DOCSLIB.ORG

European Parliament 2014-2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Parliament 2014-2019 European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs LIBE_PV(2018)0308_1 MINUTES Meeting of 8 March 2018, 9.00-12.00 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 9.05 on Thursday, 8 March 2018, with Barbara Kudrycka (Vice-Chair) presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda LIBE_OJ (2018)0308_1 The agenda was adopted with the following changes: - addition of a new point 7: presentation of the draft report "On the annual report on the functioning of the Schengen area", Rapporteur: Carlos Coelho. 2. Chair's announcements Linguistic profile: The Chair indicated that interpretation in Croatian and Gaelic was not available for this meeting. 3. European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) LIBE/8/05432 Exchange of views with the Europol Executive Director, Rob Wainwright. The Chair made introductory remarks. Rob Wainwright, Europol Executive Director, took the floor. The following Members took the floor: Barbara Kudrycka (EPP), Birgit Sippel (S&D), Cornelia Ernst (GUE/NGL), Jeroen Lenaers (EPP), Maria Grapini (S&D), Josep-Maria Terricabras (Verts/ALE), Caterina Chinnici (S&D). PV\1161822EN.docx PE626.692v02-00 EN United in diversity EN *** Electronic vote *** 4. Regulation on ENISA, the "EU Cybersecurity Agency", and repealing Regulation (EU) 526/2013, and on Information and Communication Technology cybersecurity certification (''Cybersecurity Act'') LIBE/8/11044 ***I 2017/0225(COD) COM(2017)0477 – C8-0310/2017 Rapporteur for the opinion: Jan Philipp Albrecht (Verts/ALE) AD – PE615.394v03-00 AM – PE618.105v01-00 Responsible: ITRE* – Angelika Niebler (PPE) Adoption of draft opinion The draft opinion was adopted with 35 votes in favour, 2 votes against and 4 abstentions. The following amendments were adopted: COMP: COMP 1, COMP 2, COMP 3, COMP 4, COMP 5, COMP 6, COMP 7, COMP 8, COMP 9, COMP 10, COMP 11, COMP 12, COMP 13; AM: 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 28, 29, 32, 33, 35, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 50, 53, 54, 55, 62, 63, 68, 69, 71, 72, 80, 83, 84, 92, 94, 96, 99, 116, 117, 125. The following amendments were rejected: 78, 79, 95, 98, 105, 106, 107. The following amendments were fallen: AM: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 30, 36, 47, 48, 51, 52, 56, 57, 58, 61, 64, 65, 66, 67, 70, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 81, 82, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 93, 97, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, Heinz K. Becker (EPP) requested a correction to his vote via e-mail: he intended to vote against AM 68 on the Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1a (new)). Maria Grapini (S&D) requested a correction to her vote at the meeting: she intended to vote in favour of AM 94 on the Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point m. *** End of electronic vote *** 5. European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice LIBE/8/10385 Rapporteur: Monica Macovei (ECR) Presentation of the state of play of trilogue negotiations PE626.692v02-00 2/9 PV\1161822EN.docx EN The following Members took the floor: Monica Macovei (ECR), Caterina Chinnici (S&D). 6. Study “EU and Member States’ policies and laws on persons suspected of terrorism-related crimes” LIBE/8/12372 Presentation of the study commissioned by the Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, by Quentin LIGER, Optimity Advisors. Quentin Liger, Optimity Advisors, presented the study. The following Members took the floor: Birgit Sippel (S&D), Judith Sargentini (Verts/ALE). The meeting suspended at 10:54. The meeting resumed at 11:01. 7. Draft report “On the annual report on the Functioning of the Schengen area” LIBE/8/11551 Rapporteur: Carlos Coelho (EPP) AM – PE619.140v01-00 Consideration of the draft report Deadline for amendments: 14 March 2018, 13:00 Carlos Coelho (EPP), Rapporteur, took the floor. The following Members took the floor: Sylvie Guillaume (S&D), Cecilia Wikström (ALDE). Carlos Coelho (EPP) concluded the debate. 8. Any other business No points raised. 9. Next meetings 12 March 2018, 19.30 – 21.00 (Strasbourg) 19 March 2018, 15.00 – 16.15 (Brussels) 20 March 2018, 9.00 – 12.30 (Brussels) The meeting ended at 11:19. PV\1161822EN.docx 3/9 PE626.692v02-00 EN Results of roll-call votes Contents 1. Proposal for a regulation on ENISA, the "EU Cybersecurity Agency", and repealing Regulation (EU) 526/2013, and on Information and Communication Technology cybersecurity certification (''Cybersecurity Act''), (COM(2017)0477 – C8-0310/2017 – 2017/0225(COD)), Rapporteur: Jan Philipp Albrecht........................................................5 1.1. Final vote..............................................................................................................5 Key to symbols: + : in favour - : against 0 : abstention PE626.692v02-00 4/9 PV\1161822EN.docx EN 1. Proposal for a regulation on ENISA, the "EU Cybersecurity Agency", and repealing Regulation (EU) 526/2013, and on Information and Communication Technology cybersecurity certification (''Cybersecurity Act''), (COM(2017)0477 – C8- 0310/2017 – 2017/0225(COD)), Rapporteur: Jan Philipp Albrecht 1.1. Final vote 35 + ALDE Filiz Hyusmenova, Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz, Cecilia Wikström ECR Monica Macovei, John Procter, Branislav Škripek GUE/NGL Cornelia Ernst PPE Asim Ademov, Heinz K. Becker, Andrea Bocskor, Rachida Dati, Kinga Gál, Barbara Kudrycka, Jeroen Lenaers, Jaromír Štětina, Patricija Šulin, Traian Ungureanu, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Rainer Wieland S&D Caterina Chinnici, Maria Grapini, Sylvie Guillaume, Ramón Jáuregui Atondo, Sylvia- Yvonne Kaufmann, Dietmar Köster, Andrejs Mamikins, Péter Niedermüller, Ivari Padar, Birgit Sippel, Sergei Stanishev, Josef Weidenholzer VERTS/ALE Jan Philipp Albrecht, Julia Reda, Judith Sargentini, Josep-Maria Terricabras 2 - ENF André Elissen, Auke Zijlstra 4 0 EFDD Kristina Winberg PPE Reimer Böge, Monika Hohlmeier, Axel Voss PV\1161822EN.docx 5/9 PE626.692v02-00 EN ПРИСЪСТВЕН ЛИСТ/LISTA DE ASISTENCIA/PREZENČNÍ LISTINA/DELTAGERLISTE/ ANWESENHEITSLISTE/KOHALOLIJATE NIMEKIRI/ΚΑΤΑΣΤΑΣΗ ΠΑΡΟΝΤΩΝ/RECORD OF ATTENDANCE/ LISTE DE PRÉSENCE/POPIS NAZOČNIH/ELENCO DI PRESENZA/APMEKLĒJUMU REĢISTRS/DALYVIŲ SĄRAŠAS/ JELENLÉTI ÍV/REĠISTRU TA' ATTENDENZA/PRESENTIELIJST/LISTA OBECNOŚCI/LISTA DE PRESENÇAS/ LISTĂ DE PREZENŢĂ/PREZENČNÁ LISTINA/SEZNAM NAVZOČIH/LÄSNÄOLOLISTA/DELTAGARLISTA Бюро/Mesa/Předsednictvo/Formandskabet/Vorstand/Juhatus/Προεδρείο/Bureau/Predsjedništvo/Ufficio di presidenza/Prezidijs/ Biuras/Elnökség/Prezydium/Birou/Predsedníctvo/Predsedstvo/Puheenjohtajisto/Presidiet (*) Jan Philipp Albrecht (3VP), Kinga Gál (1VP), Barbara Kudrycka (4VP), Sergei Stanishev (2VP) Членове/Diputados/Poslanci/Medlemmer/Mitglieder/Parlamendiliikmed/Μέλη/Members/Députés/Zastupnici/Deputati/Deputāti/Nariai/ Képviselõk/Membri/Leden/Posłowie/Deputados/Deputaţi/Jäsenet/Ledamöter Asim Ademov, Heinz K. Becker, Caterina Chinnici, Rachida Dati, Cornelia Ernst, Sylvie Guillaume, Monika Hohlmeier, Filiz Hyusmenova, Dietmar Köster, Monica Macovei, Péter Niedermüller, Ivari Padar, Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Traian Ungureanu, Josef Weidenholzer, Cecilia Wikström, Kristina Winberg, Auke Zijlstra, Branislav Škripek Заместници/Suplentes/Náhradníci/Stedfortrædere/Stellvertreter/Asendusliikmed/Αναπληρωτές/Substitutes/Suppléants/Zamjenici/ Supplenti/Aizstājēji/Pavaduojantysnariai/Póttagok/Sostituti/Plaatsvervangers/Zastępcy/Membros suplentes/Supleanţi/Náhradníci/ Namestniki/Varajäsenet/Suppleanter Carlos Coelho, Maria Grapini, Marek Jurek, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Jeroen Lenaers, Andrejs Mamikins, Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz, John Procter, Josep-Maria Terricabras, Axel Voss, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Jaromír Štětina 200 (2) Andrea Bocskor, Reimer Böge, André Elissen, José Manuel Fernandes, Ramón Jáuregui Atondo, Julia Reda, Rainer Wieland, Patricija Šulin 206 (3) 53 (8) (Точка от дневния ред/Punto del orden del día/Bod pořadu jednání (OJ)/Punkt på dagsordenen/Tagesordnungspunkt/ Päevakorra punkt/Ημερήσια Διάταξη Σημείο/Agenda item/Point OJ/Točka dnevnog reda/Punto all'ordine del giorno/Darba kārtības punkts/Darbotvarkės punktas/Napirendi pont/Punt Aġenda/Agendapunt/Punkt porządku dziennego/Ponto OD/Punct de pe ordinea de zi/Bod programu schôdze/Točka UL/Esityslistan kohta/Föredragningslista punkt) PE626.692v02-00 6/9 PV\1161822EN.docx EN Наблюдатели/Observadores/Pozorovatelé/Observatører/Beobachter/Vaatlejad/Παρατηρητές/Observers/Observateurs/Promatrači/ Osservatori/Novērotāji/Stebėtojai/Megfigyelők/Osservaturi/Waarnemers/Obserwatorzy/Observadores/Observatori/Pozorovatelia/ Opazovalci/Tarkkailijat/Observatörer По покана на председателя/Por invitación del presidente/Na pozvání předsedy/Efter indbydelse fra formanden/Auf Einladung des Vorsitzenden/Esimehe kutsel/Με πρόσκληση του Προέδρου/At the invitation of the Chair(wo)man/Sur l’invitation du président/ Na poziv predsjednika/Su invito del presidente/Pēc priekšsēdētāja uzaicinājuma/Pirmininkui pakvietus/Az elnök meghívására/ Fuq stedina taċ-'Chairman'/Op uitnodiging van de voorzitter/Na zaproszenie Przewodniczącego/A convite do Presidente/La invitaţia preşedintelui/Na pozvanie predsedu/Na povabilo predsednika/Puheenjohtajan kutsusta/På ordförandens inbjudan Съвет/Consejo/Rada/Rådet/Rat/Nõukogu/Συμβούλιο/Council/Conseil/Vijeće/Consiglio/Padome/Taryba/Tanács/Kunsill/Raad/ Conselho/Consiliu/Svet/Neuvosto/Rådet (*) Комисия/Comisión/Komise/Kommissionen/Kommission/Euroopa Komisjon/Επιτροπή/Commission/Komisija/Commissione/Bizottság/ Kummissjoni/Commissie/Komisja/Comissão/Comisie/Komisia/Komissio/Kommissionen
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romanian Political Science Review Vol. XXI, No. 1 2021
    Romanian Political Science Review vol. XXI, no. 1 2021 The end of the Cold War, and the extinction of communism both as an ideology and a practice of government, not only have made possible an unparalleled experiment in building a democratic order in Central and Eastern Europe, but have opened up a most extraordinary intellectual opportunity: to understand, compare and eventually appraise what had previously been neither understandable nor comparable. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review was established in the realization that the problems and concerns of both new and old democracies are beginning to converge. The journal fosters the work of the first generations of Romanian political scientists permeated by a sense of critical engagement with European and American intellectual and political traditions that inspired and explained the modern notions of democracy, pluralism, political liberty, individual freedom, and civil rights. Believing that ideas do matter, the Editors share a common commitment as intellectuals and scholars to try to shed light on the major political problems facing Romania, a country that has recently undergone unprecedented political and social changes. They think of Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review as a challenge and a mandate to be involved in scholarly issues of fundamental importance, related not only to the democratization of Romanian polity and politics, to the “great transformation” that is taking place in Central and Eastern Europe, but also to the make-over of the assumptions and prospects of their discipline. They hope to be joined in by those scholars in other countries who feel that the demise of communism calls for a new political science able to reassess the very foundations of democratic ideals and procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Roll-Call Votes of 2 April 2019
    Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Results of roll-call votes of 2 April 2019 Table of Contents 1. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination - 2018/0224(COD) - Rapporteur: Dan Nica - Vote on the partial agreement resulting from interinstitutional negotiations ...................................................................... 2 2. Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation - 2018/0225(COD) - Rapporteur: Christian Ehler - Vote on the partial agreement resulting from interinstitutional negotiations ................................................................................................................ 3 Key to symbols: + (in favour), - (against), 0 (abstention). 1. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination - 2018/0224(COD) - Rapporteur: Dan Nica - Vote on the partial agreement resulting from interinstitutional negotiations 49 + ALDE Fredrick Federley, Gesine Meissner, Lieve Wierinck ECR Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Rupert Matthews, Evžen Tošenovský EFDD Rosa D'Amato, Rolandas Paksas ENF Angelo Ciocca GUE/NGL Jaromír Kohlíček, Paloma López Bermejo,
    [Show full text]
  • A-8-2016-0354 EN.Pdf
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting A8-0354/2016 28.11.2016 *** RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offenses (08523/2016 – C8-0329/2016 – 2016/0126(NLE)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Jan Philipp Albrecht RR\1110883EN.docx PE592.131v03-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_NLE-AP_Agreement Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) PE592.131v03-00 2/17 RR\1110883EN.docx EN CONTENTS Page DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION ................................. 5 SHORT JUSTIFICATION ......................................................................................................... 6 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ................................................... 10 ANNEX: LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS .......................... 14 PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ................................................................... 16 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE .................................... 17 RR\1110883EN.docx
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 18 December 2015 Dear High Representative
    Brussels, 18 December 2015 Dear High Representative, After 16 years of exile in the Netherlands, Ms. Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, president of the Unified Democratic Forces FDU-Inkingi, a coalition of Rwandan opposition parties, returned to Rwanda to run for presidential elections scheduled for August 2010. On 14th October she was arrested after weeks of police harassment, intimidation and media lynching, charged with genocide ideology, genocide denial, and conspiracy against the regime. Charges commonly used to silence any opposition in a country where freedom of expression is severely curtailed. After a flawed trial, condemned among others by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the Foundation Jean Jaurès, she was sentenced in first 8 years in prison. On appeal, the sentence was increased to 15 years. Yet, the Supreme Court had invalidated some of the evidences used to convict her in the first place. Having lost all confidence in the justice of her country led by an authoritarian regime, she filed an application with the African Court of Human Rights and Peoples based in Arusha, Tanzania. Nominated for Sakharov Prize in 2012, the fate of this mother, nicknamed by her followers as the Rwandan Aung San Suu Kyi, should challenge us. Pursuant to the resolution of our Parliament 2013/2641 (RSP) of 25 may 2013, we ask the European Commission to officially request the immediate release of Madam Ingabire. In the meantime, we urge the Commission to take action to improve her prison conditions by ensuring, among others, a free and easy access to legal counsel and her recognition as a political prisoner.
    [Show full text]
  • TTIP-Letter-To-Schul
    Mr. Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament European Parliament Bât. Paul-Henri Spaak, 09B011 60, rue Wiertz B-1047 Bruxelles 7 July 2016 Dear Mr. Schulz, In anticipation of the 14th round of negotiations between the EU and US for the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) planned to start on 11 July in Brussels, we are writing to you on behalf of over 65 organisations representing consumers, farmers, not-for-profit health insurers, environmental and general public interest groups to express our serious concerns that the European Commission is failing to respect the European Parliament’s 2015 Resolution on TTIP. 1 Today, we released new analysis, which demonstrates that the European Commission continues to ignore critical aspects of the European Parliament’s Resolution on TTIP, in particular regarding recommendations related to protecting public health, the environment, and democracy. 1. Negotiating on and affecting EU chemicals and pesticides rules The European Parliament has called on the European Commission not to negotiate on issues “where the EU and the US have very different rules” and not to allow regulatory cooperation to affect future standards in such areas. However, the European Commission has continued to negotiate on issues that will affect legislation on chemicals, pesticides, and cosmetic products, whether directly or through regulatory cooperation. This is particularly worrying because the European Commission is already lowering current EU standards of protection (such as on limits to pesticide residues in food) in order to remove barriers to trade. 2. Respect for the EU regulatory system The European Parliament has called on the European Commission “to fully respect the established regulatory systems on both sides of the Atlantic”.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on an Aviation Strategy for Europe
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting A8-0021/2017 2.2.2017 REPORT on an Aviation Strategy for Europe (2016/2062(INI)) Committee on Transport and Tourism Rapporteur: Pavel Telička Rapporteur for the opinion (*): Ole Christensen, Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (*) Associated committee – Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure RR\1116370EN.docx PE589.131v02-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_INI PE589.131v02-00 2/40 RR\1116370EN.docx EN CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ............................................ 4 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 16 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS (*) ...... 24 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY ....................................................................................................................... 31 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ......................................................................................................................... 35 RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ........................................... 40 (*) Associated committee – Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure RR\1116370EN.docx 3/40 PE589.131v02-00 EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on an Aviation Strategy for Europe (2016/2062(INI)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the Commission communication of 7 December 2015 entitled ‘An Aviation Strategy for Europe’
    [Show full text]
  • Informal Consolidated Factual Part of EMIS Report
    European Parliament Committee of Inquiry into Emission Measurements in the Automotive Sector 19.12.2016 FACTUAL PART OF THE EMIS REPORT Rapporteurs: Jens Gieseke, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy INFORMAL CONSOLIDATED VERSION NOTE: This document is meant purely as a documentation tool for ease of consultation. EMIS REPORT - FACTUAL PART - INFORMAL CONSOLIDATED VERSION 2 / 71 EMIS REPORT - FACTUAL PART - INFORMAL CONSOLIDATED VERSION NOTE This document provides, for ease of consultation, an informal consolidated version of the “factual part” that is part of the report of the Committee of Inquiry into Emission Measurements in the Automotive Sector. At the draft report stage, the 7 chapters and 5 appendices making up the “factual part” are subdivided into 12 official working documents.1 This “factual part” sets out the methodology of the inquiry and collects and analyses the factual evidence that the committee gathered in order to reach the conclusions. The draft conclusions of the inquiry and the draft recommendations for the future are respectively included in a separate draft report and in a separate draft motion for a European Parliament recommendation.2 1 List of working documents making up the factual part of the report: – Chapter 1: Introduction (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?language=EN&reference=PE594.071) – Chapter 2: Technical background (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?language=EN&reference=PE594.072) – Chapter 3: Laboratory tests and real-world emissions (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?language=EN&reference=PE594.073)
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Sitting of 10 November 2010
    27.1.2011 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 25 E/1 Wednesday 10 November 2010 IV (Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2010-2011 SESSION Sittings of 10 and 11 November 2010 BRUSSELS MINUTES OF THE SITTING OF 10 NOVEMBER 2010 (2011/C 25 E/01) Contents Page 1. Resumption of the session . 2 2. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting . 2 3. Statements by the President . 2 4. Composition of Parliament . 3 5. Corrigendum (Rule 216) . 3 6. Composition of committees and delegations . 3 7. Documents received . 4 8. Action taken on Parliament’s positions and resolutions . 8 9. Texts of agreements forwarded by the Council . 8 10. Oral questions and written declarations (submission) . 8 11. Transfers of appropriations . 9 12. Implementing measures (Rule 88) . 10 13. Order of business . 11 14. Upcoming EU-US summit and Transatlantic Economic Council - EU-US Data Protection Agreement (debate) . 12 C 25 E/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 27.1.2011 Wednesday 10 November 2010 Contents (continued) Page 15. EU external strategy on Passenger Name Record (debate) . 13 16. Alternative investment fund managers ***I (debate) . 14 17. Single Market Act (debate) . 15 18. Innovation partnerships (debate) . 15 19. Strengthening the OSCE: a role for the EU (debate) . 16 20. Amendment of Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of Member States and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement ***I (debate) . 17 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report
    SPECIAL REPORT Key points for the 8th term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) Madrid, November 2014 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO KEY POINTS FOR THE 8TH TERM OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2014-2019) 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2. THE LATEST ELECTION The European Parliament has, since its creation in 1962 in the 3. MAIN ISSUES IN THE context of the evolution of European integration, become the LEGISLATIVE AGENDA European Union (EU) Institution to have gained more power and 4. SPANISH DELEGATION relevance in the decision-making process of the Union. Indeed, over the years, it has gained increasingly important powers, legitimized 5. CONCLUSIONS and differentiated by the fact that it is the only EU Institution to be 6. APPENDIX 1: COMPETENCES elected by universal suffrage. 7. APPENDIX 2: CURRENT COMPOSITION OF THE It has evolved from being a mere advisory body to having the COMMITTEES power to co-legislate, together with the Council, in more than 85 legislative areas, exercising legislative powers as well as powers 8. APPENDIX 3: THE CURRENT of budgetary and political control. It also wields a considerable BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN amount of political influence, and its competences include those PARLIAMENT of electing the President of the European Commission, vetoing the 9. APPENDIX 4: EUROPEAN appointment of the College, and even forcing the resignation of the PARLIAMENT DELEGATIONS entire Commission after a motion of no confidence. AUTHORS The official headquarters of the Parliament are in Strasbourg, where the main plenary sessions are held.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Viviane Reding Vice-President of the European Commission Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship B-10409 Brussels Belgium
    Ms Viviane Reding Vice-President of the European Commission Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship B-10409 Brussels Belgium 10 September 2013 Dear Vice-President Reding Pre-trial detention in the EU As the European Commission, Council and Parliament have recognised, ‘excessively long periods of pre-trial detention are detrimental to the individual, can prejudice cooperation between the Member States, and do not represent the values for which the European Union stands’.1 We are writing to you now to follow-up on the European Union’s work to tackle this problem and to urge the Commission to continue its work in this area beyond the current legislative programme, including developing a timeframe for tabling a legislative proposal setting common minimum standards for the use of pre-trial detention in the EU. We understand that the European Commission is at this stage intending to focus on monitoring the implementation of three Framework Decisions: the European Supervision Order (ESO); the Prisoner Transfer Framework Decision; and the Framework Decision on the application of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions and is not currently proposing legislation. We take note of this emphasis on effective implementation but would highlight that only one of the three Framework Decisions, the ESO, has the potential to impact on pre-trial detention. While it may go some way to alleviating problems faced by non-nationals by enabling them to return home while awaiting trial, even this is very limited in scope. In addition, the three Framework Decisions are all pre-Lisbon measures and the European Commission therefore currently has no enforcement powers if problems with their implementation are identified.
    [Show full text]