DOCSLIB.ORG

The Analysis of the Riemann Hypothesis Bahattin Gunes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Analysis of the Riemann Hypothesis Bahattin Gunes The analysis of the Riemann hypothesis Bahattin Gunes To cite this version: Bahattin Gunes. The analysis of the Riemann hypothesis. 2019. hal-02077752v2 HAL Id: hal-02077752 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02077752v2 Preprint submitted on 14 Apr 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The analysis of the Riemann hypothesis Bahattin Gunes Abstract. Here, we put forth two different proofs for the Riemann hypothe- sis. The first one was presented by using one of the integral representatives of the Riemann zeta function. The second one was claimed by using the Dirichlet s lambda function and the function q(s) = 2 (s). Keywords: Riemann hypothesis, proof, Riemann zeta function 1. Introduction Here, we will present two different proofs which prepared very rigorously. First, let us introduce some basic properties of the Riemann zeta function and some well- known arts as below to make the arguments also accessible to a nonspecialist. We hope that you will read this quite-fluent file nicely. The Riemann zeta function is defined as below in the half-plane with the com- plex variable s = + it. It is an absolutely convergent series by 1 < (s). The (s) is the real part of the complex variable. < < 1 1 1 1 1 1 (s) = = + + + for 1 < (s) (1.1) ns 1s 2s 3s 4s n=1 ··· < X As shown by Riemann, (s) extends to the whole complex plane C by analytic continuation as satisfies functional equation ([6], p2 ) with a simple pole at s = 1: s 1 s s 1/2 (s) = (1 s) for s = 1 (1.2) 2 2 6 Meanwhile, if we call another functional equation ([9], p146 ) here; s s 1 s (s) = 2 sin( )(1 s)(1 s) for s = 1 (1.3) 2 6 we can see that the Riemann zeta function (s) has zeros at the negative even integers ( 2, 4, 6, ... ) on it . These are called as the trivial zeros. The Riemann hypothesis which proposed in 1859 is concerned with the non-trivial zeros [1]. Let us denote these non-trivial zeros as s = + it . The Riemann hypothesis: The real part of any non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function is 1/2. It means, (s ) = 0 = 1/2. ) 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 11M26. 1 2 BAHATTINGUNES 1.1. Some other well-known information/features related the RH. The Riemann hypothesis (RH) is one of the most important unsolved • problems in mathematics which will help to illuminate the distribution of the prime numbers. In 1914 Hardy [5] proved that (1/2+it) has infinitely many zeros. Beside, • you can review our other work about the zeros of the zeta function [4]. If (s) is non-trivially equal to zero, the real part must satisfy the • following condition which had been already proven ([9], p5 and [11], p30 ): 0 < (s ) < 1 or 0 < < 1 for s = + it < Remark 1. The gamma function (s) is defined and analytic for any complex numbers ´ s´ except the non-positive integers. In the region 0 < (s) < 1, we know that (s) and (1 s) have no zeros, no poles and they are finite< ([8], p5). Let us present some other well-known features of the gamma function: i-) It is expressed with the positive real part via the improper integral: 1 s 1 x (s) = x e dx for 0 < (s) (1.4) < Z0 ii-) It satisfies the functional equations as: (s)(1 s) = for all ´s´ except the integers (1.5) sin(s) Remark 2. If one of the Riemann zeta functions which in (s), (1 s), (s) and (1 s) is non-trivially equal to zero; then all of them are equal to zero: (s) = 0 (1 s) = 0 (s) = 0 (1 s) = 0 (1.6) , , , Proof. In fact, it is well-known. However, it will be useful for us to show it again. If we set the functional equation in 1.3 equal to zero: s s 1 s (s) = 0 2 sin( )(1 s)(1 s) = 0 ) 2 The following result is obtained by 0 < R(s) < 1: (1 s)(1 s) = 0 And we know (1 s) = 0 from Remark 1. Consequently, (1 s) = 0. On the other hand, the Schwarz6 reflection principle in complex analysis [2] says: (s) = (s) (1.7) Thus, we can write accordingly: (s) = 0 (s) = 0 , THERIEMANNHYPOTHESIS 3 2. The First Proof of The RH Step 1: Let us call the integral representative of the zeta function ([7], p6 ) which valid in the critical strip 0 < (s) < 1. < sin (s/2) 1 1 s 1 1 (s) = x + dx (2.1) (s 1)1 s sin2 ix x2 Z0 Let us define two new functions as below: sin (s/2) 1 1 f(s) = and g(x) = + (2.2) (s 1)1 s sin2 ix x2 Now, let us consider (s) and (1 s) as partial with a new variable ´u´ (as u R which is suffi ciently large) by denoting them as below: 2 u u 1 s s (s) = f(s) x g(x)dx ; (1 s) = f(1 s) x g(x)dx (2.3) u u Z0 Z0 If we handle them with the non-trivial zeros (s ) by Remark 2 as: u u 1 so so lim f(so) x g(x)dx = 0 ; lim f(1 so) x g(x)dx = 0 (2.4) u u !1 Z0 !1 Z0 s s 1 s Step 2: Let us call equation 1.3 as (s) = 2 sin( )(1 s)(1 s). 2 We know from Remark 1 that (1 s) has no zeros and poles and it is finite in the critical strip (0 < (s) < 1). < Remark 3. Thus, the following function will be entire/ analytic/ continuous and finite and nonzero in the critical strip. Naturally, we can see that the non- trivial zeros the Riemann zeta function have no any privilege or exception on it. We can also observe the similar approaches in Schipani’s work ([10], p100). s s 1 s h(s) = 2 sin( )(1 s) (2.5) 2 Meanwhile, we know z = z for any ´z´ complex number. Thus, let us write equation 1.3 again, but thisj j timej j as below: s s 1 s (s) = (s) = 2 sin( )(1 s)(1 s) (2.6) j j j j 2 Now, by noticing Remark 3, let us write the following one. Here s refers the values which are different than the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function. Depending on Remark 2; if s=s , we see (s) = 0 and (1 s) = 0. 6 6 6 (s ) s s s 1 = 2 sin( )(1 s) (2.7) (1 s ) 2 4 BAHATTINGUNES With the equation in 2.1 accordingly (for f(s) and g(x) see equation 2.2): 1 1 s f(s) x g(x)dx 0 Z = h(s) (2.8) 1 j j f(1 s ) xs g(x)dx 0 Z Right after, let’swrite it in the following new form with the equations in 2.3: u 1 s lim f(s) x g(x)dx u !1 0 Z u = h(s) (2.9) s j j lim f(1 s) x g(x)dx u !1 0 Z Because the limit result will be stay as the same, we can write it as below: u 1 s f(s) x g(x)dx 0 lim Z u = h(s) (2.10) u j j !1 f(1 s ) xs g(x)dx 0 Z Now, let us handle equation 2.10 with the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function under the limit approach as u . However this time, the left side will appear in the indeterminate form as 0/!0 1(see the results in 2.4). On the other hand, with the non-trivial zeros, the existence of a limit-result will keep on being in the same way (see Remark 3): u 1 so f(so) x g(x)dx 0 s s 1 s lim Z u = 2 sin( )(1 s ) (2.11) u 2 !1 f(1 s ) xso g(x)dx o 0 Z At this stage, let’sask ourselves the following critical question: Could we find the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function which provide the above- equation? Or at least, any feature about them? Step 3: At moment, I think that we can apply L’Hopital rule to the left side of the above-equation with respect to the parameter ´u´; because: i-) The limit of it will appear as ´0/0´ with any non-trivial zeros. ii-) The important thing here we know that there is a limit result as one of the finite positive real numbers as h(so) . It’s values only depend on the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zetaj function.j We mean: s s 1 s h(so) = 2 sin( )(1 s ) j j 2 THERIEMANNHYPOTHESIS 5 iii-) Both the numerator and the denominator are differentiable. For example, we can get (you can also see it with Wolfram Development Platform [13]): d u 1 1 f(s) xsg(x)dx = f(s)usg(u) by g(x) = + (2.12) du sin2 ix x2 Z0 iv-) Also HERE, we have to show that the denominator shouldn’t equal u so zero as u(1 s) = f(1 so) x g(x)dx = 0 with any u > M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Of the Riemann Hypothesis
    A Simple Counterexample to Havil's \Reformulation" of the Riemann Hypothesis Jonathan Sondow 209 West 97th Street New York, NY 10025 [email protected] The Riemann Hypothesis (RH) is \the greatest mystery in mathematics" [3]. It is a conjecture about the Riemann zeta function. The zeta function allows us to pass from knowledge of the integers to knowledge of the primes. In his book Gamma: Exploring Euler's Constant [4, p. 207], Julian Havil claims that the following is \a tantalizingly simple reformulation of the Rie- mann Hypothesis." Havil's Conjecture. If 1 1 X (−1)n X (−1)n cos(b ln n) = 0 and sin(b ln n) = 0 na na n=1 n=1 for some pair of real numbers a and b, then a = 1=2. In this note, we first state the RH and explain its connection with Havil's Conjecture. Then we show that the pair of real numbers a = 1 and b = 2π=ln 2 is a counterexample to Havil's Conjecture, but not to the RH. Finally, we prove that Havil's Conjecture becomes a true reformulation of the RH if his conclusion \then a = 1=2" is weakened to \then a = 1=2 or a = 1." The Riemann Hypothesis In 1859 Riemann published a short paper On the number of primes less than a given quantity [6], his only one on number theory. Writing s for a complex variable, he assumes initially that its real 1 part <(s) is greater than 1, and he begins with Euler's product-sum formula 1 Y 1 X 1 = (<(s) > 1): 1 ns p 1 − n=1 ps Here the product is over all primes p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Riemann and Hurwitz Zeta Functions, Apery's Constant and New
    The Riemann and Hurwitz zeta functions, Apery’s constant and new rational series representations involving ζ(2k) Cezar Lupu1 1Department of Mathematics University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA Algebra, Combinatorics and Geometry Graduate Student Research Seminar, February 2, 2017, Pittsburgh, PA A quick overview of the Riemann zeta function. The Riemann zeta function is defined by 1 X 1 ζ(s) = ; Re s > 1: ns n=1 Originally, Riemann zeta function was defined for real arguments. Also, Euler found another formula which relates the Riemann zeta function with prime numbrs, namely Y 1 ζ(s) = ; 1 p 1 − ps where p runs through all primes p = 2; 3; 5;:::. A quick overview of the Riemann zeta function. Moreover, Riemann proved that the following ζ(s) satisfies the following integral representation formula: 1 Z 1 us−1 ζ(s) = u du; Re s > 1; Γ(s) 0 e − 1 Z 1 where Γ(s) = ts−1e−t dt, Re s > 0 is the Euler gamma 0 function. Also, another important fact is that one can extend ζ(s) from Re s > 1 to Re s > 0. By an easy computation one has 1 X 1 (1 − 21−s )ζ(s) = (−1)n−1 ; ns n=1 and therefore we have A quick overview of the Riemann function. 1 1 X 1 ζ(s) = (−1)n−1 ; Re s > 0; s 6= 1: 1 − 21−s ns n=1 It is well-known that ζ is analytic and it has an analytic continuation at s = 1. At s = 1 it has a simple pole with residue 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Values for the Riemann Zeta Function
    Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2021, 9, 1108-1120 https://www.scirp.org/journal/jamp ISSN Online: 2327-4379 ISSN Print: 2327-4352 Special Values for the Riemann Zeta Function John H. Heinbockel Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA How to cite this paper: Heinbockel, J.H. Abstract (2021) Special Values for the Riemann Zeta Function. Journal of Applied Mathematics The purpose for this research was to investigate the Riemann zeta function at and Physics, 9, 1108-1120. odd integer values, because there was no simple representation for these re- https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2021.95077 sults. The research resulted in the closed form expression Received: April 9, 2021 n 21n+ (2n) (−−4) π E2n 2ψ ( 34) Accepted: May 28, 2021 ζ (2nn+= 1) ,= 1,2,3, 21nn++ 21− Published: May 31, 2021 2( 2 12)( n) ! for representing the zeta function at the odd integer values 21n + for n a Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. positive integer. The above representation shows the zeta function at odd This work is licensed under the Creative positive integers can be represented in terms of the Euler numbers E2n and Commons Attribution International ψ (2n) 34 License (CC BY 4.0). the polygamma functions ( ) . This is a new result for this study area. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ For completeness, this paper presents a review of selected properties of the Open Access Riemann zeta function together with how these properties are derived. This paper will summarize how to evaluate zeta (n) for all integers n different from 1.
    [Show full text]
  • An Elementary and Real Approach to Values of the Riemann Zeta Function
    An Elementary and Real Approach to Values of the Riemann Zeta Function∗ Armen Bagdasaryan † An elementary approach for computing the values at nega- tive integers of the Riemann zeta function is presented. The approach is based on a new method for ordering the integers and a new method for summation of divergent series. We show that the values of the Riemann zeta function can be computed, without using the theory of analytic continuation and functions of complex variable. MSC numbers: 11M06, 11B68, 40C15 PACS numbers: 02.10.De, 02.30.Lt 1 Introduction The Riemann zeta function ζ(s) is one of the most important objects in the study of number theory (if not in the whole modern mathematics). It is a classical and well-known result that ζ(s), originally defined on the half plane ℜ(s) > 1, can be analytically continued to a meromorphic function on the entire complex plane with the only pole at s = 1, which is a simple pole with residue 1. arXiv:0812.1878v4 [math.NT] 9 Apr 2010 One of the main reasons of interest to ζ(s) is that the special values of ζ(s) at integers have been proved or conjectured to have significant arithmetic meanings. For instance, Zagier’s [40, 41] conjecture concerning the relation between ζ(n) and the n-logarithms for n ≥ 2 and Lichtenbaum’s [26] conjecture connecting ζ(n) with motivic cohomology. ∗extended version of the contribution to the proceedings of the XXVII International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, Yerevan, Armenia, August 13-19, 2008 †Institution of the Russian Academy of Sciences, V.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2002.04395V20 [Math.GM] 3 Aug 2021
    Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) A lower bound for the modulus of the Dirichlet eta function on partition P from 2-D principal component analysis Yuri Heymann Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract The present manuscript aims to derive an expression for the lower bound of the modulus of the Dirichlet eta function on vertical lines ℜ s α. An approach based on a two-dimensional principal component analysisp match-q“ ing the dimensionality of the complex plane, which is built on a parametric ellipsoidal shape, has been undertaken to achieve this result. This lower bound, C ℜ P ?2 which is expressed as s s.t. s s , η s 1 2α , where η is the Dirichlet eta function,@ P has implicationsp q P p forq | thep q| Riemann ě | ´ hypothes| is as η s 0 for any such s P, where P is a partition spanning one half of the critical| p q| ą strip, on either sidesP of the critical line ℜ s 1 2 depending upon a variable, which regions are complementary by mirrorp q“ symmetry{ with respect to ℜ s 1 2. p q“ { Keywords Dirichlet eta function, PCA, Analytic continuation 1 Introduction The Dirichlet eta function is an alternating series related to the Riemann zeta function of interest in the field of number theory for the study of the distribu- tion of primes [12]. Both series are tied together on a two-by-two relationship 1 s expressed as η s 1 2 ´ ζ s where s is a complex number.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Nontrivial Zeros of the Dirichlet Eta Function
    On the nontrivial zeros of the Dirichlet eta function Vladimir Garc´ıa-Morales Departament de F´ısica de la Terra i Termodin`amica Universitat de Val`encia, E-46100 Burjassot, Spain [email protected] We construct a two-parameter complex function ηκν : C → C, κ ∈ (0, ∞), ν ∈ (0, ∞) that we call a holomorphic nonlinear embedding and that is given by a double series which is absolutely and uniformly convergent on compact sets in the entire complex plane. The function ηκν converges to the Dirichlet eta function η(s) as κ →∞. We prove the crucial property that, for sufficiently large κ, the function ∞ ηκν(s) can be expressed as a linear combination ηκν(s) = n=0 an(κ)η(s + 2νn) of horizontal shifts of the eta function (where an(κ) ∈ R and a0 = 1) and that, ∞ P indeed, we have the inverse formula η(s)= n=0 bn(κ)ηκν (s + 2νn) as well (where the coefficients b (κ) ∈ R are obtained from the a ’s recursively). By using these n P n results and the functional relationship of the eta function, η(s)= λ(s)η(1 − s), we sketch a proof of the Riemann hypothesis which, in our setting, is equivalent to the fact that the nontrivial zeros s∗ = σ∗ + it∗ of η(s) (i.e. those points for which ∗ ∗ ∗ 1 η(s )= η(1 − s ) = 0) are all located on the critical line σ = 2 . arXiv:2007.04317v1 [math.GM] 9 Jul 2020 1 1 Introduction Let s := σ + it be a complex number. The Dirichlet eta function η(s), also called alternating zeta function, is given in the half plane σ > 0 by the conditionally convergent series [1] ∞ (−1)m−1 η(s)= (1) ms m=1 X which is absolutely convergent for σ > 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dirichlet Series That Generates the M\" Obius Function Is the Inverse Of
    The Dirichlet series that generates the M¨obius function is the inverse of the Riemann zeta function in the right half of the critical strip Roupam Ghosh April 3, 2019 Abstract: In this paper I introduce a criterion for the Riemann hypothesis, and then using ∞ s 1 that I prove k=1 µ(k)/k converges for ℜ(s) > 2 . I use a step function ν(x)=2{x/2}−{Px} for the Dirichlet eta function ({x} is the fractional part of x), which was at the core of my investigations, and hence derive the stated result subsequently. arXiv:1009.1092v13 [math.GM] 18 Jan 2015 1 In 1859, Bernhard Riemann showed the existence of a deep relationship between two very different mathematical entities., viz. the zeros of an analytic function and prime numbers. The Riemann Hypothesis is usually stated as, the non-trivial zeros of the Rie- 1 mann zeta function lie on the line ℜ(s) = 2 . Although, this is the standard formulation, one of the exciting features of this problem is, it can be formulated in many different and unrelated ways. The approach I take in this paper is influenced by Beurling’s 1955 paper: A closure problem related to the Riemann zeta function and B´aez-Duarte’s 2001 paper: New versions of the Nyman-Beurling criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis, although it takes a new approach. In this paper I would be studying a simple step function ν relating it to the Dirichlet eta function η. I will show how the step function ν convolves with the M¨obius function µ(n) and gives a constant, which I think is a new result significant at attacking RH.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reformulation of the Riemann Hypothesis
    A Reformulation of the Riemann Hypothesis Jose Risomar Sousa November 28, 2020 Abstract We present some novelties on the Riemann zeta function. Using the analytic con- m tinuation we created for the polylogarithm, Lik(e ), we extend the zeta function from <(k) > 1 to the complex half-plane, <(k) > 0, by means of the Dirichlet eta function. More strikingly, we offer a reformulation of the Riemann hypothesis through a zeta's cousin, '(k), a pole-free function defined on the entire complex plane whose non-trivial zeros coincide with those of the zeta function. 1 Introduction The Riemann Hypothesis is a long-standing problem in math, which involves the zeros of the analytic continuation of its most famous Dirichlet series, the zeta function. This Dirichlet series, along with its analytic continuation, constitutes a so-called L-function, whose zeros encode information about the location of the prime numbers. Riemann provided insight into this connection through his unnecessarily convoluted prime counting functions2. The zeta function as a Dirichlet series is given by, 1 X 1 ζ(k) = , jk j=1 and throughout here we use k for the variable instead of the usual s, to keep the same nota- tion used in previous papers released on generalized harmonic numbers and progressions and interrelated subjects. arXiv:2012.08558v3 [math.NT] 10 Jul 2021 This series only converges for <(k) > 1, but it can be analytically continued to the whole complex plane. For the purpose of analyzing the zeros of the zeta function though, we produce its analytic continuation on the complex half-plane only, <(k) > 0, by means of the alternating zeta function, known as the Dirichlet eta function, η(k).
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Calculations to Grasp a Mathematical Issue Such As the Riemann Hypothesis
    information Article Numerical Calculations to Grasp a Mathematical Issue Such as the Riemann Hypothesis Michel Riguidel Department of Computer Science and Networks, Télécom ParisTech, 75015 Paris, France; [email protected]; Tel.: +33-67687-5199 Received: 3 April 2020; Accepted: 23 April 2020; Published: 26 April 2020 Abstract: This article presents the use of data processing to apprehend mathematical questions such as the Riemann Hypothesis (RH) by numerical calculation. Calculations are performed alongside graphs of the argument of the complex numbers ζ(x + iy) = a + ib and ξ(x + iy) = p + iq, in the 1 critical strip. On the one hand, the two-dimensional surface angle tan− (b/a) of the Riemann Zeta y y function ζ is related to the semi-angle of the fractional part of 2π ln 2πe and, on the other hand, the Ksi function ξ of the Riemann functional equation is analyzed with respect to the coordinates (x, 1 x; y). − The computation of the power series expansion of the ξ function with its symmetry analysis highlights the RH by the underlying ratio of Gamma functions inside the ξ formula. The ξ power series beside the angle of both surfaces of the ζ function enables to exhibit a Bézout identity au + bv c between ≡ the components (a, b) of the ζ function, which illustrates the RH. The geometric transformations in complex space of the Zeta and Ksi functions, illustrated graphically, as well as series expansions, calculated by computer, make it possible to elucidate this mathematical problem numerically. A final theoretical outlook gives deeper insights on the functional equation’s mechanisms, by adopting a computer–scientific perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Computation and Structure of Character Polylogarithms with Applications to Character Mordell–Tornheim–Witten Sums
    Computation and structure of character polylogarithms with applications to character Mordell{Tornheim{Witten sums D. H. Bailey∗ J. M. Borwein.y June 9, 2014 Abstract This paper extends tools developed in [10,8] to study character polylogarithms. These objects are used to compute Mordell-Tornheim-Witten character sums and to explore their connections with multiple-zeta values (MZVs) and with their character analogues [17]. 1 Introduction In [10] we defined an ensemble of extended Mordell{Tornheim{Witten (MTW) zeta func- tion values [18, 34, 24, 25,7, 12, 36, 38, 32]. There is by now a huge literature on these sums; in part because of the many connections with fields such as combinatorics, number theory, and mathematical physics. Unlike previous authors we included derivatives with re- spect to the order of the terms. We investigated interrelations amongst MTW evaluations, and explored some deeper connections with multiple-zeta values (MZVs). In this article we continue the research in [8, 10] by studying character polylogarithms and applying them to analyze the relations between MTW character sums defined by X χd1(m) χd2(n) 1 µ (q; r; s) := ; (1) d1;d2 mq nr (m + n)s n;m>0 ±d n−1 where for d > 2, χ±d(n) := n ; and χ−2(n) := (−1) ; χ1(n) = 1: When d1 = d2 = 1 these devolve to classical Mordell{Tornheim{Witten (MTW) sums, as defined in (2) below for K = 2. ∗Lawrence Berkeley National Lab (retired), Berkeley, CA 94720, and University of California, Davis, Dept. of Computer Science, Davis, CA 95616, USA. E-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Rigorous Proofs for Riemann Hypothesis, Polignac's and Twin
    Rigorous Proofs for Riemann Hypothesis, Polignac's and Twin Prime Conjectures in 2020 c Professor Bernhard (Pseudonym) Riemann, viXra, Wednesday 15 January 2020 Abstract Dedicated to my youngest daughter Jelena born 13 weeks early on May 14, 2012. Huge thanks to Rodney Williams (Civil Engineer & Mathematician) and Tony O'Hagan (Software Engineer & Mathematician) for providing peer reviews on this paper. Mathematics for Incompletely Predictable Problems is associated with Incompletely Predictable problems containing Incompletely Predictable entities. Nontrivial zeros and two types of Gram points in Riemann zeta function (or its proxy Dirichlet eta function) together with prime and composite numbers from Sieve of Eratosthenes are Incompletely Predictable entities. Correct and complete mathematical arguments for first key step of converting this function into its continuous format version, and second key step of applying Information-Complexity conservation to this Sieve result in direct spin-offs from first key step consisting of proving Riemann hypothesis (and explaining two types of Gram points), and second key step consisting of proving Polignac's and Twin prime conjectures. ISBN 9781660905768, https://www.amazon.com/-/e/B07T4T Keywords: Dirichlet Sigma-Power Laws, Exact and Inexact Dimensional analysis homogeneity, Information-Complexity conservation, Plus Gap 2 Composite Number Continuous Law, Plus-Minus Gap 2 Composite Number Alternating Law, Polignac's & Twin prime conjectures, Riemann hypothesis 1. Introduction In this research paper,
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of the Non-Trivial Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function 3
    Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) An investigation of the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function Yuri Heymann Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract The zeros of the Riemann zeta function outside the critical strip are the so-called trivial zeros. While many zeros of the Riemann zeta function are located on the critical line ℜpsq “ 1{2, the non-existence of zeros in the remaining part of the critical strip ℜpsqPs0, 1r remains to be proven. The Rie- mann zeta functional leads to a relationship between the zeros of the Riemann zeta function on either sides of the critical line. Given s a complex number ands ¯ its complex conjugate, if s is a zero of the Riemann zeta function in the critical strip ℜpsq Ps0, 1r, then we have ζpsq “ ζp1 ´ s¯q. As the Riemann hypothesis states that all non-trivial zeros lie on the critical line ℜpsq“ 1{2, it is enough to show there are no zeros on either sides of the critical line within the critical strip ℜpsqPs0, 1r, to say the Riemann hypothesis is true. Keywords Riemann zeta function, Riemann hypothesis 1 Introduction The Riemann zeta function named after Bernhard Riemann (1826 - 1866) is an extension of the zeta function to complex numbers, which primary purpose is the study of the distribution of prime numbers [14]. Although the zeta function which is an infinite series of the inverse power function was studied long time ago and is referred to in a formula known as the Euler product establishing the connection between the zeta function and primes, Riemann’s approach is linked with more recent developments in complex analysis at the time of Cauchy.
    [Show full text]