The Planning Committee Will Be Held on Wednesday 23 July 2014

Democratic Services Officer: Ealing Council Gordon Williams Town Hall Tel: 020 8825 6058 New Broadway Fax: 020 8825 6909 London W5 2BY e-mail: [email protected]

PLANNING COMMITTEE

Date: Wednesday 2 July 2014

Time: 7.00pm

Venue: Council Chamber, 2nd Floor, Ealing Town Hall

Plans will be on display inside the Council Chamber in advance of the meeting.

MEMBERSHIP: Councillors: Hynes (Chair), Ahmed, Cogan, Conlon, Gulaid, Mahmoud, Manro, Martin, Padda, Raza, Millican, Sumner and Busuttil.

A G E N D A

N.B. Please note the attached site visit details and agreed seating arrangements as set out in the guide to proceedings.

(Items will not necessarily be taken in the order listed)

1. Apologies for Absence

2. Urgent Matters Any urgent matters that the Chair has agreed should be considered at the meeting.

3. Matters to be Considered in Private

4. Declarations of Interest

5. Minutes The minutes of the meeting held on 11 June 2014

6. Site Visit Attendance

7. Planning Applications and Enforcement Reports: Summary Schedule (Pink) and Background Reports (White) – (Head of Planning Services)

NB: (1) A copy of the standard conditions is available to members of the public in the Planning Reception Area, Perceval House, and copies will be available at the meeting. Copies have been previously circulated to members of the Committee.

(2) The source documents for the planning applications are as follows: - The Town and Country Planning Act 1990 The Adopted New Plan for the Environment (2004) Relevant planning application file – the reference number is indicated in the top right corner of each report.

8. The Local Heritage Register (Head of Planning Services)

9. Date of Next Meeting. The next scheduled meeting of the Planning Committee will be held on Wednesday 23 July 2014.

MARTIN SMITH Chief Executive 24 June 2014

NOTE: In the event of an emergency your attention is drawn to the evacuation instructions displayed on the wall by the entrance to the Council Chamber. First aid advice will also be found here.

Please note that the filming or recording of proceedings is not permitted unless prior approval has been obtained in accordance with the Council’s film protocol. *Please switch off all mobile phones*

**Fire or Emergency** - If an alarm sounds please leave by the nearest exit and gather in front of Perceval House on Uxbridge Road. WelcomePlanning Eastto the Committee Planning - Committee4th July 2001

**Please note that entry to the Public Gallery is up a steep staircase. Persons suffering from a physical impairment which would not permit them to climb stairs are welcome to be seated at the back of the Council Chamber**

What does the Planning Committee do?

 decides approximately 5% of applications made for planning permission within the borough (a senior officer decides the rest).  decides applications for listed building consent.  decides applications for conservation consent.  approves enforcement action against work carried out without prior permission.  is responsible for carrying out the Council’s conservation policies within the borough.

Agenda

Spare copies of the agenda are available at the meeting. In addition all Committee reports are available via the Council's Internet site: http://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/Committees/tabid/62/ctl/ViewCMIS_CommitteeDetails/mid/ 381/id/15/Default.aspx

Planning applications being considered at tonight’s meeting are listed on the pink schedule attached. The reports of the planning officers are on the white papers with recommendations on whether to allow or refuse the application.

Who is present at the meeting?

Elected Councillors make up the membership of the Committee and they decide whether applications should be allowed or refused. Also present are a Senior Planning Officer, a Legal Adviser, a Committee Administrator and any other officers as necessary (e.g. Environmental Health Officer). The layout used is:

Planning G A L L E R Y Committee P U B L I C

Officers/ Councillors Ward Registered Councillors Speakers

Legal Officer Planning Officer Chairman Committee Officer SCREEN

Public Speaking

Public Speakers will have registered with the Council in accordance with the agreed protocol and are permitted a maximum of three minutes each, apart from when an interpreter is used. If an interpreter is used, the submission will be limited to six minutes. One speaker may be heard in objection and one speaker may be heard on behalf of the applicant for any application on the agenda. Where members of the public have registered to speak in advance of the meeting these applications will be taken first. Although other members of the public are not permitted to speak they are welcome to sit, listen and observe the meeting.

Site Visits

Site Visits are generally held the Saturday morning before the Committee. However, site visits can also be made at a later date arising from a decision of the Committee.

Decisions

The Committee can take decisions which include:

 planning permission is granted (allowed) with or without conditions attached.  approval subject to a legal agreement being signed.  refusal, i.e. planning permission is not granted.  referral, for example for further reports or a site visit.

If an application is not clearly gaining consensus from the Committee then a vote will be taken by means of a show of hands and a simple majority will win. If there is no majority then the Chair will vote a second time.

Record of Decisions

The minutes from tonight's meeting will be available ten working days after the meeting. These will be available from the Committee Section and also on the Council's Internet site. The Planning Department will also send decision letters to the applicants.

THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING THIS MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE. IF YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON HOW YOU FEEL THIS MEETING COULD BE BETTER ORGANISED OR IMPROVED PLEASE SEND THESE TO JANINE JENKINSON AT THE TOWN HALL, EALING BROADWAY OR EMAIL AT [email protected].

Planning Committee: 02ND July 2014 Schedule for Site Visits: 28th June 2014

The minibus will collect members in front Perceval House in the on-site lay-by adjacent to staff entrance off Longfield Avenue Ealing W5 at 9.00 am.

SITE PROPOSAL APPROX TIME

1. 22 Aintree Road Perivale UB6 Change of use of the land from a 09:25am 7LA general industrial unit (B2/B8) to a coach depot (Sui Generis), together (Ward: (Perivale) with erection of a noise attenuation barrier and alteration to the lighting

2. Three Bridges Primary School, Installation of a 35m x 17m Multi- 10:05am Melbury Avenue Southall, UB2 Use Games Area (MUGA) with 3m 4HT high fencing at the sides and 5m high fencing at each end near the Ward: (Norwood Green) south eastern site boundary.

Erection of a modular double classroom with ramp and steps adjacent to the south east site boundary

3. 59 – 63 SUMMERLANDS Redevelopment to provide a four 10:45am AVENUE, ACTON, W3 6EW storey mixed used building comprising of a dental practice (Use Ward: (Acton Central) class D1) and six self contained residential units (1 x 1bed, 4 x 2bed and 1 x 4bed) with cycle parking, refuse, hard and soft landscaping following demolition of the existing pre-fabricated pods

4. 24 St Albans Avenue, Alteration of roof from hip to gable 11:25am Chiswick, W4 5JP end, rear roof extension; part second floor rear extension above Ward: (Southfield) existing outrigger; installation of three rooflights to front roofslope

Page 1 of 1 L O N D O N B O R O U G H O F E A L I N G

TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990

APPLICATIONS AND ENFORCEMENT REPORTS TO PLANNING COMMITTEE – 2nd July 2014

Contact officers: Alex Jackson – Extension: 8803, Sandra Winwood – Extension: 7784, Simon Dunn-Lwin – Extension: 7724

No. Location/Applicant/ Particulars of Remarks and Conditions and/or Ref. No. Agent Application Recommendation Reasons for Refusal

01. Three Bridges Installation of a 35m x Grant subject to Time Limit – 3 years PP/2014/1558 Primary School, 17m Multi-Use Games referral to GLA Approved plans BVE/WT Melbury Avenue Area (MUGA) with 3m Materials Southall, UB2 4HT high fencing at the Hours of use (Agent: Mr Wayne sides and 5m high School use Poole) fencing at each end Floodlighting near the south Fencing Ward: (Norwood eastern site boundary. Softlandscaping Green) (Received: 08/04/2014) (Due: 03/06/2014)

02. Three Bridges Erection of a modular Grant subject to Temporary PP/2014/2041 Primary School, double classroom with conditions permission BVE/WT Melbury Avenue ramp and steps Approved plans Southall, UB2 4HT adjacent to the south Materials (Agent: Mr Wayne east site boundary Tree planting Poole) (Received: Ward: (Norwood 02/05/2014) Green) Due: 15/07/2014)

03. 59 - 63 Redevelopment to Grant subject to Time limit – 3 years PP/2014/0152 SUMMERLANDS provide a four storey S106 Legal Approved drawings PKG/ET AVENUE, ACTON mixed used building Agreement Details of materials W3 6EW comprising of a dental and external finishes (Agent: Mr James practice (Use class Hard and soft Lloyd) D1) and six self landscaping contained residential Boundary treatment Ward: (Acton units (1 x 1bed, 4 x Refuse and Central) 2bed and 1 x 4bed) recycling store and with cycle parking, operational refuse, hard and soft management plan landscaping following Bicycle store demolition of the Noise insulation of existing pre-fabricated building envelopes pods of residential use

e:\program files (x86)\neevia.com\docconverterpro\temp\nvdc\e365f1fe-9c3a-4ec0-9b14-8384466c782e\3fa0c1d4-2f11-430b-af36-f131119573d3.doc Page 1 of 2 24/06/14

No. Location/Applicant/ Particulars of Remarks and Conditions and/or Ref. No. Agent Application Recommendation Reasons for Refusal

(Received: Construction 12/02/2014) logistics plan (Due: 09/04/2014) Protection of existing trees/ shrubs / hedgerows and planting locations Lifetime homes standards & wheelchair housing Sustainability condition

04. 24 St Albans Alteration of roof from Grant subject to Time limit – 3 years P/2013/5556 Avenue, Chiswick, hip to gable end, rear conditions Materials to match RC/ET W4 5JP (Agent: roof extension; part Approved plans Paul Vick second floor rear Architects) extension above existing outrigger; Ward: (Southfield) installation of three rooflights to front roofslope

(Received: 19/02/13)

(Due: 17/02/14)

05. 22 Aintree Road Change of use of the Grant subject to Approved P/2013/5366 Perivale UB6 7LA land from a general conditions Plans/Documents MMA/WT (Agent: Peter Brett industrial unit (B2/B8) Current/furture Associates) to a coach depot (Sui coach fleet Generis), together Coach Ward: (Perivale) with erection of a Arrivals/departures noise attenuation Washing equipment barrier and alteration Noise activities to the lighting External plant (retrospective) Coach Route restriction (Received: Operational 29/11/2013) management plan Delivieries (Due: 28/02/2014) Noise Barrier Coach parking Lighting scheme

e:\program files (x86)\neevia.com\docconverterpro\temp\nvdc\e365f1fe-9c3a-4ec0-9b14-8384466c782e\3fa0c1d4-2f11-430b-af36-f131119573d3.doc Page 2 of 2 24/06/14

Planning Committee – 11/06/14

PLANNING COMMITTEE

Wednesday 11 June 2014 at 7.00pm

PRESENT: Councillors Mohan, Raza, Cogan, Martin, Manro, Gulaid, Mahmood, Padda, Joanna Dabrowska, Proud and Ball.

IN ATTENDANCE: Councillors Anthony Young and Daniel Crawford.

1. Apologies for Absence There were none.

2. Urgent Matters There were none.

3. Matters to be Considered in Private There were none.

4. Declarations of Interest

Councillors Ball declared a non pecuniary interest in application 04, Caspian Hotel, 14 Haven Green, by virtue of the fact that he recently attended an event that the applicant had also attended.

Councillor Cogan declared a non pecuniary interest in application 02, Mill Hill Tavern, Gunnersbury Lane, by virtue of the fact that he was a member of Campaign for Real Ale (CAMRA).

5. Minutes

Resolved: That the minutes of the meeting held on 14 May 2014 be agreed as a true and correct record of the meeting.

6. Site Visit Attendance The Chair confirmed that he and Councillors Mahmood, Padda, Cogan, Gulaid, Conlan, Martin, Raza, Joanna Dabrowska and Ball had been present at the Committee site visits. Councillor Manro had not been in attendance

7. Planning Applications and Enforcement Reports The Head of Planning Services submitted reports in relation to the following planning applications for determination by the Committee.

Application 03 in respect of 24 Messaline Avenue, Acton, W3 6JX (Agent: Bratza Associates) (Ward: Acton Central) Conversion of property used as 2 no. self-contained flats into 7 no. self-contained flats (1 x three, 1 x one-bedroom and 5 x two-bedroom)

The minutes should be read in conjunction with the agenda for the meeting. They are subject to approval and signature at the next meeting of this Committee. Page 1

Planning Committee – 11/06/14

;facilitated by the construction of three storey extensions to both sides and to rear along with raising the height of existing property to 3 stories and forming a new hipped roof to be used as habitable space and off-street parking for 2 cars, cycle parking and associated amenity space and refuse storage.

Karon Monaghan spoke on behalf of twenty three local residents in objection to the application. She raised concerns in relation to roof height, proximity to neighbouring properties, design, neighbouring extensions, increase in the number of bedrooms, congestion, pedestrian traffic, noise, rubbish, vehicular traffic, car fumes, loss of sunlight and overlooking. She stated that the proposed height of the roof would more closely approximate to the height of the neighbouring properties; however, the present property aligned the windows with the neighbouring properties. This meant that the front elevation was not starkly out of line with the other properties in the street. The configuration of the windows in the proposed development would be such that all alignment would be lost. It would be a random patchwork of windows, destroying coherence between the properties. She stated that the impact of the increase in roof height would be to create three floors plus a habitable loft space, which contrasted with the neighbouring properties that had two floors plus a habitable loft space. She advised the Committee that the development would close the gap between the existing property and the neighbouring properties and this may result in the footprint of the house being closer in size to the neighbouring properties. The current comfortable size gap between properties highlighted the distinction in style between No.24 and the neighbouring properties. This empathised that No.24 was not intended as a poor mimic of the Tudor style Edwardian houses that neighboured it, but was a different style. In relation to design, she stated that the proposal was ugly and an ill-designed pastiche of neighbouring properties. She stated that the proposal was a gross overdevelopment and there would be a significant increase in pedestrian traffic, rubbish generation, vehicular traffic and car fumes. Furthermore, there would be no additional car parking spaces provided for the expected 27-28 occupants. With regards to light, she stated that the downstairs gallery kitchens in the neighbouring properties would lose almost all natural light if the proposed development went ahead. The properties opposite would suffer a reduction in sunlight which streamed through the windows in the afternoon and evening during the summer months. In relation to overlooking, she wished to highlight that the rear of the proposed development would overlook the properties in Allison Road. She felt the suggestion that this could be addressed by obscure glass in the flats was fanciful. The front and rear would have Juliette balconies that were designed to be accompanied by French windows which would open fully, so providing a clear view into the houses opposite. In addition, she stated that the proposal did not conform to the Local Plan on the grounds that it exceeded density rates. In concluding, she stated that the decision to be made here was a finely balanced one and she felt that the balance lay firmly in favour of the objectors and permission should be refused.

Sarah Ballentyne, the applicant’s Agent, spoke in response to the points raised. A Computer Generated Image indicating the proposal was circulated to Committee members. Firstly, she stated that the developer and Architect had undertaken lengthy pre-application discussions with the Council. The advice provided by officers had been

The minutes should be read in conjunction with the agenda for the meeting. They are subject to approval and signature at the next meeting of this Committee. Page 2

Planning Committee – 11/06/14 taken on board and amendments to the scheme made to produce the scheme presented to the Committee and recommended for approval by officers. She stated that the proposal extended the existing building on site so that its height, scale and massing reflected that of its neighbour. The site did not lie within a Conservation Area and had been designed to reflect the existing pattern and character of development locally; with the design incorporating reference to its neighbours including the Tudor revival farmed gable and proposed red brick and painted finish. She advised the Committee that the design had been developed in close consultation with officers. With regard to car parking, she reported that the applicant was happy to enter into a legal agreement to prevent new residents from applying for car parking permits. In relation to the impact of the proposal on neighbouring properties, she said that at the pre- application stage, the applicant had been advised by planning officers to ensure that the first and second floor levels did not break a 45 degree horizontal line from the mid-point of neighbouring windows. By stepping back the proposal at the rear, the development ensured that the 45 degree line was maintained, thus ensuring good levels of light to the rear windows of neighbouring properties. She said that the relationship the proposal created with its neighbours along the boundaries was replicated along the whole street with gaps between each property and the boundary. The side elevations of Nos. 20 and 26 were clearly designed for such a close relationship with their neighbours with the majority of the side windows facing the proposal site being non-habitable as evidenced by their small size or the use of stained glass to avoid overlooking. There appeared to be kitchen windows towards the rear side elevations of both Nos. 20 and 26. The impact on these windows had been minimised wherever possible, stepping away from the boundary both in the centre of the building and towards the rear, where the setback was more significant on both sides, ensuring adequate light would reach these rooms. In concluding, she highlighted that the developer, North Hill Properties Limited were experienced developers of sites such as these and delivered high quality developments across London and the south east. The scheme Architect was a highly regarded Conservation Architect and had worked on highly sensitive schemes including proposals at Hampton Court Palace. She stated that the proposal would result in a high quality and sustainable development that would deliver much needed new housing in the Borough and make efficient use of the under developed brownfield site.

Councillor Daniel Crawford, Ward Councillor for Acton Central spoke in objection to the application. He stated that neighbouring residents were not opposed to sensible planning schemes; however this application was a clear case of overdevelopment. He stated that the proposal was not of a high quality and the characteristics of the application were markedly different to the surrounding properties. In addition, he raised concern in relation to impact, loss of light, overlooking and increase traffic congestion. He stated that the proposal should be improved and if approved the Committee would have missed the opportunity to provide a much better scheme.

Aileen Jones (Head of Planning Services) introduced the application and drew members’ attention to the Briefing Notes. In response to points raised by the speakers regarding car parking, Aileen Jones stated that Transport Services had advised that the CPZ would warrant that any approval be subject to a S106 agreement restricting

The minutes should be read in conjunction with the agenda for the meeting. They are subject to approval and signature at the next meeting of this Committee. Page 3

Planning Committee – 11/06/14 additional parking permits for future occupants. The proposed scale of the scheme was considered acceptable and with regard to design and the Messaline Avenue street scene, the proposal was typical infill scheme, with the modern floor – to ceiling heights different from the older houses and pointed out that the site was not located within a Conversation Area. It was not considered that the scheme created any significant impact in terms of neighbouring amenity, where there would be no overlooking above the standard set in planning policies either to the front or to the rear. The scheme had been modified and designed to mitigate overlooking to the properties adjacent, but the close relationship with ground floor adjacent windows was seen on site.

Councillor Joanna Dabrowska raised concerns in relation to density, overdevelopment and design. She felt the proposal was a mediocre pastiche and was not in-keeping with the character of neighbouring properties. She also stated that the Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL) was low, although it might be raised by the development of Crossrail.

Councillor Ball raised concerns in relation to design, density, windows and overdevelopment. Councillor Padda felt that the design was not in-keeping with the surrounding area. Councillor Manro stated that the proposal exceeded the guidelines outlined in the London Plan in relation to density and the use of obscure glazing would have been unnecessary if the overall design was suitable. Councillor Gulaid felt the proposal represented overdevelopment and there was insufficient car parking provision.

Aileen Jones (Head of Planning Services) clarified points in relation to density and advised that density was not an indication of the quality of a scheme and to consider it overdevelopment it must demonstrate harm. With reference to mitigation, she advised that obscure glazing and fixing shut windows were considered acceptable mitigation to potential overlooking. Jackie Adams (Head of Planning and Properties) confirmed the relevant legal points.

REFUSE for the following reasons:

1. The proposed development would by reason of excessive density amount to an overdevelopment of the site resulting in loss of light and outlook to the adjacent property at Number 20 Messaline Avenue thereby harmful to the living conditions of occupiers. This would be contrary to policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document and 7.4 and 7.6 of the London Plan.

2. The proposed development would, by reason of its scale and design (particularly the bulk and alignment of windows) be out of character with the existing pattern of development thereby harmful to the character and appearance of the street scene. This would be contrary to policies 7.4 and 7B of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document and 7.4, 7.5 and 7.6 of the London Plan.

The minutes should be read in conjunction with the agenda for the meeting. They are subject to approval and signature at the next meeting of this Committee. Page 4

Planning Committee – 11/06/14

3. Provision of two parking spaces would be inadequate to serve the proposed number of 7 flats, thereby harmful to residents in the vicinity by reason of increased traffic and parking congestion in the surrounding area. This would be contrary to policies 6.13 of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document, 6.3, 6.12 and 6.13 of the London Plan.

Application 04 in respect of Caspian Hotel, 14 Haven Green, Ealing W5 2UU (Agent: Mr Zoya Boozorginia) (Ward: Ealing Broadway) Alterations and extension to former Coach House including internal alterations considering of insertion of a mezzanine floor and provision of internal staircases, WC facilities, office space, storage facility and kitchenette.

Ian Cunningham, owner of 1 Castlebar Road spoke in objection to the application. He stated that for over twenty-five years unneighbourly applications had been submitted for this site. These had been withdrawn or refused by the Council on the grounds of noise, disturbance or highway safety. He said that the plans for the proposed development were very unclear and the usage was muddled. It seemed that the intended usage had been changed during the planning process without any notification. He asked what had happened to the ‘meeting hall’ usage of the Coach House included on the application form, which was now not mentioned in the Committee report. He stated that in one of the plans not listed in the Committee report the B & B’s breakfast room was changed to a meeting room. He asked if this meant that the meeting room originally planned for the Coach House was now intended to be a breakfast room. He felt this was of particular concern since the previous application for a breakfast room with forty places had been refused by the Council. He stated that the report referred to 8 plans, yet there was thirty –four different plans in support of the application that he had been asked to comment on. Of the other twenty-six plans a number of them were inconsistent with the report and with each other. He stated that he had repeatedly pointed out that the proposed car parking layout would have been unworkable and cause hazardous ‘backing out’ of vehicles onto the busy Castlebar Road. He said that he had only discovered that these plans had been withdrawn by reading the Briefing Notes produced for the meeting. In concluding, he said that the original Coach House roof with its Victorian Chimney had one central Hayloft dormer with only a small glass aperture, whereas the proposed Coach House roof had two full height glass panes as dormers, one looking directly into the first floor rear bedroom window of 1 Castlebar Road. He said that the report stated that the Coach House was angled and facing away from the rear of No 1, when in fact it was angled at 15 degrees facing towards the rear first floor windows of No.1, which was a worry to existing residents. He explained that he objected to the new dormer positioning and the large glass panes and that there should either be one central dormer or the offending dormer at the boundary with No.1 should be re-positioned, so as not to look straight into the upstairs flat of No.1. He said the perception of overlooking would be substantial even if obscured glass was used and this could be changed to clear glass in the future.

The minutes should be read in conjunction with the agenda for the meeting. They are subject to approval and signature at the next meeting of this Committee. Page 5

Planning Committee – 11/06/14

Zoya Boozorginia the applicant’s agent spoke in response to the points raised. She said the application fully complied with all relevant policies and the development would enhance the area. She advised the Committee that the stable would operate as a storage space and the mezzanine floor would not exert any detrimental impact on the amenity of neighbouring properties. With regards to concerns raised in relation to an intrusive and unneighbourly full height dormer window, she stated that the objectors had misread the drawings and the windows did not directly face each other. She said that the Public Right of Way would be preserved, there would be no increase in traffic generated and the proposal raised no highway safety concerns.

Councillor Anthony Young spoke in objection to the application. He stated that there was a long history of rejected applications on this site. He raised concerns in relation to vehicular access, congestion, increased car parking issues, intensification of the site, the presence of a tree and a large wall and poor visibility splays. He stated that there was uncertainty regarding the use of the former Coach House and whether the existing breakfast room/dining area were to be used as a meeting room or as storage space.

Aileen Jones (Head of Planning Services) outlined the details of the application and referred the Committee to the Briefing Notes and clarified the drawings that formed part of the formal submission. She reported that the proposed height of the rear wall would be 5.025 metres and not 7.73 metres as stated in error within the report. In response to concerns raised regarding the dormer window, members were advised that the closest window was set in two metres from the common boundary with No. 1 Castlebar Road and the windows did not directly face each other. It was recommended that this window be fixed shut and obscure glazed. The existing arrangements for access and car parking would not require change as a result of the proposal and that the PTAL was rated highly (six) for this site.

Councillor Ball highlighted concerns in relation to access, potential intensification and joining the new building with the rear outbuilding and garden of the neighbouring property.

Councillor Manro felt that the storage building was unlikely to generate additional traffic or cause access problems and that it was not for the Committee to surmise what might happen in the future regarding use. He advised the Committee that it was the material issues that needed to be assessed.

Councillor Proud stated that at the site visit, he had asked the owner of 14 Haven Green what the intended use of the Coach House was. The owner had replied that upstairs would be used for storage and downstairs would be used for meetings.

Aileen Jones (Head of Planning Services) in relation to the intended use of the former Coach House, confirmed the description of the proposal and that there was a condition restricting the use of the building for storage and therefore any use of the building for meetings, would require a new application. Enforcement action could be considered if the condition was breached.

The minutes should be read in conjunction with the agenda for the meeting. They are subject to approval and signature at the next meeting of this Committee. Page 6

Planning Committee – 11/06/14

Councillor Cogan queried whether a planning condition could be added to restrict the possibility of joining up with the adjacent outbuilding at 12 Haven Green, Aileen Jones (Head of Planning Services) and Jackie Adams (Head of Planning and Properties) advised against this.

Some discussion took place regarding vehicular access.

The Chair summarised the issues raised by councillors and said that he was minded to support the application.

GRANT subject to conditions as detailed in the Report and amended Drawing Numbers, as follows:

Drawing Numbers: 131216-00-P0 – Location Plan 131216-02-P1 – Existing Coach House Plans Elevations and Plans 131216-03-P1 – Proposed Coach House Plans, Elevations and Sections. 131216-04-P1 – Existing and proposed block Plans PP-02001757-8 – Existing Ground Floor PP-02001757-9 – Existing First Floor PP-02001757-10 – Existing Roof Floor PP-02001757-11 – Existing Site Issues PP-02001757-12 – Existing Street View

Application 02 in respect of Mill Hill Tavern, Gunnersbury Lane. Acton, W3 8ED (Agent: Newell Projects Ltd) (Ward: South Acton) Part demolition of existing Public House (Class A4). Change of Use of retained Public House and new development to form 3 no. three bedroom houses and 4 no. two bedroom flats with amenity space and parking.

Ann Brennan a local resident spoke in objection to the application. She read out a representation from Roy Tunstall on behalf of Campaign for Real Ale (CAMRA). She said that the primary concern for CAMRA was the loss of a local pub. She stated that the pub was in a good location, as 9000 people used Acton Town Tube Station every day, there was a lot of passing trade, it was based in a large residential area and the pub had been a community resource since at least 1886. She stated that many pubs had been turned around; examples included the Grosvenor in Hanwell and the Aeronaut in Acton. She said that although the Council had passed a motion supported by all parties calling on more protection for pubs, it seemed to have been completely ignored. She explained that when the pub was open, it was on the market for £795,000. After it was sold it was closed and it was then put on the market for £1.15 million – a 30% increase. She said that this pricing tactic made it difficult to retain local pubs, so it was argued that property development was the next best option. She said there was no

The minutes should be read in conjunction with the agenda for the meeting. They are subject to approval and signature at the next meeting of this Committee. Page 7

Planning Committee – 11/06/14 mention of Policies 3.16 and 7.1 of the London Plan in the report which required the protection and enhancement of social infrastructure and the encouragement of neighbourhoods and communities. In summary, she said that CAMRA objected to the application as it would result in the loss of a vital community asset and she urged the Committee to refuse the application.

Ann Brennan then spoke as a neighbouring resident. She said that she was not opposed to the site being redeveloped and had no issues with the proposed flats, however it would have been preferable to have a successful pub or business, but it appeared that this was not a commercially viable option. She stated that a previous application for this site had been refused and the three reasons given for refusal were the same reasons she had raised in relation to the application. She explained that when she became aware of the current application she was keen to see how the issues had been addressed. In relation to overlooking, she felt that the current application addressed this. With regard to substandard amenity space for the houses, she felt that the reduction in houses from four to three had resulted in a much better standard of amenity space for each of the houses. She said that the scale, siting of the houses and the close proximity to the neighbouring properties had not been adequately addressed. She referred to the minutes of the Committee held on 19 February 2014 that set out the reasons for the previous refusal of the application in relation to overdevelopment, impact to the amenity of adjoining residents and loss of outlook and privacy. She felt that the height of the houses had been reduced, but the issues of overdevelopment, negative impact to the amenity of adjoining residents, visual intrusion and loss of outlook and privacy remained.

Aileen Jones (Head of Planning Services) introduced the application and drew members’ attention to the Briefing Notes. Further objections and photographs had been received from the occupants of 96 Mill Hill Road. Aileen Jones clarified the procedure regarding the notification objectors received about speaking at Committee. In response to points raised regarding the protection of social infrastructure, members attention was drawn to the justifications detailed on page 14 of the Committee report, where London Plan Policies 3.16 and 7.1 were specially referred to.

Councillor Joanna Dabrowska noted the objections raised by the occupants of 96 Mill Hill Road regarding the proposed development of houses contravening policies 7.6 and 7.21 of the London Plan. In response Aileen Jones confirmed that all planning policies had been taken into account and clarified that the Policy was 7.6 and it contained paragraph 7.21.

Councillor Ball expressed disappointment regarding the loss of a public house, but felt the concerns raised in relation to the previous application on this site had now been addressed and the scheme was acceptable. Given the setting back had addressed the issue of overlooking, the improved provision of amenity space and the design improvements at the rear, he was now minded to approve the application.

The minutes should be read in conjunction with the agenda for the meeting. They are subject to approval and signature at the next meeting of this Committee. Page 8

Planning Committee – 11/06/14

Councillor Padda agreed with the comments made by Councillor Ball and stated he was minded to approve the application.

Councillor Manro expressed regret at the loss of a community asset and raised some concern in relation to the financial and marketing evidence to substantiate the lack of demand for the public house and boundary treatment details. Overall, he considered the application acceptable.

Councillor Mahmood asked if the existing bus stop would be relocated. Aileen Jones reported that discussion had been undertaken with Transport for London (TfL) nonetheless the bus stop would not be moved.

The Chair summarised the issues raised by councillors and said that he was minded to support the application

GRANT subject to conditions as detailed in the Report and the additional following informative:

The applicant is advised that Planning Committee have requested that officers consult with the neighbouring owner/occupiers at adjacent properties 96 Mill Hill Road and 59 Gunnersbury Lane when Details of boundary treatment are submitted pursuant to Condition 5.

Application 01 in respect of Viking Primary School, Radcliffe Way, Northolt UB5 6HW (Agent: E.C. Harris) (Ward: Northolt West End). Erection of modular double classroom with ramp, steps, a canopy on three sides and landscaping located to South Eastern (rear) corner (Full Deemed Consent).

There were no objector or applicant speakers for this item.

Aileen Jones (Head of Planning Services) introduced the application and drew the Committee’s attention to the updates detailed in the Briefing Notes. Revised drawings had been submitted to reflect the revised and additional plans received, these had been available to view at the site visit. A response had been received from the Council’s Tree Services, regarding the impact of the proposal on the soft play area to the south of the temporary classroom. Concern was raised that if the ground was left uncovered it would lead to compaction of the soil and an impact on the trees health. No objection was raised in relation to the installation of the modular building, as it was felt this would have little to no effect on the neighbouring trees, however, they felt that the soft play area should be refused until further information was provided.

In particular, Aileen Jones drew attention to the removal of trees that had been a topic of concern at the site visit, and clarified that the larger tree to be removed was a lime tree and that it was a category C (low quality) and not B (medium) as stated in the Committee report. The other two trees to be removed are Whitebeam Category U

The minutes should be read in conjunction with the agenda for the meeting. They are subject to approval and signature at the next meeting of this Committee. Page 9

Planning Committee – 11/06/14

(condition cannot be retained) and Rowan (Category C and not B as stated in the Committee report). The other issues raised at the site visit related to robustness of the existing school fencing and safety concerns regarding the siting of a manhole. Members were advised that fencing was not directly related to the current application; and that the agents were aware of the location of the manhole.

Councillor Ball expressed disappointment regarding the loss of the lime tree and proposed that a decision on the application be deferred to allow an alternative site location to be explored. The proposal was not seconded and fell accordingly.

Aileen Jones suggested that an informative could be added to the recommendation that aimed to use tree protection measures to retain the tree.

Councillors Manro and Mahmood supported the measures to mitigate the loss of the established tree and supported the application.

GRANT subject to conditions as detailed in the Report and as amended by the Briefing Note, and an additional informative to revisit the need to remove the lime tree and investigate whether it can be retained with pruning and tree protection measures.

Application 05 in respect of Cambridge House, Cambridge Road, Hanwell W7 3PA (Agent: Cluttons LLP) (Ward : Elthorne) Change of use of vacant office building (B1 Use Class) to a children’s nursery (D1 Use Class) at ground floor level and conversion of the upper floors to provide 9 residential flats (1x studio, 6x one bed and 2x two bed units), together with alterations to openings on the building facades including the formation of balcony terraces, the construction of an internal light well, boundary fencing, refuse storage and car parking.

There were no objector or applicant speakers for this item.

Aileen Jones (Head of Planning Services) introduced the application and reported that the applicant had provided additional supporting information regarding the operation of the children’s nursery, usability of the children’s play area, parents dropping-off of children and highway impact and noted that boundary treatment had been a particular concern raised at the Committee site visit.

In relation to the operation of the Children’s nursery, the Committee was advised that the nursery would accommodate 65 children and 19 staff. The nursery would operate five days per week, 51 weeks per year and between the hours of 8 a.m. – 6.30 p.m. there would be 10 sessions per week, typically a morning session ending at 1p.m. and an afternoon session starting at 1.30 p.m. and ending at 6.30 p.m.

With regard to highway impact, the developer had undertaken an assessment of the predicted traffic generated for the nursery, based on the estimated operational levels of 65 children 19 staff. The assessment had shown that there would be eight two way

The minutes should be read in conjunction with the agenda for the meeting. They are subject to approval and signature at the next meeting of this Committee. Page 10

Planning Committee – 11/06/14 trips between 8 - 9a.m. and eight two way trips between 12 - 2p.m and four two way trips between 6 - 7 p.m. and therefore, the nursery would not have any detrimental impact on the local highway network. The assessment concluded that the number of vehicle trips associated with the nursery would also be significantly lower than with the operational use of the existing office on the site. To mitigate any impact resulting from parents dropping off their children by car, the developer had agreed to a range of mitigation measures as requested by the Council’s Transport Services department, these included a financial contribution of £4000 towards ‘Keep Clear’ road markings, pedestrian safety railings outside the site and the submission of a travel plan. Subject to these measures being put into place the Council’s Transport Planning Service had no objections to the development.

The Committee was advised that the playground would be located at the front of the site and would be enclosed by boundary treatment to ensure privacy. A planning condition would be applied to any permission requiring details of boundary treatment to be submitted.

Councillor Joanna Dabrowska raised concerns in relation to the density of the upstairs flats, design and the figures presented in the transport assessment. With regards to the transport assessment provided by the applicant, she queried the anticipated number of car journeys to and from the nursery and felt the figures presented were a gross underestimation. In relation to fencing for the play area, she felt it was appropriate that the fencing be closed.

Aileen Jones clarified that density calculations was not wholly applicable to a mixed use scheme, the proposal was for a conversion, that there was a fallback position for the applicant to seek prior approval for conversion of offices to residential. The specific arrangements for management of the nursery both inside and for outside play would not be governed by Planning legislation, but by Ofsted, although it was felt that closed boarded fencing of high quality could be appropriate.

Councillor Cogan considered that close boarded fencing would be most appropriate form a security/safety point of view, and recommended 1.8 m high fencing.

Councillor Ball noted that details of the boundary treatment were required by planning condition, but wished the treatment to be a screen and considered that an informative would be helpful. He also thought that the traffic estimates appeared low, and mentioned that there would be a nursery below the residential that could be a noise concern.

Councillor Manro drew attention to the comments received from Transport Services and stated that Ofsted would regulate the nursery use.

GRANT subject to conditions as detailed in the Report, and the following additional informative:

The minutes should be read in conjunction with the agenda for the meeting. They are subject to approval and signature at the next meeting of this Committee. Page 11

Planning Committee – 11/06/14

The applicant is advised that Planning Committee has stated a strong preference for close boarded 1.8 m high fencing to play areas in relation to Condition 5 requiring boundary fencing.

8. The Local Heritage Register

This agenda item was withdrawn by the Chair of the Planning Committee.

9. Date of Next Meeting It was noted the next meeting would take place on Wednesday 2 July 2014.

The meeting finished at 9:20 pm.

Councillor Mohan………………………………………………………………………

The minutes should be read in conjunction with the agenda for the meeting. They are subject to approval and signature at the next meeting of this Committee. Page 12

Three Bridges Primary School, Melbury Avenue, Southall Schedule Item No: 01 & 02

Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the Scale 1/2500 Date 23/6/2014 permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Crown Copyright reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright Centre = 513578 E 179180 N and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. LICENCE NO: LA100019807 2009 Three Bridges Primary School, Melbury Avenue, Southall Schedule Item No: 01 & 02

Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the Scale 1/3500 Date 23/6/2014 permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Crown Copyright reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright Centre = 513578 E 179180 N and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. LICENCE NO: LA100019807 2009 Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

Ref : APPLICATIONS (A) – PP/2014/1558; (B) – PP/2014/204

Address: Three Bridges Primary School, Melbury Avenue, Southall, Middlesex, UB2 4HT

Ward: Norwood Green

Proposal: (A) Installation of a 35m x 17m Multi-Use Games Area (MUGA) with artificial turf, 3m high fencing at the sides and 5m high fencing at each end, and floodlighting, near the south eastern site boundary.

(B) Installation of a single storey modular double classroom with a timber ramp and two sets of steps, adjacent to the south eastern site boundary.

Drawing numbers: (A) Site (Location) Plan of UB24HT, received 08/04/2014; Block Plan of UB24HT, received 06/05/2014; Site Plan of UB24HT, received 06/05/2014; Drawing no. 35594-1 – 35m x 17m MUGA Detail, received 09/05/2014; Drawing no. G.A.1 – Bay General Arrangement, received 09/05/2014; Drawing no. ALX05081401 – RLS-TE-1000 E.C. - 6 Poles 6.7m Mounting ht. 3º Tilt, received 09/05/2014; Drawing no. ALX05081402 – RLS-TE-1000 E.C. - 6 Poles 6.7m Mounting ht. 3º Tilt, received 09/05/2014; Drawing no. ALX05081403 – RLS-TE- 1000 E.C. - 6 Poles 8.0m Mounting ht. 3º Tilt, received 09/05/2014; Drawing no. ALX05081404 – RLS-TE-1000 E.C. - 6 Poles 8.0m Mounting ht. 3º Tilt, received 09/05/2014.

(B) Site Plan of UB24HT, received 06/05/2014; Block Plan of UB24HT, received 06/05/2014; Proposed Layout Drawing, received 06/05/2014; Elevations, received 06/05/2014; Annotated google earth aerial photograph, received 16/06/2014.

Type of Application: (A) Full Application; (B) Full Application

Application Received: (A) 27/03/2014; (B) 02/04/2014

Report by : Bridget Venning

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

APPLICATION (A) – PP/2014/1558 – MUGA

Recommendation: Conditional Approval

Planning permission is sought for the installation of a 35m x 17m Multi-Use Games Area (MUGA) with artificial turf, 3m high fencing at the sides and 5m high fencing at each end, and floodlighting, near the south eastern site boundary.

The site is located behind two storey semi-detached housing in Melbury Avenue, Poplar Avenue, Stour Avenue, Minterne Avenue and Shaftesbury Avenue, and to the south of the Grand Union Canal. The main site entrance (including vehicular access) is located at the intersection of Melbury Avenue and Poplar Avenue.

Whilst this development is not strictly in accordance with the London Plan policy for sports facilities, the MUGA would provide additional opportunities for pupils to participate in sporting activities. The loss of a small part of the playing field is considered acceptable as the grass football pitch on which the MUGA is sited is essentially being re-provided, and due to the substantial amount of playing field that will remain.

The MUGA would be located approximately 5 metres from the south eastern boundary, and over 130 metres to the residential properties in Shaftesbury Avenue and Stour Avenue. The development is considered unlikely to cause any significant impacts on neighbouring residential properties with respect to visual amenity, overlooking, light pollution or noise. No significant impacts on traffic or parking are anticipated. Given the scale of the proposed development no significant archaeological impacts are expected.

Six responses were received from the 66 properties notified of the proposal, raising concerns regarding impact on residential amenity, loss of green space, community use, increased traffic, anti-social behaviour, the necessity of the facility, property prices and funding of the development. The impacts arising from the construction and use of the MUGA are not regarded as being significant.

Overall the proposal is considered to provide an appropriate form of development for the site and a valuable all-weather, floodlit, sports facility for the school pupils.

It is therefore recommended that the Committee resolve to GRANT planning permission and that the application be referred to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government on that basis.

APPLICATION (B) – PP/2014/2041 – TEMPORARY CLASSROOM

Recommendation: Conditional Approval

Planning permission is sought for the installation of a 15m x 9.6m, 3.1m high modular double classroom, with ramp and steps. The building would provide accommodation for additional booster classes and group work sessions, and be required for a five year period after which it will be removed from site.

The design of the temporary classroom is typical of a modular building, and while it would not be visible from the street or detract from the amenity of occupiers of adjoining residential properties, it is not considered desirable for permanent retention.

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

As no increase in pupil numbers is associated with the proposal, no impact on the surrounding road network is anticipated. Emergency service vehicle access would be provided from the main site entrance, through the car park and across the hard play area.

Five trees would be planted to mitigate the loss of one tree located near the south east boundary. Given the nature of the buildings foundations and its location over a section of the existing hard play area the building is unlikely to affect items of archaeological interest.

Overall the proposal is considered to be appropriate development for the site on a temporary basis and the application is recommended for approval subject to conditions.

RECOMMENDATION:

APPLICATION (A) – PP/2014/1558 – MUGA

Refer to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, in accordance with The Town and Country Planning (Consultation) (England) Direction 2009, with a resolution that planning permission be granted, subject to the following conditions:

Conditions/Reasons:

Time Limit 3 years – Full Permission

1. The development permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason: In order to comply with the provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended).

Approved Plans

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Block Plan of UB24HT, received 06/05/2014; Site Plan of UB24HT, received 06/05/2014; Drawing no. 35594-1 – 35m x 17m MUGA Detail, received 09/05/2014; Drawing no. G.A.1 – Bay General Arrangement, received 09/05/2014; and one of the following floodlighting arrangements: Drawing no. ALX05081401 – RLS-TE-1000 E.C. - 6 Poles 6.7m mounting ht. 3º tilt, received 09/05/2014 & Drawing no. ALX05081402 – RLS-TE-1000 E.C. - 6 Poles 6.7m mounting ht. 3º tilt, received 09/05/2014; or Drawing no. ALX05081403 – RLS-TE-1000 E.C. - 6 Poles 8.0m mounting ht. 3º tilt, received 09/05/2014 & Drawing no. ALX05081404 – RLS-TE-1000 E.C. - 6 Poles 8.0m mounting ht. 3º tilt, received 09/05/2014, or Three Bridges Primary School – MUGA Lighting Design specifications, prepared by Luminance Pro Lighting Systems Ltd, received 09/05/2014.

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

Materials

3. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the details of materials specified. The fencing enclosing the MUGA and the floodlighting columns shall be finished in the colour black, in order to blend with the landscape background.

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

Reason: To ensure that the materials are of an adequate standard in accordance with policy 7B of the adopted Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document (DPD) 2013 and policy 7.6 of the adopted London Plan 2011.

Hours of Use

4. The MUGA shall not be used outside 08:00 to 19:00 hours Monday to Sunday.

Reason: To protect the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring residential properties in accordance with Ealing Local Variation to London Plan policy 7.4 and policy 7A of the adopted Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document 2013, and policies 7.4 and 7.15 of the London Plan 2011.

School Use

5. The MUGA shall be used solely in connection with the operation of the school and not for any other purpose.

Reason: To accord with the terms of the application, and in the interests of the amenities of occupiers of neighbouring properties and safety and security of the area in accordance with policies Ealing Local Variation to London Plan policy 7.4 and policy 7A of the adopted Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document 2013, and policies 7.4, 7.13 and 7.15 of the London Plan 2011.

Floodlighting

6. a) The floodlighting scheme shall be designed to meet the recommendations of the Institution of Lighting Professionals Guidance Notes for the Reduction of obtrusive light 2011, by correctly aiming the luminaires, using luminaires with double asymmetric beams designed so that the front glazing is kept at or near parallel to the surface being lit and ensuring that the main beam angle of all lights, directed towards a potential observer is kept below 70 degrees.

b) With the floodlights operating vertical illuminance shall be controlled to not greater than 5 lux at first floor window level outside any affected sensitive façade.

c) The floodlights shall be maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and an automatic time switch shall be inserted to ensure that the floodlights switch off during the period of 19:00 – 08:00 hours.

Fencing

7. Notwithstanding the details provided, heavy duty metal rebound fencing shall be installed at the boundaries to the MUGA pitch to ensure that the fencing is sufficiently strong and rigid enough to prevent significant resonances occurring when balls impact on it.

Reason: To protect the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring residential properties in accordance with Ealing Local Variation to London Plan policy 7.4 and policy 7A of the adopted Ealing

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

Development Management Development Plan Document 2013, and policies 7.4 and 7.15 of the London Plan 2011.

Soft landscaping

8. Details of soft landscaping, including planting along the south eastern site boundary particularly where existing vegetation is sparse, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. These works shall be carried out as approved prior to the occupation of any part of the development. Any trees or other plants which die or are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased within the first five years following the implementation of the landscaping scheme shall be replaced during the next planting season, unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To ensure that the development is landscaped in the interests of the visual character and appearance of the area in accordance with Ealing Local Variation to London Plan policy 7.4 and policy 7B of the adopted Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document 2013, policies 7.4, 7.19 and 7.21 of the London Plan 2011, and Interim Supplementary Planning Guidance 9 ‘Trees and Development Guidelines’.

Informatives

1. The decision to grant planning permission has been taken having regard to the policies and proposals in the adopted Ealing Development Management DPD, the adopted Ealing Development (Core) Strategy, the London Plan with its Revised Early Minor Amendments, the National Planning Policy Framework, and to all relevant material considerations:

National Planning Policy Framework

7 Requiring Good Design 8 Promoting Healthy Communities 11 Conserving and enhancing the natural environment 12 Conserving and enhancing the historic environment

London Plan 2011 and Revised Early Minor Amendments 2013

3.1 Ensuring equal life chances for all 3.16 Protection and enhancement of social infrastructure 3.18 Education Facilities 3.19 Sports Facilities 5.10 Urban Greening 6.1 Strategic approach 6.3 Assessing effects of development on transport capacity 6.13 Parking 7.1 Building London’s neighbourhoods and communities 7.2 An inclusive environment 7.3 Designing out crime 7.4 Local character 7.6 Architecture 7.8 Heritage assets and archaeology 7.13 Safety, security and resilience to emergency 7.15 Reducing noise and enhancing soundscapes 7.19 Biodiversity and access to nature 5

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

7.21 Trees and woodlands

Adopted Ealing Development (Core) Strategy 2012

1.1 Spatial Vision for Ealing 2026 (e), (f), (g), (h), and (j) 1.2 Delivery of the Vision for Ealing 2026 (d) and (g) 6.2 Social Infrastructure

Adopted Ealing Development Management DPD 2013

7A Ealing Local Policy –Amenity 7.3 Ealing Local Variation - Designing Out Crime 7.4 Ealing Local Variation - Local Character 7B Ealing Local Policy - Design Amenity 7C Ealing Local Policy - Heritage

In reaching this decision, specific consideration was given to the design of the development, the impact on the amenity of users of the site and surrounding properties. It is considered that the amenities of neighbouring occupiers would be protected, and the facility is compatible with the existing school activities. Given the context it is considered that the sports facility is appropriate in terms of design and location. It is therefore considered that on balance the development complies with the relevant policies in the development plans and there are no other material conditions that would warrant refusal of the application.

APPLICATION (B) – PP/2014/2041 – TEMPORARY CLASSROOM

Grant, subject to conditions

Conditions/Reasons:

Temporary Permission

1. The temporary classroom with ramp and steps shall be permitted for a limited period from the date of this planning permission for a period of five years when the building, ramp and steps shall be removed from the site and the land restored to its previous condition.

Reason: The building and works due to their nature, location and appearance are considered unsuitable for permanent retention in the interests of the visual amenities of the locality in accordance with Ealing Local Variations to London Plan policy 7.4 and policy 7B of the adopted Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document 2013, and policy 7.4 of the London Plan 2011.

Approved Plans

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans; Site Plan of UB24HT, received 06/05/2014; Block Plan of UB24HT, received 06/05/2014; Proposed Layout Drawing, received 06/05/2014; Elevations, received 06/05/2014; Annotated google earth aerial photograph, received 16/06/2014.

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

Materials

3. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the details of materials specified.

Tree Planting

4. The development shall not be occupied until details of the five replacement trees have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The details shall include the following:

 Full planting specification - Tree size, species and the numbers of trees.  Positions of all proposed species.  Comprehensive details of ground preparation.  Staking/tying method(s).  5 year post planting maintenance schedule with an agreed inspection schedule.

All tree-planting shall be carried out in full accordance with the approved details in the nearest planting season (1st October to 31st March inclusive) to the completion of the approved development, unless agreed otherwise in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The quality of all approved landscape works shall be in accordance with British Standard 4428:1989 'Code Of practice For General Landscape Operations' or any subsequent revision. All trees included within the approved scheme shall be healthy, well-formed specimens with single leading shoots and shall be of a minimum quality compatible with British Standard 3936:1992 (Part 1) 'Specifications For Trees & Shrubs' and British Standard 4043 (where applicable) or any subsequent revisions. Any trees which within a period of 5 years from the completion of all tree planting die, are removed, uprooted are significantly damaged, become diseased or malformed shall be replaced during the nearest planting season (1st October to 31st March inclusive) with others of the same size, species and quality as approved, unless the Local Planning Authority gives written consent to any variation.

Informatives

National Planning Policy Framework 2012

7 Requiring good design 8 Promoting Healthy Communities 11 Conserving and enhancing the natural environment

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

12 Conserving and enhancing the historic environment

London Plan 2011 and Revised Early Minor Alterations 2013

3.1 Ensuring equal life chances for all 3.16 Protection and enhancement of social infrastructure 3.18 Education Facilities 6.1 Strategic approach 6.3 Assessing Effects of Development on Transport Capacity 7.1 Building London’s Neighbourhoods and Communities 7.2 Inclusive Environment 7.3 Designing Out Crime 7.4 Local Character 7.6 Architecture 7.8 Heritage assets and archaeology 7.13 Safety, Security and Resilience to Emergency 7.15 Reducing Noise and Enhancing Soundscapes 7.19 Biodiversity and Access to Nature 7.21 Trees and Woodlands

Adopted Ealing Development (Core) Strategy 2012

1.1 Spatial Vision for Ealing 2026 (e), (f), (g), (h), and (j) 1.2 Delivery of the Vision for Ealing 2026 (d) 6.2 Social Infrastructure

Adopted Ealing Development Management DPD 2013

5.10 Ealing Local Variation – Urban Greening 7A Ealing Local Policy – Amenity 7.3 Ealing Local Variation - Designing Out Crime 7.4 Ealing Local Variation - Local Character 7B Ealing Local Policy - Design Amenity 7C Ealing Local Policy - Heritage

Adopted Supplementary Planning Documents

Ealing Tree Strategy

Interim Supplementary Planning Guidance

SPG 9 Trees and development guidelines SPG 7 Accessible Ealing

In reaching this decision, specific consideration was given to the design and appearance of the development, and the impact on the amenity of users of the site and surrounding properties. It is considered that the amenities of neighbouring occupiers would be protected, the development is compatible with the existing school activities, and it would be appropriate to provide temporary accommodation for classes giving extra support in certain subjects. It is therefore considered that the development is in general accordance with the relevant policies and there are no other material conditions that would warrant refusal of the application.

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

2. Construction works, audible beyond the boundary of the site shall only be carried out between the hours of 08:00 – 18:00 Monday to Friday and 08:00 to 13:00 on Saturdays, and at no other times including Sundays and Bank Holidays.

SITE DESCRIPTION:

Three Bridges Primary School is located to the rear of residential properties fronting onto Melbury Avenue, Poplar Avenue, Stour Avenue, Minterne Avenue and Shaftesbury Avenue and to the south of the Grand Union Canal.

The school occupies an area of 3.6ha and is designated as an Archaeological Interested Area under the Adopted Ealing Development Plan Document Policies Map.

The school comprises one main building sited towards the eastern end of the site with an existing modular classroom to the south of the main building. Areas to the west and southeast of the school building comprise hard play areas. The western portion of the site contains a large playing field.

The site is accessed by both vehicles and pedestrians to the northeast towards the intersection with Melbury and Poplar Avenues. The site currently contains 30 car spaces including 1 disabled space near the main entrance into the school, and is located within walking distance of bus routes along Glade Lane and Havelock Road. Pedestrian access is provided from the south via Shaftesbury Avenue and from the west by a footbridge of the Grand Union Canal.

The adjoining Grand Union Canal is designed as a Site of Interest for Nature Conservation and part of the Blue Ribbon Network in the Adopted Ealing Development Plan Document Policies Map.

THE PROPOSAL:

APPLICATION (A) – PP/2014/1558 – MUGA

The proposal consists of the installation of a 35m x 17m Multi-Use Games Area (MUGA) with artificial turf, 3m fencing to the sides and 5m high fencing at each end, and floodlights, to be located near the south eastern site boundary. Recessed goals and basketball hoops would be located at each end of the MUGA.

The MUGA would be sited in generally the same location as an existing grass football pitch, in the north east corner of the school playing field, south of the existing main school building. The facility would be used for football, tennis and basketball throughout the year. The floodlights would be utilised when necessary during the winter months, from the end of the school day until 19.00 hours at the latest.

The facility would be for sole use by the school; it is not proposed that the facility would be available for community use.

No increase in staff or pupil numbers is proposed in conjunction with the development, nor any change in access or parking arrangements.

APPLICATION (B) – PP/2014/2041 – TEMPORARY CLASSROOM

The proposal consists of the installation of a single storey modular double classroom with a ramp and two sets of steps, adjacent to the south eastern site boundary. The temporary classrooms are required to accommodate booster classes and small group activities, for a five year period. Two additional staff 9

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2 members would be employed as a result of the proposal, however, there would be no increase in pupil numbers.

The building would measure approximately 15m x 9.6m, with a floor area of 144m2, and an almost flat roof with a maximum height of approximately 3.1m. A brick and concrete ramp would extend from the north western elevation of the building, providing access to the shared circulation space between the classrooms. A set of steps from each of the two classrooms would provide fire escape routes. The modular building would be constructed of plywood with a resin smooth finish, in light yellow to match the existing school buildings. The works will include the removal of one tree.

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY:

09660/10 Erection of single storey hutted building for nursery Granted 23-10-1996 accommodation and single storey linked toy store. Conditionally 09660/11 Provision of two temporary double classroom units. Granted 21-10-1997 Conditionally PP/2013/0302 Retention of a temporary classroom building to the Granted 18-03-2013 east of the main school building Conditionally

CONSULTATION:

APPLICATION (A) – PP/2014/1558 – MUGA

Public Consultation

Public: 25 neighbours, including residents in Melbury Avenue, Poplar Avenue, Stour Avenue, Minterne Avenue and Shaftesbury Avenue were notified of the proposal by letter on 17 April 2014.

The consultation period expired on 8 May 2014.

Three responses were received, raising objections to the application.

Following the submission of further information, including amended block and site plans, details of floodlighting, fencing plans/elevations and specifications, and details regarding community issue, re- consultation was undertaken. 66 neighbours, including residents in Melbury Avenue, Poplar Avenue, Stour Avenue, Minterne Avenue and Shaftesbury Avenue were notified of the proposal by letter on 19 May 2014.

The second consultation period expired on 09 June 2014.

Three more responses were received in objection to the application, including two further submissions from residents who responded to the first consultation.

The concerns raised in the responses included the following:

- Noise and light pollution - Impact of floodlights on amenity of the area and local wildlife - Visual impact of fencing and floodlights - Necessity of floodlights

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

- Potential for use of floodlights after 6pm. - Loss of green space - Necessity of the facility given existing grass pitches and hard play areas - Necessity of the facility given the close proximity of the school to the MUGA at Havelock Estates - Potential for community use of the facility during evenings and late at night - Increase traffic congestion and parking demand - Obstruction of driveways by vehicles - Security and anti-social behaviour - Impact on property prices - Increase litter and rubbish - Belief that the installation of the MUGA is to utilise a grant specifically for sports facilities.

Response: It is considered that the concerns expressed regarding the potential for use of the facility by the community and use of the facility and floodlights at night can be appropriately dealt with by the imposition of conditions restricting these matters. Any proposal for community use or use of the floodlighting outside the hours specified by the condition would therefore be subject to a future application for planning permission.

Some neighbours have questioned the necessity of the MUGA given the existing facilities at the school and nearby. The field on which the facility would be located is not designated as open space under the Adopted Ealing Development Plan Document Policies Map, therefore, the proposal does not represent a departure from the plan. Consequently there are no applicable policies requiring that ‘very special circumstances’ be demonstrated to justify the siting of the facility and to show that alternative locations are unsuitable. The necessity of the floodlighting was also questioned through the consultation. Although the floodlights would not be in use throughout the year they would extend the period during which the MUGA can be used during the winter months, giving pupils additional opportunities to participate in sporting activities.

The potential for the proposed development to have a detrimental effect on security and anti-social behaviour in the neighbourhood is considered negligible. As the facility is for sole use by the school it would not bring any additional persons to the site. The presence of pupils, staff members and parents in the school grounds until 6pm would provide additional surveillance and therefore may improve the security and safety of the area.

As there would be no increase in pupils or staff members associated with the proposed development, it is considered that the potential for increased litter and rubbish in the surrounding area is minimal.

Neither the impact of the proposal on property prices, or how the MUGA is to be funded are material planning considerations.

The comments regarding noise, light, visual amenity, loss of green space, and traffic are discussed throughout the report.

Internal Consultation

Transport Services As long as the MUGA used by the school, Transport has no objections to the proposal.

Response: The applicant has proposed that the MUGA be only for used by the school, and a condition ensuring this is recommended to be imposed should the Committee be minded to resolve to grant planning permission. 11

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

Environmental Raised no objection to the application. The following points were noted: Health Officer  The application form refers to either 6 floodlight columns being installed with a height of 6.7 m or traditional columns of 8m height.  Letter report 33470a 8m 1kW Ace specifies 4 x 8m columns, 4 x Hi lux ACE 100 luminaire and 4 x 1kW lamps. It is stated that the luminaires are selected to minimise light overspill to the adjacent dwellings. The average surface illuminance on the pitches is predicted to be 270 lux and the overspill at 30m from pitch centre is predicted to be 0 – 1 lux. The distance to the nearest dwelling appears to be about 30 m from the edge of the pitch.  The specification for the works (J2041/02/14) refers to the installation of 6 x 6.7m columns. There does not appear to be an iso-contour of light spill for this option.

The proposed floodlighting installation would appear to be designed to meet the recommendations at the Institution of Lighting Professionals (ILP), Guidance Notes for the reduction of Obtrusive Lighting 2011, since the luminaires are designed to be also horizontal to the pitch concentrating all the light on the pitch with very little overspill outside the pitches.

It is not stated if the 3-5 m high steel fencing is sufficiently strong and rigid enough in its design to prevent resonance when balls hit it.

If it is minded to grant the application, conditions regarding compliance with the recommendations of the ILP Guidance Notes, limits on lux levels outside any affective sensitive façade, installation of an automatic timing switch, and heavy duty rebound fencing are recommended to ensure that there is no loss of amenity to nearby residents.

Response: It is considered that the proposed conditions are appropriate to address any potential noise and light pollution issues. It is recommended that these conditions be imposed should the Committee be minded to resolve to grant planning permission.

Landscape Services Raised no objection to the application.

Would like the inclusion of shrub planting to help screen the facility, to provide some environmental improvement, and to mitigate the loss of green space.

Response: It is considered appropriate that soft landscaping is undertaken in association with the proposed MUGA, particularly along the sparsely screened section of the south eastern boundary adjoining a residential property in Melbury Avenue. It is recommended that a condition requiring submission of a soft landscaping plan for approval by the Local Planning Authority be included, should the Committee be minded to resolve to grant planning permission.

Tree Officer No objections.

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

External Consultation

Sport England It is understood that the site forms part of, or constitutes a playing field as defined in The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2010 (Statutory Instrument 2010 No. 2184), in that it is on land that has been used as a playing field within the last five years, and the field encompasses at least one playing pitch of 0.2 ha or more, or that it is on land that has been allocated for the use as a playing field in a development plan or in proposals for such a plan or its alteration or replacement.

Sport England has therefore considered the application in light of its playing fields policy. The aim of this policy is to ensure that there is an adequate supply of quality pitches to satisfy the current and estimated future demand for pitch sports in the area. The policy seeks to protect all parts of the playing field from development and not just those which, for the time being, are laid out as pitches. The policy states that:

“Sport England will oppose the granting of planning permission for any development which would lead to the loss of, or would prejudice the use of, all or any part of a playing field, or land last used as a playing field or allocated for use as a playing field in an adopted or draft deposit local plan, unless, in the judgement of Sport England, one of the specific circumstances applies.”

Reason: Development which would lead to the loss of all or part of a playing field, or which would prejudice its use, should not normally be permitted because it would permanently reduce the opportunities for participation in sporting activities. Government planning policy and the policies of Sport England have recognised the importance of such activities to the social and economic well-being of the country.

Sport England is satisfied that the proposed development accords with the following:

E5 – The proposed development is for an indoor or outdoor sports facility, the provision of which would be of sufficient benefit to the development of sport as to outweigh the detriment caused by the loss of the playing field or playing fields.

This being the case, Sport England does not wish to raise an objection to this application, subject to the following condition(s) being attached to the decision notice (if the Council are minded to approve the application):

“Use of the development shall not commence until a community use agreement prepared in consultation with Sport England has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, and a copy of the completed approved agreement has been provided to the Local Planning Authority. The agreement shall apply to [describe facilities forming party of the development] and included details of pricing policy, hours of use, access by non-[educational establishment] users, management responsibilities and 13

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

a mechanism for review, and anything else which the Local Planning Authority in consultation with Sport England considers necessary in order to secure the effective community use of the facilities. The development shall not be used at any time other than in strict compliance with the approved agreement.”

Reason: To secure well managed safe community access to the sports facility/facilities, to ensure sufficient benefit to the development of sport.

If you wish to amend the wording of the conditions or use another mechanism in lieu of the condition(s), please discuss the details with the undersigned. Sport England does not object to amendments to conditions, provided they achieve the same outcome and we are involved in any amendments.

If your Authority decided not to attach the above condition(s), Sport England would wish to maintain/lodge a statutory objection to this application. Should your Authority be minded to approve this application without the above condition(s), then in accordance with The Town and Country Planning (Consultation) (England) Direction 2009, and the DCLG letter of 10 March 2011, the application should be referred to the Department for Communities and Local Government at Planning Casework (London), Communities & Local Government, 1/C4 Eland House, Bressenden Place, London, SW1E 5DU.

The absence of an objection to this application in the context of the Town and Country Planning Acts, does not in any way commit Sport England’s or any National Governing Body of Sport’s support for any related application for grants funding.

If this application is to be presented to a Planning Committee, we would like to be notified in advance of the publication of any committee agendas, report(s) and committee date(s). We would be grateful if you would advise us of the outcome of the application by sending us a copy of the decision notice.

Response: It is considered that if the facility were to be made available for community use, the potential for negative impacts on the amenity of occupiers of neighbouring residential properties would be much greater. For community use to be workable, the times of use of the MUGA would likely need to be extended, which would consequently increase noise and light pollution. The traffic and parking demand generated by the community use would need to be managed, and due to the location of the school tucked behind residential properties, there would be no natural surveillance of the MUGA, hence the potential for anti-social behaviour. Additionally, as the school has not proposed community use of the facility, a site management strategy has not been prepared. A number of responses to the public consultation also raised concerns regarding the effects associated with potential community use of the MUGA.

Despite the MUGA’s proposed location on an existing football pitch, it is considered that the facility is unlikely to reduce opportunities for sporting activities, and may in fact provide additional opportunities due to the all- 14

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

weather surface and floodlighting. The playing field is not currently available for community use, therefore there will be no loss of opportunity for the public to participate in sport in conjunction with the development. It is also noted that while the dimensions of the proposed MUGA are appropriate for the primary school, as the pitch is not full size it may not be particularly useful to many community groups.

For the above reasons it is considered that it is not appropriate for the proposed MUGA to be available for community use, and it is not proposed to attach the condition requested by Sport England. Should the Planning Committee resolve to approve the application, it shall be referred to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, as required by the The Town and Country Planning (Consultation) (England) Direction 2009.

English Heritage No objection raised. (Archaeological) Having considered the proposals with reference to information held in the Greater London Historic Environment Record and/or made available in connection with this application, the Archaeology Advisor concluded that the proposal is unlikely to have a significant effect on heritage assets of archaeological interest.

It was noted that although within an archaeological priority area, the proposed works are too small scale to be likely to have a significant impact. No further assessment or conditions are considered necessary.

Response: English Heritage has raised no objections to the proposed development within an Archaeological Interest Area, therefore, it is considered that conditions/informatives regarding items of archaeological interest are unnecessary.

APPLICATION (B) – PP/2014/2041 – TEMPORARY CLASSROOM

Public Consultation

Public: 10 neighbours, all residents of Melbury Avenue, were notified of the proposal by letter on 28 May 2014.

The consultation period expired on 18 June 2014.

One response was received in support of the application, and raised the following points:

- Does not believe monetary compensation for the removal of trees is necessary, and the suggested amount is disproportionate. - There are no practical alternative sites for the building. - The tree proposed for removal is in decline, and the other tree located in close proximity to the proposed classroom could possibly be retained with the removal of some branches. - The classrooms are a vital and necessary expansion to accommodate the rising numbers of children who need to be accommodated at the school. - Are conscious of the need to maintain the appearance of the school environment including the tree population which is a significant feature. - Planting of an additional 5 mature trees would be a fair and reasonable response. 15

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

The comments regarding removal of trees are discussed in the internal consultation and reasoned justification sections below..

Internal Consultation

Landscaping / Tree Based on the proposals submitted, the Tree Officer objections to the Services application are as follows:

- At least the removal of 2 trees – likely 3. - The level of pruning required will see a large proportion of the third tree’s canopy removed. This is likely to have a detrimental effect on the tree’s health and structural stability. - The positioning of the building on the tree’s root plate is likely to cut off water and oxygen to the tree’s roots, which will further damage the tree. - Reduced screening for neighbouring houses. - Consideration should be given to re-siting the modular classroom.

The Tree Service would support an application for the classroom to be placed in an alternative position.

This proposal currently goes against policies 3.6 A) - Children and young people’s play and informal recreation facilities and 5.10 A) - urban greening of the London Plan, the objectives of Planning Policy Statement 9: Biodiversity and Geological Conservation, Aims A and A3 of the Tree and Woodland Framework, and policies ETP42 and ETP43 of Ealing’s Tree Strategy.

The Tree Service has valued the 3 trees as having a CAVAT value of £6800. The estimated value of the proposed five replacements would be approximately £2500.

Given the placement of further temporary structures on the root-plates of other trees on site, it is likely that the trees on site are not being managed in the best interests of the health and safety. It is recommended that the Planning Department places a Tree Preservation Order on the site to help ensure healthy tree cover in this locality.

Response: It is accepted that Tree Services have concerns regarding the proposed removal of one tree and possible impact on two further trees. It is noted that the trees in question are not protected, and the tree proposed for removal by the school is in poor health due to a trunk wound. The school’s offer to plant five replacement trees is considered to be appropriate mitigation for those lost as a result of the proposed development, and any monetary compensation is deemed unnecessary. It is recommended that planning permission be issued subject to a condition regarding replacement tree planting.

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

Regulatory Services Regulatory Services have noted that the classrooms will be affected by noise from aircraft departing Heathrow Airport, and that no details of sound insulation and ventilation measures are provided. An Informative regarding sound insulation and ventilation has been suggested.

Regulatory Services have also suggested an informative restricting the hours of construction works which may be audible beyond the boundary.

Response: As the proposed temporary classroom would be in place for a limited period of five years and the school are satisfied with the internal teaching environment that the building would provide, it is considered unnecessary to require the level of insulation and ventilation recommended by Regulatory Services. The informative regarding construction times will be appended to any permission issued.

Transport Service The proposals have no significant impact to the highways, and there is no objection to the development. However, Transport would require a brief construction method statement.

Response: The applicant has provided further detail regarding the construction method, as outlined in the traffic, parking and road safety section below. The Transport Service is satisfied with the information supplied.

Education No objection.

PLANNING POLICIES:

These are set out in the respective informatives above.

REASONED JUSTIFICATION:

APPLICATION (A) – PP/2014/1558 – MUGA

Key Issues

The proposal is assessed in terms of its potential impact on the local and wider environment, on the amenities of the occupiers of surrounding development, taking into account the relevant development plan policies for the area and all other material planning considerations. The main issues for consideration are: (i) the principle of the development, (ii) sports facilities (iii) design and appearance, (iv) residential amenity, (v) light pollution, (vi) traffic, parking and road safety, and (vii) archaeological interest area.

Principle of Development

The principle of the MUGA facility is considered to be in accordance with 3.16 and 3.18 of the London Plan 2011. Policy 3.16 recognises the need for additional and enhanced social infrastructure, to meet the needs of London’s growing and diverse population. Policy 3.18 relates specifically to education facilities, and supports proposals which enhance education and skills provision. The development would enhance the sporting facilities at the school, and provide an all-weather, floodlit, recreation facility, giving the school pupils additional opportunities to participate in sporting activities.

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

Sports Facilities

London Plan Policy 3.19 encourages enhanced and increased provision of sports facilities, and resists the loss of sports facilities including playing fields. Multi-use of facilities is supported where possible, as is floodlighting where it will increase opportunities for recreation while protecting the local community and biodiversity. Where sports facilities are proposed on existing open space, they should be considered in light of policies protecting open space and the needs / opportunities for both sports facilities and green multifunctional open space.

Under a strict interpretation of this policy, the proposal would not comply as the MUGA would result in the loss of part of the existing playing field, and community use of the facility is not proposed.

While the MUGA would occupy part of the current playing field, the land is not designated as local open space under the Adopted Ealing Development Plan Document Policies Map. The MUGA would replace the existing grass football pitch on which it would be located, and provide additional space for tennis and basketball, enhancing the sporting facilities available to the school pupils. The facility would not encroach into the existing running track. As the school playing field comprises approximately 2.0 ha it is considered sufficiently large that the loss of 595 square metres of playing field space would be acceptable.

Sport England has been consulted in relation to the application and stated that they have no objection to the application provided that a condition securing community use of the MUGA is imposed on any permission issued. Community use of the facility is not considered appropriate in this instance as discussed in the external consultation section above, therefore, Sport England maintains an objection on that basis that loss of playing field permanently reduces the opportunities for participation in sporting activities. This reasoning is not considered to be applicable to the proposal because although the MUGA is to be constructed on existing playing field, it is likely to increase opportunities for sport due to the all-weather surface and floodlighting.

Given the design and proposed hours of use of the floodlighting, the local community should not be adversely affected by light pollution, and the floodlighting is located some distance from the Grand Union Canal, hence biodiversity impacts would be negligible.

In light of these factors the development is considered an acceptable exception to the sports facilities policy in this instance.

Design and Appearance

The proposed 17m x 35m MUGA would be situated in generally the same location as an existing grass football pitch, near to the south eastern site boundary. The MUGA would feature a 3G artificial grass surface, and a galvanised stainless steel ball court fencing system incorporating recessed goals and basketball hoops at the south east and north west ends. The fencing at these ends would be 5m high, with the fencing to the sides being 3m in height. With regard to floodlighting, the installation of 6 columns at a height of either 6.7m or 8m, or 4 columns at a height of 8m is proposed. These elements are typical of MUGAs, which are reasonably common within school sites.

The proposed development would not be visible from the surrounding streets due to the site’s location to rear of residential properties in Melbury Avenue, Poplar Avenue, Stour Avenue, Minterne Avenue and Shaftesbury Avenue. Visibility of the facility from the Grand Union Canal is likely to be limited, due to the summertime screening afforded by both the vegetation along the northern site boundary and internal to the site, as well as the set back of approximately 85m of the MUGA from the boundary 18

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2 adjoining the canal. The applicant has suggested that the facility would be used until 18:00 hours. It is considered reasonable to restrict the hours of use of the facility (including floodlights) to between 8:00 and 19:00 hours Monday to Sunday, by the inclusion of a condition on any permission issued. These factors act to minimise any impact of the facility on public views in to the site and the character of the area.

Impact upon Amenity of Neighbouring Properties

The proposed MUGA would be located approximately 5 metres from the south eastern site boundary which adjoins the rear gardens of residential properties in Melbury Avenue, and over 130 metres to the residential properties in Shaftesbury Avenue and Stour Avenue, located on the far side of the playing field.

It is recognised that the introduction of a MUGA to the site has the potential to generate increased noise near the south eastern site boundary, as expressed through the public consultation. The all- weather surface of the MUGA means the facility is likely to be better utilised by the school pupils than the existing grass football pitch it is replacing, and the MUGA would also provide a surface for tennis and basketball. However, it is noted that no increase in pupil numbers is associated with the proposal, and the MUGA would be in use until 19:00 hours at the latest. Consideration has been given to noise created by balls rebounding off the fencing, and it is proposed that the galvanised steel fencing panels would feature rubber spacers to reduce noise, rattle and vibration. The Council’s Regulatory Services Officer has suggested the inclusion of a condition to ensure rebounding of balls off the fencing does not result in unacceptable noise levels. This condition would be imposed on any permission issued. Given these points and in the context of the existing use of the site as a school, it is considered that any increase in noise due to the MUGA is unlikely to have a significant detrimental impact on the amenity of occupiers of the adjoining residential properties and is not sufficient to warrant withholding consent.

With regard to visual amenity, the 3m and 5m high fencing and either 6.7m or 8m high floodlighting columns will be visible from the adjoining residential properties in Melbury Avenue, and to a lesser extent from the properties in Minterne Avenue, Stour Avenue and Shaftesbury Avenue. Although the fencing and columns would be located approximately 5 metres from the south eastern boundary, it is considered that the separation from the facility afforded by the rear gardens of these adjoining properties lessens the potential visual impact. The summertime screening provided by the shrubbery planted along the south eastern site would act to reduce the visual impact on the adjoining Melbury Avenue properties. In one location along the south eastern boundary the vegetation is sparse, and it is considered that the imposition of a condition requiring soft landscaping in this area would be appropriate. Fencing and columns of this type are common features of MUGAs and school sites, and it is proposed to include a condition specifying that the fencing and columns be finished in black, as black generally blend into the landscape background better than other colours. Due to the profile of the artificial grass surface it is not likely to have any significant effect on visual amenity of neighbouring occupiers. Any potential effect of light pollution on the amenity of neighbouring occupiers is discussed in the section below.

The MUGA is not anticipated to result in a notable increase in overlooking or loss of privacy, as although the MUGA may be better used than the existing grass football pitch it is replacing, it is essentially the same location, and the existing vegetation along the south eastern boundary provides screening of an appropriate height.

Light Pollution

Potential for light pollution as a result of the proposed floodlighting was raised in a number of the public consultation responses. The Council’s Regulatory Services Officer has reviewed the specifications of 19

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2 the three floodlighting options proposed by the applicant, and considers that all three floodlighting arrangements appear to be designed to meet the recommendations at the Institution of Lighting Professionals (ILP), Guidance Notes for the reduction of Obtrusive Lighting 2011, and that there would be very little overspill of light outside the pitches. To ensure that the occupiers of the adjacent neighbouring properties are not adversely impacted by the floodlighting, the Officer has suggested conditions to ensure compliance with Institution of Lighting Professionals Guidance Notes for the Reduction of obtrusive light 2011, and the installation of a timing device to ensure the lights are not in operation between the hours of 19:00 and 08:00.

It is considered that by limiting the hours of use of the floodlights (and MUGA) to the hours of 08:00 to 19:00 Monday to Sunday, and the design of the floodlights, any impact of light pollution on the amenity of occupiers of neighbouring properties would be minimal. It is recommended that the suggested conditions be imposed should the committee be minded to resolve to grant planning permission.

As the MUGA would be sited on the far side of the playing field from the canal, it is not anticipated that the floodlighting would have any detrimental impact on local wildlife or biodiversity within the canal.

Traffic, Parking and Road Safety

The proposed MUGA would not involve an increase in pupil or staff numbers, would not alter vehicular access arrangements or car parking. Access into the nearby school buildings would not be affected.

During the public consultation some concern was expressed over potential increase in traffic congestion and parking demand in the vicinity of the site. As the MUGA is proposed to be used solely by the school, the development would not result in additional people travelling to the site. Pupils may need to be collected following after-school sporting activities, however, it is likely that these children would otherwise have been collected at the end of the school day, hence there would be no increase in the number of trips to the site.

Council’s Transportation Officer has reviewed the application and has no objection to the proposal, on the basis that the MUGA is used only by the school.

Archaeological Interest Area

The subject site is designated as an Archaeological Interest Area. Construction of the proposed MUGA playing surface will involve installation of two foundation layers with a total depth of 280mm, plus two macadam layers and the 3G synthetic grass playing surface. English Heritage have reviewed the application and raised no objection to the proposed works. It is considered that due to the scale and nature of the proposed works they would be unlikely to have a significant impact on heritage assets of archaeological interest.

APPLICATION (B) – PP/2014/2041 – TEMPORARY CLASSROOM

Key Issues

The proposal is assessed in terms of its potential impact on the local and wider environment, on the amenities of the occupiers of surrounding development, taking into account the relevant development plan policies for the area and all other material planning considerations. The main issues for consideration are: (i) the principle of the development, (ii) design and appearance, (iii) residential amenity, (iv) impact on trees, (v) traffic, parking and road safety, and (vi) archaeological interest area.

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

Principle of Development

The principle of the temporary classroom is considered to be in accordance with 3.16 and 3.18 of the London Plan 2011. Policy 3.16 recognises the need for additional and enhanced social infrastructure, to meet the needs of London’s growing and diverse population. Policy 3.18 relates specifically to education facilities, and supports proposals which enhance education and skills provision. The temporary classroom would provide space to accommodate additional booster classes and group work sessions, targeting the improvement of particular subjects such as mathematics and literacy.

Design and Appearance

The design and appearance of the proposed temporary classroom is simple in nature and typical of a modular classroom building.

The classroom building would be a single storey, pre-fabricated structure set approximately 22m to the south east of the main school building and approximately 2m from the south east site boundary, which adjoins residential properties in Melbury Avenue. The almost flat roof line and height of the modular classroom would be similar to that of the single storey part of the main school building and the two existing modular buildings. The building would be finished in light yellow to match the existing school buildings. The proposed location would mean that the classroom would not be visible from the street.

The classroom’s proposed location will not obstruct access to the existing buildings, and although the building will encroach slightly into the hard surface play area to the south east of the main school building, the school is satisfied that the remaining hard surface play area is of an adequate size. This encroachment is considered acceptable as the building is a temporary solution. The building will be wheelchair accessible with the inclusion of a ramp.

Due to the utilitarian nature and appearance of the building it is not considered desirable for permanent retention, however, as it is only required for a period of five years it is considered acceptable.

Impact upon Amenity of Neighbouring Properties

The proposed temporary classroom building would be located approximately 2.0 metres from the south eastern boundary, adjoining the rear gardens of residential properties in Melbury Avenue. The 3.1m high building would be almost entirely screened from view of the neighbouring residential properties due to a row of single storey outbuildings located at the end of the rear gardens. The proposed building is also located some distance from the residential properties to the south and west, with the school playing field situated in between. As such, it is considered that the development would not result in overlooking, loss of privacy, or the loss of visual amenity to any residential properties.

As the proposed development would not result in an increase in pupil numbers, no additional noise would generated, and the building will be in use during normal school hours. While the building would be located near the south east boundary, noise from within the classroom is not anticipated to affect the residential properties nearby, due to the buffer provided by the adjoining outbuildings. The building will also feature double glazed windows.

Given the nature and scale of the works, it is considered that the development would not have a detrimental impact on the amenity of neighbouring properties.

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

Impact on trees

It is proposed to remove of one Norway Maple tree located near the south eastern site boundary, to facilitate the installation of the temporary classroom. The Council’s Tree Officer has raised concerns regarding the removal of this tree and possible impact on two trees located to the north of the proposed temporary classroom. It is noted that the trees along this boundary are not protected, and that the tree proposed for removal by the school in in a poor condition. The school’s offer to five replacement trees is considered to be appropriate mitigation for those trees lost as a result of the proposed development. A condition requiring the submission of details of replacement tree planting for approval by the Local Planning Authority will be appended to any permission issued.

Traffic, Parking and Road Safety

No changes to the existing vehicular access arrangements or car parking are proposed. Emergency vehicles will be able to access the temporary classroom via the main entrance in Melbury Avenue, proceeding through an existing set of double gates located at the southern end of the car park and across the hard play area.

Construction vehicles will access the site in the same manner the emergency service vehicles, with the building being delivered by five lorries during the summer holidays. On reaching the playground the buildings will be offloaded by a crane, and assembled over the course a day. The Council’s Transportation Officer is satisfied with the proposed route for transporting the building sections to site, and emergency contact details for the construction period have been provided.

The proposed development will result in the employment of two additional staff members. It is considered that this increase will not have a notable impact on traffic and parking in the surrounding road network. The Council’s Transportation Officer has not raised any concerns in relation to this.

Archaeological Interest Area

The subject site is designated as an Archaeological Interest Area. Given the modular design and temporary nature of the proposed building, the foundations of the building will not be substantial and therefore are not anticipated to have any significant effect on items of archaeological interest. Additionally, part of the building is sited on existing hard surface area, therefore, will result in no further disruption to the ground surface.

CONCLUSION

APPLICATION (A) – PP/2014/1558 – MUGA

Whilst not strictly accordance with London Plan policy 3.19 due to the loss of playing field and as community use is not proposed, the MUGA will be a valuable addition to the school’s facilities and increase opportunities for pupils to participate in sporting activities.

The facility will have minimal impact on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, and will not significantly affect the amenities of occupiers of neighbouring properties. Any items of archaeological interest would be appropriately evaluated and investigated, and the development would have negligible impact on the local highway network.

Planning Committee: 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 1 & 2

APPLICATION (B) – PP/2014/2041 – TEMPORARY CLASSROOM

The proposed building will provide accommodation for additional booster classes and group work sessions, targeting the improvement of particular subjects such as mathematics and literacy.

Given the temporary nature of the development, the proposed classroom, step and ramp are considered acceptable. The building will have a minimal visual impact, will not affect the amenities of occupiers of neighbouring properties or users of the site, and have negligible impact on the local highway network or items of archaeological interest.

COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

Both developments would not be liable to contribute towards the Mayor’s Community Infrastructure Levy as education schemes are exempt.

HUMAN RIGHTS ACT:

In making your decision, you should be aware of and take into account any implications that may arise from the Human Rights Act 1998. Under the Act, it is unlawful for a public authority such as the London Borough of Ealing to act in a manner, which is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.

You are referred specifically to Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), Article 1 of the First Protocol (protection of property). It is not considered that the recommendation for approval of the grant of permission in this case interferes with local residents’ right to respect for their private and family life, home and correspondence, except insofar as it is necessary to protect the rights and freedoms of others (in this case, the rights of the applicant). The Council is also permitted to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest and the recommendation for approval is considered to be a proportionate response to the submitted application based on the considerations set out in this report.

59-63 Summerlands Avenue, Acton, W3 6EW Schedule Item No: 03 Schedule Item No: 03

Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the Scale 1/2500 Date 23/6/2014 permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Crown Copyright reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright Centre = 520087 E 180540 N and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. LICENCE NO: LA100019807 2009 59-63 Summerlands Avenue, Acton, W3 6EW Schedule Item No: 03

Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the Scale 1/1000 Date 23/6/2014 permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Crown Copyright reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright Centre = 520096 E 180518 N and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. LICENCE NO: LA100019807 2009 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03 Ref: PP/2014/0152

Address: 59-63 Summerlands Avenue, Acton, W3 6EW

Ward: Acton Central

Proposal: Redevelopment to provide a four-storey mixed used building comprising a dental surgery (Use Class D1) and 4 self-contained flats (1 x 1 bed and 3 x 2 bedrooms) with cycle parking, refuse, hard and soft landscaping following demolition of the existing pre- fabricated pods

Drawing numbers: PL001, 002, 002 REV A, 002 REV B, 003, 003 REV A, 003 REV B, 004, 004 REV A, 005, 005 REV A, 006, 007, 008, 009, P1040, P1040_4, 5 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12; Regulations Compliance Report (09 December 2013); Supporting Planning Statement (January 2014); Design and Access Statement (December 2013); Transport Statement (December 2013); Daylight and Sunlight Report (November 2013); Energy Strategy Report (10th December 2013).

Type of Application: Full Planning Application

Application 09/01/2014 Revised: n/a Received:

Report by: Peter Korankye-Gyabong

Recommendation: Approve subject to legal agreement and conditions

Executive Summary:

Planning permission is sought by Perfect Smile Healthcare Property Ltd for the construction of a four- storey mixed used building comprising of a dental practice (Use class D1) and 4 self- contained residential units (4 x 2beds) with associated cycle parking, refuse, hard and soft landscaping following demolition of the existing pre-fabricated pods.

An appeal for non-determination of the previous larger scheme was dismissed on 03/01/2013 (ref: PP/2012/0941) to provide 6 dental surgery rooms, 6 residential units at the first, second, and third floors together with internal reconfigurations of the existing building to provide ground floor bedsit unit. The previous scheme also proposed the demolition of the existing pre- fabricated pods. The previous application proposed a footprint similar to the current application at the ground floor level but larger at the first, second and third floor levels. It leads to a wider and intrusive elevation, which negatively impacted on the adjacent properties to the north with visual intrusion, loss of privacy, light, outlook and increased sense of enclosure to neighbours being the reasons for refusal.

1 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

17 objections, including 1 petition have been received from the neighbours. The objections raise concern principally on the loss of light, the impact on the character and appearance of the area, the impact on the living conditions of adjoining properties in Summerlands Avenue and increased parking pressure in the vicinity.

The report assesses the principle of the residential redevelopment; the mix and density of the proposal; the siting; layout and design of the building; the impact on the character of the existing building and; impact on local parking conditions, access and servicing; living conditions of future and existing residents and concludes that the proposal is considered to represent an appropriate development for the site.

As such, it is recommended that planning permission be granted subject to appropriate conditions and a legal agreement (s106) to restrict future occupiers of the new dwellings from obtaining parking permits within the Controlled Parking Zone.

Recommendation:

Grant subject to Legal Agreement

That the committee GRANT planning permission subject to the satisfactory completion of a legal agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) in order to secure the following:

i) Restrictions put in place to prevent the future occupiers of the development from applying for on-street parking permits within the Controlled Parking Zone; ii) Payment of the Council’s reasonable legal and other professional costs incurred preparing and completing the Legal Agreement.

AND subject to the following conditions:

Conditions/Reasons:

Time Limit 3 years - Full Permission

1. The development permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason: In order to comply with the provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended).

Approved drawing numbers

2. The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with drawing title number(s) PL001, 002, 002 REV A, 002 REV B, 003, 003 REV A, 003 REV B, 004, 004 REV A, 005, 005 REV A, 006, 008, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the local Planning Authority.

2 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

Reason: In the interests of proper planning and to ensure that the development is implemented in accordance with the approved plans, which have been, assessed against the Ealing Development Plan.

Details of materials and external finishes

3. Samples of the materials to be used for the exterior surfaces of the proposal shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority before any part of the development is commenced, and this condition shall apply notwithstanding any indications as to these matters which have been given in this application. Development shall be carried out in accordance with these approved details.

Reason: To ensure that the materials harmonise with the surroundings, in accordance with policies 7:4 and 7B of the Adopted Ealing Development Management DPD 2013, policy 7.4 and 7.6 of the London Plan 2011 and Policy 1.1 and 1.2 of the Ealing Core Strategy 2012.

Hard and soft landscaping

4. Details of proposed hard and soft landscaping works shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. This condition shall apply notwithstanding any indications as to these matters which have been given in this application. The approved works shall be implemented prior to first occupation of the development in accordance with a programme agreed by the Local Planning Authority. Any trees or other plants which die or are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased within the first five years following the implementation of the landscaping scheme shall be replaced during the next planting season.

Reason: To safeguard the character and appearance of the area and in the interests of biodiversity, in accordance with policies 3.5, 5.10, 5.11, 7.3, 7.4, 7.19 and 7.21 of the London Plan (2011), Local Variation policies 3.5, 5.10 and policies 7B and 7C of Ealing’s Development Management DPD (2013).

Boundary Treatment

5. Prior to the commencement of development details of the position, design, materials and type of new and replacement boundary treatment to be erected, shall be submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and this condition shall apply notwithstanding any indications to these matters which have been given in this application. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details and shall be completed before the development is first occupied.

Reason: To safeguard the character and appearance of the area and in the interests of safety and security, in accordance with policies 3.5, 7.3 and 7.4, of the London Plan 2011, Local Variation policies 3.5, 7.3, 7.4 and policies 7B and 7C of Ealing’s Development Management DPD (December 2013).

3 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

Refuse and recycling store and Operational Management Plan

6. Prior to the occupation of the development details of the design and location of the refuse and recycling stores for the development (including full specifications of any living roof if proposed), together with an Operational Waste Management Plan, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, and this condition shall apply notwithstanding any indications to these matters which have been given in this application. The agreed details shall be implemented in full accordance with the approved plans and thereafter retained for the life of the development.

Reason: To ensure that adequate facilities refuse and recycling facilities are provided for the development and to safeguard the character and appearance of the area, in accordance with policies 3.5, 5.17 and 7.4 of the London Plan (2011).

Bicycle store

7. Prior to the occupation of any part of the development, the bicycle store for the development shall be completed and shall be thereafter retained for the life of the development.

Reason: To ensure that adequate facilities are provided for cyclists and in order to safeguard the character and appearance of the area, in accordance with policies 3.5, 6.9, 6.13, 7.3 and 7.4 of the London Plan (2011), Local Variation policies 3.5, 6.13, 7.3 and 7.4 and policies 7B and 7C of Ealing’s Development Management DPD (December 2013).

Noise - Insulation of building envelopes of residential use

8. Details shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority for approval before the development is commenced, for the insulation of the building envelope, with windows shut and other means of ventilation provided. The details should also include the provision of alternative means of ventilation in accordance with Authority’s criteria. The measures shall be implemented as approved prior to the first occupation of any residential units and thereafter retained for the life of the development.

Reason: To safeguard the future and adjoining occupiers of the development against unacceptable noise and disturbance, in accordance with policies 3.5 and 7.15 of the London Plan 2011, policies 1.1(j) of the Ealing Development (Core) Strategy 2012, Local Variation policy 3.5 and policy 7A of Ealing’s Development Management DPD (December 2013).

Construction Logistics Plan

9. Prior to the commencement of development, a Construction Logistics Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The plan shall include the following:

 Construction traffic management proposals including details of delivery routes and HGV movements and details of any temporary site access/parking;  Details of demolition and construction hours;

4 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

 Noise mitigation and monitoring measures;  Details of enclosure of working areas and the location of compounds for the storage of plant and materials;  Details of temporary lighting;  Dust suppression and monitoring measures, having regard to BRE guide 'Control of Dust from Construction and Demolition Activities';  Wheel wash measures  Site security during construction  Tree protection  A drainage strategy to operate setting out controls of contamination, including  controls to surface water run-off, water pumping, storage of fuels and hazardous materials, spill response plans and pollution control measures;  Procedures for on-site contractors to deal with complaints from local residents

The Construction Logistics Plan shall be implemented on commencement of any works on site and the site shall be managed in accordance with the approved plan for the duration of demolition and construction.

Reason: To ensure appropriate mitigation measures to protect the amenity of local residents, local environmental conditions and to ensure adequate highway and site safety in accordance with policies 5.21, 6.3, 7.14, 7.15 and 7.19 of the London Plan 2011 and policy 7A of the Development Management DPD February 2013.

Protection Of Existing Trees/Shrubs/Hedgerows And Planting Locations

10. No operations (including initial site clearance) shall commence on site in connection with development hereby approved until a suitable scheme (Arboricultural Method Statement) for the protection of existing trees, shrubs and hedgerows has been submitted to and its installation on site has been approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

All protection measures must fully detail each phase of the development process taking into account demolition/site clearance works, all construction works and hard and soft landscaping works. Details shall include the following:

 Full survey of all trees on site and those within influencing distance on adjacent sites in accordance with BS5837*, with tree works proposals. All trees must be plotted on a site plan**, clearly and accurately depicting trunk locations, root protection areas and canopy spreads.  A plan** detailing all trees, shrubs, hedges planned for retention and removal.  Soil assessments/survey  Timing and phasing of works  Site specific demolition and hard surface removal specifications  Site specific construction specifications  Access arrangements and car parking  Level changes  Landscaping proposals

5 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

 A Tree protection plan** in accordance with BS5837* detailing all methods of protection, including but not restricted to: locations of construction exclusion zones, root protection areas, fit for purpose fencing and ground protection, service routes, works access space, material/machinery/waste storage and permanent & temporary hard surfaces.  Soil remediation plans.

All tree protection methods detailed in the approved Arboricultural Method Statement shall not be moved or removed, temporarily or otherwise, until all works including external works have been completed and all equipment, machinery and surplus materials have been removed from the site.

*Using the most recent revision the of the Standard

** Plans must be of a minimum scale of 1:200

Reason: To safeguard existing trees and other vegetation on site considered to be worthy of retention, in the interests of the character and appearance of the area and the setting of the Conservation Area, in accordance with policies 5.10, 7.4 and 7.21 of the London Plan (2011) and Local Variation policies 5.10 and 7.4 of Ealing’s Development Management DPD (December 2013).

Lifetime Homes Standards & Wheelchair Housing

11. All residential units hereby approved shall be constructed to Lifetime Homes Standards and the at least one wheelchair accessible residential unit shall be provided on the ground floor prior to the first occupation of any part of the residential accommodation hereby approved and retained thereafter for the life of the development

Reason: To increase the proportion of dwellings accessible to people with disabilities in line with the borough’s needs, in accordance with policies 3.5 and 7.2 of the London Plan 2011 and Local Variation policy 3.5 of Ealing’s Development Management DPD (December 2013).

Sustainability Condition - Code for Sustainable Homes

12. All residential units shall be constructed to achieve a minimum Code for Sustainable Homes Level 4 of the Code for Sustainable Homes (based on November 2010 Technical Guide). No development shall commence on the development until evidence that the development is registered with the Building Research Establishment (BRE) under the Code for Sustainable Homes and a CfSH Interim Design Stage Assessment is submitted to the Local Planning Authority for information. Within 3 months of the commencement of the development, CfSH Interim Design Stage Certificates verified by the BRE will be submitted to the Local Planning Authority for written approval.

No residential dwelling shall be occupied in the development until CfSH Post-Construction Stage Assessment has been submitted to the Local Planning Authority for written approval, confirming that the agreed sustainability measures will be achieved. Within 3 months from the date of first occupation of the development, Post-Construction Stage Certificates verified by

6 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03 the BRE will be submitted to the Local Planning Authority for written approval confirming that the agreed sustainability measures have been implemented. Such measures shall be retained for the life of the development.

Reason: To ensure a sustainable living environment is secured in accordance with policies 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7 and 5.9 of the London Plan 2011 policy 1.2 (f) of Ealing’s Development (or Core) Strategy 2012 and Local Variation policy 5.2 of the Development Management DPD (December 2013).

Informatives:

1. The decision to grant of planning permission has been taken by the Council’s Planning Committee, taking account of the relevant National, Strategic and Local Planning policies and the information provided in the application submission. The relevant policies and guidance include:

National Planning Policy Framework (March 2012):

The National Planning Policy Framework set out the Government’s planning policies for England and establishes a presumption in favour of sustainable development:

6. Delivering a wide choice of quality homes 7. Requiring good design

London Plan – Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London (July 2011):

London’s Places

2.6 Outer London: Vision and Strategy 2.7 Outer London: Outer London: Economy 2.8 Outer London: Transport

London’s People

3.1 Ensuring Equal Life Chances for All 3.3 Increasing Housing Supply 3.4 Optimising Housing Potential 3.5 Quality and Design of Housing Developments 3.6 Children and Young People’s Play and Informal Recreation 3.8 Housing Choice 3.9 Mixed and Balanced Communities 3.10 Definition of Affordable Housing 3.11 Affordable Housing Targets 3.13 Affordable Housing Thresholds 3.15 Existing Housing

7 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

London’s Response to Climate Change

5.1 Climate Change Mitigation 5.2 Minimising Carbon Dioxide Emissions 5.3 Sustainable Design and Construction 5.7 Renewable Energy 5.10 Urban Greening 5.11 Green Roofs and Development Site Environs 5.13 Sustainable Drainage 5.14 Water Quality and Wastewater Infrastructure 5.15 Water Use and Supplies 5.21 Contaminated Land

London’s Transport

6.3 Assessing the Effects of Development on Transport Capacity 6.5 Funding Crossrail and other Strategically Important Transport Infrastructure 6.9 Cycling 6.10 Walking 6.11 Smoothing Traffic Flow and Easing Congestion 6.13 Parking

London’s Living Places and Spaces

7.1 Building London’s Neighbourhoods and Communities 7.2 An Inclusive Environment 7.3 Designing Out Crime 7.4 Local Character 7.5 Public Realm 7.6 Architecture 7.8 Heritage Assets and Archaeology 7.13 Safety, Security and Resilience to Emergency 7.14 Improving Air Quality 7.15 Reducing Noise and Enhancing Soundscapes 7.18 Protecting Local Open Space and Addressing Local Deficiency 7.19 Biodiversity and Access to Nature 7.21 Trees and Woodlands

Implementation Monitoring and Review

8.2 Planning Obligations 8.3 Community Infrastructure Levy

Supplementary Planning Guidance /Documents

Accessible London: achieving an inclusive environment Sustainable Design & Construction

8 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

The Mayor’s Transport Strategy The Mayor’s Biodiversity Strategy The Mayor’s Energy Strategy Housing Design Guide Providing for Children and Young Peoples Play and Informal Recreation Sustainable Design & Construction The London Housing Strategy

Adopted Ealing Development (Core) Strategy (April 2012)

1.1 Spatial Vision for Ealing 2026 (a), (b), (h). 1.2 Delivery of the Vision for Ealing 2026 (a), (d), (f), (g), (h) 2.1 Realising the potential of the Uxbridge Road/Crossrail Corridor (a), (c) 6.4 Planning Obligations and Legal Agreements

Development Management Development Plan Document (December 2013)

2.18 Ealing local variation - Green Infrastructure: The network of open and green spaces 3.4 Ealing local variation - Optimising Housing Potential 3.5 Ealing local variation - Quality and Design of Housing Developments 3A Affordable Housing 5.2 Ealing local variation - Minimising Carbon Dioxide Emissions 5.10 Ealing local variation - Urban Greening 5.11 Ealing local variation - Green Roofs and Development Site Environs 5.21 Ealing local variation - Contaminated Land 6.13 Ealing local variation - Parking 7.3 Ealing local variation - Designing Out Crime 7.4 Ealing local variation -Local Character 7A Operational Amenity 7B Design Amenity 7D Open Space

In reaching this decision, specific consideration was given to the principle of the residential redevelopment; the mix and density of the proposal; the siting; layout and design of the development; the impact on the character of the existing building; impact on local parking conditions, access and servicing; living conditions of future and existing residents; landscaping and trees. It is considered, that subject to appropriate safeguarding conditions and a S106 legal agreement, given the nature and form of the proposed development, and having considered all objections/comments received from interested parties to date and all relevant policy guidance, it is considered that on balance, the proposal would comply with the relevant policies of the development plan. It is not considered that there are any other material considerations, which would warrant a refusal of the application.

9 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

The scheme complied with policy and guidance. The Local Planning Authority delivered the decision proactively in accordance with requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework.

3. Construction and demolition works, audible beyond the boundary of the site shall only be carried on between the hours of 0800 - 1800hrs Mondays to Fridays and 0800 - 1300hrs on Saturdays and at no other times, including Sundays and Bank Holidays.

4. Thames Water has provided the following advice: (Wording to be confirmed by briefing note)

5. The Council’s Crime Prevention Design Advisor has provided the following advice:

Lighting: The car park areas should be lit to the standard required by BS 5489: 2013. The purpose of lighting from a crime prevention perspective is so that people can see the faces of others in order to ascertain whether their intention is hostile or not and to be better able to identify anyone committing crime in that area. The light should be directed down onto the faces rather than sideways/upwards which would contribute to light pollution. Bollards are deemed unsuitable for communal areas such as car parks and footpaths as they do not achieve this and the light they do provide can be blocked by parked vehicles.

Ground Floor Bedrooms: In the absence of alternative means of ventilation, residents will inevitably wish to have a window open during warmer nights. Consideration should be given as to how to this is achieved without compromising security. E.g. by providing fanlights that are too small to climb through – maximum available opening 115 mm, window opening restrictors that cannot be released from outside, internal collapsible grilles or by installing alternative means of ventilation.

Flats - Internal Walls abutting communal areas: Simple stud partition and plasterboard walls are vulnerable to being broken through. Walls abutting the communal spaces need to be suitably robust to avoid this risk. E.g. by incorporating plywood and/or expanded metal mesh reinforcement or compliance with robust details specification E-WT-2, if not brick or block construction.

Physical Security Standards: I would recommend the applicant adopt the following Physical security standards in order to reduce the risk of crime and disorder.

These standards will need to be met if the applicant requires

"Full Points for Security from Category 8" (Code for Sustainable Homes) Housing Corporation's Design and Quality Standards April 2007 Code Standard Level 3(***) Incorporating: "Full Points for Security from Category 8" (Code for Sustainable Homes). Secured By Design Award.

Communal Flat Entrance Doorset recommended that it be successfully tested to LPS 1175 SR 2 or STS 202 BR2 with the proposed locking system fitted.

10 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

External Residential and individual Flat Entrance Doorsets: All such doorsets to be certificated to one of the following standards:

BS PAS 24:2012 ‘Enhanced security performance requirements for Doors and Windows in the UK" STS 201 LPS 1175 Security Rating 2 STS 202 BR2 (Glazing to include at least one pane of laminated glass certificated to BS EN 356 2000 rating P1A).

Ground Floor and Accessible Windows: certificated to one of the following standards:

BS PAS 24:2012 ‘Enhanced security performance requirements for Doors and Windows in the UK" STS 204 LPS 1175 Security Rating 1 STS 202 BR1

(Glazing to include at least one pane of laminated glass certificated to BS EN 356 2000 rating P1A for residential.)

Site Description:

The site is located on the corner of Summerlands Avenue and Horn Lane, W3. The site comprises of three Victorian terraced properties that front Summerlands Road, a group of 1970’s pre-fabricated pods on the land facing Horn Lane and an open area of land to the rear of the site used for rear access and vehicle parking.

The ground floor of no. 63, the rear part of no 61 and the pre-fabricated pods are currently used as a dental practice (Use Class D1). A single storey side extension has been added to the western edge of no. 63 and provides an entrance lobby to the dental surgery, accessible via Horn Lane, W3

A two bedroom unit is located within the ground floor of 59 and front part of no. 61 Summerlands Avenue, W3

A six bedroom unit is located within the first and converted second floors of no’s 59, 61 and 63 Summerlands Avenue, W3. The unit incorporates first floor rear extensions.

The surrounding area is predominately residential. Summerland’s Avenue is located northeast of the site and comprises of two storey, Victorian terrace dwellings.

Directly south of the site is a new four storey residential development. The development comprises of two residential blocks, containing 21 flats. The flats are supported family units with ancillary office accommodation (planning reference P/2008/4102 granted 13/12/2009)

11 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

Horn Lane is a main distributor road. The site is located within a CPZ and has a PTAL score of 3. This is rated as average for public transport access.

The Proposal:

The applicant seeks to demolish the existing pre-fabricated pods fronting Horn Lane, W3 (currently serving as surgery rooms for the dental practice) and to construct a new building with a height of four storey. Part of the proposal would be single storey with flat roof. The proposed ground floor would be used as a dental practice (Use Class D1) comprising of six surgery rooms, 1 X-Ray room, a recovery room, waiting, reception, decontamination suite, staff room, kitchen, store rooms, stock room, plant room (suction), staff cycle store, dental practice refuse store, clinical waste store, office, shower and toilet facilities.

The upper floor levels would accommodate three floors of residential accommodation comprising of 1 x 2 bed unit at first floor level, 1 x 2 bedroom unit at second floor level and 1 x 2 bedroom unit at third floor level.

Of the three existing residential units (61-63 Summerlands Avenue, W3) it is proposed to convert the ground floor of no. 63 into a residential unit. The remaining layout would be retained as existing, horizontally subdivided providing a two bedroom unit spread over the ground floors of no’s 59 and 61 and a 4 bedroom unit located over the first floor and roofspace of both properties.

The applicant proposes bikes and bin stores to the side facing Horn Lane frontage. Public cycle stands are proposed at the front of the development accessed off Horn Lane.

The extension would provide the following accommodation:

Ground Floor

Unit Type Area (sq.m) Dual Private amenity space/balcony aspect? 01 1-bed (2 person) unit 57.54 Yes None

First Floor

Unit Type Area (sq.m) Dual Private amenity space/ balcony aspect? 02 2-bed (4 person) unit 72.00 Yes 5.40sqm balcony

Second Floor

Unit Type Area (sq.m) Dual Private amenity space/balcony aspect? 03 2-bed (4 person) unit 72.00 Yes 5.40sqm balcony

12 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

Third Floor

Unit Type Area (sq.m) Dual Private amenity space/balcony aspect? 04 2-bed (4 person) unit 72.00 Yes 5.40sqm balcony

Relevant Planning History:

Application Development Description Decision Decision Appeal Number Date Decision Date 09548 No.63 Summerlands Avenue - erection of single storey Granted 14-07-1956 extension to dwelling- house to provide dental laboratory and conditionally sun lounge.

09721 Use of ground floor as extension to existing dental surgery Granted 03-11-1967 and first floor flat and erection of conservatory rear of conditionally surgery.

09721/12 Use of first floor residential unit for office purposes. Refused 18-02-1987

09721/14 Display of three advertising signs. Granted 02-06-1992 conditionally 09721/2 Demolition of existing building and erection of two-storey Refused 31-05-1968 building to provide garage and store and staff rooms.

09721/3 Demolition of existing garage and outbuildings and erection Granted 05-11-1969 of single-storey building comprising of lock up garage and conditionally store. (time expired)

09721/4 Use of ground floor of 59 for dental surgery purposes, Refused 17-02-1971 demolition of buildings and erection of single storey extension to existing ground floor surgery at 61/63 with car parking spaces. (outline)

09721/7 Erection of temporary single storey extension rear of dental Granted 01-12-1971 surgery. (nos.59-63) conditionally

09721/7A Retention and continued use of temporary single storey Granted 09-01-1974 extension rear of dental surgery. (renewal of consent) conditionally (nos.61-63)

09721/7B Retention and continued use of temporary single storey Not 09-09-1974 extension rear of dental surgery. (renewal of consent) proceeded with

09721/9 Erection of canopy to new entrance and alterations to Granted 26-04-1972 external appearance of building. (nos.59-63) conditionally

88/2973 Alterations to and conversion of no's 55, 57, 59, 61 and 63 Refused 07-08-1989 03-09-1990 to five houses and the erection of three storey extension to provide ground floor dental surgery with two residential units above , together with swimming pool, car deck and ancillary facilities.

13 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

P/2004/4433 Conversion of existing dental surgery waiting area to self- Granted 11-03-2005 contained ground floor flat and external alterations to front unconditionally and to side, to re instate entrance door(to No 59) to front and provide new door and windows to side.

PP/2012/0941 Redevelopment of the site consisting of the demolition of Appeal for non- 03-01-2013 the existing pre-fabricated pods used for a dental surgery determination and the construction of a four-storey building comprising of dismissed a dental practice on the ground floor with six new self- contained units on the first, second and third floors, together with internal alterations to no.63 to form a ground floor bedsit unit.

Consultation:

Public Consultation

Neighbour consultation letters (including Gordon Road Residents’ Association) were sent 24/01/2014.

Consultation period expired 15/02/2014.

More than 17 representations were received including 1 petition.

The key issues/objections are summarised and addressed below:

Issues: Planning Officer’s response: Increased density & Density is only an indicative measure of the scale and intensity of overdevelopment a development. In the assessment of a planning application the Council will place greater emphasis on the quality of the environment to be created for prospective and existing residents, the compatibility of the proposal within the existing character of the area, and the transport impact of a proposal. These issues are discussed in the Density section to echo the Planning Inspector’s report. Excessive height and It is not considered that the scheme would result in harm to the scale/impact on character of the area and the existing building. This issues are streetscene discussed in detail in the ‘Design, appearance and impact on the adjoining streetscene’ section of this report to echo the Planning Inspector’s view. Lack of access for The Council’s Environmental Services team has confirmed that refuse facilities. the general location of the bin store is acceptable. However, a condition is proposed to seek revised details of the proposed store to ensure that it would provide an adequate level of storage in accordance with the Environmental Services’ detailed comments. Revised details are therefore sought be condition together with the implementation of an appropriate Waste Management Plan.

14 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

Transport/ insufficient The Council’s Transport Services team has not raised any parking / pressure on objection to the parking relation to this scheme. Given the site’s existing on-street location in an area with a PTAL rating of 3 (good), it is considered parking. that the proposed quantum of car and cycle parking is acceptable and would accord with the London Plan and Ealing DM DPD standards.

The applicant has also agreed to enter into a Section 106 Agreement, denying occupants of the 4 new flats the right to purchase parking permits in the local CPZ. The effect of this will be to remove additional pressure on the public highway and to negate the impact of the proposal on on-street parking.

A condition is proposed to ensure that the proposed cycle store is implemented in accordance with the approved details. Pressure on Due to the reduced scale of the proposals (minor application for infrastructure (water less than ten units) at the proposal has not triggered a drainage, water requirement for financial contributions toward school places or pollution. health care. The resultant density of the development is considered appropriate on balance and the transport and highways impact of the proposal is acceptable. Thames Water has provided advice to be forwarded to the developer with regards to water infrastructure capacity and drainage (see informative). The planning Inspector did not raise any objection in relation to impact on insfrastructure. Living conditions/loss Due to the set back of the current proposal away from Nos. 59 of privacy/overlooking. and 57, the separation distances between the neighbouring developments and the position of the rear windows, it is not considered that the proposed flats would result in any unacceptable overlooking or loss of privacy to neighbouring properties than already exists.

Loss of light. A daylight and Sunlight Report was submitted with the application and a further letter analyzing additional windows in the extension (ground floor and roof lights) of No.62 Horn Lane and Nos. 61, 59, 57 and 55, including Nos. 18-41Summerlands Avenue has been submitted. The report and additional information submitted confirms that the proposal meets the BRE guidelines for sunlight, daylight and overshadowing. Loss of view/outlook The proposed extension would be hard up to the northeastern from Summerlands elevation of Horn Lane, an elevation that does not feature any Avenue. windows or openings to habitable rooms. The extension would extend out towards rear of 61 and 59 Summerlands Avenue only at 1 storey height and would therefore not materially obstruct the outlook from the 1st floor terrace area and windows of existing dwellings on the southern side of Summerlands Avenue. (The revised scheme does not extend at first and second floors to the

15 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

northeast as a result of the omission off the stepped down three storey element from the current scheme). Construction impacts A construction management plan would be secured by planning air/noise pollution and condition to ensure that the redevelopment of the site does not vibration. result in any unacceptable impacts on highway or pedestrian safety and the amenities of local residents during the construction period. Pressure on This is noted and would be taken into consideration by the Local Springfield Gardens. Planning Authority when assessing the amenity space/ play space proposals.

Internal Consultation Transport Comments (summary): Services: Recommended the following:

A legal agreement should be sought restricting the residents of the new flats and business from obtaining parking permits.

A condition should be imposed requiring 4 cycle parking spaces to be sheltered and secure for the residential element.

Case Officer's response: A legal agreement is proposed in order to restrict the residents of the new flats and the surgery staff from obtaining parking permits. Given the nature and small scale and of the application. Environmental Comments (summary): Services (Refuse): Refuse area is adequate for 4 storey block and dental practice but raises concerns that occupies of the ground floor unit will just leave waste on the footpath. .

Case Officer's response: A condition is proposed to seek revised details in respect of a waste management plan.

Regulatory Comments (summary): Services (Pollution No objection subject to the imposition of conditions in relation to noise Technical Team): mitigation/ventilation and an informative for the construction phase.

Construction phase Informative:

Case Officer's response: Condition and informatives are proposed where appropriate and reasonable in respect of the advice given without duplicating with requirements under the Building Regulations.

16 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

Tree Service and Comments (summary): Parks Operation Team: Raises no objection.

Case Officer's response: Conditions are proposed. Energy Officer: Comments (summary):

Recommended that relevant conditions and a legal agreement be proposed to ensure that the development is constructed to achieve a minimum of Code for Sustainable Homes Level 4 and the implementation of and a financial contribution towards energy monitoring.

Case Officer's response: Appropriate conditions are proposed. It is not considered reasonable to impose a financial contribution for monitoring for a minor development which would have to meet sustainability measures imposed under the Building regulations.. Crime Prevention Comments (summary): Design Advisor: Provided guidance on lighting for car park, ground floor bedrooms: internal Walls abutting communal areas and physical security standards.

Case Officer's response: A detailed informative is proposed in respect of the above advice. Conditions are also proposed in relation to landscaping (defensible space), parking layout and lighting, secure bicycle store and boundary treatment.

Planning Policies:

See policies text in recommendation for the list of relevant national, regional; and local planning policies and guidance.

Reasoned Justification:

The proposals have been assessed against the policy framework referred to in the Planning Policies section of this report and taking into account all other relevant material considerations. The key considerations in the assessment of the scheme are:

 The principle of the proposal  Residential density and housing mix  Living conditions for future occupiers  Design, appearance and impact on the locality  Impact on neighbouring occupiers  Trees and landscaping  Traffic, parking and access

17 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

 Refuse and recycling storage  Noise, pollution and contamination  Sustainable design and construction and renewable energy and  Whether or not the proposal adequately addresses the issues raised in the Planning Inspector’s report (in dismissing the appeal against the previous application).

The principle of the proposal

Increasing the current housing stock is an important strategic objective for the London Borough of Ealing supported by policies 3.3 and 3.4 of The London Plan (2011) and local variation policy 3.4 of the Council’s Development Management Development Plan Document (2013).

The proposal is for the redevelopment of the site involving an extension of an existing building in use as dentist surgery and residential dwelling. The proposed rear wing would containing three units and would blend in well with the main building and the neighbouring four storey building on Horn Lane.

The site is located in an existing residential area. It is considered that the proposed development would make a valuable contribution to meet increase the housing stock and improve dental care services to the local community.

It is therefore considered that the principle of providing additional residential development and improved dental surgery services in this existing residential area is acceptable, and comply with the relevant London Plan and Ealing DPD policies.

Residential density and housing mix

Density

London Plan policies 3.4 and 3.5 promote high quality inclusive design that maximizes the potential of sites whilst respecting local context. Density is only an indicative measure of the scale and intensity of a development. In the assessment of a planning application the Council will place greater emphasis on the quality of the environment to be created for prospective and existing residents, the compatibility of the proposal within the existing character of the area, and the transport impact of a proposal.

In dismissing the recent appeal against the previously refused scheme the Planning Inspector stated that the proposed 6 flats would “represent a residential density of 127 units per hectare (u/ha) and 467 habitable rooms per hectare (hr/ha)”. The Inspector concluded that the unit per hectare was within the guidelines set out in the London Plan, although the habitable rooms per hectare was above the maximum, albeit by a small amount and therefore did not raise any issues in terms of density. Given that the current scheme proposes 3 units less, it is considered that the proposal would comply with the guidance contained within the density matrix (Table 3.2) set out in the London Plan (2011). The proposed housing mix close to Acton Town Centre is considered acceptable.

18 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

Living conditions for future occupiers

London Plan Policy 3.5 seeks to ensure that housing developments are of the highest quality internally and externally. Table 3.3 of the London Plan provides minimum internal space standards for new development. LP Policy 7.2 seeks to achieve the highest standards of accessible and inclusive design in all new developments in London. London Plan Policy 7.3 seeks to ensure that developments reduce the opportunities for criminal behaviour and contribute to a sense of security without being overbearing or intimidating.

Layout

All of the units would comply with the minimum London Plan standards for internal floor areas as set put in the table above. The flats would achieve good levels of natural light, outlook and privacy and the living space would have a good layout with direct access to a balcony or terrace. Due to the generous size of the site and the relative position of adjoining properties, none of the new units would be directly overlooked by adjoining residential development.

Amenity space

The Mayors London Housing Design Guide provides the requirements for the provision of amenity space for new developments, which is 5m² for 1-2 person dwellings and an extra 1m² for each additional occupant. This is reflected in Ealing’s Development Management DPD Policy 7D Open Space. The proposal complies with these standards and each of the new units would have direct access to a private balcony or terrace.

The development is proposed within the existing pre-fabricated pods and part of rear parking space and does not reduce the amenity space for existing units. It is noted that the existing units do not benefit from private outdoor amenity space apart from No. 59 which benefits from a roof terrace. It is considered however that due to the accessible balcony, accessible Springfield Gardens, the scheme meets the London Plan standards. The proposals would also provide improved landscaping and planting.

Layout, scale and massing

The layout and footprint of the currently proposed extension is appropriate. The depth of the footprint has been reduced in the current proposal by way of omission of the rear parking and service area which the Inspector in dismissing the recent appeal stated would have resulted in and cramped development of the site with inadequate maneuvering space. The nearest part of the current proposal would sit some 6m away from rear flank walls of No. 63 and some 13m away from Nos. 61, 59, and 57 Summerlands Avenue. Impact on the neighbouring terrace gardens to the north is minimized by a greater set back of the proposed north elevation.

The width and impact of the north elevation onto neighbouring property at No 59 is reduced. The southern flank wall of the proposed building would be hard up to the north flank wall of No. 62 Horn Lane. The east elevation of the four-storey building would be some 13m from the south elevation of Nos. 59 in a diagonal direction. The west set back to Horn Lane was not a

19 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03 concern and remains as previously proposed and the planning Inspector raised no issue relating to this in refusing the previous application.

Character and appearance

In regards to external appearance, the Design and Access Statement submitted with the application states that “A contemporary style complementing the adjoining new development provides the opportunity to ‘bookend’ the frontages with the projecting boxed pair balconies.”

The acceptability of the design of the fenestration of the proposed four-storey building is also echoes in the Planning Inspectors appeal decision. In dismissing the previous proposal, the Inspector states that “The proposed four-storey building would relate visually to Horn Lane. I find that it would complement the existing streetscene along Horn Lane and provide an appropriate bridge in height between No. 62 Horn Lane and Nos. 59-63 Summerlands Avenue”. On this basis the current design, which resembles the previous proposal but to a reduced scale, would not be harmful to the appearance of the area.

The application drawings and the Design and Access Statement indicate that the proposed building would be constructed of brickwork at ground floor level to continue the adjoining plinth and divide the façade into the three classical horizontal elements. The use of white render would also create a visual stepping down in height. It is considered that the amended scheme would relate well with the streetscence and is acceptable in this regard.

The proposed flat roof form of the building has previously not raised any concerns in the Planning Inspector’s appeal decision. Therefore, it is considered that the roof from, which would sit in equal height with No. 62 Horn Lane, would allow the building to be in harmony, particularly given the reduced size of No. 62 Horn Lane. There are other examples of flat roof residential buildings in the area and it is not considered that this element of the proposals would be unduly harmful to the existing character of the area.

Impact on neighbouring occupiers

Ealing’s DM DPD Policy 7B provides the Council’s policy on Design Amenity. It states “new development must achieve a high standard of amenity for users and for adjacent users by ensuring; a) High quality architecture, b) good levels of daylight and sunlight, c) good levels of privacy, d) coherent development of the site, e) appropriate levels of development on the site, f) positive visual impact and g) legibility and accessibility”.

Due to the size of the site and the generous separation distances between the neighbouring developments, it is not considered that the proposed flats would result in any unacceptable overlooking to neighbouring properties and their gardens than already exists.

Impact on existing residents

The previously refused scheme extended at three levels in close proximity to the rear of Nos. 57 and 59 Summerlands Avenue. The current scheme has omitted the three-storey stepped down element. The four-storey building would attach to the northernmost elevation of 62 Horn

20 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

Lane, an elevation which does not feature any windows or openings. In dismissing the previous application, the Planning Inspector states that:-

“The four-storey would extend out across part of the terrace of No. 59, whilst the slightly lower three-storey projection would effectively wrap around the small terraced area outside of the home office area. The building would be around 2.5 metres away from the main rear terrace and less than 2 metres from the smaller terrace. The outlook from these terraced areas, and also from the bedroom and home office glazed doors themselves, would be of a tall, bulky building in very close proximity.”

In relation to No. 57, the Inspector was of the view that the scheme would have had a lesser oppressive impact but would have added to the overall harm that the proposal would have caused to the outlook and privacy of the occupiers of Nos. 57 and 59 Summerlands Avenue.

However, the current proposal would be hard up to the north elevation of No. 62 Horn Lane. The omission of the three-storey stepped down element albeit the reduction in depth of the first, second and third floor elements of the current proposal would create a sufficient gap between the four-storey building and the rear of Nos. 57 and 59 Summerlands Avenue to allow significant levels of outlook from the rear of these properties. Therefore, the occupiers view towards Springfield Gardens would not be intercepted. The elevation visible from within the existing Summerlands Avenue would not incorporate any windows or openings and therefore the proposals would not result in any loss of privacy to the existing flats.

Sunlight, daylight and overshadowing

The Building Research Establishment (BRE) Handbook: Site Layout Planning for Daylight and Sunlight – A Guide to Good Practice (1991) provides guidance on assessing the impact of developments on the level of sunlight and daylight received by existing buildings.

A daylight and Sunlight Report was submitted with the application and a further letter analysing additional windows in the extension (ground floor and roof lights) of Nos. 57 and 59 and the remaining properties up to No. 41 Summerlands has been submitted. The report and additional information submitted confirms that the proposal meets the BRE guidelines for sunlight, daylight and overshadowing.

The report demonstrates that the development would meet the BRE guidelines to allow good levels and daylight and sunlight to neighbouring properties and adjacent amenity areas.

Noise & Air Quality

Ealing’s DM DPD Policy 7A provides the Council’s policy on Operational Amenity. It states in paragraph A “Development which in the course of its operations will cause emissions of any sort must; a. not erode the amenity of surrounding uses or the site itself; b. take all reasonable steps to ameliorate these emissions; c. provide all necessary evidence of mitigation that is requested by the local planning authority.” The policy goes on to state that “All forms of development are potential sources of operational emissions that may erode the amenity of surrounding uses. Types of emissions will typically include, but are not limited to; noise,

21 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03 vibration, particulate matter, odour, light and reflected light.” London Plan Policy 7.15 states that developments should seek to reduce noise minimising the existing and potential adverse impacts of noise on, from within, or in the vicinity of development proposals.

The Council’s Regulatory Services team has recommended that a condition is proposed to seek details of the insulation of building envelope to protect future occupiers against transport related noise. Construction informatives are also proposed.

Trees and landscaping

An Arboricultural Survey and Implications Assessment were not submitted with the application but a Landscape Strategy is incorporated into the Design and Access Statement.

Ealing DM DPD Policy 5.10 states “Development proposals should replace existing trees and plantings on the basis of no net loss of amenity.” This is also supported by LP Policy 7.21. SPG9 provides advice in relation to trees and new developments, including tree protection methods for existing trees to be retained.

The site contains several mature trees along the Summerlands Avenue frontage. These would not be directly affected by the development.

The Council’s Tree Officer has raised no concern regarding the proximity of the proposed building to any mature or protected tree. The landscaping proposals are generally welcomed. Conditions are proposed however to seek finalised details of the hard and soft landscaping and boundary treatment, together with suitable tree tree protection.

Traffic, parking and access

A Transport Statement was submitted in support of the planning application which assesses the transport impact of the proposals and the acceptability of the proposed parking provision. It concludes that there should be no highways or transportation reason why the scheme should not be acceptable.

The site is located in an accessible area close to the town centre with a Public Transport Accessibility Level rating (PTAL) of 3 (good). The site is located within a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ). There is a single vehicular access to the site off Summerlands Avenue.

The proposed development would be car free. A secure bike store for bicycles (3 stands) is proposed along the frontage with Horn Lane.

London Plan Policy 6.3 states “development proposals should ensure that impacts on transport capacity and the transport network, at both corridor and local level, are fully assessed. Development should not adversely affect safety on the transport network. London Plan Policy 6.13 states “The Mayor wishes to see and appropriate balance being struck between promoting new development and preventing excessive car parking provision that can undermine cycling, walking and public transport use”.

22 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

The London Plan parking standards (table 6.2) require less than 1 car parking space per 1-2 bed. The London Plan cycle parking standards contained within table 6.3 requires 1 cycle parking space per 1-2 bed units.

The resultant development would provide 1 one bedroom flats and 3 two-bedroom flats. No car parking spaces have been provided. Adequate cycle parking spaces are provided. Furthermore, the policy states that development in areas of good public transport should have significantly less than 1 space per unit. The Council’s transport officer raises no objection and advice that the proposal falls within a CPZ area with good public transport accessible. Therefore the current proposal is acceptable, subject to appropriate planning conditions.

Refuse and recycling storage

London Plan Policy 5.17 requires the provision of suitable waste and recycling storage facilities in all developments. The proposal provides bin store and clinical waste facilities.

It is noted that residents within the existing building are likely to leave their bins within the Summerlands Avenue frontage.

Given the above, the Council’s Environmental Services team has confirmed that the general location of the refuse and recycling storage arrangements are acceptable. However, a condition is proposed to seek revised details of the proposed store to ensure that it would provide an adequate level of storage in accordance with the Environmental Services’ detailed comments. Revised details are therefore sought be condition together with the implementation of an appropriate Waste Management Plan.

Noise, pollution and contamination

The site is subject to significant transport related noise. Conditions and informatives are therefore proposed in relation to noise mitigation for the building envelope and also in relation to the construction period in accordance with advice received from Regulatory Services and with reference to Ealing DM DPD Policy 7A Operational Amenity. Regulatory Services did not highlight land contamination as an issue.

Sustainable design and construction and renewable energy

London Plan climate change policies collectively require developments to make the fullest contribution to tackling climate change by minimising carbon emissions, adopting sustainable design and construction, prioritising de-centralised energy supply, and incorporating renewable energy technologies. Ealing DM DPD policy 5.2 (G) states that “other new residential development in Ealing must achieve Code for Sustainable Homes Level 4 as a minimum.”

The Planning Statement submitted with the application states that the proposals are intended to include energy efficiency measures to reduce on-site energy. Including improved insulation levels, high specification glazing and energy efficiency lighting and appliances. A Sustainability Statement was submitted in support of the application.

23 of 24 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item No. 03

The Council’s Energy Officer comments are set out in the table above. It is not considered reasonable to impose monitoring costs for a minor development of this nature. An appropriate condition is recommended.

Planning obligations/ Mitigation of the Implications of the Development

In accordance with policies 8.2 and 8.3 of The London Plan 2011, appropriate mitigation measures and financial contributions are being sought through legal agreement regarding the submission as detailed in the recommendation section of this report. It is considered that the measures and contributions are necessary to mitigate impacts of the development.

Community Infrastructure Levy

In addition to S106 contributions and other requirements, the Mayor’s Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) was adopted on 1st April 2012. This has introduced a charging system within Ealing of £35 per sq. of gross internal floor area to be paid to the GLA. This is a non-negotiable sum. The liable sum would be (£21,148.75 for the proposed net floor space of 604.25.).

Conclusion:

On the balance of all material planning considerations, as set out above, it is considered, that subject to appropriate safeguarding conditions and a S106 legal agreement, the proposal adequately addresses the reasons for refusal of the previous similar scheme at appeal, and comply with the relevant policies of the development plan. It is not considered that there are any other material considerations, which would warrant a refusal of the application.

Human Rights Act:

24 of 24 24 St Albans Avenue, Chiswick, W4 5JP Schedule Item No : 04

Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the Scale 1/1250 Date 23/6/2014 permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Crown Copyright reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright Centre = 520724 E 178992 N and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. LICENCE NO: LA100019807 2009 24 St Albans Avenue, Chiswick, W4 5JP Schedule Item No : 04

Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the Scale 1/2500 Date 23/6/2014 permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Crown Copyright reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright Centre = 520724 E 178992 N and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. LICENCE NO: LA100019807 2009 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Item 04

Ref : P/2013/5556

Address: 24 St Albans Avenue, Chiswick, W4

Ward: Southfield

Proposal: Alteration of roof from hip to gable end, rear roof extension; and part second floor rear extension above existing outrigger; installation of three rooflights to front roofslope

Drawing numbers: Site location plan A/P 001 Dec 2013, A/P_002 Nov 2013, A/P_003 Nov 2013, A/P_004 Nov 2013, A/P_005 Dec 2013, A/P_006 Dec 2013, A/P_007 Dec 2013, A/P 101 Nov 2013, A/P 102 Nov 2013, A/P 103 Dec 2013, A/P 110 Dec 2013, A/P 112 Nov 2013 A/P 122a Feb 2014 (Existing) A/P 201 Nov 2013, A/P 202a Feb 2014, A/P 203a Feb 2014, A/P 210 Dec 2013, A/P 212a Feb 2014, A/P 222b Feb 2014 (Proposed)

Type of Application: Householder Planning Application

Application Received: 19/12/2013

Report by: Rebecca Corrigan

Recommendation: Approve subject to Conditions

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The application site is two storey, semi detached residential property located on the eastern side of St Albans Avenue, which has been converted into two flats.

Permission is sought for the alteration of roof from a hip to gable end, rear roof extension, and part second floor rear extension to the existing rear outrigger with the installation of three rooflights to front roofslope.

Objections have been received from local residents and the application is before the committee because the ward Councillor requested consideration by the planning committee.

The hip to gable roof alteration rear roof extension is acceptable due to the opposite half of this semi-detached property already having carried out the alteration. This proposal rebalances the building from the street, creating a symmetrical appearance and the rear roof extension would be in keeping with the prevailing pattern of development within the area.

Page 1 of 7

Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Item 04

With regard to the outrigger extension a similar extension has been constructed to the rear of 14 St Albans Avenue following approval in 2011 and it is visible from the subject site.

In terms of amenity impact, it is acknowledged that the proposal would result in a degree of impact on the neighbouring property at no 22 St Albans Avenue but this would not be severe to warrant refusal.

On balance, it is considered the proposal is compliant with policy and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION:

Grant subject to Conditions:

Time Limit

The development permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason: In order to comply with the provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended).

Materials to Match

All external materials to be used in the development shall match the appearance of those of the existing building.

Reason: To ensure that the materials harmonise with the surroundings, in accordance with policies 7.4 & 7.6 of The London Plan (2011) and policy 7B of the Adopted Development Management Plan (2013)

Approved Plans

2. The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with drawing title number(s) A/P 201 Nov 2013, A/P 202a Feb 2014, A/P 203a Feb 2014, A/P 210 Dec 2013, A/P 212a Feb 2014, A/P 222b Feb 2014.

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt, and in the interests of proper planning.

INFORMATIVES

1. The decision to grant planning permission has been taken having regard to the policies and proposals in the adopted Core Strategy 2012, the Ealing Development Management DPD (2013), London Plan (2011) and to all relevant material considerations including Supplementary Planning Guidance:

Page 2 of 7

Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Item 04

Core Strategy

1.1 Spatial Vision for Ealing 1.2 Delivery of the Vision 2.10 Residential Neighbourhoods

Ealing Development Management DPD

Policy 7A – Operational Amenity Ealing Local Variation to London Plan policy 7.3 – Designing out Crime Ealing Local Variation to London Plan policy 7.4 – Local Character Policy 7B – Design Amenity

The London Plan 2011

Policy 7.1 Building London’s neighbourhoods and communities Policy 7.3 Designing out crime Policy 7.4 Local character Policy 7.6 Architecture

National Planning Policy Framework

In reaching the decision to grant consent, specific consideration was given to the impact of the planning application on the amenity of neighbouring dwellings, the appearance and character of the property and the area as a whole. The proposal is considered acceptable on these grounds, and is also considered to comply with the relevant policies in the adopted Development Management DPD (2013). It is not considered that there are any other material considerations in this case that would warrant a refusal of the application

2. To assist applicants in a positive manner, the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, and offers and encourages a comprehensive pre-application advice service, all of which is available on the Council’s website and outlined in a 24 hours automated telephone system. The scheme complied with policy and guidance. The Local Planning Authority delivered the decision proactively in accordance with requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework.

SITE DESCRIPTION

The application site is located on the eastern side of St Albans Avenue, W4. The property comprises of a two storey, semi detached dwelling constructed in yellow stock brick with a hipped roof on the northern side. The property has been converted into two flats.

The ground floor unit benefits from a single storey rear infill extension and comprise a one bedroom self-contained flat with access to the rear garden. The upper floor

Page 3 of 7

Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Item 04 unit, which is the subject of this application, comprises a two bedroom flat. Access to both units is via the original entrance door located to the street frontage.

The site is located within a predominantly residential area. The housing stock within the southern end of St Albans Avenue is characterised by similar semi-detached properties.

THE PROPOSAL

Planning permission is sought for the alteration of roof from a hip to gable end, rear roof extension, and part second floor rear extension to the existing rear outrigger with the installation of three rooflights to front roofslope to provide additional habitable space at roof level.

The new gable end would have a length of 4.5m, a width of 5.4m and a height of 7.4m from ground. A rear roof extenison is also proposed. The rear roof extension would be set down from the roof ridge by 700mm and set in from the side boundaries by 500mm. It would have a height of 2.3m, a width of 4.6m and a depth of 2.6m. A Juliet balcony is proposed on the rear elevation.

The second floor roof extension would be located above the existing two-storey rear outrigger with a pitch roof. It would have a depth of 3.3m, taken from the rear elevation of the proposed rear roof extension and sit flush with the rear wall of the existing outrigger. It would have a width of approximately 3.2m and a height of 3.3m to the ridge. A sash window is proposed within the rear wall to align and match the lower first floor level.

PLANNING HISTORY

Application Development Description Decision Decision Appeal Number Date Decision Date 39285 Single storey rear extension to Granted 05-04-2001 ground floor flat conditionally

PLANNING POLICIES: As outlined in the informative section above.

CONSULTATION

Public

The original consultation included 14 neighbour notification letters which were sent on the 8th January 2014. The statutory expiry date for representation was 29th January 2014. Initially 4 objections were received raising amenity and design concerns on the proposal.

Following the receipt of revised plans, an additional consultation was took place, which closed on 28th May 2004

Page 4 of 7

Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Item 04

A total of 8 letters of objection have been received on the revised plans which raise the following concerns:

 Out of keeping/character and appearance  Oppressive, over bearing and dominant addition  Over-development  Overshadowing/loss of light  Privacy/overlooking  Noise pollution

Officer comments: The issues are addressed below.

REASONED JUSTIFICATION

This proposal has been assessed against the relevant policies of the current ‘Development Plan’, which comprise the London Plan (2011), Adopted Ealing Core Strategy 2012, and Adopted Ealing Development Management DPD 2013. The key issues in the assessment of this planning application are:

 Design and appearance and impact on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area.  Impact on the amenity of neighbouring occupiers;

Design and appearance and impact on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding Area

Policies 7.4 and 7B of the DPD seek to encourage high quality architecture of an appropriate height and scale, which is respectful of the setting of existing buildings. Development should be proportionate in scale with and relate well to the host building and local context

The application proposes a hip to gable end extension. The original hip ended main roof would be built up to form a gable end to match the adjoining semi-detached pair, with a roof extension inserted into the rear roofslope. The rear roof extension would be set down from the roofridge by 700mm and incorporate a set in from eaves and side edges by 500mm.

The rear outrigger extension at second floor level would be located directly above the flat roof of the existing two storey, rear outrigger to create an additional storey with a pitch roof linked in to the main roof and rear roof extensions.

In terms of scale bulk and massing the width, height and depth would follow the footprint of the existing structure and therefore considered to be a logical addition to the property, which would remain subordinate. A height of 1.9m is proposed to the eaves, it would have a pitched roof reaching to 3.3m at the roof’s apex. A sash window is proposed within the rear flank wall, which would align and be in keeping with the original windows on the lower levels.

Page 5 of 7

Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Item 04

In relation to the character and appearance of the existing street scene, similar hip to gable roof extensions are visible from the subject site. These are clearly marked on plan numbers A/P_002 Nov 2013 and A/P_003 Nov 2013. Specifically, both properties either side of the subject site have constructed roof extensions. No 26 to the north, benefits from a large side and rear roof extensions, whilst the attached neighbouring property at no 22 benefits from a hip to gable and rear roof extension. In this instance, it is considered that the proposed hip to gable extension with the rear roof extension would rebalance the symmetry of nos. 22 and 24, improving the visual aesthetic and would not be detrimental to the streetscene.

To the rear of the property, the proposed extension to the outrigger would not be visible from the public domain and as such would not impact on the appearance of the streetscene.

From the rear of the site there are many different examples of roof extensions with regard to their design and appearance. The majority of these are contained within the rear main roof slope. However it is noteworthy that a similar outrigger extension has been constructed to the rear of no.14 St Albans Avenue, and this structure is visible from the subject site. This was approved in 2011 under planning reference PP/2010/5235.

The revised plans address initial concerns on neighbouring amenity by eliminating side windows and show an identical structure to the existing outrigger extension at no. 14. As such, given the varying designs of roof extensions to the rear, and works previously carried to no 14, it is considered that the design is a suitable and logical addition to the property and would not be out of keeping with the pattern of development within the area.

The extension would be constructed in materials to match the appearance of the host building and complement its overall appearance. It would be sit lower than the original roof creating a suitable level of subordination and would not appear overly dominant or obtrusive. Given this, the proposal is considered to comply with policies 7.4 and 7B of the Development Management Plan Document (2013)

Impact on the amenity of neighbouring occupiers

In terms of impact on neighbouring amenity, objection are raised in regard to loss of light, overshadowing and loss of privacy.

The attached semi at no 22 St Albans Avenue is the property most likely to be affected by the proposal given its proximity to the boundary. No windows are located to the side of no 22, however one bedroom window is located within the first floor rear, which would be sited below the proposal. Taken from the mid-point of the window, it is considered that the depth of the proposal (3.3m) would result in a degree of overshadowing in the late morning. However, the property is east facing and it is not considered that the level of overshadowing would be detrimental to the living conditions of no.22. As such, it is not considered that a refusal could be justified on loss of daylight or sunlight. With regards to outlook from this window, the view to the north is already restricted by the existing outrigger. It is not Page 6 of 7

Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Item 04 considered that the proposal would be so severe above the current situation to warrant refusal.

With regard to privacy issues, the two windows that are proposed within the rear extensions are located on the rear elevation with no direct views into neighbouring properties. No windows are proposed within the side elevations. Rusthall Avenue is located to the rear of the site, and located at a distance of over 21m, which is a sufficient privacy distance in accordance with the London Plan guideline of between 18 to 21m. As no windows are proposed in the side elevations it is not considered that the proposal would given rise to privacy issues, over or above the existing situation on adjoining neighbours to the north and south.

Conclusion

All relevant planning polices and material considerations have been taken into account and it is considered that the proposal address relevant material planning considerations and should be approved. There are no justifiable reasons to refuse this application. Subject to the conditions outlined in schedule B of this report it is considered that planning permission should be granted.

HUMAN RIGHTS ACT:

Page 7 of 7

22 Aintree Road, Perivale, UB6 7LA Schedule Item No: 05

Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the Scale 1/1250 Date 23/6/2014 permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Crown Copyright reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright Centre = 516943 E 183573 N and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. LICENCE NO: LA100019807 2009 22 Aintree Road, Perivale, UB6 7LA Schedule Item No : 05

Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the Scale 1/2500 Date 24/6/2014 permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Crown Copyright reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright Centre = 516942 E 183561 N and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. LICENCE NO: LA100019807 2009 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

Ref: PP/2013/5366

Address: 22 AINTREE ROAD, PERIVALE, UB6 7LA

Ward: Perivale

Proposal: Retention of use of the land as a coach depot (Sui Generis) from a general industrial unit (B2/B8), and retention of a noise attenuation barrier and alterations to the lighting.

Drawing numbers: Evening Coach Movement Graphics (Received 04/06/2014), Technical note – Evening Noise Survey (received 21/05/2014) 29425/001/010 Rev. A (Received 17/04//2014), Night-time ‘Coach Stacking’ Scenarios (Received 14/03/2014); Lighting report and technical light details (Received 2402/2014) Location Plan, Planning statement produced by Peter Brett Associates LLP, Noise Assessment produced by Peter Brett Associates LLP and Transport Assessment produced by Peter Brett Associates LLP (all Received 29/11/2014)

Type of Application: Full Application

Application Received: 2911/2014 Revised: 17/04/2014

Report by: Miguel Martinez

Recommendation: Grant, subject to conditions (Subject to Legal Agreement).

Executive Summary:

The retrospective change of use from Storage and Distribution (B8 land use class) to Coach Depot (Sui-Generis land use class) is considered an acceptable use in this industrial location, which would be compatible and complementary to the range of employment uses and economic activities within this Strategic Industrial Location.

28 objections were received raising concerns about noise, highway safety, traffic and congestion and impacts on residential amenity. Extensive technical information was requested from the applicant relating to noise, lighting and highway impacts. Additionally since the coach depot is now currently operating on site, a night time noise survey was carried out to gather relevant information to determine whether the immediate residential properties were subject to undesirable impacts affecting residential amenity. The results indicated that noise levels created by the limited night time activity at the site does not result in noise nuisance and/or detrimental impacts to neighbouring properties.

The acoustic timber barrier currently on site is an acceptable element of the proposal that does not have a significant effect on residential amenity and mitigates noise arising from the coach depot.

Page 1 of 18

Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

The applicant has also demonstrated that the impacts on the highway network and safety of highway users would not be prejudicial as the departure/ arrival of coaches is throughout the day, with a limited number at peak times. As such Transport Services have not raised objection subject to appropriate conditions and a financial contribution to be used for junction improvements and for the review of existing waiting and the introduction of new loading restrictions on sections of Aintree Road.

The coach depot business at the subject site is therefore considered acceptable, as it would not cause detrimental impact to the locality, neighbouring occupiers and the overall functioning of this Strategic Industrial Location. Consequently, this application is recommended for approval.

Recommendation: That the committee GRANT planning permission subject to the satisfactory completion of a legal agreement under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) in order to secure the following:

Heads of Terms

1. A financial contribution of £10000 towards junction improvements, reviewing waiting restrictions and introducing loading restrictions. 2. Pay the Council’s professional and legal costs in preparing the agreement.

AND

That the grant of planning permission be subject to the following conditions:

Conditions/Reasons: Approved Plans/ Documents

1. The retrospective development hereby approved shall fully comply and be kept in accordance with documents and drawing title/numbers Evening Coach Movement Graphics (Received 04/06/2014), Technical note – Evening Noise Survey (received 21/05/2014) 29425/001/010 Rev. A (Received 17/04//2014), Night-time ‘Coach Stacking’ Scenarios (Received 14/03/2014); Lighting report and technical light details (Received 2402/2014) Location Plan, Planning statement produced by Peter Brett Associates LLP, Noise Assessment produced by Peter Brett Associates LLP and Transport Assessment produced by Peter Brett Associates LLP (all Received 29/11/2014).

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt, and in the interests of proper planning.

Current/future coach fleet

2. The development hereby approved shall be limited to the operation of 22 Coaches as described in the approved documents, any fleet increase shall be subject to the agreement of the Local Planning Authority through the submission of a detailed planning application prior to such increase taking place.

Reason: In the interest of the occupiers of neighbouring residential properties, in accordance with policy 7.15 of the London Plan 2011 , policies 1.1 (j) of the adopted Ealing’s Development (Core) Strategy 2026 and policy 7A of the adopted Ealing’s Development Management Document (2013) , and Interim Supplementary Planning Guidance 10 'Noise and Vibration'.

2 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

Coach arrivals/departures

3. Notwithstanding any information submitted with this application, coach arrivals/departures between the hours of 2300 -0700 shall be restricted to 2 and 22, respectively, in any 14 day period of a calendar year.

Washing equipment

4. Notwithstanding any information submitted with this application, the washing equipment to be used at the site shall be restricted to a Speedy Wash A626 battery operated Coach wash”and the hours of operation shall be 0700- 2200 only.

Noise activities

5. Notwithstanding any information submitted with this application, during the hours of 2200 and 0700 of any given day, no horns, brake hissing, reversing beepers, door slamming and engine revs shall be carried from the site.

External plant equipment

6. The rating noise level emitted from the proposed external plant and machinery at the proposed development, as assessed under BS4142: 1997, shall be lower than the existing background noise level by at least 5 dBA as measured at 3.5 m from the nearest ground floor sensitive facade and 1m from upper floor noise sensitive facades, during the relevant periods of operation.

Coach route restriction

7. Notwithstanding any information submitted with the application, coaches associated with the development hereby approved shall not travel along Fraser Road.

3 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

Operational management plan

8. The approved Operational Management Plan submitted with this application shall be fully adhered to.

Deliveries

9. Deliveries to and collections from the site (excluding refuse collections) shall only take place between 0730 hrs - 1800 hrs Monday to Friday, 0900 hrs -1800hrs Saturday and not at all in Sundays/ Bank Holidays.

Reason: To maintain and protect the amenities of the occupiers of nearby residential properties and the free flow of traffic, in accordance with policy 7.15 of the London Plan 2011 , policies 1.1 (j) of the adopted Ealing’s Development (Core) Strategy 2026 and policy 7A of the adopted Ealing’s Development Management Document (2013).

Noise barrier

10. The noise barrier installed on site shall be free of gaps between the wooden panels and fully fitted with absorbent material, retained with wooden battens, in its entirety within a month of this planning decision. It shall be so maintained to ensure that it continues to meet the local Planning Authority noise criteria.

Reason: To maintain and protect the residential amenity of the occupiers of nearby residential properties and the visual amenity of the area, in accordance with policy 5.16 of the London Plan 2011 , policies 1.1 (e) of the adopted Ealing’s Development (Core) Strategy 2026 and policy 7A of the adopted Ealing’s Development Management Document (2013) and interim Supplementary Planning Guidance 04 ‘Refuse and recycling Facilities’.

Coach parking

11. The parking of the coaches shall be carried out at all times as per markings on site and approved drawings contained in condition no. 1.

Reason: To accord with the terms of the application and preserve and maintain the amenities of occupiers of neighbouring residential properties, in accordance with policy 7.15 of the London Plan 2011 , policies 1.1 (j) of the adopted Ealing’s Development (Core) Strategy 2026 and policy 7A of the adopted Ealing’s Development Management Document (2013).

4 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

Lighting scheme

12. The lighting scheme acompanying this application shall be fully complied with.

Informatives

1. The decision to grant planning permission has been taken having regard to the policies and proposals in National Planning Policy Guidance, the London Plan (2011), the adopted Ealing Development (Core) Strategy (2012) and the adopted Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document (2013) and to all relevant material considerations including Supplementary Planning Guidance:

National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 1. Building a strong competitive economy 4. Promoting sustainable transport 8. Promoting healthy communities

The London Plan 2011 2.7 Outer London: economy 2.8 Outer London: transport 2.17 Strategic industrial locations 4.1 Developing London’s economy 4.2 Offices 4.4 Managing industrial land and premises 4.12 Improving opportunities for all 5.14 Water quality and wastewater infrastructure 5.15 Water use and supplies 5.16 Waste self sufficiency 6.1 Strategic approach 6.3 Assessing effects of development on transport capacity 6.5 Funding crossrail and other strategically important transport infrastructure 6.9 Cycling 6.11 Smoothing traffic flow and easing congestion 6.13 Parking 7.1 Building London's neighbourhoods and communities 7.2 An inclusive environment 7.3 Designing out crime 7.14 Air pollution 7.15 Reducing noise and enhancing soundscapes

Ealing’s Development (Core) Strategy 1.1 Spatial vision for Ealing 2026 (a) (b) (c) (e) (g) (j) 1.2 Delivery of the vision for Ealing (b) 3.1 Realising the potential of the A40/Park Royal corridor (b) (e) 3.2 From Northholt to Perivale, Safeguard Wmployment Land along the A40 Corridor (a)

5 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

Ealing’s Development Management Development Plan Document (2013) Policy 4A: Employment Uses Ealing local variation to London Plan policy 6.13: Parking Policy 7A : Operational amenity Ealing local variation to London Plan policy 7.3 : Designing out crime

Interim Supplementary Guidance/Documents (SPD/SPG) SPG 10 Noise & Vibration

In reaching this decision, specific consideration was given to any impact of the proposal upon the appearance and character of the surrounding area, the living conditions of neighbouring residents in the vicinity of the site and in the surrounding area and the impact of traffic generation upon the surrounding highway network. It is considered that the proposal generally complies with the National Planning Policy framework, the adopted London Plan (2011), the adopted Ealing Development (Core) Strategy 2026 (2013), the adopted Ealing Development Management Plan Document (2013) and to all relevant material considerations including Interim Planning Guidance, and that there are no other material considerations that would warrant refusal of this application.

2. Construction and demolition works, audible beyond the boundary of the site shall only be carried out between the hours of 0800 and 1800 hours Mondays to Fridays and 0800 and 1300 hours on Saturdays and not at all on Sundays and Public Holidays.

The maximum permitted noise levels are:

- not greater than 72 dB L Aeq.10 hr Mondays to Fridays - not greater than 72 dB L Aeq.5 hr Saturdays.

3. To assist applicants in a positive manner, the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, and offers and encourages a comprehensive pre-application advice service, all of which is available on the Council's website and outlined in a 24 hours automated telephone system.

The scheme complied with policy and guidance. The Local Planning Authority delivered the decision proactively in accordance with requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Site Description:

The site is located at 22 Aintree Road, Perivale at the intersection with Fraser Road. The site is largely rectangular in shape and measures approximately 3500 sqm in area. The site contains a large warehouse building of approximately 1704 sqm. The former use of the site was storage and distribution with associated office space (B8 Use Class).

The section of the site fronting onto Fraser Road is occupied by a single storey building with dual pitch roof spanning most of the frontage. Part of this building has been demolished and had a larger depth with double dual pitch roofs. However half of the depth of the building and one set of dual pitch roofs have been recently removed. The section of the building fronting onto Aintree Road features a two storey flat roof building stretching approximately half of that frontage.

The southern half of the site accommodates the parking/manoeuvring area, which has now been increased as a result of the demolition of part of the building. The main vehicular access to the site is located to the south-western corner of the site fronting onto Aintree Road and an two secondary vehicular accesses along Fraser Road at either end of the building.

6 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

The immediate area to the north, south and west is largely warehouse/industrial in character. To the east of the site the area immediately becomes residential along Fraser Road and neighbouring roads. The closest residential properties to the site are sited to the east, nos. 2 Fraser Road and nos. 17-23 Francis Road, some of them share a boundary with the subject site and others are separated by an alleyway.

The site is located within a strategic Location (SIL) as designated with the Policies Map of the Local Plan.

The Proposal:

It is proposed to retain the use of the site as a coach depot (Sui Generis) which was previously operating as a general industrial unit (B2/B8), retention of a 4m height noise attenuation barrier and alterations to the lighting.

Background:

Originally the application was submitted for a proposed development as the applicant anticipated that a decision on the application before he had to vacate the former site his business was operating from. However the application went over the statutory period for decision following an extension as a result of the concerns raised by the Local Planning Authority. The issues raised have now all been formally resolved.

This resulted in the applicant carrying out demolition works, replacement of the hardstanding in the yard, installation of the acoustic barrier and alterations to the vehicular access fencing to accommodate the operation of the coaches on site after the statutory deadline but before this reccomendation. As a result the application is now seeking planning permission for retention of the development that was originally proposed.

Relevant Planning History

Application Development Description Decision Decision Number Date P/1979/1397 Erection of fire escape staircase and single Granted 12-12-1979 storey side extension to provide storage conditionally accommodation and ancillary uses. P/1980/1474 Provision of hardstanding to provide off-street Permitted 16-10-1980 parking. development P/1992/0135 Concrete hardstanding over existing grass area Permitted 18-02-1992 (section 64). development

Consultation:

Public Consultation - Summary

Neighbour Initiated on the 18/12/2013 and expired 08/01//2014. 46 surrounding residential Notification: occupiers notified.

Site notices displayed on 20/12/2013 and press advert 14/03/2014.

7 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

28 representations have been received from neighbouring properties and one additional objection from former Councillor Justin Anderson in objection to the proposed development. The summary of objections is as follows:

 Traffic and parking congestion

Planning Officer’s response: the applicant submitted a Transport Statement and additional information requiring the analysis of the potential impact on nearby junctions at AM and PM peaks (worse case scenarios). The proposal would potentially result in minor impacts on nearby junctions. However Transport Services considered the minor potential impacts could be addressed by carrying improvements in the junctions of Bideford Avenue with Dawlish Avenue and Teignmouth Gardens.

Additionally, Transport Services recommended that a financial contribution is sought to improve the junctions of Bideford Avenue with Dawlish Avenue and Teignmouth Gardens and to review existing waiting and introduce new loading restrictions on sections of Aintree Road.

No concerns were raised by Transport Services about car parking congestion, the reason being that the site would have enough capacity to accommodate the proposed coaches and vehicles associated with operation of the development, particularly as coaches are generally away from the depot during the day.

 Highway safety (pedestrian, including children and parents from John Fisher School/ cyclists)

Planning Officer’s response: The submitted information shows that coaches are mainly exiting the site and turning left (south) towards the A40. Although there would be some exceptions with coaches exiting the site and turning right to reach Bilton Road, Transport Services has not raised objection in this regard. It should be noted that from the information submitted and statements received, there would be one coach leaving the site every 15 minutes (average) between 8am- 9am (mainly heading towards the A40).

 Noise and vibration (traffic), particularly at night.

Planning Officer’s response: The applicant has submitted extensive noise mitigation related information related to the effectiveness of the 4m height noise barrier and noise created by coaches. Tests have been carried out at evening times recording coach movements within the site, which were provided to Regulatory Services. They are satisfied that the noise levels created are very low and the noise barrier contributes positively as a mitigation measure. Their concerns have been addressed and they are now recommending safeguarding noise conditions to ensure the adjoining residential occupiers are not affected at night by the operation of the coach depot. Regulatory Services did not raise concerns about vibration as vehicles within the site would move at low speed or noise during the day given the industrial location of the site.

8 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

 Will impacts be mitigated with improvements directly benefiting h local community?

Planning Officer’s response: The potential impacts identified by Transport Services would be mitigated through a financial contribution to carry out improvements at the junctions of Bideford Avenue with Dawlish Avenue and Teignmouth Gardens and introduce new loading restrictions on sections of Aintree Road.

 Coaches are already on site, this is a clear planning breach showing flagrant disregard.

Planning Officer’s response: Noted. Planning Services was made aware in March 2014 that the coach depot was operating on site, As a result the application has been considered as a retrospective application for planning permission. However the planning system allows for retrospective applications to be considered without this affecting the planning assessment on the acceptability of the development.

 It is completely unthinkable and unworkable that a coach depot should be allowed to be constructed on Aintree Road when Bilton Road, Bideford Avenue and Horsenden Lane South already suffer no end from large vehicle movements, particularly at night time unsocial hours.

Planning Officer’s response: Noted. Transport and Regulatory Services requested additional information to address potential impacts on highways and neighbouring residential properties. They have recommended conditions to ensure that the development does not significantly affect the locality.

 Consultees on Fraser Road were made aware of the application consultation by letter however the coach depot would affect a much wider number of residents in Perivale on the local road network.

Planning Officer’s response: There were 46 immediate properties consulted, in addition there were 3 site notices and also the application was advertised in the press. It is noted that from the objections received and their addresses, the responses come from the wider area, not just immediate neighbours.

 Perivale should not be turned into an industrial area

Planning Officer’s response: This area of Perivale is, historically, an Industrial Area and the subject site is situated within an area designated as a Strategic Industrial Location in the London Plan 2011 and Ealing’s Development (Core) Strategy (2012).

9 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

 Too close to residential homes to operate 24 hrs.

Planning Officer’s response: It should be noted the former use of the site did not have any restriction in the hours of operation and/or the number of vehicles within the site. In this case the operation of the site at night time has been restricted to 24 movements (infrequent occurrence) between 2300hrs- 0700hrs. It should also be noted that these movements would be carried out by coaches that are parked by the entrance to the site (further away from residential properties). The night tests carried out have demonstrated noise levels would not result in noise nuisance for neighbouring residents.

 The noise barrier would be either too low to effectively prevent noise from the 22 coaches or too high impacting on evening light and our view of Horsenden Hill.

Planning Officer’s response: The acoustic timber barrier has been agreed at 4m in height and set in by 1m from the shared boundary with neighbouring properties. In this manner the acoustic barrier would offer acceptable noise mitigation whilst being acceptable in residential amenity terms. Particularly as the ground level of neighbouring properties is higher than that of the yard where the timber barrier is located. It should also be noted that the application has resulted in the demolition of half of the depth of the building fronting onto Fraser Road which had an approximate height of 4m to the eaves and 7m to the ridge. Therefore opening views to the west.

 Increased height of floodlights will cause light pollution to impact my hobby as an astronomer as well as being unwelcome night-time illumination of my garden and rear facing bedrooms. Light will reflect from the large shiny coach surfaces.

Planning Officer’s response: The applicant submitted a lighting report showing light spillage/ reflection. Given the type of lighting, position and direction, Regulatory Services were satisfied the lighting scheme would not cause any detrimental impact on neighbouring properties, subject to a condition that the applicant fully complies with the information submitted.

 There will be pollution from exhaust gases.

Planning Officer’s response: The coaches are not going to be kept running in the yard and it should be noted that from the several visits carried out the coach fleet in operation is meeting strict environmental emission standards. Regulatory Services have not raised concerns in this regard.

External Consultation

St John Fisher Catholic Objection School  Our children walk to and from the school site, passing the application site. The intensification of large vehicle movements to and from the site increases risk for children using the footpaths around the site when coming to and from school.

10 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

Planning Officer’s response: According to the information submitted most of the coaches would exit the site and turn left (south) towards the A40.The area opposite the application site and south of it is industrial. Residential properties are located to the north and east from the application site. Therefore, there would not be coaches passing by the school gates. The information submitted states there will be no coaches arriving but 8 coaches departing between 08.00 and 09.00, approximately, one every 7minutes. Hence, Transport Services has not considered this would pose a significant road safety risk for pedestrians around the site.

 The assessment makes no mention of the effect of peak movements on pedestrians from the school even with the conflicting peak movements and the vulnerable nature of the children.

Planning Officer’s response: The number of coaches leaving the site is very low, as stated in the previous response; and most of them would drive towards the A40 via Aintree Road (southbound). The route from pedestrians to/from school passing by the site is Fraser Road, Aintree Road (north of the site) and Bilton Road.

 This is considered to compromise the quality of the existing industrial land within this valuable Employment Area. While London Plan Policy 2.17 (Strategic Industrial Locations) states that transport functions are considered acceptable uses in Strategic Industrial Locations, this proposal does not comprise a transport function as it is a car park for coaches.

Planning Officer’s response: The coach depot business involved in this application is considered to be compatible and suitable for an Industrial location given the range of issues and overall type of operation involved. It should be noted the proposal is not a coach park facility, as this is an ancillary element of the proposal as a whole. The booking of coaches, administrative functions, maintenance and washing is part of the business. Therefore, it is considered to be a transport function as the whole, which is in line with the London Plan.

 Ealing’s Core Strategy Policy 3.2 (From Northolt to Perivale, Safeguard Employment Land along A40 Corridor) seeks to retain and attract new business development. This proposal does not attract new industrial uses and should be refused for the loss of employment use in the Employment Area.

Planning Officer’s response: The proposal is a new business in this area that creates employment. Therefore it is not considered there is any loss of employment use, particularly when it is considered the site lay vacant for several years generating no economic activity and creating no employment opportunities.

11 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

 The site is proposed to install new staff parking at the front of the site. It is considered that this position will restrict the view in and out of the site – obscuring the view of pedestrians and vehicles on the pavement and road, particularly critical for children from the school walking to and from school.

Planning Officer’s response: the number of parking spaces adjacent the vehicular access are 4. However it should be noted the vehicular access is 11m wide and the perimeter fencing is palisade, which allows visibility of the pedestrian movements in both directions (north/south). Therefore cars and other small vehicles parking by the entrance would have an acceptable visibility. This would also be the case for coaches leaving the site, particularly considering drivers would sit at a higher position.

 A condition must be placed on the site restricting the number of vehicles permitted on site and also the times that they come in and out of the site (avoiding the times when children are coming to and from school). We maintain that a condition in these terms would be unlikely to be able to be enforced as only 22 coaches have been tested in this application; this is the maximum number of coaches that should be stored on site.

Planning Officer’s response: A condition about the fleet numbers has been attached. However conditions restricting morning times are considered to be unreasonable given the low number of coaches leaving the facility at peak times.

 We consider that this number of coaches is already in excess of what the site and surrounding roads can cope with.

Planning Officer’s response: Transport Services have acknowledged road movements in local roads are high, however due the pattern of movements and the fact the coaches would leave/return to the site at different times, they have not raise an objection in terms of highway capacity. They have, however, raised concerns about potential impacts on junction capacity but recommended that a financial contribution is sought to improve the junctions of Bideford Avenue with Dawlish Avenue and Teignmouth Gardens and review existing waiting and introduce new loading restrictions on sections of Aintree Road.

 While the applicant has submitted a draft site management plan with the application, this is not acceptable or enforceable. For example, paragraph 20 states, ‘coaches should not use Frasier Road’. The wording needs to be specific, explicit and secured though a S106 agreement, which can contain a provision to submit an updated site management plan to be approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The S106 should also contain a provision for monitoring this agreement to ensure that the site is managed in accordance with the plan.

12 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

Planning Officer’s response: The statement is concise and explicit and this has been also secured via a planning condition, which would be enforceable. A condition has also been suggested for the operation of the business to fully comply with the management plan submitted.

Internal Consultation

Regulatory Services No objection, subject to conditions (Noise/ Air Pollution Control) Planning Officer’s response: Noted, conditions related to external plant equipment, night time arrival/departures, coach numbers, acoustic a barrier and coach parking have been suggested to minimise impact to the locality and neighbouring occupiers.

Transport Services No objection, subject to a planning contribution. (verbal feedback)  S106 to be used to improve the junctions of Bideford Avenue with Dawlish Avenue and Teignmouth Gardens and review existing waiting and introduce new loading restrictions on sections of Aintree Road.

Planning Officer’s response: Noted, planning obligation agreed and is part of the recommendation of this application.

Planning Policies:

The relevant planning policies are set out in the informative section of this report.

Reasoned Justification:

Principle of Development

Aintree Road features a mixture of Industrial uses across his length. This area of Perivale as a whole is designated as a Strategic Industrial Location within the Policies Map of the Local Plan, which is land also designated for employment.

Paragraph 22 of the National Planning Policy Framework states that ‘Planning policies should avoid the long term protection of sites allocated for employment use where there is no reasonable prospect of a site being used for that purpose. Land allocations should be regularly reviewed. Where there is no reasonable prospect of a site being used for the allocated employment use, applications for alternative uses of land or buildings should be treated on their merits having regard to market signals and the relative need for different land uses to support sustainable local communities.’

London Plan policy 2.7 states ‘Preferred Industrial locations (PIL) which are particularly suitable for general industrial… recycling, some transport related functions, utilities… and other related industrial activities.

London Plan policy 4.4 states that ‘Boroughs should adopt a rigorous approach to industrial land management to ensure a sufficient stock of land and premises to meet the future needs of different types of industrial and related uses in different parts of London, including for good quality and

13 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05 affordable space. They should also plan, monitor and manage release of surplus industrial land where this is compatible with the above, so that it can contribute to strategic and local planning objectives, especially those to provide more housing, and, in appropriate locations, to provide social infrastructure and to contribute to town centre renewal.’

Ealing’s Development Strategy designates the employment area the subject premises are located in as a Strategic Industrial Location (SIL). SIL‘s comprise the borough’s strategic employment land and are primarily focus for general industrial and warehousing land and office development where appropriate. SLI’s are considered worth of long term protection,

The Ealing’s Planning Policy Framework allows the release of some smaller sites that do not function effectively as Industrial/employment land and have been allocated through the Development Sites DPD document. The subject site is not within the proposed sites to be allocated for alternative uses.

The use currently being given to the site for a coach depot business (rental) would be considered a compatible use with an industrial location and a transport related function a-doc with the location of the site. It would generate employment and economic benefits to the locality and overall function of the Strategic Industrial Location. Therefore it is considered the principle of development for this application would be in accordance with the objectives of the aforementioned policies and considered acceptable subject to all other planning considerations being acceptable.

Impact on residential amenity

London Plan Policies 7.1 and 7.15 state that people should have good quality environment and that development proposals should seek to reduce noise. Ealing Draft Development Management DPD Policies 7.A and 7B of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document (2013) state that new development should have a positive visual impact, that any emissions should not erode amenity of surrounding uses or the site itself and that development must achieve a high standard of amenity for users and adjacent uses by ensuring good levels of daylight and sunlight, good levels of privacy, and positive visual impact.

It should be noted that due to the nature of the use and potential impacts on residential amenity residential properties nearby the site could be potentially affected. However the immediate neighbours to the site are 6 properties located to the east. Four of them are separated from the site by an alleyway (nos. 2 Fraser Road and nos. 15 and 17 Francis Road). The properties adjoining the site are nos. 21 and 23 Francis Road).

The first element of the proposal that was assessed in relation to neighbouring residential amenity is the Acoustic Timber Fencing proposed. The timber fencing was erected set in 1m from the eastern boundary of the site. It encloses the yard where all the coaches park and manoeuvre to leave the site. It also features a return at either end. The height of this acoustic fencing is 4m, measured from the finished level of the yard. The adjoining properties that can be potentially affected are those directly to the east of the site, nos. 17-23 Francis Road.

A site inspection revealed these properties and their gardens are at a higher level when compared to the finished level of the yard, this ranging between 0.3m-0.6m. The increase is in a south direction. These neighbouring buildings, at their closest, are located at a distance of 14m at ground level and 18m at first floor level from the shared boundary. Also some of these properties have erected detached garages/outbuildings in their rear garden.

14 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

The timber fencing raises above the timber fencing of nos. 17-23 Francis Road. However it should be noted that the dwellings are constructed to a higher level when compared to the ground level of the western end of its curtilage (closest to application site). It should be noted that in terms of the fencing’s appearance and outlook of these adjoining properties, the visible section of the acoustic fencing provides a domestic feeling as it is timber and its appearance is acceptable in the context of other boundary treatments among residential development. It has been properly framed and assembled and it neither appears to be obtrusive nor oppressive on neighbouring properties, despite its height.

In terms of daylight/ sunlight, given all the adjoining residential properties are sited east of the subject site, the fencing reduces the light received by the western end of the adjoining curtilages late in the afternoon only, which is not considered to be detrimental to the living conditions of adjoining properties. It should be noted that 4 out of 6 adjoining properties are separated from the subject site by an alleyway that is approximately 2.4m wide. It should also be noted that a section of the building has been demolished. The section of the building now removed was in close proximity to the outdoor amenity space of nos. 2 Fraser Road and 23 Francis Road. The height of this dual pitch section was 4m at the eaves and 7m at the ridge, which also contributes to improve the relationship with the outdoor amenity space of these two properties.

With regards to no. 2 Fraser Road, it appears that this adjoining property is constructed at a similar ground level to that of the buildings on the subject site. This neighbouring property and its outdoor amenity are separated from the subject site via an alleyway that is approximately 2.4m wide that provides access to a detached garage and land surrounding it with overgrown vegetation. The northern end of the timber fencing would be in close proximity of this piece of land and approximately 3.4m away from the southern end of the outdoor amenity space of no. 2 Fraser Road (in place of the section of the building demolished). The timber fencing features a uniform height of 4m in comparison to the part building demolished which had a height of 4m at eaves and 7m at ridgeline. Notwithstanding the timber fencing is set in 1m from the eastern boundary of the site when compared to the 3m from the section of the building now demolished; as a result of the reduction in height, it is considered that on balance the residential amenity at no. 2 Fraser Road has not been significantly affected.

Given that officers considered the acoustic Timber Fencing is an acceptable element as per assessment above, the only remaining matters for assessment in relation to neighbouring residential amenity relate to the noise created by the use of the site, namely the noise arising from coach movements, machinery used and external lighting.

In terms of noise, there was a noise assessment report originally submitted with the application that was assessed by Regulatory Services. There were some elements in the information submitted that Regulatory Services were not in agreement with and these related to the calculation methods used to asses night time noise. However due to the time taken to resolve the professional differences approach to the noise calculations; the applicant and Regulatory Services agreed to carry out a sound test exercise as the development was already operating from the site.

The conclusions from Regulatory Services in relation to night time noise arising from the subject site were that although the coaches and electric washer noise appeared to be audible where the microphone position was agreed (outside the first floor window in the rear elevation of no. 17 Francis Road), there does not appear to be any impulsive peak noises submitted by the applicant that would cause noise disturbance to adjoining residents.

15 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

The only noises that were apparent, other than those as a result of the dwelling occupiers talking by the window where the microphone was installed, were from vehicles on nearby roads. From the recorded noises, the coach noise peak, although audible at the 4m microphone position, appears to be contained to levels not greater than 52 dB LAeq, 1sec, against subsided ambient noise of 38 – 42 dB. Regulatory Services considered these noise levels to be acceptable provided conditions are imposed to any planning permission that is given.

It should be noted that the coaches operating at irregular intervals at night time are the coaches that are further away from residential properties (near the entrance to the site via Aintree Road). The applicant has stated that the busiest period for coaches to arrive is between 1800-1900 hrs, hence by the time the irregular night time movements are carried out, there would be two rows of coaches parked between the residential properties and the coaches used for night operation.

With regards to external machinery, the applicant has stated that it mainly relates to the washing equipment for the coaches, which would not be used at unsociable hours (e.g. between 2200-0700). During the site visit this equipment was in operation and Regulatory Services did not raise concerns about tits operation, however a condition has been suggested to restrict its use at unsociable hours as a precautionary measure.

Finally with regards to the external lighting proposed, the scheme proposed comprises 9 lights, five would be located in the elevation of the retained building facing the yard (south facing), three would be located adjacent to the south boundary of the site, pole mounted. One more is fixed to the south elevation of the two storey building fronting onto Aintree Road. The lighting proposed is at a height of 4m or less.

The applicant submitted a light assessment that analyses a worst case scenario, without motion activated lights, which are the ones proposed closer to the eastern boundary of the site (closer to residential properties). The results indicate that vertical illuminance escaping from the site is nonexistent as all lights are below the 4m barrier and they are full cutoff luminaries which prevents upward light despite the headlight being position with a 15 degree tilt. Regulatory Services assessed the technical report submitted and raised no objection, however they recommended that a condition to fully comply with the lighting scheme submitted is part of any recommendation for approval. This condition has been suggested in the recommendation above.

The technical information submitted relating to night time noise, external light and external equipment on-site with night time tests being carried out at the subject site (with the coach operation in place); are now to the satisfaction of Regulatory Services. Therefore it is considered that the residential amenity of neighbouring properties would not be detrimentally affected by the use of the subject site as a coach depot. As such, it is considered the development is complaint with Section 8 of the National Planning Policy Framework, policies 7.1 and 7.15 of the London Plan (2011), policies 1.1 (j) and 3.1 (e) of the Ealing’s Core Strategy and policies 7.A and 7B of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document (2013).

Highways

London Plan Policy 6.1 (Strategic Approach) seeks to encourage development which reduces the need to travel by car, and locate development which generates high levels of trips in locations with high public transport accessibility. London Plan Policy 6.3 (Assessing effects of development on transport capacity) seeks to ensure that impacts on transport capacity and the transport network, at both corridor and local level, are fully assessed. Development should not adversely affect safety on the transport network.

16 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

London Plan Policy 6.9 (Cycling) states that developments should provide secure, integrated and accessible cycle parking facilities in line with the minimum standards. London 6.13 (Parking) seeks appropriate balance being struck between promoting new development and preventing excessive car parking provision that can undermine cycling, walking and public transport use.

The applicant submitted a Transport Assessment. Transport Services acknowledged that the operation of the coach depot at the subject site with a fleet of 22 coaches would result in a low vehicle number with 16 vehicles trips during the am and 16 vehicles trips during pm peak periods; when compared to the former use given at the subject site, storage and distribution warehouse (B8 use class). However they also acknowledged that nearby junctions were congested.

Transport Services requested the applicant to carry out an impact assessment at nearby junctions, namely Aintree Road junction with Bilton Road, Bideford Avenue junction with Dawlish Avenue and Teignmouth Gardens junction with Bideford Avenue. The applicant demonstrated that junction impacts as a result of the development would not be prejudicial to traffic conditions. However, given that the impact Transport Services is concerned about relates to cumulative impacts (as a result of this development and other committed developments in the area); it was considered that a financial contribution to be used to improve the junctions of Bideford Avenue with Dawlish Avenue and Teignmouth Gardens and review existing waiting restrictions and introduce new loading restrictions on sections of Aintree Road would mitigate the cumulative impacts concerns.

The applicant has agreed to restrict coaches driving along Fraser Road and has stated that there would be an occasional use of Bilton Road as its use is restricted to accessing Wembley (hotels and the Metroline Bus garage). Transport Services is in agreement for such restrictions to the coaches. A condition has been suggested to ensure Fraser Road is not used by the coaches.

With regards to cycle storage and parking spaces to serve the development (staff parking) the site can easily accommodate the vehicular parking for employees and or visitors, particularly as the coaches would be out most of the day. This was observed during the site visits carried out with the business in operation. The applicant has also stated that cycle parking is accommodated within the retained building.

With regards to the safety of highway users (pedestrians, cyclists and other car users) Transport Services has not raised concerns due to the fact that during the morning peak (coinciding with school times) there are only 8 coaches departing between 08.00 and 09.00, approximately, one every 7minutes. Hence, they did not consider this would pose a significant road safety risk. Additionally it should be noted that most of the coaches, as previously stated would exit the site and turn left to drive in a south direction along Aintree Road to reach the A40.

Transport services is also satisfied that the minimum pedestrian and vehicle visibility splays set out by the Department for Transport in Manual for Streets (MfS) are met. The width of the access is 11 metres which is sufficiently wide for visibility purposes. Furthermore, coaches and cars are required to turnaround within the site and exit in forward gear. In addition, pedestrians and drivers can see through the palisade fencing in front of the proposed staff parking bays so the proposed layout is considered safe.

Therefore it is considered that subject to appropriate conditions and the planning obligations agreed, the proposal would not result in detrimental impacts on highways and therefore in compliance with section 4 of the National Planning Policy Framework, policies 2.8, 6.3, 6.9, 6.11 and 6.13 of the London Plan (2011), policies 1.1(f) and 3.1(b) of the Ealing’s Development Strategy (2012) and policy 6.13 of the Ealing’s Development Management Development Plan Document (2013).

17 of 18 Planning Committee 02/07/2014 Schedule Item 05

Other matters

Economically, the proposal is considered acceptable as it generates employment and has brought back into use as site suffering of long term vacancy.

In terms of flood risks, the amount of hardstanding onsite has not been increased when compared to the previous situation. The run-off water from the newly concreted yard has been dealt with by via existing drainage channels and connections.

Conclusion

It is considered the use of the site as a coach depot facility does not affect in a detrimental manner the locality and is therefore considered to comply with national, regional and local policies. Therefore, a conditional approval is recommended in this case, subject to a legal agreement.

Human Rights Act:

18 of 18

Report for: INFORMATION

Item Number: 8

Contains Confidential No or Exempt Information

Title The Local Heritage Register

Responsible Officer(s) Aileen Jones

Author(s) Rosemarie Wakelin

Portfolio(s) Cllr Julian Bell, Leader of the Council (Policy Overview Portfolio)

For Consideration By Planning Committee

Date to be Considered 2 July 2014

Implementation Date if N/A Not Called In Affected Wards All Keywords/Index Local List, Heritage Assets, Selection Criteria, List of Buildings of Façade or Group Value. Heritage Environment Record

Purpose of Report:

To inform members of the results of the public consultation on the reviewed old Local List and note its replacement with the newly updated Local Heritage List and List of Buildings of Façade or Group Value.

1. Recommendations

i. To note the recommendations for changes to the old 2001 approved Local List. ii. To note the responses to the review consultation, and iii. To recommend the new Local Heritage List and List of Facade of Group Value for approval by Cabinet

2. Key Implications

2.1 The Local Heritage Register is a register of local lists which highlight Local Heritage Assets. The lists will be advertised via the Council website and amended on a regular basis through public consultation and approved by Cabinet. The lists will include information we hold on buildings, sites or areas within the London Borough of Ealing which we consider to have local historic, architectural or historic interest meeting the criteria originally laid down in the former UDP and in accordance with English Heritage guidance . The Local Heritage Register will be a source of information for stakeholders and the general public and will incorporate the Local Heritage List, the List of Buildings of Façade or Group Value, the List of Designated Shopfronts, Heritage Land and Archaeological Interest Zones.

2.2 The Local Heritage Register, supported by the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), can help to recognise local distinctiveness and character to ensure these values are taken into account when changes affecting the historic environment are proposed. In tandem with conservation area appraisals, management plans and design guides, it is a key method for fulfilling the NPPF requirement to set out, ‘A positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of the historic environment’ (NPPF) and the Council’s duties as planning authority under The (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 sections 71 & 72.

2.3 The Local Heritage List recognises architectural and/or historic interest which is of local significance which may not be worthy of national designation, but exceeds the local norm..

2.4 The List of Buildings of Façade or Group Value alerts anyone who wishes to seek planning permission for alterations, to the identified quality, architectural and/or historical, of a group, parade or terrace of buildings. This seeks to encourage the successful management of change by preserving the homogeneity of facades or the significant historic relationships between groups of buildings.

2.5 Some buildings have been reclassed as ‘Positive Contributors’ within their conservation areas, these properties will be identified in the relative chapter within the conservation area appraisals currently titled, ‘key unlisted buildings’.

2.6 The new Local Heritage List , and List of Buildings of Façade or Group Value, will become approved material documents and join a suite of documents that sit alongside to inform the Local Plan.

2.7 The old List of Locally Listed Buidlings and the List of Buildings of Façade or Group Value held within the old Unitary Development Plan, contained around 1177 entries. These entries, plus new suggestions from individuals, groups and officers led to a list of 1500 entries which

were reviewed against new guidance and legislation. Of those assets reviewed, 421 have been included on the new Local Heritage List, and 300 on the List of Buildings of Façade or Group Value. Around 600 entries have been recorded as ‘positive contributors’ within their respective conservation areas.

3. Purpose of the Local Heritage Register

3.1 The Local Heritage Register is a method for managing change to our local historic environment by identifying jointly with communities, ‘heritage assets that are valued as distinctive elements of the local historic environment’, and by providing ‘clarity on the location of assets and what it is about them that is significant, guaranteeing that strategic local planning properly takes account of the desirability of their conservation.’ (Good Practice Guide for Local Heritage Listing, EH 2012)

3.2 The lists within the Local Heritage Register allows for the local designation of properties and structures henceforth described as heritage assets (see NPPF glossary https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_da ta/file/6077/2116950.pdf ). These are considered to have local significance, but fall short of the standards required to afford inclusion on the statutory National Heritage List for England. The local designation of properties and structures allows for local, as opposed to national, significance to be the driving force behind the assessment.

3.3 The Local Heritage Register should assist the strategic management of our historic environment and ensure its appropriate contribution to the shaping of neighbourhoods in accordance with London Plan policy 7.4 (See consultation on Shaping Neighbourhoods: Character and Context SPG http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/shaping_neighbourhoods_ch aracter_context_draft_low_res_spg_0213.pdf)

3.4 The Local Heritage List will identify buildings, monuments, structures and artworks which meet the level of local interest – architectural, historical or societal – recommended in EH selection guidance, and stipulated in NPPF (p127) .

3.5 The List of Buildings of Façade or Group Value will identify terraces, parades and groups of buildings that have a joint historic or architectural value which is over and above the usual norm.

3.6 The Local Heritage List and the List of Buildings of Façade or Group Value should also help promote inward investment by making clear where Heritage Assets are located, or likely to be found, as required under NPPF and within the English Heritage NPPF Practice Guide (see http://www.english- heritage.org.uk/professional/advice/hpg/decisionmaking/NPPF/ .

3.7 The Local Heritage List and the List of Buildings of Façade or Group Value join a suite of documents which sit alongside the Local Plan as approved material documents to provide detailed local information and support decision making.

4. Methodology

4.1 The criteria that were identified within the outgoing UDP were retained for the new Local Heritage List review, since they proved to cover all relevant structure and historical typologies within our borough. This also encourages continuity. The criteria recommended are:

SELECTION CRITERIA:

1. Contributions to local scene

Landmarks

A ornate corner buildings B curiosities or individual buildings of merit that are different from the surrounding ones C buildings too modern for statutory listing D other

Urban Design/Townscape

E group / façade value F architectural / historical unity G associated landscape H townscape value

Architectural Interest

J type of building K craftsmanship L design M building techniques

2. Local Historical Association

N social, economic, cultural, military P local people and events

4.2 The review of the old Local List was undertaken using the approach recommended by English Heritage in its Good Practice Guidance for Local Heritage Listing 2012.

(see http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/good-practice-local- heritage-listing/local-listing-guide.pdf)

4.3 Principles of Selection: The principles of selection employed for inclusion on the new Local Heritage List are based on English Heritage guidance (see http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/listing/criteria-for- protection/selection-guidelines/ )

The following basic principles have been applied:

Age and rarity. Aesthetic merits Selectivity Local Interest

4.4 The existing entries which have been on the approved Local List since 2001, and approximately 300 new proposals suggested by local groups and individuals and council officers, have been reviewed.

4.5 The list of entries was assessed using visits, photographs, historical OS maps and contemporary OS maps. The historic maps are not earlier than 1870. Supplementary evidence was found via the extant listing information on the Cabinet Committee Report of 17 December 2001 entitled ‘New Proposals for Sites and Areas’ and historical information gleaned from disparate sources including the Conservation Area Character Appraisals, local amenity groups and archives.

5. Consultation

5.1 The previous old Local List was approved by Cabinet Committee on 17 December 2001.

5.2 Further consultation was carried out in 2008 and more recently through the Ealing Civic Societies campaign ‘Local Gems’ to encourage local residents to propose buildings or structures which they felt held particular historic or architectural significance..

5.3 As part of this review and the updating of the local designations in line with new policy and guidance, letters were sent to every address included on either the old Local List or the previous List of Buildings of Façade or Group Value and also any properties proposed as new entries. Local Amenity groups were also contacted. From August 2013 to October 2013 the proposed changes to the 2001 UDP adopted lists were uploaded to the L.B.Ealing website for public consultation.

5.4 A substantial number of responses were received and the results are attached as Appendix 1

6. The compilation and format of data

6.1 All Local Heritage List entries and proposed entries, have been mapped using the Council’s GIS mapping system.

6.2 Spreadsheets have been compiled using co-ordinates that correspond with ward boundaries and been populated by such information as the entry’s address, whether it is in a Conservation Area, what criteria it should be listed under and a brief description of the property and justification for inclusion or rejection. This was supplemented by links to streetview, which provide the main source of visual referencing.

6.3 The proposed Local Heritage List is attached as Appendix 2.

6.4 The proposed List of Buildings of Façade or Group Value is attached as Appendix 3.

7. Financial

7.1 There are no financial implications directly arising from this report.

8. Legal

8.1 The National Planning Policy Framework requires local planning authorities to make information about the significance of the historic environment as part of plan making or development control publically accessible. It also requires local planning authorities to identify and assess the particular significance of any heritage asset (including local listed heritage assets) that may be affcted by a proposal.

9. Value for Money

9.1 The information contained in the Local Heritage Register is designed to support the policies within the new development plan documents that will guide the future development of the borough and help promote inward investment by making clear where Heritage Assets are located or likely to be found as required under NPPF and within the English Heritage NPPF Practice Guide (see http://www.english- heritage.org.uk/professional/advice/hpg/decisionmaking/NPPF/).

10. Sustainability Impact Appraisal

10.1 None

11. Risk Management

11.1 There are no risks arising directly from this report.

12 Equalities, Human Rights and Community Cohesion

12.1 Work on the council's local plans makes a positive contribution to equalities, human rights and community cohesion. The council’s procedures for community involvement provide the opportunity to bring together all sections of the community to engage with the local authority on planning policy and town planning matters. The Council’s Development Plan Documents have been subject to a full equalities impact assessment (published March 2009).

13 Staffing/Workforce and Accommodation implications:

13.1 None

14. Property and Assets

14.1 The lists and information held within the Local Heritage Register,, supported by the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), can help to recognise local distinctiveness and character of a building (including those owned by the Council) to ensure these values are taken into account when changes affecting the historic environment are proposed.

15. Any other implications:

15.1 None

16. Background Information

 The London Plan, July 2011, and proposed early alterations, 2012.  Localism Act, 2011.  National Planning Policy Framework, March 27th 2012.  Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008.  Ealing’s Adopted Development (or Core) Strategy, April 3rd 2012.  Ealing’s Development Sites, Publication Version, June 2012  Ealing’s Development Management Document, Adopted 2013 .  Ealing’s Policies Map, Adopted 2013.

NPPF (April 2012) https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_d ata/file/6077/2116950.pdf

Good Practice Guide for Local Heritage Listing (May 2012) http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/good-practice-local- heritage-listing/local-listing-guide.pdf

Listing Selection Guides (revised and illustrated 2011) http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/listing/criteria-for- protection/selection-guidelines/

Shaping Neighbourhoods: Character and Context SPG http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/shaping_neighbourhoods_c haracter_context_draft_low_res_spg_0213.pdf)

Consultation

Name of Post held Date Date Comments consultee sent to response appear in consultee received paragraph: Internal

Jackie Adams Head of Legal 20/06/14 20/06/14 Noel Rutherford Director of Built 20/06/14 20/06/14 Environment

Report History

Decision type: Urgency item? Non-key decision No Report no.: Report author and contact for queries:

APPENDIX 1

Appendix 1- Summary of results for consultation on the review of the Local Heritage List August 2013

Name and contact details Comment Support or Officer Response

reject proposals

1. Requested further information with regard listing N/A Informed that property has been retained on the Local List Resident,Mr Letterese Informed that property has been retained on the Local List Fairlawn Court

2. Requested further information with regards Disappointed that their Property recorded as a positive contributor to criteria. property not added to list. the character of Mill Hill CA Resident, Mr Luzy Informed their property identified as a ‘positive 69 Mill Hill Road contributor’ to Mill Hill CA

3. Requested further information with regard Building proposed but not added to any list criteria Resident, Mr Logan N/A

7 Waldemar Avenue

4. Requested further information with regard her Property has been removed from Local List and property’s inclusion on the local list since 2001. noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Resident, Mrs D Whittaker N/A Montpelier Park CA

18 Mount Avenue

5. Unaware that her property was locally listed in Property has been removed from Local List and 2001. noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Resident, H Spurling N/A Brentham Park CA

1 Winscombe Crescent

6. Requested further information with regard The householder would Response: The building is shown on the 1870’s criteria prefer their house not to be map and the core of the building appears to be Resident, M Rocques listed as they believe it will very early. By 1890os the existing building line Informed that building is new addition to the detrimentally affect the is evident. Of the criteria, the garden maintains 6 Marlborough Rd Local List. value of their home and a green setting which is worthy of their ability to make future acknowledgement. Local listing does not Pointed out that some criteria omitted from the alterations to the property. remove any permitted development rights and consultation letter. is unlikely to affect the building’s value. Disputed the description

saying that the garage element and room above were a later addition in the 1930s

7. Unaware that his property was locally listed in N/A Property has been removed from Local List and 2001 noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Ealing Resident, Mr H Lau Green CA

14 Mattock Lane

8. Requested further information with regards N/A Informed their property identified as a ‘positive criteria. contributor’ to Mill Hill CA Resident, Mr & Mrs Routledge

84 Mill Hill Road

9. Unaware that his property was locally listed in N/A Property has been removed from Local List and 2001 noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Ealing Resident, Ms V Puri Town Centre CA

91 The Grove

10. Unaware that his property was locally listed in N/A Informed that property has been retained on 2001 the Local List Resident, Ms M Lawry

124 Argyle Road

11. Unaware that her property was locally listed in N/A Property has been removed from Local List and 2001 noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Resident, Ms T Wong Montpelier Park CA

2 Woodfield Road

12. Unaware that their property was locally listed in Property has been removed from Local List 2001 Resident, Ms Winters & Mr Smith N/A

28 Ranelagh Road 13. Unaware that his property was locally listed in N/A Informed his property has been retained on the 2001 Local Heritage List and why. Resident, Mr Richings

51 The Grove

14. Unaware that her property was locally listed N/A Property has been removed from Local List and noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Ealing Resident, Ms Smith Ms Wark & Ms Smith requested additional Green CA. protections on the row 65-70 Mattock Lane to 68 Mattock Lane W13 protect the windows and other special features.

15. Unaware that his property was locally listed N/A Property has been removed from Local List and noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Resident, Mr J Tytko Montpelier Park CA

29 Park Hill, W5

16. Unaware that his property was locally listed N/A Informed that property has been retained on the Local List Resident,Ms Theobald

11 Sutherland Road

17. Unaware that his property was locally listed N/A Property has been removed from Local List and noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Ealing Resident, Mr Turner Green CA

3 St.Mary’s Place

18. Directed to webpage. N/A

Resident, Ms Benton

No address given 19. Unaware that his property was locally listed in N/A Property has been removed from Local List and 2001 noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Resident, Dr Rampling Montpelier Park CA

10 Woodfield Road

20. Unaware that his property was locally listed in N/A Informed that property has been retained on 2001 the Local List Resident Ms McCarthy

35 Welsby Court

21. Unaware that their property was locally listed in Request was made to retain The property has been removed from the Local 2001 the property on the local list List due to unsympathetic alterations Residents, Ms Campbell & Mr Whiteside Ms Campbell informed us that Charles de gaulle visited the house in the 1960s as the Architect Homefield Lodge, St.Stephen’s owner at the time had high up connections and Road had ‘saved’ the lodge house from demolition when the main house was demolished to make way for the faux-Georgian townhouses.

22. Unaware that his property was locally listed N/A Informed that property has been retained on the Local List Resident, Mr M Campbell

65 Warwick Road, W5

23. Unaware that her property was locally listed N/A Property has been removed from Local List and noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Ealing Resident, Ms E Healey Green CA

65 Mattock Lane

24. Requested further information with regard Support Informed that building is new addition to the Resident, Mrs Abrahamiam criteria Local List.and under what criteria.

54 Audley Rd, W5 Delighted that their treasured and unique property has been added to the list.

25. Unaware that his property was locally listed in N/A Informed that his building has been removed 2001 from the Local Heritage List and added to the Resident, Mr T Waterman register of Buildings of Façade or Group Value.

76 Madeley Rd

26. Unaware that her property was locally listed N/A Informed that his building has been removed from the Local Heritage List and added to the Resident, Mrs Khan register of Buildings of Façade or Group Value.

The Common, Southall

27. Unaware that her property was locally listed Support Informed that property has been retained on the Local List. Happy that property has been Resident, Mrs O’Halloran retained on the list. 16 Chaucer Rd

28. Would like to propose the 8 houses at the Considered to be attractive Victorian villas but entrance to Denbigh Road not of an architectural quality, or historic Resident, Mr Mishku significance, worthy of inclusion on the local list.

29. Unaware that properties were locally listed No.11 has been retained on the local list due to its history as the original base of War on Want. Director of The Marr-Manning Informed that the buildings will be removed Trust, Mr Fitzpatrick from the Local Heritage List and added to the register of Buildings of Façade or Group Value. 3,5,7,9 Madeley Rd 30. R Unaware that his property was locally listed N/A Informed that property has been retained on the Local List and why. esident, Mr Rovira He thought consultation was too complicated

13 Sutherland Road

31. Unaware his property was locally listed. Thought N/A Property has been removed from Local List and that term ‘architectural interest’ was noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Mr B Fallon meaningless in a place like Brentham where ever Brentham Park Estate CA. Further information house is interesting. regarding Local listing was sent to the resident. 12 Winscombe Crescent And that it was not clear what was required from him.

32. Unaware that his property was locally listed N/A Informed that property has been retained on the Local List and why. Mr Walker Direct of Operations Notting hill and Ealing High School

The Lodge, 2 Cleveland Road

33. unaware that the property was locally listed N/A Informed that property has been retained on the Local List and why. Claire Maddison, Centre Manager

Greenford Community Centre

34. Original enquiry nothing to do with feedback N/A Property has been removed from Local List and about the local list. He was not aware that house noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Mound Mr East ,owner is LL and pleased that it is proposed to be Park CA removed from LL. 29 Mount Park Road

35. Unaware that his property was locally listed N/a Property has been removed from Local List and noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Mound Louise Clapham Park CA

50 Castlebar Road W5 2DD.

36. As one of the owners of the property, Mr P Supports the inclusion of Noel House has been added to the Local List provided further context on the history of the Noel House on the list. Oliver Pilgerstorfer house and informed us of plans to apply for a blue plaque when the EH scheme reopens in Noel House, The Park W5 2014.

37. Requested further information on the criteria N/A Informed their property was proposed, but has applied to their property. not been included on the list. Ms M Ball

4 Marlborough Road, W5 5NY

38. Unaware that her property was locally listed in N/A Property has been removed from Local List and 2001 noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Ms L Wright Montpelier Park CA

14 Woodfield Rd W5 1SJ

39. Requested further information with regard N/A Informed that building is new addition to the criteria Local List. Ms L Szerezla

12 Marlborough Road. W5 5 NY

40. Unaware that her property was shown as locally N/A Property has been removed from Local List and listed in the 2001 UDP noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Haven Ms J Arnold Green CA 28 Haven Green W5

41. Unaware that her property was shown as locally N/A Property has been removed from Local List and noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Haven Parm Sandhu listed in the 2001 UDP Green CA

Flat 1, 18 Castlebar Rd

42. Was unhappy about front wall advice some years N/A Property has been removed from Local List and ago. And some other conservation input. bins noted as a ‘positive contributor’ to the Haven Simon East and carparking in front garden . Green CA

29 Mount Park Road Feels more should be done to protect character of CA. loss of front gardens and inappropriate bin stores.

43. Happy his property had been noted for its Building has been noted as making a positive contribution to the CA and wished more could be contribution to the conservation area Mr De-Jong done to maintain the suburban leafy character of N/A Ealing. 13 Culmington Rd

44. Requested more information as they are already Row of houses are proposed as new additions on the Local List. to the List of façade and group value Ms Iley-Gardener . Keen to see Lammas Park Road’s character Lammas Park Road protected.

45. Unaware that his property was shown as locally N/A Informed that property has been retained on listed in the 2001 UDP the Local List and why. Mr Haythorn

29 The Ridings W5

46. Unaware that his property was locally listed N/A Informed that his building has been removed from the Local Heritage List and added to the Mr Sahota register of Buildings of Façade or Group Value. 4 The Mall Ealing

47 K6 Telephone Box Ealing Road (outside the Yes K6 Telephone Box has been retained. Crown Inn) – please retain on list Ms A Butler Ivy Cottage has been retained on the local list Ivy Cottage Ealing Rd – please retain on list CAAP - NORTHOLT VILLAGE CA Ivy Cottage 4-6 Ealing Road has been added to the local list. Plough Inn site – please retain old building on site which was original Inn on the Local list. It is 4.6 Original Plough Inn UB5 5HT The group were considered better described as Ealing road making a positive contribution to the Respond to CAAP conservation area. Confusing addresses – 4-5 Ealing road UB5 6AA is No behind – The Cottage, Oak Tree Cottage and Kadel Electrical Co. Please retain these on list because of their rooflines.

48 New request for Logic House to be listed Supported Logic House has been added to the local list

Ms A Butler

CAAP - NORTHOLT VILLAGE CA

49. Ms Clover lives within a CA and has an interest in N/A Ms Clover’s points were taken on board and heritage conservation. She was dissatisfied with she was sent a pdf and full explanation of the Ms Val Clover the consultation which was hard to access. designations.

29a Oxford Road

50. Not aware that their property was already noted N/A Property is part of an Edwardian shopping Ms M Duncan on the Local List. parade and has been transferred to the List of Façade or Group Value 122 Pitshanger Lane

51. Householder was unaware their property was N/A Well Cottage has been retained on the local list already on the local list. Mr Clark

Well Cottage,Ealing Road,Northolt,Middx UB5 6AD.

52. N/A Asset has been noted as making a positive contribution to the conservation area JOHN CLARK

20 Mount Ave,Ealing

53. Householder was unaware their property was On the site of old almshouses the flats are not already on the local list and requested the architecturally distinguished but the site is Janis Gaylor,Clerk to the criteria applied to their property. listed for historical associations Trustees,Almshouse & Eleemosynary Charity

The Almshouses, Norwood Road, The categories are N and P which are Southall UB2 4JG respectively, ‘Social, economic, cultural, military’ and ‘Local people and events’

‘On the site of old almshouses the flats are not architecturally distinguished but the site is listed for historical associations’

Response acknowledged- no further response required 55. Suggested Supreme House,Unit 3 Belvue Not supported Supreme House has not been added to the Industrial Estate, Belvue Road,Northolt UB5 5HX local list Antonia Butler (Northolt V G CAAP) be added to the Local List [email protected]

56. Unaware that his property was shown as locally Resident informed that their property has been listed in the 2001 UDP retained on the list under criteria are A, E, F Anup Khosla,Khosla and H. Investments,Khosla House,Park What criterion has been applied to our property? Lane,HounslowTW5 9W

Re: 25,27 33-39 Broadway, West Ealing, W13 9DA.

57. Unaware that his property was shown as locally The property was formerly on the local list but listed in the 2001 UDP has now been reclassified as making a positive John and Sue Clark, 20 Mount contribution to the conservation area Avenue, Ealing Requested information on what criterion has been applied to our property.

The resident was delighted that their house is seen as a "Positive Contributor".

58. - proposals in Norwood Green CA in NW ward Has no objection Mr Gavin informed that the consultation was John Gavin and none with the proposed transfer of the also to invite new suggestions and responses to Advisory Panel Industrious Cottages in South Green Ward, his proposed additions are below: Norwood Green Conservation Area Canalside CA from LL to B GV -Says that there was no pre-consultation on consultation (i.e warning of so he could propose new additions) -proposes new local listings (9 in groups and individual)

1-17 Norwood Terrace, Tentelow Lane – request

LL status Norwood Terrace are proposed as Positive

Contributors to the CA 1 & 2 Woodbine Villas, Norwood Green Rd – Woodbine Villas – are proposed as Positive request LL status Contributors to the CA 5-13 Tentelow Lane, Norwood Green – request LL 5-13 Tentelow Lane – Not added to any list, but status importance to the setting of listed buildings to Vine Cottages, Tentelow Lane – request LL status be noted in appraisal update.

Vine Cottages : Not added to any list, but importance to the setting of listed buildings to be noted in appraisal update.

Harewood Villas, Norwood Road – request LL Harewood Villas: Not added to any list, but status importance to the character of Frogmore Green to be noted in appraisal update and previous Elms View Court, Norwood Green Rd – request LL address error corrected. status Elm View Court - Not added to any list, but importance to the setting of listed buildings and quality of conservation area to be noted in

appraisal update.

59. Re 25-41 Broadway W13 9DA & 48-62 Broadway 25-41 Broadway have been retained on the Susan New W13 OSU. Wants both parades listed. local list. 79 Devonshire Road W5 4TS

60. Ealing Civic Society have objected to the ECS do not support the Local designations in themselves do not Ealing Civic Society redistribution of assets across the variety of local proposed changes in remove any permitted development rights and Judith Harris designations. principle since they fear it therefore do not control development. They

72 The Knoll W13 will lead to a relaxation of are designed to alert anyone proposing Considered the consultation documents too complicated and confusing. planning controls. changes to the identified qualities of the asset we would like to see preserved or enhanced Pointed out some historic address and manage change rather than control it. errors/confusion. Address errors have been changed on the computer system.

61. Suggested additions:

Ealing Fields Residents’ Association Parkers Bakery Parkers Bakery has been added to the local list

114-136 Northfield have been added to the 114-136 Northfield Avenue List of BFGV

Upper floors not thought worthy of Terraces between Mayfield & Graham Ave inclusion

Café Roco has not been added to the list

Café Roco, 97 Northfield Avenue This suggestion was not supported due to unsympathetic alterations some of the Requested full terrace between Cambourne properties. and Leybourne Avenues Parade of shops will not be added to List of The group did not agree with the inclusion of BFGV 193-211 on the BFGV

62. Unaware that his property was shown as locally The property was formerly on the local list but listed in the 2001 UDP has now been reclassified as making a positive Helen Martin, 57 Eaton contribution to the conservation area Requested information on what criterion has been applied to our property.

63. Resident was concerned that an inconsistent The properties are protected by an Article 4 approach had been applied to properties Direction and as properties that make a Ms Gratus, 32 The Grove along The Grove. positive contribution to the conservation area character.

64. Proposed additions for Local Listings for Queens Terrace were not considered Hanwell. – worthy of inclusion. David Blackwell on behalf of 36-52 Queens Terrace, 1-9 Queens Terrace Hanwell Heritage & Local 22-42 Boston Road were not considered cottages. History Society. 22-42 Boston Road worthy of inclusion 64-84 Uxbridge Road, Nashville Place Iron railings near Hanwell Clock Tower Iron railings nr clock tower have been included on the local list. 28-36 Church Road 12-14 Woodbine Cottages, Boston Rd (on 28-36 Church Rd/Woodbine Cottages not 1865 map of Hanwell) considered worthy of inclusion

65. Quoted “The Buildings of England”, Pevsner, The Article 4 Direction The Villas will not be retained on the local list. which refers to The Grove as ”a street of demure recently issued protects the Hermione and Trevor Martin Victorian villas.” He writes of “The Street” Villas and they are also Requested that all the Villas remain on the local recognized for making a 10 The Grove W5 5LH positive contribution to the list character of the Ealing Town Centre conservation area

66. Part two of the objections from Ealing Civic The more strategic issues raised by Ms Harris Society's updated comments and objections to and the Civic Society have been responded to in Judith Harris the consultation on buildings of Local listing and a separate section but with regards individual Facade Group Value. addresses Ealing Civic Soc The major objection is that no building should be None of these local designations offer any removed from the list and that the List of Façade protection, they outline quality and character and Group Value or being noted as a positive that we would ask to be retained were planning contributor to a conservation area (i.e. previously permission required. They are a means for known as a key non-listed building) is insufficient managing change rather than preventing protection. change.

Alterations proposed: The proposals for parks and gardens is noted and will be considered at the next review. Landscapes including parks and gardens be Some of our parks and gardens are currently on included on the list the register held by the Parks and Gardens Trust and reference could be made to that list Difference between the local list and the list of via our web site. Buildings of façade or group value should be made clear Information on the list and their criteria will be included on the website and on the list If a property has been sub-divided into flats all themselves. the addresses should be informed of the listing. Our GIS (Geographical Information System) The whole of The Avenue in Mill Hill should be includes all addresses within the listed listed buildings. Requests to retain several other addresses which The Avenue is not considered worthy of are said to have suffered detrimental alteration inclusion on the local list. because the damaging work can be reversed. Since there is no way to control works on the buildings unless planning permission is required there is no way of enforcing any reversal should lawful works take place, regardless of the impact they have on the quality of the building.

67. The householder requested the entire stretch of Reject (Art 4 is applied to The properties are protected by an Article 4 houses from 8 to 46 be retained on the local list. The Grove) Direction and as properties that make a Deirdre McLellan positive contribution to the conservation area character. 36 The Grove, Ealing W5 5LH

68. The householder does not agree that 44 should Retained on the local list as the only remaining Oscar Paklayan be LL as he considers it to have no architectural original shopfront, established 1894, on Oscarsons Pets and Provisions merit. Northfield Avenue 44 Northfield Ave W ealing W13 9RR 69. Letter dated 14th Oct 2013 (scanned) re info re 30 N/A Comments have been taken into account Pierre Thomas The Grove (c1870 and not c.1880)/ re 22-46 (and 30 the Grove 8-20) W5 5LH 70. Householder was unaware his property was N/A Informed that his building has been removed Mr Joseph Atkinson listed. from the Local Heritage List 36 Ranelagh Road W5 5RJ

71. Resident requested that Nos 22 -46 remain on LL The Article 4 Direction recently issued protects Corinne Templar and that Grove Court be given positive the Villas and they are also recognized for 28 The Grove contributor status. making a positive contribution to the character W5 5LH of the Ealing Town Centre conservation area [email protected]

72. Nigel Middlemiss Resident requested many properties and historic The properties were not considered suitable for Family.middlemiss walls and gates be added to the list inclusion on the list. @btopenworld.com The walls and gates were included.

73. Ms P Gilbertson Not the Eco Book shop but the office of ECO. Ms Included on Local list with corrected address (English Chamber Orchestra office) G requested that the address is given as Seal Seal House House 2 Coningsby Road W5 4HR 74. Owner was unaware the property was on the N/A The property has been retained on the list and local list. And requested further information. the criteria sent to the householder. Devica Donovan

Holly Lodge Montessori School, UB2 4HB

75. 14th Jan: Propose to add to LL Nos 37, 39 and 41 The houses on Manor Court Road are very Manor Court Road attractive but are better served by Ray Wall acknowledgement as making a positive contribution to the Hanwell Village

conservation area shops along Boston Road from the Prince of Wales pub towards the Uxbridge Road The shops on Boston Road were not considered worthy of inclusion on the local list

The property at 35 Campbell Road was 35 Campbell Rd considered to be a positive contributor to the conservation area. 76 Proposes Ashbourne Road Electricity Pillar Asset was added to the local list

Robert Gurd

77 Further submission received 14 April 2014:

Anthony Lewis and Ealing Cricket Corfton Road – Ground Conservation Area Panel 1,3,5 request addition to BFGV Not supported 1,3,5 will be noted as positive contributors to ADDITION Ealing Cricket Ground CA

11 noted as positive contributors 11 request addition to local list Not Supported All numbers noted 9,13,15,17,19,21,23,25,27,29,35 be noted as PC Supported 39,41,45 noted as positive contributors 39,41,45, request addition to local list Not supported 43,47,49,51,55,57 noted as PC 43,47,49,51,55,57 noted as PC Supported

Ealing Cricket Club Pavilion be retained on local Supported list The Pavilion has been retained on the Local List Not supported 2,4 request addition to local list 2,4, noted as positive contributors to CA Not supported 6,8 request addition to local list 6,8, noted as positive contributors to CA Supported 10 request noted as PC 10 noted as positive contributor to CA Supported 18 (Amadeus House) be retained on local list Amadeus House retained on Local List Supported 24 request note as PC 24 noted as positive contributor to CA Not supported 28,30,32,34 request addition to BFGV 28,30,32,34 noted as positive contributors to CA

64 Hanger Lane request note as PC Not supported 64 not in conservation area and not considered worthy of local listing 1 Hillcrest Road request addition to Local List Supported No.1 added to Local List Water Tower request retention on Local List Supported Water Tower retained on Local List Madeley Road – Buildings are not considered worthy of 3,5,7,9 request addition to local list Not supported inclusion on local list

11 request addition to local list Supported No.11 retained on local list due to historic link with formation of action group, ‘War on Want’

Buildings not considered worthy of inclusion on 19,21 request addition to BFGV Not supported the list 23 request addition on locallList Not supported 23 is not considered worth y of inclusion 31,33 request addition on local list Not supported 31.33 are not considered worthy of inclusion Pillar box at boundary of 33 and 35 request Supported The Victorian Pillar box has been added to the inclusion on local list local list 51,53 request addition to local list Not supported 51 & 53 will be added to the List of BFGV

55,57,59 request addition to the local list Partially supported 55 & 59 added to the List of BFGV. 57 although attractive, did not display the same unique architecture. 69,71,73,75,77,79,81,83,85 request addition to the local list Partially supported 69,71,73,75 77 are not considered worthy of inclusion

79,81,83 & 85 will be included on the list of BFGV

58,60,62,64,66,68,70,72,74,76 Request addition Supported 58,60,62,64,66,68,70,72,74,76 included in Lis of to list of BFGV BFGV

80,82,84 request addition to list of BFGV 80,82.84 included onlist of BFGV Supported

17,39,41,43,45 request note as positive 17,39,41,43,45 are not within a conservation contributors Not supported area

14,16,22,32,34,40,50,52,56 request note as Not supported 14,16,22,32,34,40,50,52,56 are not within a positive contributors conservation area

Park View Road -

2,4,6,8 request addition to list of BFGV 2,4,6,8, are noted as positive contributors to Not supported Ealing Cricket Ground CA

14 request addition to local list Supported 14 will be added to the Local List

Westbury Road -

9,11 request note as positive contributors Not supported 4,6,9,11 are not within a conservation area 4,6, request note as positive contributors Not supported

Woodville Gardens –

15,17,19,21 are noted as positive contributors 15,17,19,21 request addition to local list Not supported to Ealing Cricket Ground CA

23,25,27,29,31,33,35,37,39,41,43,45,47,49,51,53 Supported 23,25,27,29,31,33,35,37,39,41,43,45,47,49,51,5 ,55,57 request note as positive contributors 3,55,57 are noted as positive contributors to Ealing Cricket Ground CA

1,2,3,4 request addition to list of BFGV Not supported 1,2,3,4 are noted as positive contributors to Ealing Cricket Ground CA

7,8,9,10,11,12 request addition to list of BFGV 7,8,9,10,11,12 are noted as positive Not supported contributors to Ealing Cricket Ground CA

22,24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52 Supported request note as positive contributors 22,24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50, 52 are noted as positive contributors to Ealing

Cricket Ground CA

78. The Old St John’s Church Southall, corner of King Supported The building has been added to the Local Street and Western Road. Built circa 1838. Heritage List with the following description: David Watson Mr Watson would like this historic building to be Corner of King Street and Western Road in Southall Green. Built in 1838, it is a rare survival among very Kings Centre, Southall recognised as a Heritage Asset few early buildings in Southall – e.g.Southall Manor ADDITION c1560 & Grove House c1750. It is the oldest place of worship. No longer used as a church but still consecrated. Set within a small churchyard and although much altered, recognisable as a Georgian country church.

79. Mr Gallagher suggested the following properties There are many fine Victorian Villas in Ealing be Locally listed because they were built circa and these do not stand out as the finest Peter Gallagher 1880 and because some are within the area of examples. The properties are well kept and archaeological interest: although extended most have been altered ADDITION with some sensitivity. They are charming and Rosemont Road: not without merit since they maintain a

characterful streetscape, but they are not 1,3,5,7 – 15,17,19, 21,25 – 39,41,43,45 Not supported considered worthy of inclusion on the list

18,20,22,23,24,26,28,30,34,36,& 38 Not supported

80. Ms Harris considers planning officers have Planning did not offer to go through all photos reneged on a promise to review photographs to in order to reassess the assets. Judy Harris reconsider their inclusion on the list. At the Conservation Area Advisory Panel On behalf of Ealing Civic Society meeting at the end of 2013 a meeting was suggested by the conservation officer to

sample access to the Council’s Geographical Information System (GIS) via a computer in one ADDITION of the meeting rooms to test the accessibility of information on the assets which our GIS team have added to the address. It was never said that this would be to reassess our proposals.

Ms Harris reiterated that the consultation Unfortunately, the lists that were uploaded, documents were not clear. though not incorrect, were not the simplified versions that had been prepared. They were

however, completely transparent in that they highlighted whether the entry was to be removed or transferred to another list which better reflected its significance.

Mrs Harris still considers the new lists to be a There is no protection afforded by this , or the weakening of protection for locally listed previous list, other than publicising information buildings which alerts those who wish to make alterations or redevelop to the significance of their properties well in advance.

Appendix 2 LOCAL HERITAGE LIST 2014 NO REF Name Number Street Town Postcode CA BRIEF_DESCRIPTION_AND_INFO CRITERIA 1 LLR0002 Fairlawn Court 1-24 Acton Lane Chiswick W4 5EE Acton Green Late Victorian or Edwardian re brick mansion block of four E,F,H,J, K storeys and six bays with a parapet and red tile hipped roof and three large chimneys with eight pots, stucco porches with classical motifs, rubbed brick arches, projecting string courses.

2 LLR0003 124 Argyle Road West Ealing W13 8EL Edwardian Tower house M

3 LLR0004 St. Saviour's 1 Armstrong Road Acton W3 7JL Deaf blind chapel and centre. Unique place in the B,E,F,H,JL,N,P Church history of the Deaf Church in London and owned and managed by the RAD- First church opened in Oxford street in 1875 but before due expiry of lease the church was relocated to Acton in 1922,

4 LLR0007 5 Ascott Avenue Ealing W5 3XL Edwardian houses No 1-9 variations on a theme E,F,H,L inspired by Arts and Crafts with detrimental additions and treatments on Nos 1,3,7

5 LLR0010 Signal Box, Acton Atlas Road Park Royal NW10 6PW Signal Box, Acton Canal Wharf, Makro Car Park B,D,J,K,L,N,P Canal Wharf

6 LLR0014 111 Avenue Road Acton W3 8QH Mill Hill Park Now Doctor's surgery double fronted house very E,F,H,J,K,P similar to No 113 built mid to late 19th C but with some detrimental loss of original features. entrance piers retain original Victorian cast -iron arch with central lantern

7 LLR0015 Blakeney Lodge 113 Avenue Road Acton W3 8QH Mill Hill Park Blakeney Lodge -detached two storey three bay E,F,H,J,K,P double fronted house mid to late 19th C in stock brick with canted bay windows to ground floor, stucco trimming and orignal encaustic front pathway, railings and piers

8 LLR0017 115 Avenue Road Acton W3 8QH Mill Hill Park Mid Victorian cottage, brick with sash windows, E,F,H,J,K arched on upper floor, hipped roof, compact with narrow frontage remarkably well preserved, stucco dressings in classical style, possibly original cast iron railings and piers with cottage garden 9 LLR0018 116 Avenue Road Acton W3 8QG Mill Hill Park Victorian Villa with extension to side with entrance to workshop behind 10 LLR0054 Church of the Beaufort Road Ealing W5 3EB Hanger Hill Seeley and Paget 1939. Brown brick, timber multi-paned D,E,F,H,J,L,N,P Ascension (Haymills) window frames The church was the last completed Estate building of the pre-war estate. A small yet pleasing church of neo-Georgian feel except for the pased east end. Internally this stylistic discord is resolved by the sequence of a shadowy nave to a well-lit chancel

11 LLR0055 Vicarage adjoining Beaufort Road Ealing W5 3EB Hanger Hill Neo-Georgian vicarage to Church of the Ascension D,E,F,H,J,L,N,P Church of the (Haymills) Ascension Estate

12 LLR0057 3 Birch Grove Acton W3 9SW Creffield Nos 3/5 late 19th C detached double fronted D,E,F,H,L house with rear outrigger and long rear garden influenced by the Arts and Crafts style of Bedford Park notably Norman Shaw, red/orange brick, three light casement windows with leaded fanlights, thick white stucco mullions w/doorway to small balustrade balcony on 1st floor above the recessed front door. Castellation to left hand bay with Ipswich window, large dutch banded gable to other side. Front boundary original and intact 13 LLR0058 5 Birch Grove Acton W3 9SW Creffield Nos 3/5 late 19th C detached double fronted D,E,F,H,L house with rear outrigger and long rear garden influenced by the Arts and Crafts style of Bedford Park notably Norman Shaw, red/orange brick, three light casement windows with leaded fanlights, thick white stucco mullions w/doorway to small balustrade balcony on 1st floor above the recessed front door. Castellation to left hand bay with Ipswich window, large dutch banded gable to other side. No.5 has an inappropriate boundary treatment. 14 LLR0059 23 Birch Grove Acton W3 9SP Creffield Large detached double fronted Edwardian house ( E,F,H,L c 1901-5 ) with Arts and Crafts influence, similar to Nos 3/5 in elevation and layout but with some differing detail such as half-timbered gable end and tiled mono-pitch roof over porch, Japan- influenced, sloping hipped dormer windows with ceramic finials, next to current vicarage to St. Martin’s church Hale Gardens and may be former vicarage. Boundary treatment is detrimental. 15 LLR0060 22 Birkdale Road Ealing W5 1JZ A 1930s double fronted family house with Arts and F,H,J,K,L,M,P Crafts influence. with tiled hip roof and off centre gable, built for the Bilton Family with a slender arched stained glass stair light, red brick, tile creasing and white render. Intact and handsome

16 LLR0061 Dunston House 2 Blakesley Avenue Ealing W5 2DW Haven Green Mock tudor detached house early 20th C with B, G, H, K, L, M School original feather-edge boundary and gate. Beautiful garden with tree canopy offering important visual amenity and positive contribution to CA character

17 LLR0062 12 Blandford Road Ealing W5 5RL 3 storey early semi-detached Victorian Villas - no E,F,G,H,J,L 12/14 of stock brick and red brick quoining and rough arches

18 LLR0063 14 Blandford Road Ealing W5 5RL 3 storey early semi-detached Victorian Villas - no E,F,G,H,J,L 12/14 of stock brick and red brick quoining and rough arches

19 LLR0064 16 Blandford Road Ealing W5 5RL 3 storey early Victorian semi-detached Villas - no E,F,G,H,J,L 16/18 unusual treatment using white gault brick and red brick quoining and rough arches. Both have additions and/or outbuildings

20 LLR0065 18 Blandford Road Ealing W5 5RL 3 storey early Victorian semi-detached Villas - no E,F,G,H,J,L 16/18 unusual treatment using white gault brick and red brick quoining and rough arches. Both have additions and/or outbuildings 21 LLR0066 Frank Pick House Bollo Lane Acton W3 8RP 1990s steel frame and 'crinkly 'tin an exuberant but utilitarian building in bright blue, a landmark building

22 LLR0094 Shop front 13 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AP Ealing Green Shop front is original iron frame with cast ornament.

23 LLR0098 YMCA (St 14- 16 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AA Ealing Green YMCA Three storey with attic space, neo-baroque E, F, H, J, K, L, N, P. George's Hall) in style. Handsome red and yellow brick and stucco dressings , with central pedimented windows to central bay above front rusticated main entrance door surround with dentils and ogee moulding as ornament. F

24 Shop front 1930s 37 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green City Radio Stores - charming 1930s shopfront with original inbuilt glass advertising

25 LLR0129 Shopfront 45 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time E,H,K,L as the street with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows. Nos 1,3,5 shopfront currently fast food outlet) in poor taste and detrimental to this par

26 LLR0132 Royal Victoria PH 66 Boston Road Hanwell W7 2ET Royal Victoria PH 27 LLR0133 Winscombe Lodge 1 Brentham Way Ealing W5 1BJ Montpelier Winscombe Lodge served as gate lodge to G,H,J,L Park Winscombe Court - exact date of construction not know but probably early to mid 19th C. On the border of the Brentham Garden Estate. A picturesque style house in an L shape plan, high pitched, tiled roof decorated

28 LLR0134 2 Brentham Way Ealing W5 1BJ Brentham Larger size Brentham Garden Estate house by G,H,J,L Garden Estate Barry Parker and Raymond Unwin after 1909. Corner property, detached with well articulated facades with the typical multi-paned timber casement windows, rough dashing to principal walls and high pitched, tiled

29 LLR0149 Ministry Buildings Bromyard Avenue Acton W3 7BF Ministry Buildings, By Sir J. West 1914-22 for D,E,F,H,J,L,N Ministry of Pensions. Large, functional and austere in lime and sand stone. Original windows replaced 1988. Converted to residential units from office space in about 2005, rear of the site was previously residential accommodation for Wormwood Scrubs prison staff before undergoing alteration to mixed tenure. 30 LLR0153 7 Broomfield Place West Ealing W13 9LB Ealing Green Later than adjacent properties built between 1871 L, N and 1889 this single fronted brick house was an infill property and has grander stucco porch and bay window treatments than the earlier houses. It has an arched entrance undercroft on either side leading to rear

31 LLR0154 1 Spring Villas Broomfield Place West Ealing W13 9LH Ealing Green Nos 1and 2, charming semi-detached stock brick, hipped and slate roof, two storey houses with low key but decorative stucco trim c. mid 19th C latterly conjoined c.1880's with No 7 Broomfield Place. Boundary treatments are appropriate

32 LLR0155 2 Spring Villas Broomfield Place West Ealing W13 9LH Ealing Green Nos 1and 2, charming semi-detached stock brick, hipped and slate roof, two storey houses with low key but decorative stucco trim c. mid 19th C latterly conjoined c.1880's with No 7 Broomfield Place. Boundary treatments are appropriate 33 LLR0164 Grand Junction Bullsbridge Road Southall UB2 5JU Grand Junction Arms PH, 19th century part B,H,J,K,L,N Arms PH weather-board with tiled pitched roof and chimney stacks

34 LLR0213 Wyke House 11 Castlebar Hill Ealing W5 1TA Grange & Wyke House . An eccentric house with a tower D,F,H,J,K,LM White Ledges with balustrading and wrapped windows and irregular coursed stone by Kershaw 1891

35 LLR0214 St David's Home 12 Castlebar Hill Ealing W5 1TE St David's Home since early 20th C - previously E, H, J Kent House - a low villa building with large footprint circa 1880's with Italianate style in large grounds

36 LLR0215 Wetherall Cottage Castlebar Hill Ealing W5 1TA Grange & Brick cottage built between 1864 and 1894 F,G,J,L,N White Ledges attached to Hill Cottage below.

37 LLR0216 1 Castlebar Park Ealing W5 1DD Victorian double fronted villa with tower at the rear D,F,G,H,J,K,L and iron railings on the roof

38 LLR0217 28 Castlebar Park Ealing W5 1BU Large Victorian Gothic revival house with original E,G,H,J,L,N details, currently flats. Important location in bend of road and landscape 39 LLR0218 30 Castlebar Park Ealing W5 1BU Mid-Victorian villa with altered stable block to side. E,F,H,J,L Currently flats

40 LLR0219 69 Castlebar Park Ealing W5 1DA Edwardian Arts and Crafts style pebble-dashed E,H,J,L, cottages with gables and tiled porches of which two are on the flank elevations at either end

41 LLR0220 71 Castlebar Park Ealing W5 1DA Edwardian Arts and Crafts style pebble-dashed E,H,J,L, cottages with gables and tiled porches of which two are on the flank elevations at either end

42 LLR0221 73 Castlebar Park Ealing W5 1DA Edwardian Arts and Crafts style pebble-dashed E,H,J,L, cottages with gables and tiled porches of which two are on the flank elevations at either end

43 LLR0222 Iron posts and Castlebar Park Ealing W5 1BU Iron posts and swing gates north of 52, iron post B,K swing gates north need restoration of 52

44 LLR0244 68 Castlebar Road Ealing W5 2DD Mount Park Late Victorian detached house with neo-Gothic D,E,F,G,H,J,L and Arts and Crafts detail. The first floor is dashed and marked by a central Ipswich window with timber brackets, long slung hipped roof is intercepted by projecting gables and dormer windows dressed with tiles 45 LLR0245 70 Castlebar Road Ealing W5 2DD Mount Park Early 20th century villa, front gardens with original D,E,F,G,H,J,L walls. Brick built with some half timbering, barge boarding and windows with decorative panes

46 LLR0246 12 to 14 Castlebar Road Ealing W5 2DR Haven Green Now prep school, semi-detached house on corner D,E,F,G,H,J,K (with No 4/6 and 8/10 and and 16/18) built 1880's three storeys with lower ground floor of stock brick with generous stucco trim to fenestration (arched sash), front door and eaves cornicing.

47 LLR0255 165 Cavendish West Ealing W13 0JZ 1930's maisonette.The crittal windows have been E,H,J,L Avenue replaced

48 LLR0256 167 Cavendish West Ealing W13 0JZ 1930's maisonette.The crittal windows have been E,H,J,L Avenue replaced

49 LLR0259 SKTA Temple Chapel Road West Ealing W13 9AE Ealing Green Former West Ealing Baptist Church now the SKTA B,D,E,F,H,J,L,M,N Temple (Hindu) . It is a single storey compact building of rectangular footprint with an imposing rendered neo- classical façade with pediment and entablature. The pilasters either side are fluted and highly ornate capitals

50 LLR0265 10 Cambridge Chaucer Road Acton W3 6DR Victorian stuccoed terrace of four houses circa E, H, J Villas 1870s, two and half storey, single fronted, hipped roof to terrace with neo-classical stucco finish to recessed porch and sash windows of oversized scale 51 LLR0266 12 Cambridge Chaucer Road Acton W3 6DR Victorian stuccoed terrace of four houses circa E, H, J Villas 1870s, two and half storey, single fronted, hipped roof to terrace with neo-classical stucco finish to recessed porch and sash windows of oversized scale

52 LLR0267 14 Cambridge Chaucer Road Acton W3 6DR Victorian stuccoed terrace of four houses circa E, H, J Villas 1870s, two and half storey, single fronted, hipped roof to terrace with neo-classical stucco finish to recessed porch and sash windows of oversized scale

53 LLR0268 16 Cambridge Chaucer Road Acton W3 6DR Victorian stuccoed terrace of four houses circa E, H, J Villas 1870s, two and half storey, single fronted, hipped roof to terrace with neo-classical stucco finish to recessed porch and sash windows of oversized scale

54 LLR0273 Cherington House Cherington Road Hanwell W7 3HL Circa 1900 late Victorian two-storey villa with one D,E,H,J,K,L,M Health Centre central and two flanking façade portions. Facing London stock brick, with stuccoed front entrance porch and central italianate first floor window surround. Parapet with high pitched roof elements

55 LLR0274 Carnegie Hanwell Cherington Road Hanwell W7 3HL Carnegie, Example of Carnegie library opened D,E,H,J,L,N,P Library 1905. Red brick with painted stone quoins and cartouch above the main door

56 LLR0281 Acton Baptist Church Road Acton W3 8PP Acton Town Victorian eclectic elevation. Built in 1864 by W Church Centre Mumford boasts an agreeable classical frontage with a pediment with pothole and round-headed stained glass windows with 5 idiosyncratic lamp brackets arrayed along the frontage. 57 LLR0277 Elm Grove 122 Church Road Hanwell W7 3BE Hanwell Village Georgian Manor House which has been converted B,F,H,J,L Green into a block of flats. brick built with stucco frontage, complete with ground and second floor cornices, projecting fluted drip lintels to windows, recessed entrace with steps to entrance doors to raised ground floor and upper storeys, slate mansard roof behind parapets. Ground floor projecting bay on southern elevation (windows replaced with Georgian style casement windows, with outward opening toplights) 58 LLR0278 Elm Grove 124 Church Road Hanwell W7 3BE Hanwell Village Georgian Manor House which has been converted B,F,H,J,L Green into a block of flats. brick built with stucco frontage, complete with ground and second floor cornices, projecting fluted drip lintels to windows, recessed entrace with steps to entrance doors to raised ground floor and upper storeys, slate mansard roof behind parapets. Ground floor projecting bay on southern elevation (windows replaced with Georgian style casement windows, with outward opening toplights) 59 LLR0279 Elm Grove 126 Church Road Hanwell W7 3BE Hanwell Village Georgian Manor House which has been converted B,F,H,J,L Green into a block of flats. brick built with stucco frontage, complete with ground and second floor cornices, projecting fluted drip lintels to windows, recessed entrace with steps to entrance doors to raised ground floor and upper storeys, slate mansard roof behind parapets. Ground floor projecting bay on southern elevation (windows replaced with Georgian style casement windows, with outward opening toplights) 60 LLR0280 Elm Grove 128 Church Road Hanwell W7 3BE Hanwell Village Georgian Manor House which has been converted B,F,H,J,L Green into a block of flats. brick built with stucco frontage, complete with ground and second floor cornices, projecting fluted drip lintels to windows, recessed entrace with steps to entrance doors to raised ground floor and upper storeys, slate mansard roof behind parapets. Ground floor projecting bay on southern elevation (windows replaced with Georgian style casement windows, with outward opening toplights) 61 LLR0282 Methodist Church Church Road Hanwell W7 1DJ Methodist Church designed by Gordon & Gunton D, E, F, H, J, L, N, P and built by Chas Brightman in 1904. Late Gothic, red brick building with stone plinth, window surrounds, cornices parapets and turrets, large stained glass central window with front gable, slate roof 62 LLR0284 2 Churchfield Road Acton W3 6EG Acton Town Albion Public House (prev), circa 1880's corner H, J, N Centre site, large three storey with piano nobile windows to first floor, restrained classical stucco dressings and finish

63 LLR0285 Foley's Free 113-115 Churchfield Road Acton W3 6AH Acton Town Foley's Free House circa 1870's corner site A, H, J, N House Centre formerlyMechanics Arms then Lynch's Inn , brick with ornate pub frontage and two upper storeys with arched sash windows and parapet

64 LLR0286 The Station House Churchfield Road Acton W3 6BH Acton Town The Station House PH (Former Acton Central B,H,J,L,N (Former Acton Centre Station postal sorting office) opened 1853, rebuilt Central Station) 1876. Very grand, pale brick with yellow london stock window detail. Excellent condition except for the recent front porch which has compromised the entrance

65 LLR0287 former lodge to 2 Cleveland Road West Ealing W13 8AX former lodge to Notting Hill and Ealing High School Notting Hill and Ealing High School

66 LLR0288 38 Cleveland Road West Ealing W13 8AR Fine Edwardian double fronted house in the Arts D,E, F,H,J,K,L and Crafts style with jettied upper bay window the upper half white pebbledashed and original boundary wall

67 LLR0289 40 Cleveland Road West Ealing W13 8AL Fine Edwardian house in the Arts and Crafts style D,E, F,H,J,K,L with gabled roof, Dutch gabled feature dormer windows and a corner canted bay window to ground floor with vertical hung tiling and white pebbledashed and original boundary fence 68 LLR0290 former Clinic 33-34 Cloister Road Acton W3 0DF Former day Hospital, dated 1935 with handsome BHJN Building frontage in the Art Deco style

69 LLR0291 52 Colebrooke West Ealing W13 8JY Attractive Edwardian redbrick corner house with A,B,H,L,M Avenue substantial cone turret

70 LLR0292 Seal House (ECO 2 Coningsby Road Ealing W5 4HR English Chamber Orchestra offices. Corner plot offices) and footprint with timber shop front around corner. Stockbrick with slate roof and sash windows - no boundary to small front yard.

71 LLR0295 6 Corfton Road Ealing W5 2HS Ealing Cricket Large Edwardian detached house with central G,K, L, Ground porch with elaborate door and canopy. Exceptionally well-preserved with front garden intact.

72 LLR0296 8 Corfton Road Ealing W5 2HS Ealing Cricket Large edwardian detached house compromised by G,K, L, Ground loss of front garden to vehicular hardstanding .

73 LLR0298 Amadeus House 18 Corfton Road Ealing W5 2HT Ealing Cricket 1904 - Huge Edwardian Redbrick mansion with B,H,J,K,L,M Ground queen anne gable, elaborate pargetting and ornament. 74 LLR0304 Ealing Cricket Corfton Road Ealing W5 2HS Ealing Cricket Ealing Cricket Club is set within a large, open B,G,J,K,L,M,P Club South Ground sportsground and was established in 1870. The Pavilion pavilion was built later and is is a compact two storey building that has since been laterally extended, a fine, detailed principal facade with turned railings

75 LLR0306 Greenfield 1 Courtfield West Ealing W13 0EY Greenfield, Polish catholic centre formerly 'Graham A,H,J,K,L,M, N Gardens House' built circa 1880s. Large and imposing corner building with classical detailing

76 LLR0307 Greenford Courthope Road Greenford UB6 8PY Greenford Conservative Club on the site of B,E,H,J,M,N,P Conservative Club Greenford Farm some of the central core site still extant with weatherboarded stable block with a steep tile roof that has been subject to some alterations. The main part of the club building is relatively recent

77 LLR0308 22 Cowper Road Acton W3 6PZ Victorian circa 1870s three storey semi-detached E,F,H,J,L houses with front and side entrances and ornate stucco embellished fenestration

78 LLR0309 24 Cowper Road Acton W3 6PZ Victorian circa 1870s three storey semi-detached E,F,H,J,L houses with front and side entrances and ornate stucco embellished fenestration

79 LLR0313 Japanese School 87 Creffield Road Acton W3 9PU Creffield Japanese School (former Haberdashers Askes (former School) H.W. Stock built 1901 for Haberdashers Haberdashers Aske?s Girls School, extended to N in 1910. Askes School) Extended for Japanese School in 1989. 80 LLR0314 Peace Haven 3 Creswick Road Acton W3 9HE Victorian house circa 1880's neo-gothic style with A,H,J,P oriel arch to porch and corner tower above bay windows of red brick with yellow brick dressing and stucco and timber window embellishment with relatively ornate brick boundary. Currently in use as a hostel

81 LLR0315 Torkington House Creswick Road Acton W3 9HF Edwardian red brick large former residence neo- A,B,H,J,L,P tudor and Arts and Crafts style with tower and additions of half timbering, used as a residential institution

82 LLR0320 Works, formerly 1 Dilloway Lane Southall UB2 4TD Works, formerly stable and coach house opposite D,J,N stable and coach Osterley Park Road house opposite Osterley Park Road

83 LLR0324 Shopfront 1 Ealing Green Ealing W5 5DA Ealing Green Shopfront which curves around into alleyway E, F, H, K, L, N. accessing 'Bakers Lane', which no longer survives.

84 LLR0326 3 Ealing Green Ealing W5 5DA Ealing Green 1900 - 3&4 share first and second floor of fine red E, F, H, K, L, N brick with fine mock elizabethan crittal windows with rounded bay and elaborate pargeting. Exceptionally fine

85 LLR0328 4 Ealing Green Ealing W5 5DA Ealing Green 1900 - 3&4 share first and second floor of fine red E, F, H, K, L, N brick with fine mock elizabethan crittal windows with rounded bay and elaborate pargeting. Exceptionally fine 86 LLR0330 24 Ealing Green Ealing W5 5DA Ealing Green Victorian Shopfront - recessed with fine mullions E, F, H, K, L, N and transomes. Rare survival.

87 LLR0332 26 Ealing Green Ealing W5 5DA Ealing Green corner shop with elaborate mock tudor bell tower. A, E, F, H, K, L, N.

88 LLR0338 Ealing Delivery & Ealing Green Ealing W5 5EH Ealing Green Utilitarian Post Office buildings one earlier than the E, H, J, L, N. Sorting Office later. The later block c 1950's is concrete and steel framed with brown brick infill whilst the earlier block is of red brick with neo-Georgian influence c.late 1920's

89 LLR0339 Kingdom Hall Ealing Green Ealing W5 5EN Ealing Green 1861 'The National School for Girls' now Kingdom D, E, H, J, K, L, N, P. Hall serving Jehovah's witnesses. A fine and exuberant U-shaped gothic style school building in polychromatic brickwork with decorative tiled roof, tall tudoresque chimneys, and fancy arches

90 LLR0340 St Aidan Ealing Green Ealing W5 5EN Ealing Green Small stock brick house early 19th century with red D,E,F brick details at parapet level - inappropriate window replacements but the rest of the property is intact

91 LLR0341 Welsh Cottage Ealing Green Ealing W5 5EN Ealing Green Large three storey stock brick house with bay E, F, H, J, N, P. windows and Welsh Presbyterian church behind an ornate entrance on the flank elevation of the church at end of the side passage of the cottage. Stone entrance with moulding and ball finials has inscription 'C 92 LLR0342 Welsh Ealing Green Ealing W5 5EN Ealing Green Large three storey stock brick house with bay E, F, H, J, N, P. Presbyterian windows and Welsh Presbyterian church behind Church an ornate entrance on the flank elevation of the church at end of the side passage of the cottage. Stone entrance with moulding and ball finials has inscription 'Chapel CM’ (possibly Calvanistic Methodists Chapel) 1908 picked out in gold and a handsome arched timber door. 93 LLR0343 flats 1-6 The Lawn Ealing Green Ealing W5 5ER Ealing Green The Lawn , flats Nos 1-6 mid Victorian, of stock D,E,F,H,L brick with 1-3-1 bays, arched ground floor windows, a parapet with Jacobean raised centre and coach house to match

94 LLR0344 Ealing, Ealing Green Ealing W5 5EW Ealing Green MCC School Architects 1913.Stripped classical, D,E,F,H,J,L,N,P Hammersmith and neo-georgian, dentilled cornice and pediments, West London elaborate porches, in bath stone and brown brick College with red brick segmental arches over 6 x 4 multi- paned large windows now with non-timber replacements.

95 LLR0348 Congregational Ealing Green Ealing W5 5QT Ealing Green Ealing Green (Methodist and United Reformed) J,K,M,N,P Church Church and Manse founded in 1800, the current buildings built by Charles Jones borough surveyor in 1859 in typically Gothic style in bath and rag stone with two spirelets and a matching boundary wall

96 LLR0349 Congregational Ealing Green Ealing W5 5QT Ealing Green Ealing Green (Methodist and United Reformed) Manse Church and Manse founded in 1800, the current buildings built by Charles Jones borough surveyor in 1859 in typically Gothic style in bath and rag stone with two spirelets and a matching boundary wall

97 Original PH No.4 Ealing Road Northolt UB5 5HT Northolt Village Shell of the original early victorian building that Green housed the first PH on the site. Was superseded by the thatched Plough Inn in late 1930s but that PH was demolished in 2012 after extensive fire damage. 98 Original PH no.6 Ealing Road Northolt UB5 5HT Northolt Village Shell of the original early Victorian building that Green housed the first PH on the site. Was superseded by the thatched Plough Inn in late 1930s but that PH was demolished in 2012 after extensive fire damage.

99 LLR0354 Deyntes Cottage Ealing Road Northolt UB5 6AA Northolt Village Early cottage circa 1880 massively extended B,G,H, J, M,P Green between 1999 and 2003. Adjacent to Grade I St Mary’s church and scheduled monument beyond.

100 LLR0355 K6 Telephone Box Ealing Road Northolt UB5 6AA Northolt Village K6 Telephone Box adjacent Crown Inn PH. G,H adjacent Crown Green Inn PH

101 LLR0356 Crown Pub & Ealing Road Northolt UB5 6AA Northolt Village Public House, dating from at least the early 18th G,H Stable Green century. Rebuilt in 1925 and 1976. Comprises the public house building and a separate former stable building. The public house comprises two storeys, with single storey extensions and front canopy, white

102 LLR0357 Ivy Cottage Ealing Road Northolt UB5 6AA Northolt Village Late nineteenth century cottage. Yellow brick woth G,H Green slate roof and chimney stacks with clay chimney pots. Maintained climbing Ivy. (windows replaced)

103 LLR0358 1 Willow Cottages Ealing Road Northolt UB5 6AD Northolt Village Mid-nineteenth century cottages. Single storey, B,G,H, J, M,P Green white rendered with red clay tiles. Six pane sash windows. 104 LLR0359 2 Willow Cottages Ealing Road Northolt UB5 6AD Northolt Village Mid-nineteenth century cottages. Single storey, B,G,H, J, M,P Green white rendered with red clay tiles. Six pane sash windows.

105 LLR0360 2 Herbert's Ealing Road Northolt UB5 6AD Northolt Village Cottage, c.1880s. White rendered with slate roof. G,H Cottages Green Six over six pane sash windows. Ground floor canopy with tember brackets (modern ground floor bay added)

106 LLR0361 3 Willow Cottages Ealing Road Northolt UB5 6AD Northolt Village Converted barn Mid-nineteenth century cottages. B,G,H, J, M,P Green Single storey, white rendered with red clay tiles. Six pane sash windows.

107 LLR0362 3 Herbert's Ealing Road Northolt UB5 6AD Northolt Village Cottage, c.1880s. White rendered with slate roof. G,H Cottages Green Six over six pane sash windows. Ground floor canopy with tember brackets.

108 LLR0364 Memorial Hall Ealing Road Northolt UB5 6AD Northolt Village Former school 1868, enlarged 1881.School closed B,E,G,H,N Green 1906. Brick built with clay tiled roof. Gabled roof with interesting chimney. Large window on gable end with unusual tapered red brick arched header. Red and Black brick stringcourses.

109 LLR0365 Northolt Village Ealing Road Northolt UB5 6AD Northolt Village Last remaining farmhouse, built 1851. Used as B, G, H, L, N, P Community Centre Green community centre since 1950. 110 LLR0366 Well Cottage Ealing Road Northolt UB5 6AD Northolt Village E,F,G,H,J,L Green

111 LLR0368 Goldsmith's Arms 130 East Acton Lane Acton W3 7ER Acton Park Goldsmiths Arms P.H, on the site of a much older D,H,J,L,N,P P.H public house that was also used as a point of employ for labourers. Attractive brick and half- timbered building with a tiled cat-slide roof and multi-pane timbered windows on the upper floors

112 LLR0393 Eaton Rise Ealing W5 2EY Montpelier Elegant 1930s modern block with crittal windows E,E,F,H,J,L Park set within attractive gardens. Prominent corner site which anchors character of the conservation area.

113 LLR0394 Helena Court (1- Eaton Rise Ealing W5 2RE Montpelier Three flat roof modernist purpose built blocks with D,E,F,HJ,L 22) Park steel 'crittal' windows built in 1930's on a very large plot once a sports ground. The combination of rendered and exposed brickwork emphasizes the horizontality of the architecture as do the windows

114 LLR0395 Newlands Edgehill Road West Ealing W13 8HW Grange & 1960s Modernist detached house of brick with flat D, E, H ,J, L White Ledges roofs using volumetric rectangular stacking to articulate the elevations

115 LLR0396 The Coach House Edgehill Road West Ealing W13 8HW Grange & Picturesque house contemporary to 'Thorncote', B,E,F,J,K,P White Ledges also by Leonard Shuffrey c.1888 with a front chimney with crowstepped gable. The hayracks for horses may still retained in the house 116 LLR0401 15 Elm Avenue Ealing W5 3XA Ealing Unusual 1920's monchrome townhouse with 3 high B,D,G,K,L,M Common curving Dutch gables and imposing planform with leaded casement windows and a steep pitch pantile roof. The main gable end has an oval light on the pediment

117 LLR0402 32 Elm Grove Road Ealing W5 3JJ Handsome early 20th C red brick gabled corner F,G,H,J,K,L house iin the Arts and Crafts style with Georgian paned casement windows, set in large garden

118 LLR0403 Featherstone Featherstone Southall UB2 5AG Not demo Road School Road (Junior)

119 LLR0409 1 Greystoke Fox Lane Ealing W5 1HP Large semi-detached cottages in red brick with tile B,E,F,G,J,K,L Cottages roof, set in green space of Hanger Hill Park Golf course and Fox Woods, once possibly tied housing related to the 'Grand Junction Waterworks' (later Metropolitan Water Board 1902 )

120 LLR0410 2 Greystoke Fox Lane Ealing W5 1HP Large semi-detached cottages in red brick with tile B,E,F,G,J,K,L Cottages roof, set in green space of Hanger Hill Park Golf course and Fox Woods, once possibly tied housing related to the 'Grand Junction Waterworks' (later Metropolitain Water Board 1902 )

121 LLR0411 Grange Court 1 Grange Road Ealing W5 5QN Drama Studio - large early Victorian detached F, G, H, J, K, L. yellow stock brick and elaborate stucco dressed villa on corner site originally a school for girls 122 LLR0412 St. Mark's School Green Lane Hanwell W7 2NR St Mark's School, established on this site in 1855, extended D, E, F, H, J, L, N, P Church & 1871, 1884 and 1895. Early part, simple Gothic - Canal red brick with stone window surrounds, banding, corner stones and cornicing, with whit epainted metal windows. Later simplified extensions

123 LLR0413 The Fox PH Green Lane Hanwell W7 2PJ St Mark's Public House, built c.1880s. Two storeys, with A,B,F,G,H, J,L, N Church & pointed gables. Yellow stock brick with red brick Canal cornering and chimneys with cornice stepping out. Red glazed tiles with dark tile banding at ground floor on two elevations. Attractive cornice with dential carving

124 LLR0414 Ealing Magistrates Green Man Lane West Ealing W13 0SD Early 20th century court building. Double gables on D,E,H,J,K,M,N,P Court three elevations. Red brick with central two storey projection in stone, including the building entrance with large projecting stone cornice and brackets over. Decorative stucco cornice at roof level

125 LLR0415 Hobbayne School Greenford Hanwell W7 1HA Group of three connected buildings forming a B,H,F,L Avenue purpose built school, constructed c.1900. Red brick with interesting roof form and stone features, including window surrounds and corner stones and plinth

126 LLR0416 Tesco (ex cinema) 229 Greenford Road Greenford UB6 8QY Mid-twentieth century former cinema. Asymetrical D,E,F,H,J,L,N frontage with offset front projection and tower. Brick built with projecting brick stringcourses (large modern ground floor inactive shopfront with projecting fascia)

127 LLR0417 The Cottage** 11 Gunnersbury Ealing W5 3NJ The Cottage - Unusual in style with a central A,B,D,E,H,J,K,N,P (more Drive gabled bay of three, mainly square-ish sash investigation windows with stucco surrounds and a detrimental would be helpful) side addition. Part of a larger complex of buildings called the Manor House in 1890 128 LLR0418 Acton Fire Station 25-27 Gunnersbury Acton W3 8EA Acton Fire Station & Flats c. late 1930's to 40's - & Flats Lane Art Deco building with flat roof, red brick with austere lines but string coursing and stone dressing around the red fire engine access doors to enliven the façade, red brick with stone, once crittal windows

129 LLR0419 Acton Care Centre Gunnersbury Acton W3 8EG . Lane

130 LLR0420 Passmore Gunnersbury Acton W3 8EG Formerly Acton Hospital, Charles Bell 1897- Edwards Buildings Lane 98Passmore Edwards Buildings - Early 18th century style stone and red brick. 1920s extensions were demolished to make way for the new Acton Care Centre

131 LLR0421 1 Hale Gardens Acton W3 9SG Creffield Handed pair of Edwardian semi-detached houses in the Arts and Crafts style c. 1901 - 05 red brick and stone dressings and window mullions and framing. Possibly original features wooden pelmets for external blinds, no white paint on stone window surroun

132 LLR0422 3 Hale Gardens Acton W3 9SG Creffield Has curiosity value and contributes positively to character of CA

133 LLR0423 St Martin's Hale Gardens Acton W3 9SQ Creffield E. Monson & Sons 1906. Incomplete, chancel not Church, built 134 LLR0424 36 Hamilton Road Ealing W5 2EH Ealing A group of two large stock brick villas with D,F,H,J,L Common pedimented gables with a gable roof and dressed with decorative vertical tiling and stucco finished and timber porch and bargeboards. A detrimental side extension has been added to the west flank of No 36. A m

135 LLR0425 38 Hamilton Road Ealing W5 2EH Ealing A group of two large stock brick villas with gables, D,F,H,J,L Common gable roof and dressed with decorative vertical tiling and stucco finished and timber porch and bargeboards. A detrimental side extension has been added to the west flank of No 36. A matching boundary

136 LLR0426 Gospel Hall Hammond Road Southall UB2 4EG 1899 currently unused small red brick hall, B,E,H,J,I,L,N symmetrical elevation with porch entrance

137 LLR0427 Hanger Court 1-32 Hanger Green Ealing W5 3ER Hanger Hill Hanger Court is a large modernist purpose built D,E,F,H,J,L (Haymills) block of flats of brick with flat roof, strong Estate horizontality emphasized by steel 'crittal' ribbon windows on the principal facades, continuous concrete banding, projecting eaves, canted wings to the block h

138 LLR0428 former Hanger 11 Hanger Lane Ealing W5 3HH Known as Hanger Lane farm in 1870's - the house F,G,H,J,K,N Lane Farmhouse is of stock brick with stone framed and mullioned windows still extant, steep pitched slate roof, of picturesque appearance with a fine garden and outbuildings

139 LLR0429 Fox & Goose PH Hanger Lane Ealing W5 1DP The Fox & Goose public House has been thus B,E,H,J,K,N,P (former Hanger since at least the 1870s, probably extant since Lane Farmhouse) early 19th C or late 18th C, has fine cast iron posts and stanchions beneath a canopy to principal elevations, rambling extensions to the rear, brick has been larg 140 LLR0430 British Waterways Havelock Road Southall UB2 4PJ St Mark's British Waterways Norwood Top Lock Sanitary F,G,J,N,P Norwood Top Church & Station and Lock Keeper's Cottage at lock no. 90 c Lock Sanitary Canal 1855 Two storey utilitarian brick building with slate Station and Lock roof still in use by the tow path Keeper?s Cottage at lock no. 90

141 LLR0461 45/45a Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green Former District Line station 1910 - handsome D,E,F,H,J,L,N shopping parade in Palladian style, lime stone cladding, pedimented sash windows, Ionic order pilasters, with rusticated pilasters and dentils beneath projecting cornice with 'Ealing Broadway Station' carved

142 LLR0462 Cattle trough Haven Green Ealing W5 2UP Haven Green Cattle trough B,J,N

143 LLR0464 Haven Green Haven Green Ealing W5 2UY Haven Green 1937-8 4 large storey mansion block with stone D,E,F,G,H,J,L Court dressings and crittal windows (mostly replaced). A notable feature is the green pantile-covered mansard roof

144 Ealing Broadway High Street Ealing W5 5DB Ealing Only the High Street Facade. The Broadway D,E ,H,J,L,N Centre Broadway centre was completed in 1985, Frank Roberts was High St façade design architect. Postmodernist architecture with only an attempt at responding to the vernacular.The façade along Nos 54 -62 the Broadway has a tight vertical rhythm of faced narrow glass between brick and concrete fins ending in a pointed roof line evocative of a continental medieval walled city with ornamental metalwork by Guiseppe Lund. Ingenious servicing provided from basement. 145 LLR0473 Three Horseshoes 2 High Street Southall UB1 3DA The Three Horseshoes PH is currently empty. The A,B,E,H,J,K,M, N PH building frontage is oriented in three directions that form part of an octagon. The pub can be seen in its extant footprint on the 1930s OS map. Prior to this a smithy or blacksmith stood on the site which 146 LLR0475 Windmill Public 50 High Street Acton W3 6LG Acton Town Late Victorian corner three storey building with a A, H, J,N House Centre tower and some pargetting - dated 1899

147 LLR0483 181 High Street Acton W3 9DJ Acton Town yellow stock brick two bays over two floors Centre possibly near contemporary to very early Grade II listed George and Dragon pub adjacent. Wooden sash windows . Detrimental shop front.

148 LLR0484 182 High Street Acton W3 9NN Acton Town Victorian four storey part of shop parade - neo- E, F, H, N Centre classical stucco embellishment to windows - with piano nobile windows to first floor and shop below

149 LLR0485 203 High Street Acton W3 9DR Acton Town Exceptionally fine survival of neo regency Centre shopfront. Heavy woodent paneled front with stone bay above and gabled parapet with inset window with stone surround and 'Mackintosh' type ornament.

150 LLR0486 Six Bells PH 211 High Street Acton W3 9DD Acton Town Highly decorative and elaborate corner PH with Centre considerably better survival of detail than at first sight. Part from detrimental windows to first floor much of the stonework, leadwork and wrought iron embellishment is still visible.

151 LLR0487 Kings Head PH 214 High Street Acton W3 9NX Acton Town M A, D, H, L Centre 152 LLR0488 Old Fire Station 216 High Street Acton W3 9NX Acton Town Old Fire Station - handsome civic building built in A, B, D, H, L, N Centre 1899 of red brick and stone dressings with a half timbered jettied gable has had a sympathetic extension added c.2009

153 LLR0490 The Chatsworth 290 High Street Acton W3 9BJ Acton Town Formerly White Lion PH Centre

154 LLR0491 The Old Town Hall 1 and 3 High Street Southall UB1 3HA Built in 1897 in classical style, with a central B, D, E, F, H, L and former Fire pediment of light brick dressed with stone. These Station, Southall constitute an important group of early 20th century municipal buildings. They offer an increasingly rare glimpse of old Southall.

155 LLR0492 Barclays Bank 184/186 High Street Acton W3 9NH Acton Town Barclays Bank built in 1884 by the London and A,E,H,J,K,L,N,P Centre Slough Western bank of warm red brick with decorative crow-stepped gable and unusually lavish Jacobean detail in brilliant red terracotta

156 LLR0493 199/201 High Street Acton W3 9DD Acton Town Arts and crafts influenced corner with 1950s stone Centre shopfront for bank beneath

157 LLR0494 Bellvue Building 270-278 High Street Acton W3 9BH Acton Town Bellvue Building, Early 19th century Italianate villa Centre in prominent position and ruinous state hugely detrimental shopfronts but unusual survival of early building which could be renovated with right encouragement. 158 LLR0495 Odeon Building 57-78 High Street Southall UB1 3DB Odeon Building (formerly addressed as Uxbridge D,H,J,L,N (formerly Road) Southall, Art Deco style Cinema built in addressed as 1936 as an Odeon Theatre it was designed by Uxbridge Road) architect George Coles who also designed the Southall Himalaya Palace around the corner. The main entrance block was clad in

159 LLR0499 Captain Cook PH High Street Acton W3 6NG Acton Town Captain Cook PH (former Railway PH) (former Railway Centre PH)

160 LLR0501 St. Augustine's Hillcrest Road Ealing W5 2JL Late Victorian complex now partly used as a E,F,G, H,J,L,N Priory school with a school, mainly pebble dashed two building storey with tall pitched roofs with original dormer windows with 1914 additions and lodge on south side, large

161 LLR0502 Water Tower Hillcrest Road Ealing W5 2JL Ealing Cricket 1889 water brick tower (and covered reservoir ), B,H,J,K,L,M Ground the site originally called Grand Junction Water Works (later Metropolitan Water Board 1902)

162 LLR0503 1-24 Holyoake Holyoake Walk Ealing W5 1QW Brentham Handsome Arts and Crafts- inspired development D,E,F,G,H,K,L House Garden Estate of 12 flats built in 1936 by Alwyn Gorbing - arranged around an open sided quadrangle

163 LLR0504 Bridge No 13 over Horsenden Lane Greenford UB6 7NU Canalside, M J,N Grand Union North northwest part Canal 164 LLR0507 Jubilee Gardens Jubilee Gardens Southall UB1 2TJ Y Contemporary steel framed building built 2009- E,F,G,J,N Clinic 2010 with white rendered and brick panels.Ribbon windows to slightly recessed third storey , copper clad stairwell enclosure to centre

165 LLR0508 Jubilee Gardens Jubilee Gardens Southall UB1 2TJ Y Contemporary steel framed building built 2009- E,F,H,J,L,N Library 2010 with white rendered and brick panels.Ribbon windows to slightly recessed third storey , copper clad stairwell enclosure to centre

166 LLR0509 Smiths Kensington Road Northolt UB5 6AH Late nineteenth century farmhouse and farm E,G,N Farmhouse & buildings. Double fronted farmhouse in stock brick Outbuildings and slate roof with chimneys. Twin ground floor projecting bay windows comprising neo-georgian style glazing, with four pane sashes above. Simple single pitche

167 LLR0540 Residential Wing Little Ealing Lane Ealing W5 4XF Residential Wing of Convent of the Sacred Heart. F,H,J,L Convent of the Circa 1880s, yellow stock brick with red Sacred Heart stringcourses, twin front dutch gables with circular windows, shallow arch headed soldier course windows, doric order classical entrance surround with modern paint

168 Salvation Army Leeland Road W13 9HH Salvation Army formerly based in barracks at A, E, H,J, K,L,N,P Hall Ealing in Baker's Lane by 1889. Moved 1909 to surviving citadel at corner of Leeland Rd. and Leeland Terrace, W. Ealing. Handsome red brick community hall built turn of the century with a tall articulated gable dressed with stucco. A detrimental addtion to the frontage does not detract from the quality 169 LLR0541 3 Liverpool Road Ealing W5 5NZ Small semi-detached stock brick townhouse dating E,F,J,H,J,K,L from c. 1880s with sash windows and simple stucco embellishment 170 LLR0542 4 Liverpool Road Ealing W5 5NZ Small semi-detached stock brick townhouse dating E,F,J,H,J,K,L from c. 1880s with sash windows and simple stucco embellishment

171 LLR0543 5 Liverpool Road Ealing W5 5NZ Detached stock brick townhouse dating from c. E,F,J,H,J,K,L 1880s with large sash windows and simple stucco embellishment

172 LLR0544 6 Liverpool Road Ealing W5 5NZ Semi-detached stock brick townhouse dating from E,F,J,H,J,K,L c. 1880s with large sash windows and simple stucco embellishment

173 LLR0545 7 Liverpool Road Ealing W5 5NZ Semi-detached stock brick townhouse dating from E,F,J,H,J,K,L c. 1880s with large sash windows and simple stucco embellishment

174 LLR0546 Old Fire Station 4 Longfield Avenue Ealing W5 2UQ Ealing Town Old Fire Station built in 1888 with the Town Hall B, F,H, J,K, L Centre and enlarged in 1900 and 1901 by Charles Jones District Surveyor. Red brick with tower and large doorway with stables and workshops at the rear. The fire brigade moved to the present station in Uxbridge R

175 LLR0549 5 Lower Boston Hanwell W7 3UA Boston Place' mid-nineteenth century cottage (part E,F,H,J,L Road of a group of 4 - Nos. 5-11, but set back from others), facing stock brick with four pane timber sash windows with shallow-arch brick soldier course headers to ground and first floor, timber entrance doo 176 LLR0550 7 Lower Boston Hanwell W7 3UA Boston Place' mid-nineteenth century cottage (part E,F,H,J,L Road of a group of 4 - Nos. 5-11), facing stock brick, shallow-arch brick soldier course headers to ground and first floor windows, timber entrance door on front elevation. Hipped slate roof with leaded ridg

177 LLR0551 9 Lower Boston Hanwell W7 3UA Boston Place' mid-nineteenth century cottage (part E,F,H,J,L Road of a group of 4 - Nos. 5-11), facing stock brick, four pane timber sash windows with shallow-arch brick soldier course headers to ground and first floor, timber entrance door on front elevation. Hipped

178 LLR0552 11 Lower Boston Hanwell W7 3UA Boston Place' mid-nineteenth century cottage (part E,F,H,J,L Road of a group of 4 - Nos. 5-11), facing stock brick, four pane timber sash windows with shallow-arch brick soldier course headers to ground and first floor, timber entrance door on front elevation. Hipped

179 LLR0553 St Marks Court, Lower Boston Hanwell W7 2ND St Mark's formerly St. Mark's Church by William White 1879, B,H,J,L,N formerly St. Mark's Road Church & nave completed 1883, tower and spire never built. Church Canal Converted to flats 1989

180 LLR0574 43 Lynton Road Acton W3 9HL Edwardian red brick semi-detached house with E, L, H curved bay windows, tile hanging and canted bay dormer windows to mansard roof - an idiosyncratic interpretation of the Arts and Crafts style.No 43 is the only house which is well conserved

181 11 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LA Ealing Cricket Victorian double fronted house built in 1889 unique E,F,J,K,L Ground typology in the street extent. Stock brick with red brick stringcourses. Straight window headers with red brick pointed arch window headers and textured relief brickwork insets. Two storey front bay under front gable. Recessed porch entrance. Clay tiles roof with decorative ridge tiles (Some windows replaced) Founding home of ‘War on Want’. 182 LLR0605 Former Haven Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LH Haven Green Former post office c early 19th C set back from N,P Green Post the road, appears to be empty Office(?)

183 LLR0606 46 Manor Road West Ealing W13 0JA Edwardian corner property, formerly commercial E,H premises now restored

184 LLR0607 West Ealing Manor Road West Ealing W13 0HY Edwardian sorting office with brick and stone and A,E,H,J,K,N Delivery Office structural polychromatic façade with Dutch gables

185 LLR0463 Cast iron railing to Haven Green Ealing W5 2UU Haven Green cast iron railing to NW corner opposite cattle B,J,N NW corner trough opposite cattle trough

186 LLR0431 1 Haven Green Ealing W5 2UU Haven Green Detached, compact Victorian house c1880's, E,F,H,J,K,L,N unusually articulated projecting bays, corbelling to eaves, stucco and corbelled brickwork and steps to

piano nobile.

187 LLR0621 17 Marlborough Ealing W5 5NY A pair of early Victorian semi-detached town E,F,G,H,J,L Road houses with connected porches and bay windows to ground floor – outbuilding now garage to No 17 added in the 1880s and side extension to 19 added in the 1940’s 188 LLR0622 19 Marlborough Ealing W5 5NY A pair of early 19century semis E,F,G,H,J,L Road

189 LLR0639 Questors Theatre 12 Mattock Lane Ealing W5 5BQ Ealing Green Questors Theatre circa 1970 simple yet crisp glazed elevation. Considered one of the finest amateur theatres in the country, expanded from an ncorpo redundant chapel

190 LLR0640 13 Mattock Lane Ealing W5 5BG Ealing Green Large mansion block convered into NHS clinic. E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M Mattock Lane was built during the 1860’s on part of the Ashton House Estate. Nos 2-17 are large villas of different groupings of stock brick with stucco dressing some having shallow gables with decorative bra

191 LLR0645 16 Mattock Lane Ealing W5 5BG Ealing Green Large detached Victorian c.late 1870’s house of E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M red brick/tile with Norman Shaw/Bedford Park influence with vertical fishscale tile hanging to oversized front large neo-georgian telephone exchange. Ornate stone doorway with stone cartouch above. Mansar

192 LLR0681 Gates to Meadvale Road West Ealing W13 8DJ Gates to Pitshanger Park K,L Pitshanger Park

193 LLR0682 Sunrise Radio Merrick Road Southall UB2 4AB Sunrise Radio Building Tall building of robust but D,E,F,H,K,L,M,N Building decorative brick and metal frame, part of a larger complex of Victorian industrial buildings known as The Margarine Factory opened by Otto Monsted in 1893 once on Margarine Road then Bridge Road 194 LLR0683 Southall Merrick Road Southall UB2 4AU Southall Community Centre & gateways on east D,H,J,L,N Community Centre side: A large and prominent building in Beaux Art & gateways on Style 1910 by A Marshall Mackenzie. Part of Social east side Facilitiesof Otto Monsted’s margarine works known as ‘The Institute’

195 LLR0684 Railway Arches Merrick Road Southall UB2 4AU Railway Arches (1-23b The Arches Business D, E, F, H, L,N (1-23b The Arches Centre) 19th century railway arches.Ornate yellow Business Centre) stock brickwork with red brick detailing and dressings

196 LLR0737 Oak Lodge 11 Montpelier Ealing W5 2XP Oak Lodge –Edwardian style detached inter-war G, H, J, L Avenue property of neo-tudor influence with inset porch and leaded casement windows with intact front garden and boundary treatment

197 LLR0738 12 Montpelier Ealing W5 2XP Interwar detached house curved bay windows G, H, J, L Avenue (crittal) to projecting gable and tiled hipped roof with some modifications in large plot with compromised boundary treatment

198 LLR0739 Perivale Montpelier Ealing W5 2XP Handsome 1930 over-scaled neo-Georgian public D,E,F,H,JL,N Telephone Avenue building in red brick two storeys with sash-imitating Exchange arched and rectangular windows and attic with dormers. Has stone surround to main entrance door

199 LLR0745 16a Montpelier Road Ealing W5 2QZ Mock Tudor detached house early 20th C with F,G, H, J, L original feather-edge boundary and gate 200 LLR0755 1-17 Daver Court Mount Avenue Ealing W5 1PL Early 20th century flats with original lift MORE D,E,H,J,L INFO REQUIRED

201 LLR0756 1-33 Mount View Mount Avenue Ealing W5 1PR Montpelier Inter-war flats with uniform replacement windows D,E,H,J,L Park MORE INFO REQUIRED

202 LLR0757 Mount Eaton Mount Avenue Ealing W5 2RF Montpelier Mount Eaton Court – purpose built block c. 1950’s E, H, J, L Court (1-20) Park plain cuboid brick construction with crittal stairlights and ornamental balconies . Unsympathetic windows have replaced crittal homelights, set in medium plot with plain landscaping and low wall front bou

203 LLR0758 24/26 (Moullin 24 Mount Park Road Ealing W5 2RT Mount Park 24/26 (Moulin House)inter-war neo-Georgian D,E,F,J,H,L House) purpose built block of flats

204 LLR0837 UGC (ex The 59-63 New Broadway Ealing W5 5AH Ealing Town UGC (ex The Forum) 1934 façade retained – site D, E, F, H J, L, M, N,. P Forum) Centre awaiting development

205 LLR0874 Hanger Lane North Circular Ealing W5 1DL See row 88 below B,D,E,F,G,J,K,LM,N,P Station Road 206 LLR0875 9 North Common Ealing W5 2QB Ealing 9/10 Two large three storey detached villas, E,F, H,K,M,N Road Common stockbrick with stone and red tiled roof, decorated gable, turret and and brick, stone and timber porch, part of the Wood estate circa 1880’s, now used as YMCA with infill link building

207 LLR0876 10 North Common Ealing W5 2QB Ealing 9/10 Two large three storey detached villas, E,F, H,K,M,N Road Common stockbrick with stone and red tiled roof, decorated gable, turret and and brick, stone and timber porch, part of the Wood estate circa 1880’s, now used as YMCA with infill link building

208 LLR0877 79 North Road Southall UB1 2JL Regency Coach House and stables – brick with D,E,F,H,J,L,N slate roof part of a former estate assoc with Grade II listed building adjacent. Later Victorian shopfront overlooking The Green RW RETAIN – important partner to listed 17th Century house adjacent. Shopfront

209 LLR0878 Deloitte Alms 173 North Road Southall UB1 2JZ Deloitte Alms Houses – Jubilee 1897: slate roof, D,E,F,H,J,L,N Houses single storey yellow stock brick with red brick stringcourses and red clay sills and roof ridge dressings

210 LLR0879 Deloitte Alms 175 North Road Southall UB1 2JZ Deloitte Alms Houses – Jubilee 1897: slate roof, D,E,F,H,J,L,N Houses single storey yellow stock brick with red brick stringcourses and red clay sills and roof ridge dressings

211 LLR0880 Deloitte Alms 177 North Road Southall UB1 2JZ Deloitte Alms Houses – Jubilee 1897: slate roof, D,E,F,H,J,L,N Houses single storey yellow stock brick with red brick stringcourses and red clay sills and roof ridge dressings 212 LLR0881 Deloitte Alms 179 North Road Southall UB1 2JZ Deloitte Alms Houses – Jubilee 1897: slate roof, D,E,F,H,J,L,N Houses single storey yellow stock brick with red brick stringcourses and red clay sills and roof ridge dressings

213 LLR0882 Deloitte Alms 181 North Road Southall UB1 2JZ Deloitte Alms Houses – Jubilee 1897: slate roof, D,E,F,H,J,L,N Houses single storey yellow stock brick with red brick stringcourses and red clay sills and roof ridge dressings

214 LLR0883 Deloitte Alms 183 North Road Southall UB1 2JZ Deloitte Alms Houses – Jubilee 1897: slate roof, D,E,F,H,J,L,N Houses single storey yellow stock brick with red brick stringcourses and red clay sills and roof ridge dressings

215 LLR0930 Northcote Arms 49-53 Northcote Avenue Southall UB1 2AY Northcote Arms PH E,H,J PH early 20th C built by 1910 now in a state of dilapidation

216 LLR0932 Oscars 44 Northfield Avenue West Ealing W13 9RR Oscars, shop in Northfield Avenue est.1894 shop E,K,L,M,N frontage has been detrimentally modified but character appears relatively unchanged

217 Parkers Bakery 64 Northfield Avenue Ealing W13 9RR Elaborate 1930s corner shop front with chrome E,K,L,M,N edging and sign 218 LLR0933 Gregory’s shop 70 Northfield Avenue West Ealing W13 9RR Gregory’s shop front 1950’s with black glass and E,K,L,M,N front shiny silver shop window surround

219 LLR0954 The Plough PH 297 Northfield Avenue Ealing W5 4UA Mid-nineteenth century coach house, brick built B,F,H,L with later render added with double pitch clay tiled roof and brick chimneys (Modern single storey front addition, brick built with modern stone pillars to entrances and tapered lower walls in modern glazed

220 LLR0957 Sri Guru 2 Norwood Road Southall UB2 4DL ex White Swan PH 1924.,corner site. Former A,B,H,J,L,N Andardurs public house building of red brick with Gudwara ex White polychromatic arches surrounding an unusual Swan PH array of ground floor arched windows, octagonal tower

221 LLR0958 Lamb PH 137 Norwood Road Southall UB2 4JB Norwood Lamb PH Two storey double fronted early Victorian E,H, J, N Green pub next to the canal with large sash windows in deep reveals and a balanced I

222 LLR0959 Police Station 190 Norwood Road Southall UB2 4JT Norwood Police Station Two storey 3 bay late Victorian red A, B, E, H, J, M, N, P Green brick with with neo-gothic elements such as mullioned windows and other stone detailing and a steeply pitched roof. Stylistically quite different from other local buildings adding visual interest

223 LLR0960 The Alms Houses 1 -4 Norwood Southall UB2 4JG Norwood On the site of old almshouses the flats are not N, P fronting Frogmore Road Green architecturally distinguished but the site is listed for Green historical associations 224 LLR0961 Wolf PH Norwood Road Southall UB2 4JS Norwood Wolf PH Two storey double fronted Victorian public H, J,N, P Green house with hipped roof and annex stables. It has strong historical associations for local residents

225 LLR0962 Parish Pump Norwood Road Southall UB2 4JS Norwood Parish Pump (Land to front of 168) of cast iron c. B, J, N (Land to front of Green 1860 168)

226 LLR0963 Oaklands School Oaklands Road Hanwell W7 2DP School building, c.1900. Yellow stock, red brick B,J,L,N and stone. Large front facing gables with double height windows topped with segmented pediments. Crenellated parapet on central section with stone coping. Stone cornices and banding and full height pilaste

227 LLR0964 Grosvenor PH Oaklands Road Hanwell W7 2DT Very good example of an Edwardian public house, B,F,G,H, J,L, N built in 1904. Two storey building, rendered with stone elements. Projecting ground floor with large timber windows with leaded fan lights. Marble stallriser and pilasters with stone corbels. Fascia and cornice set below red clay tiled roof to ground floor.

228 LLR0965 1-4 Model Occupation Road West Ealing W13 9LF off Northfield Avenue Prince Albert?s design for E, F, G, H, J, L, N Cottages agricultural workers? Cottages c 1870’s two storey utiltatarian style with monopitch roof, iron balcony and external stairs

229 LLR0994 The Cottage Old Ruislip Road Northolt UB5 6QD Remnant of West End village. Rear outhouse now H,J,N used as a residential cottage. Mid-nineteenth century brick built, red tile roof with clay chimney pots (brickwork painted white and original windows replaced) 230 LLR0996 Greenford Station Oldfield Lane Greenford UB6 8PX Above ground station fitted into a viaduct, owned B,E,H,J,L,N North and run by London Underground probably by FF Curtis (see Hanger Lane entry ) after Charles Holden using the same motifs and built between 1935-40 and eventually opened on 30th June 1947 replacing the GWR

231 LLR0997 Greenford Police 21 Oldfield Lane Greenford UB6 9LQ Greenford Police Station, built c.1900. Opened as B,H,L,N Station South a Police Station in 1949. Designed by Architect F.F Curtis(BR) in succession to B Lewis(GWR). Front gable with clay hanging tiles and half timbering at first floor, red brick at ground floor with red cla

232 LLR0998 Greenford Library 25 Oldfield Lane Greenford UB6 9LG Purpose built Library building c.1920’s opened A,E,G,H,J,K,N,P South 1934, landmark building. Red brick with clay tiled roof. Central entrance with stone surround and cornice with brackets above. Interesting entrance detailing, including intricate fanlight. Further stonework

233 LLR0999 Greenford 170 Oldfield Lane Greenford UB6 9JS Greenford Community Centre together with walls B,D,G,L,N,P Community Centre South to west & north on the Greenford Hall site, a very together with walls large institutional building of four storeys, stock to west & north brick with red brick arches with a strong arts and crafts style particularly shown in the irregularity

234 LLR1000 Edward Betham Oldfield Lane Greenford UB6 9JT Established 1780 at Betham House. Board School B,H,J,K,L,N,P CE Primary South Buildings 1878 on the corner of Costons Lane, School yellow stock brick with grey slate roof and decorative clock tower

235 LLR1001 Southall Library Osterley Park Southall UB2 4BL Example of Carnegie Library, opened 1905. Art B,D,F,H,J,K,L,M,N Road Nouveau lettering,triple arched entrance.(NP) Fine magnolia on the frontage 236 LLR1025 Trinity Lodge 23A Park Hill Ealing W5 2JS Montpelier Trinity Lodge, Early 20C double fronted detached F,G,H,J,L Park house with a central gable end and the use of tile creasing, herringbone and other patterned polychrome brickwork and leaded windows in the style of a Lutyens (Arts and Crafts) house

237 50 Park View Road Ealing W5 2JB Superb neo-georgian mansion built circa 1926 by B,F,H,J,L son of Aston Webb for his father’s own home

238 LLR1062 14 Park View Road Ealing W5 2JB 1920’s large and well proportioned detached two- D,E,H,L storey neo-Georgian house of red brick with hipped roof and stepped gables, the forward-most gable with integral garage , white painted timber, multi-paned windows and a porthole to other gable are highly

239 LLR1085 Servite House 45-47 Queens Walk Ealing W5 1TL One of few remaining Victorian Mansions in E,F,H,J,L Castlebar area with a central tower and pepper pot corner

240 LLR1086 Nile Lodge Queens Walk Ealing W5 1TJ c.1880’s formerly Melbourne Lodge, a large E,G,H,J,L Victorian house within a large plot of land with outbuildings. There have been considerable detrimental additions but the side extension is so early (1910) that it has become part of the story of this Gothick bu

241 LLR1112 London College of Ranelagh Road Ealing W5 5RJ Ealing Green University of West London London College of B,E,F,H,J,K,L,M,N,P Music and Media Music and Media – f.ealing Parish Vestry Hall Vestry Hall 1879, large footprint, fine institutional building of red brick with stone mullions and tracery and elaborate high Dutch gables topped with stone finials and I 242 LLR1116 3 Ravensbourne West Ealing W13 8EW Early twentieth century terraced housing with arts E,F,G,H,J,L Gardens and crafts influence, projecting bays above eaves, tiled roof, red brick and white pebble dashing and large windows

243 LLR1117 5 Ravensbourne West Ealing W13 8EW Early twentieth century terraced housing with arts E,F,G,H,J,L Gardens and crafts influence, projecting bays above eaves, tiled roof, red brick and white pebble dashing and large windows

244 LLR1118 7 Ravensbourne West Ealing W13 8EW Early twentieth century terraced housing with arts E,F,G,H,J,L Gardens and crafts influence, projecting bays above eaves, tiled roof, red brick and white pebble dashing and large windows

245 LLR1119 9 Ravensbourne West Ealing W13 8EW Early twentieth century terraced housing with arts E,F,G,H,J,L Gardens and crafts influence, projecting bays above eaves, tiled roof, red brick and white pebble dashing and large windows

246 LLR1120 HSBC Bank 1 to 3 Regina Road Southall UB2 5PL HSBC Bank, Edwardian bank building 1903 red brick, stucco- trimmed and stone feature frontage at ground storey level with copper-clad pepperpot tower terminating the vista down Kings Street

247 LLR1121 Old Oak Bridge, Regina Road Southall UB2 5QD Canalside, Old Oak Bridge, dating from the late 18th C of red D,G,J,K,L,M,N 202 North Hyde southwest part brick and ncorporates blue brick dressing with a Lane Canal Bridge simple depressed archcrossing an older lane Regina Road linking small rural settlements 248 LLR1124 Postbox at No 45 Rosemont Road Acton W3 9LU Edwardian Postbox at No 45 D,J,N

249 LLR1125 External 345 Ruislip Road Southall UB1 2QW External Sculptures, Taylor Woodrow, Taywood B,N Sculptures, Taylor House Woodrow Taywood House

250 LLR1126 Greenford Hall Ruislip Road Greenford UB6 9QN 1960s hall built in brick and white rendering set D,E,F,G,J,N,P back from the road and landscaped to the east.Recently restored to high specification.

251 LLR1128 Hare & Hounds Ruislip Road Greenford UB6 9RZ Mid-nineteenth century public house. Brick built A,B,G,H,N PH with red clay tiled roof. Chimney stacks with ncorpor red clay pots. Ground floor canopy with brackets

252 LLR1129 Dragon House 100 Rusthall Avenue Chiswick W4 1BS Dragon House Late Victorian / Edwardian B,F,H,J,K,L detached house, built originally as a decorative end of street property, many original features including decorative bargeboard, sash windows with decorative joinery, stain glass stair light, diamond attic light, r

253 LLR1148 Ealing Park 222 South Ealing Ealing W5 4RL Public House, built c.1880s and extended c.1920s. A,B,F,G,H,L Tavern PH Road Attractive glazed brick at ground floor level, with red brick and half timbering at first and stucco at second floor. Red clay tiled roof with gable ends and turreted corner roof form topped with interest 254 LLR1149 Kings Hall South Road Southall UB1 1RB Early twentieth century building by Alfred Gelder D, E, F, H, J, K, L, M, N, Methodist Church built 1916 intended for both religious and P educational purposes. It is one of only two similar types of churches in the country, the other one being Gelder’s Methodist Hall, Cottingham Road, Hull which is

255 LLR1162 former Off Licence 112 St Margarets Hanwell W7 2HF c.1900. Three storey red brick with slate roof. B,F,G,H, J,L, N Road Large half-timbered pointed-gable dormer at second floor level jettied out over timber supports set on stone corbelled brackets. Shallow splayed ground floor bay, comprising detailed mullions, arched header

256 LLR1195 Red Lion PH 13 St Marys Road Ealing W5 5RA Ealing Green Red Lion PH – mid 19th C coaching Inn that was B,D,F,H,J,K,N and is still popular with employees and actors from Ealing Studios. The (Italian) restaurant next door is part of the same building footprint but appears to be under separate ownership

257 LLR1198 Castle PH 36 St Marys Road Ealing W5 5EU Ealing Green Castle PH dates from the Regency to early B, D, F, H J, L Victorian period. In 1832 it was the meeting place for ealing Court of Tenants. The 2 strey, 3 bay pub has a well detailed ground floor with good timber and leaded window details

258 LLR1199 72 St Marys Road Ealing W5 5EX Ealing Green Early Victorian house with side entrance, good survival and early building. with substantial front garden and tree cover which positively contributes to the CA character.

259 LLR1200 74 St Marys Road Ealing W5 5EX Ealing Green Contemporary to 72. Important survival with substantial front garden and tree cover which positively contributes to the CA character. 260 LLR1201 Cattle trough St Marys Road Ealing W5 5EX Ealing Green Cattle trough opposite 60 St Marys Road opposite 60 St Marys Road

261 LLR1202 Ealing Court St Marys Road Ealing W5 5EY Ealing Green Conservative Georgian style of 5 bays, 3 storeys E,F,J,L,N Mansions built of stock brick, built in 1867 it was an industrial school

262 LLR1203 Thames Valley St Marys Road Ealing W5 5RA Ealing Green On the site of a co-operative school founded by D,E,F,H,J,L,N University – Main Lady Mary Byron (1792-1860) the extant building Building was designed by Middlesex County Architects 1953 TVU is a large four storey modernist brown brick building, crittal fenestration using larger windows on the s

263 LLR1204 Drinking fountain St Marys Road Ealing W5 5RH Ealing Green Large stone drinking fountain North side of St K,L,N,D North side of St Marys Churchyard – possibly early 20th C Marys Churchyard

264 LLR1221 2 St Stephens West Ealing W13 8ES St. Stephen’s Nos 2,4,6 1 detached and a pair of semi-detached E,G,H Avenue houses with square bays, fishscale tile hung bay panels, and sloping pyramidal roofs over the bays

265 LLR1222 4 St Stephens West Ealing W13 8ES St. Stephen’s Nos 2,4,6 1 detached and a pair of semi-detached E,G,H Avenue houses with square bays, fishscale tile hung bay panels, and sloping pyramidal roofs over the bays 266 LLR1223 6 St Stephens West Ealing W13 8ES St. Stephen’s Nos 2,4,6 1 detached and a pair of semi-detached E,G,H Avenue houses with square bays, fishscale tile hung bay panels, and sloping pyramidal roofs over the bays

267 LLR1224 23 St Stephens West Ealing W13 8ES Truncated tower house of red brick and stucco trim F,H,J,L,M Avenue with a slate roof designed as decorative endpiece at the end of the row

268 LLR1225 30 St Stephens Road West Ealing W13 8HH Educational establishment c. 1960s in modernist D,H,J,L,N style of gault brick and render and flat roof with simple cuboid volumes with the first floor cantilevered over the ground floor storey and ribbon windows, has been refurbished and redecorated with new windows

269 LLR1227 St. Stephen’s St Stephens Road West Ealing W13 8HB St. Stephen’s 1920s and 1986 by I. Goldsmit D,E,G,H,J,L,N,P Church Centre

270 LLR1228 The Old Rectory St Stephens Road West Ealing W13 8HD St. Stephen’s Late Victorian double-fronted detached house D,F,G,H,J,K,L,N,P which was built with the church. It is of generous proportions with decorative dressings of stucco and thick stone mullions and transoms on the large ground floor windows. An elaborate porch completes the grand entrance

271 LLR1241 Duke of York 86 Steyne Road Acton W3 9NU Duke of York Public House Early 20th century A,H,J,L,N,P Public House corner pub of three storeys and red brick with pepperpot turret with copper cladding. 272 LLR1243 11 Sutherland Road West Ealing W13 0DX Large Edwardian, neo-Georgian, semi-detached D,E,H,K house of stock brick and red brick quoining and window surrounds with a steep pitched roof, canted bay projections to front and side

273 LLR1244 13 Sutherland Road West Ealing W13 0DX Large Edwardian, semi-detached house of stock D,E,H,K brick and red brick quoining and window surrounds with a steep pitched roof, canted bay projections to front and side with neo-classical dressings and neo-Georgian fenestration

274 LLR1245 3 Teignmouth Greenford UB6 8BZ Prominent corner building. Octagonal window and A,D,E,F,H,J,N Parade, Bideford chamfered tops to windows. White faence work Avenue with profiled fianced green inset around frame. Detrimental shopfront modifications (Lloyds Bank).

275 LLR1246 4 Teignmouth Greenford UB6 8BZ Chamfered tops to windows, white faence work D,E,F,H,J,N Parade, Bideford with profiled fianced green inset around frame. Avenue Detrimental shopfront modifications.

276 LLR1247 5 Teignmouth Greenford UB6 8BZ Chamfered tops to windows, white faence work D,E,F,H,J,N Parade, Bideford with profiled fianced green inset around frame. Avenue Detrimental shopfront modifications.

277 LLR1248 6 Teignmouth Greenford UB6 8BZ Chamfered tops to windows, white faence work D,E,F,H,J,N Parade, Bideford with profiled fianced green inset around frame. Avenue Detrimental shopfront modifications. 278 LLR1249 7 Teignmouth Greenford UB6 8BZ Chamfered tops to windows, white faence work D,E,F,H,J,N Parade, Bideford with profiled fianced green inset around frame. Avenue Detrimental shopfront modifications.

279 LLR1250 Norwood Cottage Tentelow Lane Southall UB2 4LG Norwood Georgian brick house attached to Norwood Lodge D, E,F, H Green and appears to be the same house. Three bays of wood sash windows with 4x4 glazed panes constitutes Norwood Lodge with slight gap and another bay of same constituting Norwood Cottage. Single porch of wrought iron

280 LLR1251 Norwood Lodge Tentelow Lane Southall UB2 4LG Norwood Georgian brick house attached to Norwood Lodge D, E,F, H Green and appears to be the same house. Three bays of wood sash windows with 4x4 glazed panes constitutes Norwood Lodge with slight gap and another bay of same constituting Norwood Cottage. Single porch of wrought iron

281 LLR1252 White House or Tentelow Lane Southall UB2 4LG Norwood Small two storey double fronted cottage with slate D, E,F, H Cottage Green roof, white rendered walls, sash windows and low pitched gabled slate roof. Much altered to rear by large two storey outrigger. Appears on OS prior to 1870 without right-hand bay.

282 LLR1253 4 The Avenue West Ealing W13 8PH Shopping parade dating from about 1905 4, 6, 8 G,F,G,H,K,L,N have arched stucco shop fronts set between stucco pilasters and corbels with curved shop windows leading to recessed shop door. No 4 still has original timber mullions, ncorpor and glazing bars intact .

283 LLR1254 6 The Avenue West Ealing W13 8PH Shopping parade dating from about 1905 4, 6, 8 G,F,G,H,K,L,N have arched stucco shop fronts set between stucco pilasters and corbels with curved shop windows leading to recessed shop door. No 4 still has original timber mullions, ncorpor and glazing bars intact . 284 LLR1255 8 The Avenue West Ealing W13 8PH Shopping parade dating from about 1905 4, 6, 8 G,F,G,H,K,L,N have arched stucco shop fronts set between stucco pilasters and corbels with curved shop windows leading to recessed shop door. No 4 still has original timber mullions, ncorpor and glazing bars intact .

285 LLR1256 10 The Avenue West Ealing W13 8PH Shopping parade dating from about 1905 4, 6, 8 G,F,G,H,K,L,N have arched stucco shop fronts set between stucco pilasters and corbels with curved shop windows leading to recessed shop door. No 4 still has original timber mullions, ncorpor and glazing bars intact .

286 LLR1257 12 The Avenue West Ealing W13 8PH Shopping parade c.1880s (conjoined to Nos 12 – 4 E,F,H,J,LN but considerably older) of three storeys in height with decorative stucco trim arched on first floor sash windows, triangular gables with attic storey. Projecting shop fronts are detrimental but original features such as unusual corbels and pilasters are retained

287 LLR1258 14 The Avenue West Ealing W13 8PH Shopping parade c.1880s (conjoined to Nos 12 – 4 E,F,H,J,LN but considerably older) of three storeys in height with decorative stucco trim arched on first floor sash windows, triangular gables with attic storey. Detrimental but original features such as unusual corbels and pilasters are retained

288 LLR1259 16 The Avenue West Ealing W13 8PH Shopping parade c.1880s (conjoined to Nos 12 – 4 E,F,H,J,LN but considerably older) of three storeys in height with decorative stucco trim arched on first floor sash windows, triangular gables with attic storey. Detrimental but original features such as unusual corbels and pilasters are retained

289 LLR1260 18 The Avenue West Ealing W13 8PH Shopping parade c.1880s (conjoined to Nos 12 – 4 E,F,H,J,LN but considerably older) of three storeys in height with decorative stucco trim arched on first floor sash windows, triangular gables with attic storey. Detrimental but original features such as unusual corbels and pilasters are retained 290 LLR1261 20 The Avenue West Ealing W13 8PH Shopping parade c.1880s (conjoined to Nos 12 – 4 E,F,H,J,LN but considerably older) of three storeys in height with decorative stucco trim arched on first floor sash windows, triangular gables with attic storey. Detrimental but original features such as unusual corbels and pilasters are retained

291 LLR1262 22 The Avenue West Ealing W13 8PH Shopping parade c.1880s (conjoined to Nos 12 – 4 E,F,H,J,LN but considerably older) of three storeys in height with decorative stucco trim arched on first floor sash windows, triangular gables with attic storey. Detrimental but original features such as unusual corbels and pilasters are retained

292 LLR1263 24 The Avenue West Ealing W13 8PH Shopping parade Nos 12- 24 c.1880’s E,F,H,J,LN

293 LLR1264 116 The Avenue West Ealing W13 8JX St. Stephen’s Turn of the century corner property with turreted A,F,H,J,L bay window at the corner,weatherboarding to later upper storey, roof and rear additions, the latter in contemporary style. Boundary fence and piers around curtilage

294 LLR1265 Drayton Court The Avenue West Ealing W13 8PH Public house formerly a hotel. Three storey B,E,F,H,J,K,L,N,P Hotel building c 1900. Palest stock brick with rusticated piers in brick, on the ground floor storey, providing both a rhythmic façade and framing for the six large rectangular windows with their ncorp pediments and central portico entrance which is surmounted by a slender half-circular bay with three windows on each and topped by a half-round slated turret. Highly decorated with a rich heritage. 295 LLR1266 18 The Broadway Greenford UB6 9PT Early 20th Century. Part of shopping parade (Nos. D,E,F,H 18-34). Brick façade with feature soldier stringcourses. Red clay tiled roof 296 LLR1267 20 The Broadway Greenford UB6 9PT Early 20th Century. Part of shopping parade (Nos. D,E,F,H 18-34). Brick façade with feature soldier stringcourses. Red clay tiled roof (original steel windows replaced with upvc)

297 LLR1268 22 The Broadway Greenford UB6 9PT Early 20th Century. Part of shopping parade (Nos. D,E,F,H 18-34). Brick façade with large dutch gable and second floor iron ncorpor balcony (original steel windows replaced with upvc)

298 LLR1269 24 The Broadway Greenford UB6 9PT Early 20th Century. Part of shopping parade (Nos. D,E,F,H 18-34). Brick façade with feature soldier stringcourses. Red clay tiled roof (original windows replaced with upvc)

299 Iron railings nr 6 Broadway Hanwell W7 3SS Hanwell Clock Low decorative iron railings in traffic island BDHM Clocktower Tower provides attractive focus in traffic-bound location

300 LLR1270 25 Broadway West Ealing W13 9DA Early 20th c three storey red brick and stucco A, E, F, H, J, L, N. trimmed shopping parade with curving bays divided by projecting brick piers and turrets to either end. Fenestration has been largely replaced with PVC-U and shop fronts are mainly of poor quality

301 LLR1271 26 The Broadway Greenford UB6 9PT Early 20th Century. Part of shopping parade (Nos. G,H,L 18-34). Brick façade with feature soldier stringcourses. Red clay tiled roof 302 LLR1272 27 Broadway West Ealing W13 9DA Early 20th c three storey red brick and stucco A, E, F, H, J, L, N. trimmed shopping parade with curving bays divided by projecting brick piers and turrets to either end. Fenestration has been largely replaced with PVC-U and shop fronts are mainly of poor quality

303 LLR1273 28 The Broadway Greenford UB6 9PT Early 20th Century. Part of shopping parade (Nos. G,H,L 18-34). Brick façade with large dutch gable and second floor iron ncorpor balcony (original steel windows replaced with upvc)

304 LLR1274 29 Broadway West Ealing W13 9DA Early 20th c three storey red brick and stucco A, E, F, H, J, L, N. trimmed shopping parade with curving bays divided by projecting brick piers and turrets to either end. Fenestration has been largely replaced with PVC-U and shop fronts are mainly of poor quality

305 LLR1275 30 The Broadway Greenford UB6 9PT Early 20th Century. Part of shopping parade (Nos. G,H,L 18-34). Brick façade with feature soldier stringcourses. Red clay tiled roof (original windows replaced with upvc)

306 LLR1280 35 Broadway West Ealing W13 9DA Early 20th c three storey red brick and stucco A, E, F, H, J, L, N. trimmed shopping parade with curving bays divided by projecting brick piers and turrets to either end. Fenestration has been largely replaced with PVC-U and shop fronts are mainly of poor quality

307 LLR1281 The North Star PH 43 The Broadway Ealing W5 5JN Ealing Town The North Star PH. Small two storey pub of B,E,F,H,J,K,L,N,p Centre eclectic style possibly built in the early 19th century and later refaced,narrow but deep footprint of brick with lavish stone dressing, tiled, hipped roof, tudoresque touches of leaded upper lights to windows a 308 LLR1291 Halfway House 144 Broadway West Ealing W13 0TL Mid-nineteenth century public house, red brick B,F,H,J,L,N PH building with stucco window surrounds and cornice. Full with shopfront, complete with fascia, cornice, consoles and marble pilasters and entrances. First floor projecting bay and front gable, both with I

309 LLR1292 147 The Broadway West Ealing W13 9BE c.1880’s two storey detached house with a hipped B, D,H, K,L,M roof and white chimney pots now a surgery, white rendered and stucco trims and quoining, central portico porch between canted bay windows, ncorp dressings to eves and upper windows. Property has been com

310 LLR1293 151 The Broadway Hanwell W7 3SP Hanwell Clock small cottage converted over time to shop and now Tower café use.

311 LLR1294 former Barclays 153-155 The Broadway Hanwell W7 3SP Ealing Town former Barclays Bank D,E,H,J,LN Bank Centre

312 LLR1296 Hanwell Clock The Broadway Hanwell W7 3SS Hanwell Clock 1936 clock tower of art deco design. Restored in B,H,K,L,N,P Tower Tower 2011.

313 LLR1297 Burlington House 1 The Common Ealing W5 3TR Ealing Corner property c 1880’s, large four storey terrace A,E,F,H,K 1-3 Common of brick / stucco villas with lower and upper ground floors, latterly added dormer windows and triple height canted bay windows and steps to front doors 314 LLR1298 Burlington House 2 The Common Ealing W5 3TR Ealing Corner property c 1880’s, large four storey terrace A,E,F,H,K 1-3 Common of brick / stucco villas with lower and upper ground floors, latterly added dormer windows and triple height canted bay windows and steps to front doors

315 LLR1299 Burlington House 3 The Common Ealing W5 3TR Ealing Corner property, c 1880’s,large four storey terrace A,E,F,H,K 1-3 Common of brick / stucco villas with lower and upper ground floors, latterly added dormer windows and triple height canted bay windows and steps to front doors

316 LLR1300 4 The Common Ealing W5 3TR Ealing Four storey semi-detached town house c. 1840’s A,E,F,H,K Common with lower and upper ground floors and restrained stucco embellishment to porch and window surround, as No’s 11-12, except 11-12 have stucco quoining to sides

317 LLR1301 5 The Common Ealing W5 3TR Ealing Four storey semi-detached town house c. 1840’s A,E,F,H,K Common with lower and upper ground floors and restrained stucco embellishment to porch and window surround, as Nos 11-12, except 11-12 have stucco quoining to sides

318 LLR1310 21 The Common Ealing W5 3JB Ealing Three storey semi-detached villa as Nos 1-9 and D,L Common 11- 16 but No 20 is compromised with side extension and No 21 has detrimental alterations but retains it’s grand glass canopy to front

319 LLR1317 Cattle trough The Green Southall UB2 4AR Cattle trough outside 55 The Green – stone cattle B, D, N outside 55 The trough pre-19th C Green 320 LLR1340 St Saviour’s 27 The Grove Ealing W5 5DX Ealing Town Victorian school buildings, still a school, St E,F,G,H,J,L School Centre Saviour’s was set up in 1860 as a National infant school for St Mary’s and Christ Church. It occupied the recently vacated Congregational Chapel (which relocated to the church opposite Ealing Green)

321 LLR1364 Re Store 51 The Grove Ealing W5 5DX Ealing Town Nos 51/53/55 turn of the century, part of cohesive E,F,G,H,J,L Centre terrace, No 51 is a musical instrument repair shop, original features remain, canted shop front with ornate corbels, pilasters in stucco, carved timber profiled ncorpo running laterally above

322 LLR1368 Kings Arms PH 55 The Grove Ealing W5 5DX Ealing Town Nos 51/53/55 turn of the century, part of cohesive E,F,G,H,J,L Centre terrace, No 55 is a public house, ornately detailed, door located at corner of I,ornate corbels, pilasters in stucco, timber profiled windows, 2 upper floors and attic ncorporates , unusual gabled end.

323 LLR1471 Shopfront 10 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880’s D,E,F,H,J,LN Centre two upper floors or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof line

324 LLR1505 62 The Mall Ealing W5 3TA Ealing Town Formerly Allied Irish bank, compact and elegant D,H,J,L,N Centre 1920s building in Portland Stone

325 LLR1528 1 The Ridings Ealing W5 3BT Hanger Hill Large modern mid-20th Century double fronted E,F,G,H,J,L (Haymills) dwelling, designed by Welch, Cachemaill & Estate Lauder. White rendered with projecting rendered stringcourses at ground floor. Parapet with simple cornice, flat roof and twin chimney stacks (original windows replaced) 326 LLR1529 7 The Ridings Ealing W5 3BT Hanger Hill Modern mid-20th Century single fronted dwelling, E,F,G,H,J,L (Haymills) designed by Welch, Cachemaill & Lauder. Brick Estate with concrete window surrounds. Parapet and flat roof with second floor sun room. White painted Crittal windows. Raised ground floor with recessed entrance.

327 LLR1530 8 The Ridings Ealing W5 3BU Hanger Hill Modern mid-20th Century double fronted dwelling, E,F,G,H,J,L (Haymills) designed by Welch, Cachemaill & Lauder. Three Estate storeys. Brick with concrete banding. Projecting stringcourses at first floor. Parapet and flat roof with second floor sun room. White painted Crittal window

328 LLR1531 15 The Ridings Ealing W5 3BT Hanger Hill Modern mid-20th Century double fronted dwelling, E,F,G,H,J,L (Haymills) designed by Welch, Cachemaill & Lauder. Brick at Estate ground floor with render at first. Pitched roof in plain clay tiles. Projecting front bay with white painted Crittal windows throughout.

329 LLR1532 19 The Ridings Ealing W5 3BT Hanger Hill Modern mid-20th Century double fronted dwelling, E,F,G,H,J,L (Haymills) designed by Welch, Cachemaill & Lauder. Brick Estate with concrete band at ground floor. Recessed ground floor entrance with balcony above. Pitched roof in plain clay tiles.

330 LLR1533 29 The Ridings Ealing W5 3BT Hanger Hill Modern mid-20th Century double fronted dwelling, E,F,G,H,J,L (Haymills) designed by Welch, Cachemaill & Lauder. Three Estate storeys with two storey front projection. Brick with painted concrete banding and lintels. Parapet and flat roof with second floor sun room. White painted Crittal windows

331 LLR1534 33 The Ridings Ealing W5 3BT Hanger Hill Modern mid-20th Century double fronted dwelling, E,F,G,H,J,L (Haymills) designed by Welch, Cachemaill & Lauder. Three Estate storeys with two storey front projection. Brick with painted concrete banding and lintels. Parapet and flat roof with second floor sun room. White painted Crittal windows 332 LLR1535 11a The Ridings Ealing W5 3BT Hanger Hill Large modern mid-20th Century double fronted E,F,G,H,J,L (Haymills) dwelling, designed by Welch, Cachemaill & Estate Lauder. Rendered throughout. Parapet and overhanging soffits, flat roof and chimney stack (original windows replaced and crass second floor conservatory added)

333 The Park Lodge The Vale Acton W3 7JT Charming parks lodge, well maintained and set in B,F,H,J,L landscaped garden. Used as Ranger base until 2013

334 LLR1536 273 The Vale Acton W3 7QA Modern corner shop / showroom Late I9 century A,B,H,L,N ground floor altered 1934 and second storey added 1955. A commercial building with lantern tower on the corner and display windows on each frontage

335 LLR1537 1 Twyford Crescent Acton W3 9PP Creffield Large detached Victorian Corner House with fine detailing and survival of original details.

336 LLR1538 Lodge to City of 30 Uxbridge Road Hanwell W7 3PP Hanwell Lodge to City of Westminster Cemetery, yellow B,F,H,J,L,N Westminster Cemeteries stock brick, gabled front elevation, stone Cemetery entablature and columns with entasis. Timber double door entrance with arched header

337 LLR1545 Police Station 169 Uxbridge Road Hanwell W7 3TH Police Station, Late 19th century with interesting B, J,K, L,M N rear buildings. Fine red brick with terracotta cills and elaborate cartouche. 338 LLR1546 Ealing Fire Station 60-64 Uxbridge Road West Ealing W13 8RA Fire station by Evan E. Morgan 1932-33 Art Deco D,E,F,H,J,L,M,N of pleasing symmetry of stone and concrete with crittal windows. Main entrance for fire engines has moulded columns, first floor windows are highlighted and ncorpora with fluted stonework bands and mullions

339 LLR1548 Cattle trough & Uxbridge Road Southall UB1 3HW Cattle trough & drinking fountain & bollards B, D, N drinking fountain & opposite 483 Uxbridge Road bollards opposite 483 Uxbridge Road

340 LLR1549 Drinking fountain Uxbridge Road Ealing W5 3NT Ealing Grey marble drinking fountain north side of Ealing B north side of Common Common opposite 20 North Common Road Ealing Common opposite 20 North Common Road

341 LLR1550 The Viaduct Inn Uxbridge Road Hanwell W7 3TD Churchfields The Viaduct Inn PH, Jolly tiled Edwardian pub built A,B, J,K,L,M,N PH on the site of an old coaching inn already locally listed. Decorative ncorp work.

342 LLR1551 Church of the Holy Vale Lane Acton W3 0DY Hanger Hill Modern church with landmark roof covered with B, F, L, M, N Family Garden Estate silver coloured cladding adjacent to Hanger Hill Country Club which is mock tudor in keeping with the rest of the estate it was built to serve.

343 LLR1567 Elizabeth Arden 140 Wales Farm Road Acton W3 6UG Elizabeth Arden Building, 1930 factory building B,E,H,J,L,M,N Building 344 LLR1571 61 Warwick Road Ealing W5 5QE Nos 61 -67 Terrace of 4 fine houses with intact E,F,G,H,J,LN front boundary walls of three storeys late 18th C with narrow footprint and high ceiling living room, and closely spaced upper windows with parapet concealing slight sloping roof.

345 LLR1572 63 Warwick Road Ealing W5 5QE Nos 61 -67 Terrace of 4 fine houses with intact E,F,G,H,J,LN front boundary walls of three storeys late 18th C with narrow footprint and high ceiling living room, and closely spaced upper windows with parapet concealing slighlt sloping roof.

346 LLR1573 65 Warwick Road Ealing W5 5QE Nos 61 -67 Terrace of 4 fine houses with intact E,F,G,H,J,LN front boundary walls of three storeys late 18th C with narrow footprint and high ceiling living room, and closely spaced upper windows with parapet concealing slighlt sloping roof.

347 LLR1574 67 Warwick Road Ealing W5 5QE Nos 61 -67 Terrace of 4 fine houses with intact E,F,G,H,J,LN front boundary walls of three storeys late 18th C with narrow footprint and high ceiling living room, and closely spaced upper windows with parapet concealing slighlt sloping roof.

348 LLR1575 69 Warwick Road Ealing W5 5QE Nos 69-83 Terrace of small brick cottages with E,F,G,H,J,LN pitched roof and outriggers built 1804-1806 with surprisingly ornate stucco embellishment to front door and windows possibly added later for the purposes of gentrification . Original front boundary walls are not intact

349 LLR1576 71 Warwick Road Ealing W5 5QE Nos 69-83 Terrace of small brick cottages with E,F,G,H,J,LN pitched roof and outriggers built 1804-1806 with surprisingly ornate stucco embellishment to front door and windows possibly added later for the purposes of gentrification . Original front boundary walls are not intact 350 LLR1577 73 Warwick Road Ealing W5 5QE Nos 69-83 Terrace of small brick cottages with E,F,G,H,J,LN pitched roof and outriggers built 1804-1806 with surprisingly ornate stucco embellishment to front door and windows possibly added later for the purposes of gentrification . Original front boundary walls are not intact

351 LLR1578 75 Warwick Road Ealing W5 5QE Nos 69-83 Terrace of small brick cottages with E,F,G,H,J,LN pitched roof and outriggers built 1804-1806 with surprisingly ornate stucco embellishment to front door and windows possibly added later for the purposes of gentrification . Original front boundary walls are not intact

352 LLR1624 77 Warwick Road Ealing W5 5QE Nos 69-83 Terrace of small brick cottages with E,F,G,H,J,LN pitched roof and outriggers built 1804-1806 with surprisingly ornate stucco embellishment to front door and windows possibly added later for the purposes of gentrification . Original front boundary walls are not intact

353 LLR1579 79 Warwick Road Ealing W5 5QE Nos 69-83 Terrace of small brick cottages with E,F,G,H,J,LN pitched roof and outriggers built 1804-1806 with surprisingly ornate stucco embellishment to front door and windows possibly added later for the purposes of gentrification . Original front boundary walls are not intact

354 LLR1580 81 Warwick Road Ealing W5 5QE Nos 69-83 Terrace of small brick cottages with E,F,G,H,J,LN pitched roof and outriggers built 1804-1806 with surprisingly ornate stucco embellishment to front door and windows possibly added later for the purposes of gentrification . Original front boundary walls are not intact

355 LLR1581 83 Warwick Road Ealing W5 5QE Nos 69-83 Terrace of small brick cottages with E,F,G,H,J,LN pitched roof and outriggers built 1804-1806 with surprisingly ornate stucco embellishment to front door and windows possibly added later for the purposes of gentrification . Original front boundary walls are not intact 356 LLR1582 67a Warwick Road Ealing W5 5QE rear of Nos 69 -7 1stable block to No 67 same E,F,G,H,J,LN period as terrace Nos 61 – 67

357 LLR1583 Bridge Hotel Western Avenue Greenford UB6 8ST Bridge Hotel (formerly addressed as Greenford A,B,D,E,J,K,L,M,N,P (formerly Road) c. late 1930s to 40’s mock Tudor in Arts and addressed as Crafts style with interesting Art Nouveau tiled Greenford Road) single storey extension with large decorative windows that wraps around the site in large part and signed wit

358 LLR1584 B&Q Superstore Western Avenue Greenford UB6 8UY B&Q Superstore (formerly ‘Aladdin Building’ Lamp D,E,F,G,H,J,L,M,N (formerly Aladdin and Shade Manufactory’) built 1920’s, frontage to Factory ? frontage Western Avenue only. Imposing Art Deco factory to Western building of brick and cast concrete with a central Avenue only) tower with a copper clad roof, Italianate influence, crittal windows

359 LLR1585 Hanger Lane Western Avenue Ealing W5 1DL Inspired by the Charles Holden stations, Hanger D,F,H,J,L,N Station Lane and many other Central Line stations were designed by Brian Lewis, an Australian architect, fair-faced brick and concrete, crittall windows and a large ncorporat-lit ticket hall, in plan the station mimics cubist and fan-shaped forms and dramatic undulating canopies. Surprisingly, not listed by EH in resent assessment which listed Perivale and West Acton. 360 LLR1586 Park Royal Hotel Western Avenue Ealing W5 3BQ Hanger Hill Like much of the modernist building stock in D,E,H,J,L,M,P (Haymills) Haymills this hotel built in the 1930’s was by Estate Cachemaille, Day and Lander but has a playful twist. Strong horizontal emphasis, deep roof slab/canopy overhang and 6 barley twist pilasters between crittal nobile windows, striped brick corbelling of tumbled bricks at plinth height

361 LLR1590 Holly Lodge Wimborne Southall UB2 4HB Norwood Formerly Bees Engineering Co, ‘Frogmore House’ D, F, T, N Montessori Avenue Green the site maintains the same complex of utilitarian School, but handsome brick/slate buildings within a long narrow plot adaj to The Alms Houses – part of the site dates from the 1880’s 362 LLR1591 Hibernia or Cherry Norwood Road Southall UB2 4JE Norwood Double-fronted, three- bay, pre-1870s, probably E,H Wood Green late Georgian, detached house with a low pitched roof and concealing parapet with cornice mouldings. It is of no statutory significance but nevertheless it is of local historical importance due to its age a

363 LLR1593 The Aviary & wall Windmill Lane Southall UB2 4NG The Aviary (no extant description of subject G,H,J,K,M,N to north-east building and very little known due to inaccessible fronting Windmill location) & wall to north-east fronting Windmill Lane Lane once part of an estate known as Woodlake so named because of the lake (still extant) and dense tree cove

364 LLR1602 Woodbury Court 2 Woodbury Park West Ealing W13 8DB c. 1880’s Victorian mansion once part of a more D,E,J,L Road extensive plan with outbuildings and stables around a quadrangle courtyard – now 9 flats with a poor side extension

365 LLR1603 Gates to Woodbury Park West Ealing W13 8DD Cast iron gates to Pitshanger Park K,L Pitshanger Park Road

366 LLR1617 The Fiddle Factory 71 a,b and c York Avenue Hanwell W7 3HY The Fiddle Factory (former violin works), built B,H,L,N (former violin c.1900. Attractive building, recently renovated. Red works) brick ground floor with stucco above. Red clay tiled mansard roof with leaded eyebrow dormers. Attractive stucco cornice with dentil mouldings, includin

367 LLR1618 St. Joseph’s RC York Avenue Hanwell W7 3HU Built 1907 stock brick district school with terracotta B, H, J, L, P Primary School detailing. Single storey – two storey. Unsympathetic upvc windows but do follow earlier pattern. Lead clad bell turret above main gable. 368 LLR1628 Post Office Station Road Hanwell W7 3LD On the corner of Station Road/ Laurel Gardens B,H,J, N,P Building Built 1900 – 1914. Large red brick municipal building obviously a sorting office. Just outside the conservation area.

369 LLR1636 37 The Broadway West Ealing W13 9DA Early 20th c three storey red brick and stucco A, E, F, H, J, L, N. trimmed shopping parade with curving bays divided by projecting brick piers and turrets to either end. Fenestration has been largely replaced with PVC-U and shop fronts are mainly highly inappropriate to

370 LLR1637 39-41 The Broadway West Ealing W13 9DA Early 20th c three storey red brick and stucco A, E, F, H, J, L, N. trimmed shopping parade with curving bays divided by projecting brick piers and turrets to either end. Fenestration has been largely replaced with PVC-U and shop fronts are mainly highly inappropriate

371 LLR0001 The Swan Public 119 Acton Lane Chiswick W4 5HH Probably late Victorian public house possibly B,H,J,N House occupying site of an earlier pub with later additions on a prominent corner site

372 LLR0011 54 Audley Road Ealing W5 3ET Hanger Hill A white rendered house built in the early stages of A,B,E,F,J,K,L (Haymills) the Haymill Estate in the 1920’s, quite different Estate from any other, detached, corner property with – uniquely on the estate – a crow-stepped gable. Hipped roof with clay roman tiles, crittal windows of varying sizes with shutters and a large centrally positioned arched stair light front door is in shallow recess with flat canopy and shallow steps. Low front boundary wall is probably original. Front garden is paved but planted with formal topiary and some tree and shrub cover 373 LLR0012 Entrance gate Avenue Crescent Acton Mill Hill Park Very important entrance to the Willets Estate B,F,G,H,N posts and walls, (William Willet 1837-1913) once gated dated 1870’s. Rendered and vermiculated banding on the pillars with a stone cornice and topped with ornamental urns in the form of a large flower basket. Only short length of wall 374 LLR0013 Entrance gates 1 TO 54 Avenue Gardens Acton Mill Hill Park Very important entrance to the Willets Estate B,F,G,H,N and walls adjacent (William Willet 1837-1913) once gated dated to 1870’s. Rendered and vermiculated banding on the pillars with a stone cornice and topped with ornamental urns in the form of a large flower basket. Only short length of wall

375 LLR0052 Remnants of old Avenue Road Acton Mill Hill Park Remnants of old estate walls on south side of estate walls on Avenue Road opposite nos.196-204 south side of Avenue Road opposite nos.196- 204

376 LLR0053 27 Beaufort Road Ealing W5 3EB Hanger Hill Hybrid of Type, neo-Georgian 1, 3 with Modern A,E,F,J,K,L (Haymills) movement 1, 2 9from CA Character Appraisal) of Estate pleasing proportion, corner property with hipped tiled roof, small balcony above projecting porch, crittal windows and corbelled brickwork to lower storey . Bo

377 LLR0269 4 Cherington Road Hanwell W7 3HJ Circa 1880s Victorian semi-detached house, part D,E,H,J,K,L,M of a group of 4 dwellings (Nos 4-10). Yellow stock facing brickwork with red brick string course at cornice level with stuccoed lower and upper ground floor bays, porch, arch headed first floor window surrounds and cornice with paired brackets. Slate roof with paired chimney stack in yellow stock. 378 LLR0270 6 Cherington Road Hanwell W7 3HJ Circa 1880s Victorian semi-detached house, part D,E,H,J,K,L,M of a group of 4 dwellings (Nos 4-10). Yellow stock facing brickwork with red brick string course at cornice level with stuccoed lower and upper ground floor bays, porch, arch headed first floor window surrounds and cornice with paired brackets. Slate roof with paired chimney stack in yellow stock. 379 LLR0271 8 Cherington Road Hanwell W7 3HJ Circa 1880s Victorian semi-detached house, part D,E,H,J,K,L,M of a group of 4 dwellings (Nos 4-10). Yellow stock facing brickwork with red brick string course at cornice level with stuccoed lower and upper ground floor bays, porch, arch headed first floor window surrounds and cornice with paired brackets. Slate roof with paired chimney stack in yellow stock. 380 LLR0272 10 Cherington Road Hanwell W7 3HJ Circa 1880s Victorian semi-detached house, part D,E,H,J,K,L,M of a group of 4 dwellings (Nos 4-10). Yellow stock facing brickwork with red brick string course at cornice level with stuccoed lower and upper ground floor bays, porch, arch headed first floor window surrounds and cornice with paired brackets. Slate roof with paired chimney stack in yellow stock. 381 LLR0397 2 Elers Road West Ealing W13 9QD Three storey purpose –built block 1898 Arts and A,B,D,E,H,L Crafts influence of red brick and pebble-dashed canted bay windows with modern replacement casements, high Dutch Gable with large clock to principal elevation and pilastered recessed porch entrance.

382 LLR0398 15 Elers Road West Ealing W13 9QB Nos 15-17 semi-detached house in warm red DEFGH Edwardian period, assymetrical configuration of canted bay projections. Central Dutch gable surmounting double porch with stucco pilasters and two window sequence above porch. Boundary treatment is intact

383 LLR0399 17 Elers Road West Ealing W13 9QB Nos 15-17 semi-detached house in warm red DEFGH Edwardian period, assymetrical configuration of canted bay projections. Central Dutch gable surmounting double porch with stucco pilasters and two window sequence above porch. Boundary treatment is intact

384 LLR0400 102 Elers Road West Ealing W13 9QE St Pauls Vicarage early 20C, detached, double- B.D,H,J,L,K fronted, neo-georgian of yellow stock brick with doric stucco column beneath entablatured, lead roofed porch, dentilled cornice below latterly artificially slated hipped roof, one circular and one lozenge light

385 LLR0465 Haven Arms PH 33 Haven Lane Ealing W5 2HZ Haven Green Arts and Crafts pub early 20th C with vertical tile- B,E,H,J,K,N,P hung frontage to gable. The inaugural meeting of the Brentham Tenants Co-operative was held here. 386 LLR0466 The Wheatsheaf 41 Haven Lane Ealing W5 2HZ Haven Green Turn of the century pub, neo-Georgian stylistic B,E,H,J,K,N,P PH influence in yellow and red brick with a parapet concealing the roof, two pedimented entrance doors and lustre tiling to plinth

387 LLR0467 Entrance gate 2 TO 52 Heathfield Road Acton Mill Hill Park Interesting and rare survival that adds greatly to post and wall context and character of CA

388 LLR0489 The Aeronaut 264 High Street Acton W3 9BH Acton Town An attractive Victorian P.H. with original off-licence (formerly The Centre still attached. Important feature building.within the Redback Public conservation area. House)the red

389 LLR0619 NP 6 Marlborough Ealing W5 5NY Fine double fronted 5 bay detached townhouse of B,D,G,K Road two storeys with unusual fretwork detailing to the recessed porch and to garage fanlights – mid Victorian

390 LLR0620 NP 12 Marlborough Ealing W5 5NY Detached, single-fronted villa c. 1880’s with B,D,L,M Road classical detailing including rendered ashlar effect on lower storey with balustrading around balcony above bay window

391 Parkers Bakery 64 Northfield Avenue Ealing W13 9RR 1930s shopfront with chrome trim and lettering and original shop layout 392 LLR0934 Darch and Duff 90 90 Northfield Avenue West Ealing W13 9RT Darch and Duff. C 1904 shop on corner of Graham D,E,F,H Avenue with green lustre tiled cladding to piers, sympathetic shopfrontage and ornate corner gable with high relief portrait above the doorway. It was once Pocock’s Dairy

393 LLR0956 St. Mary’s Church 62 Norwood Green Southall UB2 4LA Norwood Built by Warren and Woods in 1925 the A, D, E, H, K Hall Green frontispiece is in art deco style with a highly distinctive roof of polychromatic glazed pantiles. The hall is behind

394 LLR0995 Black Horse PH 425 Oldfield Lane Greenford UB6 0AS A newer pub building of mock Tudor style D,H,J,L,N North occupies the site than the originally named public house which is at the canal side and is still extant, at least in footprint associated with the original building. The public house would have been a stop-off

395 LLR1113 9 Rathgar Avenue West Ealing W13 9PL Group of three (extant) detached elegant neo- georgian townhouses in in red with blue brick edging and stringcourse, intact or replicated multi- paned sash windows and front doors with porch canopies. Roofs are highly compromised with inappropriate roof

396 LLR1114 11 Rathgar Avenue West Ealing W13 9PL Group of three (extant) detached elegant neo- georgian townhouses in in red with blue brick edging and stringcourse, intact or replicated multi- paned sash windows and front doors with porch canopies. Roofs are highly compromised with inappropriate roof

397 LLR1115 13 Rathgar Avenue West Ealing W13 9PL Group of three (extant) detached elegant neo- georgian townhouses in in red with blue brick edging and stringcourse, intact or replicated multi- paned sash windows and front doors with porch canopies. Roofs are highly compromised with inappropriate roof 398 LLR1122 St Pauls Church Ridley Ave West Ealing W13 9XW Parish church, built around the turn of the century A,B,F,G,H,L (1900). A modern interpretation of the Gothic style. Yellow brick built with stone window surrounds and embelishments, slate roof with central leaded bell tower

399 LLR1194 New Inn PH 62 St Marys Rd Ealing W5 5EX Ealing Green An Edwardian public house with character and B, D, F, H J, L retaining many original features, it was originally a coaching inn and probably occupies the site of an 18th Century Inn

400 LLR1634 Acton Winchester Street Acton W3 8PB Acton Town Magistrates Court is recently converted to A,B,D,F,H,J,L,N,P Magistrate Centre residential. Handsome and ornate low level red Court brick and sand stone building in Baroque style shown on two principal elevations along 4 grand facades. Features include brick quoining, stone architraves, cornices

401 LLR1506 1 The Park Ealing W5 5NE Ealing Green Handsome early to mid-19th C double-fronted two D,E,F,G,L storey corner house with simple detailing built with unadorned brick, stucco bay windows and pointed hipped originally slate roof and intact boundary wall with hedge. The house has been compromised with a t

402 LLR1525 Noel House The Park Ealing W5 5NJ Ealing Green Large three storey double-fronted villa c. early to D,E,F,H,J mid-19th C now flats Byron House and Noel House adjoined – brick with ogee moulded stucco surrounds to windows and slightly projecting porch entrance and three steps to front door

403 LLR1526 Byron House The Park Ealing W5 5NF Ealing Green Large three storey double-fronted villa c. early to D,E,F,H,J mid-19th C now flats Byron House and Noel House adjoined – brick with ogee moulded stucco surrounds to windows and slightly projecting porch entrance and three steps to front door 404 LLR1541 Church of Our 52 Uxbridge Road Hanwell W7 3SU Interesting post-war pupose built church, built in B,C,F,H,J,L Lady and 1967. Brick and concrete structure with stained St.Joseph glass. Stone relief sculpted panel un striking hooded projecting gable. Metal seam roof ncorpor with striking contemporary pointed gable dormer windows. Br

405 LLR1542 Kings Arms 110 Uxbridge Road Hanwell W7 3SU Build of former public house, 1930. Brick B,H,J,L,N construction with glazed tiles at ground floor and render at first. Gables with half timbering and half gabled dormer windows. Original timber windows with leaded lights. Frontage ncorporates a separate shopfron

406 LLR1544 149 Uxbridge Road Hanwell W7 3ST Part of shopping parade, built c.1900. Interesting A,B,F,H,J,L,N corner building. Shopfront with stone pilasters and consoles at ground floor and red brick and stucco banding at first and second floors. Gentle undulation formed by shallow bay windows and piers on fir

407 LLR1547 Chapel, arch and Uxbridge Road Hanwell W7 3PP Hanwell Kentish ragstone with gothic stone windows. Dual B, F, G, J, K, L, N, P offices in City of Cemeteries chapels set each side of a large central stone arch. Westminster Grand and attractive example of Victorian cemetery cemetery architecture. Should be considered for statutory listing.

408 LLR1589 Little Ealing Weymouth Ealing W5 4EA Early 20th century school building. Central part B,F,H,L School Avenue glazed roof form with feature turrets at either end. Perpendicular roof forms, which produce a rhythm of valleys and striking gable ends on the building frontage. Yellow stock brick with red clay roof til

409 LLR1619 2 Lamp posts in Hanwell St Mark’s Lamp posts D, F, H, J, K, L, N Green Lane and Church & unaltered houses Canal on east side of Green Lane may need further investigation 410 LLR1629 1-14 Wilton Alexandria Road West Ealing W13 0NP Warehouse, c.1900. Four storeys, rendered with B,F,H,L,N House brick stringcourses, window headers and corbelling at eaves level. Hipped slate roof with some gables

411 LLR1630 126-122 The Broadway West Ealing W13 0SY Chignell Terrace. Shopping parade, built c.1880s. B,E,F,H,L Shopfronts complete with stucco pilasters and consoles, with red brick and stucco at first and second floors. Chamfered corner building with fuirst floor stucco inscribed panel denoting the the former Chi

412 LLR1631 116-120 The Broadway West Ealing W13 0SY Chignell Terrace. Shopping parade, built c.1880s. B,E,F,H,L Shopfronts complete with stucco pilasters and consoles, with red brick and stucco at first and second floors. Chamfered corner building with fuirst floor stucco inscribed panel denoting the the former Chi

413 LLR1633 1 Hillcrest Road Ealing W5 2JL Ealing Cricket (‘Alvechurch’): an arts and craft mock-Tudor house D,E,H,J,K,L Ground probably dating from beginning of the 20th century with fine half timber detailing, prominent central chimney and retaining many of its original leaded light windows set in iron frames. Separate ‘coach

414 LLR0135 19 Broadway Greenford UB6 9PN Late Modernist shop, concrete frame structure, two D,E,H,J upper floors built on one plane with glass, steel and coloured spandrels of 6 equal vertical divisions. Shop front has interesting curved ceiling to floor glazed shop window and recessed shop entrance. U

415 LLR1093 24 Ranelagh Road Ealing W5 5RJ Historical association with old Ealing School. Nos B,D,E,F,G,H,N,L 24 and 26 are semi-detached and are well restored three storey houses of narrow proportion with pitched roofs and with stucco quoining to sides and window surrounds. The frontages are of fair-faced red

416 LLR1092 26 Ranelagh Road Ealing W5 5RJ Historical association with old Ealing School. Nos B,D,E,F,G,H,N,L 24 and 26 are semi-detached and are well restored three storey houses of narrow proportion with pitched roofs and with stucco quoining to sides and window surrounds. The frontages are of fair-faced red

417 LLR1100 38 Ranelagh Road Ealing W5 5RJ Early Victorian three storey semi-detached house E,F,H,J,L with a piano-nobile with steps to entrance, moderately elaborate stucco embellishment to window and front

418 LLR1101 40 Ranelagh Road Ealing W5 5RJ Early Victorian three storey semi-detached house E,F,H,J,L with a piano-nobile with steps to entrance, moderately elaborate stucco embellishment to window and front

419 LLR1102 42 Ranelagh Road Ealing W5 5RJ Early Victorian three storey semi-detached house E,F,H,J,L with a piano-nobile with steps to entrance, moderately elaborate stucco embellishment to window and front

420 Electricity Pillar Ashbourne Rd Hanger Hill Historic street furniture B,J,K,N

421 Uxbridge Rd Rail 2-4 Windmill Lane Southall UB2 4NJ 1837, redesigned by IKBrunel in 1847-48 using B,G,K,L, M,P Bridge wrought iron girders. A complex structure arranged Adj Ironbridge in three spans over the main road and footways, House with brick abutment walls and intermediate lines of columns to either side of the road. It bridged the space between the columns using heavy cast iron longitudinal girders. 422 VR Pillar box 33-35 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LS Original Victorian pillar box dating from B,J,K,L,N 1880/1890s and VR cypher, made by Andrew Handyside and Co Ltd Derby and London.

423 Kings Centre King Street Southall UB2 4DA Corner of King Street and Western Road in B, F, G, J, L, N, P (formerly Old St Southall Green. Built in 1838, it is a rare survival John’s Church, among very few early buildings in Southall – Southall) e.g.Southall Manor c1560 & Grove House c1750. It is the oldest place of worship. No longer used as a church but still consecrated. Set within a small churchyard and although much altered, recognisable as a Georgian country church.

424 Formerly The 1a Haven Green Ealing W5 2UU Built in 1877 and originally home of Reading & E,H,J,L,N,P Haven Sons job masters who hired out horses and carts. It was later converted into a public house – The Haven. Now offices

425 20-24 Haven Green Ealing W5 2UP Nos 20 -23 (not No 24) is The Haven Clinic E,F,H,J,N formerly known as The Haven, a group of two storey, white-rendered semi-detached mid- Victorian cottages possibly Regency cottages, Nos 23/24 are semi-detached. 22 have a hipped roof and multi-paned sash windows. No 23 has a bay window

426 The Rose & 1 Church Place Ealing W5 4HN Attractive late Edwardian Public House with B,E,F,J,K,N,P Crown extensive fiance work to exterior and good survival of wood and tile within.

427 The Inn on the 13-15 Lower Boston Ealing W7 3TX Attractive late Arts and Craft style Public House B,E,F,J,K,N,P Green (formerly Road with decorative brickwork and fretwork. Adjacent The Dolphin) to

APPENDIX 3 LIST OF BUILDINGS OF FAÇADE OR GROUP VALUE 2014 No REFNO Name No Street Town Postcode CA BRIEF_DESCRIPTION_AND_INFO_PT1 CRITERIA 1 LLR1494 37 The Mall Ealing W5 3TJ Ealing Common Nos 32- 39, four storey terraced town house c 1880s with lower E,F,G,H,J,K,L,M and upper ground floor and double height bay window from LG to UG with steps to front door and stucco surround to windows and ground floor storey. Some original stucco boundary treatments remain 2 LLR0137 27 Broadway Ealing W5 2NP Ealing Town Centre nos 27/29 shops (and 26/28) are of no significance, principal E,H,J,K,L,M,N building (set back by depth of shop) is a Georgian terrace of three storeys, plain and rather severe with sparse classical detailing in the shape of a projecting, ogee moulded cornice 3 LLR0138 29 Broadway Ealing W5 2NP Ealing Town Centre nos 27/29 shops (and 26/28) are of no significance, principal E,H,J,K,L,M,N building (set back by depth of shop) is a Georgian terrace of three storeys, plain and rather severe with sparse classical detailing in the shape of a projecting, ogee moulded cornice 4 LLR0558 6 Lyncroft Gardens West W13 9PU Nos 2/4 , 6/8, 10/12, 14/16, 18/, Edwardian 3 bay semi-detached Ealing house with rubbed brick dressings, moulded rubbed brick gable and projecting canted double height bay window surmounted by finial-topped faceted turret and ground floor original timber sash windows. 5 LLR0560 8 Lyncroft Gardens West W13 9PU Nos 2/4 , 6/8, 10/12, 14/16, 18/, Edwardian 3 bay semi-detached Ealing house with rubbed brick dressings, moulded rubbed brick gable and projecting canted double height bay window surmounted by finial-topped faceted turret and ground floor original timber sash windows 6 LLR0562 10 Lyncroft Gardens West W13 9PU Nos 2/4 , 6/8, 10/12, 14/16, 18/,Edwardian 3 bay semi-detached Ealing house with rubbed brick dressings, moulded rubbed brick gable and projecting canted double height bay window surmounted by finial-topped faceted turret and ground floor original timber sash windows 7 LLR0564 12 Lyncroft Gardens West W13 9PU Nos 2/4 , 6/8, 10/12, 14/16, 18/,Edwardian 3 bay semi-detached Ealing house with rubbed brick dressings, moulded rubbed brick gable and projecting canted double height bay window surmounted by finial-topped faceted turret and ground floor original timber sash windows 8 LLR0566 14 Lyncroft Gardens West W13 9PU Nos 2/4 , 6/8, 10/12, 14/16, 18/, Edwardian 3 bay semi-detached Ealing house with rubbed brick dressings, moulded rubbed brick gable and projecting canted double height bay window surmounted by finial-topped faceted turret and ground floor original timber sash windows 9 LLR0568 16 Lyncroft Gardens West W13 9PU Nos 2/4 , 6/8, 10/12, 14/16, 18/, Edwardian 3 bay semi-detached Ealing house with rubbed brick dressings, moulded rubbed brick gable and projecting canted double height bay window surmounted by finial-topped faceted turret and ground floor original timber sash windows 10 LLR1490 35 The Mall Ealing W5 3TJ Ealing Common Nos 32- 39, four storey terraced town house c 1880s with lower E,F,G,H,J,K,L,M and upper ground floor and double height bay window from LG to UG with steps to front door and stucco surround to windows and ground floor storey. Some original stucco boundary treatments remain 11 LLR1492 36 The Mall Ealing W5 3TJ Ealing Common Nos 32- 39, four storey terraced town house c 1880s with lower E,F,G,H,J,K,L,M and upper ground floor and double height bay window from LG to UG with steps to front door and stucco surround to windows and ground floor storey. Some original stucco boundary treatments remain 12 LLR0936 The Owl and 106 Northfield Avenue West W13 9RT Part of Edwardian two storey shopping parade with half-timbered Pussycat Ealing gable end 13 LLR0937 114 Northfield Avenue West W13 9RT Built 1907 shopping parade with ornate rubbed brick feature A.D,E,F,H,K,L Ealing gable and related dressings above part-satined glass bay window or large very semi-circular window openings taking up the entire area of the upper storey with a medallion and dentilled ogee moul 14 LLR0939 116 Northfield Avenue West W13 9RT Built 1907 shopping parade with ornate rubbed brick feature D,E,F,H,K,L Ealing gable above part-satined glass bay window with a blank medallion and dentilled ogee moulded cornicing. The shop frontage and the roof has been detrimentally modified and the upper parts of the b 15 LLR0941 118 Northfield Avenue West W13 9RT Built 1907 shopping parade with ornate rubbed brick feature D,E,F,H,K,L Ealing gable and related dressings above part-satined glass bay window or large very semi-circular window openings taking up the entire area of the upper storey with a medallion and dentilled ogee moul 16 LLR0943 120 Northfield Avenue West W13 9RT Built 1907 shopping parade with ornate rubbed brick feature D,E,F,H,K,L Ealing gable and related dressings above part-satined glass bay window or large very semi-circular window openings taking up the entire area of the upper storey with a medallion and dentilled ogee mouldings. 17 LLR0945 122 Northfield Avenue West W13 9RT Built 1907 shopping parade with ornate rubbed brick feature D,E,F,H,K,L Ealing gable and related dressings above part-satined glass bay window or large very semi-circular window openings taking up the entire area of the upper storey with a medallion and dentilled ogee mouldings. 18 LLR0947 124 Northfield Avenue West W13 9RT Built 1907 shopping parade with ornate rubbed brick feature D,E,F,H,K,L Ealing gable and related dressings above part-satined glass bay window or large very semi-circular window openings taking up the entire area of the upper storey with a medallion and dentilled ogee mouldings. 19 LLR0949 126 Northfield Avenue West W13 9RT Built 1907 shopping parade with ornate rubbed brick feature D,E,F,H,K,L Ealing gable and related dressings above part-satined glass bay window or large very semi-circular window openings taking up the entire area of the upper storey with a medallion and dentilled ogee mouldings. 20 LLR0951 128 Northfield Avenue West W13 9RU Built 1907 shopping parade with ornate rubbed brick feature D,E,F,H,K,L Ealing gable and related dressings above part-satined glass bay window or large very semi-circular window openings taking up the entire area of the upper storey with a medallion and dentilled ogee mouldings. 21 LLR0952 138 Northfield Avenue West W13 9SB Edwardian built - parade of three shops to No 12 with upper floor. D,E,F,H,K,L Ealing No 138 is a corner property with half-timbered gable, red brick façade to Avenue and stock brick to flank elevation to side street. Upper floor to 138 only is in very good condition 22 LLR0953 151 Northfield Avenue West W13 9QT Attractive shopfront with set-back door and green tiles Ealing 23 LLR1552 2 Waldemar Avenue West W13 9PY Nos 2 - 16 (evens) Edwardian semi-detached houses (also D,E,F,H Ealing 14/16), red brick and slate roofs, with projecting vertical-hung gable end and square bay with bracketted jetty to upper bay window, shared porch to two properties with tiled lean-to roof and fretwork 24 LLR1554 4 Waldemar Avenue West W13 9PY Nos 2 - 16 (evens) Edwardian semi-detached houses (also D,E,F,H Ealing 14/16), red brick and slate roofs, with projecting vertical-hung gable end and square bay with bracketted jetty to upper bay window, shared porch to two properties with tiled lean-to roof and fretwork 25 LLR1556 6 Waldemar Avenue West W13 9PY Nos 2 - 16 (evens) Edwardian semi-detached houses (also D,E,F,H Ealing 14/16), red brick and slate roofs, with projecting vertical-hung gable end and square bay with bracketted jetty to upper bay window, shared porch to two properties with tiled lean-to roof and fretwork 26 LLR1558 8 Waldemar Avenue West W13 9PY Nos 2 - 16 (evens) Edwardian semi-detached houses (also D,E,F,H Ealing 14/16), red brick and slate roofs, with projecting vertical-hung gable end and square bay with bracketted jetty to upper bay window, shared porch to two properties with tiled lean-to roof and fretwork 27 LLR1560 10 Waldemar Avenue West W13 9PY Nos 2 - 16 (evens) Edwardian semi-detached houses (also D,E,F,H Ealing 14/16), red brick and slate roofs, with projecting vertical-hung gable end and square bay with bracketted jetty to upper bay window, shared porch to two properties with tiled lean-to roof and fretwork 28 LLR1562 12 Waldemar Avenue West W13 9PY Nos 2 - 16 (evens) Edwardian semi-detached houses (also D,E,F,H Ealing 14/16), red brick and slate roofs, with projecting vertical-hung gable end and square bay with bracketted jetty to upper bay window, shared porch to two properties with tiled lean-to roof and fretwork 29 LLR1564 14 Waldemar Avenue West W13 9PY Nos 2 - 16 (evens) Edwardian semi-detached houses (also D,E,F,H Ealing 14/16), red brick and slate roofs, with projecting vertical-hung gable end and square bay with bracketted jetty to upper bay window, shared porch to two properties with tiled lean-to roof and fretwork 30 LLR1566 16 Waldemar Avenue West W13 9PY Nos 2 - 16 (evens) Edwardian semi-detached houses (also D,E,F,H Ealing 14/16), red brick and slate roofs, with projecting vertical-hung gable end and square bay with bracketted jetty to upper bay window, shared porch to two properties with tiled lean-to roof and fretwork 31 LLR0068 1 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AP Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street, D, E, F, H, J, L, N. with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows. Nos 1,3,5 shopfront (currently fast food outlet) detrimental to this part of the CA. 32 LLR0070 2 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AA Ealing Green Parade of 6 Edwardian shops ( west side) built at the same time D, E, F, H, J, L, N as the street with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 33 LLR0072 3 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AP Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows. (Nos 1,3,5 shopfront currently fast food outlet detrimental to this part of the CA. 34 LLR0074 4 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AA Ealing Green Parade of 6 Edwardian shops ( west side) built at the same time D, E, F, H, J, L, N as the street with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 35 LLR0076 5 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AP Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N. with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows. Nos 1,3,5 shopfront (currently fast food outlet) in poor taste and detrimental to this pa 36 LLR0078 6 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AA Ealing Green Parade of 6 Edwardian shops ( west side) built at the same time D, E, F, H, J, L, N. as the street with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 37 LLR0080 7 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AP Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N. with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 38 LLR0082 8 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AA Ealing Green Parade of 6 Edwardian shops ( west side) built at the same time D, E, F, H, J, L, N. as the street with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 39 LLR0084 9 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AP Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N. with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 40 LLR0086 10 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AA Ealing Green Parade of 6 Edwardian shops ( west side) built at the same time D, E, F, H, J, L, N. as the street with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 41 LLR0088 11 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AP Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N. with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 42 LLR0090 12 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AA Ealing Green Parade of 6 Edwardian shops ( west side) built at the same time D, E, F, H, J, L, N. as the street with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 43 LLR0093 13 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AP Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street E,H,K,L with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 44 LLR0096 15 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AP Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 45 LLR0100 17 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AP Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 46 LLR0102 19 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AP Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 47 LLR0104 21 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AP Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 48 LLR0106 23 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 49 LLR0108 25 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 50 LLR0110 27 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 51 LLR0112 29 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 52 LLR0114 31 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 53 LLR0116 33 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 54 LLR0118 35 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 55 LLR0120 37 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 56 LLR0122 39 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 57 LLR0124 41 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 58 LLR0126 43 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 59 LLR0130 45 Bond Street Ealing W5 5AS Ealing Green Parade of Edwardian shops built at the same time as the street D, E, F, H, J, L, N with two storeys in red brick and banded brick/render window mullions and attic space/dormer windows 60 LLR0141 35 Broadway Ealing W5 2NP Ealing Town Centre Elegant three storey bright orange brick building with shop (now A,D,E,F,H,J,K,N Carphone Warehouse) with mansarded attic rooms and ornate supported corner gable with highly dressed central window, raised rubbed red brick and stone dressings, narrow chimneys 61 LLR0431 1 Haven Green Ealing W5 2UU Haven Green Detached, compact Victorian house c1880's, unusually E,F,H,J,K,L,N articulated projecting bays, corbelling to eaves, stucco and corbelled brickwork, steps leading to the front door and a stucco porch with half columns supported by a low wall, canted bay windows 62 LLR0446 31 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green terrace of shops - 1880s- no. 36 already on the statutory list E,F,H,G,L 63 LLR0447 32 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green terrace of shops - 1880s- no. 36 already on the statutory list E,F,H,G,L 64 LLR0448 33 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green terrace of shops - 1880s- no. 36 already on the statutory list E,F,H,G,L 65 LLR0449 34 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green terrace of shops - 1880s- no. 36 already on the statutory list E,F,H,G,L 66 LLR0450 35 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green terrace of shops - 1880s- no. 36 already on the statutory list E,F,H,G,L 67 LLR0451 37 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green terrace of shops - 1880s- no. 36 already on the statutory list E,F,H,G,L 68 LLR0452 38 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green terrace of shops - 1880s- no. 36 already on the statutory list E,F,H,G,L 69 LLR0453 39 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green terrace of shops - 1880s- no. 36 already on the statutory list E,F,H,G,L 70 LLR0454 40 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green terrace of shops - 1880s- no. 36 already on the statutory list E,F,H,G,L 71 LLR0608 1 Market Place Acton W3 6QS Acton Town Centre Victorian three storey part of shop parade - neo-classical stucco E,H,J,N embellishment to windows. Shop front is detrimental 72 LLR0609 2 Market Place Acton W3 6QS Acton Town Centre Victorian three storey part of shop parade - neo-classical stucco E,H,J,N embellishment to windows. Shop front is detrimental 73 LLR0610 3 Market Place Acton W3 6QS Acton Town Centre Victorian three storey part of shop parade - neo-classical stucco E,H,J,N embellishment to windows. Shop front is detrimental 74 LLR0611 4 Market Place Acton W3 6QS Acton Town Centre Victorian three storey part of shop parade - neo-classical stucco E,H,J,N embellishment to windows. Shop front is detrimental 75 LLR0612 5 Market Place Acton W3 6QS Acton Town Centre Victorian three storey part of shop parade - neo-classical stucco E,H,J,N embellishment to windows. Shop front is detrimental 76 LLR0613 6 Market Place Acton W3 6QS Acton Town Centre Victorian three storey part of shop parade - neo-classical stucco E,H,J,N embellishment to windows. Shop front is detrimental 77 LLR0614 7 Market Place Acton W3 6QS Acton Town Centre Victorian three storey part of shop parade - neo-classical stucco E,H,J,N embellishment to windows. Shop front is detrimental 78 LLR0615 8 Market Place Acton W3 6QS Acton Town Centre Victorian three storey part of shop parade - neo-classical stucco E,H,J,N embellishment to windows. Shop front is detrimental 79 LLR0616 9 Market Place Acton W3 6AH Acton Town Centre Victorian three storey part of shop parade - neo-classical stucco E,H,J,N embellishment to windows. Shop front is detrimental 80 LLR0624 2 Mattock Lane Ealing W5 5BG Ealing Green Mattock Lane was built during the 1860's on part of the Ashton E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M House Estate. Nos 2-17 are large villas of different groupings of stock brick with stucco dressing some having shallow gables with decorative brackets 81 LLR0625 3 Mattock Lane Ealing W5 5BG Ealing Green Mattock Lane was built during the 1860's on part of the Ashton E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M House Estate. Nos 2-17 are large villas of different groupings of stock brick with stucco dressing some having shallow gables with decorative brackets 82 LLR0627 4 Mattock Lane Ealing W5 5BG Ealing Green Mattock Lane was built during the 1860's on part of the Ashton E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M House Estate. Nos 2-17 are large villas of different groupings of stock brick with stucco dressing some having shallow gables with decorative brackets 83 LLR0628 5 Mattock Lane Ealing W5 5BG Ealing Green Mattock Lane was built during the 1860's on part of the Ashton E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M House Estate. Nos 2-17 are large villas of different groupings of stock brick with stucco dressing some having shallow gables with decorative brackets 84 LLR0630 6 Mattock Lane Ealing W5 5BG Ealing Green Mattock Lane was built during the 1860's on part of the Ashton E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M House Estate. Nos 2-17 are large villas of different groupings of stock brick with stucco dressing some having shallow gables with decorative brackets 85 LLR0631 7 Mattock Lane Ealing W5 5BG Ealing Green Mattock Lane was built during the 1860's on part of the Ashton E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M House Estate. Nos 2-17 are large villas of different groupings of stock brick with stucco dressing some having shallow gables with decorative brackets 86 LLR0633 8 Mattock Lane Ealing W5 5BG Ealing Green Mattock Lane was built during the 1860's on part of the Ashton E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M House Estate. Nos 2-17 are large villas of different groupings of stock brick with stucco dressing some having shallow gables with decorative brackets 87 LLR0634 9 Mattock Lane Ealing W5 5BG Ealing Green Mattock Lane was built during the 1860's on part of the Ashton E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M House Estate. Nos 2-17 are large villas of different groupings of stock brick with stucco dressing some having shallow gables with decorative brackets 88 LLR0636 10 Mattock Lane Ealing W5 5BG Ealing Green Mattock Lane was built during the 1860's on part of the Ashton E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M House Estate. Nos 2-17 are large villas of different groupings of stock brick with stucco dressing some having shallow gables with decorative brackets 89 LLR0806 19 New Broadway Ealing W5 5AW Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 15-31. Three storeys, architecturally D, E, F, H J, L, N. No 17 has a well articulated frontage of red brick with decorated stone dressing , triple windows subdivided by thick mullions up to second floor, projecting cornice at eaves level with dentile moundings 90 LLR0808 20 New Broadway Ealing W5 2XA Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade,Nos 14 - 36 Three storeys with attic D, E, F, H J, L, N. space, strongly articulated frontage of red brick with white painted stone dressing with dutch gable end with integral arched window , triple windows with decoracted upper sash 91 LLR0810 21 New Broadway Ealing W5 5AW Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 15-31. Four storeys, architecturally D, E, F, H J, L, N. No 21 has a well articulated frontage of red brick with stone dressing , triple windows subdivided by thick mullions up to secondfloor, projecting cornice at eaves level l 92 LLR0812 22 New Broadway Ealing W5 2XA Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 14 - 36. Three storeys with attic D, E, F, H J, L, N. space, strongly articulated frontage of red brick with stone dressing with dutch gable end with integral arched window , triple windows with decoracted upper sash 93 LLR0814 23 New Broadway Ealing W5 5AW Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 15-31. Four storeys. Architecturally D, E, F, H J, L, N. No 23 has a well articulated frontage of red brick with decorative stone dressing , triple windows set outer with casements set at angle, subdivided by thick mullions up to third floor 94 LLR0816 24 New Broadway Ealing W5 2XA Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 14-36. Four storeys. Architecturally D, E, F, H J, L, N. No 24 (and 14) has a well articulated frontage of red brick with severe stone dressing and interal window to dutch gable , triple windows subdivided by thick mullions up to third floor 95 LLR0818 25 New Broadway Ealing W5 5AW Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 15-31. Three storeys, architecturally D, E, F, H J, L, N. No 17 has a well articulated frontage of red brick with severe stone dressing , triple windows subdivided by thick mullions up to secondfloor, projecting cornice at eaves level with dormer windows 96 LLR0820 26 New Broadway Ealing W5 2XA Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 14-36. Four storeys. Architecturally D, E, F, H J, L, N. No 24 has a well articulated frontage of red brick with severe stone dressing and interal window to dutch gable , triple windows subdivided by thick mullions up to third floor 97 LLR0822 27 New Broadway Ealing W5 5AW Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 15-31. Three storeys, architecturally D, E, F, H J, L, N. No 27 has a well articulated frontage of red brick with decorated stone dressing , triple windows subdivided by thick mullions up to secondfloor, projecting cornice at eaves level 98 LLR0824 28 New Broadway Ealing W5 2XA Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 14-36. Four storeys. Architecturally D, E, F, H J, L, N. No 24 has a well articulated frontage of red brick with severe stone dressing and integral window to dutch gable , triple windows subdivided by thick mullions up to third floor and a project 99 LLR0826 29 New Broadway Ealing W5 5AW Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 15-31. Three storeys, architecturally D, E, F, H J, L, N. No 27 has a well articulated frontage of red brick with decorated stone dressing , triple windows subdivided by thick mullions up to secondfloor, projecting cornice at eaves level 100 LLR0828 30 New Broadway Ealing W5 2XA Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 14-36. Three storeys with attic D, E, F, H J, L, N. space, strongly articulated frontage of red brick with stone dressing with dutch gable end with integral arched window , triple windows with upper sash decorated by subdivided by thick mullions 101 LLR0830 31 New Broadway Ealing W5 5AW Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 15-31. Four storeys, , architecturally D, E, F, H J, L, N. No 31 (and 15) has a well articulated frontage of red brick with severe stone dressing with triangular pedimented gable end , triple windows subdivided by thick mullions up to third floor 102 LLR0832 32 New Broadway Ealing W5 2XA Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 14-36. Four storeys. Architecturally D, E, F, H J, L, N. No 24 has a well articulated frontage of red brick with severe stone dressing and integral window to dutch gable , triple windows subdivided by thick mullions up to third floor 103 LLR0834 34 New Broadway Ealing W5 2XA Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 14-36. Four storeys. Architecturally D, E, F, H J, L, N. No 24 has a well articulated frontage of red brick with severe stone dressing and integral window to dutch gable , triple windows subdivided by thick mullions up to third floor 104 LLR0836 36 New Broadway Ealing W5 2XA Ealing Town Centre 1905 shopping parade, Nos 14-36. Four storeys. Architecturally D, E, F, H J, L, N. No 24 has a well articulated frontage of red brick with severe stone dressing and integral window to dutch gable , triple windows subdivided by thick mullions up to third floor and a project 105 LLR1282 50 Broadway West W13 0SU Early 20th c shopping parade (Nos 48-62). Red facing brick with B,E,F,H,J,L,N Ealing first and second floor painted modern concrete stucco banding and window surrounds, including decorative mouldings and cornice at second floor level, with dutch gable 106 LLR1283 52 Broadway West W13 0SU Early 20th c shopping parade (Nos 48-62). Red facing brick with B,E,F,H,J,L,N Ealing first and second floor painted modern concrete stucco banding and window surrounds, including decorative mouldings and cornice at second floor level, with dutch gable 107 LLR1284 54 Broadway West W13 0SU Early 20th c shopping parade (Nos 48-62). Red facing brick with B,E,F,H,J,L,N Ealing first and second floor painted modern concrete stucco banding and window surrounds, including decorative mouldings and cornice at second floor level, with dutch gable 108 LLR1285 56 Broadway West W13 0SU Early 20th c shopping parade (Nos 48-62). Red facing brick with B,E,F,H,J,L,N Ealing first and second floor painted modern concrete stucco banding and window surrounds, including decorative mouldings and cornice at second floor level, with dutch gable complete with octagonal 109 LLR1286 58 Broadway West W13 0SU Early 20th c shopping parade (Nos 48-62). Red facing brick with B,E,F,H,J,L,N Ealing first and second floor painted modern concrete stucco banding and window surrounds, including decorative mouldings and cornice at second floor level, with dutch gable 110 LLR1287 60 Broadway West W13 0SU Early 20th c shopping parade (Nos 48-62). Red facing brick with B,E,F,H,J,L,N Ealing first and second floor painted modern concrete stucco banding and window surrounds, including decorative mouldings and cornice at second floor level, with dutch gable 111 LLR1288 62 Broadway West W13 0SU Early 20th century shopping parade (Nos 48-62). Chamfered B,E,F,H,J,L,N Ealing corner building. Red facing brick with first, second and third floor painted modern concrete stucco banding, with decorative stucco mouldings and cornice at third floor level 112 LLR1462 1 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 113 LLR1463 2 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 114 LLR1464 3 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 115 LLR1465 4 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 116 LLR1466 5 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 117 LLR1467 6 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 118 LLR1468 8 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 119 LLR1469 9 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 120 LLR1472 10 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 121 LLR1473 11 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 122 LLR1474 12 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 123 LLR1475 13 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 124 LLR1476 14 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 125 LLR1477 15 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 126 LLR1478 16 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 127 LLR1479 17 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 128 LLR1480 18 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 129 LLR1481 19 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 130 LLR1482 20 The Mall Ealing W5 2PJ Ealing Town Centre Nos 1 -20 (consec) parade of shops built 1880's two upper floors D,E,F,H,J,LN or three with pitched slate roof, rubbed brick string courses, decorative keystone panel on piano nobile, sash windows and varying height and disposition of triangular gables above roof 131 LLR1503 54 The Mall Ealing W5 3TA Ealing Town Centre Nos 54 to 57 built in 1902 on the site of old almshouses. Three D,H,J,L,N storey, red brick , prominent gabled front and finely detailed corbels. Façade is strongly defined by narrow windows with protruding mullions and white painted courses and mouldings 132 LLR1504 57 The Mall 133 LLR0165 2 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single E, F fronted* brick terrace of with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 134 LLR0166 4 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 135 LLR0167 6 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 136 LLR0168 8 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 137 LLR0169 10 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 138 LLR0170 12 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing including unseen roof behind parapet corn 139 LLR0171 14 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 140 LLR0172 16 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 141 LLR0173 18 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 142 LLR0174 20 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 143 LLR0175 22 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 144 LLR0176 24 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 145 LLR0177 26 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 146 LLR0178 28 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 147 LLR0179 30 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 148 LLR0180 32 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 149 LLR0181 34 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 150 LLR0182 36 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 151 LLR0183 38 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 152 LLR0184 40 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 153 LLR0185 42 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 154 LLR0186 44 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 155 LLR0187 46 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 156 LLR0188 48 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 157 LLR0189 50 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 158 LLR0190 52 Burlington Gardens Acton W3 6BA Acton Town Centre Victorian -circa late 1870s - three and a half storey single fronted E, F brick terrace with large bay windows to upper and lower ground floor and symmetrical fenestration finished with neo-classical stucco detailing 159 LLR0210 2 Castlebar Hill Ealing W5 1TD Large Victorian double fronted villa sensitively divided into flats D,E, F,G,H,J,K,L with interesting railings at roof level and fine plane tree in its garden 160 LLR0211 6 Castlebar Hill Ealing W5 1TD Elegant Victorian double fronted villa of three bays using D,E, F,G,H,J,K,L symmetry and restrained classical detailing , unusually of light gault brick 161 LLR0212 8 Castlebar Hill Ealing W5 1TD Large Victorian double fronted villa of neo-gothic influence which D,E, F,G,H,J,K,L been attractively renovated with sympathetic tower replacement of red brick, white timber joinery and red tiled roof with fancy brackets at eaves 162 LLR0440 20 Haven Green Ealing W5 2UP Haven Green Nos 20 -23 (not No 24) is The Haven Clinic formerly known as E,F,H,J,N The Haven, a group of two storey, white-rendered semi-detached mid-Vistorian cottages, Nos 23/24 are semi-detached. 22 have a hipped roof and multi-paned sash windows. No 23 has a bay window, 163 LLR0441 21 Haven Green Ealing W5 2UP Haven Green Nos 20 -23 (not No 24) is The Haven Clinic formerly known as E,F,H,J,N The Haven, a group of two storey, white-rendered semi-detached mid-Vistorian cottages, Nos 23/24 are semi-detached. 22 have a hipped roof and multi-paned sash windows. No 23 has a bay window, 164 LLR0442 22 Haven Green Ealing W5 2UP Haven Green Nos 20 -23 (not No 24) is The Haven Clinic formerly known as E,F,H,J,N The Haven, a group of two storey, white-rendered semi-detached mid-Vistorian cottages, Nos 23/24 are semi-detached. 22 have a hipped roof and multi-paned sash windows. No 23 has a bay window, 165 LLR0443 23 Haven Green Ealing W5 2UP Haven Green Nos 20 -23 (not No 24) is The Haven Clinic formerly known as E,F,H,J,N The Haven, a group of two storey, white-rendered semi-detached mid-Vistorian cottages, Nos 23/24 are semi-detached. 22 have a hipped roof and multi-paned sash windows. No 23 has a bay window, 166 LLR0444 24 Haven Green Ealing W5 2UP Haven Green Nos 20 -23 (not No 24) is The Haven Clinic formerly known as E,F,H,J,N The Haven, a group of two storey, white-rendered semi-detached mid-Vistorian cottages, Nos 23/24 are semi-detached. 22 have a hipped roof and multi-paned sash windows. No 23 has a bay window 167 LLR0455 41 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green Former District Line station 1910 - handsome shopping parade in D,E,F,H,J,L,N Palladian style, lime stone cladding, pedimented sash windows, Ionic order pilasters, with rusticated pilasters and dentils beneath projecting cornice with 'Ealing Broadway Station' carved in the pediment above original main entrance 168 LLR0456 44 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green Former District Line station 1910 - handsome shopping parade in D,E,F,H,J,L,N Palladian style, lime stone cladding, pedimented sash windows, Ionic order pilasters, with rusticated pilasters and dentils beneath projecting cornice with 'Ealing Broadway Station' carved in the pediment above original main entrance 169 LLR0457 46 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green Former District Line station 1910 - handsome shopping parade in D,E,F,H,J,L,N Palladian style, lime stone cladding, pedimented sash windows, Ionic order pilasters, with rusticated pilasters and dentils beneath projecting cornice with 'Ealing Broadway Station' carved in the pediment above original main entrance 170 LLR0458 47 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green Former District Line station 1910 - handsome shopping parade in D,E,F,H,J,L,N Palladian style, lime stone cladding, pedimented sash windows, Ionic order pilasters, with rusticated pilasters and dentils beneath projecting cornice with 'Ealing Broadway Station' carved in the pediment above original main entrance 171 LLR0459 48 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green Small original kiosk and shop front of one storey adjoined to No B,E,F,N 47 (the old station building) 172 LLR0460 42/43 Haven Green Ealing W5 2NX Haven Green Former District Line station 1910 - handsome shopping parade in D,E,F,H,J,L,N Palladian style, lime stone cladding, pedimented sash windows, Ionic order pilasters, with rusticated pilasters and dentils beneath projecting cornice with 'Ealing Broadway Station' carved in the pediment above original main entrance 173 LLR0511 1 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 174 LLR0512 2 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JB Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 175 LLR0513 3 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 176 LLR0514 4 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JB Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 177 LLR0515 5 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 178 LLR0516 6 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JB Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 179 LLR0518 8 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JB Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 180 LLR0519 9 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 181 LLR0520 10 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JB Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 182 LLR0521 11 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 183 LLR0522 13 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 184 LLR0523 15 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 185 LLR0524 17 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 186 LLR0525 19 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 187 LLR0526 21 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 188 LLR0527 23 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 189 LLR0528 25 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 190 LLR0529 27 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 191 LLR0530 29 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 192 LLR0531 31 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 193 LLR0532 33 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 194 LLR0533 35 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 195 LLR0534 37 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 196 LLR0535 39 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 197 LLR0536 41 Lammas Park Ealing W5 5JD Nos 1- 41( Nos 1 and 2 are detached end of row houses to south E,F,G,H,JK,L Road end of street) two storey (1-21) and three storey (23- 41 odds), semi-detached stock brick mid-Victorian houses with stucco dressing including balustrading and window surrounds. Slate roof 198 LLR0577 3 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LA No 3 - 9 (odds) Victorian double fronted house built in 1888 E,F,J,K,L possibly unique typology in Ealing . Yellow brick with raised red tile banding, decorative red brick window surrounds. Two storey front bay and white timber porch with clay tiled roof 199 LLR0578 5 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LA No 3 - 9 (odds) Victorian double fronted house built in 1888 E,F,J,K,L possibly unique typology in Ealing . Yellow brick with raised red tile banding, decorative red brick window surrounds. Two storey front bay and white timber porch with clay tiled roof 200 LLR0579 7 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LA No 3 - 9 (odds) Victorian double fronted house built in 1888 E,F,J,K,L possibly unique typology in Ealing . Yellow brick with raised red tile banding, decorative red brick window surrounds. Two storey front bay and white timber porch with clay tiled roof 201 LLR0580 9 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LA No 3 - 9 (odds) Victorian double fronted house built in 1888 E,F,J,K,L possibly unique typology in Ealing . Yellow brick with raised red tile banding, decorative red brick window surrounds. Two storey front bay and white timber porch with clay tiled roof 202 LLR0581 11 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LA Victorian double fronted house built in 1889 unique typology in E,F,J,K,L the street extent. Stock brick with red brick stringcourses. Straight window headers with red brick pointed arch window headers and textured relief brickwork insets. Two storey front bay 203 LLR0582 31 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LS Victorian double fronted house, circa 1890. Red and yellow brick F,H,J,L throughout. Two storey front bay with first floor relief decorative panel, set under front dutch gable. Recessed porch entrance with stuccoed pointed pediment and corbelling. Slate roof 204 LLR0583 33 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LS Victorian double fronted house, circa 1890. Red and stock brick F,H,J,L throughout. Two storey front bay, set under front dutch gable. Recessed porch entrance with stucco surround, comprising cornice and corbels. Slate roof with front dormer window 205 LLR0584 51 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LS Victorian double fronted house, circa 1890. Red and stock brick F,H,J,L throughout. Two storey square bay with unusual stepped gable above and decorative clay tiles. Separate ground floor splayed bay with slate roof. Recessed porch entrance with red brick arch 206 LLR0585 53 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LS Victorian double fronted house, circa 1890's unique frontage in F,H,J,L street extent. Red brick and rendered gable. Three storey square bay with gable, comprising second floor half timbering and decorative fascia. Projecting porch entrance with red brick 207 LLR0586 55 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LS Victorian double fronted house, circa 1890. Nos 55-59 (odds) E,F,H,J,L same typology, different decades, red brick throughout with stone and stucco window surrounds. Twin ground floor splayed bays with dutch gables at roof level above. Recessed porch entrance 208 LLR0587 58 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LU Nos 58-60 Victorian (1880's) double fronted house. 58 has E,F,G,H,J,L painted render. Two storey projecting gable with decorative fascia board and pediment. Entrance and ground floor splayed bay set under slate canopy. Highly ornate sash mullioned windows 209 LLR0588 59 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LS Turn of the century double fronted house, Nos 55-59 (odds) are E,F,H,J,L the same typology but built in different decades, red brick throughout with stone and stucco window surrounds. Twin ground floor splayed bays with dutch gables at roof level above. Recessed porch 210 LLR0589 60 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LU Nos 58-60 Victorian (1880's) double fronted house. 60 has E,F,G,H,J,L original facade treatment. Two storey projecting gable with decorative fascia board and pediment. Entrance and ground floor splayed bay set under slate canopy. Highly ornate sash mullioned window 211 LLR0590 62 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LU Nos 62 -62 (1880's) double fronted, stepped gables, neo-gothic E,F,G,H,J,L features, rubbed brick string course and decorations, brick mullions and stucco-medallioned ersatz segmental arches over all windows.64 is stripped back but some decorative elements remain 212 LLR0591 64 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LU Nos 62 -62 (1880's) double fronted, stepped gables, neo-gothic E,F,G,H,J,L features, rubbed brick string course and decorations, brick mullions and stucco-medallioned ersatz segmental arches over all windows.64 is stripped back but some decorative elements remain 213 LLR0592 66 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LU Nos 66-82, No 66 was built between 1871 and 1890 and 68-82 E,F,G,H,J,L built soon after 214 LLR0593 68 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LU Nos 66-82, No 66 was built between 1871 and 1890 and 68-82 E,F,G,H,J,L built soon after 215 LLR0594 70 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LU Nos 66-82, No 66 was built between 1871 and 1890 and 68-82 E,F,G,H,J,L built soon after

216 81 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LT 79, 81,83 & 85 are substantial houses with highly decorative E,F,H,J,L terracotta facades and decorative windows. 85 has been empty for some time and in very poor repair 217 LLR0596 72 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LU Nos 66-82, No 66 was built between 1871 and 1890 and 68-82 E,F,G,H,J,L built soon after 218 LLR0597 74 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LU Nos 66-82, No 66 was built between 1871 and 1890 and 68-82 E,F,G,H,J,L built soon after

219 83 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LT 79, 81,83 & 85 are substantial houses with highly decorative E,F,H,J,L terracotta facades and decorative windows. 85 has been empty for some time and in very poor repair 220 LLR0599 76 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LU Nos 66-82, No 66 was built between 1871 and 1890 and 68-82 E,F,G,H,J,L built soon after 221 LLR0600 79 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LT Nos 71-83 (odds) built c.1880's red brick, slate roof, some half- E,F,H,J,L timbering with turreted tower with porch inset, dominant central gable with jettied window inset. Many have hard standing to front garden with little or no boundary treatment 222 LLR0601 80 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LX Nos 66-82, No 66 was built between 1871 and 1890 and 68-82 E,F,H,J,L built soon after 223 LLR0602 82 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LX Nos 66-82, No 66 was built between 1871 and 1890 and 68-82 E,F,H,J,L built soon after 224 LLR0603 84 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LX Nos 84-90 built by 1910 double fronted, yellow brick with red E,F,H,J,L brick on protuding elements and stringcoursing, slate roof, distinctive fretwork work, one dominant curving bay with large gable and smaller gable with bargeboarding 225 LLR0604 85 Madeley Road Ealing W5 2LT 81,83 & 85 are substantial houses with highly decorative E,F,H,J,L terracotta facades and decorative windows. Built between 1870 and 1890 unique typology in street extent, detached, double- fronted with turreted three three corner bay and dutch gable, ornate stucco and brick porch, derelict 226 LLR0839 1 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 227 LLR0840 2 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 228 LLR0841 3 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 229 LLR0842 4 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 230 LLR0843 5 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 231 LLR0844 6 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 232 LLR0845 7 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 233 LLR0846 8 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 234 LLR0847 9 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 235 LLR0848 10 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 236 LLR0849 11 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 237 LLR0850 12 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 238 LLR0851 14 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 239 LLR0852 15 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 240 LLR0853 16 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 241 LLR0854 17 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 242 LLR0855 18 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 243 LLR0856 19 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 244 LLR0857 20 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 245 LLR0858 21 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 246 LLR0859 22 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 247 LLR0860 23 Nichols Green Ealing W5 2QU Modern three storey dwelling, design by Wren and built c.1965. E,F,G,H,J,L Recessed entrance and garage at ground floor with white painted render band and red brick above. White windows and horizontal boarded panels. Example of modernist mass produced housing 248 LLR1064 62 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QX A corner shop with an elaborate terracotta gable and dressings E,F,H,J,K,L,M with later art deco stone shop front in a Dutch style parade. Detrimental windows installed latterly 249 LLR1065 64 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QX Dutch style parade of shops with elaborate terracotta gable and E,F,H,J,K,L,M dressings 250 LLR1066 66 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QX Dutch style parade of shops with elaborate terracotta gable and E,F,H,J,K,L,M dressings 251 LLR1067 68 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QX Dutch style parade of shops with elaborate terracotta gable and E,F,H,J,K,L,M dressings 252 LLR1068 70 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QX Dutch style parade of shops with elaborate terracotta gable and E,F,H,J,K,L,M dressings 253 LLR1069 72 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QX Dutch style parade of shops with elaborate terracotta gable and E,F,H,J,K,L,M dressings 254 LLR1070 74 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QX Dutch style parade of shops with elaborate terracotta gable and E,F,H,J,K,L,M dressings 255 LLR1071 76 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QX Dutch style parade of shops with elaborate terracotta gable and E,F,H,J,K,L,M dressings 256 LLR1072 78 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QX Dutch style parade of shops with elaborate terracotta gable and E,F,H,J,K,L,M dressings 257 LLR1073 80 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QX Dutch style parade of shops with elaborate terracotta gable and E,F,H,J,K,L,M dressings 258 LLR1074 82 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QX Dutch style parade of shops with elaborate terracotta gable and E,F,H,J,K,L,M dressings. 259 LLR1075 108 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QP early 20th century shopping parade EHJN 260 LLR1076 110 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QP early 20th century shopping parade EHJN 261 LLR1077 112 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QP early 20th century shopping parade EHJN 262 LLR1078 114 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QP early 20th century shopping parade EHJN 263 LLR1079 116 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QP early 20th century shopping parade EHJN 264 LLR1080 118 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QP early 20th century shopping parade EHJN 265 LLR1081 120 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QP early 20th century shopping parade EHJN 266 LLR1082 122 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QP early 20th century shopping parade EHJN 267 LLR1083 124 Pitshanger Lane Ealing W5 1QP early 20th century shopping parade EHJN 268 LLR1140 11 South Ealing Road Ealing W5 4QT 7-13 &17-19 not acceptable E,H,J,L 269 LLR1141 13 South Ealing Road Ealing W5 4QT 7-13 &17-19 not acceptable E,H,J,L 270 LLR1143 17 South Ealing Road Ealing W5 4QT 7-13 &17-19 not acceptable E,H,J,L 271 LLR1144 19 South Ealing Road Ealing W5 4QT 7-13 &17-19 not acceptable E,H,J,L 272 LLR1145 21 South Ealing Road Ealing W5 4QT as 7-13 and 17-19 E,H,J,L 273 LLR1146 23 South Ealing Road Ealing W5 4QT as 7-13 and 17-19 E,H,J,L 274 LLR1147 25 South Ealing Road Ealing W5 4QT as 7-13 and 17-19 E,H,J,L 275 LLR1229 1 Station Parade, Northolt UB5 5HR Extension to shopping parade (Nos. 1-11), built mid 20th century. E,G,H, Ealing Road Split into 1 and 1A, with two shopfronts. Simple brickwork, including relief brickwork and textured red roof tiles. Shared central chimney stack - some original steel windows replaced 276 LLR1230 2 Station Parade, Northolt UB5 5HR Part of orignal shopping parade (Nos. 2-11, now extended to E,G,H, Ealing Road include no.1), built c.1920. Simple brickwork, including relief brickwork and textured red roof tiles (original steel windows replaced with upvc) 277 LLR1231 3 Station Parade, Northolt UB5 5HR Part of orignal shopping parade (Nos. 2-11, now extended to E,G,H, Ealing Road include no.1), built c.1920. Simple brickwork, including relief brickwork and textured red roof tiles (original steel windows replaced with upvc) 278 LLR1232 4 Station Parade, Northolt UB5 5HR Part of orignal shopping parade (Nos. 2-11, now extended to E,G,H, Ealing Road include no.1), built c.1920. Simple brickwork façade with large pedimented dutch gable comprising central bracket (clock or bell removed). Textured red roof tiles 279 LLR1233 5 Station Parade, Northolt UB5 5HR Part of orignal shopping parade (Nos. 2-11, now extended to E,G,H, Ealing Road include no.1), built c.1920. Simple brickwork, including relief brickwork and textured red roof tiles (original steel windows replaced with upvc) 280 LLR1234 6 Station Parade, Northolt UB5 5HR Part of orignal shopping parade (Nos. 2-11, now extended to E,G,H, Ealing Road include no.1), built c.1920. Simple brickwork, including relief brickwork and textured red roof tiles (original steel windows replaced with upvc and rooflights added to front roof slope) 281 LLR1235 7 Station Parade, Northolt UB5 5HR Part of orignal shopping parade (Nos. 2-11, now extended to E,G,H, Ealing Road include no.1), built c.1920. Simple brickwork, including relief brickwork and textured red roof tiles (original steel windows replaced with upvc) 282 LLR1236 8 Station Parade, Northolt UB5 5HR Part of orignal shopping parade (Nos. 2-11, now extended to E,G,H, Ealing Road include no.1), built c.1920. Simple brickwork, including relief brickwork and textured red roof tiles (original steel windows replaced with upvc) 283 LLR1237 9 Station Parade, Northolt UB5 5HR Part of orignal shopping parade (Nos. 2-11, now extended to E,G,H, Ealing Road include no.1), built c.1920. Simple brickwork façade with large pedimented dutch gable comprising central bracket (clock or bell removed). Textured red roof tiles 284 LLR1238 10 Station Parade, Northolt UB5 5HR Part of orignal shopping parade (Nos. 2-11, now extended to E,G,H, Ealing Road include no.1), built c.1920. Simple brickwork, including relief brickwork and textured red roof tiles (original steel windows replaced with upvc) 285 LLR1239 11 Station Parade, Northolt UB5 5HR Part of orignal shopping parade (Nos. 2-11, now extended to E,G,H, Ealing Road include no.1), built c.1920. Simple brickwork, including relief brickwork and textured red roof tiles (original steel windows replaced with upvc) 286 LLR1311 1 Mount View The Common Southall UB2 5JQ Nos 1-6 (and 1-2 Industrious Cottages semi-detached, adjacent E,F,H,J,N to subject properties), small terrace of workers' cottages of stock brick and erstwhile slate roofs, built after 1871 situated by the Grand Union canal historically but not architecturally interesting 287 LLR1312 2 Mount View The Common Southall UB2 5JQ Nos 1-6 (and 1-2 Industrious Cottages semi-detached, adjacent E,F,H,J,N to subject properties), small terrace of workers' cottages of stock brick and erstwhile slate roofs, built after 1871 situated by the Grand Union canal historically but not architecturally interesting 288 LLR1313 3 Mount View The Common Southall UB2 5JQ Nos 1-6 (and 1-2 Industrious Cottages semi-detached, adjacent E,F,H,J,N to subject properties), small terrace of workers' cottages of stock brick and erstwhile slate roofs, built after 1871 situated by the Grand Union canal historically but not architecturally interesting 289 LLR1314 4 Mount View The Common Southall UB2 5JQ Nos 1-6 (and 1-2 Industrious Cottages semi-detached, adjacent E,F,H,J,N to subject properties), small terrace of workers' cottages of stock brick and erstwhile slate roofs, built after 1871 situated by the Grand Union canal historically but not architecturally interesting 290 LLR1315 5 Mount View The Common Southall UB2 5JQ Nos 1-6 (and 1-2 Industrious Cottages semi-detached, adjacent E,F,H,J,N to subject properties), small terrace of workers' cottages of stock brick and erstwhile slate roofs, built after 1871 situated by the Grand Union canal historically but not architecturally interesting 291 LLR1316 6 Mount View The Common Southall UB2 5JQ Nos 1-6 (and 1-2 Industrious Cottages semi-detached, adjacent E,F,H,J,N to subject properties), small terrace of workers' cottages of stock brick and erstwhile slate roofs, built after 1871 situated by the Grand Union canal historically but not architecturally interesting 292 LLR1484 32 The Mall Ealing W5 3TJ Ealing Common Nos 32- 39, four storey terraced town house c 1880s with lower E,F,G,H,J,K,L,M and upper ground floor and double height bay window from LG to UG with steps to front door and stucco surround to windows and ground floor storey. Some original stucco boundary treatments remain 293 LLR1486 33 The Mall Ealing W5 3TJ Ealing Common Nos 32- 39, four storey terraced town house c 1880s with lower E,F,G,H,J,K,L,M and upper ground floor and double height bay window from LG to UG with steps to front door and stucco surround to windows and ground floor storey. Some original stucco boundary treatments remain 294 LLR1488 34 The Mall Ealing W5 3TJ Ealing Common Nos 32- 39, four storey terraced town house c 1880s with lower E,F,G,H,J,K,L,M and upper ground floor and double height bay window from LG to UG with steps to front door and stucco surround to windows and ground floor storey. Some original stucco boundary treatments remain 295 Logic House Unit 2 Belvue Road Northolt UB5 5QJ Late 1930's/1940's 2 Storey Art Deco building with symmetrical D, E, F, H, J,N,P façade fronting a large works 296 Logic House Unit 8 Belvue Road Northolt UB5 5QJ Late 1930's/1940's 2 Storey Art Deco building with symmetrical D, E, F, H, J,N,P façade fronting a large works