Core Designs of Modern VVER Projects

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Core Designs of Modern VVER Projects I. Vasilchenko, S. Kushmanov, V. Vjalitsyn, R. Vasilchenko JSC OKB "GIDROPRESS", Podolsk, Russian Federation 1. Introduction actor vessel. Number of CPS RCCA during evo- lutionary designing varied from 49 pcs. (V-302) and 61pcs. (V-320) to 121 pcs. (AES - 2006) and Semi-centennial anniversary of VVER safe op- 94 pcs. (VVER-TOI). The requirements for safety eration was commemorated at NovovoronegNPP (temperature of repeated criticality) and for fuel (NvNPP) in 2014 The VVER history has included composition (possibility of application of MOX fuel) several generations of designs. The basic of them called for this change. And possibility of increase are the following: in the number of drives to 121 pcs. is realized al- ● generation of small and medium power reac- ready in designs of Tianwan NPP, Bushehr NPP, tors V-1, V-2, V-3М, V-189, V-213; Kudankulam NPP. For VVER-TOI 94 CPS RCCAs ● the fi rst (and the single) reactor with 1000 MW are chosen considering the experience of previ- of type V-187 (NvNPP, Unit 5) with jacketed ous designs. For arrangement of suffi cient num- fuel assemblies; ber of ICIS indicators (54 pcs.) in 15 controllable ● generation of large power reactors V-302 (V- cells of protective tube unit, in addition to those 338), V-320 (V-428, V-412, V-446) with jacket- uncontrollable, channels for ICIS indicators are in- free fuel assemblies; stalled. With this purpose CPS RCCAs contain not 18 absorbing rods but 16 absorber rods (fi g. 1) in ● designs of the 21-st century: AES - 2006, these cells, and one of the respective fuel assem- VVER-TOI. bly guiding tubes, (GT) happened to get free , can Reference operational experience is one of the also be used for arrangement of the ICIS indicator. most attractive features at the modern market of For measurement of coolant temperature at nuclear - hazardous objects. Due to the initial de- the FA outlet one of GT of fuel assemblies is per- sign solutions successfully arrived at, designs of forated in the section between fuel rod bundle and VVER reactor plants of 21-st century have inher- the top nozzle. This has enabled to arrange 313 ited them and, respectively, a positive operational fuel rods instead of 312 in the bundle. experience both of installations as a whole and of The design of fuel assemblies of new projects their separate components. follows basic design solutions of TVS - 2М, having From the viewpoint of infl uences on fuel oper- an extensive positive operational experience /1/. ation such design solutions of reactor are success- The basic element, providing stability of shape, is ful as the elliptic bottom of the core barrel providing a welded skeleton of GT and spacing grids (SG) preliminary distribution of fl owrate at the core inlet; A distinctive feature of fuel assemblies of designs protective tubes of PTU preventing, together with of AES - 2006 and VVER-TOI is fuel stack height a shell, FA top nozzle, from fl ow-induced effect on extended by 50 mm in comparison with TVS - 2М. CPS RCCA; design of CPS RCCA itself and the Respectively, the height of fuel assembly top noz- system of its damping. Application of the 6-facet zle is reduced as compared with TVS - 2М. The shape of fuel assemblies provides more uniform mechanical interaction of fuel assemblies and, re- spectively, their mutual supporting infl uence. Be- sides, PTU structure and its fastening enables to adjust holding-down of fuel assemblies in the reac- tor considering their radiation growth. 2. Reference Feature of Core New Designs Starting from plants V-302 and V-320, cores con- CPS RCCA CPS RCCA tain 163 fuel assemblies. This number is governed with 18 ARs with 16 ARs by the dimensions of fuel assemblies and the re- Figure 1. 191 design of other components is considerably uni- the unsealed reactor. From the graph it follows, fi ed and technologically developed. Application of that from the very beginning of implementation of zirconium materials only within the core space that such fuel assemblies forces of motion of control have low neutron absorption together with other rods were considerably decreased that has re- specifi ed properties makes possible to use this de- moved the comment on reactor scram time. sign to reactor plants of Generation 3 +. That fact, that PTU before refuelling occupies Operational experience of TVS - 2М that is higher position than after refuelling proves absence given below enables to use it as reference for new of “contraction” of fuel assemblies as a result of projects because of similarity in designs and op- bowing or creeping of GT, and natural radiation erational conditions. growth of GT occurs. It qualitatively differs from operation of previous fuel assemblies having insuf- fi cient rigid structure when PTU after refuelling oc- 3. Operational Experience of the cupied higher position than before refuelling due to Prototype “fresh” more rigid fuel assemblies. Moreover, forces of CPS RCCA exercising at the end of cycle, at least, were not increased in comparison with those Pilot-commercial operation of TVS - 2М started measured at the beginning of cycle. The given in 2006 at Balakovo NPP -1. Further, it was intro- graph also demonstrates that change in number of duced at all units of this plant and also at Rostov loaded fuel assemblies from 54 up to 66 in transi- NPP. To provide compatibility with fuel assemblies tion to 18-month fuel cycle did not bring a notice- of a previous design with the reduced core height, able infl uence on the character of change of friction modifi cation of TVS - 2М with the blankets contain- forces during CPS RCCA motion. Respectively, fric- ing natural uranium was used in transition load- tion force does not depend on fuel cycle with fuel ings. After transition to the cores having the same assemblies being operated. Formation of the core height, transition of the power units to uprated is provided without limitations that were earlier im- power to 104% as well as to 18-month fuel cycle of posed in connection with changing in the shape of operation was provided on the basis of this design. fuel assemblies. To be more precise, CPS RCCA It has became feasible due to TVS - 2М stability of can be installed in any fuel assembly determined shape demonstrated from the very beginning. by physical calculation of loading. There is not also Fig. 2 shows typical graph of change of CPS a necessity of inter-sector shuffl ing of fuel assem- RCCA exercising force and also PTU position in blies. Retrofi tting of PTU tablets did not change fric- tion force of CPS RCCA either. All this is a demonstration of margin of stability in shape of Number of make-up FA TVS - 2М fuel assembly. This circumstance has The entire core of TVS-2 become a convincing proof of necessary transition to fuel Transition to 18-month fuel cycle assemblies of TVS - 2М type Friction force, kgf at power units and since 2014 the very transition has started at two units of Tianwan NPP. The same transition is planned to realize at Bushehr NPP and Kudankulam NPP. Retrofi tting 3mm Development and imple- mentation of TVS - 2М have provided fulfi llment of top pri- ority safety requirement: reli- ability of reactor scram. It has been achieved without loss of fuel utilization economy, PTU position, mm namely, on the basis of zirconi- um structural components (Э- Figure 2. 110 for SG and Э-635 for GT). 192 Table 1. Design VVER-1000 AES-2006 VVER-TOI V-320 104% (MIR-1200) Average enrichment in 4,736 / 4,730 4,71 4,78 235U, % Number of FA of make-up, 66 / 67 72-73 73 / 72 pcs. Length of fuel cycle, 510 / 515 505 511 / 506 eff.days Average burn-up of FA, 48,5 / 49,9 * 47,5 49,4 / 49,5 MWD/kg U 2.1. Main Parameters of Fuel Cycles oped and undergone the pilot operation. Not less effective measure is rigorous arrangement of the Table 1 gives the basic design parameters of repair work pertained to formation of particles. 18-month equilibrium fuel cycle for various designs. The crucial role in counteraction to failures The fuel cycle of new designs is seen to develop due to clad corrosion belongs to application of at practical operation of fuel in installations V-320. corrosion resistant alloys. They are alloy Э -110. (Considering that burn-up of 55 MWD/kg U is actu- Nevertheless, activities are under way on imple- ally achieved). mentation of modifi ed alloys Э -110м for fuel rod claddings and Э -635м for GT. 2.2. Stability to Impact of Damaging Factors FA forming. The data of measurements of drop time and CPS RCCA motion forces, forces of mo- tion of fuel assemblies and position of PTU, show, The concept of zero fuel failure formulates the ba- that no changes in shape occur. To improve op- sic damaging factors. Counter factors of TVS-2M erating conditions of fuel assemblies axial forces are given below. are essentially reduced due to application of thin- One of the major factors is clad fretting-wear. ner spring wire and PTU pressing forces providing Numerous tests of FA with spacing from 240 mm necessary margins on non-lifting of fuel assem- up to 340 mm, used in the structure of VVER fuel blies during operation. assemblies show signifi cant margins of dynamic Fuel rod heat rate. VVER –1000 reactor is accelerations critical for occurrence of fretting- a powered reactor. Nevertheless, the statistics wear.
Recommended publications
  • From Gen I to Gen III

    From Gen I to Gen III

    From Gen I to Gen III Gabriel Farkas Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava Ilkovicova 3, 81219 Bratislava [email protected] 14. 9. 2010 1 Evolution of Nuclear Reactors Generation I - demonstration reactors Generation II - working in the present Generation III - under construction 14. 9. 2010 2 Generation IV - R&D 14. 9. 2010 3 Expected development in nuclear technologies Prolongation of lifetieme of existing nuclear reactors Construction of new reactors in frame of Gen. III and IV . Figure 1 Replacement staggered over a 30-year period (2020 - 2050) Rate of construction : 2,000 MW/year 70000 60000 Lifetime 50000 prolongation 40000 Generation IV 30000 Actual reactors 20000 Generation III+ 10000 0 197519801985199019952000200520102015202020252030203520402045205020552060 14. 9. 2010 Average plant life : 48 years 4 Nuclear in Europe (Nuclear ~ 32% of total EU electricity production) SE, 7.3% UK, 7.9% SP, 5.8% BE,4.8% CZ, 2.5% GE, 16.3% FI, 2.4% BU, 1.8% Other 12.4% SK, 1.7% HU, 1.4% LT, 1.1% FR, 45.5% SI, 0.6% NL, RO, 0.5% 0.4% Source PRIS 14. 9. 2010 5 Central & Eastern Europe - Nuclear Landscape Russia Lithuania Ukraine 6 VVER440 Poland 1 RBMK 1300 2 VVER440 8 VVER1000 Min. of Energy 13 VVER1000 NNEGC State owned 11 RBMK 1 BN600 4 Graph Mod BWR Czech Republic Rosenergoatom State 4 VVER440 owned 2 VVER1000 CEZ/ 67% State Romania owned 2 Candu PHW Nuclearelectrica State owned Slovak Republic 4/6 VVER440 Bulgaria ENEL 67% owned 2/4 VVER1000 NEC State owned Hungary Armenia 4 VVER 440 1 VVER440 MVM State owned Armatomenergo, State owned 14.
  • Vver and Rbmk Cross Section Libraries for Origen-Arp

    Vver and Rbmk Cross Section Libraries for Origen-Arp

    VVER AND RBMK CROSS SECTION LIBRARIES FOR ORIGEN-ARP Germina Ilas, Brian D. Murphy, and Ian C. Gauld, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA Introduction An accurate treatment of neutron transport and depletion in modern fuel assemblies characterized by heterogeneous, complex designs, such as the VVER or RBMK assembly configurations, requires the use of advanced computational tools capable of simulating multi-dimensional geometries. The depletion module TRITON [1], which is part of the SCALE code system [2] that was developed and is maintained at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), allows the depletion simulation of two- or three-dimensional assembly configurations and the generation of burnup-dependent cross section libraries. These libraries can be saved for subsequent use with the ORIGEN-ARP module in SCALE. This later module is a faster alternative to TRITON for fuel depletion, decay, and source term analyses at an accuracy level comparable to that of a direct TRITON simulation. This paper summarizes the methodology used to generate cross section libraries for VVER and RBMK assembly configurations that can be employed in ORIGEN-ARP depletion and decay simulations. It briefly describes the computational tools and provides details of the steps involved. Results of validation studies for some of the libraries, which were performed using isotopic assay measurement data for spent fuel, are provided and discussed. Cross section libraries for ORIGEN-ARP Methodology The TRITON capability to perform depletion simulations for two-dimensional (2-D) configurations was implemented by coupling of the 2-D transport code NEWT with the point depletion and decay code ORIGEN-S. NEWT solves the transport equation on a 2-D arbitrary geometry grid by using an SN approach, with a treatment of the spatial variable that is based on an extended step characteristic method [3].
  • A Comparison of Advanced Nuclear Technologies

    A Comparison of Advanced Nuclear Technologies

    A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D MARCH 2017 B | CHAPTER NAME ABOUT THE CENTER ON GLOBAL ENERGY POLICY The Center on Global Energy Policy provides independent, balanced, data-driven analysis to help policymakers navigate the complex world of energy. We approach energy as an economic, security, and environmental concern. And we draw on the resources of a world-class institution, faculty with real-world experience, and a location in the world’s finance and media capital. Visit us at energypolicy.columbia.edu facebook.com/ColumbiaUEnergy twitter.com/ColumbiaUEnergy ABOUT THE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS SIPA’s mission is to empower people to serve the global public interest. Our goal is to foster economic growth, sustainable development, social progress, and democratic governance by educating public policy professionals, producing policy-related research, and conveying the results to the world. Based in New York City, with a student body that is 50 percent international and educational partners in cities around the world, SIPA is the most global of public policy schools. For more information, please visit www.sipa.columbia.edu A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D* MARCH 2017 *Andrew C. Kadak is the former president of Yankee Atomic Electric Company and professor of the practice at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He continues to consult on nuclear operations, advanced nuclear power plants, and policy and regulatory matters in the United States. He also serves on senior nuclear safety oversight boards in China. He is a graduate of MIT from the Nuclear Science and Engineering Department.
  • India: Protests Against Koodankulam Nuclear

    India: Protests Against Koodankulam Nuclear

    FEBRUARY 8, 2007 | No. 652 INDIA: PROTESTS AGAINST KOODANKULAM NUCLEAR PROJECT INDIA: PROTESTS AGAINST KOODANKULAM NUCLEAR Our most decent, most democratic and most lameduck Prime PROJECT 1 Minister Manmohan Singh signed a deal for four additional USA: NRC MUST REVIEW nuclear plants at Koodankulam with the Russian President Putin N-TERRORISM IN CALIFORNIA on January 27, 2007 even before the public hearing process was LICENSING 2 held for the same. The first hearing was held on October 6. Some SWEDEN: LEAKED REPORT 700 to 800 people unexpectedly turned up and the group REVEALS SAFETY BREACHES AT included many rural women who were not reluctant to speak FORSMARK 3 their minds. The meeting prematurely ended in chaos. The SWEDEN: NUCLEAR CHALLENGE second hearing was scheduled for January 31. TO ENVIRONMENTAL CODE (652.5782) SACCER - Alarmed by the Koodankulam authorities cunningly FAILS 4 plan of the Koodankulam authorities to ducked and conveniently claimed that NUCLEAR POWER POLICY IN take water from the Pechiparai irrigation they were setting up desalination plants EUROPE 5 dam in Kanyakumari district, several with Israeli technology and hence they farmers' organizations and fisherpeople's were not going to take Pechiparai dam ENERGY (R)EVOLUTION: A associations started organizing against water. When we pointed out their claim SUSTAINABLE WORLD ENERGY that dangerous move. This dam water in the official EIA report and in a recent OUTLOOK 6 plan was recorded in the official EIA journal article written by a senior nuclear IN BRIEF 8 (Environmental Impact Assessment) official, they claimed that they were all report that the Koodankulam authorities mistakes.
  • Future EQ Perspectives for Russian Global New-Build Projects

    Future EQ Perspectives for Russian Global New-Build Projects

    Future EQ Perspectives for Russian Global New-Build Projects Natalia Amosova Principal Consultant Lean Six Sigma Black Belt [email protected] +41 79 458 77 13 Prepared for 2020 Curtiss-Wright EQ Technical Meeting November 2020 November, 2020 Curtiss-Wright EQ Technical Meeting 2020 - [email protected] 1 The Water-Water Energy Reactor “VVER” Development and generations + Total number of 106 VVER‘s build since 1960 + Three generations in operation: + VVER-440 + VVER-1000 + VVER-1200 (AES-2006) + Generation III+ under construction: + VVER-1300 (TOI) + New designs developed for future projects: + MIR-1200 + VVER-1500 + VVER-1700 + VVER-600 November, 2020 Curtiss-Wright EQ Technical Meeting 2020 - [email protected] 2 Rosatom Group + Russian government owned corporation, responsible for all nuclear applications + Consists of over 350 specialized companies throughout the whole fuel cycle, of which relevant for us: + Rosatom Overseas (RAOS) - vendor for VVER outside of Russia + AtomEnergoProm (AEP) - designer of the plant + AtomStroyExport (ASE) – main contractor for the international NPP construction + Titan-2 - main contractor for the international NPP construction + AtomEnergoMash (AEM) – Main equipment manufacturer + World leader in todays‘ newbuild portfolio + 28 VVERs under construction (international and domestic) + Total new-build portfolio >130 B. USD November, 2020 Curtiss-Wright EQ Technical Meeting 2020 - [email protected] 3 The Overseas New-Build Projects Overview Rosatom Overseas (RAOS) Plant name Country Unit number
  • Advanced Sodium Fast Reactor Power Unit Concept

    Advanced Sodium Fast Reactor Power Unit Concept

    International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Challenges and Opportunities (FR 09 ) Advanced Sodium Fast Reactor Power Unit Concept a a a V.M. Poplavsky , A.M. Tsybulya , Yu.E. Bagdasarov , b b b b B.A. Vasilyev , Yu.L. Kamanin , S.L. Osipov , N.G.Kuzavkov , c c V.N. Yershov , M.R. Ashirmetov a FSUE “SSC RF-IPPE”, Obninsk, Russia b JSC “Afrikantov OKBM”, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia c JSC “SPb AEP”, St. Petersburg, Russia KYOTO, JAPAN 7-11 December 2009 Russian Experience in Development and Implementation of BN Sodium Fast Reactors for NPPs Reactor Development Construction Operation BN-350 1960 - 1965 1965 - 1973 1973 -1998 BN-600 1963 - 1972 1972 - 1980 1980 - in operation 1975 - 1983 BN-800 Under construction Planned for 2014 2002 - 2004 BN-1600 1980's - - BN-1800 2002 - 2005 - - BN-1200 From 2006 - Planned for 2020 Main Tasks and Goals of BN-1200 Development Provide competitiveness against advanced power units with other reactor plants and fossil power plants. Enhance safety to eliminate the need for population protection measures beyond the NPP site in case of any feasible accidents. Ensure the breeding ratio of 1.2 (Stage 1), 1.3-1.35 (Stage 2) for the mixed uranium-plutonium oxide fuel and 1.45, for the nitride fuel. Prepare putting into operation of the reactor series within 2-3 years after the pilot power unit start-up. Approaches to BN-1200 Development Use largely approved BN-600 technical solutions and solutions implemented in the BN-800 as a basis for reactor plant reliable operation.
  • Nuclear Fuel for VVER Reactors. Current Status and Prospects

    Nuclear Fuel for VVER Reactors. Current Status and Prospects

    6th International Conference on WWER Fuel Performance, Modelling and Experimental Support 19–23 September 2005, Albena Congress Center, Bulgaria TVEL Corporation Nuclear fuel for VVER reactors. Current status and prospects 19-23 September, 2005 V.L. Molchanov Nuclear fuel for VVER reactors Main factors determining burnup and operating life of nuclear fuel Fuel assembly performance Fuel rod performance Core physics Technical and economic indicators Nuclear fuel for VVER reactors. Current status and prospects 2 Nuclear fuel for VVER reactors Post-irradiation Operating tests: experience: Core physics: 1) Design criteria are fulfilled; 1) New design 1) Oxide layer on fuel constraints which allow rod (FR) cladding does 2) 5 TVSA stayed at to introduce loading not exceed 15 µm; Kalinin-1 for 6 years up pattern like complete to burnup of 59 2) Fission Gas Release «in-out»; MW×days/kgU; does not exceed 3%; 2) Flexible fuel cycles 3) 12 working 3) Satisfactory assemblies (WA) condition of cladding. operated at Kola-3 for 6 years up to burnup of 57 MW×days/kgU. Nuclear fuel for VVER reactors. Current status and prospects 3 Post-irradiation fuel studies JSC TVEL arranges for post- irradiation studies of full-scale fuel assemblies. During the studies the following is determined: - geometry parameters; - condition of FA components; - properties of zirconium-based materials and fuel composition; - oxidation and hydrating degree; - causes of fuel rod failure. 3 мм 25 мкм Nuclear fuel for VVER reactors. Current status and prospects 4 Nuclear fuel for VVER-440 reactors Type 2004 2005 2006 2007 3.82% (WA and FA SA vibration resistant V-230 Kola NPP design and for V-230 reactors) V-213 4.25% (second generation of WA and FA SA ) Dukovany NPP V-213 3,82;4,38% 4,25% Mohovce NPP V-213 3,82% 4,25% V-230 3,82% Bogunice NPP V-213 3,82% 4,25% Paks NPP V-213 3,82% Novovor.
  • VVER Core Design and Safety Analyses

    VVER Core Design and Safety Analyses

    Nuclear Fuel/Fuel Engineering VVER Core Design and Safety Analyses The standard tool for VVER core design is the advanced APA-H (ALPHA-H, PHOENIX-H, and ANC-H) code system evolved from the well- known and time-proven APA nuclear design code system. APA-H is a flexible tool that can be used for all nuclear design and steady-state safety related calculations and analyses for all VVER cores including VVER-440, VVER-1000 and all newer designs such as VVER-1200, VVER-1500 and VVER-TOI. The Westinghouse VVER thermal-hydraulic (TH) technology includes the sub-channel code VIPRE-W and, Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) correlations for advanced fuel designs. To improve DNB analysis accuracy and for improved DNB margins, Westinghouse has specifically developed empirical DNB correlations for VVER fuel designs containing grid spacers with- or without mixing vanes. For example, the use of the Background WVHI DNB correlation, for non-mixing vane fuel allows increasing the core design power peaking Westinghouse core design and safety analysis factor limit by three percent without any capabilities for VVER reactors lead to customer restrictions and without changing the plant safety success in multiple areas. Examples include fuel analysis of record. Additional DNB margin can be and core designs, supporting power uprate gained with Westinghouse TH statistical design projects, plant optimization projects, design procedures which provide an improved reconstitution, modernization projects, safety methodology for uncertainty treatment of reactor upgrades,
  • Highlights of Aerb Activities at a Glance

    Highlights of Aerb Activities at a Glance

    HIGHLIGHTS OF AERB ACTIVITIES AT A GLANCE During the year 2015-16, the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) continued to carry out safety monitoring and regulatory supervision of nuclear and radiation facilities under its purview. AERB continued its regulatory safety oversight on Indian operating nuclear power plants (21 units), nuclear power projects (2 under site evaluation, 5 under construction and 1 under commissioning), several fuel cycle facilities, research units and large numbers of radiation facilities spread across the country. All operating nuclear power plants and fuel cycle facilities under AERB's purview operated safely during the year and radioactive discharges as well as doses to occupational workers were well within prescribed limits. The radioactive releases from NPPs remained well within the limits authorized by AERB and the effective dose to public around the NPP sites was far less than the annual limit of 1 mSv (1000 micro-Sievert) prescribed by AERB. The maximum individual radiation dose among occupational workers has also remained well below the annual limit of 30 mSv prescribed by AERB. Key Achievements during the year, Ø Completed the development and deployment of the AERB's e-governance initiative for e- Licensing of Radiation Applications 'e-LORA’ o More than 35000 X-ray units declared in the system and 23,500 equipment registered o Increase in the approval of Radiological Safety ofcers (RSO) o Signicantly contributed in reduction of review time o AERB received the “SKOCH Smart Governance Award -2015” for e-LORA
  • Configuration of A=2 Based Tokamak for Testing of Reactor Technologies

    Configuration of A=2 Based Tokamak for Testing of Reactor Technologies

    Russian Federation Agency for Atomic Energy (ROSATOM) ConfigurationConfiguration ofof A=2A=2 basedbased tokamaktokamak forfor testingtesting ofof reactorreactor technologiestechnologies (TRT)(TRT) E.Azizov1, Yu.Arefiev1, O.Buzhinskij1, V.Dokuka1, O.Filatov2, V.Krylov2, P.Khayrutdinov1, V.Korotkov2, A.Krasilnikov1, A.Lopatkin3, A.Mineev2, N.Obysov4, V.Cherkovets1, E.Velikhov5 1State Research Center of Russian Federation, Troitsk Institute for Innovation and Fusion Research (TRINITI), Troitsk, Moscow Region, 142190, Russia 2D.V. Efremov Scientific Research Institute of Electrophysical Apparatus (NIIEFA), Metallostroy, St. Petersburg, 196641, Russia 3Research and Development Institute of Power Engineering, Moscow, 101000, Russia 4Russian Federation Agency for Atomic Energy, Moscow, 101000, Russia 5Russian Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow, Russia St. Petersburg, 2005 ITER - principal step on the way to fusion power. ITER is to demonstrate the feasibility of: - ignition and long fusion plasma burning in an efficient unit; - integration of the basic systems of the future DEMO reactor into the acting facility; - real safety of fusion reactors. ITER is cannot help in solving the following problems: - radiation resistive materials; - test and development of systems and components with necessary resources required for steady state operation; - control of reactor processes in steady state burning; - effective stationary systems of auxiliary plasma heating; - closed fuel cycle; - effective blanket. Of great importance is the creation
  • Development of an Experimental Reactor VVER-SKD 30 MW on Supercritical Water Novikova G

    Development of an Experimental Reactor VVER-SKD 30 MW on Supercritical Water Novikova G

    AtomFuture-2017 XIII International Youth Scientific and Practical Conference “FUTURE OF ATOMIC ENERGY - AtomFuture 2017” Volume 2017 Conference Paper Development of an Experimental Reactor VVER-SKD 30 MW on Supercritical Water Novikova G. S. and Bogoslovskaya G. P. Obninsk Institute for Nuclear Power Engineering of the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Studgorodok 1, Obninsk, Kaluga region, 249040, Russia Abstract The results of neutron-physical calculations of various variants of the location of the VVER-SKD core of 30 MW on the water of supercritical parameters are considered. The calculation is made for various fuel loads: uranium, plutonium and thorium, which in the future is considered as one of the main energy resources of the nuclear industry. Studies show that it is advisable to design a reactor with a single-pass flow of coolant and a reflector of at least 20 cm. Corresponding Author: Novikova G. S. Keywords: supercritical water parameters, VVER-SKD, low-power reactor, [email protected] experimental reactor Received: 23 December 2017 Accepted: 15 January 2018 Published: 21 February 2018 1. INTRODUCTION Publishing services provided by Knowledge E Specific feature of 21st century’s technology based on 238U will be the use of nuclear power units ensuring fuel breeding ratio (BR) no less than unity, instead of 0.5 in Novikova G. S. and Bogoslovskaya G. P.. This article modern VVER [2, 5]. is distributed under the terms of The experience of industrial operation of NPP with fast breeder reactor cooled by the Creative Commons Attribution License, which liquid sodium, has shown the possibility of obtaining HF values in the range 1-1.2.
  • Plutonium Disposition in the BN-800 Fast Reactor: an Assessment of Plutonium Isotopics and Breeding

    Plutonium Disposition in the BN-800 Fast Reactor: an Assessment of Plutonium Isotopics and Breeding

    Science & Global Security, 22:188–208, 2014 Copyright C Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0892-9882 print / 1547-7800 online DOI: 10.1080/08929882.2014.952578 Plutonium Disposition in the BN-800 Fast Reactor: An Assessment of Plutonium Isotopics and Breeding Moritz Kutt,¨ Friederike Frieß, and Matthias Englert Interdisciplinary Research Group Science, Technology and Security, Technische Universitat¨ Darmstadt, Alexanderstraße, Darmstadt, Germany According to the Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement, which was signed in 2000 and amended in 2010, Russia and the United States agree to dispose of 34 tons of excess weapon plutonium each. Russia plans to use the plutonium as fuel in its sodium-cooled fast reactors BN-600 and BN-800. This article analyzes BN-800 core models with and without breeding blankets for the plutonium isotopic vector in spent fuel, plutonium production in breeding blankets, breeding ratios for different plutonium concentrations in fuel, and possible annual material throughput. It finds that any spent fuel in the core contains less than 90 wt% plutonium-239, but using breeding blankets the reactor can be configured to be a net producer of plutonium, even with a breeding ratio below one, and that plutonium produced in blankets will be weapon-grade. INTRODUCTION In 1998, U.S. president Bill Clinton and Russian president Boris Yeltsin re- leased a joint statement offering to withdraw 50 metric tons (MT) of plutonium each from their respective military stockpiles.1 It was agreed that this pluto- nium should be rendered unusable for nuclear weapons either by irradiation in existing commercial reactors or by immobilization.2 In 2000, Russia and the United States agreed on the “Plutonium Manage- ment and Disposition Agreement” (PMDA).