Western Sydney Freight Line Corridor Strategic Environmental Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Western Sydney Freight Line Corridor Strategic Environmental Assessment TRANSPORT FOR NSW SENSITIVE: NSW GOVERNMENT WESTERN SYDNEY FREIGHT LINE CORRIDOR STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Western Sydney Freight Line Corridor Strategic Environmental Assessment Transport for NSW WSP Level 27, 680 George Street Sydney NSW 2000 GPO Box 5394 Sydney NSW 2001 Tel: +61 2 9272 5100 Fax: +61 2 9272 5101 wsp.com REV DATE DETAILS I This document may contain confidential and legally privileged information, neither of which are intended to be waived, and must be used only for its intended purpose. Any unauthorised copying, dissemination or use in any form or by any means other than by the addressee, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this document in error or by any means other than as authorised addressee, please notify us immediately and we will arrange for its return to us. 2270947A-ENV-REP-002 RevI Sensitive: NSW Government TABLE OF GLOSSARY, ABBREVIATIONS AND KEY TERMS ................... IX CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................... XI 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................... 1 1.2 PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT .............................................. 3 1.3 OBJECTIVES............................................................................... 3 1.3.1 OBJECTIVES OF WESTERN SYDNEY FREIGHT LINE CORRIDOR REZONING ........................................................................ 3 1.3.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE FUTURE INFRASTRUCTURE WITHIN THE WESTERN SYDNEY FREIGHT LINE CORRIDOR ............................................................................................ 4 1.4 DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ..................... 4 1.5 CORRIDOR AREA FOR INVESTIGATION ................................ 7 2 CORRIDOR PROTECTION PROCESS .............................. 9 2.1 STRATEGIC PLANNING PHASE ............................................. 11 2.2 CORRIDOR PLANNING AND REZONING ............................... 11 2.3 DELIVERY OF INFRASTRUCTURE ......................................... 12 3 STRATEGIC CORRIDOR JUSTIFICATION .....................13 3.1 FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT POLICY CONTEXT .................................................................................. 13 3.1.1 BACKGROUND TO CURRENT POLICY FRAMEWORK .................... 13 3.1.2 AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT POLICY .............................................. 14 3.1.3 NSW STATUTORY LAND USE POLICIES .......................................... 15 3.1.4 NSW GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE POLICIES ....................... 21 3.2 LOCAL POLICY CONTEXT ...................................................... 28 3.3 DEMAND FOR A WESTERN SYDNEY FREIGHT LINE .......... 29 3.3.1 THE NEED FOR FREIGHT RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE IN GREATER SYDNEY............................................................................. 29 3.3.2 EASING THE PORT BOTANY BOTTLENECK .................................... 31 3.3.3 ROAD CONGESTION .......................................................................... 31 3.3.4 REGIONAL NSW FREIGHT ACCESS ................................................. 32 3.3.5 FREIGHT RAIL RELIABILITY AND FLEXIBILITY ................................ 32 3.4 STRATEGIC BENEFITS OF CORRIDOR PROTECTION ............................................................................ 33 3.4.1 FUTURE LAND USE OPPORTUNITIES .............................................. 33 3.4.2 ECONOMIC BENEFITS ....................................................................... 34 3.4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL BENEFITS OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................. 34 3.5 DO MINIMUM SCENARIO......................................................... 35 3.5.1 THE EXISTING METROPOLITAN FREIGHT NETWORK ................... 36 3.5.2 SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF ROAD CONGESTION...................................................................................... 36 4 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT AND CONSTRAINTS ......................................................................37 4.1 APPROACH TO EVALUATION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENT AND CONSTRAINTS..................................... 37 4.1.1 REFINED STUDY AREA ...................................................................... 37 4.2 LAND USE ................................................................................. 38 4.2.1 WESTERN SECTION OF REFINED STUDY AREA ............................ 38 4.2.2 EASTERN SECTION OF REFINED STUDY AREA ............................. 41 4.2.3 SUMMARY OF KEY LAND USE CONSTRAINTS ............................... 43 4.3 FUTURE LAND USE OPPORTUNITIES .................................. 44 4.3.1 WESTERN REFINED STUDY AREA ................................................... 44 4.3.2 EASTERN REFINED STUDY AREA .................................................... 47 4.3.3 SUMMARY OF KEY FUTURE LAND USE CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES ........................................................................ 49 4.4 ECONOMY ................................................................................. 49 4.4.1 WESTERN SYDNEY POPULATION GROWTH .................................. 49 4.4.2 STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ............ 50 4.4.3 FREIGHT AND LOGISTICS ................................................................. 50 4.5 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT NETWORK ................................ 51 4.5.1 RAIL FREIGHT TRANSPORT NETWORK .......................................... 51 4.5.2 ROAD TRANSPORT NETWORK ......................................................... 51 4.5.3 LOCAL ROAD NETWORK EXTERNAL TO THE REFINED STUDY AREA ....................................................................................... 52 4.5.4 LOCAL ROAD NETWORK WITHIN THE REFINED STUDY AREA .................................................................................................... 52 4.5.5 PLANNED UPGRADES TO THE ROAD NETWORK AROUND THE WESTERN SYDNEY FREIGHT LINE ......................... 52 4.5.6 ACTIVE TRANSPORT WITHIN THE REFINED STUDY AREA .................................................................................................... 53 4.5.7 KEY PUBLIC TRANSPORT ROUTES WITHIN THE REFINED STUDY AREA ...................................................................... 53 4.5.8 SUMMARY OF KEY TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT CONSTRAINTS .................................................................................... 53 4.6 NOISE AND VIBRATION .......................................................... 55 4.6.1 WESTERN SECTION ........................................................................... 55 4.6.2 EASTERN SECTION OF REFINED STUDY AREA ............................. 55 4.6.3 SUMMARY OF KEY NOISE AND VIBRATION ISSUES ...................... 55 4.7 VISUAL AMENITY ..................................................................... 58 4.7.1 APPROACH TO EVALUATION OF VISUAL ENVIRONMENT ............ 58 4.7.2 LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS ..................................................... 58 4.7.3 SUMMARY OF KEY VISUAL AMENITY CONSTRAINTS.................... 59 4.8 SOILS AND GEOLOGY ............................................................ 62 4.8.1 SOILS ................................................................................................... 62 4.8.2 GEOLOGY ............................................................................................ 62 4.8.3 CONTAMINATED LAND ...................................................................... 62 4.8.4 ACID SULFATE SOILS ........................................................................ 63 4.8.5 HYDROLOGY ....................................................................................... 63 4.8.6 SUMMARY OF KEY SOILS AND HYDROLOGY ISSUES AND CONSTRAINTS ........................................................................... 63 4.9 BIODIVERSITY .......................................................................... 66 4.9.1 THREATENED ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES .................................. 66 4.9.2 ENDANGERED FLORA AND FAUNA POPULATIONS ....................... 72 4.9.3 THREATENED SPECIES ..................................................................... 72 4.9.4 MIGRATORY SPECIES ....................................................................... 72 4.9.5 WETLANDS .......................................................................................... 72 4.9.6 RIPARIAN/AQUATIC HABITAT AND MARINE HABITATS ................. 73 4.9.7 SUMMARY OF KEY BIODIVERSITY CONSTRAINTS ........................ 73 4.10 ABORIGINAL HERITAGE ......................................................... 74 4.10.1 REGISTERED ABORIGINAL HERITAGE SITES................................. 74 4.10.2 POTENTIALLY SENSITIVE LANDFORMS .......................................... 74 4.10.3 SUMMARY OF KEY ABORIGINAL HERITAGE CONSTRAINTS .................................................................................... 75 4.11 NON-ABORIGINAL HERITAGE ............................................... 78 4.11.1 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ................................................................. 78 4.11.2 SUMMARY OF KEY NON-ABORIGINAL HERITAGE CONSTRAINTS .................................................................................... 79 4.12 AIR QUALITY ............................................................................ 82 4.12.1 EXISTING AIR POLLUTION SOURCES .............................................. 82 4.12.2 LOCAL AIR QUALITY CONDITIONS ..................................................
Recommended publications
  • Outer Sydney Orbital, Bells Line of Road Castlereagh Connection And
    Corridor Preservation Outer Sydney Orbital Bells Line of Road - Castlereagh Connection South West Rail Link Extension July 2015 Long term transport master plan The Bells Line of Road – Castlereagh Connection, The Outer Sydney Orbital and the South West Rail Link Extension are three of the 19 major transport corridors identified across Sydney for preservation for future transport use. The corridors would provide essential cross-regional connections with access to the growth centres and the Broader Western Sydney Employment Area with connections to the Western Sydney Airport. 2 Bells line of Road – Castlereagh Connection study area The Bells Line of Road – Castlereagh Connection (BLoR - CC) is a corridor to provide a connection from Kurrajong to Sydney’s motorway network, and provide an alternate route across the Blue Mountains. Preservation of a corridor for BLoR – CC was a recommendation of the Bells Line of Road Long Term Strategic Corridor Plan. 3 Outer Sydney Orbital study area OSO is a multi-modal transport corridor connecting the Hunter and Illawarra region. Stage 1 – from the Hume Highway to Windsor Road, approximately 70km comprising of a: • Motorway with interchanges with major east/west roads • Freight corridor with connections to the main western rail line and a potential IMT • Where practical passenger rail The Outer Sydney Orbital is also included in: • NSW Freight and Ports Strategy • NSW State Infrastructure Strategy • The Broader Western Sydney Employment Area draft Structure Plan The Outer Sydney Orbital three stage approach includes: Study stage 1. Hume Motorway & main Southern Rail Line to Windsor Rd 2. Hume Motorway and main Southern Rail to Illawarra 3.
    [Show full text]
  • New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’S Guide
    New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’s Guide Important: This Operator’s Guide is for three Notices separated by Part A, Part B and Part C. Please read sections carefully as separate conditions may apply. For enquiries about roads and restrictions listed in this document please contact Transport for NSW Road Access unit: [email protected] 27 October 2020 New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’s Guide Contents Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Definitions ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 NSW Travel Zones .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Part A – NSW Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicles Notice ................................................................................................ 9 About the Notice ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 1: Travel Conditions ................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Pilot and Escort Requirements ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Patrick Port Botany Terminal, December 2017
    Community Feedback Report Port Botany Terminal Patrick HSE Management System Operation Environmental Management Plan Courtesy of Bob Wood - Patrick Port Botany Terminal, December 2017 Report No. PBT_HSE_PLN_11_01_v02 Date Issued: 5 July 2019 CommunityPort Feedback Botany Report Terminal Operation Environmental Management Plan (OEMP) Community Feedback Report DOCUMENT CONTROL Document control shall be in accordance with Patrick’s corporate PAT_HSE_PRO_14_014 Document Management Procedure, ensuring: • The Operation Environmental Management Plan (OEMP or Operation EMP) is maintained and up to date; • The current version of the OEMP is readily available to managers, employees and key stakeholders; and • A copy of the OEMP is retained for a minimum of seven years. Listed below are the four most recent issues for this document. Document History Version Page Issue Date Description of Amendment(s) Prepared By Approved By No. No. 0.7 All 3-Mar-15 Additional edits following DPE comment. A Robinson S Jones 0.8 All 29-Mar-19 Update to new template. Formal Review Marie Gibbs Bruce Guy (draft) conducted as per Condition of Consent 6.5 and includes changes to procedures and practices since the previous review. Issued to NSW Ports for review. 1 All 7-Jun-19 Final revision reissued to DPE. Marie Gibbs Bruce Guy 2 Section 5-Jul-19 Updated with further details related to Marie Gibbs Bruce Guy 6.12 unpacking (opening) a container. A person using Patrick’s documents or data accepts the risk of: • Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version; and • Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Patrick.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Parks, Urban Icons? the Case of Bicentennial Park in Sydney
    U H P H 2 0 1 6 I c o n s : T h e M a k i n g , M e a n i n g a n d U n d o i n g o f U r b a n I c o n s a n d I c o n i c C i t i e s | 505 Urban Parks, Urban Icons? The case of Bicentennial Park in Sydney Catherine Evans Faculty of the Built Environment, UNSW [email protected] This paper explores the question of how urban parks function as urban icons. It examines Bicentennial Park in Homebush Bay, 12 km west of the Sydney Central Business District (CBD) as a case study. Bicentennial Park was planned and designed between 1983 and 1988, a time when Australia, and its cities in particular, grappled with tensions between celebrating achievements of two hundred years of European settlement and redressing the cultural and ecological harm wrought by those achievements. The research focuses on a review of material related to the design and promotion of the park, and early reviews of the park. The discussion explores the influence of specific ideas about the city and ecology on the transformations of use, materiality, and physical form of the land that became Bicentennial Park. Findings reveal that Bicentennial Park at Homebush Bay was conceived as an awkwardly scripted design, which in turn reflects a convergence of urban planning initiatives, intensifying environmental awareness and ideological tensions within the then nascent Australian- based profession of landscape architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Mamre Road Precinct - Just 5Km from the Planned Western Sydney Airport at Badgery’S Creek
    02 fast track your customers Access at Kemps Creek, developed by Altis Property Partners, is located within the Greater Mamre Road Precinct - just 5km from the planned Western Sydney Airport at Badgery’s Creek. With increased connectivity, Access is close to major road transport links including the M7 and M4, and the soon-to- be-constructed M12 motorway. Access features circa 90,000 sqm (GLA) of best of class quality warehousing and corporate office accommodation, across more than 20-hectares. GROWTH AREA VERSATILITY Western Sydney is one of Access is zoned IN1 General the fastest growing regions Industrial and master- in Australia. By 2050, planned for A-grade Western Sydney will be warehouse and logistics home to 4 million people, facilities. It is designed to 2 million workers and more suit a variety of businesses than 250,000 businesses. and operations. TAILORED SOLUTIONS SUSTAINABILITY Offering innovative and Access will strive for high specification design, minimum 5 Star Green Star sites range in size from ratings across the estate circa 5,000 sqm up to to deliver sustainability 15,000 sqm and beyond, initiatives that benefit capable of accommodating our tenants and the various opportunities to suit environment. your specific requirements. 03 location ROUSE HILL PENRITH NORTHCONNEX M7 M2 BLACKTOWN M4 EASTERN CREEK INTERCHANGE LUDDENHAM M4 A9 ROAD FUTURE WESTERN PARRAMATTA SYDNEY INTERMODAL M12 MOTORWAY UPGRADE MAMRE ROAD KEMPS CREEK M12 40KM WESTCONNEX SYDNEY CBD WESTERN SYDNEY ELIZABETH INTERNATIONAL DRIVE UPGRADE LIVERPOOL AIRPORT
    [Show full text]
  • Site Analysis
    SITE ANALYSIS Site location + local context The Haymarket takes its name from the local neighbourhood. It sits entirely within an urban context and is bounded by the Pier Street flyover to the north, Harbour and Hay Streets, mixed, low-level commercial streets to the east and south respectively, and the light rail corridor to the west. The site is currently occupied by the Sydney Entertainment Centre in the east and a large multi-storey car park to the west. The raised Sydney monorail, which runs along its western, southern and eastern perimeter and includes the Paddy’s Market station, is to be closed and dismantled in June 2013. The local streets provide good connections into the city and university precincts and wider connections to Central Station. Connectivity to the west has historically been poor, after the introduction of a goods line segregated Ultimo and Pyrmont from the city. Pedestrian access is limited to the heavily trafficked Pier Street with stairs and ramps providing access to grade, and a footbridge from the Powerhouse Museum crossing Darling Drive and connecting with Paddy’s Market monorail station on the south- west corner of the site. SHFA is managing the creation of a new pedestrian corridor called the Goods Line (formerly known as the Ultimo Pedestrian Network or UPN). This project seeks to turn a disused goods line into a linear park supporting a range of activities – similar to the High Line in New York. This new corridor will land at the south-western corner of the site. The existing facilities to the north of the site within SICEEP will be redeveloped in a programme of regeneration to be completed by 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Soil and Surface Water Management Sub Plan
    Abergeldie Contractors Pty Ltd ABN: 47 004 533 519 5 George Young St, Regents Park NSW 2143 (P) 02 8717 7777 (F) 02 8717 7778 SYDNEY INTERNATIONAL SPEEDWAY Sydney Metro West CONTRACT No. 00013/11864 Construction Soil and Surface Water ManaGement Sub Plan 11 January 2021 T4129 - Sydney International Speedway – Construction Soil and Surface Water Management Sub Plan Revision Date: 11 January 2021 Page 2 of 77 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Abergeldie ComPlex Infrastructure 5 George Young Street Regents Park NSW 2143 ABN 47 004 533 519 T4129 - Sydney International Speedway – Construction Soil and Surface Water Management Sub Plan Revision Date: 11 January 2021 Page 3 of 77 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 DOCUMENT CONTROL .................................................................................................... 5 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 CONTEXT ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 8 2.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 8 2.4 IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS SUB-PLAN .................................................................... 13 2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW ..................................... 13 3 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BANDING PROJECT REPORT No.5 Prospect Nature Reserve, New
    Corella, 2017, 41: 48-52 BANDING PROJECT REPORT No.5 Prospect Nature Reserve, New South Wales (Abridged version – complete paper can be accessed at www.absa.asn.au) Aim: Avian research at Prospect Nature Reserve has been Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). conducted as part of an ongoing longitudinal study to document Within Prospect Nature Reserve, both Shale Plains Woodland and monitor the avian faunas occupying remnant areas of and Shale Hills Woodland elements of the Cumberland Plain Cumberland Plain Woodland in the north-western sector of the Woodland are present (Tozer 2003). Cumberland Plain. Other study sites include: Scheyville National Park (Egan et al. 1997), Agnes Banks Nature Reserve (Farrell Approximately two-thirds of the reserve has been mapped et al. 2012), Nurragingy Reserve (Farrell et al. 2015), Windsor as Shale Hills Woodland, with a canopy comprising Grey Box Downs Nature Reserve and Wianamatta Nature Reserve. Eucalyptus moluccana, Forest Red Gum E. tereticornis and Narrow-leaved Ironbark E. crebra, and a shrubby understorey Location: 33° 48′ S; 150° 54′ E. Elevation 61 metres above sea dominated by Blackthorn Bursaria spinosa. The remainder level. The reserve is located at Prospect, approximately five of the reserve is Shale Plains Woodland, with E. moluccana, kilometres south of Blacktown. E. tereticornis, Spotted Gum Corymbia maculata and Thin- leaved Stringybark E. eugenioides representing the dominant Description: Prospect Nature Reserve (Fig. 1) borders Prospect canopy species, and an understorey similar to that of Shale Hills Reservoir and comprises an area of 325.3 hectares. Woodland. The study site (Fig. 1) contains both Shale Hills and Shale Plains Woodlands.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2020) ISSN 1836-599X
    Issue 8 of 2020 (October 2020) ISSN 1836-599X PAINTED RIVER PROJECT By Asa Wahlquist The year six students at Forest Lodge have a tradition of leaving a gift for the students who follow them. The plan this year is for a mural featuring Johnstons Creek, but it is being thwarted by City of Sydney’s demand for $735 to lodge a Development Application. Forest Lodge principal Stephen Reed said the students wanted to do something on regeneration and sustainability. It is an ongoing theme, with a previous year instituting Waste-free Wednesdays. Mr Reed said the students were interested in regeneration in the wake of the summer bushfires, and the renaturalisation of Johnstons Creek caught their attention. Sydney Water is naturalising the Forest Lodge school students at work on the Painted River project (photo: Creek, replacing the concrete Asa Wahlquist) banks with sandstone set at different levels along the sides to create varied habitats, establishing a wetland, expanding the salt marsh and increasing the number and diversity of native plants along the sides. The students’ project is called The Painted River. Work began during Science Week, when the 36 students gathered by the Creek to study a display of water life put together by water ecologist Ian Wright and to paint what they saw under the guidance of artist Leo Robba. Dr Wright set up a table of samples collected from an undisturbed creek in Pittwater. The display included the stonefly, which he said is ‘supersensitive to changes in water quality.’ While he admits we will never know what Johnstons Creek was like before settlement, he thinks ‘some of these things could be brought back through naturalisation.’ Each of the students also completed a painted canvas.
    [Show full text]
  • 9.0International Gateways
    9.0 International gateways Summary 9.1 Snapshot • Sydney’s international gateways of Port Botany • Even with more freight and airport customers • All of NSW, (including the regions), relies on and Sydney Airport are considered together in this using the rail network, most travel to and from the containerised imports and exports of industrial section due to their close geographic proximity, gateways will remain by road. Major investment is and consumer goods moved through Port Botany. which has implications for the portside and landside needed to augment the existing roads that link to Sydney Airport’s status as Australia’s primary aviation infrastructure of each facility. Port Botany and Sydney Airport. The WestConnex hub benefits the whole state. scheme (refer Section 6) is Infrastructure NSW’s • Port Botany and Sydney Airport have plans to principal response to the transport challenges faced • Sydney’s international gateways are expected to accommodate much of the rapid growth forecast by Sydney’s International Gateways. grow strongly over the next 20 years. for container freight and air travel over the next 20 years. Achieving this primarily requires operational • Once Port Botany reaches capacity, (which is not • Passenger numbers at Sydney Airport are forecast reform to lift productivity, not major capital works. expected to happen during the timeframe of this to double from less than 40 million in 2010 to over 80 Strategy), it is planned for Port Kembla to become million in 2031. • The major infrastructure challenge that Sydney’s NSW’s supplementary container port. International Gateways face is to the landside • Sydney Ports forecasts container movements at Port infrastructure – the roads and railway lines – that • There is no immediate need for supplementary Botany to grow from around 2 million TEUs in 2011 to connect them within the metropolitan area and airport capacity in Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette No 164 of Friday 23 April 2021
    GOVERNMENT GAZETTE – 4 September 2020 Government Gazette of the State of New South Wales Number 164–Electricity and Water Friday, 23 April 2021 The New South Wales Government Gazette is the permanent public record of official NSW Government notices. It also contains local council, non-government and other notices. Each notice in the Government Gazette has a unique reference number that appears in parentheses at the end of the notice and can be used as a reference for that notice (for example, (n2019-14)). The Gazette is compiled by the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office and published on the NSW legislation website (www.legislation.nsw.gov.au) under the authority of the NSW Government. The website contains a permanent archive of past Gazettes. To submit a notice for gazettal, see the Gazette page. By Authority ISSN 2201-7534 Government Printer NSW Government Gazette No 164 of 23 April 2021 DATA LOGGING AND TELEMETRY SPECIFICATIONS 2021 under the WATER MANAGEMENT (GENERAL) REGULATION 2018 I, Kaia Hodge, by delegation from the Minister administering the Water Management Act 2000, pursuant to clause 10 of Schedule 8 to the Water Management (General) Regulation 2018 (the Regulation) approve the following data logging and telemetry specifications for metering equipment. Dated this 15 day of April 2021. KAIA HODGE Executive Director, Regional Water Strategies Department of Planning, Industry and Environment By delegation Explanatory note This instrument is made under clause 10 (1) of Schedule 8 to the Regulation. The object of this instrument is to approve data logging and telemetry specifications for metering equipment that holders of water supply work approvals, water access licences and Water Act 1912 licences and entitlements that are subject to the mandatory metering equipment condition must comply with.
    [Show full text]
  • For Personal Use Only Use Personal For
    For personal use only RESULTS DISCLAIMER AND BASIS OF PREPARATION This publication is prepared by the Transurban Group comprising Transurban Holdings Limited (ACN 098 143 429), Transurban Holding Trust (ARSN 098 807 419) and Transurban International Limited (ACN 121 746 825). The responsible entity of Transurban Holding Trust is Transurban Infrastructure Management Limited (ACN 098 147 678) (AFSL 246 585). No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information contained in this publication. To the maximum extent permitted by law, none of the Transurban Group, its Directors, employees or agents or any other person, accept any liability for any loss arising from or in connection with this publication including, without limitation, any liability arising from fault or negligence, or make any representations or warranties regarding, and take no responsibility for, any part of this publication and make no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the currency, accuracy, reliability, or completeness of information in this publication. The information in this publication does not take into account individual investment and financial circumstances and is not intended in any way to influence a person dealing with a financial product, nor provide financial advice. It does not constitute an offer to subscribe for securities in the Transurban Group. Any person intending to deal in Transurban Group securities is recommended to obtain professional advice. This publication contains certain forward-looking statements. The words “continue”, “expect”, “forecast”, “potential” and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Indications of, and guidance on, future earnings, financial position, distributions, capex requirements and performance are also forward-looking statements as are statements regarding internal management estimates and assessments of traffic expectations and market outlook.
    [Show full text]