How the Minerals Management Service's Partnership with Industry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How the Minerals Management Service's Partnership with Industry Tuesday, August 24, 2010 How the Minerals Management Service’s partnership with industry led to failure By Juliet Eilperin and Scott Higham routinely referred to the companies ington paid close attention to MMS and under their watch as “clients,” the hard-to-understand world it was Washington Post Staff Writers “customers” and especially “partners.” charged with regulating. When they did, As the relationship became more it was often to pressure the agency to in- Two weeks after BP’s Macondo well intertwined, regulatory intensity crease the money it earned from leases blew out in the Gulf of Mexico, the federal subsided. MMS officials waivedit sold and the production that followed. government’s Minerals Management hundreds of environmental reviews Over its 28-year history, MMS grew to Service finalized a regulation intended and did not aggressively pursue become one the government’s largest to control the undersea pressures that companies for equipment failures. revenue collectors, after the Internal threaten deepwater drilling operations. They also participated in studies Revenue Service. MMS did not write the rule. As it financed and dominated by industry, As oil and gas companies took had dozens of times before, the agency more as collaborator than regulator. their drilling operations into deeper adopted language provided by the oil In the face of industry opposition, and riskier waters, MMS had to rely industry’s trade group, the American MMS abandoned proposals that would on its corporate partners’ expertise. Petroleum Institute, and incorporated have increased costs but might have Along the way were warning signs of it into the Federal Register. improved safety. the partnership’s imbalance, but the MMS received two favorable public The story of how a little-known fed- industry’s track record of no major comments about the regulation: one from the Offshore Operators eral agency became an extension of accidents provided a comfort level that Committee, an industry group, and the industry it oversaw spans three de- proved deceptive. the other from BP. The regulation cades and four presidents. It began in Industry innovation, as it often stated: “BP, a large oil and gas company, 1982 with a major expressed the importance of this rule change in the way and how they have been involved with the nation man- MMS and industry to develop the aged its natural industry standard.” resources, picked The fact that BP - which has come under up pace with ini- withering criticism for how it managed tiatives to stream- mounting pressure in the Macondo well line bureaucracy - took partial credit for crafting the rule in the Clinton and is not surprising. MMS has adopted at George W. Bush least 78 industry-generated standards as administrations, federal regulations, American Petroleum and ended after Institute records show. the April 20 BP MMS’s acquiescence stemmed from blowout with the the unusual relationship it had cultivated Obama adminis- with industry. Directed by law to “meet the tration’s abrupt de- nation’s energy needs,” the agency pursued cision to undo the that mission by declaring itself publicly partnership. In this image made from video released by British Petroleum, a saw slices into the blowout preventer to prepare for a capping device to seal and formally as industry’s partner. Few in positions off the oil gusher at BP's Macondo well. Top officials and front-line workers of power in Wash- does, had outrun and overpowered the D. Bettenberg carried out many of or the Georges Bank. government’s regulatory prowess, with Watt’s orders. He recalls that the agency Leasing new tracts to oil and gas disastrous results. They were partners, was created on the fly. companies was MMS’s primary objective. but they were not equals. Bettenberg left his office in Reston one Many agency employees spent their days Friday afternoon and returned Monday determining which offshore areas would On the fly to learn that Watt was giving MMS be most productive, and then auctioning oversight of drilling operations in the those swaths to the highest bidders. James G. Watt, the man who created Outer Continental Shelf, a responsibility Now, lawmakers were saying they had MMS, came to Washington in 1982 that had rested within another Interior as much of a right to draw the map for with a mission: to alter the way the Department division, the Bureau of Land drilling as MMS officials did. government managed its natural Management. A co-worker found a copy Watt backed away from leasing off the resources. Coming off the hostage crisis of Watt’s draft order on a Xerox machine California and Massachusetts coasts, but in oil-rich Iran and gas shortages on the and relayed the news to Bettenberg in a he moved to lease nearby areas, tracts home front, he vowed to “mine more” phone call. and “drill more.” As he set up the agency, Nearly three decades later, the Bettenberg turned to industry lawyer known for his sharp mind and for guidance. “Sometimes we oversized glasses says in an interview applied industry standards,” from his home in Jackson Hole, Wyo., he says. “Many of the that he “wouldn’t change one decision.” standards are good.” As Ronald Reagan’s first interior Bettenberg, who retired in secretary, Watt wasted little time pursuing 2005 after a 41-year career, his vision. The environment, he believed, wonders whether the agency contained valuable resources that should could have done more to be exploited for the good of the nation, regulate deep-sea drilling. particularly at a time of tense relations “This recent spill has with the Soviet Union and continuing prompted me to conclude I instability in the Middle East. didn’t ask enough questions,” “The Reagan administration was he says. “I suspect people didn’t for everything,” Watt says. “We wanted keep up with technology.” nuclear, we wanted solar, we wanted James G. Watt, former Secy. of the Interior and the creator of the MMS. (Curtesy of the Univerity of Wyoming). conservation, we wanted wind, we Expansion wanted coal. We were just doing everything we could to re-arm America, In the face of Watt’s push for more that were even closer to shore. Congress dig us out of a huge financial mess. That drilling, the Democratic-controlled responded with further restrictions, required energy at every level.” Congress resisted. the beginning of what would become a For years, the U.S. Geological Survey Rep. Les AuCoin, an outspoken drilling moratorium for certain regions. had handled the task of collecting Oregon Democrat, had a vision of what The one exception: most of the Gulf royalties from companies, based on the an oil spill off California could mean for of Mexico. amount of oil and gas they extracted his state. After major storms, he said, After Watt resigned in September from federal land and offshore reserves. dead cows would wash up on Oregon’s 1983, lawmakers expanded the But allegations of fraud had left the beaches, plucked from Northern moratorium. From 1982 to 1992, the program in a shambles. A panel California coast. Oil from a blown-out territory declared off-limits grew from appointed to examine the problems well, he reasoned, would be no different. 700,000 acres off the California coast recommended that a new agency take When Watt suggested opening up to more than 266 million acres off the over those duties as its main mission. the Pacific Outer Continental Shelf Pacific and Atlantic coasts, Alaska’s Watt went one step further. The and Georges Bank off Massachusetts to Bering Sea and the gulf’s eastern portion. Minerals Management Service he drilling in 1981, AuCoin and Republican Again, the rest of the gulf remained created in 1982 would not only lease Rep. Silvio O. Conte of Massachusetts open. tracts for exploration and collect the used their posts on the powerful House Lawmakers who opposed drilling government’s share of oil and gas Appropriations Committee to block found an ally in George H.W. Bush. revenue, it would regulate the industry, him. They put language in a funding During his 1988 presidential bid, he too. That built-in conflict would bill mandating that no money could said offshore areas needed protection hamstring the agency for decades. be used to lease exploratory tracts in “until technology moves forward.” As an early director of MMS, William central and Northern California waters In his first year as president, he canceled a slew of lease sales by put Vice President Al Gore in charge of Worried that leases were declining executive order and established a marine the initiative, which sought to slash the as opportunities in shallow water sanctuary in California’s Monterey Bay. federal workforce, reduce regulation dwindled, Louisiana Democrat J. The government also bought back leases and form “partnerships” between Bennett Johnston used his senior for tracts off South Florida. The result: Washington and industry. Profound position on the Senate Energy and More offshore auctions were canceled changes would take place at MMS: It was Natural Resources Committee to seek than held between 1987 and 1992. ordered to do a better job of collecting royalty relief for companies willing to The gulf remained the primary place royalties, while losing nearly 10 percent explore deeper water. for deepwater ventures, becoming what of its staff during the next five years. “Offshore drilling had always been environmentalists such as Peter Galvin Reinvention also became the very key to our [state’s] economy, and of the Center for Biological Diversity agency’s mantra. In October 1993, an the overall oil production,” he now called a “national sacrifice area.” Today, Interior panel issued findings aimed at says. “I thought we ought to make a it is home to 99 percent of the nation’s future drilling policies.
Recommended publications
  • Putting a Freeze on Arctic Ocean Drilling America’S Inability to Respond to an Oil Spill in the Arctic
    AP PHOTO/JUDY P PHOTO/JUDY AP A TRICK, FILE TRICK, Putting a Freeze on Arctic Ocean Drilling America’s Inability to Respond to an Oil Spill in the Arctic Kiley Kroh, Michael Conathan, and Emma Huvos February 2012 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Putting a Freeze on Arctic Ocean Drilling America’s Inability to Respond to an Oil Spill in the Arctic Kiley Kroh, Michael Conathan, and Emma Huvos February 2012 COVER: The Coast Guard Cutter Healy escorts the Russian-flagged tanker Renda 250 miles south of Nome on January 6. The vessels are transiting through ice up to five-feet thick in this area.T he 370-foot tanker Renda will have to go through more than 300 miles of sea ice to get to Nome, a city of about 3,500 people on the western Alaska coastline that did not get its last pre-winter fuel delivery because of a massive storm. If the delivery of diesel fuel and unleaded gasoline is not made, the city likely will run short of fuel supplies before another barge delivery can be made in spring. AP Photo/US Coast Guard - Petty Officer 1st Class Sara Francis Contents vii MAP: Oil spill response capacity in the Arctic and Gulf of Mexico: Resources within 500 miles of BP spill site and Shell’s proposed Arctic exploration 1 Introduction and summary 5 The Deepwater Horizon response and aftermath 11 The realities of the Arctic 16 MAP: Arctic oil spill response capacity: Resources within 500 miles of Shell’s proposed drilling sites 23 Shell’s plans and emergency preparations 27 Recommendations 31 Conclusion 32 About the authors and acknowledgements 33 Additional
    [Show full text]
  • \\Crewserver05\Data\Research & Investigations\Most Ethical Public
    Stephen Abraham Exhibits EXHIBIT 1 Unlikely Adversary Arises to Criticize Detainee Hearings - New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/23/us/23gitmo.html?pagewanted=print July 23, 2007 Unlikely Adversary Arises to Criticize Detainee Hearings By WILLIAM GLABERSON NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. — Stephen E. Abraham’s assignment to the Pentagon unit that runs the hearings at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, seemed a perfect fit. A lawyer in civilian life, he had been decorated for counterespionage and counterterrorism work during 22 years as a reserve Army intelligence officer in which he rose to the rank of lieutenant colonel. His posting, just as the Guantánamo hearings were accelerating in 2004, gave him a close-up view of the government’s detention policies. It also turned him into one of the Bush administration’s most unlikely adversaries. In June, Colonel Abraham became the first military insider to criticize publicly the Guantánamo hearings, which determine whether detainees should be held indefinitely as enemy combatants. Just days after detainees’ lawyers submitted an affidavit containing his criticisms, the United States Supreme Court reversed itself and agreed to hear an appeal arguing that the hearings are unjust and that detainees have a right to contest their detentions in federal court. Some lawyers say Colonel Abraham’s account — of a hearing procedure that he described as deeply flawed and largely a tool for commanders to rubber-stamp decisions they had already made — may have played an important role in the justices’ highly unusual reversal. That decision once again brought the administration face to face with the vexing legal, political and diplomatic questions about the fate of Guantánamo and the roughly 360 men still held there.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Ocean Energy Safety Advisory Committee New Orleans, Louisiana July 13-14, 2011
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OCEAN ENERGY SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA JULY 13-14, 2011 MEETING MINUTES The Ocean Energy Safety Advisory Committee (OESC) held its second public meeting on July 13-14, 2011, at the Astor Crowne Plaza Hotel, 739 Canal Street, New Orleans, Louisiana 70130. The meeting agenda (Appendix I) focused on industry, state, academia and Federal initiatives and outreach relevant to the work of the Committee; new technology; and OESC subcommittees’ progress to date. Thirteen of the fifteen Committee members were in attendance (Appendix II). The two Committee members who were not present during the meeting represented the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Academia) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA - Federal government). In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, the meeting was open to the public from 1:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. on July 13 and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on July 14. Approximately 50 members of the public and press were in attendance (Appendix III). The meeting was called to order by Designated Federal Officer (DFO) Brad J. Blythe after establishing quorum. He then introduced OESC Chairman Thomas O. Hunter to lead meeting proceedings. Wednesday, July 13, 2011 The first day of the meeting consisted of presentations on industry initiatives by the Marine Well Containment Company (MWCC) and DeepStar, as well as a presentation by Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE) on the Well Containment Screening Tool. BOEMRE Director Michael R. Bromwich offered a few remarks (Appendix IV) of encouragement to the OESC and its subcommittees on their progress to date and future efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Blowout: Legal Legacy of the Deepwater Horizon Catastrophe:Federal Public Law and the Future of Oil and Gas Drilling on the Oute
    Roger Williams University Law Review Volume 17 | Issue 1 Article 10 Winter 2012 Blowout: Legal Legacy of the Deepwater Horizon Catastrophe:Federal Public Law and the Future of Oil and Gas Drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf David Pettit Natural Resources Defense Council David Newman Natural Resources Defense Council Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR Recommended Citation Pettit, David and Newman, David (2012) "Blowout: Legal Legacy of the Deepwater Horizon Catastrophe:Federal Public Law and the Future of Oil and Gas Drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf," Roger Williams University Law Review: Vol. 17: Iss. 1, Article 10. Available at: http://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR/vol17/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Roger Williams University Law Review by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact mwu@rwu.edu. Federal Public Law and the Future of Oil and Gas Drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf David Pettit* and David Newmant I. INTRODUCTION Transocean's Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling rig, on lease to BP, exploded and caught fire on April 20, 2010. This event caused the deaths of eleven workers and resulted in an oil geyser that spewed millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.' The Deepwater Horizon sank two days after the explosion. Nearly three months later, on July 15, 2010, BP was finally able to cap the well.2 The Flow Rate Technical Group, a group of scientists from federal agencies and academic institutions, estimated that * David Pettit, a 1975 graduate of UCLA Law School, is a Senior Attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Oilgram News/OPR Extra a Special Edition from the Editors of Platts July 20, 2010
    ] Oilgram News/OPR Extra A special edition from the editors of Platts July 20, 2010 As it has during other crises affecting oil and other energy markets, such as hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Ivan, Platts is producing this special summary of events surrounding the Deepwater Horizon rig disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. This special joint edition of Platts Oilgram News and OPR Extra will be published as frequently as Platts believes necessary to give its readers a quick summary of developments surrounding the leak at the wellhead, the growing footprint of the spill, and the impact these occurrences are having on markets and on US federal energy policy. Return of the top kill option With BP's runaway Macondo exploration hour period that ended July 17, Allen has Allen said the preliminary idea would use the well finally under control in the Gulf of Mexico, approved extensions in 24-hour intervals, and static kill to pump mud from the top, "increas- BP and the US government continued to mull he did that again on July 20. "There are com- ing the chances of success" with the relief options July 20 for a next move--including peting theories of depletion versus leakage," well. "Static kill discussions are ongoing, and another look at the "top kill" maneuver that Allen said, explaining the debate among mem- we will have a good idea in the next 24 hours failed so spectacularly at the end of May. BP bers of the government and BP technical for detailed plans from BP," Allen said. is so eager to include what it now calls a teams working to evaluate the reason for the "static kill" that BP senior vice president Kent stable pressure in the 6,800 level.
    [Show full text]
  • Fy 2012 Performance Budget
    The United States BUDGET Department of the Interior JUSTIFICATIONS and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2012 Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement NOTICE: These budget justifications are prepared for the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittees. Approval for release of the justifications prior to their printing in the public record of the Subcommittee hearings may be obtained through the Office of Budget of the Department of the Interior. BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT FY 2012 PERFORMANCE BUDGET Table of Contents Director’s Preface ......................................................................................................................... 1 General Statement ........................................................................................................................ 7 Summary of BOEMRE Budget Request ........................................................................................ 7 FY 2012 Performance Budget Request......................................................................................... 8 Reorganization and Reform .......................................................................................................... 9 FY 2012 Budget Highlights......................................................................................................... 12 FY 2012 Analysis of Budgetary Changes.................................................................................... 13 Performance Summary...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Society of Petroleum Engineers Section Annual Report
    SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS SECTION ANNUAL REPORT RETURN THIS FORM TO THE SPE SECTIONS MANAGER NO LATER THAN 1 JUNE. Please submit electronically as a Word document, if possible. If handwritten, please use black ink and attach additional sheets if needed. Please limit total submission (report and attachments) to no more than 100 pages. Include only one example of newsletters, meeting minutes, etc. If necessary, you may state “additional documentation available upon request.” Section Name: Gulf Coast Section Year June 1, 2010 – May 31, 2011 1. Technical Dissemination Provide a summary of technical exchange meetings in table 1.1 and for conferences in table 1.2. For conferences, supply an estimate of the section’s contribution to organizing and running the conference. Also provide description of each conference (theme, format, attendance, success, etc.) in section 1.2a. Please provide a detailed list of each technical meeting in table 1.3. 1.1 Type of Technical Exchange Qty Average Attendanc e Technical Presentation, DL & Study Groups 105 61 * 1-day Workshops/Courses/Seminars 9 91 2-day Workshops/Courses/Seminars 1 150 3-day Workshops/Courses/Seminars 1 535 half -day Wor kshops/Courses/Seminars 1 73 * SG meetings with TBD listed for attendance are included in meeting count but not included in average attendance calculations. 1.2 Conference Length (days) Attendance % Contribution ESP Workshop 3-Day 535 80% YP Emerging Engineers Conference 2-Day 150 (est) 100% Oilfield Orientation 2 sessions 1-Day each 92 + 81 100% Production Technology Symposium 1-Day 78 100% Shale/Tight Gas Completion Technology Symposium 1-Day 103 100% Drilling Symposium 1-Day 103 100% Reservoir Seminar 1-Day 100 (est) 100% HSE Seminar 1-Day 38 100% YP Roughneck Camp 1-Day 200 (est) 100% PFC Technology Showcase 1-Day 45 100% Permian Basin Seminar ½ Day 73 100% 1 1.2a Please provide a detailed description of each conference, topic, success, web link, etc.: Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) Workshop, April 25 – April 29, 2011 at The Waterway Marriott, The Woodlands, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Plaintiffs' Counsel Has Stated That Plaintiffs Will Oppose This Motion. in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT O
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ELOUISE PEPION COBELL, et al.,) ) No. 1:96CV01285 Plaintiffs, ) (Judge Robertson) v. ) ) DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of ) the Interior, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ALL EXHIBITS AND PROPOSED TESTIMONY IDENTIFIED IN PLAINTIFFS’ PRETRIAL STATEMENT THAT ARE OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE OCTOBER 10, 2007 TRIAL Pursuant to Rule 104(a) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Defendants respectfully move this Court for an order in limine excluding all exhibits and proposed testimony identified in Plaintiffs’ Pretrial Statement that are related to matters outside the scope of the October 10, 2007 trial.1 Plaintiffs have listed 4435 exhibits, the majority of which involve disparate and irrelevant subjects such as IT security, asset management activities and other topics far afield from accounting issues. In their Pretrial Statement, Plaintiffs also identify 53 proposed witnesses (while reserving the right to call an untold number of unidentified witnesses from “corporate entities”), and designate the testimony from prior proceedings of 53 witnesses, most of which would be offered on the same irrelevant topics. Defendants seek an order in limine to exclude such proposed irrelevant evidence for the reasons set forth below. 1/ Plaintiffs’ counsel has stated that Plaintiffs will oppose this motion. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court is authorized to conduct pretrial conferences “for such purposes as . discouraging wasteful pretrial activities [and] improving the quality of the trial through more thorough preparation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a)(3)-(4).
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack H. Obama, 2009 Digest of Other White House Announcements December 31, 2009 January 20 January 21 Januar
    Administration of Barack H. Obama, 2009 Digest of Other White House Announcements December 31, 2009 The following list includes the President's public schedule and other items of general interest announced by the Office of the Press Secretary and not included elsewhere in this Compilation. January 20 In the afternoon, in Statuary Hall at the U.S. Capitol, the President and Mrs. Obama participated in the Inaugural luncheon. Later, they attended the Inaugural parade. In the evening, at the Washington Convention Center, the President and Mrs. Obama attended and made remarks at the Neighborhood Ball. During the ball, he participated in an interview with Robin Roberts of ABC News. They then attended and made remarks at the Obama Home State Ball. Later in the evening, at the National Building Museum, the President and Mrs. Obama attended and made remarks at the Commander-in-Chief Ball. Then, at the Hilton Washington Hotel Center, they attended and made remarks at the Youth Ball. Later, at the Washington Convention Center, they attended and made remarks at the Biden Home State Ball followed by the Mid Atlantic Region Ball. January 21 In the morning, at the Washington Convention Center, the President and Mrs. Obama attended and made remarks at the West/Southwestern Regional Ball followed by the Midwestern Regional Ball. Later, at the DC Armory, they attended and made remarks at the Southern Regional Ball. Then, at Union Station, they attended and made remarks at the Eastern Regional Ball. Later in the morning, the President met with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.
    [Show full text]
  • Eihibitll United Progreuivei for Victory Pren and Media
    NH fl O O O Eihibitll United Progreuivei for Victory Pren and Media. Homt * Who We Are ' Get Involved ' Get Informed ' Press & Media Media Contecte Press contact PRESSQUPF un AIAMC. K1 ORGANIZATION: DM PHONE: SubmaOmry j RepofleShwlle^ O AaPiQgreaaheaPaaartllBClBr.Riglftttnip October 28,2004 WASHINGTON - Ralph Nader has received mom ttwi $125,000 from GOP dorwrs and consultants Jr^^ Veterans for Truth a larger figure than previously reported, United Progressives for Victory said today. UPfofVtatory.com's teteat research draws on press lapoito art Fadanri Electim CommMm tuiKflxibutMmeoe by the GOP in drculaUng arid defending Nao^ • 8wHI Boat Vaterana far Nader? Eight donors to trie Wanwjs Swift Boat Vtetenvm tor Truth 527, who have given $3^ Kenya military service, neve ateo given Nader $11.250. [FEC] • rao^^nu. Corporate SuppOftFto of the lafgertd targeted moderate RapuHcana, have given $7,500 to Nadar. They nave grven $450,000 to trie Club for Growth in the past I cydes. Seven contributors to tr*Pro-Giow» Action Teem, sr^^ [FEC] i Stave Werk raised $30.000 for Choices for America, a group that paid for aignatui Neder^ ballot effort in Nevada. [Las Vegas Review Journal, B/2&VD4] m New Hampshire, Republican consultant David Carney, htov^ ami his bustoessassm to Nader to cover the coat of petition gathering that Can»*MHBtedonNadartbarwlf.TI^ in George H.W. Bush's White House, responsible for 3 out of every 6 o^tara that ntedarraiaad in tnaGianlte State. In MUfgan, lha Rapubiein party made a S3.4W iri« baaot them after the RapubVcane turned in 46,000 signatures foe Wm end vi^ent to court for him.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Interior Building, 1849 C Street, NW., 20240, phone (202) 208–3100, http://www.doi.gov KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior; born in Alamosa, CO, March 2, 1955; education: J.D., University of Michigan Law School; B.A., Colorado College; professional: United States Senator from Colorado, 2005–09; Attorney General of Colorado, 1999–2005; Executive Direc- tor, Colorado Department of Natural Resources, 1990–94; chief legal counsel to Governor Roy Romer, 1987–90; Natural Resources Lawyer, Small Business Owner, Farmer; member, Colorado College Board of Trustees; chair, Conference of Western Attorneys General; chair, National Association of Attorneys General Environment Committee; chair, Colorado Peace Officers Standards and Training Board; chair, Rio Grande Compact Commission; chair, Sangre de Cristo Land Grant Commission; chair, Great Outdoors Colorado; religion: Roman Catholic; married: Hope; children: Melinda and Andrea; granddaughter: Mireya; nominated by President Barack Obama to become the 50th Secretary of the Interior, and was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on January 20, 2009. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Secretary of the Interior.—Ken Salazar, room 6156, 208–7351. Special Assistant / Director, Scheduling and Advance.—Joan Padilla, room 6154. Special Assisant.—Terri Johnson. Chief of Staff.—Thomas ‘‘Tom’’ Strickland, room 6144. Deputy Chief of Staff.—Renee Stone, room 6140. Senior Advisor for Economic Recovery.—Chris Henderson, room 6120, 208–7471. Senior Advisor to the Secretary.—Kenneth ‘‘Ken’’ Lane, room 6142. Director of External and Intergovernmental Affairs.—Ray Rivera, room 6212, 208–1923. Senior Advisor for Alaska Affairs.—Kim Elton, room 6020, 208–4177. Counselor to the Secretary.—Steve Black, room 6130, 208–4123.
    [Show full text]
  • Week in News: January 26- February 1, 2009
    Week in News: January 26- February 1, 2009 Why offshore drilling is good for Va. Daily Press, February 1, 2009; http://www.dailypress.com/news/opinion/dp-op_drilling_0201feb01,0,3639131.story Why the Santa Barbara oil deal collapsed Los Angeles Times, January 31, 2009; http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-drill31- 2009jan31,0,6019074.story Senate energy bill won't draw leasing boundaries – Murkowski E&E, January 30, 2009; http://www.eenews.net/EEDaily/2009/01/30/2 Commission rejects plan to drill off Santa Barbara coast Los Angeles Times, January 30, 2009; http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-santa-barbara-oil30- 2009jan30,0,4266773.story Salazar reopens criminal investigation of MMS scandal E&E, January 29, 2009; http://www.eenews.net/eenewspm/2009/01/29/1 Calif. panel to vote on Santa Barbara production plan Greenwire, January 29, 2009; http://www.eenews.net/Greenwire/2009/01/29/6 Interior secretary to clean up after oil-sex scandal Reuters, January 28, 2009; http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE50R6YI20090128 Interior Department Tarnished, New Chief Says Washington Post, January 28, 2009; http://voices.washingtonpost.com/washingtonpostinvestigations/2009/01/new_interior_secretary_top-to- .html?wprss=washingtonpostinvestigations Salazar likely to overturn some Bush regs E&E, January 28, 2009; http://www.eenews.net/eenewspm/2009/01/28/1 Offshore Calif. drilling deal could be scuttled AP, January 28, 2009; http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gB6bi0EyTozdEPy0KGisTQNaS2PQD960AHHG0 Salazar likely
    [Show full text]