Ring22-1.Vp:Corelventura
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
First Record of Brown Shrike (Lanius Cristatus) in British Columbia. by Rick Toochin, Peter Hamel and Margo Hearne. Submitted: April 15, 2018
First record of Brown Shrike (Lanius cristatus) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin, Peter Hamel and Margo Hearne. Submitted: April 15, 2018. Introduction and Distribution The Brown Shrike (Lanius cristatus) is a small species that is found throughout East Asia breeding south of the northern tundra from Eastern Chukotka Peninsula, Kamchatka Peninsula, Sea of Okhotsk, Japan, Korea, China, from northern Mongolia westward into Central Siberia approximately Yenisei and Anadyr Rivers (Lewington et al. 1992, Brazil 2009, Pyle et al. 2015). This species is highly migratory throughout its vast range. The Brown Shrike winters from India to southern China, Indonesia, and the Philippines (Lewington et al. 1992). There are 4 subspecies of Brown Shrike found throughout this species range. These include the nominate subspecies of Brown Shrike is (Lanius cristatus cristatus) which is found breeding from eastern Siberia to northwestern Mongolia. This subspecies is highly migratory and travels far to the wintering grounds (Pyle et al. 2015). This subspecies winters in India, Bhutan, Nepal, Bangladeshi, Burma, Laos, Thailand, and Cambodia, southern Vietnam and the Malayan Peninsula (Pyle et al. 2015, Clements et al. 2016). The first Alaska record was tentatively identified as (L. c. lucionensis) (Gibson 1981), but has subsequently been identified as nominate (L. c. cristatus) (Gibson and Withrow 2015). This is the subspecies that now widely accepted as the subspecies that accounts for most, if not all North American records (Hamilton et al. 2007). The second subspecies of Brown Shrike is (Lanius cristatus confuses) which is found breeding in Manchuria and Amurland (Clements et al. 2016). This subspecies winters in Southeast Asia on the Malayan Peninsula and Sumatra (Clements et al. -
Redalyc.Helminths of Molothrus Bonariensis (Gmelin, 1789)
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária ISSN: 0103-846X [email protected] Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária Brasil Fedatto Bernardon, Fabiana; de Aguiar Lopes Soares, Tatiele; Dutra Vieira, Thainá; Müller, Gertrud Helminths of Molothrus bonariensis (Gmelin, 1789) (Passeriformes: Icteridae) from southernmost Brazil Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, vol. 25, núm. 3, julio-septiembre, 2016, pp. 279-285 Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária Jaboticabal, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=397847458002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Original Article Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol., Jaboticabal, v. 25, n. 3, p. 279-285, jul.-set. 2016 ISSN 0103-846X (Print) / ISSN 1984-2961 (Electronic) Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612016042 Helminths of Molothrus bonariensis (Gmelin, 1789) (Passeriformes: Icteridae) from southernmost Brazil Helmintos of Molothrus bonariensis (Gmelin, 1789) (Passeriformes: Icteridae) do extremo sul do Brasil Fabiana Fedatto Bernardon1*; Tatiele de Aguiar Lopes Soares1; Thainá Dutra Vieira1; Gertrud Müller1 1 Laboratório de Parasitologia de Animais Silvestres – LAPASIL, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas – UFPel, Pelotas, RS, Brasil Received October 15, 2015 Accepted May 11, 2016 Abstract Information about helminths of Molothrus bonariensis (Gmelin, 1789) (Passeriformes: Icteridae) are scarce; in this sense the objective of this paper was to contribute to its knowledge. Five hosts of southern Brazil were examined and the helminths Prosthogonimus ovatus, Tanaisia valida (Digenea), Diplotriaena bargusinica and Synhimantus (Dispharynx) nasuta (Nematoda) were identified. -
Effects of Parasites on Marine Maniacs
EFFECTS OF PARASITES ON MARINE MANIACS JOSEPH R. GERACI and DAVID J. ST.AUBIN Department of Pathology Ontario Veterinary College University of Guefph Guelph, Ontario Canada INTRODUCTION Parasites of marine mammals have been the focus of numerous reports dealing with taxonomy, distribution and ecology (Defyamure, 1955). Descriptions of associated tissue damage are also available, with attempts to link severity of disease with morbidity and mortality of individuals and populations. This paper is not intended to duplicate that Iiterature. Instead we focus on those organisms which we perceive to be pathogenic, while tempering some of the more exaggerated int~~retations. We deal with life cycles by emphasizing unusual adap~t~ons of selected organisms, and have neces- sarily limited our selection of the literature to highlight that theme. For this discussion we address the parasites of cetaceans---baleen whales (mysticetes), and toothed whales, dolphins and porpoises (odon- tocetes): pinnipeds-true seals (phocidsf, fur seals and sea Iions (otariidsf and walruses (adobenids); sirenians~anatees and dugongs, and the djminutive sea otter. ECTOPARASITES We use the term “ectoparasite’” loosely, when referring to organisms ranging from algae to fish which somehow cling to the surface of a marine mammal, and whose mode of attachment, feeding behavior, and relationship with the host or transport animal are sufficiently obscure that the term parasite cannot be excluded. What is clear is that these organisms damage the integument in some way. For example: a whale entering the coid waters of the Antarctic can acquire a yelIow film over its body. Blue whales so discoiored are known as “sulfur bottoms”. -
Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 51(2) 1984
Volume 51 July 1984 PROCEEDINGS ^ of of Washington '- f, V-i -: ;fx A semiannual journal of research devoted to Helminthohgy and all branches of Parasitology Supported in part by the -•>"""- v, H. Ransom Memorial 'Tryst Fund : CONTENTS -j<:'.:,! •</••• VV V,:'I,,--.. Y~v MEASURES, LENA N., AND Roy C. ANDERSON. Hybridization of Obeliscoides cuniculi r\ XGraybill, 1923) Graybill, ,1924 jand Obeliscoides,cuniculi multistriatus Measures and Anderson, 1983 .........:....... .., :....„......!"......... _ x. iXJ-v- 179 YATES, JON A., AND ROBERT C. LOWRIE, JR. Development of Yatesia hydrochoerus "•! (Nematoda: Filarioidea) to the Infective Stage in-Ixqdid Ticks r... 187 HUIZINGA, HARRY W., AND WILLARD O. GRANATH, JR. -Seasonal ^prevalence of. Chandlerellaquiscali (Onehocercidae: Filarioidea) in Braih, of the Common Grackle " '~. (Quiscdlus quisculd versicolor) '.'.. ;:,„..;.......„.;....• :..: „'.:„.'.J_^.4-~-~-~-<-.ii -, **-. 191 ^PLATT, THOMAS R. Evolution of the Elaphostrongylinae (Nematoda: Metastrongy- X. lojdfea: Protostrongylidae) Parasites of Cervids,(Mammalia) ...,., v.. 196 PLATT, THOMAS R., AND W. JM. SAMUEL. Modex of Entry of First-Stage Larvae ofr _^ ^ Parelaphostrongylus odocoilei^Nematoda: vMefastrongyloidea) into Four Species of Terrestrial Gastropods .....:;.. ....^:...... ./:... .; _.... ..,.....;. .-: 205 THRELFALL, WILLIAM, AND JUAN CARVAJAL. Heliconema pjammobatidus sp. n. (Nematoda: Physalbpteridae) from a Skate,> Psammobatis lima (Chondrichthyes: ; ''•• \^ Rajidae), Taken in Chile _... .„ ;,.....„.......„..,.......;. ,...^.J::...^..,....:.....~L.:....., -
Intraspecific Variation Among Trematodes of the Genus Telorchis Jean Leta Watertor Iowa State University
Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1965 Intraspecific variation among trematodes of the genus Telorchis Jean Leta Watertor Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Watertor, Jean Leta, "Intraspecific av riation among trematodes of the genus Telorchis " (1965). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 2843. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/2843 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertaUon has been microfilmed exactly as received 66-3907 WATERTOR, Jean Leta, 1921- INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION AMONG TREMATC®ES OF THE GENUS TELORCHIS. Iowa State University of Science and Technology PhJ), 1965 Zoology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION AMONG TREMATODES OF THE GENUS TELORCHIS by Jean Leta Watertor A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Parasitology Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In CHarge of Major Work Signature was redacted for privacy. Head of Major Department Signature was redacted for -
Cha Kuna Taiteit Un Chitan Dalam Menit
CHA KUNA TAITEIT US009943590B2UN CHITAN DALAM MENIT (12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No. : US 9 ,943 ,590 B2 Harn , Jr . et al. (45 ) Date of Patent: Apr . 17 , 2018 (54 ) USE OF LISTERIA VACCINE VECTORS TO 5 ,679 ,647 A 10 / 1997 Carson et al. 5 ,681 , 570 A 10 / 1997 Yang et al . REVERSE VACCINE UNRESPONSIVENESS 5 , 736 , 524 A 4 / 1998 Content et al. IN PARASITICALLY INFECTED 5 ,739 , 118 A 4 / 1998 Carrano et al . INDIVIDUALS 5 , 804 , 566 A 9 / 1998 Carson et al. 5 , 824 ,538 A 10 / 1998 Branstrom et al. (71 ) Applicants : The Trustees of the University of 5 ,830 ,702 A 11 / 1998 Portnoy et al . Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA (US ) ; 5 , 858 , 682 A 1 / 1999 Gruenwald et al. 5 , 922 , 583 A 7 / 1999 Morsey et al. University of Georgia Research 5 , 922 ,687 A 7 / 1999 Mann et al . Foundation , Inc. , Athens, GA (US ) 6 ,004 , 815 A 12/ 1999 Portnoy et al. 6 ,015 , 567 A 1 /2000 Hudziak et al. (72 ) Inventors: Donald A . Harn , Jr. , Athens, GA (US ) ; 6 ,017 ,705 A 1 / 2000 Lurquin et al. Yvonne Paterson , Philadelphia , PA 6 ,051 , 237 A 4 / 2000 Paterson et al . 6 ,099 , 848 A 8 / 2000 Frankel et al . (US ) ; Lisa McEwen , Athens, GA (US ) 6 , 287 , 556 B1 9 / 2001 Portnoy et al. 6 , 306 , 404 B1 10 /2001 LaPosta et al . ( 73 ) Assignees : The Trustees of the University of 6 ,329 ,511 B1 12 /2001 Vasquez et al. Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA (US ) ; 6 , 479 , 258 B1 11/ 2002 Short University of Georgia Research 6 , 504 , 020 B1 1 / 2003 Frankel et al . -
Chapter XXV —Class Oligochaeta
Chapter XXV —Class Oligochaeta (Aquatic Worms)- Phylum Annelida Oligochaetes are common in most freshwater habitats, but they are often ignored by freshwater biologists because they are thought to be extraordinarily difficult to identify. The extensive taxo- nomic work done since 1960 by Brinkhurst and others, however, has enabled routine identifica- tion of most of our freshwater oligochaetes from simple whole mounts. Some aquatic worms closely resemble terrestrial earthworms while others can be much narrower or thread-like. Many aquatic worms can tolerate low dissolved oxygen and may be found in large numbers in organi- cally polluted habitats. Aquatic worms can be distinguished by: (Peckarsky et al., 1990) • Body colour may be red, tan, brown or black. • Cylindrical, thin (some are very thin), segmented body may be upto 5 inches. • May have short bristles or hairs (setae) that help with movement (usually not visible). • Moves by stretching and pulling its body along in a worm-like fashion. Four families in the orders Tubificida and Lumbriculida are common in freshwater in northeastern North America: the Tubificidae, Naididae, Lumbriculidae, and Enchytraeidae. In addition, fresh- water biologists sometimes encounter lumbricine oligochaetes (order Lumbricina; the familiar earthworms), haplotaxid oligochaetes (order Haplotaxida; rare inhabitants of groundwater), Aeolosoma (class Aphanoneura; small worms once classified with the oligochaetes), and Manayunkia speciosa (class Polychaeta) in waters of northeastern North America. (Peckarsky et al., 1990). The two families, Naididae and Tubificidae form 80 to 100% of the annelid communi- ties in the benthos of most streams and lakes at all trophic levels. They range in size from 0.1 cm in Naididae to 3 or 4 cm in relaxed length in Lumbricidae, the family that contains the earth- worms. -
Digenea, Microphallidae) and Relative Merits of Two-Host Microphallid Life Cycles
Parasitology Research (2018) 117:1051–1068 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-5782-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Microphallus ochotensis sp. nov. (Digenea, Microphallidae) and relative merits of two-host microphallid life cycles Kirill V. Galaktionov1,2 & Isabel Blasco-Costa3 Received: 21 July 2017 /Accepted: 23 January 2018 /Published online: 3 February 2018 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract A new digenean species, Microphallus ochotensis sp. nov., was described from the intestine of Pacific eiders (Somateria mollissima v-nigrum) from the north of the Sea of Okhotsk. It differs from other microphallids in the structure of the metraterm, which consists of two distinct parts: a sac with spicule-like structures and a short muscular duct opening into the genital atrium. Mi. ochotensis forms a monophyletic clade together with other congeneric species in phylograms derived from the 28S and ITS2 rRNA gene. Its dixenous life cycle was elucidated with the use of the same molecular markers. Encysted metacercariae infective for birds develop inside sporocysts in the first intermediate host, an intertidal mollusc Falsicingula kurilensis. The morphology of metacercariae and adults was described with an emphasis on the structure of terminal genitalia. Considering that Falsicingula occurs at the Pacific coast of North America and that the Pacific eider is capable of trans-continental flights, the distribution of Mi. ochotensis might span the Pacific coast of Alaska and Canada. The range of its final hosts may presumably include other benthos- feeding marine ducks as well as shorebirds. We suggest that a broad occurrence of two-host life cycles in microphallids is associated with parasitism in birds migrating along sea coasts. -
First North American Sighting of Brown Shrike, (Lanius Cristatus) and Dusky Warbler (Phylloscopus Fuscatus), and Second Record O
F/rst North American Sighting of Brown Shrike, (Lanius cristatus) and Dusky Warbler (Phylloscopus fuscatus), and second record of Red-throad Flyca. her (Ficedula pavva) Ben King, Davis Finch, Richard Stallcupand Will Russell HtEFOLLOWING SIGHTINGS weremade by not reaching the coast), to the mouth of the he authorswhile leading birding tours White River in Anadyr' Valley and upper near Gambell, St. Lawrence Island in the reaches of the River Achay-Vayam in northern Bering Sea in June 1977. Scientific Koratskaya Zemlya, and occurs sporadically nomenclature follows Vaurie (1959) and in Kamchatka (Dement'ev et al., 1968 and English names are those of King and Ivanov, 1976). We could not see any white Dickinson (1975). frontal band in the field. L. c. cristatus has a narrow inconspicuousfrontal band whereas Brown Shrike, Lanius cristatus. A single all three of the other races listed by Vaurie bird was observed on June 4, 5 and 6, 1977 (1959) have broad, more conspicuousones about 0.7 km east of Gambell. All observa- tions were within a radius of 300 m on level Dusky Warbler, Phylloscopusfuscatus gravel containing some grass up to 25 cm One was seen about 4 km south-southeastof high, and adjacent to a boulder-strewntun- Gambell on June 6, 1977by about 15 observ- dra-covered hillside. The bird choseexposed ers. We watched it for about 1« hours percheson knolls and boulders.It was quite through scopesand binocularsgenerally shy but well observed through several at a distance of 30 - 40 m, but several times 20x-40x spotting scopes at distances of as close as approximately7 - 8 m. -
Phylogenetic and Phenetic Systematics of The
195 PHYLOGENETICAND PHENETICSYSTEMATICS OF THE OPISTHOP0ROUSOLIGOCHAETA (ANNELIDA: CLITELLATA) B.G.M. Janieson Departnent of Zoology University of Queensland Brisbane, Australia 4067 Received September20, L977 ABSTMCT: The nethods of Hennig for deducing phylogeny have been adapted for computer and a phylogran has been constructed together with a stereo- phylogran utilizing principle coordinates, for alL farnilies of opisthopor- ous oligochaetes, that is, the Oligochaeta with the exception of the Lunbriculida and Tubificina. A phenogran based on the sane attributes conpares unfavourably with the phyLogralnsin establishing an acceptable classification., Hennigrs principle that sister-groups be given equal rank has not been followed for every group to avoid elevation of the more plesionorph, basal cLades to inacceptabl.y high ranks, the 0ligochaeta being retained as a Subclass of the class Clitellata. Three orders are recognized: the LumbricuLida and Tubificida, which were not conputed and the affinities of which require further investigation, and the Haplotaxida, computed. The Order Haplotaxida corresponds preciseLy with the Suborder Opisthopora of Michaelsen or the Sectio Diplotesticulata of Yanaguchi. Four suborders of the Haplotaxida are recognized, the Haplotaxina, Alluroidina, Monil.igastrina and Lunbricina. The Haplotaxina and Monili- gastrina retain each a single superfanily and fanily. The Alluroidina contains the superfamiJ.y All"uroidoidea with the fanilies Alluroididae and Syngenodrilidae. The Lurnbricina consists of five superfaniLies. -
Earthworms (Annelida: Oligochaeta) of the Columbia River Basin Assessment Area
United States Department of Agriculture Earthworms (Annelida: Forest Service Pacific Northwest Oligochaeta) of the Research Station United States Columbia River Basin Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Assessment Area Management General Technical Sam James Report PNW-GTR-491 June 2000 Author Sam Jamesis an Associate Professor, Department of Life Sciences, Maharishi University of Management, Fairfield, IA 52557-1056. Earthworms (Annelida: Oligochaeta) of the Columbia River Basin Assessment Area Sam James Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project: Scientific Assessment Thomas M. Quigley, Editor U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon General Technical Report PNW-GTR-491 June 2000 Preface The Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project was initiated by the USDA Forest Service and the USDI Bureau of Land Management to respond to several critical issues including, but not limited to, forest and rangeland health, anadromous fish concerns, terrestrial species viability concerns, and the recent decline in traditional commodity flows. The charter given to the project was to develop a scientifically sound, ecosystem-based strategy for managing the lands of the interior Columbia River basin administered by the USDA Forest Service and the USDI Bureau of Land Management. The Science Integration Team was organized to develop a framework for ecosystem management, an assessment of the socioeconomic biophysical systems in the basin, and an evalua- tion of alternative management strategies. This paper is one in a series of papers developed as back- ground material for the framework, assessment, or evaluation of alternatives. It provides more detail than was possible to disclose directly in the primary documents. -
Herpetofauna and Aquatic Macro-Invertebrate Use of the Kino Environmental Restoration Project (KERP)
Herpetofauna and Aquatic Macro-invertebrate Use of the Kino Environmental Restoration Project (KERP) Tucson, Pima County, Arizona Prepared for Pima County Regional Flood Control District Prepared by EPG, Inc. JANUARY 2007 - Plma County Regional FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM Water Resources Regional Flood Control District DATE: January 5,2007 TO: Distribution FROM: Julia Fonseca SUBJECT: Kino Ecosystem Restoration Project Report The Ed Pastor Environmental Restoration ProjectiKino Ecosystem Restoration Project (KERP) is becoming an extraordinary urban wildlife resource. As such, the Pima County Regional Flood Control District (PCRFCD) contracted with the Environmental Planning Group (EPG) to gather observations of reptiles, amphibians, and aquatic insects at KERP. Water quality was also examined. The purpose of the work was to provide baseline data on current wildlife use of the KERP site, and to assess water quality for post-project aquatic wildlife conditions. I additionally requested sampling of macroinvertebrates at Agua Caliente Park and Sweetwater Wetlands in hopes that the differences in aquatic wildlife among the three sites might provide insights into the different habitats offered by KERF'. The results One of the most important wildlife benefits that KERP provides is aquatic habitat without predatory bullfrogs and non- native fish. Most other constructed ponds and wetlands in Tucson, such as the Sweetwater Wetlands and Agua Caliente pond, are fuIl of non-native predators which devastate native fish, amphibians and aquatic reptiles. The KERP Wetlands may provide an opportunity for reestablishing declining native herpetofauna. Provided that non- native fish, bullfrogs or crayfish are not introduced, KERP appears to provide adequate habitat for Sonoran Mud Turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense), Lowland Leopard Frogs (Rana yavapaiensis), and Mexican Gartersnakes (Tharnnophis eques) and Southwestern Woodhouse Toad (Bufo woodhousii australis).