Durham E-Theses
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Life Cycle and Kelp Consumption of Paractora Dreuxi Mirabilis (Diptera: Helcomyzidae): a Primary Decomposer of Stranded Kelp on Marion Island
18 S. Afr. T. Nav. Antarkt., Deel 14, 1984 1 Life cycle and kelp consumption of Paractora dreuxi mirabilis (Diptera: Helcomyzidae): A primary decomposer of stranded kelp on Marion Island J.E. Crafford Department of Entomology University of Pretoria, Hatfield , Pretoria 0083 Wrack beds of the intertidal kelp Durvillea antarctica (Cham.) Apetenus liroralis and Paractora dreuxi mirabilis. are closely Har. on Marion Island (46°54' S, 37"45' E) sustain large kelp fly associated with wrack beds and decomposing kelp. populatior.s. Paractora dreuxi mirabilis (Seguy) is a primary Little is known about the nutrient and energy pathways decomposer of stranded Durv11lea with larvae reaching a operative in the littoral zone on Marion Island (Smith 1977). biomass of2 gper kg ofdecomposing kelp (wet mass). At 10°C Fronds of Durvillea antarccica, an epilitic phaeophyte Paractora completes its life cycle in 80-120 days. Egg, larval and abounding in the intertidal zone, continuously wash up on pupal stages last 4, 60 and 40 days respectively. Larvae eat 0,5 beaches around the island. After heavy seas fronds frequently rimes their own dry mass in kelp per day. They attain an indivi pile up into large and dense wrack beds. Paractora larvae are dual live mass of up to JOO mg. The feeding and burrowing the major decomposers of beached Durvillea, representing by activity of larvae probably enhance microbial decay ofbeached far the greatest biomass of decomposers in beached kelp kelp. Paractora larvae are preyed on by vertebrate insectivores (Crafford, unpublished) and constituting an easily explo1table and probably form an important link in nutrient and energy localised food resource for secondary consumers such as the chains in the littoral zone on Marion Island. -
Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List
Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List The target species list (species to be surveyed) should not change over the course of the study, therefore determining the target species list is an important project design task. Because waterbirds, including shorebirds, can occur in very high numbers in a census area, it is often not possible to count all species without compromising the quality of the survey data. For the basic shorebird census program (protocol 1), we recommend counting all shorebirds (sub-Order Charadrii), all raptors (hawks, falcons, owls, etc.), Common Ravens, and American Crows. This list of species is available on our field data forms, which can be downloaded from this site, and as a drop-down list on our online data entry form. If a very rare species occurs on a shorebird area survey, the species will need to be submitted with good documentation as a narrative note with the survey data. Project goals that could preclude counting all species include surveys designed to search for color-marked birds or post- breeding season counts of age-classed bird to obtain age ratios for a species. When conducting a census, you should identify as many of the shorebirds as possible to species; sometimes, however, this is not possible. For example, dowitchers often cannot be separated under censuses conditions, and at a distance or under poor lighting, it may not be possible to distinguish some species such as small Calidris sandpipers. We have provided codes for species combinations that commonly are reported on censuses. Combined codes are still species-specific and you should use the code that provides as much information as possible about the potential species combination you designate. -
Purple Sandpiper
Maine 2015 Wildlife Action Plan Revision Report Date: January 13, 2016 Calidris maritima (Purple Sandpiper) Priority 1 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Class: Aves (Birds) Order: Charadriiformes (Plovers, Sandpipers, And Allies) Family: Scolopacidae (Curlews, Dowitchers, Godwits, Knots, Phalaropes, Sandpipers, Snipe, Yellowlegs, And Woodcock) General comments: Recent surveys suggest population undergoing steep population decline within 10 years. IFW surveys conducted in 2014 suggest population declined by 49% since 2004 (IFW unpublished data). Maine has high responsibility for wintering population, regional surveys suggest Maine may support over 1/3 of the Western Atlantic wintering population. USFWS Region 5 and Canadian Maritimes winter at least 90% of the Western Atlantic population. Species Conservation Range Maps for Purple Sandpiper: Town Map: Calidris maritima_Towns.pdf Subwatershed Map: Calidris maritima_HUC12.pdf SGCN Priority Ranking - Designation Criteria: Risk of Extirpation: NA State Special Concern or NMFS Species of Concern: NA Recent Significant Declines: Purple Sandpiper is currently undergoing steep population declines, which has already led to, or if unchecked is likely to lead to, local extinction and/or range contraction. Notes: Recent surveys suggest population undergoing steep population decline within 10 years. IFW surveys conducted in 2014 suggest population declined by 49% since 2004 (IFW unpublished data). Maine has high responsibility for wintering populat Regional Endemic: Calidris maritima's global geographic range is at least 90% contained within the area defined by USFWS Region 5, the Canadian Maritime Provinces, and southeastern Quebec (south of the St. Lawrence River). Notes: Recent surveys suggest population undergoing steep population decline within 10 years. IFW surveys conducted in 2014 suggest population declined by 49% since 2004 (IFW unpublished data). -
Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. -
Field Checklist (PDF)
Surf Scoter Marbled Godwit OWLS (Strigidae) Common Raven White-winged Scoter Ruddy Turnstone Eastern Screech Owl CHICKADEES (Paridae) Common Goldeneye Red Knot Great Horned Owl Black-capped Chickadee Barrow’s Goldeneye Sanderling Snowy Owl Boreal Chickadee Bufflehead Semipalmated Sandpiper Northern Hawk-Owl Tufted Titmouse Hooded Merganser Western Sandpiper Barred Owl NUTHATCHES (Sittidae) Common Merganser Least Sandpiper Great Gray Owl Red-breasted Nuthatch Red-breasted Merganser White-rumped Sandpiper Long-eared Owl White-breasted Nuthatch Ruddy Duck Baird’s Sandpiper Short-eared Owl CREEPERS (Certhiidae) VULTURES (Cathartidae) Pectoral Sandpiper Northern Saw-Whet Owl Brown Creeper Turkey Vulture Purple Sandpiper NIGHTJARS (Caprimulgidae) WRENS (Troglodytidae) HAWKS & EAGLES (Accipitridae) Dunlin Common Nighthawk Carolina Wren Osprey Stilt Sandpiper Whip-poor-will House Wren Bald Eagle Buff-breasted Sandpiper SWIFTS (Apodidae) Winter Wren Northern Harrier Ruff Chimney Swift Marsh Wren Sharp-shinned Hawk Short-billed Dowitcher HUMMINGBIRDS (Trochilidae) THRUSHES (Muscicapidae) Cooper’s Hawk Wilson’s Snipe Ruby-throated Hummingbird Golden-crowned Kinglet Northern Goshawk American Woodcock KINGFISHERS (Alcedinidae) Ruby-crowned Kinglet Red-shouldered Hawk Wilson’s Phalarope Belted Kingfisher Blue-gray Gnatcatcher Broad-winged Hawk Red-necked Phalarope WOODPECKERS (Picidae) Eastern Bluebird Red-tailed Hawk Red Phalarope Red-headed Woodpecker Veery Rough-legged Hawk GULLS & TERNS (Laridae) Yellow-bellied Sapsucker Gray-cheeked Thrush Golden -
On Adult Size and Male Mating Success in the Seaweed Fly, Coelopa Frigida A
Heredity (1982), 49 (1),51—62 0018-067X/82/0507005 1$02.OO 1982.The Genetical Society of Great Britain THEEFFECTS OF A CHROMOSOMAL INVERSION ON ADULT SIZE AND MALE MATING SUCCESS IN THE SEAWEED FLY, COELOPA FRIGIDA A. K. BUTLIN, I. L. READ and 1. H. DAY Department of Genetics, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG72RD Received4.iii.82 SUMMARY An association is reported between the a//3inversionpolymorphism on chromo- some I and adult size as assessed by the length of wings. aa flies are larger than (3/3 flies, with heterokaryotypes intermediate, and the differences are more marked in males than in females. Laboratory mating experiments were perfor- med in which a single female was given a choice of two males. By examining the genotypes of the progeny larvae, it is shown that the larger male is successful in a significantly greater proportion of trials than the smaller one. This mating success is dependent on the size difference between the males and on the female size. Together these observations suggest an indirect influence of the inversion on male mating success. The possible relevance of this effect to the maintenance of the inversion polymorphism in natural populations is discussed. 1. INTRODUCTION MANY species of insects are polymorphic for chromosomal inversions. The most extensive studies of these polymorphisms have been in various species of Drosophila (da Cunha, 1955) especially D.pseudoobscura(Dobzhansky, 1971), D. persimilis (Spiess and Spiess, 1969; Yu and Spiess, 1978) and D. subobscura (Krimbas and Loukas, 1979). It is clear from the Drosophila work that there exists a multitude of selection pressures that may influence the frequencies of inversions in natural populations. -
Advances in Deciphering the Genetic Basis of Insect Cuticular Hydrocarbon Biosynthesis and Variation
Heredity (2021) 126:219–234 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-020-00380-y REVIEW ARTICLE Advances in deciphering the genetic basis of insect cuticular hydrocarbon biosynthesis and variation 1 1 1,2 Henrietta Holze ● Lukas Schrader ● Jan Buellesbach Received: 6 July 2020 / Revised: 8 October 2020 / Accepted: 9 October 2020 / Published online: 2 November 2020 © The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access Abstract Cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) have two fundamental functions in insects. They protect terrestrial insects against desiccation and serve as signaling molecules in a wide variety of chemical communication systems. It has been hypothesized that these pivotal dual traits for adaptation to both desiccation and signaling have contributed to the considerable evolutionary success of insects. CHCs have been extensively studied concerning their variation, behavioral impact, physiological properties, and chemical compositions. However, our understanding of the genetic underpinnings of CHC biosynthesis has remained limited and mostly biased towards one particular model organism (Drosophila). This rather narrow focus has hampered the establishment of a comprehensive view of CHC genetics across wider phylogenetic 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: boundaries. This review attempts to integrate new insights and recent knowledge gained in the genetics of CHC biosynthesis, which is just beginning to incorporate work on more insect taxa beyond Drosophila. It is intended to provide a stepping stone towards a wider and more general understanding of the genetic mechanisms that gave rise to the astonishing diversity of CHC compounds across different insect taxa. Further research in this field is encouraged to aim at better discriminating conserved versus taxon-specific genetic elements underlying CHC variation. -
Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Genus Aleochara) from Japan
Zootaxa 3517: 1–52 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F832C768-A8CA-4FEE-8C3B-BD933247FA6E Revision of the Seashore-dwelling Subgenera Emplenota Casey and Triochara Bernhauer (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: genus Aleochara) from Japan SHÛHEI YAMAMOTO1, 2 & MUNETOSHI MARUYAMA2, 3 1Entomological Laboratory, Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Sciences, Kyushu University, Hakozaki 6-10-1, Fukuoka, 812-8581 Japan E-mail: [email protected] 2The Kyushu University Museum, Hakozaki 6-10-1, Fukuoka, 812-8581 Japan 3Correspoding author: E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Japanese species of the seashore-dwelling subgenera Emplenota Casey and Triochara Bernhauer of the genus Aleochara Gravenhorst are revised. Five species are recognised in Emplenota, of which three are described as new species: Aleochara (Emplenota) segregata n. sp., A. (E.) hayamai n. sp. and A. (E.) yamato n. sp. The remaining known species A. (E.) fucicola Sharp and A. (E.) puetzi (Assing) are redescribed. Three species recognised in Triochara, Aleochara (Triochara) trisulcata Weise, A. (T.) zerchei (Assing) and A. (T.) nubis (Assing) are redescribed. All species are keyed. For some species ecological data are reported. The phylogenetic relationships of the Japanese species are discussed, and the distributions of all species are mapped. Key words: biodiversity, coastal environment, identification key, Palaearctic, redescription, supratidal zones, sympatric species, taxonomy Introduction Recent studies have revealed the worldwide coastal staphylinid diversity (Moore & Legner, 1976; Hammond, 2000; Frank & Ahn, 2011), and the subfamily Aleocharinae is represented by 187 species throughout the world, representing the largest number of coastal staphylinid beetles (Frank & Ahn, 2011). -
Behavioural, Ecological, and Genetic Determinants of Mating and Gene
Thesis committee Thesis supervisor Prof. dr. Marcel Dicke Professor of Entomology, Wageningen University Thesis co-supervisor Dr. Ir. Bart G.J. Knols Medical Entomologist, University of Amsterdam Other members Prof. dr. B.J. Zwaan, Wageningen University Prof. dr. P. Kager, University of Amsterdam Dr. Ir. P. Bijma, Wageningen University Dr. Ir. I.M.A. Heitkonig, Wageningen University This research was conducted under the auspices of the C. T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology and Resource Conservation Behavioural, ecological and genetic determinants of mating and gene flow in African malaria mosquitoes Kija R.N. Ng’habi Thesis Submitted in fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public at on Monday 25 October 2010 at 11:00 a.m. in the Aula. Kija R.N. Ng’habi (2010) Behavioural, ecological and genetic determinants of mating and gene flow in African malaria mosquitoes PhD thesis, Wageningen University – with references – with summaries in Dutch and English ISBN – 978-90-8585-766-2 > Abstract Malaria is still a leading threat to the survival of young children and pregnant women, especially in the African region. The ongoing battle against malaria has been hampered by the emergence of drug and insecticide resistance amongst parasites and vectors, re- spectively. The Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) and genetically modified mosquitoes (GM) are new proposed vector control approaches. Successful implementation of these ap- proaches requires a better understanding of male mating biology of target mosquito species. -
EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION. -
INSECTS of MICRONESIA Diptera: Coelopidae (Phycodromidaey
INSECTS OF MICRONESIA Diptera: Coelopidae (PhycodromidaeY By D. ELMO HARDY UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION This is the first report of the occurrence of the family Coelopidae in the Pacific region other than the subarctic, subantarctic, and New Zealand areas. The United States Office of Naval Research, the Pacific Science Board (National Research Council), the National Science Foundation, and Bishop Museum have made this survey and the publication of the results possible. Field research was aided by a contract between the Office of Naval Research, Department of the Navy, and the National Academy of Sciences, NR 160-175. The drawings were prepared by Marian S. Adachi, University of Hawaii. The coelopids are moderate-sized, conspicuously hairy flies which breed in kelp, and perhaps in other seaweed, washed up on the shore. The adults can be collected in large numbers by sweeping seaweed along the beaches. The group is almost restricted in distribution to cold and temperate regions of the world. Aldrich (1929, U. S. Nat. Mus., Proc. 76: 1) writing of North Amer ican species of Coe1opa s. 1. says "... all of the spp. appear to breed in the kelps and are found only on seashores where seaweeds of this group are washed up." The discovery of a species in the western Caroline Islands greatly extends the known range of the family. The members of this family, as defined by Hendel [1928, Tierwelt Deutsch lands 11 (2) : 89], are characterized by having the prelabrum produced; the genae swollen (bulging); the body depressed, the postvertical bristles well developed and convergent; the tibiae with preapical dorsal bristles, the median pair crossed; the subcostal vein complete, and the costa not broken. -
Shorebird Identification 5 SHOREBIRD IDENTIFICATION Usually Over 20 Mm Except in Least, Semipalmated and Buff Breasted
4 EBBA News February 1973 Shorebird Identification 5 SHOREBIRD IDENTIFICATION usually over 20 mm except in Least, Semipalmated and Buff breasted. Neck medium to long. 4 toes (except 3 in Sanderling) • BY CHANDLER S, ROBBINS* Back speckrea-or streaked in small species (indistinct markings on Spotted Sandpiper, and on Sanderling in winter). The superfamily of shorebirds is a heterogeneous group. Family Recurvirost ridae : Avocets, Stilts (7 species, 2 in Althou?h most members of this group are zeadily recognized as North Amer ica). Bi ll long, very slender; fegs very long and shoreb1rds, there are few distinctive characters that are pos slender, tarsus over 80 mm. 3 toes (stilt or 4 (avocet). sessed ~y all ~pecies. For example, nearly all shorebirds have long po1nted.w1ngs, but the woodcocks and lapwing have decided Family Phal aropodidae: Phalaropes (3 species, 3 in North ly rounded w1ngs. Most shorebirds have slender, soft bills, America). 4 toes , the front ones lobed, semipalmate. Female but the oystercatchers have heavy bills that are greatly com brighter colored than male. pres~ed l~ter~lly. The phalarope family has lobed toes, each spec1es w1th 1ts own particular type of lobe. The turnstones and most plovers have 3 toes, and most sandpipers have 4 toes Identifying Shorebirds to Species but one genus in each family does not conform to the general ' rule. The purpose of this paper is to assist banders in identi fying, to species, shorebirds that are in the hand. These pages The oystercatchers, avocets and stilts are so distinctive are not a substitute for a field guide or for manuals such as in all plumages that they will not be discussed in detail; Roberts, Forbush, Ridgway, or Coues.