Up List, sorted by MPO, Agency and Unique Project ID

MPO: Statewide (all MPO's)

Backup List Updated On: 3/27/018

HR3 Federal Funds Programmed under Federal Funds Programmed in Federal Funds Programmed in Federal Funds Programmed in Federal Funds Programmed in Unique Project ID District Agency MPO Project Location Description of Work Current Total Project Cost Estimate Current Programmed Federal Funds Other/Local Funds Approved Federal Funds Eligibility* "Prior" 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22

Installation and/or upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting, as well as the completion of a city-wide HSIP7-10-006 No 10 Manteca SJCOG All streets and roadways throughout the city $2,635,000 $2,635,000 $0 $430,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,205,000 $2,635,000 Roadway Safety Signing Audit.

HSIP7-10-007 No 10 Manteca SJCOG Various 46 signalized locations throughout the city Improve signal hardware (lenses, back-plates, mounting, size, and number) and improve signal timing. $3,170,000 $2,853,000 $317,000 $468,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,385,000 $2,853,000

H8-10-005 Yes 10 San Joaquin County SJCOG Intersection of Byron Road and Grant Line Road in Tracy. Install a roundabout. $1,367,300 $1,367,300 $0 $0 $0 $1,367,300 $0 $0 $1,367,300

H8-10-006 Yes 10 San Joaquin County SJCOG Intersection of Duncan Road and Comstock Road in Linden. Install a roundabout. $1,213,900 $1,213,900 $0 $0 $0 $1,213,900 $0 $0 $1,213,900

H8-10-007 Yes 10 San Joaquin County SJCOG Intersection of Liberty Road and Dustin Road in north San Joaquin County. Install a roundabout. $1,279,500 $1,279,500 $0 $0 $0 $1,279,500 $0 $0 $1,279,500

HSIP7-10-008 Yes 10 San Joaquin County SJCOG Union Road from Coelho Road to French Camp Road Install centerline and edgeline rumble strips, install no passing zones. $115,000 $115,000 $0 $19,000 $0 $0 $96,000 $0 $115,000

Install center line and edge line rumble strips, install no passing zones. HSIP7-10-009 Yes 10 San Joaquin County SJCOG Bird Road from Union Pacific Railroad tracks (north) to Ahern Road $298,000 $298,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $248,000 $0 $298,000

HSIP7-10-010 Yes 10 San Joaquin County SJCOG Austin Road from Burnham Road to French Camp Road Install High Friction Surface Treatment (HFST). Install center line and edge line rumble strips. $952,400 $857,160 $95,240 $143,100 $0 $0 $0 $714,060 $857,160

HSIP7-10-011 Yes 10 San Joaquin County SJCOG French Camp Road from Jack Tone Road to Prescott Road Install centerline and edgeline rumble strips. Apply High Friction Surface Treatment (HFST) $543,100 $488,790 $54,310 $81,900 $0 $0 $406,890 $0 $488,790

HSIP7-10-012 Yes 10 San Joaquin County SJCOG 35 all-way stop controlled intersections Install Red Flashing LED Beacons with solar panels $600,000 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. between N. El Dorado St. and S. Aurora St., at the intersections of S. San Joaquin St., Convert signals from pedestal-mounted to mast arms (at the intersections with San Joaquin St., California St. H8-10-010 No 10 Stockton SJCOG $1,163,500 $1,163,500 $0 $0 $0 $1,163,500 $0 $0 $1,163,500 California St. and S. Grant St. and Grant St.), and provide protected left-turns (at the intersections with San Joaquin St. and Grant St.).

H8-10-011 No 10 Stockton SJCOG Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. between Bieghle Alley and Mariposa Rd. Install raised median. $411,900 $370,710 $41,190 $0 $0 $370,710 $0 $0 $370,710

H8-10-012 No 10 Stockton SJCOG Sixteen (16) locations throughout the City of Stockton. Upgrade the existing guardrails with new guardrails, transition rails and end treatments. $1,180,900 $1,180,900 $0 $0 $0 $1,180,900 $0 $0 $1,180,900

Nine (9) intersectoins in the Weston Ranch subdivision in the southwestern corner of the City of Stockton, just west of the Install pedestrian crossings (with enhanced safety features), including high visibility crosswalks and flashing H8-10-013 No 10 Stockton SJCOG $1,034,700 $1,034,700 $0 $0 $0 $1,034,700 $0 $0 $1,034,700 Interstate-5 freeway. beacons.

Reduce the travel lanes from four to three (Road Diet), to accommodate a center two-way left turn lane and H8-10-014 No 10 Stockton SJCOG N. Eldorado St. between Morada Lane and W. Hammer Lane. $589,500 $530,550 $58,950 $0 $0 $530,550 $0 $0 $530,550 install new bike lanes.

Install a raised median with pedestrian median fencing to prevent J-walking; Install new sidewalks and ADA H8-10-015 No 10 Stockton SJCOG N. El Dorado St. between Essex St. and the Calaveras River Trail (near E. Ingram St.). $738,700 $664,830 $73,870 $0 $0 $664,830 $0 $0 $664,830 compliant curb ramps.

H8-10-016 No 10 Stockton SJCOG Pacific Ave. between Calaveras River Trail and W. Hammer Ln. Install raised median curb between the existing median limits at various locations. $1,077,500 $969,750 $107,750 $0 $0 $969,750 $0 $0 $969,750

HSIP7-10-013 No 10 Stockton SJCOG Multiple locations on Manthey Rd., Brookside Rd., Feather River Dr., Bianchi Rd. Install high friction surface treatments (HFST) and variable speed warning signs at certain horizontal curves $844,400 $759,960 $84,440 $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $624,960 $759,960

Pedestrian crossing improvements, install high-intensity activated crosswalk (HAWK) pedestrian crossing HSIP7-10-014 No 10 Stockton SJCOG Intersection of South Airport Way and East Sonora Street, south of the Crosstown Freeway (SR-4). $373,800 $373,800 $0 $66,000 $0 $0 $307,800 $0 $373,800 and install pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (new signs and markings only).

Intersections of N. Filbert St. / E. Myrtle St. and N. Filbert St. / E. Market St., at the Filbert St. exits of the Crosstown HSIP7-10-015 No 10 Stockton SJCOG Install Emergency vehicle Premption $266,600 $266,600 $0 $47,000 $0 $0 $219,600 $0 $266,600 Freeway (SR-4).

HSIP7-10-016 No 10 Stockton SJCOG Along S. Airport Way and Industrial Dr. Install guardrail, transition railing and crash cushions, re-striping of the roadway and other improvements. $253,600 $253,600 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $208,600 $0 $253,600

To reduce the travel lanes from four lanes to three (Road Diet), to accommodate a center two-way left turn HSIP7-10-017 No 10 Stockton SJCOG On North Hunter Street between West Harding Way and East Miner Ave. $449,000 $404,100 $44,900 $72,000 $0 $0 $332,100 $0 $404,100 lane and install new bike lanes.

Total(SJCOG) $20,558,300 $19,680,650 $877,650 $1,557,000 $0 $9,775,640 $1,818,990 $6,529,020 $19,680,650

Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 06/05/2018 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 FTIP Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - SHOPP Mobility Program CTIP ID: 212-0000-0667 Date Last Updated: 3/22/2018 Amendment: Final 2019 FTIP

FY 2018/19 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) Near Linden, from 0.3 mile east of Fine Road to PS&E $425 0.1 mile west of Podesta Lane. Widen travel 10 San Joaquin 26 13.1/R13.8 lanes and shoulders to improve the existing 0H560 3275 R/W SUP $230 conditions for Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) trucks. R/W $540 In Lodi, from south of Route 12 (Victor Road) to CON SUP $2,199 10 San Joaquin 99 30.9/31.3 south of Turner Road. Realign northbound on- 1C280 3145 ramp,increase bridge vertical clearance, and CON $11,110 construct auxiliary lane. In Stockton, from Route 5 to Route 99. Install ramp meters, traffic monitoring systems, closed- 10 San Joaquin 4 R16.0/R19.4 circuit television (CCTV), and synchronize 1F180 3274 PA&ED $2,177 intersection signals with ramp metering.

In various counties on various routes, at various CON SUP $697 10 San Joaquin 5 VAR locations. Upgrade Transportation Management 1C620 3147 System (TMS) elements. CON $3,462 In and near Stockton, on Routes 5, 4 (PM PS&E $2,550 14.6/21.2), and 99 (PM 15.8/18.5) at various 10 San Joaquin 5 R21.4/27.9 1F400 3250 locations. Install Intelligent Transportation R/W SUP $380 System (ITS) elements. R/W $80

In San Joaquin, Merced, and Stanislaus counties, PS&E $1,719 on Routes 5, 12 59, 99 and 152 at various 10 San Joaquin 99 Var locations. Upgrade or replace inefficient and 1G750 3227 R/W SUP $465 damaged Traffic Monitoring Station elements. R/W $7 In San Joaquin, Amador, Calaveras, Merced, Mariposa, Stanislaus, and Tuolumne Counties, PS&E $1,191 on Routes 4, 5, 26, 33, 49, 59, 88, 99, 104, 108, 10 San Joaquin 120 120, 132, 140, 152 and 205 at various locations. 1G990 3226 R/W SUP $107 Repair or replace damaged and nonfunctioning Traffic Management System (TMS) element. R/W $33

In and near Manteca and Lathrop, from Route 5 PS&E $1,221 to Route 99; also, on Route 5 at PM R13.34, and 10 San Joaquin 120 R0.6/R6.1 on Route 99 at PM 4.56. Install Intelligent 1C960 3230 R/W SUP $5 Transportation System (ITS) field elements. R/W $68

In and near Tracy and Lathrop, from Route 580 PS&E $2,512 to Route 5. Install ramp meters and other 10 San Joaquin 205 L0.0/R13.4 1C330 3146 R/W SUP $979 Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) elements. R/W $4,830 FY 2018/19 Total $36,987

FY 2019/20 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) Near Linden, from 0.3 mile east of Fine Road to 0.1 mile west of Podesta Lane. Widen travel CON SUP $680 10 San Joaquin 26 13.1/R13.8 lanes and shoulders to improve the existing 0H560 3275 conditions for Surface Transportation Assistance CON $1,250 Act (STAA) trucks. In Stockton, from Route 5 to Route 99. Install PS&E $5,813 ramp meters, traffic monitoring systems, closed- 10 San Joaquin 4 R16.0/R19.4 circuit television (CCTV), and synchronize 1F180 3274 R/W SUP $667 intersection signals with ramp metering. R/W $1,269 In San Joaquin, Merced, and Stanislaus counties, on Routes 5, 12 59, 99 and 152 at various CON SUP $1,310 10 San Joaquin 99 Var locations. Upgrade or replace inefficient and 1G750 3227 damaged Traffic Monitoring Station elements. CON $6,862

FY 2019/20 Total $17,851

FY 2020/21 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) In San Joaquin, Amador, Calaveras, Merced, Mariposa, Stanislaus, and Tuolumne Counties, CON SUP $1,243 on Routes 4, 5, 26, 33, 49, 59, 88, 99, 104, 108, 10 San Joaquin 120 120, 132, 140, 152 and 205 at various locations. 1G990 3226 Repair or replace damaged and nonfunctioning Traffic Management System (TMS) element. CON $2,065

In and near Manteca and Lathrop, from Route 5 to Route 99; also, on Route 5 at PM R13.34, and CON SUP $1,121 10 San Joaquin 120 R0.6/R6.1 on Route 99 at PM 4.56. Install Intelligent 1C960 3230 Transportation System (ITS) field elements. CON $3,550

In and near Tracy and Lathrop, from Route 580 CON SUP $2,831 10 San Joaquin 205 L0.0/R13.4 to Route 5. Install ramp meters and other 1C330 3146 Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) CON $13,257 elements. FY 2020/21 Total $24,067

FY 2021/22 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) In Stockton, from Route 5 to Route 99. Install ramp meters, traffic monitoring systems, closed- CON SUP $9,058 10 San Joaquin 4 R16.0/R19.4 circuit television (CCTV), and synchronize 1F180 3274 intersection signals with ramp metering. CON $37,521

In and near Stockton, on Routes 5, 4 (PM CON SUP $1,805 10 San Joaquin 5 R21.4/27.9 14.6/21.2), and 99 (PM 15.8/18.5) at various 1F400 3250 locations. Install Intelligent Transportation CON $8,960 System (ITS) elements. FY 2021/22 Total $57,344 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 FTIP Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - SHOPP Collision Reduction Program CTIP ID: 212-0000-0313 Date Last Updated: 3/22/2018 Amendment: Final 2019 FTIP

FY 2018/19 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) Near Holt, from 0.3 mile west to 0.5 mile east of PS&E $1,453 10 San Joaquin 4 4.1/4.9 Middle River Bridge. Realign curve, widen 1F460 3177 R/W SUP $274 shoulders, upgrade guard rail, and install R/W $1,358 PS&E $1,400 Near Clements, at Liberty Road. Improve 10 San Joaquin 88 22.1 1E531 3207 R/W SUP $460 intersection. R/W $715 In San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Tuolumne CON SUP $547 Counties, on Routes 4, 5, 99, 120, and 205 at 10 San Joaquin 205 Var 1E590 3231 various locations. Improve wet roadway surface conditions at 12 locations. CON $4,150

In San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties, on Route PA&ED $445 5 at various locations; also, in Merced County on 10 San Joaquin 5 Var Route 152 at various locations. Install new or 1C970 3190 PS&E $1,104 upgrade existing safety deveices to shield objects from errant vehicles. R/W $14

In Stockton, from Garfield Avenue to Route 99 at CON SUP $600 10 San Joaquin 4 R15.7/R19.2 various locations. Highway worker safety 0X690 3110 improvements. CON $3,520 In and near Lathrop and Stockton, from south of Louise Avenue to Charter Way; also from south CON SUP $480 10 San Joaquin 5 R16.1/25.4 of Hammer Lane to north of Eight Mile Road (PM 0X720 3112 32.3/35.7). Highway worker safety CON $2,770 improvements In and near Stockton and Lodi, at various locations from French Camp Road to Kettleman Lane; also at the Route 4 (PM R15.7 to R16.6) and Route 5 (PM 25.8 to 2.6) interchange. Pave 10 San Joaquin 99 11.5/29.4 areas behind the gore, slopes, and at narrow 1C760 3237 PA&ED $495 locations, and construct access gates and maintenance vehicle pullouts to reduce maintenance and improve highway worker safety In and near Manteca, from east of McKinley CON SUP $808 10 San Joaquin 120 R2.6/T7.1 Avenue to Route 99. Highway worker safety 0X710 3120 improvements CON $3,491 In and near Tracy, from Hansen Road to Paradise CON SUP $861 10 San Joaquin 205 2.3/R9.7 0X700 3111 Road. Highway worker safety improvements CON $3,727 FY 2018/19 Total $28,672

FY 2019/20 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) Near Holt, from 0.3 mile west to 0.5 mile east of CON SUP $2,006 10 San Joaquin 4 4.1/4.9 1F460 3177 Middle River Bridge. Realign curve, widen CON $7,335 Near Clements, at Liberty Road. Improve CON SUP $1,200 10 San Joaquin 88 22.1 1E531 3207 intersection. CON $5,500 In San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties, on Route CON SUP $872 10 San Joaquin 5 Var 5 at various locations; also, in Merced County on 1C970 3190 Route 152 at various locations. Install new or CON $1,361 In and near Stockton and Lodi, at various locations from French Camp Road to Kettleman PS&E $1,130 Lane; also at the Route 4 (PM R15.7 to R16.6) and Route 5 (PM 25.8 to 2.6) interchange. Pave 10 San Joaquin 99 11.5/29.4 areas behind the gore, slopes, and at narrow 1C760 3237 R/W SUP $15 locations, and construct access gates and maintenance vehicle pullouts to reduce maintenance and improve highway worker R/W $23 safety FY 2019/20 Total $19,442

FY 2020/21 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) In and near Stockton and Lodi, at various locations from French Camp Road to Kettleman CON SUP $790 Lane; also at the Route 4 (PM R15.7 to R16.6) and Route 5 (PM 25.8 to 2.6) interchange. Pave 10 San Joaquin 99 11.5/29.4 areas behind the gore, slopes, and at narrow 1C760 3237 locations, and construct access gates and maintenance vehicle pullouts to reduce CON $1,922 maintenance and improve highway worker safety FY 2020/21 Total $2,712

FY 2021/22 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s)

FY 2021/22 Total $0 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2017 FTIP Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - SHOPP Mandates Program CTIP ID: 212-0000-0669 Date Last Updated: 3/22/2018 Amendment: Final 2019 FTIP

FY 2018/19 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) In Lodi, from Stockton Street to Route 99. PA&ED $286 Upgrade pedestrian facilities to make compliant PS&E $770 10 San Joaquin 12 17.4/18.1 1G510 3254 with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) R/W SUP $915 standards. R/W $479 In Ripon, at Main Street Overcrossing; also in Lodi at Turner Road Overcrossing (PM 31.6). CON SUP $550 10 San Joaquin 99 0.9 Upgrade pedestrian facilities to comply with 1C060 3156 Americans with Disabilties Act (ADA) CON $1,553 requirements. FY 2018/19 Total $4,553

FY 2019/20 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s)

FY 2019/20 Total $0

FY 2020/21 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s)

FY 2020/21 Total $0

FY 2021/22 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) In Lodi, from Stockton Street to Route 99. CON SUP $560 Upgrade pedestrian facilities to make compliant 10 San Joaquin 12 17.4/18.1 1G510 3254 with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) CON $850 standards. FY 2021/22 Total $1,410 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 FTIP Grouped Projects for Bridge Rehabilitation and Reconstruction - SHOPP Program CTIP ID: 212-0000-0432 Date Last Updated: 3/22/2018 Amendment: Final 2019 FTIP

FY 2018/19 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) In Stockton, at the Stockton Channel Viaduct No. PS&E $1,030 10 San Joaquin 5 26.5 29-0176L/R. Bridge deck rehabilitation at spot 1C940 3193 R/W SUP $10 locations. R/W $5 PA&ED $598 Near Stockton, at Route 26/99 Separation No. 29- PS&E $1,827 10 San Joaquin 26 1.1 0142 (PM 1.11). Establish standard vertical 1F170 3169 R/W SUP $13 clearance. R/W $7 Near Discovery Bay, at Old River Bridge No. 29- PS&E $1,358 10 San Joaquin 4 0045. Upgrade mechanical and electrical 1C800 3113 R/W SUP $55 equipment on movable bridge. R/W $2,000 In Stockton, at Crosstown Freeway Viaduct No. CON SUP $631 10 San Joaquin 4 R16.6/R17.8 29-0269. Reconstruct hinge 32 (left and right) 1C860 3198 and three ramp joint seals. CON $3,428 Near Stockton, at Wilson Way Overcrossing (No. 29-0118C). Remove existing damaged girder and CON SUP $420 10 San Joaquin 99 21.7 build new overhang and barrier, resulting in 1C880 3206 reduced bridge width and increased vertical CON $1,170 clearance. FY 2018/19 Total $12,552

FY 2019/20 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) In Stockton, at the Stockton Channel Viaduct No. CON SUP $1,950 10 San Joaquin 5 26.5 29-0176L/R. Bridge deck rehabilitation at spot 1C940 3193 locations. CON $4,766

In San Joaquin County, on Routes 5 and 580 and CON SUP $1,783 10 San Joaquin 5 in Stanislaus County on Route 99, at various 0P540 3118 locations. Seismic retrofit of 4 bridges. CON $8,758

Near Discovery Bay, at Old River Bridge No. 29- CON SUP $1,319 10 San Joaquin 4 0045. Upgrade mechanical and electrical 1C800 3113 equipment on movable bridge. CON $4,079

In and near Lathrop, at Deuel Overhead No. 29- CON SUP $1,700 0262R/L and Mathews Road Undercrossing 29- 10 San Joaquin 5 10.7 1H342 3234 0218L. Improve to standard truck capacity. (PA&ED and PS&E Only) CON $7,700

In Stockton, at Route 4/99 Separation CON SUP $1,984 10 San Joaquin 99 17.2 (Farmington Road) Bridge No. 29-0155. Replace 0X310 3148 structure to provide standard vertical clearance. CON $5,776 FY 2019/20 Total $39,815

FY 2020/21 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) Near Stockton, at Route 26/99 Separation No. 29- CON SUP $3,221 10 San Joaquin 26 1.1 0142 (PM 1.11). Establish standard vertical 1F170 3169 clearance. CON $6,112 PS&E $905 Near Terminous, at Little Potato Slough Bridge R/W SUP $2 10 San Joaquin 12 R4.4 No. 29-0101. Replace joint seals and bearing 1F760 3273 R/W $1,232 pads using temporary pile supports. CON SUP $925 CON $3,028 FY 2020/21 Total $15,425

FY 2021/22 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s)

FY 2021/22 Total $0 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2019 FTIP Grouped Projects for Pavement Resurfacing and or Rehab - SHOPP Roadway Preservation Program CTIP ID: 212-0000-0315 Date Last Updated: 3/22/2018 Amendment: Final 2019 FTIP

FY 2018/19 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) In Stockton, from 0.1 mile east of Fresno Avenue PS&E $2,324 10 San Joaquin 4 T15.5/R16.6 to west of Center Street. Roadway 1C500 3165 R/W SUP $19 rehabilitation. R/W $48 PS&E $725 In San Joaquin County on Routes 4,5, and 99 at 10 San Joaquin 5 3.5/49.0 1C200 3140 R/W SUP $199 various locations. Rehabilitate culverts. R/W $71 Near Lockeford, from 0.1 mile south of East Jack PS&E $900 Tone Road to north of North Tully Road 10 San Joaquin 88 13.5/14.1 0S740 3141 R/W SUP $290 intersection; also, near Kirkwood in Alpine County (PM 0.3/2.4). Replace culverts. R/W $335 In and near Stockton and Lodi, at various locations from Eastside underpass to Acampo Road; also, on Route 4 at the Route 4/5 10 San Joaquin 99 19.7/33.6 Separation (PM R16.10), and on Route 120 in 1E610 3229 PA&ED $439 Lathrop at Mossdale underpass (PM R0.5). Upgrade drainage pump plants.

In San Joaquin County on Routes 5 and 99, and CON SUP $543 in Stanislaus County on Route 5, at various 10 San Joaquin 5 VAR 1C530 3129 locations. Upgrade sign panels and replace CON $1,538 overhead sign structures. FY 2018/19 Total $7,431

FY 2019/20 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) In Stockton, from 0.1 mile east of Fresno Avenue CON SUP $4,589 10 San Joaquin 4 T15.5/R16.6 to west of Center Street. Roadway 1C500 3165 rehabilitation. CON $30,576 In San Joaquin County on Routes 4,5, and 99 at CON SUP $597 10 San Joaquin 5 3.5/49.0 1C200 3140 various locations. Rehabilitate culverts. CON $3,178 In and near Stockton and Lodi, at various PS&E $1,530 locations from Eastside underpass to Acampo Road; also, on Route 4 at the Route 4/5 10 San Joaquin 99 19.7/33.6 1E610 3229 R/W SUP $59 Separation (PM R16.10), and on Route 120 in Lathrop at Mossdale underpass (PM R0.5). R/W $260 Upgrade drainage pump plants. FY 2019/20 Total $40,789

FY 2020/21 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) Near Lockeford, from 0.1 mile south of East Jack CON SUP $875 Tone Road to north of North Tully Road 10 San Joaquin 88 13.5/14.1 0S740 3141 intersection; also, near Kirkwood in Alpine CON $3,160 County (PM 0.3/2.4). Replace culverts. FY 2020/21 Total $4,035

FY 2021/22 SHOPP Amount Dist County Route Post Miles Location/Description EA PPNO Phase (in $1,000s) In and near Stockton and Lodi, at various locations from Eastside underpass to Acampo CON SUP $1,289 Road; also, on Route 4 at the Route 4/5 10 San Joaquin 99 19.7/33.6 1E610 3229 Separation (PM R16.10), and on Route 120 in Lathrop at Mossdale underpass (PM R0.5). CON $5,169 Upgrade drainage pump plants. FY 2021/22 Total $6,458 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program

See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM

Notes: 1) The purpose of this list is to show which projects being advanced by local agencies have met the eligibility requirements of the federal Highway Bridge Program and have been prioritized for funding by the Department in cooperation with local agencies for funding.

2) Please see the Local Assistance web site for the most current listings:

http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hbrr99/HBP_FSTIP.html

3) Contractual funding levels are determined at time of federal authorization/obligation for given phase of work. For details see Chapter 3 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual.

4) For FTIP/FSTIP purposes, Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funding constraint is managed by Caltrans.

5) Prop 1B bond funds (Local Seismic Safety Retrofit Program (LSSRP)) used for matching federal funds are also managed by Caltrans.

6) Financial constraint of LOCAL matching funds (including regional STIP funds) and LOCAL Advance Construction (AC) is the responsibility of the MPOs and their local agencies.

7) Some projects show that they are programmed using State STP funds. These funds are HBP funds transferred to the STP for bridge work that is not ordinarily eligible for HBP funds. See the HB Program Guidelines for details. Do not confuse these STP funds with Regional STP funds.

8) Corrections to this report should be addressed to the District Local Assistance Engineer:

http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/dlae.htm

Note id: 12

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 1 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

San Joaquin County BRIDGE NO. 00F0001, BACON ISLAND ROAD, OVER MIDDLE RIVER - WOODWARD ISLAND FERRY. Replace Ferry Service & existing timber ramps with a new 2-lane bridge (Added Lane Capacity). 4/5/2010: Toll Credits programmed for Con. Fed Proj: BRNBIF-5929(154) Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total PE 3,165,270 448,145 3,613,415 R/W CON 20,917,000 20,917,000 Total 3,165,270 21,365,145 24,530,415

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,532,216 358,516 20,917,000 23,807,732 Local Match 633,054 89,629 722,683 LSSRP Bond Local AC 20,917,000 -20,917,000 Total 3,165,270 21,365,145 24,530,415

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,532,216 358,516 2,890,732 Local Match 633,054 89,629 722,683 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,165,270 448,145 3,613,415 Phase Funding Details: Proj id Funds Src Phase Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total 1623 HBP PE 358,516 358,516 New! Local Match 89,629 89,629 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 1/23/2018 Rattan Singh: Per agency’s request for additional PE funds in Ex 6-D dated 01/18/18. Total: 448,145 1623 HBP PE 328,000 328,000 Local Match 82,000 82,000 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 3/21/2016 Benjamin Tam: Per Exhibit 6-B, 6-D add cost for completion final PE Phase Total: 410,000 1623 HBP PE Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 3/15/2016 Benjamin Tam: Based on 6-B, 6-D moving $250,000 PE from 14/15 to 15/16. In Oct 2014 an Exhibit 6-B, 6-D received. Total: $250,000 inputted under 14/15 however Local Agency did not submit AMOD to add funds. 8/17/2017 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2014/15-19/20 to 2016/17-21/22. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle.

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 2 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

1623 HBP PE 200,000 200,000 Local Match 50,000 50,000 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 10/15/2014 Jesus Serrano: PE funds revised per local agency’s 6-D dated 10/14/2014 and revised 2014 HBP Survey. Total: 250,000 1623 HBP PE 216,056 216,056 Local Match 54,014 54,014 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 7/23/2014 Jesus Serrano: PE funds revised per local agency’s revised 6-D, dated 7/3/2014. Total: 270,070 1623 HBP PE Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 4/30/2010 Jesus Serrano: This funding line is to EPSP funds into 09/10 FFY from 10/11 FFY. Local Agency is ready to request remaining Total: funds to complete PE phase. 5/10/2013 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2010/11-15/16 to 2012/13-17/18. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 1623 HBP PE Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 12/9/2009 Jesus Serrano: This funding line is to move funds from 09/10 to 10/11 FFY to free up capacity for other projects. Local Agency Total: does not anticipate to request these funds in 09/10. 5/10/2013 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2010/11-15/16 to 2012/13-17/18. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 1623 HBP PE Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 11/23/2009 Jesus Serrano: This funding correction is to free up capacity in 09/10 FFY for PE funding of the Escalon Bellota Rd. over Total: Mormon Slough bridge project (29C-0051). 5/10/2013 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2010/11-15/16 to 2012/13-17/18. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 1623 HBP PE -32,000 -32,000 Local Match -8,000 -8,000 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 11/18/2009 Jesus Serrano: This deletes the $40,000 being requested for additional PE cost, per 6-D dated 9/23/09. This amount is Total: -40,000 already included in the 09/10 FFY funds shown on the Oct. 2009 survey. 1623 HBP PE 1,740,160 1,740,160 Local Match 435,040 435,040 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 11/18/2009 Jesus Serrano: This replaces the reimbursement rate for the funds included on the Oct. 2009 survey at 80%. Total: 2,175,200 1623 HBP PE -1,925,705 -1,925,705 Local Match -249,495 -249,495 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 11/18/2009 Jesus Serrano: To correct the reimbursement rate of 88.53% for the funds included on the Oct. 2009 survey. Total: -2,175,200 1623 HBP PE 32,000 32,000 Local Match 8,000 8,000 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 10/23/2009 Jesus Serrano: To provide additional information requested by FHWA concerning Purpose and Need; Economic Analysis; Total: 40,000 Alternative Bridge locations; and Intersection Configuration. Per 6-D dated 9/23/09.

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 3 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

1623 HBP PE 1,925,705 1,925,705 Local Match 249,495 249,495 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/14/2009 Nabil Hasan: Per Oct. 2009 survey...... Total: 2,175,200 1623 HBP PE -48,000 -48,000 Local Match -12,000 -12,000 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 10/17/2007 Abel Preciado: This puts the additional $60,000 needed for PE in the correct year ( $ 60K to be invoiced in FFY 07/08). Total: -60,000 1623 HBP PE 96,000 96,000 Local Match 24,000 24,000 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% EJB 9.26.2007: This puts the PE funds back in at the correct rate. The $1,240,000 will be added when the funds are needed via Total: 120,000 post-programming action. 1623 HBP PE -1,668,791 -1,668,791 Local Match -216,210 -216,210 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% EJB 9.26.2007: This deletes the incorrect 88.53 rate on the above fund line. Total: -1,885,000 1623 HBP PE 1,668,791 1,668,791 Local Match 216,210 216,210 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% Total: 1,885,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 20,917,000 20,917,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC 20,917,000 -20,917,000 Total 20,917,000 20,917,000 Phase Funding Details: Proj id Funds Src Phase Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total 1623 HBP CON 6,417,000 6,417,000 New! Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 3/20/2018 Linda Newton: Revise funding to match revised Ex. 6D. Total: 6,417,000 1623 Local AC (HBP) CON 6,417,000 -6,417,000 New! Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 3/20/2018 Linda Newton: Revised funding to match revised Ex. 6D Total:

1623 HBP CON 14,500,000 -10,780,000 3,720,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 10/4/2017 Reza Fereshtehnejad: As requested in 2017 survey. Total: 3,720,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 4 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

1623 Local AC (HBP) CON 3,720,000 -14,500,000 10,780,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 10/4/2017 Reza Fereshtehnejad: As requested in 2017 survey. Total:

1623 Local AC (HBP) CON 10,780,000 -10,780,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 3/18/2015 Jesus Serrano: CON funds revised to include Local AC funding in 17/18 FFY per local agency’s 6-D dated 3/13/2015 to match Total: the Air Quaility Conformity “open to the public date” of 2018. Funds will be revised again when NEPA document and R/W cert are both executed and project is “Ready to Advertise.” 1623 HBP CON -10,780,000 10,780,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 10/28/2014 DLA-Admin: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 16/17 to Beyond. Action taken to financially Total: constrain the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 1623 HBP CON -10,780,000 10,780,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 10/28/2014 DLA-Admin: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 15/16 to 16/17. Action taken to financially Total: constrain the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 1623 HBP CON 10,780,000 -10,780,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 10/26/2014 DLA-Admin: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY Beyond to 15/16. As requested in September Total: 2014 Survey. 1623 Local AC (HBP) CON -10,780,000 10,780,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 10/28/2013 Linda Newton: Revised funding as requested in September 2013 Survey. Remove AC from project and put federal funding Total: into beyond. 1623 Local AC (HBP) CON 10,780,000 -10,780,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 11/8/2010 Eric Bost: AC to keep project in FFY 13/14. Total:

1623 HBP CON -10,780,000 10,780,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 11/8/2010 Eric Bost: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 13/14 to Beyond. Action taken to financially constrain Total: the FTIP (PUSH). 1623 HBP CON Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 4/5/2010 DLA-Admin: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 12/13 to 13/14. Action taken to financially constrain Total: the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 8/21/2015 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2012/13-17/18 to 2014/15-19/20. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle.

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 5 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

1623 HBP CON 10,000 10,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 4/1/2010 DLA-Admin: Reimbursement changed to 100% (Toll Credits). Total: 10,000 11/17/2009 Jesus Serrano: Correction made to CON funds, per exhibit 6-D dated 9/23/09. 1623 HBP CON 770,000 770,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 4/1/2010 DLA-Admin: Reimbursement changed to 100% (Toll Credits). Total: 770,000 10/14/2009 Nabil Hasan: Per Oct. 2009 survey...... 1623 HBP CON 10,000,000 -10,000,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 4/1/2010 DLA-Admin: Reimbursement changed to 100% (Toll Credits). Total: 10/14/2009 Nabil Hasan: CON funds moved from FFY Beyond to 12/13. 1623 HBP CON -3,850,000 10,000,000 6,150,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 4/1/2010 DLA-Admin: Reimbursement changed to 100% (Toll Credits). Total: 6,150,000 EJB 9/26/2007: Move funding into beyond until project is ready to advertise. 1623 HBP CON 3,850,000 3,850,000 Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 100.00% 4/1/2010 DLA-Admin: Reimbursement changed to 100% (Toll Credits). Total: 3,850,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 6 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

San Joaquin County BRIDGE NO. 38C0032, MCHENRY AVENUE, OVER STANISLAUS RIVER, AT SAN JOAQUIN CO LINE. Replace 2-lane bridge with a new 5-lane bridge (Added Lane Capacity). Fed Proj: BRLS-5929(166) Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total PE 3,707,800 3,707,800 R/W CON 18,170,000 3,318,418 21,488,418 Total 21,877,800 3,318,418 25,196,218

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 19,052,141 2,937,795 21,989,936 Local Match 2,587,083 380,623 2,967,706 LSSRP Bond 238,576 238,576 Local AC Total 21,877,800 3,318,418 25,196,218

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,966,240 2,966,240 Local Match 741,560 741,560 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,707,800 3,707,800 Phase Funding Details: Proj id Funds Src Phase Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total 1685 HBP PE 132,960 132,960 Local Match 33,240 33,240 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 5/31/2016 Nestor Gavino: PE funds revised per local agency’s 6-D dated 06/10/16. Total: 166,200 1685 HBP PE 486,400 486,400 Local Match 121,600 121,600 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 7/7/2014 Jesus Serrano: PE funds revised per local agency’s 6-D dated 6/3/2014. Total: 608,000 1685 HBP PE 400,000 400,000 Local Match 100,000 100,000 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 9/30/2013 Jesus Serrano: PE funds revised per local agency’s 6-D dated 9/4/2013. Total: 500,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 7 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

1685 HBP PE 1,041,706 1,041,706 Local Match 260,426 260,426 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 4/29/2008 Abel Preciado: On April 22, 2008 San Joaquin County requested an additional $ 1,302,132.00 for PE with an Exhibit 6D. The Total: 1,302,132 additiional request should remain at 80% reimbursement rate. Target date for funds is May 2008. 1685 HBP PE 905,174 905,174 Local Match 226,294 226,294 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 11/19/2007 Eric Bost: Corrects reimbursement rate. Total: 1,131,468 1685 HBP PE -1,243,847 -1,243,847 Local Match -161,154 -161,154 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% PE at wrong reimbursement rate. Also deletes 7/8 funds that are not needed. Total: -1,405,000 1685 HBP PE 1,243,847 1,243,847 Local Match 161,154 161,154 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% Total: 1,405,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 16,085,901 2,937,795 19,023,696 Local Match 1,845,523 380,623 2,226,146 LSSRP Bond 238,576 238,576 Local AC Total 18,170,000 3,318,418 21,488,418 Phase Funding Details: Proj id Funds Src Phase Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total 1685 HBP CON 2,937,795 2,937,795 Local Match 380,623 380,623 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 4/25/2017 Rattan Singh: CON funds revised per Local Agency’s Ex. 6-D dated 02/01/2017 as post programming change per Award Total: 3,318,418 amount. 1685 HBP CON 14,244,477 -14,244,477 Local Match 1,845,523 -1,845,523 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 8/3/2016 Nestor Gavino: CON funds moved from FFY 16/17 to 15/16 per local agency’s revised 6-D dated 07/27/16. Total:

1685 HBP CON -14,244,477 14,244,477 Local Match -1,845,523 1,845,523 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/29/2015 DLA-Admin: NEARLY Ready to Advertise. CON funds moved from FFY 15/16 to 16/17. Action taken to financially constrain Total: the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown.

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 8 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

1685 HBP CON 14,244,477 -14,244,477 Local Match 1,845,523 -1,845,523 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/9/2015 Reza Fereshtehnejad: NEARLY Ready to Advertise. CON funds moved from FFY Beyond to 15/16. As requested in Total: September 2015 Survey. 1685 HBP CON -14,244,477 14,244,477 Local Match -1,845,523 1,845,523 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/28/2014 DLA-Admin: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 16/17 to Beyond. Action taken to financially Total: constrain the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 1685 HBP CON -14,244,477 14,244,477 Local Match -1,845,523 1,845,523 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/28/2014 DLA-Admin: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 15/16 to 16/17. Action taken to financially Total: constrain the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 1685 HBP CON 14,244,477 -14,244,477 Local Match 1,845,523 -1,845,523 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 9/22/2014 Reza Fereshtehnejad: As requested in 2014 survey. Total:

1685 Local AC (HBP) CON -16,085,901 16,085,901 Local Match -2,084,099 2,084,099 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/13/2011 Linda Newton: Removed AC as requested in 2011 Survey. Project not ready to advertise in 6 months. Per Rank Policy, Total: Federal funds must remain outside of FTIP for line item projects. 1685 Local AC (HBP) CON 16,085,901 -16,085,901 Local Match 2,084,099 -2,084,099 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 11/8/2010 Eric Bost: Add AC to 12/13. Total:

1685 HBP CON -14,244,477 14,244,477 Local Match -1,845,523 1,845,523 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 11/8/2010 Eric Bost: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 12/13 to Beyond. Action taken to financially constrain Total: the FTIP (PUSH). 1685 HBP CON Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 4/5/2010 DLA-Admin: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 11/12 to 12/13. Action taken to financially constrain Total: the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 8/21/2015 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2012/13-17/18 to 2014/15-19/20. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 1685 HBP CON Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/30/2009 DLA-Admin: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 10/11 to 11/12. 5/10/2013 DLA-Admin: Fundline Total: zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2010/11-15/16 to 2012/13-17/18. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle.

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 9 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

1685 HBP CON Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 5/21/2008 Reza Fereshtehnejad: request for increased funds placed in the wrong years. 5/10/2013 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out Total: due to FTIP cycle migration: 2010/11-15/16 to 2012/13-17/18. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 1685 HBP CON 5,735,115 5,735,115 Local Match 743,045 743,045 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 4/29/2008 Abel Preciado: San Joaquin County on 4/22/2008 submitted a request (Exhibit 6D) for additional construction funds. The new Total: 6,478,160 total will be $18,170,000.00 an increase of $ 6478,160.00 for FFY 10/11. 1685 HBP CON 8,509,362 8,509,362 Local Match 1,102,478 1,102,478 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% Total: 9,611,840 2276 HBP CON 1,841,424 -1,841,424 LSSRP Bond 238,576 -238,576 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 8/3/2016 Reza Fereshtehnejad: Bond Funds approved. Total: 8/3/2016 Reza Fereshtehnejad: As requested by local agency. 2276 HBP CON -1,841,424 1,841,424 LSSRP Bond -238,576 238,576 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 8/3/2016 Reza Fereshtehnejad: Bond Funds approved. Total: 10/29/2015 DLA-Admin: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 15/16 to 16/17. Action taken to financially constrain the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 2276 HBP CON 1,841,424 -1,841,424 LSSRP Bond 238,576 -238,576 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 8/3/2016 Reza Fereshtehnejad: Bond Funds approved. Total: 10/9/2015 Reza Fereshtehnejad: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY Beyond to 15/16. As requested in September 2015 Survey. 2276 HBP CON -1,841,424 1,841,424 LSSRP Bond -238,576 238,576 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 8/3/2016 Reza Fereshtehnejad: Bond Funds approved. Total: 10/28/2014 DLA-Admin: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 16/17 to Beyond. Action taken to financially constrain the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 2276 HBP CON -1,841,424 1,841,424 LSSRP Bond -238,576 238,576 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 8/3/2016 Reza Fereshtehnejad: Bond Funds approved. Total: 10/28/2014 DLA-Admin: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 15/16 to 16/17. Action taken to financially constrain the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown.

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 10 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

2276 HBP CON 1,841,424 -1,841,424 LSSRP Bond 238,576 -238,576 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 8/3/2016 Reza Fereshtehnejad: Bond Funds approved. Total: 9/22/2014 Reza Fereshtehnejad: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY Beyond to 15/16. As requested in September 2014 Survey. 2276 HBP CON -1,841,424 1,841,424 LSSRP Bond -238,576 238,576 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 8/3/2016 Reza Fereshtehnejad: Bond Funds approved. Total: 11/8/2010 Eric Bost: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 12/13 to Beyond. Action taken to financially constrain the FTIP (PUSH). 2276 HBP CON LSSRP Bond Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 8/3/2016 Reza Fereshtehnejad: Bond Funds approved. Total: 4/5/2010 DLA-Admin: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 11/12 to 12/13. Action taken to financially constrain the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 8/21/2015 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2012/13-17/18 to 2014/15-19/20. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 2276 HBP CON LSSRP Bond Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 8/3/2016 Reza Fereshtehnejad: Bond Funds approved. Total: 10/30/2009 DLA-Admin: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 10/11 to 11/12. 5/10/2013 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2010/11-15/16 to 2012/13-17/18. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 2276 HBP CON LSSRP Bond Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 8/3/2016 Reza Fereshtehnejad: Bond Funds approved. Total: 5/21/2008 Reza Fereshtehnejad: seismic funds and hbp replacement funds need to be programmed in the same year. 5/10/2013 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2010/11-15/16 to 2012/13-17/18. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 2276 HBP CON 1,841,424 1,841,424 LSSRP Bond 238,576 238,576 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% Total: 2,080,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 11 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

Stockton Port District BRIDGE NO. 29C0023, NAVY DRIVE, OVER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, ROUGH & READY ISL. Replace 2 lane bridge with new 4 lane bridge. Other Federal funds will be programmed in the FTIP for the local agency match for this project, per the revised Toll Credit Policy. Fed Proj: BRLS-6349(002) Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total PE 1,601,000 1,601,000 R/W 650,000 650,000 CON 15,000,000 6,601,198 21,601,198 Total 17,251,000 6,601,198 23,852,198

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 15,135,745 5,844,041 20,979,786 Local Match 2,115,255 757,157 2,872,412 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 17,251,000 6,601,198 23,852,198

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,280,800 1,280,800 Local Match 320,200 320,200 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,601,000 1,601,000 Phase Funding Details: Proj id Funds Src Phase Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total 1571 HBP PE -536,000 -536,000 Local Match -134,000 -134,000 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 3/11/2010 Jesus Serrano: To correct reimbursement rate at 80.00%. Amount to reflect totals on the October 2009 survey. Total: -670,000 1571 HBP PE 593,151 593,151 Local Match 76,849 76,849 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 3/11/2010 Jesus Serrano: To correct reimbursement rate at 80.00%. Amount was deducted incorrectly at 88.53% on 10/14/09. Total: 670,000 1571 HBP PE 347,200 347,200 Local Match 86,800 86,800 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% 11/12/2009 Jesus Serrano: Correcting Reimbursement Rate at 80.00%. Total: 434,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 12 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

1571 HBP PE -384,220 -384,220 Local Match -49,780 -49,780 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 11/12/2009 Jesus Serrano: Reimbursement Rate needs to be corrected to 80.00%. Total: -434,000 1571 HBP PE 384,220 384,220 Local Match 49,780 49,780 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/14/2009 Nabil Hasan: Per Oct 2009 Survey...... Total: 434,000 1571 HBP PE -593,151 -593,151 Local Match -76,849 -76,849 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/14/2009 Nabil Hasan: Per Oct 2009 Survey...... Total: -670,000 1571 HBP PE -593,151 -593,151 Local Match -76,849 -76,849 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/19/2007 Abel Preciado: Need to correct reimbursement rate. Total: -670,000 1571 HBP PE 1,469,600 1,469,600 Local Match 367,400 367,400 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 80.00% Cost increases for final NEPA and final design Total: 1,837,000 1571 HBP PE 593,151 593,151 Local Match 76,849 76,849 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% Total: 670,000

R/W Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 575,445 575,445 Local Match 74,555 74,555 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 650,000 650,000 Phase Funding Details: Proj id Funds Src Phase Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total 1571 HBP R/W 198,171 198,171 Local Match 25,675 25,675 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 9/11/2017 Rattan Singh: R/W funds revised per local agency’s request in September HBP survey dated 09/06/2017. Total: 223,846 1571 HBP R/W 7,219 7,219 Local Match 935 935 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 6/10/2016 Nestor Gavino: RW funds revised per local agency’s Exhibit 6-D dated 05/26/16. Total: 8,154

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 13 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

1571 HBP R/W Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 3/24/2016 DLA-Admin: NEARLY Ready to Advertise. RW funds moved from FFY 14/15 to 15/16. Funds not obligated, moved to next Total: fiscal year. 8/17/2017 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2014/15-19/20 to 2016/17-21/22. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 1571 HBP R/W 76,136 76,136 Local Match 9,864 9,864 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 9/17/2015 Jesus Serrano: R/W funds revised per local agency’s 2015 HBP Survey. A revised 6-D will be required prior to authorization of Total: 86,000 additional funds. 1571 HBP R/W 293,920 293,920 Local Match 38,080 38,080 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 7/29/2014 Jesus Serrano: R/W programmed per local agency’s request on revised LAPG 6-D, dated 7/10/2014. Total: 332,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 13,279,500 5,844,041 19,123,541 Local Match 1,720,500 757,157 2,477,657 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 15,000,000 6,601,198 21,601,198 Phase Funding Details: Proj id Funds Src Phase Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total 1571 HBP CON 5,844,041 5,844,041 Local Match 757,157 757,157 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 1/20/2017 Rattan Singh: Con funds revised per Award amount as shown on Exhibit 6-D dated 10/24/2016. Total: 6,601,198 1571 HBP CON 13,279,500 -13,279,500 Local Match 1,720,500 -1,720,500 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 6/10/2016 Nestor Gavino: Construction Funds moved from FFY 16/17 to 15/16 per local agency Exhibit 6-D dated 05/26/16. Total:

1571 HBP CON -13,279,500 13,279,500 Local Match -1,720,500 1,720,500 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/29/2015 DLA-Admin: NEARLY Ready to Advertise. CON funds moved from FFY 15/16 to 16/17. Action taken to financially constrain Total: the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 1571 HBP CON 13,279,500 -11,199,045 2,080,455 Local Match 1,720,500 -1,450,955 269,545 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/09/2015 Jesus Serrano: CON funds revised per local agency’s 2015 HBP Survey. A revised 6-D will be required prior to authorization Total: 2,350,000 of funds.

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 14 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

1571 HBP CON -11,199,045 11,199,045 Local Match -1,450,955 1,450,955 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/28/2014 DLA-Admin: NEARLY Ready to Advertise. CON funds moved from FFY 15/16 to 16/17. Action taken to financially constrain Total: the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 1571 HBP CON Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/27/2014 DLA-Admin: NEARLY Ready to Advertise. CON funds moved from FFY 14/15 to 15/16. Action taken to financially constrain Total: the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 8/17/2017 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2014/15-19/20 to 2016/17-21/22. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 1571 HBP CON 11,199,045 -10,641,306 557,739 Local Match 1,450,955 -1,378,694 72,261 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/21/2014 Eileen Crawford: CON funds moved to 14/15 and increased per 2014 Survey Total: 630,000 1571 HBP CON -10,641,306 10,641,306 Local Match -1,378,694 1,378,694 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 11/14/2013 DLA-Admin: NEARLY Ready to Advertise. CON funds moved from FFY 15/16 to 16/17. Action taken to financially constrain Total: the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 1571 HBP CON Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 11/14/2013 DLA-Admin: NEARLY Ready to Advertise. CON funds moved from FFY 14/15 to 15/16. Action taken to financially constrain Total: the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 8/17/2017 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2014/15-19/20 to 2016/17-21/22. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 1571 HBP CON 10,641,306 -9,565,424 1,075,882 Local Match 1,378,694 -1,239,302 139,392 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/29/2013 Linda Newton: CON funds moved from beyond to FFY 14/15 and added $1,215,274 to CON as requested in September Total: 1,215,274 2013 Survey. 1571 Local AC (HBP) CON -9,565,424 9,565,424 Local Match -1,239,302 1,239,302 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/29/2013 Linda Newton: Removed AC from project as requested in September 2013 Survey. Total:

1571 Local AC (HBP) CON 9,565,424 -9,565,424 Local Match 1,239,302 -1,239,302 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/24/2012 Eric Bost: AC funding as place holder until NEPA is clear. Total:

1571 HBP CON -9,565,424 9,565,424 Local Match -1,239,302 1,239,302 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/24/2012 Eric Bost: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 14/15 to Beyond. NEPA is not clear per the 2012 Total: Survey and no risk assessment is provided. Per HBP policy, individually programmed projects should not have federal funds programmed within the 4 year element of the FTIP.

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 15 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

1571 HBP CON Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/17/2011 Eric Bost: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 12/13 to 14/15. Project was programmed in FFY Total: 11/12. Agency has indicated project slip of one year. Project is in rank 2B so penalty is to push the project out two years. 8/17/2017 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2014/15-19/20 to 2016/17-21/22. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 1571 HBP CON 140,324 140,324 Local Match 18,180 18,180 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 9/29/2011 Jesus Serrano: CON cost adjusted per local agency’s request on 6-D submitted 9/20/2011. Total: 158,504 1571 HBP CON Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 9/29/2011 Jesus Serrano: Not ready to ad within 6 months. CON funds moved from FFY 11/12 to 12/13. As requested in September Total: 2011 Survey. 8/21/2015 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2012/13-17/18 to 2014/15-19/20. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 1571 HBP CON Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 11/10/2010 DLA-Admin: NEARLY Ready to Advertise. CON funds moved from FFY 10/11 to 11/12. Action taken to financially constrain Total: the FTIP (PUSH). Attempt will be made to program this project in year shown. 5/10/2013 DLA-Admin: Fundline zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2010/11-15/16 to 2012/13-17/18. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 1571 HBP CON Local Match Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/30/2009 DLA-Admin: NEARLY Ready to Advertise. CON funds moved from FFY 9/10 to 10/11. 5/10/2013 DLA-Admin: Fundline Total: zeroed out due to FTIP cycle migration: 2010/11-15/16 to 2012/13-17/18. This does not impact funds in the current FTIP cycle. 1571 Local AC (HBP) CON -9,339,459 9,339,459 Local Match -1,210,026 1,210,026 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/27/2009 DLA-Admin: Deletes AC request...... Total:

1571 HBP CON 85,641 -9,339,459 -9,253,818 Local Match 11,096 -1,210,026 -1,198,930 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/14/2009 Nabil Hasan: Per Oct 2009 Survey...... Total: -10,452,748 1571 HBP CON 2,522,649 2,522,649 Local Match 326,836 326,836 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/14/2009 Nabil Hasan: Per Oct 2009 Survey...... Total: 2,849,485 1571 HBP CON 6,816,810 6,816,810 Local Match 883,190 883,190 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 10/14/2009 Nabil Hasan: Per Oct 2009 Survey...... Total: 7,700,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 16 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

1571 HBP CON 9,339,459 9,339,459 Local Match 1,210,026 1,210,026 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% 12/12/2007 Eric Bost: AC conversion. When project is ready to advertise, AC conversion may be advanced through a FTIP amendment. Total: 10,549,485 1571 Local AC (HBP) CON 2,522,649 -9,339,459 -6,816,810 Local Match 326,836 -1,210,026 -883,190 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% Cost increases reflect inflation and scope change from 2004. AC conversion in “Beyond” until project is ready to advertise. Total: -7,700,000 1571 Local AC (HBP) CON 6,816,810 6,816,810 Local Match 883,190 883,190 Fed. Reimb. Rate: 88.53% Total: 7,700,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 17 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing includes projects that should be individually listed in the FTIP/FSTIP. (Line item projects only) District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total

MPO Summary: San Joaquin County Council Of Goverments Number of Projects: 3 Total Costs: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 36,720,102 8,781,836 358,516 20,917,000 66,777,454 Local Match 5,335,392 1,137,780 89,629 6,562,801 LSSRP Bond 238,576 238,576 Local AC 20,917,000 -20,917,000

Total for all Phases 42,294,070 9,919,616 21,365,145 73,578,831

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:29 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt Page 18 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program

See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM

Notes: 1) This is the FTIP lump sum “backup” list for HBP funded projects. Please see the Local Assistance web site for the most current listings:

http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hbrr99/HBP_FSTIP.html

2) The purpose of this list is to show which projects being advanced by local agencies have met the eligibility requirements of the federal Highway Bridge Program and have been prioritized for funding by the Department in cooperation with local agencies for funding.

3) Contractual funding levels are determined at time of federal authorization/obligation for given phase of work. For details see Chapter 3 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual.

4) For FTIP/FSTIP purposes, Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funding constraint is managed by Caltrans.

5) Prop 1B bond funds for the Local Seismic Safety Retrofit Program (LSSRP) used for matching federal funds are also managed by Caltrans.

6) Financial constraint of LOCAL matching funds (including regional STIP funds) and LOCAL Advance Construction (AC) is the responsibility of the MPOs and their local agencies.

8) Corrections to this report should be addressed to the District Local Assistance Engineer:

http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/dlae.htm

Note id: 24

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 1 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Lathrop 3933 BRIDGE NO. 29C0127, MANTHEY ROAD OVER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, 0.3 MI NE OF STEWART RD. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge wide enough to accommodate shoulders, bike lanes, and sidewalks. Caltrans/City High Cost Project Agreement is required to program CON federal funds within 4-year element of FTIP.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 4,500,000 4,500,000 5456(016) R/W CON 39,500,000 39,500,000 Total 4,500,000 39,500,000 44,000,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 4,500,000 34,969,350 39,469,350 Local Match 4,530,650 4,530,650 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 4,500,000 39,500,000 44,000,000

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 4,500,000 4,500,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 4,500,000 4,500,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 34,969,350 34,969,350 Local Match 4,530,650 4,530,650 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 39,500,000 39,500,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 2 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 4478 BRIDGE NO. 29C0035, ELLIOT RD OVER MOKELUMNE RIVER, 1.0 MI S PELTIER RD. Rehabilitate bridge. Widen 2 lane bridge to standard lanes and shoulders. No added lane capacity.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 619,500 619,500 R/W CON 3,469,000 3,469,000 Total 4,088,500 4,088,500

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 3,619,549 3,619,549 Local Match 468,951 468,951 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 4,088,500 4,088,500

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 548,443 548,443 Local Match 71,057 71,057 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 619,500 619,500

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 3,071,106 3,071,106 Local Match 397,894 397,894 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,469,000 3,469,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 3 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 3798 BRIDGE NO. 29C0037, PELTIER RD OVER MOKELUMNE RIVER, 1.5 MI W/O LOWER SACRAMENTO RD. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 3,065,713 3,065,713 5929(237) R/W CON 15,328,566 15,328,566 Total 3,065,713 15,328,566 18,394,279

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,714,076 13,570,379 16,284,455 Local Match 351,637 1,758,187 2,109,824 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,065,713 15,328,566 18,394,279

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,714,076 2,714,076 Local Match 351,637 351,637 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,065,713 3,065,713

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 13,570,379 13,570,379 Local Match 1,758,187 1,758,187 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 15,328,566 15,328,566

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 4 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 3792 BRIDGE NO. 29C0038, ESCALON-BELLOTA RD OVER LITTLE JOHNS CREEK, 0.3 MI S/O SR 4. Replace 2-lane bridge with a wider 2-lane bridge (No Added Lane Capacity).

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 921,990 921,990 5929(238) R/W CON 3,998,379 3,998,379 Total 921,990 3,998,379 4,920,369

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 816,238 3,539,765 4,356,003 Local Match 105,752 458,614 564,366 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 921,990 3,998,379 4,920,369

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 816,238 816,238 Local Match 105,752 105,752 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 921,990 921,990

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 3,539,765 3,539,765 Local Match 458,614 458,614 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,998,379 3,998,379

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 5 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 1193 BRIDGE NO. 29C0051, ESCALON BELLOTA RD OVER MORMON SLOUGH, JUST S/E OF S.H. 26. Scour Countermeasure.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 956,320 190,000 1,146,320 5929(192) R/W CON 4,765,800 4,765,800 Total 956,320 190,000 4,765,800 5,912,120

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 846,630 168,207 4,219,163 5,234,000 Local Match 109,690 21,793 546,637 678,120 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 956,320 190,000 4,765,800 5,912,120

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 846,630 168,207 1,014,837 Local Match 109,690 21,793 131,483 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 956,320 190,000 1,146,320

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 4,219,163 4,219,163 Local Match 546,637 546,637 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 4,765,800 4,765,800

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 6 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 4246 BRIDGE NO. 29C0051, ESCALON BELLOTA RD OVER MORMON SLOUGH, JUST S/E OF S.H. 26. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. Scope not clear

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 250,000 630,000 880,000 5929(276) R/W CON 4,400,000 4,400,000 Total 250,000 630,000 4,400,000 5,280,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 221,325 557,739 3,895,320 4,674,384 Local Match 28,675 72,261 504,680 605,616 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 250,000 630,000 4,400,000 5,280,000

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 221,325 557,739 779,064 Local Match 28,675 72,261 100,936 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 250,000 630,000 880,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 3,895,320 3,895,320 Local Match 504,680 504,680 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 4,400,000 4,400,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 7 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 3800 BRIDGE NO. 29C0131, WALNUT GROVE ROAD OVER MOKELUMNE RIVER, AT SJ AND SAC COUNTY LINE. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 3,125,000 3,125,000 5929(239) R/W CON 15,000,000 15,000,000 Total 3,125,000 15,000,000 18,125,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,766,563 13,279,500 16,046,063 Local Match 358,438 1,720,500 2,078,938 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,125,000 15,000,000 18,125,000

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,766,563 2,766,563 Local Match 358,438 358,438 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,125,000 3,125,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 13,279,500 13,279,500 Local Match 1,720,500 1,720,500 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 15,000,000 15,000,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 8 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 3794 BRIDGE NO. 29C0199, PEZZI ROAD OVER CALAVERAS RIVER, 0.8 MI S/O EIGHT MILE RD. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 3/8/2011: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 968,827 968,827 5929(240) R/W CON 2,111,800 2,111,800 Total 968,827 2,111,800 3,080,627

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 968,827 2,111,800 3,080,627 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 968,827 2,111,800 3,080,627

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 968,827 968,827 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 968,827 968,827

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,111,800 2,111,800 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,111,800 2,111,800

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 9 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 3803 BRIDGE NO. 29C0219, EIGHT MILE RD, OVER WHITE SLOUGH (HONKER CANAL), 5 MI W OF I-5. Rehabilitate existing 2-lane bridge (No Added Lane Capacity).

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 657,000 657,000 5929(233) R/W CON 2,572,160 2,572,160 Total 657,000 2,572,160 3,229,160

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 581,642 2,277,133 2,858,775 Local Match 75,358 295,027 370,385 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 657,000 2,572,160 3,229,160

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 581,642 581,642 Local Match 75,358 75,358 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 657,000 657,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,277,133 2,277,133 Local Match 295,027 295,027 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,572,160 2,572,160

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 10 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 4625 BRIDGE NO. 29C0225, DAVIS ROAD OVER KETTLEMAN SLOUGH, 1.0 MI N OF 8 MILE ROAD. Rehabilitate existing 2-lane bridge. Widen New! for standard lanes and shoulders (no added capacity).

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 316,600 316,600 R/W CON 1,773,000 1,773,000 Total 2,089,600 2,089,600

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,849,923 1,849,923 Local Match 239,677 239,677 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,089,600 2,089,600

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 280,286 280,286 Local Match 36,314 36,314 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 316,600 316,600

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,569,637 1,569,637 Local Match 203,363 203,363 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,773,000 1,773,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 11 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 3852 BRIDGE NO. 29C0227, BUCKMAN RD OVER DUCK CREEK, 0.2 MI N OF SR 4. Replace 2-lane timber bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 9/13/2011: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 318,500 318,500 5929(245) R/W CON 1,592,600 1,592,600 Total 318,500 1,592,600 1,911,100

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 318,500 1,592,600 1,911,100 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 318,500 1,592,600 1,911,100

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 318,500 318,500 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 318,500 318,500

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,592,600 1,592,600 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,592,600 1,592,600

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 12 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 4479 BRIDGE NO. 29C0272, FRAIZER ROAD OVER MOSHER CREEK, 1.5 MI W OF CLEMENTS RD. Replace 2-lane timber bridge with 2-lane bridge. 10/7/2016: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 400,000 400,000 R/W CON 1,222,200 1,222,200 Total 1,622,200 1,622,200

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,622,200 1,622,200 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,622,200 1,622,200

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 400,000 400,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 400,000 400,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,222,200 1,222,200 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,222,200 1,222,200

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 13 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 4009 BRIDGE NO. 29C0274, MESSICK ROAD OVER MOSHER CREEK, 0.6 MI W/O CLEMENTS ROAD. Replace 2-lane timber bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 10/5/2012: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 283,000 283,000 5929(254) R/W CON 1,417,000 1,417,000 Total 283,000 1,417,000 1,700,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 283,000 1,417,000 1,700,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 283,000 1,417,000 1,700,000

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 283,000 283,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 283,000 283,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,417,000 1,417,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,417,000 1,417,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 14 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 3795 BRIDGE NO. 29C0292, COTTA ROAD OVER UPLAND CANAL, 1.0 MI W OF I-5. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 3/8/2011: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 439,200 439,200 5929(234) R/W CON 2,196,300 2,196,300 Total 439,200 2,196,300 2,635,500

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 439,200 2,196,300 2,635,500 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 439,200 2,196,300 2,635,500

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 439,200 439,200 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 439,200 439,200

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,196,300 2,196,300 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,196,300 2,196,300

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 15 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 3797 BRIDGE NO. 29C0303, WIMER ROAD OVER N BRANCH INDIAN CREEK, 1.2 MI S OF SR 26. Replace 2-lane timber bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 3/8/2011: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 610,533 610,533 5929(235) R/W CON 2,312,500 2,312,500 Total 610,533 2,312,500 2,923,033

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 610,533 2,312,500 2,923,033 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 610,533 2,312,500 2,923,033

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 610,533 610,533 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 610,533 610,533

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,312,500 2,312,500 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,312,500 2,312,500

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 16 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 3789 BRIDGE NO. 29C0307, BUCKMAN ROAD OVER DUCK CREEK, 0.8 MI N/O SR 4. Replace 1-lane timber bridge with a wider 1-lane bridge. 3/7/2011: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 221,071 213,370 434,441 5929(241) R/W CON 1,266,957 1,266,957 Total 221,071 213,370 1,266,957 1,701,398

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 221,071 213,370 1,266,957 1,701,398 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 221,071 213,370 1,266,957 1,701,398

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 221,071 213,370 434,441 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 221,071 213,370 434,441

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,266,957 1,266,957 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,266,957 1,266,957

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 17 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 4589 BRIDGE NO. 29C0317, HENRY RD OVER SSJID CANAL, AT N INTERSECT W RIVER RD. Rehabilitate bridge. Sliver widening for standard New! lanes with deck treatment and barrier replacement, (no added capacity).

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 400,000 400,000 R/W CON 605,000 605,000 Total 1,005,000 1,005,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 889,727 889,727 Local Match 115,274 115,274 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,005,000 1,005,000

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 354,120 354,120 Local Match 45,880 45,880 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 400,000 400,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 535,607 535,607 Local Match 69,394 69,394 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 605,000 605,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 18 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 3799 BRIDGE NO. 29C0319, SEXTON ROAD OVER S. SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT CANAL, 0.2 MI N/O RIVER ROAD. Replace 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. 3/11/2011: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 542,538 542,538 5929(242) R/W CON 1,657,875 1,657,875 Total 542,538 1,657,875 2,200,413

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 542,538 1,657,875 2,200,413 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 542,538 1,657,875 2,200,413

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 542,538 542,538 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 542,538 542,538

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,657,875 1,657,875 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,657,875 1,657,875

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 19 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 4481 BRIDGE NO. 29C0348, LAMMERS ROAD OVER DELTA-MENDOTA CANAL, 0.8 MI S VALPICO ROAD. Replace 2-lane bridge with 2-lane bridge. Not capacity increasing. 10/7/2016: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 825,000 825,000 R/W CON 5,375,000 5,375,000 Total 6,200,000 6,200,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 6,200,000 6,200,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 6,200,000 6,200,000

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 825,000 825,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 825,000 825,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 5,375,000 5,375,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 5,375,000 5,375,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 20 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 4482 BRIDGE NO. 29C0349, MACARTHUR DRIVE OVER DELTA-MENDOTA CANAL, 2.6 MI S LINNE ROAD. Replace 2-lane bridge with 2-lane bridge. Not capacity increasing.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 825,000 825,000 R/W CON 5,375,000 5,375,000 Total 6,200,000 6,200,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 5,488,860 5,488,860 Local Match 711,140 711,140 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 6,200,000 6,200,000

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 730,373 730,373 Local Match 94,628 94,628 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 825,000 825,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 4,758,488 4,758,488 Local Match 616,513 616,513 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 5,375,000 5,375,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 21 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 4475 BRIDGE NO. 29C0352, BIRD ROAD OVER DELTA-MENDOTA CANAL, 0.2 MI N OF S.H. 132. Rehabilitate bridge. No added lane capacity. 10/6/2016: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 249,150 249,150 R/W CON 1,395,240 1,395,240 Total 1,644,390 1,644,390

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,644,390 1,644,390 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,644,390 1,644,390

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 249,150 249,150 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 249,150 249,150

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,395,240 1,395,240 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,395,240 1,395,240

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 22 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 1555 BRIDGE NO. 29C0356, VICTORY ROAD OVER LONE TREE CREEK, 0.5 MI N OF S.R. 120. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 4/5/2010: Toll Credits programmed for PE & Con. 10/21/2010: Toll credits used for R/W.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 610,500 610,500 5929(216) R/W CON 2,400,550 2,400,550 Total 610,500 2,400,550 3,011,050

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 610,500 2,400,550 3,011,050 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 610,500 2,400,550 3,011,050

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 610,500 610,500 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 610,500 610,500

R/W Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,400,550 2,400,550 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,400,550 2,400,550

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 23 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 4484 BRIDGE NO. 29C0368, WAVERLY RD OVER CHANNEL B, 0.2 MI N OF FLOOD RD. Replace 2-lane timber bridge with 2-lane bridge. Not capacity increasing. 10/7/2016: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 400,000 400,000 R/W CON 1,311,800 1,311,800 Total 1,711,800 1,711,800

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,711,800 1,711,800 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,711,800 1,711,800

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 400,000 400,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 400,000 400,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,311,800 1,311,800 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,311,800 1,311,800

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 24 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 3452 BRIDGE NO. 29C0382, WILDWOOD ROAD OVER TEMPLE CREEK, 1.0 MI E JACK TONE RD. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 4/5/2010: Toll Credits programmed for PE & Con.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 559,600 559,600 5929(217) R/W CON 2,304,138 2,304,138 Total 559,600 2,304,138 2,863,738

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 559,600 2,304,138 2,863,738 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 559,600 2,304,138 2,863,738

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 559,600 559,600 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 559,600 559,600

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,304,138 2,304,138 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,304,138 2,304,138

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 25 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 3802 BRIDGE NO. 29C0413, BOLLEA ROAD OVER BEAR CREEK, NEAR CALAVERAS COUNTY LINE. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 3/11/2011: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 619,005 619,005 5929(236) R/W CON 2,344,716 2,344,716 Total 619,005 2,344,716 2,963,721

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 619,005 2,344,716 2,963,721 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 619,005 2,344,716 2,963,721

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 619,005 619,005 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 619,005 619,005

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,344,716 2,344,716 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,344,716 2,344,716

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 26 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

San Joaquin County 3400 PM00031, Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program, various locations within San Joaquin County. See Caltrans Local Assistance HBP web site for backup list of bridges.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 4,495,778 431,438 25,000 4,952,216 5929(212) R/W 5929(223) 5929(224) CON 3,590,007 2,240,417 1,606,700 3,822,600 11,259,724 5929(226) Total 8,085,785 2,671,855 25,000 1,606,700 3,822,600 16,211,940 5929(227) Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total 5929(229) Fed $ 7,158,345 2,365,393 22,133 1,422,412 3,384,148 14,352,430 5929(230) 5929(257) Local Match 927,440 306,462 2,868 184,288 438,452 1,859,510 5929(258) LSSRP Bond 5929(259) Local AC 5929(260) Total 8,085,785 2,671,855 25,000 1,606,700 3,822,600 16,211,940

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 3,980,112 381,952 22,133 4,384,197 Local Match 515,666 49,486 2,868 568,019 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 4,495,778 431,438 25,000 4,952,216

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 3,178,233 1,983,441 1,422,412 3,384,148 9,968,234 Local Match 411,774 256,976 184,288 438,452 1,291,490 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,590,007 2,240,417 1,606,700 3,822,600 11,259,724

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 27 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stockton 3459 PM00040, Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program, various locations within the City of Stockton. See Caltrans Local Assistance HBP website for backup list of bridges.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 545,928 355,055 900,983 R/W 5008(103) 5008(157) CON 2,630,000 5,388,217 8,018,217 Total 3,175,928 355,055 5,388,217 8,919,200

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,811,649 314,330 4,770,189 7,896,168 Local Match 364,279 40,725 618,028 1,023,032 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,175,928 355,055 5,388,217 8,919,200

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 483,310 314,330 797,640 Local Match 62,618 40,725 103,343 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 545,928 355,055 900,983

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,328,339 4,770,189 7,098,528 Local Match 301,661 0 618,028 919,689 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,630,000 5,388,217 8,018,217

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 28 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stockton 4603 BRIDGE NO. PM00179, Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) various bridges in the City of Stockton. See Caltrans Local New! Assistance HBP website for backup list of projects.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 542,000 542,000 R/W CON 1,628,545 1,628,545 Total 542,000 1,628,545 2,170,545

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 479,833 1,441,751 1,921,583 Local Match 62,167 186,794 248,962 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 542,000 1,628,545 2,170,545

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 479,833 479,833 Local Match 62,167 62,167 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 542,000 542,000

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,441,751 1,441,751 Local Match 186,794 186,794 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,628,545 1,628,545

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 29 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Tracy 3171 BRIDGE NO. 29C0126, ELEVENTH ST, OVER UP RR, 0.4 MI E MAC ARTHUR DR. Replace 4 lane bridge with new 4 lane bridge. Mix funding (seismic and rehab funds). High Cost project agreement required.

Phase Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Project #: PE 4,064,000 4,064,000 5192(020) R/W 1,492,290 1,492,290 CON 40,974,059 1,100,000 42,074,059 Total 46,530,349 1,100,000 47,630,349

Fund Source Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 40,846,659 973,830 41,820,489 Local Match 3,404,948 126,170 3,531,118 LSSRP Bond 2,278,743 2,278,743 Local AC Total 46,530,349 1,100,000 47,630,349

PE Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 3,251,200 3,251,200 Local Match 812,800 812,800 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 4,064,000 4,064,000

R/W Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,321,124 1,321,124 Local Match 171,166 171,166 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,492,290 1,492,290

CON Summary: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 36,274,334 973,830 37,248,164 Local Match 2,420,982 126,170 2,547,152 LSSRP Bond 2,278,743 2,278,743 Local AC Total 40,974,059 1,100,000 42,074,059

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 30 2016/17-2021/22 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: San Joaquin Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

MPO Summary: San Joaquin County Council Of Goverments Number of Projects: 29 Totals: Prior 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 Beyond Total Fed $ 68,435,900 5,856,731 3,462,959 1,422,412 2,277,133 479,833 120,995,761 202,930,728 Local Match 5,726,216 432,632 137,646 184,288 295,027 62,167 12,297,584 19,135,561 LSSRP Bond 2,278,743 2,278,743 Local AC

Total for all Phases 76,440,859 6,289,363 3,600,605 1,606,700 2,572,160 542,000 133,293,345 224,345,032

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 3/29/2018, 2:45 PM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 31 Appendix C

Annual Listings of Obligated Projects for FFY 16-17

Annual Listing of Projects with Federal Funding for Federal Fiscal Year 2017

December 2017

San Joaquin Council of Governments 555 E Weber Ave, Stockton, CA 95202 Phone: 209-235-0600 Fax: 209-235-0438 Website: www.sjcog.org

Purpose

On December 4, 2015, the President signed the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, the federal surface transportation authorization bill. A requirement within the law, 23 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23 Part 450.334 requires MPOs to develop listings of projects (including investments in pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) for which federal funds were obligated in the preceding program year within 90 calendar days following the end of the program year. These listings shall be published or otherwise made available in accordance with MPO's public participation plan for the FTIP. Specifically:

An Annual Listing of projects, including investments in pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities, for which federal funds have been obligated in the preceding program year shall be published or otherwise made available by the cooperative effort of the state, transit operator, and metropolitan planning organization for public review. This listing shall be consistent with the funding categories identified in each metropolitan transportation improvement program.

This report is published in response to the above requirement by listing all federally funded transportation projects in the San Joaquin Council of Governments region that were obligated during the federal fiscal year 2017. Obligation refers to the federal government’s commitment to pay or reimburse the lead agency for the federal share of a project’s cost. Obligation does not indicate expenditure or project completion; only that the project has been approved for federal reimbursement. Programmed project costs can be found in the corresponding Federal Transportation Improvement Program and Regional Transportation Plan.

Background

In 1973, San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) was recognized as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency for San Joaquin County. Initially the designation related solely to the administration and allocation of Transportation Development Act funds for public transit and possible road and street projects. However over time the role has expanded. SJCOG now serves as the agency responsible for adopting a Regional Transportation Plan, a Regional Transportation Improvement Program, and a Federal Transportation Improvement Program. It is also designated as a Transportation Management area and carries out Congestion Management functions. SJCOG serves as the Airport Land Use Commission, the State Designated Data Center and accesses the Regional Housing Needs Allocation for the county.

SJCOG fosters intergovernmental communication and coordination, undertakes comprehensive regional planning with an emphasis on transportation, provides for citizen involvement in the planning process and supplies technical services to its member governments.

In all these areas the SJCOG serves as a consensus builder to develop an acceptable approach on how to handle problems that do not respect political boundaries.

Who are the members, their representatives, and how do they vote?

SJCOG is a Joint Powers Authority comprised of the County of San Joaquin and the Cities of Escalon, Lathrop, Lodi, Manteca, Ripon, Stockton, and Tracy. SJCOG serves as the regional transportation planning agency and a technical and informational resource for these jurisdictions.

The SJCOG Board of Directors is composed of mayors, council members, and a county supervisor from each of the region's seven cities and the county. Supplementing these voting members are advisory representatives from Caltrans District 10, San Joaquin Regional Transit District, and the Port of Stockton.

SJCOG committees provide opportunities for involvement in regional programs by citizens, elected officials, agency staff, and representatives of civic and community groups. Some are standing committees responsible for policy direction and review, while others are established on an ad hoc basis to assist with specific projects. Standing committees are listed below.

Social Services Transportation Advisory Committee (SSTAC) The purpose of the SSTAC is to monitor and promote improvements to those public transportation services for persons with disabilities and seniors residing in San Joaquin County.

Management and Financial Advisory Committee (MFAC) The Management and Financial Advisory Committee guides administrative and financial decisions of SJCOG as the Local Transportation Authority and is composed of City Managers and the County Administrator.

Habitat Technical Advisory Committee (HTAC) The Habitat Technical Advisory Committee (HTAC) is comprised of 15 stakeholders in the San Joaquin County Multi- Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP). The HTAC is responsible for verifying that the SJMSCP is being implemented correctly and for solving any issues that arise during implementation.

Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) The Citizens Advisory Committee provides community input on project priorities and other matters pertaining to the Measure K program. Committee members are appointed by the SJCOG Board and represent the geographical, social, cultural, and economic mix of the region.

Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) The Technical Advisory Committee serves as SJCOG's technical advisory committee and is composed of Directors from the area Public Works Departments, Planning Departments, Caltrans' District 10, the Stockton Metropolitan Transit District, the Air Pollution Control District, and any other agency the Authority so names.

iiii

Executive Committee The Executive Committee is made up of five SJCOG Board members and generally reviews selected agenda items and submits a recommendation to the COG Board.

Interagency Transit Committee (ITC) The Interagency Transit Committee (ITC) was created in August 2004 by the San Joaquin Council of Governments Board of Directors to improve communication and coordination among the transit agencies within the San Joaquin County.

The Regional Transportation Plan

The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is a long-range (minimum 20-year) plan that provides a vision for future transportation improvements and investments based on specific transportation goals, objectives, policies, and strategies. The RTP is based on federal transportation law requiring comprehensive, cooperative, and continuous transportation planning. SJCOG satisfies these requirements by developing comprehensive transportation plans that include all surface transportation modes (multimodal planning), to ensure efficient people and goods movements throughout the region.

The purpose of the RTP is to provide strategic direction for transportation capital investments by assessing regional growth and economic trends. Thus, the RTP helps planners link transportation investments to provide a cohesive, balanced and multimodal transportation system that will help relieve traffic congestion, improve safety and provide for economic development.

The Federal Transportation Improvement Program

As the designated metropolitan planning organization for the region, SJCOG prepares and maintains the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). The program includes a listing of all transportation-related projects requiring federal funding or other approval by the federal transportation agencies. The FTIP also lists non-federal, regionally significant projects for information and air quality modeling purposes.

Projects included in the FTIP are consistent with SJCOG Regional Transportation Plan and are part of the area's overall strategy for providing mobility, congestion relief and reduction of transportation-related air pollution in support of efforts to attain federal air quality standards for the region.

Public Involvement

SJCOG aims to proactively engage the public in the regional transportation planning process and embrace federal requirements that MPOs provide the public with complete information, timely public notice, full public access to key decisions, and early and continuing involvement in developing the FTIP, Regional Transportation Plan, and other products.

iiiiii

Annual Listing of Projects with Federal Funding for Federal Fiscal Year 2017

Federal law requires SJCOG to publish for public review an annual listing of projects for which federal funds have been obligated in the preceding year, as a record of project delivery and a progress report for public information and disclosure.

This report is divided into the funding types administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Projects are listed by Lead Agency, FTIP Program, Federal ID and SJCOG ID. The SJCOG ID number is a unique project identifier used in the FTIP; the category Total Dollar Amount in FTIP is included for reference of total project funding. Multiple Federal IDs can correspond with one SJCOG ID. Note this list includes only federal funds obligated; no state or local funds are reported. The information contained in this report was provided by the California Department of Transportation.

iviv Date of Federal Funds Total Funds in Total Funds Bicyle/ Pedestrian Lead Agency Funding Type Federal ID Agency ID Location / Work Description Phase Obligation Obligated FTIP Remaining Related Projects ON STATE ROUTE: 12. IN SJ COUNTY NEAR TERMINOUS FROM MOKELUMNE RIVER BRIDGE Caltrans SHOPP SJ07‐3003 212‐0000‐0315 TO POTATO SLOUGH BRIDGE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND WIDENING (TC) 8/11/2017 $2,776,000 CON $2,776,000 $0

ON STATE ROUTE: 5. IN SJ CO ON ROUTE 5 FROM 0.4 MI N OF 8TH ST U/C TO HAMMER LN Caltrans SHOPP SJ07‐3004 2/1/2017 $3,296,500 CON $3,296,500 $0 U/C WIDEN FREEWAY FROM 6 TO 8 LANES ON STATE ROUTE: 5. SJ CO IN/NR STOCKTON FR 0.3 MI S CHARTER WY UC TO 0.2 MI N Caltrans SHOPP SJ07‐3005 212‐0000‐0684 11/9/2016 $9,447,456 CON $9,447,456 $0 COUNTRY CLUB BLVD UC ROADWAY REHABILITATION (TC) Caltrans SHOPP SJ07‐1002 212‐0000‐0669 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY AT VARIOUS LOCATION CONSTRUCT ADA CURB RAMPS (TC) 5/31/2017 $67,088 CON $67,088 $0 ON STATE ROUTE: 88. IN SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY NEAR STOCKTON FROM ROUTE 88/99 Caltrans HM SJ14‐1023 212‐0000‐0685 SEPARATION TO 0.3 MILE EAST OF COMSTOCK ROAD COLD PLANE ROADWAY AND PLACE 3/17/2017 $1,660,200 CON $1,660,200 $0 HOT MIX ASPHALT (TC) RIVER ROAD SIDEWALK AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS THE PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PARK VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ON THE NORTH SIDE OF RIVER ROAD WITH THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW SIDEWALK. ADDITIONALLY A NEW Ripon ATP SJ14‐8004 212‐0000‐0658 4/27/2017 $475,000 CON $475,000 $0 X SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AT RIVER ROAD AND FULTON AVENUE TO PROVIDE A DESIGNATED CONTROLLED CROSSING ALONG WITH COMPLETION OF THE ROADWAY. TC

RIVER ROAD SIDEWALK AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS THE PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PARK VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ON THE NORTH SIDE OF RIVER ROAD WITH THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW SIDEWALK. ADDITIONALLY A NEW Ripon CMAQ SJ14‐8004 212‐0000‐0658 4/27/2017 $75,000 CON $75,000 $0 X SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AT RIVER ROAD AND FULTON AVENUE TO PROVIDE A DESIGNATED CONTROLLED CROSSING ALONG WITH COMPLETION OF THE ROADWAY. TC

Port of Stockton HBP SJ07‐3034 212‐0000‐0261 NAVY DRIVE OVER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, BR. NO. 29C‐0023 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 6/15/2017 $5,844,041 CON $5,844,041 $0 CHEROKEE RD (SANGUINETTI LANE TO DIVERTING CANAL) RECONSTRUCT ROADWAY, CURB, SJ County RSTP SJ11‐CM25 212‐0000‐0605 4/7/2017 $247,825 CON $247,825 $0 GUTTER & SIDEWALK (TC) CHEROKEE RD (SANGUINETTI LANE TO DIVERTING CANAL) RECONSTRUCT ROADWAY, CURB, SJ County RSTP SJ11‐CM25 212‐0000‐0605 6/23/2017 $347,825 CON $347,825 $0 GUTTER & SIDEWALK (TC) CHEROKEE RD (SANGUINETTI LANE TO DIVERTING CANAL) RECONSTRUCT ROADWAY, CURB, SJ County RSTP SJ11‐CM25 212‐0000‐0605 6/23/2017 $123,175 CON $123,175 $0 GUTTER & SIDEWALK (TC) CHEROKEE RD (SANGUINETTI LANE TO DIVERTING CANAL) RECONSTRUCT ROADWAY, CURB, SJ County RSTP SJ11‐CM25 212‐0000‐0605 4/7/2017 $1,097,175 CON $1,097,175 $0 GUTTER & SIDEWALK (TC) JACK TONE RD. (HARNEY LANE TO JACK TONE RD. BYPASS) RESURFACING WITH ASPHALT SJ County RSTP SJ07‐3071 212‐0000‐0001 5/19/2017 $229,174 CON $229,174 $0 CONCRETE (TC) JACK TONE RD. (HARNEY LANE TO JACK TONE RD. BYPASS) RESURFACING WITH ASPHALT SJ County RSTP SJ07‐3071 212‐0000‐0001 5/19/2017 $33,183 CON $33,183 $0 CONCRETE (TC) JACK TONE RD. (HARNEY LANE TO JACK TONE RD. BYPASS) RESURFACING WITH ASPHALT SJ County RSTP SJ07‐3071 212‐0000‐0001 5/19/2017 $1,619,643 CON $1,619,643 $0 CONCRETE (TC) EIGHT MILE ROAD FROM LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD TO LEACH ROAD ASPHALT CONCRETE SJ County RSTP SJ07‐3071 212‐0000‐0001 3/17/2017 $701,000 CON $701,000 $0 OVERLAY (TC) WASHINGTON STREET(ANTEROS AVENUE TO WALKER LANE), CITY OF STOCKTON EAST SJ County RSTP SJ07‐3071 212‐0000‐0001 6/15/2017 $558,000 CON $558,000 $0 ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY (TC) 1)EIGHT MILE ROAD: INTERSTATE 5 TO 3,060¿ EAST OF INTERSTATE 5; 2)HOWARD ROAD: SAN JOAQUIN RIVER TO MATHEWS ROAD; 3)LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD: WEST JAHANT ROAD TO 600¿ SOUTH OF WOODSON ROAD AND 600' NORTH OF COLLIER ROAD TO SACRAMENTO COUNTY LIMITS; 4)MAIN STREET: DIVERTING CANAL TO PATRICK ROAD; 5)MARIPOSA ROAD: 264¿ EAST OF CARPENTER ROAD TO STOCKTON CITY LIMITS; 6)PELTIER SJ County RSTP SJ07‐3071 212‐0000‐0001 ROAD: ELLIOTT ROAD TO TULLY ROAD; 7)TRACY BOULEVARD: TRACY CITY LIMITS (2,073¿ 9/7/2017 $1,925,158 CON $1,925,158 $0 NORTH OF SUGAR ROAD) TO OLD RIVER RUBBERIZED CHIP SEAL/ROADWAY RESURFACING VARIOUS STREETS. INCLUDES REMOVAL OF THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING, MARKINGS AND PAVEMENT MARKERS; REMOVE OF FAILED PAVEMENT AND REPLACEMENT WITH HOT MIX ASPHALT(HMA); RUBBERIZED CHIP SEAL; AND REPLACEMENT OF STRIPING AND MARKERS. (TC) RESURFACE EXISTING ROADWAY WITH HOT MIX ASPHALT FROM BLOSSOM ROAD TO SJ County RSTP SJ07‐3071 212‐0000‐0001 THORNTON ROAD. ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY(RESURFACE EXISTING ROADWAY WITH 6/13/2017 $119,000 CON $119,000 $0 HOT MIX ASPHALT) (TC) RESURFACE EXISTING PAVEMENT WITH 0.25' HOT MIX ASPHALT OVER GEOSYNTHETIC PAVEMENT INTERLAYER FROM I‐5 TO STOCKTON CITY LIMITS. EL DORADO STREET SJ County RSTP SJ07‐3071 212‐0000‐0001 7/19/2017 $250,000 CON $250,000 $0 RESURFACING RESURFACE EXISTING PAVEMENT WITH 0.25' HOT MIX ASPHALT OVER GEOSYNTHETIC PAVEMENT INTERLAYER. (TC) Date of Federal Funds Total Funds in Total Funds Bicyle/ Pedestrian Lead Agency Funding Type Federal ID Agency ID Location / Work Description Phase Obligation Obligated FTIP Remaining Related Projects 1,190 FEET WEST OF EL DORADO STREET TO AIRPORT WAY ROADWAY RESURFACING: 1,190 SJ County RSTP SJ07‐3071 212‐0000‐0001 FEET WEST OF EL DORADO STREET TO AIRPORT WAY WITH HOT MIX ASPHALT AND PLACE 7/24/2017 $228,000 CON $228,000 $0 GEOSYNTHETIC PAVEMENT INTERLAYER. TC WEST LANE RESURFACING (EAST SIDE ONLY) FROM EIGHT MILE ROAD TO ARMSTRONG. SJ County RSTP SJ07‐3071 212‐0000‐0001 ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY. RESURFACE EXISTING ROADWAY WITH HOT MIX ASPHALT. TC 7/20/2017 $252,000 CON $252,000 $0

WEST LANE RESURFACING (WEST SIDE ONLY) ROADWAY RESURFACING: EIGHT MILE ROAD SJ County RSTP SJ07‐3071 212‐0000‐0001 8/3/2017 $252,000 CON $252,000 $0 TO ARMSTRONG ROAD ROADWAY RESURFACING WITH HOT MIX ASPHALT. TC CHEROKEE RD (SANGUINETTI LANE TO DIVERTING CANAL) RECONSTRUCT ROADWAY, CURB, SJ County CMAQ SJ11‐CM25 212‐0000‐0605 4/7/2017 $748,000 CON $748,000 $0 GUTTER & SIDEWALK (TC) MCHENRY AVENUE OVER STANISLAUS RIVER (BRIDGE 38C0032) BRIDGE REPLACEMENT SJ County HBP SJ11‐3025 212‐0000‐0290 6/13/2017 $2,937,795 CON $2,937,795 $0 WILDWOOD ROAD OVER TEMPLE CREEK (BRIDGE 29C0382) BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (TC) SJ County HBP SJ07‐3002 212‐0000‐0272 2/27/2017 $2,304,138 CON $2,304,138 $0 SJ County HBP SJ11‐3071 212‐0000‐0624 BUCKMAN ROAD OVER DUCK CREEK (BRIDGE # 29C0307) BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (TC) 6/5/2017 $213,370 PE $1,326,426 $1,113,056 MARIPOSA ROAD OVER SOUTH LITTLE JOHNS CREEK (29C0176) REPAIRS TO EXISTING SCOUR SJ County HBP SJ07‐3002 212‐0000‐0272 2/10/2017 $524,098 CON $524,098 $0 COUNTERMEASURES SEVERAL BRIDGE LOCATIONS PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ON FIVE MOVABLE BRIDGES SJ County HBP SJ07‐3002 212‐0000‐0272 2/23/2017 $200,554 CON $200,554 $0 WALNUT GROVE BLVD (29C0010); TRACY BLVD (29C0028); AIRPORT WAY (29C0187) BRIDGE SJ County HBP SJ07‐3002 212‐0000‐0272 4/27/2017 $334,643 CON $334,643 $0 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE WALNUT GROVE BLVD (29C0010); TRACY BLVD (29C0028); AIRPORT WAY (29C0187) BRIDGE SJ County HBP SJ07‐3002 212‐0000‐0272 7/14/2017 $26,647 CON $26,647 $0 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ELLIOTT RD (29C0151); KOSTER RD (29C0373); KOSTER RD (29C0374) BRIDGE PREVENTIVE SJ County HBP SJ07‐3002 212‐0000‐0272 5/19/2017 $863,176 CON $863,176 $0 MAINTENANCE ELLIOTT RD (29C0151); KOSTER RD (29C0373); KOSTER RD (29C0374) BRIDGE PREVENTIVE SJ County HBP SJ07‐3002 212‐0000‐0272 7/24/2017 $234,876 CON $234,876 $0 MAINTENANCE FINE ROAD OVER CHANNEL B (BRIDGE 29C0228) BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SJ County HBP SJ07‐3002 212‐0000‐0272 5/19/2017 $60,643 CON $60,643 $0 HARNEY LANE OVER NORTH PADDY CREEK (BRIDGE 29C0341) BRIDGE PREVENTIVE SJ County HBP SJ07‐3002 212‐0000‐0272 5/19/2017 $62,059 CON $62,059 $0 MAINTENANCE SJ County HBP SJ07‐3002 212‐0000‐0272 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY DEVELOP BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLAN 6/22/2017 $44,265 CON $44,265 $0 INTERSECTION OF DUNCAN AND COMSTOCK ROAD. INSTALL A ROUNDABOUT AT THE SJ County HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 3/20/2017 $200,000 CON $200,000 $0 INTERSECTION OF DUNCAN AND COMSTOCK ROAD. COUNTY WIDE IN SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY. ROAD RELATED ‐ OTHER.INSTALL RED FLASHING SJ County HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 2/23/2017 $10,000 CON $10,000 $0 X BEACONS @ 31 ALL‐WAY STOP INTERSECTION.(TC) INTERSECTION OF BYRON ROAD AND GRANT LINE ROAD. INSTALL A ROUND ABOUT AT THE SJ County HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 3/17/2017 $244,000 CON $244,000 $0 INTERSECTION OF BYRON ROAD AND GRANT LINE ROAD.(TC) INTERSECTION OF LIBERTY AND DUSTIN ROAD. INSTALL A ROUNDABOUT AT THE SJ County HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 4/6/2017 $213,000 CON $213,000 $0 INTERSECTION OF LIBERTY AND DUSTIN ROAD.(TC) SR 99 NB OFF‐RAMP/SR 120 WB ON‐RAMP, ALSO SR 120 EB & SR 99 CONNECTOR SJCOG RSTP SJ11‐3042 212‐0000‐0665 9/12/2017 $1,742,519 PE $15,964,519 $14,222,000 CONSTRUCT A SECOND LANE (TC) SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY AND MERCED COUNTY . SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY AND MERCED SJCOG CMAQ SJ11‐9009 212‐0000‐0608 9/12/2017 $150,000 CON $150,000 $0 COUNTY REGIONAL RIDESHARE PROGRAM. (TC) IN STOCKTON, NEAR THE ROBERT J. CABRAL STATION BETWEEN THE UPRR, WEBER AVENUE, UNION STREET, AND MAIN STREET. IN STOCKTON, NEAR THE ROBERT J. CABRAL STATION BETWEEN THE UPRR, WEBER AVENUE, UNION STREET, AND MAIN STREET. CONSTRUCT PARK SJRRC CMAQ SJ14‐6006 212‐0000‐0703 7/31/2017 $316,000 PE $1,311,000 $995,000 AND RIDE LOT AND RELATED ON‐STREET PARKING, SIDEWALKS, LIGHTING, SECURITY, AND OTHER PASSENGER AMENITY IMPROVEMENTS. TOLL CREDITS APPLY FOR PE AND CON PHASES. TC THORNTON ROAD (FROM EL CAMINO AVENUE TO RIVARAROAD) AND PACIFIC AVENUE Stockton RSTP SJ07‐3071 212‐0000‐0001 (FROM RIVARA ROAD TO MARCH LANE). ROAD REHABILITATION(CITY STREETS 1/18/2017 $477,001 CON $477,001 $0 RESURFACING) TC. I‐5/FRENCH CAMP INTERCHANGE (IN STOCKTON, FROM 0.4 MILE SOUTH OF FRENCH CAMP Stockton RSTP SJ07‐2026 212‐0000‐0698 ROAD TO DOWNING AVENUE. MITIGATION PLANTING.) LANDSCAPE, INSTALL LANDSCAPING 5/19/2017 $713,000 CON $713,000 $0 AT THE INTERCHANGE WEST LANE, BETWEEN ENTERPRISE STREET AND HARDING WAY INSTALL NEW TRAFFIC Stockton CMAQ SJ14‐CM15 212‐0000‐0642 RESPONSIVENESS SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM ON WEST LANE BETWEEN HARDING WAY AND 7/17/2017 $135,000 PE $668,401 $533,401 ENTERPRISE STREET.(TC) VARIOUS LOCATIONS BROOKSIDE RD,DAVIS RD,WAGNER RD,SCOT CREEKDR,TAM O Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 4/5/2017 $120,000 CON $120,000 $0 X SHANTER DR INSTALL FLASHING BEACONS,UPGRADE CROSSWALKS & SIGN Date of Federal Funds Total Funds in Total Funds Bicyle/ Pedestrian Lead Agency Funding Type Federal ID Agency ID Location / Work Description Phase Obligation Obligated FTIP Remaining Related Projects SEE VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN COMMENT SECTION INSTALL EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE‐ Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 4/7/2017 $143,160 CON $143,160 $0 EMPTION VARIOUS LOCA INTERSECTIONS OF HARDING WAY WITH EL DORADO ST AND WITH CENTER ST UPGRADE Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 6/16/2017 $72,094 CON $72,094 $0 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND CURB RAMPS INTERSECTION OF ARCH‐AIRPORT ROAD AND B STREET IN STOCKTON TRAFFIC SIGNALS (TC) Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 7/25/2017 $432,800 CON $432,800 $0 INTERSECTION OF ARCH‐AIRPORT ROAD AND B STREET IN STOCKTON TRAFFIC SIGNALS (TC) Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 8/23/2017 $7,350 CON $7,350 $0 WEST LANE AND WEST LANE FRONTAGE ROAD FROM KNICKERBOCKER DRIVE TO MORADA Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 7/10/2017 $776,330 CON $776,330 $0 LANE CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, CURB RAMPS, DRAINAGE,(TC) ALONG EL DORADO STREET BETWEEN DUNCAN AVENUE AND ALPINE AVENUE SIGNAL Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 7/17/2017 $155,150 CON $155,150 $0 CONTROLLERS AT INTERSECTIONS (TC) FILBERT STREET AT CROSSTOWN FREEWAY RAMPS IN THE CITY OF STOCKTON. INSTALL PRE‐ EMPTION DEVICES AND IMPLEMENT TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRE‐EMPTION FOR EMERGENCY Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 VEHICLES. UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLERS AND SOFTWARE. UPGRADE TRAFFIC 7/10/2017 $219,600 CON $219,600 $0 X SIGNAL CABINET AND SERVICE CABINETS AS NEEDED, AND INSTALL NEW EQUIPMENT AND PTZ CAMERAS.(TC) 1‐HENRY LONG BLVD AT SAN JOAQUIN TRAIL 2‐WILLIAM MOSS BLVD AT SAN JOAQUIN TRAIL 3‐CAROLYN WESTON BLVD AT SAN JOAQUIN TRAIL 4‐EWS WOODS BLVD AT BOARDWALK DR.5‐ISHI GOTO ST. AT EWS WOODS BLVD 6‐EWS BLVD AT LITTEL HALE PI 7‐HENRY LONG Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 BLVD AT VENICE CI 8‐HENRY LONG BLVD AT STAR WY 9‐MCDOUGALD BLVDAT SAN JOAQUIN 6/23/2017 $184,900 CON $184,900 $0 X TRAIL. INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING WITH ENHANCED FEATURES AT 9 INTERSECTIONS, INCLUDING WHEELCHAIR RAMPS, HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS AND RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACONS. EL DORADO STREET, BETWEEN HAMMER LN AND MORADA LN. REDUCE THE TRAVEL LANES FROM FOUR TO THREE (ROAD DIET), TO ACCOMMODATE A CENTER TOW‐WAY LEFT TURN Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 6/27/2017 $94,680 CON $94,680 $0 X LANE, STREETSIDE PARKING ON BOTH SIDESAND INSTAL NEW CLASS 2 BIKE LANES.

N. EL DORADO ST. BETWEEN ESSEX ST. AND THE CALAVERAS RIVER TRAIL (NEAR E. INGRAM ST. INSTALL A RAISED MEDIAN WITH FENCING TO PREVENT J‐WALKING. THE PROJECT Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 6/23/2017 $118,260 CON $118,260 $0 INCLUDES INSTALLATION OF NEW SIDEWALKS AND ADA COMPLIANT, CURB RAMPS, AND REPAIR OF BROKEN SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND GUTTERS. ALONG PACIFIC AVE. FROM CALAVERAS RIVER TO HAMMER LANE. INSTALL RAISED MEDIAN Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3118 212‐0000‐0403 6/23/2017 $173,160 CON $173,160 $0 CURB ALONG PACIFIC AVE. FROM CALAVERAS RIVER TO HAMMER LN. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BLVD. BETWEEN N. EL DORADO ST. AND S. AURORA ST., AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF S. SAN JOAQUIN ST., CALIFORNIA ST. AND S. GRANT ST. CONVERT SIGNALS FROM PEDESTAL‐MOUNTED TO MAST ARMS (AT THE INTERSECTIONS WITH SAN Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 7/19/2017 $207,700 CON $207,700 $0 X JOAQUIN ST., CALIFORNIA ST. AND GRANT ST.), AND PROVIDE PROTECTED LEFT‐TURNS (AT THE INTERSECTIONS WITH SAN JOAQUIN ST. AND GRANT ST.).

DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BLVD. BETWEEN BIEGHLE ALLEY AND MARIPOSA RD. INSTALL Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 7/10/2017 $66,150 CON $66,150 $0 RAISED MEDIAN. Date of Federal Funds Total Funds in Total Funds Bicyle/ Pedestrian Lead Agency Funding Type Federal ID Agency ID Location / Work Description Phase Obligation Obligated FTIP Remaining Related Projects 16 LOCATIONS FOR UPGRADING WITH NEW GUARDRAILS, TRANSITION RAILS AND END TREATMENT (AS APPLICABLE) 1‐ARCH ROAD NEAR FITE COURT(WEBER SLOUGH); 2‐AIRPORT WAY BETWEEN MICHAEL AVE AND 12TH, STREET (DUCK CREEK AREA); 3‐ AIRPORT WAY BETWEEN STIMSON ROAD AND CE DIXON DRIVE(SOUTH BRANCH WEBER CREEK AREA); 4‐ AIRPORT WAY SPERRY ROAD AND BOEING WAY (NORTH BRANCH WEBER CREEK AREA); 5‐BROOKSIDE ROAD BETWEEN MICHELANGELO DRIVE AND FEATHER RIVER ROAD(CALAVERAS AREA); 6‐ BROOKSIDE ROAD BETWEEN CROWN AVE AND MICHELANGELO DRIVE (CALAVERAS RIVER AREA); 7‐CAROLYN WESTON BLVD BETWEEN MANTHEY ROAD (FRONTAGE) AND MANTHEY ROAD (FRENCH CAMP SLOUGH AREA) CONTINUE BELOW GUARDRAIL. UPGRADE THE EXISTING GUARDRAILS WITH NEW GUARDRAILS, TRANSITION RAILS AND END TREATMENTS.; 8‐DR. MARTIN LUTHER Stockton HSIP SJ07‐3116 212‐0000‐0403 KING BLVD BETWEEN GRANT STREET AND AIRPORT WAY (UPRR UNDERCROSSING); 9‐EIGHT 7/20/2017 $210,500 CON $210,500 $0 X MILE ROAD BETWEEN SR 99 FRONTAGE ROAD AND HOLMAN ROAD (BEAR CREEK AREA); 10‐ EIGHT MILE ROAD BETWEEN LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD AND MARLETTE ROAD (PIXLEY SLOUGH AREA); 11‐ LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD BETWEEN ARMOR DRIVE AND GRIDER WAY(BEAR CREEK AREA); 12‐MCKINLEY AVE BETWEEN SPERRY ROAD AND INDUSTRIAL DRIVE (FRENCH CAM SLOUGH AREA); 13‐RAINER AVE NEAR RIVER DRIVE (CALAVERAS AREA); 14‐ THORNTON ROAD BETWEEN ESTATE DRIVE AND AG SPANOS BLVD (BEAR CREEK AREA); 15‐ WEST LANE BETWEEN POSTAL AVE AND WOODVALE DRIVE (CALAVERAS RIVER AREA); 16‐DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD BETWEEN GOLDEN GATE AVE AND MARIPOSA ROAD(UPRR UNDERCROSSING)

AREA BOUND ED BY MT. DIABLO, MT. OSO AND C STREET IN THE CITY OF TRACY. MT. DIABLO, MT. OSO AND C STREET.(CONSTRUCT A SIDEWALKS AND APPURTENANT SHOULDER, Tracy RSTP SJ14‐8013 212‐0000‐0661 1/12/2017 $200,000 CON $200,000 $0 STREET LIGHTING, CURB, GUTTER & DRAINAGE) TO PROVIDE SAFE WALKING ROUTE TO SOUTH WEST PARK ELEMENTRY SCHOOL. AREA BOUND ED BY MT. DIABLO, MT. OSO AND C STREET IN THE CITY OF TRACY. MT. DIABLO, MT. OSO AND C STREET.(CONSTRUCT A SIDEWALKS AND APPURTENANT SHOULDER, Tracy ATP SJ14‐8013 212‐0000‐0661 1/12/2017 $760,000 CON $760,000 $0 X STREET LIGHTING, CURB, GUTTER & DRAINAGE) TO PROVIDE SAFE WALKING ROUTE TO SOUTH WEST PARK ELEMENTRY SCHOOL. 11TH ST/MACARTHUR DR. TRAFFIC SIGNAL(ELEVENTH STREET AND MACARTHUR DRIVE) GEOMETRIC IMPROVEMENTS (CONSTRUCT WESTBOUND LEFT TURN LANE AND EASTBOUND Tracy CMAQ SJ11‐CM12 212‐0000‐0542 4/14/2017 $1,000,000 CON $1,000,000 $0 X RIGHT TURN LANE AND UPRR RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING MODIFICATIONS), TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND INTERCONNECT 11TH STREET ‐ EAST TRACY OVERHEAD (BRIDGE 29C0126) BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ‐ SEISMIC Tracy HBP SJ07‐3002 212‐0000‐0272 7/10/2017 $973,830 CON $973,830 $0 Total Roadway Obligated FFY 16/17 $50,294,891

Roadway (FHWA) Total Obligated = $50,294,891 Transit (FTA) Total Obligated = $11,696,107 TOTAL = $61,990,998 FTA 5307 Program

Total Dollar Total Project Federal FY Agency ID Sponsor Work Description Amount in Funds 16/17 Funds FTIP Remaining 212‐0000‐0154 Lodi Operating Assistance $1,352,708 $1,352,708 $0 212‐0000‐0299 Lodi Facility Upgrades $228,544 $228,544 $0 212‐0000‐0161 SJRTD Preventative Maintenace $1,752,457 $1,752,457 $0 212‐0000‐0474 SJRTD Safety and Security $52,721 $52,721 $0 212‐0000‐0610 SJRTD Capital Tire Lease $268,463 $268,463 $0 212‐0000‐0686 SJRTD Direct Operational Costs $3,198,485 $3,198,485 $0 Total Obligated Funds $6,853,378

FTA 5311 Program

Total Dollar Total Project Federal FY Agency ID Sponsor Work Description Amount in Funds 16/17 Funds FTIP Remaining 212‐0000‐0266 SJRTD Operating Funds for Rural Services $359,783 $359,783 $0 Total Obligated Funds $359,783

FTA 5339 Program

Total Dollar Total Project Federal FY Agency ID Sponsor Work Description Amount in Funds 15/16 Funds FTIP Remaining 212‐0000‐0687 SJRTD Bus Replacements $982,946 $982,946 $0 Total Funds Obligated $982,946

FLEX Funds ‐ CMAQ & RSTP

Total Dollar Total Project Federal FY Agency ID Sponsor Work Description Amount in Funds 16/17 Funds FTIP Remaining 212‐0000‐0645 SJRRC SJRRC Passenger Rail Car Expansion $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $0 Total Funds Obligated $3,500,000

Total Transit Funds Obligated $11,696,107 Appendix D

Transportation Control Measures Project List

San Joaquin COG Timely Implementation Documentation

SJC TCM 3 SJCOG Rideshare Program On going STIP 2002, 2004, 2006 1120000025 Stockton, Regional Rideshare Program On going On going 4 5 Freeway bottleneck SJC5.17 SJCOG improvements (add lanes, Measure K 2002 11200000039 SR 99 Widening Complete Complete 6 construct shoulders, etc.) 2002 11200000054 Hammer Ln and SR120 interchange Complete Complete 7 2004 11200000102 improvement projects

2004 11200000040 I-205 Widening project Complete Complete 8 9 10 SJC6.1 SJCOG Park and Ride Lots Measure K N/A N/A Master Park and Ride Lot Plan Complete Complete 11 12 SJC6.2 SJCOG Park and Ride Lots Measure K N/A N/A Master Park and Ride Lot Plan Complete Complete 13 14 TCM4 SJCOG Bicycle Programs Measure K; STIP TE 2006 21200000339 Jack Tone Class I bikeway in Ripon Complete Complete 15

State Route 120, McHenry Ave, and Main St Bicycle and Pedestrian SJC 9.3 Escalon Complete TCSP, Local pedestrian features; High School Linkage Complete Complete Program Program; sidewalk on First St 16 17 Construct bicycle lane along TCM4 Escalon FY02/03 STIP TE $221,000 2002, 2004,2006 21200000146 Construct Escalon Gateway Complete Complete 18 McHenry Avenue 19 2002-2003 TEA and CMAQ 2004 11200000154 Class I bike lane along McHenry Ave Complete Complete 20 Coordinate Traffic Signal synchronized traffic signal system at SJC5.2 Escalon Local 2000 21200000126 Complete Complete 21 Systems McHenry/SR120 Intersection 22

Reduce Traffic Congestion at synchronized traffic signal system at SJC5.3 Escalon Local 2000 21200000126 Complete Complete Major Intersections McHenry/SR120 Intersection 23 24 Coordinate Traffic Signal Coordinate traffic signals along Louise SJC 5.2 Lathrop starting in 2004 Not specified Complete Complete 25 Systems Avenue/Gold Rush Blvd. 26

C:\Users\niblock\Desktop\Appendix\ SJCOG 2018 RTP RACM TID Page 1 of 10 03/27/201811:48 AM San Joaquin COG Timely Implementation Documentation

Two grades separations on major arterial at Reduce Traffic Congestion at railroad; reconstruct one intersection; require SJC 5.3 Lathrop next 5 to 10 years STIP and Local 2006 11200000155 Complete Complete Major Intersections developers to signalize major arterial intersections

27 28

Development of Bicycle Travel Construct Class 1 and Class 2 bike lanes on SJC 10.4 Lathrop ongoing Not specified Complete Complete Facilities all new arterial and collector streets 29 30 Pedestrian and Bicycle Lathrop Road/UPRR grade separation to SJC 15.2 Lathrop Overpasses where Safety 2003 Not specified 2006 11200000155 Complete Complete include a sidewalk and Class 2 bike lane 31 Dictates 32 33 TCM 4 Lathrop Bicycle Programs CMAQ and TEA bike lanes on Fifth Street Complete Complete 34

Design Lodi Avenue Signal Lodi Ave. signal installation and interconnect SJC 5.2 Lodi complete in 2006 CMAQ 2002 21200000143 Complete Complete Interconnect Project from Cherokee Ln to Lower Sacramento 35 36 Improve congestion at Kettleman Lane Gap Reduce Traffic Congestion at SJC5.3 Lodi STIP, Measure K 2002 11200000159 Closure, Hwy 12/Mills Avenue, and Hwy Complete Complete Intersections 37 12/Tienda Drive 38 Adaptive traffic signals and SJC5.16 Lodi CMAQ 2002 21200000143 Lodi Avenue Signal Interconnect Project Complete Complete 39 signal timing 40

TCM1 Lodi Traffic Flow Improvements Local 2002 21200000143 Lodi Avenue Signal Interconnect Project Complete Complete 41 42

Reduce Traffic Congestion at SJC5.3 Manteca Local, Measure K 2004 11200000102 SR99/120 Improvements Complete Complete Intersections 43 44 2004 21200000271 South Union Widening 45 2004 21200000214 Industrial Park Drive Improvements Complete Complete 46

C:\Users\niblock\Desktop\Appendix\ SJCOG 2018 RTP RACM TID Page 2 of 10 03/27/201811:48 AM San Joaquin COG Timely Implementation Documentation

AB C D E F G H J K RACM Agency Commitment Commitment Commitment Funding TIP TIP Project ID Project Description 2017 FTIP Amendment 9, 2014 2019 FTIP Conformity Analysis Commitment Description Schedule RTP Amendment #4, Conformity Analysis 1 2 (as of 3/17) (as of 3/18) Pedestrian and Bicycle SJC15.2 Manteca Overpasses Where Safety Local, Measure K 2004 11200000102 SR99/120 improvements Complete Complete 47 Dictates 48

TCM1 Manteca Traffic Flow Improvements Local, Measure K 2004 21200000271 South Union Road Widening Complete Complete 49 50 2004 21200000214 Industrial Park Drive Complete Complete 51 52 TCM4 Manteca Bicycle Programs Local, Measure K N/A N/A Tidewater Bikeways project Complete Complete 53

TCM 1 Ripon Traffic Flow Improvements within 1-2 years CMAQ South Frontage Road Complete Complete 54 55

Coordinate Traffic Signal Install synchronized traffic signal systems on SJC5.2 Ripon Not specified N/A N/A Complete Complete Systems 4 locations 56 57 South Frontage Road project between Reduce Traffic Congestion at SJC5.3 Ripon Local N/A N/A Wilma & Fulton. Left turn pockets at Complete Complete Intersections 58 Frontage and Pine Street. 59

Site Specific Transportation Main and Stockton Street project. Signal SJC5.4 Ripon STIP/Measure K 2006 11200000162 Project complete. Project complete. Control Measures synchronization along Main Street. 60 61

The City will provide bus pullouts in curbs as Bus Pullouts in Curbs for SJC5.9 Ripon Not specified N/A N/A part of Jack Tone Road Improvements Complete Complete Passenger Loading Projects between Main and 4th Streets. 62 63 1.5 mile Class 1 bikeway between Doak SJC9.3 Ripon Bicycle/Pedestrian Program STIP 2004 21200000298 Complete Complete 64 Blvd and Canal Blvd. 65 Pedestrian and Bicycle Construct ADA accessible sidewalk over the SJC15.2 Ripon Overpasses Where Safety Local N/A N/A Complete Complete Main Street Overpass 66 Dictates 67 Hammer Lane Phase II and West Lane Reduce Traffic Congestion at SJC5.3 Stockton Local N/A N/A widening project. Added duel left turn lane Complete Complete Intersections 68 pockets. Pershing Ave widening project. Adding a left HES/Local Complete Complete 69 turn pocket at Harding. 70

C:\Users\niblock\Desktop\Appendix\ SJCOG 2018 RTP RACM TID Page 3 of 10 03/27/201811:48 AM San Joaquin COG Timely Implementation Documentation

Site Specific Transportation New traffic signal installed at SJC5.4 Stockton Local N/A N/A Complete Complete Control Measures Rosemarie/Precissi 71 New traffic signal installed and Complete Complete 72 Montauban/Lorraine Streets 73

Encouragement of Pedestrian Traffic claming treatments along Pacific SJC9.2 Stockton Local N/A N/A Complete Complete Travel Avenue in Miracle Mile commercial area 74 75 Hammer Lane/March Lane Class 2 Bike SJC9.3 Stockton Bicycle/Pedestrian Program Local N/A N/A Complete Complete 76 Lane project 77 Development of Bicycle Travel SJC10.4 Stockton Local N/A N/A Bear Creek Bike Path Complete Complete 78 Facilities 79 Weston Ranch Bike Path Complete Complete 80 Class 1 Bike paths at Pixley Slough Bike SJC TCM 4 Stockton Bicycle Program Local N/A N/A Complete Complete 81 Path 82 Pedestrian and Bicycle Bicycle/pedestrian facilities included on SJC15.2 Stockton Overpasses Where Safety Local, Measure K N/A N/A grade separation project on march Lane and Complete Complete 83 Dictates UPRR 84 traffic flow improvements on Hammer Lane TCM1 Stockton Traffic Flow Improvements Local, Measure K N/A N/A Complete Complete 85 and El Dorado Street 86 Expansion of current fixed SJC 1.5 Tracy 2002 Federal and State Transit 2002 21200000149 Operations assistance Complete Complete 87 route to Wal-Mart 88

SJC 1.6 Tracy Multi-Modal station 2004 STIP 2000/2002/2006 11200000104 Construct multi-modal station Complete Complete

89 90

C:\Users\niblock\Desktop\Appendix\ SJCOG 2018 RTP RACM TID Page 4 of 10 03/27/201811:48 AM San Joaquin COG Timely Implementation Documentation

11th St and MacArthur Dr traffic signal Interconnect existing traffic SJC 5.2 Tracy on-going partially CMAQ 2002 21200000114, 21200000145 installation and interconnect project, Tracy Complete Complete signals on major corridors Blvd traffic signal coordination project 91 92

Reduce Traffic Congestion at SJC5.3 Tracy Not specified N/A N/A 11th St/MacArthur improvements Complete Complete Major Intersections 93 Tracy Blvd between Central Ave and Clover Complete Complete 94 Street 95

Site-Specific Transportation Implement traffic control improvements on SJC5.4 Tracy Not specified N/A N/A Complete Complete Control Measures Byron/Corral Hollow Roads 96

Implement traffic control improvements on Complete Complete Grant Line/Corral Hollow Roads 97 98 Bus Pullouts in Curbs for Bus Pullouts in curbs for passenger loading SJC5.9 Tracy TDA, FTA N/A N/A Complete Complete 99 Passenger Loading on East St N/E of 10th Street

Bus Pullouts in curbs for passenger loading Complete Complete on Tracy blvd N/O Beverly Street 100 101 Involve school districts to SJC 7.3 Tracy encourage walking/biking to Not specified print and distribute bike maps to schools Complete Complete 102 school 103 bike lane project on 11th Street west of SJC9.3 Tracy Bicycle/Pedestrian Program Local, Measure K N/A N/A Complete Complete 104 Corral Hollow Road. 105

SJC 10.2 Tracy Bike Racks on Buses 2002 Not specified Install bike racks on all city-owned buses Complete Complete 106 107 Development of Bicycle Travel bike lockers at various locations and multi- SJC 10.4 Tracy ongoing Not specified Complete Complete 108 Facilities modal station 109

Transit improvements; purchase CNG TCM 2 Tracy Public Transit ongoing CMAQ, FTA, TDA buses; expanding transit service to Wal- Complete Complete Mart; printing material in Spanish 110 111

bike route signage; updated bicycle map for TCM 4 Tracy Bicycle Programs ongoing CMAQ and TEA Complete Complete Tracy; bike racks on all TRACER buses 112

C:\Users\niblock\Desktop\Appendix\ SJCOG 2018 RTP RACM TID Page 5 of 10 03/27/201811:48 AM San Joaquin COG Timely Implementation Documentation

San Joaquin Coordinate Traffic Signal SJC5.2 Local, Measure K N/A N/A Benjamin Holt Dr/Harrisburg Place Complete Complete County Systems 114 115 Pershing Ave/Thornton Road Complete Complete 116 Wilson Way/Alpine Avenue Complete Complete 117

San Joaquin Reduce Traffic Congestion at SJC5.3 Local, Measure K N/A N/A SR88 and Elliott Road Complete Complete County Major Intersections 118 119 SR12 and Victor Road Complete Complete 120

San Joaquin Site-Specific Transportation SJC5.4 Local N/A N/A Benjamin Holt Dr/Harrisburg Place Complete Complete County Control Measures 121 122 Pershing Ave/Thornton Road Complete Complete 123 Wilson Way/Alpine Avenue Complete Complete 124

San Joaquin Encouragement of Pedestrian Woodbridge Main Street Sidewalk SJC9.2 Local N/A N/A Complete Complete County Travel Improvements 125 126

San Joaquin SJC9.3 Bicycle/Pedestrian Program Local N/A N/A Class III Bike Route on Armstrong Road Complete Complete County 127 128

San Joaquin TCM1 Traffic Flow Improvements Local, Measure K N/A N/A Lower Sacramento Road Complete Complete County 129

Hammer Lane Complete Complete

130 131 SR88 Improvements PSR Complete Complete

Traffic Signal at Ham Lane and West Lane Complete Complete 132 133 Regional Express Bus purchase vehicles and operate interregional SJC 1.1 SJRTD Federal and Measure K Complete Complete 134 Program commuter service 135 Downtown Stockton Transit 2 years after ground- SJC 1.9 SJRTD Federal funds 2004 21200000236 Construct Downtown Transit Center Complete Complete 136 Center breaking 137 138

C:\Users\niblock\Desktop\Appendix\ SJCOG 2018 RTP RACM TID Page 6 of 10 03/27/201811:48 AM San Joaquin COG Timely Implementation Documentation

TCM4 SJCOG Bicycle Programs Measure K N/A N/A Duck Creek Class I bicycle path gap closure 139 Project complete. Project complete. 140 Corral Hollow Rd/Lowell Ave Class I TCM4 SJCOG Bicycle Programs Measure K N/A N/A Complete Complete 141 bikeway in Tracy 142

San Joaquin Lower Sacramento Rd Class III Bikeway in TCM4 Bicycle Programs Measure K N/A N/A On going On going County SJ County 143 144 145 TCM4 Escalon Bicycle Programs Measure K N/A N/A Install bike racks on buses in Escalon Complete Complete Improvements to McHenry Ave. corridor Escalon which included Class 2 Bicycle lanes NB 146 and SB 147 City implemented new turn lane and median Reduce Traffic Congestion at SJC 5.3 Escalon Local N/A N/A divider at St. John and BNSF rail road Complete Complete Major Intersections 148 crossing. 149

Coordinate Traffic Signal SJC5.2 Lodi Local N/A N/A Systems

150 No further updates are required. No further updates are required. 151

Reduce Traffic Congestion at South Frontage Road project between SJC5.3 Ripon Local N/A N/A Complete Complete Intersections Maple Ave & Garrison Way. 152 153 154 SJC 9.3 Ripon Bicycle/Pedestrian Program Local N/A N/A Jack Tone Class I Bike Path Complete Complete 155

Coordinate Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade/Retiming SJC5.2 Stockton CMAQ/Local 2007 212-0000-03101 Systems March Lane, Wilson Way, and Harding Way 156 Complete Complete 157

Reduce Traffic Congestion at SJC5.3 Stockton Local N/A N/A Hammer Lane Phase III. Intersections 158 Project complete. Project complete. Installation of traffic signal at Tam O'Shanter CMAQ/Local 2007 212-0000-0376 Complete Complete 159 Drive 160

C:\Users\niblock\Desktop\Appendix\ SJCOG 2018 RTP RACM TID Page 7 of 10 03/27/201811:48 AM San Joaquin COG Timely Implementation Documentation

Site Specific Transportation New traffic signals to be installed (2): SJC5.4 Stockton Local N/A N/A Control Measures Turnpike @ Lincoln, Filbert @ Myrtle

161 Complete Complete Upgrade left turn lanes to include protected left turn signals at three locations: Wilson @ Local N/A N/A Complete Complete Fremont, Pacific @ Alpine, and Pacific @ 162 Bianchi 163 Encouragement of Pedestrian Installation of sidewalks on streets in SJC9.2 Stockton CMAQ/Local 2007 212-0000-0373 Complete Complete 164 Travel unincorporated south Stockton 165

SJC9.3 Stockton Bicycle Pedestrian Program CMAQ/Local 2007 212-0000-3099 Class II Bike Lane on Tam O'Shanter Drive Complete Complete 166 167

Coordinate Traffic Signal Coordinate/synchronize traffic signals along SJC5.2 Tracy Local N/A N/A Complete Complete Systems Coral Hollow Rd and 11th Street 168 169 Coordinate Traffic Signal Coordinate/synchronize traffic signals along SJC5.2 Tracy CMAQ/Local 2007 212-0000-0365 Complete Complete 170 Systems Grant Line Road 171

Reduce Traffic Congestion at Installation of traffic signal at Byron Road SJC5.3 Tracy CMAQ/Local 2007 212-0000-0377 Complete Complete Major Intersections and Lammers Road 172 173

Parking restrictions on North side of Eaton SJC 5.8 Tracy On Street Parking Restrictions Local N/A N/A Complete Complete Avenue East of Tracy Boulevard. 174

Parking restrictions on South side of Grant Complete Complete Line Road West of Tracy Boulevard. 175 176

Gap closure projects to upgrade to Class I at two locations: Lowell Ave between Coral SJC9.3 Tracy Bicycle/Pedestrian Program Measure K N/A N/A Complete Complete Hollow & Valley View; Corral Hollow between 11th St & Byron Rd 177 178

Encouragement of Bicycle The City of Tracy Activity Guide advertised SJC 9.5 Tracy Local N/A N/A Complete Complete Travel local bicycle routes in 2007. 179

C:\Users\niblock\Desktop\Appendix\ SJCOG 2018 RTP RACM TID Page 8 of 10 03/27/201811:48 AM San Joaquin COG Timely Implementation Documentation

Encouragement of Pedestrian SJC 15.1 Tracy Local N/A N/A The City of Tracy Activity Guide advertised Complete Complete Travel 181 local walking routes in 2007

Encouragement of Pedestrian Tracy Local N/A N/A The City of Tracy Activity Guide advertised Complete Complete Travel 182 local walking routes in 2008

Encouragement of Pedestrian Tracy Local N/A N/A The City of Tracy Activity Guide advertised Complete Complete Travel 183 local walking routes in 2010 184

San Joaquin Reduce Traffic Congestion at SJC5.3 Local N/A N/A Complete Complete County Major Intersections 185 SR-12 and Davis Road. New traffic signals at LinneRoad at CMAQ/Local 2007 212-0000-0368 Complete Complete 186 Chrisman Drive New traffic signal at Howard Road at Tracy CMAQ/Local 2007 212-0000-0369 Complete Complete 187 Boulevard New traffic signal at Byron Road at Grant CMAQ/Local 2007 212-0000-0370 Complete Complete 188 Line Road. 189

San Joaquin Class III Bikeway on Austin Road from SJC9.3 Bicycle/Pedestrian Program Local N/A N/A Complete Complete County Louise Ave to French Camp Rd. 190

CMAQ/Local 2007 212-0000-0371 Class III Bikelane on Armstrong Road 191 Complete Complete 192 CMAQ South Stockton Sidewalks Phase I Complete Complete 193 Expansion of Public Purchase vehicles and operate intercity bus SJC1.5 SJRTD CMAQ/Local 2007 212-0000-0360 Complete Complete 194 Transportation System service 212-0000-0362 212-0000 Purchase vehicles and expansion of BRT CMAQ/Local 2007 195 0364 service. Complete Complete 196

C:\Users\niblock\Desktop\Appendix\ SJCOG 2018 RTP RACM TID Page 9 of 10 03/27/201811:48 AM San Joaquin COG Timely Implementation Documentation

198 Encouragement of Pedestiran crossing/crosswalk on 199 SJC 9.2 Manteca Pedestrian Travel Local N/A N/A Woodward Avenue Complete Complete

Reduce Traffic Congestion at Intersections Install left turn lane on Thornton Rd 200 SJC5.3 Stockton CMAQ 2015 212-0000-0632 at Hammer Lane On going On going

Reduce Traffic Congestion at Tam O'Shanter Drive and Castle Oaks Drive Intersections 201 SJC5.3 Stockton CMAQ 2015 212-0000-0635 Roundabout On going On going

BRT Phase 5: Adpative Signal on Weber Adaptive traffic signals and Avenue, Miner Avenue, Wilson Way, signal timing Fremont St, Filbert Street, and Main St 202 SJC5.16 Stockton CMAQ 2015 212-0000-0641 Corridors On going On going Adaptive traffic signals and West Lane Traffic Responsiveness Signal 203 SJC5.16 Stockton signal timing CMAQ 2015 212-0000-0642 Control System On going On going Adaptive traffic signals and BRT Phase 1B on Pacific Avenue and 204 SJC5.16 Stockton signal timing CMAQ 2015 212-0000-0643 Madison Street Corners. On going On going

C:\Users\niblock\Desktop\Appendix\ SJCOG 2018 RTP RACM TID Page 10 of 10 03/27/201811:48 AM Appendix E

Expedited Project Selection Procedures

Federal regulations 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 450 and Title 23 of the United States Code (USC) allows for the advancement or delay of projects within the active four-year program schedule planning element of the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) subject to procedures agreed upon by cooperating parties. This document certifies that the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), and the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), has in place a formal Expedited Project Selection Process (EPSP) agreed upon by all of the Region’s partners. SJCOG and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) have implement an EPSP for its Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), as required by Federal Regulations 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 450 and Title 23 United States Code (USC). Projects from the first four years of 2019 FTIP have been selected using the approved project selection procedures. An outline of these procedures is identified in the “EPSP Selection Process” table contained within this document. All partner agencies agree that any project identified within the 4-year program schedule planning element may be advanced or delayed in the existing Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP) subject to conditions detailed in the EPSP.

EPSP Eligibility Criteria 1. Projects identified within the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), Active Transportation Program (ATP), Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), Local Partnership Program (LPP), Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP), and Solutions for Congested Corridors Program (SCCP) may be advanced or delayed, however the use of the EPSP process is subject to the approval by the California Transportation Commission (CTC).

2. SJCOG and Caltrans agree that the Caltrans’ State Highway Operation Protection Program (SHOPP) Program Manager may advance or delay projects programmed in the adopted SHOPP project schedule upon notifying SJCOG.

3. Projects funded by the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ), Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP), Public Lands Highway Program (PLH) may be advanced or delayed within the 4-year program schedule planning element of the FTIP at the request of the sponsor agency and subject to the approval of SJCOG.

4. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) administered funds and/or projects may be advanced or delayed within the four-year program schedule planning element of the FTIP at the request of the agency, as long as funding is available and the change does not negatively impact the delivery or availability of funds for other projects ready for obligation.

5. The Caltrans Division of Local Assistance has implemented a project selection process in cooperation with the FHWA, SJCOG, and the implementing Agency for the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), Highway-Railroad Grade Separation Program, the Highway Bridge Program (HBP), and High Risk Rural Roads (HRRR/HR3) Program, to produce the four-year FTIP, Program Schedule planning list. Projects funded through the programs listed may be advanced or delayed within the four year element of the FTIP by the authorized Program Managers without amending the FTIP, upon notification to SJCOG.

This process was developed in cooperation and consultation with the implementing agencies, the FHWA, FTA, the MPO, and the HBP Advisory Committee. SJCOG and Caltrans agree that the Caltrans Division of Local Assistance may move projects within those programs identified above within the 4-year FTIP Program Schedule Planning Element without formally amending the FTIP/FSTIP.

EPSP Selection Process

Selecting Selection Consulted/Cooperating Region Project Type Agency Procedure Agency State, Transit Operators (San Joaquin Regional Transit District), San Projects funded with Title 23 Joaquin Regional Rail and Federal Transit Act funds MPO Consultation Commission (SJRRC), except: NHS, HBP, IM, and City of Escalon, City of FLHP funded projects Lodi, City of Manteca, City of Ripon, City of Tracy, and SJCOG Projects on the Highway MPO: Railroad Grade Separation, NHS, and projects funded SJCOG under the following programs: HBP, IM, HMP, HSIP, HES, Local Section 130 Grade State Cooperation MPO Crossings, and Recreational Trails. STIP, ATP, TIRCP, LPP, TCEP, and SCCP are subject to advancement or amendment approval by CTC Projects funded with Federal Lands Highway Program Selected in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 204 (FLHP) funds

Appendix F

Administrative and Formal Amendment Process

Appendix G

Public Involvement Process Major Activities Subject to Public Participation Requirements

FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Th e Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) implements the policy and investment priorities expressed by the public and adopted by SJCOG in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). In this way, public comments made as part of the RTP are refl ected in the TIP as well. Th e FTIP covers a four- or fi ve-year timeframe, and all projects included in the FTIP must be consistent with the RTP. Th e FTIP is a comprehensive listing of San Joaquin County surface transportation projects-- including transit, highway, local roadway, bicycle and pedestrian investments-- that:

• Receive federal funds, or are • Subject to a federally required action, or are • Regionally signifi cant, for federal air quality conformity purposes.

Th e FTIP includes a fi nancial plan that demonstrates there are suffi cient revenues to ensure that the funds committed (or “programmed”) to the projects are available to implement the projects or project phases. Adoption of the FTIP also requires a fi nding of conformity with federal transportation air quality conformity mandates.

33 Major Activities Subject to Public Participation Requirements

UPDATING & AMENDING THE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Federal regulations require that the FTIP be Further explanation about FTP updates, and how updated at least once every four years. SJCOG the types of amendments are processed are shown adopts a new FTIP every two years and revises it in the narrative and tables that follow. periodically to keep projects current. Outside of FTIP updates and revisions, Expedited In addition to a FTIP update, revisions to the Project Selection Procedures (EPSP) allow eligible FTIP may occur as Amendments, Administrative projects to be moved between FTIP fi scal years as Modifi cations, or Technical Corrections. Th e long as the project cost and scope do not change. criteria for Administrative Modifi cations and SJCOG staff is federally authorized to utilize Amendments are defi ned in federal legislation, EPSP without additional state or federal approval specifi cally Title 23, CFR part 450.104. Th e action. SCJOG does not require a formal public Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit participation process for EPSP actions. A more Administration, and California Department detailed description of the EPSP is available from of Transportation (Caltrans) have developed SJCOG staff upon request amendment and administrative modifi cation procedures for the FTIP. Th ese procedures are posted online at: www.sjcog.org/DocumentCenter/ View/1421

34 Major Activities Subject to Public Participation Requirements

» FTIP Update » FTIP Amendment Type 1: Adminisitrative SJCOG adopts a new FTIP every two years. As Modifi cations part of the adoption, SJCOG removes two prior Administrative modifi cations include minor years and adds two additional years of funding. changes to project cost, schedule, or funding Th e FTIP is accompanied by either a new air sources. Admininstrative modifi cations do not quality conformity determination and analysis, or require published public notices, public review and a determination that relies on a previous analysis. comment or a public hearing, with the exception FTIP updates will be subject to the conformity and of certain types of Federal Transit Administration interagency consultation procedure. Projects which must go through a formal amendment process. Administrative modifi cations » FTIP Technical Correction only require approval by SJCOG.2 State and Technical corrections may be made by SJCOG federal agencies are notifi ed, but do not take staff as necessary. Technical corrections are not approval action on administrative modifi cations. subject to an administrative modifi cation or an Administrative modifi cations do not require re- amendment, and may include revisions such as: demonstration of fi scal constraint or conformity determination. Th ese modifi cations are posted on ✓ Changes to information and projects that are the SJCOG website at the time of action, and are included only for illustrative purposes; later posted on the Caltrans website. ✓ Changes to information outside of the FTIP period; » FTIP Amendment Type 2: Formal Amendment ✓ Changes to information not required to be - Funding Changes included in the FTIP per federal regulations; or ✓ Changes to correct simple errors or omissions Type 2 amendments primarily include project including data entry errors. cost changes that are greater than minor changes identifi ed under administrative modifi cation Th ese technical corrections cannot signifi cantly procedures. Th e projects in a Type 2 amendment impact the cost, scope, or schedule within the FTIP do not change in design concept or scope, and period, nor will they be subject to a public review the conformity analysis years, as assumed for the and comment process, re-demonstration of fi scal regional analysis of the currently conforming RTP/ constraint, or a conformity determination. SCS and the FTIP, remain unchanged.

2 Consistent with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal transit Administration (FTA) letter dated June 7, 2011, SJCOG has the discretion to delegate authority to the Executive Director to approve FTIP Administratiev Modifi cations to the Federal State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) consistent with approved FSTIP/FTIP Administrative Modifi cation and Amendment Procedures. Such delegation of authority was granted as part of SJCOG Resolution No. 2011-25 which was reaffi rmed on April 26, 2012 and approved by Caltrans on May 22, 2012. the following procedures apply to this delegation of authority: SJCOG will send copies of the approved administrative modifi cation to Caltrans, FHWA, and FTA. Once the administrative modifi cation is approved by SJCOG, the administrative modifciation will be deemed part of the Federal State Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP). SJCOG will demonstrate in a subsequent amendment that the net fi nancial change from each administrative modifi cation has been accounted for. Caltrans will conduct periodic reviews of SJCOG’s administrative modifi cation process to confi rm adherence to the procedures. Noncompliance with the procedures will result in revocation of the MPO’s delegation.

35 Major Activities Subject to Public Participation Requirements

Type 2 amendments do not require published Public notifi cation of a Type 4 formal amendment public noticies or a public hearing, with the includes: exception of certain types of Federal Transit Administration Projects. Type 2 formal ✓ Legally noticed 30-day public comment period; amendments require approval by SJCOG, Caltrans, ✓ Legally noticed public hearing; and FHWA/FTA. Publicly accessible notifi cation ✓ Posting of amendment information on the of a Type 2 formal amendment is posted on the SJCOG website during public comment period; SJCOG website at least 7 days prior to action, and ✓ Publishing amendment information as part of distriuted to local agency partners through SJCOG the following publicly available SJCOG agendas: standing committees. SJCOG will consider public TAC, M&F, CAC, and SJCOG Board, and comments on the amendment prior to approval ✓ Consideration and response to public action. comments received during comment period.

» FTIP Amendment Type 3: Formal Amendment » FTIP Amendment Type 5: Formal Amendment - Exempt Projects - Confi rmity Determination and New Regional Type 3 amendments signifi cantly revise, add Emissions Analysis or delete exempt or non-regionally sigifi cant Type 5 amendments are the highest level projects or project phases to/from the FTIP. Type 3 amendment and primarily involve adding or amendments require approval by SJCOG, Caltrans, deleting new projects that must be modeled for and FHWA/FTA. Public notifi cation of a Type 3 their air quality purposes as part of the RTP/ formal amendment is posted on the SJCOG website SCS. Type 5 amendments require an Air Quality at least 7 days prior to action, and distributed to Conformity Document that demonstrates local agency partners through SJCOG standing conformity with applicable air quality requirements committees. Type 3 amendments do not require and a new regional emissions analysis. Th is type published public notices, or a public hearing, with of amendment is also used when a non-exempt, the exception of certain types of Federal Transit regionally signifi cant project makes a change to Administration Projects. SJCOG will consider either the design concept or scope or conformity public comments on the amendment prior to analysis completion year which is not consistent approval action. with the existing regional emissions analysis. Th e FTIP amendment, Air Quality Conformity » FTIP Amendment Type 4: Formal Amendment Document, and RTP Amendment (if applicable) - Confi rmity Determination that Relies on a follow the same public process. Type 5 amendments Previous Regional Emissions Analysis require approval action by SJCOG, Caltrans, and Type 4 amendments primarily include adding FHWA. or deleting projects that have already been appropriately modeled for air quality purposes Public notifi cation of a Type 5 formal amendment as part of the adopted RTP/SCS. In this case, the includes: federal approving agencies can use a previous analysis of the project’s impact on air quality for ✓ Legally noticed 30-day public comment period; apporval purposes. Type 4 amendments may ✓ Legally noticed public hearing; be accompanied by an RTP/SCS amendment to ✓ Posting of amendment information on the maintain consistency. Th e FTIP amendment and SJCOG website during public comment period; RTP/SCS Amendment (if applicable) follow the ✓ Publishing amendment information as part of same public process. Type 4 amendments require the following publicly available SJCOG agendas: approval by SJCOG, Caltrans, and FHWA/FTA. TAC, M&F, CAC, and SJCOG Board, and ✓ Consideration and response to public comments received during comment period. 36 Major Activities Subject to Public Participation Requirements

REQUIREMENTS FOR UPDATING & REVISING THE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

PUBLIC REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING APPROVAL AMENDMENT TYPE PERIOD REQUIREMENTS AUTHORITY** (# OF DAYS)*

✓SJCOG Type 1: n/a n/a Executive Administrative Modifi cation Director

Type 2: ✓SJCOG Board Formal Amendment - 14 n/a ✓ Caltrans Funding Changes ✓ FHWA/FTA

Type 3: ✓SJCOG Board Formal Amendment - 14 n/a ✓ Caltrans Exempt Projects ✓ FHWA/FTA

Type 4: Formal Amendment - ✓SJCOG Board Conformity Determination that relies 30 Yes*** ✓ Caltrans on a Previous Regional Emissions ✓ FHWA/FTA Analysis

Type 5: ✓SJCOG Board Formal Amendement - 30 Yes*** ✓ Caltrans Conformity Determination and New ✓ FHWA/FTA Regional Emissions Analysis

* All amendments are posted to the SJCOG Website. Hardcopies available upon request. ** Prior to approval action, all amendments are circulated through SJCOG’s Technical Advisory Committee, Management & Finance Committee, Citizens Advisory Committee, and SJCOG Board. *** Notice of Public Hearing published in regional English and Spanish newspapers, as part of the SJCOG Board agenda packet, and on the SJCOG Website.

37 Appendix H

Public Notices/Proof of Publication NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE DRAFT 2019 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, THE DRAFT 2018 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY STRATEGY, CORRESPONDING DRAFT CONFORMITY ANALYSIS, AND DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the San Joaquin Council of Governments will hold a public hearing on April 26, 2018 at 4:00 pm at the SJCOG office building located at 555 E. Weber Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202, regarding the Draft 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (2019 FTIP), the Draft 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Community Strategy (2018 RTP/SCS), the corresponding Draft Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the 2019 FTIP and 2018 RTP/SCS and the 2018 RTP/SCS Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The purpose of the public hearing is to receive public comments on these documents.

• The 2019 FTIP is a near-term listing of capital improvement and operational expenditures utilizing federal and state monies for transportation projects in San Joaquin County during the next four years. • This public notice also satisfies the program of projects (POP) requirements of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Urbanized Area Formula Program, Section 5307. If no comments are received on the proposed POP, the proposed transit program (funded with FTA 5307 dollars) will be the final program. • The 2018 RTP/SCS is a long-term coordinated transportation/land use strategy to meet San Joaquin County transportation needs out to the year 2042. • The EIR document provides an analysis of potential environmental impacts related to the implementation of the 2018 RTP/SCS as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). • The corresponding Conformity Analysis contains the documentation to support a finding that the 2019 FTIP and 2018 RTP/SCS meet the air quality conformity requirements for ozone and particulate matter.

Individuals with disabilities may call Rebecca Calija (209-235-0600) of SJCOG (with 3- working-day advance notice) to request auxiliary aids necessary to participate in the public hearing. Translation services are available (with 3-working-day advance notice) to participants speaking any language with available professional translation services.

A 55-day public review and comment period will commence on March 2, 2018 and conclude on Thursday, April 26, 2018 for the 2018 RTP/SCS.

A 45-day public review and comment period will commence on March 13, 2018 and conclude on April 26, 2018 for the draft EIR.

A concurrent 30-day comment period for the 2019 FTIP and 2018 RTP/SCS/2019 FTIP conformity document will commence on March 28, 2018 and conclude on April 26, 2018.

The draft documents are available for review at the SJCOG office, located at 555 E. Weber Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202 and on the SJCOG website at http://www.sjcog.org.

Public comments are welcomed at the hearing, or may be submitted in writing to Kim Anderson at the address below by 5pm on April 26, 2018.

After considering the comments, the documents will be considered for adoption, by resolution, by the San Joaquin Council of Governments at a regularly scheduled meeting to be held on June 28, 2018. The documents will then be submitted to state and federal agencies for approval.

Contact Person: Kim Anderson, Senior Regional Planner 555 E. Weber Avenue Stockton, CA 95202 209-235-0565 Contact Email: [email protected] Public Comment Email: [email protected]

Appendix I

SJCOG Adoption Resolution

Councilman Andrade, Stockton; Councilman Dresser, Lathrop; VM Holman, Stockton; Councilman Kuehne, Lodi; Councilmember Lofthus, Stockton; Supervisor Miller, SJC; Councilman Murken, Escalon; Councilmember Young, Tracy; VM Zuber, Ripon. Supervisor Winn, SJC.

Mayor DeBrum, Manteca; Supervisor Elliott, SJC.

Appendix J

Air Quality Codes EPA Air Quality Screening Criteria

1.00 Safety Programs 1.01 Railroad/highway crossing. 1.03 Safer non-Federal-aid system roads. 1.04 Shoulder Improvements. 1.05 Increasing Sight Distance. 1.06 Safety Improvement Program. 1.07 Traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects. 1.08 Railroad/highway crossing warning devices. 1.09 Guardrails, median barriers, crash cushions. 1.10 Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation. 1.11 Pavement marking demonstration. 1.12 Emergency Relief (23 U.S.C. 125). 1.13 Fencing. 1.14 Skid treatments. 1.15 Safety roadside rest areas. 1.16 Adding medians. 1.17 Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area. 1.18 Lighting improvements. 1.19 Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes). 1.20 Emergency truck pullovers.

2.00 Mass Transit 2.01 Operating assistance to transit agencies. 2.02 Purchase of support vehicles. 2.03 Rehabilitation of transit vehicles. 2.04 Purchase of office, shop, and operating equipment for existing facilities. 2.05 Purchase of operating equipment for vehicles (e.g. radios, fareboxes, lifts, etc.). 2.06 Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems. 2.07 Construction of small passenger shelters and information kiosks. 2.08 Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures. 2.09 Rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in existing right of way. 2.10 Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet. 2.11 Construction of new bus or rail storage/maintenance facilities categorically excluded in 23 CFR 771.

3.00 Air Quality 3.01 Continuation of ride-sharing and van-pooling promotion activities at current levels 3.02 Bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

4.00 Landscaping/Signs 4.01 Non Construction related activities. 4.05 Engineering studies 4.06 Noise attenuation. 4.07 Advance land acquisitions 4.08 Acquisition of scenic easements. 4.09 Plantings, landscaping, etc. 4.10 Sign removal. 4.11 Directional and infomational signs. 4.12 Transportation enhancement activities 4.13 Repair of damage caused by natural disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist actgs, except projects involving substantial functional, locational or capacity increase

5.00 Other 5.01 Intersection channelization projects. 5.02 Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections. 5.03 Changes in vertical and horizontal alignment. 5.04 Interchange reconfiguration projects. 5.05 Truck size and weight inspection stations. 5.06 Bus terminals and transfer points. 5.07 Traffic signal synchronization projects. Appendix K

2018 RTP Policies and Performance Measures Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy

C H A P T E R FIVE PERFORMANCE OF THE SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

F I V E

Performance of the Sustainable

Communities Strategy

This chapter summarizes the performance outcomes of the long-term investments in programs and infrastructure

representing the shifting needs and priorities in the San Joaquin County region. The chapter also describes how the Plan addresses the needs of communities of concern in the county. Technical analyses are contained in the Plan Performance and Environmental Justice Appendices.

Regional Transportation Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-1 Since the Plan horizon year is 2042, performance Implementation & Advisory Working Group and results reflect year 2042 performance in comparison informed along the way through the public listening to both a 2015 “baseline” year and year 2042 sessions, online web survey feedback, and individual “business as usual” conditions. This comparison stakeholder group meetings. The measures were effectively examines how the Plan measures up utilized during the public outreach process to aid against an alternative future where the land use interested citizens, stakeholder groups, and advisory trends of the recent past continue and the mix of committees in understanding the policy choices and investments is more auto-centric to match the tradeoffs inherent in the alternative land use and larger, less compact urban footprint. These transportation scenarios that could form the comparisons will demonstrate whether the Plan is foundation of the Plan. successful in addressing greenhouse gas reductions, reducing potential impact on the environment, A summary of all performance outcomes can be facilitating efficient public investments, and found in Figure 5.1. The following pages highlight improving residents’ ability to reach the places they plan performance across a variety of critical focus desire through bolder transportation and land use areas. With the 2018 Plan, SJCOG has added a planning strategies. Regional Progress Report that discusses historical trends to put the performance of the Plan in context. The Sustainability Story—Building Lives. It also identifies limitations to measurement and Building Communities. Building Business. identifies potential improvements to future indicators. Some indicators and trends are Performance — How does the Plan highlighted in the chapter; a full report is included as measure up? Appendix M. Performance indicators are qualitative or quantitative measures of progress toward the Plan’s overall goals, objectives, and policies. They contribute to the decision-making process by providing a basis for determining whether a decision advances the transportation objectives that are valued and held as priorities by the region. In some cases, the plan is making solid progress toward the goals and objectives; in other instances, the Plan is slowing the progress of undesirable outcomes, or holding sway against worsening outcomes in the face of rapid population growth. The Plan’s progress is discussed in the following sections.

Performance indicators are used as one tool to help evaluate how this Plan contributes to the quality of life in the San Joaquin region. Most of the indicators have been carried forward from the 2014 plan, while some represent new addtions based on stakeholder requests and/or improvements in available evaluation tools. These indicators were largely developed through work with the RTP/SCS

Performance of the Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-2 Figure 5.1 The SCS Story Enhance the Environment for Existing & Future Generations Prime Farmland Developed: 9,700 fewer acres of Prime Farmland developed over business as usual Energy & Water Consumption: Average residential household energy use decreases 14% and 50 gallons less water per household used daily Reducing Green House Gases: Per capita emissions decline to meet and exceed the current reduction target of 10% by 2035 Improving Air Quality through VMT Reduction: Per capita VMT declines 11% from 2015 baseline conditions

Maximize Mobility & Accessibility Improvements to mobility: Fewer minutes of delay due to congested roadways Increased Investment in Transit: $3.57 billion in transit investments BRT Routes: New routes on Eight Mile Road, March Lane, and Arch/ Sperry corridor

Acres of Land Consumed: Future urban Footprint is less by over 20,000 acres than a business as usual future High Quality Transit Areas/TOD: 39% of employment and 25% of housing in High Quality Transit Areas by 2042 Investments on Mainline Highway Systems: I-5 and I-205 carpool lanes, SR 99/120 Preventative Maintenance: Approximately 73% of Roadway operations, maintenance and safety funds for local streets, opperational improvements, and roads maintenance Maintenance & Operation Improvements for the Existing Transportation System: Approximately 10% of Roadway operations, maintenance and safety funds for state highway system maintenance

Support Economic Vitality Creation of Jobs: Average of 3,400 Full Time Equivalent jobs created by RTP projects annually and $9.5 billion in economic output Supporting Goods Movement & Economic Centers: Infrastructure improvements to streamline goods movement

Increase Safety & Security Transportation System Management Improvements: shoulders, intersection improvements Grade Separation Projects: $227 million for railroad grade separations Intelligent Transportation Systems:

Improve Public Health Residential Density: Average housing density increases from 4.5 to 8.7 units per acre Community Enhancements and Place Making: Significant investments for sidewalks, pedestrian streetlights, lanscaping, and traffic calming through Measure K smart growth incentive projects

Public Health - Emissions Budgets: The Plan meets the requirements of the Clean Air Act and reduces per capita emissions from the 2015 baseline Building on Active Transportation Active Transportation Investments (bike lanes, ancillary projects): Total investment to equal $320 million Trip Mode Share: 8,200 fewer solo driving trips daily compared to business as usual

Ensuring Social Equity Housing Mix: Increase diversity of housing options Transit Accessibility: Higher accesibility to high quality transit for communities of concern

Regional Transportation Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-3 375’s requirement that the metropolitan planning organization consider the best available scientific data on the impacts to resource and agricultural lands. The Plan’s more compact development footprint encroaches less on prime agricultural land vital to the economy in San Joaquin County than the “business as usual” or trend scenario.

Energy Usage and Water Consumption per Household

Energy and water efficiency, as characterized here, represents a co-benefit of the future resulting from the more compact urban form envisioned and modeled for the household growth in San Joaquin County. Decreases in energy and water use are both an environmental and a financial benefit through reductions in overall housing costs.

Average household residential energy use is 14% lower in the Plan when compared to “business as

usual.” This is the equivalent of powering an Enhance the Environment for Existing and Future Generations and Conserve Energy additional 17,000 households. Water saved is nearly 50 gallons per household every day. Reducing Impacts through Environmentally Sustaining Practices

The Plan seeks to encourage efficient development patterns that maintain agricultural viability and natural resources and enhance the connection between land use and transportation choices through projects supporting energy and water efficiency. The following indicators highlight the Plan’s aggressive pursuit of environmental preservation and enhancement.

Acres of Prime Farmland Consumed

While a similar measure to the total acres of land consumed, this indicator has its basis in Senate Bill

Performance of the Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-4 Improve Air Quality and Reduce Greenhouse Vehicle Miles of Travel per Capita Gases As the name implies, a vehicle mile is one vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions per Capita traveling one mile on the roadway network, The Plan meets and exceeds the greenhouse gas regardless of how many people are (GHG) targets as set by the California Air Resources occupying the vehicle. Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) Board (CARB) of 5 percent in 2020 and 10 percent in has been a consistent measurement of travel 2035. The 5 percent and 10 percent reductions are efficiencies by both transportation planners and from cars and light duty trucks and are measured policy-makers for decades. It is an important against a 2005 baseline on a per capita basis. predictor in SB 375’s principal target—GHG reductions from cars and light duty trucks, as well as This performance indicator was developed in direct other measured vehicle emissions. The total daily response to the requirements of SB 375. A full VMT per capita is 21.98 for the Plan in 2042, discussion of the GHG targets and SJCOG’s analysis is compared to 24.61 in the baseline condition (2015). included in the technical appendix. For consistency This means that the Plan reduces daily per capita with the other measures in this section, 2042 VMT by nearly 11% or 2.63 miles. indicators are included here as part of the plan performance discussion. The performance targets for this measure are currently under review by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and will be updated in mid-2018.

Regional Transportation Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-5

Performance of the Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-6 Maximize Mobility and Accessibility Transit Ridership

This Plan has a true multimodal approach in its Increases in transit ridership can be attributed to investment strategies. The Plan continues its both improvements in service through direct commitment to increased investment in bus and rail investments in transit-related capital and operations transit, and active transportation projects such as and increased ridership attributable to supportive bikeways or streetscape features to facilitate public land use patterns. For example, studies indicate that health through active communities. The targets in residential densities of approximately 7 to 8 dwelling this section are reflective of the achievements of the units per acre are required to support efficient Plan in providing easier and more convenient access transit operations. to the places citizens need and desire to travel. Existing programs supporting demand strategies such as ride-sharing also play a significant role, as do investments supporting “place-making” such as more mixed-use areas where destinations are closer Transit ridership increases by over 30% as a result of to home. The following indicators highlight some of the Plan’s direct and indirect investments in the transportation system efficiencies improved improving transit accessibility and efficiency. through this investment strategy.

Regional Transportation Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-7

Bike and Walk Trips

Trips made in the active transportation category, The Plan increases bike and walk trips by either by walking or biking, show a modest increase a modest 0.18% as a percentage of all due to plan investments. Strides are being made daily trips over “business as usual,” both at the local land use level and with the but translates to an additional 8500 active percentage of Plan investments dedicated to active transportation trips daily. transportation supportive projects.

Performance of the Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-8 Increase Safety and Security Investments that Help to Reduce the Number and Support Economic Vitality Severity of Traffic Incidents The Plan has many areas of investments targeted to Transportation infrastructure construction results in improve safety and security. The Plan invests in a large number of jobs per dollar of investment for advanced technology applications, often referred to the local economy. This indicator gives a snapshot of as intelligent transportation systems (ITS). These potential job creation - both direct, or construction- include closed circuit televisions to monitor and related employment and indirect, or additional jobs convey real time travel conditions, changeable created due to spending from those receiving message signs, traffic detection equipment, and income from direct jobs. The calculations are based traveler information systems. These high-tech on an analysis completed for SJCOG by the University applications allow motorists to choose travel options of the Pacific Center for Business and Policy and allow local and state agencies to more quickly Research. respond to incidents on the roadway. As with other Construction of the projects outlined in the RTP MPOs in the State, this plan recognizes the investment strategy and project lists will support an incorporation of the first performance based annual average of 3,400 direct, indirect, and induced planning targets surrounding safety and supports the full-time jobs in San Joaquin County annnually over state targets for this measure. Additional the life of the Plan. The full economic output benefit information on performance based planning can be to the local economy is estimated at $9.5 billion. An found in Appendix O. in-depth discussion of job creation potential can be found in Chapter 6, and the full economic analysis report in Appendix S.

Over 85,000 new jobs will be created through the RTP/SCS.

Regional Transportation Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-9 Improve Public Health and Build on Active Transportation

Promoting Active Lifestyles through Improved Linkages between Transportation and Land Use Now more than ever, the Plan, with its embedded SCS, concentrates on the ways the future built environment can be enhanced with focused, innovative transportation investments. The Plan strives to enhance public health through improving public spaces as a way to provide more opportunities to bike and walk to destinations, for work, play, or other necessary travel. For the first time in its long- range plan, SJCOG introduced new health metrics for scenario evaluation.

In preparing for the 2018 RTP/SCS, SJCOG committed to adopting a methodology for inclusion of health Active Transportation Investments indicators. Investments in land-use and transportation that improve walking-supportive This indicator shines a light on the Plan’s focused environments, including in transit infrastructure, commitment to build upon the recent successes have been shown to increase physical activity attributable to the existing commitment of the through walking, biking, and walking to transit. To bicycle/pedestrian funding pool within the Measure model this, SJCOG has adopted the National Public K renewal program and the continuation of an Health Assessment Model (NPHAM) to predict travel increased portion of revenues assigned to the Active and land use related behaviors (transport walking, Transportation category first envisioned in the 2014 leisure walking, and recreation) and health outcomes Plan. As a percentage of total funding, the category such as body-mass index (BMI) and the percent of increased from 1.5 percent of total revenues to 2.6 population reporting poor health. NPHAM is well percent in 2014, representing a 78 percent increase integrated with the Envision Tomorrow scenario over the 2011 RTP. This commitment continues in planning tool already used by SJCOG, controls for the 2018 Plan and is enhanced owing to an infusion demographics, and is able to provide estimates at of SB1 dollars for active transportation. The the Census block group level. additional bikeways attributable to the Plan assume full implementation of the bikeway projects included For the 2018 RTP/SCS cycle, SJCOG piloted the use of in the 2012 Regional Bike, Pedestrian, and Safe NPHAM with draft Scenarios 1, 2a, and 3. This pilot Routes to School Master Plan, as well as many new included (1) an analysis of predicted regional projects proposed since that Plan was completed. behavior and health metrics and (2) a spatially-based equity analysis. The findings showed that more compact scenarios support modest increases in healthy behaviors, reductions in BMI, and decreases in poor health. The full health indicators report can be found in Appendix N.

Performance of the Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-10 Equity and Access indicator has its basis in a study completed for San Joaquin Valley counties entitled Market Demand A Plan for Everybody Analysis for Higher Density Housing in the San Included in this section are performance indicators Joaquin Valley. Among the findings in the study were specific to identifying the equitability of Plan that appropriate densities need to be provided to investments across all income and minority groups in ensure adequate provision of rental housing and that San Joaquin County. These measures are considered higher-density housing has been historically under- for identified communities of concern only versus delivered, particularly for renter households. the remainder of the region. The measures include: Differences in the projected housing mix between access to high-quality transit, households within 500 the business as usual condition (based on historical feet of a major transportation facility, housing type trends) and the Plan provides for increased housing mix, roadway expenditure benefits, and health choices for all populations in San Joaquin County as outcomes. The full Title VI and Environmental Justice shown in the pie charts (Figures 5.2). The diversity of analyses are included in Appendix Q. housing is higher in identified environmental justice communities. Adequate Provision of Housing for a Diverse Population

Housing type is a complementary measure to density—and is also an indicator of housing affordability and availability for all income groups. The projected change in the housing mix demand is both a function of demographic changes and economic realities. The goal for the housing mix

Regional Transportation Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-11

Performance of the Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-12 Health Equity Metrics The Census Block is the smallest level of geography for which both income and racial/ethnic data is As discussed in the previous section, SJCOG piloted a available, and has been utilized to identify areas of study with Urban Design for Health (UD4H) to specific concern within San Joaquin County using the incorporate the NPHAM health model into its most recent available American Community Survey scenario evaluation process. As part of the scenario 5-Year Estimates (2011-2015). The Census Blocks evaluation process, scenario 2a was evaluated based that contained 75 percent or more minority on minority and poverty status. The equity analysis populations or 30 percent or more low-income clearly demonstrated that the health gains observed populations were called out as communities of would accrue most in areas with relatively high concern, or EJ communities. These percentages are proportions of low-income and minority households. slightly above the county averages of approximately Details on the analysis can be found in Appendix N. 65 percent minority and nearly 19 percent below Communities of Concern (Environmental Justice) poverty level. This process identified a total of 54 Discussion and Indicators: census blocks meeting one or both concentration threshold criteria. A map of the areas is shown in Identification of Environmental Justice Communities: Figure 5.3. Minority For purposes of the Environmental Justice analysis for the Plan, SJCOG has utilized the US Census Bureau definitions of different racial and ethnic populations to identify minority status among persons living in San Joaquin County. Minority persons are those who identify as Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, some other race, multiple races, or Hispanic/Latino of any race.

Low Income Defining “low-income” populations uses the poverty threshold as defined by the US Census. This poverty threshold definition identifies the population in San Joaquin County that falls below a nationally defined basic standard of living.

Defined Environmental Justice Areas In order to examine the degree to which minority and low-income (i.e., environment justice or EJ) groups benefit from the transportation investments and policies being carried out as part of the Plan, EJ communities must first be defined and mapped.

Regional Transportation Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-13 Figure 5.3

Potential Communities of Concern Map

Performance of the Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-14 Transit Accessibility in EJ areas represent 31.8 percent of households located near major transportation facilities, while An equity analysis of the Plan’s bus transit making up 33.8 percent of total households in San investments was performed for EJ vs. non-EJ Joaquin County. This would indicate a proportional communities for both households and employment share for EJ communities in the burden of exposure access to high quality transit areas as defined by SB to air pollution as a result of proximity to major 375. For San Joaquin County, this includes all rail transportation facilities. stations, bus transit hubs and transfer stations, and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT or express bus) routes within Roadway Expenditure Benefits the City of Stockton. The results indicated that EJ communities, both in terms of households and To gauge the extent to which EJ communities employment within walking distance of transit, have proportionately benefit from roadway improvement significantly better access compared to non-EJ expenditures compared to the general population, communities. In the Plan, just over 50 percent of the an equity analysis was performed. Using the SJCOG households located in EJ communities have access to travel demand model, a select link analysis was high-quality transit compared to only 12 percent for performed on regionally significant roadways non-EJ areas. These findings are similar for identified for capacity improvements in the Plan. The employment access to high-quality transit in EJ analysis yields the percentage of vehicle demand communities versus non-EJ communities, with nearly whose origin is in an EJ community versus a non-EJ 64 percent of jobs in EJ communities in proximity to community. Results indicate that approximately 31.5 high-quality transit versus 24 percent for non-EJ percent of daily vehicle trips utilizing these improved communities. roadways originate from EJ communities. This indicates that a significant proportion of EJ Based on these results, equitable if not more communities will benefit from future roadway favorable benefits resulting from transit investments investments resulting from the Plan. While this share can be inferred for EJ communities. This can be is slightly less than the countywide percentage of attributed to EJ communities being more total EJ households, 33.8 percent, the difference is geographically concentrated within developed areas relatively small at 2.3%. of the county where transit service provision is the greatest.

Households Within 500 Feet of A Major Transportation Facility Given that the proximity to major transportation facilities can increase population exposure to health- based emissions and particulate matter from vehicles, an equity analysis was performed to compare the number and percentage of general population households relative to EJ households located within 500 feet of a major transportation facility. Considering total countywide households in the Plan, 4.2 percent of all households are within 500 feet of any major facility versus 4.0 percent for households in EJ communities. Overall, households

Regional Transportation Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-15 CONCLUSION patterns. This is due in large part to an already well- established built environment. Over time, these These indicators demonstrate that the Plan, overall, incremental improvements will become a substantial performs better than the “Business as Usual” part of the urban environment of San Joaquin scenario and improves over current conditions. The County with a resulting increase in benefits. The performance indicators show real improvements in performance measures included in this plan meeting sustainability. It is also recognized that in demonstrate a change for the region that meets the some indicators, the Plan performance benefit is needs of our communities and provide a responsible incremental despite a different approach in both the set of metrics for meeting sustainability objectives. investment strategy and in the conceptual land use

Performance of the Sustainable Communities Strategy | 5-16 Appendix L

SJCOG Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ) Scoring Criteria SJCOG 2016 CMAQ APPLICATION

CMAQ Project Submittal Form

Agency: ______

Application Prepared by:

______Name Title Phone Date

Check all that apply

Project is eligible for CMAQ under Federal guidelines. Use of Toll Credits will not redirect nonfederal funds away from transportation. Project complies with American Disability Act. Project can be obligated within the timelines identified below. Project map is attached, if applicable. Project is consistent with the project list submitted for 2018 RTP update. Project scope will remain the same as identified below, if awarded CMAQ funds. Air Quality emission reduction calculations using ARB method are attached. Applicable Air Quality Exempt Code (Refer to the Exempt code list, Appendix B) Project is on the roadway included in the Federal Aid System Project is part of agency Short or Long Range Plans (attach appropriate documentation)

Certification Statement

I have been duly authorized to submit the following project proposal to the San Joaquin Council of Governments for scoring and possible programming. I certify that the information and response contained herein are accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that project readiness is a key component of the scoring criteria. By signing this document I am committing my agency to provide the required non-federal matching funds, and deliver the proposed project within the scope and schedule specified in this application should this project be awarded funding.

Signature: ______Date:______

SJCOG 2016 CMAQ APPLICATION

The following information will be used directly in the development of the FTIP. Please use care in writing the descriptions.

Project Name Project Location and Limits:

Project Description (Scope):

CMAQ Request: Local Match: Total Project Cost:

Project Delivery Schedule Fund Work 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total Phase CMAQ PE ROW Const. Total Local (Identify the Source of local match, refer to the “Appendix A” ) PE ROW Const. Total Project Total PE ROW Const. Total

SJCOG 2016 CMAQ APPLICATION

Category A: Air Quality Benefits

Air Quality benefits Cost-Effectiveness-dollars/pound (Submit calculations as attachment)

Please check the appropriate box; this information will be used by the person scoring your application to look in the relevant scoring sections. Project will only receive points under one category, check the box that best describes the proposed project category.

Category B: Proposed Project will maintain/sustain the existing transportation system Category C: Proposed Project will relieve congestion Category D: Proposed Project is System Expansion

Category B: Maintain Sustain the Existing Transportation

B-1 For Transit Projects Only

Please refer to ARB 2005 Methods Guidance, for On-Road Cleaner Vehicle Purchases on page 4 in the Comments section of the Inputs Table. Use the life of the project suggested defaults as the life cycle of the vehicle to be replaced.

Explain the current age and condition of the capital equipment to be replaced / rehabilitated:

If the proposed project is a rehab project, how long will the useful life be extended?

Provide the age of the vehicle at programmed replacement year:

Describe the applicable life cycle and level of improvement (e.g. urgent, normal, prolong %):

SJCOG 2016 CMAQ APPLICATION

Other information related to the proposed project relevant to this section:

B-2 For Non Transit Capital Replacements/Rehab/Diesel Retrofits Projects only

Applicant must explain the project and what makes the project eligible for CMAQ funds.

The explanation must not be covered under any other category of this criteria.

Explain current age and condition of the capital equipment to be replaced / rehabilitated:

If the proposed is a rehab project, how long will the useful life be extended?

Provide the age of the vehicle at programmed replacement year.

Describe the applicable life cycle and level of improvement (e.g. urgent, normal, prolong %):

Other information related to the proposed project relevant to this section.

Bonus for points for engine replacement projects using clean fuels above current CARB standards:

Project has Zero emissions Project uses hybrid, compressed natural gas, or other alternative fuel

Category C: Improve System Efficiency and Effectiveness 4

SJCOG 2016 CMAQ APPLICATION

. C-1-a Check all that applies to the proposed Roadway Project:

Signal interconnect of 8 or more signals Change intersection to interchange Traffic operations system and Transportation Systems Management (TSM) projects New traffic signal (not interconnected) or roundabout Geometric improvements (left or right turn pockets or other intersection improvements) on all intersection approaches Signal interconnect project of 3 to 7 signals Grade separations that do not add through lanes Geometric improvements (left or right turn pockets or other intersection improvements) on some intersection approaches Turn lanes or acceleration/decelerations lanes Pave shoulders

C-1-b Check all that applies to the proposed Transit Project:

Significantly increase rail transit vehicle capacity (Explain below) Substantially improve headways (Explain below) Significantly increase service reliability /on-time performance (Explain below)

Interconnection or fare coordination project Intermodal facility (including park and ride lots) that accommodate major transfers (Explain below) Significantly reduces travel/transfers time on existing route by 12% or more Minor increase in service reliability / on-time performance (Explain below)

Minor interconnection or fare coordination project (Explain below) Intermodal facility (including park and ride lots) that accommodates significant transfers (Explain below) Reduces travel time on existing route by less than 12% Medium increase in transit vehicle capacity (Explain below) Medium improvement to headways (Explain below) Bus turnouts/bulbs/pads

SJCOG 2016 CMAQ APPLICATION

Increases passenger comfort or convenience, such as Bike Racks Intermodal facility that accommodates an uncertain number of transfers

Minor increase transit vehicle capacity (Explain below) Minor improvement to headways. (Explain below)

C-1-c Check all that applies to the proposed Bicycle/Pedestrian Project:

Class 1 Bicycle Facility Class 4 Bicycle Facility Sidewalks where none exist, to connect to transit service Project that interconnects to jurisdictional boundaries Class 2 Bicycle Facility Sidewalk segments, including upgrades and new installations, to connect to activity center Bulbouts, flashing yellow lights, pedestrian signals, bicycle signals Class 3 Bicycle Facility Other eligible non-motorized project (Explain below)

Provide Level of Service information on the roadway, transit route, or corridor in question. (Note: Please use peak hour volumes based upon the Highway Capacity Manual to establish LOS (A-F). For transit projects use the LOS of the highest congested roadway within San Joaquin County that constitutes the service corridor)

SJCOG 2016 CMAQ APPLICATION

C-2 Freight Movement Project:

Does proposed project improve freight movement on the truck routes? If yes, please provide information on the daily truck traffic.

Does proposed project involve a major intermodal freight facility? If yes, explain.

Does proposed project involve truck stop electrification? If yes, explain.

SJCOG 2016 CMAQ APPLICATION

Category D: System Expansion

D-1: Check the appropriate box that applies to the proposed Transit Project:

Significant rail expansion (Explain below)

Minor rail expansion (Explain below) Significant interregional, intercity or local bus expansion (Explain Below) Minor interregional, intercity or local bus expansion (Explain Below)

D-2: Check the appropriate box that applies to the proposed Freight Movement Project:

Improve access to major freight distribution facilities (e.g. Port of Stockton or Stockton Airport ) Improves access to minor freight distribution facilities

Provide Level of Service (LOS) information on the roadway or transit route or corridor in question. (Note: Please use peak hour volumes based upon the Highway Capacity Manual to establish LOS (A-F). For transit projects use the LOS of the highest congested roadway within San Joaquin County that constitutes the service corridor)

Appendix M

Project Cost Estimation Template San Joaquin Council of Governments

SHORT FORM Lead Agency: PRELIMINARY PROJECT MPO ID: COST ESTIMATE TEMPLATE RTP Tier: Contact Name: Project Name: Contact Number:

Project Description:

Limits:

Proposed Improvement: (Scope)

SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST ESTIMATE

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ( 3% of Construction) 3% $0

PROJECT APPROVAL & ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES (4% of Construction) 4% $0

DESIGN PHASE (PS &E) (12% of Construction) 12% $0

CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0

CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT AND ADMINISTRATION (10%CM + 2% Admin) 12% $0

ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS IN 2013 DOLLARS $0 year MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION 2016 ESCALATION RATE PER ANNUM 3% year E and C COSTS ESCALATED TO MIDPOINT OF CONSTRUCTION $ 0

RIGHT OF WAY $0 Anticipated Date of Acquisition: 1/0/00

RIGHT OF WAY SUPPORT $0

FINANCING COSTS

UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCY (10% of costs) 0% $0

TOTAL ESCALATED PROJECT COSTS $0

All costs are escalated to midpoint of construction with the exception of ROW, which is escalated to point of acquisition in "ROW Items" Tab, and "Financing Costs", which is provided by Financial Consultant

Reviewed by Name (Phone) (Date)

Approved by SJCOG Name (Phone) (Date)

SJCOG 2018 RTP Cost Estimation Template Page 1 of 7 San Joaquin Council of Governments

Lead Agency: MPO ID: RTP Tier: Contact Name: Contact Number:

ROADWAY

Description of Roadway Section

Attach reference sketch in Sketches and Pictures tab

Roadway Length Number of Cost per Lane (in miles) Lanes Mile

ROADWAY ITEMS $100,000 $0

MINOR ITEMS (10% of Roadway Items) 10% $0

SUPPLEMENTAL WORK (10% of Roadway Items plus Minor Items 10% $0

MOBILIZATION (10% of Roadway, Supplemental and Minor Items 10% $0

Subtotal $0

CONTINGENCY** 25% $0

GRAND TOTAL ROADWAY $0

** Always use at least 45% contingency when Short Form is used

Estimate Prepared By: Name (Phone) (Date)

Estimate Checked By: Name (Phone) (Date)

SJCOG 2018 RTP Cost Estimation Template Page 2 of 7 Lead Agency: MPO ID: RTP Tier: Contact Name: Contact Number: BRIDGES AND RAILROAD ITEMS

BRIDGES Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Bridge Name Structure Type Width (out to out) - in feet Span Length in feet Total Area - in square feet Footing Type (pile/spread) Cost per square foot

Construction cost: $0 $0 $0

Mobilization @ 10% $0 $0 $0

Contingency: 35% $0 $0 $0

Total Cost Per Structure $0 $0 $0

SUBTOTAL BRIDGE ITEMS $0

RAILROAD RELATED COSTS

Item Description Cost

Construction cost: $0

Contingency: 35% $0

SUBTOTAL RAILROAD ITEMS $0

TOTAL BRIDGES AND RAILROAD ITEMS $0

COMMENTS:

Estimate Prepared By: (Print Name) (Phone) (Date)

SJCOG 2018 RTP Cost Estimation Template Page 3 of 7 BUS SHELTERS AND STATIONS Description* Three bus shelters, 20 ft long, with architectural roof and wind screens

* Attach reference sketch showing typical layout plan and elevation of shelter or station Unit of Quantity Measure Unit Price Cost Sitework $ 0 Superstructure SQ. FT. $ 0 Architectural Finishes LS $ 0 Signage LS $ 0 Fire protection LS $ 0 Utilities $ 0 Water $ 0 Sewer $ 0 Electrical $ 0 Communications $ 0 Station Furniture $ 0 Landscaping $ 0 Security $ 0 $ 0 Total Per Station $ 0 Number of Stations Total all Stations $ 0 Contingency 35% $ 0 GRAND TOTAL STATIONS $ 0

BICYCLE PATHS Path Description* 20 miles of two-way blacktop bicycle path, with painted median, five rest stops and vista points

* Attach reference sketch showing typical pavement structural section elements of the path

Path Length in miles Cost per mile $ 1,500,000

Total path $ 0

Contingency 25% $ 0

When adressing cost per path mile make sure to consider rolling surface, drainage, footbridges striping, signage barriers, furniture, landscaping, and security

TOTAL BICYCLE PATH $ 0

Estimate Prepared By: (Print Name) (Phone) (Date)

OG 2018 RTP Cost Estimation Template Page4 of 7 Lead Agency: MPO ID: RTP Tier: Contact Name: Contact Number:

RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS

Enter All Parcel Data on ROW Worksheet

Current Values Escalation Escalated (Future Use) Rate (%/yr) Value

ROW Acquisition, including excess lands, damages to remainders, and good will $0 3.50% $0

TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY $0

Utility Relocation (Agency Share) 3.00% $0

Relocation Assistance 3.00% $0

Clearance / Demolition 3.00% $0

ROW Services - Title and Escrow Fees $0 2.00% $0

Temporary Easement 3.00% $0

Condemnation Costs 3.00% $0

TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY SUPPORT $0

TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS $0

Date of Valuation 1/0/00

Anticipated Date of Right of Way CertificationDelta Dates (yrs) 0.00 (Date to which Values are Escalated)

Construction Contract Work Brief Description of Work

(Costs Included in Roadway and/or Structures Items of Work as Appropriate)

Estimate Prepared By: (Print Name) (Phone) (Date)

SJCOG 2018 RTP Cost Estimation Template Page 5 of 7 INVENTORY OF ALL POTENTIAL ROW TAKES DATE OF MOST RECENT UPDATE:

In Order, from South to North or West to East

Right-of-Way estimates should consider the probable highest and best use and type and intent of improvements at the time of acquisition. Acquisition costs should include excess lands, damages to remainders, and good will. Enter current values.

INCLUDE PARCELS REQUIRED FOR BICYCLE PATHS, STATIONS, BUS SHELTERS, ETC.

Assessor's Percent Relocation Demolition parcel Estimated Source of Date of Parcel ID Address Zoning Improvements Use Size take needed required number value estimate estimate Comments

Total Parcels Affected 0 Total Value of all Takes $0

Prepared By: (Print Name) (Phone) (Date)

SJCOG 2018 RTP Cost Estimation Template Page 6 of 7 SKETCHES AND PICTURES

Use this sheet for importing drawings and sketches that help define items of work and pictures of ROW items

SJCOG 2018 RTP Cost Estimation Template Page 7 of 7 Appendix N

Environmental Justice Analysis 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy

APPENDIX Q ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, TITLE VI, & SOCIAL EQUITY REPORT Page intentionally left blank. Appendix Q: Environmental Justice, Title VI & Social Equity Report

CONTENT LIST

Q1 Introduction, Policy Framework, Public Outreach and Plan Development Process Q2 Methodology Q3 Regional Trends Q4 Analysis Results Q5 Title VI Report Q6 Environmental Justice Report Q7 Next Steps Page intentionally left blank. Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy

APPENDIX

QINTRODUCTION, 1 POLICY FRAMEWORK, PUBLIC OUTREACH, AND PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Page intentionally left blank. Q1. Introduction

Freeways, public transit, and other transportation infrastructure have a significant effect on the quality of life of residents throughout the region by shaping access to jobs, education, housing, community services, amenities, and recreational opportunities. Approaching transportation investment with an environmental justice and social equity framework helps to advance the development of a comprehensive transportation system that provides everyone – regardless of color, race, national origin, income, or physical ability – with opportunities to work, shop, study, pray, play, and thrive. Such a system is vital for the sustainability of the region.

Without thoughtful planning and development, transportation systems can degrade the quality of life in communities. Historically, the construction of freeways, roads, and rail transit systems have placed health burdens on many low-income and minority communities throughout the nation. San Joaquin County is no exception. In addition, the lack of transportation investment in low-income and minority communities results in long-lasting social and economic costs. Therefore, it is critical to understand the impacts of transportation investment in our most vulnerable communities to better plan for the future.

With guidance from Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and various federal and state laws intended to promote the equitable distribution of benefits and burdens from transportation projects and programs, SJCOG continually strives to:

• Engage historically underserved and underrepresented communities of the region in the planning and decision-making process; and • Improve methods for analyzing how the Plan affects these communities.

This report briefly discusses the work undertaken by SJCOG during the development of the 2018 Plan to identify the specific needs of the region’s disadvantaged communities, but primarily focuses on defining the methods used to respond to federal and state requirements regarding Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and the Environmental Justice Executive Order 12898.

Policy Framework for Addressing Civil Rights, Environmental Justice, and Social Equity

The following federal and state policies infuse the spirit and intent of environmental justice and social equity into the work of SJCOG:

1. Title VI of the Civic Rights Act of 1964 States that “…no person in the United States, shall, on the grounds of race, color or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.”

2. Environmental Justice Executive Order 12898 Further operationalized the intent of Title VI by defining a process of “identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations.”

3. California Government Code Section 65040.12(e) Defines environmental justice in the context of city and county general plans as the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the development, adoption, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws and policies. In addition, Government Code 11135 states that no state agency, or agency funded by the state, shall deny full and equal access to benefits of any program or activity on the basis of race, national origin, ethnic group, religion, sex, sexual orientation, or disability.

4. California Department of Transportation In the context of transportation planning, Caltrans requires recipients of federal funding to ensure the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.

5. 2016 Public Participation Plan SJCOG seeks to engage the region’s diverse public, to connect public input to decisions, and to effectively implement public engagement and planning outcomes that respect civil rights, advance environmental justice, and ensure the inclusion of the region’s historically underserved communities.

A Closer Look: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

As a recipient of federal transportation dollars, SJCOG is responsible for assisting federal agencies with complying with Title VI. In 2012, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) issued a revised circular with guidance on how to carry out the Department of Transportation (DOT) Title VI regulations to ensure nondiscrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin in its programs, policies and activities.

In its regional transportation planning capacity, SJCOG is required to demonstrate compliance with Title VI by preparing and submitting the following:

• “All general requirements set out in [the General Requirements section of] the Circular; • “A demographic profile of the metropolitan area that includes identification of the locations of minority populations in the aggregate; • “A description of the procedures by which the mobility needs of minority populations are identified and considered within the planning process; • “Demographic maps that overlay the percent minority and non-minority populations as identified by Census or ACS data…and charts that analyze the impacts of the distribution of State and Federal funds in the aggregate for public transportation purposes…; and • “An analysis of impacts that … identifies any disparate impacts on the basis of race, color, or national origin, and if so, determines whether there is a substantial legitimate justification for the policy that resulted in the disparate impacts, and if there are alternatives that could be employed that would have a less discriminatory impact.”1

Further discussion of the methodology used to meet the above requirements is included in Appendix Q2. In addition to analyzing the 2018 Plan as described in this report, SJCOG’s Title VI program includes a variety of commitments to ensure nondiscrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin in its programs and activities.2

A Closer Look: Environmental Justice Executive Order 12898

The Environmental Justice order further augments Title VI by incorporating environmental justice (EJ) and non-discrimination principles into transportation planning and decision-making processes. In 2012, FTA issued a revised circular with guidance on how to integrate environmental justice principles into plans, projects, and activities that receive funding from the agency.

1 Federal Transit Administration Circular 4702.1B, Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients. See: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/FTA_Title_VI_FINAL.pdf 2 For more information, see SJCOG’s Title VI webpage at: http://www.sjcog.org/129/Title-VI-of-the-Civil-Rights-Act- of-1964 3

The guiding environmental justice principles followed by DOT and FTA are summarized as follows:

• “To avoid, minimize, or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects, including social and economic effects, on minority populations and low-income populations. • “To ensure the full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation decision-making process. • “To prevent the denial of, reduction in, or significant delay in the receipt of benefits by minority and low-income populations.”3

As a recipient of FTA funds, SJCOG is required to assist the federal agency on compliance with Executive Order 12898 by incorporating EJ principles into the transportation decision-making process. This is done by conducting an environmental justice analysis of programs, policies, and activities. According to the circular, components of such an analysis include:

• “…Determining whether minority populations and/or low-income populations will experience potential environmental or health impacts from a proposed program, project, or activity; and • “…[Determining]… whether the activity will result in a ‘disproportionately high and adverse effect on human health or the environment.”4 Further discussion on the methodology used to meet the above requirements is included in Appendix Q2. Public Outreach & Plan Development Process In addition to conducting technical analyses to understand the 2018 Plan’s impact on disadvantaged communities, environmental justice also entails designing an inclusive planning process that engages the affected communities. The 2018 Plan was developed with meaningful and extensive participation of key stakeholders that range from community-based organizations to public agencies, civic groups, and individual advocates and residents. Public engagement activities during the development of the 2018 Plan are summarized below.

• Stakeholder Involvement: SJCOG has a variety of practices and policies in place to ensure full and fair participation of all residents and stakeholder groups in the 2018 Plan update process, and specifically to identify needs and priorities of low-income, minority

3 Federal Transit Administration Circular C 4703.1, Environmental Justice Policy Guidance for Federal Transit Administration Recipients. See: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/FTA_EJ_Circular_7.14- 12_FINAL.pdf 4 Same as above. 4 and underserved communities. Stakeholder involvement was achieved through standing committee meetings, ongoing coordination with planning and public works staff at member agencies, as well as activities discussed below.

• SJCOG Public Participation Plan: In December 2016, SJCOG adopted an update to the region’s Public Participation Plan to guide agency outreach and public engagement efforts throughout the development of the 2018 Plan.5 This plan outlined several initiatives to support engagement with low-income and minority communities, including: o Targeted outreach to low-income, minority and other historically underrepresented and underserved communities via partnerships with community-based organizations, both early in the plan development process and again prior to selecting a preferred scenario; o A new toolbox for implementing inclusive public engagement practices throughout the planning process; and o An updated Limited English Proficiency Plan to provide meaningful access to planning activities for persons with limited English proficiency.

• RTP/SCS Implementation & Working Group: The working group brought together stakeholders from around the region representing low-income and minority communities; seniors and persons with disabilities; staff representing local jurisdictions, transit agencies; the public health department; and community-based organizations and advocacy groups. The primary purpose of the group is to advise SJCOG staff throughout the 2018 Plan development process. The Title VI and Environmental Justice analyses, including identifying social equity measures, defining communities of concern and developing the methodology for assessment, were reviewed by the group and revised based on their input. All working group meetings are open to the public.

For additional information regarding SJCOG public engagement activities, please refer to Chapter 2: Civic Engagement in the 2018 RTP/SCS.

5 SJCOG 2016 Public Participation Plan. See: http://www.sjcog.org/127/Public-Participation-Plan 5

Page left intentionally blank. Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy

APPENDIX Q 2 METHODOLOGY Page intentionally left blank. Q2. Methodology

The purpose of the Appendix Q: Environmental Justice, Title VI, and Social Equity Report is to estimate the distribution of benefits and burdens of proposed land use and transportation policies and projects on disadvantaged communities, and to assess whether these benefits and burdens are shared equitably across population groups. To achieve these objectives, SJCOG conducted six types of analyses, summarized here:

• Quantitative analysis of potential benefits and burdens of proposed land use and transportation policies and projects on disadvantaged communities compared to the balance of the region based on three performance measures, using outputs from the SJCOG Envision Tomorrow land use model; • Quantitative analysis of the relative benefit received from roadway expenditures by disadvantaged communities using the SJCOG Travel Demand Model; • Spatial analysis of transit access to low-income jobs by disadvantaged communities; • Quantitative analysis to estimate health outcomes resulting from proposed changes to the built environment in disadvantaged communities compared to the balance of the region, applying the National Public Health Assessment Model (NPHAM); • Quantitative analysis of the share of potential benefits of proposed transportation investments that accrue to low-income and minority populations compared to non-low- income and non-minority populations, using available census data; • Disparate impact analysis to demonstrate compliance with Title VI and Environmental Justice laws. The results and findings from these analyses are summarized in Appendices Q5 and Q6.

The following section summarizes the various definitions and methodologies used by SJCOG to identify disadvantaged communities, to assess potential benefits and burdens, and to conduct quantitative and qualitative analyses.

Populations and Geographies

The underlying methodology for conducting an equity analysis for the 2018 Plan relies on a comparison of benefits and burdens of proposed policies and investments on different population groups (minority vs. non-minority and low-income vs. non-low-income populations), and across different geographies (environmental justice areas vs. the balance of the region). The section below defines these populations and geographies.

Minority Populations

San Joaquin County is a “majority minority” region, where non-Hispanic Whites do not make up an absolute majority (e.g. they make up less than 50 percent of the total population). In fact, 6

the largest group in San Joaquin County is its Hispanic/Latino population (see Table Q2-1). This report uses the term “minority” primarily for maintaining consistency with the federal definition of disadvantaged populations.

Table Q2-1. Racial and Ethnic Make-up of San Joaquin Region

% of total Estimate population American Indian or Native Alaskan Alone 2,295 0.3%

Asian Alone 102,426 14.5%

Black or African American Alone 47,598 6.7%

Hispanic or Latino of Any Race 284,168 40.1%

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Alone 3,520 0.5%

Other 25,461 3.6%

White, non-Hispanic/Latino 243,086 34.3%

San Joaquin County Total Population 708,554 100.0%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Minority populations include persons who identify as any of the following groups as defined by the Census Bureau: American Indian or Native Alaskan Alone (non-Hispanic/non-Latino); Asian Alone (non-Hispanic/non-Latino); Black of African American Alone (non-Hispanic/non-Latino); Hispanic or Latino of Any Race; Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Alone (non-Hispanic/non- Latino); and Other (Some Other Race, Two or More Races). All residents who identify as Hispanic or Latino, even if they also identify with another race, are considered Hispanic or Latino. The “non-minority” population therefore consists of persons who identify as non- Hispanic Whites or “White Alone.”

Low-Income Persons and Households

For the purposes of the environmental justice analysis, SJCOG defines persons as low-income if they are living at or below 100% of the federal poverty level as defined by the Census Bureau. The Census Bureau computes poverty status for individuals based on a combination of an individual’s household composition, size and income. The official poverty guidelines do not vary geographically, but they are issued annually by the Department of Health and Human Services.

In 2015, the federal guidelines defined the poverty level for individuals living alone at $11,770, and for a family of four at $24,250.6 This provides a reasonable benchmark to understand trends over time relative to the share of population that may be considered low-income. Additionally, the poverty guidelines are used for numerous federal, state and local programs to determine eligibility for assistance and services.

Table Q2-2. Poverty Status in San Joaquin County

% of total Estimate population

Below Poverty 18.6% 129,390

Above Poverty 81.4% 565,216

San Joaquin County Total Population 100.0% 694,606 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Environmental Justice Areas

Due to high interest from stakeholder groups, some analysis was performed on the state designated SB 535 disadvantaged communities as determined by CalEnviroScreen (CES). According to CES, disadvantaged communities are census tracts that rank in the top 25th percentile in the state for pollution burden, along with several other social and environmental factors.7 Using these criteria, SJCOG identified 117 census blocks for the equity analysis (Table Q2-3). While these census blocks have a significant concentration of disadvantaged populations, in a regional context SB 535 census blocks make up a large portion of San Joaquin County - accounting for 51.5% percent of the total regional population. Some of these communities experience greater disadvantage than others, and thus may have greater needs. For a regional analysis, SJCOG received additional guidance from the RTP/SCS Implementation & Working Group to define a more meaningful subset for closer study. Accordingly, SJCOG identified environmental justice areas as census blocks that have a concentration of minority and/or low-income residents (Table Q2-4).

6 Federal Register, Notice of Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines. See: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/01/22/2015-01120/annual-update-of-the-hhs-poverty- guidelines 7 California EPA CalEnviroScreen, SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities. See: https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/sb535 8

Table Q2-3. Population, SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities

SB 535 San Joaquin Percent of Disadvantaged County Total Total Communities Census Blocks 139 117 84.2% Population 708,554 364,905 51.5%

Source: American Community Survey, Census Bureau, 2015; California Environmental Protection Agency, 2017

Table Q2-4. 2018 RTP/SCS Environmental Justice Area Thresholds

Share of Regional Share of Regional Concentration Population 2011 Population 2015 Threshold* Minority 63% 65% 75% Low-Income 14% 19% 30% Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2007-2011 5-year ACS Estimates and 2011-2015 5-Year ACS Estimates *Concentration thresholds were set higher than regional share.

Using the concentration thresholds, SJCOG designated 54 census blocks as environmental justice (EJ) areas for the analysis. These census blocks represent areas in San Joaquin County that meet or exceed either one, or both concentration thresholds for minority and low-income residents. Applying the criteria captures 30.8% of the county’s population, helping to focus the environmental justice analysis on communities where the need for investment may be greater, and where transportation investments may have a greater impact (Table Q2-5).

Table Q2-5. Population, Environmental Justice Areas

San Joaquin Environmental Percent of County Total Justice Areas Total Census Blocks 139 54 38.8% Population 708,554 218,443 30.8%

Source: American Community Survey, Census Bureau, 2015

Figure Q2-1. Environmental Justice Areas for San Joaquin County

Regional Trends Analysis Included in this report is a summary of key demographic trends regarding minority and low- income populations of San Joaquin County to provide further context for understanding social equity in San Joaquin County.

Additional population characteristics were examined due to increased likelihood of experiencing disadvantages in transportation. These characteristics include senior populations, people with limited English proficiency, zero-vehicle households, and single-parent households. While no further analysis is conducted on these populations in the report, this information may be used by SJCOG for future consideration, additional studies, and/or to help focus civic engagement and funding opportunities for disadvantaged communities.

Land Use Performance Measures

The analysis is conducted for the Draft Plan and compared to a “No Build Alternative” using performance measures identified later in this section. The relative impacts are measured over a defined time period – in the case of the Draft Plan, the time period is 2015 to 2042, where 2015 is considered the baseline year and 2042 the plan horizon year. The No Build Alternative, also analyzed over this time period, refers to a scenario where the Draft Plan is not adopted. This comparison between the Draft Plan and a No Build Alternative is intended to capture the specific impacts of adopting the Draft Plan versus no action, as required by state and federal environmental protection laws. To conduct the analysis of benefits and burdens on EJ areas defined previously, SJCOG identified three land use performance measures, which are a subset of performance measures for the entire plan. The land use performance measures examined in this report include the following:

• Housing and jobs near high quality transit; • Housing mix (multi-family and single-family); and • Percent of all households within 500 feet of freeway.

SJCOG conducted an analysis using these performance measures at two stages. First, the analysis was conducted during scenario evaluation and then again, with a draft preferred scenario. The underlying methodology for assessing the land use impacts of the 2018 Plan on disadvantaged communities is detailed below:

1. Designate each of the region’s 139 census blocks as either EJ or non-EJ. Based on the EJ definition, this report identifies 54 blocks that are EJ. The remaining 85 census blocks are designated as non-EJ, and represent the balance of the region. 2. Using SJCOG’s Envision Tomorrow land use model, calculate the performance measures for both EJ areas and non-EJ areas for each alternative.

3. Evaluate the Draft Plan results relative to the No Build Alternative to assess whether: o The alternative has a beneficial effect on EJ areas; and o This benefit is similar or greater than the benefit to non-EJ areas. Roadway Expenditure Benefits Analysis

Using the SJCOG travel demand model, a select link analysis was performed on regionally significant roadways identified for capacity improvement expenditures in the Draft Plan. The analysis yields the percentage of vehicle demand whose origin is an EJ area versus non-EJ area, using the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) as the unit of spatial analysis.

Transit Access to Low Income Jobs

As an additional measure of transit access, an analysis was conducted to determine access to employment for environmental justice communities. In contrast to the land use performance measure discussed previously, this analysis looks primarily at access to the low-income labor market segment defined in Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) data for San Joaquin County. Accordingly, LEHD defines low-income jobs as the labor market segment earning $1,250 per month or less. The analysis compares existing and future high-quality transit access to low income jobs by EJ areas compared to the county as a whole.

Health Equity Analysis

For the 2018 RTP/SCS cycle, SJCOG piloted the use of the National Public Health Assessment Model (NPHAM) with draft Scenarios 1, 2a, and 3. This pilot included (1) an analysis of predicted regional behavior and health metrics and (2) a spatially-based equity analysis. A summary of the health equity analysis is partially discussed in this report, however the full health indicators report can be found in Appendix N. For a spatially-based equity analysis, NPHAM was applied to predict health-related behaviors for the sub-geographies including SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities, as well as minority and low-income communities consistent with previously identified EJ areas. The health-related behaviors and outcomes examined include weekly transport for walking minutes per person; weekly leisure walking minutes per person, weekly total walking minutes per person, daily total recreational physical activity minutes per person, average body mass index (BMI), and percent of population with poor general health.

The health-related behaviors and outcomes were analyzed for the draft Scenario 2a through the year 2035 and compared to 2015 baseline conditions. Results were then used to calculate a percent change between 2035 and 2015 conditions to determine the impact of transportation investments on health equity in San Joaquin County.

Transportation Investment Analysis

SJCOG carried out an off-model analysis of the Draft Plan’s overall transportation investment strategy. This analysis illustrates the distribution of the investments relative to different population subgroups and communities in the region. The analysis serves two primary functions, including:

• Complying with Title VI regulations (per FTA Circular 4702.1B, issued in October 2012) by conducting an assessment with “charts that analyze the impacts of the distribution of State and Federal funds in the aggregate for public transportation purposes…” and “an analysis of impacts… that identifies any disparate impacts on the basis of race, color, or national origin…”; and • Complying with Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, which directs each federal agency to “make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations…”

To carry out these functions, the transportation financial analysis relies on two different methodologies described in this section to determine whether the Draft Plan’s investments are shared equitably among low-income and minority populations, and to determine whether there is any disparate impact at the regional level on the basis of race, color or national origin. No specific federal standard currently exists for conducting an environmental justice assessment. Similarly, FTA’s Title VI guidance for MPOs does not provide any specific benchmarks for the analyses. Therefore, for this analysis, SJCOG is building on its prior work undertaken in the 2014 transportation financial analysis.8

Population-Based Analysis

The population-based investment analysis compares the estimated share of investments that benefit low-income and minority populations in comparison to the share of their respective use of the transportation system and to their respective share of the region’s population.

As an example, if a higher share of low-income populations relies on the transit system for their commute needs, and if the Draft Plan invests a higher share of revenues in the transit system, then the low-income population will accrue a bigger share of the benefits. This scenario would therefore be considered equitable to low-income populations. The analysis relies on means of

8 2014 RTP/SCS Environmental Justice Report. See: http://www.sjcog.org/DocumentCenter/View/505 13

transportation to work data provided by the most recent Census Transportation Planning Package (CTTP).

The steps involved in conducting the population-based analysis include:

1. Using Census data, determine the share of low-income population in the region. 2. Using CTTP data, calculate the share of means of transportation to work by mode for low-income and all other workers. 3. Using the Draft Plan transportation investment strategy, total the investments by modal category. 4. For roadway investments, assign a share of the investment to the low-income population based on their share of work trips by driving alone or carpooling. Repeat for all other workers. 5. For transit investments, assign a share of the investment to the low-income population based on their share of work trips by transit. Repeat all other workers. 6. For bicycle and pedestrian investments, assign a share of the investment to the low- income population based on their share of work trips by walking or biking. Repeat for all other workers. 7. Sum all the investments by income status. 8. Compare the share of population and trips by mode to the share of assigned investments to assess the level of benefit accrued to low-income populations compared to the remainder of the region. 9. Repeat Steps 1-8 to determine the sum of all investments by minority status.

While this approach takes advantage of the available data on work trips for low-income and minority populations provided by CTTP, it is still a rough analysis with the following limitations:

• Because the data set only captures work trips, it underestimates the share of transportation system usage on all modal categories. • The analysis does not account for benefits and burdens at the project level. • The analysis assumes that the share of work trips by mode by a particular population group remains the same in future years, regardless of investments that improve efficiency, safety, capacity or access. • The analysis does not adjust for the relative size of populations in future years.

Public Transit Funding Financial Analysis - Please see Title VI Analysis for further details on methodology.

Title VI Analysis

As described in Appendix Q1, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) provides guidance specifying how metropolitan planning organizations like SJCOG must demonstrate compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and DoTs Title VI regulations in the metropolitan planning process. This section describes the methodology for conducting the analysis that demonstrates compliance with these requirements, including the methodology for conducting a disparate impact analysis.

Table Q2-6. FTA Requirements for Title VI Analysis

Requirement Related Draft Plan Analysis See page “All general requirements set out in Link to SJCOG Public Information [the general requirements section] of web page on Title VI 3 this Circular…” “A demographic profile of the Regional trends analysis 19 metropolitan area…” “Demographic maps that overlay the Demographic maps that overlay the percent minority and non-minority location of minority and non- 21 populations as identified by Census or minority populations throughout the ACS data…” region. “…[C]harts that analyze the impacts of Population-based analysis of public the distribution of State and Federal transit investments using state and Appendix funds in the aggregate for public federal sources. Q5 transportation purposes…” “An analysis of impacts identified [in Disparate impact analysis comparing row above] that identifies any disparate Draft Plan investments for minority Appendix impacts on the basis of race, color, or and non-minority populations. Q5 national origin…”9

SJCOG has the data to distinguish between public transportation investments that receive state and federal funds for the population-based analysis. The state and federal fund sources included in the Title VI analysis are:

9 Federal Transit Administration Circular 4702.1B, Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients. See: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/FTA_Title_VI_FINAL.pdf

• Federal – Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ); • Federal – Federal Transit Administration; • State – Senate Bill 132; and • State – State Transit Assistance.

To conduct the disparate impact analysis, the results of the population-based analysis of public transit investments using state and federal funds are assigned to minority and non-minority populations on a per capita basis. A comparison of the per capita investments for the two groups determines whether there is any disparate impact.

Although FTA does not provide specific guidance or standard benchmarks to determine whether any given result represents a disparate impact, a general practice in such analysis is to use the percentage result to determine whether any differences between benefits for minority or non-minority populations may be considered statistically significant. If a disparate impact is found to be statistically significant, consideration must then be given to “whether there is a substantial legitimate justification for the policy that resulted in the disparate impacts, and if there are alternatives that could be employed that would have a less discriminatory impact.”

Environmental Justice Analysis

Under Executive Order 12898 and the associated DOT Order on Environmental Justice, SJCOG must assist DOT, FTA, and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in their mission “to avoid, minimize, or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects, including social and economic effects,” on environmental justice (EJ) populations. For the EJ analysis, adverse effects are estimated using the three land use performance measures, as well as the select link analysis, to determine whether minority communities or low-income communities, or EJ areas, share in the benefits of the Draft Plan’s investments without bearing a disproportionate share of the burdens.

To make this determination, this report uses DOT’s definition of a “disproportionately high and adverse effect,” which relies on meeting the following conditions:

To test the first condition, the analysis compares the effect of the No Build Alternative and the 2018 Plan on EJ areas. This analysis shows whether the measure is moving in the right direction for EJ populations. To test the second condition, the analysis compares the effect of the 2018

Plan on EJ populations and non-EJ populations. An EJ population is determined to experience “disproportionately high adverse effect” when this condition is met AND the EJ population is more impacted by the 2018 Plan compared to the No Build Alternative.

Table Q2-7. FTA Requirements for Environmental Justice Analysis

Requirement Related 2018 Plan Analysis See page

“…[Determine] whether minority Quantitative analysis of potential populations and/or low-income benefits and burdens of proposed populations will experience potential land use and transportation policies environmental or health impacts from a and projects on EJ areas based on 3 30 proposed program, project or land use performance measures and activity…” a select link analysis on regionally significant roadways

“…[Determine]… whether the activity Disparate impact analysis comparing will result in a ‘disproportionately high the impacts of the Draft 2018 Plan Appendix and adverse effect on human health or on EJ areas compared to non-EJ Q6 the environment” 10 areas

Data Sources

Except where noted, this report primarily uses the Census Bureau’s 2011-2015 American Community Survey data and 2010 Decennial Census geographies for analysis. This is the most recent data that is also compatible with SJCOG’s existing unit for conducting spatial analysis in the travel model – the traffic analysis zone (TAZ). This cross-walk allows demographic characteristics from the Census to be linked to travel characteristics from travel model outputs. This is useful for comparing benefits and burdens of transportation investments in EJ Areas.

This section includes a description of data sources used in this report.

Decennial Census and American Community Survey

The Decennial Census is conducted every 10 years by the U.S. Census Bureau to determine the number of people living in the United States. Data collected includes basic demographic and

10 Federal Transit Administration Circular C 4703.1, Environmental Justice Policy Guidance for Federal Transit Administration Recipients. See: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/FTA_EJ_Circular_7.14- 12_FINAL.pdf 17

household characteristics, which are used to plan and determine funding for a wide array of federal, state, local, and tribal programs. The American Community Survey disseminates more current and detailed demographic and household characteristics, based on continuous data collection.

National Public Health Assessment Model

The National Public Health Assessment Model (NPHAM) is a public health impact analysis tool to assist with analyzing the predicted public health outcomes resulting from a change in built environment conditions, as defined by SJCOG in the Envision Tomorrow software. NPHAM establishes baseline conditions by using the National Environmental Database (NED), which provides spatially resolute objectively measured built, natural and social environment conditions from data from various sources including the US Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the National Land Cover Database.

SJCOG Forecasts

As the metropolitan planning organization, San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) is responsible for maintaining the regional population, household, and employment forecasts for the region. The forecasts are developed through a partnership with the Center for Business and Policy Research at the University of the Pacific Eberhardt School of Business. The estimates are important because they are used throughout the plan development process, providing the inputs for land use and transportation modeling applications.

SJCOG Travel Demand Model

The model is a transportation planning application used by SJCOG to analyze how the package of transportation investments included in the Draft Plan will affect a range of indicators related to travel within the San Joaquin region’s transportation network.

Envision Tomorrow Land Use Model

Envision Tomorrow (ET) is a scenario planning application used by SJCOG to analyze how current growth patterns and future decisions impacting growth will affect a range of indicators relating to land use, housing, demographics, economic growth, fiscal impacts, transportation, environmental factors, and quality of life.

Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy

APPENDIX Q 3 REGIONAL TRENDS Page intentionally left blank. Q3. Regional Trends

A discussion of regional trends is important to the understanding of social equity. This section summarizes recent trends in population subgroups. The demographic trends analysis for low- income and minority populations satisfies the requirements for Environmental Justice and Title VI analysis.

Minority Population

San Joaquin County is rich in racial and ethnic diversity. As of the 2000 Census, San Joaquin County became a “majority-minority” region, meaning that its white non-Hispanic/Latino population no longer represented a “majority” of the population. Since 2000, the region has become increasingly diverse (Figure Q3-1). Accordingly, the region’s minority population increased by 21.5% since 2000 to 65%, while the white non-Hispanic/Latino population decreased by 7.6% to 35%. Like the rest of California and the United States, San Joaquin County is expected to become even more diverse over time. According to population forecasts, the region’s minority population is expected to reach approximately 70% by 2040.

Table Q3-1. Change in Population by Minority Status in San Joaquin County, 2000 – 2015

2000 2010 2015 Change 2000 – 2015 (%)

Minority 383,164 422,532 465,468 +21.5%

White, Non-Hispanic 263,095 251,081 243,086 -7.6%

San Joaquin County 646,259 673,613 708,554 +9.6%

Source: US Census ACS Data and Decennial Census Tables B03002; P004

Figure Q3-1. San Joaquin County Minority Population, 2000 – 2015

Source: US Census ACS Data and Decennial Census tables B03002; P004 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 - 2000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Minority White alone

Table Q3-2. Minority Population Trends by Jurisdiction, 2000 – 2015

2000 2010 2015 Change 2000 – 2015 (%) Escalon 1,398 2,101 2,039 +45.9% Lathrop 6,456 12,919 15,254 +136.3% Lodi 20,799 26,494 30,380 +46.1% Manteca 17,702 33,104 40,903 +131.1% Ripon 2,302 4,485 4,096 +77.9% Stockton 165,232 217,650 234,905 +42.2% Tracy 26,206 51,401 55,716 +112.6% San Joaquin County 383,164 422,532 465,468 +21.5%

Source: US Census ACS Data and Decennial Census Tables B03002; P004

At a local level, between 2000 and 2015, the minority population increased in every community in the region (Table Q3-2). During this time period, the south county communities of Lathrop, Manteca, and Tracy experienced the most significant increases in minority populations. While Stockton may have observed the slowest rate of growth in minority population between 2000 and 2015, at least 50% of the region’s minority population resides within the city as of 2015.

Figure Q3-2. Census Blocks Meeting 75% Minority Threshold

Low-Income Population

Using the federal definition of poverty, nearly 19% of San Joaquin County lives below the poverty threshold. Since 2000, the absolute number of individuals living in poverty in San Joaquin County has increased by 33.2%. In contrast, the number of individuals living above the poverty threshold has increased by only 25.5%.

Table Q3-3. Change in Population by Poverty Status in San Joaquin County, 2000 - 2015

2000 2010 2015 Change 2000 – 2015 (%)

Below Poverty 97,105 105,502 129,390 +33.2%

Above Poverty 450,193 552,092 565,216 +25.5%

San Joaquin County* 547,298 657,594 694,606 n/a

Source: US Census ACS Data and Decennial Census Tables C17002, P088 *Total population for whom poverty status is determined

Because there is no way to predict the share or location of the low-income population into the future, for the purposes of analyzing future costs and benefits of the Draft Plan, the various spatial analyses included in the report will hold poverty areas constant. Figure Q3-3 displays census blocks meeting the 30% poverty threshold established in Appendix Q2. This spatial limitation also applies to the minority population displayed in Figure Q3-2.

Figure Q3-3. Census Blocks Meeting 30% Poverty Threshold

Environmental Justice Areas

SJCOG identifies Environmental Justice (EJ) areas based on the relative concentration of disadvantage at a census block level defined in Appendix Q2 (see Figure Q2-1). The demographic makeup of EJ areas is therefore distinct from the rest of the region (Table Q3-4). Overall, San Joaquin County has a minority population of 65.7% and at least 18.6% of residents live below poverty. In EJ areas, there is a super majority of residents that identify as minority. Here, at least 81.5% are minority compared to outside of EJ areas where at least 56.6% are minority. In EJ areas, there is also a slightly higher rate of residents living in poverty compared to the rest of the region (18.5% versus 18.1%). Because of higher shares of low-income and minority populations, EJ areas represent the communities with some of the greatest needs in San Joaquin County.

Table Q3-4: Environmental Justice Areas and Balance of Region, 2015

Environmental Justice Areas Balance of Region (BoR) Share within EJ % of EJ Share outside of % of Region Areas Areas EJ Areas BoR Minority 211,454 45.4% 81.5% 254,014 54.6% 56.6% 465,468 65.7%

Low- 48,141 37.2% 18.5% 81,249 62.8% 18.1% 129,390 18.6%* Income

Total 259,595 36.6% 100.0% 448,959 63.4% 100.0% 708,554 100.0% Population

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year estimates *Share calculated using the percent total for whom poverty status was determined in 2015, which was 694,606 people.

Transportation-Disadvantaged Populations

Additional population characteristics were examined due to increased likelihood of experiencing disadvantages in transportation. These characteristics include senior populations; people with limited English proficiency; zero-vehicle households; and single-parent households. The following section presents a series of maps identifying areas in the region where the prevalence of transportation-disadvantaged communities is higher than the regional average. While no further analysis is conducted on these populations in the report, this information may be used by SJCOG for future consideration, additional studies, and/or to help focus funding opportunities for disadvantaged communities within existing and future plans and programs.

Figure Q3-4. Senior Population 65+, San Joaquin County

Figure Q3-5. Single-Parent Households

Figure Q3-6. Zero-Vehicle Households

Figure Q3-7. People with Limited English Proficiency

Figure Q3-8. Combined Transportation-Disadvantaged Communities in San Joaquin County

Page intentionally left blank. Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy

APPENDIX Q 4 ANALYSIS RESULTS Page intentionally left blank. Q4. Analysis Results

This section summarizes the analysis results for the Draft Plan, incorporating relevant findings from related Title VI and environmental justice analyses, which are summarized in Appendix Q5 and Q6. Additional details about the methodology and data sources used in the following analyses may be found in Appendix Q2.

The analyses presented in this section includes the following:

• Quantitative analysis of potential benefits and burdens of proposed land use and transportation policies and projects on disadvantaged communities compared to the balance of the region based on three performance measures, using outputs from the SJCOG Envision Tomorrow land use model; • Quantitative analysis of the relative benefit received from roadway expenditures by disadvantaged communities using the SJCOG Travel Demand Model; • Spatial analysis of transit access to low-income jobs by disadvantaged communities; • Quantitative analysis to estimate health outcomes resulting from proposed changes to the built environment in disadvantaged communities compared to the balance of the region, applying the National Public Health Assessment Model (NPHAM); and • Quantitative analysis of the share of potential benefits of proposed transportation investments that accrue to low-income and minority populations compared to non-low- income and non-minority populations, using available census data.

Analysis of Land Use Performance Measures

To conduct the analysis of benefits and burdens on disadvantaged communities, SJCOG identified three land use performance measures, which are a subset of performance measures for the Draft Plan. The performance measures examined in this section include indicators that impact transit accessibility, air pollution exposure, and housing choice. Using SJCOG’s Envision Tomorrow land use model, the performance measures are projected from the base year of 2015 to 2035 and controlled to 2042 numbers to compare the impact of a No Build alternative and the Draft Plan.

Table Q4-1 summarizes the modeled results for each of the land use performance measures, which was applied to EJ and non-EJ areas of San Joaquin County.

Table Q4-1. Summary of Results for Land Use Performance Measures

Performance Sub- Base Year1 No Build2* Draft Plan2* Measure Geography

Percent (and EJ Areas 50% / 62% 51% /49% 50% / 64% number) of total (36,642 / 52,423) (50,042 / 62,266) (56,199 / 77,568) households / employment Non-EJ located within ½ Areas mile of high 10% / 18% 11% / 24% 12% / 24% quality transit (24,741 / 43,025) (25,617 / 45,512) (26,826 / 47,394) stops and centers

Percent (and EJ Areas 4.34% 4.03% 3.95% number) of total (3,208) (3,921) (4,408) households within 500 feet Non-EJ 4.47% 3.68% 4.32% of freeway Areas (6,673) (8,563) (9,432)

Percent (and EJ Areas 65% / 35% 65% / 35% 61% / 39% number) of total (53,561 / 28,224) (71,948 / 38,255) (72,269 / 47,152) Housing Mix by Single Family / Non-EJ 78% / 22% 80% / 20% 76% / 24% Multifamily Areas Units (124,558 / 35,334) (188,307 / 48,090) (171,666 / 55,513)

1 Base Year County total was 223,027 households and 234,969 jobs. Housing units total was 241,677. 2 2042 County totals would be 330,095 households and 319,946 jobs. Housing units total would be 346,600. *Results projected to year 2035 and controlled to 2042 numbers.

Transit Accessibility High quality public transit is an important indicator for environmental justice communities, where car ownership rates are statistically lower and thus dependency on other modes of transportation are higher than the general population. Adding housing and jobs that are near high quality transit helps to improve the ability to get around without a car.

An analysis of the percent of total households and employment located within ½ mile of a high- quality transit stop and center provides an indication of the impact of Draft Plan investments on the conditions within EJ and non-EJ areas. Compared to a No Build alternative, the Draft Plan represents the greatest long term positive impact for EJ communities in terms of housing and jobs located near high quality transit stops and centers. Between the two sub-geographies, the Draft Plan would see a greater percent of total households (50%) and employment (64%) located near high quality transit in EJ areas compared to non-EJ areas (Table Q4-1). This would indicate an overall positive impact in EJ areas, with the benefit to EJ areas exceeding non-EJ areas. Additionally, in the Draft Plan alternative EJ households will make up 67.8% of total households within ½ mile of high-quality transit areas in the region. While making up 33.8% of total households in the region, this would indicate a significant benefit for EJ communities. Exposure to Air Pollution Numerous studies point to the health risks associated with high exposure to air pollution including higher rates of asthma, heart attack, stroke, and lung cancer. Given that living near a major transportation facility can increase population exposure to emissions and particulate matter from vehicles, an equity analysis was performed to compare the number and percentage of countywide households relative to EJ households located within 500 feet of a major transportation facility. In this analysis, a major transportation facility is defined as any roadway within the County that carries more than 500,000 daily vehicle trips. The major transportation facilities include: Interstate 5, Interstate 580, Interstate 205, State Route 99, the Crosstown Freeway (State Route 4), and State Route 120. Figure Q3-3 includes the location of these major transportation facilities. Table Q4-2 provides detailed analysis of EJ versus total countywide households located within 500 feet of the identified facilities. EJ households make up all households near the Crosstown Freeway (State Route 4), approximately 34.1% of the households near Interstate 5, and approximately 31.0% of households near State Route 99. EJ households make up 0% of households near State Route 120, Interstate 205, and Interstate 580 as these facilities are in outlying parts of the County. Table Q4-1 shows the results of the analysis when conducted to compare EJ versus non-EJ areas. In base year conditions, 4.34% of households in EJ areas are located within 500 feet of any major transportation facility. In comparison, 4.47% of households in non-EJ areas are located within 500 feet of any major transportation facility in base year conditions. Overall, the Draft Plan represents the greatest long term positive impact for EJ areas in terms of exposure risks. Additionally, in the Draft Plan alternative EJ households will make up 31.8% of households within 500 feet of a freeway, while making up 33.8% of total households in the region, indicating a proportional share in the burden of exposure to air pollution.

Table Q4-2. Households within 500 feet of a Major Transportation Facility for San Joaquin County and Environmental Justice Areas, 2042 SR-4 Total I-5 SR-99 (Crosstown Fwy) SR-120 I-205 I-580 Any Freeway Households 500' % 500' % 500' % 500' % 500' % 500' % 500' % San Joaquin County 330,095 5,464 1.7% 3,508 1.1% 1,457 0.4% 1,054 0.3% 818 0.2% 1,541 0.5% 13,841 4.2% Escalon 3,157 0 0.0% Lathrop 16,359 236 1.4% 1 0.0% 237 1.4% Lodi 32,194 507 507 1.6% Manteca 35,990 1,101 3.1% 1,040 2.9% 2,141 5.9% Ripon 7,985 220 2.8% 220 2.8% Stockton 138,182 5,101 3.7% 1,173 0.8% 1,457 1.1% 7,730 5.6% Tracy 38,622 797 2.1% 1,515 3.9% 2,311 6.0% Unincorporated 96,228 125 0.1% 506 0.5% 13 0.0% 21 0.0% 26 0.0% 691 0.7% San Joaquin County Environmental 111,578 1,863 1.7% 1,088 1.0% 1,457 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,408 4.0% Justice Areas Escalon 0 0 0.0% Lathrop 7,292 222 3.0% 1 0.0% 223 3.1% Lodi 3,542 23 0.6% 23 0.6% Manteca 306 0 0.0% Ripon 0 0 0.0% Stockton 86,722 1,633 1.9% 953 1.1% 1,457 1.7% 4,042 4.7% Tracy 2,567 80 3.1% 80 3.1% Unincorporated 11,150 9 0.1% 112 1.0% 121 1.1% EJ Households as a 33.8% 34.1% 31.0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 31.8% Percent of Total Source: SJCOG Envision Tomorrow Land Use Model, Scenario 2A

Housing Choice Housing mix by type is an important performance measure in EJ communities, where housing affordability weighs heavily on a household’s ability to pay for other necessities, such as health care, food, clothing, and transportation. A more diverse housing mix, which includes multifamily housing, as well as single-family housing, can help to assure that individuals and families at all income levels have a safe place to stay. An equity analysis of the housing mix was conducted to understand the Draft Plan’s impact on housing choice throughout San Joaquin County. Table Q4-1 shows the results of the analysis conducted on the mix of single-family and multifamily housing types available in the Base Year and 2042 for both No Build and Draft Plan alternatives. The Draft Plan will improve housing choice in both EJ and non-EJ areas of the region by increasing the mix of multifamily housing units. In comparison, the No Build alternative would yield less than desirable results for housing choice, resulting in no change in the housing mix from the Base Year in EJ areas (35% multifamily units) and a poorer outcome in non-EJ areas (20% multifamily units). As a result, the Draft Plan may represent the greatest long term positive impact for EJ areas in terms of housing choice with 54% of new units categorized as multifamily housing types, compared to 32% in non-EJ areas.11 EJ areas will thus see a higher total mix of multifamily housing unit types (39%) compared to non-EJ areas (24%) in the Draft Plan. While these outcomes are optimistic, there is also a growing body of research that indicates providing multifamily and subsidized housing options in all neighborhoods increases household access to opportunity by ensuring residents of all income levels are able to access high-quality schools, jobs and services. While the Draft Plan improves housing choice across the region, SJCOG acknowledges the potential for unintended consequences resulting in worsening conditions of concentrated poverty and segregation in identified EJ communities. Therefore, to promote federal and state fair housing goals, SJCOG will continue to work with local jurisdictions, which directly shape land use and zoning policy, to improve access to opportunity for all residents of San Joaquin County. Roadway Expenditure Benefits To gauge to the extent EJ communities proportionately benefit from roadway expenditures compared to the general population, an equity analysis of the relative benefit received from roadway improvement expenditures was performed. Using the SJCOG travel demand model, a select link analysis was performed on regionally significant roadways identified for capacity improvements in the Draft Plan. The analysis yields the percentage of vehicle demand whose origin is an EJ community (i.e., TAZ) versus non-EJ community (TAZ). To determine the environmental justice area’s share of the use of the improved facilities, a representative list of improved regionally significant roadway facilities was first identified.

11 2018 RTP/SCS. Chapter 5: Performance of the Sustainable Communities Strategy. 34

These facilities are corridor-type facilities with regional significance (e.g., they are expected to carry over 20,000ADT by 2035 according to the travel demand model) that are also programmed for improvements by 2035 according to the RTP project list. These roadways include:

• 11th Street • Lathrop Road • Airport Way • Lower Sacramento Road • Arch/Sperry Road • Mountain House/International • Byron Road Parkway • Corral Hollow • Thornton Road • Eight Mile Road • I-205 • Grant Line Road • SR 120 • Hammer Lane • SR 99 In the travel demand model, the links within the project-limits of these roadway segments were specified by their A nodes and B nodes. Upon running the model with this set of selected links, a select link network file was generated in the model output. From this file, trips generated by EJ areas that also traverse these selected links were traced and the percentage share of these EJ trips in relationship to the total forecasted traffic that uses these facilities was calculated. Results indicate that approximately 31.5% of daily vehicle trips utilizing these improved roadways originate from EJ communities. This indicates that a significant proportion of EJ communities will benefit from future roadway investments resulting from the Draft Plan. While this share is slightly less than the countywide percentage of total EJ households (33.8%) the difference is relatively small. The difficulty in definitively concluding disproportionate benefit in the analysis for roadway improvements in the RTP/SCS is a result of the difficulty in assessing proximity benefits from operation and maintenance improvements for EJ communities versus the general population as well as the limitation that available data covers only modal difference for work trips. Absent a definitive locational analysis, one might argue that projects in the maintenance category would exhibit an inverse relationship to the regional roadway expansion projects as roads are not slated to be otherwise improved would make up the bulk of the maintenance expenditures. Of additional import to the equity discussion is that while workers in low-income households make up approximately 23% of total work trips by automobile, nearly 90% of low-income households either drove alone or carpooled for their primary means of getting to work. In addition, investments in roadway improvements also benefit transit riders in the County given that transit within San Joaquin County is primarily bus transit.

High Quality Transit Access to Low-Income Employment As an additional measure of transit accessibility for environmental justice areas, a spatial analysis was conducted by overlaying Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) data for San Joaquin County on a half-mile walk shed from high quality transit (HQT). High quality transit includes any bus transit line that operates with 15-minute frequency during peak commute time, as well as any rail transit stations. LEHD data provides information to analyze the location of jobs by income, identifying total employment in three income categories: Low, Medium, and High. For this analysis, low-income jobs were targeted, which LEHD defines as jobs with earnings that total $1,250 per month or less. A spatial analysis was performed to locate LEHD census block data into Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs). The comparison, between LEHD low-income jobs and the total jobs within a TAZ, was applied to the projected 2042 employment. As can be seen in Table Q4-3, the highest number of accessible low-income jobs within the region in 2042 will be located primarily within the urban core of San Joaquin County, within the City of Stockton (31,218). Approximately 70% of those jobs are located within Stockton’s EJ areas. Some moderate concentrations of low-income employment will also occur in the more outlying areas of the region (Figure Q4-1). For instance, outside of Stockton the next highest number of low-income jobs near high quality transit is projected in the City of Lodi (4,835), where approximately 38% of these jobs will be in EJ areas. The results of the analysis show that of the total low-income jobs in San Joaquin County, at least 51% of them in 2042 will be located near high quality transit. Additionally, of the low- income jobs near high quality transit, approximately 59% will be located within the region’s EJ areas. Except for rail stations scattered throughout San Joaquin County, existing and future high-quality transit lines are found primarily serving the urban core. Because it is challenging to predict the location of low-income jobs in the future, this layer was held constant for the analysis. The existing and future high-quality transit lines and stations were then overlaid on the map, inferring improved access to low-income jobs resulting from planned investments in the Draft Plan. While high quality transit may be improving access to jobs within the urban core, access to jobs outside of the urban core will be limited to train station areas and non-high- quality transit service in outlying areas of the County in the future.

Table Q4-3. High Quality Transit (HQT) Access to Low Income (LI) Jobs for San Joaquin County and Environmental Justice Areas

% of LI Total % of Jobs Total % of LI Total LI Jobs Total near LI Jobs jobs Jobs 1/2 Mile of HQT LI Jobs in EJ Areas near LI Jobs HQT in in County in HQT in near EJ County Total County County HQT Areas Existing Growth Future (2042) TOT (2015) TOT 2015-2042 San Joaquin County 17,418 8,220 25,638 59% 43,747 51% 85,561 27% 319,946 Escalon - - - 0% - 0% 1,033 42% 2,445 Lathrop 9 358 367 27% 1,363 49% 2,777 24% 11,357 Lodi - 1,866 1,866 38% 4,853 65% 7,465 28% 26,978 Manteca 221 416 637 24% 2,633 37% 7,194 32% 22,288 Ripon - 165 165 19% 891 62% 1,439 28% 5,197 Stockton 17,087 4,819 21,906 70% 31,218 70% 44,809 28% 162,808 Tracy 101 559 660 25% 2,609 37% 7,073 23% 30,277 Unincorporated 0 37 37 21% 180 1% 13,769 23% 58,596

Figure Q4-1. High Quality Transit Access to Low-Income Jobs, Existing and Future

Health Equity Analysis An additional analysis was conducted to consider the health equity impacts of the land use and transportation policies and projects included in the RTP. SJCOG piloted the use of public health performance metrics during the 2018 RTP/SCS cycle and applied these to conduct a spatially- based equity analysis. The results of this analysis are summarized in this section, however the full health indicators report can be found in Appendix N. The health equity analysis relies on the comparison of communities of concern that include the defined EJ areas, as well as the SB535 Disadvantaged Communities identified by CalEnviroScreen. For more detail, please see Appendix Q2. The analysis looks at the differential effects from current conditions in 2015 to a future scenario based on Scenario 2a in 2035 for the public health performance metrics found in Table Q4-4. Table Q4-4. Difference in Weighted Means Between Scenario (2035) and Baseline (2015) for Scenario 2a by Area of Concern*

*Detailed NPHAM methodology and results found in Appendix N. Highlights of the health equity results attributed to Scenario 2a are as follows:

• Walking for Transportation: All areas are gaining transportation walking minutes; areas of concentrated minority and concentrated poverty gain more minutes than the balance of the region. This is in addition to starting out in 2015 with higher levels of transportation walking. • Walking for Leisure: Results are mixed for this indicator. Minorities are losing minutes of leisure walking; areas of concentrated poverty are slightly gaining and CalEnviroScreen are gaining enough to outperform non-CalEnviroScreen areas.

• Total Walking: This indicator is reflective of the sum of transportation and leisure walking minutes. All areas gain more minutes. CalEnviroScreen and areas of concentrated poverty both perform better than the balance of the region. • Recreational Physical Activity: This indicator is less sensitive to built environment changes and the results are mixed. The CalEnviroScreen areas gain minutes and perform better than the non-equity counterpart. Areas of concentrated minorities and poverty both lose minutes even as their counterparts gain minutes. • Body Mass Index: All areas improve under this scenario with reduced BMI. CalEnviroScreen areas improve more than the non-equity counterpart. • Percent Poor Health: All areas show additional population reporting poor health under this scenario with areas of concern performing worse than their counterparts.

In general, it was found that CalEnviroScreen areas perform better than the balance of the region for 4 out of 6 outcomes: leisure walking, total walking, recreational physical activity, and body mass index. Because the concentrated minority and concentrated poverty areas do not perform as well as the balance of the region, this suggests that areas that have slightly less concentrated poverty or minorities (i.e. 20-30% of households in poverty or 50-75% of the population non-white) are performing the best. This tentative finding would require additional analysis to confirm.

Transportation Investment Analysis

This section summarizes the results from an analysis of Draft Plan investments for their relative benefit on minority and low-income populations, compared to non-minority and non-low- income populations. The methodology for conducting the transportation investment analysis is described in more detail in Appendix Q2. The legal context for the analysis is provided in Appendix Q1.

The transportation investment analysis includes the following components:

• The transportation investment analysis is a population-based analysis, which quantifies the benefits of the region’s transportation investments, and assigns these benefits to low-income and minority populations based on their share of system usage. This share of benefits is then compared to the overall share of minority and low-income populations in the region. • A public transit investment analysis, which satisfies Title VI requirements.

Population-Based Analysis

This analysis illustrates the distribution of the investments relative to different population subgroups in the region by comparing the estimated share of investments that benefit low-

income and minority populations to the share of their respective use of the transportation system. This evaluation centers on populations of concern, low-income and minorities, to estimate the average distribution of benefits across the region.

To conduct the analysis, the Draft Plan investments were divided into categories matching available data on means of transportation to work. Draft Plan investments were divided into five categories: Regional Roadways and Highways, Roadway Operations and Maintenance, Bus Transit, Rail Transit, and Bicycle and Pedestrian. Overall, the Draft Plan investment strategy is a balanced approach to support the development of a multi-modal transportation system. Table Q4-5 displays the funding amounts made available by modal category in the Draft Plan.

Table Q4-5. Draft Plan Funding by Modal Category

Funding Percent of Modal Category (in millions) Total Funding Regional Roadways & Highways $3,121 27.1% Roadway Operations & Maintenance $4,448 38.7% Bus Transit $2,393 20.8% Rail Transit $1,219 10.6% Bicycle & Pedestrian $320 2.8% Total $11,502 100%

For the population-based analysis, as a first step, share of transportation system usage by income and minority status was determined using the most recent data available from the Census Transportation Planning Package. Alongside demographic information, the CTPP data includes detailed estimates of means of transportation to work. Using this data, the share of transportation system usage was determined by calculating the percent of work trips by means of transportation by income and minority status and summarized in Table Q4-6. For this analysis, low-income workers were defined using the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) income guidelines, which include extremely low, very low, and low-income households.12 Using this definition, households with income below $43,011 were designated as low-income households for the transportation investment analysis. To match this income limit with available data, workers from households with income below $45,000 were used for the analysis.

12 SJCOG Regional Housing Needs Assessment. See: http://www.sjcog.org/113/Regional-Housing-Needs-Allocation 41

Table Q4-6. Share of Transportation System Usage by Income and Minority Status

Income Status Minority Status Means of Transportation to Non- Work Low-Income All Other Minority Minority Drove Alone or Carpool 22.7% 77.3% 58.4% 41.6% Bus 37.1% 62.9% 73.2% 26.8% Rail 13.0% 87.8% 56.4% 43.9% Bicycle or Pedestrian 48.4% 51.9% 50.7% 49.3% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2006-2010. Special Tabulation: Census Transportation Planning Package

To determine relative benefits by income status, transportation investments from the Draft Plan were assigned to either low-income households or all other households. Following in Table Q4-7, expenditure by modal category was determined by allocating expenditures by the respective share of transportation system usage by low-income population. The share of benefit for all other workers was then calculated by subtracting the calculated share for low- income workers from all expenditures for each modal category of funding. Overall, project investment totaled to $2.9 billion for low-income households, while investment totaled $8.6 billion for all other households. Compared to their share of total population in the region (23.4%), low-income households receive 25.4% of total benefit from Draft Plan investments based on their share of usage of the transportation system. Table Q4-7. Funding Expenditure by Mode and Income Status

Low-Income All Other Modal Category All Expenditures Households Households Share of Total Population 23.4% 76.6% Regional Roadways & Highways $3, 121,215,385 $707,751,876 $2,413,463,509 Roadway Operations and Maintenance $4,448,287,873 $1,008,672,487 $3,439,615,386 Bus Transit $2,393,417,693 $888,613,073 $1,504,804,620 Rail Transit $1,218,986,203 $159,062,834 $1,059,923,369 Bicycle and Pedestrian $319,855,156 $154,711,648 $165,143,508 Total $11,501,762,310 $2,918,811,918 $8,582,950,392 Share of Total Benefit 25.4% 74.6%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2006-2010. Special Tabulation: Census Transportation Planning Package

Table Q4-8 summarizes the calculated benefit by minority status. Overall, Draft Plan investment benefit totaled $7 billion for minority populations, while for non-minority populations the benefit totaled $4.5 billion. Compared to their share of total population in the region (58.0%), minority populations receive 61.1% of total benefit of Draft Plan investments based on their share of usage of the transportation system. Table Q4-8. Funding Expenditure by Mode and Minority Status

Funding Type All Expenditures Minority Non-Minority Share of Total Population 58.0% 42.0% Regional Roadways & Highways $3, 121,215,385 $1,822,773,573 $1,298,441,812 Roadway Operations and Maintenance $4,448,287,873 $2,597,777,013 $1,850,510,860 Bus Transit $2,393,417,693 $1,752,526,225 $640,891,468 Rail Transit $1,218,986,203 $687,537,950 $531,448,253 Bicycle and Pedestrian $319,855,156 $162,310,605 $157,544,551 Total $11,501,762,310 $7,022,925,366 $4,478,836,944 Share of Total Benefit 61.1% 38.9%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2006-2010. Special Tabulation: Census Transportation Planning Package

In addition to calculating total benefit to low-income and minority populations based on transportation system usage, a comparison of funding expenditures per household was conducted. To calculate relative benefits for low-income households, the total benefit for each modal category in Table Q4-7 was divided by the total estimate of low-income households. Per household expenditures by modal category are summarized in Table Q4-9. Using similar methods for the minority population, per capita expenditures by modal category are summarized in Table Q4-10. On a per household basis, the result of the analysis indicates a disproportionate share of Draft Plan expenditures accruing to non-low-income households (Table Q4-9). Modal category expenditures benefitting low-income households are less when compared to all other households. There are disparities in all funding categories, except for bicycle and pedestrian. The disparity is most pronounced in the roadway and rail categories. On a per capita basis, the result of the analysis indicates a disproportionate share of Draft Plan expenditures accruing to non-minority populations (Table Q4-10). Modal category expenditures benefiting minority populations are slightly less when compared to non-minority populations. There are disparities in all funding categories, except for bus transit.

Table Q4-9. Funding Expenditures per Household by Income Status

Low Income All Other All Households Households

Households 219,073 93,315 125,073

Regional Roadways & Highways $14,247 $7,585 $19,191

Roadway Operations and Maintenance $20,305 $10,809 $27,351

Bus Transit $10,925 $9,523 $11,966

Rail Transit $5,564 $1,705 $8,428

Bicycle and Pedestrian $1,460 $1,658 $1,313

Total $52,502 $31,279 $68,250

Source: 2011-2015 ACS 5-Year Estimates Table Q4-10. Funding Expenditures per Capita by Minority Status

All Minority Non-Minority

Population 708,554 465,468 243,086

Regional Roadways & Highways $4,405 $3,916 $5,341

Roadway Operations and Maintenance $6,278 $5,581 $7,613

Bus Transit $3,378 $3,765 $2,636

Rail Transit $1,720 $1,477 $2,186

Bicycle and Pedestrian $451 $349 $648

Total $16,233 $15,088 $18,425

Source: 2011-2015 ACS 5-Year Estimates An important limitation to this analysis is that it relies on data regarding means of transportation to work, thus only capturing a specific trip purpose. Therefore, the calculated share of transportation system usage may not represent a comprehensive picture of actual system usage by the region’s population. To provide further understanding of benefits to environmental justice communities, additional analyses are included to assess equity impacts of roadway (see Roadway Expenditure Benefits) and transit projects (see High Quality Transit Access to Low-Income Employment) included in the Draft Plan. For further discussion and analysis of public transit investment, please refer to Appendix Q5 for the Title VI Report.

Page intentionally left blank. Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy

APPENDIX Q 5 TITLE VI REPORT Page intentionally left blank. Q5. Title VI Report

This section summarizes the results of the Title VI analysis, called out separately to satisfy federal requirements related to nondiscrimination in the metropolitan planning process. For more information on the regulatory framework underlying this analysis, see Appendix Q1. Title VI Analysis and Results The purpose of this analysis is for SJCOG to demonstrate compliance with federal regulations related to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Title VI regulations prohibit recipients of federal transportation funds from utilizing criteria or methods of administration that have the effect of subjecting persons to discrimination based on their race, color or national origin. As an operating entity within DOT, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) provides more specific guidance to metropolitan planning organizations on how to demonstrate Title VI compliance (see Appendix Q1 and Q2 for more details). The first step in the analysis is to identify the combined share of federal and state transit investments in the Draft Plan (Table Q5-2). The investments included in the plan total $11.5 billion over a 27-year period, for a wide range of projects that include roadway maintenance, highway projects, active transportation programs and transit operations. Of the total Draft Plan investments, $3.6 billion are allocated to transit operations, maintenance, modernization and expansion. Therefore, public transit makes up a significant share of investments made in the Draft Plan, approximately 31.4% of the $11.5 billion total. Of the total Draft Plan investments made in public transit, 34.8% percent (or $1.3 billion) comes from various federal and state sources, listed in Appendix Q2. The Title VI analysis is conducted on this amount ($1.3 billion). Table Q5-1. Share of Population and Public Transit Commute by Minority Status

Total Minority Non-Minority

Total Population 708,554 465,468 243,086

Percent of Total Population 65.7% 34.3%

Commute Population 262,095 152,100 110,000

Percent of Commute 58.0% 42.0% Population

Public Transit Commuters 3,750 2,470 1,285

Percent of Total Transit 65.9% 34.3% Commuters*

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2011-2015. Special Tabulation: Census Transportation Planning Package, 2006-2010. *Numbers may not add to 100% due to rounding.

45 This analysis relies on a calculated share of transportation system usage. Using the latest data available from the Census Transportation Planning Package, the share of public transit commuters by minority status was determined by dividing the estimate of minority commuters with the total estimate of commuters by public transit (Table Q5-1). Compared to their share of the total population (65.7%), minority commuters make up a greater share of total public transit commuters (65.9%). Next, federal and state investments in transit are allocated to minority and non-minority populations using the same methodology used in the transportation investment analysis found in Appendix Q4. Essentially, federal and state investments in public transit are allocated to minority or non-minority populations based on their respective share of use for means of transportation to work. This allocation of funding to minority and non-minority populations based on their use of the transit system constitutes “benefit.” The results for each subgroup are compared to estimate the relative benefit accrued to minority and non-minority populations. The total state and federal public transit benefit to minority populations is approximately $828 million, compared to $430 million to non-minority populations (Table Q5-2). Table Q5-2. Disparate Impact Analysis Results, Population and Commuter Based

Total Minority Non-Minority

Total State and Federal $1,257,261,317 $828,116,121 $430,821,545 Funding for Public Transit

Per Capita Benefit $1,779 $1,772

Per Commuter Benefit $5,445 $3,917

Share of Total State and 65.9% 34.3% Federal Investment

Total Draft Plan Public $3,612,403,895 $2,379,370,032 $1,237,850,401 Transit Funding

Per Capita Benefit $5,112 $5,092

Per Commuter Benefit $15,643 $11,253

Share of Total Draft Plan 65.9% 34.3% Investment

Finally, investments are distributed on a per capita basis, so that investment benefits allocated to the region’s minority transit commuters can be compared to investment benefits allocated to the region’s non-minority commuters. The results from this analysis are summarized in Table Q5-2. 46

Following FTA guidance, SJCOG’s disparate impact analysis of Draft Plan investments reveals that, on a per capita basis, minority populations in the region would receive $1,779 of federal and state public transit investment benefits compared to $1,772 for non-minority populations. The share of investments based on a per capita basis is proportional to the share of minority (65.7%) and non-minority (34.4%) populations in the region. On a transit commuter basis, minority riders would receive $5,455 of the federal and state public transit investment benefit compared to $3,917 for non-minority transit riders. The share of investment benefits based on a per-commuter basis is proportional to the share of minority (65.9%) and non-minority (34.3%) transit ridership. For additional comparison, the disparate impact analysis was also applied to the total Draft Plan investment in public transit. Based on this analysis, the minority population of San Joaquin County benefits more from public transit funding than the non-minority population on a per capita basis, as well as a per commuter basis. The minority population subgroup garnering more of the benefit due to higher usage of transit for work commutes. As a result, investments in public transit generally have a greater benefit for minority populations proportionate to their share of use and their share of the regional population. Therefore, based on the results presented in Tables Q5-1 and Q5-2, SJCOG concludes that the Draft Plan is in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for the distribution of federal and state transit funds.

Page intentionally left blank. Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy

APPENDIX Q 6 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE REPORT Page intentionally left blank. Q6. Environmental Justice Report

This section summarizes the results of the Environmental Justice analysis, which is called out separately to satisfy federal requirements in the regional planning process. For more information on the policy framework underlying this report, see Appendix Q1. For more information about methodology, see Appendix Q2. Environmental Justice Analysis and Results Under Executive Order 12898 and the associated DOT Order on Environmental Justice, SJCOG must assist DOT, FTA and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in their mission “to avoid, minimize, or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects, including social and economic effects” on environmental justice (EJ) populations. For this analysis, adverse effects are determined using the results from the three land use performance measures, described in Appendix Q2 and discussed in Appendix Q4. SJCOG defines EJ communities in Appendix Q2 as census blocks in San Joaquin County meeting one or both concentration thresholds for minority population (<75%) or population living below the federal poverty threshold (30%+). The analysis must determine if EJ areas share in the benefits of the Draft Plan’s investments without bearing a disproportionate share of burdens. As noted in Appendix Q2, to make this determination, this report uses the DOT definition of a “disproportionately high and adverse effect,” which relies on meeting the following two conditions:

• An adverse impact is predominately borne by minority and/or low-income populations, and • An adverse impact on minority and/or low-income populations is significantly more severe or greater in magnitude than the adverse effect on non-minority and/or non- low-income populations. The following discussion includes a duplication of results from an analysis of land use performance measures from Appendix Q4. The results provide the basis for demonstrating compliance with federal requirements for the Environmental Justice Executive Order 12898. Analysis of Land Use Performance Measures

Table Q4-1 summarizes the modeled results for each of the land use performance measures, which was applied to EJ and non-EJ areas of San Joaquin County.

Table Q4-1. Summary of Results for Land Use Performance Measures

Performance Sub- Base Year1 No Build2* Draft Plan2* Measure Geography

Percent (and EJ Areas 4.34% 4.03% 3.95% number) of total (3,208) (3,921) (4,408) households within 500 feet Non-EJ 4.47% 3.68% 4.32% of freeway Areas (6,673) (8,563) (9,432)

In Table Q6-1, SJCOG summarizes its analysis of the results from Table Q4-1 to show whether there are any “disproportionately high and adverse effects” resulting from the Draft Plan on EJ communities. Table Q6-1. Summary of Environmental Justice Analysis Results for the Draft Plan

Does the Draft Plan have an Is the adverse effect adverse effect on EJ disproportionately high?** Performance Measure communities?*

Draft Plan versus No Build EJ communities vs. Non-EJ Alternative for EJ communities communities (see Table Q4-1) (see Table Q4-1) 1. Percent of total households / employment located Yes No within ½ mile of high quality transit stops and centers

2. Percent of households within 500 feet of No -- freeway

3. Percent of total housing mix by single-family / No -- multifamily

*Compares the analysis results for the No Build Alternative and the Draft Plan to determine whether the measure is moving in the right direction for EJ populations. **Compares the analysis results for the Draft Plan relative to EJ and non-EJ communities. An EJ community is determined to experience “disproportionately high adverse effect” when the Draft Plan has an adverse effect on EJ communities AND when the adverse impact from the Draft Plan is greater than the adverse impact of the No Build Alternative.

Using the results summarized in Table Q4-1, the environmental justice analysis determined adverse effects on EJ communities when comparing the impact of a No Build alternative and the Draft Plan for one out of the three performance measures:

1. Percent of total households / employment located within ½ mile of high quality transit stops and centers; and However, when comparing the impact between EJ communities and non-EJ communities it was found that the adverse effect was not disproportionately high. In the case of percent total of households / employment located within ½ mile of high quality transit stops and centers, EJ communities would experience a slight adverse effect when

comparing the differences in impact between a No Build alternative and the Draft Plan (see Table Q4-1). In the No Build alternative, EJ communities would have a slightly greater percent of households near high quality transit (51%) compared to the Draft Plan (50%). While minimal, this would indicate an “adverse effect” as a result of the Draft Plan on the housing side of the performance measure. On the jobs side of the performance measure, however, EJ communities would see very positive impacts with 64% employment near high quality transit for the Draft Plan compared to 49% in the No Build alternative. Although very minimal, because of the slight decrease in housing access by high quality transit between the No Build Alternative and Draft Plan, SJCOG determined an “adverse effect.” The impact of the Draft Plan was then compared between EJ communities and non-EJ communities to determine if the effect would be disproportionately borne by EJ communities. It was found that EJ communities would continue to experience better conditions than non-EJ communities with significantly higher access to housing and jobs by high quality transit (50% for households and 64% for jobs compared to 12% for households and 24% jobs). Based on this comparison, SJCOG determined that the adverse effect would not be significantly more severe in EJ communities compared to non-EJ communities. Therefore, based on the discussion of the Environmental Justice analysis and results, SJCOG finds no disproportionately high and adverse impact on EJ communities from the Draft Plan for the three land use performance measures.

Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy

APPENDIX Q 7 N E X T S T E P S Page intentionally left blank. Q7. Next Steps

In addition to demonstrating compliance with its statutory obligations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Executive Order 12898, this report represents a significant effort to consider social equity in a regional planning context. The analyses included in the report explored various Draft Plan benefits and burdens. For instance, an overall positive impact on transit accessibility and housing choice will be felt in environmental justice communities. Despite these benefits, however, the transportation investment analysis reveals several disparities by income and minority status on per household and per capita total investment in the Draft Plan. Additionally, the burdens associated with exposure to air pollution from living near freeways and the benefits from roadway capacity investments were found to be proportional to the environmental justice communities’ share of population in the region. For the first time, SJCOG also incorporated public health metrics into the regional planning context, and deployed the metrics to understand the impact of its investments in environmental justice communities. In many ways, this report represents a snap shot of the region at a fixed point in time and much of what is presented here is limited by elements of the planning process and the methodology used to conduct the analysis.

Moving forward, this section summarizes some of the next steps for SJCOG, which build upon the findings from the Environmental Justice, Title VI, and Social Equity Report. These next steps refer to implementation measures of the 2018 RTP/SCS, as well as refinements to the equity analysis for the next RTP/SCS update.

RTP/SCS Implementation

SJCOG is committed to meeting the mobility and access needs of low-income, minority and other transportation-disadvantaged populations. This commitment is reflected in the highlighted implementation activities below:

• Measure K Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School Program and Smart Growth Incentive Program: The programs provide funding to expand and enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety and facilities within San Joaquin County, as well as infrastructure improvements that support infill development and neighborhood revitalization. In February 2018, nearly $20 million of Measure K funding was approved by the SJCOG Board to move 21 projects and plans forward, several of which are located within identified environmental justice communities.

• SB 1 Planning Studies: SJCOG will use a portion of its allocated SB 1 planning funds to conduct a study of barriers to successful implementation, particularly in identified communities of concern. The needs assessment will focus on mobility needs, and

include first/last mile planning and an analysis of the impact of emerging technologies. Additionally, a portion of SB 1 planning funds will be used to further refine the public health performance metrics and analysis discussed within this report, and at length in Appendix N.

• South Stockton Promise Zone Initiative: As a backbone partner, SJCOG serves as a facilitator for advancing partner collaboration on Neighborhood Transformation within the South Stockton Promise Zone, a project area that aligns directly with environmental justice communities identified in this report. In 2017, major milestones included initiating dialogue on current public and private investment levels in South Stockton, as well as the exploration of strategies to articulate a community-driven vision that can guide future investment.

Refinements to the Social Equity Analysis

To build upon the work presented in this document, SJCOG staff will continue to make improvements to the planning process and methodology to develop a social equity and environmental justice lens for the San Joaquin region that ensures effective action on behalf of the region’s disadvantaged communities. With input from stakeholders and members of the public, SJCOG may pursue several items in the next RTP/SCS update to enhance efforts to address social equity in the region (Table Q7-1).

Table Q7-1. Refinements for 2022 RTP/SCS Social Equity Analysis

Planning Process Improvements Methodology Enhancements

• • Enhance outreach program by Revisit the criteria for designating focusing more intentionally on communities of concern. Explore or Hispanic/Latino populations in San expand criteria to look at conditions, Joaquin County. not solely demographic makeup. • • Enhance community-based outreach Investigate key regional trends that mini-grant program to increase effect low-income and minority engagement throughout the planning communities in greater detail. process. • Incorporate a discussion or analysis • Provide specific forums or focus on existing disparities and the groups on Environmental Justice, Title cumulative benefits of the RTP/SCS. VI, and social equity issues in the San • Incorporate methodology for Joaquin region. identifying gentrification and displacement risk in the region.

Appendix O

FTIP Checklist and Development Guidance

2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Checklist for Caltrans FTIP Coordinator

I. Timeline: Ensure each Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) submits the following items to Caltrans:

• The Draft 2019 FTIP at the start of the FTIP public review period but not later than September 3, 2018. • Three copies of the Final 2019 FTIP, along with any amendments and administrative modifications to the 2019 FTIP by October 1, 2018. • Web-link to the Final 2019 FTIP and amendments by October 1, 2018.

II. FTIP Package Submittal: Verify the FTIP package includes the following:

Project Listings • Projects that are Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) are identified Detailed listings for highway and transit grouped projects (back-up listings) Signed board resolution that addresses the following: • Consistency with the metropolitan transportation planning regulations per Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 450 • Consistency with the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) (e.g. 2030) • Financial constraint – the enclosed financial summary affirms availability of funding • Meets Air Quality Conformity • Does not interfere with the timely implementation of the TCMs contained in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) • Compliance with the performance-based planning requirements • Completion of the public participation process in accordance with the MPO’s Public Participation Plan (PPP) Project listings included in the Final 2019 FTIP are available in the California Transportation Improvement Program System (CTIPS) Financial Summary • Includes financial information covering the first four years of the FTIP • Excel file submitted electronically (Template is posted at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/oftmp.htm)

Description of the anticipated effort of FTIP towards achieving the performance targets identified in the RTP Air quality conformity analysis and determination PPP/Interagency Consultation Expedited Project Selection Procedures (EPSP) documentation Three copies of the Final 2019 FTIP mailed to:

California Department of Transportation Office of Federal Transportation Management Program, MS 82 P.O. Box 942874 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 Attention: Muhaned Aljabiry 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Development Guidance

This guidance is not intended to supersede federal regulations. FTIPs must comply with all applicable metropolitan transportation planning regulations per Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 450.

I. Update to the California State Statutes

Government Code 65074 Caltrans is required by state statute to submit the Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP) to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) by December 1 of each even-numbered year.

Streets and Highways Codes 182.6 and 182.7 MPOs are required to submit FTIPs to Caltrans by October 1 of each even-numbered year.

II. Timeline a) Submit two copies of the draft 2017 FTIP to Caltrans at the start of the public review period, but not later than September 3, 2018. Except for the signed board resolution, all items listed in the 2019 FTIP Checklist must be included. b) Submit the final FTIP to Caltrans by October 1, 2018. The cover letter shall be addressed to: Mr. Bruce De Terra Chief, Division of Transportation Programming Attn: Muhaned Aljabiry

Only FTIPs received by the deadline will be included in the draft 2019 FSTIP to the FHWA and FTA. Caltrans will not process late FTIPs until the 2019 FSTIP is approved, which is expected on 12/17/2018. Late FTIPs will be posted separately for 14-days to comply with the FSTIP’s Public Participation Plan (PPP).

Amendments and/or Administrative Modifications Any amendment and/or administrative modification to the board-adopted FTIP received before October 1, 2018, will be included as part of the base 2019 FSTIP. MPOs with delegated authority from Caltrans may only approve administrative modifications to the 2017 FTIP, but not to the 2019 FSTIP during this time. Amendments and/or administrative modifications not received by October 1, 2018, will be processed after the 2019 FSTIP is approved.

III. Maintenance and Operations Costs Include in the FTIP’s financial plan an analysis of revenues dedicated for maintaining and operating the federal-aid system, including the basis for calculation. Address any anticipated shortfall in available revenues and describe plans to deal with the gap. 1 | P a g A J B e IV. Performance-Based Planning Requirements for RTP and FTIP Federal regulations require States and MPOs take a performance based approach to planning and programming, and also requires States, MPOs and transit operators to establish targets in key national performance areas. Title 23 CFR 450.306 requires MPOs to establish performance targets in their metropolitan transportation planning process. The FTIP shall describe efforts toward achieving the targets, located here: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/05/27/2016-11964/statewide-and- nonmetropolitan-transportation-planning-metropolitan-transportation-planning

V. Satisfying Public Participation Requirement for the Development of the Program of Projects (POP) for FTA 5307 Program through FTIP Development

The FTIP’s public involvement process can be used to satisfy the public participation requirement for the development of the POP for the FTA 5307 program. In such case, the transit recipient shall coordinate with the MPO, and ensure the public knows that it is using the public participation plan associated with the FTIP to satisfy the public hearing requirements for the POP. MPO must ensure that the FTIP explicitly states that public involvement activities and time established for public review and comment for the FTIP satisfy the POP requirements of the FTA 5307 Program.

VI. Project Listings a) Verify planning studies (non-transportation capital) are included in the Overall Work Program. They do not need to be listed in the FTIP. b) Program funding for each phase of a project in the year of obligation (E-76). c) Include Grouped Project Listing: See the guidance for grouping projects in air quality nonattainment or maintenance areas for further information, located here: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/federal/fedfiles/res_publications/grouped_pjt_listing s.pdf For MPO areas and Rural non-MPO counties that are classified as air quality attainment (SBCAG, AMBAG, and Shasta), refer to 23CFR771.117 (c) and (d) for additional information on projects that can be classified as “Categorical Exception (CE).” For those areas, projects that are not considered regionally significant and qualify as CE may be grouped together. MPOs are responsible for determining if projects are eligible for inclusion in the grouped project listing. FTA-funded projects can be grouped, provided the detailed project list is made available to the FTA and public. The detailed project list must be included in the FTIP (and in the FTIP amendment) when it is circulated for public review.

d) Include projects in the FSTIP that need environmental approval, even if no funds are identified within the four years of the FTIP. Reference the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), the project completion date, and add the following language to the project description: “Project included in the FTIP for environmental approval.” e) Provide the following information for each project: 1) Sufficient description (i.e., type of work, termini, and length) to identify the 2 | P a g A J B e project. (See the section below for more information.) 2) Total project cost based on the latest estimates which may extend beyond the four years of the FTIP. Cost estimates must use an inflation rate to reflect the “year of expenditure dollars” based on reasonable financial principals and assumptions, and be included in the financial plan. Projects in air quality nonattainment and maintenance areas can be included in the first two years of the FTIP and FSTIP only if funds are "available” or “committed." 3) The amount of federal funds proposed to be obligated during each program year (for the first year, this includes the proposed category of federal funds and source(s) of non-federal funds. For the second, third, and fourth years, this includes the likely category or possible categories of federal funds and source(s) of non-federal funds). 4) Required non-federal matching funds. 5) Implementing agency. 6) Corresponding RTP number or RTP page number. MPOs that use CTIPS to develop their FTIPs may use the “Project Title, Location & Description” field or the “MPO Comments” field to include the RTP information.

3 | P a g A J B e

Highway Projects (State Highways/Local Roads) Description Format

Description Formula: [(Location :) + (Limits) + (;) + (Improvement)] Location: The nearest city or significant town illustrated on state highway maps. If the project is located more than five miles away from the city or town, then prefix the city name with “East, West, North, or South of.” f) In Bakersfield: g) South of Bakersfield Limits: Project limits can be stated as from one road to another. Other boundary landmarks, such as rivers, creeks, state parks, freeway overcrossings, can be used in-lieu of streets or roads. h) Between 1st Street and Pine Boulevard; i) North of Avenal Creed to South of Route 33; j) At Rock Creek Bridge; Improvement: Describes the work to be done. Include significant components of the improvement (in particular those that relate to air quality conformity).  Rehabilitate roadway.  Convert 4-lane expressway to 6-lane freeway with 2 HOV lanes.  Construct left turn lane. Example: In Bakersfield: Between 1st Street and Pine Boulevard; rehabilitate roadway.

Transit Project Description Format

Description Formula: [(Location :) + (Limits) + (;) + (Improvement)] Location: For work at spot locations for large (statewide) transit agencies: The nearest city or significant town illustrated on state highway maps. If the project is located more than five miles away from the city or town, then prefix the city name with “East, West, North, or South of.” k) In Bakersfield: l) North of Bakersfield: Otherwise: Skip this step. Limits: For work at spot locations (all agencies):

4 | P a g A J B e

Name of the station, description of facility, name the rail corridor for the project etc. m) Lafayette BART Station; n) The Daly City Yard, adjacent to the Coloma Station; o) San Joaquin Corridor; Otherwise: Skip this step. Improvement: Describes the work to be done. Include significant components of the improvement (in particular those that relate to air quality conformity.  Construct a station.  Construct a child care facility.  Track and signal improvements. Projects that apply to entire transit agency jurisdiction – describe activity  Purchase of 59 buses -- 12 MCI’s and 47 Standard 40 ft buses (note if expansion or replacement).  Para-transit van leasing.  Operating assistance for Sacramento Regional Transit. Example: North of Bakersfield: San Joaquin Corridor – Track and signal improvements. Lafayette BART Station; construct a child care facility. Operating assistance for Sacramento Regional Transit.

5 | P a g A J B e VII. Use of Toll Credits

Federal-aid highway projects typically require sponsors to provide non-federal funds as match to federal funds. However, at the MPO’s discretion, a project may be funded without the required non-federal match using Toll Credit (TC) provisions. The non-federal share match requirement can be met by applying an equal amount of TCs and therefore allow a project to be funded at 100% federal for federally participating costs. TCs can be used for the four-year duration of the 2019 FTIPs.

The current Caltrans policy prohibits the use of TCs for the STIP (IIP), SHOPP, and Highway Maintenance Program projects. TCs do not generate additional federal funding and are limited to the non-federal match required for the federal apportionments available in any given year.

TCs may be used for the following programs:

STIP TCs may be used only for the RIP projects Eligible federal funds (e.g. CMAQ, RSTP) HBP – Off TCs are to be used for the “Off federal aid system” projects HBP System Projects HBP – On TCs can be used for the “On federal aid system” projects using Eligible System projects other eligible federal funds. federal funds (e.g. CMAQ, RSTP)

HSIP TCs can be used for projects from the local HSIP using Eligible other eligible federal funds, except for certain federal funds (e.g. CMAQ, countermeasures eligible to use HSIP funds (**See Local RSTP) Assistance Procedures Manual for more information) *CMAQ and Projects may be programmed with TCs at MPO’s discretion CMAQ,RSTP RSTP FTA – Funded Projects funded from the formula programs are eligible to Various Projects receive TCs. Below are the eligible programs  5307 including CMAQ and RSTP FTA transfer projects  5309  5310  5311 including CMAQ and RSTP FTA transfer projects  5316  5317  5337  5339

* Notate in the FTIP the “Use of TCs” in the project description for CMAQ and RSTP-funded projects. TCs shall not be used if the non-federal matching requirement has already been met with other non-federal funds ** http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/lam/LAPM/ch03.pdf

6 | P a g A J B e

VIII. 2018 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)

The total project cost and all funding, including non-STIP funding, must be shown in the FTIP. (If a phase is programmed outside of the 2019 FSTIP period, then the total project cost can be shown in the MPO comment section or in the project description field in CTIPS). When a STIP project is transferred from the STIP into the FTIP in CTIPS though the “CTIPS Transfer Mechanism,” right of way support and construction support costs are added to the corresponding capital costs.

MPOs may choose one of the following options for programming STIP projects: a) Recommended Option: Use the California Transportation Commission (CTC) adopted 2018 STIP. b) Use CTC staff recommendations. c) Use the county and interregional shares information from the Revised 2018 STIP Fund Estimate (FE). http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/ctcliaison/misc_OCTCL_Info/FINAL_2018_STI P_FE.pdf For the first three years of the 2019 FTIP, program only existing projects from the 2016 STIP that are re-programmed in the 2018 STIP. Program new STIP projects, if any, in the fourth year of the 2019 FTIP. The total programmed STIP funding in 2019 FTIP must be constrained to the available STIP targets for the region per FE. d) Program only existing projects from the 2016 STIP that are to be re-programmed in the 2018 STIP.

Options b, c, and d, require the MPO to process an amendment to align the FTIP with the 2018 STIP once the CTC adopts the 2018 STIP. The FTIP amendment must be submitted to Caltrans by October 1, 2018.

Timeline:  February 28, 2018 – CTC staff recommendations for the 2016 STIP projects are expected to be released.  March 22, 2018 – CTC adoption of the 2018 STIP.  Mid-April 2018 – The 2018 STIP will be available in CTIPS for transfer into the FTIPs.

7 | P a g A J B e Ensure projects are programmed using the appropriate “STIP Advance Construction - RIP/IIP” fund type. Any non-STIP project funding (e.g. Road Repair and Accountability Act Funding, Proposition 1B, local funds) must be programmed consistent with the STIP funding details in CTIPS.

8 | P a g A J B e IX. 2018 State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP)

For non-attainment areas, projects that are not exempt from air quality conformity determination must be listed individually in the FTIP. For attainment areas, projects that are not classified as Categorical Exclusion (CE) must be listed individually in the FTIP.  Program all projects with “SHOPP Advance Construction (AC)” fund type.  Verify in the financial summary that the total revenue is equal to the total programmed.

MPOs are responsible for determining if a project can be classified as non-exempt or CE. Contact the District FTIP Coordinator if more information, such as a detailed project scope, is needed to make that determination.

Timeline:  January 31, 2018 – Caltrans to submit proposed 2018 SHOPP to the CTC.  April 1, 2018 – CTC adoption of the 2018 SHOPP.  July 1, 2018 – The 2018 SHOPP will be available in CTIPS for transfer into the FTIPs.  After July 1, 2018 – Caltrans Programming will provide the SHOPP Grouped Project Reports.

9 | P a g A J B e X. Various State and Federal Programs

Programming information for various federal-aid programs is posted here: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/federal/var_fed_state_prog.htm

XI. California Transportation Improvement System (CTIPS)

Draft FTIP Module - User’s Guide is available here: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/federal/fedfiles/res_publications/draft-ftip- users032612.pdf

10 | P a g A J B e Appendix P

Response to Comments

2019 FTIP Response to Comments

Letter 1: Mr. Martin Harris – Terra Land Group, LLC

Comment 1: On March 28, 2018, TLG submitted a public comment letter to the San Joaquin Council of Governments (“SJCOG” in response to the March 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Report. At this time, TLG is in receipt of the 2019 Draft San Joaquin Council of Governments Federal Transportation Improvement Program (“2019 FTIP”).

With this in mind, TLG believes that the public comments presented in our March 28, 2018 letter to SJCOG are applicable and directly apply to the 2019 FTIP. For this reason, TLG presents the March 28, 2018 letter to SJCOG to be included with the public comments received in conjunction with the 2019 FTIP.

Response: Comment noted. The 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) is a four-year transportation spending plan for the region that lists every transportation project that will receive federal funds. As the comment letter dated March 28, 2018 does not comment on the contents or adequacy of the 2019 FTIP document, SJCOG has responded to this comment letter in the response to comments in the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report for 2018 RTP/SCS document.

Letter 2: Caltrans – Office of Federal Transportation Management Program

Comment 1: Please run the MPO Summary Report in CTIPS to reconcile all financial numbers prior to submitting the final financial tables to Caltrans. Any discrepancies will delay the approval of your 2019 FTIP.

Response: Comment noted, SJCOG has reconciled all 2019 FTIP financial tables.

Comment 2: Because SJCOG’s Draft FTIP was submitted to us prior to the release of the SHOPP, STIP, and other state managed programs, please prepare an Amendment 1 to align the STIP, SHOPP, and other state managed program projects into the 2019 FTIP.

Response: Comment noted. SJCOG has included the relevant state managed programs into the Final 2019 FTIP, including the 2018 STIP and 2018 SHOPP.

Comment 3: Please update the CMAQ revenues. See the link provided for the dollar amount: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/federal/cmaq/cmaq-4yr-revised_032818.pdf

Response: The Final 2019 FTIP updates the CMAQ revenues based upon the Revised 4- Year CMAQ Estimates released by Caltrans on 5/22/2018. As a result, to keep the FTIP fiscally constrained three projects have had programming changed. Projects 212-0000-0644 and 212-0000-0699 have had their funding for the CON Phase shifted from Fiscal Year 2018/19 to 2020/21. Project 212-0000- 0608 consolidates all CMAQ funding in Fiscal Year 2020/21.

Comment 4: Correct the programming of your STIP projects. The Fund Type should be “STIP AC” not “NHS” or “STP” for RIP and IIP. (e.g. project 112-0000-0348)

Response: SJCOG has made the relevant changes in the Final 2019 FTIP.

Comment 5: Include the RTP page number/reference for projects that are missing this information. You may notate this information in the “Project Title, Description” or “MPO Comment filed.”

Response: SJCOG has made the relevant changes in the Final 2019 FTIP.

Comment 6: 212-0000-0684; 212-0000-0685; 212-0000-0668: No funding programming. What is the purpose of this entry (for information only)?

Response: These listings are included for information purposes. No funding is currently identified for these grouped listings in the four-year period of the FTIP. However, it is anticipated that funding will be subsequently be identified through future FTIP amendments. Inclusion of the listings in the FTIP also preserve past project programming history in the CTIPS system.

Comment 7: 212-0000-0638: The Clean Diesel Sewer Truck project does not appear CMAQ eligible as these vehicles perform a maintenance role/function.

Response: After consultation with the project sponsor, the scope of this listing has been changed to purchase of a replacement street sweeper, which is an eligible project for CMAQ.

Comment 8: 212-0000-0707: This project appears ineligible for CMAQ funding. Please see FHWA’s 2013 CMAQ Guidance, Page 13, item No 7. “Models and Monitors—Acquisition, operation, or development of models or monitoring networks are not eligible for CMAQ funds. As modeling or monitoring emissions, traffic operations, travel demand or other related variables do not directly lead to an emissions reduction, these activities or acquisitions are not eligible. Such efforts may be appropriate for Federal planning funds.”

Response: 23. USC § 149 defines eligible CMAQ projects, including the following:

“(4) to establish or operate a traffic monitoring, management, and control facility or program, including advanced truck stop electrification systems, if the Secretary, after consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, determines that the facility or program is likely to contribute to the attainment or maintenance in the area of a national ambient air quality standard;”

…

“(5) if the program or project improves traffic flow, including projects to improve signalization, construct high occupancy vehicle lanes, improve intersections, add turning lanes, improve transportation systems management and operations that mitigate congestion and improve air quality, and implement intelligent transportation system strategies and such other projects that are eligible for assistance under this section on the day before the date of enactment of this paragraph, including programs or projects to improve incident and emergency response or improve mobility, such as through real- time traffic, transit, and multimodal traveler information”

…

“(9) if the project or program is for the installation of vehicle-to-infrastructure communication equipment.”

SJCOG’s position is that this project is eligible for CMAQ funding and it is a cost effective use of federal resources that will help contribute to the attainment of national ambient air quality standards and reduce congestion.

Comment 9: The EPSP document must specify each type of program that has been agreed to by various parties in the project selection process. Programs not specified are ineligible for the EPSP process. Whenever changes occur to programs specified in the EPSP, such as the addition of new programs, or when a new FSTIP cycle begins, a new EPSP must be prepared. We recommend the MPO to update this document to ensure new programs are added every FSTIP update cycle.

Response: SJCOG has made the relevant changes in the Final 2019 FTIP.

Comment 10: Will SJCOG’s board resolution include language to address the performance based planning requirements

Response: The SJCOG board resolution will include language to address the MAP-21 performance based planning requirements.

Letter 1: Mr. Martin Harris – Terra Land Group, LLC

T E R R A L A N D G R O U P , L L C ______

April 5, 2018

VIA EMAIL

San Joaquin County Council of Governments Attn: Kim Anderson 555 East Weber Avenue Stockton, CA 95202 ([email protected])

Re: 2019 Draft San Joaquin Council of Governments Federal Transportation Improvement Program: Public Comments.

Dear Project Team,

My name is Martin Harris and I am an authorized representative for Terra Land Group, LLC (”TLG”). TLG owns several properties located in the Lower San Joaquin River Basin that may benefit or be adversely affected as a result of various local, state, or federal government flood protection improvement actions currently being considered for future implementation.

On March 28, 2018, TLG submitted a public comment letter to the San Joaquin Council of Governments (“SJCOG”) in response to the March 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Report. At this time, TLG is in receipt of the 2019 Draft San Joaquin Council of Governments Federal Transportation Improvement Program (“2019 FTIP”).

Thank you for your attention to very this important matter.

Respectfully,

Martin Harris for Terra Land Group, LLC

MH/cm

Enclosure: ______

5 1 5 1 E. A L M O N D W O O D D R I V E M A N T E C A, C A 95337

Pg. 1 of 2

T E R R A L A N D G R O U P , L L C ______

1. March 28, 2018, TLG letter to the San Joaquin Council of Governments.

______

5 1 5 1 E. A L M O N D W O O D D R I V E M A N T E C A, C A 95337

Pg. 2 of 2

T E R R A L A N D G R O U P , L L C ______

March 28, 2018

VIA EMAIL

San Joaquin County Council of Governments Attn: Kim Anderson 555 East Weber Avenue Stockton, CA 95202 ([email protected])

Re: March 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Report: Public Comments (LETTER #1).

Dear Project Team,

At this time, TLG is in receipt of the March 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (“RTP/SCS”). TLG presents the following responses to the RTP/SCS with the hope that the public concerns detailed in this letter will be carefully considered by the San Joaquin Council of Governments (“SJCOG”) Board Members and staff prior to making any decision affecting flood protection drainage in and along the Lower San Joaquin River Basin and especially the areas affecting the urban and rural areas of Manteca and Lathrop.

As recent flooding in Houston, Texas has demonstrated, unrestrained development without consideration for flood impacts can have serious consequences. In particular, as more and more development projects continue to move forward, TLG has put forth a regular effort to ensure that local authorities are aware of the need for cumulative environmental review and analysis of all hydrology-related impacts associated with all currently existing and foreseeable development projects affecting drainage in and along the Lower San Joaquin River Basin, especially the areas affecting the urban and rural areas of Manteca and Lathrop.

For some time now, TLG has sent various copies of our letters to SJCOG and other authorities expressing public concern related to development in the floodplain and the need to examine any potential impacts related to San Joaquin River (and tributary) flow deficiencies and the potential for upstream and downstream channel flow stage increases due to drainage patterns affected by grade, levee location, and other environmental considerations. (See public concerns presented in Enclosure 1 which also contains a list of letters and related items in its own Enclosure 1. This list contains information that TLG believes is

______

5 1 5 1 E. A L M O N D W O O D D R I V E M A N T E C A, C A 95337

Pg. 1 of 5

T E R R A L A N D G R O U P , L L C ______

important to consider in the decision making process. In particular, TLG believes letter items 9, 10, 21, 22, 25, and 28 directly apply to this project. Also See Enclosure 2: List of Environmental Impact Reports and Feasibility Studies Reviewed by TLG in preparation of this letter. Finally, also See Enclosure 3: March 5, 2018 letter from TLG to the San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission “LAFCo”)

Through careful study, the letters included in Enclosure 1 can offer significant details relating to what appears to be very significant drainage impacts affecting the Lower San Joaquin River Drainage system and in particular the study area as described to include the areas detailed below. (The following quotes are taken from the January 2018 Lower San Joaquin River Project Interim Report San Joaquin County, California Final Integrated Interim Feasibility Report/Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (“LSJRFS”).)

1. Page ES-1 of the LSJRFS states: The study area also includes the distributary channels of the San Joaquin River in the southernmost reaches of the Delta; Paradise Cut and Old River as far north as Tracy Boulevard, and Middle River as far north as Victoria Canal. 2. Page 3-31 of the LSJRFS states: Currently, the levee safety program has defined the levee system that incorporates RD 17 as bounded on the north by Walker Slough, west by the San Joaquin River and south by the Stanislaus River. This includes RD 17, RD 2096, RD 2094, RD 2075, and RD 2064.

3. Page 5-17 of the LSJRFS states: Stanislaus River to Paradise Cut. The confluence of the San Joaquin and Stanislaus Rivers defines the upstream extent of the hydraulic model used for this study.

4. Page ES-2 of the LSJRFS states: Analysis of the study area is challenged by the presence of three sources of flooding, The Delta Front, Calaveras River and San Joaquin River. This results in commingled floodplains for the North and Central Stockton areas. The distributary nature of the Delta also affects Delta water levels, because high river flows from the Sacramento River may “fill” the Delta prior to a peak inflow on the San Joaquin River as occurred in 1997, raising water levels on the Delta front levees.

5. Page 5-27 of the LSJRFS states: 2.1.1 FLOODING Problem: There is significant risk to public health, safety, and property in the study area associated with flooding. The study area is located in the Central Valley of California which has very little topographic relief, resulting in potential flooding of areas far from water courses…

I. 2018 RTP/SCS Transportation Projects that may affect drainage along the South Delta Front-Lower San Joaquin River Basin.

See Enclosure 4 for Tables 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, and 6-6 of Appendix B as taken from the RTP/SCS. This is supported by 100-year flood zone mapping described on Page 264 of the RTP/SCS.

II. Hydrology/Impacts and Associated Mitigation Measures to Consider

______

5 1 5 1 E. A L M O N D W O O D D R I V E M A N T E C A, C A 95337

Pg. 2 of 5

T E R R A L A N D G R O U P , L L C ______

Page 279 of the RTP/SCS states: A portion of the transportation projects included in the proposed 2018 RTP/SCS could occur within the 100-year flood hazard area, thus increasing the potential to obstruct or exacerbate floodwaters. The construction of projects involving support structures in the floodway could obstruct floodwaters at some locations. Placement of structures within a floodplain can displace floodwaters and alter the base flood elevations in the surrounding areas. Structures can form a backwater effect, resulting in an increase in the flood elevation level upstream and in neighboring areas. Likewise, floodwater can cause scour effects, resulting in erosion and sedimentation problems downstream from structures. Drainage areas could be altered by highway corridors, in which floodwaters could be detained by medians and along the roadside. Proposed bridge supports could block debris in waterways, creating obstructions and further elevating upstream flood levels. The Plan could alter existing drainage patterns or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding or produce or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems.

In addition, Page 279 of the RTP/SCS further details how placement of new structures within the existing floodplain can impede flood waters, altering the flood risks both upstream and downstream. Further, Page 280 of the RTP/SCS offers flood mitigation measures W-3(a), W-3(b), and W-3(c). These describe the potential for significant and unavoidable impacts that may not be foreseeable when considering all project circumstances that may or are likely to occur. (See Enclosure 5)

COMMENT: With that in mind, TLG calls your attention to recently presented information in the form of TLG’s public review and comments submitted in response to the recently released January 2018 San Joaquin RIver Basin Lower San Joaquin River, CA FINAL Integrated Interim Feasibility Report/Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (“LSJRFS”). (See Enclosure 1 and associated letters included in its own Enclosure 1)

Further, TLG believes that it is important to mention that the LSJRFS may not fully consider the potential for any and all flood and other hydrology related impacts involved due to RD 17’s plan to pursue a phased strategy of levee improvements and other Federally assisted improvements in order to meet SB 5 requirements. (See page 3-40 of the LSJRFS).

This is especially important when you consider that Page 3-42 of the LSJRFS states:

The identification of Alternative 7a as the NED Plan serves to set the level of Federal participation in the project. Alternative 7a may not fully meet the NFS objective of SB 5 compliance, but in order to expedite authorization, the NFS elected not to pursue a Locally Preferred Plan (LPP) at this time.

QUESTION: What non-federal sponsor elected not to pursue a Locally Prefered Plan at this time? Is it in the public’s best interest to allow a non-federal sponsor to pursue any flood risk management plan that places emphasis on expediting the process over taking the time to consider and mitigate against the

______

5 1 5 1 E. A L M O N D W O O D D R I V E M A N T E C A, C A 95337

Pg. 3 of 5

T E R R A L A N D G R O U P , L L C ______potential for very significant drainage impacts affecting the developing and non-developing urban and rural areas of Manteca and Lathrop?

Most concerning is TLG’s belief that it is the intent of local authorities to assign a project sponsor to seek Section 408 approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers allowing expansion and/or relocation of the RD 17 dry land cross levee system to a location south of the point that Paradise Cut and the San Joaquin River converge. (See Enclosure 1)

It is in this way that TLG believes the City of Manteca intends to move forward with plans to gain the approvals necessary to construct critical but currently unidentified public services infrastructure supporting: (i) Storm water drainage, (ii) Treated and untreated wastewater spray field discharge, (iii) Groundwater sustainability through percolation and recharges, and (iv) Traffic circulation as necessary to accommodate the rapid pace of development affecting both the urban and rural developing and non-developing areas of our community.

Why is this important? Due to widely-recognized San Joaquin River drainage channel (and associated tributary) flow deficiencies both upstream and downstream of the point that the San Joaquin River and Paradise Cut converge, TLG believes that any number of RTP/SCS transportation infrastructure projects involving support structures in the floodway could obstruct floodwaters and increase flood elevation levels upstream and in neighboring areas. (See Enclosure 1)

Most important, TLG believes that the proposed mitigation measures associated with RTP/SCS transportation infrastructure projects may be inadequate in relation to the potential for what appears to be very significant flood impacts affecting the rural areas south of Manteca. (See Enclosure 5)

For this reason, TLG believes that more needs to be done to properly identify and mitigate any and all flood and other hydrology related impacts created in support of reducing any increased impacts to less than significant levels.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Respectfully,

Martin Harris for Terra Land Group, LLC

MH/cm

______

5 1 5 1 E. A L M O N D W O O D D R I V E M A N T E C A, C A 95337

Pg. 4 of 5

T E R R A L A N D G R O U P , L L C ______

Enclosures: 1. February 26, 2018 letter from TLG to San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency. Please access this Enclosure by downloading the file through this Dropbox link: (https://www.dropbox.com/s/8scnhemfwexbkr9/2018-02-26_LTR_SJAFCA_LSJR%20EIR_PublicCo mm_wEncl.pdf?dl=0) 2. List of Environmental Impact Reports and Feasibility Studies Reviewed by TLG 3. March 5, 2018 letter from TLG to the San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission. Please access this Enclosure by downloading the file through this Dropbox link: (https://www.dropbox.com/s/vrxhht508075ro8/2018-03-05_LTR_LAFCo_AgIt3.pdf?dl=0) 4. Tables 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, and 6-6 of Appendix B as taken from the March 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Report 5. Pages 279-280 as taken from the March 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Report cc: Central Valley Flood Protection Board, Attn: Leslie Gallagher, Executive Officer ([email protected]) San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency, Attn: Marlo Duncan, Project Manager ([email protected])

______

5 1 5 1 E. A L M O N D W O O D D R I V E M A N T E C A, C A 95337

Pg. 5 of 5

ENCLOSURE 2

List of Environmental Impact Reports and other Environmental and Technical Documents Reviewed by Terra Land Group

● “Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Report;” San Joaquin Council of Governments, March 2018. ● “Draft Regional Transportation Plan Sustainable Communities Strategy;” San Joaquin Council of Governments (“SJCOG”), 2018. ● “San Joaquin River Basin Lower San Joaquin River, CA FINAL Integrated Interim Feasibility Report/Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report;” San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency (“SJAFCA”), Central Valley Flood Protection Board (“CVFPB”), US Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”), January 2018. ● “DRAFT Municipal Service Review Selected San Joaquin County Reclamation Districts;” San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission, December 20, 2017. ● “SSJID and City of Manteca Request for Proposal for Master Plan Study for the French Camp Outlet Canal;” South San Joaquin Irrigation District, City of Manteca, November 2017. ● “DRAFT Technical Memorandum Central Valley Flood Protection Plan Investment Strategy;” California Department of Water Resources (“DWR”), August 2017. ● “Central Valley Flood Protection Plan 2017 Update [Final];” DWR, August 2017. ● “Draft EIR for the Oakwood Landing-Cerri & Denali Subdivisions;” DeNovo Planning Group, July 2017. ● “Draft Environmental Impact Report San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission ACEforward;” ICF, May 2017. ● “San Joaquin River Basin-Wide Feasibility Study;” DWR, March 2017. ● “Flood System Long-Term Operations, Maintenance, Repair, Rehabilitation, and Replacement Cost Evaluation: Draft Technical Memorandum;” DWR, January 2017. ● “Central Valley Flood Protection Plan 2017 Update Draft;” DWR, December 2016. ● “Bay Delta Conservation Plan/California WaterFix Final EIR/EIS;” DWR, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, December 2016. ● “CVFPP Supplemental Program Environmental Impact Report;” DWR, December 2016. ● “Recirculated Draft: Substitute Environmental Document in Support of Potential Changes to the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay-Sacramento San Joaquin Delta Estuary; San Joaquin River Flows and Southern Delta Water Quality;” California State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency, September 2016. ● “2017 CVFPP Update Scoping Report;” DWR, July 2016. ● “San Joaquin River Basin Lower San Joaquin River, CA Draft Integrated Interim Feasibility Report/EIS/EIR;” USACE, SJAFCA, February 2015. ● “Final EIR Phase 3-RD 17 Levee Seepage Repair Project Administrative Draft;” Reclamation District No. 17, March 2015. ● “Lower San Joaquin River and Delta South Regional Flood Management Plan;” SJAFCA, November 2014. ● “Draft: Lower San Joaquin River and Delta South Regional Flood Management Plan;” SJAFCA, January 2014. ● “Environmental Impact Statement: River Islands at Lathrop, Phase 2B;” USACE, October 2014.

● “2012 Central Valley Flood Protection Plan (“CVFPP”);” DWR, June 2012. ● “Regional Mercury Load Reduction Evaluation Central Valley, California;” US Environmental Protection Agency Region 9, CA Regional Water Quality Control Board: Central Valley Region, August 2008. ● “Investing in California's Flood Future: An Outcome-Driven Approach to Flood Management;” Presentation at the Floodplain Management Association Conference, DWR, September 2016. ● “Storms and Flooding in California in December 2005 and January 2006--a Preliminary Assessment;” US Geological Survey, 2006. ● “French Camp Outlet Canal-Hydraulic Capacity Analysis Final Report;” CH2M Hill, February 2002 ENCLOSURE 4

Appendix B 2018 RTP/SCS Transportation Project List Table 6-1: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Mainline Highway Improvements Category

t n te c u g D io o je I at s l ro O /R min P m e er ar va ffic l P r iv e am o t Y r ra M # fo on am el e g pr wa ec rs P In ti N D p T e oj T ID t ic y o on ro A to n r fie R S c d it t t P e P ti 8 O je l A n IP N ris cil st ta les IP P en R IF e 01 T P ro u a o o i T E p K T Id 2 C P P J F Project Description Project Limits C T M F N O M R Construct a second lane on the SR 99 NB Off-ramp/SR-120 WB On- Ramp and on the SR-120 EB off- ramp/SR-99 SB On-Ramp. Reconstruct Austin Road Overcrossing. Widen SR-120 from 4 lanes to 6 between Main Street and SR 99/120 SR-99. Construct auxiliary lanes on On SR-120 from Main Street (P.M. 5.13) to SR- Operational SR-99 between SR-120 and Olive 99 and on SR-99 from SR-120 to Olive Avenue SJ14-1004 212-0000-0665 Caltrans Improvements Avenue. (P.M. 6.22) $76,711,000 2015 2018 2023 X Widen from 6 to 8 lanes SJ07-1003 Caltrans I-205 HOV (inside/outside) Alameda County Line to Eleventh Street $95,874,000 2020 2026 X Widen from 6 to 8 lanes SJ14-1001 Caltrans I-205 HOV (inside/outside) Eleventh Street to MacArthur Drive $102,000,000 2020 2026 X X Widen from 6 to 8 lanes SJ14-1002 Caltrans I-205 HOV (inside/outside) MacArthur Drive to I-5 $100,000,000 2020 2026 X Widen to add HOV lanes with HOV Connector Ramps to I-205 and SR- SJ07-1008 Caltrans I-5 HOV Mossdale 120 I-205 to Louise Avenue (P.M. 12.5/R 16.5) $207,970,000 2022 2028 X X SJ07-1014 Caltrans SR-120 Widen 4 to 6 lanes (inside) I-5 to Main Street (P.M. 5.13) $95,191,000 2024 2030 X

ject ID ion o at /Route c r e val i P rm ears o fo Y r n e p I Nam n TP MPO ID # rogramming fiers R ct y to P to Traff ti e lit s n n 018 TIPS PNO roj urisdiction aci ost to Deliver otal ile TIP EPA Ap pe K RenewalTIF Project Ide 2 C P P J F Project Description Project Limits C T M F N O M R Reconstruct interchange (PM 16.4- SJ07-2005 Lathrop I-5 at Louise Avenue 16.8) I-5 at Louise Avenue $28,754,000 2024 2030 X Reconstruct interchange (P.M. SJ07-2004 Lathrop I-5 at Lathrop Road 17.3/17.8) I-5 at Lathrop Road $39,146,000 2029 2033 X Relocation of intersection at Roth/Harlan Road inclusive of signalization; relocation of intersection at Roth/Manthey Road inclusive of signalization. Widen from 2 to 5 lanes from Roth/Harlan road intersection to Roth/Manthey SJ11-3066 Lathrop I-5 at Roth Road Road Intersection I-5 at Roth Road $16,800,000 2020 SR 120 at Yosemite Reconstruct interchange - SR 120 at Yosemite Ave/Guthmiller SJ14-2004 Lathrop Ave/Guthmiller Road ENVIRONMENTAL ONLY Road $3,000,000 SR-99 at SR-12 West Reconstruct interchange and widen SR-99 at SR-12 West (Kettleman SJ11-2015 Lodi (Kettleman Lane) to free flowing interchange Lane) $50,000,000 2030 2036 X Reconstruct interchange to provide 6 through lanes on SR 99, 4 lanes on Harney between Reynolds Ranch Pkwy and SR 99 and modify on- SJ07-2006 Lodi SR-99 at Harney Lane ramps and off-ramps SR-99 at Harney Lane $35,362,000 2009 2028 2033 X Reconstruct interchange to provide operational and safety improvements on SR 99 at Turner SJ07-1020 112-0000-0347 Lodi SR-99 at Turner Road Road (PM 31.3/31.6) SR-99 at Turner Road $6,142,986 2019 2036 2041 X Reconstruct interchange (P.M. SJ07-2012 Manteca SR-120 at Union Road 4.1/4.1) SR-120 at Union Road $22,000,000 2021 X SJ07-2009 212-0000-0231 Manteca SR-120 at McKinley Ave Construct new interchange SR-120 at McKinley Avenue $37,850,000 2009 2014 2022 X X SJ18-2001 Manteca SR-120 at Airport Way Reconstruct interchange SR-120 at Airport Way $36,828,000 2029 2031 X SJ18-2002 Manteca SR-120 at Main Street Reconstruct interchange SR-120 at Main Street $36,828,000 2031 2033 X SR-99 at Raymus Construction of new interchange - SJ14-2001 Manteca Expressway ENVIRONMENTAL ONLY SR-99 at Raymus Expressway $3,000,000 XX Interchange Modification and SJ11-2004 212-0000-0309 Stockton I-5 at Hammer Lane auxiliary lanes (PM 32.6) I-5 at Hammer Lane $47,164,647 2007 2009 2036 Construction of a new interchange SJ11-2006 212-0000-0309 Stockton I-5 at Otto Drive and auxiliary lanes (PM 33.3/34.2) I-5 at Otto Drive $103,371,218 2007 2009 2036 Modification of interchange (P.M. SJ07-2020 212-0000-0309 Stockton I-5 at Eight Mile Road 34.7/35.9) I-5 at Eight Mile Road $57,255,179 2007 2009 2036 Reconstruct Interchange (PM 35.1- SJ11-2002 212-0000-0562 Stockton SR-99 at Eight Mile Road 35.5) SR-99 at Eight Mile Road $93,070,215 2030 2036 X Reconstruct interchange (PM 23.5- SJ11-2001 212-0000-0561 Stockton SR-99 at Morada 24.5) SR-99 at Morada $96,474,024 2030 2036 Construct Interchange I-205 at Construct Interchange I-205 at Eleventh street realign and widen Eleventh street realign and widen Eleventh Street to 6-lanes north of Eleventh Street to 6-lanes north of Grant Line to Byron Road. Grant Line to Byron Road. Construct Construct Aux lane Hansen to Aux lane Hansen to Eleventh; in WB I- I-205/Lammers Eleventh; in WB I-205 Eleventh 205 Eleventh Street to Grant Line SJ11-2010 212-0000-0227 Tracy Rd/Eleventh St Street to Grant Line Road Road $51,500,000 2007 2012 2022 X I-580 at International Pkwy/Patterson Pass SJ14-2002 Tracy Road Reconstruct interchange I-580 at Mountain House Parkway $9,000,000 2015 2018 2021 X I-205 at Mountain SJ14-2003 Tracy House/International Pkwy Reconstruct interchange I-205 at Mountain House Parkway $4,000,000 2015 2018 2021 X X

I-205 / MacArthur Modification of existing interchange - SJ18-2003 Tracy Interchange modification ENVIRONMENTAL ONLY At MacArthur (PM 7.8 -PM 8.5) $9,670,000

tion a PO ID ffic M n ject rogramming P IPS ID # st to Deliver PA Approval IF Pro T o E T Identifiers 2018 RTP C PPNO Project Inform Jurisdictio Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits C Total Milestone YearsFTIP N Open to Tra MK RenewalR Project Widen and reconstruct to include center turn lane, bike lane, and graded SJ07-3010 Escalon McHenry Avenue shoulders. Narcissus to Jones Road $400,000 2017 2018 2020 Reconstruct intersection, including addition of turn pockets, improvement of traffic signal and installation of train Intersection of Ullrey Avenue and Ullrey Avenue/McHenry pre-emption system for UPRR railroad McHenry Avenue including UPRR SJ07-3013 Escalon Avenue Intersection crossing. railroad crossing. $1,000,000 2022 2024 X SR 120/Brennan Ave SJ07-3011 212-0000-0228 Escalon Intersection Intersection improvements SR-120 at Brennan Avenue $446,066 2020 2026 Construct new roadway parallel to I-5, 2 lanes from Brookhurst Blvd to Stewart Along Northwest side of I-5 from SJ07-3014 Lathrop Golden Valley Parkway Road Brookhurst Blvd to Stewart Road $7,500,000 2018 2023 Construct new roadway parallel to I-5, 4 lanes from Stewart Road to Paradise Along Northwest side of I-5 from Stewart SJ14-3001 Lathrop Golden Valley Parkway Road Road to Paradise Road $45,000,000 2018 2026 Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, from Along Northwest side of I-5 from SJ07-3014 Lathrop Golden Valley Parkway Brookhurst Blvd to Stewart Road Brookhurst Blvd to Stewart Road $7,500,000 2018 2027 Widen from 2/3 lane collector to 4 lane Hutchins Street to Lower Sacramento SJ07-3018 Lodi Harney Lane divided arterial Road $18,390,688 2009 2016 2026 X Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. Add center dual left turn lane, turn pockets at intersections and median seperation Between SR 99 to Central California SJ07-3022 Lodi Victor Road (SR-12) with landscape Traction railroad tracks. $9,013,203 2030 2034 X SJ07-3017 Lodi Ham Lane Widen 2/3 lanes to 4 lanes From Lodi Avenue to Elm Street $2,784,072 2037 X Construct new 4 lane roadway (gap SJ11-3010 Manteca Atherton Drive closure) East of Airport Way to Union Road $2,481,200 2010 SJ07-3023 Manteca Airport Way Widen from 2 to 4 lanes SR-120 to Yosemite Ave. $9,039,644 2010 2022 SJ11-3008 Manteca Airport Way Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Lathrop Road to Roth Road $6,563,978 2012 2022 X SJ07-3027 Manteca Louise Avenue Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Main Street to SR-99 $1,522,000 2022 2023 X SJ11-3011 Manteca Atherton Drive Construct new 4 lane roadway McKinley Ave to West of Airport Way $1,095,144 2012 2023 SJ07-3024 Manteca Lathrop Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes From East of UPRR to SR-99 $3,079,636 2016 2024 SJ11-3014 Manteca Raymus Expressway Construct new 4-lane expressway Main Street to SR-99 $9,343,608 2017 2026 X SJ14-3003 Manteca Airport Way Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Yosemite Ave. to Lathrop Road $6,327,751 2010 2027 SJ11-3013 Manteca Raymus Expressway Construct new 2 lane expressway SR-120 to Woodward Ave $2,801,188 2017 2028 X SJ11-3012 Manteca Atherton Drive Construct new 4 lane roadway Woodward Ave to McKinley Ave $4,321,170 2019 2029 SJ11-3015 Manteca Raymus Expressway Construct new 2 lane expressway Woodward Ave to Main Street $11,115,162 2019 2031 X SJ14-3004 Manteca Airport Way Widen from 4 to 6 lanes SR 120 to Lathrop Road $12,351,768 2010 2036 SJ18-3003 Port of Stockton Washington Street Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Navy Drive to Port Rd 21 $6,000,000 2017 2021 SJ11-3020 Ripon River Road, Phase 2 Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Fulton Avenue to Jack Tone Road $2,500,000 2017 2019 SJ11-3017 Ripon Jack Tone Road, Phase 1 Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Santos Road to South Clinton Avenue $9,500,000 2013 2020 Construct 2-lane extension of Garrison Maple Avenue to 500 ft east of Acacia SJ11-3019 Ripon Garrison Road Gap Closure Road. Avenue $3,000,000 2014 2021 Rehabilitate and widen roadway from 2 SJ11-3016 212-0000-0586 Ripon Stockton Avenue to 4 lanes Second Street to Doak Boulevard $3,300,000 2017 2021 X SJ07-3137 Ripon W. Ripon Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Jack Tone Road to Olive Expressway $10,000,000 2020 2024 Construct 4-lane extension of Canal SJ14-3006 Ripon Canal Boulevard Extension Boulevard Jack Tone Road to Olive Expressway $4,600,000 2013 2026 X Construct 6-lane Olive Expressway - SJ07-3137 Ripon Olive Expressway ENVIRONMENTAL ONLY Canal Boulevard to Raymus Expressway $3,000,000 X San Joaquin Widen from 2 to 3 lanes, add drainage, SJ11-3023 County Pershing Avenue curb, gutter, sidewalk Meadow Avenue to Thorton Road $3,754,775 2009 2019 X San Joaquin Widen from 2 to 3 lanes, add paved SJ11-3028 County Cherokee Road shoulders SR-99 to Ashley Road $3,816,000 2016 2020 San Joaquin SJ11-3029 County Howard Road Passing lanes and channelization Tracy Blvd to Matthews Road $15,000,000 2021 2023 Realign roadway and widen from 2 to 4 San Joaquin Grant Line Road Corridor lanes with operational and safety SJ14-3005 County Improvements improvements Tracy City Limits to 11th Street $27,459,000 2023 X San Joaquin SJ11-3031 County Tracy Boulevard Passing lanes and channelization I-205 to Howard Road $5,000,000 2023 2025 San Joaquin Operational and safety improvements SJ11-3027 County Eleventh Street along corridor and at intersections Tracy City Limits to I-5 $15,439,000 2023 2028 X X San Joaquin SJ07-3154 County Roth Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes with shoulders) UPRR to Airport Way $4,678,947 2028 San Joaquin SJ11-3008 County Airport Way Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Roth Road to French Camp Road $11,446,302 2036 X Table 6-6: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Rail Corridor Improvements Category

n g D io e I at s l t O min P m er ar va Da r iv e am o M # fo on el Y r pr on rs P In ti D e g p ti T ID t ic o on ro A le fie R S c d t t P p ti 8 O je l A n IP N ris st ta les IP P m e 01 T P ro u o o i T E o Id 2 C P P J Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits C T M F N C Construct double main track, panelized turnouts, San Joaquin County between Caltrans Caltrans Intercity Rail relocate/renew siding turnout, and realign Escalon and Stockton SJ07-6001 112-0000-0139 existing trackage. $34,012,294 Caltrans Intercity Rail Passenger In Stockton, Construct track connections and a Intersection of the BNSF and UP Caltrans SJ11-6001 112-0000-0277 Facility new intercity passenger rail facility railroads. $19,622,477 212-0000-0281/ SJRRC ACE Capital Purchase rail cars for ACE service expansion ACE Capital SJ07-6003 212-0000-0645 $9,593,211 SJRRC shared costs for the overall maintenance SJRRC ACE Capital ACE Capital SJ07-6004 212-0000-0190 of vehicles $8,245,801 2030 SJ07-6009 SJRRC ACE Capital Realignment of tracking Near Altamont Pass $9,811,239 Restoration of abandoned Western Pacific Depot Downtown Stockton, between SJRRC ACE Capital SJ07-6013 112-0000-0140 building Weber Ave and Miner Ave $7,630,963 2007 Allow SJRCC to operate on separate tracks from Between the Stockton ACE Station Stockton Track Extension Phases SJRRC Union Pacific Railroad between maintenance and the ACE Equipment II & III (ACE Gap Closure Project) SJ07-6015 212-0000-0306 yard and the station siding. Maintenance Facility $20,712,615 Enhance/extend rail to benefit residents; San Joaquin County and San SJRRC ACE Service Extensions integrate ACE with the State intercity rail service; Joaquin Valley; Sacramento, SJ07-6016 extend ACE service Modesto, and San Francisco $9,334,848 2030 Acquisition of ACE Corridor between Stockton Between Stockton and Niles SJRRC ACE Forward SJ07-6017 and Niles Junction Junction $49,056,193 Phase II Implementation Plan for SJRRC Commuter rail service Central Valley to Sacramento SJ07-6018 the Central Valley Rail Service $1,090,138 SJRRC Operations Shuttle Services in San Joaquin County stations San Joaquin County SJ07-6019 $1,224,225 2030 Maintenance Facility Expansion from 9 train sets SJRRC Capital City of Stockton SJ07-6020 to 17 train sets Phase 2 $17,000,000 2020 ACE operations and Capital Access Fee (5 trains from 2012 to 2016, 6 trains from 2017 to 2021, 7 SJRRC/Santa Clara/Alameda SJRRC ACE Operations trains from 2022 to 2029 and 8 trains from 2030 contributions shown SJ07-6021 to 2041) $556,612,929 2030 Rail Information Systems (Ticket vending machines, on-train internet, changeable message ACE Operational Corridor and SJRRC Rail Information Systems signs at stations, trip planner via internet, real Station Planning Areas time system for train status for ACE and other SJ07-6023 connecting services) $14,607,844 Central Valley Rail Service Operations and SJRRC Central Valley Rail Service Maintenance, Capital Access Fees, ROW Central Valley to Sacramento SJ07-6025 purchase) $92,661,697 Rolling Stock/Track Improvements/ Station ACE Operational Corridor and SJRRC ACE Capital SJ07-6028 Improvements Station Planning Areas $34,884,404 2030 Central Valley to Sacramento Commuter Rail SJRRC ACE Capital Central Valley to Sacramento SJ07-6029 Project - Extension of services $58,867,431 Altamont Corridor Speed and Safety upgrades (including signal upgrade to automatic train stop ACE Operational Corridor and SJRRC ACE Capital increase train speed from 79 to 90 MPH and Station Planning Areas SJ07-6035 several track realighment projects) $32,704,128 Facilities and information technology ACE Operational Corridor and SJRRC Minor Capital maintenance and enhancements, fleet vehicle Station Planning Areas SJ14-6005 replacements and expansion $9,669,521 2030 Lathrop/Manteca: MP 82.7 to MP SJRRC ACEforward: Capital Phase 1 Extension of Wyche Siding SJ14-6001 80.4, 8,500' clear of McKinley Ave $9,000,000 2022 Connection from UPRR Fresno Sub to UPRR Lathrop, Ca: Oakland Sub MP 84.25 SJRRC ACEforward: Capital Phase 1 SJ14-6002 Oakland Sub to Fresno Sub MP 94.1 $7,848,492 2018 High priority locations between SJRRC ACEforward: Capital Phase 2 Grade crossing improvements/grade seperations Stockton and San Jose. Chrisman Rd MP 72.8, McKinley Ave MP 82.1 SJ14-6003 $15,000,000 2022 Construct park and ride lot and related on-street In Stockton, between the UPRR, Robert J. Cabral Station SJRRC parking, sidewalks, lighting, security, and other Weber Avenue, Union Street, and Expansion SJ14-6006 passenger amenity improvements Main Street $1,311,000 2020 Lathrop/Manteca Station Platform Lengthen platform at current Lathrop/Manteca SJRRC Lathrop/Manteca Extension project Station to allow for eight car train capacity $1,791,000 2022 ENCLOSURE 5 Environmental Impact Analysis Hydrology and Water Quality

While the majority of growth will take place outside of flood zones, some new housing could occur within flood zones. The proposed 2018 RTP/SCS could increase the amount of housing in flood hazard areas, but state regulations, in combination with local ordinances and federal regulations, as well as ongoing improvements to flood protection infrastructure, would likely mitigate the risk associated with housing in these areas. Further, individual project sponsors are required by state and federal regulations to obtain necessary approvals for construction within designated floodplains. A portion of the transportation projects included in the proposed 2018 RTP/SCS could occur within the 100-year flood hazard area, thus increasing the potential to obstruct or exacerbate floodwaters. The construction of projects involving support structures in the floodway could obstruct floodwaters at some locations. Placement of structures within a floodplain can displace floodwaters and alter the base flood elevations in the surrounding areas. Structures can form a backwater effect, resulting in an increase in the flood elevation level upstream and in neighboring areas. Likewise, floodwater can cause scour effects, resulting in erosion and sedimentation problems downstream from structures. Drainage areas could be altered by highway corridors, in which floodwaters could be detained by medians and along the roadside. Proposed bridge supports could block debris in waterways, creating obstructions and further elevating upstream flood levels. The Plan could alter existing drainage patterns or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding or produce or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems. Storm water runoff is influenced by rainfall intensity, ground surface permeability, watershed size and shape, and physical barriers. The introduction of impermeable surfaces greatly reduces natural infiltration, allowing for a greater volume of runoff. In addition, paved surfaces and drainage conduits can accelerate the velocity of runoff, concentrating peak flows in downstream areas faster than under natural conditions. Significant increases to runoff and peak flow can overwhelm drainage systems and alter flood elevations in downstream locations. Increased runoff velocity can promote scouring of existing drainage facilities, reducing system reliability and safety. The 2018 RTP/SCS would result in increased impervious surfaces through transportation projects and development. Additional impervious surfaces increases storm water runoff volumes and peak flow rates. This increase has the potential to create or contribute runoff flows that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems. In addition, placing new structures within an existing floodplain can impede flood waters, altering the flood risks both upstream and downstream. In areas of San Joaquin County where soils have naturally low permeability and are subject to quick saturation, high rain volumes remain on the surface as runoff, and can cause flash flooding. When impervious surfaces such as highways are placed within these areas of an existing flood plain the public is exposed to the hazards of flash flooding. The highway and arterial projects proposed in the 2018 RTP/SCS generally include widening existing highways, constructing new interchanges, new highway segments, and new rail lines. Some of the proposed transit projects would involve construction of new rail lines, new stations, and upgrades to existing stations, and are not included in the calculation of approximately 256 new lane miles. Placing new structures within an existing floodplain can impede flood waters, altering the flood risks both upstream and downstream. The flooding risks associated with projects located in flood zones can be modified with appropriate design and alignment considerations. The amount of new urbanized acreage (consuming previously vacant land) would be on the order of 18,123 acres. The

Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Report 279 San Joaquin Council of Governments 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy additional urbanized acreage expected by 2042 could increase stormwater runoff and therefore require mitigation. The impacts associated with land use changes and transportation projects from the implementation of the proposed 2018 RTP/SCS are considered potentially significant but mitigable.

Mitigation Measures For transportation projects under their jurisdiction, SJCOG shall implement, and transportation project sponsor agencies can and should implement, the following mitigation measure developed for the 2018 RTP/SCS program where applicable for transportation projects that would be exposed to flood hazards. Municipalities in the SJCOG region can and should implement this measure, where relevant to land use projects implementing the 2018 RTP/SCS.

W-3(a) Project-Specific Hydrology Studies Project sponsors conduct or require project-specific hydrology studies for projects proposed to be constructed within floodplains to demonstrate compliance with applicable federal, state, and local agency flood-control regulations. These studies should identify project design features or mitigation measures that reduce impacts to either floodplains or flood flows to a less than significant level. For the purposes of this mitigation, less than significant means consistent with federal, state, and local regulations and laws related to development in the floodplain.

W-3(b) Development In Flood Hazard Areas Project sponsors shall, to the extent feasible and appropriate, prevent development in flood hazard areas that do not have appropriate protections.

W-3(c) Elevated Structures In Flood Zones If a 2018 RTP/SCS project is in an area with high flooding potential, project sponsors shall ensure that the structure is elevated at least one foot above the 100-year flood zone elevation and that bank stabilization and erosion control measures are implemented along creek crossings, where applicable.

Significance After Mitigation If the project sponsor adopts these mitigation measures, impacts would be reduced, although not to a level of less than significant in all cases. Because this document evaluates impacts at the programmatic level, all project circumstances are not foreseeable and therefore, even with implementation of Mitigation Measures W-3(a) through W-3(c), impacts could remain significant and unavoidable. As appropriate, SJCOG will encourage lead agencies to adopt these mitigation measures through its Intergovernmental Review process. With adoption of these mitigation measures, this impact would be significant but mitigable.

280

Letter 2: Caltrans – Office of Federal Transportation Management Program

David Ripperda

Subject: FW: SJCOG 2019 FTIP Comments

From: Huy, Lima A@DOT [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 10:17 AM To: Ryan Niblock Subject: SJCOG 2019 FTIP Comments

Thank you for the opportunity to review SJCOG’s Draft 2019 FTIP. Below are my comments:

1. Please run the MPO Summary Report in CTIPS to reconcile all financial numbers prior to submitting the final financial tables to Caltrans. Any discrepancies will delay the approval of your 2019 FTIP.

2. Because SJCOG’s Draft FTIP was submitted to us prior to the release of the SHOPP, STIP, and other state managed programs, please prepare an Amendment 1 to align the STIP, SHOPP, and other state managed program projects into the 2019 FTIP.

3. Please update the CMAQ revenues. See the link provided for the dollar amount: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/federal/cmaq/cmaq‐4yr‐revised_032818.pdf

4. Correct the programming of your STIP projects. The Fund Type should be “STIP AC” not “NHS” or “STP” for RIP and IIP. (e.g. project 112‐0000‐0348)

5. Include the RTP page number/reference for projects that are missing this information. You may notate this information in the “Project Title, Description” or “MPO Comment filed.”

6. 212‐0000‐0684; 212‐0000‐0685; 212‐0000‐0668: No funding programming. What is the purpose of this entry (for information only)?

7. 212‐0000‐0638: The Clean Diesel Sewer Truck project does not appear CMAQ eligible as these vehicles perform a maintenance role/function.

8. 212‐0000‐0707: This project appears ineligible for CMAQ funding. Please see FHWA’s 2013 CMAQ Guidance, Page 13, item No 7. “Models and Monitors—Acquisition, operation, or development of models or monitoring networks are not eligible for CMAQ funds. As modeling or monitoring emissions, traffic operations, travel demand or other related variables do not directly lead to an emissions reduction, these activities or acquisitions are not eligible. Such efforts may be appropriate for Federal planning funds.”

9. The EPSP document must specify each type of program that has been agreed to by various parties in the project selection process. Programs not specified are ineligible for the EPSP process. Whenever changes occur to programs specified in the EPSP, such as the addition of new programs, or when a new FSTIP cycle begins, a new EPSP must be prepared. We recommend the MPO to update this document to ensure new programs are added every FSTIP update cycle.

1 10. Will SJCOG’s board resolution include language to address the performance based planning requirements?

Please contact me if you have questions. Thanks.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Lima Huy Senior Transportation Planner Caltrans ‐ Division of Transportation Programming Office of Federal Transportation Management Program 1120 N Street, MS 82 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone (916) 651‐7411 Website: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/oftmp.htm

2 SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

P R O F E S S I O N A L S T A F F

Andrew T. Chesley...... Executive Director Steve Dial...... Deputy Executive Director/CFO Diane Nguyen...... Deputy Director/Planning, Programming &Project Delivery Rebecca Calija...... Manager of Administrative Services Nicole Gorham...... Public Information Ofﬁ cer Steve Mayo...... Program Manager Kim Kloeb...... Senior Regional Planner Kim Anderson...... Senior Regional Planner Yvette Davis...... Senior Program Specialist Ryan Niblock...... Senior Regional Planner Rob Cunningham...... Senior Regional Planner Kari McNickle...... Associate Program Specialist David Ripperda...... Associate Regional Planner Lisa Donahue...... Associate Program Specialist Christine Corrales...... Associate Regional Planner Travis Yokoyama...... Associate Regional Planner Laurel Boyd...... Assistant Habitat Planner Summer Anderson...... Assistant Regional Planner Michelle Lacondeguy...... Assistant Regional Planner Teresa Garcia...... Administrative Technician Rosemary Romero...... Administrative Technician Stephanie Maynard...... Administrative Analyst Gracie Orosco...... Chief Accountant Lynetta Castle...... Staff Accountant Kelly Bagley...... Accounting Assistant II Gregory Solario...... Accounting Assistant I Vikram Sharma...... IT Manager Rosie Guttierrez...... Ofﬁ ce Administrator Katy Castro...... Administrative Clerk II Melissa Ablang...... Administrative Clerk II