View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server NYU-TH-00/09/05 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 14/09/00 NEUTRON STARS WITH A STABLE, LIGHT SUPERSYMMETRIC BARYON SHMUEL BALBERG1,GLENNYS R. FARRAR2 AND TSVI PIRAN3 NYU-TH-00/09/05 ABSTRACT ¼ If a light gluino exists, the lightest gluino-containing baryon, the Ë , is a possible candidate for self-interacting ¼ ª =ª 6 ½¼ Ñ dÑ b dark matter. In this scenario, the simplest explanation for the observed ratio is that Ë ¼ ¾ Ë 9¼¼ MeVc ; this is not at present excluded by particle physics. Such an could be present in neutron stars, with hyperon formation serving as an intermediate stage. We calculate equilibrium compositions and equation of ¼ state for high density matter with the Ë , and find that for a wide range of parameters the properties of neutron ¼ stars with the Ë are consistent with observations. In particular, the maximum mass of a nonrotating star is ¼ ½:7 ½:8 Å Ë ¬ , and the presence of the is helpful in reconciling observed cooling rates with hyperon formation. Subject headings: dark matter–dense matter–elementary particles–equation of state–stars: neutron 1. INTRODUCTION also Farrar & Gabadadze (2000) and references therein. The lightest supersymmetric “Ê-hadrons” are the spin-1/2 The interiors of neutron stars offer a unique meeting point ¼ gg Ê ~ bound state ( or glueballino) and the spin-0 baryon between astrophysics on one hand and nuclear and particle ¼ ¼ g~ Ë Ë Ùd× bound state, the .The is thus a boson with baryon physics on the other. The macroscopic properties of neutron ½ number unity and a strangeness charge . The strong color stars, such as mass, radius, spin rate and thermal history de- g~ pend on the microscopic nature of matter at very high densi- hyperfine interaction unique to the Ùd× in a flavor singlet state ¼ Ê ties. Neutrons stars are, in this sense, cosmological laboratories makes the mass of the Ë much less than that of all other - baryons (Farrar 1984; Buccella & Farrar 1985), and probably of physics at densities exceeding the nuclear saturation density ¾ c ¿ less than 2 GeV , which would make it stable through con- ³ ¼:½6 ( ¼ fm ). One aspect of matter at supernuclear densi- servation of Ê parity (Farrar 1996). ties is the possible appearance of hadronic degrees of freedom ¼ In the very early universe the Ë remains in equilibrium with beyond nucleons. The principle candidates are hyperons, me- ¼ ¼ Æ ° Ë Ã Ì ¿5 son condensates and a deconfined quark phase (see, e.g., Glen- nucleons via processes such as Ê ,downto denning 1996, Prakash et al. 1997 for reviews). MeV (Farrar, Spergel & Steinhardt 2000; see also in Wandelt ¼ et al. 2000). Hence for a suitable Ë mass, slightly less than the In this work we wish to illuminate another possibility, the proton mass, standard freezeout estimates lead to a density ratio appearance of an Ê-baryon. We are motivated by the obser- ¼ ¼ ª =ª 6 ½¼ Ë B Ë , as required if the is to be the dark matter. vation of Spergel & Steinhardt (2000) that the observed prop- To posit a new baryon lighter than a nucleon is quite shocking! erties of dark matter (DM) on scales of order 10-100 kpc are better described by a theory with self-interacting DM than by But it is known that the color hyperfine force is very strong in this channel, and there are innumerable examples of the inad- conventional, weakly interacting DM. Since the required cross- equacy of phenomenological models of non-perturbative QCD =Ñ ½ X section to mass ratio, XX b/GeV, is characteristic of ¼ phenomena. The possibilityof such a light Ë should not be dis- hadronic physics at low energies, a light stable neutral hadron missed on theoretical grounds, and we must seek observational would be a welcome feature of physics-beyond-the standard constraints. One possible astrophysical constraint is whether model, and such particles arise naturally in theories with a very light gluino. In some sense, this is the minimal extension of the this new baryon can form in neutron stars, and if so, would it imply unacceptable neutron star properties? arXiv:astro-ph/0010112 v2 10 Apr 2001 standard model needed to produce the required DM particle, ¼ Nucleons cannot convert directly into the Ë ,evenifthe and therefore merits examination. latter is less massive. Conservation of Ê parity requires that A supersymmetric version of the standard model contains Ê-hadrons are produced in pairs, forbidding direct conversion g a massless gluino ( ~), the spin-1/2 superpartner of the gluon; ¼ of individual nucleons into Ë particles. The weak neutral cur- therefore it is endowed with a corresponding chiral symmetry ¼ ¼ ! Ë Ë rent process ÒÒ requires simultaneous creation of two Ê called Ê-invariance. When supersymmetry is broken, the - Ë = ¾ units of strangeness (¡ ). Strangeness-changing neu- invariance may or may not break. If it does not, the gluino Ë = ¦½; ¡É =¼ tral currents ( ¡ ) are highly suppressed in the mass arises only from loops sensitive to the Higgs vevs (which ¼ ¼ ÒÒ ! Ë Ë ¾ standard model due to the GIM mechanism. Thus, ½¼¼ do break Ê-invariance) and is naturally of order MeVc . is doubly GIM suppressed; crude estimates indicate that its Although considerable effort has been devoted to excluding it, rate is of order the inverse Hubble time (Farrar et al. 2000). a very light gluino remains a possibility – mainly because of ¼ ¼ ! Ë Ë ¡Ë =¼ the difficult of making firm, first-principles predictions for non- However processes such as ££ ( )andeven ¼ ¼ Ô ! Ë Ë ¡Ë = ½ ¦ (charged current, ) are not GIM sup- perturbative phenomena in QCD. The question deserves very pressed, so that if the conditions in interiors of neutron stars serious scrutiny because the existence of a light gluino would allow for hyperons to appear (as is predicted by many works resolve several puzzles. These issues and the constraints im- on this issue, see, e.g., Glendenning 1985, Weber & Weigel posed by experiment are reviewed by Farrar (1998, 2000). See 1 Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801–3080, [email protected] 2 Department of Physics, New York University, NY, NY 10003, [email protected] 3 Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel, [email protected] 1 2 ¼ 1989, Knorren, Prakash & Ellis 1995, Schaffner & Mishustin 3. COMPOSITION OF NEUTRON STAR MATTER WITH THE Ë 1996, Balberg & Gal 1997, Huber et al. 1998, Baldo, Burgio The composition of neutron star matter is determined & Schulze 2000), these hyperons could serve as a doorway for by chemical equilibrium for all weak-interaction processes. ¼ Ë formation, which might affect observable properties of neu- B ! B ` B B ¾ ` ½ ¾ Specifically, these are ½ ,where and are tron stars. ` baryons, is a lepton and ` is its corresponding neutrino (or ¼ Our goal in this letter is to explore whether a light Ë can antineutrino). Neutron star matter is well approximated as cold form in neutron stars and assess whether the resulting global Ì =¼ =¼ ( ) and neutrino free ( ) so that all equilibrium properties of these stars are compatible with observations. In conditions are summarized concisely in the form: Ü 2 we extend an equation of state for high density matter with ¼ Ë ; = Õ hyperons to include the . The equilibrium composition with e Ò B B (2) i i ¼ Ü the Ë is found in 3, followed by a discussion of the corre- B i where B is the chemical potential of the baryon species , i sponding properties of neutron stars in Ü 4. e Ò and are the neutron and electron chemical potentials, re- ¼ Ë B 2. INTERACTIONS IN HIGH DENSITY MATTER Õ i spectively, and B is the electric charge of the baryon .The i ¼ equilibrium composition at any baryon number density, B ,is In order to include Ë particles in an equation of state of high ¦ Ü =½ B then determined by two additional conditions: i and density matter, we must specify their interactions with other i ¦ Ü Ü Õ ·¦Ü Õ =¼ i B B B ` ` charge neutrality, i ,where and i i baryons and among themselves. Here we do so in the frame- i Ü work of an effective equation of state (Balberg & Gal 1997, ` denote the fraction per baryon for each baryon and lepton Balberg, Lichtenstadt & Cook 1999), where the potential felt species, respectively. ¼ Equation (2) does not fully apply to the case of the Ë ,since by a single, isospin singlet particle of species Ü placed in mat- ¼ ¼ ! Ë Ë the process ÒÒ is suppressed, even if energetically fa- Ý ter composed of species at a baryon number density Ý is ¼ vorable. The Ë must maintain a direct equilibrium only with ­ Î ´ µ= a · c · Û : Ý ÜÝ Ý ÜÝ Ü (1) Ý Ý ¾ ¼ =¾ ¼ ¾ ¼ = · Ô Ë Y Ë hyperons, i.e., ,and Y ,but ¼ a ¼ =¾ Y Y In equation (1) is negative and represents a long range, attrac- ¾ Ò Ë is not required (where and denote a neutral tive component in the interaction, c is positive, corresponding to and a negatively charged hyperon, respectively). The signifi- ¼ Û an intermediate range repulsive component, and is also pos- cance of this distinction is that a combination of Ë and nucle- itive, representing a universal repulsive short range interaction, ¼ < Ò ons may coexist even while Ë , as long as no hyperons presumably arising from the quark structure of the baryons. The are present. On the other hand, a finite hyperon fraction will ­ ¼ = powers and must be greater than unity, so that repulsion Ò indirectly impose that Ë , so then equation (2) applies dominates at high densities.