DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Resource Development Under the FWCA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Resource Development Under the FWCA WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE FISH AND WILDLIFE COORDINATION ACT An update and expansion of: Issues in Fish and Wildlife Planning: Water Resources Development Under the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act by Karl F. Stutzman, 1980 and Policy and Guidance on Fulfillment of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Responsibilities in the Corps of Engineers Water Resources Development Program by Charles K. Baxter, Catherine D. Duncan, and David R. Parsons, 1986 Prepared by: Daniel H. Smalley Under contract for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive Arlington, Virginia 22203 In collaboration with: Allan J. Mueller U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Supervisor, Arkansas Field Office Conway, Arkansas November 2004 CONTENTS Page ACRONYMS USED ix PREFACE xi I. The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act A. Introduction B. Background Basic Problem addressed by the FWCA General Approach to the Problem C. Legislative History The Act of 1934 The Coordination Act of 1946 Coordination Act Amendments of 1948 The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958 Subsequent Amendments and proposal to amend Relationship of the FWCA to Other Legislative Authorities D. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Proposed Regulations E. Provisions of the FWCA Overview Definitions and Concepts Institutional Framework Summary of the Provisions of the FWCA Section 1: Declaration of Purpose; Cooperation of Agencies; Surveys and Investigations; Donations Equal Consideration Other Provisions of Section 1 Section 2: Impounding, Diverting or Controlling Waters Subsection 2(a): Consultation Enhancement Evaluations for Determining Mitigation Needs Subsection 2(b): Reports and Recommendations; Consideration Full Consideration by the Action Agency Some Concepts in Federal Project Plan Formulation Enhancement and Public Law 89-72, the Federal Water Project Recreation Act Organization of the Remainder of Section 2 Subsection 2(f): Estimation of Wildlife Benefits and Losses Subsection 2(c): Modification of Projects; Acquisition of Lands Subsection 2(g): Applicability to Projects Subsection 2(d): Project Costs Subsection 3(c): Acquisition of Land, Waters and Interests Therein Subsection 2(e): Transfer of Funds Subsection 2(h): Exempt Projects and Activities Section 3: Impoundment or Diversion of Waters Subsection 3(a): Conservation, Maintenance, and Management of Wildlife Resources; Development and Improvement Subsection 3(b): Use and Availability of Waters, Lands, and Interests Therein Protection of the Authorities of the Secretary of Agriculture Other Aspects of Section 3 Sections 4-9 F. Summary II. Agency Programs with FWCA Implications A. Types of projects covered by the FWCA B. Construction Agencies Corps of Engineers Bureau of Reclamation Natural Resources Conservation Service Others C. Permitting Agencies Corps of Engineers Coast Guard Mineral Management Service Others D. Licensing Agencies Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission III. Water Resources Development Planning and Involvement Under the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act ii A. Introduction B. How Water Resources Development Projects are Planned and Authorized C. Objective of FWS Involvement under the FWCA D. Interrelationship of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, National Environmental Policy Act and Endangered Species Act in Project Planning E. Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies History Purpose Agencies to which Principles and Guidelines apply Six Steps of Planning under Principles and Guidelines FWS Input to the six steps of planning F. Roles and Responsibilities of the Fish and Wildlife Service Biologist Planner Biologist Negotiator Coordinator Conservation Advocate G. Mitigation and the Fish and Wildlife Service Mitigation Policy The Concept of Mitigation The FWS Mitigation Policy Purpose and goal Applicability to other agencies Resource Categories and Mitigation Goals Evaluation Species Impact Assessment Compensation Timing of Mitigation Planning Evaluation Methodologies H. Transfer Funding National Transfer Funding Agreements Corps of Engineers Bureau of Reclamation Fish and Wildlife Service Guidance on Transfer Funding Scopes of work Scheduling of Transfer Funding Coordination Meetings Funding Estimates - The Staff Day Cost Additional Information Other Mechanisms for Transferring Funds I. General Plans for Management of Fish and Wildlife at Federal Water Resources Development Projects iii Purpose of General Plans General Plan Provisions in the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Existing Guidance Signatories to General Plans Types of General Plans Development and Content of General Plans Issues with General Plans Reservoir Land Acquisition Policy List of Existing General Plans J. Reservoir Land Acquisition Policy IV. Corps of Engineers Project Planning and Implementation A. Corps References B. Types of Projects C. Project Planning, Implementation and Operation D. How Corps Projects are Authorized E. Types of Studies Pre-authorization Studies Reconnaissance Study Feasibility Study Post-Authorization Studies Continuing Authorities Studies Other Studies Review of Completed Projects Fish and Wildlife Reports Water Resources Needs of River Basins and Regions Floodplain Management and Riverine Restoration Program Project Deauthorizations Legislative Phase I Studies Congressional Adds F. Corps Planning Procedures Pre-authorization Studies and Reports Reconnaissance Phase Feasibility Phase (Plan Formulation) Post-authorization Studies and Reports Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) Reevaluation Studies National Environmental Policy Act Documentation Construction Operations and Maintenance Continuing Authorities Program (CAP) Studies CAP Program Planning iv CAP Project Studies CAP Project Approval CAP Project Cost-Share G. Purpose and Timing of FWS Involvement in Studies Reconnaissance Studies Feasibility Studies Post-Authorization Studies and Reports and Beyond Continuing Authorities Studies H. Implementing Fish and Wildlife Service Procedures for Participating in the Corps Planning Process through the National Transfer Fund Agreement I. When FWCA Responsibilities Cannot Be Fulfilled by the “2(b) Report” V. Fish and Wildlife Evaluation Framework A. Introduction B. The Evaluation Framework Step 1. Specify the resources likely to be evaluated Step 2. Adopt an evaluation method(s) Step 3 Define the baseline condition and the significant resources likely to be impacted Step 4 Determine the most probable future resource conditions without a project Step 5 Define resource problems, opportunities and planning objectives Step 6 Define the Alternatives relative to their potential impacts on fish and wildlife resources Step 7 Determine the most probable future resource conditions with identified alternatives Step 8 Define impacts Step 9 Evaluate and compare alternatives Step 10 Formulate conservation measures Step 11 Develop Recommendations Step 12 Establish the Fish and Wildlife Service position on the project Step 13 Write the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report VI. FWCA Report Content, Organization, Format and Style A. Introduction B. Content and Organization The 2(b) Report Reconnaissance Phase PAR v Plan Formulation PAR(s), Feasibility Study Phase (Plan Formulation) Continuing Authorities Program PAR C. Format D. Style E. Grammar, Style and Tone F. List of Tables and Figures VII. Relationship of the FWCA to Other Legislation A. Introduction B. National Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act C. Federal Water Projects Recreation Act (P.L. 89-72) D. Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act (P.L. 83-566) E. Water Resources Development Acts (Corps of Engineers Omnibus Acts) F. Federal Power Act G. Coastal Barriers Protection Act H. Estuary Protection Act I. Clean Water Act (formerly Federal Water Pollution Control Act) J. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 K. Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act L. Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) M. Coastal Zone Management Act N. Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act O. Sikes Act List of Tables Table I-1 Summary of the Provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958 Table III-1 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act General Plans for Fish and Wildlife Management of Project Lands and Waters Table IV-1 Corps of Engineers Continuing Authorities Projects Table IV-2 Outline of FWS Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Activities for a Federal Project Table V-1 Summary of Evaluation Framework Steps Table V-2 Laws, Policies, and Plans Relevant to Establishing the Institutional Significance of Fish and Wildlife Resources Table VI-1 Summary of Content and Organization of FWCA 2(b) Report Table VI-2 Example of an Impacts Matrix for a Hypothetical Channelization Project Using Confined Upland Disposal Table VI-3 Content and Organization of a Reconnaissance PAR/PAL vi Table VI-4 Content and Organization of a Plan Formulation PAR/PAL Table VI-5 Content and Organization of a Continuing Authorities Program PAR/PAL Table VI-6 Suggested FWCA Report Format List of Figures Figure III-1 Mitigation and Compensation Figure III-2 Corps Funding Process and FWCA Coordination Figure IV-1 Major Steps in the Corps of Engineers Project Development Process for Projects Specifically Authorized by Congress Figure IV-2 Continuing Authorities Projects Figure IV-3 Major Steps in Corps of Engineers Project Development Process for Continuing Authorities Projects Figure VI-1 Title Page, Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marine Director WCS Finaltor
    JOB DESCRIPTION Director, Marine Conservation and Fisheries Wildlife Conservation Society Founded in 1895 as the New York Zoological Society The Wildlife Conservation Society seeks a Director of Marine Conservation and Fisheries, to be based at WCS headquarters in New York City. WCS has a long history of ocean exploration and conservation, including William Beebe’s 1934 record-setting bathysphere dive and Roger Payne’s extraordinary 1974 discovery of humpback whale songs. From these early roots, and reflecting the WCS focus on saving wildlife and wild places, WCS’ marine conservation efforts currently focus on four strategies: Marine Protected Areas, sustainable fisheries, marine mammals, and sharks and rays. Supporting these strategies, WCS maintains a strong commitment to applied marine scientific research and is building its capacity to leverage our impact through WCS’ New York Aquarium and other innovative partnerships. To deliver on these objectives at scale the Director oversees all WCS marine conservation efforts, including the implementation of marine conservation actions by ~250 marine conservation staff in Belize, Cuba, Nicaragua, Argentina, Chile, Gabon, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambiue, Madagascar, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Fiji, New York and the Arctic Beringia, as well as overseeing staff who coordinate global initiatives on marine species (cetaceans and sharks), climate, fisheries and marine policy. The program is staffed by a dynamic and committed team of field scientists based at sites around the world, and a directorate of six staff in New York. Position Objectives: * Direct WCS’s marine conservation programs across 9 global priority regions and all 5 oceans in Africa, Asia, Latin America and North America that largely focus on the establishment and management of marine protected areas, artisanal, and commercial fisheries, and the global conservation of marine mammals and sharks and rays.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Army, Dod Pt. 651, App. B
    Department of the Army, DoD Pt. 651, App. B Executive Order 11988 As amended (CERCLA, Superfund) (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) Endangered Species Act of Floodplain Management, 3 CFR, 1977 1973. Comp., p. 117 Public Law 93–205, 87 Stat. 884. Executive Order 11990 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Protection of Wetlands, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., Public Law 85–624, Sec. 2, 72 Stat. 563 and p. 121. Public Law 89–72, Sec. 6(b), 79 Stat. 216. Executive Order 12114 National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions, 3 CFR, 1979 comp., p. 356. Public Law 91–190, 83 Stat. 852. Executive Order 12778 National Historic Preservation Act Civil Justice Reform, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. Public Law 89–665, 80 Stat. 915. 359. Native American Graves Protection and Executive Order 12856 Repatriation Act Federal Compliance with Right-to-Know Public Law 101–601, 104 Stat. 3048. Laws and Pollution Prevention Require- Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 ments, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 616. Public Law 101–508, Title VI, Subtitle G, Executive Order 12861 104 Stat. 13880–321. Elimination of One-Half of Executive Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of Branch Internal Regulations, 3 CFR, 1993 1976 Comp., p. 630. Public Law 94–580, 90 Stat. 2795. Executive Order 12866 Sikes Act Regulatory Planning and Review, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 638. Public Law 86–797, 74 Stat. 1052. NOTE. The following CFRs may be found in Executive Order 12898 your legal office or law library. Copies may Federal Actions to Address Environmental be purchased from the Superintendent of Justice in Minority and Low-Income Popu- Documents, Government Printing Office, lations, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Natural Resources and Environmental Constraints
    Chapter 4 Natural Resources and Environmental Constraints PERSONAL VISION STATEMENTS “I want to live in a city that cares about air quality and the environment.” “Keep Birmingham beautiful, especially the water ways.” 4.1 CITY OF BIRMINGHAM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PART II | CHAPTER 4 NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS GOALS POLICIES FOR DECISION MAKERS natural areas and conservation A comprehensive green infrastructure • Support the creation of an interconnected green infrastructure network that includes system provides access to and natural areas for passive recreation, stormwater management, and wildlife habitat. preserves natural areas and • Consider incentives for the conservation and enhancement of natural and urban environmentally sensitive areas. forests. Reinvestment in existing communities • Consider incentives for reinvestment in existing communities rather than conserves resources and sensitive “greenfields,” for new commercial, residential and institutional development. environments. • Consider incentives for development patterns and site design methods that help protect water quality, sensitive environmental features, and wildlife habitat. air and water quality The City makes every effort to • Support the development of cost-effective multimodal transportation systems that consistently meet clean air standards. reduce vehicle emissions. • Encourage use of clean fuels and emissions testing. • Emphasize recruitment of clean industry. • Consider incentives for industries to reduce emissions over time. • Promote the use of cost-effective energy efficient design, materials and equipment in existing and private development. The City makes every effort to • Encourage the Birmingham Water Works Board to protect water-supply sources consistently meet clean water located outside of the city to the extent possible. standards. • Consider incentives for development that protects the city’s water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake of the Ozarks 303D – 2021
    March 22, 2021 Jeff Robichaud Water, Wetlands, and Pesticides Division US EPA Region 7 11201 Renner Boulevard Lenexa, KS 66219 RE: EPA Proposed Decision on Missouri’s 2020 303(d) List Dear Mr. Robichaud: On behalf of the Missouri Corn Growers Association (MCGA) and the Missouri Soybean Association (MSA) we would like to thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed decision on Missouri’s 2020 303(d) List of Impaired Waters (hereinafter called the 2020 303d list). In addition to our comments, MSA and MCGA also fully supports comments submitted by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (Department) and the Missouri Clean Water Commission (CWC). For over 50 years, MCGA and MSA has worked with several generations of crop farmers to achieve major milestones and advances in Missouri’s agriculture industry. As grassroots organizations, MCGA & MSA invests considerable time and resources in supporting and promoting policies, education and research that is advancing crop production, sustaining grower profitability and improving environmental stewardship. MCGA and MSA are committed to working with both our growers and governmental partners in developing policies, practices and technology that benefit Missouri farmers and their local communities. MCGA and MSA purposely engaged on Missouri’s lake numeric nutrient criteria (Lake NNC) rule at a very early stage. Contributing technical expertise and suggestions on policy development, our staff participated on stakeholder committees and met directly with Department and EPA staff, voicing our positions, providing farmer perspectives, and contributing to the rule’s content and eventual adoption. We, along with many other agriculture, industry and municipal stakeholder groups, understood the importance of getting the Lake NNC rule developed right for Missouri, and more importantly, understood the potential unintended consequences of getting it wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Harry S. Truman Lake Brochure
    Evidence gathered from the Pleistocene Spring Bogs on the Pomme de Terre River indicates that approximately 30,000 years ago, during the last glacial period, animals such as the mastodon, tapir, musk ox, ground sloth, and giant beaver roamed the upper Osage Basin. During this period, spruce forests covered the area and the climate was much colder than today. The earliest mention of the Osage River was by Marquette, but the first known scientific expedition to the Osage River was in 1719 by Charles Du Tisne, who named the river for the Osage Indians. The Osage River was used as a part of the Santa Fe Trail. The trail was an The Corps of Engineers is responsible for important shipping route for the gold and silver operating and managing land and water mines in New Mexico and Arizona. resources at Truman Lake. The natural resource The rush of pioneer settlers began about management program is designed to protect 1831. Settlements were made along the Osage, and enhance the natural and cultural resources South Grand, Pomme de Terre, Weaubleau and provide visitors with quality recreational Creek, Sac River, Monegaw Creek, and opportunities. Clear Creek. These streams were the major Land management policies and practices transportation routes for shipping logs, produce, provide for the maintenance and protection and supplies. of wildlife habitat. Prescribed burns are used Warsaw and Fairfield, both of which were to convert old fields and fescue pastures into stops on the Butterfield Stage Line, were platted beneficial stands of native grass. One of in 1837. Osceola became a shipping point the most important tools utilized in wildlife for merchandise from the river boats.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Military's Environmental Protection Efforts
    Boston College Law Review Volume 60 | Issue 3 Article 7 3-28-2019 The .SU . Military’s Environmental Protection Efforts: Unexpected Eco-Friendly Solutions to Land Management Problems Curtis Cranston Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Environmental Law Commons, Land Use Law Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, and the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Curtis Cranston, The U.S. Military’s Environmental Protection Efforts: Unexpected Eco-Friendly Solutions to Land Management Problems, 60 B.C.L. Rev. 1023 (2019), https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol60/iss3/7 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE U.S. MILITARY’S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION EFFORTS: UNEXPECTED ECO- FRIENDLY SOLUTIONS TO LAND MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS Abstract: The military’s historically destructive relationship with the environ- ment and its several national security exemptions from compliance with federal environmental laws would appear to indicate that the military’s mission is inher- ently at odds with environmental protection. Nevertheless, the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”) has recently demonstrated a significant interest in ensuring military readiness by reducing potential impediments to normal military opera- tions on DoD installations. Often cumulatively referred to as “encroachment,” these outside pressures include land-use restrictions from federal environmental laws as well as more direct interference from nearby civilian populations, such as noise complaints and light pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Landowner Guide to the Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program
    Landowner Guide to the Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program This document provides an overview of the Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program, administered by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), and the expectations of the program for interested landowners. ODFW recommends that interested landowners first read this Guide, and if eligible, contact the local ODFW biologists for more information. Additional resources are available on the following website: http://www.dfw.state.or.us/lands/whcmp/. Table of Contents: A. Purpose of the habitat program B. Objective of the habitat program C. History of the habitat program D. Calculating a property’s assessed value E. Dwellings and homesites F. Participating Counties G. Moving from one special assessment category to another H. Landowner process to participate in the program I. Information needed in a habitat plan J. Conservation and management actions in a habitat plan K. Resources counties and cities can provide to assist landowners L. Submission of a habitat plan for review M. Implementation of approved WHCMP plans N. Application for wildlife habitat special assessment O. Monitoring by ODFW P. Amending an approved habitat plan Q. Change of ownership R. Disqualification of a property from wildlife habitat special assessment S. Appendix a. Certification of Eligibility Form b. Landowner Interest Form c. Annual Status Report Form p. 1 2015 A. Purpose of the habitat program: Provide an incentive for habitat conservation The Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program (habitat program), administered by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), is a cooperative effort involving state and local governments and other partners to help private landowners voluntarily conserve native wildlife habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • AREI Chapter 3.3 Wildlife Resources Conservation
    3.3 Wildlife Resources Conservation U.S. agriculture is well positioned to play a major role in protecting and enhancing the nation's wildlife. Wildlife in the U.S is dependent on the considerable land and water resources under the control of agriculture. At the same time, agriculture is one of the most competitive sectors in the U.S., and economic tradeoffs can make it difficult for farmers, on their own, to support wildlife conservation efforts requiring them to adopt more wildlife-friendly production techniques or directly allocate additional land and water resources to wildlife. Besides the opportunity costs associated with shifting resource use or changing production techniques, the public goods and common property nature of wildlife can also affect a farmers decision to protect wildlife found on their land. However, the experiences of USDA conservation programs demonstrate that farmers are willing to voluntarily shift additional land and water resources into habitat, provided they are compensated. Contents Page Introduction....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Tradeoffs Between Agricultural Production and Wildlife Habitat ................................................................... 2 Asymmetric distribution of costs and benefits....................................................................................... 2 Ownership of land and water resources ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Management Companion Plan
    WATER MANAGEMENT COMPANION PLAN December 2016 Photo Credit: Left: Lake Shasta, California Date: 19 July 2010 Photographer: brianscotland0 via pixabay Right: Monarch Butterfly Date: 17 March 2006 Photographer: Armon via Wiki Commons Prepared by Blue Earth Consultants, LLC December 2016 Disclaimer: Although we have made every effort to ensure that the information contained in this report accurately reflects SWAP 2015 companion plan development team discussions shared through web-based platforms, e-mails, and phone calls, Blue Earth Consultants, LLC makes no guarantee of the completeness and accuracy of information provided by all project sources. SWAP 2015 and associated companion plans are non-regulatory documents. The information shared is not legally binding nor does it reflect a change in the laws guiding wildlife and ecosystem conservation in the state. In addition, mention of organizations or entities in this report as potential partners does not indicate a willingness and/or commitment on behalf of these organizations or entities to partner, fund, or provide support for implementation of this plan or SWAP 2015. The consultant team developed companion plans for multiple audiences, both with and without jurisdictional authority for implementing strategies and conservation activities described in SWAP 2015 and associated companion plans. These audiences include but are not limited to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife leadership team and staff; the California Fish and Game Commission; cooperating state, federal, and local government agencies and organizations; California Tribes and tribal governments; and various partners (such as non-governmental organizations, academic research institutions, and citizen scientists). Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................ iii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • For-74: a Guide to Urban Habitat Conservation Planning
    FOR-74 A Guide to Urban Habitat Conservation Planning Thomas G. Barnes, Extension Wildlife Specialist Lowell Adams, National Institute for Urban Wildlife entuckians value their forests and Kother natural resources for aes- Guidelines for Considering Wildlife in the Urban Development thetic, recreational, and economic Process significance, so over the past several Promote habitats that will have the food, cover, water, and living space that decades they have become increasingly all wildlife require by following these guidelines: concerned about the loss of wildlife • Before development, maximize open space and make an effort to protect the habitat and greenspace. Urban and most valuable wildlife habitat by placing buildings on less important portions suburban development is one of the of the site. Choosing cluster development, which is flexible, can help. leading causes of this loss: A recent • Provide water, and design stormwater control impoundments to benefit wildlife. study indicated that every day in • Use native plants that have value for wildlife as well as aesthetic appeal. Kentucky more than 100 acres of rural • Provide bird-feeding stations and nest boxes for cavity-nesting birds like land is being converted to urban house wrens and wood ducks. development. • Educate residents about wildlife conservation, using, for example, informa- Because concern for loss of tion packets or a nature trail through open space. greenspace is not new, we have for • Ensure a commitment to managing urban wildlife habitats. some time created attractive urban greenspace environments with our parks and backyards. These The publication can also be useful to A landscape is a large area com- greenspaces have been created not so the average homeowner in understand- posed of ecosystems (the plants, much for wildlife habitats as for people ing the complex issues involved in animals, other living organisms, and to enjoy, but the potential for wildlife landscape planning and wildlife their physical surroundings).
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Days Events Eagle Watching on Your
    http://www.MSCNews.net/news/index.cfm?nk=65977 Discover nature with MDC through Eagle Days From December through February, Missouri's winter eagle watching is spectacular. Discover nature with the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) through Eagle Days events around the state, or enjoy eagle viewing on your own. Because of the state’s big rivers, many lakes, and abundant wetlands, Missouri is one of the leading lower 48 states for bald eagle viewing. Each fall, thousands of these great birds migrate south from their nesting range in Canada and the Great Lakes states to hunt in the Show-Me State. Eagles take up residence wherever they find open water and plentiful food. More than 2,000 bald eagles are typically reported in Missouri during winter. Eagle Days Events MDC Eagle Days events are listed below. They include live captive-eagle programs, exhibits, activities, videos, and guides with spotting scopes. Watch for eagles perched in large trees along the water's edge. View them early in the morning to see eagles flying and fishing. Be sure to dress for winter weather and don't forget cameras and binoculars. MOUND CITY: Dec. 1 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. and Dec. 2 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. at Loess Bluffs National Wildlife Refuge near Mound City. Call 816-271-3100 for more information. KANSAS CITY: 5 from 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. and Jan. 6 from 10:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. at Smithville Lake Paradise Pointe Golf Course Clubhouse north of Kansas City.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW WE DO IT: Wildlife Habitat
    SUSTAINABILITY @ WEYERHAEUSER HOW WE DO IT: Wildlife Habitat A common misperception of managed forests is that they do not support diverse plant and animal communities — but the truth is our forests are home to vibrant ecosystems throughout the United States and Canada. The forests we manage in the western U.S. alone host more than 250 native vertebrate species, including large mammals such as deer, elk, cougar, black bear and bobcat, as well as a tremendous diversity of birds, reptiles, amphibians, insects, native fish and other aquatic species. Many of these species prefer different forest age classes and forest structures, or other habitat features on the landscape, such as riparian areas. Since our timberlands contain a matrix of forest stand ages, along with other special areas we protect around streams and wetlands, these forests support a high level of native biodiversity. KEY POINTS • To manage these habitat types and protect biological diversity at multiple spatial scales, we participate in conservation partnerships with state and federal agencies and nonprofit organizations1, and we support our planning and decision- making with our internal Environmental Research and Operational Support teams. • We also frequently partner with other research organizations to ensure our practices are consistent with the best available science — and that we are meeting our conservation objectives, including protecting water quality and biodiversity, and providing habitat for threatened, endangered and sensitive species. • Weyerhaeuser has a long history of contributing timberlands for conservation initiatives through land exchanges, sales, donations and conservation easements. • Through special programs, including Habitat Conservation Plans and Candidate Conservation Agreements with Assurances, we are able to enroll our timberlands in conservation agreements that ensure our forests provide habitat features that support at-risk or sensitive species — and still sustainably harvest and regenerate timber.
    [Show full text]