DOCSLIB.ORG

Livelihood Activities in a Wildlife Conservancy on Namibia’S Kwando River

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Livelihood Activities in a Wildlife Conservancy on Namibia’S Kwando River LIVELIHOOD ACTIVITIES IN A WILDLIFE CONSERVANCY ON NAMIBIA’S KWANDO RIVER By WILLIAM J. KANAPAUX III A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2009 1 © 2009 William J. Kanapaux III 2 To my wife, Regina, for her love, encouragement, and support 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was part of a larger collaborative project funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), the University of Florida and the International Union of the Conservation of Nature. I received additional NSF funding through an Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) Program at UF on the Adaptive Management of Water, Wetlands and Watersheds. The Caprivi-based Integrated Rural Development and Nature Conservation, the Namibian Ministry of Environment and Tourism, and the management staff at Mashi Conservancy provided valuable assistance. In particular, I thank conservancy manager Joubert Muchaka, conservancy secretary Obey Lifumbela and Lucious Lunyandile for their assistance. My two research assistants, Elvis Wamui Diamani and Noricah Likeleli, played key roles in making this study possible. The field study was conducted in collaboration with professors and fellow graduate students from the University of Florida: Grenville Barnes, Michael Binford, Mark Brown, Brian Child, J.G. Collomb, Andrea Gaughan (with special thanks for help on the maps), Cerian Gibbes, Daniel Godwin, Patricia Mupeta, Narcisa Pricope, Luke Rostant, Jennie Saqui and Andrea Wolf. I also benefited from the knowledge, logistical help and comradery of Bennety Munyama, Adi Child, Graham Child, Chaka Chirozva, Rachel Demotts, Thatayaone Diane, Candace Diggle, Richard Diggle, Paul Leslie, Rodgers Lubilo, Johanna Mbandi, Shylock Muyengwa, Daisy Nheta, and Binah Seretse. Finally, I thank the staff and management of Namushasha Lodge for their accommodations and hospitality. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................7 LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................8 ABSTRACT .....................................................................................................................................9 CHAPTER 1 RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES ................................................................10 2 STUDY AREA .......................................................................................................................12 Physical Characteristics ..........................................................................................................13 Wildlife ...................................................................................................................................14 Human Population ..................................................................................................................16 Pre-Colonial History ...............................................................................................................17 Colonial Rule ..........................................................................................................................19 Conflict ...................................................................................................................................20 Economic Development ..........................................................................................................22 Role of Conservancies ............................................................................................................23 Mashi Conservancy ................................................................................................................26 3 DATA AND METHODS .......................................................................................................29 Development of Instrument ....................................................................................................29 Random Sampling ..................................................................................................................30 Application of Surveys ...........................................................................................................31 Statistical Analyses Used on Data ..........................................................................................33 4 RESULTS ...............................................................................................................................35 Differences in Livelihood Activities: Riverside vs. Interior ..................................................35 Food Security: Riverside vs. Interior ......................................................................................37 Differences in Land Use .........................................................................................................38 5 DISCUSSION .........................................................................................................................47 Livelihood Activities ..............................................................................................................47 Food Security ..........................................................................................................................48 Differences in Land Use .........................................................................................................50 5 6 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................53 APPENDIX A HOUSEHOLD LIVELIHOOD SURVEY .............................................................................58 B FIELD SURVEY ....................................................................................................................69 LIST OF REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................74 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .........................................................................................................79 6 LIST OF TABLES Table page 4-1 Demographic information for 60 households surveyed. ....................................................40 4-2 Percent of households growing crops in 2007. ..................................................................40 4-3 Test for differences in number of livelihood activities per household. .............................40 4-4 Proportion tests for food security: riverside vs. interior. ...................................................40 4-5 Test for differences in household agricultural practices. ...................................................41 4- 6 Proportion test for conservancy membership: riverside vs. interior. .................................41 6-1 Summary of key findings and management implications. .................................................57 7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 2-1 Location of study region. ...................................................................................................27 2-2 Map showing conservancies in Eastern Caprivi. ...............................................................27 2-3 Distribution of villages within Mashi Conservancy. .........................................................28 3-1 Location of surveyed households and soil types. ...............................................................34 4-1 Percent of Mashi households earning income from livelihood activities by location. ......42 4-2 Percent of Mashi households getting subsistence from livelihood activities. ...................42 4-3 Percent of Mashi households growing enough food per year by location. ........................43 4-4 Percent of riverside households growing enough food per year by soil type. ...................43 4-5 Percent of Mashi households growing enough food by location and soil type. ................44 4-6 Percent of households reporting crop raiders by species. ..................................................44 4-7 Percent of households growing crops by location. ............................................................45 4-8 Distance to field and field size for 10 households. ............................................................46 5-1 Percent of Mashi households owning assets by location. ..................................................52 6-1 Average annual income of Mashi households (N$ 7 = US $ 1). .......................................56 8 Abstract of Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science LIVELIHOOD ACTIVITIES IN A WILDLIFE CONSERVANCY ON NAMIBIA’S KWANDO RIVER By William J. Kanapaux III May 2009 Chair: Brian Child Major: Geography We examined livelihood activities at the household level in a wildlife conservancy along the Kwando River in the Caprivi region of Namibia. It analyzes data from surveys collected in Mashi Conservancy, a community-based natural resource management program bordered on two sides by national parks. The conservancy is remote, economically undeveloped, and has a recovering wildlife population. Its people subsist primarily on rain-fed agriculture from sandy soils in a semi-arid, drought-prone environment. We asked how
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Go Wild – Boxed2go Track Namibia’S Awesome Wildlife
    Go Wild – Boxed2Go Track Namibia’s awesome wildlife. 12 Day Namibian Self-Drive Safari. Experience the wild side of Namibia on this twelve-day trip through the northern regions of the country. Join the Gondwana Collection and Namibia2Go for a special Namibian journey. This carefully planned safari includes stopovers at all the popular wildlife sites. Beginning in Windhoek, the route leads northwards to the famous Etosha National Park, where two nights are enjoyed at the unique and quirky Etosha Safari Camp. The third day is spent travelling into the heart of Etosha for superb wildlife viewing, exiting in the late afternoon at the northern gate. Overnight at the stylish Etosha King Nehale on the Andoni Plains before travelling further north to the peaceful oasis of Hakusembe Lodge on the glittering Okavango River. Arrive in time to raise your glass and watch the sun sink into the horizon from the deck of the lodge. As you journey eastwards into the Zambezi Region and toward the Kwando River, a wilder Africa calls. A sanctuary for wildlife, Bwabwata National Park and surrounds provide countless photographic opportunities. Tune in to the sounds of the river and fall asleep to the chortling of hippos at Namushasha River Lodge. A highlight of a stay is a trip into Bwabwata, by boat and game-viewing vehicle. The safari continues further east on the floodplains of the Chobe River, adjacent to Chobe National Park, where it’s possible to spot elephant, buffalo and water-adapted antelope like sitatunga at different times of the year. After savouring the delights of Chobe, you enter into the enchanted world of the mighty Zambezi River, where the life-affirming calls of fish eagles resound through the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Angolan Giraffe (Giraffa Camelopardalis Ssp
    Angolan Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. angolensis) Appendix 1: Historical and recent geographic range and population of Angolan Giraffe G. c. angolensis Geographic Range ANGOLA Historical range in Angola Giraffe formerly occurred in the mopane and acacia savannas of southern Angola (East 1999). According to Crawford-Cabral and Verissimo (2005), the historic distribution of the species presented a discontinuous range with two, reputedly separated, populations. The western-most population extended from the upper course of the Curoca River through Otchinjau to the banks of the Kunene (synonymous Cunene) River, and through Cuamato and the Mupa area further north (Crawford-Cabral and Verissimo 2005, Dagg 1962). The intention of protecting this western population of G. c. angolensis, led to the proclamation of Mupa National Park (Crawford-Cabral and Verissimo 2005, P. Vaz Pinto pers. comm.). The eastern population occurred between the Cuito and Cuando Rivers, with larger numbers of records from the southeast corner of the former Mucusso Game Reserve (Crawford-Cabral and Verissimo 2005, Dagg 1962). By the late 1990s Giraffe were assumed to be extinct in Angola (East 1999). According to Kuedikuenda and Xavier (2009), a small population of Angolan Giraffe may still occur in Mupa National Park; however, no census data exist to substantiate this claim. As the Park was ravaged by poachers and refugees, it was generally accepted that Giraffe were locally extinct until recent re-introductions into southern Angola from Namibia (Kissama Foundation 2015, East 1999, P. Vaz Pinto pers. comm.). BOTSWANA Current range in Botswana Recent genetic analyses have revealed that the population of Giraffe in the Central Kalahari and Khutse Game Reserves in central Botswana is from the subspecies G.
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Based Conservation and Protected Areas in Namibia: Social-Ecological Linkages for Biodiversity
    Community-Based Conservation and Protected Areas in Namibia: Social-Ecological Linkages for Biodiversity By Arthur Hoole A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Natural Resources Institute University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba March, 2008 THE UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES ***** COPYRIGHT PERMISSION Community-Based Conservation and Protected Areas in Namibia: Social-Ecological Linkages for Biodiversity By Arthur Hoole A Thesis/Practicum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of the University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (c) 2008 Permission has been granted to the Library of the University of Manitoba to lend or sell copies of this thesis/practicum, to the National Library of Canada to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of the film, and to University Microfilms Inc. to publish an abstract of this thesis/practicum. This reproduction or copy of this thesis has been made available by authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research, and may only be reproduced and copied as permitted by copyright laws or with express written authorization from the copyright owner. i To the memory of my parents, and for Leslie ii ABSTRACT This study investigates the premise that national park designations and management in Southern Africa decoupled indigenous communities from their local ecosystems. The research explores ways and means to recouple communities and national parks to promote biodiversity. The relationships are characterized between Namibia’s community-based resource management program (CBNRM), conservancies, and protected areas system, with particular reference to the Ehi-rovipuka Conservancy and Etosha National Park in northern Namibia.
    [Show full text]
  • Caprivi and Khaudum Safari
    CAPRIVI & KHAUDUM SAFARI Visit remote and beautiful areas often devoid of other visitors on this safari through Namibia’s northeast and Caprivi Strip. Sleep under soft duvets on stretcher beds in comfortable mobile camps erected for you and enjoy relaxed evenings at smart lodges. Your knowledgeable guide will escort you through the rugged wilderness of Khaudum National Park, a densely wooded wilderness region of the northern Kalahari that’s unreachable in a 2WD vehicle. Experience rural village life and travel through lush green landscapes not see in the western desert regions of Namibia. Seek out wildlife on the fertile flood plains, swamps and in the riverine forests of the small but fascinating Mahango Game Reserve and in the larger, wilder Mudumu National Park. Finally, enjoy the tranquil experience of cruising along the Chobe River in a House Boat whilst watching animals drink at the waters edge. Day 1 - Windhoek After checking through customs at Windhoek Airport, you are met and transferred to a quiet guesthouse set in pretty gardens and situated in one of the city’s leafy suburbs. Spend the afternoon relaxing and getting over your long flight or take the time to explore Windhoek. Ask your hosts to recommend their favourite restaurant from one of the city’s many good eateries or perhaps arrange to dine in. No meals are included. Day 2 – Okonjima Your guide will meet you at your guesthouse after breakfast for the drive north through a region of gentle rolling hills where many of Namibia’s larger farms and ranches can be found. One such farm has been transformed into a wildlife reserve and is home to the AfriCat Foundation, an organization dedicated to the conservation and protection of Namibia’s predators – in particular leopard and cheetah.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile Republic of Zambia Giraffe Conservation Status Report
    Country Profile Republic of Zambia Giraffe Conservation Status Report Sub-region: Southern Africa General statistics Size of country: 752,614 km² Size of protected areas / percentage protected area coverage: 30% (Sub)species Thornicroft’s giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis thornicrofti) Angolan giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis angolensis) – possible South African giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa) – possible Conservation Status IUCN Red List (IUCN 2012): Giraffa camelopardalis (as a species) – least concern G. c. thornicrofti – not assessed G. c. angolensis – not assessed G. c. giraffa – not assessed In the Republic of Zambia: The Zambia Wildlife Authority (ZAWA) is mandated under the Zambia Wildlife Act No. 12 of 1998 to manage and conserve Zambia’s wildlife and under this same act, the hunting of giraffe in Zambia is illegal (ZAWA 2015). Zambia has the second largest proportion of land under protected status in Southern Africa with approximately 225,000 km2 designated as protected areas. This equates to approximately 30% of the total land cover and of this, approximately 8% as National Parks (NPs) and 22% as Game Management Areas (GMA). The remaining protected land consists of bird sanctuaries, game ranches, forest and botanical reserves, and national heritage sites (Mwanza 2006). The Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZA TFCA), is potentially the world’s largest conservation area, spanning five southern African countries; Angola, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe, centred around the Caprivi-Chobe-Victoria Falls area (KAZA 2015). Parks within Zambia that fall under KAZA are: Liuwa Plain, Kafue, Mosi-oa-Tunya and Sioma Ngwezi (Peace Parks Foundation 2013). GCF is dedicated to securing a future for all giraffe populations and (sub)species in the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • Itinerario Namibia, Botswana & Zimbabwe
    Namibia, Botswana & Zimbabwe 9 DAYS | 2021 NEW WORLD SAFARIS D E S T I N A T I O N M A N A G E M E N T C O M P A N Y African travel specialists www.newworldsafaris.com Information DAY Itinerary Distance Example hotels MEAL 01 Windhoek Town Lodge Windhoek D 02 Windhoek | Okahandja | Etosha 450 km Etotongwe Lodge BLD 03 Etosha NP | Tsumeb/ Etosha Region 250 km Makalani Hotel BD 04 Tsumeb/Etosha Region | Divundu 580 km Rainbow River Lodge BD 05 Divundu | Caprivi 260 km Zambezi Mubala Lodge BD 06 Caprivi Zambezi Mubala Lodge BD 07 Caprivi | Chobe National Park 250 km Trave Lodge BD 08 Chobe National Park Trave Lodge BD 09 Chobe National Park | Victoria Falls 100 km The Kingdom at the Falls BD 10 Victoria Falls | Departure D Key B L D Breakfast Lunch Dinner www.newworldsafaris.com Itinerary Day 01 | Windhoek You will be welcomed at the airport and escorted to your hotel. Before you arrive at your hotel, an orienta- tion city tour through Windhoek begins. Here you can see the Christ Church, the boulevard, the equestrian monument and the district of Klein Windhoek, as well as the district of the Bantu-speaking Katutura commu- nity. The rest of the day is at your disposal. In the evening, enjoy a dinner at Joe’s Beerhouse. Day 02 | Windhoek - Okahandja - Etosha National Park After breakfast, continue towards Outjo. You drive through typical African semi-desert landscapes and stop in Okahandja, where you visit the famous wood carving market. Visitors can learn about the art of wood car- ving and buy small souvenirs here.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambezi After Breakfast, We Follow the Route of the Okavango River Into the Zambezi Where Applicable, 24Hrs Medical Evacuation Insurance Region
    SOAN-CZ | Windhoek to Kasane | Scheduled Guided Tour Day 1 | Tuesday 16 ETOSHA NATIONAL PARK 30 Group size Oshakati Ondangwa Departing Windhoek we travel north through extensive cattle farming areas GROUP DAY Katima Mulilo and bushland to the Etosha National Park, famous for its vast amount of Classic: 2 - 16 guests per vehicle CLASSIC TOURING SIZE FREESELL Opuwo Rundu Kasane wildlife and unique landscape. In the late afternoon, once we have reached ETOSHA NATIONAL PARK BWABWATA NATIONAL our camp located on the outside of the National Park, we have the rest of the PARK Departure details Tsumeb day at leisure. Outjo Overnight at Mokuti Etosha Lodge. Language: Bilingual - German and English Otavi Departure Days: Otjiwarongo Day 2 | Wednesday Tour Language: Bilingual DAMARALAND ETOSHA NATIONAL PARK Okahandja The day is devoted purely to the abundant wildlife found in the Etosha Departure days: TUESDAYS National Park, which surrounds a parched salt desert known as the Etosha Gobabis November 17 Pan. The park is home to 4 of the Big Five - elephant, lion, leopard and rhino. 2020 December 1, 15 WINDHOEK Swakopmund Game viewing in the park is primarily focussed around the waterholes, some January 19 of which are spring-fed and some supplied from a borehole, ideal places to February 16 Walvis Bay Rehoboth sit and watch over 114 different game species, or for an avid birder, more than March 2,16,30 340 bird species. An extensive network of roads links the over 30 water holes April 13 SOSSUSVLEI Mariental allowing visitors the opportunity of a comprehensive game viewing safari May 11, 25 throughout the park as each different area will provide various encounters.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia, Botswana & Zimbabwe
    Namibia, Botswana & Zimbabwe. Three countries tour. Tour designer: Monika Ihms Telephone: +27 214 260 032 Email: [email protected] DURATION: 12 days / 11 nights Angolia Zambia 3 4 6 5 2 Zimbawe Namibia Botswana 1 Start destination Namibia Destinations Namibia 2. Etosha National Park 1. Windhoek 3. Rundu 4. Bwabwata National Park Botswana Finish Destination TOUR OVERVIEW Cross 3 countries for an exciting holiday visiting of some of the greatest parks and wonders of the world, that Destination Zimbawe Southern Africa have to offer. The tour starts in Namibia with the visit of Windhoek, the largest city in the 5. Chobe National Park 6. Victoria Falls country, offering a cultural overview of the country´s history, with its old colonial houses and modern buildings of the post-independence Namibia. The travel continues in Namibia with the exploration of the Etosha National Park, consisting of 22,270 sq. km saline desert, faced impala. About 340 bird species occur in the park, of which savannah and woodlands. Visitors will be able to go to Rundu before getting to Bwabwata National Park, where rivers, woodland and approximately one third are migratory, including the European bee- typical African savannah is part of the scenery. The journey ends with the visit of two famous points of interest; the Chobe National Park eater and several species of waders. in Botswana with its hundreds of birds’ species and the Victoria Falls in Zimbabwe. DAY 1 | ARRIVAL WINDHOEK DAY 2 | WINDHOEK Overnight at Etosha Safari Lodge | Half board basis Meet and greet with your tour guide, departure to Windhoek - ETOSHA NATIONAL PARK DAY 4 | ETOSHA NATIONAL PARK - RUNDU and check-in at the Safari Court Hotel with a welcome drink.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks of Namibia.Pdf
    Namibia’s National Parks “Our national parks are one of Namibia’s most valuable assets. They are our national treasures and their tourism potential should be harnessed for the benefi t of all people.” His Excellency Hifi kepunye Pohamba Republic of Namibia President of the Republic of Namibia Ministry of Environment and Tourism Exploring Namibia’s natural treasures Sparsely populated and covering a vast area of 823 680 km2, roughly three times the size of the United King- dom, Namibia is unquestionably one of Africa’s premier nature tourism destinations. There is also no doubt that the Ministry of Environment and Tourism is custodian to some of the biggest, oldest and most spectacular parks on our planet. Despite being the most arid country in sub-Saharan Af- rica, the range of habitats is incredibly diverse. Visitors can expect to encounter coastal lagoons dense with flamingos, towering sand-dunes, and volcanic plains carpeted with spring flowers, thick forests teeming with seasonal elephant herds up to 1 000 strong and lush sub-tropical wetlands that are home to crocodile, hippopotami and buffalo. The national protected area network of the Ministry of Environment and Tourism covers 140 394 km2, 17 per cent of the country, and while the century-old Etosha National and Namib-Naukluft parks are deservedly re- garded as the flagships of Namibia’s conservation suc- cess, all the country’s protected areas have something unique to offer. The formidable Waterberg Plateau holds on its summit an ecological ‘lost world’ cut off by geology from its surrounding plains for millennia. The Fish River Canyon is Africa’s grandest, second in size only to the American Grand Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • Mudumu National Park
    Mudumu National Park Mudumu National Park is one of Namibia’s least-known parks, but is richly rewarding for adventurous visitors. The main attraction is the riverine habitat of the Kwando River, while inland the Mudumu Mulapo fossilised river course and the dense mopane woodland shelter woodland species. There is no formal entrance gate or park fence – the park is separated from neighbouring communal farmland by a graded cutline. Mudumu is home to a large elephant population. The park acts as a corridor for these pachyderms as they migrate between Botswana, Zambia, Angola and Zimbabwe. In recent years, Mudumu has become the model for co-operation between parks and neighbours. The parks, conservancies, community forests and traditional leaders work together on law enforcement, fire management (early burning), game monitoring and translocations. This evolved from the need to manage common resources across unfenced park and conservancy boundaries. FACT FILE Park size: 1 010 km² (737 on cutline) Date proclaimed: 1990 Natural features: Kwando River floodplain and associated grasslands and riparian woodlands. Vegetation: Tree and Shrub Savannah Biome. Vegetation type: North-eastern Kalahari Woodlands, Riverine Woodlands and Islands, Caprivi Mopane Woodland and Caprivi Floodplains. Mopane (Colophospermum mopane), leadwood (Combretum imberbe) and mangosteen (Garcinia livingstonii) trees. Wildlife: Elephant, buffalo, lion, leopard, spotted hyaena, cheetah, African wild dog, hippo, crocodile, spotted-necked otter, sitatunga, red lechwe, common impala, Burchell’s zebra, sable antelope, eland, wildebeest and giraffe. Tiger fish and tilapia are common fish species. The 430 bird species recorded in Mudumu include African fish eagle, African skimmer and western-banded snake eagle. Tourism: Walking, bird-watching, game viewing.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Protected Landscape Conservation Areas Initiative (NAMPLACE)
    Terminal Evaluation - Annexes Namibia Protected Landscape Conservation Areas Initiative (NAMPLACE) UNDP project IDs: PIMS 4173, Atlas Award 00059705, Atlas Project No: 00074796 GEF project ID: 3737 Evaluation time frame: 6 July-31 August 2016 Date of evaluation report: 30 September 2016 Country: Republic of Namibia GEF SO1/SP3: Strengthened National Terrestrial Protected Area Networks Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MET) Evaluator: Jessica Smith 1 Table of Contents 5. Annexes ......................................................................................................................... 3 Annex A: ToR ............................................................................................................... 3 Annex B: Itineraryand notes on the selection of 3 sites visited within the TE ........... 27 Annex C: List of persons consulted: ............................................................................ 30 Annex D: Evaluation Question Matrix .......................................................................... 32 Annex E: Questionnaire used and summary of field visit results ............................... 34 Annex F: List of documents reviewed ........................................................................ 41 Annex G: Evaluation Consultant Code of Conduct Agreement Form ......................... 45 2 5. Annexes Annex A: ToR TERMINAL EVALUATION TERMS OF REFERENCE INTRODUCTION In accordance with UNDP and GEF M&E policies and procedures, all full and medium-sized UNDP supported GEF financed projects
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ICR2045 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (TF-53247) ON A GRANT Public Disclosure Authorized IN THE AMOUNT OF US$ 7.1 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA FOR AN INTEGRATED COMMUNITY-BASED ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized November 29, 2011 Environment and Natural Resources Management Unit - AFTEN Sustainable Development Department Southern Africa 1, Namibia, Botswana, Lesotho, South Africa, Swaziland – AFCS1 Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective October 13, 2011) Currency Unit = N$ N$ 1.00 = US$ 0.121 US$ 1.00 = 8.24 N$ FISCAL YEAR April 1 – March 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CBIEM Community-based Integrated Ecosystem Management CBNRM Community-based Natural Resource Management CBO Community-based Organization CBS Central Bureau of Statistics CCF CBNRM Consultative Forum CFF Community Funding Facility CPP Country Pilot Programme CPS CBNRM Policy Specialist CSD CBRNM Support Division CSP Contracted Service Provider DEA Directorate of Environmental Affairs DoF Directorate of Forestry DPWM Directorate of Parks and Wildlife Management DSS Directorate of Scientific Services EIA Environmental Impact Assessments ESA Environmental and Social Assessment ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework EWERAP Enhancing Wildlife-based Economy in Rural Areas Project FFEM Fonds Français pour l'Environnement Mondial (French GEF) GEF Global Environment Facility
    [Show full text]