DOCSLIB.ORG

Here Possible, Maximize the Amount of Forest Interior (And Minimize Disturbance Within It) to Benefit Area-Sensitive and Forest-Interior Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Here Possible, Maximize the Amount of Forest Interior (And Minimize Disturbance Within It) to Benefit Area-Sensitive and Forest-Interior Species Partners in Flight Bird Conservation Plan for The Boreal Hardwood Transition (Bird Conservation Region 12 — U.S. Portion) Partners in Flight Bird Conservation Plan for The Boreal Hardwood Transition (Bird Conservation Region 12 – U.S. Portion) Version 1.0 March 2009 by Sumner Matteson1, Kimberly Kreitinger2, Gerald Bartelt3, Gregory Butcher4, David Sample3, and Tom Will5 1 Bureau of Endangered Resources, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 2 Wisconsin Bird Conservation Initiative 3 Bureau of Integrated Science Services, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 4 National Audubon Society 5 Division of Migratory Birds, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Suggested citation: Matteson, S., K. Kreitinger, G. Bartelt, G. Butcher, D. Sample, and T. Will. 2009. Partners in Flight Bird Conservation Plan for The Boreal Hardwood Transition (Bird Conservation Region 12 — U.S. Portion). Version 1.0. Partners in Flight. www.partnersinflight.org. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following individuals should be mentioned for their review, comments, edits, and for contributing information and/or data: Tom Cooper, Ron Eckstein, Eric Epstein, Dave Ewert, Jane Fitzgerald, David Flaspohler, Ronald Gatti, Diane Granfors, Kimberly Hall, JoAnn Hanowski, Randy Hoffman, Robert Howe, Rex Johnson, Melinda Knutson, Jim Lind, Karl Martin, Gerald Niemi, Eunice Padley, Linda Parker, Andy Paulios, Lee Pfannmuller, Anna Pidgeon, Amber Roth, Mike Tans, and Wayne Thogmartin. Larry McQueen created the Golden-winged Warbler cover artwork. PRIMARY CONTACT Sumner Matteson Avian Ecologist, Bureau of Endangerd Resources Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Box 7921 Madison, Wisconsin 53707 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................4 GOAL ...................................................................................................................................................................4 PROCESS ..............................................................................................................................................................4 IMPLEMENTATION................................................................................................................................................5 SECTION 1: THE PLANNING UNIT.................................................................................................................5 PHYSICAL FEATURES ...........................................................................................................................................5 VEGETATION........................................................................................................................................................7 NATURAL DISTURBANCES ...................................................................................................................................8 HISTORY AND LAND USE .....................................................................................................................................9 SECTION 2: AVIFAUNAL ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................................10 SPECIES ASSESSMENT FACTORS.........................................................................................................................10 SPECIES OF REGIONAL IMPORTANCE..................................................................................................................11 SECTION 3: BIRD CONSERVATION ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES...................................................15 TIMBER MANAGEMENT......................................................................................................................................15 HABITAT FRAGMENTATION ...............................................................................................................................16 WHITE-TAILED DEER HERBIVORY .....................................................................................................................17 CLIMATE CHANGE .............................................................................................................................................17 IDENTIFICATION AND PROTECTION OF STOP-OVER HABITATS............................................................................18 GENERAL CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES .......................................................................................................19 SECTION 4: HABITATS AND OBJECTIVES................................................................................................19 FORESTS .............................................................................................................................................................19 ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION STATUS ............................................................................................................19 PRIORITY BIRD SPECIES.....................................................................................................................................20 POPULATION OBJECTIVES AND HABITAT STRATEGIES .......................................................................................23 Forest Bird Conservation Area Strategy......................................................................................................24 MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES...............................................................................................................................26 RESEARCH AND MONITORING NEEDS ................................................................................................................27 OUTREACH.........................................................................................................................................................28 GRASSLANDS AND SAVANNAS ....................................................................................................................29 ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION STATUS ............................................................................................................29 BIRD HABITAT REQUIREMENTS .........................................................................................................................29 POPULATION OBJECTIVES AND HABITAT STRATEGIES .......................................................................................31 MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES...............................................................................................................................32 RESEARCH AND MONITORING NEEDS ................................................................................................................33 OUTREACH.........................................................................................................................................................34 WETLANDS ........................................................................................................................................................35 ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION STATUS ............................................................................................................35 BIRD HABITAT REQUIREMENTS .........................................................................................................................35 POPULATION OBJECTIVES AND HABITAT STRATEGIES .......................................................................................36 MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES...............................................................................................................................37 RESEARCH AND MONITORING NEEDS ................................................................................................................39 OUTREACH.........................................................................................................................................................39 URBAN LANDSCAPES......................................................................................................................................40 BIRD HABITAT REQUIREMENTS .........................................................................................................................40 POPULATION OBJECTIVES AND HABITAT STRATEGIES .......................................................................................40 MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES...............................................................................................................................41 RESEARCH AND MONITORING NEEDS ................................................................................................................42 OUTREACH.........................................................................................................................................................42 LITERATURE CITED .......................................................................................................................................43 APPENDIX A. LAND COVER CLASS DEFINITIONS .................................................................................52 APPENDIX B. PIF SPECIES ASSESSMENT FACTORS ..............................................................................53 APPENDIX C. POPULATION OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS...................................................................54 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. THE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Warblers of Lake County (Field Guide)
    Wood of Lake County An educational wildlife pamphlet provided by the Lake County Public Resources Department Parks & Trails Division 2 The Lake County Public Resources Department, Parks & Trails Division, manages more than three dozen parks, preserves and boat ramps. Lake County park rangers lead regularly scheduled nature in some of these parks. In partnership with the Lake County hikes, bird and butterfly surveys and other outdoor adventures Water Authority, Parks & Trails also schedules guided paddling adventures. For a listing of Lake County parks and events, call 352-253-4950, email [email protected] or visit Forwww.lakecountyfl.gov/parks. more information about birds that can be seen in Lake County, or bookstores. Information on birds is also available online at the check out a field guide to birds available at many local libraries Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, www.birds.cornell.edu. Bird watchers in Florida tend to bring a little more on their trips than their Northern peers. While the average temperature in Lake County is a mild 72°F, the summer months in Central Florida can be steamy. Outside enthusiasts are always encouraged to carry sunscreen to protect skin from sunburn, insect repellent to ward off mosquitoes and plenty of water to avoid dehydration. Sunscreen should be 15 SPF or higher and applied 20 minutes before. 3 Park rangers recommend these six popular comprehensive guides: • A Field Guide to the Birds, Eastern and Central North America (Fourth Edition, 1980, Roger Tory Peterson) • Stokes Field Guide to Birds, Eastern Region (First Edition, 1996, Donald and Lillian Stokes) • All the Birds of North America (First Edition, 1997, The American Bird Conservancy) • Field Guide to the Birds of North America (Fourth Edition, 2002, The National Geographic Society) • Focus Guide to the Birds of North America (First Edition, 2000, Kenn Kaufman) • The Sibley Guide to Birds (First Edition, 2000, David Allen Sibley) Insect repellent should contain DEET.
    [Show full text]
  • Macgillivrays Warbler
    Wyoming Species Account MacGillivray’s Warbler Geothlypis tolmiei REGULATORY STATUS USFWS: Migratory Bird USFS R2: No special status USFS R4: No special status Wyoming BLM: No special status State of Wyoming: Protected Bird CONSERVATION RANKS USFWS: No special status WGFD: NSS4 (Bc), Tier II WYNDD: G5, S4 Wyoming Contribution: LOW IUCN: Least Concern PIF Continental Concern Score: 11 STATUS AND RANK COMMENTS MacGillivray’s Warbler (Geothlypis tolmiei) does not have any additional regulatory status or conservation rank considerations beyond those listed above. NATURAL HISTORY Taxonomy: Two subspecies of MacGillivray’s Warbler are recognized and known to breed in the United States: G. t. tolmiei and G. t. monticola 1. In Wyoming, G. t. monticola is the known subspecies; it breeds east of the Pacific slope, in the Rocky Mountains and Great Basin, and winters in higher elevations of central and southern Mexico, occasionally in southern California 2, 3. Two additional subspecies of G. tolmiei are not recognized by the American Ornithologists’ Union (AOU): G. t. intermedia and G. t. austinsmithi. The distinguishing characteristic is reported to be a shorter tail length in G. t. austinsmithi and there are specimens of said subspecies from western Wyoming 1, 4. Recent molecular phylogeny efforts concluded that MacGillivray’s Warbler is more closely related to the genus Geothlypis 5. The AOU approved the genus change in 2011 6. Prior to this, the species was placed in the genus Oporornis. Description: The species is a small wood-warbler in the Parulidae Family. MacGillivray’s Warbler is identifiable in the field during the breeding season. Male upperparts are olive green and underparts are yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Juvenile Warblers the Fun Really Begins Here
    FEATURED PHOTO Identifying Juvenile Warblers The Fun Really Begins Here Peter Pyle • Bolinas, California • [email protected] Christine M. Godwin • Fort McMurray, Alberta • [email protected] Kenneth R. Foster • Fort McMurray, Alberta • [email protected] he Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) other areas, are now available online (tinyurl.com/land-birds- TProgram is a continent-wide collaborative effort among re- vital and see DeSante et al. 2015). searchers and citizen scientists to assist the conservation In 2011 the Boreal MAPS Program was initiated in northeast- of birds and their habitats through bird banding (tinyurl.com/ ern Alberta to evaluate landbird demographic rates in reclaimed MAPS-banding). Since 1989, more than 1,200 MAPS banding habitats and other habitats subjected to varying levels of dis- stations, spread across North America, have recorded more than turbance relative to those in natural boreal forests (Foster et al. 2 million bird captures. MAPS data enable assessment of avian 2012). Few demographic data on landbirds have been collected demographic vital rates such as productivity, recruitment, sur- in the boreal forest (Wells 2011), making this program an im- vival, and intrinsic population growth, and these supplement portant contributor to understanding bird populations and vital other monitoring data by providing insights into what factors rates from local to continental scales. During July of our first drive avian population declines. For example, low productivity field season we began to catch recently fledged juvenile wood- indicates problems are occurring on breeding grounds whereas warblers (family Parulidae) in the mist nets. Frankly, we had a low survival suggests problems are occurring on winter grounds very difficult time, at first, with their identification.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers
    Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Brandan L. Gray August 2019 © 2019 Brandan L. Gray. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers by BRANDAN L. GRAY has been approved for the Department of Biological Sciences and the College of Arts and Sciences by Donald B. Miles Professor of Biological Sciences Florenz Plassmann Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT GRAY, BRANDAN L., Ph.D., August 2019, Biological Sciences Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers Director of Dissertation: Donald B. Miles In a rapidly changing world, species are faced with habitat alteration, changing climate and weather patterns, changing community interactions, novel resources, novel dangers, and a host of other natural and anthropogenic challenges. Conservationists endeavor to understand how changing ecology will impact local populations and local communities so efforts and funds can be allocated to those taxa/ecosystems exhibiting the greatest need. Ecological morphological and functional morphological research form the foundation of our understanding of selection-driven morphological evolution. Studies which identify and describe ecomorphological or functional morphological relationships will improve our fundamental understanding of how taxa respond to ecological selective pressures and will improve our ability to identify and conserve those aspects of nature unable to cope with rapid change. The New World wood warblers (family Parulidae) exhibit extensive taxonomic, behavioral, ecological, and morphological variation.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Migrant Passerines at Two Non-Forested Sites in Venezuela
    j. Field Ornithol., 64(4):549-556 NORTH AMERICAN MIGRANT PASSERINES AT TWO NON-FORESTED SITES IN VENEZUELA BETSY TRENT THOMAS Waterfield,Rt. 1 Box 212 C Castleton,Virgznia 22716 USA Abstract.--Fourteen speciesof passerinenearctic migrants to the neotropicswere observed at two non-forestedsites in interior Venezuela, over >20 yr. Eleven specieswere found in a secondary-scrubhabitat in northern Venezuela and 12 were observedat a site in the central llanos. Behavioral notesare reportedin addition to extensionsof monthsof occurrence for five species,and sevennew state records. PASERIFORMES MIGRATORIOS EN DOS LOCALIDADES NO-FORESTADAS DE VENEZUELA Sinopsis.--Enun perlodo>20 aftos,se han observado14 especiesde paseriformesmigra- torlos del neofirtico en dos localidades no-forestadas del interior de Venezuela. Se encontraron 11 de las especiesen habitat caracterizadocomo matoffal secundariode la parte norte de Venezuela,y 12 en una 1ocalidadde los llanoscentrales. En el trabajose informanademfis 7 nuevosregistros para estadosde Venezuela,se discuteel perlodode estadlade cincode las aves,y se ofrecengeneralidades sobre la conductade las 14 especies. Currently there is concernabout the diminishingnumbers of some North American migrants to the neotropics(Keast and Morton 1980, Rappole et al. 1983, Robbinset al. 1986, Terborgh 1989). To address this problem, numerousauthors call for more detailedobservations of nearcftcmigrants on their wintering grounds(see Hagan and Johnston 1992). Most North American passefinemigrants to the neotropicsare found in forestedhabitats (Rappole et al. 1983), but Leck (1985) in Mexico, Karr (1976) in Panama, and Robinson et al. (1986) in Peru, reportedthat high numbersare alsofound in edge,scrub and secondary habitats. In Venezuela nearcticmigrants are reported to be found from coastalmangroves to montanewet forestsat > 3000 m (Meyer de Schauen- seeand Phelps 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Warbler (Vol. 44, No. 1) Kentucky Library Research Collections Western Kentucky University, [email protected]
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Kentucky Warbler Library Special Collections 2-1968 Kentucky Warbler (Vol. 44, no. 1) Kentucky Library Research Collections Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ky_warbler Part of the Ornithology Commons Recommended Citation Kentucky Library Research Collections, "Kentucky Warbler (Vol. 44, no. 1)" (1968). Kentucky Warbler. Paper 129. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ky_warbler/129 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Warbler by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Kentucky Warbler (Published by the Kentucky Ornithological Society) VOL. XLIV FEBRUARY, 1968 NO. 1 # Young Great Horned Owl at Nest. Photograph by Terry Snell IN THIS ISSUE NEWS AND VIEWS 2 CONNECTICUT WARBLERS IN THE LOUISVILLE AREA IN AUTUMN, Kenneth P. Able 3 OBSERVATIONS ON THE GREAT HORNED OWL, Donald Boarman .... 5 MID-WINTER BIRD COUNT, 1967-1968 6 FIELD NOTES; First Record of the Rock Wren in Kentucky, J. W. Kemper and Frederick W. Loetscher 18 Some Notes from Boyle County, J. W. Kemper 18 BOOK REVIEW, Anne L. Stamm 19 2 THE KENTUCKY WARBLER Vol. 44 THE KENTUCKY ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY (Founded in 1923 by B. C. Bacon, L. Otley Pindar, and Gordon Wilson) President Herbert E. Shadowen, Bowling Green Vice-President Mrs. James Gillenwater, Glasgow Corr. Sec.-Treasurer Evelyn Schneider, 2525 Broadmeade Road, Louisville 40205 Recording Secretary Willard Gray, Carlisle Councillors: Albert L. Powell, Maceo ... r. 1966-1968 Alfred M. Reece, Lexington 1966-1968 Ray Nail, Golden Pond 1967-1969 Burt L.
    [Show full text]
  • Refuge Bird List
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge Bird List Lou P. Kellenberger St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge is on the shores of Apalachee Bay, in northwestern Florida, about 20 miles south of Tallahassee. Established in 1931, the refuge contains about 68,000 acres of salt and brackish marshes, hardwood swamps, pine flatwoods, and pine-oak uplands; parts of which are in Taylor, Jefferson, and Wakulla Counties. An additional 31,700 acres of water in Apalachee Bay are included as part of the refuge through a Presidential Proclamation. St. Marks Refuge provides an extensive wintering habitat for waterfowl and is one of the earliest such areas acquired by the St. Marks National Government. Wildlife Refuge The seasons bring about marked changes in both species and abundance of birdlife. Best opportunities for observing the greatest variety and number of birds are during the fall and spring. This blue goose, Waterfowl are most easily seen on designed by J.N. the refuge from mid-November “Ding” Darling, has become a through late December. Shore birds symbol of the are most common during late spring National Wildlife and early fall. Refuge System. This list is in accordance with the A.O.U. Checklist as amended. Enjoy your visit! Symbols used in this list are defined as follows Sp-Spring - March-May USFWS S-Summer - June-August Turkey F-Fall - September-November W-Winter - December-February * Nest on Refuge a-abundant a common species which is very numerous Nick Baldwin c-common certain to be seen or Barred owl heard in suitable habitat u-uncommon present, but not certain to be seen o-occasional seen only a few times Nick Baldwin during a Scarlett Tanager season r-rare seen at intervals of 2 to 5 years This folder lists 274 species of birds that are considered part of the Nick Baldwin Stilt refuge’s fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals of New York
    CHECKLIST OF AMPHIBIANS, REPTILES, BIRDS AND MAMMALS OF NEW YORK STATE Including Their Legal Status Eastern Milk Snake Moose Blue-spotted Salamander Common Loon New York State Artwork by Jean Gawalt Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Fish and Wildlife Page 1 of 30 February 2019 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Diversity Group 625 Broadway Albany, New York 12233-4754 This web version is based upon an original hard copy version of Checklist of the Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals of New York, Including Their Protective Status which was first published in 1985 and revised and reprinted in 1987. This version has had substantial revision in content and form. First printing - 1985 Second printing (rev.) - 1987 Third revision - 2001 Fourth revision - 2003 Fifth revision - 2005 Sixth revision - December 2005 Seventh revision - November 2006 Eighth revision - September 2007 Ninth revision - April 2010 Tenth revision – February 2019 Page 2 of 30 Introduction The following list of amphibians (34 species), reptiles (38), birds (474) and mammals (93) indicates those vertebrate species believed to be part of the fauna of New York and the present legal status of these species in New York State. Common and scientific nomenclature is as according to: Crother (2008) for amphibians and reptiles; the American Ornithologists' Union (1983 and 2009) for birds; and Wilson and Reeder (2005) for mammals. Expected occurrence in New York State is based on: Conant and Collins (1991) for amphibians and reptiles; Levine (1998) and the New York State Ornithological Association (2009) for birds; and New York State Museum records for terrestrial mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • BIRD TOURISM REPORTS 10/2016 Petri Hottola
    BIRD TOURISM REPORTS 10/2016 Petri Hottola NORTH MICHIGAN, THE USA Fig. 1. Pretty galls on a leaf, at Dingman Marsh, North Michigan. In summer 2016, June 10th to 15th, I had a pleasure to drive around Lake Michigan at the Great Lakes region, birdwatching on the way, with two additional birding days in Wisconsin (Horicon Marsh; see a separate report) and a departure to Grand Cayman at O’Hare, Chicago. The journey was about my twentieth visit in the United States but the first one in Michigan. It was a high time to visit North Michigan. On the 14th of March, 1988, I and Harri Kontkanen met a Michigan birder Terry Walsh at Snake Bight Trail in Florida. He invited us to his home state, promising to show us the rarest U.S. passerine, Kirtland’s Warbler. Since then, I had been contemplating on such a visit. 28 years later and with my 50 States list already at 680, I was finally going to go for it! Not only for the warbler, but for three other species as well… The main target birds were Yellow Rail, Black-backed Woodpecker, Connecticut Warbler and, of course, Kirtland’s Warbler, all potential lifers. Moreover, I was looking for species already seen or heard, but not yet on my U.S. list, such as Sharp-tailed Grouse (which I missed). Finally, there was an interest to add as many North American bird species to my World Year List, which in the end of 2016 stood just below 1.300 species. The target birds were soon located and my other lists received a number of new species, too.
    [Show full text]
  • CONNECTICUT WARBLER Oporornis Agilis
    CONNECTICUT W ARBLER Oporornis agilis Original prepared by John M. Cooper and Suzanne M. Beauchesne Species Information British Columbia The Connecticut Warbler reaches the northwestern Taxonomy extreme of its breeding range in northeastern British Columbia where it occurs mainly in the Peace The Connecticut Warbler is a neotropical migrant Lowland and Kiskatinaw Plateau ecosections of the songbird and one of three species of warbler in the Boreal Plains Ecoprovince (Campbell et al. 2001). genus Oporornis that breeds in British Columbia Small numbers have been reported from the Fort (Campbell et al. 2001). No subspecies of Nelson Lowland near Fort Nelson (Erskine and Connecticut Warbler are recognized (Pitocchelli Davidson 1976; Campbell et al. 2001). et al. 1997; Cannings 1998). Forest regions and districts Description Northern Interior: Fort Nelson, Peace A small (13–15 cm) songbird, adapted for life on or Ecoprovinces and ecosections near the forest floor, which is reflected in relatively TAP: FNL long legs on a stout body. In breeding plumage, the male has a grey hood extending to the lower throat; BOP: CLH, HAP, KIP, PEL a complete whitish eye ring; olive to olive brown, Biogeoclimatic units unstreaked upper parts; and yellowish under parts. BWBS: mw1, mw2 Females are similar but duller, and immatures are duller still, with a brownish hood. The primary Broad ecosystem units distinguishing feature, separating Connecticut BA, PR Warbler from Mourning and McGillivray’s warblers, is the complete whitish eye ring, which is present in Elevation both sexes, all age classes, and at all times of year 400–1100 m (Campbell et al. 2001) (Pyle 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • The Nest and Habits of the Connecticut Warbler in Minnesota
    VoL1929 XLVII I HUFF,Nest and Habits ofConnecticut Warbler. 455 THE NEST AND HABITS OF THE CONNECTICUT WARBLER IN MINNESOTA. BY N. L. HUFF. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/auk/article/46/4/455/5256472 by guest on 30 September 2021 Plates XXV-XXVI. ThE ConnecticutWarbler (Oporornisagilis) is one of the rarest of our songbirds. It was first collectedby AlexanderWilson in Connecticut,and notes concerningit were publishedin 1812.• It is seen not infrequently during migration seasons,mainly restrictedto the Mississippiriver valley in springand occasionally beyond,and to the Atlantic slopein autumn, but comparatively little is known or has been publishedof its home life and habits. For more than seventy years after the bird was described,its summer home was shroudedin mystery, and not until 1883 was the mystery partly cleared,when Ernest T. Seton•' discoveredthe first nest in a cold boggy tamarack swamp in Manitoba. He made no extensivestudy of the habits of the bird, and so the domesticlife of this rare songsterwas left in obscurity. Other records of its summer residenceare few, and the nest to be de- scribedin this paper is probably the first ever discoveredwithin the bounds of the United States, certainly the first recorded from Minnesota. 0. B. Warrens collectedyoung Connecticut Warblers in early August, 1894, in Marquette County, Michigan. Norman A. Wood4 reportsthe takingof an adult and youngon July 27, 1904, in OntonagonCounty, Michigan, and 0. M. Bryens5 reports maturebirds seen July 23, 1922, August18, 1923, and August 22, 1924, in Luce County, Michigan. These summerrecords, especiallyof immaturebirds, may be taken as goodevidence of breedingin the upper peninsulaof Michigan.
    [Show full text]