DOCSLIB.ORG

Mt. Hood National Forest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mt. Hood National Forest Forest Management and Stump-to-Forest Gate Chain-of-Custody Certification Case Study Evaluation Report for the: Mt. Hood National Forest Conducted under auspices of the SCS Forest Conservation Program SCS is an FSC Accredited Certification Body Submitted to: USDA Forest Service Mt. Hood National Forest Supervisor’s Office Sandy, Oregon, USA Lead Author: Robert J. Hrubes, Ph.D. Date of Field Evaluation: September 18-22, 2006 Date of Report: November 27, 2006 By: SCIENTIFIC CERTIFICATION SYSTEMS 2200 Powell St. Suite Number 725 Emeryville, CA 94608, USA www.scscertified.com SCS Contact: Dave Wager [email protected] MTHNF Contact: Nancy Lankford, [email protected] 1 Organization of the Report In September 2006, SCS and NSF-ISR conducted a dual simulated certification evaluation of the Mt. Hood National Forest relative to the standards of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI). This report contains the results of the FSC portion of the certification case study. It is important to note that award of FSC certification was not a possible outcome of this evaluation, nor was the Forest Service seeking certification. This document is divided into two sections. Section A provides the public summary and background information required by the Forest Stewardship Council. This section is made available to the general public and is intended to provide an overview of the evaluation process, the management programs and policies applied to the forest, and the results of the evaluation. Section B contains more detailed results and information and is made available only to the client, who is free to make it publicly available if they choose to do so. 2 FOREWORD Scientific Certification Systems, a certification body accredited by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), was retained by The Pinchot Institute for Conservation to conduct a simulated certification evaluation (pilot assessment) of the management of the Mt. Hood National Forest (MTHNF). This was one of five such evaluations that comprise a multi-unit case study, whose aim is to provide the Forest Service with a better understanding of the certification process, and how their management aligns with the FSC standards for forest stewardship. By pre-arranged agreement, these evaluations were not intended to result in the award of certification. An interdisciplinary team of natural resource specialists was empanelled by SCS to conduct the assessment in September 2006. The team collected and analyzed written materials, conducted interviews and completed a five day field and office evaluation of the subject property as part of the simulated certification evaluation. Upon completion of this fact- finding phase, the team determined conformance to the FSC Principles, Criteria, and Regional Indicators in order to ascertain whether award of certification would be warranted, were a genuine certification evaluation to be conducted. The following pages detail the process that was undertaken and the audit team’s findings. Of particular interest, the report identifies several non-conformances relative to the FSC Pacific Coast Regional Standard. As well, the report discusses identified non-conformances relative to a set of “additional considerations” that were developed through a consultative process by SCS prior to the field evaluation. These “additional considerations” attempt to anticipate what might be promulgated by the FSC as supplemental indicators applicable to National Forest management. That is, in the event that a bona fide certification evaluation were to be conducted on the Mt. Hood National Forest (or any other National Forest System unit), the certification standard would entail both a pertinent FSC regional standard as well as a set of endorsed supplemental indicators applicable to the management of National Forests. 3 Foreword................................................................................................................................... 3 Section A- Public Summary and Background Information ...................................................... 6 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION....................................................................................... 6 1.1 FSC Data Request...................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Management Context................................................................................................. 8 1.2.1 Environmental Context..................................................................................... 8 1.2.2 Socioeconomic Context.................................................................................... 9 1.3 Forest Management Enterprise ................................................................................ 10 1.3.1 Land Use......................................................................................................... 10 1.3.2 Land Outside the Scope of Certification......................................................... 11 1.4 Management Plan.....................................................................................................11 1.4.1 Management Objectives..................................................................................11 1.4.2 Forest Composition......................................................................................... 12 1.4.3 Silvicultural Systems .......................................................................................... 13 1.4.4 Management Systems ..................................................................................... 14 1.4.5 Monitoring System..........................................................................................15 1.4.6 Estimate of Maximum Sustainable Yield ....................................................... 15 1.4.7 Estimated, Current and Projected Production...................................................... 15 1.4.8 Chemical Pesticide Use................................................................................... 16 2.0 Guidelines/Standards Employed................................................................................. 17 3.0 THE CERTIFICATION ASSESSMENT PROCESS................................................. 17 3.1 Assessment Dates.....................................................................................................17 3.2 Assessment Team..................................................................................................... 18 3.3 Assessment Process ................................................................................................. 20 3.3.1 Itinerary........................................................................................................... 20 3.3.2 Stakeholder Consultation................................................................................ 27 3.4 Total Time Spent on Evaluation .............................................................................. 30 3.5 Process of Determining Conformance..................................................................... 30 4.0 Results of the Evaluation ............................................................................................ 31 Table 4.1 Notable strengths and weaknesses of the forest management enterprise relative to the P&C.............................................................................................................. 32 4.2 Corrective Action Requests and Recommendations................................................ 38 4.2.1 Major Corrective Action Requests.................................................................. 38 4.2.2 (Minor) Corrective Action Requests............................................................... 40 4.2.3 Recommendations........................................................................................... 44 5.0 simulated Certification Decision.................................................................................47 5.1 Certification Recommendation (Simulated)............................................................ 47 6.0 Surveillance Evaluations............................................................................................. 47 7.0 Summary of SCS Complaint Investigation Procedure................................................ 47 Section B Detailed Results of the simulated Full Evaluation................................................. 49 1.0 Detailed Evaluation of Conformance............................................................................. 49 1.1 Evaluation of Conformance with the Additional Considerations for National Forest Management........................................................................................................................ 92 1.2 Controversial Issues................................................................................................. 95 2.0 TRACKING, TRACING AND IDENTIFICATION OF FOREST PRODUCTS ..... 96 4 Appendix 1 List of Federal Statutes Related to Forest Service Activities ..................... 97 Appendix 2 List of Forest Service Personnel Participating in the Evaluation Process 103 Appendix 3 List of Stakeholders .................................................................................. 104 Appendix 4 MTHNF Preliminary Evaluation Report .................................................. 106 5 SECTION A- PUBLIC SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 FSC Data Request Applicant entity USDA Forest Service – Mt. Hood National Forest Contact person
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of the Army, Dod Pt. 651, App. B
    Department of the Army, DoD Pt. 651, App. B Executive Order 11988 As amended (CERCLA, Superfund) (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) Endangered Species Act of Floodplain Management, 3 CFR, 1977 1973. Comp., p. 117 Public Law 93–205, 87 Stat. 884. Executive Order 11990 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Protection of Wetlands, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., Public Law 85–624, Sec. 2, 72 Stat. 563 and p. 121. Public Law 89–72, Sec. 6(b), 79 Stat. 216. Executive Order 12114 National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions, 3 CFR, 1979 comp., p. 356. Public Law 91–190, 83 Stat. 852. Executive Order 12778 National Historic Preservation Act Civil Justice Reform, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. Public Law 89–665, 80 Stat. 915. 359. Native American Graves Protection and Executive Order 12856 Repatriation Act Federal Compliance with Right-to-Know Public Law 101–601, 104 Stat. 3048. Laws and Pollution Prevention Require- Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 ments, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 616. Public Law 101–508, Title VI, Subtitle G, Executive Order 12861 104 Stat. 13880–321. Elimination of One-Half of Executive Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of Branch Internal Regulations, 3 CFR, 1993 1976 Comp., p. 630. Public Law 94–580, 90 Stat. 2795. Executive Order 12866 Sikes Act Regulatory Planning and Review, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 638. Public Law 86–797, 74 Stat. 1052. NOTE. The following CFRs may be found in Executive Order 12898 your legal office or law library. Copies may Federal Actions to Address Environmental be purchased from the Superintendent of Justice in Minority and Low-Income Popu- Documents, Government Printing Office, lations, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Military's Environmental Protection Efforts
    Boston College Law Review Volume 60 | Issue 3 Article 7 3-28-2019 The .SU . Military’s Environmental Protection Efforts: Unexpected Eco-Friendly Solutions to Land Management Problems Curtis Cranston Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Environmental Law Commons, Land Use Law Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, and the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Curtis Cranston, The U.S. Military’s Environmental Protection Efforts: Unexpected Eco-Friendly Solutions to Land Management Problems, 60 B.C.L. Rev. 1023 (2019), https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol60/iss3/7 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE U.S. MILITARY’S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION EFFORTS: UNEXPECTED ECO- FRIENDLY SOLUTIONS TO LAND MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS Abstract: The military’s historically destructive relationship with the environ- ment and its several national security exemptions from compliance with federal environmental laws would appear to indicate that the military’s mission is inher- ently at odds with environmental protection. Nevertheless, the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”) has recently demonstrated a significant interest in ensuring military readiness by reducing potential impediments to normal military opera- tions on DoD installations. Often cumulatively referred to as “encroachment,” these outside pressures include land-use restrictions from federal environmental laws as well as more direct interference from nearby civilian populations, such as noise complaints and light pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chronology of United States Natural Resource
    CHRONOLOGY OF UNITED STATES NATURAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY, LAWS, AND AGENCIES, 2015 Compiled by Fred Cubbage Professor, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, NC State University Law Review and Assistance by Anjali Orlando, JD Version #50; 11 January 2015 1215* Magna Carta - issued by King John at Runnymede - ensured feudal rights, and king could not encroach on baronial privileges. Freedom of church and customs of towns; protection of rights of subjects and communities; and words later to be interpreted as the rights to trial by jury and habeas corpus (no imprisonment without cause or hearing) Era I: Colonial Settlement and Conservation; United States Expansion and Exploitation: 1492-1860 1492* Columbus lands in Americas, San Salvador Island, October 12 e.g., 1492; Guns, Germs, and Steel 1499-1500 Amerigo Vespucci, early explorer and master navigator of South America and merchant from Florence, Italy/Seville, Spain – namesake of the Americas 1558 Queen Elizabeth Tudor becomes Queen of England; leads Renaissance in England; defeats Spanish Armada 1584 Sir Walter Raleigh established at Roanoke Island, Virginia (now North Carolina) Became Lost Colony by ~1587. 1603 Queen Elizabeth dies after 45 years of rule; King James I (son of (executed) Mary Queen of Scots) becomes King 1607* Jamestown Colony, Virginia; first permanent settlement 1620 Plymouth Colony founded 1626* Plymouth Colony forbids timber sale or export w/o permission 1653 Virginia colonists form first permanent colony in North Carolina 1668* Massachusetts
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act
    GUIDELINES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUTES FOR THE LICENSING OF COMMERCIAL LAUNCHES AND LAUNCH SITES February 22, 2001 Revised Office of the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, DC 20591 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DISCLAIMER These guidelines provide additional guidance to FAA commercial space launch site license applicants and others involved in commercial space launch site actions, on the format and content of FAA environmental assessments and impact statements. These guidelines are not intended to replace or overrule FAA Order 1050.1D, NEPA or other environmental laws. License applicants and others involved in commercial space launch site actions are required to comply with FAA Order 1050.1D, NEPA and other applicable environmental laws. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS..................................................................................... iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................5 2.0 PURPOSE ………………………………………………………………………………………………..7 3.0 NEPA PROCESS AND DOCUMENTATION .......................................................................................9 3.1 Early Application of NEPA .................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G Federal Statutes
    APPENDIX G FEDERAL STATUTES Transformation Environmental Impact Statement Final U.S. Army Alaska APPENDIX G FEDERAL STATUTES Table of Contents A. Federal Laws .........................................................................................................................G-3 B. Federal Regulations...............................................................................................................G-5 C. Executive Orders (EO) and Presidential Memos...................................................................G-5 D. Department of Defense Directives ........................................................................................G-6 E. Army Regulations..................................................................................................................G-6 G-1 Transformation Environmental Impact Statement Final U.S. Army Alaska THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. G-2 Transformation Environmental Impact Statement Final U.S. Army Alaska A. FEDERAL LAWS • Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (as amended, 16 USC 3101-3233) • American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978; 42 USC 1996 • Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (PL 101-336; 42 USC 12101) • Antiquities Act of 1906 (PL 59-209; 16 USC 431-433) • Archaeological and Historic (Data) Preservation Act of 1974 (PL 93-291; 16 USC 469 et seq.) (AKA Archeological Recovery Act and Reservoir Salvage Act of 1960) (PL 86-523; 16 USC 469) • Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (PL 96-95:16 USC 470aa-11) • Bald and Golden Eagle Protection
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Newsletter of the Pacific Northwest Forest Service Retirees—Fall 2015 President’S Message—Jim Rice
    OldSmokeys Newsletter Newsletter of the Pacific Northwest Forest Service Retirees—Fall 2015 President’s Message—Jim Rice It’s been a terrible wildfire season with U.S. Forest Service casualties and Forest Service retirees’ homes lost. As described on page 3, your Elmer Moyer Memorial Emergency Fund has been tapped to help alleviate—in some small way—these tragedies. It was great to see and talk with so many of you at the Summer Picnic, and a pleasure to have Regional Forester and OldSmokey Jim Pena and a couple future OldSmokeys from the Mt. Hood National Forest attend, too. The culinary arts instructor from the Timber Lake Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center and five of his students provided an excellent picnic lunch to about 120 OldSmokeys. Thank you Job Corps! Special thanks to David Jay for donating one of his beautiful wooden clocks for the raffle to support the PNWFSA Grant Fund; to Rick Larson for reserving the picnic area and coordinating with the Job Corps; and to Bev Pratt and Deb Warren for welcoming, selling raffle tickets, collecting tips for the Job Corps students, and doing the name tags. This edition of our OldSmokeys Newsletter begins a new era. Les Joslin, editor for almost ten years, would like to retire someday. Your Board of Directors, seeking a new editor, has voted to reduce the newsletter to an average of 16-page issues to reduce the work it takes to produce the newsletter. We hope this helps attract a new editor as it reduces duplication of news OldSmokeys get through other sources such as Vern Clapp’s frequent e-Notes and as we transition to other formats for quicker delivery of perishable news.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Overview
    6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW FAA Order 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, and Order 5050.4B, National Environmental Policy Act: Implementation Instruction for Airport Actions, address specific environmental categories that are evaluated in environmental documents through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The following section inventories the categories that pertain to the Airport and their existing conditions (Construction Impacts, Cumulative Impacts, and Secondary (Induced) Impacts). 6.1 AIR QUALITY Air quality analysis for federally funded projects must be prepared in accordance with applicable air quality statutes and regulations that include the Clean Air Act of 197036, the 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments37, the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments38, and the National Ambient Air Quality Standards39 (NAAQS). In particular, the air pollutants of concern in the assessment of impacts from airport-related sources include six “criteria pollutants”; carbon monoxide (CO), lead (Pb), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), particular matter (PM-10 and PM-2.5), and sulfur dioxide (SO2). The Airport is located in Garfield County, which is designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as being in attainment for all criteria pollutants. 6.2 COMPATIBLE LAND USE As discussed in Section 2.7 Regional Setting and Land Use, the land surrounding RIL is primarily zoned as Rural to the north and east, with Planned Unit Development (PUD) to the south, and Light Industrial PUD to the west. There is also a small parcel of land to the southwest of the main airport entrance that is zoned as Public Zone District; this is in place for the newly developed campus for the Colorado Mountain College.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory-Nomination
    -rm No. 10-306 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ___________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS___________ INAME HISTORIC USDA Forest Service Administrative Buildings in the State of Oregon and Washington built by the Civilian Conservation Corps.________________ AND/OR COMMON Depression-Era Buildings LOCATION STREET*NUMBER National Forest System Lands in the States of Oregon and Washington —NOTFOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT See Inventory Sheets — VICINITY OF STATE CODE COUNTY CODE flCLASSIFI CATION Thematic Group CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS . PRESENT USE —DISTRICT .XpUBLIC ^OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILOING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE _BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _|N PROCESS X.YES: RESTRICTED ^GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO _ MILITARY —OTHER: AGENCY REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: fIf applicable) USDA Forest Service STREET & NUMBER Regional Office. 319 S.W. Pine St... P.O. Box 3623 CITY. TOWN STATE Portland, OR 97208 VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. Unit of Lands and Minerals, Land Status Records REGISTRY OF DEEDS.ETC. Sery1ce> Regional Office_____________ STREET & NUMBER 319 S.W. Pine St.. P.O. Box 3623 CITY. TOWN STATE Portland, OR 97208 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Region 6 Inventory of Depression Era Sites and Structures DATE 1978-1980 ^.FEDERAL STATE COUNTY LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR _______UnitSURVEY RECORDS 11^44. of/? Recreation,n j. CRMPDM FilesC-i1«o CITY. TOWN STATE USDA Forest Service. Regional Office, 319 S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resource Development Under the FWCA
    WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE FISH AND WILDLIFE COORDINATION ACT An update and expansion of: Issues in Fish and Wildlife Planning: Water Resources Development Under the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act by Karl F. Stutzman, 1980 and Policy and Guidance on Fulfillment of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Responsibilities in the Corps of Engineers Water Resources Development Program by Charles K. Baxter, Catherine D. Duncan, and David R. Parsons, 1986 Prepared by: Daniel H. Smalley Under contract for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive Arlington, Virginia 22203 In collaboration with: Allan J. Mueller U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Supervisor, Arkansas Field Office Conway, Arkansas November 2004 CONTENTS Page ACRONYMS USED ix PREFACE xi I. The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act A. Introduction B. Background Basic Problem addressed by the FWCA General Approach to the Problem C. Legislative History The Act of 1934 The Coordination Act of 1946 Coordination Act Amendments of 1948 The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958 Subsequent Amendments and proposal to amend Relationship of the FWCA to Other Legislative Authorities D. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Proposed Regulations E. Provisions of the FWCA Overview Definitions and Concepts Institutional Framework Summary of the Provisions of the FWCA Section 1: Declaration of Purpose; Cooperation of Agencies; Surveys and Investigations; Donations Equal Consideration Other Provisions of Section 1 Section 2: Impounding, Diverting or Controlling Waters
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Memo
    DECISION MEMO Portland Post Office Community Club Driveway Relocation August, 2010 USDA Forest Service, Mt. Hood National Forest Zigzag Ranger District Clackamas County, Oregon T3S, R 8E, Section 18, W. M., Clackamas County, Oregon Decision I have decided to authorize the Portland Post Office Community Club (Post Office Club) to construct a new driveway to their cabin on National Forest System lands, located on the Zigzag Ranger District of the Mt. Hood National Forest, at the end of Forest Road 35B, approximately 3 miles southeast of Rhododendron, Oregon. Implementation of this decision may occur immediately. The existing driveway is shared with a neighboring residence on Lot 29, and to access the Post Office Club, vehicles must pass within feet of the cabin. Because the Post Office cabin is a “club” cabin with multiple users who often arrive late at night, conflicts have resulted due to the disturbance of the Lot 29 residents. A new driveway needs to be constructed to access the Post Office Club; located at an adequate distance from Lot 29. Proposed Action The Post Office Club has requested approval to change the access to their cabin at the end of Road 35B by decommissioning a portion of the road they currently use and improving an existing, underused road so that it will replace the current one. The improved road will run 250ft in a generally southwest direction before rejoining the existing access driveway 145 ft to the east of the Post Office Club cabin (see map in Project Folder). This route will have minimum impact on existing vegetation and will not remove any large trees or impact their root systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteer Training Handbook
    Volunteer Training Handbook 2 INDEX INDEX 3 CONTACT LIST 5 SHORT HISTORY 7 MISSION 7 ROLES OUTLINED 7 VOLUNTEER COMMITMENT AND BENEFITS 8 KEY MESSAGES ABOUT TRAILHEAD AMBASSADORS PROGRAM 9 TARGET TRAILHEADS (for 2018 season) 9 MAP OF TRAILHEADS 10 BEFORE A SHIFT 11 WEEKEND OPERATIONS 13 Day of Shift 13 If you are the equipment lead… 13 Pick-up your 4 Ts: Tent, Tent Weights, Table, and Tub 13 If you are not the equipment lead… 17 Set up at trailhead 17 Basic Visitor Engagement 19 Initial Contact Engagement 19 Secondary Engagement 19 Visitor Engagement Tracking 20 Taking and Submitting Photos 20 After a Shift 21 Take Down 23 TRAILHEAD REFERENCE GUIDE: 24 Starvation Creek 24 Location Information: 24 Latourell Falls 26 Multnomah Falls I 84 Parking Lot 28 Cape Horn Trailhead 31 Trillium Lake 33 Mirror Lake 36 3 BE AN INFORMED VOLUNTEER 43 Trail Safety 43 Eagle Creek Fire 45 USEFUL LINKS 48 International Visitor Information 48 REFERENCE TOOLS 49 Temperature Conversion 49 Mileage Conversion 49 Regional Sunset times (by Month) 50 NOTES 50 4 CONTACT LIST Do you have a question, either before, during, or after your shift? Below is a great list of resources for who to reach out to for help depending on the situation at hand: Main Contacts General Questions Ali Smith |Trailhead Ambassador Coordinator | [email protected] | 716-531-0713 Program Management Questions Maegan Jossy | Outreach Manager @ Friends of the Columbia Gorge | [email protected] | 503-887-0822 Tourism/Visitor Information Questions Lizzie Keenan | Regional Specialist @ Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B–Laws, Policies, and Other Sources of Design Criteria
    Ozark-St. Francis National Forests Appendices APPENDIX B–LAWS, POLICIES, AND OTHER SOURCES OF DESIGN CRITERIA INTRODUCTION This appendix supplements the Key Laws Providing Direction for Ozark-St. Francis National Forests Land Management Plans section found in Part 3 of the LRMP with a list of federal and state statutes, regulations (Code of Federal Regulations or CFR), Executive Orders (EO), and national and regional Forest Service policy relevant to the Land Resource and Management Plan. The list of national and regional policy is partial. A complete listing can be found in the Forest Service Manual (FSM) and Forest Service Handbook (FSH). The Forest Service Directives System is available on the national website at http://www.fs.fed.us/im/directives. KEY LAWS PROVIDING DIRECTION FOR OZARK-ST. FRANCIS NATIONAL FORESTS U.S. Mining Laws (Public Domain land) Act of May 10, 1872: Provides that all valuable mineral deposits in land belonging to the United States, both surveyed and unsurveyed, are free and open to exploration and purchase, and the land in which they are found to occupation and purchase by citizens of the United States and those who have declared their intention to become such, under regulations prescribed by law, and according to the local customs or rules of miners, so far as the same are applicable and not inconsistent with the laws of the United States. There are a number of Acts which modify the mining laws as applied to local areas by prohibiting entry altogether or by limiting or restricting the use which may be made of the surface and the right, title or interest which may pass through patent.
    [Show full text]