1 Universidad De Alicante Facultad De Derecho

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Universidad De Alicante Facultad De Derecho UNIVERSIDAD DE ALICANTE FACULTAD DE DERECHO DERECHO ROMANO MATERIALES DOCENTES VICTORIANO SÁIZ LÓPEZ P R O G R A M A 1.- PRESENTACIÓN Suele afirmarse, desde una perspectiva formalista, que el Derecho romano ha dejado de ser un ordenamiento jurídico vigente y que ha quedado reducido a mero apartado de la Historia del Derecho. Según este criterio simplificador, las Constituciones y los Códigos que, tras la Revolución francesa, han entrado en vigor, a lo largo del siglo XIX, son considerados como actos creadores ex novo, por lo que suponen una ruptura completa con los antecedentes de Derecho histórico. Así habría ocurrido, por ejemplo, con el Código napoleónico en Francia, con el BGB alemán o con el Código civil español. Sin embargo, tales afirmaciones son válidas sólo en cierta medida. Es evidente que el paso de la Edad Moderna a la Edad Contemporánea supone un cambio radical, pero no hasta el extremo de haber introducido un ordenamiento totalmente original y novedoso. Podemos plantear, pues, importantes objeciones frente a ese criterio inicial. Ante todo, el Derecho romano de la Edad Antigua, que evoluciona desde el siglo VIII a. C. hasta el siglo V d. C., es un ordenamiento jurídico dotado de vigencia plena e inmediata. Pero lo más importante es constatar que no va a desaparecer tras la caída del Imperio de Occidente. En efecto, después de haber extendido su vigencia, más allá de la Ciudad, a todo el Orbe mediterráneo y de haber alcanzado un grado de elaboración completa, se imponía su recopilación definitiva, como así sucedió con ocasión de la obra sistemática del emperador bizantino Justiniano. Asimismo, el Imperio de Oriente se mantiene a lo largo de la Edad Media, hasta el siglo XV, y el Imperio de Occidente, restaurado en la persona de Carlomagno, pervive, después, como Sacro Imperio Romano-Germánico, hasta los tiempos de Napoleón. De este modo, podemos afirmar que el Derecho romano, a través del Corpus Iuris Civilis de origen justinianeo, va a recuperar su vigencia, pero no como un ordenamiento capaz de renovarse legalmente, sino como un modelo definitivamente cristalizado e inalterable, aunque susceptible de actualización a través de la doctrina. Todo ello nos lleva a la convicción de la existencia de una Tradición romanística medieval, moderna y contemporánea. En primer término, la Tradición romanística medieval, que tiene lugar entre los siglos V y XV d. C., se desarrolla en una circunstancia histórica fuertemente condicionada por la teocracia pontificia, o predominio del poder espiritual del Papado sobre el poder temporal de los monarcas, y por el régimen estamental, dominado por la nobleza y el clero, en detrimento del pueblo llano. En tales condiciones, la obra de los glosadores y comentaristas facilita la persistencia del ideal secular y ciudadano, frente a los ordenamientos canónico y feudal, éste último de carácter consuetudinario. A partir de la doctrina universitaria que los juristas civilistas extraen de las fuentes romanas, se hace posible la configuración de un Derecho común romano-canónico, que cumple la función de ordenación interregional. En este sentido, podemos hablar, todavía, de una vigencia 1 parcial y mediata. Al mismo tiempo, gracias al fenómeno de la Recepción, en el seno de los nuevos ordenamientos propios, locales y regionales, se produce una forma de vigencia, que también podemos denominar supletoria, es decir, complementaria de los citados Derechos propios locales y regionales, que van constituyéndose a lo largo del tiempo (ius commune-iura propria). Entre los ejemplos más significativos de Recepción, se encuentra el libro de Las Siete Partidas, en el ámbito de la Corona de Castilla. Tal vigencia supletoria tiene por objeto facilitar la interpretación, clarificadora e integradora, de las nuevas normas a la luz del Derecho histórico. Nos referimos, en segundo término, a la Tradición romanística moderna, que comprende los siglos XVI, XVII y XVIII. Hemos de destacar acontecimientos trascendentales, como la caída del Imperio de Oriente y Constantinopla, el descubrimiento y colonización de América, la Reforma protestante y la Contrarreforma católica, e incluso las guerras de religión. Las circunstancias históricas cambian profundamente, siendo un hecho de especial relevancia la creación del Estado moderno de carácter absoluto, tanto en el ámbito de la monarquía católica como en los reinos protestantes. Se pasa, entonces, de la teocracia pontificia al absolutismo monárquico, en un contexto en que las insuficiencias del Derecho común romano-canónico resultan patentes. Los autores tienen ante sí el reto de configurar un nuevo Derecho natural y de gentes que permita normalizar las relaciones interestatales, de acuerdo con los principios de la razón universal, tras la superación del concepto unitario de Derecho común romano-canónico- feudal del periodo medieval. Destacan, en este sentido, dos orientaciones metodológicas fundamentales, representadas por F. de Vitoria, en el marco de la Segunda escolástica, y por H. Grocio. Asimismo, tales principios racionales están destinados a delimitar los poderes de monarca absoluto. Uno de los ejemplos ilustrativos de Recepción moderna se encuentra en la Glosa latina incorporada por el jurista G. López al texto castellano de Las Partidas. Las nuevas escuelas jurídicas de inspiración romanística vienen identificadas con los términos de mos italicus, mos gallicus, usus modernus pandectarum. En suma, la vigencia parcial y mediata, o bien supletoria, del Derecho romano permanece, tras las oportunas modificaciones. En tercer lugar, cabe preguntarse si podemos admitir la existencia de una Tradición romanística contemporánea, a pesar de las transformaciones, incluso revolucionarias, que ahora tienen lugar. Se trata, en efecto, de un periodo en que, tras la caída del régimen estamental y de los privilegios nobiliarios y clericales, van configurándose los ordenamientos propios de las Naciones-Estado, en el contexto del Derecho internacional público y privado. La respuesta a esta pregunta es afirmativa, al menos en el sentido de vigencia supletoria implícita1, a través de las reglas y principios generales del Derecho, desarrollados por mediación de la jurisprudencia y la doctrina contemporáneas, junto con los antecedentes históricos (nihil fit ex nihilo; nihil sub sole novum). Un ejemplo ilustrativo, entre otros muchos, es la regla negativa non sunt probanda. 1 En el marco del Derecho foral, podemos encontrar incluso el reconocimiento explícito de esa vigencia supletoria, como pone de manifiesto la Ley 1 de la Compilación de Derecho Civil Foral de Navarra. En cuanto al Derecho común, los arts. 1 y 3 del Código Civil hacen referencia a los principios generales y a los antecedentes históricos. En este sentido, F. REINOSO, Los principios generales del Derecho en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Supremo, Madrid, 1987. Por lo que se refiere al Derecho internacional, el art. 38 del Estatuto de la Corte Internacional de Justicia se remite a los principios generales de derecho reconocidos por las naciones civilizadas. Citamos también la obra, AA VV, Principios de Derecho contractual europeo, Madrid, 2003. 2 2.- OBJETIVOS ESPECÍFICOS DEL APRENDIZAJE Concepción interdisciplinar del ordenamiento jurídico estatal e interestatal Comprensión del sistema de las instituciones Iniciación al método de razonamiento casuístico 3.- ACTIVIDADES ACADÉMICAS Consulta de los materiales docentes publicados, a través del Campus virtual, y de la bibliografía recomendada Clases teórico-prácticas Tutorías, presenciales y no presenciales, a través del Campus virtual Trabajo fin de curso y examen final Otras actividades complementarias 4.- EVALUACIÓN La normativa de la Universidad de Alicante, relativa a la implantación de Títulos de Grado, establece (en su art.16.1 f) lo siguiente: Los nuevos planes de estudio requieren del sistema de evaluación continuada. Por tanto, dado que el alumno debe adquirir parte de las competencias como consecuencia del desarrollo de la actividad docente planificada, en aquellas situaciones en que haya una prueba final su aportación a la calificación no excederá del 50%. De acuerdo con este sistema de evaluación continuada, establecemos cuatro calificaciones diversas, cuya media aritmética da como resultado la calificación definitiva: 1ª.- Nota teórica parcial, a partir de las redacciones entregadas al final de clase, sobre comentarios de textos latinos, aplicando el criterio “50 puntos = 10”. 2ª.- Nota práctica parcial, a partir de las intervenciones orales en clase, sobre traducciones, cuestiones, definiciones, clasificaciones, ejemplos, casos, etc., aplicando el criterio “50 puntos = 10”. 3ª.- Nota teórica final, a partir de examen final, de 0 a 10 puntos. 4ª.- Nota práctica final, a partir del trabajo fin curso, sobre el caso práctico, de 0 a 10 puntos. 3 5.- TEMARIO TEMA 1: Derecho romano actual: Introducción. 1.- Recepción contemporánea. 2.- Antecedentes del Derecho romano actual: Época moderna; época bajomedieval; época altomedieval; época justinianea; época postclásica; época clásica; época preclásica; época arcaica. TEMA 2: Derecho objetivo romano actual: Introducción. 1.- Fuentes de derecho objetivo. 2.- Criterios aplicables de derecho objetivo. TEMA 3: Régimen del hecho jurídico romano actual: Introducción. 1.- Hechos naturales. 2.- Acciones u omisiones ilícitas. 3.- Actos lícitos sustantivos. 4.- Actos lícitos procesales. TEMA 4: Derecho subjetivo romano actual: Introducción. 1.- Derechos personales (persona física y jurídica). 2.- Derechos personales (familia).
Recommended publications
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/02/2021 03:34:06PM Via Free Access  F.J
    REDUCING SENATORIAL CONTROL OVER PROVINCIAL COMMANDERS: A FORGOTTEN GABINIAN LAW OF 67BCE F.J. Vervaet I. Introduction At two critical junctures in Roman history, M. Tullius Cicero (cos. ) bit- terly complained that Caesar’s legally-guaranteed second quinquennium in the Gauls and Illyricum (from March to March ) had put him in a formidable position of power vis-à-vis a frustrated Senate.*1 On the th of December , less then a month before the outbreak of civil war between Caesar and his opponents in the Senate, Cicero indicates in Ad Atticum .. (Trebula) that this second five-year term, protected by law, was one of the main factors that had made Caesar nigh-irresistible. He complains, Curimperiumilliautcurillomodoprorogatumest?Curtantooperepugna- tum ut de eius absentis ratione habenda decem tribune pl. ferrent? His ille rebus ita conualuit ut nunc in uno ciui spes ad resistendum sit; qui mallem tantas ei uiris non dedisset quam nunc tam ualenti resisteret. Why was his command extended, and in such a fashion [i.e., in under the terms of the lex Pompeia Licinia]? Why was there such pressure to get the ten tribunes to bring in the law about his candidature in absentia [i.e., for a second consulship in , passed with the support of Cn. Pompeius as consul sine conlega]? By these steps, he has become so strong that hope of resistance now depends on one man; and I would rather that he [i.e., Pompeius] had not given Caesar such formidable strength in the first place than that he should resist him now that he is so powerful.
    [Show full text]
  • Cicero Leg. Agr. 2,1-46 Www-Fassung
    Inhalt Vorwort .......................................................................................................................... 3 Verzeichnis der abgekürzt zitierten Literatur ............................................................ 5 Einführung ..................................................................................................................... 9 1. Die Fakten ................................................................................................................... 9 2. Perspektiven .............................................................................................................. 10 2.1. Der Redner: Ciceros Karriere bis zum Konsulat .................................................... 11 2.2. Die Situation: Konstellationen und ‘Hintermänner’ in Rom Anfang 63................. 15 2.3. Der Gegenstand und seine Geschichte: leges agrariae – eine strittige Tradition ... 22 2.4. Der Gesetzesvorschlag des Rullus: ein verlorener Text ......................................... 27 2.5. Der Text des Gesetzes im Jan. 63: streng öffentlich, aber unkenntlich .................. 28 2.6. Der Aufbau der Rede .............................................................................................. 34 2.7. Die erste, dritte und vierte Rede ............................................................................. 35 2.8. Die Erschließung der Reden: Rezeption, Kommentare, Interpretationen ............... 40 Kommentar Cic. agr. 2, 1-46 .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Way: a Poetics of Roman Transportation
    On the Way: a Poetics of Roman Transportation by Jared McCabe Hudson A dissertation in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ellen Oliensis, chair Professor Maurizio Bettini Professor Dylan Sailor Professor Carlos Noreña Spring 2013 On the Way: a Poetics of Roman Transportation © 2013 by Jared McCabe Hudson Abstract On the Way: a Poetics of Roman Transportation By Jared McCabe Hudson Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Berkeley Professor Ellen Oliensis, Chair The first chapter examines the role played by the litter (lectica) and sedan chair (sella) in Roman literature and culture. The portrait of the wealthy freedman, lounging in his deluxe octaphoros (litter carried by eight imported slaves), is one which appears repeatedly, taking shape in the late Republic and reaching a climax of frequency in the satires of Juvenal and the epigrams of Martial, in the late first century CE. While by this stage the conveyance undeniably functions as a satirical symbol, the origins and constructedness of its role as such have been surprisingly under-examined by modern scholars. In order to excavate the litter’s developing identity, I first unravel Roman accounts of the vehicle’s origins. The lectica was repeatedly framed by Roman authors such as Cicero as an exotic import from the near east (Bithynia, in particular), only available to Romans upon their exposure, through the process of imperial expansion, to eastern softness. However, such a projection involved carefully distinguishing this “decadent” litter from already existing, sanctioned litter use: thus the lectica also encompasses a category closer to our “stretcher.” Indeed, the litter’s status as a newfangled import is belied by coexisting narratives of republican-era patriarchs riding in the lectica, usually because of injury, old age, or disability.
    [Show full text]
  • A FORGOTTEN GABINIAN LAW of 67 BCE FJ Vervaet I
    REDUCING SENATORIAL CONTROL OVER PROVINCIAL COMMANDERS: A FORGOTTEN GABINIAN LAW OF 67BCE F.J. Vervaet I. Introduction At two critical junctures in Roman history, M. Tullius Cicero (cos. ) bit- terly complained that Caesar’s legally-guaranteed second quinquennium in the Gauls and Illyricum (from March to March ) had put him in a formidable position of power vis-à-vis a frustrated Senate.*1 On the th of December , less then a month before the outbreak of civil war between Caesar and his opponents in the Senate, Cicero indicates in Ad Atticum .. (Trebula) that this second five-year term, protected by law, was one of the main factors that had made Caesar nigh-irresistible. He complains, Curimperiumilliautcurillomodoprorogatumest?Curtantooperepugna- tum ut de eius absentis ratione habenda decem tribune pl. ferrent? His ille rebus ita conualuit ut nunc in uno ciui spes ad resistendum sit; qui mallem tantas ei uiris non dedisset quam nunc tam ualenti resisteret. Why was his command extended, and in such a fashion [i.e., in under the terms of the lex Pompeia Licinia]? Why was there such pressure to get the ten tribunes to bring in the law about his candidature in absentia [i.e., for a second consulship in , passed with the support of Cn. Pompeius as consul sine conlega]? By these steps, he has become so strong that hope of resistance now depends on one man; and I would rather that he [i.e., Pompeius] had not given Caesar such formidable strength in the first place than that he should resist him now that he is so powerful.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Dissertation Final Version
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title On the Way: a Poetics of Roman Transportation Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4rp2b2ws Author Hudson, Jared McCabe Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California On the Way: a Poetics of Roman Transportation by Jared McCabe Hudson A dissertation in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ellen Oliensis, chair Professor Maurizio Bettini Professor Dylan Sailor Professor Carlos Noreña Spring 2013 On the Way: a Poetics of Roman Transportation © 2013 by Jared McCabe Hudson Abstract On the Way: a Poetics of Roman Transportation By Jared McCabe Hudson Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Berkeley Professor Ellen Oliensis, Chair The first chapter examines the role played by the litter (lectica) and sedan chair (sella) in Roman literature and culture. The portrait of the wealthy freedman, lounging in his deluxe octaphoros (litter carried by eight imported slaves), is one which appears repeatedly, taking shape in the late Republic and reaching a climax of frequency in the satires of Juvenal and the epigrams of Martial, in the late first century CE. While by this stage the conveyance undeniably functions as a satirical symbol, the origins and constructedness of its role as such have been surprisingly under-examined by modern scholars. In order to excavate the litter’s developing identity, I first unravel Roman accounts of the vehicle’s origins.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Dissertation Final Version
    On the Way: a Poetics of Roman Transportation by Jared McCabe Hudson A dissertation in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ellen Oliensis, chair Professor Maurizio Bettini Professor Dylan Sailor Professor Carlos Noreña Spring 2013 On the Way: a Poetics of Roman Transportation © 2013 by Jared McCabe Hudson Abstract On the Way: a Poetics of Roman Transportation By Jared McCabe Hudson Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Berkeley Professor Ellen Oliensis, Chair The first chapter examines the role played by the litter (lectica) and sedan chair (sella) in Roman literature and culture. The portrait of the wealthy freedman, lounging in his deluxe octaphoros (litter carried by eight imported slaves), is one which appears repeatedly, taking shape in the late Republic and reaching a climax of frequency in the satires of Juvenal and the epigrams of Martial, in the late first century CE. While by this stage the conveyance undeniably functions as a satirical symbol, the origins and constructedness of its role as such have been surprisingly under-examined by modern scholars. In order to excavate the litter’s developing identity, I first unravel Roman accounts of the vehicle’s origins. The lectica was repeatedly framed by Roman authors such as Cicero as an exotic import from the near east (Bithynia, in particular), only available to Romans upon their exposure, through the process of imperial expansion, to eastern softness. However, such a projection involved carefully distinguishing this “decadent” litter from already existing, sanctioned litter use: thus the lectica also encompasses a category closer to our “stretcher.” Indeed, the litter’s status as a newfangled import is belied by coexisting narratives of republican-era patriarchs riding in the lectica, usually because of injury, old age, or disability.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIA Y FUENTES DEL DERECHO ROMANO.Pdf
    María-Eva Fernández Baquero Apuntes Unidad 1 Profesora Titular de Derecho Romano UNIDAD 1: HISTORIA Y FUENTES DEL DERECHO ROMANO 1.1.- CONCEPTO DE DERECHO ROMANO. TERMINOLOGÍA Antes de comenzar analizando el concepto de Derecho Romano es preciso detenernos en el significado del término “Derecho”. Entendiendo por tal como “norma de convivencia social”. Esto implica que la sociedad, en general, para poder conseguir una convivencia pacífica necesita de unas pautas, reglas o normas de comportamiento que vendrán determinas por el sistema político que en cada etapa de la historia social exista. Ahora bien, con independencia del sistema político concreto que se desarrolle, lo que está claro es que el Derecho (como norma de convivencia social) tiene, a su vez, distintos significados diferentes pero complementarios: 1º) Derecho Objetivo (norma agendi)Æ Conjunto de normas jurídicas que regulan la convivencia en sociedad y se imponen a la conducta humana de una forma coactiva. 2º) Derecho Subjetivo (facultas agendi)Æ Facultad jurídica que a una determinada persona atribuye el Derecho Objetivo. Facultad concedida a una persona de usar o disfrutar de una cosa de una manera más o menos completa (ius in rem), o bien de exigir a una determinada persona (ius in personam) una cierta prestación o comportamiento de dar, hacer o no hacer. 3º) Derecho PositivoÆ Es el derecho objetivo y subjetivo vigente o actual, es decir, es el que se aplica efectivamente a una sociedad determinada. 4º) Derecho HistóricoÆ El derecho del pasado que el jurista actual puede estudiar o analizar pero no aplicar, puesto que no es un derecho vigente o derecho positivo.
    [Show full text]
  • TESI FILE UNICO Sezioni
    ALMA MATER STUDIORUM UNIVERSITÀ DI BOLOGNA DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN ISTITUZIONI, MERCATI E TUTELE INDIRIZZO DIRITTO AMMINISTRATIVO Ciclo XXV Settore Concorsuale di afferenza: 12/D1 – Diritto amministrativo Settore Scientifico disciplinare: IUS/10 – Diritto amministrativo IL PRINCIPIO DI CONTINUITÀ NEL DIRITTO AMMINISTRATIVO Coordinatore Dottorato: Presentata da: Chiar.mo Prof. Dott. ssa FRANCO MASTRAGOSTINO OLIVIA PINI Relatore: Matricola n. 0000566138 Chiar.mo Prof. MARIO MIDIRI Esame finale anno 2013 INDICE BREVI CONSIDERAZIONI INTRODUTTIVE ................................................................... 1 PARTE PRIMA LA CONTINUITÀ NELL’AMMINISTRAZIONE: RICOSTRUZIONE IN CHIAVE CRITICA DELLO STATO DELL’ARTE CAPITOLO 1 IL PRINCIPIO DI CONTINUITÀ NELL’ORGANIZZAZIONE DELLA P.A. 13 1.1. La prorogatio dei poteri .................................................................................. 20 1.2. La supplenza e il commissariamento .............................................................. 39 1.3. I poteri sostitutivi ............................................................................................ 51 1.4. Lo spoils system .............................................................................................. 60 CAPITOLO 2 IL PRINCIPIO DI CONTINUITÀ NELL’ATTIVITÀ AMMINISTRATIVA 75 2.1. I tempi procedimentali: la continuità nel farsi dell’atto .................................. 77 2.2. Il silenzio: continuità e discontinuità nell’assenza dell’atto ........................... 96 2.3. Effetti dell’atto e potere amministrativo:
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient and Modern Concepts of Lawfulness
    Ancient and Modern Concepts of Lawfulness by Zˇika BUJUKLIC´ (University of Belgrade) The legal system, in the broadest sense of the term, should ensure a community’s basic cohesion, prevent severe forms of discord hazardous to its existence, and establish an effective social structure. That the community of Ancient Rome successfully accomplished these objectives was best proven by its longerrity. On the hills above the Tiber river the Latins established their urbs, which saw tremendous growth and fundamental transformations: regnum – res publica – Imperium Romanum. For centuries, the Roman community served as a model of government for other nations (1). The Romans’ strength 1) DE VISSHER, L’espansione della civitas romana e la diffusione del diritto romano, in Conferenze romanistiche, Milano, 1960, 181 ss. SESTON, 124 ZˇIKA BUJUKLIC´ lay not only in their deep reverence for their own gods, customs and traditions, in their fighting spirit and their military prowess, but also in a marked adherence to the norms they had established. The greatest difference between the Romans and other ancient peoples, however, lay in the manner they looked upon the nature of these norms and on the origin of their binding force. Heraclitus, for example, warned his contemporaries that the polis had to care as much about its laws as about its city ramparts (2). In Crito Plato describes how Socrates was condemned to death by certain laws. The following message still stands, engraved in the rocks of Thermopylae: “Traveller, tell Sparta that we died here in obeisance to its laws”. The Roman respect for the law derives from the fact that they were considered to be of divine origin and, as Plato said, obeisance to laws meant obeisance to the gods.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Legislate with Wisdom and Eloquence
    HOW TO LEGISLATE WITH WISDOM AND ELOQUENCE HOW TO LEGISLATE WITH WISDOM AND ELOQUENCE The Art of Legislation Reconstructed from the Rhetorical Tradition Luis Alberto Marchili Author’s Edition 2016 Marchili, Luis Alberto How to Legislate with Wisdom and Eloquence. The Art of Legislation Reconstructed from the Rhetorical Tradition. 1st edition, spanish, Editorial Dunken, Buenos Aires, 2009, 498 p. 16x23 cm. ISBN 978-987-02-4047-1. Author’s English translation, Author’s Edition, ebook (pdf), 333 pp. Buenos Aires, 2016. Philosophy of Law. Rhetoric. Art of legislation. Legislative Drafting. © 2016 Luis Alberto Marchili e-mail: luis4@fibertel.com.ar All rights reserved: no part of this book may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior written permission from the author. "[...] the orator that we look for, and who we want to make the chief of the State council, [will be] the author of the resolutions to be taken by the government, and either in the senate or in the assemblies, will always make his opinions prevail by the force of wisdom and eloquence." Cicero (106-43 B.C.)1 1 "Entre celles-ci, la secte qui combat pour la volupté, quand même ses principes auraient quelque apparence de vérité, ne peut convenir en rien à l'orateur que nous cherchons, et dont nous voulons faire le chef du conseil de l'État, l'auteur des résolutions à prendre pour le gouvernement, et celui qui, dans le sénat comme dans les assemblées, fera toujours prévaloir ses avis à force de sagesse et d'éloquence." "Ex illis autem, quae remanent, ea philosophia, quae suscepit patrocinium voluptatis, etsi cui vera videatur, procul abest tamen ab eo viro quem quaerimus, et quem auctorem publici consilii, et regendae civitatis ducem, et sententiae atque eloquentiae principem in senatu, in populo, in causis publicis esse volumus." Cicero, De Oratore, III, XVII Cicéron, De l'Orateur, III, XVII; dans Oeuvres Complètes de Cicéron, Traduction de S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Republican Rome and Popular Politics
    Review Article Mid-Republican Rome and Popular Politics Alexander Yakobson R. F. Vishnia, State, Society and Popular Leaders in Mid-Republican Rome 241 - 167BC, London -ΝΎ.: Routledge, 1996, xii + 264 pp. R.W s book on mid-Republican politics and society is part of the ongoing debate on the nature of the Roman political system and the people’s role in it.1 How­ ever, one of the best features of the book is that it provides an integrated analysis of foreign and domestic affairs, always trying to establish the domestic context of foreign policy decisions and the foreign policy background of internal politi­ cal issues and controversies. In this respect, and contrary to what is often the case, this book offers more than what its title promises. Rome’s wars and con­ quests, as well as her internal political developments, and the interconnection between the two spheres, are subjected to a learned, careful and thoughtful anal­ ysis. The overall picture of this period which emerges is lucid and coherent. Although I disagree with some of R.W s views on Roman politics, I have no doubt that this book is a significant contribution to our understanding of mid- Republican Rome. The first chapter deals with ‘the era of Flaminius’ (241-218). R.V. argues, convincingly, that this period should not be seen merely as a prelude to the Sec­ ond Punic War. Rather, it should be analysed mainly from the standpoint of what was apparently Rome’s highest national priority in that period — the con- The debate was largely sparked by F.
    [Show full text]
  • Luxury As a Theme in Latin Love Elegy
    LUXURY AS A THEME IN LATIN LOVE ELEGY by -/ c. E. Chandler Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Classics at the University of Cape Town supervisor: Prof RA Whitaker, University of Cape Town September 1991 The University of Cape Town has been given the right to reprodu:;-; this thesis in whole or In par( Cooyright is :ic!d by the author. The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I should like to thank the following individuals without whose patience and assistance this dissertation would not have been. completed: Prof K. M. Coleman who supervised my dissertation initially and continued to give me valuable advice; Dr M R Mezzabotta who took me under her wing for several months; my friend Miss D. Massenz, who courageously proof-read the English portions of my text; my supervisor Prof R. A. Whitaker, . whose "gentle insistence" and constructive criticism ensured that the job got done . I extend my thanks also to the Interlibrary Loan department of the library of the University of Cape Town for their prompt and efficient service. i ABSTRACT The territorial expansion of Rome in the second and first centuries B.C. was accompanied by an influx of foreign luxuries and fashions into Italy.
    [Show full text]