Hymenoptera, Apidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hymenoptera, Apidae) G Model RBE 117 1–9 ARTICLE IN PRESS Revista Brasileira de Entomologia xxx (2016) xxx–xxx 1 REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE 2 Entomologia A Journal on Insect Diversity and Evolution www.rbentomologia.com Biology, Ecology and Diversity 3 Species richness and activity pattern of bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) 4 in the restinga area of Lenc¸ óis Maranhenses National Park, 5 Barreirinhas, Maranhão, Brazil a b c 6 Q1 Luana Fontoura Gostinski , Gracy Chrisley Alencar Carvalho , Márcia Maria Correa Rêgo , a,c,∗ 7 Patrícia Maia Correia de Albuquerque a 8 Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Programa de Pós-Graduac¸ ão em Rede de Biodiversidade e Biotecnologia da Amazônia Legal, São Luís, MA, Brazil b 9 Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Programa de Pós-Graduac¸ ão em Biodiversidade e Conservac¸ ão, São Luís, MA, Brazil c 10 Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Departamento de Biologia, Laboratório de Estudos sobre Abelhas, São Luís, MA, Brazil 11 a b s t r a c t 12 a r t i c l e i n f o 13 14 Article history: The Apidae community structure was studied in a vegetated area of coastal dunes in Lenc¸ óis Maran- 15 Received 14 April 2016 henses National Park. Collections were performed monthly from August 2009 to July 2010. The collection 16 Accepted 26 August 2016 methods included the use of entomological nets on flowers and Moerike traps. In total, 1211 individuals 17 Available online xxx belonging to 59 species were collected. The pattern of abundance and richness was similar to those found 18 Associate Editor: Maria Cristina Gaglianone in Maranhão and other coastal areas of northeastern Brazil. The bees were present throughout the year, 19 with an increase in the number of individuals during the rainy season. Constant and dominant species 20 Keywords: included Trigona sp. gr. fulviventris, Apis mellifera, Plebeia alvarengai, Centris aenea, Xylocopa cearensis, and 21 Annual activity Centris caxiensis. 22 Apoidea © 2016 Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. This is an open 23 Bee diversity access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 24 Coastal region 25 Neotropical 26 Introduction Sakagami et al. (1967) proposed the standardization of samp- 44 ling, with the collection of bees on flowers using entomological 45 27 The exuberance and uniqueness of the landscape of Lenc¸ óis nets, thus providing data on local diversity, relative abundance, 46 28 Maranhenses National Park (Parque Nacional dos Lenc¸ óis Maran- habitat preference, and associated plants. This method allows com- 47 29 henses – PNLM), represented by dune fields surrounded by lakes, parisons among various ecosystems, enabling easier to compare 48 30 beaches, mangroves, and restingas (sandy coastal plains) and the patterns in the structure of bee communities in the Neotropical 49 31 high level of local biodiversity justified the creation of the Protected region (Aguiar and Zanella, 2005). Other methods of collecting bees 50 32 Area of PNLM in 1981 (Silva and Silva Filho, 2008). To improve are scent baiting, which is typically aimed at attracting Euglossini 51 33 the understanding of this ecosystem, species inventories have been males (Nemésio and Silveira, 2007), the use of trap nests (Gazola 52 34 performed at PNLM. Among the bees, several species of Centris and and Garófalo, 2009), and more recently, sampling with coloured 53 35 Euglossa were recorded using trap nests (Ramos et al., 2006). A more trays and bowls (Gonc¸ alves and Oliveira, 2013). Without the use 54 36 complete list of 14 of species of orchid bees (Euglossa, Eulaema, of complementary methods, 20% or 8% of the bee species would 55 37 and Eufriesea) was obtained by baiting with aromatic fragrances not have been recorded in recent inventories in Santa Catarina in 56 38 (Silva et al., 2009). In a case study of murici pollinators (Byrsonima southern Brazil (Krug and Alves-dos-Santos, 2008; Kamke et al., 57 39 crassifolia (L.) Rich, Malpighiaceae), 21 species of Centridini were 2011, respectively). 58 40 identified (Rêgo et al., 2006). Although these studies yielded first As reported by Viana and Kleinert (2005), despite the variety 59 41 assessments of some species rich bee taxa, the knowledge regarding of methods, little is known regarding the bee fauna of the coastal 60 42 the bee species remained fragmentary because of the selectivity of ecosystems of Brazil. Most surveys of bees in restinga areas have 61 43 the sampling methods used. focussed on the southern region of the country, including studies 62 in Paraná (Laroca, 1974; Zanella, 1991; Schwartz-Filho and Laroca, 63 1999), Santa Catarina (Mouga, 2004; Kamke et al., 2011), and Rio 64 Grande do Sul (Alves-dos-Santos, 1999). Among the studies con- 65 ∗ ducted in the northeastern region, we can cite Viana and Kleinert 66 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (P.M. Albuquerque). (2005), Silva et al. (2015) and Moreira et al. (2016) in Bahia and 67 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2016.08.004 0085-5626/© 2016 Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Please cite this article in press as: Gostinski, L.F., et al. Species richness and activity pattern of bees (Hymenoptera, Api- dae) in the restinga area of Lenc¸ óis Maranhenses National Park, Barreirinhas, Maranhão, Brazil. Rev. Brasil. Entomol. (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2016.08.004 G Model RBE 117 1–9 ARTICLE IN PRESS 2 L.F. Gostinski et al. / Revista Brasileira de Entomologia xxx (2016) xxx–xxx 68 Madeira-da-Silva and Martins (2003) in Paraíba. Gottsberger et al. Temperature and air humidity data were obtained from the 128 69 (1988) studied pollinating bees in the dune vegetation on São Luís Geoenvironmental Centre of Maranhão State University, using the 129 70 Island (northern Brazil) and found that nine out of the 10 plant Urbano Santos station located approximately 85 km from the col- 130 71 species studied were melittophilous, and in spite of the adverse lection site. The Weather Forecasts and Climate Studies Centre in 131 72 conditions and the strong wind, 18 bee species were reported as the Northeast Region (CPTEC, 2010) provided rainfall data. 132 73 flower visitors. In addition, the studies of Albuquerque (1998) and 74 Oliveira et al. (2010) were conducted at the same location and 75 resulted in inventories of 36 and 31 bee species, respectively. Data analysis 133 76 The present study aims to evaluate, using different sampling 77 methods, the species richness, and diversity of bees in PNLM to The Shannon–Wiener index was applied to calculate the species 134 78 describe their activity pattern, and to compare the similarities with diversity, and Pielou’s index was used to calculate the area 135 79 other coastal environments of northeastern Brazil. equitability. The calculations were performed using PAST (Paleon- 136 tological Statistics 2.00) (Hammer et al., 2001). 137 For each species sampled by netting, the dominance (D) and 138 80 Material and methods constancy (C) were calculated according to Bodenheimer (1955). 139 For dominance, D = (abundance of species i/total abundance) × 100. 140 81 Study area If D > 5%, then the species was considered dominant (D); if 141 2.5% < D < 5%, then the species was considered accessory (A); and 142 82 This study was conducted in a restinga area measuring 200 ha if D < 2.4%, then the species was considered occasional (OC). 143 83 located at the edge of PNLM in the municipality of Barreirin- ◦ ◦ Constancy is the percentage of individuals present, calculated 144 84 has (2 43 22.5 S–42 49 50 W), Maranhão, Brazil. According to the as C = P × 100/N, where P is the number of samples containing the 145 85 Köppen (1948) classification, the regional climate is the Aw type, species, and N is the total number of samples. The bees collected in 146 86 which is a tropical climate with high temperatures and two well- 12 h of netting per month were considered one sample. If C > 50%, 147 87 defined seasons, dry (July–December) and rainy (January–June), then the species was considered constant (W); if 25% < C < 50%, 148 88 with approximately 1800 mm of rainfall (Maranhão, 2002). then the species was considered accessory (Y); and if C < 25%, then 149 2 2 89 The PNLM vegetation covers an area of 453.28 km , 405.16 km the species was considered accidental (Z) (Silveira-Neto et al., 150 90 (89%) of which are classified as restinga. There are also mangroves, 1976). 151 91 riparian forests, and cerrados that cover a small portion of the The Morisita index was applied to analyse the similarity with 152 92 total area (Ibama, 2003). According to studies conducted through bee communities equivalent to the restinga of PNLM, such as the 153 93 the PNLM Management Plan (Ibama, 2003), the restinga of this restinga of Cabedelo, Paraíba (Madeira-da-Silva and Martins, 2003), 154 94 region is composed of melittophilous plants that belong to the Abaeté dunes and Salvador, Bahia (Viana and Kleinert, 2005; Silva 155 95 families Lythraceae, Malpighiaceae, Turneraceae, Asteraceae, and et al., 2015), Panaquatira beach (São José de Ribamar), Maranhão 156 96 Ochnaceae. (Oliveira et al., 2010), and São Marcos beach (São Luís), Maran- 157 hão (Albuquerque, 1998), using PAST. The Morisita index was only 158 97 Sampling applied to the bee species collected with nets, the primary col- 159 lecting method used in those studies. 160 161 98 The collections were performed by two collectors at an interval To determine the representativeness of the community sam- 162 99 of 25–30 days over 12 months (August 2009–July 2010) on two pled with both methods, a species accumulation curve (collector 163 100 consecutive days: from 12:00 to 18:00 h on the first day and from curve) as well as richness estimators Chao 1 and Jackknife 1 were 164 101 6:00 to 12:00 h on the second day, for a total of 288 h of sampling.
Recommended publications
  • Crop and Semi-Natural Habitat Configuration Affects
    insects Article Crop and Semi-Natural Habitat Configuration Affects Diversity and Abundance of Native Bees (Hymenoptera: Anthophila) in a Large-Field Cotton Agroecosystem Isaac L. Esquivel 1,2,*, Katherine A. Parys 3 , Karen W. Wright 1, Micky D. Eubanks 1, John D. Oswald 1, Robert N. Coulson 1 and Michael J. Brewer 1,2 1 Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA; [email protected] (K.W.W.); [email protected] (M.D.E.); [email protected] (J.D.O.); [email protected] (R.N.C.); [email protected] (M.J.B.) 2 Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Corpus Christi, TX 78406, USA 3 Pollinator Health in Southern Crop Ecosystems Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS 38732, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Commercial cotton growing systems are one of the most intensely managed, economically, and culturally important fiber cropping systems worldwide. The composition and configuration of crop species and semi-natural habitat can have significant effects on ecosystem ser- vices such as pollination. Here, we investigated the local-scale effect on the arrangement of different Citation: Esquivel, I.L.; Parys, K.A.; crop fields and surrounding semi-natural habitat in a large-field commercial cotton system on the Wright, K.W.; Eubanks, M.D.; Oswald, diversity and abundance of native bee pollinators. Using bee bowl traps at crop interfaces (cotton J.D.; Coulson, R.N.; Brewer, M.J. Crop grown next to cotton, sorghum, or semi-natural habitat along with a natural habitat comparator), and Semi-Natural Habitat we found a total of 32 bee species in 13 genera across 3 families.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Distribution of Hymenoptera Aculeata in Midwestern Brazilian Dry Forests
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264895151 Diversity and Distribution of Hymenoptera Aculeata in Midwestern Brazilian Dry Forests Chapter · September 2014 CITATIONS READS 2 457 6 authors, including: Rogerio Silvestre Manoel F Demétrio UFGD - Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados UFGD - Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados 41 PUBLICATIONS 539 CITATIONS 8 PUBLICATIONS 27 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Bhrenno Trad Felipe Varussa de Oliveira Lima UFGD - Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados 4 PUBLICATIONS 8 CITATIONS 8 PUBLICATIONS 8 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Phylogeny and Biogeography of genus Eremnophila Menke, 1964 (HYMENOPTERA: Sphecidae) View project Functional diversity, phylogeny, ethology and biogeography of Hymenoptera in the chacoan subregion View project All content following this page was uploaded by Rogerio Silvestre on 28 November 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. 28 R. Silvestre, M. Fernando Demétrio, B. Maykon Trad et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH - PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL FACTORS DRY FORESTS ECOLOGY, SPECIES DIVERSITY AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT FRANCIS ELIOTT GREER EDITOR Copyright © 2014 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Diversity and Distribution of Hymenoptera Aculeata ... 29 In: Dry Forests ISBN: 978-1-63321-291-6 Editor: Francis Eliott Greer © 2014 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 2 DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTION
    [Show full text]
  • The Very Handy Bee Manual
    The Very Handy Manual: How to Catch and Identify Bees and Manage a Collection A Collective and Ongoing Effort by Those Who Love to Study Bees in North America Last Revised: October, 2010 This manual is a compilation of the wisdom and experience of many individuals, some of whom are directly acknowledged here and others not. We thank all of you. The bulk of the text was compiled by Sam Droege at the USGS Native Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab over several years from 2004-2008. We regularly update the manual with new information, so, if you have a new technique, some additional ideas for sections, corrections or additions, we would like to hear from you. Please email those to Sam Droege ([email protected]). You can also email Sam if you are interested in joining the group’s discussion group on bee monitoring and identification. Many thanks to Dave and Janice Green, Tracy Zarrillo, and Liz Sellers for their many hours of editing this manual. "They've got this steamroller going, and they won't stop until there's nobody fishing. What are they going to do then, save some bees?" - Mike Russo (Massachusetts fisherman who has fished cod for 18 years, on environmentalists)-Provided by Matthew Shepherd Contents Where to Find Bees ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Nets ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Netting Technique ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Structure and Seasonality of Bees and Flowering Plants in a Riparian Corridor Of
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.04.894600; this version posted January 6, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Community structure and seasonality of bees and flowering plants in a riparian corridor of 2 the lower Rio Grande River in Webb County, Texas (USA) 3 Amede Rubio ([email protected])1,2 and Scott Longing2, 1Texas A&M International Univ., 4 Laredo, TX, 2Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 5 Abstract: 6 The Lower Rio Grande River (LRGR) in Texas is the physical boundary between the United 7 States and Mexico and is considered one of the world’s most at-risk rivers due to intensified 8 management of the riparian corridor and human use. Exotic plant invasions have significantly 9 altered the native floral communities because of invasive giant reed, with potential impacts to the 10 native wildlife using resources in the riparian corridor. This study was conducted along a 3.22 11 km stretch of the LRGR in southwestern Webb County, TX to assess bee (Anthophila) 12 communities and their flowering-plant resources among proximal and distal terrestrial upland 13 and river-adjacent sub-corridors. Patterns related to the bee community across the two habitats 14 consisted of low variation and dominance by common taxa, suggesting the riparian corridor 15 could be used as a resource for bee foraging and soil-nesting.
    [Show full text]
  • Bees of Ohio: a Field Guide
    Bees of Ohio: A Field Guide North American Native Bee Collaborative The Bees of Ohio: A Field Guide (Version 1.1.1 , 5/2020) was developed based on Bees of ​ Maryland: A Field Guide, authored by the North American Native Bee Collaborative ​ Editing and layout for The Bees of Ohio : Amy Schnebelin, with input from MaLisa Spring and Denise Ellsworth. Cover photo by Amy Schnebelin Copyright Public Domain. 2017 by North American Native Bee Collaborative Public Domain. This book is designed to be modified, extracted from, or reproduced in its entirety by any group for any reason. Multiple copies of the same book with slight variations are completely expected and acceptable. Feel free to distribute or sell as you wish. We especially encourage people to create field guides for their region. There is no need to get in touch with the Collaborative, however, we would appreciate hearing of any corrections and suggestions that will help make the identification of bees more accessible and accurate to all people. We also suggest you add our names to the acknowledgments and add yourself and your collaborators. The only thing that will make us mad is if you block the free transfer of this information. The corresponding member of the Collaborative is Sam Droege ([email protected]). ​ ​ First Maryland Edition: 2017 First Ohio Edition: 2020 ISBN None North American Native Bee Collaborative Washington D.C. Where to Download or Order the Maryland version: PDF and original MS Word files can be downloaded from: http://bio2.elmira.edu/fieldbio/handybeemanual.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Bee Family Megachilidae (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Based on Adult Morphology
    Systematic Entomology (2012), 37, 261–286 Phylogeny of the bee family Megachilidae (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) based on adult morphology VICTOR H. GONZALEZ1, TERRY GRISWOLD1,CHRISTOPHEJ. PRAZ2,3 and BRYAN N. DANFORTH2 1USDA-ARS, Bee Biology and Systematics Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, UT, U.S.A., 2Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, U.S.A. and 3Laboratory of Evolutionary Entomology, University of Neuchatel, Neuchatel, Switzerland Abstract. Phylogenetic relationships within the bee family Megachilidae are poorly understood. The monophyly of the subfamily Fideliinae is questionable, the relation- ships among the tribes and subtribes in the subfamily Megachilinae are unknown, and some extant genera cannot be placed with certainty at the tribal level. Using a cladistic analysis of adult external morphological characters, we explore the rela- tionships of the eight tribes and two subtribes currently recognised in Megachilidae. Our dataset included 80% of the extant generic-level diversity, representatives of all fossil taxa, and was analysed using parsimony. We employed 200 characters and selected 7 outgroups and 72 ingroup species of 60 genera, plus 7 species of 4 extinct genera from Baltic amber. Our analysis shows that Fideliinae and the tribes Anthidiini and Osmiini of Megachilinae are paraphyletic; it supports the monophyly of Megachilinae, including the extinct taxa, and the sister group relationship of Lithurgini to the remaining megachilines. The Sub-Saharan genus Aspidosmia,a rare group with a mixture of osmiine and anthidiine features, is herein removed from Anthidiini and placed in its own tribe, Aspidosmiini, new tribe. Protolithurgini is the sister of Lithurgini, both placed herein in the subfamily Lithurginae; the other extinct taxa, Glyptapina and Ctenoplectrellina, are more basally related among Megachilinae than Osmiini, near Aspidosmia, and are herein treated at the tribal level.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade De São Paulo Faculdade De Filosofia, Ciências E Letras De Ribeirão Preto Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Entomologia
    UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA, CIÊNCIAS E LETRAS DE RIBEIRÃO PRETO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ENTOMOLOGIA “Paisagem e redes de polinização: Como manter a polinização na Mata Atlântica?” Bárbara Nobrega Rodrigues Tese apresentada à Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, como parte das exigências para obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências, obtido no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Ribeirão Preto – SP (2020) UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA, CIÊNCIAS E LETRAS DE RIBEIRÃO PRETO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ENTOMOLOGIA “Paisagem e redes de polinização: Como manter a polinização na Mata Atlântica?” Bárbara Nobrega Rodrigues Tese apresentada à Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, como parte das exigências para obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências, obtido no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Danilo Boscolo Coorientadora: Dra. Patrícia Alves Ferreira Ribeirão Preto – SP (2020) Autorizo a reprodução e divulgação total ou parcial deste trabalho, por qualquer meio convencional ou eletrônico, para fins de estudo e pesquisa, desde que citada a fonte. Rodrigues, Bárbara Nobrega Paisagem e redes de polinização: Como manter a polinização na Mata Atlântica? Ribeirão Preto, 2020. 210 p. Tese apresentada à Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo. Orientador: Boscolo, Danilo. Coorientação: Ferreira, Patrícia Alves 1. Polinizadores. 2. Visitante floral. 3. Redes de interação. 4. Agrupamento. 5. Processo ecológico. 6. Abelhas. Folha de avaliação Dedicatória A todos que me ajudaram a concluí-lo. Agradecimentos Agradeço a oportunidade Agradeço a Tatiana Machado Souza por me colocar em contato com o orientador dela, o qual seria meu futuro orientador, o prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Structure of Native Bees in Fourvegetation Types in the Dry Tropics of Yuca Tan, Mexico
    Folia Entorno/. Mex. 42(2): 177-190 (2003) COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF NATIVE BEES IN FOURVEGETATION TYPES IN THE DRY TROPICS OF YUCA TAN, MEXICO 1 1 2 LUISA F. NOVELO-RINCÓN , HUGO DELFÍN-GONZÁLEZ , RICARDO A Y ALA ANO HEZZARD H. CONTRERAS-ACOSTA1 'Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Departamento de Zoología. A. P. 4-116 Col. Itzimná, 97100 Mérida, Yucatán, México 2 Estación de Biología Charnela, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 21, San Patricio, Jalisco, 48980, Mexico Novelo-Rincón, L.F., H. Delfin-González, R. Ayala and H.H. Contreras-Acosta. 2003. Community structure ofnative bees in four vegetation types in the dry tropics ofYucatan, Mexico. Folia Enlomo!. Mex., 42(2): 177-190. ABSTRACT. The structure of native bee communities was studied in four vegetation types in the state of Yucatan, Mexico. Community structure was established using índices (dominant, common and rare species), four lifeways and unique species. A total of 5, 701 specimens were collected, falling in five families, 55 genera and 140 species. Community structure was equal, and independent ofvegetation type. On average, rare species represented 51.2% of community structure, common species 31.2% and dominant species 17.6%, while parasocials represented 50.8%, solitaries 30.1%, eusocials 9.1% and parasitic 7.5%. Results suggest that parasocial species are the most important in terms of dominance and richness and that the sampled vegetation associations are rich in social bees. This coincides with descriptions demonstrating that eusocial Apidae and Halictidae are most common and abundant. The bee communities do not differ in the size and composition of dominant, common, and rare species assemblages, or in strata composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology of the Male Reproductive System and Spermatozoa in Centris
    Micron 43 (2012) 695–704 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Micron j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/micron Review Morphology of the male reproductive system and spermatozoa in Centris Fabricius, 1804 (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Centridini) a,d b c b d,∗ Luiz Fernando Gomes , Juliana P. Badke , Uyrá Zama , Heidi Dolder , José Lino-Neto a Departamento de Biologia, Instituto Federal de Educac¸ ão, Ciência e Tecnologia do Maranhão-IFMA, Maranhão, Brazil b Departamento de Biologia Celular, Universidade de Campinas-UNICAMP, São Paulo, Brazil c Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto-UFOP, Minas Gerais, Brazil d Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Vic¸ osa-UFV, Minas Gerais, Brazil a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The genera Centris and Epicharis constitute the Centridini and are widely distributed in the Neotropical Received 19 September 2011 region. Centris is also found in the southern portion of the Neartic region, although both genera are more Received in revised form 26 January 2012 abundant in the humid tropical regions. To describe the structure of the male reproductive system and Accepted 27 January 2012 spermatozoa, light and transmission electron microscopy were used. The male reproductive system of Centris sp. is formed by a pair of testes, a pair of deferent ducts, a pair of seminal vesicles, a pair of accessory Keywords: glands and an ejaculatory duct connected to the external genitalia, the aedeagus. In this species, testes and Bees the pre-vesicular deferens ducts as well as the seminal vesicles are encapsulated in a single conjunctive Ultrastructure capsule, the scrotal membrane.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Journal of Melittology Bee Biology, Ecology, Evolution, & Systematics The latest buzz in bee biology No. 17, pp. 1–22 9 September 2013 BIOGRAPHY In memoriam: Wallace Edmund LaBerge (1927–2013) Claus Rasmussen1, Victor H. Gonzalez2, Michael S. Engel3, & Charles D. Michener3 Abstract. A brief account of the life and career of Wallace Edmund LaBerge (1927–2013) is pre- sented along with a compilation of his publications and taxa proposed. In total 326 publications and 1 family-group, 46 genus-group, and 206 species-group names are listed, as well as seven cases of eponymy. This issue is dedicated to the memory of Wallace Edmund LaBerge (Fig. 1) (7 Feb- ruary 1927–22 July 2013), an American entomologist best known for his monumental works on the systematics of Andrena Fabricius (Andrenidae) and Melissodes Latreille (Apidae). We commemorate his life by presenting a brief account of his career as well as a summary of his contributions to melittological science. LaBerge was born in Grafton, North Dakota, and obtained both his Bachelor and Master degrees in Zoology from the nearby University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, in 1949 and 1951, respectively, and developed an interest in the systematics of ants (Formicidae). He was the second of seven children and married Elizabeth “Betty” LaMont, a native of Grafton, on 9 August 1958. Following his M.Sc. degreee, LaBerge was hired as research assistant at the University of Kansas, Lawrence, under the super- vision of Charles D. Michener. LaBerge enrolled in the Ph.D. program in Entomology and was initially interested in continuing his ant studies from North Dakota.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant-Arthropod Interactions: a Behavioral Approach
    Psyche Plant-Arthropod Interactions: A Behavioral Approach Guest Editors: Kleber Del-Claro, Monique Johnson, and Helena Maura Torezan-Silingardi Plant-Arthropod Interactions: A Behavioral Approach Psyche Plant-Arthropod Interactions: A Behavioral Approach Guest Editors: Kleber Del-Claro, Monique Johnson, and Helena Maura Torezan-Silingardi Copyright © 2012 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved. This is a special issue published in “Psyche.” All articles are open access articles distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Editorial Board Toshiharu Akino, Japan Lawrence G. Harshman, USA Lynn M. Riddiford, USA Sandra Allan, USA Abraham Hefetz, Israel S. K. A. Robson, Australia Arthur G. Appel, USA John Heraty, USA C. Rodriguez-Saona, USA Michel Baguette, France Richard James Hopkins, Sweden Gregg Roman, USA Donald Barnard, USA Fuminori Ito, Japan David Roubik, USA Rosa Barrio, Spain DavidG.James,USA Leopoldo M. Rueda, USA David T. Bilton, UK Bjarte H. Jordal, Norway Bertrand Schatz, France Guy Bloch, Israel Russell Jurenka, USA Sonja J. Scheffer, USA Anna-karin Borg-karlson, Sweden Debapratim Kar Chowdhuri, India Rudolf H. Scheffrahn, USA M. D. Breed, USA Jan Klimaszewski, Canada Nicolas Schtickzelle, Belgium Grzegorz Buczkowski, USA Shigeyuki Koshikawa, USA Kent S. Shelby, USA Rita Cervo, Italy Vladimir Kostal, Czech Republic Toru Shimada, Japan In Sik Chung, Republic of Korea Opender Koul, India Dewayne Shoemaker, USA C. Claudianos, Australia Ai-Ping Liang, China Chelsea T. Smartt, USA David Bruce Conn, USA Paul Linser, USA Pradya Somboon, Thailand J. Corley, Argentina Nathan Lo, Australia George J. Stathas, Greece Leonardo Dapporto, Italy Jean N.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Morphological phylogeny of Megachilini and the evolution of leaf-cuter behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Victor H. Gonzalez, Grey T. Gustafson, & Michael S. Engel Journal of Melitology No. 85 ISSN 2325-4467 3 July 2019 On the cover: A female of Megachile sp. preparing to take a freshly cut coinvine [Dal- bergia ecastaphyllum (L.) Taub. (Fabaceae: Faboideae: Dalbergieae)] leaf section back to her nest (Frenchman’s Forest Natural Area, Palm Beach County, Florida; photograph by Bob Peterson; used with permission). Journal of Melitology Bee Biology, Ecology, Evolution, & Systematics The latest buzz in bee biology No. 85, pp. 1–123 3 July 2019 Morphological phylogeny of Megachilini and the evolution of leaf-cuter behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Victor H. Gonzalez1,2, Grey T. Gustafson2,3, & Michael S. Engel2,3,4 Abstract. A unique feature among bees is the ability of some species of Megachile Latreille s.l. to cut and process fresh leaves for nest construction. The presence of a razor between the female mandibular teeth (interdental laminae) to facilitate leaf-cuting (LC) is a morphological novelty that might have triggered a subsequent diversifcation in this group. However, we have a lim- ited understanding of the phylogeny of this group despite the large number of described species and the origins and paterns of variations of this mandibular structure are unknown. Herein, using a cladistic analysis of adult external morphological characters, we explored the relation- ships of all genera of Megachilini and the more than 50 subgenera of Megachile s.l. We coded 272 characters for 8 outgroups and 114 ingroup species.
    [Show full text]