Renewals Lapsed 2004
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Water Stewardship Experiences in the Western Cape
ZA Water stewardship experiences in the Western Cape © ANETTE KRISTENSEN © CERES V Good water stewardship A LLEY, WWF guidelines for Western Cape fruit farmers This booklet is addressed to Western Cape agricultural producers, who rely on irrigation and are interested in better understanding water risks and how to reduce these through good water use, protection and stewardship. It shares the experiences of nine stone-fruit farmers in the Breede catchment, who took part in a water stewardship initiative in 2013 and 2014. It is envisioned that their journey will also help other farmers in the region identify ways to improve the use and management of water resources that are critical to sustaining their businessess. This water stewardship initiative and this booklet are produced by WWF South Africa, the WWF United Kingdom, Alliance for Water Stewardship (AWS), Marks & Spencer and Woolworths. INTRODUCTION The Mediterranean climate of the Western Cape translates into hot and dry summers and wet, cold winters. This sets the region apart from the rest of South Africa, which typically receives summer rainfall. This unique rainfall pattern in reality that water is both a necessity for South Africa makes the Western Cape the business, but that many risks to water can key area for particular agricultural crops also hamper business. that are often linked to the export market. Water risks are recognized at many These include stone and pome fruit different levels, including the retailers (apples, pears), citrus as well as grapes. that accumulate risks through the supply Other crops, such as olives, wheat and chain. The retailer Marks & Spencer vegetables are also common to particular applied the WWF-developed Water Risk sub-regions. -
Approved Iacom Minutes 10 March 2021 1 Approved Minutes of the Meeting of the Impact Assessment Committee
Approved Minutes of the Meeting of the Impact Assessment Committee (IACOM) of Heritage Western Cape (HWC) held via Microsoft Teams, at 09H00 on Wednesday, 10 March 2021 1. Opening and Welcome The IACom Chair, Mr David Gibbs, opened the meeting at 09h00 and welcomed everyone present via Microsoft Teams. 2. Attendance Members Staff Mr Dave Saunders (DS) Ms Penelope Meyer (PM) Mr Mike Scurr (MS) Ms Waseefa Dhansay (WD) Mr Siphiwo Mavumengwana (SM) Ms Stephanie Barnardt (SB) Ms Cecilene Muller (CM) Ms Khanyisile Bonile (KB) Ms Sarah Winter (SW) Mr Thando Zingange (TZ) Mr Rashiq Fataar (RF) Ms Aneeqah Brown (AB) Mr Gaarith Williams (GW) Ms Anita Shologu (AS) Mr David Gibbs (DG) Ms Nosiphiwo Tafeni(NT) Prof Walter Peters (Co-opted BELCom Member) Ms Anita Shologu (AS) Observers None Visitors Ms. Cindy Postlethwayt Mr. Tiaan Meyer Mr. Willem Hutten Mr. David McDonald Ms. Bettina Woodward Ms. Emmylou Bailey Mr. Johan Malherbe Mr. Henry Aikman Mr. Graham Jacobs Ms. Claire Abrahamse Ms. Janine de Waal Mr. Andre Vercuil Ms. Bridget O'Donoghue Ms. Patricia Botha Ms. Renske Haller Ms. Petra Broddle Ms. Katie Smuts Mr Mark Saint Pôl 3. Apologies Mr Jason Knight (JK) 3.1. Absent None 4. Approval of the Agenda 4.1 Agenda dated 10 March 2021 The Committee resolved to approve the Agenda dated 10 March 2021 with minor amendments. Approved IACom Minutes_10 March 2021 1 5. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting 5.1 Minutes dated 10 February 2021 The Committee reviewed the minutes dated 10 February 2021 and resolved to approve them with no amendments. -
7. Water Quality
Western Cape IWRM Action Plan: Status Quo Report Final Draft 7. WATER QUALITY 7.1 INTRODUCTION 7.1.1 What is water quality? “Water quality” is a term used to express the suitability of water to sustain various uses, such as agricultural, domestic, recreational, and industrial, or aquatic ecosystem processes. A particular use or process will have certain requirements for the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of water; for example limits on the concentrations of toxic substances for drinking water use, or restrictions on temperature and pH ranges for water supporting invertebrate communities. Consequently, water quality can be defined by a range of variables which limit water use by comparing the physical and chemical characteristics of a water sample with water quality guidelines or standards. Although many uses have some common requirements for certain variables, each use will have its own demands and influences on water quality. Water quality is neither a static condition of a system, nor can it be defined by the measurement of only one parameter. Rather, it is variable in both time and space and requires routine monitoring to detect spatial patterns and changes over time. The composition of surface and groundwater is dependent on natural factors (geological, topographical, meteorological, hydrological, and biological) in the drainage basin and varies with seasonal differences in runoff volumes, weather conditions, and water levels. Large natural variations in water quality may, therefore, be observed even where only a single water resource is involved. Human intervention also has significant effects on water quality. Some of these effects are the result of hydrological changes, such as the building of dams, draining of wetlands, and diversion of flow. -
Terrestrial Biodiversity Compliance Statement
Terrestrial Biodiversity Compliance Statement Erven 46 and 47, Azalea, Clifton, Western Cape, South Africa PREPARED FOR: CHAND Environmental Consultants DATED: 21 July 2020 PREPARED BY: NCC Environmental Services M · 021 702 2884 E · [email protected] T · +27 21 702 2884 26 Bell Close, Westlake Business Park F · +27 86 555 0693 Westlake 7945, Cape Town NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd | Reg No: 2007/023691/07 | VAT No. 4450208915 REAL GROWTH FOR PEOPLE, PLANET AND BUSINESS www.ncc-group.co.za DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION BY THE SPECIALIST I, Sean Altern, as the appointed Specialist hereby declare/affirm the correctness of the information provided or to be provided as part of the application, and that I: • In terms of the general requirement to be independent: other than fair remuneration for work performed in terms of this application, have no business, financial, personal or other interest in the development proposal or application and that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity; or am not independent, but another specialist (the ‘Review Specialist’) that meets the general requirements set out in Regulation 13 has been appointed to review my work (Note: a declaration by the review specialist must be submitted); • in terms of the remainder of the general requirements for a specialist, have throughout this EIA process OPS_004_v002 met all of the requirements; • have disclosed to the applicant, the EAP, the Review EAP (if applicable), the Department and I&APs all material information that has or may have the potential to influence the decision of the Department or the objectivity of any report, plan or document prepared or to be prepared as part of the application; and • am aware that a false declaration is an offence in terms of Regulation 48 of the EIA Regulations, 2014 (as amended). -
AC097 FA Cape Town City Map.Indd
MAMRE 0 1 2 3 4 5 10 km PELLA ATLANTIS WITSAND R27 PHILADELPHIA R302 R304 KOEBERG R304 I CAME FOR DUYNEFONTEIN MAP R45 BEAUTIFULR312 M19 N7 MELKBOSSTRAND R44 LANDSCAPES,PAARL M14 R304 R302 R27 M58 AND I FOUND Blaauwberg BEAUTIFULN1 PEOPLE Big Bay BLOUBERGSTRAND M48 B6 ROBBEN ISLAND PARKLANDS R302 KLAPMUTS TABLE VIEW M13 JOOSTENBERG KILLARNEY DURBANVILLE VLAKTE City Centre GARDENS KRAAIFONTEIN N1 R44 Atlantic Seaboard Northern Suburbs SONSTRAAL M5 N7 Table Bay Sunset Beach R304 Peninsula R27 BOTHASIG KENRIDGE R101 M14 PLATTEKLOOF M15 Southern Suburbs M25 EDGEMEAD TYGER VALLEY MILNERTON SCOTTSDENE M16 M23 Cape Flats M8 BRACKENFELL Milnerton Lagoon N1 Mouille Point Granger Bay M5 Helderberg GREEN POINT ACACIA M25 BELLVILLE B6 WATERFRONT PARK GOODWOOD R304 Three Anchor Bay N1 R102 CAPE TOWN M7 PAROW M23 Northern Suburbs STADIUM PAARDEN KAYAMANDI SEA POINT EILAND R102 M12 MAITLAND RAVENSMEAD Blaauwberg Bantry Bay SALT RIVER M16 M16 ELSIESRIVIER CLIFTON OBSERVATORY M17 EPPING M10 City Centre KUILS RIVER STELLENBOSCH Clifton Bay LANGA INDUSTRIA M52 Cape Town Tourism RHODES R102 CAMPS BAY MEMORIAL BONTEHEUWEL MODDERDAM Visitor Information Centres MOWBRAY N2 R300 M62 B6 CABLE WAY ATHLONE BISHOP LAVIS M12 M12 M3 STADIUM CAPE TOWN TABLE MOUNTAIN M5 M22 INTERNATIONAL Police Station TABLE RONDEBOSCH ATHLONE AIRPORT BAKOVEN MOUNTAIN NATIONAL BELGRAVIA Koeël Bay PARK B6 NEWLANDS RYLANDS Hospital M4 CLAREMONT GUGULETU DELFT KIRSTENBOSCH M54 R310 Atlantic Seaboard BLUE DOWNS JAMESTOWN B6 Cape Town’s Big 6 M24 HANOVER NYANGA Oude Kraal KENILWORTH PARK -
Stellenbosch Landfill Closure SIA 3 November
SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (DRAFT REPORT) PROPOSED DECOMISSIONING AND REHABILITATION OF THE STELLENBOSCH LANDFILL SITE, STELLENBOSCH, WESTERN CAPE OCTOBER 2014 Prepared for AURECON SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD Prepared by Tony Barbour and Schalk van der Merwe Tony Barbour ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT AND RESEARCHER 4 Oakdale Road, Newlands, 7700, South Africa (Tel) 27-21-683 7085 - (Fax) 27-21-683 7085 - (Cell) 082 600 8266 (E-Mail) [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Aurecon South Africa (Pty) Ltd (“Aurecon”) was appointed by the Stellenbosch Municipality as the lead consultant to manage the integrated Basic Assessment (BA) and Waste Management License (WML) application process for the proposed closure and rehabilitation of the Stellenbosch Municipal Landfill Site. The site is located on the western outskirts of the town of Stellenbosch in the Cape Winelands region of the Western Cape. Tony Barbour Environmental Consulting was appointed by Aurecon to undertake a specialist Social Impact Assessment (SIA) as part of the application process. This report contains the findings of the SIA undertaken as part of the integrated BA and WML process. The key focus of the BA is to identify the most acceptable post closure land use for the Stellenbosch Landfill Site. The focus of the SIA is therefore on commenting on the three alternative end uses, namely: • Alternative 1: Open Space green landscaping and community up-liftment project; • Alternative 2: Methane gas extraction of landfill gas for commercial beneficial use; • Alternative 3: No Development Option. However, it should be noted that the no- go alternative does not meet the legal minimum requirements for closure. Alternative 1 and 2 are not mutually exclusive. -
National Liquor Authority Register
National Liquor Register Q1 2021 2022 Registration/Refer Registered Person Trading Name Activities Registered Person's Principal Place Of Business Province Date of Registration Transfer & (or) Date of ence Number Permitted Relocations or Cancellation alterations Ref 10 Aphamo (PTY) LTD Aphamo liquor distributor D 00 Mabopane X ,Pretoria GP 2016-09-05 N/A N/A Ref 12 Michael Material Mabasa Material Investments [Pty] Limited D 729 Matumi Street, Montana Tuine Ext 9, Gauteng GP 2016-07-04 N/A N/A Ref 14 Megaphase Trading 256 Megaphase Trading 256 D Erf 142 Parkmore, Johannesburg, GP 2016-07-04 N/A N/A Ref 22 Emosoul (Pty) Ltd Emosoul D Erf 842, 845 Johnnic Boulevard, Halfway House GP 2016-10-07 N/A N/A Ref 24 Fanas Group Msavu Liquor Distribution D 12, Mthuli, Mthuli, Durban KZN 2018-03-01 N/A 2020-10-04 Ref 29 Golden Pond Trading 476 (Pty) Ltd Golden Pond Trading 476 (Pty) Ltd D Erf 19, Vintonia, Nelspruit MP 2017-01-23 N/A N/A Ref 33 Matisa Trading (Pty) Ltd Matisa Trading (Pty) Ltd D 117 Foresthill, Burgersfort LMP 2016-09-05 N/A N/A Ref 34 Media Active cc Media Active cc D Erf 422, 195 Flamming Rock, Northriding GP 2016-09-05 N/A N/A Ref 52 Ocean Traders International Africa Ocean Traders D Erf 3, 10608, Durban KZN 2016-10-28 N/A N/A Ref 69 Patrick Tshabalala D Bos Joint (PTY) LTD D Erf 7909, 10 Comorant Road, Ivory Park GP 2016-07-04 N/A N/A Ref 75 Thela Management PTY LTD Thela Management PTY LTD D 538, Glen Austin, Midrand, Johannesburg GP 2016-04-06 N/A 2020-09-04 Ref 78 Kp2m Enterprise (Pty) Ltd Kp2m Enterprise D Erf 3, Cordell -
Breede Catchment Water Stewardship Programme Author: Klaudia Schachtschneider WWF-SA Water Stewardship Programme [email protected]
SUMMARY REPORT BREEDE CATCHMENT WATER STEWARDSHIP PROGRAMME Author: Klaudia Schachtschneider WWF-SA Water Stewardship Programme [email protected] Contributors: Mark Dent – Alliance for Water Stewardship Nelisiwe Vundla – WWF South Africa Partners: M&S (Marks & Spencer) Woolworths Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) Breede-Gouritz Catchment Management Agency (BGCMA) Alliance for Water Stewardship Collaborators: Emerging Leaders Duzi Umgeni Conservation Trust (DUCT) DHI Danish Embassy GroundTruth Design and layout: Nita Nagar Text-editing: Marlene Rose Front cover photo: Woolworths Published in May 2016 by WWF – World Wide Fund For Nature – South Africa (Formerly World Wildlife Fund), Cape Town, South Africa. Any reproduction in full or in part must mention the title and credit the above- mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. Citation: Schachtschneider, K. 2016. Breede Catchment Water Stewardship Programme – Summary report. WWF Report available at www.wwf.org.za/freshwater. © Text 2016 WWF All rights reserved WWF is one of the world’s largest and most experienced independent conservation organisations, with over 6 million supporters and a global network active in more than 100 countries. WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by conserving the world’s biological diversity, ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable, and promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. -
Thesis Ebe 2019 Ma Kiese Ste
Development of a Geographical Information System Based Transport Assessment Approach in Rural South Africa The Case of Healthcare Accessibility in Cape Winelands District Municipality Town Cape of University Dissertation presented in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Masters in Science, Civil Engineering Special field: Transport Studies, In the Department of Civil Engineering, EBE Faculty, University of Cape Town October 2019 By: Stephane Simon Masamba Ma-Kiese The copyright of this thesis vests inTown the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes Capeonly. of Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University Dedication This thesis is dedicated to the memory of my grandfather, Simon Masamba Makela. “Il est grand celui qui respecte le petit.” Development of a Geographical Information System Based Transport Assessment Approach in Rural South Africa The Case of Healthcare Accessibility in Cape Winelands District Municipality Dissertation presented in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Masters in Science, Civil Engineering Special field: Transport Studies Department of Civil Engineering, EBE Faculty, University of Cape Town Private Bag X3, Rondebosch, 7701 October 2019 By: Stephane Simon Masamba Ma-Kiese Declaration of Free License I Stephane Simon Masamba Ma-Kiese hereby: (a) grant the University free license to reproduce the above thesis in whole or in part, for the purpose of research; (b) declare that: (i) The research reported in this thesis, except otherwise indicated, is my original research. -
HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT of the PROPOSED ESKOM CERES to WITZENBERG 132Kv OVERHEAD POWERLINE
HWC CASE: 20111710SB1118E HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED ESKOM CERES TO WITZENBERG 132kV OVERHEAD POWERLINE HWC CASE: 20111710SB1118E DEFF CASE: not allocated yet (Assessment conducted under Section 38 (8) of the National Heritage Resources Act (No. 25 of 1999) as part of a NEMA Basic Assessment process) Prepared for SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd On behalf of Eskom Holdings SOC Limited February 2021 Prepared by David Halkett ACO Associates cc Physical: Unit D17, Prime Park, 21 Mocke Rd, Diep River Postal: 8 Jacobs Ladder St James, 7945 [email protected] Tel: 021 7064104 Cell: 0731418606 Fax to e-mail: 086 603 7195 INTEGRATED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (HWC CASE: 20111710SB1118E) The Integrated Executive Summary conforms to the specific requirements of Heritage Western Cape. SITE NAME: Proposed Eskom Ceres to Witzenberg 132kv Overhead Powerline LOCATION: Logical centrepoint: S33.294864° E19.296151° The regional location of the site is off R303 near the towns of Ceres and Prince Alfred Hamlet in the Witzenberg Municipality. Figure: Location of the project in regional context (Powerline - Red line) Table: Proposed powerline crosses the following parcels of land REGISTERED OWNER AND NO ADDRESS CONTACT PERSON PROPERTY Hennie Taljaard (Town Planner) WITZENBERG MUNICIPALITY Po Box 44 [email protected] Erf 1002 Ceres Erf 5137 6835 Raymond Haywood (Supervisor) 1 Erf 1 (PA Hamlet) Anita Grobelaar (Secretary) Farm 2/323 Voortrek Street 53 Farm 1/316 Ceres Johan Swanepoel (Manager) Farm 3/316 (Witzenberg s/s -
Heritage Scoping Study for the Proposed
HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE R44 ROAD BETWEEN SOMERSET WEST AND STELLENBOSCH, WESTERN CAPE (Assessment conducted under Section 38 (8) of the National Heritage Resources Act (No. 25 of 1999) as part of an EIA) Prepared for CCA Environmental (Pty) Ltd PO Box 10145, Caledon Square, 7905 Phone: (021) 461 1118 Fax: (021) 461 1120 Email: [email protected] 1st draft: 14 November 2013 Final report: 26 February 2014 Prepared by Jayson Orton ACO Associates cc 8 Jacob’s Ladder St James 7945 Phone (021) 706 4104 Fax (086) 603 7195 Email: [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ACO Associates cc was appointed by CCA Environmental to assess the potential impacts to heritage resources that might occur through the proposed improvements to the R44 road between Somerset West and Stellenbosch. The section of road of concern stretches between Steynsrust Road (Km 20.15) in the south and Van Rheede Street (Km 33.00) in the north. This represents a length of 12.85 km. Besides minor interventions along the route, the principal alternatives of heritage concern involve the Winery and Annandale Road intersections. Grade-separated roundabouts (preferred alternative), at-grade roundabouts and signalised intersections are being considered at each. The preferred alternative may be constructed either with fill slopes or retaining walls, the latter of which would reduce the footprints. In addition to the terms of reference provided for the study, Heritage Western Cape requested that the HIA include archaeological and visual specialist studies and mapping of all heritage resources located in and around the affected areas. -
Meeting of Heritage Western Cape's Impact Assessment Committee (Iacom) Date: Wednesday, 14 April 2021 Time: 09:00
MEETING OF HERITAGE WESTERN CAPE'S IMPACT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE (IACOM) DATE: WEDNESDAY, 14 APRIL 2021 TIME: 09:00 The meeting will be held online via Microsoft Teams (https://teams.microsoft.com/downloads) To be a participant in the meeting, kindly email the agenda item number and the contact details (email address and cellphone number) of the attendee to [email protected] no later than 24hrs ahead of the scheduled meeting. In order to be updated with agenda proceedings, please use the following QR code or link to access the HWC Whatsapp group on the day: Follow this link to join the WhatsApp group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/IJzuikP4jtt4fmPW7fA5X6 It is your responsibility to join the respective group to be kept up to date on the meeting proceedings – HWC officials will not be contacting individuals in order to advise them when to join. AGENDA Agenda Case number Item Reference No Documents to be tabled Matter Heritage Officer No. 1 Opening 2 Attendance 3 Apologies 4 Approval of Agenda 4.1 Dated: 14 April 2021 5 Approval of the minutes of the previous meeting 5.1 Minutes dated: 10 March 2021 6 Disclosure of conflict of interest 7 Confidential Matters 8 Appointments 8.1 None 9 Administrative Matters 9.1 Outcome of the Appeals and Tribunal Committees Penelope Meyer 9.2 Committee starting times Cathy-Ann 9.3 Draft Heritage Protocol Potgieter 10 Standing Items 10.1 Site Inspections Conducted 10.2 Report back from Council, and any other Committees 10.3 Discussion of the agenda 10.4 Potential Site Visits 10.5 HWC and DEADP Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Waseefa Dhansay MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED / Penelope Meyer 11 Section 38(2): Response to Notification of Intent to develop Agenda Case number Item Reference No Documents to be tabled Matter Heritage Officer No.