Proceedings of the National Academy of Sience8 Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 18-25, September 1970

Deficient Photosystem II in Agranal Bundle Sheath of C4 Plants K. C. Woo,* Jan M. Anderson,f N. K. Boardmantt W. J. S. Downton,4 C. B. Osmond,* and S. W. Thornet

AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL1 UNIVBR8ZTY AND COMMONWEALTTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION, CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA Communicated by R. N. Robertson, June 4, 1970 Abstract. A method is described for separating mesophyll and bundle sheath chloroplasts from the leaves of C4 plants. The agranal bundle sheath chloro- plasts are inactive in the Hill reaction, whereas granal bundle sheath and granal mesophyll chloroplasts exhibit normal photosystem II activity. The agranal bundle sheath chloroplasts are deficient in photosystem II; they lack b-559 and the fluorescence bands associated with photosystem II. All the chloro- plasts exhibit photosystem I activity.

Leaves of plants with the C4-dicarboxylic acid pathway of photosynthesis1 contain two distinctive layers of -containing cells: the outer meso- phyll layer and the inner bundle sheath layer surrounding the vascular bundles.2 Chloroplasts of the mesophyll cells contain grana, but those of the bundle sheath exhibit varying degrees of grana development depending on the species. Earlier studies' in which leaf sections were treated with the Hill oxidant, tetranitro blue tetrazolium chloride (TNBT), showed that noncyclic electron flow from was restricted to chloroplasts contaiuing grana. The agranal bundle sheath chloroplasts of Sorghum were incapable of TNBT reduction unless arti- ficial electron donors were provided to photosystem I. This paper describes a technique for separating mesophyll and bundle sheath chloroplasts from the leaves of (X plants. The method is based on the differen- tial resistance of the bundle sheath and mesophyll cells to breakage.4 The species used in this study were selected to provide a suitable range of grana de- velopment in the bundle sheath chioroplasts. We have examined the photochemical and fluorescence properties and cy- tochrome contents of the isolated mesophyll and bundle sheath chloroplasts. The results indicate that the bundle sheath chloroplasts lacking grana are de- ficient in photosystem II but they contain an active photosystem I. Grana- containing chloroplasts, both mesophyll and bundle sheath, have a functional photosystem II. Materials and Methods. Seedlings of Zea mays L. (var. NES 1002), Sorghum bicolor L. (var. Texas 610), and Atriplex spongiosa F. v. M. were grown in a glass house for 2-3 weeks. Leaves (10-15 g samples) were cut into strips (2-3 mm wide) and blended in a Sorvall Omnimixer for 5 sec at 50% of the line voltage in 100 ml of isolation medium (0.33 M sorbitol, 30 mM TES buffer, pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, 5 mAI 18 Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 VOL. 67, 1970 PHOTOSYSTEM BUNDLE SHEATH CHLOROPLASTS 19

2-mercaptoethanol, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, and 2% polyclar AT). This grinding procedure is effective in breaking mesophyll cells, but very few of the more resistant bundle sheath, cells. Unbroken cells and some cell debris were removed by filtration through two layers of Miracloth. The filtrate was centrifuged for 2 min at 300 X g and the pellet discarded. Mesophyll chloroplasts were obtained by centrifuging the supernatant for 10 min at 1000 X g and resuspending the pellet in the suspension medium (0.33 M sorbitol, 10 mM buffer, pH 7.4, 1 mM MgCl2, and 0.5% bovine serum albumin). The residue from the Miracloth was resuspended in 100 ml of isolation medium and blended for 3-5 min in the Omnimixer at 100% of line voltage. This procedure disrupts the remaining mesophyll cells and leaves the intact bundle sheath cells attached to lengths of vascular tissue. The blending time was varied for each species to give good yields of bundle sheath cells. The brei was filtered through Miracloth, and the residue washed and suspended in 50 ml of isolation medium. Examination in the light micro- scope showed that the bundle sheath cells were devoid of mesophyll cells. Fragments of bundle sheath chloroplasts were obtained by blending the resuspended residue in a Ten Broeck homogenizer or a Janke Kunkle mill with glass beads. The homogenate was filtered through Miracloth and the filtrate centrifuged for 2-3 min at 1000 X g to remove starch grains and cell debris. Bundle sheath fragments were then sedi- mented by centrifugation for 20 min at 10,000 X g, and resuspended in a minimum volume of suspension medium. All operations were performed at 0-4CC. Hill reaction activities were measured by an electrode (Rank), with NADP as electron acceptor. Samples were illuminated for 2 min with red light (Wratten 29 filter; X >600 nm) of intensity 4 X 105 erg cm-2 sec-'. Photoreduction of NADP was measured at 340 nm with ascorbate-dichlorophenolindophenol (DCIP) as electron donor and in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethyl urea (DCMU). Light-induced absorbance changes were measured with a Chance-Aminco dual wave- length spectrophotometer (American Instrument Co.). Actinic monochromatic light was provided by a 650 watt tungsten iodide lamp and Balzer interference filters. Light intensities were measured with an YSI-Kettering model 65 radiometer. were identified from reduced minus oxidized difference spectra, measured at 200C and 77°K in a Cary model 14R recording spectrometer, as described previously.5 Measurements at 77°K were performed in 60% glycerol by the single freezing procedure. Fluorescence emission spectra at 77°K were recorded in 60% glycerol on a fluorescence spectrometer incorporating automatic correction for photomultiplier and monochromator responses, and variation in output of light source.6'7 Fluorescence quantum efficiencies were calculated as described previously.7 Results and Discussion. The mesophyll chloroplasts of Sorghum bicolor contain well-developed grana but the bundle sheath chloroplasts are transversed by single unappressed lamellae (agranal). In contrast, grana are well developed in the bundle sheath chloroplasts of Atriplex spongiosa and somewhat less de- veloped in the mesophyll cells.8 In Zea mays, the bundle sheath chloroplasts are essentially similar to those of Sorghum bicolor except for an occasional region of appressed lamellae; the mesophyll chloroplasts have good grana. The degree of grana formation in these species is reflected by the chlorophyll a/b ratios.9 Photochemical activities: Hill reaction activities of isolated chloroplasts with NADP as electron acceptor are shown in Table 1. M\Iesophyll chloroplasts from the three species gave good rates of oxygen evolution and there were no significant differences between the species. In contrast, the bundle sheath chloroplasts of Sorghum were inactive in the Hill reaction and oxygen evolution was not detectable. Bundle sheath chloroplasts of Zea mays gave traces of oxygen, but the rates of evolution were very low. The bundle sheath chloro- plasts of Atriplex gave rates of oxygen production comparable to those of its Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 20 BOTANY: WOO ET AL. PROC. N. A. S.

TABLE 1. Photochemical activities of isolated chloroplasts. Hill reaction* NADP reductiont (,uatoms[01/mg (umoles/mg Chloroplast type chlorophyll/hr) chlorophyll/hr) Sorghum bicolor mesophyll 159 38 Sorghum bicolor bundle sheath 0 43 Zea may8 mesophyll 168 41 Zea mays bundle sheath traces (<10) 30 Atriplex spongiosa mesophyll 150 Atriplex spongiosa bundle sheath 137 * Reaction mixture contained in 4 ml, chloroplasts (40-100 ug chlorophyll) and (in umoles) sorbitol, 1200; phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 40; MgCl2, 4; NADP, 2; and a saturating amount of . t Reaction mixture contained in 3 ml, chloroplasts (25 p&g chlorophyll), and (in pmoles) sorbitol, 900; phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 30; MgCl6, 3; NADP, 2; DCMU, 0.003; sodium ascorbate, 7.5; DCIP, 0.1; and a saturating amount of ferredoxin.

mesophyll chloroplasts. The chloroplasts of Sorghum and Zea which were in- active in the Hill reaction were able to photoreduce NADP, if provided with the electron donor ascorbate-DCIP (a photosystem I activity). The rates of photoreduction by these chloroplasts did not differ significantly from the rates obtained with the granal mesophyll chloroplasts (Table 1). Thus, there appears to be a good correlation between the ability of chloroplasts to evolve oxygen (a photosystem II activity) and the presence of grana. The traces of oxygen observed with bundle sheath chloroplasts of Zea may arise from the occasional regions of appressed lamellae observed in these chloroplasts. We suggest, therefore, that the agranal bundle sheath chloroplasts of Sorghum and Zea either lack photosystem II or have an inactive photosystem II, whereas the granal bundle sheath chloroplasts of Atriplex exhibit normal photosystem II activity. The agranal chloroplasts of Sorghum and Zea, however, possess an active photosystem I. Cytochromes: The light-induced absorbance changes observed with cyto- chrome f support the above suggestion. Cytochrome f, which is normally in the reduced state in isolated chloroplasts, is localized in photosystem I.10 It is oxidized by light absorbed by photosystem I, but not by light absorbed by photo- system II. Figure la shows the light-induced absorbance changes at 554 nm in the bundle sheath chloroplasts of Sorghum illuminated with 714 nm light. There is a rapid decrease in absorbance on turning on the light (oxidation of cytochrome f) and a return to the steady-state level on turning off the light. A spectrum for the absorbance change, obtained by varying the wavelength of the measuring beam, corresponds with the absorption spectrum of oxidized cytochrome f (Fig. lb). Similar results to those shown in Figure 1 were obtained with the mesophyll chloroplasts of Sorghum, and with the bundle sheath and mesophyll chloroplasts of Atriplex. The effect of wavelength of monochromatic actinic light on the magnitude of the light-induced absorbance decrease at 554- nm was investigated for the meso- phyll and bundle sheath chloroplasts of Sorghum and Atriplex. With the bundle sheath chloroplasts of Sorghum (Fig. 2a) the absorbance decrease was independent of the wavelength of actinic light between 650 nm and 732 nm. The addition of DCMU had no significant effect. In contrast, cytochrome f oxidation in the Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 VOL. 67, 1970 PHOTOSYSTEM BUNDLE SHEATH CHLOROPLASTS 21

-* 1 (a)

0 To 1 ° E SORGHUM 8/COLOR BUNDLE SHEATH

ON OFF -2I 20 sec4 (b) SORGHUM BICOLOR

X ~~~~~~~MESOPHYLL (b) -

<-1.5 540 550 560 650 670 690 710 730 WAVELENGTH (nm) WAVELENGTH (nm) FIG. 1.- (a) Absorbance changes of FIG. 2.- Relative effectiveness of mono- bundle sheath chloroplasts of Sorghum Si- chromatic light 'of different wavelengths on color at 554 nm at 2000, induced by 714 nm the steady-state absorbance change at 554 light of intensity, 6.2 X 108 ergs cm-2 sec1l. nm. (a) Bundle sheath chloroplasts of Reference wavelength, 570 nm. The reac- Sorghum bicolor (50 pig chlorophyll/mi). tion mixture (3.0 ml) contained chloropla~st (b) Mesophyll chioroplasts of Sorghum Si- fragments (50 pg chlorophyll/mi) in 0.05 M color (82 pig chlorophyll/ml). (c) Bundle phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 with 0.3 M sucrose, sheath chloroplasts of Atriplex spongiosa 0.01 M KOI and 10 pmol of sodium ascorbate. (28 pg chlorophyll/mi). Incident intensity, (b) Spectrum of absorbance change in 6 X 103 ergs cm-2 sec1; temperature, bundle sheath chioroplasts of Sorghum Si- 2000, reference wavelength, 570 nm. Con- color at 2000, induced by 714 nm light. ditions as for Fig. 1. In the presence (-0-) and absence (*-@-) of 10- M DCMU.

mesophyll chioroplasts of Sorghum (Fig. 2b) was activated by 703, 714, and 732 nm light (photosystem I) but not by 650, 663, or 675 nm light (photosystem II). In the presence of DCMU, cytochrome f oxidation was independent of wave- length. The bundle sheath (Fig. 2c) and mesophyll chioroplasts of Atriplex gave similar action spectra to those observed with the mesophyll chloroplasts of Sorghum. Thus, after the addition of DCMU which inhibits electron flow in photosystem II, the granal chioroplasts, both mesophyll and bundle sheath, resemble the agranal bundle sheath chloroplasts. Neither the Hill reaction activities nor the light-induced absorbance changes permit us to determine whether photosystem II is absent or merely inactive in the agranal chioroplasts' of Sorghum and Zea. We decided therefore to look for cytochrome b-559, a known component of Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 22 BOTANY: WOO ET AL. PROC. N. A. S.

photosystem II in spinach chloroplasts.5 Reduced minus oxidized difference spectra of mesophyll chloroplasts from Sorghum (Fig. 3a and b) closely resemble the corresponding difference spectra of spinach chloroplasts at 20'C and 770K.A The ascorbate-reduced minus ferricyanide-oxidized difference spectrum shows peaks at 548 and 552 nm caused by cytochrome f and at 557 nm caused by cyto- chrome b-559. The dithionite-reduced minus ferricyanide-oxidized difference spectrum shows an enhanced peak at 557 nm and a shoulder at 561 nm because of cytochrome b6. We conclude that the Sorghum mesophyll chloroplasts contain cytochromes f, b6, and b-559 in about the same molar ratios as in spinach chloro- plasts.

557 + 552 557 MESOPHYLL 55 561 548 FIG. 3.-Reduced minus oxi- L/ \ 548 dized difference spectra of Sor- / \ ghum2 \bicolor chloroplasts at 77°K. (a) and (c), ascorbate- reduced minus ferricyanide-oxi- ba)(b) (a) (b) dized. (b) and (d), dithionite- reduced minus ferricyanide-oxi- BUNDLE SHEATH 5 552 dized. (a) and (b), mesophyll 548557 I 552 A=0. 01 chloroplasts: 322 ,ug chloro- 548 4 , j,UZ 561 phyll/ml; optical path length, s /1 / a + 2 mm. (c) and (d), bundle 557 sheath chloroplasts: 156 ug chlorophyll/ml; optical path (c) (d) length, 4 mm. 540 550 560 570 540 550 560 570 WAVELENGTH (nm)

The difference spectra of bundle sheath chloroplasts of Sorghum are shown in Figure 3c and d. The ascorbate-reduced minus ferricyanide-oxidized difference spectrum indicates the presence of cytochrome f, but cytochrome b-559 is barely detectable (the small amount may arise from slight contamination of the bundle sheath chloroplast fragments with fragments of mesophyll chloroplasts). The dithionite-reduced minus ferricyanide-oxidized difference spectrum indicates peaks at 548 and 552 nm caused by cytochrome f and at 557 and 561 nm caused by cytochrome b6. Room temperature difference spectra of Sorghum bundle sheath chloroplasts confirmed the absence of cytochrome b-559. The ascorbate- reduced minus ferricyanide-oxidized difference spectrum showed a single band at 554 nm (cytochromef), while the dithionite-reduced minus ferricyanide-oxidized difference spectrum gave two bands at 554 nm (cytochrome f) and 563 nm (cyto- chrome b6). The Sorghum bundle sheath chloroplasts thus resemble the photo- system I fragments obtained by digitonin fragmentation of spinach chloroplasts.5 Fluorescence spectra: We have also examined the fluorescence emission spectra at 77°K of mesophyll and bundle sheath chloroplasts from the three species. Grana-containing spinach chloroplasts give a three-banded fluorescence emission spectrum at 77°K with maxima at 683, 695, and 735 nm.10 An earlier Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 VOL. 67, 1970 PHOTOSYSTEM BUNDLE SHEATH CHLOROPLASTS 23

examination of the fluorescence properties of subehloroplast fragments enriched in photosystems I and II respectively, indicated that the emission band at 735 nm originates mainly from photosystem I and the bands at 683 and 695 nm come from photosystem 11.6 The mesophyll chloroplasts of Sorghum and both meso- phyll and bundle sheath chloroplasts of Atriplex gave three-banded spectra (Figs. 4 and 5) which resembled the spectrum previously obtained with spinach chloro-

SORGHUM B/COLOR 9 A TRIPLEX SPONGIOSA 9

LOe SHEATH

7 -BUNOLE zw = U / SHEATH Z 6- 660 6 U 1%

LU 5~~~~~~~~~~~~~,

g i U. 4

,ect;Uoncentration,0.1absorbanceunit- 2 -J U)~~~~~WVLNT5nm UAEEGH{m

at~~~~~~431m

2ength, 43 olih MntesiyL2hers . 49 plast. ThFurenequntmyission spcrf t I.5-luorescenceemissfrctooight semitted at

TABLEof Atriplexspongio~~~aQuohlandu bunldebundlefloecenceotshatsheathMESOPHYLL477°K o eohl adbnl het hoo

pstofSorghum bicolormExcitatio wave- 79ssotipe pnis odtosa Fonition4.-Fluorescence.emissionsptetracat Fion 5.-Fobdquna mtedaluorescence.eisosetaa sec- conentraton,r 0.1abseorbane 0.16i7

plas/0ts.the*last Then qantuqatumi ofgyireldsgyield fluoresctaloftefluorescencethe andandethefractionabsorbe offractionaoftlight5emitteddquat Mmittedloecnea at TABLE total2 S) ecntumyildh ofthfluorescence the73-K.bndeegat mte Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 24 BOTANY: WOO ET AL. PROC. N. A. S.

The fluorescence spectrum of Sorghum bundle sheath chloroplasts is strikingly different from the above and, in fact, resembles the small (photosystem I) sub- chloroplast fragments obtained by digitonin incubation of. spinach chloroplasts.6 Light emitted at the 735-nm band accounts for 95% of the total fluorescence emission. A similar spectrum was obtained with the bundle sheath chloroplasts of Zea. It might be argied, however, that the grinding procedure used to disrupt the bundle sheath cells may preferentially release photosystem I fragments from the chloroplasts. We examined the fluorescence emission spectrum of intact bundle sheath cells of Sorghum and found this to be identical to that of the chloro- plast fragments. These fluorescence studies suggest that the agranal bundle sheath chloroplasts are deficient in photosystem II pigment assemblies. The virtual absence of cytochrome b-559 from these chloroplasts supports this con- clusion. It appears that the lack of Hill activity in the agranal chloroplasts is a result of a deficiency of photosystem II units rather than to a mere inactiva- tion of photosystem II. Concluding Remarks, From a study of a number of Nicotiana tabacum mutants, Homann and Schmid"1 suggested that appressed lamellae were neces- sary for photosystem II activity. Our present studies with the agranal bundle sheath chloroplasts, together with the earlier work with TNBT,3 lend support to this suggestion. During chloroplast development in the greening pea, there is also a good correlation between grana formation and the onset of Hill activity."2 However, a mutant of Chlamydomonas reinhardi (ac-31) has been described13 which shows essentially no appression of chloroplast lamellae but normal photo- system II activity. Therefore, we cannot conclude that appressed lamellae or grana are obligate for photosystem II activity, although in higher plant chloro- plasts there appears to be a correlation between the presence of grana and an active photosystem II. These studies show that the bundle sheath chloroplasts of some species with the C4-dicarboxylic acid pathway of lack grana and an active photosystem II. Since the appear to be confined to bundle sheath chloroplasts,1'4 the lack of reducing power generated by photosystem II raises problems for the reduction of 3-phosphoglycerate.3 It has been suggested that the reducing power in these bundle sheath chloroplasts may arise from the oxidative decarboxylation of malate transported from the mesophyll chloro- plasts.l 3 14 The same problem would not occur in those species with granal bundle sheath chloroplasts.3'1

* Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Box 475, Canberra City, 2601, Australia. t C.S.I.R.O., Division of Plant Industry, Canberra City, 2601, Australia. t Requests for reprints may be sent to Dr. C. B. Osmond at the Australian National Uni- versity, address above, and Dr. N. K. Boardman, C.S.I.R.O. 1 Slack, C. R., M. D. Hatch, and D. J. Goodchild, Biochem. J., 114,489 (1969). Reviewed by Hatch, M. D., and C. R. Slack, in Progress in Phytochemistry, ed. L. Reinhold, and Y. Liwschitz (London: Interscience, in press), vol. 2. 2 Downton, W. J. S., and E. B. Tregunna, Can. J. Bot., 46, 207 (1968). 3 Downton, W. J. S., J. A. Berry, and E. B. Tregunna, Z. Pflanzenphysiol., 62, 194 (1970). 4Bjorkman, O., and E. Gauhl, Planta, 88, 197 (1969). 6 Boardman, N. K., and J. M. Anderson, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 143, 187 (1967). Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 VOL. 67, 1970 PHOTOSYSTEM BUNDLE SHEATH CHLOROPLASTS 25

6 Boardman, N. K., S. W. Thorne, and J. M. Anderson, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 56, ,586 (1966). 7 Boardman, N. K., and S. W. Thorne, Biochim. Biophy8. Acta, 153, 448 (1968). 8 Osmond, C. B., J. H. Troughton, and D. J. Good~hild, Z. Pflanzenphysiol., 61, 218 (1969). ' Woo, K. C., N. A. Pyliotis, and W. J. S. Downton, manuscript in preparation. Boardman, N. K., Advan. Enzymol., 30, 1 (1968). Homann, P. H., and G. H. Schmid, Plant Physiol., 42, 1619 (1967). 12 Boardman, N. K., J. M. Anderson, A. Kahn, S. W. Thorne, and T. E. Treffry, in Autonomy and Biogemnei of Mitohondria and Chloroplasts, ed. N. K. Boardman, A. W. Linnane, and R. M. Smillie (Amsterdam: North-Holland, in press). 1" Goodenough, U. W., J. J. Armstrong, and R. P. Levine, Plant Physiol., 44, 1001 (1969). 14 Karpilov, Yu. S., The Photosyntheis of Xerophytea, Publication of the Academy of Sciences of the Moldavian S.S.R. Kishnev (1970), 19 pp., in Russian. ' Downton, W. J. S., Can. J. Bot. (in press). Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021