DOCSLIB.ORG

Fighting Homelessness and Housing Exclusion in Europe (2019)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fighting Homelessness and Housing Exclusion in Europe (2019) Fighting homelessnessTitle and housing exclusion in Europe Authors A study of national policies Isabel Baptista and Eric Marlier EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Directorate C — Social Affairs Unit C.2 — Modernisation of social protection systems Contact: Giulia Pagliani E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels European Social Policy Network (ESPN) Fighting homelessness and housing exclusion in Europe A study of national policies 2019 Isabel Baptista and Eric Marlier The European Social Policy Network (ESPN) was established in July 2014 on the initiative of the European Commission to provide high-quality and timely independent information, advice, analysis and expertise on social policy issues in the European Union and neighbouring countries. The ESPN brings together into a single network the work that used to be carried out by the European Network of Independent Experts on Social Inclusion, the Network for Analytical Support on the Socio-Economic Impact of Social Protection Reforms (ASISP) and the MISSOC (Mutual Information Systems on Social Protection) secretariat. The ESPN is managed by the Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER), APPLICA and the European Social Observatory (OSE). For more information on the ESPN, see: https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catld=113S&langld=en LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission. However, it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). ISBN 978-92-76-08769-4 Doi 10.2767/624509 © European Union, 2019 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Quoting this report: Baptista, I. and Marlier, E. (2019), "Fighting homelessness and housing exclusion in Europe: A study of national policies", European Social Policy Network (ESPN), Brussels: European Commission. National strategies to fight homelessness and housing exclusion Synthesis Report Contents OFFICIAL COUNTRY ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................................7 PREFACE ......... .......................................................................................................................................................................................9 European policy context ......................................................................................................................................................9 A Synthesis Report from the European Social Policy Network ..................................................................10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................................12 RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................................................................................18 Recommendations to countries ...................................................................................................................................18 EU level recommendations.............................................................................................................................................22 1 EXTENT AND NATURE OF HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING EXCLUSION IN EUROPE ...................... 23 1.1 Defining homelessness and housing exclusion: harmonisation challenges ............................. 24 1.2 Insights into the extent of homelessness in Europe .............................................................................30 1.3 Profiling homelessness: the characteristics of homeless people .................................................. 37 1.3.1 The gendered nature of homelessness in Europe ................................................................. 37 1.3.2 Age distribution and trends over time .........................................................................................40 1.3.3 Education, work and income ..............................................................................................................42 1.3.4 Ethnicity and migration background .............................................................................................43 1.3.5 Health conditions and the homelessness experience ..........................................................44 1.4 Rising homelessness trends across Europe: unveiling the main drivers .................................... 45 1.4.1 Homelessness on the increase in Europe ...................................................................................45 1.4.2 Main drivers for homelessness and housing exclusion in Europe: the determinant role of housing market pressures ...................................................................................................51 2 STRATEGIES AND POLICIES TACKLING HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING EXCLUSION IN EUROPE....... ...................................................................................................................................................................................54 2.1 The extent of European countries’ strategic approaches to homelessness ............................. 54 2.2 Monitoring and implementation of existing strategic approaches to homelessness and housing exclusion................................................................................................................................................................. 63 2.3 Tackling homelessness and housing exclusion: the adequacy of funding mechanisms ............................................................................................................................................................................65 2.3.1 Insufficient and inadequate funding: a major challenge .................................................. 65 2.3.2 Enhancing strategic responses to homelessness and housing exclusion: the role of EU funding ...........................................................................................................................70 2.3.3 The use of EU indicators on housing in strategic approaches to homelessness and housing exclusion ...........................................................................................................................72 3 NATURE AND PATTERNS OF HOMELESSNESS SERVICE PROVISION IN EUROPE .............................. 75 3.1 A European framework for the classification of services for homeless people .................... 75 3.2 Main types of support services ..........................................................................................................................76 3.2.1 Prevailing approaches to homelessness and housing exclusion................................... 76 5 National strategies to fight homelessness and housing exclusion Synthesis Report 3.2.2 Emergency and temporary accommodation ............................................................................78 3.2.3 Non-residential support services.....................................................................................................85 3.2.4 Housing First services ............................................................................................................................89 3.2.5 Prevention services ................................................................................................................................. 91 3.3 Effectiveness of homelessness services......................................................................................................95 3.4 The main service providers and their role ...................................................................................................99 3.5 Main recent innovations in the provision of homelessness services ........................................ 104 3.6 Main systemic causes limiting and/or enhancing sustainable ways out of homelessness .....................................................................................................................................................................107 ANNEX A: FEANTSA ETHOS-LIGHT TYPOLOGY ............................................................................................................112 ANNEX B: ADDITIONAL SUMMARY TABLES ...................................................................................................................113 Table B1: Main recent innovations in the provision of homelessness services............................. 113 Table B2: Main gaps/weaknesses in the provision of services for homeless people ................. 116 Table B3: Priorities for improvement in service provision for homeless people .......................... 121 ANNEX C: REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................................127 ANNEX D: PRESENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY NETWORK – APRIL 2019 ................. 129 ESPN Network Management Team and Network Core Team ..................................................................129 National independent experts in social inclusion and social protection ............................................ 129 6 National strategies to fight homelessness and housing exclusion Synthesis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Youth Homelessness in the Neoliberal Era
    HOUSING FIRST AND ‘ENDING’ YOUTH HOMELESSNESS IN THE NEOLIBERAL ERA: A Case Study of the Infinity Project & Calgary’s 10-Year Plan to End Homelessness AMANDA J.F. NOBLE A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program of Education York University January 2018 © Amanda J.F. Noble, 2018 Abstract The purpose of this study is twofold. First, I conduct a mixed-methods program evaluation of the first known Housing First program for Youth called the Infinity Project in Calgary, Alberta. I analyze Infinity using Gaetz’s (2014b) Housing First for Youth Framework and investigate the main outcomes of the program using HMIS and Outcomes Star data. The second purpose of this research is to conduct a grounded analysis of the Infinity Project and the 10-Year Plan to End Homelessness it is embedded within through the lens of neoliberal governmentality. The findings show that the Infinity Project strongly adheres to Gaetz’s Housing First for Youth Framework, although informally in some respects. The youth also retain their housing at levels comparable to the Canadian literature, and show modest improvements in their physical health and in the use of public services. The program faces several challenges, particularly in securing affordable housing for the youth and the necessary mental health and addictions support. These findings suggest that while largely successful at a programmatic level, there are multiple systemic and structural challenges that are beyond the control of the program. From a governmentality perspective, I argue that the Housing First and 10-Year Plan to End Homelessness models are insufficient to address homelessness because they do not challenge the neoliberal status quo in two ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Systems to End Family Homelessness
    Family Connection Building Systems to End Family Homelessness Ending homelessness for families and children is a priority for the nation and for every The Plan community. By providing the right amount of assistance to help families obtain or regain Opening Doors: permanent housing as quickly as possible and ensuring access to services to remain stably Federal Strategic housed, achieving an end to family homelessness is possible. Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness Defining an End to Family Homelessness sets the goal to end family homelessness Given the current economic realities in most communities, situations in which families experience a crisis in 2020. and lose their home will likely occur. Recognizing this reality, USICH and federal partners adopted a vision of an end to family homelessness to mean that no family will be without shelter and homelessness will be a rare and brief occurrence. To achieve an end to family homelessness, we encourage communities to join us to strengthen our local crisis response systems together. What We Know Families experiencing Working together with our partners at the state, local, and federal level to strengthen the local homelessness are crisis response systems, we will: very similar to other • Ensure that no family is living unsheltered, low-income families. • Shorten episodes of family homelessness by providing resources that enable families to safely They face many reenter permanent housing as quickly as possible, obstacles such as • Link families to the benefits, supports, and community-based services they need to achieve and low education level, maintain housing stability, and domestic violence, • Identify and implement effective prevention methods to help families avoid homelessness.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending Homelessness in Finland with Housing First CEO Juha Kaakinen OECD Workshop, Paris 25.11.2019 1 Homelessness in Finland 1987- 18000 2027 16000
    Ending Homelessness in Finland with Housing First CEO Juha Kaakinen OECD Workshop, Paris 25.11.2019 1 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 2000 4000 6000 8000 2 0 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1987 in Finland Homelessness 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2027 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 - 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Homelessness in Finland • 5.482 in 2018 (0,1% of the population) • 4.882 single homeless persons (down by 39% since 2008) • 600 in families • Wide definition of homelessness: 70−75% living temporarily with friends and relatives • Low amount of rough sleeping 3 (283) Homelessness in Finland • Long-term homelessness has decreased by 2.435 persons, down by 68% • Its relative share of all single homeless from 45% to 24% since 2008 • The number of long-term homeless 1.162 (2018) 4 Phases of Homelessness Policy in Finland • 1985─2007: Several National Programmes • Welfare legislation • Building new social housing (preventing family homelessness) • Supported housing as part of a staircase model • 2008─2015: Ending Longterm Homelessness • Housing First as the main principle • From temporary to permanent housing • 2016─2019: Programme for Prevention 5 Housing options for Homeless persons in Helsinki Year Supported Independent Hostels and Social housing housing rental shelters apartments apartments 1985 127 65 2.121 35.404 2008 552 2.033 558 68.881 2016 1.309 2.433 52 67.764 6 Government Programme 2019: Eradicating Homelessness within Two Government Terms • Halving homelessness during the government term and eradicating homelessness within two government terms by 2027.
    [Show full text]
  • European Homelessness and COVID-19 3
    European Homelessness and COVID 19 Nicholas Pleace Isabel Baptista Lars Benjaminsen Volker Busch Geertsema Eoin O’Sullivan Nóra Teller Acknowledgements This report draws on research, interviewing homelessness service providers and reviewing available information, conducted within the home countries of the members of the European Observatory on Homelessness (EoH): Isabel Baptista (Portugal); Lars Benjaminsen (Denmark); Volker Busch-Geertsema (Germany); Eoin O’Sullivan (Ireland), Nóra Teller (Hungary) and, in 2020, prior to leaving the EU, the UK (Nicholas Pleace). The most recent EoH comparative research for the 10th report in the series, exploring staffing in homelessness services in Europe1, was conducted as COVID-19 was causing the first waves of lockdowns. The result of this work, which covered the immediate impacts of COVID-19 on homelessness services in: Belgium; Croatia; the Czech Republic; Denmark; Finland; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Italy; the Netherlands; Poland; Portugal; Slovenia; Spain; and the UK, are also drawn upon on here. The report also draws on a range of other resources, including FEANTSA’s own data collection, analysis by the Deputy Director, Ruth Owen, and inputs from the Director, Freek Spinnewijn. As always, the work of EoH presented here benefits from Mike Allen’s (Focus Ireland) input and comments. Sources from outside Europe are also used in trying to understand and consider the possible long-term effects of COVID-19 on homelessness and housing exclusion as the pandemic continues to unfold. People working in homelessness services across Europe also supported the research at an extremely challenging time. Our sincere thanks are due to all those who contributed both directly and indirectly to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Homelessness : a Review of the International Evidence
    This is a repository copy of Preventing Homelessness : A review of the International evidence. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/145335/ Version: Published Version Monograph: Pleace, Nicholas orcid.org/0000-0002-2133-2667 (2019) Preventing Homelessness : A review of the International evidence. Research Report. Simon Communities of Ireland , Cork. Reuse ["licenses_typename_other" not defined] Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Preventing Homelessness: A Review of the International Evidence Nicholas Pleace Simon Communities of Ireland April 2019 Acknowledgements My thanks to Simon Communities of Ireland for commissioning this review and for help with the project. This report draws on their work on the development of prevention and the relevant legislation. My thanks to my colleagues Dr Paula Mayock and Professor Eoin O’Sullivan (Trinity College, Dublin) for their comments on an earlier draft of this report. Nicholas Pleace Centre for Housing Policy, University of York Sept 2018 1 Simon Communities of Ireland April 2019 Disclaimer Interpretations and views reported here are not necessarily those of the Simon Communities of Ireland or the University of York. Responsibility for any errors lies with the author. 2 Simon Communities of Ireland April 2019 Contents
    [Show full text]
  • THE CRIMINALISATION of HOMELESSNESS a Magazine FEANTSA by Homeless in Europe CONTENTS
    SPRING 2020 THE CRIMINALISATION OF HOMELESSNESS A Magazine FEANTSA by Homeless in Europe CONTENTS , The Brighton and Hove Homeless Bill of Rights , Will the UK government finally repeal archaic vagrancy law in England and Wales? , The spread of anti-begging measures and the absence of free movement rights in Sweden , Criminalising rough sleeping in Denmark , How can it be that “anti-poor” orders still exist? , Housing instead of handcuffs – the fight against the criminalisation of homeless people in Hungary , Martin v. Boise: a victory in fighting the criminalisation of rough-sleeping he present issue of the FEANTSA magazine focuses on repressive The social and economic policies of the last few decades have and coercive approaches towards people who are homeless encouraged increasing hostility towards people who are homeless, Tand their survival practices in public space. We were ready in particular when it comes to their presence in public spaces, and to proofread and edit the articles we had received for our Spring efforts tend to aim at making them invisible rather than meeting magazine, when the Covid19 outbreak shook our societies in a way their social needs. There has been an increasing amount of control that we could not have imagined. As Homeless people are especially exercised over urban public spaces. Undoubtedly, economic growth vulnerable to the virus, FEANTSA has called for public authorities to and globalisation have brought about a growing culture of control take measures to protect homeless people and public health. We where the State seeks to dominate the social climate. Equally, many have seen governments using all possible resources to provide them urban spaces have seen rapid gentrification, with poorer groups with emergency accommodation and many other measures have being forced out.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Philanthropic Sector in Addressing Homelessness: Australian and International Experiences
    The Role of the Philanthropic Sector in Addressing Homelessness: Australian and International Experiences Literature Review National Homelessness Research Partnership Program Dr Selina Tually, Miss Victoria Skinner and Associate Professor Michele Slatter Centre for Housing, Urban and Regional Planning The University of Adelaide Contact: Dr Selina Tually Centre for Housing, Urban and Regional Planning The University of Adelaide Phone: (08) 8313 3289 Email: [email protected] September 2012 Project No. FP8 This project is supported by the Australian Government through the Flinders Partners National Homelessness Research Partnership funded as part of the National Homelessness Research Agenda of the Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. 2 of 103 Acronyms ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics ACNC Australian Charity and Not-For-Profit Commission ACOSS Australian Council of Social Service ACTCOSS Australian Capital Territory Council of Social Service AIHW Australian Institute of Health and Welfare ASIC Australian Securities and Investment Commission ATO Australian Taxation Office DGR Deductible Gift Recipient FaHCSIA Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs FBT Fringe Benefit Tax GFC Global Financial Crisis GST Goods and Services Tax ITEF Income Tax Exempt Fund J2SI Journey to Social Inclusion NAHA National Affordable Housing Agreement NCOSS Council of Social Service of New South Wales NFG Neighborhood Funders Group (US) NFP Not For Profit NP Non-Profit NTCOSS
    [Show full text]
  • EOH Comparative Studies on Homelessness 9
    This is a repository copy of The Regulation and Quality of Homelessness Services : EOH Comparative Studies on Homelessness 9. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/158131/ Version: Published Version Monograph: Pleace, Nicholas orcid.org/0000-0002-2133-2667, Baptista, Isabel, Benjaminsen, Lars et al. (1 more author) (2020) The Regulation and Quality of Homelessness Services : EOH Comparative Studies on Homelessness 9. Research Report. FEANTSA , Brussels. Reuse ["licenses_typename_other" not defined] Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ European Observatory on Homelessness The Regulation and Quality of Homelessness Services 9 EOH Comparative Studies on Homelessness Brussels 2019 Acknowledgements This research was based on questionnaire responses from 16 European Union member states. Each questionnaire was completed by an expert in homelessness, with additional expertise being drawn upon where necessary. Our sincere thanks to everyone who supported this piece of research. It is not possible to include every detail of the information collected through the questionnaires, though the authors have worked to try to ensure equal representation of each country and every effort has been made to report the information shared with us accurately. Readers should note that there
    [Show full text]
  • Homeless Bill Fo Rights
    Advocating for the rights of homeless people The Homeless Bill of Rights User Guide A handbook for social actors to engage with the Homeless Bill of Rights The Homeless Bill of Rights User Guide ABOUT THE EUROPEAN CAMPAIGN ........................................................................................... 1 POLICY CONTEXT .......................................................................................................................... 2 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................................... 3 WHAT IS THE HOMELESS BILL OF RIGHTS?.................................................................................... 3 ENDORSING THE HOMELESS BILL OF RIGTHS .............................................................................. 6 DIRECT ENDORSEMENT BY THE MUNICIPALITY: ....................................................................... 7 PARTICIPATORY PROCESS OF ACTORS AT LOCAL LEVEL: .................................................... 7 IMPLEMENTING THE HOMELESS BILL OF RIGHTS ......................................................................... 10 INVOLVING THE HOMELESS PEOPLE THEMSELVES ..................................................................... 10 MONITORING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BILL ...................................................................... 10 CONTACT ..................................................................................................................................... 11 The Homeless
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Homelessness in the Nordic Countries Lars Benjaminsen, Hanna Dhalmann, Evelyn Dyb, Marcus Knutagård and Jarmo Lindén
    Articles 159 Measurement of Homelessness in the Nordic Countries Lars Benjaminsen, Hanna Dhalmann, Evelyn Dyb, Marcus Knutagård and Jarmo Lindén The Danish Center for Social Science Research (VIVE), Denmark The Housing Finance and Development Centre of Finland (ARA), Finland Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research NIBR, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway School of Social Work, Lund University, Sweden The Housing Finance and Development Centre of Finland (ARA), Finland \ Abstract_ The four Nordic countries, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden all have long time series data on homelessness, which is more or less compa- rable between the countries. The data is gathered through particular homeless- ness censuses (‘counts’) using methods developed for the purpose. The four countries initiated the counts at different times, Finland as the first in 1987 and the latest, Denmark, in 2007. Despite some national differences, the definitions and methods are widely similar. In all four countries, the definition of homeless- ness encompasses not only rough sleepers and shelter users but also people staying temporarily with family and friends. This is also reflected in the method- ology of the counts as they draw not only upon homeless services but include wider parts of the welfare system into the data collection. However, one notable difference is that Denmark, Norway and Sweden collect substantially more information about homeless individuals than Finland, thus allowing for identifying particular sub-groups within the homeless population. In Finland and Sweden the data collection is carried out by state agencies, while in Denmark and Norway the data collection is conducted by research institutes. In Norway the first count was initiated by researchers, however the definition of homelessness and the methodology was almost a duplicate of the state-initiated count conducted in Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Count! Process Study
    YOUTH COUNT! PROCESS STUDY Michael Pergamit Mary Cunningham Martha Burt Pamela Lee Brent Howell Kassie Bertumen July 2013 Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................... iv Glossary of Terms...................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Introduction and Background ................................................................................................. 4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Homelessness among Unaccompanied Youth ...................................................................................... 4 Importance of Counting Homeless Youth ............................................................................................. 7 Policy Context ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Youth Count! Initiative .......................................................................................................................... 8 Youth Count! Cross-Site Process Study ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hidden Faces of Homelessness | 1 Introduction
    HiddenHidden FacesFaces ofof HomelessnessHomelessness internationalinternational researchresearch onon familiesfamilies Foreword UNANIMA International is a Coalition of 22 dialogue around the subject of homelessness, Communities of Women Religious, in 85 Coun- has been achieved through the work of Non- tries with 25,000 members. We have been advocat- governmental Organizations (NGOs), including ing on behalf of Women and Children/Girls for UNANIMA International (UI). Our research and the past 18 years at the United Nations in New York expertise— specifically on family homelessness— and Geneva. Founded in 2002 by Sr. Catherine has contributed greatly to this issue gaining recog- Ferguson, the mission was helping and giving a nition at the international level. voice to Women and Children/Girls that were the victims of human trafficking. Today, Women and As part of our commitment to end homelessness, Children/Girls remain our focus, however it is UI and other NGOs committed ourselves to make through the lens of Homelessness and Displace- homelessness our common focus for advocacy work. ment, that we base our work. In 2017 the Working Group to End Homelessness (WGEH) was established. Many UN Agencies and In 2015, the United Nations (UN) established the Member States have shown their unique support on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), as a the issue, including Brazil, Iceland, Madagascar, the “blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable United Kingdom, Slovakia, UNICEF, and UN future for all.” UNANIMA International began to Habitat. These entities have displayed their interest look at how many of these goals (specifically SGD in bringing homelessness to socio-political forums 1, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11 and 16) relate to Women and to try and include the issue in official resolutions.
    [Show full text]