DOCSLIB.ORG

Cv2013jacquelinetaylor Copy 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cv2013jacquelinetaylor Copy 2 CURRICULUM VITAE JACQUELINE TAYLOR Department of Philosophy Telephone: 415-422-5323 (office) University of San Francisco 2130 Fulton Street Email: [email protected] San Francisco, CA 94117 EDUCATION University of Chicago, Philosophy Department, Ph.D. (with honors, 1985-93) Dissertation: "David Hume and the Anatomy of Character" (Christine M. Korsgaard, Chair) UNC-Chapel Hill , Philosophy Department, M.A. (1982-84) Santa Clara University, Philosophy Department, B.A. (with honors, 1979-82) FELLOWSHIPS AND GRANTS Travel and research support, Faculty Development Fund, University of San Francisco, annually National Endowment for the Humanities Faculty Fellowship, for 2006-07 Laurance S. Rockefeller Fellowship, Center for Human Values, Princeton University, 2001-02 Faculty Research Grant, Tufts University, Summer 2000 Visiting Fellow, Tanner Humanities Center, University of Utah, 1999-2000 Ames Dissertation Fellowship, Philosophy Department, University of Chicago, 1989-90 University Fellowship, University of Chicago, 1984-87 Teaching Fellowship, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1982-84 California State (Cal Grant) Fellowship, 1979-82 ACADEMIC POSITIONS Current Position: Professor, Dept. of Philosophy, University of San Francisco, 2013 Associate Professor, Dept. of Philosophy, University of San Francisco, 2007-13 Participating Faculty member in Gender & Sexualities Studies Program Participating Faculty member in the Honors Program in the Humanities J. Taylor, 2013 1 Previous Positions: Assistant Professor, Dept. of Philosophy, University of San Francisco, 2003-07 Participating Faculty member in the St. Ignatius Institute, Univ. of San Francisco, 2004-2008 Allen-Berenson Visiting Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies, Brandeis University, 2002-03 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Tufts University (included Core Faculty duties in Women's Studies and in International Relations) 1995-2002 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Affiliate in Women's Studies, Temple University, 1993-95 William Rainey Harper Instructor, University of Chicago, 1990-93 Lecturer, Columbia College Chicago, Spring 1989 Lecturer, The Colorado College, Winter 1988 Instructor, University of Chicago, Fall 1987 RESEARCH AND TEACHING INTERESTS Areas of Specialization: Ethics; History of ethics; Feminist philosophy; Moral psychology; History of Modern Philosophy; Hume; Aesthetics Areas of Competence: Philosophy of law; Social and Political Philosophy PUBLICATIONS Books: • The Cambridge Companion to Hume, 2nd edn., David Fate Norton and Jacqueline Taylor, eds. (Cambridge University Press, 2009) • Reflecting Subjects: Passion, Sympathy and Society in Hume’s Philosophy (Oxford University Press, forthcoming) • Reading Hume on the Principles of Morals: Essays on An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, Jacqueline Taylor, ed. (Oxford University Press, forthcoming) Articles: • “Hume’s Moral Psychology,” Res Philosophica (forthcoming) J. Taylor, 2013 2 • “Hume and Virtue Ethics,” Routledge Companion to Virtue Ethics, Lorraine Besser-Jones and Michael Slote, eds., Routledge (forthcoming) • “Hume on Deliberation, Character and Motive,” Moral Motivation, Iakovos Vasiliou, ed., Oxford University Press (Oxford Philosophical Concepts series, forthcoming) • “Adam Smith and Gender,” Princeton Guide to Adam Smith, Ryan Hanley, ed., Princeton University Press (forthcoming) • “Pride and the Indirect Passions,” Oxford Handbook to David Hume, Paul Russell, ed., Oxford University Press (forthcoming) • "Sympathy, Self, and Others," in Donald Ainslie and Annemarie Butler, eds., Cambridge Companion to Hume’s Treatise, Cambridge University Press (forthcoming) • “Moral Sense and Sentiment,” in The Routledge Companion to Eighteenth Century Philosophy, Aaron Garrett, ed., Routledge (in press) • “The Idea of a Science of Human Nature,” in The Oxford Handbook to Eighteenth Century British Philosophy, James Harris, ed., Oxford University Press (in press) • “Hume on the Importance of Humanity,” in Revue Internationale de Philosophie 67 (March 2013): 81-97. • “Sentiment and Moral Inclusion,” Iride XXV, No. 67, Settembre/Dicembre (2012): 589-602 • “Hume on the Dignity of Pride,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (2012): 29-49 • “Moral Sentiment and the Sources of Moral Identity,” in Morality and the Emotions, Carla Bagnoli, ed., Oxford University Press (2011) • “Gilding and Staining, and the Function of Our Moral Sentiments,” Hume Studies 36, No. 1 (2010) • "Hume's Later Moral Philosophy," in David Fate Norton and Jacqueline Taylor, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Hume, 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press (2009) • “Hume on Beauty and Taste,” in Elizabeth Radcliffe, ed., Blackwell Guide to Hume’s Philosophy, Blackwell Publishing (2008) • “Hume and the Nortons on the Passions and Morality,” Hume Studies 33 (Nov. 2007): 305-12 • “Humean Humanity versus Hate,” in Jennifer Welchman, ed., The Practice of Virtue, Hackett Publishing (2006). • “Virtue and the Evaluation of Character,” in Saul Traiger, ed., Blackwell Guide to Hume’s Treatise, Blackwell Publishing (2005) • "Hume on the Standard of Virtue," The Journal of Ethics 6 (No. 1, 2002), 43-62 J. Taylor, 2013 3 • "Humean Ethics and the Politics of Sentiment," Topoi 21 (No. 1, 2002), 175-86 • "Hume and the Reality of Value," in Anne Jaap Jacobson, ed., Feminist Interpretations of David Hume, Penn State Univ. Press (2000), 107-36 • "Justice and the Foundations of Social Morality in Hume's Treatise," Hume Studies XXIV, No. 1 (April 1998), 5-30 Reprinted in Hume: Moral and Political Philosophy, Rachel Cohon, ed., Ashgate's International Library of Critical Essays in the History of Philosophy (2001), 205-30 • "Moral Sense Theories," in E. Craig, ed., The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge 1998 Book Reviews: • Review of Persons and Passions: Essays in Honor of Annette Baier, J. Jenkins, J. Whiting, and C. Williams, eds., Ethics (Oct. 2006). • Review of Norman Daniels' Just Health Care, in Ethics (October 1988). INVITED TALKS “Hume on Justice and Society,” Invited Panel, 40th International Hume Conference, Brazil, July 2013 “Hume’s Enlightenment Justice,” Humean Readings, La Sapienza, Rome, June, 2013 “Hume’s Enlightenment Morality,” Fribourg University, May, 2013 “Hume’s Enlightenment Legacy,” Why Hume Matters, Oxford Brookes Second International Hume Workshop, May 21, 2013 Workshop on “Moral Motivation,” CUNY, New York, April 2013 “Mandeville, the Scottish Philosophers, and the Women,” Plenary Talk, Mandeville and the Scottish Responses, Center for the Study of Scottish Philosophy, PTSEM, Princeton, March 8-10, 2013 Keynote Lecture, 90th Anniversary Conference, Pontifica Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia, November 2012 (also a workshop on my recent publications; and a general discussion) “Hume on Sympathy and the Variety of Sentiment,” Sympathy and Empathy: Hume and Beyond Conference, University of Antwerp, June 2011 “Hume on the Importance of Humanity,” University of Alberta, March 2011 “Hume on Power and ‘the philosophy of our passions,’” Eighteenth Century Workshop, University of Toronto, September 2010 J. Taylor, 2013 4 “Hume on Power and ‘the philosophy of our passions,’” Hume Workshop, Simon Fraser University, August, 2010 “Remarks on Peter Kail’s Projection and Realism in Hume’s Philosophy,” APA Central Division Meetings, February 2010 “Hume on the Importance of Humanity,” Hume Workshop, University of Toronto, November 2009 Panel Presentation: Including Women Figures in the History of Philosophy, Conference in Honor of Eileen O’Neill, Columbia/Barnard Universities, October 2009 “Remarks on the Norton and Norton Critical Edition of Hume’s Treatise,” 34th International Hume Conference, Boston, MA, August 2007 “The Pleasures of Pride,” Humean Readings 7, in conjunction with il Gruppo de Ricerca Nazionale sull’Illuminismo Britannico, University of Rome, La Sapienza, June 2007 “Hume on Experimenting with the Passions,” Occidental College, Nov. 2006 “Hume on Beauty and Taste,” APA Pacific Division Meeting, Hume Society Group Session, Portland, OR, 2006 “Hume on Beauty and Taste,” Contactforum on the Emotions in the 17th and 18th Centuries, at the Royal Flemish Academy, Brussels, Nov., 2005 “Hobbes and Hume on Moderating the Passions,” University of Antwerp, Nov., 2005 “Hume’s Later Moral Philosophy,” Southern California Philosophy Conference, UC Irvine, October 2004 “Sentiment and Moral Inclusion,” Rocky Mountain Virtue Ethics Conference, University of Colorado, Boulder, April 2004 “Hume on Moral Inclusion,” American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, Sept. 2003 “Social Division and Moral Inclusion,” Keynote Talk, 30th International Hume Conference, Las Vegas, Summer 2003 "Sympathy and Subjectivity," 29th International Hume Conference, Helsinki, Finland, Summer 2002 "Passions, Power and Authority in Hume's Ethics: A Feminist Approach," presented as part of a Symposium on Feminism and the History of Philosophy at the December 2000 Meetings of the Eastern Division of the APA "Sincerity and the Politics of Sentiment," Workshop on Gender and Philosophy, MIT, November 2000 "Sincerity and the Politics of Thinness," Tanner Center for the Humanities, University of Utah, March 2000 J. Taylor, 2013 5 "Justice and the Foundations of Social Morality in Hume's Treatise," Dartmouth College, February 1999 "Value and Deliberation," Philosophy Department Faculty Colloquium, Tufts University, Spring 1998 "Valorizing Penelope," Philosophy Department, Williams College, Fall 1996 "Hume and the Reality of Value,"
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hume's Objects After Deleuze
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School March 2021 Hume's Objects After Deleuze Michael P. Harter Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Continental Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Harter, Michael P., "Hume's Objects After Deleuze" (2021). LSU Master's Theses. 5305. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/5305 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HUME’S OBJECTS AFTER DELEUZE A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies by Michael Patrick Harter B.A., California State University, Fresno, 2018 May 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Human beings are wholly dependent creatures. In our becoming, we are affected by an incredible number of beings who aid and foster our growth. It would be impossible to devise a list of all such individuals. However, those who played imperative roles in the creation of this work deserve their due recognition. First, I would like to thank my partner, Leena, and our pets Merleau and the late Kiki. Throughout the ebbs and flows of my academic career, you have remained sources of love, joy, encouragement, and calm.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Psychology, Fall 2010
    Philosophy of Psychology, Fall 2010 http://mechanism.ucsd.edu/~bill/teaching/f10/phil149/index.html Phil 149 Philosophy of Psychology Fall 2010, Tues. Thurs., 11:00am-12:20 pm Office Hours: Wednesday, 2:30-4:00, and by Professor: William Bechtel appointment Office: HSS 8076 Email: [email protected] Webpage: mechanism.ucsd.edu/~bill/teaching Telephone: 822-4461 /f10/phil149/ 1. Course Description How do scientists explain mental activities such as thinking, imagining, and remembering? Are the explanations offered in psychology similar to or different from those found in the natural sciences? How do psychological explanations relate to those of other disciplines, especially those included in cognitive science? The course will focus on major research traditions in psychology, with a special focus on contemporary cognitive psychology. Research on memory will provide a focus for the latter portion of the course. Given the nature of the class, substantial material will be presented in lectures that goes beyond what is included in the readings. Also, philosophy is an activity, and learning activities requires active engagement. Accordingly, class attendance and discussion is critical. Although we will have discussions on other occasions as well, several classes are designated as discussion classes. 2. Course Requirements Class attendance is mandatory. Missing classes more than very occasionally will result in a reduction in your grade. To get the most out of the class, it is absolutely essential that every one comes to class prepared to discuss the readings. To ensure that this happens and to foster subsequent discussions in class, you will be required to turn in a very short (one paragraph) comments or questions on reading assigned during each week of the quarter, except when there is an exam.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Mind
    From the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Philosophy of Mind Frank Jackson, Georges Rey Philosophical Concept ‘Philosophy of mind’, and ‘philosophy of psychology’ are two terms for the same general area of philosophical inquiry: the nature of mental phenomena and their connection with behaviour and, in more recent discussions, the brain. Much work in this area reflects a revolution in psychology that began mid-century. Before then, largely in reaction to traditional claims about the mind being non-physical (see Dualism; Descartes), many thought that a scientific psychology should avoid talk of ‘private’ mental states. Investigation of such states had seemed to be based on unreliable introspection (see Introspection, psychology of), not subject to independent checking (see Private language argument), and to invite dubious ideas of telepathy (see Parapsychology). Consequently, psychologists like B.F. Skinner and J.B. Watson, and philosophers like W.V. Quine and Gilbert Ryle argued that scientific psychology should confine itself to studying publicly observable relations between stimuli and responses (see Behaviourism, methodological and scientific; Behaviourism, analytic). However, in the late 1950s, several developments began to change all this: (i) The experiments behaviourists themselves ran on animals tended to refute behaviouristic hypotheses, suggesting that the behaviour of even rats had to be understood in terms of mental states (see Learning; Animal language and thought). (ii) The linguist Noam Chomsky drew attention to the surprising complexity of the natural languages that children effortlessly learn, and proposed ways of explaining this complexity in terms of largely unconscious mental phenomena. (iii) The revolutionary work of Alan Turing (see Turing machines) led to the development of the modern digital computer.
    [Show full text]
  • Wittgenstein on Freedom of the Will: Not Determinism, Yet Not Indeterminism
    Wittgenstein on Freedom of the Will: Not Determinism, Yet Not Indeterminism Thomas Nadelhoffer This is a prepublication draft. This version is being revised for resubmission to a journal. Abstract Since the publication of Wittgenstein’s Lectures on Freedom of the Will, his remarks about free will and determinism have received very little attention. Insofar as these lectures give us an opportunity to see him at work on a traditional—and seemingly intractable—philosophical problem and given the voluminous secondary literature written about nearly every other facet of Wittgenstein’s life and philosophy, this neglect is both surprising and unfortunate. Perhaps these lectures have not attracted much attention because they are available to us only in the form of a single student’s notes (Yorick Smythies). Or perhaps it is because, as one Wittgenstein scholar put it, the lectures represent only “cursory reflections” that “are themselves uncompelling." (Glock 1996: 390) Either way, my goal is to show that Wittgenstein’s views about freedom of the will merit closer attention. All of these arguments might look as if I wanted to argue for the freedom of the will or against it. But I don't want to. --Ludwig Wittgenstein, Lectures on Freedom of the Will Since the publication of Wittgenstein’s Lectures on Freedom of the Will,1 his remarks from these lectures about free will and determinism have received very little attention.2 Insofar as these lectures give us an opportunity to see him at work on a traditional—and seemingly intractable— philosophical problem and given the voluminous secondary literature written about nearly every 1 Wittgenstein’s “Lectures on Freedom of the Will” will be abbreviated as LFW 1993 in this paper (see bibliography) since I am using the version reprinted in Philosophical Occasions (1993).
    [Show full text]
  • There Is a Very Substantial Literature Now on Wittgenstein-And-Pragmatism
    Practicing Pragmatist-Wittgensteinianism Introduction Much has been written on the continuities between Wittgenstein’s later work and Pragmatism. Much of that writing has argued for there being strong continuity. Of those who see such strong continuity there are those who hold Wittgenstein to be the pre-eminent—even perhaps the superior—philosopher of the Wittgenstein-Pragmatism nexus (e.g. Hilary Putnam), and others who see Wittgenstein as simply echoing some of what was said with more originality by C.S. Peirce, with the consequent diminution in clarity that echoes bring (e.g. W.V.O. Quine). What Quine and Putnam have in common, however, is the identification of note-worthy continuity, and in this they are far from alone (see James C. Edwards Ethics Without Philosophy, Richard Rorty Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, and many others). We don’t necessarily wish to dispute these. However, in a similar manner perhaps to with Wittgenstein’s relationship to Freud, there are certain often downplayed aspects of the Wittgenstein-Pragmatism nexus that considerably complicate the picture of continuity as it is so often presented. Indeed, one question to ask is whether the picture can survive—will its hold over us remain—once we’ve been furnished with certain reminders; that is to say, once we’ve been taught certain differences between Wittgenstein’s philosophy and Pragmatism. 1 Back for a moment to Freud. It is now fairly widely accepted that Wittgenstein’s philosophy is best understood as therapeutic and in being so is indebted to Freud and the therapeutic method he devised.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth S. Radcliffe Department of Philosophy William & Mary P.O
    Curriculum Vitae, September 2019 Elizabeth S. Radcliffe Department of Philosophy William & Mary P.O. Box 8795 Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795 Office: James Blair Hall 134 · Department Phone: 757-221-2716 · E-mail: [email protected] Webpage: http://wmpeople.wm.edu/site/page/eradcliffe/home EDUCATION Ph.D. in Philosophy, Cornell University, 1985 (Adviser: Nicholas L. Sturgeon) M.A. in Philosophy, Cornell University, 1980 B.A. in Philosophy, Fort Hays State University, summa cum laude, 1977 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Tenure-Track & Tenured Appointments The College of William and Mary, Professor of Philosophy, 2009-present Santa Clara University, Professor of Philosophy, 2006-2009 Santa Clara University, Associate Professor of Philosophy, 1996-2006 Santa Clara University, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, 1989-96 Visiting & Temporary Appointments UNC-Chapel Hill, Visiting Scholar, Fall 1991 UNC-Chapel Hill, Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Spring 1992 University of Southern California, Lecturer in Philosophy, 1988-89 Loyola Marymount University, Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy, 1987-88 UCLA, Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Summer 1986 California State University, Los Angeles, part-time Lecturer in Philosophy, 1985-86 Fort Hays State University, part-time Instructor in Philosophy, 1982-83 MAJOR ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS The College of William & Mary, Department Chair, 2013-14, 2015-18 Hume Society President, 2010-2012 (calendar years, inclusive) Santa Clara University, Department Chair 2003-08 Co-editor and Managing
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle's Psychology
    victor caston aristotle’s psychology Aristotle’s starting point, and not questions about skepticism and certainty, explains why he is not preoccupied with many of the issues that preoccupy Descartes. 17 The soul, then, is that by which we perceive, feel, think and act,1 since these are all activities peculiar to living things. To this extent, Aristotle’s use of “soul” is quite Aristotle’s Psychology similar to our use of “mind.” We commonly say that we perform these activities “with our minds,” without implying anything Cartesian about dualism or privacy. But the two are not precise equivalents. As the basis of life, the soul for Aristotle is also that in VICTOR CASTON virtue of which we grow, digest, reproduce, and breathe.2 In fact, he criticizes his predecessors for not having paid attention to this, and pointedly insists that plants also have a soul, even though he regards them as incapable of perception, thought, feeling, or action.3 In so far as it studies vital capacities as well as mental ones, psychology has Aristotle’s psychology – what he calls the “study of the soul” (hE tEs psuchEs historia) a broader scope for Aristotle than philosophy of mind does for us. But apart from this – occupies a prominent place both in his own philosophy and in the Western philo- difference in extension, they will have much in common. Many of the issues that arise sophical tradition as a whole. In his own system, psychology is the culmination of in connection with the mind – for example, mechanism, reduction, and emergence metaphysics and natural science.
    [Show full text]
  • Medium-Term Strategic Plan of the Institute of Philosophy (2020–2023) 1A) Analysis of the External Environment the Situation
    Medium-term Strategic Plan of the Institute of Philosophy (2020–2023) 1a) Analysis of the external environment The situation of the Institute has been determined by the fundamental science policy reform in the course of which the Research Centre for the Humanities changed its operational form. Instead of being a budgetary entity of the Public Body of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS), as of 1 September 2019, it continues to operate as a central budgetary entity directed by the Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELRN). 1b) Review of the internal capacities The previous period (2016–2018) saw the creation of the first excellence research team within the Institute, which has had an important budget from funds, and which has studied the values underlying scientific research. We have published monographs about the philosophy of Kant, Hume, and Saint Augustine of Hippo, about quantum theory, logical empiricism, historical philosophy and other topics. In addition to the publication of Latin- and Hungarian-language sources, the Hungarian Philosophical Archives has also been launched, which contains documents and biographical data. The Institute is a founding member of the Artificial Intelligence Coalition. The Institute has increased its presence in international professional forums, as has been reflected – in addition to our publication activities – by the higher number of international conferences attended and organized in the recent period. In accordance with the broad interpretation of philosophy’s mission of usefulness for the community, the fellows of the Institute have been involved in public life extensively as well as in popular science and interdisciplinary activities, both through their lectures delivered in Hungary and abroad, and their media appearances and writings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Princeton Apologetics: Common Sense Or Reformed?
    JETS 46/4 (December 2003) 647–72 THE OLD PRINCETON APOLOGETICS: COMMON SENSE OR REFORMED? tim mcconnel* At its founding, Princeton Theological Seminary was given the specific apologetical task of equipping its students to combat the deistic errors of the eighteenth-century Enlightenment. This played a significant role in the development of its apologetics, as it tended to take over the argumentation of previous apologists who had attempted the same task, without regard to whether they were Reformed or not. Thus, Bishop Butler’s eighteenth-century work, The Analogy of Religion Natural and Revealed, became a standard ref- erence work for apologetics classes, in spite of the fact that Butler had repu- diated his strict Calvinistic Presbyterian upbringing to embrace a moderate Anglicanism.1 While apologetics was a significant concern, it was certainly not the sole focus of the major Princetonian theologians. Archibald Alexander, the found- ing professor of Princeton, taught both didactic and polemical theology. Charles Hodge began his academic career as an exegete of Scripture, and later moved to systematic theology, for which he is better known.2 His son Archibald Alexander Hodge replaced him in the chair of didactic and polemic theology, and he in turn was replaced by Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield. None of these noted professors served explicitly in the chair of apologetics, which was only created in the later part of the nineteenth century. However, Warfield, a prolific writer, frequently addressed apologetical themes in his writings. A later, lesser known Princetonian, William Brenton Greene, Jr., occupied the Stuart Professorship of Apologetics and Christian Ethics from * Tim McConnel is assistant professor of theology at Dordt College, 498 4th Avenue NE, Sioux Center, IA 51250.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae RICHARD H
    Curriculum Vitae RICHARD H. DEES Department Department of Philosophy University of Rochester P.O. Box 270078 Rochester, NY 14627-0078 Phone: (585)-275-8110 Current position Associate Professor of Philosophy, Neurology, and Medical Humanities Chair, Interdisciplinary Cluster in Health and Human Values University of Rochester Areas of Specialization Social and Political Philosophy Medical Ethics P Public Health Ethics History of Moral and Political Philosophy Areas of Competence Ethics Feminist Philosophy History of Modern Philosophy Publications Book Trust and Toleration (London: Routledge, 2004). Articles 1. “Moral Philosophy and Moral Enhancements.” American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience, forthcoming. 2. with Ronnie Guillet, “Will My Baby Walk?: The Predictive Value of Cranial Imaging,” Neurology 76 (2011): 2048-49. 3. “Rawlsian ‘Neutrality’ and Enhancement Technologies,” American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience 1, no. 2 (2010): 54-55. 4. with Jennifer Kwon, “Pediatric Screening and the Public Good.” Cerebrum 2009, ed. Dan Gordon (New York: Dana Press, 2009), pp. 121-29. See http://www.dana.org/news/cerebrum/detail.aspx?id=14300 5. with Eric Singer, “KidneyMatch.com: The Ethics of Solicited Organ Donations,” Journal of Clinical Ethics 19 (2008): 141-49. Winner of the 2008 Library Award 1 2 from the Rochester Academy of Medicine for the best essay in ethics or the history of medicine. 6. “‘One of the Finest and Most Subtile Inventions’: Hume’s Theory of Government,” in Blackwell Companion to Hume, ed. Elizabeth Radcliffe (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2008), 388-405. 7. “Soldiers as Agents,” American Journal of Bioethics 8 no. 2 (2008): 46-47. 8. "Of Socinians and Homosexuals: Trust and the Limits of Toleration," in Toleration on Trial, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Katharina T. Kraus CURRICULUM VITAE
    Katharina T. Kraus CURRICULUM VITAE PERSONAL INFORMATION Department of Philosophy Email: [email protected] University of Notre Dame Office: 309 Malloy Hall 100 Malloy Hall Phone: +1 (574) 631 - 7327 Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA RESEARCH AREAS Areas of Specialisation Kant, Philosophy of Mind, Philosophy of Psychology Areas of Competence Modern Philosophy (esp. 17th and 18th Century), Epistemology, Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Language, Moral Psychology ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2017 – present Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame (USA) Steering Committee and Fellow of the History of Philosophy Forum Faculty Fellow of the Nanovic Institute for European Studies Faculty Member of the Ph.D. Program in History and Philosophy of Science 2014 – 2016 Assistant Professor, Epistemology and Theory of Science, University College Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs University of Freiburg (Germany) 2013 – 2014 Postdoctoral Fellow of the Martin Buber Society of Fellows in the Humanities, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Israel) EDUCATION PHILOSOPHY 2013 Ph.D. History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge (UK) Thesis Title: “Psychological knowledge in Kant’s Critical thinking” 2010 MPhil History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge (UK) Thesis Title: “Kant’s Theory of Agency” 2009 Philosophy (Bachelor equivalent: “Grundstudium” of Magister Artium) Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg (Germany) PHYSICS 2008 Diplom Physics (Bachelor & Master equivalent; Minors: Mathematics, Philosophy) Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg (Germany) PUBLICATIONS MONOGRAPHS 1. Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-Formation: The Nature of Inner Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. EDITED VOLUMES 2 Katharina T. Kraus – CV 2. Kant’s Philosophy of Science. Bridging the Gap between the Natural and the Human Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contemporary Relevance of Kant's Transcendental Psychology
    The Contemporary Relevance of Kant’s Transcendental Psychology Deborah Maxwell Alamé-Jones BA (Hons) Supervisor: Dr David Morgans Submitted in partial fulfilment for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy UNIVERSITY OF WALES TRINITY SAINT DAVID 2018 DECLARATION SHEET This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed .......Deborah Alame-Jones........................................................... Date .............. 17th May 2018.......................................................... STATEMENT 1 This thesis is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Sources are acknowledged by giving explicit references in the body of the text. A bibliography is appended. Signed ........ Deborah Alame-Jones............................................................. Date .............. 17th May 2018.......................................................... STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed .......... Deborah Alame-Jones........................................................... Date .............. 17th May 2018.......................................................... STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for deposit in the University’s digital repository. Signed ........... Deborah Alame-Jones.........................................................
    [Show full text]