Saint Thomas Aquinas on the Death Penalty

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Saint Thomas Aquinas on the Death Penalty Saint Thomas Aquinas on the Death Penalty Author: Elinor Gardner Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/712 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2009 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of Philosophy SAINT THOMAS AQUINAS ON THE DEATH PENALTY A dissertation by SISTER ELINOR GARDNER, O.P. submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2009 © copyright by SISTER ELINOR GARDNER, O.P. 2009 BOSTON COLLEGE ABSTRACT SAINT THOMAS AQUINAS ON THE DEATH PENALTY by Sister Elinor Gardner, O.P. Chairperson of the Supervisory Committee: Father Arthur Madigan, S.J. Department of Philosophy Catholic moral philosophers and theologians for centuries used Thomas Aquinas’s defense of the death penalty as a point of reference in defending the state’s right to execute. Recent Church documents such as Evangelium Vitae , however, seem to take a different approach to the question than Aquinas did. In secular contemporary treatments of the death penalty, Aquinas’s account is often caricatured or simply overlooked. One of the reasons for this is the lack of a thorough treatment of the death penalty in the thought of Aquinas. This dissertation seeks to address that deficiency. I present Aquinas’s account of capital punishment as an example of determining civil punishments through the exercise of practical reason. Aquinas’s thought sanctions neither an absolute acceptance nor an absolute rejection of the death penalty; for him, this is not a question that admits of absolutes. Like other punishments, the death penalty is a determination made by human reason. Its justification depends on specific historical and cultural circumstances and on the needs of the political community, as well as on the severity of the offense. Killing a guilty person is not intrinsically evil, in Aquinas’s view, but it is nonetheless a last resort, when nothing else can be done for the good of the community. It may be that recent Church documents have avoided making use of the Thomistic teaching on the death penalty, even where this could have made their reasoning clearer, for fear that such arguments would be misunderstood, or in order to make a clearer case for forgoing the penalty. If this dissertation contributes to our understanding of what Thomas actually says about CP, it will be helpful in reconciling the thought of John Paul II with the tradition of Catholic thought on capital punishment, as well as in offering a reasonable way for thinking about punishments in general. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I dedicate this dissertation with gratitude and affection to Mother Ann Marie, O.P. and to my parents, Arthur and Michele. I thank Father Arthur Madigan, S.J. for his careful reading of every chapter, for his encouragement and evaluation, and for his kindness, patience, and good advice. I thank Professor Jorge Garcia for his thoughtful and challenging comments, which I have only begun to address. I thank Professor Patrick Byrne for his perceptive suggestions, and Professor Thomas Hibbs for the initial idea for this dissertation, and for reading and commenting on an earlier version. Finally, I thank Sister Mary Bernard Curran, O.P. for her comments and corrections, and all the Dominican Sisters of Saint Cecilia for their unflagging love and prayers. i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION V A Background and Sources viii B Assumptions xii C Order of Presentation xiv CHAPTER I: SAINT THOMAS ON PUNISHMENT 1 A Punishment is Evil in a Certain Respect 2 A.1. The Problem 3 A.2. The Nature of Evil 5 A.3. Punishment and Fault 9 B Punishment is Good Simply 13 B.1. Human Acts 14 B.2. Good and Evil in Human Acts 18 B.3. The Object of an Act of Punishment 22 B.4. Levels of Order Addressed by Punishment 32 C Remote Ends of Punishment 34 C.1. Perfect Retribution: Eternal Punishment 36 C.2. Medicinal Retribution: Temporal Punishment 39 D Conclusion 45 CHAPTER II: THE ACT AND THE INSTITUTION OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT ACCORDING TO ST. THOMAS 47 A The Act of Capital Punishment 47 A.1. Central Texts: S.T. II-II, q. 64, a. 2 and S.C.G. III. c. 146 48 A.2. Objections and Replies 55 A.3. Other Acts of Killing 66 B The Institution of Capital Punishment 73 B.1. Thomas on Human Law 73 B.2. Utility, Equity, and Custom Determine Specific Punishments 84 B.3. Determining the Death Penalty 89 C Conclusion 99 CHAPTER III: THE POLITICAL COMMON GOOD ACCORDING TO ST. THOMAS 102 ii A The Political Community 103 B The Political Community as a Whole 109 C The Common Good 124 C.1. Proper Good 127 C.2. Common Good 135 D The Political Common Good 141 D.1. Happiness and the Political Common Good 141 D.2. Love of the Political Common Good 154 E Conclusion 168 CHAPTER IV: PHILOSOPHICAL OBJECTIONS TO THE THOMISTIC ACCOUNT OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT 173 A First Objection: Thomas is Inconsistent in Condoning CP for Heresy 175 Response to the First Objection 177 B Second Objection: Capital Punishment is Not a Useful Punishment 181 Response to the Second Objection 182 C Third Objection: CP is a Necessary Determination of Natural Law 186 Response to the Third Objection 191 D Fourth Objection: The Human Person is not a Part 198 Response to the Fourth Objection 200 E Fifth Objection: The Political Common Good is a Merely Instrumental Good 206 Response to the Fifth Objection 207 F Sixth Objection: Intentional Killing Is Always Evil 213 Response to the Sixth Objection 218 G Conclusion 225 CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND APPLICATION 227 A Summary 227 B Application of the Thomistic Theory of CP to a Contemporary Case 237 C The Value of the Teaching 245 APPENDIX: THEOLOGICAL OBJECTIONS TO THE THOMISTIC ACCOUNT OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT 249 A Scriptural Objections 250 iii B Recent Church Teaching on CP 258 C First Objection: There Has Been a Development of Doctrine on CP 263 Response to the First Objection 270 D Second Objection: CP is Incompatible with the Common Good as Understood in Catholic Social Teaching 281 Response to the Second Objection 282 E Third Objection: CP Violates Human Dignity 288 Response to the Third Objection 289 F Conclusion 303 BIBLIOGRAPHY 305 iv Introduction Why turn to Thomas Aquinas for philosophical insight into the problem of capital punishment? There are reasons to doubt the value of this approach. His account contains elements repugnant to the contemporary reader. 1 In responding to an objection that the death penalty cannot be just because “to kill a man is evil in itself,” Thomas says that “although it be evil in itself to kill a man so long as he preserve his dignity, yet it may be good to kill a man who has sinned, even as it is to kill a beast.” 2 He also frequently compares the political community to a living body, such that “the whole of man is directed as to his end to the whole of the community of which he is a part.” 3 We will examine both these comparisons in what follows, to see the point that each attempts to convey. Yet we will also see that his argument does not depend on these comparisons as a conclusion on premises. Rather, he uses them as illustrations that, ironically, are supposed to clarify his point about punishment of the evildoer. They may indeed have clarified the case for his contemporary readers, but the fact remains that for us they tend not to clarify but to obscure. Further, Aquinas’s reasoning about the death penalty is informed by the time in which he lived: the penal law, the nature of the mediaeval political order, and the 1 His account also challenges some of our preconceptions about mediaeval political thought, as when Thomas says of a free people that “the consent of the whole people expressed by a custom counts far more in favor of a particular observance, that does the authority of the sovereign, who has not the power to frame laws, except as representing the people.” S.T. I-II, q. 97, a. 3, ad 3. References to the Summa Theologiae (S.T. ) are from the translation by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province (Benziger, 1948). Where the translation might lead to confusion, I provide the Latin text in parentheses or footnotes. In the few cases where I give a different translation of a word or phrase, I also give the Latin (Edizioni San Paolo, 1988). 2 S.T. II-II, q. 64, a. 2, arg. 3 and ad 3. 3 S.T. II-II, q. 65, a. 1. v particular threats and concerns of thirteenth-century political life. If the idea in looking at Thomas’s theory of capital punishment were to introduce something like mediaeval penal law into twenty-first century American political life, this would clearly be ridiculous. Moreover, it would be contrary to Thomas’s own conception of law, for he says that every change in law undermines the force of custom, which is one of the greatest forces in maintaining civil order. Finally, one might think that Thomas’s teaching on the morality of capital punishment is a matter for theology. This teaching has been a frequent point of reference for Catholic theologians and prelates up to the mid-twentieth century. 4 Yet in recent Church documents, particularly in John Paul II’s Evangelium Vitae and in the Catechism of the Catholic Church , one finds a near-total repudiation of the use of capital punishment.
Recommended publications
  • CNZP Streamlined JMT Reductions.Docx
    Journal of Moral Theology, Vol. 5, No. 1 (2016): 111-128 “For He is our Peace” Thomas Aquinas on Christ as Cause of Peace in the City of Saints Matthew A. Tapie OST SCHOLARS WHO HAVE COMMENTED upon Aquinas’s view of peace have done so in the context of discussing his teaching that peace, defined as the “tranquility of or- M der” (tranquillitas ordinis), is the aim of a just war.1 Alt- hough “civic peace” falls short of the perfect peace that the saints will 1 An abridged version of this essay appears in Reading Scripture as a Political Act copyright © 2015 Fortress Press. In Summa Theologiae II-II 29.2, Aquinas adopts Augustine’s definition of peace as tranquillitas ordinis. English translations of the Summa Theologiae are from the Benziger edition unless otherwise noted. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province (New York: Benziger, 1948). Avery Cardinal Dulles observes that, “political theorists have frequently dealt with …civic peace …according to Saint Thomas.” Avery Cardinal Dulles, A Church to Believe In: Discipleship and the Dynamics of Freedom (New York, NY: Crossroads Publishing, 1983), 149. Most scholarly comment upon Aqui- nas’s view of peace treats the concept in the context of his teaching on war in ST II-II q. 40. John Finnis’s treatment of peace is representative since he places emphasis on the fact that Aquinas taught that genuine peace is not the absence of war but the maintenance of the common good. John Finnis, “The Ethics of War and Peace in the Catholic Natural Law Tradition,” in Christian Political Ethics, The Ethikon Series in Comparative Ethics (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 2008), 193.
    [Show full text]
  • Writings of Charles De Koninck, Volume
    D E K O N I N The Writings C K of ልሎ CHARLES C H DE KONINCK A R T L h E e S W D r i E t i n K g O s o N f I N C K ልሎ Edited and Translated by Ralph McInerny The Writings of CHARLES DE KONINCK Charles De Koninck, University of Laval, Quebec. The Writings of CHARLES DE KONINCK volume one Edited and Translated by Ralph McInerny with a biography by Thomas De Koninck andልሎ an introduction by Leslie Armour University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana DeKoninck-000.FM 4/15/08 1:17 PM Page iv Copyright © by University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana www.undpress.nd.edu All Rights Reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Designed by Wendy McMillen Set in ./. Minion by Four Star Books Printed on # Nature’s Recycle paper by Sheridan Books, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Koninck, Charles de, d. [Works. English. ] The writings of Charles De Koninck / edited and translated by Ralph McInerny ; with a biography by Thomas De Koninck ; and an introduction by Leslie Armour. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. -: ---- (cloth : alk. paper) -: --- (cloth : alk. paper) . Koninck, Charles de, d. Science—Philosophy. I. McInerny, Ralph M. II. Title. '.—dc This book is printed on recycled paper. Contents Preface vii The Philosophy of Charles De Koninck 1 Leslie Armour Charles De Koninck: A Biographical Sketch 69 Thomas De Koninck ልሎ Works by Charles De Koninck The Philosophy of Sir Arthur Eddington (1934) 99 The Cosmos (1936) 235 The Problem of Indeterminism (1935) 355 Reflections on the Problem of Indeterminism (1937) 401 Are the Experimental Sciences Distinct from the Philosophy of Nature? (1941) 443 Index 457 Preface A few years ago, David Quackenbush, a tutor at Thomas Aquinas College in California, conceived the idea of photocopying the Charles De Koninck ar- chives at the University of Laval.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aquinas Review of Thomas Aquinas College Vol
    The Aquinas Review of Thomas Aquinas College Vol. 23, 2019–2020 ISSN 1076–8319 Editor Christopher Decaen Editorial Board Michael F. McLean John J. Goyette Kevin D. Kolbeck R. Glen Coughlin John Francis Nieto The Aquinas Review is published annually by the Office of the Dean, Thomas Aquinas College, Santa Paula, California; Michael F. McLean, President; John J. Goyette, Dean. Unsolicited articles, reasoned criticisms of articles, and letters are welcome. Correspondence should be addressed to: Editor, The Aquinas Review, 10,000 Ojai Road, Santa Paula, CA 93060. A subscription form follows the final article. ©2020 by Thomas Aquinas College. All rights reserved Editor’s Statement The autumn of 2020 will mark the beginning of the 50th year of the existence of Thomas Aquinas College, which is, and has been consistently, devoted to providing the beginnings of Catholic liberal education. As was stated in its founding document, “this college will explicitly define itself by the Christian Faith and the tradition of the Catholic Church. Thus theology will be both the governing principle of the whole school and that for the sake of which everything is studied.”1 Given its manifest success in this regard, the College founded The Aquinas Review in 1994 to “stimulate a continuing conversation with an every widening audience”2 about matters on which our students and faculty, the Church at large, and man as such can meditate, for the better- ment of our souls and—most of all—for the greater glory of God. Ronald P. McArthur, the founding president of Thomas Aquinas College and the founding editor of this journal, had hoped that one of the uses of this journal would be to publish not only original essays of intellectual depth, but also occasion- ally to put into circulation older essays of great worth that are underappreciated, difficult to obtain, or not available in English.
    [Show full text]
  • UNCREDIBLE: Broke Out
    SPRING 201620162016 ••• NUMBER 333 A JOURNALJOURNALJOURNAL OFOFOF CHRISTIANITYCHRISTIANITYCHRISTIANITY &&& AMERICANAMERICANAMERICAN FOREIGNFOREIGNFOREIGN POLICYPOLICYPOLICY THE MORALMORAL UNDERPINNINGSUNDERPINNINGS OFOF JUSTJUST RETRIBUTION:RETRIBUTION: JUSTICE && CHARITYCHARITY ININ SYMBIOSISSYMBIOSIS BY JJ DDARYL CCHARLES MORAL MULTILATERALISM:MULTILATERALISM: SPONSORED BYBYBY THE OBAMAOBAMA DOCTRINE’SDOCTRINE’S CHRISTIANCHRISTIAN REALISMREALISM BY MMATT NN GGOBUSH SPRING SPRING SPRING UNCREDIBLE: OBAMA && THETHE ENDEND OFOF AMERICANAMERICAN POWERPOWER 2016 2016 2016 BY MMARC LLIIVECCHE • • • ALSO:: MMARK TTOOLEY ON TTRUMP && THE INADEQUACYINADEQUACY OF “A“AMERICA FFIRSTIRST”” •• BBRIAN AAUTEN ON JUSTJUST NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER SURVEILLANCESURVEILLANCE •• FFREDERICK DDOUGLAS ON CHOOSING RIGHT FROM WRONG •• AANDREW T.T. WWALKER ON A BBAPTIST VIEW OF WOMEN ININ WAR •• AAUGUST LLANDMESSER FOLDS HIS ARMS •• AALAN DDOWD REFLECTS ON THE NATION STATESTATE && INTERNATIONALINTERNATIONAL ORDER •• SSUSANNAH BBLACK && THE CCALIPHATE •• GENERAL GGEORGE MMARSHALL’’SS VISION FOR AAMERICA •• GGIDEONIDEON SSTRAUSS ON POLITICAL HOPE FOR 3 3 3 AFRICA •• RROBERT NNICHOLSONICHOLSON ON IISLAMSLAM,, CCHRISTIANITY,, && THE END OF PPALESTINE Providence_spring16_final_cover_spine.inddProvidence_spring16_final_cover_spine.indd 111 5/31/165/31/16 8:368:368:36 AMAMAM It is worth touching on two men who had killed him to a and puts us instead on a foot- points. First, and surprisingly parley, and put to them the case ing for war. Hardheaded realism perhaps, Dayan
    [Show full text]
  • "Science & Religion in the Work of Charles De Koninck"
    Article "Science & Religion in the Work of Charles De Koninck" Leslie Armour Laval théologique et philosophique, vol. 47, n° 3, 1991, p. 387-400. Pour citer cet article, utiliser l'information suivante : URI: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/400631ar DOI: 10.7202/400631ar Note : les règles d'écriture des références bibliographiques peuvent varier selon les différents domaines du savoir. Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter à l'URI https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l'Université de Montréal, l'Université Laval et l'Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. Érudit offre des services d'édition numérique de documents scientifiques depuis 1998. Pour communiquer avec les responsables d'Érudit : [email protected] Document téléchargé le 9 février 2017 11:32 Laval théologique et philosophique, 47, 3 (octobre 1991) SCIENCE & RELIGION IN THE WORK OF CHARLES DE KONINCK Leslie ARMOUR RÉSUMÉ. — Charles De Koninck était un philosophe des sciences qui participait en outre de manière active à la discussion de questions théologiques comme celle du dogme de l'Assomption de la Vierge Marie. Je soutiens que ce dogme cadre bien avec la philosophie des sciences chez De Koninck si Von admet son explication de la nature du monde concret - ce monde dont la science fait abstraction - et son explication de la causalité, en particulier ses vues sur la cause universelle.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GLOBAL QUEST for TRANQUILLITAS ORDINIS Pacem in Terris , Fifty Years Later
    The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences XVIII Plenary Session THE GLOBAL QUEST FOR TRANQUILLITAS ORDINIS Pacem in Terris , Fifty Years Later 27 April-1 May 2012 • Casina Pio IV Introduction p . 3 Programme p. 5 List of Participants p. 10 Biographies of Participants p. 12 Memorandum p. 18 Holy Masses p. 19 SCIE IA NT EM IA D R A V C M A S S O O O A A I I I C C C C C C I I I I I I I I A A A A A A A F F F I I I I L L L L L L T T T T I I I I V V V N N N N M M O O O P P P VAtICAn CIty 2012 Peace is a gift which God entrusts to human responsibility, to be fo - stered through dialogue and respect for the rights of all, through re - conciliation and through forgiveness. In the prophecy of Zechariah, Jesus found not only the image of the king of peace arriving on a donkey, but also the vision of the slain shepherd, who saves by his death, as well as the image of the Pierced One on whom all eyes will gaze. As Prefect, Pilate represented Roman law, on which the Pax Romana rested – the peace of the empire that spanned the world. this peace was secured, on the one hand, through Rome’s military might. But mil - itary force alone does not generate peace. Peace depends on justice. (Benedict XVI, Angelus 28 March 2010; Jesus of Nazareth ; Vatican City 2011, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Booklet
    Ethics in Action for Sustainable and Integral Development Peace 2-3 February 2017 | Casina Pio IV | Vatican City Peacebuilding through active nonviolence is the natural and necessary complement to the Church’s continuing efforts to limit the use of force by the application of moral norms; she does so by her participation in the work of international “ institutions and through the competent contribution made by so many Christians to the drafting of legislation at all levels. Jesus himself offers a “manual” for this strategy of peacemaking in the Sermon on the Mount. The eight Beatitudes (cf. Mt 5:3-10) provide a portrait of the person we could describe as blessed, good and authentic. Blessed are the meek, Jesus tells us, the merciful and the peacemakers, those who are pure in heart, and those who hunger and thirst for justice. Nonviolence: a Style of Politics for Peace, Message of His Holiness Pope Francis for the Celebration of the Fiftieth World Day of Peace, 1 January” 2017 2 Ethics in Action for Sustainable and Integral Development | Peace The Importance of Peace he purpose of this meeting is to answer the other technological advances. And the socio-cultural question posed by Pope Benedict XVI to the landscape is being reshaped by an explosive growth in T representatives of the world’s religions gathered information and communications technology, and by in Assisi to pray for peace: “What is the state of peace the revolution in social norms and morals that define today?” Accordingly, Ethics in Action will reflect on how an individualistic society rooted in the technocratic to achieve the tranquillitas ordinis (the tranquility of paradigm, at the expense of notions such as virtue, the order), as Saint Augustine denoted peace (De Civitate common good, and social justice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See
    The Holy See MESSAGE OF HIS HOLINESS POPE JOHN PAUL II FOR THE CELEBRATION OF THE WORLD DAY OF PEACE 1 JANUARY 2003 PACEM IN TERRIS: A PERMANENT COMMITMENT 1. Almost forty years ago, on Holy Thursday, 11 April 1963, Pope John XXIII published his epic Encyclical Letter Pacem in Terris. Addressing himself to “all men of good will”, my venerable predecessor, who would die just two months later, summed up his message of “peace on earth” in the first sentence of the Encyclical: “Peace on earth, which all men of every era have most eagerly yearned for, can be firmly established and sustained only if the order laid down by God be dutifully observed” (Introduction: AAS, 55 [1963], 257). Speaking peace to a divided world 2. The world to which John XXIII wrote was then in a profound state of disorder. The twentieth century had begun with great expectations for progress. Yet within sixty years, that same century had produced two World Wars, devastating totalitarian systems, untold human suffering, and the greatest persecution of the Church in history. Only two years before Pacem in Terris, in 1961, the Berlin Wall had been erected in order to divide 2 and set against each other not only two parts of that City but two ways of understanding and building the earthly city. On one side and the other of the Wall, life was to follow different patterns, dictated by antithetical rules, in a climate of mutual suspicion and mistrust. Both as a world-view and in real life, that Wall traversed the whole of humanity and penetrated people's hearts and minds, creating divisions that seemed destined to last indefinitely.
    [Show full text]
  • Genuine Solidarity and Subsidiarity Catholic.Net
    ?Genuine solidarity and subsidiarity Catholic.net Genuine solidarity and subsidiarity Speech that Benedict XVI addressed to the participants of the 14th plenary session (Vatican, 2-6 May) of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, to receive them in audience. By: Benedict XVI | Source: fluvium.org Dear Brothers in the Episcopate and the priesthood, Ladies and gentlemen: I am pleased to have the opportunity to meet you during your 14th plenary session of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. In the last twenty years, the Academy has offered a precious contribution to deepening and developing the social doctrine of the Church and its application in the areas of law, economics, politics and other social sciences. I thank Professor Margaret Archer for the kind words of greeting that she has addressed to me and I express my sincere appreciation for the profuse commitment to research, dialogue, and teaching so that the Gospel of Jesus Christ can continue to illuminate complexes situations of this world in swift change. In the election of the theme "pursuing the common good: how solidarity and subsidiarity can work together", you have decided to examine the interrelation of four fundamental principles of Catholic social doctrine: the dignity of the human person, the common good, the subsidiarity and solidarity (compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, 160-163). These key realities, which emerge from the direct contact between the Gospel and the specific social circumstances, constitute a basis for identifying and confronting the imperatives of humanity at the dawn of the 21st century, such as the reduction of inequalities in distribution of goods, the extension of educational opportunities, the promotion of growth and sustainable development and the protection of the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmony Between Man and Man, and Man and Nature
    31_STIGLITZ ok_pp_473-483.QXD_Layout 1 12/02/13 15:08 Pagina 475 The Global Quest for Tranquillitas Ordinis. Pacem in Terris, Fifty Years Later Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, Acta 18, 2013 www.pass.va/content/dam/scienzesociali/pdf/acta18/acta18-stiglitz.pdf Harmony between Man and Man, and Man and Nature Joseph E. Stiglitz* In this brief paper, I take up some of the critical ethical issues in the context of economic behavior posed by the necessity of creating harmony between man and man, and man and nature, focusing in particular on several issues raised by Pacem in Terris which are of central concern to economic life today. The world is still suffering from the aftershocks of the financial crisis of 2008. Much has been written about the excesses of the financial sector – such as excessive leverage and excessive risk taking – which imposed such high costs on the rest of society. But there are two aspects of this crisis which have not drawn sufficient attention. The first is the moral turpitude that many in the financial sector demon- strated. By now, there is ample evidence of many in the financial sector tar- geting and exploiting the least educated and the least financially sophisticated, in the attempt to maximize profits. In the end, the banks were hoisted on their own petard – but then government came into rescue the banks, letting those who had been exploited to fend for themselves. Those in the financial sector were supposed to have the expertise to manage risk and to design financial products appropriate to those at the bottom of the pyramid, helping them to manage the risks that they faced.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Descriptions and Readings
    International Theological Institute COURSE DESCRIPTIONS AND READINGS STM / LA YEAR 1, SEMESTER 1 STM/LA 111: AN INTRODUCTION TO LIBERAL EDUCATION, WRITING AND RHETORIC (3 ECTS) The focus of this course is to introduce our students to the contemplative heart of liberal education— the truth and beauty of our intellectual life which must always be pursued for its own sake—and secondarily to impart the practical skills of writing and rhetoric that will foster and bring to maturity such a life. Sources: C.S. Lewis, ‘Learning in Wartime’; Jean Leclercq OSB, The Love of Learning and the Desire for God (chaps. 1 and 7); Pope Benedict XVI, ‘Address at the College de Bernardins’. Bl. John Henry Newman, Idea of a University (excerpts); Christopher Dawson, The Crisis of Western Education. A. G. Sertillanges, The Intellectual Life; Marcus Berquist et al., A Proposal for the Fulfilment of Catholic Liberal Education; M. Adler and Van Doren, How to Read a Book; Sister Miriam Joseph, C.S.C., The Trivium: the Liberal Arts of Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric; Scott Crider, The Office of Assertion. J. Guitton, Student’s Guide to the Intellectual Life. Dorothy Sayers, ‘The Lost Tools of Learning’. STM/LA 112: INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY: EARLY PLATONIC DIALOGUES (6 ECTS) The presocratic movement develops in Plato into a science of philosophy. This science is called ‘dialectics’ and refers to the understanding of the eternal ideas. The chosen dialogues are located at the beginning of the curriculum and consider principles of Plato’s thought. In Socrates they reveal the exemplary way of a philosopher as a lover of wisdom, who dedicates his life to the discernment of an unchangeable truth in service of the gods and the polis: “The unexamined life is not worth living for men” (Apology 38a).
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ontology in the Just War Tradition
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&M University “THAT TRUTH THAT LIVES UNCHANGEABLY”: THE ROLE OF ONTOLOGY IN THE JUST WAR TRADITION A Dissertation by PHILLIP WESLEY GRAY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2006 Major Subject: Political Science © 2006 PHILLIP WESLEY GRAY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED “THAT TRUTH THAT LIVES UNCHANGEABLY”: THE ROLE OF ONTOLOGY IN THE JUST WAR TRADITION A Dissertation by PHILLIP WESLEY GRAY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Cary J. Nederman Committee Members, Elisabeth Ellis Nehemia Geva J. R. G. Wollock Head of Department, Patricia Hurley December 2006 Major Subject: Political Science iii ABSTRACT “That Truth that Lives Unchangeably”: The Role of Ontology in the Just War Tradition. (December 2006) Phillip Wesley Gray, B.A., University of Dayton Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Cary J. Nederman The just war tradition as we know it has its origins with Christian theology. In this dissertation, I examine the theological, in particular ontological, presuppositions of St. Augustine of Hippo in his elucidation of just war. By doing so, I show how certain metaphysical ideas of St. Augustine (especially those on existence, love, and the sovereignty of God) shaped the just war tradition. Following this, I examine the slow evacuation of his metaphysics from the just war tradition.
    [Show full text]