View metadata,citationandsimilarpapersatcore.ac.uk ½6 : ¼ ¬ arXiv:astro-ph/0010112³ v2 10 Apr 2001 Å ¼ eov eea uze.Teeise n h osrit im- See constraints 2000). the (1998, Farrar and would by reviewed issues gluino are experiment These light by a posed of puzzles. several existence the resolve very because deserves question scrutiny The serious QCD. b in mainly non- phenomena for perturbative – predictions first-principles possibility firm, making a of difficult remains the gluino it, light excluding very to devoted a been has effort considerable Although nainemyo a o ra.I tde o,tegluino the not, (which does vevs Higgs it the If break to sensitive do loops from break. only not arises mass may or may invariance asesgun ( gluino massless a particle, DM required examination. the merits produce therefore and the to of extension needed minimal the model is standard this very sense, some a In with standard theories gluino. physics-beyond-the in light naturally of arise particles feature such and hadron welcome model, neutral a stable light be a would energies, low at physics hadronic hrfr ti noe ihacrepnigcia symmetry chiral corresponding a with called endowed is it therefore eto oms ratio, mass by to are cross-section than required kpc the DM self-interacting 10-100 Since DM. order with interacting weakly theory conventional, of a scales by on described prop- (DM) better observed matter the dark that of (2000) erties Steinhardt & Spergel of vation perneo an of appearance reviews). for 1997 Glen- al. e.g., et (see, Prakash phase 1996, denning quark me- deconfined hyperons, a and are condensates candidates freedom son principle of The degrees hadronic nucleons. of beyond appearance possible the is ties ( densi- de- ex densities high history laboratories at very cosmological physics sense, thermal of at this in matter and are, of stars rate Neutrons nature ties. spin microscopic the neutron radius, on of mass, particle pend properties as macroscopic and The such nuclear stars, other. and the hand on one physics on astrophysics between 3 2 1 rpittpstuigL using typeset Preprint NYU-TH-00/09/05  aa Ins Racah [email protected] [email protected]. 10003, 61801–3080, NY NY, University, IL York Urbana, New Street, Physics, Green of West Department 1110 Urbana–Champaign, at Illinois of University Physics, of Department 8 : uesmercvrino h tnadmdlcontains model standard the of version supersymmetric A nti okw iht luiaeaohrpsiiiy the possibility, another illuminate to wish we work this In h neir fnurnsasofrauiu etn point meeting unique a offer stars neutron of interiors The ½

Ê 7 ½ : ivrac.We uesmer sboe,the broken, is supersymmetry When -invariance. Ê iueo hsc,TeHbe nvriy Jerusalem University, Hebrew The Physics, of titute ihhprnfrainsriga nitreit tg.W aclt qiiru opstosadeuto of equation the and with compositions matter equilibrium density calculate We high stage. for intermediate state an as serving formation hyperon with akmte.I hsseai,tesmls xlnto o h bevdratio observed the for explanation simplest the scenario, this In matter. dark ujc headings: Subject tr ihthe with stars ½  ivrac)adi aual forder of naturally is and -invariance) fm falgtgun xss h ihetgun-otiigbro,the baryon, gluino-containing lightest the exists, gluino light a If ¿ X MeVc

A =Ñ T .Oeapc fmte tsprula densi- supernuclear at matter of aspect One ). E Ê ¾ tl mltajv 14/09/00 v. emulateapj style X ~ g

bro.W r oiae yteobser- the by motivated are We -baryon. XX ,tesi-/ ueprnro h gluon; the of superpartner spin-1/2 the ), 1.  ¼ n h rsneo the of presence the and , hsi o tpeetecue ypril hsc.Sc an Such physics. particle by excluded present at not is this ; Ë INTRODUCTION ETO TR IHASAL,LGTSPRYMTI BARYON SUPERSYMMETRIC LIGHT STABLE, A WITH STARS NEUTRON edn h ula auaindensity saturation nuclear the ceeding r ossetwt bevtos npriua,temxmmms fannoaigsa is star nonrotating a of mass maximum the particular, In observations. with consistent are akmte–es atreeetr atce–qaino tt–tr:neutron state–stars: of particles–equation matter–elementary matter–dense dark S /e,i hrceitcof characteristic is b/GeV, HMUEL B ALBERG ¼ ¼ Ë Ë ½¼¼ n n htfrawd ag fprmtr h rpriso neutron of properties the parameters of range wide a for that find and , shlfli eocln bevdcoigrtswt yeo formation. hyperon with rates cooling observed reconciling in helpful is 10,Ire,[email protected] Israel, 91904, MeVc ½¼ cueof ecause 1 ,G

¼ 6 Ë ¾ LENNYS ¼ NYU-TH-00/09/05

 ABSTRACT Ë Ê B - . ! ª = ~ g 1 Ô ¼ .F R. =¼ Ë É esta GeV 2 than less Bu 1984; (Farrar baryons atri esmsie osrainof Conservation massive. less is latter yefieitrcinuiu othe to unique interaction hyperfine hsnwbro a omi eto tr,adi o ol it would so, if properties? and star stars, neutron neutron in unacceptable form whether imply can is baryon constraint new astrophysical this possible observational One seek must constraints. we and grounds, theoretical on missed hnmn.Tepsiiiyfsc light a such possibilityof inad- The QCD non-perturbative the phenomena. in of of strong models examples phenomenological very innumerable of is are equacy force there hyperfine and color channel, the shocking! that this quite known is nucleon is a it than But lighter baryon new a posit To nti su,se .. lnenn 95 ee Weigel & Weber 1985, works Glendenning many e.g., by predicted see, stars is neutron issue, (as of this appear interiors on to in hyperons conditions for the allow if that so pressed, rtnms,sadr reeu siae edt est ratio density a to lead estimates freezeout standard mass, proton ulosvapoesssc as such processes via nucleons ae h aso the of mass the makes ubruiyadasrneescharge strangeness a and unity number etprocess rent tnadmdldet h I ehns.Thus, mechanism. GIM the to due model standard rlcret ( currents tral nt fsrnees( strangeness of units evto of servation fidvda ulosinto nucleons individual of Ùd× aei fodrteivreHbl ie(arre l 2000). al. et (Farrar time ¦ Hubble its as inverse that such the processes indicate order However estimates of crude is suppressed; rate GIM doubly is Ê ª Wandelt suitable in a also for Hence see 2000). 2000; al. Steinhardt et & Spergel (Farrar, MeV loFra aaaz 20)adrfrne therein. references and (2000) Gabadadze & Farrar also ~ gg ARRAR ½¼ ¼ hdosaepoue npis obdigdrc conversion direct forbidding pairs, in produced are -hadrons ¡ uloscno ovr ietyit the into directly convert cannot Nucleons ntevr al nvrethe universe early very the In h ihetsprymti “ supersymmetric lightest The ; Ë on tt ( state bound

¼ ½ Ë 6 ¼ ¦ on tt,the state, bound Ë 2  ! = AND

sapsil addt o self-interacting for candidate possible a is , b Ë ¾ Ê ª ÒÒ ¡ ¾ =

T cagdcurrent, (charged

¼ SVI c ¼ aiy(arr1996). (Farrar parity ¼ Ë dÑ = Ë Ê srqie fthe if required as , ª ¼ Ã P Ë hc ol aei tbetruhcon- through stable it make would which , stars, neutron in present be could Ë ¼ IRAN ¼ ¡ Ë rgublio n h pn0baryon spin-0 the and glueballino) or ¼ Ë ½ Ë ! eurssmlaeu raino two of creation simultaneous requires

° cla&Fra 95,adprobably and 1985), Farrar & ccella 3 .The ¼ uhls hnta falother all of that than less much Ë = Æ ££ ¼ ¼ Ë atce.Tewa eta cur- neutral weak The particles. ¼ ~ g Ê ¼ Ë Ë ¡ neu- Strangeness-changing ). Ë r ihysprse nthe in suppressed highly are ) Ê Ùd× ean neulbimwith equilibrium in remains stu oo ihbaryon with boson a thus is ¼ hdos r h spin-1/2 the are -hadrons” as lgtyls hnthe than less slightly mass, Ë

=¼ ½ sthat is st etedr matter. dark the be to is Ê ¼  naflvrsnltstate singlet flavor a in

provided byCERNDocumentServer Ë ¼ Ë ( ¼ Ë ¼ ¡ r o I sup- GIM not are ) aiyrqie that requires parity Ë h togcolor strong The . Ë ¼ ,downto hudntb dis- be not should brought toyouby Ñ Ë ! ,evenifthe ¿5 ÒÒ edu )andeven  Ì CORE Ê - 9¼¼

2 ¼

1989, Knorren, Prakash & Ellis 1995, Schaffner & Mishustin 3. COMPOSITION OF NEUTRON STAR MATTER WITH THE Ë 1996, Balberg & Gal 1997, Huber et al. 1998, Baldo, Burgio The composition of neutron star matter is determined & Schulze 2000), these hyperons could serve as a doorway for

by chemical equilibrium for all weak-interaction processes. ¼

Ë formation, which might affect observable properties of neu-

B ! B ` B B

¾ ` ½ ¾ Specifically, these are ½ ,where and are

tron stars.

` 

baryons, is a lepton and ` is its corresponding neutrino (or ¼ Our goal in this letter is to explore whether a light Ë can antineutrino). Neutron star matter is well approximated as cold

form in neutron stars and assess whether the resulting global

Ì =¼  =¼

( ) and neutrino free (  ) so that all equilibrium properties of these stars are compatible with observations. In conditions are summarized concisely in the form:

Ü 2 we extend an equation of state for high density matter with

¼

Ë

 ; =  Õ

hyperons to include the . The equilibrium composition with 

e Ò B

B (2)

i i

¼ Ü

the Ë is found in 3, followed by a discussion of the corre-

 B i

where B is the chemical potential of the baryon species , i

sponding properties of neutron stars in Ü 4.

  e

Ò and are the neutron and electron chemical potentials, re-

¼

Ë B

2. INTERACTIONS IN HIGH DENSITY MATTER Õ i

spectively, and B is the electric charge of the baryon .The

i

 ¼

equilibrium composition at any baryon number density, B ,is

In order to include Ë particles in an equation of state of high

¦ Ü =½ B then determined by two additional conditions: i and

density matter, we must specify their interactions with other i

¦ Ü Ü Õ ·¦Ü Õ =¼

i B B B ` `

charge neutrality, i ,where and

i i

baryons and among themselves. Here we do so in the frame- i Ü work of an effective equation of state (Balberg & Gal 1997, ` denote the fraction per baryon for each baryon and lepton

Balberg, Lichtenstadt & Cook 1999), where the potential felt species, respectively. ¼

Equation (2) does not fully apply to the case of the Ë ,since

by a single, isospin singlet particle of species Ü placed in mat-

¼ ¼

! Ë Ë

the process ÒÒ is suppressed, even if energetically fa-

Ý 

ter composed of species at a baryon number density Ý is ¼

vorable. The Ë must maintain a direct equilibrium only with

­ 

Î ´ µ= a  · c  · Û :

Ý ÜÝ Ý ÜÝ

Ü (1)

Ý Ý

¾ ¼ =¾ ¼ ¾ ¼ =  · 

Ô

Ë Y Ë

hyperons, i.e., ,and Y ,but

¼

a

¼

=¾  Y Y In equation (1) is negative and represents a long range, attrac- ¾ Ò

Ë is not required (where and denote a neutral

tive component in the interaction, c is positive, corresponding to and a negatively charged hyperon, respectively). The signifi-

¼ Û

an intermediate range repulsive component, and is also pos- cance of this distinction is that a combination of Ë and nucle-

itive, representing a universal repulsive short range interaction, ¼

 < Ò

ons may coexist even while Ë , as long as no hyperons

presumably arising from the quark structure of the baryons. The are present. On the other hand, a finite hyperon fraction will

­ 

¼ =  powers and must be greater than unity, so that repulsion  Ò

indirectly impose that Ë , so then equation (2) applies

dominates at high densities. to all species.

¼

  For nucleons and hyperons, the values of the coefficients can  Ò

We emphasize that even if Ë , nuclear matter can- ¼

be constrained by experimental data. Since no such data exists not “burn” exothermally into Ë matter. Unlike the case of ¼ for the Ë , we resort to phenomenological arguments to esti- “strange-quark-stars” (Witten 1984; Alcock, Farhi & Olinto mate the magnitude of these terms. The attractive component 1986), where a deconfining front converts an entire neutron star is generally associated with two-pion or two-kaon exchanges. into the (hypothetically) lower energy strange quark matter if This interaction is strong because the intermediate state in the a seed of of strange quark matter is somehow formed (Olinto

×-channel can be the same as the initial state, hence the ampli- 1987), there exists no equivalent stimulant to initiate conver- tude has a small energy denominator. However the flavor sin- ¼

sion of nuclear-matter into Ë -matter, regardless of density or

¼

 Ã glet Ë cannot exchange or without becoming a much more composition. massive flavor octet Ê-baryon (Buccella & Farrar 1985). Thus In Fig. 1a we show for reference the equilibriumcomposition

the long-range attractive interaction is strongly suppressed for of neutron star matter as a function of baryon density, using ¼

the Ë . A more empirical way to arrive at the same conclusion the “standard” equilibrium composition of matter with nucle- ¼

is to note that if there were a significant long-range attractive ons and hyperons but no Ë (hereafter, NH matter) based on ¼ force the Ë would bind to nuclei (and to itself), and nuclei EoS 1 of Balberg et al. (1999), assuming that the equation of

with exotic mass values have not been observed. We there-

½¼

state is valid up to densities as large as ¼ . The results, with

fore assume that the attractive component is negligible for the

¾

hyperon formation beginning at about ¼ , are typical of mat-

¼

Ë related interactions. The intermediate repulsive component ter with hyperons (Glendenning 1985; Weber & Weigel 1989;

may be associated with the exchange of vector mesons, such as Knorren et al. 1995; Schaffner & Mishustin 1996; Balberg & 

the  and . Only the flavor-singlet component of these vector- Gal 1997; Huber at al. 1998; Baldo et al. 2000).

¼ ¼ mesons can couple to the Ë , so we roughly assume that the Figure 1b depicts the equilibriumcomposition when the Ë is

magnitude of this term (the value of c in Eq. [1]) is half of its

included according to the assumptions of Ü 2. Due to the

¼ £

value for the . The universal short-range interaction for the low mass of the Ë , its chemical potential is lower than that ¼

Ë is taken as identical to that of the baryons. Here we use EoS of all hyperons, even when the fractions of the latter are in-

4 5

=  =

1 of Balberg et al. (1999), where ­ and , so that for ¿

¿ finitesimally small. As a result, all hyperons that form convert

4

¼ ¼

a =¼ c = ¿¾9:5 Ë

the Ë and MeVfm for all its interactions, to particles, and the matter consists only of nucleons and

5

¼

= ¾¾¿:6 Ë

and Û MeVfm . Below we refer to this choice of pa- . The composition is determined by the nucleons being in

¼ ¾

4

Ë Ñ = 9¼¼

rameters along with an mass of Ë MeVc as our equilibrium with an exactly zero fraction of hyperons .Even ¼

nominal set. Most of our conclusions prove insensitive to these though absent from the matter, the hyperons do play a role in ¼ choices, as will be seen below. determining the amount of Ë particles which are created.

4

 ¼:¼½

In reality, some additional nucleons would convert to hyperons through quantum and thermal (Ì MeV in neutron star cores) fluctuations, ¼ and these hyperons would decay to Ë ’s. The actual equilibrium composition would be one where the chemical potential of the nucleons is slightly below that of zero-fraction hyperons at every density (in other words, fluctuations would deplete a thin outer layer in phase space of nucleons). Assuming that the probability of fluctuations decreases exponentially with the energy gap, the quantitative effect on the results should be small. 3 100 n 36 (a) Λ 10 − N −1 p 10 Ξ Ξ− 0 e Σ ) N+H + −2 −2 Σ 35 10 µ 10 Σ− Λ P (dyne cm (b) n 0 34 −1 p S 10 10 e 14 14 15 15 15 −2 2x10 5x10 1x10 2x10 5x10 10 µ ε (g cm−3) relative fractions

FIG. 2.— Equation of state for matter of the compositions shown in Fig. 1. ¼

Matter with the Ë : nominal values (see text) - thick solid line; nominal inter-

¾ = 975

n Ñ actions and ¼ MeVc - dashed line; nominal mass and increased Λ Ë (c) 0 repulsion - dot-dashed line. Also shown are the equations of state for nucleon S − −1 p Ξ and hyperon matter - N+H, and nuclear matter - N.

10 ¼ where hyperon (and therefore also Ë ) formation is ignored. e Σ0 + The hierarchy of EoSs in Fig. 2 is mostly determined by the 10−2 Σ number of available species in each model. Nuclear matter nat- − µ ¼

Σ urally has the stiffest EoS, followed by matter with the Ë . ¼

Even though the Ë , being a boson, does not exert any Fermi 10−3 pressure, the fact that four species of hyperons are suppressed 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 due to its appearance makes such matter stiffer than NH mat- ρ −3 B (fm ) ter, which is clearly the softest. An exception occurs just above the threshold density for hyperon formation, where NH mat-

FIG. 1.— Equilibrium compositions for high density matter for EoS 1

¦ ¼ ter includes only a single hyperon species (the ), so that the

of ref. [1]: (a) matter with hyperons when the Ë is ignored, (b) includ-

¼ ¾

Ë Ñ = 9¼¼

ing the with ¼ MeVc , and (c) same as (b) but with contribution of its Fermi pressure does make NH matter stiffer.

Ë

¼

¾

Ñ = 975 Ë ¼ MeVc .

Ë Although the mass of the does not affect its contribution

to the pressure, it does contribute to the mass energy-density. ¼

Since the Ë is never in chemical equilibrium with the nu-

¼ Ñ

Hencealower Ë yields a stiffer EoS, while a larger value ¾

cleons (or the zero fraction hyperons), the equilibrium compo-

¼

Ñ = 975

yields a softer one. For Ë MeVc such softening

¾

Ñ < 9¼¼

½5 ¿

sition would be identical for any Ë MeVc .In

¼

½:8 ¢ ½¼ is enhanced at a density of  gmcm , when hy-

fact, for the nominal interactions, the same composition is also ¼

perons begin to accumulate; as the Ë fraction is depleted this

Ñ º Ñ Ô found for Ë . A qualitative change is found when

¼ EoS gradually approaches that of NH matter. It is noteworthy

Ñ ¼

Ë is larger: in Fig. 1c we show the equilibrium composition ¼

that increasing the repulsive power of the Ë does not lead to

¾ ¼

¼

Ë Ñ = 975

for nominal interactions, but with Ë MeVc . significant stiffening of the EoS. We demonstrate this with an- ¾

At low and intermediate densities the composition is identical

¼

Ñ = 9¼¼

other model shown in Fig. 2 when Ë MeVc but

¾

Ñ ¼ = 9¼¼ 4

to that of the Ë MeVc case, but beginning at a

= 494:5

c MeV fm (50% larger than the nominal value).

¿ ¼ Ë density of 0.9 fm the larger mass of the makes it favor- ¼

Magnified repulsion leads to an increase of the Ë chemical po- able for a finite fraction of hyperons to coexist in the matter. tential, which in turn enhances hyperon formation. The result-

The general equilibrium condition (Eq. [2]) is now satisfied for ing composition of this model is quite similar to that of Fig. 1c, ¼ all particle species. Owing to the Ë having only repulsive in- and the EoS, while slightly stiffer than nominal until hyperons teractions, the hyperons achieve chemical equilibrium with it appear, is then softened. We emphasize that this is a mani- even though it has a lower mass and no kinetic energy. More- festation of the ability of hyperons to exert “pressure control”

over, for larger densities, it becomes increasingly favorable to (Balberg & Gal 1997; Balberg et al. 1999), since the extent of ¼ reduce the Ë fraction as the equilibrium composition gradu- their formation tracks the dependence of particle interactions

ally approaches that of NH matter. With similar calculations we on density.

¾

¼

Ñ ³ ½¼¿¼

find that for nominal interactions, if Ë MeVc the Given an EoS, the structure of a spherical, non-rotating ¼

Ë appears only after some hyperons already exist in the matter, neutron star is found by numerically integrating the Tolman-

¾ ¼

¼

Ñ Ë ² ½¼6¼ and if Ë MeVc formation is suppressed for the Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations of general relativistic hydro- entire range of densities. static equilibrium (see, e.g., Misner, Thorne & Wheeler 1973). The resulting mass sequences (stellar mass as a function of the

4. EQUATION OF STATE AND MASS SEQUENCES assumed central density) for the EoSs of Fig. 2 are given in

½:½ Å

We now turn to examine the equation of state (pressure Fig. 3. All sequences are identical up to about ¬ ,where

vs. mass-energy density, hereafter EoS) of high density matter the mass sequences diverge according to the hierarchy of EoSs.

¼ ¼

Ë Ë ½:8½ Å

with the . These are shown in Fig. 2, including the models The maximum mass found for matter with the is ¬

¾

¼

= 975 ½:68 Å Ñ ¬ used for Fig. 1 and also a model labeled N for nuclear matter, for the nominal case, for Ë MeVc , 4

2.5 tal observed properties of neutron stars, namely, their inferred masses. This conclusion applies for a wide range of models

N ¼

for high density matter with the Ë . In particular, the maxi-

2 mum mass of a static neutron star under nominal assumptions

¼

Ë ½:8 Å

regarding the is found to be about ¬ . We note that since it suppresses hyperon accumulation, the appearance of the )

1.5 ¼ Ë

. O

N+H yields a stiffer equation of state and higher maximum mass ¼

than obtained with nucleons and hyperons without Ë .There- fore, identification of a relatively high mass neutron star would

M (M 1 ¼

be easier to reconcile with an Ë component than in its absence (where hyperons accumulate undisturbed). Some indication for 0.5 the existence of such massive neutron stars is implied by re- cent analyses, although uncertainties are still significant (van Kerkwijk 2000). We emphasize that current data on neutron star masses is not restrictive enough to decisively constrain the 0 14 14 15 15 15 2x10 5x10 1x10 2x10 5x10 properties of high density matter.

−3 ¼

ε ThepresenceofË particles could have a significant and wel- c (g cm ) come effect on the cooling rate of neutron stars, if they do in- FIG. 3.— Nonrotating neutron star sequences for the five equations of state deed replace hyperons in the cores. Hyperons can participate in

shown in Fig. 2. ¼

B ! B e Ë ¾

the direct Urca cooling process ( ½ ) while the can-

¾ ¼

¼

½:78 Å Ñ = 9¼¼ Ë ¬ and for Ë MeVc but enhanced re- not. The threshold fraction required for hyperons to drive direct

pulsive interactions. In both latter cases, hyperons coexist with Urca cooling processes is of the order of 0.01 (Prakash et al. ¼

the Ë only in the largest mass stars, those of mass closer than 1992), so neutron stars with hyperons are susceptible to rapid

:½ Å ¼ cooling, which seems inconsistent with observations (Schaab

¬ to the maximum mass in each case. We note that for

EoS 1, the maximum masses for nuclear matter and NH matter et al. 1996). Hyperon direct Urca cooling can be partially sup-

½

£ Ë

¾:½8  ½:57 Å ¼  pressed if the hyperons pair to a superfluid state (Schaab, are and ¬ respectively. At present, the primary observational constraint on high den- Balberg & Schaffner-Bielich 1998), but the extent of suppres-

sity equations of state is that the maximum mass must be at sion is sensitive to the details of the equilibrium composition

¼

Ë

:44 Å ½ and gap energy (Page et al. 2000). On the other hand, forma-

least ¬ , the inferred mass of PSR 1913+16. All EoSs ¼ discussed above, with and without the Ë , are acceptable. This tion would prevent the hyperon direct Urca, or restrict it only

limit does allow to rule out very soft EoSs, such as would arise to the highest mass stars, so that very moderate cooling rates ¼

if the Ë had a low mass and an attractive component in its in- are attainable. Future measurements of surface thermal emis- ¼ teractions. Such interactions would make a pair of Ë similar to sion from young neutron stars with the CHANDRA and XMM the hypothetical H dibaryon - a six quark flavor singlet, boson satellites may lead to stronger constraints on cooling rates; if so (Jaffe 1977a, 1977b) - whose interactions are supposed to be this will yield valuable insight into the internal structure of high

similar to those of two £ hyperons combined. The EoS for mat- density matter.

:44 Å ½ The research of GRF is supported in part by NSF-PHY-99-

ter with the H would indeed be too soft to sustain a ¬

¼

Ë Ñ ¾ 96173. The idea that the could be a dark matter candidate, star, unless its mass is significantly above £ (Glendenning

& Schaffner-Bielich 1998). The expected strongly repulsive in- and constraints on such a scenario, were developed by GRF in ¼ teractions of the Ë are thus crucial for allowing its existence in collaboration with D. Spergel and P. Steinhardt; that work will neutron stars. be reported in greater depth elsewhere (Farrar et al. 2000); a brief description can be found in (Wandelt et al. 2000). SB and 5. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION TP thank NYU for hospitality which facilitated this research.

Our primary conclusion is that the existence of a light

¼

¼

º Ñ Ñ Ë Ô

( Ë ) particle is consistent with the fundamen-

REFERENCES

Alcock, C., Farhi, E., & Olinto, A. V. 1986 ApJ, 310, 261 Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., & Wheeler, J.A. 1973, Gravitation, Freeman, Balberg, S., & Gal, A. 1997, Nucl. Phys. A, 625, 435 San Francisco. Balberg, S., Lichtenstadt, I., & Cook, G. B. 1999, ApJS, 121, 515 Olinto, A. V. 1987, Phys. Lett. B 192, 71 Baldo, M., Burgio, G. F. , & Schulze, H. J. 2000 Phys. Rev. C, 61, 055801 Page, D., Prakash, M., Lattimer, J. M., & Steiner, A. 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., Farrar,G. R. 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett., 53, 1029 85, 2048 Buccella, F., Farrar, G. R., & Pugliese, A.1985, Phys. Lett. B153, 311 Prakash, M. , Prakash, M., Lattimer, M. J., & Pethick, C. J. 1992, ApJ390, L77 Farrar,G. R. 1996, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 4111 Prakash, M. 1994, Phys. Rep., 242, 297 Farrar, G. R. 1998, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 62, 485 Prakash, M. et al. 1997, Phys. Rep., 280, 1 Farrar, G. R. 2000, (NYU-TH-00/09/08) in preparation Schaab, Ch., Weber, F., Weigel, M. K.,& Glendenning, N. K. 1996, Farrar, G. R., & Gabadadze, G. 2000, (NYU-TH-00/09/06) in preparation Nucl. Phys. A, 605, 531 Farrar,G. R., Spergel,D. N., & Steinhardt, P. J. 2000 in preparation Schaab, Ch., Balberg, S., & Schaffner-Bielich, J. 1998, ApJ, 504, L99 Glendenning, N. K. 1985, ApJ, 293, 470 Schaffner, J., & Mishustin, I. N. 1996, Phys. Rev. C, 53, 1416 Glendenning, N. K. 1996, Compact Stars, (New York: Springer) Spergel, D. N., & Steinhardt, P. J. 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 3760 Glendenning, N. K., & Schaffner-Bielich, J. 1998 Phys. Rev. C, 58, 1298 van Kerkwijk, M. H. 2000, Neutron Star Mass Determinations, To appear in Huber, H., Weber, F., Weigel, M. K., & Schaab, Ch. 1998, Int. J. Mod. Phys. “Proc. ESO Workshop on Black Holes in Binaries and Galactic Nuclei”, E7, 301 (L. Kaper, E. P. J. van den Heuvel, and P. A. Woudt, Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Jaffe, R. L. 1977, Phys. Rev. Lett., 38, 195 Berlin (2000) (astro-ph/0001077) —— 1977b, Phys. Rev. Lett., 38, 617 B. Wandelt et al. 2000, astro-ph/0006344. Knorren, R., Prakash, M., & Ellis, P. J. 1995, Phys. Rev. C, 52, 3470 Weber, F., & Weigel, M. K. 1989, Nucl. Phys. A, 505, 779 Witten, E. 1984, Phys. Rev. D, 30, 272