DOCSLIB.ORG

Waste Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwater from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Stormwater Management Plan 2015 Annual Report Town of Enfield Enfield, Connecticut May 2016 146 Hartford Road Manchester, Connecticut 06040 Table of Contents Stormwater Management Plan 2015 Annual Report Town of Enfield 1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 2 Public Education and Outreach on Stormwater Impacts ........................ 2 2.1 Staff and Property Owner Education .................................................................... 2 2.2 Storm Drain Stenciling .......................................................................................... 4 2.3 Watercourse Signs ................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Plan Modifications ................................................................................................ 4 2.5 Future Activities .................................................................................................... 4 3 Public Involvement and Participation........................................................ 4 3.1 Community (Riverbank) Clean-Ups ..................................................................... 5 3.2 Recreational Water Resource Events .................................................................... 5 3.3 Plan Modifications ................................................................................................ 6 3.4 Future Activities .................................................................................................... 6 4 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination ............................................... 6 4.1 Identification of Illicit Discharge Sources ............................................................ 7 4.1.1 Mapping of Outfalls ..................................................................................................... 7 4.2 Recycling Program ................................................................................................ 7 4.3 Plan Modifications ................................................................................................ 8 4.4 Future Activities .................................................................................................... 8 5 Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Controls ........................................... 8 5.1 Ordinance/Regulatory Mechanisms .................................................................... 8 5.2 Inspection Program ..............................................................................................10 5.3 Plan Modifications ...............................................................................................10 5.4 Future Activities ...................................................................................................10 6 Post Construction Stormwater Management .......................................... 11 6.1 Post Construction Stormwater BMPs .................................................................. 11 6.2 Plan Modifications ...............................................................................................12 6.3 Future Activities ...................................................................................................12 7 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping ...................................... 12 7.1 Information Management System ........................................................................ 12 7.2 Maintenance Schedule .........................................................................................13 7.3 Plan Modifications ...............................................................................................13 7.4 Future Activities ...................................................................................................14 F:\P1989\89272\T58\2015 Annual MS4 Report\2015 - SWMP - Annual MS4 Report.Docx i Table of Contents Stormwater Management Plan 2015 Annual Report Town of Enfield 8 Outfall Monitoring ...................................................................................... 14 8.1 Sampling of Representative Outfalls .................................................................... 14 8.2 Other Water Quality Data Collection ................................................................... 15 Appendices End of Report Appendix A MS4 General Permit Registration Appendix B Public Education and Outreach on Stormwater Impacts Appendix C Public Involvement and Participation Appendix D Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Appendix E Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Controls Appendix F Post-Construction Stormwater Management Appendix G Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations Appendix H Outfall Monitoring F:\P1989\89272\T58\2015 Annual MS4 Report\2015 - SWMP - Annual MS4 Report.Docx ii 1 Introduction The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) promulgated Phase II of its National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater regulations on December 8, 1999. Phase I of the USEPA stormwater program established regulations for stormwater discharges from municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) in municipalities with populations of 100,000 or greater, construction activities disturbing five or more acres of land, and ten categories of industrial facilities. The Phase II Final Rule expands the Phase I program by requiring smaller communities with MS4s in urbanized areas to implement programs and practices to control polluted stormwater runoff through the use of NPDES permits. The Town of Enfield is one of approximately 130 municipalities in Connecticut that are located either completely or partially within an urbanized area. These communities were mandated to seek permit coverage with the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection’s (CT DEEP) Phase II Stormwater Program. CT DEEP issued the final General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwater from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4 General Permit) on January 9, 2004. The permit was reissued without changes on January 9, 2009 and again on January 12, 2016 and is set to expire on June 30, 2017 (Appendix A). No re-registration is required. CT DEEP indicates permittees must continue implementing their Stormwater Management Plan, conduct annual sampling and submit their annual reports. A new modified MS4 General Permit was issued and will become effective July 1, 2017. Compliance with the 2004 MS4 permit was a two-part process. The first part (Part A – General Permit Registration) was the submission of a registration form including primarily administrative information and basic mapping. The CT DEEP issued the Town of Enfield a General Permit for Stormwater – Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (General Permit) (#GSM000086) on April 26, 2004. A copy of the General Permit registration certificate is included as Appendix A. The second part of the process is the submission of a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP). The Town of Enfield submitted the initial SWMP to the CT DEEP, ‘Town of Enfield - MS4 General Permit Annual Report for CY 2005,’ on April 18, 2006. The 2006 SWMP Report described the program elements and their status regarding compliance with the six Minimum Control Measures outlined in the MS4 General Permit. The six Minimum Control Measures include: • Public Education and Outreach on Stormwater Impacts • Public Involvement/Participation • Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination • Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Controls • Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Redevelopment • Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations This Annual Report for the 2015 calendar year, outlines the status of compliance with the MS4 General Permit, provides an assessment of the appropriateness of the previously identified best management practices and the Town’s progress towards achieving the implementation dates and measurable goals of each Minimum Control Measure as identified in the 2006 Initial SWMP Report. In addition, the Annual F:\P1989\89272\T58\2015 Annual MS4 Report\2015 - SWMP - Annual MS4 Report.Docx 1 Report provides results of monitoring data collected and analyzed during the reporting period, summarizes stormwater activities the Town plans to undertake during the next reporting cycle, and outlines any changes to previously identified measurable goals or implementation dates that apply to the program elements. The Town of Enfield will continue to implement the SWMP program elements according to the requirements of the MS4 General Permit until it expires and replaced by the new, modified MS4 General Permit. Implementation of the six Minimum Control Measures to take steps in keeping the stormwater entering its storm sewer system clean before that stormwater enters water bodies is described in the following sections. 2 Public Education and Outreach on Stormwater Impacts An informed and knowledgeable community is crucial to the success of a stormwater management program as it provides support for the program through volunteers and donors with an understanding of why the program is important and necessary. In addition, there will be greater compliance with the program as the public becomes more aware of their own personal responsibilities and those expected of the community to protect and improve area waters. 2.1 Staff and Property Owner Education The Town of Enfield continues
Recommended publications
  • Connecticut River Watershed

    Connecticut River Watershed

    34-AC-2 CONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED 2003 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS IAN BOWLES, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LAURIE BURT, COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION GLENN HAAS, ACTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY LIMITED COPIES OF THIS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT NO COST BY WRITTEN REQUEST TO: MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 627 MAIN STREET WORCESTER, MA 01608 This report is also available from the Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management’s home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/wqassess.htm Furthermore, at the time of first printing, eight copies of each report published by this office are submitted to the State Library at the State House in Boston; these copies are subsequently distributed as follows: • On shelf; retained at the State Library (two copies); • Microfilmed retained at the State Library; • Delivered to the Boston Public Library at Copley Square; • Delivered to the Worcester Public Library; • Delivered to the Springfield Public Library; • Delivered to the University Library at UMass, Amherst; • Delivered to the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Moreover, this wide circulation is augmented by inter-library loans from the above-listed libraries. For example a resident in Winchendon can apply at their local library for loan of any MassDEP/DWM report from the Worcester Public Library. A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This report, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester.
  • The Nayigation of the Connecticut River

    The Nayigation of the Connecticut River

    1903.] The Navigation of the Connecticut River. 385 THE NAYIGATION OF THE CONNECTICUT RIVER. BY W. DELOSS LOVE. THE discovery of the Connecticut river has been generally attributed hy histoi'ians to Adriaen Block. If Giovanni da Verrazano in 1524 or Estovan Gomez in 1525 sailed by its mouth, we have no record of the fact ; and it is very doubtful whether a river, whose semicircle of sand bars must have proclaimed it such, would have attracted much attention from any navigator seeking a northwest passage. In 1614, Block, having completed his yacht the Onrust [Restless], set sail from Manhattan to explore the bays and rivers to the. eastward. His vessel was well adapted to his purpose, being of sixteen tons burden, forty-four and a half feet long and eleven and a half feefc wide. He was able thus to obtain a more exact knowledge of the coast, as may be seen by the "Figurative Map," which is sup- posed to exhibit the results of his explorations.^ At the mouth of the Connecticut river he found the water quite shallow, but the draught of his yacht enabled him to cross the bar Avithout danger and the white man was soon for the first time folloAving northward the course of New Eng- land's longest river. There were few inhabitants to be seen near the mouth, but at a point which is thought to have been just above the bend near Middletown, he came upon the lodges of. the Sequins, located on both banks of thé river. Still farther up he saw an Indian village "resembling a fort for protection against the attacks of their enemies." This was in latitude 41° 48', and was, > De Laet's " Description of the New Netherlands," x: Y:,met.
  • MMI 53 River Street Dam.Pdf

    MMI 53 River Street Dam.Pdf

    TOWN OF ACTON JUNE 7, 2019 | ACTON, MA PROPOSAL Studies Related to the Dam Located at 53 River Street June 7, 2019 Mr. John Mangiaratti, Town Manager Town of Acton Town Manager’s Office 472 Main Street Acton, MA 01720 RE: River Street Dam Removal and Fort Pond Brook Restoration Acton, Massachusetts MMI #4458-02 Dear Mr. Mangiaratti: The Milone & MacBroom team of structural engineers, bridge scour experts, geotechnical engineers, and hydraulic engineers are uniquely qualified to design the dam removal, and evaluate the potential upstream and downstream infrastructure impacts associated with the removal of the Dam at River Street to improve ecological functions of the Fort Pond Brook. When reviewing our proposal, we ask that you consider the following: Our team brings expertise and a proven track record of success in dam removal projects throughout New England. Milone & MacBroom professionals have backgrounds in hydrology and hydraulics, engineering design, fisheries expertise, and wetland biology. Our staff also includes invasive species experts, fisheries biologists, and permitting specialists. We also integrate the creative innovation of our extensive in-house team of landscape architects and frequently include passive recreational park features at our dam removal sites. We have the ability to integrate dam removal with the natural site opportunities through careful analysis and planning so that your project is technically sound, environmentally sensitive, and aesthetically pleasing. Our team of experts has performed many dam removal projects throughout New England and the Northeast. Milone and MacBroom are pioneers in the field, having completed our first dam removals in the 1990s. With over 40 constructed dam removal projects, we have completed more than any other design firm in the Northeast.
  • Official List of Public Waters

    Official List of Public Waters

    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
  • Winter 2011 Volume 23 Number 4

    Winter 2011 Volume 23 Number 4

    HE ABITAT TA newsletter of the Connecticut H Association of Conservation and Inland Wetlands Commissions, Inc. winter 2011 volume 23 number 4 VERNON CONSERVATION COMMISSION IMPLEMENTS TOWN-WIDE INVASIVE AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM by Thomas Ouellette, Vernon Conservation Commission he Town of Vernon, led by the Conservation the Town’s Water Pollution Treatment Facility, and Commission and the Department of Parks then flows more than four miles south to Manchester. Tand Recreation, has been engaged since 2008 Within Vernon, the Hockanum River, which transits in a program to proactively identify, monitor, and industrial, commercial, residential and natural control populations of non-native invasive aquatic environments, is designated by the Connecticut plants within two principal Department of Energy and watersheds, and to plan for their Environmental Protection (DEEP) removal. Concerns relate to as impaired for recreation and for the exclusion of native aquatic habitat for fish, other aquatic life vegetation by proliferating and wildlife. non-native species, and to the resulting oxygen depletion and The Tankerhoosen River is a elimination of fish and wildlife tributary of the Hockanum River, habitat in surface waters. with headwaters in Tolland. Impairment of recreational From Walker Reservoir East activities, i.e., swimming, near I-84 Exit 67 in Vernon, boating, and fishing, are the Tankerhoosen extends also of concern. The town’s approximately five miles to its coordinated effort, which confluence with the Hockanum includes both professional field River at the Manchester town investigations and volunteer line. It is fed by a number of surveys as described below, streams, including Railroad may be instructive to other Brook, which originates at Bolton communities striving to protect Notch Pond in Bolton and flows the health of their rivers Hockanum River and Tankerhoosen River Watersheds.
  • Upper Connecticut River Paddler's Trail Strategic Assessment

    Upper Connecticut River Paddler's Trail Strategic Assessment

    VERMONT RIVER CONSERVANCY: Upper Connecticut River Paddler's Trail Strategic Assessment Prepared for The Vermont River Conservancy. 29 Main St. Suite 11 Montpelier, Vermont 05602 Prepared by Noah Pollock 55 Harrison Ave Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802) 540-0319 • [email protected] Updated May 12th, 2009 CONNECTICUT RIVER WATER TRAIL STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................2 Results of the Stakeholder Review and Analysis .............................................................................5 Summary of Connecticut River Paddler's Trail Planning Documents .........................................9 Campsite and Access Point Inventory and Gap Analysis .............................................................14 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................................29 Appendix A: Connecticut River Primitive Campsites and Access Meeting Notes ...................32 Appendix B: Upper Valley Land Trust Campsite Monitoring Checklist ....................................35 Appendix C: Comprehensive List of Campsites and Access Points .........................................36 Appendix D: Example Stewardship Signage .................................................................................39 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Northern Forest Canoe Trail Railroad Trestle ................................................................2
  • NFCT-Waterway Work Trip-2015 Upper Ammonoosuc River, NH Access Ramp July 9Th-11Th

    NFCT-Waterway Work Trip-2015 Upper Ammonoosuc River, NH Access Ramp July 9Th-11Th

    NFCT-Waterway Work Trip-2015 Upper Ammonoosuc River, NH Access Ramp July 9th-11th Introduction: The Upper Ammonoosuc River is a tributary of the Connecticut River and flows east to west across New Hampshire. NFCT through paddlers typically paddle upstream passing through the towns of Groveton and Stark before taking out in West Milan and portaging up RT 110A to the Androscoggin River. Day-trippers, or weekend paddlers typically take the trip in reverse, putting in at West Milan and taking out in Stark or Groveton. The NFCT has been developing relationships along the Ammonoosuc for years, and as a result, we have a number of campsites and project locations along its banks. This year, we will be installing bin privy systems at two campsite locations. If extra time allows we will work on prepping a river access put in/takeout in the town of Stark. Driving Directions and Meeting Location: From Groveton: Turn onto RT 110/ Berlin Groveton Hwy. Go approximately 12.4 miles. You will venture through the town of Stark and towards West Milan. Turn left onto Hart Rd. It’s a dirt road. Go approximately .4 miles. Just before the train tracks, on the left, pull in and park next to the NFCT truck (white F150). From West Milan: Gord’s Corner Store(Closest place to get supplies) is located at the Junction of RT110A and 110. From here, go west on RT 110 roughly 3.9 miles. Turn Right onto Hart Rd. Go approximately .4 miles. Just before the train tracks, on the left, pull in and park next to the NFCT truck (white F150).
  • Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5144

    Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5144

    Prepared in cooperation with the New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission Assessment of Total Nitrogen in the Upper Connecticut River Basin in New Hampshire, Vermont, and Massachusetts, December 2002–September 2005 Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5144 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Photograph shows the Connecticut River and Mt. Ascutney, Vermont, in the background. Assessment of Total Nitrogen in the Upper Connecticut River Basin in New Hampshire, Vermont, and Massachusetts, December 2002–September 2005 By Jeffrey R. Deacon, Thor E. Smith, Craig M. Johnston, Richard B. Moore, Rebecca M. Weidman, and Laura J. Blake Prepared in cooperation with the New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5144 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Deacon, J.R., Smith, T.E., Johnston, C.M., Moore, R.B., Weidman, R.M., and Blake, L.J., 2006, Assessment of total nitrogen in the Upper Connecticut River Basin in New Hampshire, Vermont, and Massachusetts, December 2002– September 2005: U.S.
  • Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study Report

    Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study Report

    Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study STUDY REPORT A watershed-scale assessment of the potential for flow restoration through dam re-operation THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST The Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study A watershed-scale assessment of the potential for flow restoration through dam re-operation Katie Kennedy, The Nature Conservancy Kim Lutz, The Nature Conservancy Christopher Hatfield, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Leanna Martin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Townsend Barker, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Richard Palmer, University of Massachusetts Amherst Luke Detwiler, University of Massachusetts Amherst Jocelyn Anleitner, University of Massachusetts Amherst John Hickey, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Kennedy, K., K. Lutz, C. Hatfield, L. Martin, T. Barker, R. Palmer, L. Detwiler, J. Anleitner, J. Hickey. 2018. The Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study: A watershed-scale assessment of the potential for flow restoration through dam re-operation. The Nature Conservancy, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and University of Massachusetts Amherst. Northampton, MA. Available: http://nature.org/ctriverwatershed For a quick, easy-to-read overview of the Connecticut River Watershed Study, see our companion “Study Overview” document, available at: http://nature.org/ctriverwatershed June 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................................................................................1
  • Large Woody Debris Fact Sheet

    Large Woody Debris Fact Sheet

    Inland Fisheries Division Habitat Conservation and Enhancement Program Large Woody Debris Fact Sheet I. Introduction Trees that grow along a streamside can often fall into a watercourse due to floods, erosion, windthrow, disease, beaver activity or natural mortality. These materials, often referred to as Large Woody Debris (LWD) can include whole trees with a rootwad and limbs attached or portions of trees with or without rootwads or limbs. LWD is typically defined by biologists as logs with a minimum diameter of 4 inches and a minimum length of 6 feet that protrude or lay within a stream channel. Environmental and recreational groups have often removed LWD as part of river cleanup or river improvement projects. Although these groups have good intentions, LWD removal can be “very detrimental” to stream health and well being. In fact, during the last decade, the Inland Fisheries Division has been actively adding LWD to river systems as a component of individual stream restoration projects, particularly in streams that are LWD deficient. This fact sheet describes the vital importance of LWD to river ecosystems and provides guidance for its beneficial management. Example of various types of large woody debris in the Moosup River, Plainfield. DEP • Inland Fisheries Division • Habitat Conservation and Enhancement Program 1 II. Ecological Benefits of Large Woody Debris Research studies have shown that LWD is a vital and naturally occurring component of healthy stream ecosystems. Ecological benefits of LWD are described below. ¾ Fish Habitat LWD that falls completely across a stream causes water to be slightly impounded resulting in the formation of an upstream pool and a downstream plunge pool as water flows under and over the wood.
  • YOUR SOURCE for CT Fishing Information

    YOUR SOURCE for CT Fishing Information

    Share the Experience—Take Someone Fishing • APRIL 14 Opening Day Trout Fishing 2018 CONNECTICUT ANGLER’S GUIDE INLAND & MARINE FISHING YOUR SOURCE For CT Fishing Information »New Trout & »New Inland »New Marine Salmon Stamp Regulations Regulations See page 8 & 20 for 2018 for 2018 See page 20 See page 58 Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection www.ct.gov/deep/fishing FISHING REGULATIONS GUIDE - GA TRIM: . 8˝ X 10-1/2˝ (AND VARIOUS OTHER STATES) BLEED: . 8-1/4˝ X 10-3/4˝ SAFETY: . 7˝ X 10˝ TRIM TRIM SAFETY TRIM BLEED BLEED SAFETY BLEED BLEED TRIM TRIM SAFETY SAFETY SAFETY SAFETY TRIM TRIM BLEED BLEED TRIM TRIM TRIM BLEED BLEED SAFETY SAFETY Client: Progressive Job No: 16D00890 Created by: Dalon Wolford Applications: InDesign CC, Adobe Photoshop CC, Adobe Illustrator CC Job Description: Full Page, 4 Color Ad Document Name: Bass ad / Fishing Regulations Guide - GA and various other states Final Trim Size: 7-7/8˝ X 10-1/2˝ Final Bleed: 8-1/8˝ X 10-13/16˝ Safety: 7˝ X 10˝ Date Created: 11/7/16 FISHING REGULATIONS GUIDE - GA TRIM: . 8˝ X 10-1/2˝ (AND VARIOUS OTHER STATES) BLEED: . 8-1/4˝ X 10-3/4˝ SAFETY: . 7˝ X 10˝ TRIM TRIM SAFETY TRIM BLEED BLEED SAFETY BLEED BLEED TRIM TRIM SAFETY SAFETY 2018 CONNECTICUT ANGLER’S GUIDE INLAND REGULATIONS INLAND & MARINE FISHING Easy two-step process: 1. Check the REGULATION TABLE (page 21) for general statewide Contents regulations. General Fishing Information 2. Look up the waterbody in the LAKE AND PONDS Directory of Services Phone Numbers .............................2 (pages 32–41) or RIVERS AND STREAMS (pages 44–52) Licenses .........................................................................
  • Ammonoosuc River Management Plan

    Ammonoosuc River Management Plan

    AMMONOOSUC RIVER LOCAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN JUNE 2013 WITH ASSISTANCE FROM NORTH COUNTRY COUNCIL AND THE UPPER CONNECTICUT RIVER MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT FUND Cover Photos: Field Geology Services, 2009 Founded in 1973, North Country Council (NCC) is a nonprofit regional planning agency serving 51 communities and 25 unincorporated places in the northern third of New Hampshire. It is the mission of North Country Council to encourage effective community and regional planning for the development of economic opportunity and the conservation of natural, cultural and economic resources. This is accomplished by providing information, regional advocacy, technical assistance, community education, and direct service to the region, its organizations, and political subdivisions. Learn more about the Council and its work at NCCouncil.org. Ammonoosuc River Corridor Management Plan Adopted by the Ammonoosuc River Local Advisory Committee June 5, 2013 Town representatives on the Ammonoosuc River Local Advisory Committee at time of adoption: Leslie Bergum, Carroll Connie McDade, Littleton Marilyn Booth, Landaff Rosalind Page, Lisbon William Harris, Haverhill Errol Peters, Landaff Steve Jesseman, Lisbon Charles Ryan, Littleton Marilyn Johnson, Bethlehem Richard Walling, Bath Michael King, Haverhill Jessica Willis, Littleton Developed by Ammonoosuc River Local Advisory Committee with assistance from North Country Council and the Upper Connecticut River Mitigation and Enhancement Fund ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people assisted the Ammonoosuc