DOCSLIB.ORG

Watkin Guerci 28/7/08 8:22 Am Page 136

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Watkin Guerci 28/7/08 8:22 Am Page 136 watkin guerci 28/7/08 8:22 am Page 136 Charles Barry’s Designs for Northumberland House MANOLO GUERCI his essay is concerned with three remarkable sets of designs made in 1852–4 by Sir Charles Barry for Northumberland House in London, the T greatest representative of the old aristocratic palaces on the Strand. Presented and analysed here for the first time, they can be reckoned amongst the most accomplished achievements of England’s leading interpreter of the Italian Renaissance palace, whose work has received no attention in recent years.1 Built by one of the most powerful Jacobean courtiers, Lord Henry Howard, 1st Earl of Northampton, between 1605 and c.1611, as a massive four-towered square block around a central courtyard with a large garden extending to the Thames (fig. 1), Northampton (later Northumberland) House remained in the family of his heirs, the Earls of Suffolk, until 1642.2 Through the marriage in that year of Algernon Percy, 10th Earl of Northumberland, into the Suffolk family, the house became a property of the Percys, who used it as their primary London residence for the following 234 years, until its tragic demolition in 1874. A new street called Northumberland Avenue was built instead, to connect Trafalgar Square with the newly-created Victoria Embankment. By the time of Barry’s involvement, Northumberland House epitomised some 150 years of architectural practice. Architects called in for advice, or directly involved with alterations, included Edward Carter, John Webb, Daniel Garrett, James Paine, Robert Adam, C.R. Cockerell, Thomas Hardwick and Thomas Cundy. Edward Carter had completely rebuilt the south front of the house for the 10th Earl of Northumberland 136 watkin guerci 28/7/08 8:22 am Page 137 manolo guerci Fig. 1 John Smythson, [1609]: survey of the ground floor of Northampton (later Northumberland) House at Charing Cross, London between 1642–9, initiating a process of continuous alterations which gradually trans- formed it into a secluded riverside palace with its public side moved away from the Strand. A few years later, in 1655–7, John Webb designed the great external staircase erected by Edward Marshall in the middle of the south front to provide a direct connection to the garden, and remodelled Carter’s interiors.3 Daniel Garrett was responsible for updating the Strand front “in order to make it appear less like a prison,” and for adding two wings in the garden.4 The east one contained service rooms, while that on the west included a Library, Bed Chamber and a Waiting Room.5 Commissioned by the 7th Duke of Somerset, the 10th Earl’s grandson, in 1748, works were carried on under Sir Hugh Smithson, who took the name of Percy through marriage and in 1766 became 1st Duke of Northumberland of the third creation. It was he who transformed the newly-created west wing into an enormous two-storey Picture Gallery or Ball Room 106 feet long, to be completed in c.1754–7 by Garrett’s successor, James Paine (fig. 2). Lavishly decorated, the Gallery had nine great windows alternated with oval and pier glasses on the garden side, while on the oppo- site one there were two identical chimney pieces supported by Barbarian captives and surmounted by elaborate overmantels which framed the full-length portraits of the Duke and Duchess of Northumberland.6 The updating of the Strand front was followed by that of the courtyard eleva- tions, which were finished “in the Roman style of architecture,”7 that is Palladianised, and faced with Portland stone. In the 1770s, Robert Adam created the famous Glass Drawing Room in the state apartments on the south side for the new Lord and Lady Northumberland, together with some magnificent new interiors for Syon House and Alnwick Castle, the family’s suburban and ancestral seats.8 A Neo-Classical version of the Baroque Mirror Room which had Italian prototypes such as the rooms by Filippo 137 watkin guerci 28/7/08 8:22 am Page 138 the persistence of the classical Juvarra at the Palazzo Reale in Turin, the Gallery at the Palazzo Doria-Pamphilj in Rome, or the Porcelain Room at the Palazzo Reale at Portici, Naples, this was “a splendid chamber for ‘the parade of life’,” with eight large pier glasses and walls sheathed with red and green spangled-glass panels overlaid with gilt-metal ornaments. 9 Lit by a central chande- lier and a number of candelabra, it featured an inlaid-scagliola chimneypiece of a sober Neo-Classical design. By the early nineteenth century, constant alterations to the south front had apparently caused some structural problems. The outer wall was leaning outward, while many of the state rooms still maintained their original character of being too narrow in proportion to their length.10 Called in for advice by the 3rd Duke of Northumberland in 1819,11 C.R. Cockerell remarked that they had “the appearance rather of galleries than salons,”12 and judged the great staircase, essentially unal- tered since its first erection, “dark, and unpleasant in its Fig. 2 Charles Barry, 1853: sudden approach from the Hall door.” He thus proposed a “magnificent disposition,” Survey of the ground floor of Northumberland House as that is a new saloon in the courtyard, which would have made an immense room some altered by Thomas Cundy in ninety feet square, probably unmatched within the context of a private residence. 1818‒24 Cockerell’s involvement at Northumberland House was to be limited to hasty observations; the 3rd Duke therefore commissioned Thomas Hardwick, a pupil of Sir William Chambers who had previously worked at Syon, to remodel the interior.13 But it was Thomas Cundy who, between 1818 and 1824, eventually carried out what was the fifth alteration of the south front, giving Northumberland House that character- istic nineteenth-century appearance documented in several photographs of the early 1870s.14 Perhaps the grandest aspect of Cundy’s alterations was the reconstruction of the main internal staircase as three large flights of veined marble steps, particularly praised during the Great Exhibition of 1851, when the 4th Duke, another important Algernon in the history of Northumberland House, opened it to the public for the first time (together with Syon House).15 A philanthropist, art collector and patron of the arts immersed in travel and archaeological exploration, Algernon “the Good” was one of the first Englishmen to journey in Upper Egypt to record Pharoanic remains there.16 In Rome in 1853 the Duke met the architect and archaeologist Luigi Canina, who had restored the gardens of the Villa Borghese in 1822, to discuss the scheme for the interior restoration of 138 watkin guerci 28/7/08 8:22 am Page 139 manolo guerci Alnwick Castle. Carried out between 1854 and 1863, this included a new set of state apartments designed by Anthony Salvin, one of the finest Victorian exponents of the castle style who had already worked for the Percys.17 By September 1851, the 4th Duke had also commissioned Charles Barry to inspect the interiors of Northumberland House, with the view of a grand scheme of recon- struction of the south front.18 Had it been realised, this would have been the sixth as well as the last alteration of the public side of the house. Given the Duke’s penchant for sixteenth-century Roman palaces, the choice of Barry must have been an almost inevitable one: his club houses in Pall Mall, The Travellers’ (1830–2) and The Reform (1838–41); the British Embassy at Constantinople (1845–7); and the much grander Bridgewater House in London (1846–51), had made him the undisputed interpreter of Italian Renaissance palaces on British soil.19 In addition, Barry led the way in the alteration of pre-existing buildings, which he would almost invariably rework in a highly Italianate fashion. Amongst these were notable country houses such as Trentham Hall, Staffordshire, recon- structed for the 2nd Duke of Sutherland between 1834 and 1849;20 Highclere Castle, Hampshire, remodelled for the 3rd Earl of Carnarvon in 1842–9;21 and Cliveden House, Buckinghamshire, rebuilt for the 2nd Duke of Sutherland in 1850–1.22 Barry’s unexecuted schemes of this type included alterations for Petworth House, the seat of the Dukes of Egremont, the other branch of the Percy family.23 From the architect’s point of view, notwithstanding his full-time engagement with the Houses of Parliament since 1836, Northumberland House represented a unique chance to work on the greatest and only surviving example of the Strand palaces. Appropriately enough, it faced the newly-created Trafalgar Square (1840s), Barry’s only urban project to be realised.24 The first series of plans for Northumberland House is dated 25 May 1852.25 It consists of a single sheet showing the existing layout with proposed alterations of the ground floor, and, at either side of it, part of the basement wings of the house (fig. 3). The purpose was the improvement of the state apartments on the garden side, to remedy, as it has been suggested, both the constriction of the seventeenth- century quadrangular plan as well as the narrowness of its interiors. Furthermore, given the considerable social changes going on in the area, the Strand entrance into the house no longer afforded a dignified and safe route.26 Hence, Barry’s proposal to link the outer wings in the garden by a continuous arcade providing the house with an imposing new entrance from the south through Scotland Yard and Whitehall, an idea which would be further elaborated in the second and third series of designs (see 139 watkin guerci 28/7/08 8:23 am Page 140 the persistence of the classical Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Classical Nakedness in British Sculpture and Historical Painting 1798-1840 Cora Hatshepsut Gilroy-Ware Ph.D Univ
    MARMOREALITIES: CLASSICAL NAKEDNESS IN BRITISH SCULPTURE AND HISTORICAL PAINTING 1798-1840 CORA HATSHEPSUT GILROY-WARE PH.D UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART SEPTEMBER 2013 ABSTRACT Exploring the fortunes of naked Graeco-Roman corporealities in British art achieved between 1798 and 1840, this study looks at the ideal body’s evolution from a site of ideological significance to a form designed consciously to evade political meaning. While the ways in which the incorporation of antiquity into the French Revolutionary project forged a new kind of investment in the classical world have been well-documented, the drastic effects of the Revolution in terms of this particular cultural formation have remained largely unexamined in the context of British sculpture and historical painting. By 1820, a reaction against ideal forms and their ubiquitous presence during the Revolutionary and Napoleonic wartime becomes commonplace in British cultural criticism. Taking shape in a series of chronological case-studies each centring on some of the nation’s most conspicuous artists during the period, this thesis navigates the causes and effects of this backlash, beginning with a state-funded marble monument to a fallen naval captain produced in 1798-1803 by the actively radical sculptor Thomas Banks. The next four chapters focus on distinct manifestations of classical nakedness by Benjamin West, Benjamin Robert Haydon, Thomas Stothard together with Richard Westall, and Henry Howard together with John Gibson and Richard James Wyatt, mapping what I identify as
    [Show full text]
  • Palace of Westminster and Westminster Abbey Including Saint
    Palace of Westminster and Westminster Abbey including Saint Margaret’s Church - UNESCO World Heritage Centre This is a cache of http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/426 as retrieved on Tuesday, April 09, 2019. UNESCO English Français Help preserve sites now! Login Join the 118,877 Members News & Events The List About World Heritage Activities Publications Partnerships Resources UNESCO » Culture » World Heritage Centre » The List » World Heritage List B z Search Advanced Palace of Westminster and Westminster Abbey including Saint Margaret’s Church Description Maps Documents Gallery Video Indicators Palace of Westminster and Westminster Abbey including Saint Margaret’s Church Westminster Palace, rebuilt from the year 1840 on the site of important medieval remains, is a fine example of neo-Gothic architecture. The site – which also comprises the small medieval Church of Saint Margaret, built in Perpendicular Gothic style, and Westminster Abbey, where all the sovereigns since the 11th century have been crowned – is of great historic and symbolic significance. Description is available under license CC-BY-SA IGO 3.0 English French Arabic Chinese Russian Spanish Japanese Dutch Palace of Westminster and Westminster Abbey including Saint Margaret’s Church (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) © Tim Schnarr http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/426[04/09/2019 11:20:09 AM] Palace of Westminster and Westminster Abbey including Saint Margaret’s Church - UNESCO World Heritage Centre Outstanding Universal Value Brief synthesis The Palace of Westminster, Westminster Abbey and St Margaret’s Church lie next to the River Thames in the heart of London. With their intricate silhouettes, they have symbolised monarchy, religion and power since Edward the Confessor built his palace and church on Thorney Island in the 11th century AD.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Medieval and Modern Resource Assessment
    THE SOLENT THAMES RESEARCH FRAMEWORK RESOURCE ASSESSMENT POST-MEDIEVAL AND MODERN PERIOD (AD 1540 - ) Jill Hind April 2010 (County contributions by Vicky Basford, Owen Cambridge, Brian Giggins, David Green, David Hopkins, John Rhodes, and Chris Welch; palaeoenvironmental contribution by Mike Allen) Introduction The period from 1540 to the present encompasses a vast amount of change to society, stretching as it does from the end of the feudal medieval system to a multi-cultural, globally oriented state, which increasingly depends on the use of Information Technology. This transition has been punctuated by the protestant reformation of the 16th century, conflicts over religion and power structure, including regicide in the 17th century, the Industrial and Agricultural revolutions of the 18th and early 19th century and a series of major wars. Although land battles have not taken place on British soil since the 18th century, setting aside terrorism, civilians have become increasingly involved in these wars. The period has also seen the development of capitalism, with Britain leading the Industrial Revolution and becoming a major trading nation. Trade was followed by colonisation and by the second half of the 19th century the British Empire included vast areas across the world, despite the independence of the United States in 1783. The second half of the 20th century saw the end of imperialism. London became a centre of global importance as a result of trade and empire, but has maintained its status as a financial centre. The Solent Thames region generally is prosperous, benefiting from relative proximity to London and good communications routes. The Isle of Wight has its own particular issues, but has never been completely isolated from major events.
    [Show full text]
  • War of Roses: a House Divided
    Stanford Model United Nations Conference 2014 War of Roses: A House Divided Chairs: Teo Lamiot, Gabrielle Rhoades Assistant Chair: Alyssa Liew Crisis Director: Sofia Filippa Table of Contents Letters from the Chairs………………………………………………………………… 2 Letter from the Crisis Director………………………………………………………… 4 Introduction to the Committee…………………………………………………………. 5 History and Context……………………………………………………………………. 5 Characters……………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Topics on General Conference Agenda…………………………………..……………. 9 Family Tree ………………………………………………………………..……………. 12 Special Committee Rules……………………………………………………………….. 13 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………. 14 Letters from the Chairs Dear Delegates, My name is Gabrielle Rhoades, and it is my distinct pleasure to welcome you to the Stanford Model United Nations Conference (SMUNC) 2014 as members of the The Wars of the Roses: A House Divided Joint Crisis Committee! As your Wars of the Roses chairs, Teo Lamiot and I have been working hard with our crisis director, Sofia Filippa, and SMUNC Secretariat members to make this conference the best yet. If you have attended SMUNC before, I promise that this year will be even more full of surprise and intrigue than your last conference; if you are a newcomer, let me warn you of how intensely fun and challenging this conference will assuredly be. Regardless of how you arrive, you will all leave better delegates and hopefully with a reinvigorated love for Model UN. My own love for Model United Nations began when I co-chaired a committee for SMUNC (The Arab Spring), which was one of my very first experiences as a member of the Society for International Affairs at Stanford (the umbrella organization for the MUN team), and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Later that year, I joined the intercollegiate Model United Nations team.
    [Show full text]
  • London Cries & Public Edifices
    >m ^Victoria %S COLLECTION OF VICTORIAN BOOKS AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Victorian 914.21 L533L 1851 3 1197 22902 7856 A,AA A ,' s 7rs a' lEn! 31113 rf K* I 'r X ^i W\lf' ^ J.eU ^W^3 mmm y<i mm§ ft Hftij •: :ii v^ ANDON431IE GRMMT am &U<2<3Slg,SORS TT© KEWBgRy A.KfD HARRIS *S) A SORNER OF1 3-AjWTT PAUL'S 6HUR6H-TARD, LONDON UPB Tfffi TOWfiR QT LONDON. A POTS & KETTLES TO MERaBELLOWiS TO MEND. POTS AND KETTLES TO MEND !—COPPER OR BRASS TO MEND ! The Tinker is swinging his fire-pot to make it burn, having placed his soldering-iron in it, and is proceeding to some corner or post, there to repair the saucepan he carries.—We commence with the most in- teresting edifice in our capital, THE TOWER OF LONDON; the fortress, the palace, and prison, in which so many events, connected with the history of our country, have transpired. The building with four towers in the centre is said to have been erected by William the Conqueror, and is the oldest part of the fortress. The small bell- tower in the front of our picture is that of the church of St. Peter's, (the tower being a parish itself,) on the Tower Green, erected in the reign of Edward I. Our view is taken from Tower Hill, near which was the scaffold on which so many have fallen. To the left of the picture stood the grand storehouse of William III., destroyed by fire, Nov. 1841. The Regalia is deposited here, and exhibited to the public, as is also the Horse Armoury.
    [Show full text]
  • The Construction of Northumberland House and the Patronage of Its Original Builder, Lord Henry Howard, 1603–14
    The Antiquaries Journal, 90, 2010,pp1 of 60 r The Society of Antiquaries of London, 2010 doi:10.1017⁄s0003581510000016 THE CONSTRUCTION OF NORTHUMBERLAND HOUSE AND THE PATRONAGE OF ITS ORIGINAL BUILDER, LORD HENRY HOWARD, 1603–14 Manolo Guerci Manolo Guerci, Kent School of Architecture, University of Kent, Marlowe Building, Canterbury CT27NR, UK. E-mail: [email protected] This paper affords a complete analysis of the construction of the original Northampton (later Northumberland) House in the Strand (demolished in 1874), which has never been fully investigated. It begins with an examination of the little-known architectural patronage of its builder, Lord Henry Howard, 1st Earl of Northampton from 1603, one of the most interesting figures of the early Stuart era. With reference to the building of the contemporary Salisbury House by Sir Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury, the only other Strand palace to be built in the early seventeenth century, textual and visual evidence are closely investigated. A rediscovered eleva- tional drawing of the original front of Northampton House is also discussed. By associating it with other sources, such as the first inventory of the house (transcribed in the Appendix), the inside and outside of Northampton House as Henry Howard left it in 1614 are re-configured for the first time. Northumberland House was the greatest representative of the old aristocratic mansions on the Strand – the almost uninterrupted series of waterfront palaces and large gardens that stretched from Westminster to the City of London, the political and economic centres of the country, respectively. Northumberland House was also the only one to have survived into the age of photography.
    [Show full text]
  • The Industrial Revolution: 18-19Th C
    The Industrial Revolution: 18-19th c. Displaced from their farms by technological developments, the industrial laborers - many of them women and children – suffered miserable living and working conditions. Romanticism: late 18th c. - mid. 19th c. During the Industrial Revolution an intellectual and artistic hostility towards the new industrialization developed. This was known as the Romantic movement. The movement stressed the importance of nature in art and language, in contrast to machines and factories. • Interest in folk culture, national and ethnic cultural origins, and the medieval era; and a predilection for the exotic, the remote and the mysterious. CASPAR DAVID FRIEDRICH Abbey in the Oak Forest, 1810. The English Landscape Garden Henry Flitcroft and Henry Hoare. The Park at Stourhead. 1743-1765. Wiltshire, England William Kent. Chiswick House Garden. 1724-9 The architectural set- pieces, each in a Picturesque location, include a Temple of Apollo, a Temple of Flora, a Pantheon, and a Palladian bridge. André Le Nôtre. The gardens of Versailles. 1661-1785 Henry Flitcroft and Henry Hoare. The Park at Stourhead. 1743-1765. Wiltshire, England CASPAR DAVID FRIEDRICH, Abbey in the Oak Forest, 1810. Gothic Revival Architectural movement most commonly associated with Romanticism. It drew its inspiration from medieval architecture and competed with the Neoclassical revival TURNER, The Chancel and Crossing of Tintern Abbey. 1794. Horace Walpole by Joshua Reynolds, 1756 Horace Walpole (1717-97), English politician, writer, architectural innovator and collector. In 1747 he bought a small villa that he transformed into a pseudo-Gothic showplace called Strawberry Hill; it was the inspiration for the Gothic Revival in English domestic architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish of Skipton*
    294 HISTORY OF CRAVEN. PARISH OF SKIPTON* HAVE reserved for this parish, the most interesting part of my subject, a place in Wharfdale, in order to deduce the honour and fee of Skipton from Bolton, to which it originally belonged. In the later Saxon times Bodeltone, or Botltunef (the town of the principal mansion), was the property of Earl Edwin, whose large possessions in the North were among the last estates in the kingdom which, after the Conquest, were permitted to remain in the hands of their former owners. This nobleman was son of Leofwine, and brother of Leofric, Earls of Mercia.J It is somewhat remarkable that after the forfeiture the posterity of this family, in the second generation, became possessed of these estates again by the marriage of William de Meschines with Cecilia de Romille. This will be proved by the following table:— •——————————;——————————iLeofwine Earl of Mercia§=j=......... Leofric §=Godiva Norman. Edwin, the Edwinus Comes of Ermenilda=Ricardus de Abrineis cognom. Domesday. Goz. I———— Matilda=.. —————— I Ranulph de Meschines, Earl of Chester, William de Meschines=Cecilia, daughter and heir of Robert Romille, ob. 1129. Lord of Skipton. But it was before the Domesday Survey that this nobleman had incurred the forfeiture; and his lands in Craven are accordingly surveyed under the head of TERRA REGIS. All these, consisting of LXXVII carucates, lay waste, having never recovered from the Danish ravages. Of these-— [* The parish is situated partly in the wapontake of Staincliffe and partly in Claro, and comprises the townships of Skipton, Barden, Beamsley, Bolton Abbey, Draughton, Embsay-with-Eastby, Haltoneast-with-Bolton, and Hazlewood- with-Storithes ; and contains an area of 24,7893.
    [Show full text]
  • Tower of London World Heritage Site Management Plan
    Tower of London World Heritage Site Management Plan Published by Historic Royal Palaces © Historic Royal Palaces 2007 Historic Royal Palaces Hampton Court Palace Surrey KT8 9AU June 2007 Foreword By David Lammy MP Minister for Culture I am delighted to support this Management Plan for the Tower of London World Heritage Site. The Tower of London, founded by William the Conqueror in 1066-7, is one of the world’s most famous fortresses, and Britain’s most visited heritage site. It was built to protect and control the city and the White Tower survives largely intact from the Norman period. Architecture of almost all styles that have since flourished in England may be found within the walls. The Tower has been a fortress, a palace and a prison, and has housed the Royal Mint, the Public Records and the Royal Observatory. It was for centuries the arsenal for small arms, the predecessor of the present Royal Armouries, and has from early times guarded the Crown Jewels. Today the Tower is the key to British history for visitors who come every year from all over the world to relive the past and to enjoy the pageantry of the present. It is deservedly a World Heritage Site. The Government is accountable to UNESCO and the wider international community for the future conservation and presentation of the Tower. It is a responsibility we take seriously. The purpose of the Plan is to provide an agreed framework for long-term decision-making on the conservation and improvement of the Tower and sustaining its outstanding universal value.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicholas Hilliard (1547–1619) Henry Percy, 9Th Earl of Northumberland, C
    Nicholas Hilliard (1547–1619), Portrait of Henry Percy, Ninth Earl of Northumberland, c. 1594-5 Fig. 1. Nicholas Hilliard (1547–1619) Portrait of Henry Percy, Ninth Earl of Northumberland, c. 1594-1595, miniature on parchment, 25.7 x 17.3 cm (slightly small than A4), Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. 1. Introduction, Patronage, Dates, Description, Related Works 2. Melancholia, Panofsky, Dürer, Four Humours 3. Impresa, Archimedes, Galileo, „Tanti‟ 4. Secret Knowledge, School of Night, Square 5. Conclusion This article can be downloaded from http://www.shafe.co.uk/art/Northumberland.pdf 1 of 8 pages 1. Introduction Patronage This is arguably the most cryptic Tudor cabinet miniature. It is likely that is was commissioned by Henry Percy the Ninth Earl of Northumberland (1564-1632), a well known Elizabethan intellectual and cultural figure. He was known as the ‗Wizard Earl‘ because of his scientific and alchemical experiments and his large library. In 1594 Henry Percy married Dorothy Devereux sister of Robert Devereux, Second Earl of Essex. His southern estates were Petworth and Syon House, the latter he acquired through his marriage to Dorothy Devereux. He was a non-Catholic but argued for Catholic toleration and tried to negotiate with James VI of Scotland to reduce Catholic persecution when he became king of England. This did not happen and Henry‘s second cousin and agent Thomas Percy became one of the five conspirators in the Gunpowder Plot of 1605. As a result Henry Percy suspected of complicity and spent the next 17 years in the Tower of London and was financially ruined by a fine of £30,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Land Surveyors
    PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS Abraham, William Spero 02006 Akker, James Alan 02618 Allen, Timothy John 02625 Anglin, John Charles 02865 Universal Ensco Inc GF Young Inc Apache Louisiana Minerals Clearpoint Engineers Survey Supervisor VP/Surveying Asst. Gen. Mgr. Project Engineer 135 Sawmill Ct. 13925 Gull Way 1246 Bayou Blue Road 4741 Hwy 49 Bastrop, TX 78602- Clearwater, FL 33762-4518 Houma, LA 70364 Mt. Olive, MS 39119 (512)581-0558 (727)822-4317 (985)879-3528 (601)261-2609 Achee, Kristie Marlene 02950 Aldred Jr, Lewis Connell 01993 Allen Jr, Thomas Earl 02820 April IV, Archibald Earl 02690 Quad Knopf, Inc Aldred Surveying Co Pritchard Engineering Wink Engineering Associate Surveyor Owner Project Engineer Drafting Manager 5400 Planz Road #25 PO Box 2201 717 Park Circle 2436 Martin Road Bakersfield, CA 93309 Pascagoula, MS 39569-2201 West Point, MS 39773 Biloxi, MS 39531 (661)301-4960 (228)762-7374 (662)324-2205 (228)385-0474 Achee Jr, Lloyd Joseph 02048 Alexander, Glen Wood 02536 Alston, Kenny Lenaz 02529 Armstrong, John 02870 Jackson Cty Port Author Self Employed Self Richard Port Engineer Surveyor President Pickering Firm Inc PO Box 982 2481 Mooresville Pike 4602 Kendall Avenue Proj Surveyor/Assoc Pascagoula, MS 39568-0982 Culleoka, TN 38451 Gulfport, MS 39507 Pickering Firm Inc. (225)769-3400 (931)987-0736 (228)864-2645 6775 Lenox Ctr Court #300 Memphis, TN 38115 Adams, Jonathan Eric 02879 Alexander Jr, George 02052 Anderson, David Larry 02054 (901)726-0810 HL Foley Jr & Assoc Edward State of Mississippi Engrg Technician Alexander Engineering Dir. Bureau of Bldg. Armstrong, Scott 01919 1073 CR 261 610 Highway 44 President Douglas Blue Springs, MS 38828 Sumrall, MS 39482 346 South Gamwyn Engrg Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Artist's Depiction of the City and Its Gardens 1745-1756
    Durham E-Theses Public and private space in Canaletto's London: An examination of the artist's depiction of the city and its gardens 1745-1756 Hudson, Ferne Olivia How to cite: Hudson, Ferne Olivia (2000) Public and private space in Canaletto's London: An examination of the artist's depiction of the city and its gardens 1745-1756, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4252/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Public and Private Space in Canaletto's London. An Examination of the Artist's Depiction of the City and its Gardens 1745-1756. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published in any form, including Electronic and the Internet, without the author's prior written consent.
    [Show full text]