European Longevity Records - 2017-04-05 the Table Below Lists Longevity Records Recorded Through European Bird Ringing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List
Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List The target species list (species to be surveyed) should not change over the course of the study, therefore determining the target species list is an important project design task. Because waterbirds, including shorebirds, can occur in very high numbers in a census area, it is often not possible to count all species without compromising the quality of the survey data. For the basic shorebird census program (protocol 1), we recommend counting all shorebirds (sub-Order Charadrii), all raptors (hawks, falcons, owls, etc.), Common Ravens, and American Crows. This list of species is available on our field data forms, which can be downloaded from this site, and as a drop-down list on our online data entry form. If a very rare species occurs on a shorebird area survey, the species will need to be submitted with good documentation as a narrative note with the survey data. Project goals that could preclude counting all species include surveys designed to search for color-marked birds or post- breeding season counts of age-classed bird to obtain age ratios for a species. When conducting a census, you should identify as many of the shorebirds as possible to species; sometimes, however, this is not possible. For example, dowitchers often cannot be separated under censuses conditions, and at a distance or under poor lighting, it may not be possible to distinguish some species such as small Calidris sandpipers. We have provided codes for species combinations that commonly are reported on censuses. Combined codes are still species-specific and you should use the code that provides as much information as possible about the potential species combination you designate. -
Purple Sandpiper
Maine 2015 Wildlife Action Plan Revision Report Date: January 13, 2016 Calidris maritima (Purple Sandpiper) Priority 1 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Class: Aves (Birds) Order: Charadriiformes (Plovers, Sandpipers, And Allies) Family: Scolopacidae (Curlews, Dowitchers, Godwits, Knots, Phalaropes, Sandpipers, Snipe, Yellowlegs, And Woodcock) General comments: Recent surveys suggest population undergoing steep population decline within 10 years. IFW surveys conducted in 2014 suggest population declined by 49% since 2004 (IFW unpublished data). Maine has high responsibility for wintering population, regional surveys suggest Maine may support over 1/3 of the Western Atlantic wintering population. USFWS Region 5 and Canadian Maritimes winter at least 90% of the Western Atlantic population. Species Conservation Range Maps for Purple Sandpiper: Town Map: Calidris maritima_Towns.pdf Subwatershed Map: Calidris maritima_HUC12.pdf SGCN Priority Ranking - Designation Criteria: Risk of Extirpation: NA State Special Concern or NMFS Species of Concern: NA Recent Significant Declines: Purple Sandpiper is currently undergoing steep population declines, which has already led to, or if unchecked is likely to lead to, local extinction and/or range contraction. Notes: Recent surveys suggest population undergoing steep population decline within 10 years. IFW surveys conducted in 2014 suggest population declined by 49% since 2004 (IFW unpublished data). Maine has high responsibility for wintering populat Regional Endemic: Calidris maritima's global geographic range is at least 90% contained within the area defined by USFWS Region 5, the Canadian Maritime Provinces, and southeastern Quebec (south of the St. Lawrence River). Notes: Recent surveys suggest population undergoing steep population decline within 10 years. IFW surveys conducted in 2014 suggest population declined by 49% since 2004 (IFW unpublished data). -
Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. -
A Eurasian Wryneck Speciment from Southern Indian
A EurasianWryneck specimen from southern Indiana JohnB. Dunning,Jr. Amanda Beheler head of the natural resources division at Crane. Andrews also did not rec- Michael Crowder ognizethe bird, and neither he norMr. Crowdercould find a goodmatch Departmentof Forestryand Natural Resources in the North Americanfield guides present at the naturalresource office PurdueUniversity Knowingthat wildlife faculty and students from Purdue University would WestLafayette, Indiana 47907-1159 be workingat Cranein the spring,Andrews placed the specimenin h•s office freezer. Several months later Beheler,then a Ph.D. candidate in the Steve Andrews Departmentof Forestryand Natural Resourcesat Purdue,arrived at NaturalResources Building NSWC Crane to begin her annualfield researchon EasternPhoebes Code 09228 (Sayornisphoebe).Andrews showed her the specimen, but shealso did not Naval Surface Warfare Center recognizeit. The detailsof itsdiscovery were vague, because the nameand Crane,Indiana 47522 contactinformation of thefinder had disappeared during the intervemng months.Beheler transported the bird to Purdue,while Andrews tried to Ron Weiss relocate the individual who found the bird. Ch•pperWoods Bird Observatory Bythe time Behder arrived home, she had checked a numberof North 10329North New Jersey Street andCentral American field guides to no avail..Shecalled Dunning, a fac- Indianapolis,Indiana 46280 tfitymember in her departmentat Purdue,and told him aboutthe find WhenDunning arrived at the Behelerhouse 30 minuteslater to seethe ABSTRACT specimen,Amanda and her husbandBrian had identifiedthe bird as a In February2000, a deadbird found by a workerat theCrane Naval Surface EurasianWryneck (Jynx torquilla) using a Europeanfield guide. Dunning WarfareCenter in southernIndiana proved to be a EurasianWryneck concurredwith theidentification, although neither he norBeheler had any (Jynxtorquilla), a species recorded only once before in NorthAmerica. -
Field Checklist (PDF)
Surf Scoter Marbled Godwit OWLS (Strigidae) Common Raven White-winged Scoter Ruddy Turnstone Eastern Screech Owl CHICKADEES (Paridae) Common Goldeneye Red Knot Great Horned Owl Black-capped Chickadee Barrow’s Goldeneye Sanderling Snowy Owl Boreal Chickadee Bufflehead Semipalmated Sandpiper Northern Hawk-Owl Tufted Titmouse Hooded Merganser Western Sandpiper Barred Owl NUTHATCHES (Sittidae) Common Merganser Least Sandpiper Great Gray Owl Red-breasted Nuthatch Red-breasted Merganser White-rumped Sandpiper Long-eared Owl White-breasted Nuthatch Ruddy Duck Baird’s Sandpiper Short-eared Owl CREEPERS (Certhiidae) VULTURES (Cathartidae) Pectoral Sandpiper Northern Saw-Whet Owl Brown Creeper Turkey Vulture Purple Sandpiper NIGHTJARS (Caprimulgidae) WRENS (Troglodytidae) HAWKS & EAGLES (Accipitridae) Dunlin Common Nighthawk Carolina Wren Osprey Stilt Sandpiper Whip-poor-will House Wren Bald Eagle Buff-breasted Sandpiper SWIFTS (Apodidae) Winter Wren Northern Harrier Ruff Chimney Swift Marsh Wren Sharp-shinned Hawk Short-billed Dowitcher HUMMINGBIRDS (Trochilidae) THRUSHES (Muscicapidae) Cooper’s Hawk Wilson’s Snipe Ruby-throated Hummingbird Golden-crowned Kinglet Northern Goshawk American Woodcock KINGFISHERS (Alcedinidae) Ruby-crowned Kinglet Red-shouldered Hawk Wilson’s Phalarope Belted Kingfisher Blue-gray Gnatcatcher Broad-winged Hawk Red-necked Phalarope WOODPECKERS (Picidae) Eastern Bluebird Red-tailed Hawk Red Phalarope Red-headed Woodpecker Veery Rough-legged Hawk GULLS & TERNS (Laridae) Yellow-bellied Sapsucker Gray-cheeked Thrush Golden -
EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION. -
Shorebird Identification 5 SHOREBIRD IDENTIFICATION Usually Over 20 Mm Except in Least, Semipalmated and Buff Breasted
4 EBBA News February 1973 Shorebird Identification 5 SHOREBIRD IDENTIFICATION usually over 20 mm except in Least, Semipalmated and Buff breasted. Neck medium to long. 4 toes (except 3 in Sanderling) • BY CHANDLER S, ROBBINS* Back speckrea-or streaked in small species (indistinct markings on Spotted Sandpiper, and on Sanderling in winter). The superfamily of shorebirds is a heterogeneous group. Family Recurvirost ridae : Avocets, Stilts (7 species, 2 in Althou?h most members of this group are zeadily recognized as North Amer ica). Bi ll long, very slender; fegs very long and shoreb1rds, there are few distinctive characters that are pos slender, tarsus over 80 mm. 3 toes (stilt or 4 (avocet). sessed ~y all ~pecies. For example, nearly all shorebirds have long po1nted.w1ngs, but the woodcocks and lapwing have decided Family Phal aropodidae: Phalaropes (3 species, 3 in North ly rounded w1ngs. Most shorebirds have slender, soft bills, America). 4 toes , the front ones lobed, semipalmate. Female but the oystercatchers have heavy bills that are greatly com brighter colored than male. pres~ed l~ter~lly. The phalarope family has lobed toes, each spec1es w1th 1ts own particular type of lobe. The turnstones and most plovers have 3 toes, and most sandpipers have 4 toes Identifying Shorebirds to Species but one genus in each family does not conform to the general ' rule. The purpose of this paper is to assist banders in identi fying, to species, shorebirds that are in the hand. These pages The oystercatchers, avocets and stilts are so distinctive are not a substitute for a field guide or for manuals such as in all plumages that they will not be discussed in detail; Roberts, Forbush, Ridgway, or Coues. -
The Ecological Determinants of Wryneck Occurrence
Food or nesting place? Identifying factors limiting wryneck populations Master thesis der Philosophisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Bern submitted by Valérie Coudrain 2009 Supervision Prof. Raphaël Arlettaz PD Michael Schaub Institute of Ecology and Evolution Division of Conservation Biology Table of contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 3 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 4 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS..................................................................................... 6 2.1 HABITAT REQUIREMENTS OF WRYNECKS ..................................................... 7 2.1.1 Sampling design ............................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Habitat mapping ............................................................................................... 8 2.1.3 Food resources .................................................................................................. 9 2.1.4 Statistical analyses .......................................................................................... 9 2.2 ANT ABUNDANCE MODELLING ......................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Sampling design ............................................................................................. 10 2.2.2 Ant nest detection probability .................................................................. -
Explicit Nation-Wide Habitat Models for Common Italian Piciformes
Avocetta 33: 115-122 (2009) Explicit nation-wide habitat models for common Italian Piciformes Tommaso Campedelli2, GuGlielmo londi2, lorenzo mini2, Guido Tellini Florenzano1,2 1 MITO2000, National Committee 2 DREAM Italia - Via Garibaldi 3, I-52015 Pratovecchio (AR), Italy ([email protected]) Abstract – The aim of this paper is to assess the effect of broad scale environmental and geographical variables on the presence of Italian commonest breeding Piciformes (Wryneck, Green, Black, and Great Spotted Woodpeckers). Using the data of MITO2000 (2000-2003), logistic regression models were built, relating their presence with area occupied by Corine land-use categories, habitat diversity, morpho- logical and elevation-range, latitude and longitude. Our analyses seem to give some basic information about large scale ecology of the species, allowing to indicate different habitat types (heterogeneus habitat for Wryneck, broadleaved woods for Green Woodpecker, woods for Great Spotted Woodpecker). Our models clearly show the importance of geographical variables to infer how species ecology chang- es at different latitudes: Green and Great Spotted Woodpecker for example, become commoner, and less linked to woods, northwards. INTRODUCTION 2003, Brotons et al. 2004a, Rushton et al. 2004). Although some doubts on their effectiveness still remain (Gutzwiller Woodpeckers are typically considered forest species and and Barrow 2003, Chamberlain et al. 2004), these tech- efficient woodland biodiversity indicators, from local niques, if correctly applied, have proved to be valuable (Mikusinski et al. 2001) to continental scale (Mikusinski tools for the knowledge of the actual distribution of spe- and Angelstam 1998). Moreover, the ecology of wood- cies and to obtain objective information on the main eco- peckers is complex: they show a different degree of spe- logical factors affecting their presence (Guisan and Zim- cialization (Angelstam and Mikusinski 1994) and, even merman 2000, Scott et al. -
The Woodcock Volume 4
The Woodcock Volume 4 Fall 2019 Antioch Bird Club Table of Contents Editor’s Note - A Call to Action ABC News Event Recaps - Coastal Trip - River Run Farm Bird Walk - Meet the Mountain Day - Birds on the Farm: Workshop & Guided Bird Walk - Game Night - Cemetery Prowl - Motus Winterizing - Bagels and Birds - Library Scavenger Hunt - Hot Spot Bird of the Month - November – Red-Bellied Woodpecker - December- Pine Siskin Audubon’s Climate Change Actions The Monadnock Region Birding Cup Student Showcases - Raptors: A lifelong love – Eric Campisi - Oscar the Barred Owlet – Jennie Healy - Chasing Nighthawks – Kim Snyder Upcoming Events - Keene & Brattleboro Christmas Bird Count - Coastal Field Trip: Cape Ann and Plum Island 2020 Global Big Year A New Silent Spring – Audrey Boraski *Cover page photo is by Greg & Company, Springbok Editor’s Note - A Call to Action In September of this year, the New York Times published a bombshell article based on a paper from ornithologists across North America called Decline of the North American Avifauna. Within this report was the realization that 1 in 4 birds, some 3 billion individuals, have been lost since 1970. The losses stretched across various families, from sparrows and warblers to blackbirds and finches — all common visitors to backyards here in New England. This kind of revelation can feel crushing, especially for something we see everyday that is slowly fading from existence. Birds are being taken out from multiple threats: pesticides, loss of habitat, window strikes... So what do we do? Something. Anything. Because if we do nothing, they will fade so gradually that we become numb to the loss. -
Bird Ringing Results in Hrvatsko Zagorje Region (North-Western Croatia): Ringing Recoveries in Other Countries
NAT. CROAT. VOL. 17 No 4 325¿333 ZAGREB December 31, 2008 original scientific paper / izvorni znanstveni rad BIRD RINGING RESULTS IN HRVATSKO ZAGORJE REGION (NORTH-WESTERN CROATIA): RINGING RECOVERIES IN OTHER COUNTRIES ZDRAVKO DOLENEC Department of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia (e-mail: [email protected]) Dolenec, Z.: Bird ringing results in Hrvatsko zagorje region (north-western Croatia): ringing recoveries in other countries. Nat. Croat., Vol. 17, No. 4, 325–333, 2008, Zagreb. This paper is based on the recoveries of birds ringed in the territory of Hrvatsko zagorje region (north-western Croatia). In the period from 1972 to 2007 I ringed 16400 birds (70 species), 31 of which were recorded outside the territory of Croatia (5 species: starling Sturnus vulgaris – 26, woodpigeon Columba palumbus – 1, blackbird Turdus merula – 2, song thrush Turdus philomelos – 1 and blue tit Parus caeruleus – 1). Twenty-two birds were recovered in Europe (8 in Italy and 1 in Spain, France, Hungary and the Czech Republic) and nine in Africa (5 in Algeria and 4 in Tunisia). Key words: ringed, recoveries, migration of Croatian birds, Hrvatsko zagorje region Dolenec, Z.: Rezultati prstenovanja ptica u Hrvatskom zagorju (sjeverozapadna Hrvatska): nalazi u drugim zemljama. Nat. Croat., Vol. 17, No. 4, 325–333, 2008, Zagreb. U ovome se radu donose rezultati dugogodi{njeg prstenovanja ptica na podru~ju Hrvatskog zagorja, a odnose se na nalaze u drugim zemljama. U razdoblju od 1972. do 2007. godine prsteno- vao sam 16400 ptica (70 vrsta) od koji je izvan granica Hrvatske na|ena 31 ptica (5 vrsta: ~vorak Sturnus vulgaris – 26, golub grivnja{ Columba palumbus – 1, kos Turdus merula – 2, drozd cikelj Turdus philomelos – 1 i plavetna sjenica Parus caeruleus – 1). -
Jynx Torquilla
Jynx torquilla -- Linnaeus, 1758 ANIMALIA -- CHORDATA -- AVES -- PICIFORMES -- PICIDAE Common names: Eurasian Wryneck; European Wryneck; Torcol; Wryneck European Red List Assessment European Red List Status LC -- Least Concern, (IUCN version 3.1) Assessment Information Year published: 2015 Date assessed: 2015-03-31 Assessor(s): BirdLife International Reviewer(s): Symes, A. Compiler(s): Ashpole, J., Burfield, I., Ieronymidou, C., Pople, R., Wheatley, H. & Wright, L. Assessment Rationale European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) In Europe this species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence 10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). The population trend appears to be increasing, and hence the species does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (30% decline over ten years or three generations). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern in Europe. Within the EU27 this species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence 10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). The population trend appears to be increasing, and hence the species does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (30% decline over ten years or three generations).