Attachment 1 Summary of Written Submissions, Officer Advice and Deliberations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Attachment 1 Summary of written submissions, officer advice and deliberations Summary of hearing deliberations Correction of spelling, grammatical errors and minor amendments as noted Additional stakeholders added throughout including predator free groups Master planning text moved forward from Plan Appendix 1 and example added Additional text and imagery referencing walking, tramping, hunting, horse riding and mountain biking activities. Additional images Rearranging text and adding images to reflect pest plan and animal work programme work and the restoration focus of the Plan Adding KNE programme boundaries on maps to illustrate their extent Minor changes in Definitions Policy section key changes Set riparian setbacks at 15 metres for Battle Hill, 10m for plantation forest and 20m for the Remutaka Rail Trail Ensuring farming activity practices protect soil, water and remnant native vegetation as stock grazing is phased out Excluding plantation forestry expansion to new areas of park Integrating proposed masterplans into the management plan following Reserves Act process Prioritising the reduction of pest/introduced animals and plants to support biodiversity and restoration work Action section key changes Investigate an access ‘pass’ (not ‘permit’) with horse riders Amended action to include possible collaborative working groups for specific topics or recreation activities Action added to map ecological corridors connecting to and within parks Action amended referencing working with others regarding predator fencing options where cost effective Rule section key changes Backcountry camping – minor changes to Belmont (Allowed), Queen Elizabeth Parks and Baring Head (Managed) Fishing – eel and whitebait changed to Prohibited, with an exception for mana whenua customary harvest Firewood harvesting – include in Plan, prohibited, with the exception of ranger residences, mana whenua customary uses, art and education purposes Remove reference to East Harbour Hunting phasing out by 2025. Attachment 1 Summary of written submissions and officer advice Note: 1. Submissions are ordered below by the structure of the draft plan and their primary topic, noting many submitters discussed a variety of parks and topics. 2. Quoted text from submission is italicised. Bold text is proposed changes/ additions. Submission Name Submission summary Officer comment Officer recommendations number Noted / not accepted No change to Plan Accepted in part or full – change identified NATURAL HERITAGE NA GW officers and Suggested changes to: Change from 40m minimum setbacks to: Council hearing - 18P – to support ongoing stock grazing 18P Stock exclusion zone for riparian margin to deliberations activities at Battle Hill and allow change to 15m flexibility in the width of setbacks 21P Plantation forestry a. to change to 10m - 21P – be consistent with National setback Environmental Standards Add f. Remutaka Rail Trail forestry set back - to reflect current PNP and NZ heritage minimum 20m listing for the Rail Trail, Pakuratahi 44P add bullet point: ‘separating motor vehicles Noting that set backs are a minimum and from walkers, cyclists and horse riders where draft Plan policies 5P, 11P and 74P support ever practicable‘. Definition added to Glossary re moving beyond minimum standards in parks. shared/ multi use trails. KNE boundaries added to maps to better show connection to biosecurity/ predator free work. Heading 2.7 changed Policies 7P and 10P adding to both ‘prioritising pest animal reduction, working collaboratively with others’ Combined sections 2.3 and 2.7 conservation opportunities and challenges. Added more reference to pest animal management and photos. Some text added from the consultation supporting document, ‘Reclothing Papatūānuku’. #17 Hutt City Council HCC owns parts of Belmont and East Harbour Comment: Accepted (HCC) parks. ‘HCC supports the vision and direction HCC input to master planning and land use of the draft Plan’ change to restoration is important to ensure Attachment 1 Submission Name Submission summary Officer comment Officer recommendations number Noted / not accepted No change to Plan Accepted in part or full – change identified ‘HCC would like to explore opportunities with connections with trails, other restoration work HCC to be added as a stakeholder to additional GWRC to speed up re-establishment of and operational programme co-ordination actions for Belmont, East Harbour and indigenous forests specifically in the eastern Wainuiomata parks including master planning ‘Speeding up’ land use change and restoration side of Belmont Park, and partnering with processes will be determined by Council community groups to improve biodiversity decisions in the LTP process, grazing licence outcomes’ changes, community and other partner / Supports ‘Reclothing Papatuanuku in a stakeholder led initiatives. It is expected that a collaborative way with mana whenua and range of passive and active restoration options community groups as set out in the draft will be explored through master planning Plan’. processes. Land use change supported for a number of benefits including increasing recreation opportunities for Kelson residents, improving biodiversity and the quality and mauri of freshwater, supporting Whaitua work and HCC zero carbon target of 2025. HCC would like to provide input to: - Master planning - Speeding up restoration processes - Partnering with community groups - Co-ordinating and collaborating on issues such as pests and weeds Partnering with community groups to establish trails, picnic spots and ‘make parks more available to a wider audience to enjoy, and which incentivise residents to participate in wider ecological restoration programmes’ #62 Porirua City Supports key directions. Suggests: Comment: Accepted Council - Plantation forestry also phased out and A6 applies to all parks ‘Incorporate Whaitua PCC to be added as a stakeholder to additional that PCC be involved in master planning Implementation Programme (WIP) priorities actions for Belmont and Battle Hill including for Belmont and Battle Hill. and actions into park plans and work master planning. - PCC encourages GWRC to address programmes’. planning and implementation of riparian Attachment 1 Submission Name Submission summary Officer comment Officer recommendations number Noted / not accepted No change to Plan Accepted in part or full – change identified management on Regional Parks through A9. add ‘for areas outside of KNEs, to give effect 21P c. says ‘Restore areas with native the PNP as a matter of urgency. to the restoration priorities identified through vegetation when current forestry agreements - Addition to 21P to phase out plantation master planning. Prioritising riparian planting’ expire’. forestry. A9 Develop and implement habitat restoration - Fast tracking and prioritising riparian Riparian planting can be prioritised as part of plans. planting master planning processes A39 add… ‘and future’ needs - 49P suggested change. Consistency with District Plans is intended - A68 suggest TA’s included in 49P add g. excluding plantation forestry. Refer collaboration groups Post Transmission Gully land transfer Rules - Suggests Whitby to Takapu Rd key discussions are ongoing A68 TA’s added in Notes destination - Identifies land transfer option A72 TA’s added - A185. Whitby to Takapu Road added to A123, PCC added, ‘a ki uta ki tai, mountains to sea cross-park trails approach’ A126, riparian areas added, changed to short - long. A165, timeframe changed to short A168,169, riparian areas added A185 amended to a. Porirua to Hutt Valley, b. Whitby to Takapu Road and map updated A172, A185, A197 PCC added in Notes #23 James Mikoz, There are serious omissions in the Draft Toitu Comment: Accepted in part Wellington Te Whenua Parks Network Plan 2020-30 as it The draft Plan has numerous references to Interpretation panel in QEP to be updated as part Recreational fails to mention that all freshwater fish travel improving fish passage in streams. The extent of operational activities Marine Fishers in and out of the sea throughout their lives. of their travels is not detailed. Association Nowhere in the Plan has there been any acknowledgement that all native freshwater QEP – riparian plantings are ongoing. fish travel into and out of the sea throughout Significant long term habitat restoration works their life cycles. are proposed. The Plan identifies an action to Attachment 1 Submission Name Submission summary Officer comment Officer recommendations number Noted / not accepted No change to Plan Accepted in part or full – change identified QEP. Nothing has been proposed to capture develop a fire management plan. GW has a the sediment before it runs off the dirt tracks take your rubbish home with you policy. around the QE2 Park and flows into one of Parangarahu Lakes-Refer action A271 for fish the streams. Currently along the walking and passage. Also note that this Plan draws on, but riding tracks are manmade channels does not replicate the Co-management Plan directing the sediment off the tracks directly for the Lakes developed in 2014. Refer action into a stream? There is nothing to stop logs 3.1, page 41 which refers to reviewing and from entering the Whareroa Stream where identifying best options for fish passage. The with every visit it can be seen the logs have Roopu Tiaki management group determine moved up and down the stream with every priority work. spring tide, severely damaging the stream bank. Park boundaries stop at mean high water springs.