DOCSLIB.ORG

Quaboag River Bridge, Brookfield, MA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quaboag River Bridge, Brookfield, MA Project Number: LDA-1301 Quaboag River Bridge Replacement Design A Major Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty Of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE By Lauren D’Angelo Madison Shugrue Mariah Seaboldt Date: 18 April 2013 Approved: Professor Leonard Albano, Advisor Abstract The Quaboag River Bridge located in Brookfield, MA is to be replaced through the Accelerated Bridge Program. In this Major Qualifying Project, alternative designs for the Quaboag River Bridge were investigated and evaluated based on a set of established criteria. As a result of the evaluation process a prestressed concrete, spread box girder design was created based on AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. The proposed design includes a completed superstructure, substructure, 3D model and life-cycle cost analysis. 2 Authorship The Abstract, Authorship, Capstone Design, Introduction, and Background chapters were equally contributed to by Lauren D’Angelo, Madison Shugrue, and Mariah Seaboldt. All other elements of the project were collaborated on, but headed and written individually. The following individuals were responsible for the specific project elements listed below: Evaluation Criteria: Mariah Seaboldt Superstructure: Mariah Seaboldt Deck: Madison Shugrue Substructure: Lauren D’Angelo Cost Analysis: Lauren D’Angelo Editing and Formatting Madison Shugrue 3 Capstone Design In our Major Qualifying Project, alternative designs for a single span bridge were investigated and evaluated based on a set of established criteria. As a result of the evaluation process, we created a prestressed concrete, spread box girder design based on AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. This design included a completed superstructure, substructure, 3D model and life-cycle cost analysis. To satisfy the ABET Capstone Design requirements, our project addressed realistic sustainable, environmental, ethical, manufacturability, economic, social, political, and health and safety constraints of the Quaboag River Bridge Replacement project. For our project’s bridge design, we chose to use concrete girders rather than steel girders after researching sustainable, environmental, ethical, and manufacturability evaluation criteria. We also ran life-cycle cost analyses (LCCAs) of a concrete and steel girder bridge using the program BridgeLCC from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Since Massachusetts will only fund a concrete sustainable bridge design, the LCCAs allowed political, economic, and social considerations of the replacement bridge project to be addressed. Ethical and health and safety considerations were met by abiding to AASHTO LFRD Bridge Design Specifications through the entirety of the project. With these combined efforts, our project satisfied the ABET Capstone Design requirements. 4 Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Authorship .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Capstone Design ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Contents ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 7 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. 8 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 11 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 14 2. Background ............................................................................................................................................. 16 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 16 2.2 Spread Box Girder Bridges ................................................................................................................ 20 2.3 Steel Box Girder Bridge ..................................................................................................................... 24 2.4 Bridge Decks ...................................................................................................................................... 27 2.5 Substructure ...................................................................................................................................... 34 2.6 Decommissioning of the Bridge ........................................................................................................ 41 2.7 Constructability ................................................................................................................................. 45 2.8 Building Information Modeling ......................................................................................................... 46 2.9 Evaluation Criteria for Bridge Designs .............................................................................................. 47 2.10 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 51 3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 52 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 52 3.2 Value-Based Evaluation and Selection of Options ............................................................................ 52 3.3 Superstructure Design ...................................................................................................................... 61 3.4 Substructure Design Method ............................................................................................................ 68 3.5 BridgeLCC Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Method ...................................................................................... 84 4. Results ..................................................................................................................................................... 88 4.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 88 4.2 Value-Based Evaluation and Selection of Options ............................................................................ 88 4.3 Superstructure Design ...................................................................................................................... 92 4.4 Substructure .................................................................................................................................... 104 5 4.5 3D Model ......................................................................................................................................... 113 4.6 BridgeLCC Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 115 5. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................... 121 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 121 5.2 Superstructure ................................................................................................................................ 121 5.3 Substructure .................................................................................................................................... 123 5.4 Cost Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 126 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................... 128 References ................................................................................................................................................ 129 Appendix A: Proposal ................................................................................................................................ 133 Appendix B: Evaluation Criteria Analysis .................................................................................................. 175 Appendix C: Superstructure Design .......................................................................................................... 179 Appendix D: Substructure Design Equations ............................................................................................ 191 Appendix F: Substructure Spreadsheet Calculations and Drawings ......................................................... 205 6 List of Figures Figure 1 - Location of Bridge - Brookfield, MA ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quaboag and Quacumqausit
    Total Maximum Daily Loads of Total Phosphorus for Quaboag & Quacumquasit Ponds COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS STEPHEN R. PRITCHARD, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ROBERT W. GOLLEDGE Jr., COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION MARY GRIFFIN, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR Total Maximum Daily Loads of Total Phosphorus for Quaboag & Quacumquasit Ponds DEP, DWM TMDL Final Report MA36130-2005-1 CN 216.1 May 16, 2006 Location of Quaboag & Quacumquasit Pond within Chicopee Basin in Massachusetts. NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY Limited copies of this report are available at no cost by written request to: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management 627 Main Street Worcester, MA 01608 This report is also available from DEP’s home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/tmdls.htm A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This report, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963- (current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester. DISCLAIMER References to trade names, commercial products, manufacturers, or distributors in this report constituted neither endorsement nor recommendations by the Division of Watershed Management for use. Front Cover Photograph of the flow gate at Quacumquasit Pond, East Brookfield. Total Maximum Daily Load of Total Phosphorus for Quaboag and Quacumquasit Ponds 2 Executive Summary The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is responsible for monitoring the waters of the Commonwealth, identifying those waters that are impaired, and developing a plan to bring them back into compliance with the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Census Tract Outline Map (Census 2000
    42.170732N CENSUS TRACT OUTLINE MAP (CENSUS 2000) 42.170732N 72.604842W 72.337413W 8112 Chicopee Rsvr 8102 Three Rivers 69730 8104.12 Palmer ABBREVIATED LEGEND 8104.14 52070 8106.02 SYMBOL NAME STYLE Quaboag River 8101 INTERNATIONAL 8106.01 Minechoag Pond LUDLOW TOWN 37175 Chicopee 8103 River Chicopee° 13660 Chicopee River AIR (FEDERAL) 8104.03 8104.04 Trust Land 8110 PALMER TOWN 52105 OTSA / TDSA Chicopee River AIR (State) 8107 SDAISA 8001 STATE COUNTY 8002.02 MINOR CIVIL DIV.1 Nine 8109.01 Mile 8108 Pond Consolidated City Lake 1 Lorraine Incorporated Place Loon Pond 1 Five Census Designated Place Mile 8136.01 8002.01 Pond 8015.03 Census Tract Abbreviation Reference: AIR = American Indian Reservation; Trust Land = Off−Reservation Trust Land; OTSA = Oklahoma Tribal Statistical Area; 8109.02 TDSA = Tribal Designated Statistical Area; Tribal Subdivision = American Indian Tribal Subdivision; SDAISA = State Designated American Indian Statistical Area 1 A ' * ' following a place name indicates that the place is coextensive with a Wilbraham 79705 MCD. A ' ° ' indicates that the place is also a false MCD. In both cases, the 8003 8015.02 Pulpit Rock Pond MCD name is shown only when it differs from the place name. FEATURES FEATURES 8004 8014.01 8016.03 WILBRAHAM TOWN 79740 River / Lake 8016.02 Glacier 8005 8014.02 8015.01 Military Inset Out Area 8006 8009 8013 Springfield° 67000 8008 8016.01 8136.02 8012 8017 Dan Baker Cove 8018 MONSON TOWN 42145 8011.01 Connecticut River 8137 Watershops Pond 8016.04 8024 8019 8011.02 West8123 Springfield* 77885
    [Show full text]
  • The Quaboag River Blue Trail! Access Is Possible at Rt 9 and Near the Spencer Fair Grounds
    still a wild interface with surrounding forests. Studies POINTS OF INTEREST have shown an inverse relation between the presence 1 The Seven Mile River offers paddling at adequate flows. of marshbirds to the presence of development around a Welcometo the Quaboag River Blue Trail! Access is possible at Rt 9 and near the Spencer Fair Grounds. marsh, and it is no surprise that the Quaboag still supports Adequate flows at Stevens Rd are generally over 3 cfs as This guide and map will familiarize you with the Quaboag impressive numbers of American bitterns, along with measured at the Seven Mile USGS flow gage. other rare species of marshbirds, while so many other River’s interesting natural and historical features and 2 East Brookfield access on the Seven Mile River is recreational opportunities. marshes in central and eastern Massachusetts have lost their marshbirds to the on Stevens Rd off Cottage St (off Rt 9). At low flows, the first The Quaboag Blue Trail is a community partnership disturbance, pollution hundred yards can be shallow. The East Brookfield River formed to strengthen river stewardship and community and general degradation below Lake Lashaway can be accessed at the end of Connie vitality throughout Central Massachusetts’ Chicopee brought on by marsh-side Mack Dr. In low water, these segments may be best to paddle 4Rivers Watershed, which we refer to as C4R. sprawl. (MassDF&W) up from Quaboag Pond. Be prepared for beaver dams, too. The Upper Quaboag Blue Trail offers a smooth paddle River Etiquette: 3 Quaboag Pond access is on Shore Rd at the state boat through scenic and wildlife-rich areas bordering Mass The upper Quaboag River ramp.
    [Show full text]
  • T Ro U T Sto C K E D Wat E Rs
    2021 MASSACHUSETTS TROUT STOCKED WATERS CONNECTICUT VALLEY DISTRICT Daily stocking updates can be viewed at Mass.gov/Trout. All listed waters are stocked in the spring. Bold waters are stocked in spring and fall. AGAWAM: Westfield River GILL: Fall River AMHERST: Adams Brook, Amethyst Brook, GRANBY: Bachelor Brook, Dufresne Farm Pond Cushman Brook, Fort River, Mill River, Puffers Pond GREENFIELD: Fall River, Green River (Factory Hollow Pond) HADLEY: Fort River, Harts Brook, Mill River, USFW BELCHERTOWN: Jabish Brook, Metacomet Lake, Pond Quabbin Reservoir, Scarboro Brook, Swift River HAMPDEN: Scantic River, South Branch Mill River BERNARDSTON: Fall River, Shattuck Brook HATFIELD: Mill River BRIMFIELD: Dean Pond, Foskett Mill Stream,Little Alum Pond, Mill Brook, Quaboag River, Quinebaug HOLLAND: Hamilton Reservoir, Holland Pond, River, Sherman Pond Quinebaug River CHICOPEE: Chicopee Reservoir HOLYOKE: Broad Brook COLRAIN: East Branch North River, Green River, LEVERETT: Doolittle Brook, Roaring Brook, Sawmill North River, West Branch North River River CONWAY: Bear River, Deerfield River, Poland Brook, LEYDEN: Green River, Shattuck Brook South River LUDLOW: Broad Brook, Chapin (Haviland) Pond, DEERFIELD: Deerfield River, Mill River Chicopee River EAST LONGMEADOW: South Branch Mill River MONSON: Chicopee Brook, Chicopee Brook Reservoir, Conant Brook, Quaboag River, Scantic EASTHAMPTON: Broad Brook, Hannum Brook, River Manhan River, Nashawannuck Pond, North Branch Manhan River MONTAGUE: Goddard Brook, Millers River, Sawmill River ERVING: Keyup
    [Show full text]
  • Quaboag & Quacumquasit Ponds
    Total Maximum Daily Loads of Total Phosphorus for Quaboag & Quacumquasit Ponds COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS STEPHEN R. PRITCHARD, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ROBERT W. GOLLEDGE Jr., COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION MARY GRIFFIN, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR Total Maximum Daily Loads of Total Phosphorus for Quaboag & Quacumquasit Ponds DEP, DWM TMDL Final Report MA36130-2005-1 CN 216.1 May 16, 2006 Location of Quaboag & Quacumquasit Pond within Chicopee Basin in Massachusetts. NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY Limited copies of this report are available at no cost by written request to: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management 627 Main Street Worcester, MA 01608 This report is also available from DEP’s home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/tmdls.htm A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This report, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963- (current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester. DISCLAIMER References to trade names, commercial products, manufacturers, or distributors in this report constituted neither endorsement nor recommendations by the Division of Watershed Management for use. Front Cover Photograph of the flow gate at Quacumquasit Pond, East Brookfield. Total Maximum Daily Load of Total Phosphorus for Quaboag and Quacumquasit Ponds 2 Executive Summary The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is responsible for monitoring the waters of the Commonwealth, identifying those waters that are impaired, and developing a plan to bring them back into compliance with the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology at the Tobin's Beach Site Brookfield
    ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE TOBIN’S BEACH SITE BROOKFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS Eric S. Johnson University of Massachusetts Archaeological Services 2017 This project has been financed in part with federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, through the Massachusetts Historical Commission, Secretary of the Commonwealth William Francis Galvin, Chairman. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, or the Massachusetts Historical Commission, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior, or the Massachusetts Historical Commission. The U.S. Department of Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, gender or handicap in its federally assisted programs. If you desire more information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of Interior, 1849 C Street NW, Room 1324, Washington, DC 20240. By the Shores of Quaboag Pond This is a story about a special place—its ancient past and its more recent history. Quaboag Pond in Brookfield, Massachusetts has a deep history. This report tells some of that ancient history. It also tells some more recent history about this place, and about an archaeological study that was done here in 2017 by UMass Archaeological Services. What is now known as Brookfield, Massachusetts has been a home to people for thousands of years, though not by that name. The ancestors of today’s Nipmuck* people and the other New England tribes arrived here more than 12,000 years ago. That’s 120 centuries! That is a time span that is easy to state, but impossible to really understand for most of us.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FLOODS of MARCH 1936 Part 1
    If you do jno*-Be <l this report after it has served your purpose, please return it to the Geolocical -"" Survey, using the official mailing label at the end UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THE FLOODS OF MARCH 1936 Part 1. NEW ENGLAND RIVERS Prepared in cooperation withihe FEDERAL EMERGENCY ADMINISTRATION OF PUBLIC WORKS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 798 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Water-Supply Paper 798 THS^LOODS OF MARCH 1936 PART 1. NEW ENGLAND RIVERS NATHAN C. GROVER Chief Hydraulic Engineer Prepared in cooperation with the FEDERAL EMERGENCY ADMINISTRATION OF PUBLIC WORKS UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1937 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 70 cents CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction......................................................... 2 Authorization........................................................ 5 Administration and personnel......................................... 5 Acknowledgments...................................................... 6 General features of the storms....................................... 7 Floods of the New England rivers....................................o 12 Meteorologic and hydrologic conditions............................... 25 Precipitation records............................................ 25 General f>!-................................................... 25 Distr<* '-utlon
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Ware River Watershed Access Plan
    Public Access Management Plan Update – 2010 Ware River Watershed December 2009 Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Water Supply Protection Office of Watershed Management Abstract The Public Access Management Plan Update 2010 - Ware River Watershed explains DCR- Watershed’s obligation to manage public access on its drinking water supply lands, the process used in developing the management plan, and its policies. The update process included an intensive public input component which collected survey data from 274 stakeholders from a period of May 2009-September 2009. This management plan contains six sections 1) an introduction to DCR-Watershed, with a revised Master Policy statement ; 2) a brief history of the Ware River Watershed and existing conditions; 3) the methodology used in the update and development of the policies in the plan; 4) Fact Sheets, with maps where appropriate, for 29 individual public access policies; 5) the description of related operational activities; and 6) an Implementation Schedule, including a new annual policy review process. The revisions and updates made to the 2010 plan have clarified existing policies. Eight policies were modified and one policy was added. DCR will begin implementation of the Public Access Management Plan Update starting January 2010. DCR will conduct an annual report to evaluate the Plan in general, as well as any policy concerns or conflicts that arose during the year beginning with its first report in 2011. DCR-Watershed intends to conduct another Plan update by 2020, or earlier, if needed. Citation Public Access Management Plan Update 2010 - Ware River Watershed. Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Water Supply Protection, Belchertown, MA.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing Nitrogen Endpoints for Three Long Island Sound Watershed Groupings: Embayments, Large Riverine Systems, and Western Long Island Sound Open Water
    Establishing Nitrogen Endpoints for Three Long Island Sound Watershed Groupings: Embayments, Large Riverine Systems, and Western Long Island Sound Open Water Subtask B. Regulated Point Source Discharges Submitted to: Submitted by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Tetra Tech, Inc. Region 1 and Long Island Sound Office March 27, 2018 Establishing N Endpoints for LIS Watershed Groupings Subtask B. Regulated Point Source Discharges This Tetra Tech technical study was commissioned by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to synthesize and analyze water quality data to assess nitrogen-related water quality conditions in Long Island Sound and its embayments, based on the best scientific information reasonably available. This study is neither a proposed TMDL, nor proposed water quality criteria, nor recommended criteria. The study is not a regulation, and is not guidance, and cannot impose legally binding requirements on EPA, States, Tribes, or the regulated community, and might not apply to a particular situation or circumstance. Rather, it is intended as a source of relevant information to be used by water quality managers, at their discretion, in developing nitrogen reduction strategies. B-i Establishing N Endpoints for LIS Watershed Groupings Subtask B. Regulated Point Source Discharges Subtask B. Regulated Point Source Discharges Contents Introduction and Methods Overview .................................................................................................... B-1 Traditional Point Sources ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brookfield Open Space and Recreation Plan
    Brookfield Open Space and Recreation Plan Brookfield, Massachusetts March 2010 With Assistance from 2 Washington Square – Union Station Worcester, MA 01604 www.cmrpc.org APPENDICES Appendix A – The Massachusetts Heritage Landscape Inventory Program – Upper Quaboag Watershed and North Quabbin Region Landscape Inventory – Brookfield Reconnaissance Report (without appendices) Appendix B - MACRIS Search Results Appendix C – October 15 SWOT Analysis and October 29, 2008 Open Space and Recreation Forum Notes Appendix D - 2008 Resident Survey Appendix E - Funding Resources Appendix F - ADA Access Self Evaluation and Grievance Procedure 2010 Brookfield Open Space and Recreation Plan Page 90 Appendix A – The Massachusetts Heritage Landscape Inventory Program – Upper Quaboag Watershed and North Quabbin Region Landscape Inventory – Brookfield Reconnaissance Report (without appendices) 2010 Brookfield Open Space and Recreation Plan Page 91 BROOKFIELD RECONNAISSANCE REPORT UPPER QUABOAG WATERSHED AND NORTH QUABBIN REGION LANDSCAPE INVENTORY MASSACHUSETTS HERITAGE LANDSCAPE INVENTORY PROGRAM Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission North Quabbin Regional Landscape Partnership PROJECT TEAM Massachusetts Department of Conservation Local Heritage Landscape Participants and Recreation Brandon Avery, N. Brookfield Local Project Richard K. Sullivan, Jr, Commissioner Coordinator Joe Orfant, Director, Bureau of Planning & Jim Barlette Resource Protection Linda Barlette Patrice Kish, Director,
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating the 350Th Anniversary of Quaboag Plantation T Able of Contents Welcome
    2010-2011 Visitor & Resource Guide for Central Massachusetts 2010 Brimeld Antique Shows May 11-16 • July 13-18 • September 7-12 Belchertown • Brimeld • Brookeld • East Brookeld • Hardwick • Holland• Monson New Braintree • North Brookeld • Palmer • Spencer • Wales • Ware • Warren • West Brookeld Celebrating the 350th Anniversary of Quaboag Plantation T able of Contents Welcome ..........................................................................................................2 Quaboag Plantation 350th Anniversary History ............................................... 3 Quaboag Plantation 350th Anniversary Events ..............................................4-5 Accommodations ...........................................................................................6-7 Antiques .....................................................................................................8-14 Attractions .................................................................................................15-19 Calendar of Events ....................................................................................22-26 Farms, Orchards & Nurseries ..........................................................................27 Restaurants ................................................................................................28-30 Services .....................................................................................................31-34 Shopping ...................................................................................................35-36
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Water Use and Transfer in the Chicopee River Basin
    Overview of Water Use and Transfer in the Chicopee River Basin Prepared For: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Resources 251 Causeway Street, Suite 700 Boston, Massachusetts 02114 Prepared By: Gomez and Sullivan Engineers, P.C. Engineers and Environmental Scientists 55 North Stark Highway Weare, NH 03281 Final Report, September 2003 Overview of Water Use and Transfer in the Chicopee River Basin Final Report Executive Summary Introduction This study was funded by the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs (EOEA), through the Massachusetts Watershed Initiative and managed by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management (MDEM), now the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (MDCR) to evaluate seasonal water movement and use within the Chicopee River basin. Located in central Massachusetts, the Chicopee River basin is surrounded by the Connecticut, Millers, Nashua, Blackstone, French, and Quinebaug River basins. The Chicopee River basin drains approximately 722 mi2 and is comprised of three major watersheds-the Swift River, Ware River, and Quaboag River watersheds. Quabbin Reservoir, located in the Swift River watershed of the Chicopee, is one of the largest reservoirs constructed for public water supply in the world. It is the primary water supply source for most of the cities and towns near metropolitan Boston. The resulting wastewater is treated and discharged into Boston Harbor, many miles from its original source. The Chicopee River basin also contains several dams and is the site of many other withdrawals and diversions. Interbasin transfers and diversions can cause major reductions in streamflow. The objective of this study was to evaluate streamflows, precipitation, water withdrawals, wastewater discharges, and interbasin water transfers to quantify and describe water movement within the Chicopee River basin.
    [Show full text]