Services for Sexual Violence Survivors in Kayanza and Muyinga Provinces, Burundi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Services for Sexual Violence Survivors in Kayanza and Muyinga Provinces, Burundi Services for Sexual Violence Survivors in Kayanza and Muyinga Provinces, Burundi The RESPOND Project/Burundi October 2012 2012 EngenderHealth (The RESPOND Project) The RESPOND Project c/o EngenderHealth 440 Ninth Avenue New York, NY 10001 U.S.A. Telephone: 212-561-8000 Fax: 212-561-8067 e-mail: [email protected] www.respondproject.org This publication is made possible by the generous support of the American People through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), under the terms of cooperative agreement GPO-A-000-08-00007-00. The contents are the responsibility of the RESPOND Project/EngenderHealth and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial- Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/. Suggested citation: The RESPOND Project. 2012. Services for sexual violence survivors in Kayanza and Muyinga provinces, Burundi. New York: EngenderHealth. CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................................. v ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. ix INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................................... 3 FINDINGS ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 RECOMMENDATIONS ..............................................................................................................................15 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................... 21 APPENDIX A. Health Facility Manager Questionnaire ....................................................................... 23 APPENDIX B. Health Provider Questionnaire ..................................................................................... 33 APPENDIX C. Key Informant Interview Guide ................................................................................... 41 APPENDIX D. List of Key Informants .................................................................................................... 45 APPENDIX E. Focus Group Discussion Guide .................................................................................... 47 Services for Sexual Violence Survivors in Kayanza and Muyinga Provinces, Burundi iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was conducted with the generous financing of the Burundi Mission of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The study was led by Marie-Christine Ntagwirumugara, a consultant for The RESPOND Project/Burundi, and by Mahamadi Cissé, the project manager for RESPOND/Burkina Faso. The study was conducted through close collaboration among RESPOND, the Ministry of National Solidarity, Human Rights and Gender (MSNDPHG), the Ministry of Public Health and the Fight against AIDS (MSPLS), and administrative authorities in Kayanza and Muyinga provinces. Marie- Christine Ntagwirumugara served as the lead author and Ashley Jackson from RESPOND served as the lead technical editor. The report was also reviewed by Esther Braud, Maureen Clyde, Santiago Plata, Hannah Searing, Fabio Verani, and Jane Wickstrom from EngenderHealth/RESPOND. The report was copyedited by Michael Klitsch and was formatted by Elkin Konuk. Thanks are due to each of these collaborators. RESPOND also extends its gratitude to the health facility managers, health providers, Family Development Center teams, community members, and all others who participated in this study. Services for Sexual Violence Survivors in Kayanza and Muyinga Provinces, Burundi v ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ABUBEF Burundian Association for Family Well-Being ADDF Association pour la Défense des Droits des Femmes AMAVES Association of the Compassionate for the Assistance of Those Affected by HIV/AIDS APRODH Association for the Protection of Human Rights and Detained Persons ARV antiretroviral (drug) BCC behavior change communication CDF Family Development Center COP Country Operational Plan FGD focus group discussion GBV gender-based violence ICRW International Center for Research on Women MAP Men As Partners® MSNDPHG Ministry of National Solidarity, Human Rights and Gender MSPLS Ministry of Public Health and the Fight against AIDS NGO nongovernmental organization PEP postexposure prophylaxis PEPFAR U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief SEED Supply–Enabling Environment–Demand SOP standard operating procedure SRH sexual and reproductive health STI sexually transmitted infection SV sexual violence SWAA Society for Women and AIDS in Africa TMAP Technical Support to Map Gender-Based Violence Services in Tanzania UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund USAID U.S. Agency for International Development Services for Sexual Violence Survivors in Kayanza and Muyinga Provinces, Burundi vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Addressing sexual violence (SV) is a priority of the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) initiative in Burundi. With the support of PEPFAR and the partnership of the Ministry of National Solidarity, Human Rights and Gender (MSNDPHG) and the Ministry of Public Health and the Fight against AIDS (MSPLS), the RESPOND Project aims to improve efforts to prevent SV and to respond to SV survivors in two provinces—Kayanza and Muyinga—through the following results: 1. Strengthen the health sector response for SV survivors 2. Promote gender-equitable norms to prevent SV and to support survivors 3. Increase the capacity of communities and civil society to prevent SV Building upon the results of a national SV assessment led by RESPOND in August 2011, this study aimed to: Assess the health services available to SV survivors in the two provinces Identify other, nonmedical services available to SV survivors in the two provinces Explore the factors that allow SV to take place and prevent survivors from seeking help Develop recommendations for PEPFAR and the relevant ministries in Burundi Guide the strategy and activities of the RESPOND Project in Burundi Data were collected in a total of four townships in Kayanza and Muyinga. RESPOND audited 17 health centers and two hospitals, interviewing the 19 facility managers and an additional 30 providers. Key informant interviews were conducted with 24 administrative authorities, community leaders, and representatives of organizations that work in SV services. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with single-sex groups of 9–11 community members each. A total of 158 community members participated in 16 FGDs. Facility audits showed that health centers lack the trained staff and equipment necessary to respond to SV and that many providers hold attitudes that are unsupportive of SV survivors. Since they are unprepared to care for SV survivors, providers at health centers typically refer cases to hospitals after providing very few services, such as treating wounds and providing antibiotics for treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Given significant barriers to pursuing these referrals, it is likely that many survivors do not receive adequate medical care for SV, even after seeking it at health centers. Outside the health system, services for survivors are similarly limited. In both provinces, some legal and psychosocial services exist, although they are not well-known by communities. The study found no economic reintegration services or safe houses currently available to SV survivors in the two provinces. The Family Development Centers (CDFs), which are charged with coordinating SV services, have insufficient staff and funding to fulfill their mandate. While woman volunteers called “baremeshakiyago” (peer educators) and “imboneza” (community relays) raise community awareness about health and social issues, which in theory include SV, there appear to be no structures with which to engage men in SV prevention. Services for Sexual Violence Survivors in Kayanza and Muyinga Provinces, Burundi ix Factors that allow SV to happen and that prevent survivors from receiving help include power imbalances between men and women, the acceptability of marital rape, fears of retaliation by the perpetrator, taboos around discussing SV, the blaming of SV survivors, corruption in the court system, and cost and transportation barriers. Key recommendations include the following: Prepare health centers to offer survivors at least a minimum package of SV services, including counseling and referrals. Providers who work at first-line and referral facilities should be trained. It is very important for training to address attitudes around SV. Existing job aids for infection prevention and the care of SV survivors need to be adapted and disseminated to health facilities. Key commodities, supplies, and services,
Recommended publications
  • The Mineral Industry of Burundi in 2016
    2016 Minerals Yearbook BURUNDI [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior January 2020 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Burundi By Thomas R. Yager In 2016, the production of mineral commodities—notably can be found in previous editions of the U.S. Geological Survey gold, tantalum, tin, and tungsten—represented only a minor Minerals Yearbook, volume III, Area Reports—International— part of the economy of Burundi (United Nations Economic Africa, which are available at https://www.usgs.gov/centers/ Commission for Africa, 2017). The legislative framework for nmic/africa-and-middle-east. the mineral sector in Burundi is provided by the Mining Code of Burundi (law No. 1/21 of October 15, 2013). The legislative Reference Cited framework for the petroleum sector is provided by the Mining United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, 2017, Burundi, in African and Petroleum Act of 1976. Data on mineral production are statistical yearbook 2017: United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, in table 1. Table 2 is a list of major mineral industry facilities. p. 113–117. (Accessed November 7, 2018, at https://www.uneca.org/sites/ More-extensive coverage of the mineral industry of Burundi default/files/PublicationFiles/asyb-2017.pdf.) TABLE 1 BURUNDI: PRODUCTION OF MINERAL COMMODITIES1 (Metric tons, gross weight, unless otherwise specified) Commodity2 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 METALS Gold, mine, Au contente kilograms 500 400 500 500 500 Niobium and tantalum, mine, columbite-tantalite concentrate: Gross weight do. 258,578 73,518 105,547 53,093 r 31,687 Nb contente do. 51,000 14,000 21,000 10,000 r 6,200 Ta contente do.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS MAP OF BURUNDI I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 II THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGROUPMENT CAMPS ...................................... 2 III OTHER CAMPS FOR DISPLACED POPULATIONS ........................................ 4 IV HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS DURING REGROUPMENT ......................... 6 Extrajudicial executions ......................................................................................... 6 Property destruction ............................................................................................... 8 Possible prisoners of conscience............................................................................ 8 V HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN THE CAMPS ........................................... 8 Undue restrictions on freedom of movement ......................................................... 8 "Disappearances" ................................................................................................... 9 Life-threatening conditions .................................................................................. 10 Insecurity in the context of armed conflict .......................................................... 11 VI HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS DISGUISED AS PROTECTION ................ 12 VII CONCLUSION.................................................................................................... 14 VIII RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... 15
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi 19 the U.S
    Angola/Burundi 19 The U.S. House of Representatives held hearings on Angola in June, showing interest in the consolidation of Angolan civil society and the role of church groups in reconciliation work. Among those who addressed the House Subcommittee on Africa was Reverend Daniel Ntoni-Nzinga, executive director of COIEPA. BURUNDI HUMAN RIGHTS DEVELOPMENTS In the year following the November 2001 installation of a transitional govern- ment comprising seventeen political parties, hopes that the nine-year-old civil war might end remained unfulfilled. Government leaders, both Hutu and Tutsi, pledged serious negotiations with the two largely Hutu rebel groups that had refused to sign the Arusha Accord of 2000, the Forces for the Defense of Democracy (Forces pour la défense de la démocratie, FDD) and the National Forces of Libera- tion (Forces nationales de libération, FNL). But as of mid-November 2002 the war dragged on with widespread suffering for the population. Both government and rebel forces killed, raped, or otherwise injured hundreds of civilians and pillaged or destroyed their property. Rebel forces ambushed civil- ian vehicles and killed and robbed the passengers. As in the past, government mili- tary and rebel groups alike coerced men, women, and children into transporting goods, a practice that sometimes placed the civilians in the direct line of fire. The government continued a program of “civilian self-defense” and did little to curb or punish human rights abuses committed by its participants. Courts continued to function badly. In early 2002 an international commission recommended prison reforms and the freeing of political prisoners, but such measures were not taken and prisoners remained in inhumane conditions in overcrowded jails: at 8,400, the prison population declined slightly from the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2018
    JANUARY 2018 This DTM report has been funded with the generous support of the Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA), the Department for International Development (DFID/UKaid) and the Swiss Agen- cy for Development and Cooperation (SDC). TABLE OF CONTENTS DTM Burundi Methodology..……….…………………………………...……………….…….…..1 IDP Presence Map…..………..…………………………………………………………..…..…….2 Highlights.……………………………………………………………………………….….….…..3 Provinces of Origin..………………………………………………………………………..….…..4 Return Intentions…………………………………….……………………………………....……5 Displacement Reasons.….……………………………………………………………….…..……6 New Displacements……..……………………………………………………………….….…….7 Displacement Trends……..…………………………………………………………….……….…8 Humanitarian Overview: Health and Food Security.………………………………………..…….9 Humanitarian Overview: Livelihoods and WASH.....……..……………….……………….……..10 Humanitarian Overview: Education and Protection……..…..……………...…………....………11 IDP Shelter Types………………………..………………………….…………………..……...…12 Shelter Construction Materials……….……………………….………...……………...….……..13 Precarious Conditions in IDP homes…….……...………………………………….…...…...…...15 Natural Disaster Cycle…….……………..…………………………...……………………..…....16 Provincial Profiles.…………………………………………………………………………….….17 Contact Information……………………………………………………………………………..18 The IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix is a comprehensive system DTM METHODOLOGY implemented to analyse and disseminate information to better unders- tand movements and needs of Internally Displaced Persons in Burundi. 1 Volunteers from the Burundian Red Cross consult
    [Show full text]
  • 1996 Human Rights Report: Burundi Page 1 of 13
    1996 Human Rights Report: Burundi Page 1 of 13 The State Department web site below is a permanent electro information released prior to January 20, 2001. Please see w material released since President George W. Bush took offic This site is not updated so external links may no longer func us with any questions about finding information. NOTE: External links to other Internet sites should not be co endorsement of the views contained therein. U.S. Department of State Burundi Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1996 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, January 30, 1997. BURUNDI Burundi's democratically elected president was overthrown in a military coup on July 25. Despite the coup, the National Assembly and political parties continue to operate, although under constraints. The present regime, under the self-proclaimed interim President, Major Pierre Buyoya, abrogated the 1992 Constitution and, during the so-called Transition Period, replaced the 1994 Convention of Government with a decree promulgated on September 13. Under this decree, the National Assembly does not have the power to remove the President of the Republic. The Prime Minister, appointed by the President, replaces the President in the event of the President's death or incapacity. Under the former constitution, the President of the National Assembly replaced the President. Buyoya holds power in conjunction with the Tutsi-dominated military establishment. The judicial system remains under the control of the Tutsi minority, and most citizens consider it biased against Hutus. Violent conflict among Hutu and Tutsi armed militants and the army plunged the country into a civil war marked by ethnic violence, which included fighting between the army and armed rebel groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi Page 1 of 18
    Burundi Page 1 of 18 Burundi Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor February 25, 2004 Burundi is a republic ruled by a Transitional Government established under the Arusha Peace and Reconciliation Accord (Arusha Accord) in November 2001. On April 30, the second half of the 3-year Transitional Government began as Domitien Ndayizeye, a member of the Hutu ethnic group, succeeded Pierre Buyoya, a member of the Tutsi ethnic group, as President. In 2001, a Transitional Constitution was adopted, providing for power to be shared between the Tutsi minority, which has traditionally ruled the country, and the Hutu majority. A presidential decree suspended elections in 1998; however, the Transitional Constitution provides for elections following the completion of the 3-year Transitional Government. The country remained engaged in a low-intensity civil conflict, and for most of the year, the conflict involved two armed opposition groups, the National Council for Defense of Democracy– Forces for the Defense of Democracy (CNDD-FDD) faction led by Pierre Nkurunziza, and the Palipehutu/National Liberation Front (FNL) faction led by Agathon Rwasa. Smaller factions of both groups had signed and implemented ceasefire agreements with the Transitional Government in October 2002. In December 2002, the largest armed opposition group, the Nkurunziza faction of the CNDD-FDD, also signed a ceasefire with the Transitional Government. In October, the Transitional Government and the CNDD-FDD faction led by Nkurunziza signed a protocol on power-sharing, and in November, the CNDD-FDD entered the Transitional Government, assuming four cabinet positions and other posts.
    [Show full text]
  • PEPFAR Burundi Country Operational Plan (COP) 2017
    PEPFAR Burundi Country Operational Plan (COP) 2017 Strategic Direction Summary April 29, 2017 Table of Contents 1.0 Goal Statement 2.0 Epidemic, Response, and Program Context 2.1 Summary statistics, disease burden and epidemic profile 2.2 Investment profile 2.3 Sustainability Profile 2.4 Alignment of PEPFAR investments geographically to burden of disease 2.5 Stakeholder engagement 3.0 Geographic and population prioritization 4.0 Program Activities for Epidemic Control in Scale-up Locations and Populations 4.1 Targets for scale-up locations and populations 4.2 Priority population prevention 4.3 Preventing mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) 4.4HIV testing and counseling (HTC) 4.5 Facility and community-based care and support 4.6 TB/HIV 4.7 Adult treatment 4.8 Pediatric Treatment 4.9 TB/HIV 4.10 Addressing COP17 Technical Considerations 4.11 Commodities 4.12 Collaboration, Integration and Monitoring 5.0 Program Activities in Attained and Sustained Locations and Populations (Note: In COP 2017, Burundi does not have attained or sustained SNUs) 6.0 Program Support Necessary to Achieve Sustained Epidemic Control 6.1 Critical systems investments for achieving key programmatic gaps 6.2 Critical systems investments for achieving priority policies 6.3 Proposed system investments outside of programmatic gaps and priority policies 7.0 USG Management, Operations and Staffing Plan to Achieve Stated Goals Appendix A - Prioritization Appendix B - Budget Profile and Resource Projections Appendix C - Tables and Systems Investments for Section 6.0 Page
    [Show full text]
  • WPHF Burundi Case Study
    Women’s Peace & Humanitarian Fund Burundi Case Study Women lead and participate in conflict prevention, sustain peace and promote economic recovery Photo EN. Ruwonge Province September 2019 Suvira Chaturvedi International Consultant WPHF Midterm Review December 2019 Burundi Case Study Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Acronyms.…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………….6 I. INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………………………..10 1. Methodology …………………………………………………………………………………………………..10 2. Context ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………11 3. Women’s Peace & Humanitarian Fund -a Brief Background …………………………….14 4. WPHF coverage in Burundi ………………………………………………………………………………14 II. MAIN FINDINGS………………………………………………………………………………………………..16 1. Civil Society Organizations -Key Partners in the WPHF …………………………………………16 2. A Strategy for Implementation …………………………………………………………………………….19 3. Results Achieved ………………………………………………………………………………………………….22 4. Partnerships and Synergies ………………………………………………………………………………...32 5. Communications ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 33 6. Management of the WPHF Projects……………………………………..................................34 7. Impact………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….36 III. CHALLENGES, LESSONS LEARNED AND GOOD PRACTICES ………………………………..37 IV. CONCLUSIONS………………………………………………………………………………………………….42 V.RECOMMNENDATIONS……………………………………………………………………………………...43 ANNEXES Annex 1: Terms of Reference for the Midterm RevieW/Case Study ………………………47
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Time. Human Rights Briefing on Burundi
    TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 II POLITICAL CONTEXT AND SUMMARY .................................................... 2 III CRITICAL HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED ............................................................................................................... 6 III.i NO ACCOUNTABILITY: PERSISTENT HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES IN 2003 BY THE GOVERNMENT SECURITY FORCES AND THE CNDD- FDD (NKURUNZIZA) ............................................................................................ 6 Human rights abuses by the CNDD-FDD (Nkurunziza) .................................. 6 Extrajudicial executions by government forces ................................................ 7 Need for reform of the military justice sector ................................................... 8 A blatant disregard for justice ............................................................................ 9 III.ii TORTURE AND “DISAPPEARANCES” ............................................ 11 III.iii INCREASING SEXUAL VIOLENCE .................................................. 12 III.iv THE RIGHT TO HEALTH.................................................................... 14 III.v THE PROLIFERATION OF SMALL ARMS ..................................... 17 Government response – the distribution of more arms .................................. 19 Other economic exploitation or punishment ................................................... 19 Insecurity
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED E NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2006/109 23 December 2005 Original: ENGLISH COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Sixty-second session Item 19 of the provisional agenda ADVISORY SERVICES AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN RIGHTS Report of the independent expert on the human rights situation in Burundi, Akich Okola GE.05-16823 (E) 050106 E/CN.4/2006/109 page 2 Summary In its resolution 2005/75, the Commission on Human Rights requested the independent expert to continue to study the situation of human rights in Burundi and requested him to submit an interim report to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session and a report to the Commission at its sixty-second session. The findings of his third mission in July 2005 were the basis of his report (A/60/354) to the General Assembly. The independent expert undertook his fourth mission to Burundi from 4 to 15 October 2005. The present report is based on that last mission and covers the period from 15 August to 15 December 2005. During his mission the independent expert met with senior State officials and senior officials from national institutions, national and international non-governmental organizations, diplomatic missions, United Nations agencies and international organizations, including the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General and Special Representative of the African Union in Burundi. He also undertook a follow-up mission to Gitega where he visited the prison and the Mushasha primary school, and met with local officials. The present report addresses in section I the political and security situation in Burundi.
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi 2018 International Religious Freedom Report
    BURUNDI 2018 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution defines the state as secular, prohibits religious discrimination, and provides for freedom of conscience and religion. It prohibits political parties from preaching religious violence or hate. Laws regulating nonprofit organizations and religious denominations require registration with the Ministry of the Interior, and religious denominations must meet standards including a minimum number of adherents in order to seek registration. Religious groups that do not seek or receive registration may face scrutiny, and at times harassment or prosecution, by government officials and ruling party members. On March 14, a man in Cankuzo Province died after being arrested and imprisoned for refusing to register as a voter due to his religious beliefs. The official cause of death was malaria, but witnesses cited beatings with iron rods and stated that they contributed to his death. Approximately 2,500 members of a nonrecognized religious group that fled the country to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in 2013 and 2014 returned to the country in April. The Ministry of Interior appointed 11 members of a new religious monitoring body, of whom eight were religious leaders, including the president and vice president of the committee. The committee included one Muslim representative, six representatives from Protestant denominations, and one Catholic representative, who resigned and was not replaced during the year. The committee reported extensive efforts to promote dialogue among and within religious denominations during the year. Among the committee’s stated functions was to track what were termed subversive or inflammatory teachings of religious groups. Religious leaders from different denominations sought to promote improved interfaith relations, which at times were strained by political differences, including through nongovernmental organization (NGO)-supported dialogue programs.
    [Show full text]
  • After-Action Review
    United Nations Nations Unies Office for the Coordination Bureau de Coordination Of Humanitarian Affairs in Burundi Des Affaires Humanitaires au Burundi http://ochaonline.un.org/Burundi http://ochaonline.un.org/Burundi Burundi Weekly Humanitarian News 08 – 14 DECEMBRE 2008 Activities and Updates Cholera outbreak under control in Mwakiro and Kiganda communes respectively in Makamba, Muyinga and Muramvya provinces. Cibitoke province The first cholera case was reported in Rugombo Several activities were also conducted within the th commune/ Cibitoke province on 14th November and framework of the celebration of 60 anniversary of confirmed by the laboratory of National Institute for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Public Health (INSP) three days later. Until 19th While 52 participants, including 14 women, mainly December, a total of 96 cases including one home local administrative authorities, religious and civil death (on 14th December) were treated in Cibitoke society representatives attended a sensitization hospital and other health centres. The most affected session in Bujumbura Mairie province, the official zones are the chef- lieu of Rugombo commune with commemoration of the event was chaired by the first a total of 60 cases. Thanks to the collaboration Vice- president, H.E. Dr Yves Sahinguvu in the between NGOs and local health services, the presence of DERSG Bintou Keita and the Vice situation is under control and no other case was minister of Human Rights in Kirundo Province. received since the 15th December. Experts are waiting until 7 days to declare the end of the Assistance to Burundians expelled outbreak as reported by UNICEF. It is worth noticing from Tanzania that cholera outbreak in Cibitoke are recurrent and are mainly due to lack of access to potable water.
    [Show full text]