Catches, Fishing Efforts, Catches Per Fishing Effort, and Fishing Locations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CATCHES, FISHING F1FOHIS, CATCHES PER FISHING mar, AND FISHING LOCATIONS FOR THE GULF OF SUEZ AND EGYPTIAN RED SEA COAST PURSE SEINE FISHERY DURING 1979 to 1982 UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS RAB/81/a:J2,/12 CATCHES, FISHING EF.FDRI'S, CATCHES PER FISHING EFFDRT, AND FISHING I.CCATIONS FDR THE GULF OF SUEZ AND EGYPI'IAN RED SEA COASI' PURSE SEINE FISHERY DURING 1979 to 1982 By Michael J. Sanders &: Salah M~. Kedidi Snr. Fishery Biologist Fishery Biologist (in collaboration with) Mohamed R. Hegazy Counterpart Fishery Biologist FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZArION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Project for Development of Fisheries in Areas of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden March 1984 j_ ABS'lRACT This report presents a collation of dm:a describing the rn:mthly catch weights by importam: species groups, the associated fishing efforts ~md catch weights per unit effort, and the fishing locations, for a period of three years fron~ 1979 to 1982. Data collection involved catch enumeration at the landing sites by employees of the Departrr~mt of Agriculture, and the interviewing of skippers for details of fishing efforts and fishing locations by Project personnel and counterparts. ii ACKNOWLEIX1EMENT Tue assistance of the following persons is gratefully acknowledged Mr. N~auib Amin Rash\van (Biologist Assistant) Mr. Mohamed Abdu Abdulralmlfill (Biologist Assistant) Miss Magda Awadallah (Assistant Econornist) Mr. Mahnx:ud Hassan Abdullah (Biologist Assistant) Mr. Mohamed Abdelkerim (Biologist Assistant) Wir. Shawld Khamis (Biologist Assistant) In addition to the 1 enun1erators' and other staff nBrnbers of the Suez and Hurghada branches of the DepartID2nt of Agriculture. iii CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 ') "-'• DRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY 1 3. STUDY METHODS 2 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3 Catches 3 Fishing Efforts 4 Catches per Fishing Effort 6 Fishing Locations 7 5. CONCLlJ"DING CO.MMENTS 8 6. REFERENCES Al\JD BIBLIOJP.APHY 9 7. TABLES 10 8. FIGUP..ES 44 1. INTTIODUCTION As one of the activities of the UNDP/FAO 'Project for the Developn:ent of Fisheries in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden' HAB/81/002 (previously HAB/77/008), a biological study of the Gulf of Suez and Egyptian Red Sea fisheries was corrmenced during late 1979. The study emphasis was directed towards the collection and analysis of data relevent to assessing the state of the stocks, and providing an irnproved basis upon v.hich to for- 1111late management advice. The data collection phase of the study was con tinued into 1982, at v.hich stage three years data were in hand. This report is intended to be one of a series providing a collation of these data for each of the main fisheries types studied. It specifically deals with the purse seine fishery, which is operated principally on grounds within the Gulf of Suez; but also on grounds adjacent to the entrance of the Gulf, and in Egyptian and Sudanese waters adjacent to Foul Bay. Included in the report, is a description of the IT.Dnthly catches landed during each season by in1portant species, the associated fishing efforts, catches per unit effort, and fishing locations. Data interpretation has been limited to general corrr:Bnts only, with the intention that the rrore detailed interpretation would be provided in subsequent reports dealing with stock assessn:ents and managenent. 2. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY Sane 84 vessels are engaged in the fishery; eleven of v.hich are required to be exclusively operated outside the Gulf of Suez. 'The t\ro landing sites are Atal{a, v.hich is adjacent to Suez, and Sakkala within the township of Hurghada. The vessels based at Atalrn are operated within and outside the Gulf, while the vessels based at Sakkala are operated outside the Gulf. 'The fishery is seasonal, particularly that part within the Gulf of Suez, and generally canr.ences in October or NovenJber and concludes at the end of 1lay. All fishing ceases during an approximately ten-day period each rronth, when the IT.Don is full. 'Il1is is a consequence of the fishing rrethod in \vhich the purse seines are set at night around lighted dinghies. Each such dinghy is equipped with about nine kerosene larr;ps each of about 100 watt candle povvBr. This illumination acts to concentrate the fish prior to setting the net. At the beginning of each season, in respect to the Gulf of Suez fishery, nnst fishing is undertalrnn relatively close to the landing site of Atalrn, and involves fishing trips of twJ to five d:.1.ys duration. Later in the season, trips of longer duration are n:ore conmon. When operating in Foul Bay, a single trip may take as long as twenty days, including SL'<: days travelling to and fran the fishing ground • Trips to Foul Bay may involve a vessel being used for trawling and other nethods, as vvBll as for purse seining. 2 The length of the vessels used range from 12.5 metre to 30 nietre. They are powered by engines of between 100 HP to 400 HP. 'lne nets, v.b.ich are generally 200 to 300 metre in length and 50 to 80 metre in depth, are hauled manually. As a consequence the crew nurrbers are generally high, usually some 25 to 30 persons. Typically two or three shots are undertaken from each vessel during each night of fishing; one shot around each independently placed 'lighted' dinghy. A nDre detailed general description of the fishery is given in Awadallah (1982), v.b.ich also contains a detailed account of the incomes and costs associated with purse seining during 1980-81. 3 • S'IlJDY METHODS The data presented in this report derives fran two seperate activities. The first of these, the collection of catch statistics, ~as in operation prior to the conmencement of the study; and involves enunierators employed by tte Suez and Hurghada branches of the Department of Agriculture. In respect of each fishing day they record the number of boxes of fish loaded in each species group category, for each vessel. (These numbers of boxes were subsequently converted to catch weights, on the basis of 25 kg/box). Independent records on vessel .!nnvements' kept by the Coastguard were also used, when required, to determine v,hether the fishing had been undertaken within the Gulf of Suez, adjacent to the Gulf, or within or near Foul Bay. The second activity involved the study personnel interviewing a sample of skippers at the landing sites to determine fishing locations and fishing efforts. Interviews were conducted on several days each week. The numbers of samples taken during each nnnth is shown in Table 1 ;¥- The skippers chosen were from those landing catches on the day of interview, and the information collected was that relevent to the nnst recent fishing trip. The locations were provided with reference to place nanies, and aided by the availability of diagrams copied from Admiralty Charts. The inforrnation sought concerning fishing efforts were the number of fishing days, niean number of shots per fishing day,niean nunber of hours from th2 cormiencement of illumination to the tline of the first shot, mean number of lighted lamps used each fishing day, length of net and depth of net. 'Ihe associated information collected ~Bre the names of the skipper and vessel, the nurrber of crew, the nan-ie of the port of landing, and the date. The nwriber of boxes for each species group comprising the particular landings, were subsequently obtained from the previously mentioned catch statistics. Estimates of the total efforts expended during each nnnth \Vere detennined from these sample data. The estin:ation procedure firstly involved determining the fleet effort on each interview day. 'Ihis was estimated as the proc..1uct of the effort associated with the interview landing and the raising factor catch landed by fleet on interview day/catch landed from interview vessel(s) * The intensity of samples, as percentages of the estimated nurnbers of fishing trips were 3% for th Gulf of Suez, 33% for Foul Bay a..11d adjacent waters, and 2('f'h for adjacent to the Gulf of Suez. 3 1 on the same day • After surrming the fleet effort for all the interview days, the fleet effort for the rronth was determined as the product of this and the raising factor 'catch landed by fleet during ITDnth/catch landed by fleet on interview days'. Efforts in units of numbers of fishing days, shots, illumination hours, and landings were determined in this way for each ITDnth, and then Sl.lIIm2d to obtain the annual totals. These values were in turn used for estimating the rrean number of shots per fishing day, the rrean number of illumination hours per fishing day and the mean number of fishing days per landing. The other effort associated statistics such as the mean length of vessels, rrean main engine horse pov.er, rrean length of net , mean depth of net, mean number of lighted lamps used per fishing day, and the rrean number of crew per trip were determined for each month as the simple mean of data resulting directly fran the interviews. The annual means w::re estimated from the rronthly means after 'weighting' each of these by the number of interviews undertaken during the month. The estimation of catches per unit effort involved dividing the monthly and annual landings for each species group by the associated estimated efforts. In respect to the small number of vessels engaged in other types of fishing activity, such as trawling or lining, that part of the landings reslllting fran these other rrethods and the associated fishing efforts, have been excluded when making the above rrentioned calculations.