AMERICAN BANKRUPTCY INSTITUTE ournal JOctober 2010 * The Essentail Resource for Today's Busy Insolvency Professional * Vol. XXIX, No. 8 Texas Rangers Play Ball in Bankruptcy Arena Part II: Possible Conflicts Between Sports Leagues’ Goals and the Code Written by: franchises, requires Jonathan S. Covin About the Authors a three-fourths vote Wick Phillips Gould & Martin LLP; Dallas Jonathan Covin and David Gamble are of the major league
[email protected] attorneys at the Texas-based firm of clubs to sell or trans- fer a controlling David G. Gamble Wick Phillips Gould & Martin LLP in 3 Wick Phillips Gould & Martin LLP the bankruptcy and creditors’ rights, interest in a team. Fort Worth, Texas bankruptcy litigation and commercial The commissioner’s
[email protected] litigation practice areas. position in the bank- ruptcy proceeding— Editor’s Note: Part I appeared in the owners are indirect subsidiaries of HSG David G. Gamble which was agreed July/August 2010 Journal. Sports Group LLC, a Tom Hicks-led to by the debtor and art I discussed the early innings company. Certain lenders are creditors the Greenberg-Ryan Group—was that of the Rangers bankruptcy case.1 of HSG in excess of $525 million. The the MLC and the pre-petition financing PAnother article appeared in the debtor guaranteed and pledged its assets agreements entered into between the September 2010 issue of the Journal on to secure $75 million of this amount. debtor and the affiliate of the commis- the potential conflicts between the goals The debtor had not been profitable sioner, barred any sale of the Rangers not of professional sports leagues and the since its acquisition by Hicks in 1998.